THE  UNIVERSITY 

OF  ILLINOIS 

LIBRARY 
630.1 
In  Z b 

^/93'2.IO 


NON  CIRCULATING 

CHECK  FOR  UNBOUND 
CIRCULATING  COPY 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 
in  2017  with  funding  from 

University  of  Iliinois  Urbana-Champaign  Aiternates 


https://archive.org/details/summariesofsoilf1982wian 


PURDUE  UI^TIVER?ITT  AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIOTJT 


STATI5TT 


BULLETIITS 

198-210 


1917  - 18 


LARAYETTE^  lUDIAUA 


|l98 


il99 

200 

201 

202 
203 


^k)5 

1 

5^206 


207 

208 

209 

210 


(,v 


9 


-V 


4^ 


0 CONTT^TTS 


Sviinrraries  of  soil  fertility  investigations  by  A.  T, 

Wiancko  and  S,  C,  Jones 

Conirr.ercial  fertilizers  by  W.  J.  Jones  and  others 

Strawberry  varieties  and  cultural  hints  by  J.  Oskairp 

Varieties  of  blackberries  and  raspberries  with  notes 
on  their  care  by  J . Oskanip 

Fattening  west-^rn  lambs  by  J.  H.  Skirjier'and  F.  G,  King 

Test  of  three  protein -concentrates  and  two  leguminous 
rcu^ages  in  milk  production  by  0.  F.  Hunziker  and  R.  F. 
Caldwell 

Experimental  studies  in  hog-cholera  by  R.  A,  Craig  and 
R,  A,  Whiting 

Soil  management  investigations  in  a young  apple  orchard 
by  C,  G.  Woodbury  and  others 

Winter  steer  feeding 

I Corn  silage  and  le^^inous  hay  vs,  leguminolis  hay  as, 
roughage  for  fattening  steers 

II  A limited  feed  of  corn  as  compared  v;itli  a full  feed 
of  corn  for  fattening  ca.ttle 

III  Clover  vs.  alfalfa  hay  as  roughage  for  fattening 
steers  by  J.  K.  Stdnner  and  G.  F.-  King 

Gooseberries  and  currants  by  J , Oskairp 

The  pasteuriza^tion  of  sour,  farrnikimijned  cream  for  butter- 
making by  0.  F.  E\inziker  and  others 

Commercial  feeding  stuffs  by  W,  J.  Jones, Jr.  and  others 

The  value  of  phospha.tes  on  Indiana  soils  by  A.  T.  Wiancko 
and  S.  C.  Jones 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


Bulletin  No.  198,  Vol.  XIX 
March,  1917 


SUMMARIES  OF  SOIL  FERTILITY 
INVESTIGATION  S 


Published  by  the  Station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 

Addison  C.  Harris,®  President 


.Indianapolis,  Marion  County 


Fax  S.  Chandler 

Charles  Downing 

Samuel  M.  Poster 

John  A.  Hillenbrand. 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs 

Joseph  D.  Oliver 

George  W.  Purcell 

William  V.  Stuart 


Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

Greenfield.  Hancock  County 

Fort  Wayne.  Allen  County 

Batesville.  Ripley  County 

Bridgeport.  Marion  County 

•South  Bend.  St.  Joseph  County 

Vincennes.  Knox  County 

-LaFayette  Tippecanoe  County 


WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D, 


.President  of  the  University 


STATION  STAFF 


HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS 

Arthur  Goss,  M.  S.,  A.  C 

George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A 

Robert  A.  Craig.  D.  V.  M 

Otto  P.  Hunziker.  M.  S 

Herbert  S.  Jackson.  A.  B 

William  J.  Jones,  Jr..  M.  S.,  A.  C.^ 

John  H.  Skinner.  B.  S 

James  Troop,  M.  S 

Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S 


Director 

.Sup’t  Agricultural  Extension 

Chief  Veterinarian 

Chief  in  Dairy  Husbandry 

Chief  in  Botany 

State  Chemist 

...Chief  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Chief  in  Entomology 

Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Chief  in  Horticulture 


ASSOCIATES  AND  ASSISTANTS 

John  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.® Entomological  Assistant 

Evelyn  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Paul  R.  Bausman.  B.  S.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

James  C.  Beavers.  B.  Agr Associate  in  Soils  and  Crops  Extension 

Reuben  0.  Bitler.  B.  S.* * Deputy  State  Chemist 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S Associate  in  Milk  Production 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  S.-* Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C Assistant  Veterinarian 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader  Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops 

Carleton  Cutler.  B.  S.^ First  Deputy  State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 

John  J.  Davis.  B.  S.» Entomological  Assistant  in  Charge 

Ralph  B.  Deemer.  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Frederick  A.  Fenton,  M.  S.* Scientific  Assistant 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

Mabel  L.  Harlan Assistant  in  Agricultural  Extension 

Abner  J.  Hunter,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

Cora  A.  Jacobs,  A.  M.^ Seed  Analyst 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Assistant  in  Soils 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Franklin  G.  King,  B.  S Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Marshall  S.  Libbert,  B.  S.  A.^ Denuty  State  Chemist 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

Edwin  B.  Mains.  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S Assistant  in  Entomology 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B.* Scientific  Assistant 

Horace  C.  Mills,  B.  S Associate  in  Dairv  Manufactures 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S...Research  Assistant  in  Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 

Joseph  Oskamp.  B.  S Research  Assistant  in  Pomology 

George  A.  Osner.  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Harry  C.  Paine,  D.  V.  M Associate  Veterinarian 

Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.* First  Deputy  State  Chemist  (Fertilizers) 

Harry  J.  Reed Associate  in  Horticulture 

Charles  C.  Rees.  M.  A Assistant  in  Botany 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.* Chief  Inspector  State  Chemistry  Department 

J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G.,  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Swine  Production  and  Management 

Herbert  B.  Switzer,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Chester  F.  Turner.  B.  S.* Scientific  Assistant 

Gilbert  P.  Walker.  B.  S Assistant  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Fred  L.  Walkey.  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Lester  Yoder,  B.  S.  A Graduate  Assistant  in  Horticultural  Chemistry 

Nellie  Tracy Secretary  to  the  Director  and  Librarian 

Mary  K.  Bloom .• rBookkeeper 

1 In  charge  of. Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Seed  Testing 

* Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  Insect 

Investigations 

* Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

® Died  September  2,  1916 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909) 

J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleville State  Live  Stock  Association 

U.  R.  Fishel,  Hope State  Poultry  Fanciers’  Association 

H.  H.  SwAiM,  South  Bend State  Horticultural  Society 

D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville State  Dairy  Association 

D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort State  Corn  Growers’  Association 


SUMMARIES  OF  SOIL  FERTILITY  INVESTIGATIONS 


A.  T.  WiANCKo  S.  C.  Jones 

INTRODUCTION 

It  is  the  purpose  of  this  bulletin  to  present  in  condensed  form 
the  principal  results  that  have  been  secured  up  to  the  present  time 
from  the  use  of  lime,  legumes,  manure  and  various  commercial  fer- 
tilizers upon  some  of  the  Station’s  experiment  fields  devoted  to  soil 
fertility  investigations.  In  each  case,  there  is  a brief  description  of 
the  experiment  field,  followed  by  a summary  table  showing  at  a 
glance  the  crop  increases,  the  cost  of  treatment  and  the  net  returns 
per  rotation  from  each  of  the  more  important  treatments.  A brief 
discussion  follows  each  table. 

Since  the  experiment  fields  are  located  in  diflerent  parts  of 
the  State  and  upon  different  types  of  soil,  each  reader  should  make 
a particular  study  of  the  results  upon  the  field  which  comes  nearest 
to  representing  his  own  soil  conditions. 

VALUATIONS  USED  IN  THE  SUMMARY  TABLES 


In  computing  the  net  returns  from  the  experiments  herein 
reported,  the  lime  and  fertilizer  materials  used  have  been  charged 
as  follows,  including  the  ordinary  cost  of  delivering  to  the  soil : 


Ground  limestone 
Limestone  screenings 
Acid  phosphate 
Raw  rock  phosphate 
Steamed  hone  meal 
Mixed  fertilizer 
Nitrogen 
Phosphoric  acid 
Potash 


$3.00  per  ton 

2.00  per  ton 

1.00  per  unit^ 
.25  per  unit 

1.00"  per  unit 

3.80  per  unit 
1.20  per  unit 
1.20  per  unit 


All  large  initial  treatments,  where  the  time  for  their  repetition 
is  not  fixed  in  advance,  have  been  charged  at  their  per  rotation  cost 
to  date.  Thus,  wherever  ground  limestone  or  large  initial  appli- 
cations of  rock  phosphate  are  used,  to  get  the  per  rotation  cost  to 
date,  the  initial  cost  has  been  divided  by  the  number  of  years  since 
the  application  was  made  and  multiplied  by  the  number  of  years 
in  the  rotation. 


1 A unit  of  fertilizer  is  1 per  cent,  per  ton  or  20  pounds 

2 Includes  value  of  nitrogen  contained  in  the  bone  meal 


4 


The  crop  increases  produced  have  been  valued  as  follows: 


Ear  corn 
Wheat  grain 
Oats  grain 
Soybeans 
Corn  stover 
Wheat  straw 
Oats  straw 
Hay 


$ .50  per  bushel 

1.00  per  bushel 
.35  per  bushel 

1.50  per  bushel 

3.00  per  ton 

2.50  per  ton 

3.00  per  ton 

10.00  per  ton 


Some  of  these  crop  prices  are  above  the  average  of  the  ten- 
year  period  covered  by  the  Scottsburg  experiment,  but  they  are  be- 
low the  averages  of  the  periods  covered  by  all  the  other  experiments. 
Anyone  wishing  to  use  other  valuations  can  easily  recalculate  the 
data  in  the  tables. 


No  allowance  has  been  made  for  the  extra  cost  of  harvesting 
the  increased  crop  yields  produced  by  the  treatments,  as  this  is  a 
variable  factor  and  depends  upon  local  conditions. 

In  the  tables  which  follow,  the  crop  increases  have  been  com- 
puted from  the  progressive  differences  between  the  two  nearest 
check  plots. 


THE  FIELD  AT  SCOTTSBURG,  SCOTT  COUNTY 


The  Scottsburg  field  is  located  on  Volusia  silt  loam,  commonly 
called  “yellow  clay,”  which  is  the  predominating  soil  type  on  the 
hilly  lands  of  southern  Indiana.  The  land  on  which  the  experiments 
are  located  is  almost  level  on  Series  A,  but  rises  gradually  through 
Series  B in  a diagonal  direction  into  Series  C.  The  field  was  laid 
out  in  the  fall  of  1905  with  three  series  of  similarly  treated  plots  to 
accommodate  a corn,  wheat  and  clover  rotation.  Each  series  con- 
sists of^  22  one-twentieth  acre  plots,  and  the  corresponding  plots  in 
each  series  receive  the  same  treatment,  with  every  third  plot  an  un- 
fertilized check.  All  produce,  except  the  second  growth  clover,  is 
removed  from  the  land. 

The  complete  treatment  was  applied  to  the  first  wheat  crop  on 
each  series.  The  limed  plots  received  1000  pounds  of  ground  lime- 
stone disked  into  the  surface  soil.  The  manure  was  applied  at  the 
rate  of  10  tons  per  acre  and  disked  into  the  surface.  The  rock 
phosphate  plots  received  one  ton  per  acre,  disked  into  the  surface, 
alone  on  one  plot  and  with  manure  on  the  other  plot.  The  other 
fertilizer  materials  were  applied  at  wheat  seeding  time.  The  acid 
phosphate  was  applied  at  the  rate  of  150  pounds  of  16  per  cent, 
goods.  The  mixed  fertilizers  were  applied  at  the  rate  of  300  pounds 
per  acre.  The  manure,  acid  phosphate  and  mixed  fertilizer  appli- 
cations have  been  repeated  once  per  rotation,  the  manure  being 


5 


plowed  under  for  corn  and  the  fertilizers  drilled  in  with  the  wheat, 
except  that  beginning  with  1915  the  acid  phosphate  and  mixed  fer- 
tilizer applications  have  been  repeated  on  corn,  thus  doubling  the 
amounts  per  rotation. 

In  1911,  an  application  of  two  tons  of  ground  limestone  per 
acre  was  made  on  all  plots,  except  an  acid  phosphate  alone  plot  and 
certain  untreated  plots.  The  rock  phosphate  application  of  one  ton 
per  acre  was  repeated  for  corn  and  cowpeas  on  Series  A and  B in 
1911,  and  for  cowpeas  on  Series  C in  1912.  In  the  fall  of  1911 
three  lines  of  four  inch  tile  were  laid  crosswise  of  the  plots,  spaced 
about  59  feet  apart,  thus  giving  uniform  drainage  to  all  plots.  At 
this  time,  also,  the  potash  in  the  mixed  fertilizer  of  the  2-8-2  formu- 
la-was  doubled,  making  the  formula  2-8-4,  shown  in  Table  I. 

At  the  time  this  field  was  laid  out,  it  had  been  cropped  contin- 
uously for  at  least  two  generations  with  no  manure  and  but  little 
fertilizer  applied,  and  was  considered  badly  run  down. 

In  the  following  table  are  shown  the  principal  treatments,  the 
average  increases  produced  upon  each  crop  in  the  rotation,  the  total 
value  of  these  increases,  the  cost  of  the  treatment  and  the  net  re- 
turns per  rotation. 

A glance  at  the  last  column  of  Table  I shows  that  all  the  treat- 
ments have  produced  handsome  profits,  except  the  rock  phosphate 
used  in  addition  to  manure,  which  still  has  a deficit  of  $4.18.  This 
deficit,  however,  will  probably  decrease  from  year  to  year  if  no  ad- 
ditional application  is  made.  In  the  case  of  the  lime,  the  net  return 
per  rotation  will  also  probably  increase  until  another  application  is 
required.  The  largest  net  return  has  been  secured  from  the  complete 
fertilizer  in  which  half  the  phosphorus  was  derived  from  bone  meal. 
The  acid  phosphate  alone  has  made  the  next  largest  profit  per  acre, 
but  per  dollar  invested  it  has  made  the  largest  profit  of  all  the  treat- 
ments. In  the  mixed  fertilizer,  the  2 per  cent,  of  nitrogen  has 
paid  a profit  in  all  cases  but  the  8 per  cent,  has  been  used  at  a 
loss.  In  the  case  of  the  potash,  4 per  cent,  has  given  a profit, 
while  8 per  cent,  has  been  used  at  a loss.  An  interesting  feature 
in  the  mixed  fertilizer  treatment  is  the  fact  that  phosphorus  derived 
wholly  from  bone  meal  has  not  given  as  good  returns  as  the  phos- 
phorus derived  wholly  from  acid  phosphate,  and  that  where  half 
the  phosphorus  has  been  derived  from  bone  meal  and  half  from 
acid  phosphate,  the  profit  has  been  largest  of  all.  The  small  aver- 
age hay  increases  are  due  to  the  fact  that  the  clover  repeatedly  failed. 


6 


Table  L — Summary  of  Results  on  the  Scottsburg  Experiment 
Field,  1906-1916 — Averages  per  Acre  per  Rotation  of  Corn, 
Wheat  and  Clover 


Average  per  acre  crop  increases 


Treatment  1 

Value  of 

Cost  of 

Corn 

stover 

Wheat 

straw 

Hay 

Net 

bushels 

pounds 

bushels 

pounds 

pounds 

increase 

treat- 

ment 

returns 

Lime^ 

6.0 

336 

2.2 

172 

204 

$ 6.94 

$ 3.63 

$ 3.31 

Manure 

19.5 

1439 

9.3 

985 

648 

26.24 

10  tons 

- 2.62 
per  ton 

Manure  plus 

rock  phosphate 

20.5 

1497 

10.1 

1071 

713 

28.14 

6.08 

4.18 

over  manure 

Rock  phosphate 
Acid  phosphate 

8.4 

631 

3.5 

313 

73 

9.30 

6.08 

3.22 

(0-8-0) 

3.9 

223 

4.8 

460 

161 

8.47 

1.42 

7.05 

Mixed  fertilizer 

(2-8-0) 

6.1 

337 

6.9 

645 

95 

11.65 

3.05 

8.60 

Mixed  fertilizer 

(0-8-4)^ 

4.7 

270 

6.3 

574 

85 

10.13 

2.36 

7.77 

Mixed  fertilizer 

(8-8-4) « 

6.1 

263 

9.7 

878 

64 

14.51 

7.20 

7.31 

Mixed  fertilizer 

(2-8-8) 

4.5 

236 

8.5 

789 

39 

12.26 

4.75 

7.51 

Mixed  fertilizer 

(2-8-4)^ 

7.3 

520 

7.4 

565 

24 

12.67 

3.70 

8.97 

Mixed  fertilizer 

(2-8-4)^ 

phosphorus 

5.7 

672 

5.6 

458 

202 

10.86 

2.99 

7.87 

in  bone 

Mixed  fertilizer 

(2-8-4) « 
half  phos- 
phorus in  bone 

8.2 

573 

7.3 

582 

159 

13.64 

3.35 

10.29 

Acid  phosphate 
alone  ^ (0-8-0) 
Acid  phosphate 

7.8 

243 

5.3 

488 

208 

$11.00 

$1.42 

$9.58 

(0-8-0)  over  lime 

2.9 

227 

4.1 

263 

1.41 

6.78 

1.42 

5.36 

Average  yields 

of  regular 
checks 

28.9 

2436 

9.9 

986 

532 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 


1 Lime  alone  was  applied  at  the  rate  of  1000  pounds  per  acre  of  ground  lime- 
stone at  the  beginning  and  two  tons  in  1911 

Manure  is  applied  at  the  rate  of  10  tons  per  acre  for  corn 

The  rock  phosphate  was  applied  at  the  rate  of  one  ton  at  the  beginning  of  the 
experiment,  and  a second  ton  in  1911-1912 

The  acid  phosphate  (0-8-0)  and  all  mixed  fertilizers  were  applied  at  the  rate  of 
300  pounds  per  acre  on  wheat  only  until  1914,  after  which  the  same  amounts  were 
applied  to  corn  also 

2 Crop  increases  are  over  no  treatment.  All  other  plots  were  limed  in  1911 

3 For  the  first  six  applications  the  potash  in  the  mixed  fertilizers  was  2 per 
cent,  instead  of  4 per  cent. 


7 


THE  FIELD  AT  NORTH  VERNON,  JENNINGS  COUNTY 

The  North  Vernon  field  is  located  on  a flat,  poorly  drained, 
whitish  gray  silt  loam  area  of  low  productivity,  commonly  known  as 
“crawfish,”  “slash  land”  or  “white  clay,”  which  is  widely  repre- 
sented throughout  southeastern  Indiana.  The  field  consists  of  three 
series  of  22  one-twentieth  acre  plots  each  and  carries  a corn,  wheat 
and  clover  rotation,  with  the  corresponding  plots  in  each  series  re- 
ceiving the  same  treatment.  Every  third  plot  is  a uniformly  treated 
check.  Knowing  beforehand  that  the  untreated  land  would  not  pro- 
duce clover,  it  was  decided  to  adopt  the  plan  of  giving  the  check 
plots  some  sort  of  rational  treatment.  They  were,  therefore,  limed 
the  same  as  all  other  limed  plots  and  have  received  the  standard 
manure  applications  of  six  tons  per  acre  per  rotation,  applied  to 
corn.  The  topography  of  the  experiment  field  is  almost  level,  with 
scarcely  enough  slope  for  surface  drainage.  Some  preliminary  in- 
vestigations showed  that  tile  drainage  and  liming  were  the  first 
requisites  in  improving  this  type  of  soil.  After  the  field  was  laid 
out  in  the  fall  of  1911,  parallel  lines  of  four  inch  tile  were  laid  44 
feet  apart,  crosswise  of  the  plots  in  such  a way  as  to  give  all  parts 
of  all  plots  equal  drainage.  To  correct  the  acidity  of  the  soil,  finely 
ground  limestone  was  applied  at  the  rate  of  four  tons  to  the  acre 
in  the  spring  of  1912.  The  whole  field  was  then  seeded  to  soybeans 
and  uniformly  treated  throughout  the  season.  The  crop  was  har- 
vested for  seed  and  the  straw  uniformly  spread  back  upon  the  land. 
After  the  soybean  harvest,  one  series  of  plots  was  seeded  to  wheat. 
In  the  spring  of  1913,  corn  was  planted  on  the  second  series  and  soy- 
beans (in  place  of  clover)  on  the  third  series.  Since  then,  the  reg- 
ular rotation  of  corn,  wheat  and  clover  has  been  practiced,  with  all 
the  produce  removed  from  the  land,  except  the  second  growth  clover. 

The  experiment  on  the  North  Vernon  field  was  planned  to  de- 
termine if  it  would  pay  the  farmer,  on  this  soil,  to  use  acid  phosphate 
or  raw  rock  phosphate  with  manure  on  corn  and  some  form  of 
mixed  fertilizer  on  wheat  after  providing  good  drainage,  liming 
to  correct  acidity,  establishing  a good  crop  rotation,  utilizing  the 
produce  on  the  farm,  except  the  wheat  grain,  and  returning  reason- 
able amounts  of  manure  to  the  land.  Provision  was  also  made  for 
the  use  of  fertilizer  alone  as  compared  with  manure  and  fertilizer, 
and  to  study  the  efifect  of  the  clover  by  substituting  timothy  as  the 
hay  crop  on  certain  plots. 

The  manure,  acid  phosphate  and  rock  phosphate  are  applied 
for  corn,  while  all  mixed  fertilizer  applications  are  made  on  wheat. 
The  rates  of  application  per  acre,  per  rotation,  are  as  follows : 
manure,  six  tons;  acid  phosphate  (14  per  cent.),  200  pounds;  rock 
phosphate  (30  per  cent.),  350  pounds;  mixed  fertilizer  (2-8-4),  200 
pounds.  The  mixed  fertilizer  is  made  up  of  nitrate  of  soda  and 
dried  blood  (half  of  the  nitrogen  from  each),  acid  phosphate  and 
muriate  of  potash. 


8 


Although  this  field  has  been  in  operation  only  a few  years,  very 
pronounced  results  have  been  secured.  In  the  following  table  are 
shown  the  principal  treatments,  the  average  increase  produced  upon 
each  crop  in  the  rotation,  the  total  value  of  these  increases,  the  cost 
of  the  treatment  and  the  net  returns  per  rotation. 


Table:  II. — Summary  of  Results  on  the  North  Vernon  Field, 
1913-1916'^ — Averages  per  Acre  per  Rotation  of 
Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover 


Average  per  acre  crop  increases 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Treatment 

Corn 

bushels 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value  of 
increase 

Cost  of 
treat- 
ment 

Net 

returns 

Lime 

(over  manure) 

13.5 

1374 

9.7 

654 

1242 

$25.54 

$ 7.20 

$18.34 

Legume  (over 
timothy  in 
rotation,  no 
fertilizer) 

3.1 

340 

2.4 

157 

680 

8.07 

8.07 

Legume  (over 
timothy  in 
rotation, 
fertilizer  on 
wheat  and  corn) 

. 6.1 

974 

6.9 

339 

927 

16.47 

3.97 

12.50 

Manure 
(over  lime) 

26.1 

2193 

7.3 

634 

436 

26.71 

6 tons 

4.45 

Fertilizer 
(over  lime) 

4.9 

887 

12.1 

1223 

624 

20.53 

3.97 

per  ton 

16.56 

Fertilizer  (over 
lime  and 
manure) 

-2.7 

235 

8.0 

624 

597 

10.76 

3.97 

6.79 

Acid  phosphate 
(over  lime  and 
manure) 

5.1 

704 

2.1 

428 

354 

8.10 

1.40 

6.61 

Rock  phosphate 
(over  lime  and 
manure) 

6.0 

997 

.3 

. 201 

147 

5.77 

1.31 

4.46 

Average  yield  of 
check  plots 

70.3 

5024 

14.7 

1468 

4067 

1 Although  the  lime  was  applied  in  1912  and  the  manuring  and  fertilizing  were 
begun  in  1913  on  corn  and  wheat,  respectively,  the  1914  wheat  was  the  first  to  have 
received  the  full  treatment,  and  the  corn  and  clover  harvested  in  1915  were  the 
first  of  these  crops  that  had  received  the  full  treatment.  Therefore  the  corn  and 
clover  yields  recorded  in  the  table  are  the  averages  for  1915  and  1916  only,  and  the 
wheat  yields  are  the  averages  for  1914,  1915  and  1916  only 


9 


In  Table  II,  the  net  return  so  far  of  $18.34  per  rotation  for  the 
lime  application  clearly  shows  the  need  of  lime  on  this  soil.  Clover 
has  practically  failed  and  no  other  treatment  has  given  satisfactory 
results  in  the  absence  of  lime.  The  return  from  manure,  $4.45  per 
ton,  is  phenomenally  large,  showing  that  organic  matter  and  nitrogen 
are  important  needs  of  the  soil.  The  use  of  clover  or  soybeans  in 
the  rotation,  instead  of  timothy,  has  increased  its  value  $8.07  with- 
out fertilizer  and  $12.50  net  where  fertilizer  was  used  on  wheat  and 
corn.  Complete  fertilizer  has  proven  profitable  in  all  cases.  Even 
where  used  in  addition  to  lime  and  manure,  it  has  given  a profit 
nearly  double  the  cost.  The  use  of  acid  phosphate  over  lime  and 
manure,  has  been  the  most  profitable  fertilizer  treatment  per  dollar 
invested.  The  rock  phosphate  has  also  produced  satisfactory  re- 
turns. 

THE  FIELD  AT  WORTHINGTON,  GREENE  COUNTY 

The  Worthington  field,  consisting  of  about  10  acres,  is  located 
on  Knox  silt  loam,  commonly  called  “clay,”  which  is  the  predom- 
inating soil  type  of  The  rolling  uplands  of  that  section  of  the  State. 
The  land  had  been  farmed  for  many  years  and  had  become  consid- 
erably run  down  in  productiveness. 

This  field  was  started  at  the  same  time  and  is  in  every  respect 
a duplicate  of  the  North  Vernon  field,  except  that  it  has  a few  addi- 
tional plots  on  which  crop  residues  are  compared  with  manure  in 
combination  with  other  fertilization,  and  that  the  ground  limestone 
application  was  only  two  tons  per  acre  instead  of  four  tons  as  at 
North  Vernon,  due  to  the  fact  that  the  soil  was  found  to  be  less  acid. 

The  principal  results  of  the  more  important  treatments  are 
shown  in  the  following  table. 


10 


TablK  hi. — Summary  of  Results  on  the  Worthington  Field, 
1913-1916^ — Averages  per  Acre  per  Rotation  of 
Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover  • 


Average  per  acre  crop  increases 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Treatment 

Corn 

bushels 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value  of 
increase 

Cost  of 
treat- 
ment 

Net 

returns 

Lime 

(over  manure) 

13.8 

761 

1.5 

208 

2165 

$20.62 

$ 3.60 

$17.02 

Legume  (over 
timothy  in 
rotation, 
no  commercial 
fertilizer) 

-1.5 

-40 

-2.3 

-143 

22.19 

7.80 

7.80 

Legume  (over 
timothy  in 
rotation, 
fertilizer  on 
wheat  and  corn) 

-1.7 

115 

-1.7 

21 

2277 

, 9.05 

3.97 

5.08 

Manure 
(over  lime) 

10.2 

338 

4.7 

507 

800 

14.94 

6 tons 

2.49 

fertilizer 
(over  lime) 

3.9 

-108 

5.9 

409 

835 

12.47 

3.97 

per  ton 

8.50 

Fertilizer 

(over  lime  and 
manure) 

2.3 

186 

4.8 

408 

410 

8.73 

3.97 

4.76 

Acid  phosphate 
(over  lime  and 
manure) 

1.9 

135 

• 1.3 

123 

1415 

9.69 

1.40 

8.29 

Rock  phosphate 
(over  lime  and 
manure) 

-.9 

-20 

-.8 

-80 

610 

1.67 

1.31 

.36 

Average  yield  of 
check  plots 

49.7 

3130 

10.9 

991 

3521 

1 Although  the  lime  was  applied  in  1912  and  the  manuring  and  fertilizing  were 
begun  in  1913  on  corn  and  wheat,  respectively,  the  1914  wheat  crop  was  the  first 
to  receive  the  full  treatment,  and  the  corn  and  clover  harvested  in  1915  were  the 
first  of  these  crops  that  had  received  the  full  treatment.  Therefore  the  corn  and 
clover  yields  recorded  in  the  table,  are  the  averages  for  1915  and  1916  only,  and 
the  wheat  yields  are  the  averages  for  1914,  1915  and  1916  only 


Table  III  shows  handsome  returns  from  all  of  the  treatments, 
except  rock  phosphate.  The  returns  from  liming  have  been  much 
the  same  on  the  Worthington  field  as  on  the  North  Vernon  field,  al- 
though the  acidity  of  the  surface  soil  was  considerably  less.  The 
value  of  the  increase  in  one  rotation  has  paid  more  than  three 
times  the  total  cost  of  liming.  The  use  of  clover  or  soybeans  in 
the  rotation,  instead  of  timothy,  has  increased  its  value  $7.80  with- 
out fertilizer  and  $5.08  net  where  complete  fertilizer  was  used  on 
wheat  and  acid  phosphate  on  corn.  The  six-ton  application  of  ma- 


II 


nure  has  produced  crop  increases  worth  $2.49  per  ton  of  manure. 
The  fertilizer  treatment,  consisting  of  acid  phosphate  on  corn  and 
complete  fertilizer  on  wheat,  has  produced  a net  profit  of  $8.50 
when  used  in  addition  to  lime  and  $4.76  when  used  in  addition  to 
both  lime  and  manure.  This  is  a good  showing  and  very  positively 
answers,  in  the  affirmative,  the  principal  question  that  was  asked 
in  the  plan  of  the  experiment,  namely:  will  it  pay  to  use  fertilizer 
after  providing  good  drainage,  liming  to  correct  acidity,  establishing 
a good  rotation  of  crops,  feeding  all  of  the  produce  that  can  be 
profitably  utilized  on  the  farm  and  returning  the  manure  to  the 
land  ? The  affirmative  answer  to  this  question  has  been  much  more 
pronounced  on  the  North  Vernon  field.  The  acid  phosphate  used 
in  addition  to  lime  and  manure  has  produced  crop  increases  worth 
about  six  times  its  cost.  Rock  phosphate,  on  the  other  hand,  has 
produced  a profit  of  only  $ .36  per  rotation. 

THE  FIELD  AT  WESTPORT,  DECATUR  COUNTY 

The  Westport  field  is  located  on  the  same  type  of  land  as  the 
North  Vernon  field.  It  was  laid  out  to  determine  the  value  of  tile 
drainage  and  to  study  the  effect  of  lime,  manure,  phosphoric  acid, 
potash,  and  the  growth  of  legumes  on  both  drained  and  undrained 
land.  The  regular  rotation  is  corn,  wheat  and  clover,  with  all  pro- 
duce, except  the  second  growth  clover,  removed  from  the  land. 

The  field  contains  three  series  of  six  one-twentieth  acre  plots 
each  of  drained  and  the  same  of  undrained  land  and  carries  a three 
year  rotation  of  corn,  wheat  and  clover.  Three  lines  of  four  inch 
tile  placed  66  feet  apart  and  at  a depth  of  30  inches  extend  across 
the  three  drained  series,  which  are  end  to  end  with  the  three  un- 
drained series. 

In  1915,  corn,  oats  and  soybeans  were  grown  on  both  the 
drained  and  undrained  series.  The  plots  were  fertilized  in  the 
spring  of  1915  but  limestone  was  not  applied  until  the  following 
fall.  The  corn  series  were  seeded  to  wheat  in  the  fall  of  1915,  and 
the  soybeans  series  to  rye  to  be  turned  under  for  corn  in  1916.  The 
limestone  was  applied  to  these  four  series  and  worked  into  the  soil 
as  the  land  was  prepared  for  wheat  and  rye.  At  the  same  time  the 
limestone  was  spread  broadcast  as  a top  dressing  on  the  other  series, 
which  were  in  young  clover.  All  limestone  applications  were  made 
at  the  rate  of  four  tons  per  acre.  Manure  was  applied  to  the  corn 
land  at  the  rate  of  eight  tons  per  acre.  It  was  applied  to  the  south 
half  of  all  plots  on  both  the  drained  and  undrained  areas.  The  first 
application  was  made  in  the  spring  of  1916.  Fertilizers  of  the  basal 
formula  0-10-5  applied  to  the  corn  crop  at  the  rate  of  200 
pounds  per  acre,  and  at  the  rate  of  300  pounds  per  acre  to  the  wheat 
crop,  the  potash  being  omitted  on  the  phosphorus  alone  plots.  The 
following  table  shows  the  results  for  1916.* 


12 


Table  IV. — Summary  of  Results  on  the  Westport  Field  on 
Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover  Rotation,  1916 


Treatment 

Average  per 

Corn  > Stover 
bushels  pounds 

acre  cr 

Wheat 

bushels 

op  incre 

Straw 

pounds 

ases 

Hay 

pounds 

Value  of 
total 
increase 
on  first 
rotation 

Limestone  (over  P K) 

12.6 

270 

1.31 

119 

169 

$ 9.11 

Manure  (over  lime) 

11.1 

501 

not  yet  mar 

lured 

6.30 

P (over  lime) 

-2.96 

-98 

1.37 

125 

1124 

5.45 

P K (over  lime) 

.26 

226 

1.26 

121 

1156 

7.69 

Drainage^ 

23.4 

1140 

4.63 

316 

190 

19.74 

Average  yield  of  check  plots 

39.5 

2172 

5.30 

474 

3240 

1 Averages  of  the  six  drained  plots  over  the  averages  of  the  six  undrained  plots 
in  each  series 


Although  some  of  the  crops  have  not  yet  received  the  full  treat- 
ment, the  results  for  1916  are  presented  here  because  they  show 
how  quickly  liming  and  drainage  may  become  effective.  The  drain- 
age effect  is  particularly  striking.  In  1915,  the  first  year  of  crop- 
ping after  drainage,  the  increase  for  drainage  was  18.  i bushels  for 
corn  and  2.9  bushels  for  oats.  The  crop  increases  secured  in  the 
first  two  years  have  already  more  than  paid  the  entire  cost  of  drain- 
age. The  soybean  crop,  which  took  the  place  of  clover  in  1915,  was 
not  weighed. 

The  fertilizer  results  for  one  year  do  not  warrant  any  conclu- 
sions. There  has  been  practically  no  effect  on  the  1916  corn  crop ; 
the  effect  on  wheat  was  fair,  considering  the  severe  fly  damage, 
while  the  residual  effect  on  clover  has  been  remarkably  large.  Ap- 
parently phosphorus  is  the  element  that  is  most  needed. 

THE  FIELD  AT  WANATAH,  LAPORTE  COUNTY 

The  Wanatah  field  is  located  on  a very  acid  peaty  sand  area, 
and  represents  a type -of  unproductive  black  soil  which  failed  to  re- 
spond to  the  drainage  and  fertilizer  treatments  found  effective  in 
the  greater  part  of  the  Kankakee  region. 

The  soil  treatment  and  the  results  of  the  experiments  upon  this 
field  have  been  published  in  Bulletin  No.  170  of  this  station,  in  which 
it  was  shown  that  the  unproductiveness  of  this  soil  was  due  to  the 
toxic  effects  of  soluble  salts  of  aluminum  formed  in  the  soil  in  con- 
siderable amounts,  and  that  this  could  be  remedied  by  the  addition 
of  sufficient  quantities  of  lime  to  neutralize  the  acidity. 

For  convenience,  the  principal  results  of  the  field  treatments 
are  presented  in  the  following  table.  Anyone  interested  in  the  de- 
tails of  this  study  should  secure  a copy  of  Bulletin  No.  170. 


13 


Tabi^E  V. — Summary  of  Results  on  the  Wanatah  Field,  1910-1914 
— Averages  per  Rotation  of  Corn,  Small  Grain  and  Legume 


Treatment  ^ 

Average  per  acre  crop 

increases 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Corn 

bushels 

Stover 

pounds 

Oats 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

Soy- 

beans 

bushels^ 

Hay 

pounds^ 

Value  of 
increase 

Cost  of 
treat- 
ment 

Net 

returns 

Lime  alone 

13.0 

664 

-.4 

4.1 

500 

$11.69 

$ 8.10 

$ 3.59 

Fertilizer  alone 

(2-10-8) 

.3 

-97 

15.6 

-.3 

5.23 

5.84 

-.61 

Fertilizer  (2-10-8) 

(over  lime) 

10.3 

773 

19.0 

770 

4.3 

517 

18.63 

5.84 

12.79 

Fertilizer  (4-10-8) 

(over  lime) 

5.0 

854 

31.3 

900 

3.6 

433 

19.87 

7.36 

12.51 

Fertilizer  (4-0-8) 

(over  lime) 

4.9 

583 

14.6 

400 

-.2 

-133 

8.55 

4.96 

3.59 

Fertilizer  (0-10-8) 

(over  lime) 

7.1 

855 

21.7 

350 

1.4 

817 

16.04 

4.32 

11.72 

Rock  phosphate 

alone 

1.9 

173 

7.9 

27 

2.9 

167 

6.61 

2.10 

4.51 

Rock  phosphate 

(over  lime) 

4.3 

467 

15.3 

103 

-1.6 

533 

8.48' 

2.10 

6.38 

Average  yield  of 
check  plots 

5.2 

388 

12.9 

246 

8.9 

789 

1 Limed  with  two  tons  of  ground  limestone  in  1910  and  two  tons  in  1911.  Mixed 
fertilizer  applied  at  the  rate  of  400  pounds  and  rock  phosphate  at  the  rate  of  1000 
pounds  per  acre 

2 Only  half  of  the  soybean  crop  and  half  of  the  hay  crop  counted  in  computing 
value  of  increase  because  each  was  grown  half  of  the  time  in  the  three-year  rotation 

An  examination  of  Table  V shows  that  lime  alone  gave  fairly 
good  returns  on  corn,  soybeans  and  clover.  Oats  grew  rank  but  fell 
down  long  before  it  was  ripe  and  failed  to  fill.  Fertilizer  alone  was 
used  at  a loss.  Where  both  lime  and  fertilizer  were  applied  good 
profits  were  secured  in  all  cases.  Where  phosphorus  was  omitted 
the  profits  were  reduced  from  $12.51  to  $3-59?  showing  that  this 
element  is  the  principal  fertilizer  need  of  this  soil.  Rock  phosphate 
gave  good  returns,  both  alone  and  with  lime.  Acid  phosphate  was 
not  used  alone  on  this  field. 

On  account  of  difficulties  with  the  tenant  on  the  farm,  the 
Wanatah  field  was  seeded  to  grass  in  1915  to  be  left  until  better  con- 
ditions for  its  continuation  can  be  secured. 

THE  FIELD  AT  SOUTH  BEND,  ST.  JOSEPH  COUNTY 

This  field  is  located  on  the  County  Farm  of  St.  Joseph  County. 
It  was  started  with  the  object  of  making  a comparative  study  of 
acid  phosphate,  bone  meal  and  raw  rock  phosphate  as  sources  of 
phosphorus  under  a good  system  of  rotation  and  crop  management. 


14 


The  soil  is  a brown  sandy  loam  of  somewhat  better  than  average 
quality,  but  fairly  representative  of  large  areas  of  sandy  soil  in  St. 
Joseph  and  neighboring  counties.  The  field  consists  of  three  series 
of  14  one-twentieth  acre  plots  each  and  carries  a rotation  of  corn, 
wheat  and  clover,  with  soybeans  put  in  the  place  of  clover  whenever 
the  latter  fails.  All  the  produce,  except  second  growth  clover,  is 
removed  from  the  land  and  a reasonable  amount  of  manure  is  re- 
turned. As  the  soil  was  found  to  be  acid,  it  was  limed  with  a uni- 
form application  of  four  tons  of  limestone  screenings  to  the  acre. 

The  phosphates  to  be  compared  on  this  field  are  therefore  used 
in  addition  to  a uniform  lime  and  manure  treatment.  The  phos- 
phates are  applied  at  three  different  rates  to  determine  the  most 
profitable  amounts  and  to  give  a wider  range  of  comparison  for  the 
different  materials.  The  rock  phosphate  is  applied  in  single  doses 
for  each  two  rounds  of  the  rotation,  while  the  acid  and  bone  appli- 
cations are  distributed  to  all  the  corn  and  wheat  crops.  The  initial 
applications  were  made  in  1914  and  the  whole  field  planted  to  soy- 
beans. 

In  the  following  table  are  shown  the  average  results  to  date 
from  the  three  different  phosphates.  The  three  different  rates  of 
application  are  averaged  at  this  time  because  the  bone  and  acid  are 
differently  proportioned  for  corn  and  wheat  and  will  not  be  even 
until  the  end  of  the  second  rotation. 


Table:  VI. — Summary  of  Results  on  the  South  Bend  Field, 
1914-1916^ — Averages  per  Acre  per  Rotation  of 
Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover 


Average  per-  acre  crop  increases 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Treatment  2 

Corn 

bushels 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value  of 
increase 

Cost  of 
treat- 
ment 

Net 

returns 

Steamed  bone 
meal  (over  lime 
and  manure) 

3.3 

-83 

2.3 

244 

-28 

$ 4.00 

$ 3.50 

$ .50 

Acid  phosphate 
(over  lime  and 
manure) 

1.5 

341 

3.7 

216 

26 

5.37 

3.50 

1.87 

Rock  phosphate 
(over  lime  and 
manure) 

2.1 

-138 

.7 

65 

-124 

1.00 

3.50 

-2.50 

Average  yield  of 
check  plots 

37.7 

3077 

22.9 

2050 

3745 

1 Only  two  corn  and  wheat  crops  have  been  grown.  The  whole  field  was  in  soy- 
beans in  1914,  and  soybeans  were  again  used  in  place  of  clover  in  1915 

2 Average  of  the  three  rates  of  application  in  each  case.  The  acid  and  bone  are 
applied  to  each  corn  and  wheat  crop  and  average  70  pounds  P2O5  per  acre  per 
rotation.  The  rock  phosphate  applications  average  280  pounds  P2O6  per  acre,  all 
put  on  at  the  beginning  of  the  experiment 


15 


Table  VI  does  not  show  any  very  pronounced  phosphate  ef- 
fects on  this  field  up  to  the  present  time.  It  seems  that  so  far  the 
manure  (6  tons  per  acre  per  rotation)  is  meeting  the  demands  of 
the  crops  for  phosphate  to  such  an  extent  as  to  need  little  help  from 
the  added  phosphates. 

THE  PHOSPHATE  TEST  AT  BEDFORD,  LAWRENCE  COUNTY 

This  experiment  is  located  on  the  Moses  Fell  Annex  Farm 
about  six  miles  northwest  of  Bedford.  No  soil  survey  of  the  area 
has  been  made  but  the  field  seems  to  be  representative  of  most  of 
the  uplands  of  Lawrence  and  neighboring  counties.  The  soil  is 
residual  from  the  underlying  limestone.  It  is  a yellowish  brown 
silt  loam,  underlaid  by  a more  reddish  subsoil.  Notwithstanding  its 
limestone  origin,  this  soil  was  found  to  be  acid. 

The  experiment  on  this  field  was  planned  to  study  the  relative 
merits  of  steamed  bone  meal,  basic  slag,  acid  phosphate  and  raw  rock 
phosphate  in  supplying  phosphorus  needs  of  crops.  ^ A special  fea- 
ture of  the  experiment  is  the  comparison  of  rock  and  acid  phos- 
phates in  several  different  proportions  alone,  with  lime,  and  with 
both  lime  and  manure. 

As  nearly  as  could  be  learned,  the  field  upon  which  the  experi- 
ment is  located  has  been  cropped  for  about  two  generations  with 
little  use  of  manure  or  fertilizer  and  had  been  in  meadow  for  sev- 
eral years.  There  was  a thin  growth  of  timothy,  blue  grass,  red  top 
and  broom  sedge.  This  was  plowed  up  in  the  spring  of  1914  and 
two  preliminary  crops  were  grown  without  any  soil  treatment.  The 
1914  crop  was  corn,  which  was  removed  from  the  land.  The  1915 
crop  was  soybeans,  plowed  under  in  the  fall.  The  field  was  under- 
drained in  the  spring  of  1915  with  parallel  lines  of  four-inch  tile 
laid  44  feet  apart  and  crosswise  of  the  plots  so  as  to  give  all  parts 
uniform  drainage.  Ground  limestone  was  applied  to  all  limed  plots 
at  four-  tons  per  acre  after  the  soybeans  were  plowed  under.  The 
phosphates  were  broadcasted  and  disked  into  the  surface  on  one  of 
the  three  series  of  plots,  which  was  then  seeded  to  wheat.  In  the 
spring  of  1916,  the  next  series  was  prepared  for  corn.  Manure  at 
the  rate  of  six  tons  per  acre  and  the  phosphates  were  disked  into 
the  surface  shortly  before  planting.  The  third  series  was  again 
seeded  to  soybeans  without  any  treatment. 

The  results  of  the  treatments  on  the  first  corn  and  wheat  crops 
are  here  presented  because  of  the  marked  contrasts  that  have  been 
produced  by  the  different  phosphate  treatments. 


i6 


Tabi^e:  VII. — Summary  of  Results  on  First  Corn  and  Wheat  Crops 
on  the  Bedford  Field — 1916 


I 

Average  per  acre  crop  increases  I 
Total 


Treatment 

Corn 

bushels 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

value  of 
increase 

Acid  phosphate  alone 

48  pounds  P2O5 

17.0 

-20 

6.5 

580 

$15.68 

Rock  phosphate  alone 

192  pounds  P2O5 

10.6 

246 

4.2 

454 

10.44 

Acid  phosphate,  48  pounds  P2O5 
(over  manure) 

9.9 

433 

3.8 

380 

9.88 

Rock  phosphate,  192  pounds  P2O5 
(over  manure) 

5.9 

153 

3.6 

266 

7.11 

Acid  phosphate,  24  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

10.1 

-76 

3.4 

393 

8.83 

Rock  phosphate,  96  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

-.7 

-273 

1.3 

23 

.42 

Acid  phosphate,-  48  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

14.1 

13 

4.4 

560 

12.18 

Rock  phosphate,  192  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

8.4 

-293 

.7 

240 

4.76 

Acid  phosphate,  72  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

13.2 

693 

6.7 

610 

15.10 

Rock  phosphate,  288  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

4.4 

147 

1.1 

-50 

3.46 

Acid  phosphate,  1000  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

26.4 

900 

6.8 

620 

22.13 

Rock  phosphate,  2000  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

3.3 

120 

.4 

150 

2.43 

Acid  phosphate,  48  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

14.1 

13 

4.4 

560 

12.17 

Steamed  bone  meal,  48  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

8.7 

120 

.7 

183 

5.46 

Basic  slag,  48  pounds  P2O5 
(over  lime  and  manure) 

3.3 

-80 

3.6 

507 

5.76 

Lime,  4 tons  (over  manure) 

-3.1 

226 

-.2 

- 7 

-1.40 

Manure 

10.5 

87 

.1 

74 

5.57 

Average  yield  of  check  plots 

37.6 

3700 

2.8' 

645 

. 

1 The  small  wheat  yields  were  due  largely  to  Hessian  fly  damage 

In  Table  VII  it  will  be  seen  that  acid  phosphate  has  produced  . 
large  returns  in  all  cases.  Bone  meal  has  given  the  smallest  returns 
of  the  available  phosphates.  Rock  phosphate  has  given  satisfactory 
returns  where  used  alone,  where  used  with  manure,  and  in  one  case 
where  used  with  both  lime  and  manure.  The  larger  applications 
have  been  used  at  a loss.  As  the  average  of  six  different  applica- 
tions, the  rock  phosphate  has  produced  in  the  first  corn  and  wheat 
crops  increases  valued  at  $4.77,  while  the  average  for  the  six  cor- 


17 


responding  money  values  of  acid  phosphate  has  been  $13.94.  A very 
striking  thing  is  the  fact  that  the  abnormally  large  applications  of 
450  and  1000  pounds  of  acid  phosphate  per  acre  have  more  than 
paid  for  themselves  the  first  year,  while  the  same  money  values  of 
rock  phosphate,  carrying  four  times  as  much  phosphorus,  have  re- 
turned less  than  one-sixth  as  much. 

THE  FERTILIZER  TEST  ON  THE  UNIVERSITY  FARM 

This  field  is  located  on  a brown  silt  loam  underlaid  by  gravel  at 
a depth  of  about  two  feet,  which  the  Bureau  of  Soils  has  classified 
as  Sioux  silt  loam.  The  field  consists  of  13  sixteenth  acre  plots,  and 
carries  a rotation  of  corn,  oats,  wheat,  clover  and  timothy.  It  was 
laid  out  in  1889  and  the  different  treatments  were  begun  in  1890. 
One  plot  has  been  manured  with  horse  manure  at  the  average  rate  of 
19  tons  per  acre  per  rotation.  Another  plot  has  received  an  average 
dressing  of  28.5  tons  of  cattle  manure  per  acre  per  rotation.  The 
other  plots  have  received  commercial  fertilizer  as  shown  in  the  fol- 
lowing table.  All  nitrogen  applications  have  been  at  the  average 
rate  of  187.5  pounds  of  nitrogen  per  acre  per  rotation,-  All  phos- 
phorus applications  have  been  at  the  average  rate  of  95.5  pounds  of 
phosphoric  acid  per  acre  per  rotation.  All  potash  applications  have 
been  at  the  average  rate  of  144  pounds  of  actual  potash  per  acre 
per  rotation.  All  manure  and  fertilizer  applications  have  been  di- 
vided between  the  corn,  oats  and  wheat  in  the  rotation.  The  corn 
has  received  approximately  one-half,  the  oats,  one-quarter  and  the 
wheat,  one-quarter  of  the  total  applications.  During  the  first  nine 
years,  ammonium  sulphate  was  used  as  the  source  of  nitrogen,  and 
dissolved  bone  black  as  the  source  of  phosphorus.  Since  that  time 
nitrate  of  soda  and  acid  phosphate  have  been  used.  Muriate  of 
potash  has  been  used  throughout  as  the  source  of  potash. 

According  to  the  information  available,  the  originators  of  the 
experiment  had  in  mind  supplying,  in  the  manure  and  fertilizer, 
about  two-thirds  of  the  total  plant  food  needs  of  crops  of  75  bushels 
of  corn,  60  bushels  of  oats,  and  30  bushels  of  wheat.  The  manure 
applications  were  calculated  to  carry  about  the  same  amounts  of 
plant  food  as  the  complete  fertilizer  application.  Fresh  manure  has 
been  used  at  all  times.  The  average  results  per  rotation  are  present- 
ed in  the  following  table. 


i8 


Table  VIIL — Summary  of  the  Fertilizer  Test  on  the  University 
Farm,  1890-1916 — Averages  of  Twenty-seven  Years  on  a 
Five-Year  Rotation  of  Corn,  Oats,  Wheat, 

Clover  and  Timothy 


Treat- 

ment 

Average  per  acre  crop  increases 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Corn 

stover 

Oats 

straw 

Wheat 

straw 

Clover 

Tim- 

othy 

Value  of 

Cost  of 

Net 

bushels 

pounds 

bushels 

pounds 

bushels 

pounds 

hay 

hay 

increase 

treat- 

returns 

pounds 

pounds 

ment 

Horse 

manure 

13.6 

1437 

8.4 

349 

13.1 

1527 

2807 

852 

$45.72 

19  tons 

$ 2.40 

Cattle 

manure 

14.9 

1513 

8.1 

535 

13.7 

2256 

2245 

1004 

46.12 

28.5 

per  ton 

1.62 

N P 

10.3 

946 

2.5 

459 

12.9 

1751 

795 

166 

28.02 

tons 

47.59 

per  ton 
-19.57 

N P 

8.2 

468 

1.7 

381 

9.3 

1241 

223 

127 

18.57 

40.39 

-21.82 

P K 

10.7 

795 

8.8 

55 

10.5 

920 

1091 

383 

28.72 

11.97 

16.75 

N K 

8.0 

563 

1.9 

287 

4.2 

833 

180 

199 

13.07 

42.82 

-29.75 

P 

1.8 

331 

4.5 

199 

6.0 

599 

856 

100 

14.80 

4.77 

10.03 

N 

2.6 

192 

.8 

197 

.1 

350 

-160 

8 

19.40 

35.62 

-16.22 

K 

7.0 

635 

1.0 

-10 

1.5 

83 

237 

-14 

7.50 

7.20 

.30 

Aver- 

age 

yield  of 
checks 

37.3 

2137 

43.7 

1425 

•18.5 

1861 

2328 

1357 

1 Nitrogen,  phosphoric  acid  and  potash 


An  examination  of  Table  VIII  clearly  shows  that  the  nitrogen 
applications  on  this  field  have  been  much  too  large  to  yield  a profit. 
Phosphorus  alone  and  the  phosphorus  and  potash  combination,  even 
though  used  in  very  large  amounts,  have  yielded  handsome  profits. 
It  is  worthy  of  note  that  potash  has  produced  its  best  increases  on 
corn,  and  the  phosphate  has  done  best  on  wheat,  oats  and  hay. 
Horse  manure  has  produced  good  returns  per  ton  even  though  the 
application  has  been  abnormally  large.  The  cattle  manure  has  pro- 
duced only  a little  more  crop  increase  than  the  horse  manure,  al- 
though the  application  was  a half  greater. 

It  will  be  observed  further  that  the  heavy  applications  of  bc/th 
manure  and  fertilizer  have  maintained  the  wheat  yield  well  up  to 
the  30  bushel  mark,  and  that  the  applications  have  been  profitable. 
The  phosphorus  and  potash  combination  has  also  been  profitable 
on  the  other  crops  in  the  rotation.  Phosphorus  alone  has  not  been 
profitable  on  corn.  Potash  alone  has  about  paid  for  itself  on  the 
corn  and  the  slight  profit  has  come  from  the  residual  effect  on 


19 


clover.  Comparing  the  value  of  the  crop  increases  in  the  third  and 
fifth  lines  of  the  table,  it  will  be  seen  that  the  large  nitrogen  appli- 
cation not  only  failed  to  give  an  increase  but  was  actually  detrimen- 
tal, since  the  P K plot  yielded  crop  increases  worth  $28.72  while  the 
N P K plot  yielded  only  $28.02.  The  oats  crop  on  the  plots  receiv- 
ing nitrogen  generally  fell  down  before  ripening  and  the  hay  crops 
were  not  as  good.  The  failure  of  nitrogen  to  make  a better  showing 
is  further  explained  by  the  fact  that  this  soil  is  naturally  well  sup- 
plied with  nitrogen,  the  untreated  plots  still  showing  .23  per  cent,  of 
total  nitrogen,  and  the  probable  losses  through  leaching  into  the 
gravel  subsoil.  All  of  the  produce  has  been  removed  from  the  field 
throughout  the  experiment. 

OTHER  NEW  EXPERIMENTS  UNDER  WAY 

During  the  last  two  years,  the  Station  has  begun  several  im- 
portant lines  of  soil  fertility  investigations  on  the  Wilson  Farm, 
which  was  acquired  especially  for  soil  and  crop  improvement  exper- 
iments. This  farm  lies  immediately  to  the  east  of  the  city  of  La- 
Fayette  and  consists  of  120  acres  of  what  is  commonly  known  as 
‘‘black  and  clay”  soil,  which  represents  the  greater  part  of  the  middle 
half  of  the  State.  The  “clay”  is  Miami  silt  loam  and  the  “black”  is 
Clyde  silt  loam  as  cbassified  by  the  Bureau  of  Soils  in  their  soil  sur- 
veys of  other  counties  in  the  State.  A uniform  drainage  system  for 
the  whole  farm  has  been  completed.  By  preliminary  cropping  the 
most  uniform  parts  of  the  farm  were  selected  and  the  following 
experiments  started. 

A comparison  of  ten  different  systems  of  cropping,  comparing 
38  one-half  acre  plots. 

A comparative  study  of  the  more  important  phosphates  used 
as  fertilizers.  This  is  similar  to  the  Bedford  experiment  de- 
scribed in  this  bulletin. 

A complete  fertility  test  of  the  Miami  silt  loam. 

A comparison  of  the  effects  of  “grain  farming”  and  “stock 
farming”  upon  the  productiveness  of  the  soil. 

A study  of  the  soil  fertility  value  of  corn  stalks  plowed  under 
vs.  left  to  decay  on  the  surface. 

A study  of  the  best  place  to  apply  stable  manure  in  a corn, 
wheat  and  clover  rotation. 

A study  of  the  amount  of  raw  rock  phosphate  that  must  be 
applied  and  maintained  in  the  soil  to  continuously  supply  the  phos- 
phorus needed  by  crops. 

Two  new  outlying  projects,  started  in  1916,  are  the  “Hunting- 
ton experiment  Field”  of  about  12  acres,  located  near  Huntington, 


20 

I 

^ Indiana,  where  the  main  objects  are  to  compare  sugar  beets  with 
corii  in  rotation  with  oats  and  clover  and  to  study  the  fertilizer  re- 
quirements of  sugar  beets,  and  the  “Francisco  Experiment  Field” 
in  Gibson  county,  which  is  designed  to  show  the  effects  of  lime, 
legumes,  phosphorus  and  potash  on  the  rolling  upland,  light-colored, 
silty  soil  of  southwestern  Indiana. 

All  of  the  above  new  experiments  have  been  outlined  in  the  re- 
ports of  the  Department  of  Soils  and  Crops  in  the  1915  and  1916 
Annual  Reports  of  the  Station. 

SUMMARY 

This  bulletin  reports  the  results  of  the  principal  soil  treatments 
on  seven  outlying  experiment  fields  and  one  of  the  older  series  of 
plots  on  the  University  Farm. 

Leaving  out  of  consideration  the  Westport  and  Bedford  fields, 
which  are  only  a year  old,  the  principal  treatments  have  produced 
results  as  follows : 

Ground  limestone  has  yielded  good  returns  on  all  of  the  fields 
where  it  was  used,  with  profits  ranging  from  $3.31  to  $18.34  per 
acre  per  rotation. 

Manure  has  yielded  returns  ranging  from  $1.62  to  $4.45  per 
ton  per  rotation. 

On  limed  land,  mixed  fertilizer  has  been  used  at  good  profits  in 
all  cases.  At  North  Vernon  and  Worthington,  where  mixed  fer- 
tilizer is  applied  to  wheat  on  manured  land,  good  wheat  increases 
have  been  secured  from  the  use  of  200  pounds  per  acre  of  2-8-4  fer- 
tilizer following  corn,  which  had  received  six  tons  of  manure  and 
200  pounds  of  acid  phosphate  per  acre. 

Rock  phosphate  used  without  manure  at  Scottsburg  and  Wan- 
atah  has  yielded  profitable  returns.  With  manure,  it  has  been  profit- 
able at  North  Vernon  and  Worthington,  while  at  Scottsburg  and 
South  Bend  it  has  been  used  at  a loss. 

Acid  phosphate,  either  with  or  without  manure,  has  given  large 
profits  in  all  cases.  Per  dollar  invested,  it  has  been  by  far  the  most 
profitable  of  all  the  fertilizer  treatments,  either  alone,  with  lime,  or 
with  both  lime  and  manure. 

Clover  instead  of  timothy  in  rotation  with  corn  and  wheat  has 
increased  the  value  of  the  rotation  by  $8.07  at  North  Vernon  and 
$7.80  at  Worthington  where  no  fertilizer  was  used.  On  fertilized 
land,  the  legume  has  increased  the  value  of  the  rotation  by  $12.50 
at  North  Vernon  and  $5.08  at  Worthington  after  paying  for  the 
fertilizer. 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


Buclktin  No.  199,  Von.  XIX 
April,  1917 


COMMERCIAL  FERTILIZERS 


Pimiislied  iiy  tie  station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


C3WMKU  I r^V-»L_  , ^ 

Addison  C.  Harms,'  President V“^VZV"Z.V.'lnd/anapSis,'  Marion  County 

G^ent^^d.  Hancock  County 

pv^ncs^M  l\"V"”'’.BridKeport,’  Marion  County 

Joseph  D Oliver... Vincennes,  Knox  County 

WT??TrM^V  ^Stuart V'V.V.'.V. LaPayette.  Tippecanoe  County 

WTNTHROP  k SiONEi'X' mT'p^' President  of  the  University 

STATION  STAFF 

HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS  Director 

in 

Herbert  S.  Jackson.  A.  B...... qtatc  Chemist 

Skinner  ’ B^S  Husbandry 

John  hL  skinner,  h.  s Chief  in  Entomology 

il^^Rfn^T^^TANCKo ''b'  s A Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Ch^lL  G wSun?;  M.  sXTZXXZr;::.. Chlet  m Horticulture 

R q ^ -V Assistant  in  Botany 

Sherman  L Andersen  B.  S ;::::::::;::;::inspecto?  Stat^  CheSStVeplrtSent 

J^Ses'^C  BeaTees-.  B.  Asr;;;;:;;:;;;;;;;;;;;.;: Associate  in  Soils^aml_  crons  Jx^tens.on 

cSa5Ss°S  ^Bee“sSe®'m  ■■  s' Poultry  Husbandry 

H 'RrSuShton  B S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

HaS  D^Burns?de  B S A‘i Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

msnector  state  Chemlst^Department 

caS”h^  clink’^’b°s’'* *'  ^ ;;;;;;;;;;;.'.'.':;::::".'.';.'.'"!;;Assistant  in  serum  production 

Thomak  a C?leman  "VV/.V.'.'.V.V/.^Ass’t  State  Leader  Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 
sSSuEL  4‘  CONNER.  M,  S. Associate  Chemist  ^.n  ^Smls^/nd  Crops 

Carleton^Cutler^^B  % ^ prYst' Deputy 'stale' Chemist Microscopist  (Feeds) 

55gN^  L^dS™b:  ^^tomological  ass  Stant  m 

Leo^P  Doylb^^B^S^’  V.V;  V:.V'.V.'-V."';.V.'.'As^  in  Animal  Pathology 

p fVpte  Ph"G - Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Margin  I ^fSmr’ M^S  Y".'.';!!;.! Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

GeoS  M Frier  B S A.'.r"''''.'''.'.' Associate  in  Charge  of  Short  (bourses  and  Exhibits 

maret  T HV.RLAN  ' Assistant  in  Agricultural  Extension 

Ab5S  j;.HUN™ErB:;'s:  : Assistant  m SerumJ^roductmn 

Coba  A.  ".....V. Assistant  in  Soils 

Sadocie  C.  Assistant  Veterinarian 

^KrNKLm  G^T'Kii?,  B.°s....; -::-X'"xr;rz 

Walter  H.  Larrimer.  B.  S.3..  Deifutv  State  Chemist 

HoR^A^r?^ c^' B^s ^ in  Dairy  Manufactures 

;;;;'::'':'r;;;;/::Assfc!^frV%S^ 

?T  T r ■ PHimPs'^B^S  \ 'X';.'.'.'..  Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

“•  

?"£LSi;  E; 

cSFSTlR^G^STARg^B^S  ^/^■■■E:;;.E::V;Asslstant‘'in''Swine'^P^^^^ 

SeSber?  I iwi5SER®  R>,-A.-.-. Assistant  in  gairy  Bacteno^^^^^^ 

GfuBERT^/'wASKlS’  B I ::  :::: m soiis  and  cr9ps 

Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

L?^?1r^Y^er®^B^S  a ^ :;:'':::;::GY'adua'e ''AEsi'stant  m Horticultural  (Jhemistry 

1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Seed  Testing  ^ x . 

3 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  Insect 

Investigations  on  « a i 

* Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 
3 Died  September  2,  1916 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 

(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909)  * • a- 

T P PRirr  Daleville  State  Live  Stock  Association 

J-  P-  frigg,  uaieviiie qta+p  Poultry  Fanciers’  Association 

S:  p:  MA™H?PrSort . state  com  Growers’  Association 


COMMERCIAL  FERTILIZERS 


W.  J.  JONES,  JR. 

E.  G.  Proulx  R.  B.  Deemer  R.  O.  Bitler  H.  C.  Mugg* 


The  main  points  of  the  law  governing  the  sale  of  materials  for  ma- 
nurial  purposes  in  Indiana  are  summarized  in  the  following: 

Manufacturers 

Registration.  Before  offering  or  exposing  for  sale,  selling  or  dis- 
tributing, hy  saviple  or  otherwise,  any  material  for  manurial  purposes  in 
this  state  submit  the  required  certificate  accompanied  by  fees  and  order 
for  State  Chemist’s  labels  to  the  amount  of  500  or  some  multiple  for  each 
brand  it  is  desired  to  offer  for  sale. 

Attachment  of  State  Chemist’s  Labels.  Attach  State  Chemist’s  labels 
to  all  packages  of  200  pounds  or  fraction,  whether  of  one  ounce  or  200 
pounds,  including  sample  bottles,  and  furnish  with  similar  quantities  when 
bulk  sales  are  made.  Bo  not  make  unlabeled  shipments  expecting  to  furnish 
labels  at  a later  date.  Such  procedure  does  not  meet  the  requirements  of  the 
law  and  places  your  customers  in  position  to  violate  it  unintentionally.  No  ex- 
cuse can  be  accepted  for  the  sale  of  unlabeled  fertilizer. 

Labels.  The  registration  of  a brand  being  permanent  the  only  way 
to  make  a change  in  guarantee  is  by  a distinctive  change  in  thd  name  of 
the  brand,  the  submission  of  a new  certificate  and  the  payment  of  min- 
imum fees.  Never  make  any  change  on  the  official  label.  Such  alteration 
constitutes  a misdemeanor  and  subjects  any  agent  selling  fertilizer  with 
such  altered  labels  attached  to  prosecution  for  violation  of  the  law. 

Maintain  Guarantees.  Be  certain  that  all  shipments  made  into  Indi- 
ana equal  or  exceed  in  every  particular  the  guarantee,  this  means  for  each 
plant  food,  not  equivalent  values,  on  the  State  Chemist^ s labels  furnished  with 
the  shipment. 

Materials  under  the  law.  The  term  “commercial  fertilizer”  is  defined 
to  include  all  materials  used  for  manurial  purposes  except  barnyard 
manure,  marl,  lime,  wood  ashes  and  plaster  and  these  in  order  to  be  en- 
titled to  exemption  must  be  sold  in  their  original  condition  and  under  their 
respective  names. 

Rulings  12  A and  B.  Attention  is  called  to  rulings  12  A and  B pub- 
lished in  each  report  since  1914  covering  registrations  on  forms  1902  and 
under  names  indicating  the  use  of  animal  by-products  only.  Fertilizers 
sold  under  the  name  of  Raw  Bone,  Bone  Meal,  Ground  Bone,  Steamed 
Bone,  Tankage,  Bone  and  Potash,  Bone  and  Potash  mixture,  etc.,  must  be 
free  from  acidulated  materials,  ammonium  sulfate,  nitrate  of  soda,  rock 
phosphate,  lime,  all  fillers,  and  must  contain  animal  by-products  only. 
Where  it  is  desired  to  use  reinforcing  agents  or  fillers  the  fertilizers  must 
be  offered  for  registration  under  names  which  do  not  indicate  the  presence 
of  animal  by-products  only. 

Excuses  for  failure  to  comply  with  these  rulings  cannot  be  accepted 
in  the  future  and  where  fertilizer  is  found  on  sale  in  violation  of  same, 
registration  will  be  cancelled  and  further  labels  refused. 

Full  text  of  the  law  and  working  regulations  of  the  department  in  so 
far  as  they  relate  to  persons  or  firms  who  wish  to  register  fertilizer  for 
sale  in  this  state  and  blank  forms  for  making  such  registration  will  be 
furnished  on  request. 


Agents,  Dealers,  Distributors 

Read  the  law.  Write  to  this  department  for  a copy  of  the  law  and 
acquaint  yourself  with  its  provisions. 

Companies.  Consult  the  State  Chemist’s  reports  each  year  and  repre- 
sent manufacturers  with  good  records  of  inspection. 


Resigned  Jan.  1,  1917 


4 


Labels.  The  only  label  recognized  under  the  law  is  that  bearing  the 
fac  simile  signature  of  the  State  Chemist-  (See  reproduction,  page  6). 
Do  not  accept,  offer  or  expose  for  sale,  sell,  deliver,  distribute  or  have  in  your 
possession  any  sample,  pachage,  or  any  quantity  of  any  commercial  fertilizer 
which  does  not  have  attached  to  the  packages  or  available  for  bullc  shipments 
the  State  Chemist ’s  label  for  each  200  pounds  or  fraction. 

In  connection  with  the  preceding  it  is  to  be  noted  that  the  law  re- 
quires the  labels  to  be  attached  to  the  packages  of  fertilizer  or  to  accom- 
pany bulk  sales  at  the  time  of  delivery,  and  the  delivery  of  the  fertilizer 
with  subsequent  delivery  of  the  labels  on  the  plea  of  oversight,  hurry, 
accommodation,  etc.,  cannot  be  accepted  as  an  excuse  for  such  viola- 
tions, and  prompt  report  of  all  unlabeled  sales  will  be  made  to  the  prose- 
cutor. Refuse  to  accept  any  unlabeled  shipments  until  labels  are  avail- 
able and  such  shipments  will  cease. 

Do  not  accept  or  deliver  unlabeled  fertilizer  expecting  to  be  excused 
through  subsequent  delivery  of  labels.  Such  procedure  does  not  meet  the 
requirements  of  the  law  which  are  that  the  State  Chemist’s  labels  and  the 
fertilizer  must  be  delivered  at  the  same  time.  No  excuse  for  making  un- 
labeled deliveries  can  be  accepted. 

Altered  Labels.  Do  not  accept  any  sample,  package  or  quantity  of 
fertilizer  with  State  Chemist’s  labels  showing  alterations.  The  label  as 
issued  is  always  printed,  contains  all  the  facts  required  by  law  and  any 
alterations  thereon  constitute  a violation  of  the  law. 

Sample  bottles.  Make  contracts  on  the  basis  of  the  guarantee  on 
State  Chemist’s  labels  and  compare  said  guarantee  with  that  on  State 
Chemist’s  labels  attached  to  packages  or  furnished  with  the  shipment  and 
be  certain  that  they  are  in  agreement. 

Deficiencies.  Examine  the  report  of  inspection  of  any  sample  secured 
from  goods  in  your  possession  very  carefully  and  if  report  shows  the  sam- 
ple deficient  sufficient  to  carry  with  it  the  advice  that  shipment  should  be 
withdrawn  from  sale  do  so  promptly  and  report  the  amount  and  date  of 
withdrawal  to  this  department.  While  there  is  good  ground  for  claiming 
that  a dealer  has  no  means  of  knowing  until  a report  is  received  whether 
guarantees  are  maintained,  after  a report  has  been  made  showing  that  a 
shipment  does  not  meet  the  requirements  of  the  law  there  can  be  no  valid 
excuse  for  his  continuing  the  sale  and  in  all  such  cases  prompt  complaint 
will  be  filed  with  the  prosecutor  by  this  department. 

Equivalent  values.  In  the  case  of  deficiency  in  a certain  plant  food, 
manufacturers  often  (too  often)  make  claim  that  since  the  percentage  of 
another  plant  food  is  in  excess  of  guarantee  sufficient  to  bring  the  sam- 
ple up  to  the  guaranteed  equivalent  value  no  objection  should  be  made  on 
account  of  the  deficiency.  If  the  plant  foods,  nitrogen,  potash  and  avail- 
able phosphoric  acid  could  replace  each  other  in  plant  production  such  a 
claim  would  be  entirely  reasonable  and  the  purchase  of  fertilizer  would 
become  merely  a purchase  of  so  many  dollars  worth  of  plant  food  without 
regard  to  kind  or  quantity,  but  since  nitrogen  cannot  perform  the  func- 
tions of  either  potash  or  phosphoric  acid,  nor  can  either  of  the  last  two 
mentioned  take  the  place  of  nitrogen  or  one  another,  it  is  essential  that 
the  particular  plant  food  desired  and  purchased  be  secured  and  not  an 
equal  money  value  of  another.  It  is  just  as  logical  to  sell  sugar  when  coffee 
is  desired  as  to  substitute  one  plant  food  for  another. 

Comparative  values  are  a means  of  comparing  similar  brands  but 
should  be  used  only  for  such  purposes  and  care  should  be  taken  to  con- 
sider from  whence  the  values  come,  since  in  many  cases,  through  the 
use  of  untreated  rock  phosphate  as  a make  weight  it  will  be  found  that 
while  on  the  basis  of  total  valuation  one  brand  may  show  much  higher 
than  another,  when  compared  on  the  basis  of  the  value  of  the  nitrogen, 
potash  and  available  phosphoric  acid  present,  the  excess  value  of  one 
may  be  due  to  a large  excess  of  insoluble  phosphoric  acid. 

The  plant  food  or  foods  required  by  the  soil  and  crop  to  which  they 
are  to  be  applied  together  with  proper  cultivation  and  the  application  of 


5 


other  principles  of  good  farming  and  not  the  application  of  so  many  dol- 
lars’ worth  of  fertilizer  without  regard  to  kind  or  quality  are  the  essen- 
tials of  maximum  crop  production. 

Sales.  Study  the  needs  of  the  soil  in  your  locality  and  sell  your  cus- 
tomers high  grade  fertilizer  containing  the  ingredient  or  ingredients 
needed  to  give  the  most  profitable  results. 

Handling  and  storing  fertilizer.  The  local  dealer  being  directly  re- 
sponsible for  the  fertilizer  he  offers  for  sale  in  Indiana,  care  should  be 
taken  to  keep  fertilizer  in  a clean,  waterproof  building,  the  different  brands 
in  separate  piles  with  sufficient  space  between  to  prevent  mixing  if  the 
bags  burst,  with  proper  labels  attached  to  each  package. 

Represent  companies  whose  past  record  of  inspection  shows  that  they 
are  maintaining  their  guarantees. 

Consumers 

Through  observation,  experiment  and  consultation  with  the  Soils  and 
Crops  Department  of  the  Experiment  Station  determine  the  plant  food 
required  by  your  soil  to  produce  profitable  results  and  purchase  on  the 
basis  of  the  price  of  the  ingredient  or  ingredients  desired  and  not  on  the 
filler  used  or  the  price  per  ton.  High  grade  fertilizers  while  more  costly 
per  ton  almost  without  exception  furnish  plant  food  at  a less  cost  per 
pound  and  from  more  valuable  sources  than  lower  grade  and  cheaper  per 
ton  fertilizers. 

Refuse  to  accept  any  fertilizer  which  does  not  have  attached  to  pack- 
ages or  accompanying  bulk  sales  State  Chemist’s  labels,  (see  reproduction, 
page  6),  having  printed  thereon  guarantees  agreeing  with  those  on 
sample  bottles  or  in  contract  at  time  of  purchase.  The  law  only  requires 
that  the  person  or  persons  selling  the  fertilizer  furnish  the  amounts  of 
plant  food  guaranteed  on  the  State  Chemist’s  labels  furnished  with  the 
shipment,  hence  it  is  essential  if  you  purchase  fertilizer  guaranteed  to 
contain  1.6%  nitrogen,  2%  potash  soluble  in  water  and  8%  available 
phosphoric  acid  that  the  official  labels  contain  this  guarantee  and  no 
other. 

Do  not  have  fertilizer  in  your  possession  v/ithout  State  Chemist’s 
labels  to  cover  each  200  pounds  or  fraction. 

When  reports  are  received  showing  that  fertilizer  purchased  does  not 
meet  the  requirements  of  the  law  notify  the  prosecuting  attorney  of  your 
district  of  the  violation. 

When  inspections  are  desired  do  not  forward  samples  but  observe 
carefully  the  instructions  under  Samples,  page  7. 

Consult  the  inspection  reports  and  cooperate  with  this  department  by 
purchasing  from  companies  whose  record  of  inspection  shows  they  are 
maintaining  their  guarantees. 

WATCH  FOR  STATE  CHEMIST’S  LABEL 
ACCEPT  NO  OTHER 

Only  one  label  is  recognized  as  legal  under  the  Indiana  Fertilizer  Law 
and  this  is  the  one,  see  reproduction  page  6,  which  must  be  purv'jhased 
from  the  State  Chemist  and  always  hears  his  fac  simile  signature. 

The  State  Chemist’s  official  label  is  always  printed,  contains  all  the 
facts  required  by  law,  must  be  attached  to  all  packages  and  accompany 
bulk  sales  for  each  200  pounds  or  fraction  whether  said  fraction  be  one  oz. 
or  200  pounds  and  fixes  the  legal  standard  of  composition  for  all  fertilizer 
offered  or  exposed  for  sale,  sold  or  distributed  in  Indiana.  Do  not  under 
any  circumstances  accept  any  fertilizer  unless  the  official  labels  are  avail- 
able and  do  not  accept  any  shipments  with  altered  State  Chemist’s  labels 
attached. 


6 


JOHN  DOE  & COMPANY, 
of  Columbus,  Ohio, 

Guarantee  this 

SNOWFLAKE  FERTILIZER 

to  contain  not  less  than 
2,4  per  cent,  of  total  nitrogen,  (N), 

10.0  per  cent,  of  potash,  (K2O),  soluble  in 
water, 

8.0  per  cent,  of  soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid,  (P2O6),  and 

1.0  per  cent,  of  insoluble  phosphoric  acid, 

(P2O5). 


Purdue  University 
Agricultural7 
Experiment  Station, 

LaFayette,  Indiana. 

State  Chemist. 


Use  of  annual  reports.  In  order  that  purchasers  as  well  as  agents 
and  dealers  may  obtain  the  most  value  from  the  annual  reports,  the  fol- 
lowing suggestions  are  offered: 

First.  Determine  the  formula  you  wish  to  purchase. 

Second.  Consult  Table  IX  to  ascertain  the  manufacturers  having  fer* 
tilizers  of  the  desired  composition  registered  for  sale. 

Third.  Consult  Tables  II,  III,  IV  to  ascertain  the  inspection  records 
of  manufacturers  selected  from  Table  IX. 

Fourth.  If  details  of  the  inspection  of  any  particular  brand  are  de- 
sired consult  Table  VI  and  for  additional  information  write  to  the  State 
Chemist. 

Fifth.  Purchase  of  manufacturers  whose  records  of  inspection  are 
such  as  to  justify  the  belief  that  they  will  deliver  fertilizer  as  guaranteed. 

Sixth.  The  index  4:0  each  report  is  so  arranged  as  to  enable  the  pre- 
ceding suggestions  to  be  followed  with  a minimum  expenditure  of  time 
and  labor. 

ADMINISTRATION 

The  administration  of  the  Fertilizer  Law  is  in  charge  of  the  State 
Chemist  who  is  assisted  in  carrying  out  the  provisions  of  the  law  by  a 
staff  of  deputies  and  inspectors,  the  latter  of  whom  are  on  the  road  each 
working  day  collecting  samples  of  fertilizers  and  feeding  stuffs  which  are 
forwarded  to  the  laboratory  where  they  are  analyzed  by  the  former. 

Receipts  and  expenditures.  The  revenue  for  carrying  on  the  work  of 
inspection  is  secured  from  the  sale  of  State  Chemist’s  labels.  All  fees 
are  made  payable  to  the  State  Chemist  by  whom  they  are  paid  into  the 
treasury  of  the  Purdue  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  on  the 
25th  of  each  month.  All  expenditures  are  on  vouchers  and  duplicate  re- 
ceipts and  the  accounts  of  the  department  are  audited  by  the  State  Board 
of  Accountants. 

Inspections.  The  number  of  shipments  into  the  state  has  become  so 
numerous  that  it  is  impossible  to  secure  a sample  from  each  shipment. 


7 


nor  is  this  necessary  to  secure  adequate  inspection  and  protection,  but 
at  present  the  inspectors  are  instructed  to  secure  two  samples  of  each 
brand  in  the  spring  and  fall  in  different  parts  of  the  state  and  in  the  case 
of  brands  having  large  sales  or  of  companies  with  poor  records  of  inspec- 
tion this  number  is  increased  so  as  to  insure  that  the  results  of  the  in- 
spection are  representative  of  the  fertilizer  sold  in  the  state  each  year.  In 
the  1916  inspection  one  sample  was  secured  for  each  94  tons  and  one 
sample  analyzed  for  each  97  tons  sold  in  the  state.  Requests  for  special 
inspections  are  almost  invariably  complied  with. 

Samples.  Manufacturers  are  not  required  to  forward  samples.  When 
an  analysis  is  necessary  for  the  purpose  of  making  guarantee  it  must  be 
secured  from  a commercial  chemist. 

The  only  samples  analyzed  are  those  taken  by  our  regular  inspectors 
from  goods  properly  labeled  on  the  open  market.  Consumers,  agents  or 
dealers  desiring  inspections  are  requested  not  to  forward  samples  but  to 
write  to  the  State  Chemist  stating  the  manufacturer,  brand,  official  num- 
ber (which  is  always  at  the  top  of  the  official  label),  amount  of  fertilizer 
on  hand  and  any  special  reason  for  des/iring  the  inspection.  If  the  amount 
on  hand  is  sufficient  to  give  a representative  sample  and  a number  of 
samples  of  the  same  brand  or  brands  has  not  already  been  secured,  an 
inspector  will  be  sent  to  take  an  official  sample  without  expense  to  the 
person  desiring  the  inspection. 

For  reasons  fully  set  forth  in  previous  reports  which  are  briefly; 
first,  in  order  for  the  analysis  of  a sample  of  fertilizer  to  be  of  value  it 
must  be  drawn  in  such  a manner  as  to  be  representative  of  the  entire 
shipment  and  such  a representative  sample  can  only  be  taken  by  persons 
with  special  training  and  with  a sampling  tube  which  will  take  a full  core 
the  entire  length  of  each  package  sampled;  second,  unless  the  sample  is 
so  drawn  as  to  be  representative,  its  legality  cannot  be  sustained  in  the 
courts;  third,  the  inspection  in  Indiana  is  more  general  than  in  most 
states  having  similar  laws,  and  since  the  only  funds  available  for  the 
work  of  inspection  are  those  received  from  the  sale  of  labels,  the  number 
of  samples  which  can  be  analyzed  is  necessarily  limited  by  the  revenue 
and  the  staff  available. 

Analyses.  The  inspection  samples  are  analyzed  in  the  order  in  which 
they  are  received  at  the  laboratory  and  by  what  is  known  as  the  blind 
system;  i.  e.,  the  analyst  is  not  in  possession  of  the  name  of  the  manu- 
facturer or  brand  which  he  is  analyzing  but  works  solely  by  the  labora- 
tory number  assigned  the  sample  on  its  arrival.  In  the  case  of  samples 
found  below  guarantee  before  report  is  made  at  least  two  analysts  make 
independent  determinations  on  different  portions  of  the  sample  and  in 
case  of  disagreement  these  results  are  checked  by  a third  analyst  on 
another  portion  of  the  sample. 

All  samples  received  from  the  inspectors  are  analyzed  and  the  results 
reported  and  published  unless  error  in  connection  with  the  taking  of 
same  by  an  employee  of  this  department  can  be  shown. 

Reports.  The  results  of  the  inspection  of  all  samples  are  rci^orted  to 
the  manufacturer,  agent,  and  persons  from  whom  samples  are  obtained.  In 
the  case  of  deficient  samples  the  manufacturer  is  given  10  days  in  which 
to  file  objections  and  review  the  work  for  which  purpose  a portion  of  the 
official  sample  is  furnished  if  requested  after  which  a duplicate  report 
with  comments  pertinent  to  the  inspection  is  forward  to  the  agent  and 
persons  from  whom  sample  was  secured. 

Requests  are  frequently  received  that  we  report  inspections  within  a 
certain  time  limit.  Unless  some  exceptional  reason  exists  for  so  doing 
such  requests  cannot  be  granted  since  under  the  most  favorable  condi- 
tions we  cannot  report  more  than  150  samples  of  fertilizer  per  month  and 
the  only  regulation  fair  to  all  concerned  is  to  analyze  the  samples  in  the 
order  of  their  arrival.  Consumers  should  purchase  not  on  the  basis  of  a 
certain  time  limit  but  with  the  proviso  that  if  inspected  and  found  defi- 
cient the  manufacturer  will  rebate  on  said  analysis.  This  is  perfectly  fair 


8 


to  the  manufacturer  whose  interests  are  fully  protected  through  the  ten 
days’  advance  notice  he  receives  of  such  samples. 

Enforcement.  Attention  is  requested  to  the  fact  that  the  prosecutor 
of  the  district  in  which  the  violation  occurs  and  not  the  State  Chemist 
is  charged  with  the  enforcement  of  the  Act  and  any  citizen  of  the  state 
may  call  violations  to  his  attention.  Since  reports  of  the  results  of  in- 
spection are  made  to  all  parties  to  the  transaction  it  is  expected  that 
purchasers  of  fertilizer  will  assist  in  protecting  their  own  interests  by 
reporting  violations.  A copy  of  this  bulletin  is  sent  to  each  prosecutor 
and  a certified  copy  of  the  analysis  of  any  inspection  sample  will  be 
promptly  forwarded  to  any  prosecutor  on  request. 

Official  Duties.  The  official  duties  of  the  State  Chemist  are  restricted 
to  the  inspection  of  fertilizers  and  feeding  stuffs  and  the  settlement  of 
disputes  between  coal  oil  dealers  and  inspectors.  The  official  work  re- 
quired takes  the  entire  time  of  the  staff  of  the  department  and  no  mis- 
cellaneous work  either  gratis  or  for  pay  can  be  undertaken.  Analyses  of 
fertilizers  and  feeding  stuffs  must  be  restricted  to  samples  secured  by  our 
regular  inspectors.  Analyses  of  water,  soils,  rocks  or  similar  materials  are 
not  made  by  this  department. 

Commercial  work  or  outside  remuneration  cannot  be  accepted  by  any 
employee  of  this  department. 


CASES  REPORTED  TO  PROSECUTORS 


The  following  cases  for  selling  fertilizer  without  labels  were  reported 
to  prosecutors. 


o 

<X) 

cc 

d 

o 


61 

62 


Names  and  addresses  of  persons 
charged  with  violations 

Names  and  address  of 
prosecutor  or  deputy 

Date 

reported 

1 

Result 

Samuel  E.  Robbins,  Fair  Oaks.— 
The  Goodland  Grain  Co., 
Goodland __ 

Reuben  Hess,  Kentland 
Reuben  Hess,  Kentland 

June  26,  1916 
June  26,  1916 

No  report 
No  report 

Case  No.  60.  Report  was  received  from  Prosecutor  Geo.  B.  Staff  un- 
der date  of  Sept.  30,  1916,  that  after  a plea  of  guilty  by  Pearl  Underwood 
the  court  affixed  a fine  of  $50  and  costs,  and  paroled  Mr.  Underwood  on 
the  fine, 

EXPLANATION  OF  TERMS 

There  being  apparently  a desire  for  more  information  regarding  the 
terms  used  in  the  fertilizer  trade  and  industry,  the  following  are  again 
published. 

GENERAL  TERMS 

Plant  food.  “A  plant  food  may  be  defined  as  a substance  which  sup- 
plies any  constituent  necessary  for  the  nourishment  of  plants  and  in  a 
form  suited  to  promote  their  development  or  capable  of  being  changed  by 
natural  processes  into  such  a form.”-  In  connection  with  commercial 
fertilizers  this  term  is  used  to  designate  the  plant  food  ingredients, 
nitrogen,  potash  and  phosphoric  acid,  which  are  the  three  essential  plant 
foods  usually  deficient  in  soils  and  which  commercial  fertilizers  are  de- 
signed to  supply. 

Available  plant  food.  An  available  plant  food  is  one  that  is  in  such 
form  or  combination  as  to  be  immediately  utilizable  in  the  growth  of  the 
plant  or  in  such  condition  as  to  become  promptly  utilizable  through  nat- 
ural processes. 

Unavailable  plant  food.  An  unavailable  plant  food  is  one  in  such 
form  or  combination  as  not  to  be  capable  of  utilization  by  the  plant  in  its 
growth  or  which  becomes  utilizable  too  slowly  to  be  of  appreciable  value 
in  crop  production. 


2 Fertilizers  and  Crops 


9 


Direct  fertilizer.  A direct  fertilizer  is  one  which  supplies  an  essential 
plant  food  in  condition  to  be  utilized  in  the  growth  of  the  plant  or  to  be- 
come available  for  this  purpose  through  natural  processes. 

Indirect  fertilizer.  An  indirect  fertilizer  is  one  which  influences  the 
growth  of  plants  in  general  by  beneflcial  effects  on  the  soil  in  improving 
mechanical  condition,  promoting  aeration,  rendering  plant  food  already 
in  the  soil  more  available,  correcting  acidity  and  similar  conditions  and 
not  by  furnishing  a plant  food. 

Commercial  fertilizer.  A commercial  fertilizer  is  a material  or  mix- 
ture of  materials  containing  one  or  more  of  the  plant  foods,  nitrogen, 
potash  and  phosphoric  acid,  which  through  manufacturing  or  mixing  pro- 
cesses have  been  rendered  suitable  to  aid  in  the  growth  and  development 
of  plants.  Under  the  Indiana  fertilizer  law  “A  commercial  fertilizer  is 
any  and  every  substance  imported,  manufactured,  prepared  or  sold  for 
fertilizing  or  manurial  purposes,  except  barnyard  manure,  marl,  lime, 
wood  ashes  and  plaster.” 

Complete  fertilizer.  A complete  fertilizer  is  one  which  supplies  all 
three  of  the  plant  foods,  nitrogen,  potash  and  phosphoric  acid,  which  are 
essential  to  crop  production  and  most  commonly  defiicient  in  cultivated 
soils. 

Incomplete  fertilizer.  An  incomplete  fertilizer  is  one  which  does  not 
supply  one  or  two  of  the  plant  foods,  nitrogen,  potash  and  phosphoric 
acid. 

High  grade  and  low  grade  fertilizers.  The  term  high  grade  fertiliser 
is  used  to  designate  fertilizers  which  have  plant  food  present  in  large 
amount  as  compared  with  those  having  it  present  in  small  amount  and 
commonly  designated  as  low  grade.  These  terms  are  also  used  to  desig- 
nate the  availability  of  the  plant  foods  in  fertilizers,  those  having  the 
plant  food  in  available  forms  being  classed  as  high  grade  and  those  having 
the  plant  food  in  unavailable  or  in  slowly  available  forms  as  low  grade. 

It  is  extremely  difficult  to  flx  a satisfactory  line  of  demarcation  be- 
tween high,  medium  and  low  grade  fertilizers  since  a high  grade  fertilizer 
for  one  crop  or  section  is  not  necessarily  a high  grade  for  some  other 
crop  or  section.  In  general  the  division  is  made  on  the  basis  of  the  total 
content  of  plant  food  or  on  the  retail  price. 

The  majority  of  authorities  consider  a high  grade  as  one  containing 
not  less  than  14  per  cent,  of  plant  food,  a medium  grade  as  one  containing 
not  less  than  12  per  cent,  of  plant  food  and  a low  grade  fertilizer  as  one 
containing  less  than  12  per  cent,  of  plant  food,  these  percentages  being 
based  on  ammonia,  phosphoric  acid  and  potash. 

Wet  mixed  fertilizer.  Wet  mixing  as  originally  practiced  consisted 
of  mixing  all  the  materials  used  in  the  fertilizer  including  the  potash 
salts  and  adding  sulphuric  acid  to  the  entire  mixture. 

At  the  present  time  two  methods  of  procedure  are  in  use: 

1.  The  rock  phosphate  is  first  thoroughly  mixed  with  the  sulphuric 
acid  and  the  organic  materials  containing  nitrogen  added  to  the  mixture. 

2.  The  rock  phosphate  and  materials  containing  nitrogen  are  first 
thoroughly  mixed  and  the  sulphuric  acid  added  to  the  mixture. 

Dry  mixed  fertilizer.  In  this  process  two  methods  of  procedure  are 
followed,  the  first  of  which  combines  to  some  extent  wet  and  dry  mixing. 

1.  The  rock  phosphate  is  thoroughly  mixed  with  sulphuric  acid  and 
partially  seasoned,  but  while  still  hot  and  before  all  the  free  acid  haa 
disappeared  the  nitrogenous  materials  are  added. 

2.  In  this  process  the  rock  phosphate  is  treated  with  sulphuric  acid 
and  thoroughly  seasoned  and  dried,  after  which  the  proper  amount  is 
mixed  with  the  nitrogen  and  potash  containing  materials  to  give  the 
formula  desired. 

By  the  wet  process  the  unavailable  nitrogen  as  well  as  other  plant 
food  in  many  materials  is  rendered  more  available. 

While  agents  use  the  method  of  mixing  as  a selling  point,  if  the  basic 
materials  are  in  proper  condition  there  is  no  reason  why  satisfactory  mix- 
tures should  not  be  obtained  by  either  process  and  a per  cent,  of  available 
plant  food  is  just  as  valuable  for  plant  production  from  one  process  as  the 


10 


other  although  hy  the  dry  method,  No.  2,  it  follows  that  original  materials 
having  their  plant  food  content  in  available  form  will  be  required. 

Fillers  and  dryers.  A filler  is  any  material  which  does  not  contain 
nitrogen,  potash  or  phosphoric  acid  in  appreciable  quantities  added  to 
high  grade  fertilizer  primarily  to  reduce  the  percentage  of  fertilizing 
ingredients  and  secondarily  to  improve  its  mechanical  condition.  The 
term  filler  is  never  properly  applied  to  any  material  containing  sufficient 
of  any  or  all  of  the  plant  foods,  nitrogen,  potash  and  phosphoric  acid,  to 
serve  as  a source  of  determinable  amounts  of  these  in  the  completed 
products.  Dryers  may  be  either  fillers  or  low  grade  fertilizer  materials. 

Low  grade  fertilizer  materials.  The  term  low  grade  fertilizer  materials 
is  used  to  designate  two  distinct  conditions  in  the  fertilizer  trade.  First. 
To  define  a material  in  which  the  amount  of  plant  food  present  is  much 
less  than  that  contained  in  other  materials  known  as  high  grade.  Second. 
To  indicate  that  the  plant  food  present  is  of  low  availability. 

In  order  to  overcome  the  necessity  for  using  fillers,  manufacturers 
use  lower  grade  materials  in  reducing  high  grade  materials  to  a lower 
percentage  of  plant  food  and  when  so  used  they  serve  not  only  as  make 
weights  or  diluting  agents  and  driers  hut  also  as  sources  of  plant  food,  hence 
the  use  of  the  term  filler  in  connection  with  dried  peat,  muck,  rock  phos- 
phate, dried  manure,  tobacco  stems  and  similar  materials  is  incorrect. 

Per  cent.  This  term  is  used  to  indicate  the  number  of  pounds  of  the 
ingredients  in  each  one  hundred  pounds  of  the  fertilizer.  For  example,  a 
fertilizer  guaranteed  to  contain  2 per  cent,  of  nitrogen,  2 per  cent,  of 
potash  soluble  in  water  and  8 per  cent,  of  soluble  and  reverted  (available) 
phosphoric  acid  is  guaranteed  to  contain  2 pounds  of  nitrogen,  2 pounds 
of  potash  soluble  in  water  and  8 pounds  of  soluble  and  reverted  phos- 
phoric acid  in  each  100  pounds. 

Formula.  This  is  the  term  used  to  express  the  composition  of  a fer- 
tilizer. For  example,  if  we  say  the  formula  for  a certain  brand  is  1. 6-2-8 
we  mean  in  Indiana  that  the  minimum  guarantee  for  the  fertilizer  is  1.6 
per  cent,  of  nitrogen,  2 per  cent',  of  potash  soluble  in  water  and  8 per 
cent,  of  available  phosphoric  acid.  In  the  general  trade  the  nitrogen  is 
usually  expressed  in  terms  of  ammonia  and  the  phosphoric  acid  after  the 
ammonia  so  that  in  the  advertising  matter  of  fertilizer  manufacturers  the 
above  becomes  2-8-2,  i.  e.,  2 per  cent,  of  ammonia,  8 per  cent,  of  avail- 
able phosphoric  acid  and  2 per  ceiit.  of  water  soluble  potash. 

While  at  the  present  time  some  81  elements  are  known  to  exist,  only 
14  (calcium,  carbon,  chlorine,  hydrogen,  iron,  magnesium,  manganese, 
nitrogen,  oxygen,  phosphorus,  potassium,  silicon,  sodium  and  sulphur) 
seem  to  be  generally  present  in  plants  and  of  these  14  only  10  are  prob- 
ably essential  to  their  growth  and  maintenance.  Of  the  ten  which  are 
■essential  in  normal  plant  production  only  four,  nitrogen,  potassium,  phos- 
phorus and  calcium  are  liable  to  be  deficient  in  the  soil  to  such  an  extent 
as  to  impair  its  productiveness  and  only  three,  nitrogen,  potassium  and 
phosphorus,  (the  latter  two  generally  designated  in  fertilizers  as  com- 
pounds under  the  name  of  potash  and  phosphoric  acid)  are  considered  in 
the  manufacture  and  use  of  commercial  fertilizers. 

CHEMICAL  TERMS 

Nitrogen,  being  a gas  cannot  be  utilized  directly  in  the  manufacture 
of  commercial  fertilizers  and  hence  is  always  present  in  combination  with 
other  elements. 

For  the  past  two  inspections,  the  nitrogen  in  the  inspection  samples 
of  fertilizers  has  been  separated  into  different  groups  by  the  C.  H.  Jones 
alkaline  permanganate  method,  and  appears  in  Table  VI  under  the  follow- 
ing headings: 

In  nitrates  and  ammonia  salts  is  that  portion  of  the  water  soluble 
nitrogen  in  the  fertilizer  derived  from  nitrate  and  ammonium  salts  such 
as  nitrate  of  soda,  ammonium  sulphate,  etc.,  possesses  a high  degree  of 


II 


availability  and  is  in  such  form  as  to  be  readily  utilized  by  the  plant  in 
its  growth. 

Water  soluble  organic  is  that  portion  of  the  water  soluble  nitrogen 
in  the  fertilizer  derived  from  organic  materials  and  while  probably  not 
as  readily  available  for  the  use  of  the  plant  as  nitrates  and  ammonia  salts 
possesses  a high  degree  of  availability. 

Active  water  insoluble  organic  nitrogen  is  that  portion  of  the  organic 
nitrogen  present  insoluble  in  water  but  rendered  soluble  or  liberated  by 
the  alkaline  potassium  permanganate  solution  used  in  the  method.  Being 
considered  as  of  such  form  as  to  be  readily  available  for  the  use  of  the 
plant  it  is  termed  active. 

Inactive  water  insoluble  organic  nitrogen  is  that  part  of  the  organic 
nitrogen  present  insoluble  in  water  and  not  affected  by  the  permanganate 
solution  and  being  of  little  value  for  immediate  plant  growth  is  termed 
inactive. 

Total  water  soluble  and  active  is  the  nitrogen  present  in  the  fertilizer 
which  in  our  opinion  may  be  considered  as  in  such  form  as  to  be  utiliz- 
able  by  the  ordinary  crops  during  the  growing  season.  In  other  words 
it  is  all  the  nitrogen  in  the  fertilizer  except  the  inactive  water  insoluble 
organic. 

As  explained  in  previous  report,  the  total  water  soluble  and  active  col- 
umn is  not  of  general  use  but  has  been  adopted  by  this  department  in  the 
hope  that  it  may  offer  a simple  method  of  comparing  the  a,mounts  of 
utilizable  nitrogen  present  in  various  brands  inspected. 

Total  is  the  entire  amount  of  nitrogen  contained  in  a fertilizer  and  is 
the  guarantee  required  by  law. 

Results.  In  considering  the  results  reported  by  the  alkaline  method 
it  should  be  remembered  that  it  is  not  a measure  of  the  quantity  but  of 
the  quality  of  organic  nitrogen.  The  presence  of  high  grade  organic 
materials  such  as  dried  blood,  tankage,  etc.,  will  show  a relatively  higher 
percentage  in  the  “Active  insoluble  organic”  column,  while  those  deriving 
their  nitrogen  from  peat,  garbo  tankage,  leather  and  similar  materials 
will  have  the  larger  percentage  in  the  “Inactive  insoluble  organic”  column. 

The  data  at  present  available  on  fertilizer  sold  in  Indiana  do  not 
justify  general  deductions  on  the  nitrogen  determinations  but  the  detailed 
results  are  published  in  Table  VI  and  can  be  advantageously  used  by  fer- 
tilizer purchasers. 

The  principal  sources  of  the  nitrogen  used  in  the  commercial  fer- 
tilizers sold  in  Indiana  are:  packing  house  by-products  (dried  blood, 
tankage,  bone),  nitrate  of  soda,  cyanamid,  ground  tobacco  stems,  garbo 
tankage  and  ammonium  sulphate. 

Potash,  K2O,  containing  the  plant  food  potassium  is  a compound  of 
potassium  and  oxygen  in  the  proportion  by  weight  of  78  parts  of  the  for- 
mer to  16  parts  of  the  latter  and  as  used  in  this  bulletin  means  the  total 
amount  of  the  compound  present  which  is  soluble  in  boiling  distilled 
water.  Neither  potassium  or  potassium  oxide  can  be  used  directly  in 
manufacturing  fertilizers  and  hence  like  nitrogen  this  plant  food  is  always 
present  in  combination  with  other  elements. 

Prior  to  1914,  ninety-eight  to  ninety-nine  per  cent,  of  the  potash  sold 
in  Indiana  was  derived  from  German  salts,  but  at  the  present  time  the 
bulk  of  the  potash  is  being  obtained  from  the  waters  of  western  lakes, 
with  a smaller  portion  from  corn-cob  ashes  and  similar  sources.  A com- 
plete analysis  of  the  western  potash  in  general  use  in  Indiana  is  given  in 
bulletin  186  and  so  far  as  this  department  has  been  able  to  ascertain,  the 
results  per  unit  of  potash  from  this  product  should  be  equal  in  value  to 
similar  units  of  potash  from  German  salts. 

Consumers  should  carefully  save  wood  ashes,  cob  ashes,  straws, 
tobacco  waste,  garbage,  corn  stalks,  and  other  carriers  of  potash  in  order 
to  conserve  to  the  fullest  extent  this  valuable  element. 

Phosphoric  acid,  P2O6,  the  compound  recognized  by  the  law  and  in 
general  by  the  fertilizer  trade  as  containing  the  plant  food  phosphorus,  is 


12 


composed  by  weight  of  62  parts  of  the  former  to  80  parts  of  the  latter. 
This  compound  known  in  the  trade  as  phosphoric  acid  occurs  in  most  fer- 
tilizers in  combination  with  lime  but  in  some  cases  is  combined  with  iron 
and  alumina. 

Available  phosphoric  acid  is  the  amount  of  phosphoric  acid  present 
in  the  fertilizer  readily  available  for  the  use  of  the  plant  and  consists  of 
two  forms:  Soluble,  which  dissolves  in  cold  water  and  reverted,  which 
while  insoluble  in  cold  water  is  soluble  in  the  soil  solvents  and  is  deter- 
mined by  digesting  2 grams  of  the  fertilizer,  from  which  the  water  soluble 
phosphoric  acid  has  been  removed,  with  100  c.  c.  of  neutral  ammonium 
citrate  solution,  specific  gravity  1.09,  for  30  minutes  at  65°  C.  The  soluble 
phosphoric  acid  is  combined  with  lime  to  form  acid  calcium  phosphate,  CaH4 
(P04)2  and  the  reverted  is  in  combination  with  lime  as  dicalcium  phos- 
phate (Ca2H2)  (P04)2. 

The  principal  sources  of  available  phosphoric  acid  in  the  fertilizers 
sold  in  Indiana  are:  Acidulated  rock  phosphate  (acid  phosphate);  pack- 
ing house  by-products,  acidulated  and  non-acidulated;  spent  bone  black 
from  sugar  refineries,  etc.,  precipitated  bone  from  glue  factories  and  basic 
slag  which  is  sold  in  limited  quantities. 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  is  the  amount  of  phosphoric  acid  in  the  fer- 
tilizer not  soluble  in  water  or  ammonium  citrate  solution.  This  form  of 
phosphoric  acid  which  exists  in  combination  with  lime  to  form  tri-calcium 
phosphate,  Ca3(P04)2,  is  not  readily  available  for  the  use  of  plants  in  their 
growth.  The  phosphoric  acid  in  the  unacidulated  rock  phosphates  utilized 
for  fertilizers  and  also  the  insoluble  in  acidulated  rock  phosphates  used  in 
this  state  is  tri-calcium  phosphate.  Distinction  should  be  made,  however, 
in  the  case  of  insoluble  phosphoric  acid  from  rock  phosphate  and  from 
animal  products,  such  as  bone,  tankage  and  other  slaughter  house  waste 
since  the  phosphoric  acid  in  the  latter  becomes  available  much  quicker 
on  account  of  rapid  decomposition  of  the  organic  matter,  the  rate  of 
which  depends  to  a large  extent  on  the  fineness  of  the  material. 

Total  phosphoric  acid  is  the  sum  of  the  soluble,  reverted  and  insoluble, 
i.  e.,  all  the  phosphoric  acid  in  the  fertilizer. 

GUARANTEES 

By  the  term  guarantee  is  meant  the  minimum  amount  of  plant  food 
which  the  person  or  firm  responsible  for  the  sale  of  fertilizer  certifies  it 
to  contain. 

While  under  the  Indiana  law  the  guarantee  must  be  made  in  terms  of 
nitrogen  (N),  potash  (K2O)  and  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5),  other  states  have 
different  requirements  and  in  many  the  guarantee  for  the  nitrogenous 
ingredient  is  required  in  terms  of  ammonia  (NHs)  a compound  of  nitro- 
gen and  hydrogen  in  the  proportion  of  14  parts  by  weight  of  the  former 
to  3 parts  by  weight  of  the  latter.  To  convert  ammonia  into  nitrogen 
multiply  the  percentage  of  the  former  by  0.822  and  to  convert  nitrogen 
into  ammonia  multiply  the  per  cent,  of  nitrogen  by  1.22. 

In  the  case  of  potash,  the  requirements  in  some  states  call  for  the 
guarantee  to  be  made  in  terms  of  the  plant  food  element,  potassium.  To 
convert  potassium  into  percentage  of  potash  (K2O)  multiply  the  per- 
centage of  the  former  by  1.21  and  to  express  potash  (K2O)  in  terms  of 
potassium  multiply  the  percentage  of  potash  by  0.83. 

In  a similar  manner  some  states  require  that  the  percentage  of  phos- 
phorus and  not  phosphoric  acid  be  guaranteed.  To  express  percentage  of 
phosphorus  in  terms  of  phosphoric  acid  multiply  the  percentage  of  the 
former  by  2.29  and  to  convert  phosphoric  acid  into  phosphorus  multiply 
the  per  cent,  of  phosphoric  acid  by  0.436. 

Calculation  of  formulas.  While  to  many  the  calculation  of  fertilizer 
formulas  is  mysterious  in  reality  it  is  a very  simple  matter  and  resolves 
Itself  into  ascertaining  the  number  of  pounds  of  plant  food  desired  in  a 
ton  or  any  given  quantity  of  fertilizer  by  multiplying  the  amount  to  be 
prepared  by  the  percentage  of  plant  food  desired  in  the  finished  product 


13 


and  dividing  this  result  by  the  guaranteed  percentage  of  the  plant  food 
in  the  raw  material  from  which  it  is  to  be  obtained.  For  example,  if  we 
wish  to  manufacture  one  ton  of  1.6-2-8  fertilizer  from  dried  blood  con- 
taning  14  per  cent,  of  nitrogen,  western  potash  containing  22  per  cent, 
of  water  soluble  potash  and  acid  phosphate  containing  14  per  cent,  of 
available  phosphoric  acid  we  proceed  as  follows: 

2000  lbs.  (in  ton)  X .016  = 32  lbs.  nitrogen 

32  lbs.  ^ .14  = 228.5  No.  of  lbs.  of  dried  blood  required 
2000  lbs.  (in  ton)  X .02  = 40  lbs.  of  potash 

40  lbs.  .22  = 181.9  No.  of  lbs.  of  western  potash  required 
2000  lbs.  (in  ton)  X .08  = 160  lbs.  of  available  phosphoric  acid 

160  lbs.  .14  = 1142.9  No.  of  lbs.  of  acid  phosphate  required 
Filler  or  dryer  required  to  make  up  to  ton,  lbs.  required  446.7 
Total,  2000  lbs. 

If  the  use  of  filler  is  not  desired  the  more  concentrated  material  can 
be  used  in  smaller  amount  per  acre. 

If  200  pounds  per  acre  of  1. 6-2-8  are  required  the  equivalent  amount 
of  the  mixture  without  filler  to  be  used  can  be  ascertained  by  the  follow- 
ing simple  proportion. 

2000  lbs.  : 1454.7  lbs  : : 200  lbs.  : X = 155.3  number  of  poqnds  of  the 
concentrated  mixture  required  per  acre. 

ACTION  OF  PLANT  FOODS 

In  considering  the  part  played  by  the  plant  foods,  nitrogen,  phos- 
phoric acid  and  potash  in  the  growth  of  the  plant  it  must  be  kept  in  mind 
that  the  effect  of  any  element  is  largely  dependent  on  the  other  elements 
necessary  to  plant  growth  being  present  in  normal  amounts,  that  all  the 
elements  working  together  are  essential  to  maximum  crop  production 
and  that  even  when  these  are  present  the  results  obtained  by  their  use 
are  often  very  materially  affected  by  cultural  and  climatic  conditions. 

It  is  generally  conceded  however  that: 

Nitrogen  exerts  its  greatest  influence  on  the  amount  of  foliage,  the 
flowering  process,  maturing,  color,  growth,  quality  and  disease  resisting 
power  of  the  plant. 

If  insufficient  available  nitrogen  is  present  there  will  be  a lack  of 
foliage,  stalks  or  stems  will  be  short,  leaves  or  blades  small,  color  yellow- 
ish, weight  of  foliage,  straw  and  grain  or  fruit  less  than  when  required 
amount  of  nitrogen  is  available. 

If  excessive  amounts  of  nitrogen  are  used  the  growth  of  foliage  will 
be  out  of  proportion  to  the  grain  or  fruit,  the  growth,  development,  and 
maturity  of  the  crop  retarded,  a tendency  to  softness  of  the  tissues  and 
apparently  less  power  to  resist  attacks  of  fungous  diseases. 

Potash  is  apparently  essential  to  the  formation  and  transference  of 
starch  and  other  carbohydrates,  has  an  important  part  in  the  develop- 
ment of  leaves  and  woody  parts  of  stems,  stiffens  the  stem,  stalk  and 
straw,  assists  in  the  development  of  the  fieshy  parts  of  fruits  and  makes 
the  plants  more  resistant  to  the  attacks  of  fungous  diseases. 

Lack  of  potash  results  in  weak  plants  while  excessive  amounts  delay 
the  maturing  of  the  crop. 

Phosphoric  acid  in  available  form  favors  rapid  development  of  the 
young  plant,  hastens  maturity,  increases  the  proportion  of  grain  to  straw, 
assists  in  developing  the  grain  and  is  necessary  to  the  development  of 
protoplasm  without  which  there  could  be  no  plant  growth. 

SPECIAL  SUBJECTS 

Nu-Life  Fertilizer.  A complete  analysis  of  inspection  samples  of  this 
fertilizer,  which  was  registered  by  the  Mineral  Fertilizer  Co.  in  Septem- 
ber, 1915,  was  published  in  the  1916  report  in  comparison  with  complete 
analysis  of  high  grade  basic  slags.  Additional  investigation  of  samples 


14 


of  Nu-Life  Fertilizer  secured  in  1916  justifies  this  department  in  stating 
that  this  material  is  not  a high  grade  basic  slag  but  a mixture  of  low 
grade  slag  and  untreated  rock  phosphate. 

The  much  higher  soluhility  in  2 per  cent,  citric  acid  and  neutral  ammonium 
of  basic  slag  of  both  European  and  American  manufacture  over  the  Nu-Life 
Fertilizer  and  low  grade  open  hearth  slag  is  shown  by  the  following  table 
and  justifies  this  department  in  assigning  -the  same  comparative  value, 
25  cts.  per  unit  to  Nu-Life  Fertilizer  as  to  untreated  rock  phosphate. 


Fertilizer 

Inspec- 

tion 

No. 

Total 

phosphoric 

acid 

per  cent. 

Phosphoric 
acid 
soluble 
in  2% 
citric  acid 
per  cent. 

Phosphoric 
acid  sol- 
uble in 
ammonium 
citrate 
per  cent. 

Guaran- 

teed 

compara- 
tive value 
per  ton 
$ 

Found 
compara- 
tive value 
per  ton 
$ 

Nu  Life  Fertilizer 

BB  5427 

15.2 

1.6 

0.8 

3.75 

3.80 

Nu  Life  Fertilizer 

BB  5621 

18.4 

2.2 

0.7 

3.75 

4.60 

Nu  Life  Fertilizer 

BB  5874 

16.8 

1.8 

0.7 

3.75 

4.20 

Nu  Life  Fertilizer 

BB  5955 

13.5 

1.1 

1.0 

3.75 

3.38 

Average  

16.0 

1.7 

0.8 

3.75 

3.97 

European  Basic  Slag. 

”4893” 

18.5 

14.3 

11.1 



14.80 

European  Basic  Slag. 

4897 

18.3 

15.5 

10.6 



14.64 

European  Basic  Slag_ 

4895 

18.5 

14.4 

10.9 



14.80 

American  Basic  Slag__ 

4894 

15.9 

12.8 

10.6 



12.72 

American  Basic  Slag.^ 
Open  Hearth  Slag 

4896 

17.3 

12.8 

10.9 

— 

13.84  * 

low  grade  

4898 

6.1 

0.9 

0.5 

— 

4.88 

FERTILIZER  MAP 

The  fertilizer  map  on  page  15  now  contains  1162  towns  where  ferti- 
lizer is  known  to  be 'on  sale  as  compared  with  544  towns  in  1905. 


Towns  Added  to  Map  in  1916 


County 

No.“  of 
town  on 
map 

Name  of  town 

County 

No.  of 
town  on 
map 

Name  of  town 

Blackford 

3 

Millgrove 

Madison  

9 

Frankton 

Carroll  _ _ _ 

10 

Ockley 

Marshall  

9 

Twin  Lake 

Clinton  

14 

Moran 

Miami  

9 

Menzie  Switch 

Dearborn 

21 

W.  Harrison 

Parke 

10 

Rosedale 

Elkhart 

8 

Bristol 

Posey  

10 

Welborn 

Fountain 

10 

Rob  Roy 

Starke  

7 

Bass  Lake  Junct’n 

Grant  

11 

Radley 

Tipton  

7 

Elkin 

Hendricks 

18 

Montclair 

Vigo 

5 

Black  Hawk 

Jasper  

19 

Dunns 

6 

Riley 

Foscinslrn 

11 

Burket 

Wabash  

9 

Urbana 

12 

Claypool 

10 

Rich  Valley 

15 


FERTILIZER  MAP 


i6 


ESTIMATED  SALES  IN  1916  COMPARED  WITH  THOSE  OF 
1907  AND  1915 

Based  upon  report  of  sales  received  from  a large  majority  of  manu- 
facturers, reports  from  inspectors,  tag  orders  and  similar  sources  of  infor- 
mation it  is  estimated  that  132,624  tons  of  fertilizer  with  a total  retail  value 
of  $3,243,816.53  were  sold  in  the  state  in  1916.  Compared  with  the  sales  for 
1915  this  shows  a decrease  of  23,560  tons  and  in  expenditures  of  $363,0,73.91 
while  a decrease  of  86,515  tons  and  $1,702,062.62  in  expenditures  is  shown 
when  compared  with  the  1914  sales,  the  year  the  European  war  began. 
Compared  with  sales  of  1907,  ten  years  previous,  a gain  of  31,833  tons 
equivalent  to  30%  with  $663,605.61  increase  in  expenditures  is  shown. 

The  reasons  for  the  decrease  in  sales  are  discussed  in  previous  re- 
port and  may  be  summarized  briefly  as;  effect  of  the  war,  shortage  in 
yields  especially  of  wheat,  unfavorable  weather  conditions,  shortage  of 
potash  and  increase  in  prices. 

The  variations  in  formulas,  prices  and  total  values  are  set  out  in  detail 
in  the  following  table: 


Comparison  Sales  and  Formulas  1907-1915-1916 


Class  of  Fertilizer 

Estimated  sales  tons 

Average 
retail  price 
per  ton  $ 

1907 

1915 

1916 

1915 

1916 

1. 

Acid  phosphate,  20%  available  phosphoric  acid... 

85 

3 

18.50 

20.00 

2. 

Acid  phosphate,  18%  available  phosphoric  acid... 



1538 

2379 

18.00 

23.46 

3. 

Acid  phosphate,  16-18%  available  phosphoric  acid 

37 

5337 

17775 

16.16 

20.30 

4. 

Acid  phosphate,  14-16%  available  phosphoric  acid 

6001 

7823 

6160 

15.65 

19.74 

5. 

Acid  phosphate,  less  than  14%  available  phos- 

phnric  acid 

996 

584 

. 209 

18.00 

6. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash  (KsO)  below  1% 

151 

33 

23.25 

25. oof 

7. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash  (K2O)  1-2.5% 

4978 

12696 

1523 

19.07 

24.56 

8. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash  (K2O)  2.5-5% ... 

2985 

752 

478 

22.27 

31.81 

9. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash  (K2O)  5-7.5% 

1616 

559 

24.00 

29.80 

10. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash  (K2O)  7.5-10% 

765 

322 







11. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash  (K2O)  10-12.5% 

280 

2 

32.25 

14. 

Acid  phosphate  and  untreated  rock  phosphate 

250 

22.00 

15. 

Ammoniated  acid  phosphate 

”1603 

3767 

32578 

23.08 

23.30 

16. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen  below  0.5% ^^...  _ 

7873 

22589 

15416 

23.97 

25.77 

17. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen  0.5%  to  1% 

28067 

50833 

8815 

23.11 

25.27 

18. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen  1 to  1.6% 

13623 

8710 

22913 

25  .-08 

26.64 

19. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen  1.6  to  2.5% 

17526 

28446 

11404 

26.05 

30.20 

20. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen  2.5  to  4% 

1300 

925 

150 

27.21 

29.81 

21. 

ririTnplptP  fcrtili^cr^  nitrogen  4-f% 

69 

1 

65.00 

120.00 

23. 

Pernyian  gnano 

32 

15 

80.00 

165.00 

24. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O)  below  1%* 

274 

470 

7691 

25.00 

25.26 

25. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O)  1-2.5%* 

47304 

68125 

48020 

23.58 

26.48 

26. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O)  2.5-5%*  

13076 

41699 

2986 

24.79 

33.26 

27. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O)  5-7.5%*  

4381 

1191 

1 

33.30 



28. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O)  7.5-10%*  

2122 

18 

It 

30.00 

29. 

riompletft  fertili7er  ITCoOl  in-19  .5%* 

1301 

48.50 

31 ! 

Raw  bone 

6642 

3342 

3669 

31.24 

31.98 

32. 

Steamed  bone 

3165 

348 

2404 

29.69 

30.71 

33. 

Ammoniated  bone  . 

124 

475 

29.67 

30.00 

34. 

Precipitated  bone  . . 

3 

35. 

Acidulated  bone  ..  

32^50 

34T0O 

37. 

Bone  and  potash  

”1927 

’”329 

27.90 

27.25 

39. 

Tankage  

603 

607 

28.21 

25.00 

40. 

Tankage  and  p<^tasb  - 

173 

104 

24.50 

27.33 

41. 

Basic  slag  . 

2 

63 

18.00 

23.25 

42. 

Rock  phosphate  : — 

145 

3287 

3272 

7.53 

7.78 

43. 

Rock  phosphate  and  low  grade  slag  (Nu-Life 

Pertilizer)  

305 

28.65 

45. 

Nitrate  of  soda 

32 

13 

159 

54.08 

82.50 

46. 

Dried  blood  

4 





47. 

nf  . . 

415 

614 

86.12 

48! 

Sulphate  of  potash 

139 



— 

49. 

]V[f|TmT'0  {Sfilfic 

33 

50. 

Painit  . 

876 

■40.00 

51. 

^Poliacco  stems;  

5 

144 

43.00 

52. 

33 

.53. 

Dried  manure  

743 

855 

24.27 

-34.43 

55. 

GS/fbO  t3;Ilk9g^6  

66 

16.15 

56! 

Muck  

.33 

37.00 

Totals  

100,791 

156,184 

132,624 

— 

*Not  included  in  addition  for  totals  fReported  .05  tons  JEstimated 


17 


Comparisons  of  the  spring  and  fall  sales  both  as  regards  formulas  and 
retail  values  are  shown  in  the  following; 


Class  of  fertilizer 

Estimated  sales,  tons 

Average  retail  value,  $ 

Spring 

Fall 

Total 

Spring 

Fall 

Total 

1. 

Acid  phosphate,  20%  avail- 

able  phosphoric  acid 



3 

3 

60.00 

60.00 

2. 

Acid  phosphate,  18%  avail- 

able  phosphoric  acid 

755 

1624 

2379 

18,120.00 

37,481.92 

55,601.92 

3. 

Acid  phosphate,  16-18% 

available  phosphoric  acid 

6573 

11202 

17775 

129,619.66 

230,761.20 

360,380.86 

4. 

Acid  phosphate,  14-16% 

available  phosphoric  acid 

2879 

3281 

6160 

57,637.58 

61,223.46 

118,861.04 

5. 

Acid  phosphate  less  than 

14%  available  phosphoric 

acid  

122 

87 

209 

2,196.00 

1,566.00 

3,762.00 

6. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash 

(K2O)  below  1%  

33 

33 

825.00 

825.00 

7. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash 

(K2O)  1-2.5%  

402 

1121 

1523 

4,961.56 

25,603.64 

35,565.20 

8. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash 

(K2O)  2.5-5%  

478 

478 

15,205.18 

15,205.18 

14. 

Acid  phosphate  and  un- 

treated  rock  phosphate___ 

20 

230 

250* 

440.00 

5,060,00 

5,500.00 

15. 

Ammoniated  acid  phos- 

phate  

15956 

16622 

32578 

367,626.24 

399,592.88 

767,219.12 

16. 

Comnlete  fertilizer,  nitrogen 

below  0.5%  

5210 

10206 

15416 

136,137.30 

258,620.04 

394,757.34 

17. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen 

0.5%  to  1%  

4146 

4669 

8815 

111,071.34 

110,608.61 

221,679.95 

18. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen 

1 to  1.6%  

9382 

13531 

22913 

302,475.68 

297,140.76 

599,616.44 

19. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen 

1.6  to  2.5% 

4665 

6739 

11404 

145,268.10 

194,689.71 

339,957.81 

20. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen 

2.5  to  4%  

73 

77 

150 

2,199.49 

2,271.50 

4,470.99 

21. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen 

4-|-%  

1 

1 

120.00 

120.00 

23. 

Peruvian  guano  

10 

5 

15 

1,650.00 

825.00 

2,475.00 

24. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O) 

below  1%*  

2477 

5214 

7691 

65,516.65 

124,093.20 

189,609.85 

25. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O) 

1-2.5%*  

18535 

29485 

48020 

503,595.95 

743,022.00 

1,246,617.95 

26. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O) 

2.5-5%*  

2162 

824 

2986 

71,324.38 

27,918.24 

99,242.60 

27. 

Comnlete  fertilizer  (K2O) 

f;-7  f^%* 

1 

1 

30.30 

30.30 

28. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O) 

7 .6-1  n%* 

1 

1 

30.00 

30.00 

29. 

Complete  fertilizer  (K2O) 

10-12.5%*  













31. 

Raw  bone  

848 

2821 

3664 

28,408.00 

89,679.59 

118,087.59 

32. 

Steamed  bone 

302 

2102 

2404 

8,558.68 

62.576.54 

71,135.22 

33. 

Ammoniated  bone : __ 

204 

271 

475 

6,052.68 

8,219.43 

14,272.11 

35. 

Acidulated  bone  

37. 

Bone  and  potash 

’""'37 

”'292 

329 

999T00 

"i’oi^ris 

”9'oiir48 

39. 

Tankage  

269 

338 

607 

8,917.35 

10,140.00 

19,057.35 

40. 

Tankage  and  potash  

100 

4 

104 

2,733.00 

109.32 

2,842.32 

41. 

Basic  slag  

59 

4 

63 

1,268.50 

100.00 

1,368.50 

42. 

Rock  phosphate  

1576 

1696 

3272 

8,006.08 

12,075.52 

20,081.60 

43. 

Rock  phosphate  'and  low 

grade  slag  (Nu-Life 

Eertilizer)  . . 

305 

305 

8,738.25 

8,738.25 

45. 

Nitrate  of  soda 

59 

100 

159 

4,857.50 

8,250.00 

13,107.50 

46. 

Dried  blood 

1 

3 

4 

70.00 

210.00 

280.001 

51. 

Tobacco  stems  

111 

33 

144 

4,440.00 

1,468.50 

5,908.50 

52. 

Mannrfl  ash 

33 

33 

53. 

Dried  manure  

772 

83 

855 

’22^68i’36 

”8,300.00 

30,981.36 

55. 

flarhn  tankage 

66 

66 

1,065.90 

1,065.90 

56. 

Mnek  nr  peat 

33 

33 

1,221.00 

1,221.00 

Totals 

55,380 

77,244 

132,624 

1,406,404.43 

1,836,812.10 

3,243,816.53 

*Not  included  in  addition  for  totals 


Estimated' 


Compared  with  the  results  of  1915  of  34  classes  available  for  com- 
parison 20  show  increased  sales  varying  from  one  ton  for  tankage  to 
28,811  tons  for  ammoniated  acid  phosphate  while  14  classes  show  a de- 
crease from  15  tons  for  rock  phosphate  to  42,018  tons  for  complete  ferti- 
lizer containing  less  than  0.5  per  cent,  of  nitrogen. 


i8 


In  the  matter  of  prices  25  of  27  classes  show  an  increase  varying  from 
25  cents  for  rock  phosphate  to  $85  per  ton  for  Peruvian  Guano  while  two, 
lime  and  potash  and  tankage,  show  decreases  respectively  of  65  cents  and 
$3.21  per  ton. 

The  sale  of  brands  containing  in  excess  of  5 per  cent,  of  potash  was 
practically  eliminated.  Indications  at  present  are  that  more  potash  will 
be  available  for  the  1917  trade  and  that  a number  of  manufacturers  will 
offer  5 per  cent,  potash  formulas. 

To  illustrate  the  variation  in  prices  which  has  prevailed  since  the  war 
began  the  following  summary  of  average  spring  and  fall  prices  for  classes* 
available  is  published. 


Class 

No.* 

Average 
retail  price  $ 

Class 

No. 

Average 
retail  price  $ 

Class 

No. 

Average 
retail  price  $ 

Spring 

Fall 

Spring 

Pall 

Spring 

Fall 

1 

20.00 

18 

32.24 

21.96 

37 

27.00 

27.44 

2 

24.00 

23.08 

19 

31.14 

28.89 

39 

33.15 

30.00 

3 

19.72 

20.60 

20 

30.13 

29.50  i 

40 

27.33 

4 

20.02 

18.66 



120.00  ; 

41 

21.50 

25.00 

5 

18.00 

23 

165.00 

42 

5.08 

7.12 

7 

24.78 

22.84 

24 

26.45 

23.80 

43 

28.65 

8 

31.50 

32.33 

25 

27.17 

25.20  ' 

‘ 45 

82.50 

9 

29.80 



26 

32.99 

33.76 

1 51 

40.00 

44.50 

14 

22.00 

31 

33.50 

31.79 

1 53 

29.38 

100.00 

15 

23.04 

24.04 

32 

28.34 

29.77 

I 55 

16.15 

16 

26.13 

25.34 

33 

29.67 

30.33 

^ 56 

37.00 

17 

26.79 

23.69 

34 

— 

34.00  1 

I 

PURCHASING  FERTILIZER 

The 'necessity  for  conservation  in  all  practical  affairs  at  the  present 
time  leads  us  again  to  emphasize  the  important  fact  we  have  been  en- 
deavoring to  impress  upon  purchasers  of  fertilizer  for  many  years, 
namely,  that  low  price  per  ton  does  not  necessarily  and  in  fact  rarely  ever 
means  low  price  per  unit  of  plant  food.  Economy  and  profitable  results  in 
the  purchase  and  use  of  fertilizer  demand  that  the  purchaser:  First. 
Decide  upon  the  plant  food  or  foods  required  by  the  soil  and  crop  and 
purchase  such  plant  food  or  foods  and  no  other.  Second.  That  he  decide 
upon  the  form  in  which  such  plant  food  or  foods  should  be  used.  Third. 
That  he  purchase  the  plant  food  or  foods  in  the  form  desired  at  the  lowest 
price  per  unit  of  plant  food  and  not  on  the  basis  of  cost  per  ton. 

As  a practical  illustration  of  the  truth  and  importance  of  the  preced- 
ing the  following  facts  regarding  the  cost  per  unit  of  plant  food  and  per 
ton  of  fertilizer  secured  from  the  samples  of  different  grades  of  acid 
phosphate  secured  in  1916  are  submitted. 


Kind  of  fertilizer 

1 

No.  of  samples 
analyzed 

Average  per  cent,  of 
available  phosphoric  i 
acid  guaranteed 

Average  per  cent,  of 
available  phosphoric 
acid  found 

1 [ 

Retail  price  i 

per  ton  $ ; 

Average  price  per 
unit  of  available 
phosphoric  acid  $ ! 

Average  price  per  lb. 
of  available  phos- 
phoric acid  $ 

1.  Acid  phosphate  not  less  than  20% 

available  phosphoric  acid  

1 

20 

22.9 

20.00 

0.87 

0.043 

2.  Acid  phosphate  18  to  20%  available 

phosphoric  acid  

12 

18 

18.8 

23.46 

1.25 

0.063 

3.  Acid  phosphate  16  to  18%  available 

phosphoric  acid  _ 

118 

16 

16.8 

20.30 

1.21 

0.060 

4.  Acid  phosphate  14  to  16%  available 

phosphoric  acid 

70 

14 

14.9 

19.74 

1.32 

0.066 

5.  Acid  phosphate  less  than  14%  available 
phosphoric  acid  

2 

11 

12.0 

18.00 

1.50 

0.075 

•For  materials  included  under  classes  No.  5,  see  preceding  tables 


19 


If  the  preceding  results  he  calculated  to  price  per  ton  on  the  basis 
of  percentage  of  available  phosphoric  acid  and  price  per  unit  found  the 
20%  in  terms  of  18%  becomes  $28.63;  in  terms  of  16%,  $27.71;  in  terms  of 
14%,  $30.23,  and  in  terms  of  less  than  14%,  $34.35. 

The  18%  in  terms  of  16%  becomes  $22.75;  in  terms  of  14%,  $24.81; 
in  terms  of  less  than  14%,  $28.20,  while  the  16%  in  terms  of  14%  becomes 
$22.18;  in  terms  of  less  than  14%,  $25.20,  and  the  14%  in  terms  of  less 
than  14%,  $21.35. 

To  express  this  in  another  manner  on  the  basis  of  the  plant  food  and 
price  per  unit  those  who  purchased  16%  or  over  acid  phosphate  made  a 
saving  of  $1.88  per  ton  over  the  purchaser  of  14%  and  $4.90  per  ton  over 
the  purchasers  of  less  than  14%.  Purchasers  of  14%  made  a saving  of 
$1.61  per  ton  over  the  purchasers  of  less  than  14%. 

The  acid  phosphate  results  are  used  because  they  furnished  the 
facts  in  such  a manner  as  to  be  easily  understood  but  the  same  general 
rule  holds  good  with  all  classes  of  fertilizers;  i.  e.,  the  higher  grade  the 
fertilizer  the  lower  cost  per  unit  or  pound  of  plant  food  though  the  higher 
the  cost  per  ton  of  fertilizer.  In  other  words  almost  invariably  the  plant 
food  or  foods  desired  can  be  obtained  at  less  cost  per  unit  and  from  better 
sources  in  high  grade  than  low  grade  fertilizers. 

Attention  is  requested  to  remarks  on  equivalent  values  page  4. 

MATERIALS  FOR  HOME  MIXING 

In  Table  VIII,  will  be  found  a list  of  manufacturers  who  have  cer- 
tified materials  for  sale  for  use  in  home  mixing.  In  this  table  are  in- 
cluded: nitrate  of  soda,  dried  blood,  tankage,  basic  slag,  dried  manure 
and  tobacco  dust.  No  materials  containing  appreciable  amounts  of  potash 
suitable  for  use  in  home  mixing  are  certified  as  on  sale  for  1917  except 
tobacco  dust. 

All  fertilizer  materials  purchased  for  home  mixing  must  be  registered 
and  labeled  the  same  as  other  fertilizers  and  the  mixing  must  be  done 
at  home.  The  manufacturer,  agent,  dealer  or  any  other  person  cannot 
sell  the  raw  materials  and  mix  them  to  order  and  deliver  the  mixture 
to  the  consumers  neither  can  he  sell  raw  materials  to  a number  of  persons 
and  mix  the  entire  amount  for  pay  and  deliver  portions  of  the  mixture  to 
different  persons.  In  all  such  cases  the  mixtures  must  be  properly  regis- 
tered and  State  Chemist’s  labels  furnished  giving  the  guarantee  of  the 
mixture  and  not  of  the  raw  materials.  In  every  case  the  raw  materials  and 
not  a mixture  of  them  must  he  delivered  to  the  purchaser. 

COMPARISON  OF  STANDING  OF  MANUFACTURERS 

Those  desiring  to  compare  the  relative  inspection  standing  of  the 
various  manufacturers  are  respectfully  referred  to  Tables  II,  III,  4V,  and 
VI.  The  first  three  summarize  the  results  of  the  inspection  and  should 
always  be  considered  in  conjunction  with  Table  VI  which  contains  the 
details  from,  which  the  summaries  are  compiled. 

Purchase  from  companies  who  maintain  their  guarantees! 

REPORT  OF  INSPECTION  MADE  IN  1916 

In  the  work  of  inspection  each  county  in  the  state  was  visited  by  the 
inspectors  and  in  the  case  of  counties  having  large  sales  a number  of 
visits  was  made.  Fourteen  hundred  and  ten  samples  were  secured  in  91 
of  the  92  counties,  it  having  been  impossible  through  a number  of  visits 
to  secure  samples  in  Vermilion. 

In  the  spring  774  samples  representing  446  brands  of  79  manufac- 
turers, were  secured  in  243  towns  in  87  counties  of  380  towns  in  92  counties 
visited.  In  the  fall  636  samples  representing  416  brands  of  69  manufac- 
turers were  secured  in  199  towns  in  80  counties  of  285  towns  in  83  coun- 
ties inspected. 


20 


In  securing  these  samples  the  inspectors  traveled  20,361  miles  by  rail, 
3441  miles  by  automobile,  610  miles  by  livery,  and  visited  1764  dealers 
and  435  consumers. 

Owing  to  the  necessity  for  drawing  more  than  one  sample  from  large 
shipments  of  more  than  car  load  lots  it  was  necessary  to  composite  a 
number  of  samples  so  that  of  the  1410  samples  secured  1367  were  analyzed 
and  appear  in  this  bulletin.  Reports  were  made  on  all  samples  to  dealers 
and  consumers  but  where  two  or  more  were  composited  only  the  results 
on  the  composite  are  reported. 

The  1367  analyzed  and  reported  in  this  bulletin  were  divided  as 
follows: 


Kind  of  fertilizer 

Spring 

Fall 

Total 

1. 

Acid  phosphate,  20%  available  phosphoric  acid  

1 

1 

2. 

Acid  phosphate,  18-20%  available  phosphoric  acid 

5 

7 

12 

8. 

Acid  phosphate,  16-18%  available  phosphoric  acid 

63 

55 

118 

4. 

Acid  phosphate,  14-16%  available  phosphoric  acid 

41 

29 

70 

5. 

Acid  phosphate,  less  than  14%  available  phosphoric  acid 

2 



2 

7. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash,  K;;0,  1-2.5%  

6 

15 

21 

8. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash,  K2O,  2.5-5%  

5 

3 

8 

9. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash,  K2O,  5-7.5% — _ 

2 



2 

14. 

Acid  phosphate  and  untreated  rock  phosphate _ 

2 



2 

15. 

Ammoniated  acid  phosphate „ 

151 

ioi 

252 

16. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  beloAV  0.5% 

99 

80 

179 

17. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  0.5-1% 

177 

' 156 

333 

18. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  1-1.6% 

26 

31 

57 

19. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  1.6-2. 5% 

66 

48 

114 

20. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  2.5-4% 

2 

3 

5 

21. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  4-f% 



1 

1 

23. 

Pprnvian  gnann 

2 

2 

24. 

Complete  fertilizer,  potash  below  1%*'_  

60 

”47 

107 

25. 

Complete  fertilizer,  potash  1-25%* 

271 

250 

521 

26. 

Complete  fertilizer,  potash  2.5-5%*  

39 

22 

61 

31. 

Raw  bone  

6 

47 

53 

32. 

Steamed  bone 

16 

25 

41 

33. 

Ammoniated  bone  

3 

3 

6 

35. 

Apifinlatpfi  bone  _ . . . 

1 

1 

37. 

Bone  and  potash  

‘”3 

4 

7 

39. 

n''ankage  _ 

13 

7 

20 

40. 

Tankage  and  potash 

3 

____ 

3 

41, 

Basic  slag  

1 

2 

42. 

PopV  phnsphalP 

21 

6 

27 

43. 

Rock  phosphate  and  low  grade  slag  ___ 

4 

4 

45. 

Nitrate  of  soda  

2 

2 

51. 

Tpiba^'P*^  pipmt; 

2 

'i 

3 

53. 

Pric’d  rnaTinrp  ...  

13 

1 

14 

55. 

rjarhn  tankage  _ 

4 

4 

56. 

Peat  _ 

1 

1 

Total  

741 

626 

1367 

*Not  included  in  totals 


Manufacturers’  guarantees,  names  and  addresses  of  persons  from 
whom  obtained,  and  detailed  results  of  the  analyses  of  the  samples  above 
summarized  will  be  found  in  Table  VI  which  shows  the  manufacturers’ 
promises  and  how  they  were  kept. 


21 


SUMMARY  OF  INSPECTIONS  FOR  THE  PAST  SEVENTEEN  YEARS 


YEAR 

No.  of  samples 
analyzed 

No.  equal  to 
guarantee  in  every 
particular 

No.  equal  in  value 
to  guarantee 

No.  within  10%  of 
value  of  guarantee 

Total  No.  equal  and 
within  10%  of  value 
of  guarantee 

No.  not  within  10% 

of  value  of 

guarantee  ! 

No.  w’ith  one  or  more 

ingredient  20%  below  i 

guarantee 

No.  with  one  or  more 

ingredient  30%  below 

guarantee 

No.  with  one  or  more 

ingredient  50%  below 

guarantee 

1900 

468 

76 

206 

99 

305 

163 

214 

* 

* 

1901 

592 

281 

469 

85 

554 

38 

103 

* 

* 

1902 

679 

335 

564 

93 

657 

22 

112 

* 

* 

1903 

674 

286 

492 

139 

631 

43 

138 

* 

* 

1904 

643 

248 

451 

148 

599 

44 

122 

65 

21 

1905 

734 

312 

528 

158 

686 

48 

148 

77 

21 

1906 

879 

374 

642 

176 

818 

61 

136 

64 

25 

1907 

793 

265 

481 

210 

691 

102 

177 

75 

29 

1908 

901 

391 

683 

171 

854 

47 

134 

51 

8 

1909 

969 

417 

720 

215 

935 

34 

138 

52 

12 

1910 

1118 

441 

834 

242 

1076 

42 

169 

75 

9 

1911 

1095 

527 

896 

180 

1076 

19 

98 

22 

2 

1912 

1220 

636 

1034 

175 

1209 

11 

63 

18 

3 

1913 

1204 

714 

1021 

178 

1199 

5 

41 

12 

4 

1914 

1396 

727 

1152 

239 

1391 

5 

51 

14 

2 

1915 

1368 

684 

1145 

214 

1359 

9 

92 

31 

6 

1916 

1367 

870 

1183 

168 

1351 

16 

102 

40 

6 

Totals 

16100 

7584 

12501 

2960 

15391 

709 

2038 

596 

148 

The  preceding  table  shows  that  compared  with  past  inspections  that 
of  1916  makes  a very  favorable  showing  especially  as  regards  the  per- 
centage of  samples  “Up  to  guarantee  in  every  particular”  there  being  64.1 
per  cent,  as  compared  with  58  per  cent,  the  previous  high  record  in  1913. 

Compared  with  the  inspection  of  1915  that  of  1916  shows  better  re- 
sults as  regards  “Samples  up  to  guarantee”  64.1  per  cent,  against  50  per 
cent.;  samples  “Equal  to  value  of  guarantee.”  No.  less  than  $1  below  value 
of  guarantee;  No.  $1  or  more  above  value  of  guarantee  but  in  other  re- 
spects shows  results  inferior  to  those  obtained  in  1915. 


SUMMARY  COMPARING  INSPECTION  SPRING  AND  FALL 
SAMPLES,  1916 


Spring 

Fall 

Spring 

per 

cent. 

Fall 

per 

cent. 

Year 

per 

cent. 

Nn  saTTip1e<5  nnaly7Pd 

741 

626 

54.2 

45.8 

No.  equal  to  guarantee  in  every  particular 

437 

433 

59.0 

69.2 

64.1 

No.  equal  to  value  of  guarantee 

614 

569 

82.9 

90.9 

86.9 

No.  within  10  per  cent,  of  value  of  guarantee 

118 

50 

15.9 

8.0 

12.0 

No.  equal  and  within  10  per  cent,  of  value  of  guar- 

antee   

732 

619 

98.8 

98.9 

98.9 

No.  not  within  10  per  cent,  of  value  of  guarantee.. 

9 

7 

1.2 

1.1 

1.1 

No.  with  1 or  more  ingredient  10  per  cent,  below 

guarantee  

176 

91 

23.7 

14.5 

19.1 

No.  with  1 or  more  ingredient  20  per  cent,  below 

guarantee  

75 

27 

10.6 

4.3 

7.4 

No.  with  1 or  more  ingredient  30  per  cent,  below 

guarantee  

28 

12 

3.8 

1.9 

2.9 

No.  with  1 or  more  ingredient  50  per  cent,  below 

guarantee 

5 

1 

0.7 

0.1 

0.4 

No.  less  than  $1  per  ton  below  value  of  guarantee.. 

82 

41 

11.0 

6.5 

8.8 

No.  $l-$2  per  ton  below  value  of  guarantee 

35 

9 

4.7 

1.4 

3.0 

No.  $2-$3  per  ton  below  value  of  guarantee 

7. 

4 

0.9 

0.6 

0.8 

No.  $3-$4  per  ton  below  value  of  guarantee.. 

1 

1 

0.1 

0.1 

0.1 

No.  $4-$5  per  ton  below  value  of  guarantee 

1 

1 

0.1 

0.1 

0.1 

No.  $7-$8  per  ton  below  value  of  guarantee 



1 

0.1 

0.1 

No.  $1  or  more  per  ton  above  value  of  guarantee... 

398 

439 

53.8 

70.1 

62.0 

No.  above  value  of  guarantee  per  ton 

607 

567 

81.9 

90.6 

86.3 

Av.  deficiency  per  ton  “Within  10%  of  value  sam- 

plP«5”  8 

0.73 

0.52 

Av.  defleieney  per  ton  “Not  within  10%  of  value 

samples”  $ 

2.37 

3.90 

22 


As  has  been  the  case  in  past  years  the  preceding  summary  shows  that 
in  practically  every  point  the  results  of  the  fall  inspection  are  superior  to 
those  of  the  spring  this  being  especially  true  of  the  samples  “Up  to  guar- 
antee,” “Equal  in  value,”  “Ingredients  20%  deficient,”  “Samples  deficient 
$l-$2  and  $2-$3  per  ton  and  of  excess  value.” 

The  spring  samples  “Within  10%  of  value”  had  an  average  deficiency 
of  73  cents  per  ton  with  a range  of  2 cents  to  $2.68  while  those  in  the  fall 
had  an  average  deficiency  of  52  cents  per  ton  and  a range  from  2 cents 
to  $1.80. 

The  “Not  within  10%  samples”  secured  in  the  spring  were  on  the 
average  $2.37  per  ton  below  value  of  guarantee  with  a range  of  $1.02  to 
$4.69  as  compared  with  an  average  deficiency  of  $3.90  per  ton  and  range 
of  $2.54  to  $7.84  for  the  same  class  of  samples  secured  in  the  fall. 


TABLE  I — Summary  of  Inspection  on  the  Basis  of  Composition,  Guaranteed,  Found  and  Retail  Values. 


23 


24 


CLASSIFICATION  OF  BRANDS  WHICH  DID  NOT  EQUAL  IN  VALUE 

THE  GUARANTEE 


Kind  of  fertilizer 

No.  within  10  per 
cent,  of  value 
of  guarantee 

No.  not  within  10 
per  cent,  of  value 
of  guarantee 

Spring 

Fall 

Total 

Spring 

Fall 

Total 

3. 

Acid  phosphate,  16-18  per  cent,  available 

— 

phosphoric  acid 

6 

1 

7 

1 

1 

4. 

Acid  phosphate,  14-16  per  cent,  available 

phosphoric  acid 

6 

2 

8 

7. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash,  K2O,  1-2.5% 

6 

5 

11 

1 

1 

— 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash,  K2O,  2.5-5% 

3 

3 

2 

2 

9. 

Acid  Phosphate  and  potash,  K2O,  5-7.5% 

1 

1 

15. 

Ammoniated  acid  phosphate 

14 

'T 

18 

16. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  N,  below  0.5%_- 

14 

10 

24 

2"’ 

’'2' 

17. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  N,  0.5  to  1% 

41 

12 

53 

2 

1 

3 

18. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  N,  1 to  1.6% 

1 

2 

3 

19. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  N,  1.6  to  2.5%-_ 

12 

6 

18 

-20. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen,  N,  2.5  to  4% 



____ 

31. 

Raw  bone 

1 



32. 

Steamed  bone 

1 

3 

4 

33. 

Ammoniated  bone 

1 

3 

4 

37. 

Bone  and  potash 

1 

1 

39. 

Tankage  1 

1 

1 

40. 

Tankage  and  potash 

2 

2' 

42. 

Rock  phosphate  _ 

6 

"2” 

8 

3 

'3' 

45. 

Nitrate  of  soda 

1 



1 



51. 

Tobacco  stems  

1 



1 

53. 

Dried  manure 

56. 

Peat  

Totals 

118 

50 

168 

9 

7 

16 

CLASSIFICATION  OF  BRANDS  IN  WHICH  ONE  OR  MORE 
INGREDIENTS  WERE  NOT  WITHIN  10  PER  CENT.  OF  GUARANTEE 


Kind  of  fertilizer 

No.  with  one  or  more 
ingredients  below 
guarantee 

No.  with  2 ingre- 
dients below 
guarantee 

No.  below 
guarantee 
in 

10  to 
20 
per 
cent. 

20  to 
30 
per 
cent. 

30  to 
50 
per 
cent. 

50  or 
more 
per 
cent. 

10  to 
20 
per 
cent. 

20  to 
30 
per 
cent. 

30  or 
more 
per 
cent. 

2 in- 
gredi- 
ents 

3 in- 
gredi- 
ents 

3. 

Acid  phosphate,  16-18%  avail- 

able phosphoric  acid  

2 

















4. 

Acid  phosphate,  14-16%  avail- 

able phosphoric  acid 

3 

1 

1 









2 



7. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash. 

K20',  1-2.5%  

10 

1 

1 













8. 

Acid  phosphate  and  potash. 

2 

2 

1 

1 

15. 

Ammoniated  acid  phosphate 

20 

6 

IIII 

IIII 

IIII 

3 

IIII 

16. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen. 

N,  below  0.5% 

63 

31 

14 

2 







7 



17. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen. 

N,  0.5-1% -1 

95 

38 

11 

3 

8 

3 



22 

1 

18. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen. 

N,  1-1.6%  

7 

2 

1 

1 

1 

19. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen. 

N,  1.6-2. 5%  

37 

9 

4 



3 

1 



3 



20. 

Complete  fertilizer,  nitrogen. 

4 

31. 

IN,  — 

Raw  bone  

1 

IIII 

32. 

Steamed  bone  

8 

2 









”2" 



33. 

Ammoniated  bone  

1 

















37. 

Bone  and  potash  

2 













1 



39. 

Tankage  

2 

2 

1 

1 









40. 

TnTiVfigf>  and  potash 

9 

3 

3 

42. 

Rook  phosphate 

4 

51. 

Tobacco  stems 

1 















53. 

pried  marmre 

4 

2 

1 

____ 

56.’ 

Peat 

1 

1 

1 

Totals 

267 

102 

40 

6 

12 

5 

43 

1 

The  brands  listed  above  were  deficient  in  fertilizing  ingredients  as 


follows : 


25 


Ingredient 

No.  below  guarantee 

10  to  20 
per 
cent. 

20  to  30 
per 
cent. 

30  to  50 
per 
cent. 

50  and 
over  per 
cent. 

1 Ni't.rngfin 

33 

95 

36 

12 

12 

42 

8 

6 

25 

1 

2 

4 

0 

9 , Pntfl  ph 

3.  Available  phosphoric  acid 

4.  Total  phosphoric  acid 

Totals 

176 

62 

32 

6 

RESULTS  OF  INSPECTION 

The  results  of  the  1916  inspection  are  very  favorable  when  compared 
with  those  of  previous  years  but  the  increased  number  of  samples  in  the 
“Not  within  10  %”  and  poor  mixing  columns  while  slight  are  entirely  too 
large  to  show  the  careful  mixing  and  chemical  control  that  is  necessary 
to  prevent  violations  of  the  law. 

It  is  realized  that  the  war  has  produced  conditions  with  regard  to 
some  materials  that  make  it  difficult  to  control  the  supply  and  in  the  case 
of  potash  especially  the  composition  of  the  sources  available  is  very  vari- 
able but  in  view  of  these  conditions  and  the  absolute  necessity  that  the 
production  be  increased  to  a maximum  more  care  should  be  exercised  to 
insure  that  all  fertilizer  shipped  meets  the  requirements  of  the  law  in 
every  particular.  Never  in  the  history  of  the  fertilizer  trade  has  care  in 
purchasing,  manufacturing,  chemical  controlling  and  meeting  all  the  re- 
quirements of  the  law  been  so  essential. 

The  past  17  years  inspections  are  compared  in  the  following: 


Year 

Per  cent, 
equal  and 
within  10% 
of  value  of 
guarantee 

Per  cent . 
with  in- 
gredients 
20% 
below 
guarantee 

Year 

Per  cent . 
equal  and 
within  10% 
of  value  of 
guarantee 

Per  cent, 
with  in- 
gredients 
20% 
below 
guarantee 

Year 

Per  cent, 
equal  and 
within  10% 
of  value  of 
guarantee 

Per  cent, 
with  in- 
gredients 
20% 
below 
guarantee 

1900 

65.2 

45.7  . 

1906 

93.1 

15.5 

1912 

99.1 

5.1 

1901 

93.6 

17.4 

1907 

87.1 

22.3 

1913 

99.6 

3.4 

1902 

96.7 

16.5 

1908 

94.8 

14.9 

1914 

99.6 

3.7 

1903 

93.6 

20.5 

1909 

96.5 

14.0 

1915 

99.4 

6.7 

1904 

93.1 

18.9 

1910 

96.2 

15.2 

1916 

98.9 

7.4 

1905 

93.4 

20.0 

1911 

98.3 

8.9 

While  a slight  decrease  of  0.5  per  cent,  is  shown  in  the  “Equal  and  10 
per  cent,  columns,”  and  an  increase  of  0.7  per  cent,  in  the  “20  per  cent, 
column”  when  compared  item  for  item  there  is  a very  slight  if  any  choice 
between  the  results  of  the  T5  and  T6  inspections. 

It  will  be  noted  that  in  the  annual  summary  two  companies.  Central 
Phosphate  Co.  and  Farmers  Ground  Rock  Phosphate  Co.  have  their  rec- 
ords in  black  type  showing  that  20%  or  more  of  samples  inspected  were 
not  within  10%  of  the  value  of  the  guarantee.  Since  the  samples  In- 
spected were  of  untreated  rock  phosphate  there  seems  no  excuse  possible 
for  the  shipments  being  deficient  except  carelessness. 

The  results  Table  I show  that  of  35  classes  available  for  comparison: 
28  equal  or  exceed  the  guarantee  in  every  particular,  33  are  above  the; 
average  value  $2.19  per  ton  with  a range  of  12  cents  for  class  7,  acidi 
phosphate  and  potash,  K2O,  1-2.5%  one  equals  the  value  and  one,  acid 
phosphate  and  potash,  K2O,  2.5  to  5%  is  below  value  $1.12  per  ton.  One 
class  just  equals  the  guarantee,  2 classes  are  below  in  nitrogen  respectively 
0.6%  and  0.1%,  three  classes  are  below  in  potash,  two  being  0.1%  and  one 
0.2%  K2O,  and  one  0.8%  below  in  available  phosphoric  acid.  Eleven  hund- 
red and  seventy-four  samples  had  an  average  of  $2.13  per  ton  above  guar- 
anteed value. 


26 


The  average  retail  price  of  31  classes  is  $11.94  per  ton  above  the  found 
comparative  value  and  in  four  class  $8.22  less. 

Short  Weights.  For  the  first  time  in  many  years  a claim  was  filed 
that  short  weight  shipment  had  been  made  into  the  state  and  on  investiga- 
tion it  was  found  by  Inspector  Bausman  that  supposed  125  lb.  packages 
received  by  Louis  Neipert,  Ft.  Branch,  of  J.  H.  Woods,  Princeton,  local 
agent  International  Agric.  Chem.  Corporation,  averaged  121  lbs.,  or  4 lbs. 
under  weight.  This  matter  was  carefully  investigated  with  the  result  that 
the  reason  for  shortage  was  not  discovered,  as  Supt.  C.  R.  Boland  of  the 
manufacturers,  certified  shipment  was  weighed  over  Sawyer  Beam  scales 
and  check  weighed  over  check  scales. 

The  manufacturers  refunded  Mr.  Woods  on  the  basis  of  cost  price 
and  shortage  and  the  latter  filed  receipts  showing  the  refund  had  been 
prorated  among  his  customers  on  the  same  basis. 

If  short  weight  shipments  are  suspected  notify  this  department  at 
once  and  do  not  accept  until  an  investigation  has  been  made  by  an  official 
Inspector. 

Shipments  without  Labels.  Too  many  shipments  without. labels  were 
found  in  the  1916  inspection,  a majority  of  the  offenders  being  florists 
and  seed  dealers  in  Chicago,  unlabeled  shipments  having  been  found  con- 
signed by  the  following,  all  of  Chicago.  A.  L.  Randall  & Co.,  D.  B.  John- 
son, Vaughn  Seed  Store,  I.  H.  Kahn  & Co.,  W.  W.  Barnard  Co.,  J.  Oliver 
Johnson. 

In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  law  requires  that  all  fertilizer  found  in 
the  state  be  accompanied  by  State  Chemist’s  labels  the  provision  applies 
to  manurial  materials  for  florists  the  same  as  for  farmers. 

Do  not  accept,  sell,  or  deliver  any  fertilizer  of  any  kind  or  in  any 
quantity  unless  a label  bearing  the  fac  simile  signature  of  the  State  Chem- 
ist (see  page  6)  is  attached  to  each  200  lbs.  or  fraction  and  furnished 
with  similar  quantities  in  bulk. 

PRICES  USED  IN  SECURING  THE  COMPARATIVE  VALUES 
OF  FERTILIZERS 

Owing  to  the  uncertainty  of  prices  of  fertilizer  materials  in  the  open 
markets  many  fertilizer  controls  have  omitted  fixing  values  for  fertilizer 
ingredients  the  current  year.  Since  these  values  as  used  by  this  depart- 
ment are  not  for  the  purpose  of  fixing  the  commercial  values  of  fertilizers 
but  for  comparative  purposes  only  it  has  been  decided  to  continue  past 
practice  and  the  values  which  appear  later  have  been  decided  as  fair  on 
the  basis  of  present  market  condition  after  consultation  with  manufac- 
turers, agents,  dealers,  market  reports  and  information  collected  by  our 
inspectors. 

These  values  will  not  give  the  price  at  which  fertilizer  should  be  sold 
at  all  points  in  the  state  and  should  not  be  used  for  such  a purpose.  They 
are  for  use  in  comparing  the  value  of  inspection  samples  with  manufac- 
turers’ guarantees  and  can  be  used  advantageously  by  fertilizer  pur- 
chasers in  calculating  the  relative  values  of  similar  brands  offered  for  sale 
by  different  manufacturers. 

The  following  prices  were  used  in  securing  the  comparative  values 
of  samples  reported  in  this  bulletin. 

Nitrogen,  20  cents  per  pound;  $4.00  per  unit. 

Potash  soluble  in  water,  25  cents  per  pound;  $5.00  per  unit. 

Soluble  and  reverted  (available)  phosphoric  acid,  6 cents  per  pound; 
$1.20  per  unit. 

Total  phosphoric  acid  in  bone,  tankage  and  basic  slag,  4 cents  per 
pound;  80  cents  per  unit. 

Total  phosphoric  acid  in  rock  phosphate,  1%  cents  per  pound;  25 
cents  per  unit. 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  in  mixed  fertilizers  containing  nitrogen, 
2 cents  per  pound;  40  cents  per  unit. 


27 


Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  in  precipitated  bone,  cents  per  pound; 
70  cents  per  unit. 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  in  mixed  fertilizers  containing  no  nitrogen, 
no  value. 

For  use  in  determining  the  comparative  values  of  fertilizers  inspected 
in  1917  the  following  prices  have  been  adopted: 


Per  lb . 
cts. 

Per  unit  or 
per  cent.  $ 

All  fertilizers 

Nitrogen  fNi 

25 

5.00 

Potash  (K26)  soluble  in  water 

30 

6.00- 

Soluble  and  reverted  phosphoric  acid  (PiOs) 

6 

1.20 

Mixed  fertilizers  containing  nitrogen 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  (P^Os)  

2 

0.40 

Precipitated  bone 

Available  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  _ _ _ - - 

6 

1.20 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  ___  

4 

0.80 

Animal  by-products,  bone,  tankage,  etc. 

Total  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  - 

4 

0.80 

Basic  slag 

Total  phosphoric  acid  (P2O6) - 

4 

0.80 

Rock  phosphate  (floats) 

' 

Total  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5) 

11/4 

0.25 

Rock  phosphate  and  low  grade  slag 

Total  phosphoric  acid 

iy4 

0.25 

Mixed  fertilizer,  acid  phosphate,  etc.,  containing  no  nitrogen 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid 

0 

0.00 

In  order  to  ascertain  the  comparative  value  of  any  fertilizer  in  1917 
proceed  as  follows: 

In  acidulated  fertilizers  containing  nitrogen: 

Multiply  $5.00  by  the  guaranteed  per  cent  of  nitrogen. 

Multiply  $6.00  by  the  guaranteed  per  cent,  of  potash  soluble  in  water. 

Multiply  $1.20  by  the  guaranteed  per  cent,  of  soluble  and  reverted 
(available)  phosphoric  acid. 

Multiply  $0.40  by  the  guaranteed  per  cent,  of  insoluble  phosphoric 
acid. 

Add  the  numbers  thus  obtained  and  the  sum  is  the  estimated  com- 
parative value  of  a ton  of  the  fertilizer. 

If  no  nitrogen  is  guaranteed  the  multiplication  of  40  cents  by  the  per 
cent,  of  insoluble  phosphoric  acid  and  the  addition  of  the  product  thus 
obtained  should  be  omitted. 

If  it  is  desired  to  obtain  the  estimated  comparative  value  of  bone: 

Multiply  $5.00  by  the  guaranteed  per  cent,  of  nitrogen. 

Multiply  $0.80  by  the  guaranteed  per  cent,  of  total  phosphoric  acid. 

Examples:  If  it  is  desired  to  ascertain  the  estimated  comparative 
value  of  an  acidulated  fertilizer  guaranteed  to  contain:  2%  of  nitrogen, 
2%  of  potash  soluble  in  water,  8%  of  soluble  and  reverted  (available) 
phosphoric  acid  and  2%  of  insoluble  phosphoric  acid  the  calculation  be- 
comes: 

$5.00  X 2 = $10.00 
$6.00  X 2 = 12.00 
$1.20  X 8 = 9.60 

$0.40  X 2 = 0.80 


Estimated  comparative  value  per  ton  $32.40 


28 


To  secure  the  estimated  comparative  value  of  an  acidulated  fertilizer 
guaranteed  to  contain:  5%  of  potash  soluble  in  water,  10%  of  soluble  and 
reverted  (available)  phosphoric  acid  and  2%  of  insoluble  phosphoric  acid, 
multiply: 

$6.00  X 5 = $30.00 
$1.20  X 10  = 12.00 


Estimated  comparative  value  per  ton  $42.00 

To  secure  similar  information  for  a raw  bone  guaranteed  to  contain: 
2.5%  nitrogen,  24%  total  phosphoric  acid,  multiply: 

$5.00  X 2.5  = $12.50 
$0.80  X 24  = 19.20 


Estimated  comparative  value  per  ton  $31.70 

COMMENTS  BY  MANUFACTURERS,  AGENTS  AND  THIS  DEPART- 
MENT REGARDING  SAMPLES.  REFUNDS 


Manufaetiirer 

Inspec- 
tion 
No.  BB 

Date 

refund 

reported 

Refund 
per  ton 
$ 

Total 

refund 

$ 

To  whom  paid 

Am.  Agri.  Chem.  Co.,  Bowker 
Works 

5654 

June  6 

0.58 

4.65 

.Tn.s  Bmdi  Pn 

Central  Phosphate  Co.  _ 

5899 

5923 

Nov.  17 
Nov.  17 

1.02 

1.50 

20.40 

37.62 

W.  C.  Jackson 

W.  C.  Jackson 

Cincinnati  Phosphate  Co. 

Empire  Guano  Co.  _ _ 

5895 

6028 

Dec.  28 
Dec.  80 

0.80 

1.14 

3.20 

2.28 

- Cook  Bros. 

H.  R.  Erwin 

Farmers  Ground  Rock  Phos- 
phate Co.  _ 

6004 

Dec.  4 

1.23 

27.00 

Fred  Niederhaus 

Federal  Chemical  Co. 

5270 

June  5 

0.77 

38.40 

Ind.  Seho’l  Feeble  Minded 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Co. - 

5962 

Nov.  2 

1.36 

2.72 

Harley  Pearson 

6348 

May  23 

.60 

12.00 

Spriesterbach  Bros. 

Hoj'kins  Fertilizer  Co. 

5457 

July  29 
July  29 

1.50 

1.88 

Hubert  Karnes 

5458 

1.50 

3.75 

Hubert  Karnes 

Jones  Fertilizer  Co.  

6453 

June  5 

0.50 

7.50 

Burnsworth  Bros. 

Kaufman  Fertilizer  Co 

5986 

Dec.  28 

1.44 

8.64 

Y.  D.  Deardriiff 

Packers  Fertilizer  Co. 

(Cincinnati)  

E.  Rauh  & Sons  Fertilizer  Co._ 

5954 

5844 

Dec.  4 
Oct.  27 

0.28 

3.42 

4.20 

3.42 

- McCray  Grain  Co. 
C.  E.  Hubbard 

Read  Phosphate  Co.  — 

5744 

Oct.  9 

1.26 

25.20 

W.  A Kendall 

5756 

Sept.  14 

1.20 

1.80 

Benj.  Jones 

Southern  Fertilizer  Co.  . 

6084 

Jan.  11 

1.56 

2.44 

Mulberry  Hdw.  Co. 

Swift  & Company 

5896 

Feb.  3 

1.06 

21.20 

_ J.  J.  Overmeyer 

The  payment  of  refunds  does  not  meet  the  requirements  of  the  law  and 
this  department  does  not  recognize  such  payment  as  in  any  way  affecting 
the  right  of  any  one  in  the  state  to  call  cases  of  deficiencies  in  all  samples 
to  the  attention  of  the  prosecutors.  Where  refunds  are  made  the  agent  is 
required  to  prorate  among  purchasers  and  file  receipts  with  the  State 
Chemist’s  Department  showing  such  distribution. 

SHIPMENTS  WITHDRAWN  FROM  SALE 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works.  B.  B.  5265,  5268.  M’fr’s  call  attention  to 
the  fact  that  these  unlabeled  shipments  found  in  the  possession  of  the 
Flick  Floral  Co.,  and  J.  F.  Knecht  & Co.,  florists  at  Fort  Wayne,  were  pur- 
chased of  the  Vaughn  Seed  Store  and  that  the  Armour  Fertilizer  Works 
are  not  responsible  for  their  shipment  into  Indiana  without  State  Chem- 
ist’s labels. 

F.  F.  Buhner.  B.  B.  6402.  This  shipment  withdrawn  from  sale  on 
Sept.  28,  by  W.  R.  Bolles,  Ewing,  on  account  of  absence  of  labels  was  cer- 
tifled  on  Oct.  10,  as  being  labeled  with  official  labels  No.  4171. 

Darling  & Co.  B.  B.  6082,  6167.  These  shipments  withdrawn  from 
sale  respectively  by  H.  E.  Pitman,  Bedford,  and  Morrow  Grain  Co.,  Wabash, 
on  account  of  1.3%  and  1.6%  deflciencies  in  available  phosphoric  acid 
were  relabeled  No.  6901  and  arrangements  made  for  replacing  on  sale. 


29 


B.  B.  6220.  Under  date  of  Feb.  10,  Fred  Sumine,  Silver  Lake,  advises 
that  the  one  ton  of  this  shipment  withdrawn  from  sale  on  Jan.  1,  ’17,  will 
be  used  by  him. 

B.  B.  6259.  A.  C.  Keene,  Elkhart,  under  date  of  Oct.  9,  certifies  that 
labels  No.  6258  have  been  received  to  cover  this  shipment. 

Empire  Guano  Co.  B.  B.  6293.  Balance  of  this  shipment,  ®2o  tons,  was 
withdrawn  from  sale  on  account  of  deficiencies  of  0.1%  K2O  and  0.5% 
available  phosphoric  acid  and  will  be  used  by  the  agents,  D.  W.  Neely  & 
Son. 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Co.,  Columbus,  O.  B.  B.  6251,  6301,  6302.  6306. 
These  shipments  found  without  labels  in  the  possession  of  Peter  Messner, 
Etna  Green,  and  the  latter  three  at  Geo.  Wagner’s,  Butler,  were  labeled  the 
former  on  Sept.  29  and  the  latter  on  Sept.  25.  The  manufacturers  offered 
as  an  excuse  for  the  violation  that  a new  superintendent  who  was  un- 
acquainted with  the  necessity  for  attaching  State  Chemist’s  labels  had 
just  been  employed.  Receipts  showing  delivery  of  tags  by  agents  were 
filed.  Delivery  of  labels  subsequent  to  delivery  of  the  fertilizer  does  not 
meet  the  requirements  of  the  law. 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Co.  B.  B.  6348.  After  extended  investigation  the  manu- 
facturers paid  a rebate  of  60c  per  ton  on  this  shipment  and  the  agents, 
Spriesterbach  Bros.,  Charlestown,  used  the  6 tons  remaining  unsold. 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Co.  B.  B.  5438,  5469,  5470.  On  July  22,  H.  F. 
Fisher,  Memphis,  advises  that  0.6  tons  No.  5438,  % tons  No.  5469,  2.8  tons 
No.  5470  have  been  withdrawn  from  sale  on  account  of  deficiencies  in 
available  phosphoric  acid  in  the  former  two  and  in  potash  and  available 
phosphoric  acid  in  the  latter. 

B.  B.  5458.  This  shipment  withdrawn  frojn  sale  by  Lubert  Karnes, 
Martinsburg,  on  account  of  deficiencies  in  nitrogen  and  potash  was  re- 
labeled No.  6311,  retail  price  reduced  $1.50  per  ton  and  replaced  on  sale. 


SHIPMENTS  RETURNED 


Manufacturer 

Inspec- 
tion 
No.  BB 

Date 

Amount 

returned 

tons 

Agent 

Empire  Guano  Co.  

5560 

Aug.  31 

2.8 

Marion  Campbell,  Corydon 

5562 

Aug.  31 

7.2 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Co 

4653 

July  3 

0.9 

H.  E.  Pearson,  Wabash 

5502 

Aug.  7 

10.1 

Jas.  M.  Lee  & Co.,  New  Albany 

6165 

Mar.  22 

8.8 

H.  E.  Pearson,  Wabash 

International  Agri. 

Chem.  Corporation  ___ 

6015 

Jan.  2 

4.0 

T.  H.  McGeorge  Co.,  Covington 

6017 

Jan.  2 

6.0 

6030 

Sept.  30 

4.5 

A.  T.  Lett,  Petersburg 

Jones  Fertilizer  Co.  

5355 

June  28 

3.6 

Ben.  L.  Perry,  Columbus 

5694 

Oct.  16 

3.6 

Allen  & Parish,  New  Palestine 

5695 

Oct.  16 

1.6 

Kentucky  Fertilizer  Co., 

Branch  Federal  Chem- 

ical Co.  _ 

5805 

Sept.  25 

2.5 

C.  H.  Billman  & Sons,  Shelbyville 

Louisville  Fertilizer  Co.-- 

5485 

July  18 

2.0 

J.  Gienger  & Co.,  Jeffersonville 

6051 

Jan.  5 

0.8 

J.  S.  Newhouse  & Co.,  Cumberland 

6052 

Jan.  5 

0.3 

Morris  & Company  ___  _ 

5780 

Oct.  26 

1.0 

A.  P.  Andrews,  Muncie 

E.  Ranh  & Sons  

5450 

Agent  E.  Bierly,  Pekin 

Return  requested  by  manufacturers 

Swift  & Company 

5390 

July  7 

2.0 

Geo.  E.  Stouffer  & Co.,  South  Bend 

5543 

Aug.  24 

0.2 

A.  T.  Turley,  English 

5971 

July  18 

2.6 

IG.  Wolff  & Sons’  Co.,  Hamilton 

(Ferris  & W'ysong,  Pleasant  Lake 

5972 

July  18 

3.1 

5973  ] 

r 

5979  [ 

July  18 

\ 3.0 

5980  J 

1 

5981 

Nov.  22 

4.9 

Hammell  Milling  Co.,  Fremont 

Virginia-Carolina  Chem- 

ical Co.  

5776 

Aug.  29 

1.0 

Clark  Transfer  & Storage  Co., 

Anderson 

5778 

Aug.  29 

4.0 

6071 

Jan.  9 

4.1 

J.  N.  Hamilton,  Star  City 

30 


SOLD  UNDER  NAMES  INDICATING  USE  OF  ANIMAL  BY-PRODUCTS 
ONLY  BUT  CONTAINING  FOREIGN  MATERIALS  IN 
VIOLATION  OF  RULING  12A 


Manufacturer 

Inspec- 
tion 
No.  BB 

Foreign 

material 

present 

Amount 
approx, 
lbs.  ton 

Agent 

American  Agricultural 

Chemical  Co.  

6463 

Salt 

102.6 

J.  E.  Elliott,  Dupont 

Amer.  Ag.  Chem.  Co., 

Bowker  Fertilizer  Wks. 

5731 

Gypsum 

159.4 

Salt 

110.2 

6059 

Gypsum 

132.2 

C.  Stewart  & Son,  Martinsville 

Salt 

149.2 

Amer.  Agr.  Chem.  Co., 

Miehigan  Carbon  Wks. 

6207 

Gypsum 

160.2 

R.  E.  Eldrod,  Pekin 

Salt 

128.0 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works 

5871 

Silica 

equi. 

to  sand 

347.0 

Thos.  Hickey,  Hobart 

6284 

Sand 

161.4 

Kost  & Becker,  Corydon 

6430 

Sand 

154.2 

Arthur  Sale,  Rochester 

6491 

jGypsum 

42.4 

J.  C.  Pierce,  Columbus 

)Sand 

71.6 

6568 

) Gypsum 

42.4 

Susott  and  Gerich,  Elberfeld 

(Sand 

210.6 

6625 

Salt 

100.0 

Heidet  Bros.,  Ferdinand 

Buhner  Fertilizer  Co 

5430 

Water 

soluble 

P2O5  % 

0.61 

Manufacturer 

6402 

Gypsum 

81.6 

W.  R.  Bolles,  Ewing 

&427 

Sand 

420.6 

Geo.  B.  Lucas,  Ewing 

Groves  Fertilizer  Works, 

Joslin-Schmidt  Co 

6101 

Salt 

97.4 

Victoria  Milling  Co.,  Jasper 

6349 

Salt 

122.0 

Edgar  Hass,  Charlestown 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Co 

6077 

Sand 

115.6 

Josiah  Chess,  Mitchell 

6081 

Sand 

99.6 

Dobson  & Ramsey,  Bedford 

6113 

Sand 

173.0 

A.  M.  Bonnert,  Dubois 

6576 

Sand 

132.6 

F.  A.  Stunkle,  Daubstadt 

Morris  & Company 

6115 

Sand 

268.8 

Geo.  P.  Wagner,  Jasper 

6146 

Sand 

125.8 

Harry  Brooks,  Orleans 

Quebbeman  & Son 

6283 

Gypsum 

132.6 

Manufacturers 

Sand 

79.6 

Smith  Agri.  Chem.  Co... 

6567 

Gypsum 

47.2 

Cyrus  & Owens,  Elberfeld 

Sand 

151.2 

Swift  & Company 

5348 

Salt 

102.0 

Getz  & Leman,  Bremen 

5543 

Salt 

92.8 

A.  T.  Turley,  English 

5903 

Salt 

95.0 

John  Werner,  Rochester 

6009 

Salt 

106.8 

T.  S.  Nugent,  Louisville 

6150 

Salt 

83.6 

T.  E.  Lindley,  Paoli 

6151 

Salt 

92.8 

i 

6639 

Salt 

100.0 

Roy  Keaton,  Morgantown 

American  Agri.  Chem.  Co..  Under  date  of  Jan.  11  Mr.  Sarvene  advises 
that  this  shipment  found  in  the  preceding  table  was  made  from  the  Cin- 
cinnati factory  and  that  the  Detroit  Sales  Dept.  3-20  hone  meal  will  be 
withdrawn  from  Indiana  markets. 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works.  Mr.  Wehner  writes  under  date  of  Nov.  6 
that  the  salt  present  is  probably  due  to  concentrated  tankage  manufac- 
tured from  tank  water  in  which  scraps  of  pickled  meat  may  have  been  in- 
cluded. That  the  sand  present  was  due  to  a misunderstanding  of  Ruling 
12A  by  the  superintendent.  Affidavit  filed  that  Ruling  12A  will  be  ob- 
served in  future. 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Co.  Under  date  of  Dec.  14  et  al.  Mr.  G.  W.  Watson 
files  objections  to  statements  on  our  preliminary  reports  regarding  the 
presence  of  sand  in  samples  listed  above.  Mr.  Watson  claims  that  any 
sand  present  in  these  fertilizers  is  not  added  but  is  present  in  the  bone 
as  treated  and  handled  in  their  process  for  manufacturing  raw  bone.  Affi- 
davit in  substantiation  of  his  claim  was  filed  by  Mr.  Watson  under  date 
of  Jan.  23. 

Morris  & Company.  Under  dates  of  Oct.  2 and  Dec.  12  Mr.  Geo.  Raasch 
advises  that  the  presence  of  any  other  materials  than  animal  by-products 


31 


in  inspections  B.  B.  6079,  6115,  6146,  is  due  to  misunderstanding  of  Ruling 
12A.  Mr.  L.  C.  Williamson  furnishes  affidavit  that  no  such  violations  will 
occur  in  future. 

Louis  Quebbeman  & Son.  Report  on  Jan.  11  and  to  inspector  who 
made  special  trip  that  they  can  offer  no  explanation  and  believe  that  some 
error  has  occurred  regarding  presence  of  gypsum  and  sand  in  inspection 
B.  B.  6283.  This  department  has  been  unable  to  find  error  in  its  work. 

Swift  & Company.  Through  J.  S.  Tolson  under  date  of  Aug.  9,  submit 
affidavit  that  all  shipments  after  Oct.  31  will  meet  the  requirements  of 
Ruling  12A  in  all  particulars. 

SAMPLES  SENT  TO  MANUFACTURERS.  COMPARATIVE  RESULTS 
BY  MANUFACTURERS’  CHEMISTS 


American  Agri.  Chem.  Works,  Detroit  Sales  Dep’t.  and  Michigan  Car- 
bon Works. 


Inspection  No.  B.  B. 

5344 

5721 

Analyst 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind. 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind. 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Nitrocen  (N)  % 

2.0 

2.1 

2.12 

2.0 

2.1 

2.05 

Potash  solnblfi  in  water  % 

1.0 

1.0 

1.09 

1.0 

0.8 

0.76 

Available  phosphone  aeiri  tPyOst 

8.0 

7.0 

7.24 

8.0 

7.5 

7.73 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  ('PaOk'I  % 

1.0 

4.4 

4.30 

1.0 

1.8 

1.70 

Total  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  % 

7.0 

11.4 

11.54 

9.0 

9.3 

9.43 

Inspection  No.  B.  B. 

5750 

5813 

Analyst 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind. 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind. 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Nitrogen  (N)  % 

Potash  tKaOt  soluble  in  water  % 

— 

2.0 

2.3 

2.31 

.... 

.... 

— 

Available  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  % -- 

'sTo 

’7’2 

'7'47 

ii’o 

iSA 

13789 

Tnsnluble  phosphoric  acid  tPoOr;') 

1.0 

3.2 

3.02 

2.3 

1.98 

Total  phosphoric  acid  ('P^Ok')  % 

9.0 

10.4 

10.49 

15.7 

15.87 

B.  B.  5494,  5501,  5948,  5975.  M’fr’s  report  results  of  this  department 
confirmed. 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works.  B.  B.  5871.  No  report  analytical  results 
received. 

Central  Phosphate  Co. 


Inspection  No.  B.  B. 

5899 

5923 

Analyst 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind.  . 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind. 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

n^nt.al  phosphoric  acid  ('P>0:;'>  % 

32.0 

27.9 

27.99 

28.0 

22.0 

22.33 

Darling  & Company.  B.  B.  5539.  No  report  analytical  results  received. 
Empire  Guano  Co.  B.  B.  5562.  No  report  analytical  results  received. 
Farmers  Ground  Rock  Phosphate  Co. 


Inspection  No.  B.  B. 

6004 

Analyst 

Guarantee 

Indiana 

State 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Chemist 

Total  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  % 

30.0 

25.2 

25.5 

32 


Hirsh,  Stein  & Co.  B.  B.  6113.  No  analytical  results  received. 
Hopkins  Fertilizer  Co.  B.  B.  5612.  No  analytical  results  received. 
International  Agri.  Corporation. 


Inspection  No.  B.  B. 

5679 

Analyst 

Guarantee 

Indiana 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Nitrogen  (N)  % 

15.6 

15.3 

15.48 

Morris  & Company.  B.  B.  5780,  6079,  6146.  No  analytical  results  re- 
ceived. 

Packer  Fertilizer  Co.,  Indianapolis.  B.  B.  6510.  No  analytical  results 
received. 

Rasin  Monumental  Co.  B.  B.  6836.  No  analytical  results  received. 

Read  Phosphate  Co.  B.  B.  5541.  No  analytical  results  received. 

Swift  & Company.  B.  B.  5888,  5941,  5950.  No  analytical  results  re- 
ceived. 

Virginia-Carolina  Chemical  Co. 


Inspection  No.  B.  B. 

5776  ' 

' 6529 

Analyst 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind. 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Guar- 

antee 

Ind. 

State 

Chemist 

M’fr’s 

Chemist 

Nitrogen  (N)  % _ __  __  _ . 

2.4 
1.0 

11.0 

1.5 
12.5 

1.4 

1.0 

12.4 

0.6 

13.0 

1.4 

1.11 

12.28 

0.62 

12.90 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.1 

1.9 

8.0 

2.7 

10.7 

1.12 

1.86 

8.23 

2.52 

10.75 

Potash  (Kl'O)  soluble  in  water  % 

Available  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  % 

Insoluble  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  % - 

Total  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  % 

SPECIAL  REMARKS 

E.  Rauh  & Sons’  Fertilizer  Co.  B.  B.  6177.  This  sample  sold  under 
the  name  of  Superphosphate  guaranteed  to  contain  14%  available  phos- 
phoric acid,  on  inspection  was  found  to  be  an  ammoniated  superphosphate 
containing  1.1%  nitrogen,  10.5%  available  phosphoric  acid.  After  investi- 
gation and  in  view  of  the  fact  that  the  shipment  was  made  in  bags  branded 
Superphosphated  Manure  it  is  evident  that  through  error  Superphosphate 
labels  were  attached  to  the  wrong  packages,  the  fertilizer  shipped  selling 
at  $20.00  and  that  purchased  at  $18.00  per  ton. 

Virginia-Carolina  Chemical  Co.  B.  B.  6071.  The  inspection  of  this 
sample  reported  to  the  manufacturer  on  Dec.  8 showed  10.5%  available 
phosphoric  acid  against  12%  guaranteed  and  was  returned  to  factory. 
Under  date  of  Feb.  15,  1917,  Dr.  F.  B.  Carpenter,  chemist,  reports  that  the 
return  shipment  showed  12.16%  available  phosphoric  acid. 

EXPLANATION  OF  TABLES 

In  considering  the  results  and  summaries  of  inspection  it  should  be 
noted  that  in  the  case  of  deficient  samples  manufacturers  were  given  10 
days’  advance  notice  and  opportunity  to  request  a portion  of  sample  and 
time  for  review  of  the  results  by  their  chemists.  A summary  of  samples 
so  furnished  as  well  as  results  reported  by  the  manufacturers’  chemists 
will  be  found  on  page  31.  The  results  as  reported  in  Table  VI  are  official 
and  final. 

Table  I summarizes  the  results  of  the  inspection  samples  for  the 
year  1916,  according  to  composition. 

Table  II  summarizes  the  results  of  the  inspection  of  samples  secured 
in  the  spring,  1916. 


33 


Table  III  summarizes  the  results  of  the  inspection  of  samples  secured 
in  the  fall,  1916. 

Table  IV  summarizes  the  results  for  the  inspection  of  samples  for 
the  year  1916. 

In  Table  IV  manufacturers  having  20  per  cent,  or  more  of  brands  in- 
spected ‘‘Not  within  10%  of  Value  of  Guarantee”  are  given  in  black  type. 

Table  V summarizes  the  results  of  the  inspection  of  samples  for  the 
year  1916  by  counties. 

In  Tables  II,  III,  IV  and  V an  extra  column  showing  the  number  of 
samples  having  $1  or  more  excess  comparative  value  due  to  the  presence 
of  excess  insoluble  phosphoric  acid  has  been  made  necessary  by  the  in- 
creasing use  of  untreated  phosphate  as  a make  weight.  In  reaching  con- 
clusions regarding  comparative  values  as  shown  in  the  summaries  this 
fact  should  be  kept  in  mind  and  the  analytical  results  in  Table  VI  con- 
sulted. 

Table  VI  contains  the  details  of  the  inspection  of  samples  from  which 
Tables  I,  II,  III,  IV  and  V are  compiled  together  with  the  name  of  the 
manufacturer,  brand,  guaranteed  and  found  composition  and  the  names 
and  addresses  of  persons  from  whom  samples  were  obtained. 

In  Table  VI  ingredients  guaranteed  one  per  cent,  or  less  showing  a 
deficiency  of  20  per  cent,  of  the  total  guarantee  and  ingredients  guaran- 
teed over  one  per  cent,  showing  a deficiency  of  0.3  per  cent,  are  printed 
in  bold  face  type.  If  deficiencies  are  shown  by  ail  the  ingredients  such 
results  also  appear  in  black  type.  In  the  preceding  total  phosphoric  acid 
deficiencies  are  only  so  marked  in  fertilizers  in  which  the  available  phos- 
phoric acid  is  not  guaranteed. 

In  comparing  the  standing  of  manufacturers  Tables  II,  III  and  IV 
should  always  be  used  in  conjunction  with  Table  VI. 

Table  VII  contains  results  showing  the  mechanical  condition  of  rock 
phosphate  samples.  All  siftings  reported  in  this  table  are  made  by  the 
dry  method. 

Table  VIII  contains  the  names  and  addresses  of  manufacturers  who 
have  certified  materials  for  home  mixing  on  sale  in  1917. 

Table  IX  contains  a list  of  brands,  and  names  and  addresses  of  manu- 
facturers certifying  them  as  on  sale  in  1917.  The  registrations  being  per- 
manent any  registered  brand  may  be  legally  sold  at  any  time  without  re- 
gard to  its  publication  in  this  list  provided  a State  Chemist’s  label  is  at- 
tached to  packages  and  for  bulk  shipments  for  each  200  pounds  or  fraction. 

ATTENTION  FERTILIZER  PURCHASERS 

To  cooperate  with  this  department  to  the  best  advantage  observe  the 
following:  Do  not  accept  any  fertilizer  in  any  quantity  unless  State 
Chemist’s  labels  are  furnished  as  required  by  law.  (See  reproduction 
page  6). 

Consult  Tables  II,  III,  IV  and  VI  and  purchase  from  companies  who 
maintain  guarantees,  do  not  have  brands  in  the  “Not  within  10%  of  value” 
column,  few  and  preferably  none  in  the  “20%”  column,  and  an  infre- 
quency of  bold-faced  figures. 

Note  that  prosecutions  for  deficiencies  are  not  a part  of  the  official 
duties  of  the  State  Chemist.  The  facts  are  given  in  the  fertilizer  bulle- 
tins (which  are  sent  free  by  the  Experiment  Station  to  any  citizen  of  the 
state  on  request)  and  it  is  for  purchasers  to  decide  whether  they  will 
purchase  of  manufacturers  whose  inspection  samples  are  below  the  legal 
guarantee  in  composition  or  show  carelessness  in  mixing  by  having  a 
large  number  in  the  “20%”  column  or  cooperate  with  this  department  and 
purchase  from  manufacturers  whose  inspection  results  show  guarantee 
uniformly  maintained. 


TABLE  II — Summary  of  Results  of  Inspection  of  Samples  Secured  Spring,  1916 


34 


eO^tl  aiqniosni  ssao 
-xa  oj  anp  aniBA  ssaaxa 
aioui  JO  jBHop  I qjiM.  ‘oj^ 

0 0 

- 

CO 

0 

CO 

OrHOO<MOOrHO(NOOOOOOOOOC<JO-^OOOC^ 

(N 

uoj  jad  aajuB 

-jBnS  JO  aniBA  baoqb 
ajoui  JO  JBpop  X 'Oii 

r-l  (M 

CD 

CD 

- 

CO 

rHin.rH(MI>O<N(MrHrHTt<C:rHrHC<JC^rHJ^-O^-r-«Jt-.00lft^C0 

rH  rH  rH  (M  C^l  rH 

noj  jad 

aajuBJBnS  jo  aiqBA 
Avopq  sjBpop  s oj  t -OM 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OOOOOOrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

uoj  jad 
aajuBJBnS  jo  aniBA 

Moiaq  SJBqop  x oj  e 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

oooooooooooooooooooojoooooo 

noj  jad 

aajuBjBnS  jo  aniBA 
MOiaq  sjBqop  2 O'i  Z ‘ON 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

00000000000000000000000000 

noj  jad 
aajoBjBnS  jo  aniBA 
Mopq  SJBqop  g oj  I -ojsi 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OrHOOO<NrHrHrHOrHOOOrHOOOrHOOOOOOlO 

noj  jad  aaj 

-UBJBnS  JO  arqBA  MOjaq 
JBpop  I UBqj  ssat  'O^j 

0 rH 

- 

(M 

0 

- 

0<NOOOO<NO'rt^rHOOOO(MOOOOCOOOOrHOCO 

aajuBJBoS  Avoiaq 
•juaa  jad  os  sjuaipajS 
-ui  ajoui  JO  ano  qjiAV  ’o^^ 

1 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOtMOOO 

aajUBJBnS  AiO{aq 
•jnaa  jad  08  sjuaipajS 
-ui  0JOUI  JO  auo  qji’Av  -o^ 

rH  0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OOOOOOCOOOO(MOOOrHOOOO(NOOlOOOO 

aajoBjBnS  Avoiaq 
•jaao  Jad  os  sjnaipajS 
-ui  ajoin  JO  auo  qjiAi  ‘o^ 

rH  0 

0 

(M 

0 

0 

O(NOOOC>->^r-lrHOmOOO00OOOOinOO03OOC>0 

aajuBJBuS  Aioiaq 
•juaa  jad  oi  sjuaipajS 
-ui  aJoui  JO  auo  qjiM  ’o^v 

i rH  0 

0 

0 

- 

0'gtiOOrHIMlO(M'^rHt-i-IOOlOOOOr-IQOOOr-lr-l'?-H{33 

eajuB 

-jBuS  JO  arqBA  jo  -juaa 
jad  01  uiqjiAV  jou  -oj^ 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OOOOOCqrHOOOOOOOOOOOi-IOOOOOOO 

aajuBJBnS  jo  aniBA  jo 

•juaa  jad  oi  utqjiM  -oj^ 

0 i-H 

1— t 

fN 

0 

rH 

OCOOOOOCOrHlOrHrHOCJOCOOOOOeOOOOi-lOOO 

aajuBjBuS 

oj  an^BA  UI  iBiiba  ‘o^j 

i-i  CM 

CO 

(M 

(M 

CO 

- 

Oi 

'^OOrH(MOiO’^C<lCD(MCO<MrHrHi>COCOOOOrHT-H|>0'^'^Tj< 
Cvj  rHrirH  COCOrH(N 

jBinaijiud  AjaAa  ui 
aajuBjBnS  oj  [Buba 

0 rH 

1 

(N 

0 

(N 

rH 

C<3C<10(M'3<OCOi-H(N(M003i-Hr-IC<l(MC*3000THrHJ>00(M-g*(l> 
(M  rH  rH  (N  1-1  rH  i-H 

SaidCCtBS  JO  •Ojyj  I CO 


<MO1(M00COt-HC0O5C<1i 


o o 

OO 


1 13  I ’S 


a a 

S O)  ' 

6§| 


Q S 5 N 


I ^ o 

! a|a 

' QJ  2 O) 

a '‘=i 

•-<  C3-^  oS 
“ o.  5®  >H 

b C-’  Da 

D3  Q D5  ” 

S d 

g S g S3 


o 

o 


fl  « 
d3 


d CO  a 
d is!  « ro  CrI 


O 6^ 


o o 


a bD  bjo^ 
O C3  03  fe 


bccc  bfi  03 

<3_^<!  W 
a o rt 


Sag 

d o 3 

d c3  =3 fco  9 
O r--,  o O)  .N  J3  o 

<-3  •«  <u  ^ .d  OQ 
<1  03  <;  t>  OJ  03  ^ 


U I ^ 

O 

j_,  o r 
6 

•Sco^O 

Q 4J 

^ V — C3  t-i 

.O  o ^ ^ o; 

N -5  ^ w o -M 

^ «a  fe  ;P  S 


a 

ft  ... 

^ ' ° 
Q.^O 

d3  « 

^ 0,4^ 

6S| 

Ml 

<3r-ig  dd3 


dO 

d.S3 

o3d 

O 

ogS 


' '&:o  o o o d® 


OO  d d S3  a 


'do 


.a  .3  9 03  42  -JS  d d -d  N - _ 


»a  a 

<1<3<3 


3W 


a a 

«3  <3 


03  ^ es  W g-.  V 

O Cl  o 3 ^ 

d S 2 ^ ” 

c ^ c d ^ d 

a a f.03C3.JW.^-.("r.r— l^  ' 

<!  <3  -^papapqoOOOQQQ 


^ d 

0 d c 

2 ^ -j  .9  -a 

3 d -d  c->  u ci  a 

3 d g 2 2 .a  3S 


1 <y  o 03  "-i  c c (H  ^ 70  .os  d .d 

I Sgwi 

)-Hi-4W:;2t»aiai  ^ CC 

'co-i-^^^cSjceScQ  S'® 

2S-a9aaas3.SM^> 

‘ 


[Hcd?*o3o3o3c2o,i:;^^^ 
fiPdWWP^pHpHpHpHpHOOWP^ 


35 


OOi-tONOOOOONOOOOOOi 


IOOOOOOOOOO,-IOOOOOrHOCOOOOOO<M 


t~r-icoe<3!0'4'eoinococo-^' 


'<=^0»-l<M^Wl(N(M(MOCOCO,-HlOOOOCO^OrHrHJt-, 


oooooooooooooo 


ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOc 


lOOOOOOOOOOOrHOOOOO 


oooooooooo 


oooooooe«5oooooooo< 


OOOOiHOOOOOOOOOr-IOOOOrHOr-IOOOO 


OOOC^i-IOlMOi-IOOOOOi-lOO 


OOOOOOOOOONOONOOOOOIOOOOOO 


UOOOrHT((C<50rHr-l(MO, 


IC0OI-(OOO^^O<NOOO^^Or^OOOOC5OOOOO 


O (N  O r-l  O O 


ooooooooooooo 


O O O O O O O I 


ooooooooooooooo 


o o o o o 


>50Oi-(OOOiHOOi-li-IO0O 


O O O O O O I 


OOOOpH<MOOOOi=>OOrHO 


(M  O O O c 


IO(MOOCOi— li— lOOOOOOCOOr— lrHOOOOCO'rJ<OOi— lOOi— lO 


t-  O (N  O O O (M 


30i-(cowcoomoco-^i 


OrHCMOOOTUrHCMrHOOOOCOi 


IOOOOO>-(OOrHTj<OTHO(M 


;>oooooocoooooo 


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHOOOrHOOOOOOOOOOO 


DOOrHCOrHOCOrHCOO(NCOOrHr-iOOrHO(Mi 


lOrHOMOO^OOOOOOCOO, 


' CO  CO  r-l  tH  (» 


5i-HC<llOt'-COCOTj((MCOi 


l(MOrHCOOrHTHCO^COOi-l(MOeOCOCOlOOOO<MinoOi-IOO 


m Oi  CO  rH  i-H  tP 


OrHC0O'^^-^jMC0N^C0e0r-l'#inr-lp-l^jMQ0C0!M(NrHC01>rHin00r-IC0C0rH(M, 

^ CO  <M 


' liO  CO  rH  CO  tH  o 


OO 


aj  oi  ^-1 

bl)3 


• fl  “O 

O)  03  o 

^ 6 ri'4  S 


oo 


«8o 


69 


'aOfe'^'ooOQ 

■ O o O S)--;  ^ ^ O)  N N.HSS  CS  fH  QJ  5 


a 

So. 

OO  ^ 

J d 6 


a 

^ 6^  . 


xi 

O g ■ 

oS 


o-a  a-^O  a 


^ See 


^ rti  'P  ^ <3*.  y ^ 3 - CD 


S3  ^^33  ° oo  o.t^  SS  S SS  SoS  raS-Sa  a “-So 


TABLE  III— Summary  of  Results  of  Inspection  of  Samples  Secured  Fall,  1916 


36 


siQntosui  SS90  j 

-xa  anp  ani^A  ssaaxa 
ajom  JO  J'Bnop  I miA\  ‘oisi  ' 

uo;  lad  aa^uB  [ 
-jBaS  JO  anjBA  aAoqB  j 
ajoui  JO  j^nop  I •oj!j 

' uo^^jad  I 

aa^juBJBnS  jo  ani^A  i 

Avoiaq  SJBiiop  8 ‘ON 


O Oi-iOCCOOCl^OOi^OC^C^C-. 


000  o r-<  o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 


' o O O O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOO 

aa^uTJjBnS  jo  an^BA  i “ 

Av.opq  SJBiiop  e o:^  f -on 

^o:^  jad 


^0:^  Jad  ^ ^ Or-IOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

aa:inBJBaS  jo  arqBA 

Avoiaq  SJBiiop  t 8 ‘ON  ’ 

UO^  jad  , o^oooooooooocooooooooooooo 

^ac^^BJBnS  jo  arqBA  ; o o o o 

Aiopq  SJBqop  8 0^^  'OM  i 


C i o O O O O OMOOOOOOOrlOOOOOOOOOOOrHOOOO 

aa^uBJBiiS  JO  arqBA  000 

AVOpq  SJBqop  g oj  I ‘on:  ! 


UOJ  -19^  j OlrtOOOOr-lr-IOMOrHO.-HOOOOO,-lOe0<MOOO 

-UBJBrrS  JO  aniBA  Aioiaq  | o r-  o o o 0 

JBqop  I uBqj  ssai  ’On  i 

aajUBJBrrg  Avopq^ '<-,0000  O o o o o o rn  o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 

•jnaa  Jad  OS  sjnaipajS  , 

-ui  ajoin  JO  auo  qjiAv  ‘Oisl  


aajUBJBnS  AVOjaq  o(MOOoor.ooooooooc;0^ooo<MOOoo 

•juaa  jad  08  sjuaipaJS  0000 

-UI  ajorn  jo  auo  gjiAv  'ON  

aajuBJBrrS  Avopq 


aajUBJBrrS  Avopq  ; ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ o co  o o o o rn  o o ^ o ^ o ^ o o ..  <n  o o o ^ o o o o 

•juaa  Jad  C3  sjuaipajS  <=,00000 
-ui  aJorn  jo  auo  qjiAi  'OK 


aajuBJBirS  Avopq 

•juaa  jad  oi  sjuaipaJS 
-UI  aJoui  JO  auo  qjuA 

aajuB 


o 0)OOoeooor-(mooo(MOC':ooc''ioooooift'^o 


/ -jBrrS  JO  arqBA  jo"?uao  | o o o o o 00,000000000000000000000000 

jad  01  niqjLA  jou  -on  , 


aajuBJBrrS  jo  aniBA  jo 

•juao  jad  ox  uiqJI^  'ON  i 


o O O ooOOOO--lr-iO-i^OT-HO^OOOOO^O'i((MOOC 


aajuBJBtig 

oj  aniBA  UI  iBuba  'oj^ 


^ 00  00  (M  OOOO^^^CO(MOOOCOiniOlOO,rHr^Og5r^0^flOOOOOrHO 

rH  (M  rH  CO  I-' 


jBpraijjBd  AjaAa  ui 


^ ^ oO(MrHO--tO.-HOC»lO-i<'<fingQ.-lr^^rHr-IO'*^'<t<Or-IO 

aajuBjBuS  oj  [Btrlba  •oj.;  (m  i-h  (m 


pazAlBUB  ^ 00  00  00^ 

saidruBS  jo  ^ ^ c-i  r-.  ^ 


HCocooootMioom 


CO  c<i 


<Oimi-<r-<'^IMOCOr-(C 


37 


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC<JOOOOOOOOTtiO<MO 


<M  O o O t 


OlCi>*G0i— 'rHlOOiOi— li— ^OX^OrHO<MOOOi>r-ti-HCOr-(OOCOi— lLOCOOCC'OrHC<l 


ooooooooooooooooooooooooo 


ooooooooo 


OOOOOOtHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 


o o o o o o 


oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 


o o o o o o 


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHOOOO 


000(— IrHOOOOO 


C^JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOi— lO 


OOtMOi-HOOOO 


(MOMOOOMOOOOi— (Oi— lOi— lOi— (OlOOOCqi— lOOO 


o o o o o o 


oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 


o o o o o o 


IOOO(MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOi 


l<MOOO(MOOOOOOOOOOOO(MOOi— lOOOO(MrHOOOOO 


lOi— ITfOOOlOOlMOOOOi— (OOOrHOlOOO(Nl 


O (M  CO  i-H  O O ( 


OOOOOOi-IOOOOOOOOOOOOi-HOOOOOOi 


o o o o o 


lOCOOOOCOOOOOrHOrHOi— IOrHOCOOO(M(MOOOCO 


f O O O O O 


ICOlOCOCOi-H'^LncOCOOli-HCO 


'l>l>-Ce(MrHLnr-ICOCOrHrMOOOi— IO(NrHClJ 


i-H-rHcsioooorHincoocooOT-ioq 


ft8 

ts' 

CO  O 

H a 

> i eS 


o 6 
OQ 


4J  OJ  ® ^ 

N 

' '-3  « « ' 


Mas 


■ ■ I 

O IS 

«2  ' 

■ >> 

.ld< 


,^s§ 


fcj  . 
.wa>>a3i- 

g«S5 

q G a p 

3 03  S .bq  o 


>>:5 

a -M 


CO  :3 

C3  03 
\ ^ -fl 

) 'm  M o) 

iSSii 


r ^ o <v . 

O o O Eq  O. 

O ^ 5 EC  >-i 

^ t-,  o o o 
si'-go 

iaco  g 

^ £ M QJ  O' 

“tj  O'  QJ  „ T"  -G 

g ^ ^ .s  G5 

" " G 03  QJ 

fin  Ph  fl;  Oh  c? 


■216 


6 ^ 


aP^ 

O) 

fl  02 

I §9 


<11  Q 
o S . 
o 

fjo'ra  S 

G c g.N 

Gq-QH.-G 


fan 


o a I ^ 

'^O  O 


o a 

o S 


-ill 

•S-§^|S55 

22  H -S  £ 

^ W Oh  02  :/2  '02 


o i O 

r^aj^^*'-'WCOa;c3CJ 
•SN^siGflGNaN 
- a tuos 
a G O G ’43  G 43 

OSoOO^^feQi^ 

^.9<»4j£GaSgxq 

^■n:G.^G-5,,:a-g.H 

03iiiOSG;^q_,QjOP 

SSS^SiJSgiSS 


TABLE  IV — Summary  of  Results  of  Inspection  of  Samples  Secured  1916 


38 


20<"<i  aiquiosui  ssao  1 
-X8  o:j  8np  ©niBA  ssaoxe 

ajOOI  JO  JBIIOp  I miAV  'OM  1 

0 0 

(M 

0 

0 

0 

o<MOoioooMo-^;oooo^oooo;^ooogoo 

no:j  lad  99:;u'b 
-jBaS  JO  anj'BA  oAoq'B 
9JOUI  JO  jBqop  I -OH 

T-t  Ir- 

00 

(M 

0 

CO 

- 

0 

CO 

t-H 

00O<M<MC0O<NC<3  00i-l00l0r-lrHjt>O«0>-lOOr-IC3«0C0r-li-H 

1—1  i-iC-li-l  r-ll33  C'1-^rH 

noj  jad 

aajuBjBnS  jo  aiq^A 
MOjaq  sj'Bnop  s o'i  1 -on 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Or-IOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

uoj  jad  1 

aajuBjBnS  jo  ani^A 
Avojaq  sjBiiop  g oj  t ’om 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OOOOOOrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

uoj  jad 

aajn^jBnS  jo  anjBA 
MOjaq  SJBqop  oj  g -om 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Or-HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

uoj  jad 

aaju’BJBnS  jo  anjBA 
Avojaq  sjBiiop  8 0^  S ’ON 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

uoj  jad 

aajuBj^nS  jo  anjBA 
Avojaq  sjBuop  g oj  x -o^j 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0(N000eMrHi-Hi-l0i-(000<M000'—  OCOOOOO 

noj  jad  aajn'B 
-u'BJBnS  JO  anjBA  Avojaq 
jBqop  1 UBqj  ssai  'o^j 

0 r-i 

(N 

(N 

0 

- 

0 

01>OOOOfMO-^(Mi— lOOOmOl—IOO'^OOOOON 

aajuBJBnS  Avopq 

•jnaa  jad  og  sjuaipajS 
-ui  ajooi  JO  ano  qjiAV  ’o^ 

1 

j 0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

OOOOOOOOO.-HOOOOOOOOOOOOOCMOO 

aajuBJBn^  MOjaq 

1 -jnaa  jad  08  sjnaipaJS 
-UI  ajoui  JO  auo  qjiAV  ’oj^ 

! 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0(MOOOOC<300i-l(MOOOr-IOOOO(MOOO«300 

aajuujBnS  Avopq 

, -juaD  jad  03  sjuaipajS 
-UI  ajoui  JO  auo  qjiAi  ‘o^ 

rH  0 

0 

CO 

0 

0 

0 

OlOOOOO'>3<i-li-Hi-linOCOlOOi-HOOOOOi-li-HOO 

aajuujunS  Avojaq 
•juaa  jad  ox  sjuaipajS 
-UI  ajotti  JO  auo  qjiAi  -o^ 

i-H  0 

- 

0 ' 

• 0 

10 

0 

O(MOO'^eMl0(M-^fM^'-HOOi^O(MO^j^OOC3^O^ 

j eajuu 

-junS  JO  anjuA  jo  -juaj 
Jad  01  niq^IAV  jou  -on; 

0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

oeooooojriooooooooooo^ooooooo 

1 aejuBJunS  jo  anjuA  jo 
•juao  jad  ox  niqjiAi  -on 

0 rH 

CM 

CM 

0 

- 

0 

O0iOOOOC0r-lin(M(MOOOt^Oi-'OO'M<OOOOO(M 

eaxuBjuaS 

oj  aiqBA  UI  lunba  •ojjj 

rH  00 

CO 

0 

CO 

rH 

CO 

CM 

(Mi-l(NC<IOO^COO-^t-OrHr-HlOCOOOSOO;^i-l<Ng^r-l;^ 

P;0  (M  (MOOtM  i-l  t-lO  (N10<N 

jBinoijjBd  AJaAa  ui 
i aajuBJuris  oj  junlba  'o^ 

1 

CXf- 

CO 

CO 

CM 

- 

CO 

- 

T-('^rHCMOOCOCMr-'COOl>r-lrHl>CDt>COOWrHCM;^CiiHOO 

1—1  <M  CM  rH  i—tTfi  C^CO^ 

|j 

pazAjuuu 
saiduiBS  JO  ‘o^j 

j .. 

Ci 

CO 

CM 

CO 

- 

CO 

CO 

CM 

!| 

^ M bl  Oa  0 CM  00  ^ ^ 0 0 0 ^ ^ gl  CO  0 ^ ^ <N  g rH  g , 

1; 

o 6 
Oo 


O o o 

Iasi 


H n i 


^ 

p S p « I w 


^ ^ O 

• Ogo^oS 

_ 03  p-i  ^ X! 

^ S3  g-Sw  2 g So 

rr,  053  Jh  3 


o ^ ^ ^ o .Si  1=I 

t'O 

" 00  bjo"  bXlC/J  b/l  c3  bo  c tfl 


OJ  O) 

p,  g g 

-<  <1  <1 


O o, 

^,0 


t;  O'* ' 

^s- 

<3^ 

gw' 

, 

is 

a 

<1  • 


bjQ 


! '^o 

.a  CO; 

, ^ 

S'H.g 

> 03  M 

p;  p. 

i c3  c3 

:mw( 


®‘- 

o o a a 

5 « bo  bo  a 3) 
3 »2  03  C3  .a  -o 

i^aa  a a 

3 £3:;p3.aai 

5 5^(^000 


'Q 
oT 

M i an  £ 

R :r  c •"  o a S 


o 

0 S3 

%xi 

1 g 

^ a 

i=i  A 

1-1  Ph 

^30 


.§l1w 


a>  cj  c3  3 

«p,  p 


p^ss.s|| 

5-«'E.S|S| 

03  . fcH  O P ►>  03 

POOWHpq^ 


W , 

O Pi 


QJ  4)  03  q 

^ ^ll' 

P 03  o;  cu  • 
Pm  W WWI 


•fniVor  Works.  fThe  Joslin-Schmidt 


39 


'COT-»OOr-*0  <NOOOOOGOOOOOOOOr-tOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOCOOOrHOi>00<NOOOOCO 


■COCOCOt— C005CO(MOi 


l<NC:.rHC<JCO<MO.  CO<NCOai<MCir-iO<Mi^CO'^<M«MCOrHCiCOi>Or-ii> 


ooooooo  ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 


>000000  OOOOOOOOrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 


lOOOOOO  OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOi— lOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 


• 000000  OOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOr^OOOOOOOr-lOOOr^OOOO(^^1-^OTHOOOOO 


OOl-HOOOO  -rfr-lO(MOr-iOOOOOOT-lOOOOOOOOOOOOOO(MOOO<NrHOOOrHOOi-lOOO< 


OO^-OOOrH  OC0O-^rH(MOO^C0OrHOOOO(MOC0OOOC<lOO<MOC0OOOT-HrHOOO'^OO<NOrHOOO 


OOrHOOOO  OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOi-lT-lOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO< 


0(M(N000r-l  rHOO(NOOrHOCOOOOOOOOOOOiHrHOOOOOrH<NOOOOOOOO(MrHO(MOOOOO 


OI>'«^lOOOrH  (M(MO'^OOC»5OC0i-tOOOOOOOC0OrHrHOOOOOC0OOOOC<lOOrHOCiT-IO(NOOOO(M 


iTt<OOr-iCO  OTjiOOOCO'^OCOrHOt-l'^OOOO^C<J(Mi-HOOOOi-lGOCDOOOOOr-«Oi-«0(MCOr-ilOOrHOOCO 


OOOOOOO  OOOCOOOOOr-iOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHt-lOOOrHOOOOrHrHOOOOOOO 


O C<1  GO  O O O 1 


O O CO  1 


OOlOCOOrHi-IOOOG<IOCOrHOOCsIOO(MOlOOOOCO<MOOOCOOO'^OrHOOO 


lrH'^OlCC<lCC(MOCOC<Jl:^COlCOi 


i-tOlOC^JOlOCOCOCOOT 


> O O I-H  CO  ^ 


(N  <M  (M 


O CO  rH  <N  ( 


iCOOlO<M^COCOOCOi 
I rH  CO  CO  1 


^ 6 ^ 
_.-0  S 


o r 
O o 


N 

■"So 

! Qi  S 
> tn  wr 
) o o a 


0.2 ' 


8-9 1 


^ O? 

is 

atnwM. 


d a 
<U  OJ  o 

'O'O  P, 
a a 53 


1^6' 

m 


d 

B 

cu  H CQ 

^o'o- 

d '4;;  '-^3  S -P 
N x:  t,  s S ^ 

d:  0,0)  <u  .d  ^ 

■4^  cfj  ^ fii  d 

P-H  O O)  yiN 

pxi  a >)x: 

^ Qj  d r'l 
d 

CQ  CO  3 d 35 
05  Oj'ti  v 

a 2 d -S 

O O ^3  O)  .d 


o ^ 

Q _ 

bfl  O 1.-4  f-i 

.SO  >4^0 


o 

_ 1-5 


'CcL--  df^ 

d • 4-4  o "2 

« “ 5r!0  S-G 


W r-<  ^ 
^ -2  ^ 


4)  O ^ P-,  S 

cj-io  d M .OTd 

03  03  .2  O 4J  O d 


W o a 

d &0 

BdoT® 

cn  d:  d;  O , 

r r o -d  <D 
o 00-J3  “ 

•c3SS  d bo-g 
S jH  cj  .9  o 

“Ssl_ 

^73  o 

Ph  0 o d C3  tH 
03  Ki  03  05  4J 
fit  Pm  pi<  PL(  PL| 


c3  O 

■SO 

05  05 
O !h 
X3  3 

^ 9 

o3 

« a 


Sp4S 

§351 

O “ 

0.9..  _ 
o 
O 


’O-S: 


iPnog 


O 53 

CC  S r'“  S 2 

^ S’^  d-g 

d o B 
d ° 

£S'=3PM  „ 

S -9  ^ a 9 

05  05  3 C3  -d 

3 d 03  05  3 

0-t2C^pqp£? 


be 

1 1 

fin  ^ 


^ d 

d 4 tu]  tH 

::3  .£3  a o? 


s ^ 

C3  - 


3 ?-» 

9 s 


.... 

5 S'-i3.S  BS  . G.N 
c SSfe  25'-gQ  o'-g 

^ O 03  Q 'g  ^ ^ 


a 

OQC»! 


^ 2-2  g gc»  -S 

-^.9  44o“dda4.„d-d 

rr-j  ^ rd  C O T.'d  +4  taO  d <3-’ 

B 27^-  a s ^ a 2-d 


5-  2 g’-E  E.2  o S 


TABLE  V — Summary  of  Results  of  Inspection  of  Samples  Secured  in  1916,  by  Counties 


40 


20''ti  9[UU[osui  ssaoxa  o}  aap 
uo:}  jad  jo  eui^A 

9AOqB  0JOIU  JO  JBllOp  I ’OfiJ 


000000  (M  10  i-lCOCOOr^r^'S<OCOi-^COOr^r--i-^L';  Cl  --H— .C-  ' 


uo:^  jad 

aa:}UT3JcaS  jo  aniBA  aAoqi? 
jBpop  I uBqj  ssai  ‘ON 

OC'l'^i-iOrHCO.  CClOCOCOX^':0(M-^l>-(N'rJi(M(MT-<l>COCllO'«^Oi-i'^OtCr-'i-HO'^^;CCC 

uoj  jad  aa^utJjBnS  jo  an[T?A 
aAoqB  ajout  jo  lenop  i 'Om 

OCO':OOr-((Mi-H'?i<COCOCOCOOrHCOCO(MC^ail>COtO(NOC:OrHlOt'^CCCOlCT*<OX^tDCOC<l 

I-*  10  CO 

uo^  Jad  aa^juBJBnS  jo  anp?A 
AVO[aq  sjBqop  8 i,  ‘ON 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHOOO 

no;  Jad  aa^uujBnS  jo  aiq^A 
Avopq  sj^pop  g o;  f 'oj^ 

00000000000000000000000000000000000000 

uo;  jad  aa;ut3JBn3  jo  anp3A 
Aioiaq  sjGpop  t 0;  g '0^^ 

Oi— 1000000000000000000000000000000000000 

uo:^  Jad  aa;uGJGn3  jo  aiqGA 
Avoiaq  SJGpop  g o:j  g ’ox 

O0OOOOOOOOOO0OOOOOi-HOOOOOOOO0O(MT-IOOOi-Hr-(OO 

uo:^  Jad  aajuujGnS  jo  aiqBA 
Avoiaq  SJGpop  z 0%  1 'oj^ 

rHi-trHOOOOOOOOrHOOOOOi-Hi-lOOC<Ii-lOi-HOr-lOOO(NOr^OOOOO 

uoi  jad  aa;uBjBag  jo  aniGA 
Avopq  JG[iop  1 uGq;  ssai  -ojsi 

OCOrHOOOi-(Oi-llOOpHC<10i-(rHi-lOCOCOOrtlO(MOOOC^OOlCr-i(Mi-i(MCNi-tO 

aa^uGJGnS  Avo[aq 
•:^uaa  jad  og  s;uaipaj3 
-ut  ajoui  JO  auo  qj.iAv  •o|v[ 

00000000000000000000000000000000000000 

aa^uGjGnS  Avo[aq 
■;uaa  jad  08  s^uatpajS 
-ui  ajora  JO  auo  qjiA\  ’ojvi 

OCOOOOOOO^OOOi-lOOOOO(MOOC<Ii-IOOOOOO<M<MOOOiMOOO 

aa;uGJGU3  A\oiaq 
•^uao  jad  os  s;uaipaj3 
-UI  aJOui  JO  auo  qp^A  'o^j 

r-ITtlrHOOOOQiH-^OOi-HOOO(MOeOr-li-llOi-IOOi-Hi-Hi-lr-ICOOrH(MO'MOi-li-l 

aa^uGJGus  Avo[aq 
•;uaD  Jad  oi  s:^u^!paJ3 
-ui  aJOui  JO  auo  q4LA  'oj^ 

r-tL^COOOOC<Ii-iCO<MOCCi^OrHCOCOi-HOOi-HT-li-iC<lCO'^(N'MTtH(MCO(MCO(Mr-»c01>i>Oi-l 

aa^UGJGnS  jo  aniGA  jo 
•^uaa  Jad  ox  U!qX!‘«^  XOti  'ON 

Or-i000000000O0O00O0i-(O00000OO0O<Mi-IOO0(Mi^C,0 

aaxuGJGuS  JO  an[GA  jo 
•juaa  jad  oi  uiqjiAi  -oj^ 

rH’^CMOOOi— iOi-HCOO(M(MOi— (i-HrHrHT^^COOOi— l<Mi— (OrHC'IOOr^T-HCOi— ((MC<1^0 

aajuGjGuS 

oj  an[GA  UI  [Guba  -o^*! 

OCiT-*r-lrHC0^1>*OOLOOCOCOCOT--'0'^Oi-^C5'^COlOi-i'^lCr-<OrHOT-iOlOOi-HX^(MLO 

r-^i-l  C0(Mr-lt^(MC'3O  riTtir-i 

jGpaaijJGd  AjaAa  ui 
aajuGjGu's  OJ  jGnba  'oj^ 

OCOOrHrHfNi-HCOOfM-^-^i^lOCOOl^Oi— l■^lra^>C<l'^^mO00C001<^5^^l0.f^■^C0O0>OQ0C0 
1—1  lO  CO 

No.  of 
samples 
analyzed 

IBJOJ, 

rHTt<COr-ti-HCOLQX^OrHOLOOOCO(Mr-lb::t^O<M'*^OOCOlOlO<MOOrHOOOJ>OOrHLOOCCL^ 

(Mr-i  (MrH  Oi-^  CO  (Ni-fi-ii-n  rH  i-tinrH 

11  Bd; 

OOCOOOOi-Ht^-^COOOlOOCOlOOO(M<M-^OCOCO(MCOOOO'^0<NO(M'^00':t<(Mr- 1 
rH  1— lOli— I— tCO 

Suijdg 

i-H-’+t^r-lr-ieO^OlOmCOOOOOir’i— iLOlO-i'OO'^COCOi-HIMt^CO'^^COCOlO-^i-llOOrH-^ 

^ (M  rH  !M  OJ  1— 1 r-l  rH  CO  rH  rr 

COUNTY 

1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i > 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 i t 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 > i 1 1 I 

1 1 1 i 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 < 1 1 1 i I 1 1 > 1 1 > > 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 1 1 I I i 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 < 1 i 1 I • 1 1 1 1 1 ■ 1 > > 

1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 < 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ 1 ■>  1 1 < 1 1 > 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 > 1 1 1 1 * 1 

t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ 1 I 1 i > I * > 1 > 1 1 > * 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ( 1 <>■  1 > 1 

1 , 1 1 1 1 « 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ 1 ■ 1 1 ' ■ ' 1 > 1 * 1 ' 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i t 1 1 1 i i 1 t t 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 < 1 < 1 i i 1 1 1 

1 1 t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 < 1 >'«  1 1 ‘ 

i ! i I i I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 > > ■ 1 i ■ ■ 

1 1 1 i > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i t 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > 1 1 I 1 1 1 < 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 i i 1 i i ■ ■ 1 1 ■ ■ > 1 ' 1 

1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 > 1 1 1 i ( > < 1 I > 1 I 1 I < I 1 ' * < ■ ' 

1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 Ill 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t ' 

1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ■ t <>  1 > > 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 > 1 1 ' 

1 ! ^ 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 t 1 > 1 1 ■ 1 > ■ 1 1 1 _ > 1 1 

1 0^  1 t 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 > i 1 1 f C i ■ > 

1 iS  1^3  1 1 1 1 1 1 1-c  ' ' 1 ' ' 1 1 i !a  : '2  ■ 

0 till  III  H Pt  P l®C!  llori4<^'^'..«hnrH‘' 

» 1 ‘ : g 0 » g ^ ! 

41 


ir5(MOCC<M<>)!N!M(MrHCO^<MlOCCCOtOOeOOO(MCO<Mi-<(MrHJ^r-(CC!^OMeOi-HCOCCC>OCOi-lrH(MX^lMO-^i— 

1- 

CO 

CO 

(^^I-IOO(^]I-IOO(MOlO(^^r-^I-^^^Or-^r^OI-l^^iOOOI-ITt^^HI-l(^^(MC<ICOT-llOlOr^(^]OCOr-ICOOOOT-lOC<;0<^llO^OOOT^^ 

1 

(X;r-tC0-^LnC050Jt-Ol000i-IQ0l0(Mi-l00C<IC0i-lCl«0<Nl>i^00l0050JC0MH00lrt05'^O00OC0CC<MO^C00'*l0Or^'iHC0i-IJ>in 
rHrHrH  <N  C<lrHr-ii— tT— t r-irHC^rH 

s 

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 

- 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHOOi-lOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

(M 

O000000000000000i-H00000000000000000000000000000<;500c000 

(N 

OOOi-nOOOOOrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHO 

- 

OOOOOO(NOO(NOOOOOOOC0OOOOOO(NrHOrHi--lOOOr-tOrHO(Ml0OOOT-iOT-IO<Nr-IOC0rHOOO 

(Mi-Hi-lfOOi-IO(MC<!lO(NOO(MCOOrHCOOC5COl-li-IOOC5  0C<l<M'rtlCOrHrHr-lrH<M(MCOO(MOO(MOOrHOi-IOOC«:iOCOi-l 

CO 

(N 

r-lOOOOOOOOOrHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHOOOOOOOOOOOOi-HtMOOO 

CO 

i-^OOOOOO(MOC0(MOOOr-iOi-IOOOi-IOOOi-IOr-IOOOOOT-l(MOi-IOi-IOr-IOOC>OC<i-lOO(M(NOOO 

o 

COOrH(MOi-lOCMOCO(NOOOrHOrHr-lCNO(MrHOOi-li-Hi-HOi-lT-l^OOO<M'MCMi-lr-H(MrHOOOOOC^OOLO(MOG<3rH 

(N 

O 

OrHCO'^COC'lC^lCOT^iCO'^i^rHi-H'rtiOCOlOCOOCDCOOOCOCOrHfNLCi-lG^jCNCO’^COCOLOOOC-lC^lOC'lC'lrHOCOC'IrHOCOOTj^C^) 

1:^ 

CO 

(M 

OOc:>rHOOOOOOC=)OOOOOi-tOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCDOOCOOOi^OOOr-OOOOOOOi-HO 

CD 

1 "" 

C']iH,-HC<50^(M(MC<IQO(MOO<MCOOrHJOOOCOi-li-IO(MCOOCO;0';tlCOT-l(MT-IC'JC<3eOOOO(MO,-HC-100COr^i-lT-l-^CC''5i-l 

168 

■^C0051>l>l0C0C5C''lOi-.(MOOLn->i<-^C0rHrHG500l0ClC0OOC0OC0C0C500(Ml0C0t-lC0ri0iC0C'ie0OTti0;rH(M00  0r)C<5i-HC0 

CO  C<1  rH  1— (r-li-Hi— irH  i— I i-H  CO  i-H  i— irH  ii— I r^i— li— ii— i i— i—  i— iCO.— l i— 1 

1183 

l^(NCqcOCOC^10000lCi--01>^COCOOC<10r-i'rJ^lCLOlCl>I^lCCOlO'^OOlCGO’^OOCOlOOO(>lOOI:^'rf'lOOCOOOCDCCt^*^ 
C'lC'l  rHi-n  CO 

870 

O-^O^t^CCOi—  ■^'^(CO(MO(MOO'^OC5i-lrHC'1C»0010fOCOC5COOOOOCOt~Ot^rH,-l(MOOCOlc:rH-^(M(MCOC;C''lCO>0  1> 

CO  COi-H  i-l  i-(  -Tti  i-Hi-l  i-ir^r^-ifCOfMi-i  rir-iC'li-'i-i  (M  rH 

1867  1 

»CO^lO^^H^^^He005(^lCCCOCOt^|-^(^^OOC5^Hat’COHi^t~H^^CO;CHtl(^^T^lOr^CO(^I'^^COOOHt^OrHrHOCOONC'<^^^;050COCO 

626  1 

CX)rHOCOOG^10XK5C^110CiX^rHi^C^ll>OiC^OCO<>1COLOCOO:iCOCOCiOOlOLOCriOir:)C'l-^COi'-C'll>10QC:iO^OC<lrHOCOCO<>'ti-t 

^r-  ^ ^ (M  rHCOOlr-ii-ii^r-i  ^COr^r-i 

I ^ ! 

i 

l>  i 

Jefferson  

Jenunings  

Johnson  

Knox  

Kosciusko  

LaGrange  

Lake  _ ___  ___  _ 

LaPorte ___  . 

Lawrence  

Madison 

Marion  

Marshall  

Martin  _ 

Miami  

Monroe  __  ___  

Montgomery  _ 

Morgan  

Newton  __ 

Noble  

Ohio  

Orange  

Owen  

Parke  

Perry  ___ 

Pike  _ 

Porter  

Posey  

Pulaski  

Putnam  ___  

Randolph  

Ripley  

Rush  _ 

Scott  

Shelby  

Spencer  

Starke  

St.  Joseph  

Steuben 

Sullivan  

Switzerland  

Tippecanoe 

Tipton  _ 

Union  _ 

Vanderburg  ___  . _ 

Vigo  

Wabash  

Warren 

Warrick  ___  _ 

Washington  ___  __ 

Wayne  _ 

Wells  ■_ _ 

White  

Whitley  

Totals 1 

TABLE  VI. — Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916 


42 


0 £ 

2 « 
a^ 

•4uaD  aad 
‘IP401, 

'Xuao  aad 

•aiqniosui 

o-o 

3J  3 

•xuao  aad 

P 

‘paiaaAaa 

puB  aiqniog 

•}U80  jad  ui 

aiqnios  ‘o^H 


•:tuao  jad 


•luao  aad 
•aAno^  puB  aiqn 
-los  aa:^BAv  ib;oj:, 


•;uao  aad  ‘oiubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
aa^BAi.  aA^DBui 


CO  O » C<1  CO 


o »o  O 

O rH  »0  ?0 
C<J  <N  ^ 


O^COOCOt^OOXM 

^co<doO»-ii>^i> 


O O (N  O O O 


I O 00  o 

iass 


Lf^co  lOlT-iOiOX^CO 

C<J  I-H  oa  rH  1-H 


OOOC<llOOOOrHCO 

06  06  cd  CO  CO  CO  CO 


OOOOOOOi--l’^OiC<l’^ 

OrHrHOrHi-IC^<N»-lrH 


00  100 


05  CO  I CO 

i-H  (M  t (N  (>3 

00  I o d 


00  cx) 

d d 


CO  to  CO  CO 


O 03  00  O ^ 

d cd  06  d 06  cd 


o o O (M  (M  O 


-^^HIOCOOOOOOOO 

01  d d d rH  i-I  d rH  i-H 


d d 


o'  d 


i>-  00  f-  00 

d d d d d 


00000 


•;uaa  aad  ‘oiubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
aa^BAV  aAij^V 


•:^ua^  aad 
‘oiuBSao 
aiqnios  aaiBM 


•:}uaD  aad  ‘s:hbs 
BtuouiiuBpuB  sa:jBj:j 
-I’u  ui  axqnios  aa:xBA\ 


aa;  uotxaadsui 


IBtOTJJO 


0^ 

S a 

52 
® ss 
-d® 


iO  <M  I O 
CO  ^ I CO  CO 

do  ! d d 


to  O CO  00  CO 
CO  Tti  CO  CO  <>5 

d d d d d 


C<J  CO  t 10  CO 
fH  O I (M  ^ 

d d I d d 


lO  03 

d d 


00000 


CO  03 

d d 1 d d 


10  00 

d d 


d d d d 


U(a  tHafliHoat-iaQfcHOjHOt-ia 

033  o333c333o333o33o33o33 

30  300300300303030 


es'O  ca'0'^'0''3'0'0  oj'O'O  oj'O'O'O'O 
^HaMoaaoafltHfla^Hflaaci 
O33c3330333o333o33300 
30300000030030000 


1 1 j 

i i i : i.s 

I a 1 

* to  ! 

1 1 
i 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 t 

1 1 

1 1 
t 1 

1 1 

1 1 t 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 >, 

!- 

i ' i i '•§ 

<3  1 1 ® o3 

il  i 

' P ! 

1 1 

1 i 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

t t 
t 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 t 

1 t 

1 1 

1 

1 <u 

' G ‘ 5 ’ ' ' 

1 i i 1 

1 I 1 1 

1 1 1 

10 

1^  ! I^P 

1 1-5  1 

t 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

i 2. 

1.2  i 0 ! ' bX} 

i 

i -2  — ' I 0 

1 1 

1 <=^  ' 

1 t 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 s 

1 M - 1 ' b 

1=1  a a- 

12  0 03  oS  ® 

1 ' j 

03 

!.a> 

iSS 

igp,  ,£« 

\S^  1 OJ  0 
>h E-i 

if" 

1 ^ a 

1 0 § 

! c« 

1 

1 03 
' ^ 

! ^ 

0 

1 ^ 

1 ^ 

G> 

1 Oi 

1 

1 cd 

! 

0 

i>>.a  i 

■ <S  -{j  1 

1 

is 

■Oh, 

lo 

'0 

1 ^ 

'POOP<3P 

•1>S  ' 

uu  ^ ' 
IC  Ift  10  lA  I 


> -M  ^ . 

t>(^  i-^a: 


i5  S 1 ^ 


xlxl 

88? 
0©  go  d 

ti  CO  CO  c 

dSoqSooSooS 

© (O 

C<J  ^ c 

qC<l<NC<J(NC<l(MC< 

:8g. 




■-'-■-■■)  ift  10  irt  LO  Lft  I -■“■-■-■*■■- 


)«cO®cpcCi«3®<0; 

- - - - ^ 

'Ti'TiLoiosususiftioirtLOLftLQiftioioiAiir; 


is 

a 
a 
a 

^2  a 

m 13  O 

i“l 

3 a* 

cS  ^ 

a 

< 


<33  ' 


o3 

a 

CC  w 

PM  .3 


o . 

bo  . 

a o 

«;>H 


3 

O d >■' 

wsf 

'2^  ^ 


PI  ®3  ^ 03 


p s 


a.^- 

a 

° 1=1 

o 3 

I— I '0 

<J3  3 


CO  . " 

•-  Q P 

coWS 


I T3  h 0 


KP 

^ y 3 

T3  CC  W T”.  O 1-5 
C3  * 03 

W P 


w o 

g^gWcc^' 

■o  " ^33 

cl^:^  ..^o 

3 t>  -5  >-5  T3  1-5 

'H  a 


cc 


p 


<11 


3 

3 

3 

"is 

fH  t: " 
t>cfe  to 
P M 
a> 

"-So 
S3  oW 
SP 

<3 


op 


03  <1  'O  03  Jrs  13 
o o apq  fl'O 
co^  <u'^  S c3 

gl“wSS 

•pgl“l 

a'Sa 

* P 
O 

P 


<33 


3 s a 

O O o o o 

I S opq^« 

3 


(13  O^ 

a • 

o S o 

j cd  5 

* ^ 
o 
P 


^^g|30 

g-e 


02  53  « 


02  £ 02 


<3; 


T 02  S 'S  g p 

' 03  . (j3  u,  . <0 

OO-^OPPP 

o 

p 


■The  Heldt  Oo.  ' 5764  I 6602  ' Evansville  'Found 1 0.14 


43 


CO  IC  ?-H  lO 


0?OC?iOCOCOCOl-^J 

M<'^lft000050i 


■OOOCOOCOOCOOt^COOOCO' 
d ci  O o C»  00  00  C<I  <>i  o rH  cH  1 


<00  OiCJ^OirSrHOi-frH 
Id  d d d r-I  d 1-1  d d 


ii-lOOO<NOr-lOO 


OOOOOiOOCsO'^OCOt^COCOOOOOCCJCOCi'OOOOOOiO  OOOiOCiOl 
d d O d d r-I  (M  d 1-1  r-I  rH  I-H  rH  rH  rH  1-1  r-I  r-1  rH  T-I  rH  O o rH  O I-I  1 


(N  00  CO  O 
CO  CD  05 

d d d d d 


00  ^ <N3  l>  O 
I-H  C<J  I-H  rH  rH 

d d d d d 


CO  CO  00  CO  CO 
<N  CvJ  <54  (N 

d d d d d 


o o o o o 


o o o o o 


lO  I C4  rH  CO 


I o o o o o 


O O o 1 o o 


I o o o o 


I o o o o o 


lCOCO00d5  IC4COCO'^<M 

Idddd  iddddd 


a ^ lrt<^COO  tC4X^C35'-J<CO 
l'«^LCCOC0  I-^COOIOILO 

dd  idddd  Iddddd 


I 1C  lO 
I (N  (M  CO 

I d d d 


ss  j8?3SgS 

do  idddd  Iddddd 


qj 


^ d C G fl  ^ ^ 

es'O'O  oa'O  ca'O  os'O'CS'C}  ca'O'O  oa'O'O'^'O'O  cs'C'O 

^Hda^Hac3aGl=l!HC^^HC3^flGa!-lOG;HaaGa^HC^aGaa^HGG 
c3ddo3dddddc33cadoadddo3ddcadaddo3dddPdc3dd 

doopooooodododooodoodoooodooooodoo 


O 05  O t-H 
CO  CO  CO  cd  cd 


00 
C4  <N 


05 

ca  d 
D O 

Ol^ 


03  Td  03  'O  'O  'O 

S a 2 a a G c 

ca  G G G G G G 

G O G O O O O 

O O Ph  ^ 


1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 < 1 

1 1 1 

1 I 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 ‘ 



1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 i 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 i I 1 1 1 

III  1 

111  1 

1 1 1 0;  OP  1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

I 0 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 I 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 
till 

1 1 1 

i !o2> 

1 1 t 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

I 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 i 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 ! 

1 i 1 1 < 

1 t 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

III  1 

111^1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

I 1 I 1 1 1 

1 1 t 1 t 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 
111  11 

! i 1^  ' 1 

I 1 ^ 0 1 

1 t 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 i 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 I 

1 1 1 

i I 

1 1 

1 1 

1 i 

1 

1 ^ 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 I 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 



1 1 1 1 1 

t 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 ill 

1 5r!  I 1 1 

1 ' G 
!g  g 

1 .52  ft 

'll 

! >j  S > > 

05  ^ ^ 

i.i■i■§5S 

^ S G G 

-G  OP  05  05  G 

1 'S 

1 OP 

Ig 
! ^ 

1 0 
! ^ 

\ > 

iG^I 

1 ca.Gts 
t>  -tJ  G 

1 0^  G 

1^  0 2 

ll^ 

•s2 

1 W2  OP 

1 t-t  05 

1 05  ;h 

1 ' > 1 

1 05 

lg|-S  >> 

■ .£  -p  G 

G ^ a > 

1 G 0 G ^ 

! Igg3  1 

1 0 Ph  rj 

1 rQ  05  .d; 

13  bag  0 

1 G 0 oft  G 

1 G ' 

I'd  ^ 

Cw  05 

1 ^ 

1 JO 

1 OP 

i.a 

Ito 

1 

'1 

'il  ■ 1 1 

1 ”3  I';*  ;h  >, 

j tc  -p  G y 

! G ftoG 

1 05  05  OP  05 

!wiw 

i0f>MM<i1 

■§ 

'CO 

'c2So 

-f>pq 

'cc 

'|1|00§IW 

,0|> 

IS 

1 ic  <35 

1 (M 

1 CD  C5  (50 

1 00  C5  CO  0 0 

1 C4 

I 10 

I 05 

1 CO  CO 

1 05  LO  CO 

Ifeg 

ISdSS 

1 05  CO  05 

1 <»  (M  IC  (M 

1 CO  cc 

IS^ 

1 CD  CO 

1 0 

' 

1 05 

IgfeSS 

1 CO  05 

1 10  to  icio 

IScS 

1 LCt)  CO  05  -r  10 

1 IC  10  lO  CO  CO 

1 Oi 

1 10 

1 <M 

1 10 

1 (M  10 

1 10  to  CO 

1 ^ 

1 to  CO 

1 cq  10  C>  -tl 

1 irb  ITS  «0  ® 

1 ^ 10  CO  05  CO 

1 10  to  10  to  CD 

IS 

li 

iQDOOOgOi^OOOOOO 
iCOCOOCDOCDl^t^l^f-l^ 
! (M  IM  <NI  S']  <M  <M  N <M  <N  <M 


ISSi 


iCOcocD^cOcoco^^  rococo*! 


I rH  rH  C5  05  O 
■ C4  C4 

I Ol  Ol  <M 

) CO  ^ CO  CO  CO 


M CO  CO  S 

’^-T»  ’»Trii0iC^i5i0505 

'^'^ICIDICICIC 


o 

+C1 

G 

QJ 

G ^ 


5^0 


G 002  ^ 

s .SgG-gggg 
-^<11-; -0^0002 
O O 

m « 


ca  !h  '•'" 

^ I 8 -S  8 

G G G ca 

w§0^3^ 

% . d d 

05  05  . 05  . 

^ ^ P J!  ? i 

o o o 
WWW 


02  § 


= 2 I 

• r*  “ 

02 

d<lj 


O 

a 

- a 

^05  O 05 

^ 05  O ^ 4H  05 

a-G  V ca  a 

. . 05  ^ 

tc  ^ W r,  ^ • 4^ 

G 

^ WJ  , 


G 


G J • 
u r;  02 

o 

m 


GIOh 

iifl 

•n'o. 


g £ 


>-.G3  G 
G .a  O' 
G ^ c/2 


a 

^0 


H.” 


o 

G --G 

§ g“ 

G!  G Qj 

oa^ 

^ d o 

|«  2 
<->03+^ 

'a  G “ 

<102^ 
G +0-G 

I2I 

+H  ^ 

(U  OP 

a« 


IS 

G G 

•—  tH 

G . g 
CO  . 03 

0>G  G 

S*  gw 


£ o 

os 


0 g § P'25 

05wdWw 


05  ^ 

s:  o 
^ o 

>1  . 

^ < 


o o b o § 2 

p o 

Ch 


a 

C G 

O S 

w Oi 

c-  >> 

iB 

'G 

C to 


d 

a>^ 


ft  g,  ft 

^ ca  ^ o3 

05  .^:  05 

^ c<5  05  c3  05  fC 

G G 

Go  o G G 

0,0  O WPh 

I I I I I 


C 05 


W 

G 

C5  ^ ^ 
05  05  o 

^ -M 


C5  — ' 

sw;g 

g«l 

S-  d . 
ft  m 

22 

ca 

“ 2 G 

c 5 ‘ 

— O ( 


O G Gi  ca  GS 

G G G CO  G 

w y M ^ to 

OGa)_Gt,GyG 
"o  Q.GG  gG 

2 Will  ft  w cj 

G ft  ca  G G G 

W 02  W Ph 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


44 


o * 

•;uaD  jad 

‘I'BIOJ, 

"i^i 

Qj 

•:juaD  aad 

‘aiqniosui 

do 

•luao  jad 

d 3 

‘pa^jaAaj 

puB  aiqniog 

•^uao  jad  ‘aa^'BAV  ui 
aiqnios  ‘ns-B^Od; 


•:juao  jad 


•:;uao  aad 
‘aApo'B  pu-B  aiqn 
-los  aa:jBA\ 


•;uao  jad  ‘diubS 
-ao  aiqrqosui 
Ja:^■BAi.  aApoBui 


O lO  1-I  CO 


O UO  CO  O ^ 00  o 
tH  I-H  r-J  (M  r-H  <M  CO 


Oo<jOc<icOC>mO 
0^1  (M*  CO  CO*  CO  1-1  r-J  CO 


O 00  CO 

O C5  rH 


O O O CO 
O O O oi 


O 00  O O rH  CO  CO 

x>  oi  c<j  oi  oi 


I O 00  O o 00 
I oi  i-H  00  00  CO 


o o o o 


00  o C5  OJ 
o i-I  d i-H 


lOqcoi^CiOi  cojL^ooOio:) 


00  S Ci 
odd 


T— t OJ  05 

o d o 


d d 


OI  oi 

d d 


OI  OI  CO 

d d d 


TtH  iC  iTi  CO 


OI  OI  CO  OI 

d d d d 


O O a>  O rH  o r-»  OI 

i-I  rH  d d r-I  rH  r-i  r-i 


00  O O O O 

d r-I  ,H  r-5  i-i 


d d d d 


Ol  OI  CO  OI 

d d d d 


CO  ^ 

dd 


O O O i>- OI  o Ci  CO  Ol 
00*  00  00*  00  CO  00  CO*  I 


’:^U0O  a0d  ‘oiu^S 
-JO  oiqniosui 
j04'BAi  ©Apoy 


■;u0O  a0(I 
‘oru'BSao 
oiqnios  a0;'BAi 


OI  Ol 

d d 


Ol  Ol  Ol 

d d d 


d d 


d d d d 


m <35 
CO  in 

d d 


<M  (>q 

d d d 


(»  CO 

d d 


(M  I> 

CO  in  <^5  CO 

d d d d 


•:juao  jad  ‘s:^[t;s 
BTirouiiuB  puB  sa:}Bj:^ 
-I'u  UT  aiqnios 


(M  t-H  O 

d d d 


(Ca  CO 

d d 


CO  CO  in 

d d d 


M CO  CO  m 
CO  l-H  i-l  I-H 

d d d d 


r: 

d fl 
C3  13  13 
3 0 0 


is  73 -o  "73 
fl  3 3 
3 3 3 3 
3 0 0 0 


os  '3  T3  c3  33  t3  t3 
3 3 i-(  3 3 3 
CS  3 3 3 3 3 3 
3 0 0 3 0 0 0 

o ^ o 


cg'O'O'O'O  nS'O'O 
;h3333^(33 
(533333333 
30000300 


C 

ca  '3  'O  33  33 

!h  3 3 3 3 

3 3 3 3 3 

3 0 0 0 0 


O — — 
3-1  3 3 
3 3 3 
3 0 0 


3 

01  ^ 

02 


3 

is  xi 

O 3 


O ;-( 

<11  05 


fcxi  05  w 

•S 

<11C5S 


^ id 

® jj 

a 

^ i 3 “ 

05  3h  sh  n; 

kWdPM 


is  t>. 

o I d 

tifl  3^ 


00<i;z; 


3 o 
Od 


:3  a 

3 § 

OQ  3 


aa;  uonaadsui 


s « 
© 0) 
® ao 

t( 

A u 


;8S 

) lO  I ^ 

) LO  I LO  ^ CD 


inminKiiKicoco 

COCOCO(«  C«5COCOt-Hi-Hi— li-l  i-HrHr-l'— inilMC 

<35<3505<35  <35<35<35<cqni(Cac<i  (MmninacaMcoc 

inminin  ininio'n<33<ncD  (aDcococDtocoi®! 


(inimntD  <©C0©  t-F- 

I <>5  <iii  <M  ni  m m m <^5  c<i 

)c<3cococo  (C3coc*3  coco 

ii®cococ£>  coinco  CDCD 


3 

3 

3^0 

3 

Sd3 

O-d  3 

Q O <1 

log 

S dal ' 


M 3^^ 

B 

3fi  S 

.a  m o 

3-(  <15  QQ 

if '3” 
3+^  a 


OJ  0.?  ' 

ao 


o. 

Pa  3 

j3 


tn  d 

C 05 

> O 

d S ® 

H 3 53 

! , . <u  O 


•r-i'O  >1® 

3 tn  ' 3 3 3 I— I 

3'^^33^0303 

«l.a  ® 

“ “ S 5 s. 

||^W:S_§OWo 


CQ  3 

05  P, 

O CO 
rC  o 
CC^ 
<150 
M 05 


x} 


imj 


33  <35  “ O 

3.  3 -g  X3 

§g|o 

A! !??  O 

d* " a 

<1^ 


is 

•d 

ai 

aid 


^o|g 

<V  ^ CO 

W S'S  3 


m 


03  O 


^ g a 3 0 

_ 002  fr! W 

'S^'SgQ 

3 • 3 ►> 

<1J  ^ O? 

oa  gin^fq^SO 

Sh  3 =K  IH  * 

0*=^  o 


6^  go; 


- a 

§s 

^ % 

Cfi  o) 

a^ 

=3  33  c 

O -M  T 


saaS 

|aag 


aa 


o« 

d?  ^ ^ 

^ ^dw’^  &Q 
5 |d 

oO=' 


002 

a 


45 


ot~  O'#  oooNOOeooino  oo  ooo  coooooco  oioooo(m  oiooooO' 


I M CO  ■#  eg  I 


O oj  00  O o>  o o 
oo'  to"  00  CO  O i-H 


)r-CMcococooOt^ 
)r-r— r— loodooto 


o to  o lo  05  o o o <M  o 05  o i-H  o o ■#  to  o 1-1  o o eg  ■# 
00  05*  00  oo’  oo"  o 1#  oo’  00  to"  to  od"  05  oo’  o oo"  05  o6  o6  oo’  oo"  o6  oo"  od 


03  3 3 
3 0 0 
CD  ^ 


03-0 

Cl  3 
03  3 
3 O 
CD^ 


CS-O 

Ch  3 
03  3 
3 O 
CDPh 


<o 

3 ^ 

ca'O'O'O'O'O  cs'O'O 
tH33333tH33 
333333333 
300000300 

CD^^^Ph^O^Ph 


1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 t t 1 1 

1 1 1 i 1 

1 1 1 i 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1.0 

1.1 

0 (M  <>3 

1 

1 0 Ci 

1 th  d 

OOi005i-HOC)0 

l-HOl-HOl-li-lt-lrH 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

OC^Ol  0<M  OO1— 1 Or-^COCvIrHCO 

(N  (N  C<)  (M*  (M*  0 r-I  (M*  (m’  <N  (M*  (N 

00  0 
d i-I 

CO  Oi  00  CO  0 00  rH 

1-4  1-4  rH  d r4  d 1-4 

OOOiOOOOiO<>3rHOrHCO 

OOOr-iocgcgegegegeg 

1 Oit- 
1 

1 rH  rH 

s 

d 

1.84 

1.93 

1.82 

1.82 

1.95 

3 

d 

kD 
^ CO 

§ 

d 

d 

ID  1 00 

1 i:^  CO 

d 1 d d 

<M  05 

00  CO 

1 rH  CO 

1 Tj<  '•H 

1 0 0 

d 

to 

eg 

d 

0.26 

0.37 

0.38 

0.28 

0.35 

CO 

CO 

d 

' 

CO  ko 

d d 

0 

03 

d 

CO 

d 

kO  1 D3  CO 

1-H  1 D3  C<J 

d 1 0 d 

d d 

M CO 

d d 

1 ^ Ci 
» !>•  IC 

1 d d 

CO 

d 

CO 

d 

0.72 

0.97 

0.93 

0.62 

0.76 

<N 

d 

3 ID 

d d 

c<i 

d 

CO 

CO 

d 

r-  1 0 CO 

<M  1 CO 

d i' d d 

CO  CO 
kO  kO 

d d 

Sf2 
a d 

1 0 CO 

1 Qi 

1 d d 

r2 

d 

CO 

d 

'+ir^05t-t- 

13  lO  eg  t-  13 

d d d d d 

d 

CO  CO 
>D 

d d 

ID 

0 

CO 

d 

1 0 j>. 

0 1 C<J  r-< 

d 1 d d 

83S 
d d 

(M  03  1 
D1  CO 

d d 

1 0>  ID 

1 (N  D1 

j d d 

CO 

d 

8 

d 

0.58 

0.39 

0.60 

0.43 

0.62 

d 

HH  ID 

CO  (M 

d d 

8 

d 

00 

d 

^ i S r4 

d 1 d d 

CO  CO 

d d 

tH  (>3 

kD  CO 

d d 

3 3 
3 O 
0^ 


3 O 
OPh 


4) 


;_I  3 3 t-1  3 

3 3 3 3 3 

3 0 0 3 0 

0 Ph  Ph  CD  Ph 


373  oS'O  03  73 

t_,  3 ;-i  3 tH  3 
3 3 3 3 3 3 
3 0 3 0 3 0 
0Ph0^0;5^ 


„ 3 3 3 

03  73  03  'a'O  03 '3 'O  ^3-0 
tH3t-i33t-i33tH33 
33333333333 
30300300300 
0^0^[iH0^pH0^^ 


132  3! 

I O)  05 

'Iz;;?; 


So 
I 3|=.S 

I 3 .3  3!  ■ 

.95  a « 
'Hs- 

O O o 

■ i^^oWo 


' eg  I CO  . 
lo  m ud  S to  I S 3 


I 3 
1 

I o 


5 g 


3!  O 
3 3 
<1W 


45  C-  I I U5  I I J,-— 

-}<  I (50  I #1  I 0>  I 

eg  CO  I 55  I lo  i co  j 

to  to  I irt  I to  I to  I to 


I be 

' .9 

|3 

3 

.’i  ►3 

^O 


^ o 


3 3 
O O 
-CTO 
>1  >> 

o o 
00 


S IS®  IS®  Igg^ 

00  I lO  Ol  I 0 eg  I to  i-i 


3 S 

<V 

3 3 k 
ft  0,5 

3 . 3 

<0030^ 

O 05  <P  o 

.-.•ass 


O O "O  75  73 
+J  +5  3 <P  <U 
CO  [0  m 
0!  (U  3 3 3 

S'ft'9  ^ 


M M fV  Ph  ^ 

Mil  I 


^ m 


<50  00  So  C5 

C^l  N (M  (M  C-l 

CO  CO  (^5  CO  CO 

^ ^ ^ zo 


COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO 

COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO 

COOOCOCOCOCD^OCD 


CO  CO 
CO  CO 
CO  CO 
CO  CD 


CDCOC<I(MCOCO 
CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  lO  iD  LO  1<^ 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 
COCO'^^O  ^^COCOO'^ 


ID  kC  ID  »0  I 

cococococococococOco< 


CO 

“S3 
O o 


5s 


_ 3 O 
^ ft^CH 

OQ 

3J  o g 
+51  _q  H 

SPh* 

;z; 


a ^ s 

O «j  ^ S 02 
r-1  O)  OJ 

S0*  s 


Ph* 


p*.s 

3 ^ 3 

s s 75  a ^ 

1?^  Ki  ^ 
^1-2 
5 20«^ 

go*  * * 
;z: 


03  ^ 

3 to 

pq^ 

. 73 
&j  3 

M s 

H 

S=3  73 
c3 

O 0?  QJ* 

^■sac 

a3  ^ W 

CO  ^ 


a 

35  3; 
33  o. 

Ph  PP 

3 a 


02  P? 


; .3  sh 

I'^WS 
MM  9 

i 

Ph 


a 

a tn  g ® 

gS'SSgl^S 

oSaSo^afH 

pp^pqp5pp  10- 

a Sft! 


a 

o 

sS 

S 73 

'a  s 

a^ , 


2a 

0 


-Ti  ^ » 

^ 44  CO  ^ qj 

la 

p^  0 


aS3 

s * . 

3!  >5  g 
M73^ 


a o 


o c3 
44  a> 

3® 


0035  35 
i5fl0  _• 

25  a 

3! 


>>  a >> 

^ cH 
c5  Oi 


ft  i5  C^’  S ^ . 

J rr'  S .J  PP  rg  1 


PP  pp  pp 


pp 


pp 


o 

03 

>1 

3 

s 

c « ^ ^ 

3 ,§  '”  tt) 
2 o 

o S W)  be 
3 t-5  0 3 3 

"a  . ^ 

02  02 


cfeO 
"^9  9 

2 o o, 


175  75 
,33 
03  03 


ftt 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


46 


^ O 


•4U90  jad 


•:ju0D  jad 

•aiqniosui 


■:^uao  aad 
‘pa^jaAaa 
pu'B  aiqn{og 


•;uaD  jad  *jai'BAi  ut 
aiqnios  “Us-B^od 


•;uaD  jad 


■;uao  jad 
pu-B  aiqn 
-[OS  aa:^BM.  ib;oj. 


•4uao  jad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqnfosui 
ja^BAi  GAno^ui 


I O CO  O 00 

I »o  1-H  o o 

I <M  CO  ca  « <N 


O O CO  O <M  10  O < 


lr-lc4<MrHC^rHT-li-lrH 


O O O CO  <>3  O O 00  10  O O T}< 

O O CO  00*  Oi  O I-I  O O 03  M 00  00* 


OGOOt^OO<NOM^QOi-ICO 
t>  GO  i>  00  ^ 10  ifi  ic 


00000 


00  O 00  00  < 

o 1-4  o o 1 


' 00  o o o 

I d d d r4 


O 00 
CO  1- 

d d 


1'-  i- 

odd 


10  o o 

rH  rH  CO 

odd 


00  o 

d d 


00  o 00  1 
d d d 1 


00000 


CC  LO  O J-  r-( 
rH  rH  (N  i-H  <N 

d d d d d 


> O CO  o o 
1 c4 1-1  c4  c4 


o 00  0 CD  Ot^ 
O CO  d c4 


CO  1>  00 

I-H  T-t  C3  <M 


*|uao  jad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqniosui 
ja^BAv  aAi;0Y 


<N  CO 

d d 


CO  04  CO 

d o d 


CO  CO  CO  CO 

d d d d o 


•;uaa  jad 
‘diubSjo 
aiqnios  ja^BAi 


rH  CO  CO 

d d d 


GO  CO  O 10 
O r-i  CO  O CO 

d d d d d 


!!S^ 

I 00  CO 

I d d 


•:ju3a  jed  ‘s:)|t}s 

tJtUOlUUlBpUR 

-I'u  ui  9[qn{os  J3:)T3A\ 


d d 


CO  ^ t-H  i-H  00 
CO  rH  i-l  rH 

d d d d d 


00  I tr  00 

d ! d d 


' 1 

i 

1 1 "o  1 

3 1 

'O  1 1 

1 1 I'O  1 1 

i i’S 

1 *0  1 

''i  > 

1 I'd  1 

1 <13  1 

‘ d ' 

1 3r.  » 

1 ^ 1 

'd  ‘ 

iifi 

I i 

03  1 j 

d ' ■ 

1 1 l«  1 1 

■ ■ ' d ' ‘ 

1 

' 'd^ 

1 H3  I 
J d _ ' 

1 

_'d 

1 { g 1 
' ' dd 

csT)  cs'O'O  cS'O 

t^a^nCinsHcioiHt-ia 
c3j3c3D^i03PJ3pca3 
iriOPOOPOOOPO 


03 -a 
^H  a 
ca  13 
3 O 

0;^ 


TJ-O 

o c 

3 3 

o o 


u '3  ”3  o3 '3 '3  TJ OB'-;  03  ■'H cS'U'U'ij 
flflo^Ha333M3!Hn3MacG„„ 
333c33333s33c333c3333o33 

o~ 

Eh 


333c33333s33c333c3333o33 

0003000030300300330 

EHfi<EH0(i|I^EHEH0EH0EHEH0EHSHEH0pH 


aa;  uoi^aadsui 


■H  05  -H 

0 ^ CO  t 05 

1 CSJ 

It-ClODOlfi  iCOfMcSCO 
ii-oi'-HOoco  iciSrjc'jei 

1 0 1 1 CO  1-H 

10  1 0 05  1 <M  ® rH 

0 CO  0 • CO 

0 iO  CO  ICO 

1 

1 lO 

lC<5  10<3-t<CD  |r,<lOC<3lD 
IIOIO$COCO  ilAiO<»<r> 

1 10  l-OI  04  1 0 CO 

1 to  1 0 CO  1 10  10  CD 

1 1 

I 1 1 

1 1 1 

III! 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 I 

1 1 ' 

1 ! d 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 

I 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 < 

1 1 

1 i 1 

1 1 

1 t 

1 1 i j 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

i 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 i 1 1 
till 

1 1 1 1 

i 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

II"  II 

i i§£;  i i 

1 t 1 i 1 

1 1 1 i 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 

! Eh 

1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

t 05 

1 1^ 

i ' '3 

1 1 

1 

1 1^3  1 1 

•1  d ' ! 

ii?  i '3 

1 d 

1 o3 

1 

1 

1 III 

' d ' ! 

i'E 

1 ^ 

1 >;  0 

! Eh  0 E* 

i 

I bJO 

1 a 

1 d M ‘ ' 

I 0 

Henryvil 

English 

Marengo 

GreenfieL 

|33 

^2. 

!■§ 

1 C 

1 V 

<0 

iti  a 

1 <13  3 
Id!  03 

idS 

iti.i'g 

i-S'go 

1 a 

1 O) 

1 ^ 

! ^ 

I ^ 

1 s 

! 9 

1 :3 
•OJ 

1 3 <"  EhES 

1 3.  tx'd  03  c3 

0 X +H  ►>  0 

1 c3  0 c3  03 

iPHOPE|t>CC 

l<3 

1 5 

Pekin 

Grabil 

Freeto 

Moroc 

Alban; 

Cp  ^ CO  ^ O CO  <0 


li-HCOCOCOCOtOt>t^l 


C o 

O OJ 


4,  V 

S a 
22 
® 83 


a^' 

u 2 
Sft 

OJ  "O  N 


CO 


o . 

q3  ’ i H i a ^ 
la  ;|‘a  \ 

c3  ^ pu  CO  £ ^ bjQ  ■ 

daoja'^S’^a,  c3  S 
d-S^S’^.a 

3 CO 

a ^ ^ bj  ^ 

3 r-i  rH  § fe" 


^ 3 ^ 23  1^?  "a  d 
.0<  dW  2'^ 

KH  r_  . ^ Q 3 . 

^ -aiw 


|0|*  HC  o 

^ Q 

a« 

<13 


d c3 


aw 

o 

0£ 

^ CJ 


aws 

OJ  ^ 

«« 

C3  +H  S Jh 

P oj  ^ >3 

^ d 'S 

§ g _2  5 

'h1  QJ  CC 

tUJ-^  03“ 

<3  d 

[H  W ■ 


o 0' 

o-d 


a . 

O)  03 

"3^ 
5 « 

Ed  o 

3^ 


bijO 

d 


IPQ 


ao 

<3 


^ <0 

ai 

<3 


I O -w 

^ cci  . flo  ^ 

03  ^ d M 3 3 ■ 

|.|SS?g&|§ 

i«g«olSsS 

rCJ  * * ♦ * 

03  <13 

« K 


d d ri, 

03  . . Ui)^  fC  43  bfl  . 

I >Kpu-S^^pq2E- 

O 03  * * CJ  * 

S - ii 


47 


<N  1-1  r4  CO  CO  r4  fH  (N  (M*  T-I  T-I  i-I  r-J  r-I  iH  f-H  f-t  rH  iH  rH  C<J  rH  (N 


lO  CO  lO  < 

O r4  O I 


^'^COO'^OrHC^C^l 


COO(MOCOC^O(N'^l>OT-tOO'^OOT-C<lOCOt^COOlftr-C5CO 
C<J(N(N06c50500Ci00  00  00  00OOO00r-r^00Ot-lOOC0*or^0000 


o tH  O 00 

00  d o Oi 


OCOOOrHCilOOCO^lO^CO 
o o CO  CO  CO  CO  00  CO  00  00  00  00* 


S 00  S 

odd 


O o 05  O Oi  O O ^ O O o o O 

i-IrHOrHdT-lr-JrHrHi-IrHrHr-l 


O CO 

lO  lO 


GOa5000rHOOa500r-1rHC<JOOO»-lT-^OT-lTHCOCO 
d d r-I  rH  rH  r-I  d d i-I  d C^'  C^*  d pH  r-I  rH  Oq  oi  <N  Oi  (N 


00  05  00  05 

d d d d 


o o o o o 


O CO  O C<J  05 
oq  c<j  CO  ^ i-H 

d d o d o 


'Cti  00 
(M  r-J 

! o d 


§q  oq  CO 

d d d d d 


1 d d 


oq  OO  05  (M  CO 
rH  ro  oq  CO  w 

d d d d d 


05  (M  ^ CO  Q I O 00 

(>q  pH  O pH  o I i-t  oq 

d d d d d 1 d d 


CO  CO  CO 

d d d 


CO  CO  CO 

d d d 


d d d 


(N  <N  CO 

d d d 


CO  CO 
(N  <M 

d d d 


kO  c<j 

d d d 


8g8 

d o o 


^ 8 «o  M 

d d d d 


> oD  CO 

i d d 


d d d d 


'0t3'0  cS'O'O  (TjtJ'O'O  cS'O'^'O'O 

aaflMflfl^Hf3ciaciat^aa^Hcii=iatHaaci;-,cirtaa 
DD:Jo333s3PJ33Pac333o30!3Pis33=30!c3D3:3S 
000300=300000:0003000^3000^30000 


03  "3  csi'3 

3 ^ 3 
3 3 C3  3 
3 0 3 0 

OPhOEm 


00  05  O iH  O 1 

d d rH  rH  i-J  , 


CO  t-  CO  IfS  05 

d d d d d 


o o o o o 


o o o o o 


-tl  <M  o t-H 
CCl  T3<  U3  3^ 

d o d d d 


.-H  CO  eo  I-H 

r-H  rH  I-H  tH 

d d d d d 


i'O  ^'O'O'O'O  i'O'3'0'3’3 
H3^i33a3!-,33333 
3333333333333 
3030000300000 


0£  §< 


' 3 

,Q 

CO 


II 

o^ 
O 0? 

mM 


60  § 

o. 

M 3 =5 
O > 
CJ  rQ  M 

!h  >)  2 
-M  (H  3 
3 O > 
PMOf^ 


:3ss 


Ph  CO 


o n>  so 

CO  I C^^  -H 
CO  I lO  lA 


0^3  i 9 

05  (U  cs 


3 

o o3 

M M PM 


i|5  3H 

I O OJ  -ri  M 
I o 3 

I r— 1 ?H  CJ 

'pqp^PM^ 


S 


lig?g 

1 iS  8 8 


I lo  CO  I m lo  CO 


^ 1 
O.tJ  bJO 
CO  ca 

O ^ ri  «H 


! -o  52  -3=3  9 


1^15  ‘3 gill 

= 3!^i3  I0.O-303 

OOOhI  ico0PM«fi 


05  (M  b-  W 
lO  CO  CO  CO 


I eo  --sc  ^ 
CO  10  ® 


oocoooo5C5050oac>oo> 


^COMCOr-"*^-'  ■- 

I CO  CO  CO 


I CO  CO  CO 

iS8S 


.^r^i>r^oooooc> 

- ■*■  -O  lA  ^ lO 


S 3 

•gS 
60  M 


copq 


TS 
3 
3 
O 
3. 

a 

O 

^ i o 
OS 

C35 

60'-' 
3 

555  — =5  'I’ 

« S.a 

f-9  ^ ^ 60 
0 m O Sh  Bj 

a o 

d gtllcoPH 
§ - 
pq  <! 


'3  o 
o 

fto 


do 


3 05 

OPh 

CO 


' M S 

;Mglws 

^ uJ 

Mddgs 

o* 

w 


o^ 

60  o 
3 3, 

sS' 


;S§|S 

i i'OO  3 3 ?T3 
' d c3  Ch  O !h 
2r_45>0O  3 

31 

w • a c3 

tn  oc  . '3  i:? 
cj  05  s 0 3 aj 

O 5 

a 


a-a 


M 


ai  lpq5 

gii  ' ® 1=1 

-rt  'O 

^ 3 2i 

dcoPSad^Pn'M 
* . g*  . 

a 


.a  O p 

go2 

05  r-l  rt 

.3  3 

^•"3  5-, 

-g  a ®«  g® 

^xi  S CO  -a  OT 

5 ‘5  d ‘S 

33^^  3^ 

® O r-,  ® ^ 

C '3  3 ® Eh  ® 

6o5  2^  a 

l|2  o 

a^ 


9 'o 

3 r1  ®3 

3.S-C 

aa  g 

0 3 0 

-H  -Ph 

® ® '2 

•3  3 O 

a ^<!* 


Xipq  05 

o 

r 3 

-3  o ch 

2oOt.0t»  iiciiS'  ■ 

dj  c3  I ^ p r**)  o 

|^§f§52|a||QcS|.| 

■^|"'o3'^’'o5|'^'^.  ® s a a|  g*^' 
®^‘ ®00^S  i^^Sad 

i'^.s  ^ s 
as 
<1 


<V  0) 

<D  (V 

c/i  W 


o i 

<1-1  <M  (M  o p 

S .2 

SSS'go'g 

m w 
® ® 05  oj  ;;  3 
ft  ft  D-d  ® d 

Hesn 

333^  ^ 

«2  72  CO  PM  PM 

III  I 


<i>  < 

■c^5 

a • 

" S-d 

^ o o • 
.2  ^ c- 

05  cw  ' 

g 3)  -d 

^5  D 0) 

w xn 

(Odd 

72  PM  Pm  c 
111 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


48 


•juaD  aad 


oO 

fL 

0 

quaa  jad 
•aiqniosui 

rPO 

•luao  jad 

PL,  c3 

‘paijaAaj 

puB  aiqniog 

•juao  jad  ‘ja:>'BA\.  ut 
aiqnios  ‘qsB^Oti 


•;uao  jad 


•luaa  jad 
‘aAiioB  puB  aiqn 
-los  aa;BAv  ib;oj, 


luaa  jad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqniosui 
jajBAV  aApOBUI 


•^uao  jad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqniosui 
ja^BAV  aAi^oy 


*:>uaD  jad 
‘ocubSjo 
aiqnjos  ja^BAA 


•:juao  jad  ‘s:}X’^s 
BiuouiiuBpuB  sa:;Bj; 
-I’u  ut  aiqrqos  ja:;BA\ 


aa;  uoi^asdsui 


4; 

Sa 

2S 


o in  o CO 


OCM  O I 

ooj  o > 


S'2  §'2 

C !=l 
ci3  P C3  a 
3 O P O 
O 


a 2 

o - 

”3  O 


tuD  =1^ 
<1  ^ ' 


M I 
ai  • ' 


I 

as 

Sh  <Xl  Qj 

O >> 

o o . 


O 05  ^ ^ O Ift  CO 

g;’  ^ 


(M  01  01  Ol  CM  C^J  (M 


OrHC-J<Mi-iC<JC<lOi-Hl;^OOCJ 

c^odddddoidooii-Ii 


■ to  O CO  CO 
I I-I  rH  d r-I  d 


Ocs  to 

s s si 


05  CO 

d d 


:^t0ici0  0l0000000l000l005005^0coc0 

i'^M^'^'^^-^ddcidccccGocoodoocodddd 


^ TtH  05  05  OJ  05  05 


Oi  T-<  o 
1-H  CO  ^ 

CO  CO  CO 


o to  Jr- 

rH  d d 


IQ  to 

O O CO 


^ g 

d d d 


00  Ci  CO  rH 

•Hi  to  to  IQ 

d d d d 


d r-I  d T 


0000 


S O 5h 
d d d d 


OCOi-HOCOCi05CO’^OOCOOt 

O5t—O5oirHi-HO5O5O5C0C0C0Tf< 


Oi  Ol  1 

d d 1 


I 05  CO 

1 

1 d d 


LQ  CO  01  O Ci  I CC  5 

IQ  to  iQ 

d d d d d 


I CO  rji 
I d d 


CO  Co  LQ 

d d d d d 


I O Ci 
I 05  rH 

1 d d 


00000 


d d 


o o o o o 100 


d d 


CO 

to  tQ 

d d 


88 

d d 


03 'O 

u P 
a p 
p o 

01^ 


„ c p p „ „ „ 

'O'O  ss'O'O'P'O'C'P  p'C'O  es'O'C'O'C'C  ci'O'O  a'O'O  oS'C'P 

pp^^pppp^^pppppp(^pPi-,ppppptHaat-cptHCia 
ppcsppppppppppppppppppppcsppesppospp 
OOPOOOOPOOOOOOPOOPOOOOOPOOPOOPOO 


1 >. 

I 03  03  p 


a 

^ CO 

O P'P 

p ^at: 

^ ^ ^ <v 

ogoS 

W00M 


o , 

I^Ssfg 

g o 

500cg^i 


coccit-<P5<icn  i@P-  lOpioF-o 

(Mcooit-"— '"-H  ic»o  ii©ot^a5_  --  - 

005^-*' ID  icoinor- loom  ir-iiD  ii-i(M-t'-^in  lOstN 

KJbcDffi  iininio«D0co  icnco  i^cocD'" 


^ £ 
a P 
<1<J1 


•S  ^ 2 S 2 
N .S  g 3 o 

^ O Si  o :3 

^a(0O<i 


£ 2 
CG  fn 
<V  XIJ 

•g  a 

O 03 

W0 


s; 
s ^ 


iw 

-5  ^ 

C O) 


p 


03  O 

Ah« 


:8i88 

nq  CM  (M  <M 


O O - .. 

05  05  05  05 


ggi 


qooeoqqoo^^^; 
, — _.  _.  — ^ in  m m 10  ( 

l(MC<IC<l(M(MCOCOCO0»3OO0O' 


>1  >1 

a o 

03  C3 

a a 

O o 
00; 


o-W 

o 

CJ 


>>  ^ 
® -p , 

O O) 

1/3  >”3  ■ 


2 a® 

sag 


o|i5-S« 


P s 

PLqPIag 


u 


c» 


P o 

p 

<=8  ® c 


“3=3^ 


[5h  |Sh  0 ® ► 

=f  » P =» 

O 

pq 


3^0 
Ah  . 
2^0 


O)  ” 

-lig^sp®';§£®flSss  gg55 
«p^0  03  “£  ^^00PM  2 feWm 


a 


® . • 0 O ft  • O - 0 • . • o p o £ "5  J ; 


P>M‘g“<iit?.aWdi-jd^n 


P 

^ 


51  O 

03 

. O) 


49 


lCOCO<NOlC05LOa5i 

o o o d o d d o d 1 


l0^5iG0^OL0’^C0t0mr^(^3l0<^^l005l0l-^1-lmI 

d d d d r-i  o d th  o o rH  (M^d  o d rH  t-H  d d d 1 


COOlOCiOOOCiCOOlO' 
I rH  rH  d d rH  d d d d d t 


Our5'^T*^rHO’«^^OrHCOC<3LOOiCTt<OOOCOrHM<0'^OOOOOCOC^OCOOT*<(MOqOOCOC<Jrt<i>rtH^Oi 

dddddddciddddcoooodt^oo(Nojdc<ic<Jc<jrHoooooooocooooooddodooooooooo6ooood» 


03  lO 

T}< 

d d 


d d 


OTtHOOOCOrHOOqOOIf-OlCOOlOrHCs 
d d rH  rH  rH  r4  rH  d d d d r-^  rH  rH  rH  rH  CO  CO  03 


i 00  00  00  O LO  00  1 
1 d d d rH  rH  d 1 


; a>  rH  00  05  05  O < 
I d rH  d d d rH*  1 


lO  CO  J>-  T 

d d d 1 


o o o o 


o o o o 


03  05  rH  lO 
03  03 

d do  d 


O O rH  rH 

d d d d 


00  IC  05 
^ CO  O 

d d d d 


^ ^ 
d d d d 


^\oao 

^ 00 

d d d 


ggs 

odd 


CO  ^ 

d d 


d d 


58 
d d 


OOOOrHOO00OOO00OO05  03i 
rH  rH  rH  tH  r-I  rH  rH  O rH  rH  rH  O rH  rH  d rH  1 


Tt<000000050005000000005rH05'*^<LO 

;rHrHrHdOrHi-ldodrHOOrHO0303 


^ 10  o cp 

^ CO  10 

d d d d 


05  CO  03  CO 
^ ^ LO  rt^ 

d d d d 


d d d d 


O t-  O 03 
03  rH  03  03 

d d d d 


0000 


^ CO  CO  CO 

d d d d 


IP  00  rH  CO 
03  03  03  rH 

d d d d 


rH  03  CO  O 

d d d d 


0000 


000000 


00  O CO  rH  05 
rH  03  03  03  'HH  CO 

d d d d d d 


03  CO  03  03  03  03 

d d d d d d 


CO  03  CO  03  03  03 

d d d d d d 


000000 


OOPOOOOPOPOOOOPOOOOPOOOPOOPOPOOOOPOOOOPOOOOOODO 


o “ 
O > 


.S'^  o 

QJ  QJ  OJ 

PMO^O 


ssii 


>H  2 

3 QJ  g G 

gi-g  G 


1 '='  3 

O) 

lo  “ 


1 >.-5 
O G 

'P5P1h 


gG 

'Ss 

o 

QO 


Ol  I rH  F-  ( 

’ 00  (M  I eo  i5D  1 

^ CO  I 05  o <M  ■ 
CD  CO  I 10  CO  CO  < 


G 

c3  g>  G 

a&b 

<S  <u  O 
0)^:0 


8ag 


P O) 
G § 

M « 


0? 


CO  J> 


G ’>  a 

O OG!  W 

'S  O G^ 

^ tH  QJ  03 

S WWcc 


la  irjggg 

IS  1 S g fe  CO 


G 

O 

-u  5fl  O) 
bX)  gG3 
G ^ 'G 
•g  GJ  -G 

a " O 

O O 'S  ^ 

pd  rj  O W 


bX) 

P 

> g 03 

" O >>  2„  ^2  ^ 
r n tj)  G O 
+J-0  a OX2T3 
G QJ  « O G « 
PL|pqWiG|<;g 


' 10  CP  GC  00 


)«lft>^ipt?5CDCPlft»OiPlOlOOCPOO«p] 

;aaaaa?^^i88  8888888: 

'iOiOiciiomiDiOCOCOcOcOco40®®cDCO' 


• x-f=-  05 

) g g «l  CO 

> S CO 


I t-h  e- t>  F- 




SSooS§S33oScd3SSSo3o33o3oo 


o P 


2«8 
w ^ 


(15  CO 

03  C3 

GiG 


o 5 

ocsj 

1 

^ 03 


og  ^dlQ^ 

G S J .1  ■ 

CO  (H  G M • — 


io; 

O •;■ 


G 1' 

° J, 

G1  05 

&r“ 

ga 

w° 


^ 1=1 
CO  O 


Jh  G riol 

05  rr  cj 

MG 


d^p4 


S G 

w a 


s-s 

g h 

tuo  ^ 


05 


. QW  <L>  1_J  QJ 


. ^ 4h  « G a 4h 

S .goG'SSS 

< 


I i-i  ^ 

JjIS 

I 3“" 

(M  03 

r“  b § 

agG 

ga^ 


G. 

CO 

O 
XI 

a ®.2 


a G 

03  o 


2a 


15  'o  a (H  G 


|«8|. 
= q8  .(^‘S 


G 

Xh 

O 

G 
G G 


O . 

^ O 
PMO 


G 03  |G 

a as 

03  O 


QJ  Cl  • 
m . 05  ^ W 

2 . a oG> 

OG  OlT 


ow 

a> 


G a G 5 

Mg  o 
Gfp' 

W 


) “ a lG  S 3 


xh  G: 

rs  03  Q5^^.XtC"  X'  ' 

G'5  650°®  5 a a bfl 

WaGG^^  - 

O 05  . Sj- 

- 

diK^o  gdad 

ti*  * * 


3 o 


05  05 
45  05 

tn  m 


^ c C 

i)  L.  C3  c3  ■; 
Q be  45  « W fan  1 


g'^S 
ul^y 
c G w 

G G c3 
t-3  Hi  a 

a a a 


egg 


O O G 


t3  G G 

45  45  45 
05  CO  CO 


G G G 

aaa 

i 1 1 


££0000 

a ^ ^ ^ 

c3  G 1^  rjJ 
„ „ 45  45  D D 
2 G CO  CO  CO  CO 

.g  .5  c3  c3  c3  c3 
oj  c3  X!  XI  x;  X5 
+H  -M  ly  o y o 

D C <H  Sh  u (-, 

0 o G 3 G 3 

ooaa  a a 

1 I M I I 


P X5 


(15  3 

45  CO 

72  a 
>. 
. be 


G'm 

a'! 

3 X 
W o 
a t.  ^ 
^ g 00 

bo  a 

c3  y 

CO  „ bo 


yg‘'^Oc3^o02 

*-■  y CO  a CO 

y .g  y y .a  g g 

a'^gaggao 

g^  c g"^  G a"" 

cnlocn  OM 

I I I I 11 


a2 

CO  53 

G g 

G > 

(15  r 


s 

O o 
’-'U 


50 


o - 
fcO 


oS 

^ o 
a 


•^U80  aad 


•:juao  jad 
‘aiqniosui 


•;uao  jad 
‘pa:>jaAaj 
pa's  aiqniog 


•;uao  jad  ‘jai-BM.  ui 
aiqnios  ‘0^3!  ’qs-B^OcE 

1 

•:iuao  jad 
‘l^ioj. 

i 

•^uao  aad 
‘aAiion  puB  aiqn 
-los  aa:i'BA\.  ibioj, 

a 

<y 

•juao  aad  ‘diubS 
-ao  aiqni’osui 

ja^BAlL  aAltOBUI 

0 

a 

■juao  aad  ‘oiubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
aa^BAi.  aApov 

•^uaD  aad 
‘DtUBSaO 
a[qnios  aa^B^i 

:! 

•;uao  aad  ‘s:jibs 
BiuouiuiB  puB  sa;Bj:j 
-lu  UI  aiqtixos  ja:>BA\ 

Sample  taken  at 

1 Number  | 

aa;  uoT^oadsui 

IBIOIPO 

S3® 

©is 


ao  ^ 

0)  V 

Sa 

5S 

® rt 


o o o < 

. CD  lO  Oi  o o d . 


» ^ —1  C3  C<J  M 


lCOC<JOOCOOlDO*^rH 
d rH  <N  I-H  C<j  c4  d CO  oa 


d o d o d C5  d d < 


ID  CO  ID  rM 

d d d CO 


o r-  o o 
d 05  d d 


o CO 

rH  rH 


o 05  o 

O 05  CO  o 


> j>  CO  CO  CD  i>  CO  o 
I I-H  1-1  i-i  I-H  rH  ID  CO 


O Ci  O ID 
<N  <M  C<I  CO  CO 


I ^ CO  CO  CO 

) d d d d 


o o o o o 


<M  JXM  CO  05 
CO  i>-  tD 

d d d d d 


d d d d d 


ID  05  (M 
CO  CO 

d d d 


CO  CO 
^ rfi  <M 

d d d 


d o o 


2^ 

03 

P O 


CO  05 

d d 


O ^ CO 
d CO  ID 


ID  CO  (M 
CO  d ID 


OlDt^COC^OOOT-HOOCOOO 

dddrHCO'^CO'^odrHf-H 


I d ^ 


8SS1 


I CO  CO  CO  I d d o 


|S8S 

I d o d 


iqss 

1 d d d 


I ID  < 

I d d 1 


isg 

t CO  CO 


I ^ OC 
I 00 

I d d 


I CO  CO  CO 

I i-H  1-4  d 


> (M  d d I d o o 


lo  m oi 

I d d d 


I S oS 

I d d d 


I88S 

d d d 1 d d d 


TJ'O'O'O  cS'C'O'O  cS'O 
ascsa^^aciasHa 
p^srssosaaacsa 
ooooaoooao 


C3  "O 
s-i  a 
03  a 
a o 


g-a 

s-i  a 
03  a 
a o 

OPh 


03  a a 
a o o 


® C fl 

tn  a a 
03  a a 
a o o 
O fH  ^ 


ca'a'a'c  cs'a'O'o  03'a'a'a 
tZcaafHaaatnaaa 
c3aaaaaaao3aaa 
aoooaoooaooo 


1 t>c  a 
, a o 
' a 4J  ® 0 
1 o 

1 “ a~ -a 
I ^ ‘a  > bfl 

i s i o|.s 

iSogS-S 

iPhHPQQPh 


IfrSi 

1 S ^ is  la  t 


® a3  be 

s > ^ 

> 

a:  ^ . 


a r;  oj 
OhCC^ 


1 l=> 

1 O 

I T) 

1 >> 


03  0 


§ 00 


s > 
> ^ 
M'S 
Sa3 
See 


u a 


000 

a 

>>  >■.  ® 


82^  isss 

1 iS  d o 1 S iS 


a 

bfiO 

,a  s 

fe  ^ 


H 02 


OOoO&OQO^OCdOsCJOiOO^-ii-HMOO 

SS335oS8®88oD<5ocDfe«o 


88; 

CD  CO  « 


I>  1— I rH  I—H  t 

C<1  (M  C<l  i>  I'*  J 

CO  CO  CO  CO  »-H  1-H  rH  , 


<N 

""  6 


o'^ 

gs 

.a  03 


o g- 

- o 

oj  a; 


"a  2 

I’"' 


o .a  ® ^ a 

j_a  h/1 'H 


o ® 
•r  ^ 


S t>e 


a 
s a 

N<J1 


^d 


'a 

OC.O  'g 

a 

g s 

Sc5oW;|w 

fQ  . - . • 

a J “rQffi 


o ^ 

a 0 
M o rs 

SJW 

a^ 


.►j  "a  ® 
rt  S 

a 


o o 
^aoQ 


03  “ 


be  be 

ad  -S  .a 

Q a a c3 
be'a^ 


;a^f^ 

1 "d  TS  t3 
a a 
c3  0 


® 10 

a'**.  . 
WQO 


<v  o 
03  a 

a ^ 


<u  <u 


03  2 

552o 
t.  a 


a<io 
* ■ * a ♦ * 


03  ,Q  O 
oco 
o 


a 0'S  ^ 
a w ‘o 
a o) 
iu  S3. 

<J  cc 


o » 
a -O"  " 
Cb  a a a 
apqpq 


-a 

■ 


c8§-<  ® 

^.Saa  .oapia 

Ej  0 a a cwO  3 

a MH  * * 

02  0 
gw 

feS*  5* 

a 

a 

W 

m 

Bolles  Illldl'I— I-I-I ' 5747  1 6401  I Ewing 


51 


1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 

1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 t 1 i 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 t i 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

j OI>; 

I s 

o o o o 

00  CM  <N 

C<J  C^^  C0C>l 

lOlDO'^t^OCOOOir^OOCDO 

rHi-Ioic^dooooodcodd'd'^ 

f-li-l  C^(MrHi-lC'3<N<N 

29.7 

32.2 

loiOCD^OOOOOO^^OOi^O 

I d CO  ID  C^  r4  c<i  (N  ^ 

1 ! 

d 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

; 1 ! 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 i 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 O 05  O <N  O 



I 1 00  rH  iH  <M  i-l 

1 1 

1 1 

O rH  O 05  O m O 05  O 00  O i-<  CM  <n  O 1 1 

•^ooo6i^t--V-ooi~ooJ>oooor-tococc5  i i 
rH  rH  rH  fH  I 1 

1 1 1 1 

1111 
1111 

1 1 1 1 

lilt 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

i 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 O CO  O CO  o o 

1 t lo  T-^  d o>  00  d 

c 

o 

« 


y 


►-5 


d 


(NCOLO^^IOOOOOC^COCOtJH 

odddddrHrHoddd 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

00  05  O to  05  o •» 
d d rH  i-I  rH  Co’  ^ 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 O 05  o o 

1 iM  d oa  d 

1 

OO'^CD'^IOOOOCOOOOOGO 

DaddddcsjOiHi-irHi-HiH 

^ 05 

d d 

iDlOCOCOCOCDlDCO*^05m^00  05  C0O5'<^<lO'^rH00rH 

Cq<Nd^^rHi-lTHr-H’^CO<Mdd  ddoddi-Jdr-? 

1.S7 

1.69 

1.94 

s§ 

d 

1.27 

1.09 

1.02 

(M 

CO 

^ joS; 

r-?  ! rH  d 

d 

CD 

j— 

o 

d 

CO  <M 

d c<i 

C<J 

CO 

d 

CO 

d 

8 

d 

d 

0.63 

0.71 

0.66 

o 

d 

<N 

d 

0.53 

0.71 

0.78 

s 

d 

CO  1 QD  CO 

CO  1 Jr-  00 

i-H  j dd 

05 

r- 

d 

d 

CO 

i-H 

00 

to 

d d 

d 

Jh 

d 

CO 

CD 

d 

00 

d 

0.77 

1.22 

1.38 

8 

d 

CO 

d 

ID  I-H 

CD  cot- 

d d d 

<3 

05  1 00  C<J 

^ 1 ^ ID 

d 1 d d 

d 

g 

d 

r-H 

r— 1 

<M  T-l 

CD  ID 

•HH 

ID 

d 

CO 

(M 

d 

CO 

d 

CD 

d 

odd 

00 

d 

o 

0.60 

0.33 

0.15 

>s 

d 

05  1 O ID 

ID  1 ID  ^ 

d 1 d d 

d 

^ 

d 

8 

d 

— H rH 

ID  CO 

d d 

rH 

c> 

d 

8 

d 

o 

d 

Cd 

(N 

d 

d d d 

o 

d 

lO 

d 

0.00 

0.11 

0.16 

d 

8 188 
d 1 d d 

s 

d 

ID 

CO 

d 

ID 

d 

0.00 

0.00 

8 

d 

8 

d' 

rH 

d 

(M 

d 

CO  CO 

Ns'S 


Ijj  W Clj  M 
^ y ^ oj 
o he  y io 
tr  cS  t-  rt 
3 ft  3 D, 


" 1 § c"  ” 

S<2£5£ 

3 y 3 y 3 


^ ^ ^ ^ 
'S  5!  '5  '3 
M j ^ J 


73 
y 

5 £3  ' n O C 

3T3  cs'Q'O'O  03^3  oS'O  oa'O'C'O 

ioSflflcSrtSaScGG 

03:333033o333cj3333;3 


y 

y 

d c 

3 C3  3 


^ cy  ,-*  W ^ ^ ^ W pj  ^ 

303000303030003030 
O(i<OPHl^fi<dipH0EHOP^pHpHC'fi<Of^ 


- I 

y y 

3 'a 

03-3  OS'S 
^ 3 ;h  3 
3 3 3 3 
3 0 3 0 


3 3 3 3 3 3 

S'cJa’O'oS'oJs'O^'oSs'a'O 


3 3 3 

3 3 3 3 3 


^ ,— > UU  '.'O  ^ '•'J  ^ >.SJ  ^ ^ 

30300303030300 


3 ^ 3 ^ 3 ^ 3 ^ 

;h  3 ^ 3 ^1  3 n 

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 

3 0 3 0 3 0 3' 

O(^0pH0pH0f 


1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 
III 
III 
III 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

V \ 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

i I 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

'ft 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 'ft 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 ( 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 4->  2 

1 1 

1 1 

1 i 

1 1 

I 1 

1 O 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

j'ft 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 'ft 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 

! 

i 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 

1 1 1 f 1 

1 i 

1 1 

t 1 

1 1 

1 ' 1 ' 

1 1 

1 3 

1 y 

1 3 

1 y 

1 o 

1 o ^ 

1 

1 3 

1 3 

1 y 

1 1 p 

1 o 

i 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 

H > 1 1 

3 j 3 

1 1 

1 1 

1 fH  1 tH 

1 3 3 

1 

1 tH 

IW 

im 

i- 

cc  > 

i cS 

iw 

jW 

:4.m 

1 1 1 

i 1 1 

1 

3 i ft  ft  a 

1 be 
'i.S 

1 bo 

1 ^ 

1 ft  bo  ft 

1 3 o 3 

1 o 

1 s 

1 O 

I a 

1 

j43 

ig 

1 ft*^ 

1 ^ HH 

1 ^ 

1 

i-ft 

+j 

.'•ft 

1 3 43 

ift  \B 

j I 

l’^ 

'<>>’>>> 

1 y ^ y 

1 

1 OJ 

1 

1 <v 

ft 

1 o 

1 3 

1 O 

1 bo 

1 O 

bo 

1 O O 

1 o 

3 

1 O 

3 

1 O 

1 Iri 
1 y 1 c: 

1 1 ' 

0 

'P^ 

'CCPhM 

*c» 

'02 

'02 

'iH 

ildl^H 

*Ph 

'02 

>02 

' W 02 

Ifl|  ICO  'i 

I ip  «0  <i 
I <^J  (M  t; 
) lO  iO  l< 


_ . . acoooooD<a:><oc<jc^ 

ih  lO  »0  lO  IQ  »0  lO  CD  ^ ^ 

cdcdcocdcdcdcdcocdoo 


^ ^ CO  CO 
O O C^l  Ol 
ID  iO  lO  ut) 


T— « f-H  (M  ^1  lo  lO  ID  ^ ^ 

OCOcDoDcO'^cDCDP 


) O CO  CO  CQ  CO  lO  ID 
) lO  CD  CD  CO  CD  CD  ^ 


|c;|  y^ 
"a;  ft  y 
^ 342  Cxi 
iS  3 
02  02 


o ® " 
„ c5  y 

y Jl  3 

be 

o 3 2 •!-> 

CO  ft  P.  o 

y'  y y ^ 
bo  y y 
<A02^ 
ft  3 

y c c -2 
y § o 
02  ^ 
y 

^ S ^ ft 

« ft>> 

3 M bo  • , 
— .3  M « 

2 P/  ' 


£h  Sh 
N 2^ 

^ W O 

o OpH  ■ '° 


O 03  O 2 C/3  ^ 

^£30  ^13  ^ 


ft'-e 


^ ^ f-i  w 

i.w(Due;._o  o 

^ p^ww'^-gw  3pq 

^ ^ r^  fT^  ^ ^ ^ 

OjO  • .03^  - ^ .'^03  *03  a 

- 3 ’^0203  3J^D5p'kQ2,?k  303  d 'V  ■ 

s * * * * ♦ ^ 

< & ^ ^ So 


Sf^ 

O Ip. 

'§ft 

3fq 

o 


>> 

3 ft 

3W 


3 ft  ^ +j>  O 
O 3 -to  2 ft 
^'§.|ft^ 

-2  ft  a|-g 

3 43  S -ft  O 
W <D  . 13  “ 

O O)  rv)  ^ . 

;? » ”2 

m ft  * ft  •■=' 


O 3 
Q o. 


2° 


Report  of  Jnspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued 


52 


o3 

A o 


•:}U80  aad 


•^U90  aad 

■eiqniosui 


•1U9D  jad 
‘pa^jaAaa 
puTJ  9iqnios 


queo  J9d  ‘asT'BAi.  ui 

eiqnios  ■^s^:^OcI 


•4U9D  J9d 


•4U99  a9d 

‘9An9B  puB  9iqn 

-los  a9:jBiA 


•:^U90  J9d  ‘oiu^S 
-ao  aiqniosui 
J9:j'BAV  9Ano'BUi 
■;u90  a9d  ‘oiubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 

J9:>^Ai.  9ApOY 


qu99  aad 
‘Diu'BSao 
aiqnios  aaj'BAi 
•'4U9D  jod  ‘s:h;t3S 
■CTuouiiuB  puB  s9:)t;j:^ 
-Tu  UI  aiqnxos  J9:^ba\ 


aa;  uono9dsui 


moi350 


O 00  O 01  O t-H  O O C5  O CO  <M  O Cl  O CO  10  O 01  CO  I-H  rH  O 05  CO  -IH  O CO  t-  O']  O 00 
r-i  O o"  O O i-i  ci  i-I  O']  r-I  >-3  CQ  ci  06  O i-H  C]  ci  i-H  t-H  r-t  C]  Cl  i-H  r-!  C]  C]  t-H  Cl  Cl  C]  rH  O 


Oi-l'^C1050tOOeDCOCOmCOOrHOCOClOl-HliOOCOOmC5r-OeO»-|05005 

Cor^coc0idci'-^05ooooooeo050oo6cic]cic505c50c5coi'-t-r-i-coeoi05£!m 


o m 05  CO  .-I  i-H 


0000- 


I O o 05  05  O O 00 
I I-I  rH  O O r-j  CO  Cl 


00  05  00  C0000505rHCOOOCOCOt-C]tOCOCOCOC0  1>-t'*COQOC5  05  05  '1<lO 

^ rH  -H  t^'  i-H  r-H  r-5  rH  ,-H  --I  I-I  >-3  d O o o 0 O 


1 10  10  10  CO 

I d d o d o 


I CC  rX  00  <55 

1 o d o o 


I (M  J--  CO  CO  T 


COOICOCO"^  (COCO 

iooooo  lO  lOO  lOOOO 


! C5  oi  Oi  <M  I 9$  ! ' 

Ir-Ht— It— IC<ICO  1^  lOiO  I' 


T— l6^CO  1^  lOiO  I'^'^COCO 

ddooo  lO  lOrH  loooo 


1 10  <0  o 01 

I (M  Ol  <M  CO 

I d d d d d 


I I CO  CO  CO 

I d d 1 d d d d 


ISSSSS 


I g CO  00 

1 d d d d 


10  10  I -rf  (N 

d d d I d d d 


CO  O 10  I CO  ^ 
CO  O I Ol  CO 

d d d ' 


I-H  01  I f-H  1— 1 t— I 

d d d 1000 


I O O r-l 

I d o d 


;30000^0^j00000^0;j00^30  0 00P0  0^0:3^00^.^0 


O) 

i'C'a'O'C'O 
c o o o c 

« 3 13  3 :3  D 
3 0 0 0 0 0 
C Pm  Ph  Ph 


1 ^ 
o 
' ^ 

I a>  O 0: 

^ 5 72 

q-a  :3  o ^ 

is 


IS 


I CO  -M  Cl  CO 
I 10  05  CO  o 

I CD  l-  10 

I 10  lO  CO  CD 


1 1 ',  1 ! ! 1 1 1 

' ' 1 ' ! ' ! 1 

1 ' 1 1 ' ! ' : 1 

1 1 1 1 '1  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i II  1 I 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 +5  1 1 11' 

1 ' 15  1 

0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 .3!  1 CD  1 

+j  1 1 1 1 Q 1 0 1 03  ' 1 

1 

1 

t 1 1 1 1 
111' 

1 1 1 ' 0 

i 

sm  1 's'  toiCL,  ' ^ ^ 

•S  S i 1 lggo3 

1 

\ 

1 

i i^g'3 

1 a ^ ^ 

I m 05 

1 o"^ 

IS  • 
!qS 


-ft  1 10  o 

CD  I 10  10 


~ 00  1 ^ CO 

O -S  P 1 g g 

■3^  g g i o 


F-  CO  Cl  -H  1 CO  00  1> 
(3  co  00  1C  I Cl  r*' 
10  00  05  I CD  CD  t- 
10  ID  in  in  I in  in  m 


logs  S'5 

03  0--  03  C> 

.pL|KS!><i1 


cocccococoinminm 


in  in  m in  en  on 
I 3 05  3 3.  Cl  Cl 
, . j Cl  Cl  Cl  Cl  & CD 
> ^D  CD  CD  CD  CD  CD  CD 


53 


O CO  lO  CO  CO  o 
r-I  rH  i-I  rH  C<J  <M 


(N  O O IC 
lO  CO  1-1 


> in  Oi  lO  Ci  O CO  J 


O CO  CO  1-H 
<N  <M*  oi  CO  oq  CO 


O^COOOOOOSOOOCM 


^ lO  VO  lO  CO  CO 

o d o o d o 


^ 00  1-H  lO  CO 
oq  <M  C<1  oq  CO 

d d d d d 


oq  (N  CO  c<J 

d d d d d 


r-(  rH  <M  <>q 

d d o d d 


d d d d d 


8dSSS 
d d d d d 


iHa50<MO"^»ocooovooqi>'Oooo 

G^qc<ioqc<ic^cq<Nc4c<qco'^^<Ndoq 


OOlCOiCOO'^OO' 

co^-oococodddd 


I O VO  o 
) cq  d d 


VO  GO  O VO  05  Oi 


1 CO  O lO  GO  00 


cooooc<ii-«rHcoi-ioc<qoiocooo 

di-HrHd<NC<JOqCO<MOqOq(Cqdc<J 


S 

d d 


O o 

o d 


I 00  CO  C 
I ITS  CO  1 


QQ  GO  (M  O 
CO  lO  lO  O CD 

d d d d d 


o o o o o 


8gsg3 
d d d d d 


rH 

d d o 


cj  ^3  T3  T3  ^3  73 

fl  a d a a 

ca  d d d d d 

d o o o o o 


(S73  73  ccj^  ca^^  oadS 
^aa^HdsHddsHd 
Kiddsadnsdddd 
doododoodo 


oiNicor-ooooooo 

i-HrHOOOrHi-HrHrHrHrH 


IOq00C35OlrHCOinO5] 
i iH  d d d rH  rH  iH  rH 


00  Ht<  rH  CO  CO  oa 
COCO/^*^V.OVOi>- 

0 0 0 0 0*00 


c^q  CO  CO  05 

CO  ^ CO  CO  CO 

d d o o o o d 


o o o o o o o 


d d d d d d d 


d d d d d d^  d 


CO 

d d 


bjD  ^ 

0 'H 

•r-.  (D 

. P w 

«ss 

?°s 

ei 

a a a 

O O o 


r bD 

p ca 
U)  V 


5^ 

U r 
o 

6^ 

U-d 


dCq 

sal 


d o „ „ ^ ^ ^ 

ca73  i:s73  7373  73  73  ^73  ca73  73'd  ca73  73  73  73  5s73  73  73  73  73'073  ^7373 

(HdPHdoodafcHa^dddfcHdcddtHddOddddMdd 

cadoaddddd53dcadddcaddddcadddddddo3dd 

dodooooododooodoooodooooooodoo 


is; 

VO  VO  I 


th  o o -IH  GO  I c^q  I CO 

^ CO  ^ • CO  Ii> 

CO  lO  o O'!  ' « (N 


J:-dO 

CO  S ofe  o o I 

iO  lO  LO  vO  CO  CD  ' 


'd  'O 'd 

(D  0)  0) 
WWW 


1 1 i f 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 i 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 t 

I 1 1 

1 t 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 I 

1 t 1 

1 1 > 

1 1 1 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 t 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

t 1 1 

1 i i 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 
i 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 
t 1 

1 1 

1 f-t 

1 OJ 
i 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 t 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 i 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 

G 1 1 G 

1 1 

1 1 
t 1 
t 1 

1 t 

1 05 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

till 
till 
lilt 

1 t 1 

1 1^  1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

' 1^3  h 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 

1,111111 

1 I 1 1 1 I t 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

III  III 

1 1 1 1=1  1 1 1 P 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 I 

1 1 1 

1 1 I 

1 1 

1 1 

t 1 1 i o 

1 1 ti)  ' 

1 ' 3 ca  >1  g 

a H->  y M 

._  dd  H CO  03 

1 'O  TD 

1 73 

1^^ 

IS 

' ^ ^ ‘si 

1 >» 

1 1 G t 

1 1 05 

' 53  g 

1 ' y c3  0 

1 1 pi  1 1 pi 

1 ^ ' 

! G G 
o o 

! 3 3 

1 53 

1 o 

1 a 

1 G G 
] O O 

1 s a 

! 5G 

1 O 

1 s 

|6 

1 

iw5.-t^  \S 

1 oj  rA  I <15 

' ^ bjO^  fcuo 

1 a 

\ ^ ^ 

1 G ^ 

1 G 

ly  ° H 

1 Odd  sS 

i 0 d y 0 ^ 0 y 

i2§l 

Paol 

Weis 

Atlai 

Ram 

Valp 

1 dd  dd 

1 y y 

!SS 

idd 

1 y 

1(5 

1 o o 

iss 

1 ^ 
iS 

io 

>K 

Sout 

Geor 

Star 

Chili 

Geor 

1 M 

o 

'ft 

1 0 oft 

‘0a2ft 

<M  4H  d tuo 

73  33 .3 

1 y 0 M d 
'PPojft  W 

l^S  d.'S'S  a 5p'S 

1^  0 53  33°^  d 

'WfiMMftSW 

O^i 

1 y y i 

'0M 

1 

73  73  w 

(B  0)  r-, 

W M 4) 

ca  ca  ^ 

^ d:  ^3  ^ ^ ca 

0 o o y y J 

t, 

3 d d 3 d 

Ph  Ph  Ph  Ph 

1 I I M 


« CO  « ISO  CO  CO 

0 o o o o o 

01  ^ Ci  oi  Ci 
CO  M CO  CO  CO  CO 


0§»I^rHS®Co3tD 

■^rTt^cOCOCOOcOCOCO 


o o 

d,  03  (U  OJ 


_§  d N OM  g 


. ^ tu)  . g .S' 

m ^ o ^ a 


=5^.3 

4H  d.  a d o d 
JH  cc  y y xh  y 
y 0 73  73  0 73 
^ dd  d d d 

OJ  O 40  O) 

I_^35g5 


0 O 0 

t"  (_i  CQ  *H 

. . gj  y " y 

IPnf^Tdf^ 
g d ^ d d § d 

^ y y ® y 
273  73-^73 


0 


,K  d d d s 
^ ^ y y 
dOQ  wO 


O t3 

r d 

>>  03 
d ^ 
oaPq 

Prfl 

a 

0.30  ” 


fi-a  > 


33  JO; 

S d c 

^ y « y y — 
03 d 03  0.  d 

S 6 ^ y d M d 
y . ;h  y o 03 
^0^3p:i0;dh:i 

♦ ♦ 5*5  ^5*5 


<v  Jx 


bjO  M 

fl  ^ 
;d0 


D 

° ” 

w Pm  a - 

y d ^0  d0 


^ y 
^ y 

y • 

y 


Sd|Jg|a|«W5^^ 

i0og.-tiyo^a=o'«iyS 


bfl  O I 

.ap^' 


, Pi  y - 

:.a^g 

Q.5f® 


Q O 


<3j  w uw  • eg 

°P5;apH^y^ 

y * y J,  j.  r. 

c3  o3 

ft  Q 


« 3 


‘H  . di  d y • 

W i-s  ffi  Bd  0 >-a 

Ch  * * 

03 

ft 


» a o ^ 

C ^ en  ^ H 


a a a 

o o o 


a a 
y a a 


y hh  s-i 

y 33  73 
y y y 

m CO 

y ca  ca 
dd 
' cj  y 


Cl  Qj 

I r!  j 


WWW 

-C  ^ ^ 
V o o 
u u 
:3  o o 
CM  Hi  Ph 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


54 


.2  £ 

•:}uao  jad 

•:^ua^  jad 

‘aiqniosui 

G3o 
Hh  G 

'luao  aad 
‘pa^aaAaa 
puB  aiqniog 

OtNOCOCCCOOiOCit^OC^I-COOCOl-^OiO'^ 

CNCO<MCOCOmCO<MrH<MCCir:r5cvOrH-!j^COrHCOr-I 


Ci  Oi  O 00  o 

d O rH  d r4 


^ O 00 

d d d d 


O^OOrHOr^OO^NCOCOOOlOOiOl 

00*C5<NC<J(MOC0Oi-iOO00i-lOC<J< 


oof-HOi^coocor^oi^OrHOicooi 

T}<-tlOi^OOt'»OiCiCiOOOCOC^<MC-l< 


•:)uao  jad  ‘j}9riT3Ai.  ut 
aiqnios  ‘o^H  'qs^iOti 


m LO  ^ ic  lo  to 

d d d d d d d 


•:ju0o  J9Ci 

mojj 


>i>*4:^oo^ooooo5a500i-Hoo<Ncoi 

ii-Hi-lr-lrHOOOOi^rMrHOrHTHi 


•:}U80  jad 
‘aAHO'B  pu'B  aiqn 
-los  aa:^'BA\  iBioj;, 


•:^uao  aad  ‘aiu^S 
-ao  aiqniosui 
jai'BM  aAijo^ui 


•;uao  aad  ‘oiu^S 
-JO  aiqniosui 
ja:^^Ai  aApoy 


1 CO  i>  O t-h  lO 

1 to  to 

I d d d d d d 


^ o 

I oa  Ci  00  00 

I d d d d d 


I CO  CO 

I CO  lO  lO 

I d d d d 


I CO  CO  1-1  Oi  lO 
I CO  lO  CO 

I d d d d d d 


' 00  CO  00  CO  o 
I <M  CO  C<J  CO  CO 

I d d d d d 


o o o o 


r-*  00  CO  CO  00  CO 
I ^ Tji  CO  CO  LO 

I d o o o o d 


JL'-  Oi  rH  CO  O 
^ CO  ^ 

o o d d d 


o o o o o 


C0Ofc00  00  00  00<NCO 
ddddddrHrH 


I to  to  I Oi 
1 d d I d d id 


; ^ CO  I rH  rH  I 

d d 'do  i' d 


I d d I d d 


lo  CO  |>  to 

d d d d d 


00  00  Oi  o J>^ 
d d d i-H  d 


1 © © d d 


I cq  <M  CO  CO 
I CO  'lit  CO  <>q 

1 d d d d 


M rH  ^ g 

I d d d d 


•;U0D  J0Cl 
*0\UV3d0 

oiqnios 


03  -t  lO  1-^ 

I (N  (N  CO  CO 

i d d d d 


1 o d d d d d 


I oq  rH  CO 

! d d d d d 


I O CO  wo  ^ I CO 
I (N  (M  I iO  lO  I LO 

1-d  d I d d id 


I CO  cq  c<i 

I d d d d 


•:)U9a  jsd  ‘s:)];i3s 
'CTUouiiuBpuB  se^'B.q 
-I’uut  Q^qnjos  J9:;t?a\ 


I O O CO  CO  CO 
I O O O 1-H  O C> 

I d d d d d d 


183838 

I d d d d d 


88  188 

! d d 1 d d 


|S83S 
I d d d d 


<v 


'2 


fl  Cj  c c 

^T3T3'a"0  03'aT3'OT3'O'c 
na^^aGGfl!-iflcioaaGf-,Gaflaa 
03Pc3GGPG03GGG'_3GD«GDGGG 
GOGOOOOGOOOOOOGOOOOO 


— ^ „ G ' ' ' 

SggSggSggSgSgSgggg 

cJGGGGGcsGGGGGGGGGGG 

GOOGOOGOOGOGOGOOOO 


3 5 


aa  uopaadsui 


QJ  O " 

g:  o « t> 


I t>  4^  G3  1-^ 
1^  C > u, 

O s 

is  G 

1 3 o N » ; 


© (N  © CO 


Ol  03  t 

_ n ( 

1 ifs  in  to  © ^ 


o kPM 


G 3 


-C  G S 

1'  ti.  G O 

PQ^ccCCq 


3 ^ 

> I-, 

c«  n 

o S 

Ot3 


G S 

oa 

33 


’■^G 

G 5 

ffi  w 


©©  Ir-H^  I©©  1(M  ICO  IO(MCO^ 

-ti©  lOOiG  i?<liD  lO  lip 

00  LQ  icot--  iplIM  I©  1©  liOiPt^© 


> 

2 G M 

O o;a 

3 g3  a 

G 2 § G 

PMOP^oq 


1 © CO  CO  <©  M © < 
© © © © © O I 


ccoooo©©©©S©o5(m©io©©  _ 

■^-tl-t'©0©(MC<IC<l'MC<lPie<IC<l<M5<105lM 

©©ip©©©©©©©©©©©©©©© 


2 G 

s ^ 

o c; 

CB  XI 

(h 

<te  o) 

a; 


S a 

ss 


G - ■ — 

o . . *<  . o 

..“qg  ^ .-'“w  ^ 

tm  o tix)  S o ^ tn)^ 

^Qo^a  • <v  •a  • • . 

^SoSot^OPHGOOi-s 

bo  Jh  + Sh  ♦ * f-t 

e C3  o3  «S 

So  fi  fi 


^ C3 

1 aW' 


G 

.W 

« 
C) 

3 


a 'G 

o‘S 

o<j 


o 

G 
G 
a 
C3  4^ 
O cH  , 


. t-i  ^ o)  q • ^ . a> 

oliiccOGsWS^O 

U 

q 

« 


m <u  -M  o G oj 

Phg  G .^3  £5  Oj  GG  5®*  o 

ft  S d <5  S 


G^|>.’;:^.a' 

•-  g <u  G O 03  ( 


GO 


ial  Spring  Fertilizer i 6261  i | i Guaranteed. j 1 1 1 1 1 0.4  i 0.5  | 13.0 


55 


O N 

O IQ 


IQ  O 

5^  si 


r>OiTjHOoOO'^OOOiQCO 
W CO  CO  00  00  C<J  <m’  CO  CO  CO* 


£>^liOOa5lQCOOlQlQt 
o’  O o CO  O c>  rH  d o t 


O O O 1 

(M*  rH  ( 


o oo  o o 
^ CO 


.niQLO'^’^COOOrHT^HioCO 

dddddddr-Iddd 


O LQ 


>0  CO  CO 
(N  C<J 

d d d 


N (N 

d d d 


^ CO  ^ 

d d d 


S2S 
d d d 


CO  O I CO  lO 

d i-H  ! d d 


IQ  c> 

d d 


S8 


O o I o o 


d d j d d 


' ' 'a  'c  ' ' ' 

c3ac!.iC3MCci!.HGa 

J3P;3c3.:!o3=3Sc333 

OOOPOPOO^JOO 


o 00  o lo  o ■ 


o o r-  o o o ( 

i-l  <M  rH  CO  rH  d I 


I o 

’ CO*  d 


O05OC0OLQO'^OCO0iOC0mOX--j 

<NrHCo*codo^»Qdco"^*coodi^coco  ' 


0co0m00000i0i0ool0«^■*:^00 

»-tOCOeM(Mr-lrHOOi-toddorHi-l 


lQOOOOO'^lOOOCiCOCO’^’^’«^'^lOlQCOOi 

co'^ddddddddddddddrHrH 


<M  <M 

odd 


32  3 
d d d 


858 
d d d 


?33§  1S8 

d d d I d d 


CO  8 

o d 


88 
d d 


03  p 

P O 


03  P 

P O 


^ p M p 
ra  p p p 

p o p o 


p p p p p 
eo'Ow'Ore'Op'ap'C'C'P'PS'P'PS'P 
SpmP^hPSPshPPPpSpP^hP 
PPPPPPPPPPPPP03PP03P 
POPOPOPOPOOOOPOOPO 


O-G  p 
c3  a>  ^ 
1|00 


) eo 

.J  1-0  00 

LO  lO  lO 


P o 


K< 


p ^ 

09  p 

^ 03  a 
;h  ^ >.P 
O QJ  O)  'P 

OM!>H 


!.2i  P 
I > O 

1-0  rg 

1 P >L 


'OO 


i-H  o a I P)  eo 

S 03  5 ! S CN 

m 10  «D  «D  1 10  CO 


I— I I— I tG  Ift  10  03  01  < 

CO  <0  I-I  t-H  CO  00  < 
IM  <M  0-1  CO  CO  CO  CO  < 
CD  CO  CO  CD  CO  CO  S < 


O O 

in  10 


55; 


eo  CO  in  in 

CO  CO  CO  CO 


5Tti.rtiininf-t-OiC33C30300DOD6oC303 

il:^t>l>l>QOC!OOcOOoOi-i^^,.HrH 

sr^i^t^t^i^jt^iMccicNCMCcicoeocococo 

■’inmininmincocococofecococoPJCD 


JP 

CD  t 


S SoS=?.s^"  !>.=ci 

-.5.9  9 J-  - =«-^  =2- 


O) 


<^WOdc^O(^Oajc^Hi-o 


ft  ft 


P ” Ol 

9 W >3 

r5  IH 

PhlmQ 
tn  P * 

Sq 

>> 

IH 

o 


O +j  p 

{mo's 
.9^W 
" “'S 

^ ra[i< 
.i«!  * 


> P 
P!P3 

CC  Q, 

P M 

9 

° 

^ HSo^c® 

M |o9x!^ 
a Qr.OSr 


o 

PO 

p^ 


9W  .0.22 
G P ^ p 9 

^ p-!?  pQ 
2 9*9 
pf^  w 
9 
w 


■ ^ S o ^ 

^ P.2  9c»S.2  2 S s S 


p ^ 

og 

OJ  ^ 

■a^ 

9:^ 

w 


Ph  . 

cuBh 


> o 

O P Q 5 P 


PpL, 


o 502^  P g"^^CC  _ 

pqgp'^pSpg'dojg^pq 

Pp.2rQPGCc!  .G!2.2 


o* 

o 

O 


pc'  i9 


o 5 

fe'”  S' 
p-G 

pW“! 

IS 

M 


2^§ 

P o ^ 

l^'l 

ij  c c 
p "g  "g 

9 9 9 

GOO 
tn  U 
CM  <M 

•GJ  "G 
G G G 
CO  cn  CO 


dW  c ^ 
c o >» 

;3  . ^ ,0 

'*7*  ^ 


<M 

G ^ 

as  PJ  Jo  P 

s_  --<  xs 


3 P P 
Ph  Mil 

I I I 


g-GW^l 

^ p _ 

P^goi-2S 

S £ 

P -p  lJ  2 'I-' 

S "9  9 9 ^ 

£^g2| 

tl_t  «M  «M  ^ 

c ^ 
nd  ^ 

^ ^ ^ 

CO  Q CO  c/j  l> 
5 (Kj  ^ (d  cd 
: g;  8 XI  g:  c 

) o O G o 
, u 

1 1 1 1 1 


X 

o 

p 

N P 


P P t,  ' 

T-I  X X P c 

eo  _tQ  Cn  " 

bflp  'Gg*^5-.s 

.S9> 

g,  <ii8<S<22 

'g  .o'^'c!jt39£ 

> <w  ^ 5 9 o c 

•P  tw  P p fc,  s. 

p 2 xx''-''^- 

0 c c c 8 8 

'"""pppjjos^s 

<i^2±;22’2’9  p cc 

9 9 .ti  .t:  .-2  *e  -G  *- 

pp>i>>o®p:= 

1 M I I M I I 

#eiw^ioot-ooo> 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


56 


iJ  £ 

•quao  jad 

o9, 

o_. 

•quao  jad 

•aiqniosui 

g-G 

P3  0 

•quao  jad 

PP  3 

‘paqjaAaj 

puB  aiqniog 

•^uao  jad  ut 

aiqnios  ‘0^3: 


'luao  jad 


•;uao  aad 
•aApo-B  puB  aiqn 
-los  aa^BAi  IB^oj, 


•;uao  jad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqniosui 
jajBAV.  aA^OBUI 


jad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqni'osui 
jajBAi  aAt;oY 


‘luao  jad 
‘ocubSjo 
aiqnios  ja:jBA\. 


•:fuaD  jed  ‘s:h^bs 
TJiuomiUT?  puB  sa:)Bj:j 
-Tu  ui  a^qn^os  Ja;B  \\ 


aa:  uonosdsui 


IBTDtpO 


2 3 

5 " 

o a> 

s* 

ftC 


V 
( M 
0) 

<w  u 

O P 

OD  ^ 

^ (0 

Sa 


OCDOCOOCsOlOOCCCOOOOJ 

1-I  C<i  1-H  C^l  f-H  (N  i-H  5^1*  (N  r-I  I 


OlOOmOCOO^OOOCOO'-^i 
(M  CO  (M  CO  (N  CO  CO  CO  <N  (M* 


OOiOCOtOX-*05CO 

i-idi-Iddddd 


O-^GOt^Oi-HOCOOOlOOOOCO 

COCOr-IC'JcOCOCjaiOoddt^i:^ 


oooooi>ooiooooooo 

dcoi>j>cooooi-Hodc>codd 


o o CO  r-(  no 

-iH*  d d d d i-*  d 


1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

i 1 

1 1 

1 1 

lOOOCOCOOLOCO 

l.-li-(T-IOi-lrH(M(M 

1.0 

1.1 

2.0 

2.2 

1.0 

1.1 

1.3 

1 1 

1 1 0 f-i 

1 1 i-t  CO 

I 1 
i > 

G000Cit^':oi:-00r--^^n0OC0C0 

ddddrHrHoddddi-ndd 

oo-^fDooioco'^coioi'-'^ir- 

Or-ti-Hi-ICOCOCOrHi-fi-ICOCO 

0.43 

0.65 

0.34 

CO 

CO 

0.46 

0.25 

0.23 

0.54 

00 

d 

0 

Ci 

d 

1.40 

1.65 

1.50 

o2 

I— 1 rH 

8 

0.37 

0.26 

0.36 

00 

CO 

0 

CO 

d 

odd 

60 

d 

0 

10 

d 

0 

TtH 

d 

0.55 

0.90 

no  f-* 

^ no 

d d 

0 

0.19 

0.16 

0.19 

Ci 

01 

d 

d 

0.11 

0.06 

0.29 

CO 

d 

CO 

^o 

d 

d 

82 
t-h  d 

0.81 

0.70 

r- 

CO 

t-H 

0.24 

0.49 

0.11 

CO 

Ci 

0 

00 

d 

o.os 

0.01 

0.07 

00 

d 

00 

CO 

d 

CO 

d 

d d 

-H  10 

CO  CO 

d d 

8 

d 

Q 0 
000 

d d d 

0 

rH 

d 

d 

CD  ^ CO 

0 t-H  1— 1 

d d d 

GO 

d 

0 

d 

CO 

CO 

d 

CO  C5 

d d 

0.00 

0.08 

d 

03J3;3:dc3r5(J3^3c3Dp!:r!c33 

pooo3o::o;3ooo30 

c;5P^|^^pL^C5l^^OPRO(^lfi|PHOP^ 


X}  ','3 
a>  I oj 

a ' G ■ fl  ■ ■ C ■ ■ G 

S'CG'sS'acs'O'acs’a'aS'o 
!HG!Ha;-iS^Gr];-iGd!-iG 
(SGc3G«3o3G3o333eSG 
G030D0G00G00G0 


a> 

„ G 
cs'O  ca'^'^'O'O'O 
ShG^hGGGGG 
C3GGGGGD3 
DOGOOOOO 
O P^  O P^  Ph  Ph  Ph  P^ 


CO  oi 

G<Jj  G 
G 03 

Oi 

O'i^O 


II3  IS 

irt  10  «o 


O O rt 

TD-O  S 
>■-!>.> 


10  C<l  I 
10  ?D  ' 


> > 
xa  w 
G G 
« a 
> > 
PiP5 


Cv5  C5 


> !> 
CO  CO 

G G 


> !> 
pqpq 


1^  40  M 

iS  s- 


bX)  3 ■ 

O G G 

W;^np:i 


1 Ci  « 
I CO  CD  ( 
I no  to  « 


CO  CO  fM  (M  0-1  O'!  61  (>1  6l  CO  6i  CO  00  ' 
COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO^- 
COCOOOOCOOO^OCOCO^’ 


OC>iSt^^iDocnOtDiO?DcOO-tM< 

cDOiOiDiOno^'-i^'^'l^^^coco 

cocooOcO)OLCitftnonoiD»D^^4:r 

LOIDOCDCDOCOCOOCOCOCOO® 


1 g Ci  Oi  Oi  C5  ^ 
) no  ic  no  no  iD  LO 


OJ 

D<  w 
CC  G1 
O 


>1  a ^ 

G arrt  bfi'G 
ft  “ S G 5^ 

S«  O a>  •>-< 
'OGS  GJ’O.g 
O G CL;  Q,  5-1  ft 

G G QJ  • fO  • 
2 oi  U)'G)  'Gi 

s 

a oj  ^ 

a:< 

M 


O (N 

o . 


o 

G3 

03  -H  CO 
G ^ 

. ;hPP^ 
fl  t>»  c3 

I . JH'f- 

:cH  s a G 

^ a 
*< 


G 
o 
cc 

g;  ^ ai  A 
O O 

G ^ CZJ  o 

O O'  , u 
'S  C pq  O 

G c3  k> 

^ Q *-j  U 
* G 


^ (1) 

5|  . 

^ <=> 

2-ft  o 
ftPP  GfL| 

a a,  != 

^GG 

.a  02 


:'G«3 


Ph  pi 


=j  a t;  tc 

ax:^  2 
> w)  a 

gM  m 
w 


o o 

00 


G G 

aw; 

0 

03  T3 

w a 


w 

' -lG 

CO  rrl 
--  • G ” 
opq  G-o 

a ^ <1^ 
a*  p 

33  Ol 

H p^ 


o o 

G G 

PPPhg; 

OJ  ^ 

■>>  2 
cc  M (25 
G G 

G G G 

P^Ph  c 
* o 


o o 
OQ 


Pi  rG 
o o 
G G’ 

PPP^ 

G _G 
> ’> 


<=!  1=^  r. 
G G h O 

PPIP^  gS 


a 

CD 


O o 
O-ft  c 


G S3 

a ph 


T3  G I ' o 
in  C3 

' ' C2  O “ ^ 

g 00  G^ 

Q O l^lj  G ^ 

I g 0-30^,^ 
i-  02^^  G 
. cn  00  G o . 'G 
I Xh  PP  iD  s3  O 3 

I G G O >4  G G 

I Si-P1PhPhO«2 


5192  I 6566  I Sandusky 


!al  Fertilizer  i 5195  i i ^ i Guaranteed, 


57 


O O O o o o 

00  O O O 00  00 


O Oi  Oi 

r-I  d d 


OO  Oi  CO  00  CO  00 

d d T-I  th  d d d 


d d 


05  00 

d d 


d d 


00  05 

d d 


o3  03  'O 

d !h  G c3 

D 03  d 03  d G 

o d o d o o 


rt  rt 

S S 

fH  ;h 

0O 


a G 

Sw 


g f-  ^ ® 00  K 

siiiii 


I O CO  CO  00 
1 rH  I-H  d d 


O0i05OrHO-f*^C5OOlCC0(NOC0OX>Ot^Ot^ 

rtH*  00*  d d d d d d d d (N  CO  ic  d CO  d 00  oc 


O 

CM  d 


: O LC  CO 
; CO*  CO  d d 


lOOO^COOOOOOOO 

idr-ndddddd 


lio  CO  ^ 

odd 


d d d 


d d d 


d d d 


odd 


fl  w C fl  fl  G fl  G 

C3D^3C3^3C3;3^!I5C3:33PC33C3PC3:3C33 

pooDo:3ooo^3ooo;30j3o:3o:3o 

Ofef^Oi^Of^fHF^HOP^PHpHO^OPnO^O^ 


O CO 

(M 


OlOCOCOt-- 

CO  d uo  lo 


OCOOOCiOOcoCO 


a; 

O) 

^ a 
2 o 


O I— I Ci  (M  (M  O 


-TtHCOCOUOOOCOl^OO 

O d d d d d CO  CO* 


C'T  (M  (M  05 
^ ^ C^3  (M 

d d d d d 


tH  r-i  65  CO  CO 

d d d d d 


d d d d d 


S S 8 o S 

d d d d d 


lO  oo  IQ  1:^ 

1-1  rH  i-l  03  O 

d d d <d>  d 


03 


G G 
ca^d  os'd'Q'd'd'd 
shGshGGGGG 
c3dGdGdGd 

dodooooo 

0 O Ph  Ph  1=3  Ph 


03  d 

d o 
0Ph 


cc 

03 

tn  ft 
o c3 

wo 


S G d 

.2  g G 

^o>: 


gE| 

g0  2 

o 03  03 

Swo 


) OO  I O CD  O 
) CO  I o rH  CD 
Ig  'PO.COrH 


e dJ 
G "3 


! 33  o o £ £I 
<'^KO';^0 


1 in  lo  CO  «5  CD  I CD 


a3c3l<53CDCDOO<5DSDi5Qf-F-r-r^(M(M40cO-^-t<<D® 

D3C3e3iniooooot30cococococot^r-;^f-r-t-I-P- 
T-i  rH  I-J  lO  in  1— I 1— I 1— I 1— I 03  03  c-l  03  n3  (M  03  03  03  03  03  03 
COCOCOCOCOCDCDCDCDCOCDCDCDCOCOCDCDCOCDtoCD 


in  in  fo  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  I 


xj 

rH  a 


ftO 

o=<j 

0 ,, 


'd  g 
0 


ftM 

o 


G 

cc  03 


>w 

G 

D 


||g=8|G 


— . 03 


o 

'd 

bj3  d 
.2^ 


o 

! ftO 


g S_2 

6-'='  sS:«.sli^^^gS'""o.as 

jd  . .Ha^ojG 

20o:»w  re  2§S  Gd^oftw  feOWMc 

S g * .2 

W 0 2w  Q 25  CB  w 


X 2; 
Wg< 

cc^ 

II. 

iS’gi 

cd  ■ 

5 


? S? 

* O* 
0 


O G C 

K 03  dW 

2 • 

G00^ 


C«  OJ  o 
^ g 2-G 

20^^ 

w 


G 
O D 

G xfi 

cd  o 

2Ph 
0^1-. 
0 c3  d 


a O 

X Q, 

y, 


I 


^ O g G 2i^ 


2i  =3^  « 2Q 

al  03 

0 ‘ 


w • 

b. 


^ >»*  ^^  * * _, 
cd  <3  ’T' 

d 


1h 

O 01 

d 


^ § 

Ci  to 

.c;  si 

0)  ft  C 

w ^ ft<(J 

W'S  .d 

, s 0 W ■ 
.2 
d 


2 2oc  s g s a 
0^  0 0 0 0 


^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 
bx) 

'd  cd  ^ 
a>  0)  ry  <1^  <D  0)  a? 
W W OT  W W CO 

cd  cd  ^ cd  cd  cd  cd 

^ ^ (V  ^ A ^ ^ 
O O V O V V 

U U U Ut  ^ 

:3  ;3  G G G 

Ph  Ph  Ph  ^ PL| 

II  1 1 1 1 


c 


d ft  CO 
03  a 03 

2 2 <13 
■g  n 

ft  73  G 

a 

0-03 

>7  ^ D 

ft  03  ro 


03 


D e 

iX)  bo 


D <13  D 
C 
bn 


W CO  CO  . • 

.2 

*■'  D 

ft  03  • D 

M O +J 
03  D 

.2  O0 

g £ 

S o 

C?  4-> 

D d d 
Ih  d 03  D 
D tB  to 
® C tti  c3 

ft  2 0 
" d o o 

2 ^ ^ 

JJJJ 


:d  D 


Oft  £ 

2 2"^ 
o o ft 


d d 

D D <13 

M to  d 


ft  ft 


I I 


58 


.2  vS 

•:^uao  jad 
‘I'BIJOJ, 

►C  n 1 

•^uao  jad 

•aiqrqosui 

p3 

•^uao  aad 

P P 

■pa:^a^AaJ 

puu  aiqnios 

•^uao  jad  ‘aa^'BAi  ut 
aiqnios  'qs^^Od; 


•;uao  jact 


•;uao  jad 
‘aAtio-B  pu3  aiqn 
-los  aa:»^Ai  I'Bjoj, 


■juao  jad  ‘aiu^S 
-JO  aiqni’osui 
jai^Ai.  aAtj^'Bui 


•;uao  aad  ‘oiu'bS 
-JO  aiqniosut 
ja^BAi  aAijoy 


O IC 

O <6 


04 

CO 


Oi  CO 
CO  iO 


03 

cp  O o 


03  m 


OCiCDOlO'^lOI>t^O'rt<'»^OCOOCOOi 
00  00CC03O30303o!03C0C0C0OOOOOi 


lOrHCOOt^COOOCO 
iOO«-I0303t-03C0  03* 


O 00  05 
r-I  d O 


O00  03lCl0X^OC0O 
rHOMOdOi-HOi-I 


Q00003Tjii-t^lOl£^^03C0030)COCDr^COCOOOOI'^#<OOI> 

drHt-IrHi-IrHdddd03rH04rMr-5rHTH^rHi-Ir-5ddd 


d d 


SB 


CO  CO 

d d 


05  05 
'f  03 

d d 


d d 


d d 


O 

d d 


o o 

03  ^ 

d d 


C» 

l?5 

d d 


03  CQ 

03  ^ 

d d 


d d 


•:juao  dBd 
‘oiu^Sao 
9iqnios  JBT'BM 


o o 

d d 


ss 

d d 


d d 


88 
d d 


d d 


■;uao  jad  ‘squs 

BTUOUJUIB  pUB  Sa^BJ^ 
-Tu  ut  aiqu^os  Ja^B.w 


ds 

d d 


03  03 

d d 


d d 


<NI 

O «) 

d d 


88 
d d 


^ ^ rr- 

C3  “ C3  ” ~ 
tnCt-lCO 
03  12  03  P ^ 
3 0^300 

CD  Ph  0 ^ 


0 l_i 

■u'O'C'C  c3'0  o3"C'G 

acnGt-,n;Hca 

'-GGSC3GC3'-" 


S'O'O  oS'O'O  cs'O'O 

^ccs^cctHca 

GP^Sc3Gc3GGo3GGGGGo3GSc3GGc3Go3Gc3Po3GGo3aGa3GD 

000030POOGOOPOO::OOGOOGOGOGOGOODOOJ300 

pt|^pH;iH0pH0PHpHCD!^<fi<CDf^pHC5l^[^OpHfi<CDI^CDPHOPHCDP^^CDI^I^CDPH^ 


i'C'P  a-O 

■ ! t-,  a 


'p 

<K 

V 

'p«’C«’a'0aT3'Prt'0'a 

CtnCs-iOCt-iCOtHOO 
03Pc3Po3PPGapa3PD 
OPOODOOPOO 


aa  uonaadsui 


p « p 

pc  P is 

' o >>  o 

' pp:  p3 

l-g  0x3  Ul-e  fcX) 

1 o £ ^5  p o p 


18  188 

I M 00  C5  O »0  I S5  1 (M  lO 


-p  > 

>>  o 


1^1 


o ^ 

O rQ 

as 

C«  C3 

oo 


I O I ^ T— I 

I -f  I O !p 

1 o 1 lo  «? 


p 

o£ 


.P  o 

fcH  !-( 


88 


€2 


I Cvl  00  I t rH 
I 1-n  O I O 00 

I m 00  ' g 


’>5 

>1  cn 

O)  o 
PI  o 
GOOD 


>145 

P P 


lBTDt,yo 


CO  CO  0^1  <M  (M  O']  (M  (M  <M  VO  Ift  f-  (M  <M  (M  I 

T— I iH  VO  VO  VO  VO  VO  VO  VO  OO  CO  lO  lO  VO  -fi  -r  I 

O O 01  (N  Ol  CO  C<l  (M  O]  -f  -H  CD  CO  CO  V^  V>  1-  ( 

vovovovo  vovovovo  vovovovovoi-  - ■“  - - - '*  ' 


) Ci  05  CD  CO  tr  t-  J 

- _>COCO^i4hi-It-Ii 

00  IXi  CO  < 


i-l  (N  <M  03 

I VO  VO  VO  VO  VO  CD  CD  CD  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  S3  ■S 


a 

o 

.p 

a 

S-p 


i)  Ov 

sz 

? 5= 


1 15 

dS 

o 

I- 

O ^ 

hfi  p 

s 3 


? ‘ ■ 

Sapp 


I ^ 
1 o 

I'p 

I <D 

'p 

p 

|a 

QV 

^3 

P Sj 

Z^ 

20 


0 03  >4 

P0 


■ a.P 

^ <D  ^ OJ 


2 

'p 

ID 


0 

>1*  * 
c3 

Q 


(H  O O 

p . p 

g 

M >>•- 
<ii«3 


P o 

5 

3p'i 

fCi  PM2 

P;4hP 

3 * 

M 


P O 03 

"-"Opi 

“4^  m 

§§2 


tea 


p^  ^ 
CQP-G  S^P 

w ^ ^ bflOJ 

|w§W^oM 

P . O ^ G ^ • 


03  P o 

o0p 
«ro.S 
^ OCC, 

p 9 o 

<D  tJC-g  ' 
Vh  to  O 
■900- 
>1* 


P „ p s . 
k'O'S'g  " 

Sglgs 

okPoc^ 


. p 

o o 

0 9i 


a 

a 

a 

a o 

oO 


be, 


P 


>0> 

9 cu" 

G X3 

WPf 

«P' 

<V  , ' 
h J i 


.a  =3^3 1 gS  g§  « G 

S 2a  Saa  9 a 

S|^.0^OO.G 
^POpOco  t-3 
* bjO+  T3  * 

a « 


I S ap' 
10  gP 

'■pO^' 

lo'g 

I be  03 


59 


I I 


O 05  I COi>-  I 00 


Oi>  O lO  CO 


<N  I CO  J>  LO 


1 i>*  I o o 


iO  CD  I I I C<J  li— 


GO  I O O 


OCOOOlOOOiOOOr-t^COOQOtMlOOCOCO'OCOOCNlOOOlOtCKNOCOOOC^O'^LOCOOCO 
CqC<ic^'^r0  0506'^*^l0^lOl0OOHOOOOQC)a5C>O05i-(C<i<?i05OOrHC0OOC<J(M(NC0 


Oi-(OCOlOO'e^<COO  CO  C<l 

ooQOoo6dodcoi>t^ 


C>OlOOOl01>Or^05r-llOLOCOCOCOlOCOCO^lOlOCOOiMOOrHir:tCOlOCO 

VI  rH  d d d d i-H  o d rH  d d d d d d d d d d d d rH  i-I  rH  d rH  o d d d 


ID  00  CO  CO  CO  CO 

d d d d d d 


C0OO00  00  C0C50005^C0'^C0C0rH05rHOC<IC<J<NC<I^C0l0C0'^l0I>0005OTtHC0OC0C^-rJ<-rt<C0-f<Tt4C0lO0005OCgL0’«i<»-H  <M  Oq 
d r-I  rH  d d r4  I-I  d d d d d d d r-I  d rH  i-I  r-I  1-1  I-I  r-I  d d d d d d d d d r-I  d d r-I  r4  I-I  I-I  d d d d 1-1  r-5  d d I-H  1-1  rH  rH  d d d 


I CO  CO 

I d d d 


dddd 


-1^10  I ^ 00 
<M  CO  I lO 

d d I o d 


lo  oq 

lO  J> 

d d 


05  05 

d d 


dddd 


I! 

d d I < 


d d 


05  CO 
ITS  '!« 

d d 


I (M  in 

I <M  CO  (M 

I d d d 


dddd 


in  in 
IM  (M  <J3 

d d d 


CO  ^ 

d d 


S§5 
d d 


igs 
d d 


d d 


d d d 1 d d d 


o o o 

d d d 


g8S 
d d d 


I O (M 

I d d 


ss 

d d 


88 

d d I 


8S 
d d 


o o> 
d d d 


lasa 

I d d d 


o o o o 


I CO  t-H 

I d d 


ca  D 
D O 


is 

^ c3  ^ o3 
o tH  a 
3 C3  :0  03 
O S!  O J3 
^0^0 


E3  S3  P 
0 3 0 


M n s 
c3  3 3 
3 0 0 
0pt|pH 


I'O 


'O'OTS  oS'O'C'O'O  ca'O'O  c3'^^  ca'O  es'O  ca'O  oS'O  oa'O  cS'O  Ki'O 

aaaSnGdaSaaGiHGflSoaSaScScSaSaSaiHa 

333o33333e3333o333s333o33cS3c33c33c33s33o33 
00030000300030030030303030303030 
0'!d  Ph(^O(3hP40Ph(5^C3[s^OSh  0PH0!d0pR0(=H0f^ 


'2  '^'2 
3^3 
3 S3  3 
0 3 0 
^ 0 


13  § T)  T! 
3^33 
3 03  3 3 
0 3 0 0 
^0  ^ Ph 


|g 

C3  « 

coP> 


13  3 
> 3 
WOJ 

gS  bfl 
^0  3 

o 2 

;^0S 


133  O o 
1 > 
o CjO 
'23  13  fe 


I >>  >1  i § 
iggaa 

I ^ 

« C3^ 


•;2i;2i- 


1 <=i 
1 o 
I 3 

%>o 

bfl 

03  ij  M 

1-3  S O 


3 

& 

o 

^o 

O bfl 

05  W 

0O 


.3  >1 

CO  ^ 

.£''3 


I o o 
|X!X3 
3 3 
■PO 


^ 3 
13  O 

^2 


M 2 1 o i 

-ti I fo  \ 00  i in  I 2 on  In  I 8 d CO  i co 

mcD  iin  iin  iin  icococo  iinmco  imcoco 


Cn  CO  ,-1 
“ ^ M 00 


> <?a 


in  in  in 


f-  ISO  ICO  I in 

05  t-  I CO  I CO 

5 CO  1 ® 13 


<S4<Mc^C<ic<!03cjc^C3(sa(NC3(NcococococoeoMcoe<3C<3coc»5cococococo5S£?^$?S^^®®8S333Sd3 

co33SS3333333S3333SSS33335333S3SS33333333333“'*‘®^'® 


CO  CO  CO  CO  o 


03  ^ . 


I o S3  O 

:|p^  g"’ 

H-*  rH*  ' 

1 «<  E 


o. 

Q 

2a 

3i  ® 

■S’S-So'^ 

2 ^-5  -w 

^ ft  . 
.y*  CH 

W <J 


3 QJ  QJ  ^ 

■ rrWl3 


|l|5'gl55”l 

®lsi|  = 


a> 

i? 

c2 

O0 

02  W 


o Oi 

2oa 


cgta 


g S45.2  a 

! 3 bjo+i  > O 

I •—  . 3 p-  « 

i 3 rl  frt  P 33 


; CB  3,  3 
,3002 


S00CB0  o a^l  g'^ 
a_  <J  . _ 0 15  .0 

30cs^0o3rj3  -^  • 

^ ^ ^ . .w-’mtuooi^tuOaiajS.ESO 
S— I Ch  Ih  3 K-^  Ch  O CC  Ih  3 CO  Ih  l— i Ih  C5 

^;5HPL<i^^^0^O£<3O^(i(^fi,0 
^■‘-  >>*!!:*>>+  >) 

3 C3  3 

Q ft  p 


. 3 


a ‘S  o -3  x 

3 

=82  222  s2  a g gS 

gfe  >1^  oM  W 

O 33  .a  3 2 

3 .3  .3jSqj^_Q3'p 

.2  O .£3  0 .2  5^  .2  & x:  !S  g 

t-,  <v  u,  V M'OW'cJft 

p0ft0pppp  <uW2 

40  +5>  +3  +a  ^ 3 

2 “ 2 P OQ 


P 3 ^ ^03 

o b P P 

» P 0 0 2 

ia  o3  ^ ^ P 
r}  ft  05  m ^ 

-jb  S3  3 a g o 
P g 05  3 x3 

^I'SWWAh 

cadi's 'H'S 

3 .roisu^ 

1^  W 


p 

V* 

C5 

2 p' 
0'  P- 
2 p 
^ cc 

• 3 

^ 2 
p 2 
2 p 


* — Sample  received  in  spring  ®2 — Purchased  from  L.  B.  Stowe,  Vevay,  Ind. 

80— Refund.  See  page  28  »3— Purchased  from  P.  C.  Bulleit 

— Purchased  from  Perry  Rule  — Purchased  from  W.  C.  Anderson.  Composited  2 samples 

— Purchased  from  Pox  Chemical  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky.  — Purchased  from  Fox  Chemical  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


6o 


.2  £ 

•;u0O  jad 

•juao  jad 

a'^ 

‘aiqniosui 

G'o 

•ijuao  jad 

P-i  =3 

‘pa:;jaAaa 

puB  aiqniog 

nu0o  J0(I  ‘aa'i'BAv  UT 
Qiqnios 


nu9o  jad 
‘IBJOJ, 


C C-l 

c4  CO 


o o 

O 00* 


O Oi 

(M  C<J 


CO  00 

00*  o6 


I CO  o 
I CO*  CO* 


CO  ic  <N 
CO  CO 


^ 00  O CO 

CO*  CO  lO 


CO  CO 
CO  CO 


00  CO  ^- 
ifi  iri 


OrtH01>C01>OOOJOOO' 

ci  o CO*  CO  CO  '^*  CO  rH  1 


'COT-HOCOOrHCOlO<MOiC<JO-^0(N 
I ^ ^ ^ .-H*  O O rH  r-I  r-I  (N  05  o CO  O 


0’^0500000eo^0l0coc0loc0i>ici0l0l0l0 

1-trHOr-lt-lT-lrHl-lOrHrHOOOOOOOCOOOO 


«(tHC0C0C0'^l0C0l'-C01>lf:><MlC^-^C00000^i-tOC0 

docoodddoodcDi-Hr-Ii-HOodcooT-Hr-Jr-I 


•^uao  aad 
‘aAijD-B  puB  aiqn 

-los  ae^BM.  iB^oj, 


'luao  aed  ‘diubS 
-JO  aiqniosui 
ja^BAV  0AnOBUI 


(M  (M  CO 

d d d 


lO  CO  00 

CO  CO  (M 

d d d 


Ol  IM  CO  CO  »0  r-H 
CO  ^ CO  <M  CO  CO 

d d d d d d 


CC  00  X'-  ^ VO  < 
t-H  rH  CO  CO  CO  » 

d d d d d < 


CO 

CO  ^ 

d d 


S ^ 

o'  o o 


■4U0O  j0d  ‘oiubS 

-JO  aiqniosut 
J0:^BA4.  0Ai;oY 


o g o ^ m M 
d o o o'  d o 


00  CD  CO 

^ I-H  O) 

d d d 


nu00  j0d 
‘oiubSjo 
aiqnios  J0:^BAi 


o S 

d d d 


d d d d d d 


d o'  o' 


•:;u0D  J0d  ‘s:f];cs 
T3tU0UilUB  pUB  S0;BJ:J 
-lit  ut  0iqn|os  Ja^B^ 


SSg 
d d d 


g g s g 

o'  d d d d d 


I'g  1 1 1 

1 1 1 'O  1 

1g3  1 

1 1 'O  1 TO  1 

i|  i i i 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 G , 

' ' '5  ' 

1®  1 
'g  ' 

1 ! G 1 G 1 

' '5  'g  ' 

csg 
U(  Cl 
C\S  ^3 
C3  O 

OPh 


'V  . . . 

^ „ ' ' ' q ' ' ' C ' ‘ ' C ' ' G „ ^ 

rt'O  cS'C'G'G  cs'O'C'C  cs'^’C'C'OTJ'C  ojTJ'C  cs'O'O'O  ca'O  eS'O 
(-.GtHGCIGt^ClGG^HClGCIGGGnCIGfc^OGCl^Gt-ia 
GGGG3Go3GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG03Go3G 
GOGOOOGOOOGOOOOOOGOOGOOOGOGO 


aa;  uonasdsui 


'>  ’> 

a G 
o o 
o o 

mm 


O -H 
(N  00 
-t'  IQ 

m o 


1 

I >1  M 

i«li 

1 


il?i 


O >5 

c .t; 

50 


0-2 
h ^ 


be 
5 

« 03 
G ^ tic3 
•"  O o "G 

0CZJCB<1 


fcfl 

a .t; 

g a 


>00  lt~OlQ(M-3<lO 
1^10  iCOOqDi-hOO 
l-tiQ  icOODoo-f'^-H 
icDcD  iiOiOCDcDCOO 


C»« 


C O Ci 
G h cl 


00 

g IS 


IBTOtJJO 


ss 

CD  CD 
CD  CD 


CO  00  J 
(N  CSl  ( 


. CD  ’ 
, CO  CO  ( 


^ 00  (>D  CO  00  CO  ( 


ISggggSSgg 


iOOOOOQ(^'CDc^__.__ 

iLOlOVDVCVOVOVOlOVDI.OVQCDcDCDCDCDCDCDCDCOCDCO 


§ s 

I® 

© > 

OD  * 
V © 

So. 

ss 


ft 

CO 

O 

.p-l 

q;i  ^ 

II 

SM  a 

G O 

O G ^ 

G®  G 

■G'0» 
Cl  G . 


CU  ,Cd  h, 

G 
G G 

O)  ^ 


O O 
o o 
CJ  o 
G G 
X3-Q 
Sh  O O 

N s s 

S-(  M 

OOC3 


ft 

a 

o Sh 
qO 

G.a 

_ti  G 

ao 

a> 

C3  X 
0 O 

X^^ 

o 

Ph 


o 

£ 

X3  ' 

;-i  -G.  : 
a>  cj  . . 

a<^  >>< 


o a 


oPh 


' ' O ^ Cr  O cu 


.22 

'"’(S 


iifl  « 

Q |G  m .G  m 


rO  ;;  G >>  o) 

coG  <r!o"-'ft.^^CQo:S3C.22o  '•'.>ni-"a)0--o 

|5«dnl^S<^-as^Sagp|^aSa 

o o o o 6 

^ pR  pH  Ph  Ph 


C3  “r 

•s®' 

G 73 

0 

X 

O 

Ph 


G be 

_ W o 

^ . O) 

Ph5?0 


6i 


OCM 

! 


00  00 


I ^ 00 
I CO  (M 


O C<1  CO  f-t 
CO  kO  GO 


Oi  CO 
CO  CO*  (N 


O OI>* 
lO  CO 


• 00  kO  lO  lO  lO 

■ CO  kO  CO  x>- 


)00co<P«Ocox^C>C> 


OCOO'^OOOOOkO’^ 
d q '^*  kO  CO  1>  cp  00 


O C7i  ^ UO 
(N  CO  cq  C<l 


)j^-OiCOOJt^OiOkOCOr— C<J00050i 
I rH  fM*  rH  CO  CO  CO*  CO  <>3  C<I  ^*  CO  kO  d \6  r-!  i 


I O C55  lO  CO  ko  05 


kOtOCO  I lCO'«^^COlOkO 

odd  I I d d d d d 


i050omr*-coiooox'^co 
I d rH  i-I  d d r-I  d d d d 


oocoomrHOo 
r4  d d rH  d r-I  rH*  r-I 


CqkC»OOOC<lrHC<JCOO(M 
rH  r-I  rH  d rH  d d d r-I  rH 


lH0500l^OO'^r-J>.^COH<l>kOCOH<lOkniJ>C<J<MkOCO"^kOkOH^kCkOTt<lf:ti>kOCO 

cocoddrHrHc^*— (MddoodddoddrHrHrHi-Iddddddddddd 


O 'Tfi 
rH  (N 

d d 


^5583 
d d d 


C^  CO  C<l  (N 

d d d d d 


<M  CO  CO 

d d d 


Hi  CO  rH  CO  O 00  I 
CO  CO  CO  Hi  C<l  (M  1 

O O O O O O O 


05  CO 
ira  'if 
o o' 


o o’  d 


CCI  CO 

d d 


o o o o o 


03  CO  CC 

d d d 


d d d d d d d 


I8g 
d d 


d d d 


M o ^ ^ 

d o d o d 


odd 


03  rH 

d d 


lO  g M M g ^ 

d d d d d d d 


d d 


g^g 
d d d 


ggg 


d d d 


gg 
d d 


dggggdg 

d d d d d d d 


03  CO 

d d 


dS 

o d 


d ^ ^ d 
d d d d'd 


odd 


d d 


00  30  00  i-H  C<3  op  OO 
rH  rH  rH  rH  03  O O 

d d d d d d d 


QJ 


S'O'O  Sts  §'t3T3 
3HdC4Mfl3HCC];Hfl 
033;3c!303cS33c33 
30030300130 


3 3 ' ' ■ ' ' 3 

.^wra'OTJ'aca'O'Os'O'OTJ'O'O- 

ajH33333tH333sH33t-33333 
333o33o3333o333c333333 


a> 


<u 


oS'O  BS'O’O'O  OS'S 

^ 3 ^H  3 " “ “ 

3 3 3 3 

3 0 3 0 


3 3’'3 

w w w w Hr  co'O'OTS  cs'3'3'3  o3'3'3  S'3'3'3'3'3'3'3 
33333h333jhB33333!h3033333 

3333333333333 

030030000000 


3 

3 

O 


3 3 

05  3 
3 3 
3 3 

O0 


333333333333333333333333331333333333333 

03000303000300300000300030003003000000 


|a'-3 

in 


° S 5 

S oS 

^ u <v 

wmpm 


c3  > 
3 3 
3!  O 

o o 

Hpq 


3 ° O ^ ^ 
O S 3 J?  V 


S go 

►h  Ui  3 

^pqw 


1 -H  cl  tuD 

i.s  g-o 

1 ES  >>'t, 

'Endfq 


a 3 
3 
D 3 

"3  5 
MS 


I'll 


o § ''g 

3 O 
3 I— I 3 3 

y 3 3 g 

tuO  >.  05  31 

OS  O 

WphOp^ 


a ca 

Ip  C5 


S ti 


oco<M 

o lo  $<i  1 CD  CO  I CO  CO  cc  q 

c:  O kO  I Cil  kQ  I Hi  kO  O CSl  CD 


<50  CD  eo  I CD  CO  ic 

® g S ' cp  5 g 


CO  Ift  CS  00  05  rH  CD 

to  m lo  lo  lo  CO  CD 


I CD  CD  CD  CD  1 

'SSS3oScScdo 


05  05  0>  O O I 
rH  rH  eg  oq  O' 
t-  1' 

eg  eg  eg  eg  <M  CO  < 


3 

o 

3M 


53  3 
e3  3 


8^1 


9 s 


^ O Q o 
u2 

od5w 

X 3 S ej 

Q OJ  hH 

CD  O 

w ^ 


“ ^ a 
I si 

in  O W 

a^l 

.-SM 

^333 

o 

Ph 


3 3 3 
33  O 
3,  3.  CO 

a 3 3 

o o 


O 43 

O o 
<31  Ph 
3 'O 

^ s 


■3  !h  3h 

P<  tH  3 ra  O 

1/5  3 3,  ^ rt 

2 « o S ^ 

g ao^l 

«’§|M 

o’' 

5 


o 


a “■ 


2 9 M .9  0 

3 !h  o'^a^ 

O 3 * 

o ^ 


HH  P 

go  >> 

a C53 


>.'0 

S3 

.a"^ 

3 . 

00 


gosS: 

fe  CQ  3 .2 

3 > « 

|o 

C3 


> 'O  3,  3 
10-33 


o 

cn 

CO 

3 


(£  “ 
P-I  w 

^ 3 

3W 


3, 

^ o 

g|'|  dS 

■5  O g O 05 

2 3 5 3 .10 

g piH  3.=8  o s s 


o 

dpq.s 

P O 


’-'rh  P 


3 3 


6 SHO.C  3 3O  SQfq-j^W 

o o 00 


.a-3S  W3 

^ rr-3  a ,r 
3 3 'g  S 3 
3 3 Jg-g  3 
O O ga  O 


* — Sample  received  in  spring  — Purchased  from  Pearl  Underwood,  Bargersville,  Ind. 

— Purchased  from  Jarecki  Chemical  Co.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio  — Purchased  from  J.  W.  Stokesburry,  Camby,  Ind. 

— Purchased  from  A.  F.  Brockelmeier,  Greensburg,  Ind.  — Purchased  from  Pearl  Underwood 

— Purchased  from  Chas.  Tenneson,  Mt.  Vernon,  Ind.  — Purchased  from  Chas.  Winegarden,  Rochester,  Ind. 

— Purchased  from  W.  D.  Coleman 


Report  of  Inspeotion  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


62 


•:juao  jad 

.9  5 

‘1'b;oj;, 

19, 

' 1 0 . 

‘^uao  aad 

'1 

1 0'^* 

■aiqniosui 

•:5uaa  aad 

‘pa^aaAaa 
put?  aiqntog 

CO  O <N 
06  CO  ^ 


i>  10  to 


OOO(MOOC0Or-li^C0O^OC^Ol0i 
O r-I  05  O Oi  O O (M  C<I  CO  <N  CO  ci  c!  Oi  O 1 


n-HrHCOiOO'^COOOO<MOOOO 

l(NC<lrH(NO0C>C500T-HQ(N 


•:ju8o  jad  ui 

aiqnios  ‘0"a[  ’qs'B^OdE 


lo^cocoioiocoiotocotoio-fc^-ioiocooco^ia- 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 


ot-io 
1-1  o 


d 

o 

^ 2 

'i  i 


•:)U90  jad 


totocoooc^<M^iccotooooo'^coototo-^mcocDt:~oe<5rH'«i<oeocoe<5c 

l-IrHOrHiHrHi-IoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHr-Ji-lT-IrH'rHrHrHI 


•juaa  aad 
‘aApo'B  puB  aiqn 
-los  aaiBAi.  iB^ajj 

CO  1 

C<J  1 CO 

.2  J d 0 

d 

0.37 

0.42 

0.29 

CO 

d 

0.44 

0.41 

0.25 

0.30 

0.25 

0.28 

0.26 

0.28 

0.77 

0.85 

0.91 

0.78 

O.Sl 

1.00 

0.32 

8 

in 

•;uao  aad  ‘diubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
aa:}BAi  aAijOBUi 

CM  1 CO  CO 

CO  1 CO  10 

d 100 

C5 

rH 

0 

CO  00  rH 
rH  r-(  CO 

000 

CO 

d 

CO  05  10  0 1 10  Ol  (N 

rH  rH  CO  CO  1 (M  CO  CO 

0000  lOOOO 

s?  ^ ^ 

000 

C<J  05  0 00 

10  HP  CO  (M 

0000 

In 

•juaa  aad  ‘oiubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
aa^BM  aApay 

08  1 CO  cl 
d Ido 

(M 

0 

W 05 

<M  i-H  rH 

000 

0 

CO  CO  OD  (N  J CO  0 (M  CO 

(M<Mr-lrH  lrHC<JrHr-i 

dood  loood 

J>  CO  (M 
^ <M  to 

000 

10  40  CO  in 

HJ1  HJ1  (>q 

0000 

d 

•juaa  aad 
‘otuBSao 
aiqnjos  aa^B^^ 

8 

d 1 d d 

0 

d 

<M  <M  0 

0 (M  rH 

d d d 

8 

d 

rHlQOO  '(MO-HCO 
rnOOrH  lOCOOO 

dddo  idddd 

0 rH  »0 

I— t 0 rH 

0 d 0 

0.11 

0.12 

0.00 

0.09 

CO 

CO 

0 

■:}uaa  aad  ‘sj^us 
Btuouiuit;  puB  sa:}Bj; 
-Tuut  ai;qni;os  aa:)B4\ 

10  1 JC^ 

CO  « J-H  oq 

d 1 d d 

8 

d 

888 

0 0 d 

d 

0 CO  ^ g lOgOg 

dood  loodo 

0 00 

(M  10  (M 

d d d 

0.22 

0.24 

0.74 

0.08 

(M 

HP  ■ 

d 

S'o  i’C'o  §'c  a'O  ra'C'TJ'a'a  §'0'a’0  aTj'a'O'a 

fHCfHOfl^HCf^cnG^-iGs-iGcciatHGGCcit-iGGaMcaac 

e3PcS=33J3D.«=3ppc3f:c3J3;3D^:cJ33;33«3DP(33D3J3;3 

SODOOPO^JOOOPOPOOOOrSOOOOPOOODOOOO 


21 
03  D 

P o 


5'C'O 

a a 

ca  :3  3 

300 


aa  uouaadsui 


Scottsburg  __ 

Borden  

Borden  

Oorydon  June 

Mauckport  __ 
Mauckport  _. 
French  Lick  _ 

Bargersville  _ 

New  Albany  _ 

Dubois  

Orleans  

Newburg  

Huntingburg 

Corydon  

Star  City 

Corydon  

New  Albany  . 
Tdnton  

Lynn  

Scottsburg  _. 
Petersburg  _. 
Mauekport  __ 
Petersburg  .. 

8 

3=  •.#  1 CO 

lO  0 t Oi 

IS 

5559 

6272 

6630 

5340 

54OT 

5.514 

6152 

6604 

5517 

5554 

6069 

6289 

5495 

5740 

5841 

5436 

5758 

6273 

6523 

> 

82“ 
3i  a 


lMlOlO>0-^'-t-lrtlftlAK3t^l^OOC)OOOOOOO^Ci05d5030<=!OOrHrHr;HrHrH 

iCsasdiOoiomioioioiifiioioioioioioifliniOiOiomtocDcooDcocoo^OD 

jlSlOLOlOCOCOCOOCOCOCOCOCOOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOOCOCOCDCO 


CO  CO 

M 


s ^ 

O 01 


ft 


O V 

Sa 

g2 

« OS 
-d* 

'aS 

x> 

03 


>> 

M 

« 2 

S d 

w X 

1! 

"3 

- O) 

03  <4-1 

CM 

0=53 


o p 
Oft 

tn  « >1  >> 

.s 

5 ^ c o 
g w 

n o o 

bf^  m m 


0:>  2 


c3 

5W 

oJ  <I> 

^ o 

IS 

o 

3 


GOG 


O nj  ^ ^ 
OujZi  ^2:/} 
%* 

5 


53  W 1 
cd 

2^1ooWSd 

■fl*  -3*  B* 

00  0 


a>  o 


r— « ^ f ' 

■■Si-  - ■ 

oj  g W S-4 


(5 'd  ^ 1 
X ;2  W S pH 

■§4.  41= 

0 


5 'S 

-2*1 
O) 

§=3 

-gS 40.  ^ 

p -2  <u  c _5i 

-oMpq-^  w 


0 


=3  4J  O CU 

^•5W  g 
S3  . G 

. >>ry 

COr-N  5H  C 
£ §1 
o * * * 


fH  O _ 

Bo  ^ 
Ph  o 


4:::g  ^Gr- 

^ ^ a .1 

=3  ^ ^ 

G 

g jG0CC3 

0“  -rj  • 

0-g'-3«'-5 

« B rK  r<. 


G 

1 ■= 


g: 

pH  .Si  2 
"o  =0  ^ 

•go 

^0 

o 

0 


CO 

.9 

^ .2 
‘3 
o 
02 
02 
< 

> 

02  I 

s 

^ o G 9-g 
— 2 2 ® G 

.N  o ^ W 

§d-gld 

S'G  o 

t»  .s  ^ 

2^ 

0 


12.0 


63 


Oin  O 00  CO 

CO  CO  CO 
05  CM  <N  (N  (N 


^ 1>  CO  00  o I 
! d d r-I  rH  1 


OCOl^iOOOlOOCMOC 

1-H  1-5  rH  i-I  d r-I  d <N  d CO  ( 


CO'^r—  01>(>5C<lOGOX>rHlOliO 

dci^ddcoddddddd 


OCMCO'^oc»c^ro'^Oco^O( 

oocdco*o6dddo5do6oor-c<i> 


O 00  O 00  O rH  O rH  O 
dcoodoocdcocodd 


o o o o o 1 


0 0)00 
rH  d 1-5  tH 


O rH  O CO  <>5  O c<j 


OOCOOOOOOOCDOOt^Ot-OOOOOOOOOOOii-IrHCOOOCOOOO 

dddddd.-5rHco’cocodddi“5dddr-5rHi-5i-5i-Idi-5 


COOOOOiCOCOOOOCO 
d 1-1  d d rH  rH  1-5  f-5  1-5 


CO  05  1^5 

CO  CO 

0.52 

0.59 

0.66 

0.63 

0.62 

rH 

2.83 

2.50 

CO  CO  05 

10  IC  CO 

d d d 

0.64 

0.66 

0.84 

0.S2 

0 00 

'H  rH 

rH  rH 

0.90 

s 

05 

d 

00  1 LO  CO 

CO  » 05  -H 
d ! rH  rH 

d 

0.37 

0.31 

0.35 

X rH  CO 

(M  05  C<J  rH  <>5 

d d d d d 

CO 

CO 

d 

t>  0 

0 05 

rH  rH 

d d d 

CO  CO  00 

05  05  05  05 

d d d d 

0 05 

d d 

0 

d 

S 

d 

s 

d 

05  J IC  -H 

05  1 CO  CO 

d 1 d d 

CO 

05 

d 

s 

d 

0 »0  CO 
to  io 

d d d 

^ ^ Q5 

d d d d d 

s. 

d 

00  rH 

CM 

05  05* 

J>  05 
rH  05  05 

d d d 

So  CO  S S 

d d d d 

C5  rH 

CO  CO 

d d 

10 

d 

0 

CO 

CO 

d 

d I d d 

00 

d 

i>» 

d 

d d d 

05  05  <r>  CO 

(M  05  CO  CO  m 

d d d d d 

d 

8§ 
d d 

10  05  rH 

05  05  01 

d d d 

05  -H  05  CO 

05  05  05  05 

d d d d 

CO  CO 

CO 

d d 

d 

05 

CO 

d 

d 

05  1 CO  00 

CO  1 rH  rH 

d I d d 

05 

CO 

0 

Ci 

05 

d 

0.15 

0.14 

0.09 

2 ^ 2 3 

d 0 0 0 d 

0 

88 

0 0 

rH  05  rH 
rH  rH  05 

000 

safes 

0000 

CO  rH 

05  05 

0 0 

8 

d 

0 

0 

d 

s 

d 

05  1 CO  05 

rH  1 05  0 

d 1 d d 

d 

8 

d 

P o 


M 1-i  an  n n c a 

'O'O  cS'O'O'O  ca'CJ  ca'O'O  caTJ'O'O  ea'C'O'O'C  as 

aat,Piaa^^paaaa^a!^aa;-,aaa!-, ' 

3So3ac33c3aa3;3ac3yc3a!3c3?;3ao3 


OJ 


33waa^ra^;-';-);->;jraaraa^c3a;-iaraaa;->araaais3;-i 
0030003000003030030003000030030 


n a 3 

33333333i333c33333 
0030003000030030 
Su  Ecj  rf^  &j  lij  rf*,  &j  Gli  &j  Bu  rh  Bli  &j  rK  Ecj 


a c a a a a 

3 'O  C8  « 'O  3 "O  3 ^ 3 'O 

tH3!-ia^HOt-i3tH33^3 
cS3c3333o33o33333 
3030303030030 


3 
C3  3 
3 O 


3 

&g 

.a^S 
S ^ 5:^ 

a>  q;>  O 


, S-S 

•s^  a 

'PMq 


Ph 


1 >33 
I 03! 

!5S 


'O'O 
rt  O o 

.a  o o 

3)  bo  bo 

<1>  ZO  02 

fUOO 


l^o 


33  ■ 

< 

^ && 
O 03  w 


03  J-  QJ  fH 

33  S ftg 
35  o tn 
S.-t;  c3  03 


I £>  >-H 

I ? cc 


3 3 

<U  03 

wa 


lO  <3  CO  I U3  O 03 
-t<  I CO  lO 

lO  Mb  CO  I in  ira  CO 


I O (M  03  ^ o 1C 

I 03  in  in  o 1 1 
I bo  CO  'll  t-  lo  I < 
I in  m m m CO  1 1 


g bO  lO 
-H  to  CO 
I Mb  in  3) 


eo  I®  iio  ICO  Oil  i-^ 

CO  Ito  103  ICO  ICOCD  ICO 

“ -CO  it~  i-'bi  I'+co 

CO  I in  I in  I Mb  CO 


OC'C><0>C<I<5CI03IM-^ 


•^T5H-^-ti-^t^3>Tl<'+'^b020eObbbOOO(5DOD50<3>03  03eotO 

T-Hr-tr— ti-HrHi-H?-HtO^^CpOCiOiOit^f^l-—  IrH 

C:CiOiCiC50iC5000pHr-Hi— ir— icoeocoCOco^^cocof^J'^ 
lOiOlOlOlOlOLOCDcDCOCOCOCO^OCOCOOCDOCOCDCOCOO 


CO  C§  d S ;p  O S3  S S S 3 S 


33  Pi 
3.  O 
O 3 

'O  3 

‘a< 

o . 

a 


. 1=1  a 

icos  -2 

s«a 


^ o 
a ^ o 

f-i  o 
mm  a 

a4 

o 

3 


w 


.a  .a 

d3  s 'a 
3!00 

So'gg  . 
^ o o oH 
< bo  bO[2^ 

. CO  C»3  w . 

i-bOOr-<5 

7* 

Cd 


U.2W-SS 

3 ^.1  J_I  M o 
a O 03 

S --I  '3  03  . 

2 

o a 


o O 
CZ2.S  02 


3 
03  3-1 
T 

CJ 


o 

« CQ 
1§  SbO 

■S-S-S 

ft  OP  o3  S 

111*1 
a p .2  w 

3 «a|d 

3 . 03  . 

2 °a>§ 

3 + * 

O 

a 


^ >>3 

a|i 

'Sa^gc 

03  . c3 

O 


W"  O o ^ 

OJ  .S  W2 

. o>.ao 

- * as 

(H 


a 3 
O 

s'"" 

'^’33 

d g 

- O 
6 ' 


^<1 
§ ® 

CC  tH 
030^ 

S33  a 

> boM 
>> 


O PI 


sa 


3. 

CQ 

o 
« ■ 

a ^ PI  o' 

3 03  ^ 

O 03  3a8 

iaia 

C3  * 53  * 

H-H  3 
03  03 


O 
33 

a 1 >. 

- I'-a 

03  3 3 QJ  • 
3 2 33  N o 
3 (3  03  33  tH 
cn 


- tn'^ 

^ =3  3 s 

s ?a 
-a 

3 03  3 P (O 

O 30  « X3 

gppapjq 

3*  bo* 


a 


PI  . 


033 

!»a 


1^2 
3 a ~ 
o 2 

.0  3 
S 'S  § 

03 ’I  ^ 

” N 
O ^ 03  "S 

30  tH  a 
hH^oa 

tH  3 

a^t^a 

3 03 

'"•Sg 

02  SuoP* 

<D  <q 

a 


* — Sample  received  in  spring  — Sample  contains  approx.  97.4  ibs.  salt  per  ton.  See  page  30 

103 — Purchased  from  Pearl  Underwood  — Sample  contains  approx.  122  lbs.  salt  per  ton.  See  page  30 

106 — Purchased  from  P.  C.  Bulleit  — Purchased  from  Herman  Bock 

106 — Purchased  from  Gardner  & Lewis 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  In  1916  (continued) 


64 


0 . 

•:}uao  jad 

‘IBXOJ, 

33  n. 

•5uao  jad 

•axqniosui 

0'S 

33  y 

•4uao  aad 

fL,  Ofi 

•paxaaAaa 

puB  aiqnios 

; ‘^uao  J3(I  tii 

eiqnios  'O^S[ 


'iuao  asd 


•4U0O  aaci 
‘aAnoB  pu-B  0iqn 
-los  aa^BAi  iB^oj, 


^ O 0>  »— 

05  I— » 05  O O 0> 
CO  CsJ  ^ 


OCOT-HOCO<MCOi-ICOCDOC500lOt^O'^C<IC0005 

rHlOlOrHrHi-IrHrHrHrHi-(lOCOrHOOrH<NrH(>irHO 


lO05mOl0CDC0i— l<MGOOmOOrHOOO^COOOrH 

loocor'oooooocioomco^io^oooocdodoooo 


iO»-ioor^6oi^r^oco»iOooco  i i iOi-iot-iO(m 

I Ill 

l <M  (N  (N  IM  i-H  »— f— C<1  ^ rH  tH  t~H  I » I C<1  (M  (N  CO  CO 


COOOC5t^COOCOI>J 

OOOCOCO^r-li-(i 


• ^tOCDlO'^lOlOOrHCO 

’ooooooooicvKN 


CO  CO 


o o o o « 


O iO  10  O'^M^OOCO 
rHOO  T-JoOi-<rH»-H 


O tH  (M  OOOOOCOO 
i-H  i-H  i-(  COCMCOCOCOCO 


I O 00  o T 

^ r-I  d rH  I 


iO  O 

odd 


S3 
d d 


':^U9D  JOd  ‘OtU'BS 
-JO  oiqniosui 
jet^'BAi.  OAI^OBUI 


T-(  CO  I CO  ^ 
I 10  kfi 

do  I d d 


O oq  <M  OQ 

CO  CO  CO  01  <M  oq 

d d d d d d 


CO  Tin 

odd 


o d 


d d 


i 


•;U90  J8(I  ‘oiubS 
-.10  eiqnfosui 
aaiBAv  8Ai;ov 


2 S S S S 
d d d d d d 


d d 


CO  -1^  00 

1-1  (M  i-H 

d d d 


d d 


CO  M 

d d 


•:^u^D  jaci 

‘OtUBSjO 

aiqnios  jaiBM 


d d 


d d d d d d 


d d 


i-l  O CO 

d d d 


'SJ  T-l 

d d 


?3S 
d d 


BS 
d d 


•;ii3c>  jod  ‘s:jxBs 
TJiuoiuuit:  puB  s9:jbj:) 
-t'u  ut  aiqnxos  J9X^A\ 


d d 


8 8 18x8 

00  i o'  O 


8d88d8 

d o o o*  d d 


(N  o 

X> 

d d 


d d d 


88 
d d 


38 
d d 


d d 


3 § 
H G Ch 

3 3 0 03 
3 0 0 3 


O C Xh  3 
3 3 03  3 
0 0 3 0 

Ph  1^  O 


T3  ' T3 


3 03 
O 3 
PhO 


'O'O'O 
3 3 3 
3 3 3 

000 


33  33 -3 
3 3 3 
3 3 3 


Xh33xh33!-,33 
033303330033333 
300300300030 


' ‘ ' 3 ' 3 ' ' 3 ' 

'O'O'O  c3'0  cs^OTS  cs'O'O 


3 3 S 3 3 
3 3 3 3 3 
0 0 3 0 0 


3 3 

3 "O  'O  3 'O  '0! 

3 3 Xh  3 3 
3 3 3 3 3 3 
3 0 0 3 0 0 


{jg;  uoixoadsui 


1 1 1 
t 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 t 

1 1 1 

1 1 i 

1 1 

‘ 

1 ® 
ig:  is 
' *r  0 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 i t t 1 c3 

i 12  ij  ' 0 

J 

1 

1 

1 

1 

gton  

till 

1 1 1 1 

1111 
till 

1 1 1 

1 d;  c3 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 
> 1 

1 1 > 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 I 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 I 1 

1 1 

' ‘ 2 

till 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

fill 
lilt 
1111 

lilt 

1 - ' 1 

1 G 

J » c3 

1 > 

\ W OQ 

1 \ G ^ 

' cc  ^ -C  w 

1 

1 03 

‘ oQ  a?  n 
! GCG^-^ 

1x3 

! IG  zf) 

isl 

I33  33  1 

Dubois 

rerdin; 

1 .S 

1 ‘42  Th 

1 C3 

•§Q 

Monon 

Wheat: 

Liberty 

Goodla 

Wabas 

Knight 

Wabas 

Salem 

, I 3 
! lo^ 

! 1 W C» 

0-M<J 

1 0?  OJ 

1 tH  ^ a> 

1 w 
! ^ 
1X5 

1 03 

Mitche: 

Orleani 

! 

i’ifl 

i^w 

1 CO  C«  1 

1 G 03  j 

1 ^ G5  1 

1 G G 1 
1^^  1 

. 1 CO  CO 

• 1 T— I 03 

1 10  5 

5302 

5474 

5620 

5957 

5961 

5966 

ill 

) 1 1— ( 

• 1 6q  C5 

18x88 

'i 

1 0 CD 

1 ID 

188 

\ 

> 1 t-H  CD 

) i CD  CO 

188 

1 S E 

1 1 CO 

> 1 10  »D 

1 CO  10 

1 to  LO  lO 

1 C5 

1 10 

1 CO  rH 

1 ID  CD 

188 

1 0 05  1 

1 ID  ID  1 

o os 
3-g 


IT3IOTJJO 


s 

2-3 


0)  ^ 

3 a 

5S 

® a 
-3* 
§ 

O' 

•§ 

Hi 


. O 

o cq 

33 

•3  S 

-"3 

>>•3 


s 

S C'C 


o 

Xh 

C5 
3 

- 12  o 


3 -g  ^ .2  ^ 

'Bb  • o s 

CC  3 

-'3  "3 

■So  o 


3 

■d  S >31 


O-  3 O O 
y2  rsf^K 
4h  * ♦ 


bfl 

■Is 

3 O 
3 42 

33 


O cs 
13  33 

3 P, 

II 

"^■3 

o '3 


♦ * * 43 


O '1'  O 
M ft  : 
^ O'O' 
3 ' 3 

<1^  o frt 

PMO  2 

"3  3 
WcB  §( 
3 ’ 
O 


33 
O 

o 

Xj  t-  ^ 

3 


oS 

=303 


' ® O 

02 

O 


^00  S 
=®o§ 

3 hr  S 


hfl  3 

•S  a 


■o  3 


o 


£ 2 

■3  .'^W 

I 

mWd  31 

o3 

Q 


■s-1 


'3<!  ho 

i§|M 

1 “So) 

I 3 ■3  3 

:;So2 

I 

IWoll 

i*  3^ 

I - Q 


60 

•3  3 » 

3 §03 

® ^ C/J 

03  Jh  ^ aj  Sh 

o c3  G s 53 

O)  o3  — OP 

33Pm2kph 

42  H id  f4 

« . a . . 

"3 


Blood  & Potash..  I 5943  i i I Guaranteed.  ( ] .] 1 1 1 0.8  i 2.0  i 10.0 


6s 


O iC 

IQ 


O O O O <M 

^ S CO  S S 


OCOrM(MOOOCO^O(NOOCOO< 

^ r-I  O O c<i  rH  rH  c4  I-I  rH  1 


O ^ LQ  O T 
d C35  d d d T 


>COOCOOCO«— CMCD 

idoOGOOenoaoJO 


Oi  O O O O 1-H  N 
r-I  (m’  (N  i-I  rH  tH  iH 


OCO(MOTtHOOt>01>'?tH  OLQ 

Mr-ndj-idddcoi-icodco 


0<MC001>COCOO«— *^1000 


l:^G0C500C0OO':0CClQt^O00'^<N00Ci0i00i 

dddodr-lr-li-lrHi-Hr-lo5rHOrHOOOO! 


(N 

d 

0.66 

0.40 

0.48 

0.54 

1.03 

1.18 

1.31 

0 

0 X-  CO 

CO  CO  TjH 

d d d d 

0.7^7 

0.84 

1.06 

0.79 

-r  cp  CO  00 

CO  CO  LQ  <M 

d 0 d d 

CO 

CO 

CO 

<M 

8 

d 

LQ  ^ LQ 
LQ  05  (M 

d d d i 

s 

0 

d 

0 <M  CO 

LQ 

000 

(M  05 

LQ  CO  CO 

000 

.8 

0 

0000 

CO  CO  rH 

CO  ^ CO  CO 

0000 

CO  ^ ^ Q1 

I-H  rH  CM 

d d d d 

LQ 

d 

X- 

CO 

0 

CM 

CO 

d 

LQ  CO  LQ 
(M  CD  OJ 

000 

CO 

d 

LQ 

d 

00  CO  GO 
rH  CO  <M 

d d d 

812  ig 
odd 

d 

CO  05  rH  CO 
(M  I-H  <M  (M 

d d 0 0 

0 CO  CO  ^ 

CO  CD  X-  LO 

d 0 d d 

(M  r^  rH  CO 
<M  CM  <M  (M 

d d d d 

CO 

CO 

CO 

d 

S 

d 

0 CO 

(M  CO  rH  , 

d d d ( 

8 

0 

§ 

d 

CO 

<M  0 i-i 

000 

00  CQ  05 
rr<i  COCA 

000 

05 

0 

0000 

Cp  CO  0 LQ 

0 T-^  Qi  oa 

0000 

d d d d 

Q5 

0 

d 

x^ 

0 

8 

d 

PS8 

odd 

§ 

0 

8 

d 

888 

0 d 0 

8Sa 

000 

0 

0 

8 0 8 S 

0000 

a8?28 

0000 

8888 

0 d d d 

8 

0 

c:) 

CO 

d 

d 

0 (M 

<>1  Q1  0 1 
d 0 d 1 

O) 


O O CO  »-H  C^l 
rH  <M  i->  (N  CO  d 


O rH  O CC  IQ 
(M  fM  O C:»  <0  O 


OlQOCiOOOr- 
00  GO  rH  d <M  (M  (M*  ^ 


IQ  IQ  IQ 

d d d d d 


IQOlQmOOO-rt^OOCOlQ 
CO'^C<3t—  OrHOOrHO 


ft? 

S s 


tc  W 

aa 

O o 

ou 


O o 

to  to 

0)  0) 

. . 

S S S 

o o c 


bc^ 

CtJ  S 

& ft 


"ft  b/:_ 'd 

£ c 


X>  <U 
ifi  ui 
< ^ 


. O;  05 

m ^ 


TJ  Sti  S'C'd'O  a'O'd'a  aTS  a'O'd'O'c  S'O'd'O'd  S'O'O  S'CC'd  S'd'C'C'O 
a!Hfl!HC3GafcHciafl!.iatH0Gc!n^HC0CGfHGC!.^GGn^.GCCG 
Go3GGGGGo3GGGGde3dGGG«dGGGGdGC3dddGGGGG 
OGOGOOOGOOOGOGOOOOGOOOOGOOGOOOGOOOO 


xJ  73 'd 
0)  O)  d 
to  to  to 


be 

a -d 
ft  <p 


G O 

0fe 


GOGOGOOO 

0^0fe0^pH^ 


.ft  G > 
^ !>>'G 


T3  O 

Oft 

QJ  O t>> 

.ft  buj 

G to  O 

POQ 


IQ 

CO  LO  ^ 
LQ  CO  Ql 
LQ  IQ  CO 


d 


03  W > 

^ ^ o O 
QJ  G Q ft 

"ft  ^ G 

00mo 


! ® ® c _ 

> IQ  -r*  I IQ  W < 

> LQ  iQ  CD  I IQ  IQ  < 


O 'G  Us 

.S2  o 53 
O bOtS-S 
ftG  2 

OP  wW 


'Ko 


S I lo  lO 


O c3  O 
ft  ft  ft 
^ G ^ 

ft's  O 

0x0 


S:^  G 

d CLi  W2 
Q-'  ts.  T5 

^ ^ . ji 

fcH  O;  ^ .d 

0;^ccm 


. . LQ  1 ..  _ 

LQ  LQ  CO  CO 


S O .41 
(« 10  ira 


Cj  I cc  I T.J  O CO 
-f  I to  ft  CD 

CO  I 10  CO  $ 


G G G 
PPP 

1 I I 


I i 


G G H 

G G S 

O O 

o y rd 

G _2  C 

ft  ft  ^ 
2 22 
G G a; 

XX  Pi 


J I 


( w W 


^iGin5<l<MC.10](3oSwoOCiOcocOC)Ot5000<5f)rrjr/jQOOOOOcoi 
<55T-HrHrM(M(SlC<lCOCOCOCO<Xl«OfOCOCOCO'COCOfOCOCOCOCOl 
mCDCOCOCOCOCOCDCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO' 


G 

0®  G 

G^G 

G.-S  G 

^ W2 

O)  ^ c> 

2ga 

3 


S 6 

CO' 


I ^ LQ  lsf5  IQ  IQ  CO  ^ CO  CO  ' 
)COC/DOOC/3C4<(^OOCOOC( 
)Cotf?:>cococococ^cocQ< 
= COC0COCOCOCOCOCOC0' 


> Cp  Ci 
' . 

, . 

CO  CO  LQ  LQ  LQ  LQ  LQ  LQ  LQ  IQ 


X-  ^ 05  ( 


_'S  2.2 

ft‘g<3ft 
^ftag  OftT3ft  ■ 
ft  2 . 1G  G G 


IPho 

' GO 


^ G . 

■'.  O o 

OiX  !h 

o pq 

ft 

^ft  “„co 

0 Oft  gftS 
^ft  G g gM 

^ G G Gq  G 

03  O SlP^GQj  tHh-l 

^copq 

03^-^.  > _'■ 

*5q  d OJ 

ft  |ft<ii0  ic. 


|q  Is 


!-i  O 

V t-i 

G pq 
ft^ 
° “ 
W ft 

I 

G . y 


■3  S'O 

ism 


w 


>> 

G 

CO  ” 

2h 
G y 
Ph2 

I 

Goq 

o 

ft  ^ 

o . 

PH 


p. 

to 

O 

So 

ftO 

G . 

<J  y 


^-Cft 

‘rSMt: 
ft  ^ 2 

G G P 

ii“£ 

w 

■sl* 

G y . 
§W0 


o«  o 

G Q '^.  +J 

G oX 

&'ft  O - O jyQ  , 

52  ftcc-g^m  5sT  !^ft 

ftS  toftftft'^.S  G 

Gft^r2cWa,22 

GGg^G 

^x 


>>: 

G G 
G G 

IS 

"I 

ip 

2 I 

O G OJ 

S 

^ft« 

:So- 


c 


0 0 0 


0 


0 0 


G . . . G .2  G 

ft  * ft  + * 

G G 

0 0 


P .2 


iH  O 

o.-ft 

0 G 

'§“8^  s'?  g| 

G.ft'52m2„ 
p s tiflG  o g;^.^ 
5'gg20fq0| 
- ■ 


2 

:.c£P 

0*0  S 
a 0 


G 2 
G G 
®ft 

se 

“iS 


G 

ft  G 
ft 
ft 

C 'G 
G C 


bfi'^ 

2 x'  g 

ft  £ ^ 

to  Q,  ft 

G?? 


. <l> 
to  <D 
02 


CD 

^ £ 


ft  n 


ft  . 

ft  G 


ft  to  w to  “ 

^2.S®.2  g 

■P  G G G 2 

G -d  G +J  2 

o C G bj)  c <2 
G o O rt  o 

^ G G p,  G ft 
G G G p G " 
ft  ft  a .a^  ft  O 
2 2 2 2 2 
G G G 
XXjX 

1 1 1 


G 2' 
O 

O £ 

_ G 
ft  G 

o ■ 

0K 

2 2 

O O 


I I 


(D  <U  35 

W CQ  a; 

d d c 

d ^ 

0 cj  d 

L.  Li  +-» 

d d 

ppp 

1 1 i 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


66 


“ £ 

•;u90  jad 
‘I'B^oj, 

1 ;Cj  n . 

•}uao  J0d 

‘Qiqniosui 

a'o 

•:)U0O  aad 

Hi  a} 

‘p0:jj0Aaj 

puB  aiqnios 

Ol^5lOO<Oi>-Oi-HOOC<JCDC5C0005’Tj10^0QOOCDl-^OOrHO'^OOOOT— lOO^OOO 


)^00'?fHOOc^OOOOOi'^CiOOOOiOCOCOOOOCO<MCOOC<JCOOCOlOOr*00 
• oor^cococotr5^»i50<:;5cooc>c<JrHOc4f-i^cDtoc>i>i>‘COOoooi>tot'-»*Oioooo 


> O rH 

! M c4  cJ 


O CO  0«5  GO 
001-^  00  l> 


1 ’juaD  jad  ‘aa:(BAV  ut 

; aiqnios  ‘o^H  'qsB^Od; 

O Oi  r— 

iH  o o 

0050500COOCO 

,-(OOT-H»Mi-lrHr-t 

1 1 

1 1 

1 i 
t 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 lO’^C^rHrHtOOOtOtOOC<JOOO 

1 li— IrHrHrHrHOOOC^COC^IrHO 

1 1 

1 1 

1 o o a>  o 

j C<l  rH  (M 

Nitrogen,  N, 

•:)uao  jad 

00  lO  03 

o'  O O 

COeOCO.^lOt-tDi— I0t-00  00  03  03G>.^U310-^M<010<00500003«050  OOi-IrHO 

dddddddaaaadddaaarHr^ddddrndddaa  daaa 

•juao  aad 
‘aApoB  puB  aiqn 

-[OS  aa:[BA4.  [Bjoj^ 

lO  CO 

rH 

o o 

QD  l© 

rH  rH 

d d 

0.22 

0.55 

0.33 

0.57 

rH  rH  idd  1 d rH  rH  d idd  lod  t 

o 

o 

1.23 

0.51 

0.62 

0.51 

•:[uaD  aad  ‘oiub3 
-JO  aiqni’osui 
jajBAV  aAIJOBUI 

0.15 

0.17 

(N  to 

d d 

d d d d 

IrH'^  liOlOQ'^  I-HIO  lQ05  1 
COCO  1 1 ^ w ^ 1 CO  CO  1 

dd  Idd  Idddd  Idd  Idd  1 

0.20 

0.37 

0.59 

0.48 

0.49 

*:[uao  aad  ‘ciubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
aatBAi  aAi^oy 

8 a 

d d 

88 
d d 

0.10 

0.24 

0.09 

0.31 

»OOi  llO<MQ<M  fCOrH  IQO  1 

<N  to  i C<J  C<1  i CO  to  CO  1 rH  rH  1 CO  rH  1 

dd  Idd  I'dddd  Idd  Idd  1 

OT-0 

8 

d 

0.40 

0.30 

0.31 

•luaa  aad 
‘oiUBSao 
aiqnios  aaaBA\ 

ss 

d d 

feo 
d d 

0.01 

0.09 

0.18 

0.09 

to  CO  iCOOiCOCO  i<MQ  I^CO  i 

lOlrH  COCOOICO  lOO  lOrH  1 

dd  Idd  Idddd  Idd  idd  1 

§ 

o 

8 

d 

0.03 

0.07 

0.12 

•:[uaa  aod  ‘s:qx3S 
BTUOuiuiB  puB  sa;Ba:[ 
-Tu  ui  a[qn{os  aa^n  \\ 

d d 

8S 
d d 

r-4  (N  CO 
rH  (M  O rH 

d d d d 

|88  188  |8I3  j 

dd  idd  Idddd  Idd  Idd  1 

0.08 

o 

rH 

d 

888 
d d d 

ii 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

it: 
! c 
! P 
) C 
la 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Found  

Found 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Found 

Guaranteed. 
Found 

Found  _.  -. 
Found  

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

Found 

Guaranteed. 

Found  

Found 

Found 

Sample  taken  at 

Martinsburg  

Lexington  

Paoli 

o 

,'c 

> 

o 

CJ 

1 

Martinsburg 

Pendleton  

Paoli  

Memphis 

Bellview  

Edinburg  

Tell  City  

Dubois  - 

Campbellsburg  .. 
Helmsburg  

Campbellsburg  _. 
Cnrvdnn 

Dubois  

Columbus  

Campbellsburg  _. 
Corydon  

Memphis 

Sellersburg  

Memphis 

Pekin  

Camden  

Cutler  

Kouts 

1 Number  j 

aa  uoitoadsui 

5458 

5612 

5379 

5551 

5457 

5726 

5378 

5438 

6465 

6498 

5573 

6111 

188 
-H  OO  1 -H  to 

to  to  1 to  to 

6112 

6487 

5404 

5552 

5469 

6365 

o 

to 

5456 

6060 

6064 

6396 

[BIOTTJO 

00®00C0C0C^r-H,-lrH<i:>oC>OO©So^^O-H^^ 

(ric^icococococococococococooococi: 

LOlOLOO<tOcOOOOCOOCOCDOC^<OC>^^^000^ 

6310 

6310 

6311 
6311 
6311 
6482 
6482 
6482 
6605 

6605 

6627 

6627 

6006 

6006 

6000 

6006 

m 2 

S " 

O 4) 
£ * 
s ® 

ft  ^ 

0^ 

CM  > 
© 


opn  ^ 
Q I 


S o 

M 

o 

w 


a 

m 

o 
-a 

;a 

-a  ' ° 

H .02 

« o 

Co^ 


< is  .::l  ^ 3 

ia 

! rt  . 

* O * 

a 


o o « 

H CS  - O)  OJ  >1 

.2  =3a;  £ jsa  G 

« a o '0 .22  G 

53  .Q  Sh  O'^  G 

cl  3 G +a  53  •2"' 

G^a  gaap^- 

ra*  * xi*  * 

5 


o 


22  a M 
a t2  “ o 

O oj  O a 

02  G.aa 

>0^^  o' 

2a 

0 1^  bfl  g 
• c3  ^ 

<<<!ao2i 
* G :(=  : 


G 

O -I.J  ® Q 

w2.g  %[ 

§m«a 

,|ass 

S !>"  <j  a 


‘ o ^ 

; .-22  a ^ , 

1 13  Si  o 

I G 2 

!«|a 

jaoa 

oa 

1=  G* 


a> 

: 

*•  o3 

l!fi 

G 3 ._22  a O 

^ (jti 

a G " +j  ® 

+i  . G ^ 

aa‘^1  o 

• o o) 
^ ®a  GO 

o*  a* 

a <! 


a.iij 

a^ 


Q 

, S' .2  2:2 

.§oa 

■S£&”a 

spil 

q3  g 


6; 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


68 


o - 

•JU0O  a0d 

o9. 

ft  n 

•DU0O  J0(I 

‘0iqniosui 

oft' 

fty 

•1U0D  J0(I 

P 3 

‘P01J0A0J 

pu'B  ©iqniog 

•;u0D  Jdd  ‘JSri'BAi  ut 
eiqnios 


•:^U9D  J0(3 


•;U80  J0(I 
‘0Ano'e  puB  0iqn 
-los  a0:^'BAi 


•:^U0^  J0(i  ‘oiu'bS 
-JO  oiqniosui 
J0;'BAV  eAijo^ui 


CO  Oi  CO  (M  C5 


OCOi-HOOOCiCiCOCOOOOi  Om(N 

<M(M(NlOlOlOlOlO<:Oo6oOO  OOJO 


OlOOOOCOLO”^ 
rH  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 


o 05  Ci 

I-H  O O 


0 CO  o r- 

01  lo  05  tn 
<>1  (M 


OLOcocoot^C5'*iHoi>a> 

rHCOCOrHrHCOCqC^rHC^O 


'OOOl-HOt^O*^OCOrH 

lOOGOOOOOrHCOOOO 


00C5O^00C01:^l>l>*OOi-« 

d o r-5  o d d d o d c4  (M*  OQ 


CO  LO 

o o 


I ^ C-l  (N  CO 

I o o o d o 


CM  LO 

d d 


' O O I o o 


CO  CO  lO  CO  CO  o 
d tn  01  (M  O r-f 


C0C0l>00C000C0^XC5O 

doOOr-iMrHi-JodrH 


kO CO  I CO  CO  rH  I lO 
OOO  I rH  rH  rH  idd 


(N  rH 

o d o 


I ^ TjH  (M 

' d d d 


*:^u^D  aad  ‘oiu'bS 
-JO  aiqniosuT 
je^'BM  OAi:j^>y 


(MCO  lOOCOOCiOO 

(MCO  l<M'MCOrH(M  *t^00 

dd  iddddo  lOO 


CO  oq  00  I CO  lo  CO 

d d d I o o o 


•;uao  jed 
'oru'BSjo 
oiqnios  J^:^'BAY 


O O CO  00 
o o o o o 

I o o d o o 


I 01  lO 

I d d 


r-*  O O 

odd 


I O CO  (M  J O lO 
t CO  I O 

I d o d I d d 


‘:juao  jad  ‘s:q;Bs 

BfuouiLUBpuc  sa^Bj:} 
-TU  lit  a|qn|os  Ja^B^V 


I o o o o o 


00  O I LO  CO 
04  rH  » t-H  O 

OOO  I O O 


«T3'o  °'C’a'a'3'a 
Mdfl^Haaacia 


a a 

; D 3 


M t-H  *-H  M »-H 

Ki;_iJ3eSP3;3D_jw_j_i 
300300000300 


(H  3 3 
3 3 3 
3 0 0 

0Ph 


a> 


3 ^ 3 ^ 3 ^ 

3 3 3 

3 3 3 3 3 3 

3 0 3 0 3 0 

O ^ O CD  Ph 


cs'O'O'O  cS'O'O'O  co'O'O 
(H333^-,333(-,33 
C33333333333 
30003000300 

C5;^|^PhcDPhI*<^0Ph[=h 


aa;  uonD9(isui 


3 

^ <D 

Wc» 


ii 

13  CD 


rr-i  f-l 

.ii  tC  (U 
C 3 ft, 


3 

V d 


5 

3 

,2  ^ 

O 3 

oo 


|.s§ 

ft  o'a 

WO<) 


Hfc-ID 

iiS  is: 


ft 'C  o 
>.3  3 
03  3 ^ 

t^SW 

V bfl  . 

swS 


ft  ft 

E o 


wo 


IBIOIJJO 


THr0  ® ® 

S S S 13  ra  13 


<Oe>00>eHT-Hr-<r-'( 
13  13  I®  IS  13  13  IS  13  I 
13  13  lo  13  « 13  13  IS  I 
CDCDCOCOOftCDCD' 


O % 
£ * 
Pi  hi 


» « 
a p 


o 

O 

3 ^ 
3 ; 


mO  . 

ftW^ 
3 .5 

.2Ph 


'ft  1 ft 

og  IS 

^ a~  ^a’5  a « 3^ 

30.SftS«8Q  ^ 

::2  rrt  M Jh  S 

o ^ ‘ o o J a?  >i 

<'gpft>^CD'^pW 

* C3* 

ft  fH 


O kJ 
ft!^ 


o ;z; 

O^.  13 

■si  i'§ 


■fD  o 

bo  O 

<!W 


ft 

3ft 

v 3 

tSffi 

3 . 


=> 

3W 


^3 


M caft  g 
bcjii  ~ 


o 
3 
O 
<u  W 


0^3  ft'^ 
"3^  o OJ®  G g fl 

— ^ S3  rH  . T ^ ^ 

<x> 

a 

pq  w 


' ID 

g hH  ID-^  Q 

O D 4-> 


5-1  D 

P o 


tm  ^ 
OS 


.N  3^  <H 

* ‘1-1  fh 

DD  3 .9 

M 


c« 

-e 


0=3 

l>‘2a 

2mS« 

!«aoQE-ic» 


PM  b3 


s-i  _3 


9 t>i'9 

§s  ao;a  O 
2'S  g-s 

^ CD  ® 3 3 

ogi^iSgo 

■ft  2 3 5 3 OjD 

<2  c»  H W a cc  c-i 

«l-l  + ♦ Sh  * * 

3 3 

w w 


69 


O 00  O lO  O 


O 05  O O 
O O 05  O O O 


O 05  O 05  O Oi 

rH  O pH  O r-3  O 


03  'O  T3  ^3  03  'O 
fl  fl  fl  ^ a 
<S  3 D 03  53  3 
3 0 0 0 3 0 


33  Ch  05 

>30 
“03 
■K  3 ® 


O (M 
00  CO 


a> 

CiP 

u 3 
3 3 
3 O 


>|5vt3 

jiJ 

CO  © 


s 

^33  -C 

2 o o 

hSO 


pq 

d-g. 

oa 

o -S  d 

|S  3 

S S 

S s 
go  a 

O . 3 


I O O C5  1>  O O CO  O Tt4  I I O O Oi  lO  CO  O C<J  o (M  O t-h  rH 

II 

lr-lC<JT-(OOrHrHTHrHOO  l irHr-ir-lrHOOi--i<NC0<N(N(M(N 


0(MOOOICI>OIOCO'^Ot-H 
CO  00  (M*  (N  TjH  lO  lO  CO  CO*  CO  1>  05 


O O O 05 
(N  (N  <M  rH 


IOC<JLOIOOt-iOIO( 

(N^<N(M000500( 


> CO  o 1 

> 05  CO  • 


GO  O iC  lO 
O t-H  O O O O 


CO  (N  (M 
O O O 


00  rH 
rH  1-H  (N 

o o o 


CO  05  lO 

P-1  (M 

o o o 


o o o 
o o o 


CO  CO  05  C5  00  05  05 

o o o o o o o 


Ol  LO  00 
Tii  i>.  CO 

o o o 


I CO  CO 
I J>- 

I o o 


00  lO  oi 

r-*  I— I (N 

o d o 


I Jr^ 

1 d d 


CO  oi  oi 
t-h  CO  ^ 

d d d 


05  00  o 
O I-*  O 

o o o 


P o 


d d c d d G 

^OPOOPOOOOO^O'POOOOO 


G fl 
G G 
o o 
^ Ph 


C3  "G  ^ 
^ G G 
G G G 
GOO 
0(^^P^ 


bJ] 

S'^ 

O cn 
S OP 

(X»  ^ 

OQ  Ph 


i>*  I 03 
CM  I I rH  ( 

' 'is  i8: 


3 S 

s> 

>ri<3 

,i«1  o 

§2 


r,  >0  3) 

2 3 3 

o > > 

3 0 0 

h-lOQ 


C>  1 &-  IS  © I R)  I 50  1 

^ iiT^rHi'  ■ — ' 

pH  I CO  © < 
iO  I lO  © ( 


I ii 


'O  »H 

> a ^ 

05  3 o 

t^s  a 

SWm 


'3  S' 


53)50C<I5C155(55£OpH'HH-h-^' 

gsggggggggg; 


iggj^si 

jc^COCDcOcocO^cOcOco^cocO^cO 


M ^ <9  ^ ! 


2S| 

ii  — r 
2 30  <u 

ll.ag 

3Q^<,j 

a - o 

•2g:a^ 

S >pq 


-3 

25  g 

5^  o 

3 .=« 

.2  a 


o 

Ph 

>73  . c« 

" 3 O o 

H 5303! 

3 (u  fH 
3 X3  3 ►>  — 

3Ph-(5« 


2 o a 

3 0 3 

3 

fp 


O 

33  05  • 

5o<3 

3 

w 


s 

30^^ 

t-P  . to 
2 


H a 

G3  ii  Jg  w 43 
o o *0  o 
^ Q5C»'2  3 

^•9o 

«n  C)  O53 

3 o 

Ph  jOhh  h-5 


O 05  CO  O O 


00  05  00  CO  05 

d o o o o 


10  LO  TtH  LO 
o o d o 


CO  (M  CO  CO 
d o o o 


0000 


0000 


d 

c3  'O  TJ 

G G G G 
CS3  G G G G 
G O O O O 
O Ph  Ph  Ph  Ph 


.3  05  3 O 

mOKQ 


gg; 


05  <25  © 05  C5 

ssisi 


o o 

05  05 

00 

O C5 

MM 

cHH 


®ll 

■45.'^  2 - !5.  c 

25  s 2 s a 

gpH  >.^00  25 

Oo  rOa^atnO 

Ph  oMop^ 


c 


o 3 


^MO' 


^ ” 


r O d O O [ 
<.\i-djjCO05rtS 

K gc»005i-sCa 


3 
o 

p 3 

3 a 

a ^ 

iS„a'E5 

2||S|s 

3O  d^  . 3 
.Si  3 ^ r 

d 05 

3 5 d S c '3 
a;  a 3 3 !-i  05 

Q § 53  a 3 !h 

^ ^ CC  K*  Ph 

s _*  * + 

3 <5 

CD  ^ 


50 

cc  • 


CP 


Q)  4h 

u-ti 

3^ 

3 

(h  C 

ms 


■Sg 

>m 

a a 

o o 


•a 

5 "^5 

” g > 


1 t,  3;  a 
3 ^ rd 
C 5 3 

© y O 

; !p 

' O _ CQ 

I 3 • 

! a a a 


55.1 1' 

to  tc  pH  3 
3 3 £ i 

43  .3  d 5 

O 3 <M  43 


3 3 

Pnm 

1 1 


43  43  43 
3 0 3 
Sh  S-. 

3 3 3 
■ CM  Ph  pH 

1 I I 


<15  c 35! 

M ’c  a 

^.ph  a 

2 tn  43 

'S'^  3 


O M 
o 


ft  ft-'-  -'-s  J “■ 

M P,  3 3 <13 

- 3 bo  bCs.'  . 43 

.a  72  3 t>  1-5  O 

ft  ft 

5 ■•  3 3 9 a a 

> 41  3 3 o O O 


! 72  72 


!-.  t.  tp 


3 0 • . -3  <3  <3 

Sh  PJ  fd  <3  3 3 3 

O)  (1)  w w w 
3 3 pH  2 3 3 3 

•3 -3  a 3 43  43  43 

3 " d 3 3 o 3 

H a 4H  +H  (-,  t-  tp 

pS  3 3 d 3 3 

Ui  72  Pi  frj  p^  Pm  pH 

J J J J J J J 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


70 


0 - 

•JU30  jod 
‘lT310i 

|9. 

■5U9D  J9d 

‘9iqniosui 

ga 

3!  0 

qu99  a9d 

PE  d 

‘P9:^J9A0J 

pti'B  9tqniog 

OCSOlOOOlO'tOlC  OOOOOCOOOif-HOJ 
o6cirHOrHi-!(MC<JCq 


OC<JOC5t-*Oi-HO'^<  OlOCOCO(M<MrHOOOOrHO(MOOOO 

o6Gdoo?oc<j(>ic^c^  CiCiOiOOiOia^Goooooooood  co-o 


O l>*  O rH 
r-I  O rH  ci 


O0>  CO  o o 


•;uaD  jad  ut 

aiqnios  *qs'B;Oc[ 


OOOOOOOOt 


o o or— 


•;uao  aad 


O O X 00 


(MC0C0C0C0C0C0C0C0000iG0OOl>'^O 

i-lr-IrHr-trHr-lrHr-IrHOOOOrHrHOO 


00  0 

o o 


*:juao  jad 

‘aApD'e  puB  aiqn 

-los  aa^'SiW 


o o o o o < 


m 10  o 

C5  o o 


*;uaD  aad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqniosui 
aar^BM.  aApoBuj 


00000000 


'i^uaa  jad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqniosui 
ja^BAi  aAT:^0Y 


00000000 


10  op 
o o 


•;uaD  aad 
‘oruBSjo 
aiqnios  aa:^BA\. 


I-H  C<I  o 
0 0*0 


► o o ^ « 


0-1  ^ CO  CO  CO  rH  (>1  ^ 

ooo*ooooc> 


O O 
O 
o o 


•:juaD  jad 

ryuoiumu  puB  sa:jBj:} 

-Tuut  a^qn^os 


'^OO-^lOLO^COr-l 

00000000 


c3:3s3^:;2o3^3p:3 
:30;300D000 
O ^ ^ ^ Ph  Er 


1111.- 

'aT3T3'3'CT3'0  cS'a-3-c  « 

aadociaosHaact^citHH 

oooooooaoooaoao 


ca'O  :jT3'C5'a 
^HaMaaa^-ia 
c33os3aaaa 
30300030 
O Em  O 6^  E^  Eh  O 


32  g 
m 32 

3P  QJ 
^ 3 c3 
Q.  H)  !h 
C O 

S Pt3 

03  c3  W 


j ^ 

;5o 

l-a  73 

1 o o 


I 

I 03  33 


C 

bS 

O.S, 

o>- 


S-33 


OWK 


^ 3 

.H  >r§ 


O O O 

o 


§'t3'a 

”03 
03  3 3 
3 0 0 
OEHfil 


I <v  ® 

1 3 3 
f».  t» 
I 03  03 
1^^ 


{ja;  uoaoadsui 


IT3I0TJJO 


<M  (N  <5D  CD  SO  OD  < 


S-3 

dj  1 1 

0 w 

3 a 1 1 

3 5 1 1 

c 1 ! 

i i 

s © 

b « 1 ! d 

,3  I !0 

«H  U 

0 I' 

§ 1 ! i § 

OO  CA 
® ® 

1®“^ 

S a 

|PhtO  3^ 

aa 

® 03 

0<8  o-§,33 
; ^ ho  oQ  .-t^ 

IglglS' 

s . 3 

SC5 


aj  ho 

'3  3 ^.$2 

; a^^Hl 
Q ^ 5 3 CO  33 

^ Hi  ^ 3 .-„  CO 

<3  ^ TO  o 5 

■J  M W 1-5  " ■g 


■«  a 


ho  3 3 3,®  ■‘32  p^‘"3i 

TO 


^ 3 g 
3 ® fq  Ph" 


S .;3  M ^ =8 ^ 


3. 

O O >>33 

Pw^  9 


• S-*  C3  fl  0 L>  n O rri 

'^®3c3  33Hl!^og^Q3S^'a® 

.33®tHO'H  .®O^Shi®^®>h 

EH<HaP4^^pqH;0ga:»|9^E:^.S2^ 

3 * O ni 


^ O ® 

H « 


a o 

O)  Sh 

^ <0 
S D 

Qd 

o 


. ^ OP 


tn  c/-i 
,24  O 
® 3 9 
*^  2 
TO  3 g 

flo  a 
O 

TH  g 1-5 

0 * 


'Flick 


71 


C<J 
<N  C<1 


CO 

o o 


LO 

o o 


raxi 
a fl 
p p 
o o 


p p 

<X>  OP 

mw 


p p 
o o 

CCOQ 


o 

f— c ^ 


Q 


o 

S 

^2 

§5 

X:  Eh 


O (M 

LO 
(M  (M 


O CO  o CO 
r-I  O rH  O 


(N  CO  1>  CO 


lOCOI>lOCOLOCD'^lCTt<lOOlOOLOrHM<'^lOCDC^lOCOlC^ir:>lOCOt-H'<^CO 

OOOOrHOrHOOOOrHOOOOOCOOOOOOOOi-HOOOOO 


o !>•  o o ^ 
00  00  05  ci  CO  ■ 


'C00r-«005000’^C5050000' 

•COC^ItMrHr-IOOOiCOOOOOOOOOOod' 


• lOOrHinOi-lOOOrH 

>rH<=>O0006c5t^0506 


00  00  00  lO  lO 

O O (M  (M  O O O 


C-1  CN 
O O 


P P P 
POP 
0^0 


n-l  <=>^-1 

Pi  fi  C! 
P!  03  3 
0 3 0 

^ 0Ih 


1-1 
"S  J 
2^ 
p p 

P o 


'ooocoomor-ooso 

rHr-iC<l^Cs|^<MT-rHOi-H 


(Ml>’^lOOOCOT*HTtilCI>CO’ 

OOOOOOOOOOr-I 


tmcot^ooooc<iTHiO'»i<iot^ 

IrHrHr-lOOrHOOOOO 


I C<1  (N  LO 
I O O O 


(M  (M  (M 
O O O 


lO  rH 
. O O rH 

I o o o 


1 o o o 
I o o o 


CO  oq 
I r-<  lO 

! o o 


CO  (N  (M 
O O O O 


05  CO  00  1-1 


o o o o 


o o o o 


o o o o 


CD 


p p 
P o 
OPh 


^ P Pp^  r-,  ^ 

T3  ce"P  S'P'P  p'P  P 

PshP;-»PPehP;hPehP^PPP;hPP^ 
pppppppppppppppppppp 
OPOPOOPOPOPOPOOOPOOP 


cu 

05 

^SV: 

3 03  3 
0 3 0 


3 ;h 
3 03 
O 3 
EhO 


TP  TP  'O  TP 
3 3 3 3 
3 3 3 3 
O O O O 

Eh  E^  Eh  Er 


03  O 

fiQ 


to  o 
to  to 
to  to 


m O 

s b 

03  O 

WO 


W ^ O 

Q,  <U 

O 

QJ  ^ q; 


O oj 
cc  tuo 

So 


O 05 

03  £U3 

P 


g.a 


O QJ 


&s 

K ■H> 

S OJ 
3 O 


jg3toi5g®totog^groootototoj 

ito^^to^oc^^f^J^feSStoto! 

l-ji-^tl^'^-THiOtotototototototolOl 


tooSSoS^S 

tototo^totoSS 


o 

3 ^ 
3 c3 
3,03 

oE- 

oS 


3 

03  ® 
QJ  1-3 

3 

O 

'-3 


5«-i 

!'S§h 

: 333 

I 6 

w “o 


o 

' 3 

O 

w-pq 

Seh  § 
o .9 
Q dAn 

So  £ 


O ' H “ 

.9s  S® 

S 2 -3  w “ 

90  !=i 


30!  ^ 

3 O 3 

<|J  Sww 

3 

o 

3 


iS  M 

^,§8 

^ QjO  a; 

.5?W  ^ 

M .£» 

3 

m >;  OB 

oj  Eh  o) 
3*3 
o o 
3 3 


f£ 

o 

Og 


Hi  M 3 
o 

bo  tiO  g 

SS  s 

. 

3 3 

EnEq  S 

* 3 


0 

8^5  s-S 

1 ”^0 1 

pq  oW  3 . 

• pq  .O^wS 

Eq  S W S pq  S E 

3 3 * 3 * 

O O O 

3 3 3 


3 
O 

M 

o 

+J 

3 

bo 

H,  3^ 
3033 

9 N 

. rH  O)  ~ 

So^  £0 


3 3 o 

N3  -3 
"£  O 1^ 

3<J1  o 


3 — I 

^1S 

sg| 

H .Eti.i 

O&H 


3 3 

3 O 

OEh 


3 3 
3 3 
3 3 
O O 
Eh  Eh 


■ 3 

' +3 

; oj  “Ih 

! 3 3 S 
S So 
■Sc»W 


§§ 
to  to 


to  10  to  to 
to  to  to  io 


O 


'Cl'a  S 
E 3 ^ 

Qj  -M 
O 05 


o d 30^  sw  i 

£0^  £wEo^ 

3 * 3 * ■!, 

o o 

3 3 


'H  3 ” 3 S 3 

3S|^m|; 
■E^Ah  . 
m -_<ij  00 
Q OJ  3 ^ o 

fC  e_, 

W 05 


SO 


3 3 3 

OJ  OJ 

"S  oj  2 

n o 


05  0)  r 


3 3 3 
^ ^ ^ 
P P P 

Eh  Eh 

nd  'P  'P 
x:  X3  X3 


<D  01  0 
a>  m 

02  CC 

3 

. . 0) 

3 3 3 

3 

3 3"“ 


r 3 r u <u  o 

I I I I M 


O 01  . 

3,  bo  >. 

3 3 H 
H P,  H 


3 <1^  0 

,3  <U  o 3 <p 

c’®«£^  . 
H ^ E • E 
apq  CM® 

“ 3 03  M O 

.s  ^ £ I Q 3 

'SSS0S§ 

>00  o 
u u ^ 
o H-l  <1-1  . <1-1  . 

o 33 
<u  tj  o to  > 
3 o)  m to  0)  ^ 

tn  m 3 to  TO 
o ri  3 -2  o5  H 

0.032  W® 
poo  o x: 

g Eh  Eh  4-)  Eh 

1 1 1 1 1 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


72 


.2  5 
CL( 


^ o 
Ph  53 


•:juao  jad 


•?U90  aad 

‘aiqniosuj 


•juao  jad 
•pa^aaAaj 
pu^  9iqnios 


'luao  jad  'ja^'BAv  ui 
aiqnios  'tis^iod; 

- 

•;uaa  jad 

‘l^iOJ, 

•juaa  jad 
‘aApon  pun  aiqn 
-los  aa^nAi  in;oj[, 

Nitrogen,  N, 

•;uaa  aad  ‘aiunS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
jaiBAv  aAijonui 

•luaa  jad  ‘oiunS 
-JO  aiqnfosui 
jajnAi.  aAi;ov 

'luao  jad 
‘otunSjo 
aiqnios  ja^nAi 

•;uaa  jad  ‘s:qBS 
uiuouiuin  puB  sa^BJij 
-t’u  ut  aiqnios  Ja:iB^\\ 

Sample  taken  at 

1 Number  I 

aa  uonosdsui 

I'BPIWO 

2^ 

§8 


S a 


O CO  O O t 


I O Ci  O lit)  J 


JrHOOOQOCiCOlOr^' 

t <M  (m’  (N  rH  rH  rH  c4  (M  1 


> O O IC  GO  01  O 00 
I t-h  rH  (N  <M*  CO*  r-^*  O 


OC»OO^OOCilCr-(COOi-HrHOCOCOt^<MeMOi-iOlOi>000(M 

' ■^*  00  0-1  (M*  Oi  00*  00*  Oi  00  Ci  O Oi  O Ci  o Ci  Ci  00  GO  06  01  oi  01  1-^  O O 


CO  Ci 

o o 


OOOOOOOOOOt 
J-H  i-I  r-I  rH  o r-I  rH  r-i*  r-I  rH  r 


10000 


OOCiOGOOOGOai< 

OOi-HOOOOOi 


OO'MC0C0rHC0'^Ol>OJ>l 


CO  00 

o o 


CO 

G^l  rH 
O O 


O CO 
»-«  <N 

o o 


o o 

CO 

d d 


CO  o -r  CO  ^1-  00 

LO  CO  to  iO  CD  Tji  10 

o d o o d d o 


0000000 


0000000 


10  O O CO  rH  00  O 


^ CO  (>1  CO  ^ 

d d o o o o o 


0000000 


d o*  d d d 


00000 


o ^ ^ ^ o 

d d d d d 


Oto  C<J  CO  o 
Csl  (N  o CO 

00000 


00000 


CO  O CO 
CO 

000 


CO  o o 

O rH  O 

d d d 


<v 

raTJ  §'0^0  S'O'O  S'O'a'C’^'aTJ’O  ^'O'a'a'a'a  5t5  S'ca'a  5x3 

o3GcS:33o3GGc3GG33GGGGGGGGG0jGGGGGGG 

GOGOOGOOGOOOOOOOGOOOOOGOGOOOGO 


a o 

.N  O 


K o 

> sS 


«0 


Si'S  ~ 'G  — ' 

> O tc 

” C3  O M 3 § 

HH  N cc  tm  M j:;  g 

G 3^  G M O tu  PS 

hPWP^OOSPMO 


1 g ^ G.  5 rt 
I O ^ ^ 


) <M 


feS  l8?T^2bc!5lO  It;;ic*<j5«g  IrH  |®< 


G So 

^ O)  ^ 

W Phi-1 


M cS  ■ 


55  § 1 


los 


•3  o CQ 

■uO  : 


bi] 

G 

M 

5o  S b ^-(  g n 

«-<  Q O G 


G > 
g G 

i^w 


c;  o o .5  ^Ph  ^ c O 2 . CJ  - n 

t2  • ^ w ^ S ^ ^hQ  ^ 

^“>§G 

-■  .G“  G.Q  Qjaj'3t«q  G 

I s5  S'25  2'gs 

G+J  •SoSOlJ'-'+Ji.^  .floGGaGjgt-i 


u 3 
o 
v Ph 

M . 

• W 


O CO  rH  O C l Irt  O 
r-i  to  1>  rH  CO  50  in 


O O O D1  O CO 

i-H  r-H  r—  I-H  I— I ,-H 


O o rH  000  00  (N 


•^lOGO-^iClC^- 
O O d O O O O 


oj  CO  I CO  CO  CO 

d d I d d d 


(M  <>J  I r-^  rH  CO 

d d I d d d 


00  1000 


CO  CO  I rH  CO  01 
O rH  I O rH  o 

00  « o d d 


rH  CO  I <M  rH  rH 

o d I d d d 


t-  c c frH  o a fl 

C5  D D ca  D s 
3 O O 05  O O O 
O Ph  O f2H  Ph  Ph 


00  O 

>1  s 

^ 03 

■3 .9 


' G 

■ » Sh 

S G 
a 0X3 
(O  G G 

|-!M<J 


i 

S !S3§ 


S S li 


eq  3 


<1  w 


® H G 
O 5 tH 

•r  G n3 


■s-a  S 

■O  cu  jT 

.q 


'gs  ^ 

C3  r*-  r* 

Jh  «2  O 

«15 

G^Gg 

^&Sg5||l 

sSlI-SSll 

::r  a ^ a>  ? 


pa-SsligO 
^ ^ S M • S 

ph^qW  W0 


a> 


Ho  6 

g*^ 

w 


73 


IC 

O 


(N  O c<i  <M  00 


00  CO  oo 

00*  lO 


Ot^  O lO 


Oi>lO'^rHCOO’^rHOCOlCXOOC^l-OOCOOOOCDlCOOOC5?-H(MOTli 
CO  CO*  CO  i>  00  (N  (N  CO  LO  CO  <M*  C^l  CO  CO  CO*  Ci  O O oJ  Oi  Oi  r-H  (N  <N  CO*  (N*  01  cd  CO 


lO  CO 

o 


O CO  o 1> 

J> 


lO  CO  O O I 

d d r4  < 


IOOO<MrHlCCOlOlO 
1 t-h  d rH  r-I  o d d d 


IC  1>  IC 

o o o o 


O CO  O (M 

CO  00  d CO 


OOO 
CO  oq 


000i05’^C0C<Jt0'^l01>l>00O0i00^C0*^,-iT*<LCC0ir:)00r-l 

dodoOi-JrHOOOOOrHoddddrnddodorH 


o o 
LO  d 


I CO  CO  (M  CO  O O 


CO  m 

d d 


CO  C<J 

d d 


00  o 

O i-t 

d d 


I (M 

I Tt<  CO 

I o d o 


I rH  (N  0-1 

t d d d 


d o d 


rH  O O 
OOO 


(M  (M  (M 

odd 


^ „ „CJfl  ^ „ 

c3PPc3D;3:3DPc3D303:zJcS^3ceDDDc3:3n;2KJPc3Pc3:3j3;3cd^3 

POo:3ooooopooDODO^ooo3ooo:3o;30DOOo;3o  iso 


C30c30c30cS;Sc3S3c30 

ISOOOOOISOOOOO 


o 

O ^ 

■i§ 

A M 

h-ls 


+J 

aS 


iji  CO 


i 

'OwM 


E£ 

o o 5 
u a 

BS  03  o 


^ lO 

I 13  ' 6X1 

•S  O JH 
I'O 

I w w S 


II 

i ! S 1 S ^ S IS 

IS 

IS 

1 

1 OD 

IS  IS 

1 5-  1 0 

IC^  1 lA 

S S IS 

I IS  isss  is 

IS 

IS 

IS 

1 1 1— 1 

1 CD  1 CD 

J 10  1 00 

1 CD  1 CD 

’ ^5  ^2  ft:  ft:  ft: 


• t--i#-t<CC’C005P3I::~f'TO03 
icdWSfjTti-^mioinioioio 


o3 

33 

a 

Oo 
33  O 

03  ^ 

bcS  Q 

cii  2 


T3  D 


T3  33 


J2  ^ • • 


a 

CQ 

o 
33 

.S  fl  ■ Q-i 
; 03  ^ 

2 tH  33 

JCD 

5 a«  O 2 .S  .H 

j 33  d cd 

iSs>l 

.S|S«n 

d d 


o.-ti 

T3S' 
a 05  - 
03  . 

o a 

d 


=8  5 

— . -u 
o 03  03 


03  Sh 
2^ 
S O d 

oj  ctl  Sh  Oh 

g^‘«|52gl 


d 


'Mir 

d 


tuo 

s 


■Sag  « 

omI 

d d d 


>< 

mi 


3 :s 

03  O 

a . o, 

ftS^  o 

.a  a " 

03  S 

^ O 

w Eh  =3  ‘2  ^ 
m'm;2i|m‘ 

*~3  m K^  m 

d 


o ^ 

^ o 


13 

a 

a 

o 

mSM 


am« 

•^20 

o-a 


a xh 

3 

a 

P o 
O ^ 


•S  O 


02=8 -a 


di  d 

5 o 
33 

d^ 

o 33 

i:q 

(U 


M 2 

■S  ^ 3 

ipl  I 

J r z:  Cl]  5^ 

^ ^ z:  (P 

a a a a 

O O O O (i;  o 

U tn  ;h  ^ tH 


*713  . 'O 

(P  (p  <x>  (P  >73  c; 

W W W W d)  w 

c^  cj  ai  c c^ 

^ ^ ^ ^ tH  ^ 

U O O O 3 O 

^ Sm  -M 

13  :3  IS  p 0)  a 

plicih  mm  m 

I I I I M 

» t-  00  CS  © H 


bfl*  - , 

.aow 


; c 

be  3 

(p 

:am 

o 
, o 

w« 

- . 3 <u 
-0-0- 
O 

O c3  ^ 
o cd 

P§ 


mi_ 

Ol  ^ 


fl 

o 

m 

cocStHdeo^S^S 

be  a bum  a 03  > 

§.a  g’agd^i'sm 
^ >3  d 02  ^ im  cc  m 

be*  be  be^  be^ 


.2  02  W W W W 


2^ 

m^ 


S bo 

-M  a 

X_oj 

dcD 


.a  O O hj  h O 

1 a a a a a 

>00000 


o T?  'd 

Sh  (p  (p 
W «2 
O c^  03 
n-  fP  id 

Poo 

S tH 

P ^ ^ 
CO  (1|  CU 

1 1 1 


-o  -d  ds 

0)  4)  to 
OJ  03  01 


3 3 3 

m m m 

I I I 


74 


o 

03 


•JU90  aad 


•JU80  jad 
‘aiqniosui 


•^uao  J8d 

puB  aiqniog 


•1U90  J9d  ‘ja^BAi.  ut 
aiqnios  ‘qsB^Od 


':^uao  jad 


•:^uao  aad 
‘aAt:jo'B  puB  aiqti 
-lOS  ja^BAi.  IBiOJ, 


•:>uaa  aad  ‘oiubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
aaiBAi.  aAir^oBui 


•luao  aad  ‘oiubS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
a^:^BAl  aAijDv 


'luaa  aad 
‘DiuBSao 
a'lqnios  aagBM 


•^uao  aad 

BiuouituB  puB  sa^Ba^ 
-lu  ui  aiqnxos  aa;BA\ 


aa  uopaadsui 


TBTOTJJO 


© 

0^ 


ao  * 
0)  ^ 
S a 

Si 

■0” 


o Cl  '•t  00  m 

lO  IC  CO  O CO 


OO  OrHOOOT-HOOOOOOOOOOOOO 


)0  OLQOOOI^-OOlOOeOOCiCOOrH^OCM 

1 Cl  00  CO  ci  ci  o o 00  00*  CO  o 05  C5  o o>  00*  ci  o 00  r-- 


O 00  C5  CO  O 
rH  C5  O »-H*  CO  X 


■ tH  O d O O O X < 
r-l  d (M  X Cl  Cl  I-H  ( 


O O O O O 00 


<lrt  COJt>XCOT^^m'r^':OOXOO^Ot^T^^lOTt^X05 
>0  r4rHOOOOOOOOrHr-»i-irHOOOOO 


■ X X 
I o o 


I io  I d X 


I CO  d 

I o o 


X lO 
I CO  X 

I o o 


I o o 
I o o 


I X 

I o o 


O 

I d I-H 

I o o 


QJ 

•M 

fl  ’ fl 

;h  C Ch 
c3  C3  ;3 
D O P O 

OPh  o^( 


a> 

^opoooooo:^oopoopo 


»f5  <n 
c6  la 


53  a c ui  a 

ca  3i  S'  3 03  3! 

3 0 0 0 3 0 

O SH  ^ 0 pi4 


“a 

Jh  3 
03  3 
3 O 
0^ 


03  '3  'O  "O  'O 

5h  3 3 3 3 

03  3 3 3 3 

3 0 0 0 0 


3 O 
t-s!?; 


>> 

0 

Peru  

Jeffersonvi 

>>2 

o« 

'S  tH 

HO 

LQ 

n~  LO 

{5 

33  GO 

Ol  -+1 

is  33 

IQ 

lb  ID 

IQ  IQ 

3 o o 
3 3 3 


tD5 

j ^ 35  0 1 ^ 

1 0 

IS 

isis  is 

ii 

a> 

S O 

ro  W CS  W 
fn  ^ 
3 g g,3 

^ 5-  or  o 

QJ  O O 

«O!>0 


^ X ^ 
lO  IQ  lO  lO 


33  33  < 

ir 


- o e> 

' ^ to 
Cl  Cl 
■ <0  CO 


gg 

3 o 


S8§1 


1 3 3 «o  3 3 


.0.00  &1> 
! g S S 3 S 


-H  -r*<  -tl 

OD  CD  CO  OO  CO 


3 

O « 

-1  tB 
M 03 


3 

!W 

2 QJ 

u S O o 


• 


^ o 
’p  ^ 

SS  Q) 
O w 


^ s ? 

w 


c5  03  ’c3 
(p  a o) 

-d  G ft 

3 fca33  js 

.2"  SS's^ 
.5^ 

M 53  „ 02 

3 '• 

41W.HW3^ 


3, 
m 
O 

i-i  ^ 
"H 

• ^ ^ 
0-5 

OJ  Q 

a 3 2 
^o'S  s 

3 s ‘ " 


^<1 


0 02 


V V«, 

3 3 

o w 


o 

. " ft 

3a8  o 0'S 
■5  o 5 3 

3 to  3 — 

og's^i^ 

.Si  !h  3 QJ 

g00 
S . .,  TD  .a 

+ t bJ]+  * 


2^ 


W 


H S 

0 3 
33  O 
Mx: 

a I 

Occ 

bn 

o3 

W 


S » 

S O fes  W 


^ I 


0O 


FU 


mQ 

O 2 ^ ^ 

2 .2  g S p.f^  5 o 0 2 

Qj  3 3 CD  3 ^ pq 


ftt-  t- 

sst. 

O ^ OJ 


O^ 

^6 

^ — 

<V  03 


'’^3  0 -ix;- 
OQ  QJ  <52  M 02  (O 

(3  , O 

3 o o 6 S 

S pj  QJ  O)  q;  g 

7000, 
og  r =(c  * 

O 


8 2‘”H 

0pq 
* 0* 


|®os|-g 

^3pSa| 

rri  A • 


75 


o Oi  (M  Oi 

*■  O 00  Oi 


o CO  o ^ < 
ZO  CO  CO  CO  ■ 


OCOO'^COOJ>-tH1> 

i-IOOOOtJhCOIOOI 


o o o o 


O lO  1> lA  O o CO 

GO  05  1>  CO  1>  O J>  05  05  05 


O rH  rH  O 


O 00  00  00  O C<J  O < 
CO  (N  CO  CO  CO  » 


'OOOJC^OC<JOOOOi-l005'^ 

i-HrHr-IrHr-IrHrHOaOlCOOQC^Ol 


O00C<lO'?*<O- 
rH  (M  CO  O O O T 


1 rH  o o 05 f-H  oq 
1 O cq  (M  rH  CO*  «M  Ol 


O CO  <>q  O CO 


0'^05L001>r—  (NOO 
CO  CO  CO  CO  oq  (M  rH 


IICIOCDCM  0qrHi^rHC<llC'^0qC^'<^^C0l000OrH^00  0qC0  000qC^OC0(>qcqC 
»(>q(N(NC>4  OrHrHrHrHrHOOrHOOOOrHrHOOOrHi-HOrHrHrHfMC^Ji 


1 CO  IC  rH  J 00  CO  m 1> 

CO  05  1 r-t  CO  05  ^ 

1 cq  CO  (N  1 cq  rH  O rH 

0.60 

0.50 

0.53 

0.69 

2.02 

2.15 

1.53 

05  05  05 
lO  lO  LO 

o o o 

!>•  !oJ>00C0C0  1 CO  CO  1 -H 

O ICOO5(>iC0CO  I00O5  ITJHCO 

tH  iooooo  ioo  ioo 

(N  1 O CO  IC<10rHJD^t^ 
rH  1 CO  LO  IJt>lOLOCCO 

iH  IOO  liHiHrHrHrH 

1 1>  ic  05  1 cq  j>  lo  CO 

1 o lo  LO  1 ITS  cq  (N  CO 

1 o d o 1 d o rH  d 

O O 1>  rH  1 CO  LC  !>■ 
lO  lO  CO  ^ 1 ^ o 

d d d o i d o o 

rH  rH  rH 

IC  lO  lO 

O O O 

CO  tocooq-^j^  Ij>l>  1 CO  CO 

ic<JCslt-HC^i-|  IrHrH  ICO'^ 

O IOOOOO  IOO  ioo 

00  1 O 1 00  O 05  CO  CO 

O 1 CO  1 J>  05  JD- CO 

O IOO  IOOOOO 

1 1 

2.39 

2.95 

2.44 

1.64 

1.03 

0.53 

1.33 

CO  00  00  t''  1 o o Jr- 

oq  (M  (N  CO  1 (N  C<J  00 

O d O O 1 rH  rH  O 

00  00  00 

CO  CO  CO 

d d d 

oq  1 CO GO  lO  1 00  lO  1 CO  o 

J>  1 CO  CO  rH  CM  (M  I iO  LO  1 (M  (M 

• 1 • • 1 • • 

O IOOOOO  IOO  IOO 

0.66 

0.33 

0.40 

1.03 

0.93 

0.72 

0.62 

0.67 

t UO  1 <0  CO 

1 CO  oq  CO  1 ic  iH  (M  o 

t o o o 1 o o d o 

o o J>  i>  1 00  J>*  ir5 

CO  rH  O iH  » CO  m m 

d d d d 1 o d d 

CO  CO  CO 
o o o 

o o o 

LO  l-^COlOOfH  IIOOQ  11005 

CO  1 (M  CO  O O O 1 Oq  CO  j rH  O 

O IOOOOO  IOO  lOO 

CO  1 I>  CO  1 05  05  rH  t- t- 
CO  l(MO  iCO'^t-COC^ 

O IOO  IOOOOO 

1 O IC  O 1 O ^ CO  rH 

1 O rH  IH  1 O rH  rH  rH 

1 d d O 1 O O O O 

t-  CO  00  m 1 Tj<  00  rH 

O O »H  rH  1 rH  CO  tH 

O O O O 1 O O O 

lO  lO  lO 

o o o 

O IOOCDOOJ>»  lOO  1 CO  LO 

O IOOOOO  IOO  lOO^ 

O IOOOOO  too  IOO 

0.10 

0.00 

0.08 

0.00 

o.os 

0.08 

0.08 

0.13 

uaaauaaaa 

c3PD;3c3Pj3;3;3 

;3ooo;ooooo 


cs'O'O'O'O 

^Haaafl^^aaa 

173:3^33:303333 
300003000 
O Ph  Si  O ^ ^ 


cs'O'OtS  cS'O  eg'O'O'O'3'3  oS'^'^  cS'Ol'O  sjtS  cS'O'O  o3'0'OT)'0'0 

033S3OdO033O3i3Oc33Oc33O033033O033OOOO 
300030300000300300303  0 0300000 


'O 

a g 

tn  o 03 
032  Cl 

I 

0 O u 

oms 


5 o fl  a 
^ S ^ 

oSMw 


^ ® ( 


S-,  &X)  O 33 

2 3 -u  3 
ft'r;  o ap 

CO  X r-J  73 

hDl-lWO 


'0^.5 

So'O 


tuo 
-o 

(5  _ 

o 

CO  'u  33 


ffiSS  IrH  icpcgooiiji 

^0703  li-H  ICOOOX^I"’' 

lA  if3  Irt  1 CO  I lO  lO  C5  ' 


3 3 

5 C ® SrS 

.U'isl 

CO  £ o o 
MO^MO 


'P'S 


m 3 t>  o 

q O oo  ^-1  X 

§ 3^  S'£ 


^§8g 

1^  1— ( (^3 

lo  CO  I iS)  ifi  in  CO  CO 


3 

O 

§)« 


sS^  ^ 

kTO'^xi 
332§“ 
83  ^ ! 

o I 

02.5? 

■gs 

o 


tio 


s 


o)  ^ 
M 3 
o 3 


oS  I? 

^ H S T 

m 


U ^ ? c3  5 I >.  w .ti  3 

o3>^g3-flJ  il>qgEH 

.^*  * B*  •£§*'*.$?  g.*  * * 

MW  pq  r pq 


|S  'i?isgx.sll 

•M-  "^iJ^OqSgO'O 
o.-ddaqip 

.CO  .3  03  . 3 - • 


O 

do 

^3 


« fe 

rx 

^ o3  M-i  ~ 33 

5j  Cl  o oj  CO 

W^M  >.2 
-■  ■ so 


CO 


S|ga.i|wga 

3“  S oS  3-0^  o 
W MMjg  tiflW 
MSxqShj'gSq 

• 03  . o a • -1^  cs  o 
'S 1-5 1-;  o ^ '5 

QJ  QJ  'I'  QJ  ♦ 

3.  3,  O. 

CC  CC  M 


<p  _3  o 


Ua 


, >. 
o -o 


(P  to  O 
P X 0) 


O 


<cq 


ft!-; 

^•^3  S 

V2  o 

g 

) fe  <P  OJ 
I r 0) 


^ 3 ft 

sis 

■Sl^ 


w ^ W 

o d d e 
'^,'S  ftX  X <i>  E 

■ -tJ 

(D 

Pi 

I 


S2S^ 

n !>  o 3 
a!t>OS  ( 

I 1 ' ' 


3 

a> 

> 

S 3 

S‘5 

M . 


O w- 
O p: 

bm. 

:!^|t 


fen 

0 

c S P 
I ft'^ 


-q  <u 
<p  (»  pi 

> <p 

•S»2 

0 3 
<0  . > 

p 2 

(D  TO  ' 

a c P 

355 

ll?i 

1 I I 


p rt 
X ” 
•2  ai 

’S  ;o 

tn  — ' 

5oo 

<V  rH 
rO 


cc 


ft  Si 

(P  ’-'  m 3 

o "33  w ^ 

W 6j0^  c 

saasl 


1 1 1 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  In  1916  (continued) 


76 


.2  £ 
20 


0.2 
JO  u 
pLn  03 


•juao  jad 


•;uao  jad 
•aiqn[0sui 


•juaa  aad 
‘pajaaAaj 
pu'B  aiqniog 


•juao  jad  ‘japeAV  ut 
aiqnios  ■qs'B^Od 


•juaD  jtad 


o L'^  eo  LO  o 

00  1-^  I-H  r-i  c-i 
(M  CO  00  CO  CO 


O 00 

cc  01 


O CO 
C-l  CO 


O CO 

06  ci 


CO  m CO  m 


O Cd 
(M  (M 


<M  (M 
CO  CO 


IC  Ci  o 00  o r-(  10 

O O ^ O ^ 


o CO  o cr.  o m CO 


o CO 
(N  01 


o 10  o 
10  to  o o 


O CO 
<M  CO  (N 


COO^OOOOrHCOl^fMi 

O O O O I-H  r-I  r-^  r-H  , 


■;u80  aad 
‘QApoB  pu'B  0iqn 
“los  aei^'BAV  iB^oj, 


•;u0o  aed  ‘oiubS 
-JO  0iqn[osui 
J0:^BA\.  0Ano^ui 


I CO  10 
I o o 


•4U00  J0d  ‘oiubS 
-JO  oiqniosut 
J0:^'BA1  0AnOY 


•;u00  j0d 
‘oiubSjo 
oiqnios  JOIN'S Ai 


1 o o 
I o o 

I 0 o 


•:}uaa  aad  ‘s:jtBs 
ciuouiuiB  puB  sa^Bj; 
-I’u  ut  a^qn^os  Ja^ByV\ 


Irt  I CO 
10  I CO 


03  TS  'O  73  ^3 
a C3  O G 
eS  G '3  G G 
G P O O O 
CD  ^ 


C3  G 
G O 

CDP^ 


03PPP  CSP*  03P  C3P 
;..GCGJhOjhC!hG 
c3GGGc3Go3Gc3G 
GOOOGOGOGO 
CDP-iP^PjCDP-iCDP-iCDPh 


,GGs.HCtHGCtHa^, 
!GG03Gc3GGcCG03 
;OOGOGOOGOG 
; Pm  Ph  CD  Pj  O P^  Pm  O Ph  0 


Ui 

<D 

33  uorjaadsui 

rO 

' 

S 

P 

IBIOIJJO 

I C3 

S O G ra 

g G >>  S 
^PMQpq 


10  tH  CO  Q 
10  @ S)  CO 


^0  OJ 

s ^ s 

03 

KSffi 


Irt  t;  e> 

I-H  C5 

-h  e>  03 

ICO  10  CO 


T3  t£ 

P 2 
'-o  2 


o M> 


b£.33 

2W 


Km 


a p 

s « 

O t 


O ;s 

a a 

Sa 

” C8 

T)* 


G 

G 

a 

a 

o 

0 

Ml 

(U  . 
N p 

S c 

0 O) 

2 ^ 


J ® g G' 
O 


GGIP  CO  o s 

°S5l| 


o o 
gO 

=0  K. 

P ^ 

G^ 

G eg 

•2|p 
g <0 

- ^ Oi 

03 

! G ^ 


G O G ^ M ag 
03  M 02^ 


'^03  *' 

-M  g a . . . 

PggP^MMPH 

SoacG  . . . . buGGoj  rPejl: 
GrSP^KKP^lPH  ofl'pK  G^M 

M-"S*  ■£'5 


I— ’ M r-*  L 

.2.aG' 

Pg0 

0 V-  ^ ro  f 

o O .Si 


a 

a 

o 

^.2 

•GO 

geo' 
bjO  G 


O I O t3  M 

0 :o  G „ 

' G<^ 

! 

’MGS 

I — I M O 0^ 

. G G G J OJ 

faX)G 

O cS  . C3  G G 

M^^-G^a 

S * * cc 


r o r 
o G o 

0Gq 

K!  03 

fli  w ni 


euo  ^ tic 

a*< 


M G M 

£ .12  P .12 

gS'ai? 

* G >■ 


M CD 


e>>g 
S-^ 

Sat*, 

Pi  (Jj  0^ 

g O 

,®  a G G o H- 

M G,  P^  G 
P=804^M 
;Ga2  03 

M • O)  uJ 

j»  ;z;  <;  x:  K 

. G * M 

g G G 

M o 


00  G 
03  M H g t 

g ^ G G 

^E-IMf^r 

. . <D 

GMi-s*t>1c 

M * G 

O G 

0 P4 


> ’g  P 

;<M0 


4797  I 9933  I Butler  I Found 1 0.13  I 0.20 


77 


OOOi 

o d d o rH  d 


lOlo  a Ci 
o o o o 


o Oi  o 1 

(M  O t-H  ( 


lOOOCO  OOiOCNOOi^OOCO 
lrHrH(M(N00Gi6i^C<lrHrHT-i<MC<l 


OrHOC<I0iOl>00^C<IOJ 

odo6dcid^dcocoi>d< 


•COC<1000lOCOC<10rH(MOlOOiCOOOiOOO 
5O>oddl0k0lCC<JC<lC<lC0Q000GCcdd00  00  C0 


oioomomooocooi-Hoo^Oioo 

'rt^^’oococicooiOiGooooooddddcoco 


O O 1 
(N  (N  rH  1 


CD  GO  00  0:>  rH 

r-I  rH  d d rH 


I LO 

I d d 


o 

s-D  O 
O O 


I o o 
: d o 


Oa5'»!hrH(MOC<lCOlDl>':«‘0 

CodcOCOCOrHi-ndoodo 


IrHTt^lOlOt^lDOOO^rHOOt^eOtOOOiCNCOCi 

lr4dddddddrHdddd(drH(ddd 


CO  lO  o 
o d o 


CD  lO  (M 
o o o 

o o o 


C<1  (N  CO  OQ 

d o d d 


1 ID  00 

I d d 


O O'  CD  t- 
CO  (M  CO  (M 

o o o o 


I CO  CM 

I d d 


I CO  c<i 
I o d 


C<>  C<J 

d d d I o o 


o o o o 


13  c3 
0:3  0 


a;-(C(CHoatH  cGHs-iCCHflcisHCici^apiGt-icicifcHG 
3033^3r3pc3  2:3Do3:333J3o3pj3KiP:3;3s3j33:33 
PPOOOOPi  OOOPOOOOPOOPOOOPOOPO 


I O 05  O O O O O 1 


O O O O (M 


OOOOOCirHOCDX^CDt-OlCMCOCOi 


Ci  00  GO  1 
00  5 

o o d ' 


o o o o 


o o o o 


o o o o 


o o o o 


G K O Q 

ca'^  ca'O'^'O  csP  os'^  os'O'OPP 
pGpGpppospcapcapppp 
OPOPOOOPOPOPOOOO 


Iv, 

Qj  :G 
0§ 


! S S 

1 S QJ  a ^ 

(h'0  0) 

■00^M 


S 3 
o P 

pqM:^ 


c ^ -M 


3 O -M 
O O O P 

cQiziKm 


^ o 
0P-I 


P P3 

^ 

jp  tB  n 
in  O 

o3§ 


,2  2 
S o 


TO  h-. 

pq^ 


feS 


o & 

o3  O 

PhO 


r-I  *1X3  IC53  i^CMCDrH 

IQ^  ' I C<1  I O CO  (M  LO 

^ IS  1^  IS  iggs§ 


bo  O > 

•-H  !_,  O P 

® O C “ 
03  QJ  W :3 

PL,0<I« 


)iCiiBO<DCO<SO«DcocOO!©co60CC  ■ 


0i05®Sj'^MH*t-t<mif5Ooooooo 

•^Pcaesi^fsciocca^eococbfbcjiisaco 

Kieo'*i-rt<tomLQiocoLococococoa5c05D 


0'^ 
^ bo 

^*3 
2 10 
o 


9 3 -iP  ^ p 


p _ 
p bo- 


l5  boat's  3 0^^13  g|.S§ 

£riis2^S«S^2.SSiW^ 


s£o''i^i-<5'33$®|2  0a 


bo  ^ 

3 “ - 

<c  cQ : 


o ® 
p 

3W 


iW  s 


n 


P 'o  P ~ ' . S 1>  03 
Mlz;  I 

^ o g d d g)^  0 

‘"'ScDdlw’pJ 


0^0000-g0q;^ 


G.bl 

CC0 

P 

I; 

pW 


o 

0 

^ o 

53 


_ p 
0 ° 


^ 33 

3.-.( 


0-5^ 

o 


Mw 


O-Pc 


P 

:s 


■p  p s p M 
^ 


■^■Sd^  OP 

.'3^0 
2 20S-”SS^>'^ 


w 


0 


^ <1  HJ 
g>  - 


M 03  P 

-<o<i 


0 0 0 


^ S 


■■  p cq 
y p 
p”«.S 
ftp 

<B  P > 
(B  O CU 
M M 


W 

<D 

^ M d 

I 2 3 

0^^ 


333-33 

o o o 0 o o 

p p p 0 p p 


P pi  ^3  o pi  P 
a;  (1)  dj  +j  (D  (p 

M tn  to  MM 

c3  P ® cd  rt 

P p p Pp  p 

0 0 0 0 0 0 

p p p H p p 

p p p 3 p p 

0 0 0 CO  0 0 

I I I I M 


o o 
P -o 
o P ' 
=“0 


“ ^ 3 
§0^ 


^3^033 


O ” 
ftp3 
p 2- 
P p o 

CO  0 1^; 


Pi 

CD 

— (1)  (P 


I I 


.2  P P 
o o 

PJ  p p 
O p p 
:|00 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


.9  5 

•^U80  jad 

S9i 

33  n , 

*;uao  jad 

‘aiqniosui 

§9 

-ft  u 

quao  aad 

^ ft 

‘pa^aaAaa 

puB  aiqniog 

■ O O J 

I'--  o o • 


O lO  <M  O (N 


O Tji  O 03  O O 


O O Tji 
CO  O CO 


0 to  f-H  LO  lO  O Oi 

01  03  CO  03  O 


O CO  O CO  O < 


•;uaD  aad  ut 

eiqnios  ‘xis-B^Ocr 


•:^uaD  jod 

‘moj. 


*:^U0O  aad 
‘aAi:^0T3  pu'B  0iqn 
-los 


•:^U0O  jad  ‘oiu^S 
-JO  0iqn[osui 
ja^'HAl  OA^O^UI 


’;u3o  aad  ‘oiu'bS 
-JO  aiqniosut 
ja:^^M.  aAi:)0Y 


O CO  oto 


lO)  to  CO  GO  Ci 
o o o o o o o 


CO  05 

d d 


o o o o 


o o o o 


O IC  J>  GO  CO 

d LO  d ic  lo 


IC  lO  i> 

CO  d d 


rH  CO  CO 
r-i  05  CO  CO 

CO  d CO  CO 


•:^ua^  aad 
‘DIU'BSaO 
aiqnios  'ja;^A\- 


Sh  O Sh  O 

d d d d 


CO  ^ < 

d d 1 


■:}uaa  aad 

BiuouiuiB  puB  sa:jBj:) 
-T*u  ut  ayqn^os  Ja:jB^\\ 


d d o o 


o o o o 


03  03 

d d 


c3^ 
tH  G t-.  0 
C3  3 C3  ^3 
33  O 13  O 


a a 

03  73  73  73  73  53  73 

a a a a ;;  a 
c3  a a a a a 3 
a o o o o a o 

O pq  Pil  0 


a _ 

2^ 
a a 
a o 
0pq 


a_ 
a ^ a ^ 
vh  a M a 
a a a a 
a o a o 
CI^iOPh 


§73 -a '3X3 

^ a a a a 
a a a a a 
a o o o o 
OP^PhI^iPh 


a'O'O 
a a a 
a a a 
a o o 
OPrPh 


a'^'O 

a a 
a a a 
a o o 
O Ph  P4 


aa  uonoaclsui 


1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

j j 

! 1 1 la 
' ' ' 1 "S 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 
t 1 
[ 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

t 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 t 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 I 1 1 1 

> 1 1 

1 > 1 

1 I ( 

! 1 » 

> 1 > 

t 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

! ^ 

> 

' ' ' 1 S; 

1 1 1 1 C 

1 1 1 '2 

1 a 
> 

1 t 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 t 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 

i 1 1 ^ ^ 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 

1 

ift 

1 o 

1 ^ 
lo 

1 l4 

1 1 'ft' 

i i2i2a 

1 ' 33  O O 

1 _ , >03X3 

I o 

io 

1 ;-i 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

t 1 

1 1 

1 

ll 

1 1 

! 

<u 

Madison  _. 
Madison  _. 

(a)  Hanov( 

(b)  Madiso 

1x3  1 

1 a 

1 § a 
'.9  o 

1 P a 

1 <v 

1 ftW 
1^33 

il 

'M 

1 ^ 

1 

>o 

Paoli 

Rush 

Pitts 

Cory 

1 ft 
'O 
a 
'O 

1 s 

1 c« 

Iffl 

1 ft 

iw 

19 

1 ^ 
iw 

l'C;9 

] <1> 
s ^ 

1 ^ o 
•«a2 

1 05 

1 

1 tO  CO  to  CO 

1 O 

ifc- 

1 2h 

1 s 

1 CO  t-  to  to 

1 to  tO 

1 in  i8  3 S 

1 ^ CO 

IM  Cp 

18 

1 to 

\\^ 

1 CO 

t to  to  to  CO 

ii 

iS 

1 ^ 

1 5l 

1 in 

1 CO  o 

1 to  to 

iii 

^ ‘c8  ® CO 


05  05  05  05  ^ 05  05 
CO  CO  CO  CO  ^ CO  CO 


s@ 


ip  lO  CO  CO 
lO  to  U5  lO 


to  »o  lO  to  »o 


«w  > 

o ? 

X X 

a»  i> 

2 a 


a;  a 
X3  CC 

- o 
>1^2 


ft  a rt 

a 

a s (>,co  o 

o"-!  a'-' 02 

O a a 

rt  U 4-J 

S r. 

ft-i 

:a  a . 

+-» I— I a-i  o '<-1 

a 73 


-ft  ^ pp 
O ? ft 


o 

»A  ^ 
>10  ■ 


Ph  a 


Ph  o 

>*  s® 


1-2 1 -n 

a » a S'^  8^  ft 

-SM  d 


^■SOftO 


a a 

W Ifl 

a 


33  ^ 


S g 9 S 

ft  -a  2 -a 


O £ 
.9<1 


5^  a 
i ^ 
: o“S? 


3 ca  a 

-3^  o a 


a " 

a 

O 


•0O  go  g 

a ft  ft_^ 
^ a<;  a<i 
o a 
ft  •£  2 2 

.99  Sg  2 

9 a?  a? 

<;  a a 


a-o  o o ; 
^ 9MMS 


p .a  .a  a 
o m -P  o pjl 
M g a a § a 

p oa  ^ ^ N ^ 

S O a a o ft 

a oj  Qj  a -a  a 

a ^ ^ <1^  (1^ 

OiK  * 

'Vt 


'3-S  < 

^1  fti^ 
-211 
a a 

2 ’ft  a “ 

-2^-9  9 


C3 
ft 

9 

O a 

9-9 

a m 

•s  t. 

99  s a 

gPpH  ja 

-ftpJ  SS 
P-l  wjj 

2^  >> 

a Ph  .a 

■§73^  g 

a o* 

.9  0 

a 

£ 


79 


3 0 0 0 


aoo 

c3  fl 


3 0 3 0 


CZJ 


o 00  <r) 

CO  t I 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

t 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 

f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 

7—ir~ti—<r~< 

C<J  (M  i 1 
<N  j j 

1 1 1 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 i 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 i 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 -1  1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 O CO 

Ln-^inrHinoinco.inoiintMfMinco 

in 

X*  CO 

OOOX^'^OCOOQO 

ill! 

1 1 05  O 

1 I 

1 1 

l-KMrHrRr-li-IrHi-li-HOi-IOOr-IO 

rH  oq 

o o 

i-HOqooqrHrHrHrH 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 (M  m 

OCiOOiOX-OrHOTiHOOOCOOrH 

O rH 

O 00  05 

inCOOCDOOOrHX* 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 t 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 CO  CO 

1 1 

1 1 

OOldodoOMCOiRtRCOM^^’i^inCO 

oq  oq 

00  05  05*  00  00  00  05’  CO 

o (X  CO 

1 1 1 i 

o 00  o 00  o oq  1 j 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 0 r-  0 Ttf 

*-l  (N  CO  (>q 

1 1 1 1 
(III 
till 

<N  rH  CO  CO  rH  rH  j j j i j 

i 1 

1 1 
t 1 

1 I 

1 1 

1 1 
t 1 

1 1 1 1 oq  ^ oq  oq 

till 

till 

l>  in  CM  rH 

j>  o 00 

1 

00  C5  Tti  i>  T#i  in  CO  in  00  05  j 

1 1 

1 1 

in 

1 1 

oioqcoinoooorH 

rH  (N  ni 

(N  CO  r-l  CO 

OOOOOOrHrHOO  i 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

o o 

1 1 

1 1 
t 1 

rHi— li—trHOrHrHrH 

1 

1 O JC^ 

1 i-H  00  00 

1 Oi  1 00 

1 CO  t 00 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 oq  1 CO  1 rH  1 O 1 CO  1 

1 CO  1 CO  » « CO  1 1>-  1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 rH 

1 CO 

1 J 

1 1 

1 1 

1 $ 13  CO  1 irt  01  m 

1 ft  Oa  1— 1 ■ 1 10 

1 r-I  O o 
\ 

1 oq  1 oq 

1 < 

1 O to  1 O 1 rH  1 O 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

I o 

1 

1 1 
t 1 

1 0 0 i-R  1000 

1 O CO  CO 

1 TtH  CO  (N 

IS  j ^ 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 GO  1 X^  1 05  1 O 1 J>  1 

1 oq  to  to  1 oq  i i-h  i 

1 1 

1 

1 05 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 in  CO  1 in  rH  in 

1 oq  CO  CO  1 in  in  in 

1 1— • rH  rH 

1 

1 O 1 o 

1 1 

to  i O to  to  to  1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 

1 O 

1 

1000  1000 

1 o in  o 

1 in  ^ in 

i 1 

1 X^  1 CO 

1 in  1 o 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

to  1 00  1 in  1 00  1 1 

1 oq  1 rH  1 rH  1 1 CO  t 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 rH 

1 oq 

1 1 

1 1 

1 CD  rH  1 0 05  00 

1 J>  CO  m 1 Tfi  CO  CO 

1 o o o 

1 

1 rH  1 oq 

1 1 

to  to  to  to  to  1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

I 1 

1 1 

1 o 

1 

I 1 

1 1 

1000  1000 

1 

1 o c<j  in 

I CO  TJH  rH 

1 1 

1 CO  1 J>* 

ICO  1 in 

1 1 i 1 1 1 

1 "riH  1 1 in  1 r-t  ; in  1 

to  to  to  t -H  to  1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 o 

1 1 
i 1 

1 1 

t oq  05  05  1 X- 

1 r-*  0 1 0 0 rH 

1 o o o 

1 

1 o 1 o 

1 1 

to  to  to  to  to  1 

1 1 1 1 1 t 

1 o 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

1000'  1000 

1 O O (N 
» CO  O (M 

1 1 

1 CO  1 in 

1 rH  1 (M 

1 1 1 1 i 1 

1 00  1 rH  1 rH  1 rH  1 Tt<  1 

1 CO  1 1 C<l  1 I>  1 CO  » 

1 1 

1 t 

1 

1 o 

1 o 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 00  oq  oq  i ^ co  o 

1 0 oq  rH  1000 

1 o o o 

1 

1 O 1 O 

1 1 

1 o to  to  to  to  1 

1 I 1 1 1 1 

I 1 

1 1 

1 o 

1 1 

1 1 

1000  1000 

1 1 1 1 
"S  ''  1 '■ 

y ' ! ! 

"fl  I'fl  1 

y 1 y ', 

^ 1 ! '^  1 ^3  i 'O 

g 1 ^ 1 1 ^ I 55 

T3  1 

3 i 
y I 

3 

1 1 

' i 1 

1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 

'2  1 ! '''g  ''  ''  '' 

32  1 , ' y 1 1 , 

S''' 

3 ' ■ ' 
S-OToa 

R|  3 3 3 

03  3 3 3 

"Sis! 

o3  "O  R '3 

R,  3 c3  3 
-<333 

C '"S  ' C '"S  'fl  ‘S 

03^  03^ 

c3po3;3c3po3;octf3o3;: 

13 
1 3 
i 3 

Q ' 

1 0 
! c3  D 

9§ 

2^'§ 

3 3 3 

y 1 1 1 y 1 1 1 

3 ' ' ' 3 ' ' ' 

jrj3'03  C3333 
!h333r,333 
33333333 

303030303030030 


3 O 
OPq 


3 0 0 


30003000 

(5  ^ 0 pR  ph  ^ 


o5 


Oo3 

-M  03 
t>fi  > 


3 O 
3 O 

MS 


>'^  9 

0^5 

0CM 


ife! 

ift  ® < 


a 

0 !«  c3 
T3 

'III 

■8g>a 
S-3  g 

a®a 

^ 5B  Qj 

"S  "S 
■S'^'9 
9 a 9 
'cy'Sa 

''fl.2r5.S2 

3 fl  3 O fl 

caW  OrQ  O 

1 

o fl  o 

of9  O 


O 

■o 

3 

3 

4:>  o 
c3  ^ 


o 

OQ  O 
3 3 


03  ^ ra  N — 

fl  9 flS  S 


oS  o^ 


3-S<1 


flS- 

aSsf 

fl  -t^  fl 

3 3-“  C3 

O 3 3a 

S.9‘^ 

A 3 03 

.9  AM 
§o 


i R(  O 

fl=a  fl  • 

A3  ^<|.S  3 3<I 
fl  2lj  o N '3 

flJofCOQ,..  tnO 

^ S ‘m  cc 

“ ^ i ” g ® s 

.90.SS.9M.9S 

w*  w * m*  oi  ^ 


R'a  >1  wa 

<1  O 9"^  O 
3(^  3 ^ 

H ’S  . • CC  ‘d 
3 >■  „ 3 


O0 
!>>  ' 


S ft 

^9 

3 O 

02  0 Rh 

O) 

0--  .2 

3 go5 

aS' 

9 2S 
o 
O 


.9 

Sh 

3 

,9Sd.9S 


K « w w w 


3!  S 
OPr^ 

Os  s’® 

a'^  '?* 

. 

.2-9  fl_g<J 

go  i a « 

^ tH  .2  OJ  O 

3 fl  O Ph  ‘C 
30  3 

S .9  -3  M 

■ tao-fl  o3 

.9 


a 

2 d 
. ^“8 


a 

03 

fll-sS' 

o 

:ir" 

•9 '2^ 

3 3 
C3  RR 
« 


■“g  r2  P 

bXiN  O o 


2^0-  § g 

. . . bR.  t-(  ^ 


.52 

o 


_)  rs  t/j  ^ f-i 

I'S'g^oipq^pri^a 

Pro  flod'^ 

<T<  P-J  r^ 


a « 
fl  9 

w-2 

. W r,  ^ 

> ':;t  o ^ 

^ ^ u 

^ Q,  to 

3 I 
9 3 S . 9 

0 g ^ o 

-llai 

'3  M ° O a 

02  ^ o +3  (1) 

ms  to 

3 .t!  a;  c3 

•fl  ft  ft-fl 
y I>  J7  y 
9 S 9 R 

fl  c3  3 fl 

CR  O!  M Ph 

1 I M> 


03  y 

pq""  S 

" y R 

• bcfl 
H 3 pR 
ft 

9 Q)  9 

O y O 

a . a 

y a y 
H!  y w 
c3  C c3 
R a: 
y 55  y 

R +3  R 

53  0)  53 

Ph  MCR 

• I i I 

TOTPUSOt- 

© o o o c 


U1  "fl 


^ C<1 


M 

Ida 


35  a 

(m  y 

c3  s 5 S jR 

” £ 9 s ^ 

; M <M  <(H  '*-'  c3 


fl  a;  y 
■"  bc-5 
a c3  fl 

y ftO 
> 

•rt  y 

y O), 

Of/)  ^ _ 

y y y a sa  a rri 
tl  m _S 


y a 

ft§2 

g «M  -M  C ^ 

Mill. 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


8o 


•^uaD  jaci 

.a  1? 

! o9i 

' C 0 

•juaD  jad 

1 a^ 
§2 

‘aiqniosui 

c'G 

' Ps  oj 

quao  jad 
•pajjaAaj 
X^u-B  aiqniog 

o ir>  ic 

(N  ^ 'M 


(M  to  00  to 


(M CO  lo  o - 

OOOOOOOOrHi 


' lO  CO  CO  CO  ' 


I O 00  00  C5 
I r-i  O O O 


CO  CO 

I-H  rH  d O 


Ot^OOOtOOi-HiOCOOOCOOOCOOOCOCOCOrHOCOMH'^i^r-tOtOCOOli-'OeOOOOO'^CO 

oocioot^cooociCiOoocot^cococococoj^i^oooooooooooo>oGoococoo6 


•:juoD  jad  ui 

aiqnios  ‘qs^^Od: 


0 O CO  O O Ci  O 1 

01  Ol  Ol  O O T-H  1 


■;u9o  jad 


cooococoooo04>i>co« 

i-HC<101r4rHrHOOodi 


OlrHO^lCOOOrHCiOO 
I T-I  r-H  r-^  d 1-4  d r-< 


•^uao  aad 
‘aApo-B  puB  aiqn 
-IDS  aa^BAi  ib;oj. 


CO  CO  CO 
to  to 

dodo 


ooooooooooo 


to  Ol  Ci 
to  ^ CO 

o o o o 


'luaD  aad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqnfosui 
ja:jBAi  OAt^OBUI 


to  CO  to 
o d d d 


COOOOOr^T-iOOCO^O 

tO'^Tji^lOlO^COCOCOl^- 

odoodoododd 


*;uaD  aad  ‘oiubS 
-JO  aiqTifosuT 
ja^BAi  aAi^oy 


rJH  CO 

O O d O 


Tti-tiCO'^CO'^'^'^'*^^tO'^ 

oddodoodddd 


^ CO  CO  CO 

o d o d 


•:juao  aad 
‘oeubSjo 
aiqn[Os  ja^B^i 


1-H  Ol  • <>1  CO  too 
o o I o d I d d 


o o o o 


ooooooooooo 


o o o o 
d o d d 


•:juao  aad  ‘squs 

BtUOUlUIUpUB 
-Tuut  aiqu^os  Ja:jT3A\ 


t*-  to  I 00  O I to  00 

rH  T-i  I O O I O O 

o d I o o j o d 


Oq  GO  CO  CO 
1-H  o O O 

o o o d 


OOOOOOOOOOO 


c3^:2c3:3::c3o;o5c3:3p:3;3c3:3o;o^^j3:3^3:3c3^3:3Dp::^::;^3^::^c3:3o5;o;j 

:3oo::oo:3ooo!oooopoooooooo:3ooooooooooo^oooo 


t 1 

1 qj 

I G c 

1 1 i 

1 1 1 

1 i 1 

t 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 a 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

t 1 1 ( 1 

1 1 1 i 1 

1 1 I 1 1 

1 t 1 1 1 

III  1 

1 1 I 1 ' 1 1 !=l  1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 

1 I 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 

I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 

lo2 

1 1 1 

i 1 

1 0 1 

! i 1=1  1 

1 0 10 

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 

1 1 1 1 0 1 1 ■!-:> 

i"  ® ' i ^ i '^  ' i 

'Q  tD 

la,  .3 

1 bfi  S 

0 

1 o2 

I 1 

i.2 

'1 

I o3 

' tUO  1 

II  & 

III 

1 .^2  ^ CO 

1 C3  S tJ3a! 

' iH  0 'p 

1 cS  'C  •-  > 

a » 

1 ^ -G  ^ 

Pekin 
Morris  -_ 
Cicero  __ 
Valparais 
Denham 
Colfax  __ 
Worthing 
Franklin 

1 tc  a:  ® 1 1-2  9 ' >-'2  a ' 

i=!  “ ^ S 2 S)  ® -c  _§ 

1 S c'S'S'S  o ^ o 1 

,s-,cSaQ3aiO®--®4:;(-(  1 

'on 

'PQfi 

iOmKQQi-IWSSccPs  ' 

i 6 
! <; 


acE  uoI:^^^cIsuI 


:g& 


I'^cooOi  i^ScOl^OO’^S'— I ifHco 

® S5  (S  isi  I -rfH  r-  ® 00  C5  ^ 1$  Ift  I « in 
ininS>co  iiniftioiniTiO'mco  imm 


® s s 


^iS  ' bfl 


IT3PIJJO 


iniaoooooooooooej 
Ln£OCC>'®tOCO®O^C>®<®?b®COCOcp50«5c£>®5C>OcO'®^OtO 


a 

>'3 


a i 
2 * 


06  !» 
it  it 

a c. 


Ol 
c3 

73  M (a  ft 

c ^ a . 

o o 00 

CO 

cy  C 

-•5  3 

^ frt  Qj 


QJ  O' 

aj 

W o 
. -c 


.2  a 

o 5 

•r'l.SS 

<1^5 

o 53  ^ 

'S  sf^ 

i5 

3 (is  -2 


3 


Jh  fl 

rj  O) 

Cl'”' 


o 

- ”m 


. .SM-pW 

ui  c»  t4  i 


cq-^IQO 


<dl 


pjoo 

oSS 

as 

N« 

m’M 

fi(iH‘ 


C !-i 
i2  o 

X c 

■2 

O 


G=3| 


o 

Ph 

-(•a 

C 

, O 

O-fH 


O)  Hj  I-J  C 
a*  * > 
D 

cc 


> 2*'-' 

,Q| 

1 fn 

’°a 

; ^'iZ 


nteed 


8i 


CO 

(M 


C bJD 


W M ^ - 
^ w P 
s : . rt 


O 


fe  ^ H M ® W 

tiB 

S £ S S 5 S 

o o o o o 

^ ^ (D 

«M  <M  «w  «W  ^ «M 

'd  ^ ^ ^ n3 

O 0 (D  d)  0 

CQ  W W CG  . C^ 

d Cj  d d 'd  rt 

^ rd  rd  d ,d 

0 o 0 0 :3  0 

u, 

d d d d <1^  d 

(1,  CL,  fu  Pm  (1, 

MIN! 


c 

d O 
0 I-: 


•Sw*^ 

'Ssa 

> o c 

0 ^ M-t  ' 
0 

Ui  (X)  (V 

w w 

0 cd  d 

pd  rd 

Jv  0 0 
d ^ ^ 

1 I I 


« ft.S  - 


S § ' 

£ "S  „ . 
WP^OH 


m 


S £ 

o o 

Si  ti 


^ P,l3  PJ 

o PT  o o 

Lh  £ i, 
G rt  G P 

CM  OJ  Ph  CM 

MM 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


82 


^ o 

P4 


*^U9a  aad 


jad 

‘aiqniosui 


•1U9D  aad 
pa's  aiqniog 


! 'juao  J9d  ‘J9J^AY  UT 

1 9iqnios  *o^H  ‘qs-BjOd: 

1 

•1U90  a9d 

•1U90  a9d 

•9Aijo'B  pu'e  9iqn 
-los  a9;'BAi.  injoj^ 

Z 

3 

<0 

•:tu90  a9d  ‘oiubS 
-JO  oiqni’osui 
J9:^nA\.  9AnDnui 

0 

u 

\ z 

•:tu90  a9d  ‘otuvS 
-JO  9iqnfosut 
J9;BAJ.  9AIJ0V 

ll 

•;u9D  J9d 

‘oiunSjo 
9iqnios  J9i-eM 

1 

•:)U9D  J9d  ‘s:)tcs 
BiuoujuiB  put?  S9:fBj:j 
-III  ut  oiqn^os  J9:>ByVV 

i 

i 

i 

aa  uoI:^^^dsuI 


a 

a 

«M  W 

o « 

I® 

ft  M 


aa 


OC005(MC<lOC0C<JOC^I^O0i05O00O<MlCi^OC0C<J’^C0OOC0O00T 

rM(Mr-100(Mt6<:Dl0rH(M’T-li-tr-Ic0rMc4rHrH<NC^rHrHCN*rHT-Hr-HC0'^r-3of 


OC<lCOOOCOOrHl>OI>OOrHO>OrHCOt^^OOOO(MirilOOCOOOCOOiO 

40LOLO'^OOt^OOOOOOOOC^COOOOOOO>00505Ci05a5C^l»— 


)CiC50iOOOCO<MlOCOlO 

(OOOOrHrHrHOOO 


or—  000  r 


> O 05  Oi  CO  O 
• i-H  O O r-I  rH 


COCOCO'^COOlOlO’^OlOXOOOO^iOOLOlCliOOOCOOOOOOOOOOO'^lO'^lO 
OOOOOt-<i— ti— (OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOt-Ht— (1— lOOOO 


I 00  o 

1 

I o o 


10  I CO  (M  I CO  CO 

o <=>  100  loo 


05  CO  I 10  o 

CO  O I r-1  rH 

00  100 


I «M  C<J 

I o o 


I 00  CO 
I o o 

I o o 


r-H  CO  CO  O 00 
CO  CO  Ol  <M 

00000 


r-t  (M  (M  CO  (M 

00000 


>0000 


O 1— I O O O 
O O O O C5 


r-t  t-H  r-«  O O 

00000 


10  ^ to 
0000 


O o 05  C5 
cq  CO  CO  (M 

O <0  O O 


^ 10  oi  o 

0000 


O 05  01  O 

(N  T-H  (M 

0000 


00  1000 


to  I r-i  o O 
00  I O O O 


O rH  J CO  CO  10 

00  I o o o 


i'OTS'O'a  i-o-a  ca'O'O  ca'a'a'^'O  oa'^'O  S'O'C'a 

MaaaflMaasHaflMaatHaaoaatHaaaci^Haci^Haafl 
c33aaao33ao3a3c3aac3aDDa3MaaaaoaDacaa3a 
30000300300300300000300003003000 


bX)_  '2 

.395 


ft  o 


as 

'PMQ 


i - o c 
. g 1^3  O 
i O I 3 +J 

I 5 IW.9 

I 


I O 

I o;  .r 

'Eh^ 


@ si  I o5  § I ^ 
I US  CO  I fe  ^ 1 fe  o ' 


O ts-  '!> 

!5fl-e.2  s >> 

3 b ^ I’ 

3 o3  .3  tn  CO 

ti'a 

53  o S ^ .b 


CO  CQ> 
O O Orj 

O 3 3+2 
£S  t>.  3 
ft  O)  CO  o 
W«Kc» 


S8§S  IS! 


>, 

'6 

p^o 


fe  >, 
ft  ’ft  CO 


IIS 

ui  § CO 


^^c 

3 3 
g9  6? 

^ g.2  « 

Tl^ 

5.S  oa^m 

3 d _ . 


fcfi 


” <0 

I'O  " 

tuO 

- a 0.3^. 

i ■■ 

ip>i-q  ca 

■ d” 


5 bcj  Ph 


^Joa^Wo^^ 

g H 3 . .0 
xa+j.2P^pqOPH+H 
PM  oax)*  * "S 

s« 


>“.3 

05  ^ 
«2  05 

ft  O 

9^ 

ot! 

P5a2 


ft 

“PM^ 


3 2+2^P  Sc^og  o "i!  caa  M 5j  cr 
oft++;3PHg3^.9o  <iJ'aT3 
oPL|03_Scat^9.Go‘^^>' 

as.  apt|'Oo'-ia3^2cj,$033 

W<S8^  ^c»^'oSa3'^'-sc»a2| 

n*  3***  3** 

33  o 

Eh  <Jj  Q 


03  '3  '3  '3  "O  "3 
M 3 3 3 3 3 
333333 

3 0 0 0 0 0 
CD  ^ ^ [hh 


ift  ft  ft  ^ 

I +j  4+  +j  'b 

13  3 3 3 
1 O O O'-! 

1999® 

ISSSpp 


I CO  ' 


PtH  . 

•W 

02  _ 


^ >+ 
CO  02  o 
3 3 CO  3 
3 O >1 
rH  O^  3 
qi-aPPcO 

3 

CO  04i  . 

V2Pq02sM 


4480  I 5722  I Vincennes 


83 


00  00  CK  to 

i-H  rH  (N  O 

eo  eo  eo  CO 


'(3  'a  ^3 
a a (3  fl 
3!  3 S3 

o o o o 


O C<J 
00  GO 


O 00 
00  00 


IC  ^ O O 

O O O rH 


o d o 1 


O 05  rH  rH  lO  O 0>  (M  ?0  O 

CO  iri  d d d CO  TjJ  d 


J>  CO  O 1>  T 

d d rH  rH  ( 


OlO'«^<OOOOlOr-CMOI 

OOOOOiOOOiOii^l 


•OO^COlOO^rHrH 
! d GO  00  00  00 


'iocooqoooicot--cocoj>t^oooooooooiaicoe>ii>io 

IrHrHodorHrHrHrHrHrHddddddrHr-^rHrH 


CO  CO  (M 
O O d O 


O O O O 


CO  C<H:^  CO 
Cv]  rH  rH  C<J 

o d d d 


O CO  CO  o 
O rH  rH  O 

dodo 


iC  CO 

d d 


I O CO  CO  rH 

I CO  IC  lO  lO  CO  I GO  O O 

I d d d d d I d rH  d 


(N  lO 

d d 


O CO  (M  Oi 

LO  LO  lO 

d o o o o 


> (N  (N  CO  <M 

I d d d o d 


I CO  CO  LO 

I d o o 


(N  <M 

d d 


I CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

1 d d d d d 


I CO  I oq  CO  CO 
. d o d I o o d 


OOOOO  JOOOOO 


CO  o I c>  CO  (M  CO 
rH  o I CO  LO  CO  CM  rH 

o d I o o d d o 


- CO  iO  O LO 
I C<J  (N  cq  (N 

iddddd  ;ooo 


c3  D 
D O 

OPh 


5'a'aT3T3  S'O'ci'a'a  §'a'aT3^  S'O'o  i'a'O'a'O'a  ^'a'O'a'O'c 
^ai3l3CMa!3C!=l!-i!=l!3£3a^CC3FHSC!3C3a;Hapi3CiC^!3!3S 

POOOOPOOOOPOOOOPOOPOOOOOPOOOOOPOOO 


I lO  m CD  1 m CD  «D  < 


00  ID  I -41  05  CD  ID 

SS  ISSKSS 

ID  CD  I ID  in  ID  CD  CD. 


SggSS  iSSS; 


CO  CO 

fo  « 


ididiDiDiDCDcDCDcDcdcDcDCDCDCD' 


5=3  P =3 

Sgocp 

WwdM 


> 
w 

6 
o 

4) 

O.  tH  « 
g O)  ►-I 

O:po8 

o5? 

8J0 

g QJ  P 
“8'g  P 
•Sg'S 

,;*!  -33 

- go 


p 

S ^ 

P N 


•mS 


Qi  ^ 

S p 

O J3 

O & 

§ ® s 

43^  o 
O %<  ^ 


ga 


g p o "S 'S  & o 


a® 


. ■ ^ ~ - o3 

p 2 CJ  P pi  03 

S'o 

. .p£ 

.3;^  -02  0 

(h  rrH 

tijn  1=^  P ^ ^ 

a t-s  w 

^ 5 td  * * * 

+i  csCQ 
03 


o o p ^ ' b 
O g-  P tn  b 03 
oglu  S3 

o)  c/j  a .05 

•.a 

^pi-ic»,W<5 


® p 

§g?s 

§“|S 


o 

t-i 

O +51  ' P^  4) 

a 03  05  Q,  a o„ 

o og?i+ 
1 r +j'a  5 
|6«2-S-g 

o‘5 


05  O 

O 


^ Sh 


''  X <D 


e 

o3  P 


=3 

. i-l 

“ !z  ^ cu 
S-(  tc  P g 
;>!%  03.9 


3 p 


i^oo5«W 

a^ 

w 


doi-iP' 

a*  * 

03 


S 2 

p^'aao^opjoz  4, 
g'®  S |jc.a^  o«.- ® g 

..go  .!5-ei^  o3  b 


1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

■ 1 1 > 

1 1 1 1 

1111 
1111 

1 1 

1 1 

1 ‘ 

1 1 

1 t 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Mi!! 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 
till! 

M i M 

1 1 4 

1 1 1 1 t 

j i I j4 

1 1 1 1 t 1 

1 1 1 1 1 I 

1 1 I 1 1 1 

I 1 t 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

till 
till 

1 I 1 1 
till 

till 

1 

1 

j 

i 

1 

1 

4 

P 

Ill  1 

1 1 1 rrj  1 

1 o I ' 

! ' > 

1 1 m 

1 "P  _ P m 

1 rt  1 1 1 1 

1 It  1 1 1 1 

i ;>  1 1 1 1 

1 1 

C ® 

bd  0-2 

OJ  OJ  O 

ffS  C3  CS  ^ 

I > 

i 

! 

I > 

1 P 

l'^ 

ii 

! o 

1 

1 a 

1 cz 

>» 

lb  a 

1 4 +5 

la^ 

4 

0 

I’p 

1 >> 

< o 

Salem  __.. 
Seymour 
Wheatfleli 
Grabill  _ 

'.S3  m 

1 ft  P 3 S 

1 2 tH  o ® 

1 p g •”  t: 

, p P..O  4 

1 p p^a 

1 

P f-i 

1 O O 

1 T3 

a 

I o 

1 3'S’^:'3 

g|?s 

p ft  p > 

1 ® W k!  5 S3 
1 4 ft3  m P IH 
, Sh  P 43  in  4 

1°  1 1 ■'  1 
i§.»p.S2a 

i 1 ^ 2 O 2.S2 

1 o *2  fl  'S  ^ 

1 ^ p P Ph 

|gg£ 

l'S5  ^ 

■SsS: 

OOfalfa 

•W 

'Q 

•CC 

ifalfaW 

lOQ 

'Ofa<i10fa 

ipqQfaPiO 

‘0^0, 

o g p 

^ .a  g 

® <u  <I_I  b ” -r 

'S'3  ° g g Q 

V - w OT 

U O ^ ^ 

<V  <D 

g d ^ M a 
K 

aasacog 

o o o o •::i  CO  o 

Jh  s-i  ^ 

^ ^ H-J  O %-t 

^ c bn 

-g  PJ  -p  -p  o 

® 4)  D 41  O p,  41 

2 to  to  w m 
™ ^ ^ o; 

.g  p;  ^3  ^3  ft  4 ^3 
0 0 4 4 3'«3  4 
b P g U 

g P P p 3 3 

(ii  a,  (1, 03  Ph 

1 1 1 1 1 i 


J P ” 5 HH 
•-I  pm  o p I-H 


. . J.  Sh  03  • 'iJ  ^ C • 

f>^<i3pqpqQn<:5QWQ 

a a 

03  03 


P ^ -P  ^ N 

"^3  b M c 

c .113  K M .S3  O 
bCM  p^.o  4 " o 

s“feS«Sn^ 
S'^p^»i“es 
.a  ^ fa  M d M ^ d 

'S  a a a a . a a 

>OOCCtCOO 
(p'dTi'd'd  o^"d 

t^(D(D<It(D4j(P(D 

ra  CG  U3  CC  CG  03 
'i>c^aJda5<i>c^a5 
"3,53  43  ^3  P3  ft.p  P3 
d'yooop'oo 

ppppp^pp 

03fafafa|li03fafa 

MINIM 

*OrHC»«^iaO 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  In  1916  (continued) 


•:iu90  jad  ‘aart'BAi  ui 
9iqnios  ‘o^X  ’qsB^Od: 


•JU90  jad 
‘moj, 


O ‘ 

2 ^ 
■&“• 
Ss 

3;  0 
P C3 

•4uao  jad 
‘I'e^oj, 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

1 i 1 1 1 1 

1 1 t i 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

i 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

\ 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

i 

1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

t 1 

II  II 

II  II 

II  II 

II  II 

II  II 

•^uao  jad 
‘aiqniosui 

a 

GO  Oi  0 10  rH  C5 

0 0 rH  ,-1  (M  rH 

0 CO  GO  0 

I-H  I-H  CM  01 

CO  rH  (M 

0 (M  i-H 

0 (M 

rH  C^l 

(M  fM 

i-H 

01  (M  (M 

1.6 

1.3 

1.0 

0.5 

•4uao  aad 
‘pajjaAaj 
pu-B  aiqnios 

OtMOr-lCOOCOCOOlOCOCsJOCOt—  OCOr'OOr^J-OOOOGOOOCiOOOCiGO  oi>. 

00  00  a303eOC00300CS340-^C0»3-^«^00  00f~C000COC»C»00  00OO00  06  000do03O 

O <M  O (M  O C<l  1 


oooooooooo«tooi 

rHr-trHr-iOrHCO<MCNJCOC'li 


'OOOJ>000^-rtH(MOOr- 

■(MC<lCO<MrH(MCCCOCOCO<M(>l'»- 


'«*<C000C00000O0if-l00Jr^G0C500O 

(MC<JOOOOrHOrHOOOOOrH 


00  GO  Oi  LO  O 

O O O I-I  t-I  r-l 


00  Ci 
O O 


•;uaD  joa 
‘0Ai:^OB  pu'B  0iqn 
-los  a0:^'BAV 


O CO  GO  00  I-H  O 
LO  LO  lO  LO  O 

o o o o o o 


TjH  c<l  o rH 
^ LO  O lO  00 
O O O O O 


O CO 
CO 

o o 


CO  CO 

o o c> 


*;u0D  aad  ‘oiu^S 
-JO  oiqniosui 
je^BiVi  eA^o'Bui 


(M  01  (N  CO 
O O O O O O 


GO  CO  GO  o a> 
(M  Csj  OJ  CO  r-i 

o o d o o 


CO  LO 
d o 


o o 


•:;uao  aad  ‘oiuisS 
-ao  aiqniosui 
jai'BAv  aAi^DV 


'luao  jad 
‘OfUBSao 

aiqnios  ja^BAi 


lO  o LO  lO 

1“(  (N  r-t  t-H  rH 

o o o o o 


C^l  (M 

d d 


i-H  rH  CO 
O O d 


<M  05  00  rH  rH 
r-^  O CD  (M  O <M 

d d d d d o 


<M  lO  CO  00  C5 
(M  CO  <M  lO 

o d d d d 


o o o 
d o d 


■:^uaa  jad  ‘s;];bs 
muouiui^  puH  sa:}Hj:} 
-t’u  UI  aiqnps  Ja;BA\ 


GO  i>  lO  00  CO  00 
Ol  (M  CO  O (M  rH 

o d o d o o 


o o o o o 


o o 
d o 


o o o 
d o o 


OG  G G GGCG 

^X2  oj'O'd'CC'O'C  c3'0't3'0t3T3  cS'O'O  oS'^  cS'O'O'O 

t;atHflciflc!ciatHGaaaGtHGGa!-.aatHcia!HflMaaa 

c3D=3:3ppp3;iSo3^33:3j3:3c3:3S3o333o33:3o3;zio3J3:3:3 

^30S000000300000P000;300P00P0P3000 


a 


03  3 D 
D O O 


s&g? 


S g 03  X'P  fl 

|||3g S 

cB®^^o0 


'OD 
u 
;3 

So|ag 


ra  V 
oj  ni;  <u 
ce  >•  -^ 

^ ^ C) 


3 ' 

1 1 3 

1 1 

424C3 

p: 

0 P>> 

+j  +3 

1 

! 

1 b'3 

i 

lQd| 

Ph  Ch 

Us 

30 

1 ^.Q 

1 O)  Q, 

I 0 

1 33 

03  03  “ 

1 +J  +3>  3 

n ^ 
p 03 

wS 

'Bq 

1 3 s 

1 >= 

' 0 
'O 

1,02  02  pi 

1^^  0 

isa 

^ c 
t-i  c 

03  3 
3 O 
OP4 


aa;  uopaadsui 


lBiDt,5J0 


*w  V 


S " 
2 

OD  «J 


Sa 


SI 


1^ 

is  1 s s s s < 


8 I8§ 

1 § § 1 S ' 

1 S CO  1 S I 

SS3 

!8i 

) CO  <e  CO  oo  CO  < 


I lO  CO  Cl  03  < 


o 

3 is  ' 

o S 

O l3  rS  ' 03 

'3  "S  ' 3 

S .SS  -2  g o 

S,  O 3 


S 9 0^ 

03  pi  Es 


-3 

a 


•3  „aj”t«o®^a39^cofi  tHO03a!^j3^cQo^'«g^“3a3g^o'«^3l 

M CK  ajCCCCMJCCCC 

■J1 


3 

o 

1-^  s 

CSO 

ft 

S c3 
O 05 

N 'O 


a;  G 

^ s 

aO 

dS 

3 

O 

cc 


'Joseph  Pinaire ' 5486 ' 5588  ' Ramsey 


0.73  I 0.00  I 0.10 


85 


CN  (M  (M 


O o (N  I 

O O O rH  O 1 


> IC  CO  ITS  CO  CO  GO 
I i-I  rH  O O O O 


.OOlOrH«^J>(M005T-i(MO(M 
I rH  O O Ol  C^’  O r-I  r-I  O rH  rH  t-H  rH 


co^r—OHj^'^r-ioof 

t>eocooo0090*^< 


■ O O C<J  I>  Ci 
Hjl  o6  CO  00 


O O Ci  o (M  rH  < 
00  CO  CO  J>  C5  05  Oi  ( 


a5ocoi>c<joj:^ 

O CO  CO  CO  <>3  oi 


) O C<J  (N  O < 


O O 00  ^ lO  lO  CO  CO 

rH  r-H  O O O O O O 


o o o 


• oq  CO 

I (N  rH 

) o o 


(M  O 
rH  O 

O d 


lO  LO 

o d 


rJH  CO  00  O 

f-H  rH  rH 

d d d d 


O O rH  O 

d o o o 


o o o o 


o o o o 


O (M  CO  <M 


ir:fi>  05 

d d d 


O (M 
O rH  O 

d d d 


OCOCvIlOI>OOq<M(N 

i-HrHrHodrHrHrHrH 


O rH  O CO  O CO 

C<J  <M  rH  (N 


O 00  O CO  O ^ 
05  00  d rH  CO  r-* 


O O lO  CO  o o 
rH  rH  O d rH  rH 


ICOO’^X>COOO*^CO 

(Or-Idooodo 


CO  GO  00  (>q  CO  05  00  CO  lO 
C0C0rHC<lOOOO(NC<l 


o o 


o o 


CO  (M 
o o 


C<J  CO 
o o 


CO  O f- 
lO 

o o o 


(M  (M  (N 

o"  o’  o 


T3t3'a  os'C'O'O'Ci  cS'O'Ci  cJ'O'OTJ 
aflatHflaaoMaasHflcia 
33Pc33;333c3^3303=iJ33 
000300003003000 


o3'3  03'^  ra'O  cs'O'O'O  c3"0 

;H3t^G(-(a3na;H333(Hn 
33c33cS30c33o333333 
303030030300030 


CS'O  03^  3^  C3^ 
(-,3sH3tHCs-(3;Hn 
C33033333OC33 
3030303030 
0PH0Pq0fi(0^0;^ 


' 1 ! 

1 

1 

1 

\ 

lilt 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 t 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 f 

1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 i 

1 i 1 

1 1 1 

1 I 1 

1 

J 

1 

1 

1 1 1 

! 1 ^ 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 ■ 

t c3  1 

1 

1 > ! 

i 1 1 

1 

1 1 1 

1 

1 1 3 1 

1 j 

;|  i 

1 

» 

1 

1 ! 1 0; 

1 1 a 

1 1 1 
) i 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 
> 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 P 1 

1 ' 

a 

i 1 3 

1 '0.2 

1 ^ 
QJ 

0 Sx) 

=2  s i>. 

1 

1 

1 0)  t>i  c3 

1 >»  ' 

1 tH  t>. 

1 

I 

1 ' >» 

1 t>.  ^ 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 0 ^ 
i-e  c2 

C5 

iS^S 

'.  E> 

1 a 

O <u  03 


^ t-  c£>  1 lO  < 

Ifeg! 

ift  CO  CC>  1 LQ  lO  < 


2S 


^ o3 


O §-3 


3 

QJ  O 

3 S 

I- 


li| 


|g 

1 riH  m 

1 <»  CO 

1 LO  1 (5 

0 • QD  rH 

P ! X> 

1 01  1 f-  - 

1 CO  1 0 D 

Ife  1^ 

1 ^ 

1 

1 e> 

! C>1 

1 05  1 LO  1 CO 

1 rH  1 LO  1 ^ 

ijag 

ScO 

iS^ 

1 LO  10  S 

1 ^ 1 c 
1 lO  1 cj 

0 1 (N  CO 

5 1 CO  CO 

IS  ISS 

is  IS 

1 s 

1 3 

IS  IS  IS 

1 LO  CO 

1 LO  CO 

lf3  IC  lO  30  ® so  (50 

igggiiiiiii 


|0( 

2-|( 
Q g_ 

^4U> 


1 a*  > 


a 

=1 

N TD 

^ a 

C3  <1? 

|lo 

PH  Sj  !h 

bfl  r-S 

.aw  2 

^ CQ 
tH  ^ (Ti 

TS  xi^ 

03  ^ 


o 

33  ! 

; 

.'2 
'0  ' 

5*  ^ 


0 5-a 


0 d- 

30 


J Pi  05 

! S § 

' rW 


.3 

a|« 

||s 

Eh  (15  ►-5 

so 

05 


Ph  33^ 


3 

3 

ft 

i» 

O 

a*  d 

33 


0 0^'^ 


2 !=* 

pj  S-l 

3 W 

•flW  gcd’a  ^ 
O . .00 

3^[^o  a^H5 

a a 

< < 


o 

13  10 
3 w I 3 I - 

ft^  1^^-S 

a Soo  ® 0.2 
2 os  § a0 

gpq 

s ^ gjSSl 


o t 
o cc  • 


in  00  J>  I 

^ in  ic  ' 


m 

d o 


c C 

I <1^  ^ 

1 

, ^ ^<t;  t c 

03  2«’S  --’S 
^4?-^  3 g W W 

,'^5K(g0333 

L-  • . . -aft 

I C “ w w 

J 0 >-5  ^ d ^3 

a a a a a a a 

0000000 

tn  t.  t. 


-3  3 -3  3 3 

<D  O (1)  <];  (X) 
VI  W U1  U2  U2 


:3  :3  :3  a d 
P-,  Ph  CL,  0^  Oh 

I M M 


-3  0 

05  05 
W (A 
3 3 


3 3 
0 &H 


I 3:  3! 
I 3 3 
1 O O 

1 a a 

1333 

I o o 

!S2 


— 05 

aw 

P 


ou  . 
3 ° 
30 


tuo'^  bn  ^ bo 

3 S.  3 (0  3 

3 ^ ^ 2 
V W!  CC  CC 


bS.30> 

aw  0 

rH  rH  .5  «2  Ch 

S) 

M2W  2.2 

^rO330^ 
ft^  ft*^  - 
3 

0.9  O s o 
0 0>  0 0 


o 

a 

33  N 3 3 
.03  0 0 
QH0a3M 

O 05  45 


< a 


05 

^=3 

33  ^ 
O 

W 


o .a  X 3 bu  bi) 

K?0S£2 

w ;-.  d 

3 2^2  • J 

.9  fc  ppb  0 W Ph  w 

1 a a a a a a 

^000000 

4J  (H  (t_l  d-l  PH  <1-1  PH 

o 

(D  po!  3 3 3 3 ' 

05  05  05  05  4)  05 
to  to  M !0  to  to 
45  3 3 3 cb  3 3 
3 3 3 3:  3 . 

0 0 0 C5  y 0 05 

9 t.  t.  t.  t.  tn  Sh 

3 3 3 3 3 3 

W Ph  Oi  CP  01  Ph  CV  I 

1 M I I i j . 


86 


o2 

43  o 
^ c3 


•:jU9D  a9(I 


•1U9D  J9(I 
‘9iqniosui 


•^U99  J9d 
•p9:;a9A9a 
pu-B  9iqnios 


qu90  J9(I  ‘J91'BA4.  UT 

9iqnios  ’qsiB^Od; 


•}U9D  J9(I 


•;U90  J9(l 

‘9AnOB  pu^  9iqn 
-los  a9;T3AV 


•JU90  a9d  ‘oiu^S 
-ao  9iqniosui 
a9^'BAV  9AnOBUI 


•1U90  a9d  ‘oiu'b3 
-JO  9iqniosui 
J9:t'BA\.  9AI^0V 


•1U90  J9d 
‘otu^Sjo 
9iqnios  j9a^A\ 


•^U99  J9d  ‘s:^x^s 
BIUOUIlUB  pUB  S9:)BJ:J 
-i"u  ui  oiqrqos  a9:jBA\ 


aa  uoT:;o9dsui 


1BTDT,P0 


^ a> 

S a 


OOO-^OICOCSOl 

COC<5ine*5100oirH 


(M  (M  C>l  (N 


O 01  r-l  01>CO  O 


O (N  (M  O • 

(M  (N  CO  00  r 


O o 00  O O OI 

(M  (N  rH  C<J  (>q  1 


i:^j>cot^oot^ooir:i>< 

OOOOOOlOt^Or-Ii 


O O 00  O O , 
CO  CO  CO  1>  J 


< O CN  O rH 
i CO  Ifi  00  GO  CO 


I CO  00  CO  CO  < 


iCOCOOlOrJ<lClCir^iOGOC 


) CO  O O ^ O 00 
) O O (M  (N  <N  rH 


I:-  o 
o o 
o o 


O O 1 o o 


I o o o 


I lO  iC  CO  » CO  CO  CC  I lO 
lOOO  lOOO  I o o o 


I O O lOOO 


' lO  I lO  C<J  (M 
) CO  t (N  <N  (N 

I rH  I o d d 


CO  I CO  CO 


lOOO  lOOO 


O O I (M  (M 

I o d 1 o d 


I t-h  CO  (N 

I d d d 


lOOO  lOOO 


O O O 

I o d d 


^ 1 
s 1 


O O I-H 

CO  CO  CO 


^ i: 


d ' ' 'a  ' ' ‘a  ' ' 'c  ' ' 'fl  ' ' ' ‘ ' 'fl  'c  ' ' 

g'd'O'O  §'^'0-0  d'O'a'o  §'aT3T)T)'a'ci'd'0  §-0  STJ-a 

^HaaasHatHajHflaa^iciciCMflaoaaoaa^HcitHGa 

csaacsjsossacaaDojaaacsasacsaaacsasacaaDDaaaascsaosaa 

aooaoaooaooDoooaoooaoooaoooaooooooooaoaoo 


*“l  — — *-<  _ w 

03  '5  ^ C3  'O  ^ 

a a ;h  a jh 

c3  ;3  :3  c3 


^ a 

<v 


O <M  I i?5 

53S  153 


1 


Ph  'Phcc 


ca  o 

mo 


o ca  d 

SMO 


I O)  PS  03 


«D  * 
o?  O q; 

r1  Jh  4J 
ce  O 2 

g’S'G 


..  :a  o ! a a o 

;ziO«  immS 


c£)  ^ I lO  Lft  1^5  I Ift  CD  ‘ 


^ o;  I 

mpq  iJ 

4<1  x3  'o  ® 

o a -(j  2 •”  oj  S 

ui  oa)^^f-ca3  a 

pqc^mCmmPnO 


1 to 


iS^SoSo^l 

1 S§  fe  te  S I 


, tp 


\U  iSi 


O OJ 

tuo  d 
ca  o 
"pq 
43^ 
O ^ 

- =3 

>>m 


Sm 

5 


gg 

QJ 

m« 

6W 
<1^  . 


>.c» 

rr-l 

.S  a 
m o 

t-, 

rJ^O 


ca  ca 
PhOJ 


m x} 

m ^ 

^ O OS 


• o 


'SS 


6 

jgO| 


C3  i*  ° o 
<u  2 ^ 43 

d ^ g m o ^ 

1^  pij  a « o o) 

“c^sli 

. q;  ^ ^ C3 

r^Oi^OOoJ 

!(;  .„  * * * 

m 


'T"  'a  a> 


aj  fafl  O 

wgm 

>1  - ® 
0-®  43 


m”  >. 
>1  ® 

T3  ® ■ 

gs.s 


6 I 


^ b£  • 

>2  a o 

oO 

^ Sh 

4^  .1 

-2  Sl^  °-n 
Sa.a^ 


8/ 


o o c<i  Oi  lo  ' 
-5  rH  rH  O O T 


1 rH  rH  O O O O O O rH  i-I  O C^*  O i-I  rH  r-  rH  (M  1 


) lO  O 1-H  rtH  C<J  O (M 

I (N  t-h  rH  1-H  CO  rH  O'! 


-ilOGOCOOTtlKtirH'-^COOlrHOCOOr— COCiOOOlOCOCOOlftOlOOCilOiOi-^mOi-i'^eMCOOC 

«o6i>^r-c<i(MC<j<Mci(Ncococi6r-(>q^’^T-Mcqcooo5P500oooor^oooocdr'<M<M’<M»-^oc4< 


"-00r-0  005000< 
SC^CM(Mi— lOr- (r-tt— 1< 


I o Ci  o C:>  o 

I CO  c<i  Co’  (N  CNJ  CO 


1 o as  o o 


JSCOOSOOXOSOOCSOSOOOOOCO* 

DOOOOOOOOOOrHrH 


I X X GS  00  o CO  o 1 

» O O O O rH  O r-*  1 


O X CS  CO  Irt  ^ O J 

1-1  O O rH  rH  f-H  r-I  1 


.i>COCOCOlOlOJC^CO 


^XC<ICO  1 X X (N  t- J>- Ci  (N  IX  IIOOtJHO  I CO O O 

0*^10-^  1 lO  ICIO  LC  lO  ^ Gi  IX  1 lO  CO  LO  CO  i^i>J>Xi>- 

booo  lOOOOOOO  lo  lOOOO  1 Cli  o o o o 

o 

XOXr-HGi  l<MT}HCOCOCOi> 
000X0  li-ii-ii-^OT-^C<J 

OrHi— IrHrH  li—li— li— Ii-Ht-Hi— 1 

O 0^  CC  ICdt^XXXrHX  'IM  IIOOCOO  I'ct^COCOOO 

NJXXX  IXCNXXC^IXO  llO  i(NX(M'^  l(NXXXX 

3000  lOOOOOOO  jO  jOOOO  lOOOOO 

CO 

(M 

o 

l>Oi>-Gii-H  1 X CO  X 

IC 'Tti  LO  X CO  1 X TJH  LO  X 

ooooo  ioooooo 

i'qOiOCO  lrHlOC<IJ>lOi-l<N  ICO  I’^GilO"*^  IIOIOIOXX 

M i-H  rH  (N  1 X (M  X CN  (M  X (M  jX  I CN  (N  <N  I lO  lOlO  CO  lO 

OOOO  lOOOOOOO  lO  lOOOO  lOOOOO 

lO 

o 

•^(MCOJt^X  tXOQCXr-i|r- 
XXXXLO  IX'^XIOCOLO 

OOOOO  IOOOOOO 

01>l>x  .'XXir^XXCdO  iiH  iGiX'^CO  iXCOCOiOGS 

Nr-li-HO  ii-HrHOr-trirHLO  IrH  lOOOX  li-Hi-HrHr-iO 

OOOO  lOOOOOOO  iO  lOOOO  iOOOOO 

CO 

X 

o 

O CO  X X ^ . rH  rJ4  c<j  (^0  rt<  O 

(NX'^Jt^CN  l■^^^•^'^X(MJ> 
OOOOO  1 o ci  O O O O 

?H(NCOJ>  l-^lOXiMOCOO  irH  lC<lXlOO  IXXX(MX 

Hr-lrHi-H  IrHrHi— ii— lrHOC<J  l**^  l(MC<JC<JO  lOOOOO 

OOOO  lOOOOOOO  IO  lOOOO  lOOOOO 

X 

o 

O C<J  T}H  rH  i>.  1 X O CO  O 1-1  O 

XX^MCNfM  lXXX(MXO 

OOOOO  IOOOOOO 

a> 


<v 


q'_ C3  Q r-,  „„  „ 

:iGflanflflqaflfloi^ci^GflaafcHGfiac}c;;-.c4^aciflGfljHaaGaflfl 

OSDPc3p^3ppPJ3Dc3:Oc3pp^3:303^5aPPP03^3c3Pj3;D^:Oc3P^3:3:3pp 

DOOOPOOOOOOOPOPOOOOPOOOOOPOPOOOOOPOOOOOO 


('300 
iS ^ o 
c3_G^ 

i^P^S 


1 rt 

„ I fe 

'3-’  5 ® ' cl 

O a>  4^  d '5 

IS 

tic's  P tc  I q 
o q M I a 
O o I q 


IS  issfefeiss  IP 


i fl 
' & 
fl  a fl  o 
o O O S 

a a s:i) 

q q q a 
WWMM 


q 

a 

« ^ s « 

2 cW-2^ 
o O 

MpqCgO 


) t-  <M 


^ bo 
m H 
O)  q 


'O  i!5 


^ o , 

O 'O  C!|  I "O 
4J  a “ fl 

& S 2 S Cl  o 

-g-g  a.s  a a 

q^Sn'M 

^ q o o 1 ^ jr  o .S 

QhPOAh  iWOCe^tDW 


8II§I 

lO  IC  U3  CO  CO 


o 

t-l 

s o 

Cl 

Oq 

W (H 


a>w 


5 2 


CC  03 

S o 


^ a ^''  2 

;:r  ew  H ;h  • iO: 

oW 


K>  o; 

- O; 


-Isis 

t>-  - o®  • 
* * * 


ph  a 

^ o o o 

C^  02  “02 
O kT* 

'IS'^S  q Cm  W<J 

ag€l2« 

W ^ ^ ^ 

.OP  . d 


S ^ 

S ^ 03  M 

02^2  a 


'§q^. 


.o  _ 
;.a  o o 

csOxi 

' S 

> '^  a? 

§2" 
■ a p 


gw 

G.S 

.-a 

HS  q 

. q 


o 03  q 03  ® q X! 

l?|S(So5 

OSS'S  .g. 
»g»^oio 


Q ® 
ft 
bo  02 

§ ot^ 
^”1 
iso 

q 


^ I _ 

® o 

o o .S  Q 

O oMW  « 

,•  a • j ^ 

W So 

q rrt  . 
^SwW^ 


g 

o 

o 

5| 


'r  o)  K. 

|SS^ 

Q w 

• 03 

M 03  t*  •« 

^ u 

aagg 

O O o o 


qj  fq  1 
03  ® 

to  to 


iSSiSS 

Jill 

r-l  fl  m T(< 
to  tt>  to  ® 


c 

o 

m 

q 

a 

03  q.  03  g 

C^  c^q  Cd  ^ 
® ® 03  02  * 

) bo  bD  bo  . 

q q q 02 

H p,  ft  ft 

® ® ffi  a 

® ® ® o 

02  72  02  ^ 

. . . t3 

tq  tq  tq  03 

03  ® ® to 

C C c g 

S-  tH  W 

C q C 03 1 

+J  +j  +J  Sh 

03  ® ® q 
Pi  Ph 

MM 

t-  00  c>  o 


s a , • 
2 

§ 

2^1  o 

ft  03  +3 

Sto 

q ® 

Jp  Q, 

a s 
M 


ft  to 


0)  O 

w 

q . 

W c 


^2” 
c ® 
O bo 
cU  q 

o ft 

tJ  <12 


03  <12 

bo  ^ 
q q 
ft  ft 

03  ® 
0)  ® 
02  02 


ft  ^ 

■M  ® 


2 't!  ^ 

3 ft  CO  a 

! CL 

' d tD  -t_> 

Q,  CO  0) 


^ * O TO  • 

ft. 


. <M  d ^ ^ o - 
^CO  0^02 

g03^^  ” 

SSal^aa- 

I ft"^  .§ 

q'^'dao'ci'^o'^'tJ 

^D3®2+3®®2a303 

«.aqsH<i2qq(Ni.aq 

aq^  ®a^^lo  qft 
--qoft^ooTH-uo 
qCt^  Es-t^t  a u 

qoq  qqq  oq 

MOP^  02PHai  OPh 


St  ij  Pi 


h3  ft 


to  03 

K W 

ft  ft 


1-5 

Ma 

w St  o 
to  ft  St 
. ft'*-' 


X X X 

o <=■  o o 

tH  M U St 

ft  „ ft  ft 
ft  2 ft  ft 


<d  .:: 

c3  o c3  c3 

■M  CO  -M  •<-> 


Ml  I 


o o 

T\ 


Report  of  Inspection  of  Fertilizers  Collected  in  1916  (continued) 


88 


89 


lOOO^lCOO 
OOOOi-^  OrHrHCOCO 


00  1> 
(M  C<1 


>JiOl>-(NlrtmiOC000’^in>00O500»OCO^lOC54^00C0C0lO'^ 

lT-»CO<Mi-10r-lOOOrHOOOrHr-iC'lf-lr4rHOrHr-Ioc^’ 


O O rH  O O O O O O CO 
oo’odcoooci  OOOOO 


OCOOOOiOCOOmOO(MOC<J'^r-tO(Ma5J^-Oi 
00  00  o 03  CO  O oi  O r-I  lO  00  I>  00*  CO*  CO  CO  rH  I 


■OOOO^rHOOl 

lOiCiCOTt^COCOOOOO* 


O O C) 
C<J  03  i-i 


o o o 

03  03  03 


O O O 03 


03  03  03  03  03 


oooooaicoooo'«^,-<^iocoi>ooT 

OOr-lOr-lrH03  03COOOOOOT 


05  05 

d d 


CO  00 

d d 


CO  Tji  lO 

o o d 


03  03 

d d 


03  T-H  rH  I 00  CO 

d o d I o o 


iO  05 
03  t-i 

d d 


iO  O 03  I LO 
rH  CO  » IC  CO 

o o o I o d 


CO  lO 

d o 


O CO  I CO  00 

O O O I .-I  rH 

odd  I d o 


1h  o o 

d d d 


I i:^  00 

I o o 


?t<  LC  O 
Z>  03 

odd  1 


03 

^3  O 


a p 
^ a ^ ^ 

ci  p p P p 

P O O P o 

O Ph  CD 


o d ti  a 
03  d d d d 
d o o d o 


i_i  'd'd'd''d'd 
03^'d  03^3  S'd  03^3  cs'dJ'd'd 

■ - ^ - c3d!-i^ 


i-i  ' ' "d  ' d ' ' 

Mdddsnddd^ddf-td^ndd 
^ — 


tnCJdi-idfHdt-idds-idMdddsHddd^Hddf-td^Hdd 

csddo3dcs3o3ddo3do3dddo3dddddde3dcddd 

doodododoododooodooodoododoo 


a> 

d d 
d 03  d 

o d o 
P^OPtH 


Ferdinand 

Mimcie 

Portland 

Rushville 

Rushville 
Milroy  __. 

Portland 

Jasper  __. 
Carlisle  _. 

Burney  _. 

Jasper  __. 

Star  City 
Jasper  ... 

Huntingtc 

Glenwood 

Huntingtc 

Mooresvill 

Deputy  _. 
Glenwood 
Wheatflelc 

Greensbur: 

Scottsbur, 

Scottsbur, 

Liberty  _. 
Greensbur, 
Kouts 

|l 

1 I -9 

1 1 -H 

1 I 0 i 
1 '^! 

is  i|i 

1 CO  1 lb  10 

5673 

IS 

gg  Ig 

® 8 

6640 

1 rH  CO 

1 ill 

<^  1 K rH 

S iili 

<0  cp  $5 
to  10  10 

'^00  <05  1 1:^  10  ^ 1 CO 

CO  1 1 eg  CD  C5  1 Q5  , 

CO  ICO  » & ^ CO  i ^ 

10  cO  1 CO  1 lO  lO  »0  1 CO  1 

<13 


ggggg  ggggg 


IOIOLOLOLQCOCO^COCOCOCOCOCOCO^CO^COCOOCOCOOCOCOCOCOCDCD< 


s 93 

a o 
a CP  d 


13  d O 
<33  d 


d a 

<13  3^ 

2 ° 

i 3 d 

-.-a  ! S' 

>>d  d 

lli|5 

S-^  >>S 

0 .2  s 3 .2 

Jh  Ph  <^h  rr^  ^ 1-#^ 

3 la  n a CO  O 
3-(tH  d^'SS^i 
93  c3  - ■ - 


O 


g§ 

a - 

a 42 
O d 


do® 


93  f-i  > ” 
+p»  g G 


a?  ^ M 

d P 9 


OJ  >1  <« 

o > o 


2 

a d 


^Oaa 

^^.sl 

PM 


M S H o 


I ^ ll  CP  CP  M M 
* * 


d > 

2® 

f-i 

d 

9 

.2  ^ 

!a 


d 

S ~ M 

O > aa  d aa  •;= 

d ^ '-9>  O 

4d  ^ ^ ^ 

o g 2 


93  ^ cj 
<X>  ,P 
C3  > > 


G S > 

^ a US  ft  0?  3 
cc  ft,  oi  “ 
>0^0 

rg  ^ rQ  ^ ^ 


JCP;l^ 


<33  M 

> a s 

d 
a 93 

:a« 


be  ! 


Q ^2 
.CD 
P5  0. 


^ bfl^  ^4.^  tjjjQ  3 

^•5^s^a§d|«2 

-<  .<D-r5  3Hdj-')ao3tH3H.^^2cq 

.ojTDtc'^  . 

dg^A<o9giD.dOO^^"’ 


a 

S'  d 


'^.sj  a 


oMfi^  ga:c  St®  gftwa  Sw 

***S*  2 0***0 

CD  ^ O 


, * — Sample  received  in  spring  aso — purchased  from  W.  P.  Pierce 

“ Purchased  from  A.  Henderson  & Co.,  Chicago,  111.  281 — Sample  to  Mfr.  See  page  32 

Returned.  See  page  29  282 — Returned.  See  pages  29  and  32 

Purchased  from  Henry  Otte  asa — Purchased  from  Fred  Reddleman 


90 


'luao  jad 

0 - 

31  CL 

•juao  jad 

§■3 

•aiqniosui 

3 u 
Ph  c3 

•juao  aad 
‘pa:^aaAaa 
pu-B  aiqniog 

•juao  jad  ‘aaTBAi  ut 
aiqnios  ’qsB^Od: 


•;u9o  aad 


ir5i:-o-^iocoJt~»j:5rHincooinif505iooi 

rH  ,-H  (N  rH  i-H  O d i-i  i-H  i-i  O I-H  rH  i-I  i-H  (m' 


CO'^OCiOC^OlTiOOO 

C^COOCOTH(NC<ioiC> 


oocomooO’^oirto-«i<ooo(No<M 

rH(M(N(M*i-HrH(NX00rH(N050i  00  00OO 


;i-;^OCOOCOOiOOi 

icdtl>o6oc^Ic^<NCirH 


O Ci  O O 

00  1--*  J>^  05  00 


OO000O(M0(NO0 

rHr-li-lr-lr-trHrHCOOOr-trH 


IOGO'^^OOOOI> 

tC^rH(M^OrHrHrH 


•}uao  jad 

1 

1 0 :3»  CO 

1 r--  CO  00 

1 10 

l+ti 

CO 

CO 

10 

1 

1 

05 

1 00  in 

1 CO 

1 0 

‘aAna^  puB  ajqn 

1 (M  05 

1 10 

(M 

(M 

1 

1 

1 0 I— 1 

' '®. 

1 0 

-los  aaiBAY  IB^OJ, 

1000 

1 

1 rH  0 

1 

d 

1 

1 

1 rH  rH 

I"^ 

d 1 0 d 1 rH 

■)uao  jad  ‘oiubS 

1 0 CO  (M 

I 0 )0 

1 CO 

lO 

1 

j 

1 CM  10 

1 

1 1 10 

CO  i CO  CO  1 CO 

1 0 

-JO  aiqniosut 

1 ^ CM  (M 

1 . . . 

1 fM 

CM 

CO 

1 CM  CM 

1 

1 

ja^BAV  aAi^oBui 

1000 

1 

1 0 0 

t 0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

d 

1 d d 

i 0 

0 1 d 0 id 

1 0 

■;uao  jad  ‘oiubS 

1 C<J  GO  i-H 

1 CO  0 

1 ,-H 

lO 

CO 

0 

i 

1 

1 05  CM 

1 10 

CO  1 T-i  0 1 CO 

l CM 

-JO  aiqniosui 

1 (M  CnI  CO 

1 t-h  (N 

1 10 

(M 

rji 

LO 

1 

1 10  LO 

1 0 

rH  1 CM  CM  1 CM 

1 CM 

Ja:^BA^.  aAtioy 

> 0 0 0 

1 

1 0 0 

1 0 

0 

d 

0 

1 

1 

1 

0 

1 d d 

d 1 d d 1 rH 

1 d 

•;uaa  jad 

1 

i (M  C>  rH 

I 0 CO 

1 CO 

0 

S 

1 

1 

05 

1 CO  CO 

1 1-. 

i 1 

m 1 10  CO  1 05 

• ^ 

‘oiubSjo 

1000 

1 O.rH 

1 <M 

0 

rH 

1 

1 

1 ^ CO 

1 10 

CM  1 Tt<  10  ICO 

1 0 

aiqnios  ja^BAi 

1 0 0 0 

1 

1 0 0 

1 d 

d 

0 

d 

d 

1 d d 

1 d 

0 1 d d id 

1 d 

•i^uao  jad  ‘siqBS 

1 

1 CO  CO  CO 

1 TjH  10  10 

1 GO  05 

1 0 

CM 

00 

1 

1 

1 

! 

00 

1 CO  0 

1 0 

10  100  10 

1 rH 

BIUOUIUIB  pUB  Sa;Bj; 

1 0 10 

1 00 

0 

oq 

iO 

f 

1 

1 

1 0 0 

1 

0 1 0 0 10 

1 '^• 

-I'u  ui  a[qnxos  jai^B^vv 

1000 

1 

1 r-^  d 

1 d 

d 

d 

1 

1 

J 

1 

0 

I d d 

1 ^ 

d 100  j 0 

I 0 

O O 


^ CO  O CO  m 1 


00CC'^OrHl>O^’^ 

OOOr-ir-irH(NrHf-I 


aa;  uouaadsui 


I'BIOIJJO 


S ^ 

S " 

o 

I® 

ft  M 


Sa 


r-i  ^ a c w R 

os'tJ'O'a  o3’5'2  OS'S  OS'S  c3’5  ca'2 
e3ddde3dd03dc3dc33033033 
30003003030303030 


es'O'g  cs'O  oS'O'O  cs-O 
^^aanatHOdMd 
ca33ra3d3O033 
3003030030 

0Ph^0^0Ph^0^ 


3 3 3 3 

03'Oc3^^3^3U 
^3(H33tH3!-i3 
c3333333«3 
303003030 
0 fsH  0 Ph  0 ^ 0 Ph 


I I ! I I 


3 


83 

c»o 


1 fcjo 

' !=*  s 

.'■^  9 


I 3 

'0<J 


i8g  IS 
1 o «D  8 I fe  id 


S IS 


3 3 
I ^ & 
1 o o 


QJ  <B 
I tuo  bfl 
! 3 3 

'MIH 


i IS 


3 3 
o o 


OJ  O) 

bfl  be 

3 3 

MM 


2^ 

'OW 


igggggg: 


I ro  lo  ^ t- 


c<i  lo  13  IS  M « 

gisssssi  §i; 


'#^ioiocr>cD«?'C> 


mil 

M M ift  d 


30 

3 

ftrf 
S 3 
O 3 

*^.9 


9 ^ ^ 

OJ  3'  O 
^ 3 rv  3 

^•3  0 0 


S ^ U 
^ S « 3 9 


02 


0 3 


O 

OQ  ^ 


3-3  0 


OJ  M ^-1 

2 3 3 

3 3 Ph 

^ ^ 


^ N ^ 3 Q _ 

.2§=2  ft-g^i 

oi  tc  ^ S , 

a o a^S  S 


b£ 

3 


^hQj  ^ 3 cpq 

I ^0  3 


^ 30 

i3i'  r1r-Hqj3^ 


33 
ft 

o 

33 

3 3*^ 

3 3 73 

9 2a 

_'a'a<t3' 

lisi 


9 2 § 9 

S S ^ 2 

‘S  'S  Cu  '3 


00 

m O 00 

pcoga 


M £■ 


o 3 ;g 
V 3£$ 
33’^ 

•sl:^ 


a2pq  3 W0 

be*  ♦ 


'SM'2|^od'  . 

03  3§3PP 

30  £0  3S0W33W 

S* 

Ph  02 


§*|  § 

PP  3 <J 


3 

^ -73 

9 g 


O 02 


5 PQ  CO  *0 


CO  CO  *1^ 

^ ^ 9 

bfl  tie  ^ 

9_9  ^ 

<1<1t3 

* -s 


5:3  ’S  0 3 S 

030 

■ ' " 3 •'  7 - 


3 

3' 

'0.3 


+3  3.0) 


bot-l  be  M 3 bx) 
3^3333 
3 .<  <j  3 <j 
*3*  3 

b PP 


3 j_;  ft 

S 2^  9 

O 0 3 

.2^  0 12:10 


'S! ! 

•r.  • ^ ° 

OPP  3I-ST3I-S 


91 


o 

5^ 


oO 

PQ  0)  ts 

SO) 

'St;  ” c 

> O e b 

aS 

n 4)  M 
^ o w § > 
M U "S  ^ 
■?  a^-S  " 


^ o 
j o a; 
I— I 1-^ 


H S S 

O C CD  O O 

U ^ r-,  U U 

«M  <M  CD  «w  «w 

-a  a 

<U  (P  <D  0) 

w to  w w 

t'S  a ■!::  a a 

a o 1^  o o 

li  t,  s^ 

3 a 3 a 

1? 

00  OJ  © rH 

CO  00  © © 


^ 5 

ft  ^ 

0)  a 5 

- ss 

s^P 

boii  a ™ ^ 

a 3 a W fL| 


92 


TABLE  VII. — Mechanical  Condition  (Fineness)  of  Rock  Phosphate  Samples 

Secured  in  1916 


LABEL 

Number 

Taken  at 

Total  phos- 
phoric acid, 
P2O5, 
per  cent . 

Passing 

percent.* 

0 

<D 

Official 

Inspection 

BB. 

Guaran- 

teed 

Found 

50  mesh 

80  mesh 

100  mesh 

Not  passing 
80  mesh,  pei 

Central  Phosphate  Company, 

Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

Tennessee  Phosphate  Koek 

5040 

5923 

South  Bend 

28.0 

22.0 

96 

81 

75 

19.0 

Tennessee  Phosphate 

Farmers  Ground  Rock  Phosphate  Company, 

5261 

5899 

South  Bend 

32.0 

27.9 

94 

78 

73 

22.0 

Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

“Farmers  Ground  Phosphate  XXX 

4896 

6004 

Inglefield  

30.0 

25.2 

96 

79 

74 

21.0 

Federal  Chemical  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

5252 

5270 

Fort  Wayne  __  _ _ 

29.7 

27.8 

96 

90 

89 

10.0 

Daybreak  Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

5262 

5200 

Brookville 

29.7 

29.7 

97 

91 

89 

9.0 

Daybreak  Ground  Phosphate  Rock  

5252 

5864 

Elkhart 

29.7 

27.4 

94 

81 

87 

10.0 

16.0 

Daybreak  Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

5252 

5965 

Knightstown  

29.7 

27.3 

95 

84 

81 

Daybreak  Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

5252 

6008 

Fort  Wayne 

29.7 

30.4 

98 

92 

89 

8.0 

Daybreak  Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

Jones  Phosphate  Company,  The  Robin, 

5262 

•6505 

Knightstown  

29.7 

28.9 

93 

82 

82 

18.0 

Nashville,  Tenn. 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

5451 

5353 

Middlebury  _ 

28.0 

26.1 

93 

85 

83 

15.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

5451 

5741 

Spades  

28.0 

20.2 

100 

90 

88 

10.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock  

5451 

5870 

Hobart 

28.0 

28.4 

99 

93 

89 

7.0 

Mt.  Pleasant  Fertilizer  Company,  Inc., 

Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

Mt.  Pleasant  Untreated  Phosphate 

4108 

5475 

Wheatfield  

28.0 

31.5 

99 

89 

87 

11.0 

Mt  Plpfipant  TTntrfintpd  Phosphate 

4108 

6011 

Paoli  

28.0 

31.3 

99 

91 

87 

9.0 

Mt^^,  Pleasant  Untreated  Phosphate 

4198 

6013 

Cynthiana  

28.0 

31.5 

99 

94 

91 

6.0 

Mt.  Pleasant  Untreated  Phosphate 

Prairie  State  Phosphate  Company, 

4198 

6080 

Bedford  _ 

28.0 

32.0 

100 

90 

90 

10.0 

Chicago,  111. 

r^rfiiiTid  PoeV  Phosphate 

4516 

5803 

Rose  Lawn  

28.5 

27.6 

97 

77  ■ 

72 

23.0- 

r4ronnd  Roelr  Phosphate 

4516 

6316 

South  Bend  __  

28.5 

27.1 

99 

82  , 

77 

18.0 

Ruhm,  Jr.,  John,  Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock — _ 

4480 

5303 

Plymouth  

23.0 

29.7 

99 

95 

92 

5.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

4480 

5304 

Plymouth  

23.0 

29.4 

99 

96 

94 

4.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock . 

4480 

5305 

Plymouth  

23.0 

20.4 

99 

96 

94 

4.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

4480 

5676 

Bass  Lake  Jet 

23.0 

30.5 

99 

96 

93 

4.0 

Phosphate  Roelr 

4480 

5722 

Vincennes  _ 

23.0 

27.6 

100 

97 

94 

3.0 

Phosphate  Rock 

4480 

5936 

Garrett  

23.0 

31.8 

100 

96 

93 

4.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

4480 

6037 

Garrett  

23.0 

31.8 

100 

96 

93 

4.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock  

4480 

6010 

Laketon  

23.0 

32.8 

99 

97 

95 

3.0 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock  

4480 

6330 

LaPorte  

23.0 

30.6 

IW 

98 

95 

2.0 

* — Siftings  made  by  the  dry  method 


TABLE  VIII. — Firms  Certifying  Materials  for  Home  Mixing  For  Sale  in  1917 


MATERIALS  CONTAINING  NITROGEN 
Nitrate  of  Soda 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The,  Detroit, 
Sales  Department,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Armour  Fertilizer  "Vyorks,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

D.  & K.  Fertilizer  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Empire  Guano  Company,  New  Albany  Sales  Depart- 
ment, New  Albany,  Ind. 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Columbus,  0. 
Federal  Chemical  Company,  The,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Fessenden,  F.  L.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Company,  New  Albany,  Ind. 
Louisville  Fertilizer  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Mt.  Pleasant  Fertilizer  Co.,  Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 
Nitrate  Agencies  Co.,  Western  Branch,  Columbus,  O. 
Rauh  & Sons  Fertilizer  Co.,  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Read  Phosphate  Co.,  New  Albany  Sales  Department, 
New  Albany,  Ind. 

Smith  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  Indianapolis  Fac- 
tory, Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Woodward  & Dickerson,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Castor  Pomace 

Toledo  Seed  & Oil  Company,  Toledo,  Ohio. 

Dried  Blood 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Smith  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  Indianapolis  Fac- 
tory, Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Tankage 

Ballard  Packing  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

Dryfus  Packing  & Provision  Co.,  LaFayette,  Ind. 
Eckhart  Packing  Co.,  Fred,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
Globe  Fertilizer  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Goldreich  Fertilizer  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Company,  New  Albany,  Ind. 
Major  Bros.  Packing  Company,  Mishawaka,  Ind. 
Nitrate  Agencies  Co.,  Western  Branch,  Columbus,  O. 
Pearl  Packing  House,  Marion,  Ind. 

Pero  & Stoecker,  Louisville,  Ky. 


Rauh  & Sons  Fertilizer  Co.,  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Smith  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  Indianapolis  Fac- 
tory, Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Stolle  & Sons,  Anton,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Wachtel  Rendering  Plant,  John,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 


MISCELLANEOUS 
Basic  Slag 

Tennessee  Coal,  Iron  & Railroad  Company, 
Birmingham,  Ala. 

Wing  Seed  Company,  The,  Mechanicsburg,  O. 

Dried  Manure 

Chicago  Feed  & Fertilizer  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Indianapolis  Rendering  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Packer  Fertilizer  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Pulverized  Manure  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 
Rauh  & Sons  Fertilizer  Co.,  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Rock  Phosphate 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Go.,  Bowker  Ferti- 
lizer Works,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Buhner,  Ferdinand  F.,  Seymour,  Ind. 

Central  Phosphate  Company,  Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 
Empire  Guano  Company,  New  Albany  Sales  Depart- 
ment, New  Albany,  Ind. 

Federal  Chemical  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Company,  New  Albany,  Ind. 
Jones  Phosphate  Co.,  The  Robin,  Nashville,  Tenn. 
Mt.  Pleasant  Fertilizer  Company,  Mt.  Pleasant, 
Tenn. 

Read  Phosphate  Company,  New  Albany  Sales 
Department,  New  Albany,  Ind. 

Ruhm,  Jr.,  John,  Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

Smith  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  Indianap- 
olis Factory,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Tobacco  Dust 

Federal  Chemical  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Fluhrer  Tobacco  & Snuff  Co.,  Boonville,  Ind. 
Hopkins  Fertilizer  Company,  New  Albany,  Ind. 


94 

• TABLE  IX. — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917 


LABEL 

j 

Official  number  , 

Nitrogen,  N,  d 

per  cent.  12  ' 

b 3 

Potash,  KgO,  soluble  o ^ 

in  water,  per  cent.  g g,  j 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid,  | ^ g: 

P2O6.  P®’’  cent.  1 0 5 

manufa 
less  ti 

0 . 

“1 
ft  5 

0)  0 

CO  •'H 

ictur- 

lan 

c 

1- 

1 5 

20 
^ Cl 

5 '3 

Oo 

H d 

Alphano  Humus  Company,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

Prepared  Alphano  Humns  . 

6928 

1.2 

0.5 

0.5 

0.5 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

Cleveland  Dryer,  XXX  Snperphnaphat^^ 

2803 

14.0 

Zell’s  Dissolved  IRone  Phosphate  . _ 

2809 

14.0 

Bradley’s  Corn  & "Wheat  Phosphate  _ 

2813 

"oTs 

"iTo 

10.0 

Bradley’s  Niagara  Phosphate  1 

2817 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

IIII 

IIII 

Reese,  Half  & Half  _ _ _ 

2880 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

Reese,  Elm  Phosphate 

1 2881 

14.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda  . . _ 

4649 

i^o 

Bradley’s  Soluble  Dissolved  Bone  Phosphate 

5921 

iiTo 

^ft%  Aeid  Phosphate  , 

5923 

16.0 

iTo 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  Bowker  Fertilizer 

Works,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Bowker’s  Grain  & Grass  Grower 

4626 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.5 

Bowker’s  Aeid  Phosnhate 

5316 

16.0 

Bowkers  Floats  . 

5711 

33I0 

Bowker’s  Harvest  Bone  Phosphate 

5764 

"o^s 

i.o 

8.0 

5765 

14.0 

Bowker’s  Special  Wheat  Grower 

6201 

o's 

1.0 

10.0 

Bowker’s  High  Grade  Fertilizer,  1916  _ 

6265 

2.4 

1.0 

10.0 

Bowkers  General  Crop  _ 

6266 

1.6 

1.0 

10.0 

Bowker’s  Speeial,  lOlfi 

6267 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 

Bowker’s  9 — Ammoniated  Aeid  Phosphate 

6269 

1,6 

12.0 

Bowker’s  9 — 19  Ammoniated  Aeid  Phosphate  . _ 

6270 

1.6 

10,0 

Bowker’s  1 — 10  Ammoniated  Aeid  Phosphate 

6271 

0.8 

10.0 

Bowker’s  No  1 Raw  Rone  

6723 

3,2 

20.0 

Bowker’s  Aeid  Phosphate  with  Potash  1916 

6729 

1.0 

12'o 

Bowker’s  Crop  and  Cereal  Grower 

6762 

~L6 

1.0 

8.0 

Bowker’s  Harvest  Queen 

6763 

0.8 

• 2.0 

8.0 

Rowker’s  Ground  Bone 

6765 

1.6 

27~a 

Bowkers  Wheat  & Clover  Grower  1916 • 

6856 

0.8 

'i’o 

ii’o 

— 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  Detroit  Sales 

Department,  Detroit,  Mich. 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Square  Deal  Phosphate  . . 

4430 

14.0 

2.0 

Packers  Boars  Head  Brand  Faultless  Grain  Grower 

4437 

'o’s 

”i?o 

7.0 

i.'o 

Paekers  Boars  Head  Brand  Gilt  Edge  Phosphate.  _ . 

4442 

14.0 

2.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Raw  Bone 

4533 

’3"2 

22I0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  16%  Phosphate 

5931 

16.0 

1.0 

Packers  Boar’s  Head  Brand  Ammoniated  Bone  Phosphate  and  Potash. 

5933 

’0?8 

”lo 

io!o 

2.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Acidulated  Bone  Phosphate  and 

Potash 

5934 

0.8 

1,0 

10.0 

2.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Animal  Bone  Phosphate  Manure 

5935 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

1.0 

Amo-Phos  FertihVer 

6213 

1.6 

12.0 

2.0 

Amo-Phos  & Potash  Fertilizer 

m4 

0.8 

‘lo 

10.0 

2,0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Dissolved  Ammoniated  Bone  Phosphate 

6216 

1.6 

12.0 

2.0 

North  Wflstprn  Horsfi  Shoo  Brand  18%  Fertilizer  _ . 

6324 

18.0 

1.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Potash  Manure  1916  _ . 

6325 

0^8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower  1916 

6326 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Garden  City  Superphosphate  1916 

6327 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  National  Bone  Phosphate  Dust  1916.. 

6328 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Challenge  Corn  Grower  1916 

6329 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  F and  F Fertilizer 

6330 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower  No,  2 

6331 

2.0 



8.0 

1.0 



Papkprs  Boar’s  Head  Brand  16%  Phosphate 

6332 

16.0 

1,0 

Packers  Boar’s  Head  Brand  Sure  Growth  Potash  Manure  1916 

6333 

'ols 

"iTo 

8.0 

1.0 

Paekers  Roar’s  Head  Brand  Extra  Bone  Phos  Formula 

6834 

18.0 

1.0 

Packers  Boar’s  Head  Brand  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower  1916 

6335 

'i?o 

8.0 

1.0 

Packers  Boar’s  Head  Brand  World  of  Good  Superphosphate  1916 

6336 

2.0 

1.0 

8,0 

1.0 

Paekers  Roar’s  Head  Brand  New  Compound  _ 

6337 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

Packers  Boar’s  Head  Brand  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower  No.  2 

6338 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Cleveland  Dryer  Potato  and  General  Crop  Fertilizer  1916 

6346 

0.8 

"iT5 

8.0 

1.0 



Cleveland  Dryer  Ohio  Seed  Maker  with  Potash  1916 

6347 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

— 

95 

Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 


LABEL, 


American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  Detroit  Sales 
Department,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Cleveland  Dryer  Ohio  Seed  Maker 

Zell’s  Economizer  1916 

Zell’s  Ammoniated  Bone  Superphosphate  1916 

Zell’s  Ammoniated  Bone  Superphosphate  No.  2 

Bradley’s  16%  Acid  Phosphate 

Bradley’s  High  Phos.  Formula 

Bradley’s  Dissolved  Bone  Phosphate  with  Potash  1916 

Bradley’s  Potato  and  Root  Fertilizer  1916 

Bradley’s  B.  D.  Sea  Fowl  Guano  No.  1 

Bradley’s  B.  D.  Sea  Fowl  Guano  No.  2 

Reese  Crown  Extra  Bone  Phosphate 

Reese  Challenge  Phosphate  1916 

Reese  Complete  Fertilizer 

Reese  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower 

Extra  Phos  Formula  

New  York  State  Special  1916 

1 and  10  Compound 

Cleveland  Dryer  Works  Phospho  Potash  Fertilizer 

Reese  Crown  Phosphate  and  Potash  1916 

Crown  Phosphate  and  Potash 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  XXX  Fertilizer 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  2 Potash  Fertilizer 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Old  Standard  Fertilizer 

Packers  Boars  Head  Brand  Phospotash  Fertilizer 

Packers  Boars  Head  Brand  New  Compound  and  Potash  Fertilizer 

Packers  Boars  Head  Brand  Potash  Special  Fertilizer 

Packers  Boars  Head  Brand  Success  Fertilizer 

Favorite  Potash  Fertilizer 

Complete  2 Potash  Fertilizer 

Fine  Ground  Bone 

Packers  Boar’s  Head  Brand  Ground  Bone 

North  Western  Horse  Shoe  Brand  Ground  Bone 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  Great  Eastern  Fertilizer 
Branch,  Rutland,  Vt. 

Great  Eastern  Dissolved  Acid  Phosphate 

Great  Eastern  Special  Crop  Fertilizer  1916 

Great  Eastern  General  1916 

Great  Eastern  Wheat  Special  1916 

Great  Eastern  Vegetable,  Vine  & Tobacco  Fertilizer  1916 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  Michigan  Carbon  Works, 
Detroit,  Mich. 

Red  Line  Complete  Manure 

Red  Line  Phosphate 

Michigan  Carbon  Works  Superior  Acid  Phosphate 

Michigan  Carbon  Works  Triaton  Fertilizer 

Banner  Bone  Phosphate  Compound 

A-1  Potash  Fertilizer*  1916 

Homestead  Bialode  Fertilizer 

Red  Line  Crop  Grower  1916 

Homestead  Bone  Black  Fertilizer  No.  1 

New  Standard  Fertilizer 

Homestead  Bone  Black  Fertilizer  No.  2 I___ 

Usemore  Fertilizer 

Homestead  Special  Potash  Fertilizer 

Homestead  2 — 8 — 2 Potash  Fertilizer 

Homestead  Ground  Bone 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  M.  E.  Wheeler  & Co., 
Branch,  Rutland,  Vt. 

Wheeler’s  Peerless  Acid  Phosphate 

Wheeler’s  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate IIII” 

Wheeler’s  Royal  Wheat  Grower  1916 


Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent. 

Potash,  K2O,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

P206*  cent. 

Insoluble  phosphoric 

acid,  PaOe,  per  cent. 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  PaOg,  per  cent. 

1 

. 6348 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

. 6349 

0.8 

"1.0 

8.0 

1.0 



6350 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

. 6351 

2.0 



■ 8.0 

1.0 

6352 

16.0 

1.0 

6.353 

18.0 

1.0 

. 6354 

'o’s 

'i'o 

8.0 

1.0 

. 6355 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

. 6356 

2.Q 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6357 

2.0 



8.0 

1.0 

6358 

18.0 

1.0 

6359 

'o's 

'i?o 

8.0 

1.0 

6360 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

6361 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6362 

__ 



18.0 

1.0 

6363 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6364 

0.8 



10.0 

1.0 

6697 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

, 6724 



1.0 

12.0 

1.0 

6735 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 

6766 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 

6767 

"o*8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6768 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6769 



1.0 

12.0 

1.0 

6770 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6771 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6772 

1.6 



12.0 

1.0 

6773 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6774 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6796 

1.6 

27'.b 

6797 

1.6 

27.0 

6798 

1.6 

27.0 

4671 

14.0 

1.5 

6636 

'o’s 

~i~b 

10.0 

1.0 

6537 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6538 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6539 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

— 

4411 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

1.0 

4413 





14.0 

2.0 

5939 





16.0 

1.0 

6218 

1.6 



12.0 

2.0 

6339 





18.0 

1.0 

6340 

0.8 

i.o 

8.0 

1.0 

6341 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

6342 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6343 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6344 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

6345 

2.0 



8.0 

1.0 

6775 



i.o 

12.0 

1.0 

6776 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6777 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

6795 

1.6 

— 

— 

— 

27^9 

4668 

14.0 

1.5 

6127 





16.0 

6540 

0.8 

i.o 

8.0 

'iio 

— 

96 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  number 

i 

Guara 
ers  1 

a)  ^ 

il 

O 3 

Potash,  KoO,  soluble  o 5? 

in  water,  per  cent.  § S. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid,  g; 

P206>  cent.  o fx> 

Insoluble  phosphoric  ^ p 

acid,  PoOs,  per  cent.  “ c 

ictur- 

lan 

3 

.H  0 

1 « 
to  13 

•5 

ftpH 

Eh  rt 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  M.  E.  Wheeler  & Co., 

Branch,  Rutland,  Vt. 

Wheeler’s  Corn  Fertilizer  1916  _ 

6541 

1.6 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

Wheeler’s  Potato  Manure  1916 

6542 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

A.  A.  C.  Co.  Ammoniated  Fertilizer  A 

6616 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

A.  A.  C.  Co.  Ammoniated  Fertilizer  AA 

6617 

1.6 

10.0 

1.0 

A.  A.  C.  Co.  Ammoniated  Fertilizer  AAA  

6619 

2.4 

10.0 

1.0 

— 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  Western  Union 

Chemical  Co.,  Branch,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

1916 — Herrick’s  Fertilizer  with  Potash 

6652 

1.6 

1.0 

10.0 

0.5 

1916— Corn  & Wheat  Grower 

6653 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

W.  U.  Complete  Fertilizer 

6654 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6655 

1.6 



12.0 

0.5 

One  and  Ten  Phosphate  

6656 

0.8 

10.0 

0.5 

16%  Acid  Phosphate  _ _ _ 

6657 





16.0 

0.5 

Tiger  Bone  Meal  ___  

6658 

2.4 

solo 

W.  U.  Ohio  Special 

6917 

"iro 

i2lo 

'ols 

— 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Star  Phosphate — 

2908 

14.0 

2.0 

Grain  Grower  

2910 

1~6 

2.0 

8.0 

2.0 

Wheat  Corn  and  Oat  Special 

2938 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

2.0 

Armour’s  Steamed  Bone __  __  ___ 

3331 

1.6 

20IO 

Cereal  Phn.sphate  

3860 

10.0 

2.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda 

3478 

is"  6 

Armours  Standard 

3610 

0.8 

’§^0 

'slo 

’2I0 

Dried  Blood  — _ __ 

3791 

13.2 

“U.  S.  Phosphate” 

4057 

i2lo 

Armour’s  Bone  Meal  

4860 

1.6 

27.0 

16%  Acid  Phosphate i 

5295 

iolo 

'0I5 

Armour’s  1^9—1  Fertilizer 

0035 

'5^8 

'i’o 

9.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  1^12—1  Fertilizer  _ 

6037 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  1—14—2  Fertilizer  

6038 

0.8 

2.0 

14.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  12—2  Fertilizer _ _ 

6040 

2.0 

12.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  18%  Phosphate 

6041 



18.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  Special  Grain  Grower 

6477 

i.6 

i.o 

8.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  1—10—1  Fertilizer 

6478 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

0.5 

Armour's  Special  Wheat,  Corn  & Oats 

6479 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  Ammoniated  Phosphate  No.  3 

6480 

2.4 



10.0 

0.5 



Armour’s  Ammoniated  Phosphate  No.  2 

6481 

1.6 

10.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  High  Grade  Ammoniated  Phosphate __ 

6592 

1.6 



12.0 

0.5 



Armour’s  3 — 8—1  Fertilizer 

6593 

2.4 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  Potash  & Phosphate  Special 

6712 



1.0 

10.0 

0.5 

Special  Ammoniated  Phosphate  No.  1 

67^32 

0.8 



12.0 

0.5 



Armour’s  1—14 — 1 Fertilizer 

6760 

0.8 

i.o 

14.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  1—14  Fertilizer  

6831 

0.8 



14.0 

0.5 



Armour’s  2—10—1  Fertilizer 

6882 

1.6 

i.o 

10.0 

0.5 

Armour’s  1— 8^— 5 Fertilizer  

6912 

0.8 

5.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Armour’s  1—8—6  Fertilizer 

6921 

0.8 

6.0 

8.0 

0.5 

— - 

Ballard  Packing  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

Ballard’s  Animal  Tankage  Fertilizer 

5600 

5.0 

— - 

— 

— - 

14.0 

Barwell,  J.  W.,  Waukegan,  111. 

Barwells  Plant  Grower  and  Land  Renovator 

5000 

5.0 

6.0 

5.2 

5.0 

— - 

Bausback  & Sons,  Robert,  Shelbyville,  Ind. 

t 

Soft  Bone 

3007 

3.5 

14.0 

Buhner  Fertilizer  Company,  Seymour,  Ind. 

Raw  Ground  Bone 

4171 

3.2 







20.0 

RopV  Phn.ssphatp 

5565 

28.0 

Half  Bone  & Phosphate 

5734 

'i'e 

II” 

iolo 

“elo 

Grain  Booster 

5747 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

Acid  Phosphate 

0075 

— 

14.0 

— 

97 

Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 


LABEL. 

Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent. 

Potash,  K2O,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

P2O5,  per  cent. 

Insoluble  phosphoric 

acid,  PaOs.  per  cent. 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  PaOg,  per  cent. 

Buhner  Fertilizer  Company,  Seymour,  Ind. 

W.  T.  Crop  Grower  

6525 

2.0 

0.2 

8.0 

2.0 



W.  T.  Truck  Grower 

6526 

2.4 

0.5 

8.0 

2.0 



W.  T,  Grain  Producer 

6527 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 



W.  T,  Grain  Grower 

6528 

1.6 

0.2 

8.0 

2.0 



16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6606 





16.0 





6742 

2.4 

24.0' 

Central  Phosphate  Company,  Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

5040 

28.0 

Tennessee  Phosphate 

5251 

— 

32.0 

Chicago  Feed  & Fertilizer  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Magic  Blood  & Bone 

6584 

4.9 







13.7 

Magic  Tankage  Fertilizer 

6585 

2.4 

0.5 





1.5 

Magic  Pulverized  Sheep  Manure 

6586 

1.6 

1.0 





1.0 

Magic  3^22  Steamed  Bone  Meal 

6587 

2.4 

22.0 

Magic  4—6—1 

6588 

3.2 

To 

6.0 

Magic  4 — .3—1  ..  

^60 

3.2 

1.0 

3.0 

Magic  Manure  Ash  Potash 

6706 

4.0 

— 

2.0 

Chicago  Raw  Products  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Consumers  Special  14%  Acid  Phosphate 

5012 



14.0 

1.0 



Consumers  Special  Raw  Bone  Meal  _ 

5018 

3.7 



20.0 

Consumers  Special  3—22  Bone  Meal 

5070 

2.4 



22.8 

Consumers  Special  1^20  Pure  Bone  Meal 

5072 

0.8 







29.7 

Consumers  Special  Ammoniated  Extra  Bone  Meal 

5681 

2.0 

28.0 

Consumers  Brand  Steamed  Bone  Meal 

6387 

0.8 



24.0 

Consumers  Brand  Bone  & Phosphate  Mixture 

6388 

0.4 

isio 

"sio 

Consumers  Brand  16%  Acid  Phosphate ___ 

6380 

16.0 

1.0 

Consumers  Brand  16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6300 





15.0 

1.0 



Consumers  Brand  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6303 

i.6 

10.0 

1.0 

Consumers  Hummer  Grain  Grower 

6827 

0.8 

~0?5 

10.0 

1.0 

Consumers  Ammoniated  Bone  Phosphate 

6828 

0.6 

15.0 

1.0 

— 

Cincinnati  Phosphate  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Capitol  City  Wheat  Grower 

2886 

14.0 

1.0 

Patrons  High  Grade  Phosphate 

3626 

16.0 

1.0 

“Bonus”  A Phosphate  with  Humus 

3903 

'o'i 



12.0 

1.0 



“A”  Grain  and  Grass  Grower 

4301 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

A.  Conservation  Brand 

6829 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 



Grain  & Grass  Grower 

5830 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 

Ammoniated  Super  Phosphate  

6292 

1.6 



12.0 

1.0 



High  Grade  Manure  

6203 

1.2 

i.o 

9.0 

1.0 



“A.”  Tobacco  Potato  & Beet  Grower 

6204 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

, 

Revised  Indiana  Black  Soil  Special  

6582 

0.4 

3.0 

6.0 

1.0 



Revised  Black  Soil  Special 

6583 

0.4 

2.0 

6.0 

1.0 

Favorite  Grain  Grower  

6622 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

A Ground  Bone 

6754 

1.6 

27.0 

O-Bone  & Phosphate  Mixture  Wheat  Special 

6755 

1.6 



'sio 

To 

Capitol  Crop  Booster 

6758 

0.4 

i.o 

10.0 

1.0 

Cleveland  Provision  Company,  The,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Premium  Bone  Meal 

6898 

0.6 

25.0 

Clendenin  Fertilizer  Company,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Acid  Phosphate  Special ^ 

4839 

14.0 

Wheat  Grower  

6117 

o"8 

1.0 

10.0 

Corn  Grower 

6607 

1.6 

10.0 

Tankage  and  Phosphate __  _ 

6608 

0.8 

11.0 

Acid  Phosphate 

6609 

16.0 

Phosphate  and  Bone  . 

6610 

'i’s 

12.0 

’7T0 

— 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Darling’s  Ground  Raw  Bone  

2843 

3.3 

21.0 

Darling’s  Nitrate  of  Soda ... 

4184 

14.8 



— 





98 

Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


LABEL. 

Official  number 

Guara 
ers  1 

c ^ 

2 « 

0) 

^ a 

o 5. 

Potash,  KoO,  soluble  o re 

in  water,  per  cent.  g S, 

Soluble  and  reverted  g-'<! 

phosphoric  acid,  ^ g; 

P2O5,  per  cent.  0 re 

manufs 
; less  tl 

. 

i 2 

^ a> 

■S 

ft  , 

w 

0 « 

X ^ 

P<  5 

01  0 

0 T? 
to 

Total  phosphoric  3 ^ 1 

acid,  PgOe,  per  cent.  j 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

5120 

1.8 

28.0 

Darling’s  Pulverized  Sheep  Manure 

6153 

2.0 

'i’s 

1.5 

Darling’s  Sheep  Manure 

6258 

2.0 

1.0 





1.0 

Darling’s  16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6372 





16.0 





Darling’s  Grain  Grower 

6373 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

2.0 



Darling’s  Big  Harvest 

6374 

1.6 

1.0 

12.0 

2.0 



Darling’s  Farmers’  Favorite 

6375 

2.4 

1.0 

8.0 

2.0 



Darling’s  Sure  Winner  

6377 

0.8 

0.5 

10.0 

2.0 



Darline^’.'?  Blnnd  & Bono  _ _ . . 

6620 

4.9 

12.0 

Darling’s  General  Crop 

6778 

1.6 

i2'o 

’2'0 

Darling’s  T.ittlfi  Ciant  Brand 

6812 

0.8 

10.0 

2.0 

Darling’s  One-Eight-Two  Brand  

6813 

0.8 

'f.O 

8.0 

2.0 

Darling’s  Half  and  Half 

6901 

0.8 

10.0 

13.0 

D.  & K.  Fertilizer  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

D and  K Bone  Phosphate 

3030 

1.1 

10.0 

1.0 

Pure  Ground  Bone 

3363 

'l6 

io’o 

Quick  Acting  Corn  Grower 

3402 

0.8 

'r.5 

~9’0 

TB 

D.  & K Nitrate  of  Soda 

4979 

14.0 

D and  K 14%  Acid  Phosphate 

5483 

ii'o 

D & K Garden  Special  

5757 

’i"6 

'i’o 

10.0 

D «&  K Early  Maturity ' 

5759 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

Ammoniated  Mixture 

5769 

1.6 

12.0 

Dissolved  Bone  Phosphate  with  Potash 

6062 

0.8 

'i'i 

7.0 

To 

D & K Special  Wheat  & Clover 

6200 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

.Available  Plant  Food  

6226 

1.2 

10.0 

16%  High  Grade  Phosphate 

6259 

16.0 

D & K Com  King 

6260 

'oTs 

'o's 

12.0 

D & K Special  Spring  Fertilizer 

6261 

0.4 

0.5 

13.0 

T)  /ir.  K 14— 8— 

6615 

0.4 

3.0 

8.0 

D & K Special  Wheat  Fertilizer 

6689 

0.'8 

0.5 

12.0 

D & K Special  Fall  Fertilizer ___ 

6690 

0.4 

0.5 

13.0 

— 

.... 

Dryfus  Packing  & Provision  Company,  LaFayette,  Ind. 

Dryfus  Star  Fertilizer 

5460 

5.0 

.... 

.... 

.... 

10.0 

Eckart  Packing  Company,  Fred,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Eckart’s  Fertilizer 

4572 

3.6 

.... 

.... 

12.8 

Empire  Carbon  Works,  Subsidiary  of  The  American  Agricultural 

Chemical  Co.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Empire  14%  Arid  Phnsphnte 

6814 

14.0 

Empire  16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6815 

16.0 

TI 

Empire  1 — 10  Ammoniated  Acid  Phosphate 

6816 

'ol 

10.0 





Empire  2—10  Ammoniated  Acid  Phosphate 

6817 

1.6 

10.0 



Empire  2—12  Ammoniated  Acid  Phosphate 

6818 

1.6 

12.0 

Empire  Acid  Phosphate  with  Potash  1916 

6819 



To 

12.0 





Empire  Full  Harvest  .. 

6820 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 





Empire  Wheat  & Clover  Fertilizer 

6821 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 



Empire  Grain  & Grass  Grower  ^ 

6822 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 





Empire  Bone  Black  Fertilizer  1916 

6823 

2.0 

1.0 

8.0 





Empire  Farmers  Favorite 

6824 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 





Empire  High  Grade  Fertilizer  1916 

6825 

2.4 

1.0 

10.0 





Empire  Ground  Bone 

6826 

1.6 

.... 

— 

.... 

27.0 

Empire  Guano  Company,  New  Albany  Sales  Department, 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Empire  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate  

3307 





14.0 

2.0 



Empire  Climax  Acid  Phosphate 

3514 

_ 



16.0 

1.0 



Empire  Pure  Raw  Bone 

4593 

3.5 







21.5 

Raw  Rock  Phosphate 

5125 









30.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda 

5127 

15.0 

_ 







Good  Enough  No.  1 _ 

5774 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 



Red  Banner  Special  No.  1 

5787 

0.8 

2.0 

10.0 

1.0 



Indiana  Special  No.  2 

620^ 

0.3 

1.0 

15.0 

1.0 

— 

99 

Brands  Certified  by  Mahufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 


LABEL. 

Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent. 

Potash,  K2O,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

PoOs*  cent. 

Insoluble  phosphoric 

acid,  P2O6,  per  cent. 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  P2O5,  per  cent. 

Empire  Guano  Company,  New  Albany  Sales  Department, 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Empire  Pure  Steamed  Bone 

6231 

0.8 







29.0 

6318 

0.4 

0.5 

8.0 

1.0 

Half  & Half  No.  1 _ 

6319 

1.6 

1.0 

6.0 

6.0 



6320 

0.8 

12.0 

1.0 

6321 

1.6 

12.0 

1.0 

Ked  Banner  Special  No.  2 

6322 

0.8 

'i'o 

9.0 

1.0 



Ammoniated  Potash  & Phosphate  No.  1 

0323 

0.4 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 



Truck  Grower  No.  1 

6483 

0.6 

2.5 

7.0 

1.0 



Blood  Bone  & Phosphate  No.  1 

6703 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Half-Seven-Three 

6722 

0.4 

3.0 

7.0 





Empire  Half-Ten-Five  

6910 

0.4 

5.0 

10.0 

1.0 



Empire  Five-Five  

6911 

5.0 

5.0 

1.0 

— 

Evansville  Packing  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Potato  & Tobacco  Grower  

4222 

1.6 

5.0 

8.0 

1.0 



4886 

1.0 

2,0 

8.0 

1.0 

Pure  Eaw  Bone  Meal 

4891 

3.'7 

23io 

Corn  & Wheat  Special 

5859 

0.8 

“§'0 

iiio 

"iio 



High  Grade  Soluble  Phosphate  

5360 

16.0 

2.0 



Bone  Phosphate  & Potash 

6057 

"o’s 

“i^o 

7.0 

2.0 



Three  B. 

6058 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

■ 2.0 

Phosphate  & Potash 

6059 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

“Farmers  Pride” 

6247 

'o’s 

1.0 

12.0 

2.0 



Pfivised  Half  and  Half  _ . 

6545 

, 2.5 

1.0 

10.0 

2.0 

Wonder  Growth 

6516 

1.6 

10.0 

2.0 

“T.padpr”  . .. 

6734 

2.4 

'i’o 

9.0 

2.0 

Ewing,  Geo.  M.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

Ewing’s  Phosphate  & Potash 

3324 

2.0 

10.0 





Ewing’s  Best  Phosphate  & Potash 

3325 

2.0 

12.0 





■Rwin^^’s  Acid  Phnsphata 

3326 

10.0 

Ewing’s  Complete  Fertilizer 

3619 

1 00 
1 d 

'i'o 

7.0 

Ewing’s  14%  Acid  Phosphate 

3733 



14.0 





Ewing’s  Grain  King  _ 

4706 

i.6 

2.0 

8.0 

0.5 

— 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Columbus,  Ohio. 

Farmers  Acid  Phosphate 

5030 

14.0 

1.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda  ___  

5043 

15.5 







Farmers  “16” 

5192 

16.0 

i.o 

Farmers  Favorite  Fertilizer  (1— l(L-2)  

6149 

'o's 

'2.0 

10.0 

Corn  & Wheat  Special  (1—9—1) 

6151 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 





Farmers  Favorite  

0647 

1.6 

10.0 

General  Crop 

6648 

0.8 

'i?o 

7.0 

Farmers  Wheat,  Corn  & Oats  Special 

6049 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

Farmers  Wheat  Grow.w 

6650 

0.8 

11.0 



Humus  Chief  . . _ . . __ 

6671 

0.4 

12.5 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Farmers  Wheat  & Oats  Special 

3199 

14.0 

Our  Universal  Phosphate 

3555 

'0~8 

'i'o 

7.0 

"lo 



Corn  & Wheat  Grower 

3556 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Our  German  Phosphate  _ 

3557 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Pure  Bono  . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . 

3806 

1.6 

^2.0 

Farmers  Favorite 

4814 

1.6 

~2.0 

'sio 

Our  Half  & Half 

4817 

1.2 

8.0 

iiio 

Grain  Manure 

5808 

0.8 

iio 

9.0 

Concentrated  Manure 

5853 

2.0 

1.5 

'l5 

16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6188 

ieio 



Superphosphated  Manure  _ __  _ 

6237 

’lo 

10.0 

'iio 

Plant  Fond 

6272 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

Black  Soil  Formula 

6273 

0.4 

3.0 

5.0 

Soil  Food  _ _ _ 

6274 

0.8 

0.5 

8.0 

Tankage  & Bone  Phosphate 

6275 

2.0 

8.0 

Corn  & Wheat  Grower  without  Potash 

1 6276 

0.8 

— 

8.0 

— 

— 

lOO 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  In  1917  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  number  j 

Guara: 
ers  t 

C A 

2 « 
II 

nteed  1 
0 cent; 

0) 

s . 

-§  fl 

O O 

W O 

C a3 

^ & 
(S.S 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid,  ^ g; 

P2O5,  per  cent.  0 ^ 

manufa 
less  tl 

^ • 

Xi  ^ 

» 5 
<a  0 

ictur- 

lan 

SS 

CQ  ^ 

ftp^ 

^ 'd 

o'B 

H cS 

I 

Federal  Chemical  Company,  Inc.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Daybreak  Standard  Phosphate 

3923 

12.0 

Daybreak  Star  Phosphate 

3924 

10.0 

Daybreak  Royal  Phosphate 

3925 

14.0 

Daybreak  Fine  Raw  Bone 

-4088 

’2’4 

^io 

“A”  Daybreak  Wheat  & Corn  Special 

4143 

0.4 

"i'o 

iiio 

Daybreak  Special  Manure 

4271 

0.8 

2.0 

10.0 

Ground  Tobacco  Stems 

4754 

2.0 

9.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda  . . _ . ..  

4997 

15.0 

A.  1 Daybreak  Raw  Bone 

5092  • 

3.7 

^2io 

Daybreak  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate  — 

5016 

ieio 

Daybreak  Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

5252 

^'.7 

Half  & Half  Phosphate  Mixture 

5435 

ioio 

i2io 

Pure  Bone 

5657 

"i'o 

30.0 

Extra  Hip-h  Grade  Phosphate 

5742 

18.0 

Daybreak  Royal  Wheat  «&  Grain  Special 

5766 

'ol 

"iio 

12.0 

Sand  Land  Special 

5867 

1.2 

0.5 

12.5 

Daybreak  Nitro-Phosphate 

5868 

0.4 

15.0 

Daybreak  Clay  Land  Crop  Grower 

5864 

1.2 

"ois 

12.5 

Daybreak  Cracker-Jack  

5866 

0.4 

1.0 

13.0 

Daybreak  Harvest  Home 

5868 

2.4 

10.0 

Daybreak  Half  & Half  Meal  Mixture  ..  

5869 

1.6 

10.0 

ioio 

Standard  Crop  & Tobacco  Fertilizer 

6416 

1.2 

10.0 

A-1  Formula  1916 

6417 

1.6 

10.0 

High  Grade  Fertilizer  

6418 

1.6 

12.0 

Special  Potato  Fertilizer 

6419 

2.4 

"lo 

9.0 

Potato  Grower  . 

6420 

3.2 

1.0 

8.0 

Red  Rooster  Mixture 

6421 

0.4 

12.0 

A-1  Fertilizer  1916 

6422 

0.8 

12.0 

A-1  Corn  & Wheat  Fertilizer 

6423 

0.8 

14.0 

Potato  & Tobacco  Fertilizer  _ . . 

6424 

2.0 

1.0 

10.0 

Tobacco,  Truck  & Tomato  Fertilizer  1916 

6425 

1.6 

1.0 

9.0 

Special  Truck  & Tomato  Fertilizer 

6426 

1.6 

0.5 

11.5 

High  Grade  Special 

6427 

0.8 

1.0 

14.0 



A-1  Special 

6428 

0.4 

0.5 

15.0 

Standard  Grain  Grower 

6429 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

Standard  Corn  & Wheat  Fertilizer  _ _ 

6430 

1.2 

0.5 

10.0 





Daybreak  Special  Manure  1916  

6431 

1.0 

0.5 

10.0 

Daybreak  Grain  Grower  1916 

6432 

0.4 

0.5 

9.0 

Daybreak  A-1  Champion 

6433 

0.4 

0.5 

11.5 

Daybreak  Corn,  Wheat  & Clover  Grower 

6434 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

1st  Prize  Phosphate 

6435 

14.0 

A.  1st  Prize  Tobacco  Mixture 

6436 

"o'i 

"ois 

9.0 

1st  Prize  Ammoniated  Meal  Mixture 

6437 

2.4 

10.0 





1st  Prize  Corn  & Wheat  Champion 

6438 

0.4 

"ois 

11.5 





1st  Prize  Corn,  Wheat  & Oats  Grower  . 

6439 

0.4 

1.0 

11.0 





1st  Prize  Grain  Maker 

6440 

0.4 

1.0 

13.0 

1st  Prize  Wheat  Grain  Special 

6441 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

1st  Prize  Corn  & Wheat  Fertilizer .. 

6442 

1.0 

0.5 

10.0 

III! 

1st  Prize  Clay  Land  Soil  Builder 

6443 

1.2 

0.5 

12.5 





1st  Prize  Phosphate  Mixture 

6444 

0.4 



12.0 





1st  Prize  Ammoniated  Bone  Phosphate 

6445 

0.4 



15.0 





1st  Prize  Standard  Phosphate 

6446 





12.0 





1st  Prize  A A.  Phosphate 

6447 





10.0 





1st  Prize  Fine  Raw  Bone 

6448 

2.4 







24.0 

1st  Prize  Raw  Bone 

6449 

3.7 







22.0 

Blue  Ribbon  Meal  Mixture  

6450 

1.6 



10.0 

10.0 



Blue  Ribbon  Corn  & Wheat  Fertilizer 

6451 

1.2 

0.5 

12.5 





Porn  PInh  Porn  /i-.  Wheat  Fertilizer 

6452 

1.2 

0.5 

10.0 

Mogul  Phosphate 

6453 

16.0 





Standard  Meal  Mixture 

6564 

'5^8 



10.0 

10.0 

— 

Mogul  Complete  Manure 

6591 

1.2 

0.5 

8.0 

— 

— 

High  Grade  Phosphate  & Tobacco  Fertilizer 

6628 

0.1 

0.3 

16.0 

— 

— 

Mogul  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6632 

0.4 



12.0 

10.0 



High  Grade  Half  & Half  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6633 

0.4 



12.0 

10.0 

— 

1st  Prize  High  Grade  Phosphate 

6651 



— 

16.0 

— 

— 

lOI 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 


LABEL. 

♦ 

Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent. 

Potash,  KgO,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

PsOg,  per  cent. 

Insoluble  phosphoric 

acid,  PaOe,  per  cent. 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  P2O5,  per  cent. 

Federal  Chemical  Company,  Inc.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Carbonate  Potash  & Phosphate  Special 

6744 

0.2 

2.0 

10.0 





6745 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

Daybreak  King  Crop  Grower 

6800 

0.8 

8.0 

ILO 



Daybreak  Champion  Grain  Grower _ 

6891 

0.4 

’o’5 

9.0 

9.0 



1st  Prize  Fertilizer  King 

6802 

0.8 



8.0 

12.0 



Mogul  Grain  Grower 

6803 

0.4 

0.5 

9.0 

9.0 



Black  Land  Special 

6857 

0.4 

1.0 

10.0 

10.0 



Vegetable  Grower _ 

6920 

2.0 



12.5 





6927 

2.4 

10.0 

5.0 

Fertilizer  Company  of  Paris,  111.,  Paris,  111. 

5505 

2.0 

27.0 

Fessenden,  F.  L.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“A  Nitrate  of  Soda” 

4730 

15.6 

— 

— 

— - 

— - 

Fluhrer  Tobacco  & Snuff  Company,  Boonville,  Ind. 

6667 

1.0 

5.0 

Fox  Chemical  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Fox  Grain  Grower 

2728 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 





Pnv  Acid  Phosphate 

2732 

14.0 

A.  A.  Acid,  Phosphate 

2733 

mi 

10.0 

mi 

IIII 

Fox  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate 

3607 



16.0 





Pox  Standard  Acid  Phosphate 

3685 





12.0 





Fox  Wheat  & Grain  Special 

3689 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 





Fox  Ground  Raw  Bone 

4089 

2.4 







•M.O 

A.  1 Fox  Raw  Bone 

5008 

3.7 







22.0 

Pnv  Soil  Pnilder 

■5872 

0.4 

1.0 

13.0 

Fox  Clay  Land  Crop  Grower 

5873 

1.2 

0.5 

12.5 

Pnir  Ammnniated  Phosphate 

5877 

0.4 

15.0 

Fox  Ammoniated  Fertilizer 

5880 

2.4 

10.0 

Fox  Blood,  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash 

5881 

0.4 

'ilo 

11.0 

Pox  Half  Xr.  Half  Meal  Mixture  . . _ 

5882 

1.6 

10.0 

io.o 

Fox  Formula  1916  

6463 

1.2 

'ols 

10.0 

Pox  Ideal  Pertilizer  Thin  _ _ __  . __ 

6464 

0.4 

0.5 

11.5 

Fox  Grain  Special  1016 

6465 

0.4 

0.5 

9.0 

Parly  Harvest  Pertilizer  .... 

6466 

1.0 

0.5 

10.0 

Fox  Complete  Fertilizer  ! 

6467 

1.2 

0.5 

8.0 

IIII 

IIII 

Red  Fox  Mixture 

6468 

0.4 



12.0 





Red  Pox  Crop  Grower  . ..  .. 

6469 

0.8 

16.0 

Fox  Crop  & Tobacco  Fertilizer 

6470 

1.2 

10.0 

Pox  Vegetable  Grower  1916  _ 

6471 

2.0 

12.5 

Fox  Decatur  County  Fertilizer 1 

6472 

0.1 

'oIs 

16.0 

Fox  Ideal  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6635 

0.4 



12.0 

iolo 



Pox  Wheat  & Corn  Manure  1916 

6748 

1.0 

0.5 

10.0 





Fox  King  Mixture  

6808 

0.8 

_ 

8.0 

12.0 



Fox  Ideal  Grain  Grower 

6809 

0.4 

0.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Gleaner  Clearing  House  Association,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Gleaner  2 — 10  Fertilizer 

6543 

1.6 



10.0 

0.5 



Corn  and  Grain  Special  . ...  ...  

6907 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

0.5 

Phosphoric  Acid  and  Potash  ! 

6908 

2.0 

10.0 

0.5 

Ammonia  and  Phosphoric  Acid  . ..  . . i 

6909 

I'e 

10.0 

0.5 

Globe  Fertilizer  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Acorn  Acid  Phosphate 

2719 

10.0 

Globe  Acid  Phosphate 

2720 

14.0 

Globe  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate  . . 

3608 





16.0 





Globe  Raw  Bone 

3643 

3.7 

22.0 

Standard  Acid  Phosphate 1 

3676 

ILO 

Wheat  & Grain  Special __ 

3680 

"o’s 

"ilo 

12.0 

Tankage  ...  _ . 

3880 

8.2 

11.0 

Acorn  Raw  Bone  _ _ 

4090 

2.4 

24.0 

Globe  Grain  & Grass  Grower 

4269 

0.4 

'ilo 

iilo 

— 

102 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 


LABEL, 

Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent. 

Potash,  K2O,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

P2OK,  per  cent. 

Insoluble  phosphoric 

acid,  FaOe,  per  cent. 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  PoOg,  per  cent. 

Globe  Fertilizer  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Globe  Mnney-Malrer 

5884 

0.4 

1.0 

13.0 

Globe  Clay  Land  Crop  Grower 

Globe  Grain-O-Phnsphate  . _ 

58S6 

5890 

1.2 

0.4 

0.5 

12.5 

16.0 

— 

— - 

Globe  Golden  Harvest  . . 

5891 

2.4 

10.0 

Globe  Blood,  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash 

5892 

0.4 

'lo 

11.0 

Globe  Half  A Half  Meal  Mixture  _ _ __  _ 

5893 

1.6 

10.0 

io’o 

Globe  Bone  Phosphate  Dust  _ . . 

5895 

0.8 

'ilo 

9.0 

TTniversal  Crop  & Tobacco  Fertilizer  _ . . 

6454 

1.2 

10.0 

Globe  Gold  Medal  Mixture  lOlfi  . 

6455 

0.4 

12.0 

Globe  Soluble  Vegetable  Manure  lOlfi 

6456 

2.0 

12.5 

Globe  Tip  Top  Fertilizer  

Globe  Grain  Fertilizer  _ _ . 

6457 

6458 

0.8 

0.4 

'o’s 

16.0 

9.0 

:::: 

Globe  Good  Taiclc  Fertilizer  _ _ . _ _ 

6459 

0.4 

0.5 

11.5 

Progress  Corn  & Wheat  Fertilizer  . _ . 

6460 

1.0 

0.5 

10.0 

Fagle  Corn  & Wheat  Fertilizer 

6461 

1.0 

0.5 

10.0 

Braden  Formula  1916 

6462 

1.2 

0.5 

10.0 

Globe  Tip  Top  Ammohiated  Phosphate 

6634 

0.4 

12.0 

io^o 

Globe  King  Fertilizer  . ... 

6806 

0.8 

8.0 

12.0 

Globe  Tip  Top  Grain  Grower 

6807 

0.4 

’0^5 

9.0 

9.0 

Globe  Complete  Com  Wheat  Grower  . _ 

6913 

1.2 

0.5 

8.0 

Goldreieh  Fertilizer  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

Goldreich  Special 

5646 

6.0 

11.0 

Goodrich,  W.  J.,  Royal  Center,  Ind. 

General  Crop  Grower 

6134 

1.0 

3.0 

8.0 

Goodrich  Twelve  Two  . _ __  

6922 

2.0 

12.0 

Goodrich  Four  Five  . _ _ . 

6923 

5.0 

4.0 

Groves  Fertilizer  Works,  (The  Joslin-Schmidt  Co.),  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Monarch  Brand  

5909 

5910 

14.0 

12.0 

1.0 

1.0 

Ammoniated  Phosphate  _ _ _ _ . 

Te 

Acid  Phosphate 

5912 

16.0 

1.0 

Economy  Brand  . _ 

5914 

0.8 

'i’o 

10.0 

1.0 

5^—27  Tionft 

5917 

1.6 

27'o 

Harvest  King  

6193 

0.8 

"i?o 

's’o 

iTo 

Bone  and  Phosphate 

6378 

0.8 

10.0 

10.0 

“A.”  Half  and  Half 

6379 

1.6 

To 

8.0 

8.0 

Grain  Grower 

6713 

0.8 

12.0 

1.0 

Ideal  Crop  Grower 

6852 

0.4 

12.0 

1.0 

Hess  & Bro.,  Inc.,  S.  M.,  Subsidiary  of  The  American  Agricultural 
Chemical  Company,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate  . 

6678 

14.0 

1.0 

Special  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate 

6674 

16.0 

Standard  Super  Phosphate 

6675 

0?8 

10.0 

Superior  Super  Phosphate 

6676 

1.6 

10.0 

Indiana  Special  Phosphate  _ _ _ 

6677 

1.6 

12.0 

Keystone  Phosphate  _ . _ 

6678 

0.8 

"i'o 

8.0 

'iTo 

Special  Corn  Manure,  1916  _ . . . . . 

6679 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

Wheat  & Grass  Manure,  1916 

6680 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

Ammoniated  Super  Phosphate,  1916  . 

6681 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

Big  Crop  Fertilizer,  1916  _ ^ 

6682 

1.6 

1.0 

10.0 

Potato  Manure,  1916  _ _ 

6683 

2.4 

1.0 

10.0 

Hess’  Ground  Bone 

6684 

2.4 

20"0 

Alkaline  Phosphate 

6733 

'iro 

1275 

Special  Ground  Bone  . . _ _ . 

6865 

'i?6 

27*0 

Reliable  Super  Phosphate  . . _ _ 

6924 

2.4 

To 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Calumet  Brand  Special  Pure  Bone  Meal  . _ 

4180 

0.8 

29.7 

Calumet  Brand  Ptire  Bone  Meal 

Calumet  Brand  Bone  Black  Grain  Grower  _ __ 

4181 

4543 

2.4 

2.0 

"l5 

*8^0 

To 

22.8 

Nitrate  of  Soda 

4726 

15.5 

Calumet  Brand  14%  Acid  Phosphate  ___  

4785 

— 

iiTo 

'I'o 

— 

103 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  number  | 

Guara 
ers  t 

1^* 

<u 

tu 

z ft 

nteed  1 
;o  cent; 

<13 

3 . 

O 03 

w o 

O ^ 

M 

IS 

(S.S 

Soluble  and  reverted  g-'<j 

phosphoric  acid,  ^ g; 

PoOs,  per  cent.  o <^ 

manufs 
; less  tl 

_C3  . 

P(  , 

O V 

.d  ft 
ft  io 

03  O 

1 w — < 

1— i C3 

ictur- 

lan 

d 

.H  o 

1 “ 
ft^ 

w iS 

ftp], 

r(£ 

o'S 

E-i  aj 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

5672 

2.0 

28.0 

Calumet  Brand  Ammoniated  Phosphate  & Potash  

6222 

0.8 

'lo 

10.0 

To 

Calumet  Brand  Hummer  Wheat  Grower 

6241 

0.8 

0.5 

10.0 

1.0 



6380 

1.6 

10.0 

1.0 

Calumet  Brand  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash  Mixture 

6382 

0.4 

'i'o 

10.0 

1.0 



Calumet  Brand  Steamed  Bone  Meal _ 

6383 

0.8 



' 



24.0 

6384 

16.0 

1.0 

Calumet  Brand  16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6385 





16.0 

1.0 



Calumet  Brand  Bone  & Phosphate  Mixture 

6386 

0.4 



15.0 

8.0 



Calumet  Ammoniated  Bone  Phosphate 

6779 

0.6 



15.0 

1.0 



Calumet  Hummer  Grain  Grower 

6780 

0.8 

0.5 

10.0 

1.0 



Wedeking’s  Tobacco  Fertilizer  

6919 

0.8 

0.5 

10.0 

1.0 

— - 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Company,  New  Albany,  Ind. 

Hopkins  “Old  Times  Pi*e  Raw  Bone” 

3430 

3.5 







21.5 

Nitrate  of  Soda 

4515 

15.0 









Hopkins  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate 

4606 





14.0 

1.0 



Hopkins  Meat  & Blood  Tankage 

4784 

5.5 







13.0 

Raw  Rock  Phosphate 

51'32 









30.0 

Hopkins  Steamed  Bone 

5514 

2.0 







27.0 

Hopkins  Ground  Tobacco  Stems 

5678 

2.5 

8.0 







Good  Enough  No.  1 

5777 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 



Bone,  Potash  & Phosphate 

5780 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

1.0 



Hnpkin.«!  Climax  Arid  Pbnsphate 

6139 

16.0 

1.0 

Indiana  Special  No.  2 

6210 

'oTs 

To 

15.0 

1.0 



Wheat  & Corn  Grower  No.  2 

6307 

0.4 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 



Favorite 

6308 

1.6 



12.0 

1.0 



'^Pankage  Phosphate  Rperial 

6309 

0.8 

12.0 

1.0 

Half  & Half  No.  1 

6310 

1.6 

To 

6.0 

6.0 



Hoosier  Special  

6311 

0.4 

0.5 

8.0 

1.0 



Truck  Grower  No.  1 

6482 

0.6 

2.5 

7.0 

1.0 



Bone  Potash  & Phosphate  No.  1 

6605 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 



Ammnniat.ed  Phosphate  Speeial 

6627 

1.6 

10.0 

1.0 

Hopkins’  Half  Seven  Three 

6666 

0.4 

'sio 

7.0 

. 1.0 



Blood,  Bone  «fe  Phosphate  No.  1 

6704 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Hopkins  Half-Ten-Five 

6867 

0.4 

6.0 

10.0 

1.0 

— 

Hurst  & Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Hurst’s  Hoosier  Brand  1 — 8 — 4 

6892 

0.8 

4.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Hurst’s  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower  2—8—2 

6803 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Hurst’s  Winner  1—8—2 

6894 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Hurst’s  Farmer’s  Favorite  1 — l.'J 

6895 

0.8 

13.0 

1.0 

Hurst’s  Triumph  Brand  1 — 10—1 

6896 

0.8 

To 

10.0 

1.0 

Hurst’s  Acid  Phosphate  Sixteen  Percent 

6897 

— 

— 

16.0 

1.0 

Independent  Packers  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Columbus,  Ohio. 

Number  Two,  Bone  Meal  and  Phosphate  Mixture 

6266 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

8.0 

Number  5,  Universal  Crop  noiei  _ 

6646 

1.6 

10.0 

Number  7,  Corn  and  Wheat  Speeial 

6747 

0.8 

'¥.0 

8.0 

Number  1,  Independent  Favorite  noi7) 

6849 

0.8 

0.5 

11.0 

Number  3,  Corn  Wheat  Oats  & Clover  (10171 

6860 

0.8 

0.5 

8.0 

Number  4.  Independent  Grain  Special  _ . _ . 

6851 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

Number  Nine  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6918 

0.4 

— - 

14.0 

— 

.... 

Indianapolis  Rendering  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Superphosphate  __ 

3264 





14.0 





Our  (irain  Grower 

3561 

0.8 

i.o 

7.0 

i.o 

Corn  & Wheat  Grower 

3562 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Banner  Bone  Meal _ 

3808 

1.6 

To 

Our  Half  & Half 

4807 

1.2 

'sio 

iiio 

Indiana’s  Favorite  __  _ _ _ _ _ . 

4810 

1.6 

'^0 

8.0 

Complete  Manure 

5811 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

Pulverized  Manure 

5856 

2.0 

1.5 

Ti 

16%  Acid  Phosphate _ 

6186 

ieio 

Superphosphated  Manure 

6238 

'i'o 

— 

10.0 

'iio 

— 

104 

Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


LABEL. 

Official  number  j 

Guara 
era  1 

o o 

4J  U 

^ a 

b 2. 

Potash,  K2O,  soluble  0 J® 

jin  water,  per  cent.  g 2. 

Soluble  and  reverted  g-'<j 

phosphoric  acid,  ^ 

P2O5,  per  cent.  0 

manufa 
less  tl 

0 . 

0 « 

,C  O' 

p<  5 
<D  0 

ictur- 

lan 

c 

1- 

Is 

|o 

^ Cl 

E-i  d 

Indianapolis  Rendering  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Corn  & Wheat  Grower  without  Potash 

627'7 

0.8 



8.0 





Soil  Pood 

6278 

0.8 

0.5 

8.0 

Plant  Poodi 

6279 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

Black  Soil  Formula 

6280 

0.4 

3.0 

5.0 

Tankage  & Bone  Phosphate 

6281 

2.0 

__ 

8.0 





Bone  Phosphate  & Potash  

6700 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

.... 

.... 

International  Agricultural  Corporation,  Cincinnati  Works,  Cincinnati,  0. 

Ideal  Phosphate  

5383 

14.0 

Buffalo  One-Eight-Four 

5495 

"o’s 

"i'o 

8.0 

i’o 

Hubbell’s  Crop  Maker 

6006 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Hubbell’s  High  Phosphate  and  Potash 

6007 

2.0 

12.0 

1.0 

C.  P.  Xr,  G.  W.  Meteor  Brand  . _ _ _ . . _ 

6011 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

C.  F.  & C.  W.  Crescent  Brand 

6012 

0.8 

3!o 

8.0 

1.0 

C.  F.  & C.  W.  Crown  Brand 

6013 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

C.  F.  & C.  W.  Best  Acid  Phosphate 

6016 

14.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  One  Eight  Three  

6020 

'o's 

's'o 

8.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Grain  and  Grass  Grower 

6021 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Phosphate  and  Potash 

6022 

2.0 

12.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Dissolved  Phosphate  _ _ 

6023 

14.0 

1.0 

I.  A.  0.  16%  Acid  Phosphate  __  

6024 





16.0 

1.0 

_ 

I.  A.  C.  Bone  Meal ___  _ 

6026 

2.4 

^.0 

I.  A.  0.  Pine  Steamed  Bone 

6027 

0.8 

29.0 

Buffalo  Garbage  Tankage  and  Phosphate 

6174 

0.4 

i2"5 

’iio 



18%  Acid  Phosphate  

6204 

18.0 

0.5 

Wheat  Corn  & Oat  Special 

6244 

"o’s 

'i’o 

10.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Complete  Fertilizer 

6549 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Crop  Grower  

6550 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6551 

1.6 

10.0 

1.0 



Farmers  Favorite 

6552 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Buckeye  Brand 

6563 

"i’o 

10.0 

1.0 



Hubbell’s  Complete  Fertilizer  

1 6654 

"i's 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Hubbell’s  Wheat  Corn  & Oats  Special  

6555 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 



Hubbell’s  Crop  Grower 

6656 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Hubbell’s  Hoosier  Brand 

6557 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

C.  F.  & C.  W.  Triumph  Brand 

6566 

__ 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 



C.  F,  & C.  W.  Smith’s  Special 

6567 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 



C.  P.  & C.  W.  Red  Ribbon  Brand 

6568 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Buffalo  Grain  Grower  _ 

6726 

0.8 

13.0 

2.0 



Buffalo  Two  Eight  Two __  

6799 

1.6 

’2'o 

8.0 

1.0 



Hubbell’s  One  Eight  Three 

6810 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Old  Honesty  Sterling  Brand 

6811 

0.8 

4.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Hubbells  Double  Five 

6854 

_ 

5.0 

5.0 

1.0 



Hubbell’s  Indiana  Highland  2—8—2 

6855 

i.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

.... 

Jarecki  Chemical  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

— 

C.  0.  D.  Phosphate 

2918 





14.0 

1.0 



Number  One  Guano  with  Phosphate  and  Potash  _ 

4288 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Ground  Bone 

51J89 

1.6 

27.0 

Raw  Bone  _ _ . . 

5569 

3.7 

22.0 

A.  Middle  West  Formula 

5818 

0.8 

1.0 

i2?0 

'lo 

A.  Number  One  Formula _ 

5819 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 



An  Acid  Phosphate 

6145 

_ 



16.0 

1.0 



Jarecki’s  Cereala  __  

6296 

1.6 



12.0 

1.0 



Jarecki’s  Lake  Erie  Guano  with  Phosphate  & Potash 

62197 

1.2 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 



Ammoniated  Phosphate 

62'98 

0.8 



10.0 

1.0 



Tobacco  & Truck  Grower _ 

6299 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Revised  Black  Soil  Special 

6575 

0.4 

2.0 

6.0 

1.0 



Revised  Indiana  Black  Soil  Special 

6576 

0.4 

3.0 

6.0 

1.0 



C-Raw  Bone  & Phosphate  Mixture 

6751 

1.6 



8.0 

8.0 



Jarecki’s  Little  Giant 

67'59 

0.4 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

.... 

Jones  Phosphate  Company,  The  Robin,  Nashville,  Tenn. 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock 

5451 

— 

— 

— 

— 

28.0 

105 

Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continu^^ 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 


LABEL. 

Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent.  ^ 

Potash,  KoO,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

P2O5,  per  cent. 

Insoluble  phosphoric 

acid,  P2O5,  per  cent. 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  P2O5,  per  cent. 

Kaufman  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“A”  Harvest  King 

4291 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

— 

“Dissolved  Phosphate”  

4731 

— 

— 

14.0 

1.0 

— 

A.  Complete  Ration  

5836 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 

— 

Kaufman  Harvest  King 

5839 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 

— 

A.  Special  Wheat  Fertilizer  

5840 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 

— 

Kaufman’s  Corn  Wheat  & Oats  Grower  

6300 

1.2 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 



Kaufman’s  Special  Potato  & Tobacco  Fertilizer  _ 

6301 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

— 

Jewel  Plant  Food - 

6302 

1.6 



12.0 

1.0 

— 

6303 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 



Revised  Indiana  Black  Soil  Special __  

6580 

0.4 

's’o 

6.0 

1.0 



Revised  Black  Soil  Special 

6581 

0.4 

2.0 

6.0 

1.0 

— 

Acid  Phosphate  16% 

0707 

— 

— 

16.0 

1.0 

— 

6766 

1.6 





27.0 

Kaufman’s  Half  & Half 

6757 

1.6 



"s.o 

8.0 



Kaufman’s  Banner  Crop  Grower 

0760 

0.4 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

— 

Kentucky  Fertilizer  Company,  Branch,  Federal  Chemical  Company,  Inc., 

Louisville,  Ky. 

0.  K.  Corn,  Wheat  & Oat  Grower  

4569 

0.4 

1.0 

11.0 

1.0 



0.  K.  Grain  Grower  

4'560 

0.4 

1.0 

11.0 

1.0 



0.  K.  Phosphate 

4563 





14.0 





Standard  Phosphate 

4564 



12.0 





Good  Luck  Phosphate 

4566 



10.0 





0.  K.  Raw  Bone 

4566 

3.7 







22.0 

0.  K.  Pine  Raw  Bone  

4667 

2.4 







24.0 

O.  K.  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate  

5608 

16.0 





O.  K.  Wheat  & Grain  Special  

5767 

'o'.8 

"lo 

12.0 





0.  K.  Ammoniated  Phosphate ___ 

5898 

0.4 



15.0 





0.  K.  Clay  Land  Crop  Grower  

5902 

1.2 

0.5 

12.5 





0.  K.  Old  Reliable 

5003 

0.4 

1.0 

13.0 





0.  K.  Special  Meal  Mixture 

5904 

2.4 



10.0 





0.  K.  Half  & Half  Meal  Mixture 

5906 

1.6 

__ 

10.0 

10.0 



0.  K.  Corn,  Wheat  & Clover  Grower  __  

6409 

0.8 

i.o 

9.0 





O.  K.  Grain  Special 

6410 

0.4 

0.5 

9.0 





O K.  Special  Mixture 

6411 

0.4 

0.5 

11.5 





O.  K.  Corn  & Wheat  Fertilizer 

04112 

1.0 

0.5 

10.0 





0.  K.  Gold  Medal  Corn  & Wheat  Grower 

6413 

1.2 

0.5 

10.0 





O K.  Mixture  _ _ 

6414 

0.4 

12.0 

0.  K.  Special  Crop  Grower  1916 

6415 

0.8 

16.0 

O.  K.  Gold  Medal  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6636 

0.4 



12.0 

io'o 



O.  K.  Golden  King  Fertilizer 

6804 

0.8 

8.0 

12.0 



0.  K.  Gold  Medal  Grain  Grower  

6805 

0.4 

'o’s 

9.0 

9.0 

Kirke  Chemical  Company,  Brooklyn,  N.  Y. 

Kirke  Fertilizer 

6590 

5.0 

3.1 

7.5 

0.7 

— 

Louisville  Fertilizer  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Special  Wheat  Grower __  

2786 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

1.0 



Eagle  Guano _ 

3423 

1.6 

2.0 

10.0 

1.0 

Eagle  Indiana  Special  Corn  Grower _ 

3424 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

1.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda 

3601 

16.0 

Eagle  Indiana  Phosphate _ 

3561 



12^0 

'i’o 



Eagle  Standard  Raw  Bone 

4618 

"§'7 



22.0 

Eagle  Fine  Raw  Bone  Meal 

5312 

2.4 

24.0 

Eagle  Grain  Formula  

5714 

0.4 

I’o 

io’o 

’oi5 



Eagle  Special  Grain  Grower 

5715 

0.4 

3.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Eagle  High  Grade  Dissolved  Bone  Phosphate 

5985 

14.0 

0.5 



Eagle  Sixteen  Percent. 

5986 

16.0 

0.5 



Eagle  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash 

5988 

'o'i 

"i'o 

11.0 

0.5 



Eagle  Slaughter  House  Bone  & Phosphate 

5989 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Grain  Formula  Special 

6249 

0.4 

2.0 

10.0 

0.5 



Special  Grain  Grower  Formula _ 

6250 

0.4 

2.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Indiana  Special  Wheat  Formula 

6261 

0.8 

2.0 

12.0 

0.5 

One  Ten  One  Fertilizer 

6402 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

0.5 



Eagle  Ammoniated  Phosphate _ 

1 6403 

1.6 

— 

10.0 

0.5 

— 

io6 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


LABEL, 

Official  number 

j 

Guara 
crs  t 

• 

£ « 

+->  t-, 

01 

O 3 

Potash,  KoO,  soluble  o o 

in  water,  per  cent.  § 2, 

Soluble  and  reverted  g-v- 

phosphoric  acid,  ^ g: 

PoOs,  per  cent.  oS 

tnanufa 
less  th 

u , 

sS 

p." 

.d  » 

P"  iS 

0)  0 

O 

m — • 

C o 

M rf 

ctur- 

an 

c 

pS 

1- 
w 5 

pi  rt 

Louisville  Fertilizer  Company,  Louisville,  Ky, 

Special  Slaughter  House  Bone  Phosphate 

6404 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Eagle  Grain  Grower  Special 

6406 

0.4 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Eagle  Guano  Special  ___  __  

6674 

1.6 

1.0 

10.0 

0.5 

Soluble  Bone  & Phosphate  . 

6728 

0.8 

1.5 

8.0 

0.5 



Eagle  One  Eight  Three  _ 

6730 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Eagle  One  Twelve  One  Fertilizer 

6858 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

0.5 

Eagle  Twelve  One  Fertilizer 

6859 

1.0 

12.0 

0.5 

■Rear  Fine  Raw  Rone  Meal 

6868 

'2A 

24.0 

Bear  Standard  Raw  Bone  _ _ 

6869 

3.7 

22.0 

Bear  Special  Corn  & "Wheat  Grower  

6870 

0.8 

To 

'iio 

‘ols 

Bear  Grain  Grower  Special ___ 

6871 

0.4 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Bear  Special  Grain  Grower 

6872 

0.4 

3.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Bear  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash 

6878 

0.4 

1.0 

11.0 

0.5 



Bear  Indiana  Potash  Mixture  

6874 

1.0 

10.0 

0.5 



Bear  Special  Slaughter  House  Bone  Phosphate  

6876 

’i.6 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Bear  Amraoniated  Phosphate 

6876 

1.6 

10.0 

0.5 



Bear  Ammoniated  Potash  Mixture 

6877 

0.2 

2.0 

12.0 

0.5 

Bear  High  Grade  Dissolved  Phosphate 

6878 



14.0 

0.5 



Jones  Ammoniated  Potash  Mixture  

6879 

0.2 

2.0 

12.0 

0.5 



Jones  Special  Grain  Grower  _ 

6880 

0.4 

3.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Jones  Grain  Grower  Speeial 

6881 

0.4 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Jones  Sixteen  Per  Cent 

6882 

16.0 

0.5 

IT 

Jones  High  Grade  Dissolved  Phosphate 

6883 



14.0 

0.5 



Jones  Twelve  One  Fertilizer 

6884 



To 

12.0 

0.5 



Jones  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6885 

i.6 



10.0 

0.5 



Jones  One  Ten  One  Fertilizer 

6886 

0.8 

1.0 

10.0 

0.5 



Jones  Special  Slaughter  House  Bone  Phosphate 

6887 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Jones  Special  Corn  & Wheat  Grower 

6888 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

0.5 



Jones  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash 

6889 

0.4 

1.0 

11.0 

0.5 



Jones  Standard  Raw  Bone  _ 

6890 

3.7 







22.0 

Jones  Fine  Raw  Bone  Meal 

6891 

2.4 

— 

— - 

— 

24.0 

McCartney  Bros.,  Greenville,  Ohio. 

“C”  Perfection  Crop  Maker  and  Potash 

6925 

1.0 

11.0 

1.0 



“0”  Prize-Taker,  Tobacco  & Potato  Special  

6926 

'iio 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Major  Bros.  Packing  Company,  The,  Mishawaka,  Ind. 

Major’s  Fertilizer  

4217 

3.5 

16.0 

Morris  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Rig  One — ‘Pure  Ground  Raw  Rone 

4091 

3.0 

24.0 

Big  Two— Pure  Bone  Meal 

4092 

2.0 

IT 

28.0 

Big  Eight— Ammoniated  Acid  Phosphate  and  Potash 

4098 

0.8 

To 

"lo 

i.o 



Rig  Five  . ...  . . _ _ 

4352 

2.5 

1.0 

6.0 

4.0 

Big  Ten  Prepared  Manure  with  Phosphate  and  Potash 

5146 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

2.0 



Speeinl  Rig  Six 

6530 

0.4 

1.0 

16.0 

Special  Big  Seven  

6531 

0.8 

IT 

22.0 

Speeial  Big  Nine  __  

6532 

0.4' 

'iio 

ii.o 

2.0 



Special  Big  Eleven  — 

6534 

0.8 



10.0 

1.0 



Special  Big  Twelve 

6536 

1.6 



12.0 

2.0 



Special  Big  Three  

6721 

0.4 

3.0 

11.0 

2.0 

— 

Mt.  Pleasant  Fertilizer  Company,  Inc.,  Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

Mt.  Pleasant  Untreated  Phosphate 

4198 









28.0 

Mt.  Plea«!ant  High  Grade  Arid  Phosphate 

4206 

14.0 

2.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda 

4248 

isTo 

Nitrate  Agencies  Company,  Western  Branch,  Columbus,  Ohio. 

Acid  Phosphate  

5575 





14.0 

1.0 



Acid  Phosphate  16% 

5576 





16.0 

1.0 



Nitrate  of  Soda 

5578 

15.0 









Tankage  . 

5582 

5.7 

6.2 

Fine  Ground  Bone  

5583 

0.8 





29.0 

Genuine  Peruvian  Guano 

6137 

10.6 

~2'o 

io.o 

2.0 

107 

Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
•ers  to  contain  not  less  than 

LABEL. 

^4 

B 

3 

C 

ri 

'y 

iS 

o 

..s 

2 

S ft 

3 , . 

•sS 

W y 

y 

• 

2 y -S 

42s 

0)  ^ p, 

3 ^ 

3 o 0 

o 

O . 

Is 

y 0 

o tS 
in 

c 

.hS 

so 

'1 

ftg^ 

^ d 

Oy 

Packer  Pertilizer  Company,  The,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

3253 

14.0 

3658 

"o's 

To 

7.0 

'i?o 

3669 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

3560 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

1.0 

3809 

1.6 

22'() 

Hf(lf  Half  --  --  

4797 

1.2 

"s'o 

ILO 

Packers  Crop  Grower 

Grain  Manure 1 

Coneentrated  Manure 

16%  Acid  Phosphate 

Superphosphated  Manure 

Black  Soil  Formula 

Plant  Food i 

4799 

5805 

5855 

6187 

6239 

6282 

6283 

6284 

1.6 

0.8 

2.0 

'i"o 

0.4 

0.8 

0.8 

’2'o 

1.0 

1.5 

~3~0 
1.0 
, 0.5 

8.0 

9.0 

ie’o 

10.0 

5.0 
12.0 

8.0 

To 

Ts 

6285 

2.0 

8.0 

6286 

0.8 

8.0 

Packers  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

3902 

0.4 

12.0 

1.0 

4296 

0.8 

I'o 

8.0 

1.0 

4586 

14.0 

1.0 

5847 

0.8 

LO 

9.0 

1.0 

A Quality  Brand 

5848 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 

Big  Bonanza  - - - 

6304 

1.6 

12.0 

1.0 

Pack^^r’s  Putat<~>,  Tnhappn  /ir,  Trunk  Manure 

6305 

1.6 

”i~o 

8.0 

1.0 

Pack^^r’s  Sweepstakes  ..  

6306 

1.2 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 

Reyi^e^I  Hlank  Snil  Spenia.l 

6677 

0.4 

2.0 

6.0 

1.0 

Revis^’d  TnrUana  Blank  Soil  Special  _ . . . . . 

6678 

0.4 

3.0 

6.0 

1.0 

Favorite  Grain  Grower  

Acid  Phosphate  16% __ 

A.  Bone  Meal 

Pure  Bone  with  Phosphate 

’ 6621 
6708 

1 6752 
6753 

0.8 

'i'e 

1.6 



10.0 

16.0 

~8lo 

1.0 

1.0 

"s'o 

27"  0 

Packer’s  O.  F.  Fertilizer  . ..  . 

6761 

0.4 

'i"o 

10.0 

1.0 

Pearl  Packing  House,  The,  Madison,  Ind. 

Yunker's  Pearl  Brand  

5492 

5.0 

8.0 

Pero  & Stoecker,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Pure  Animal  Matter  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower 

3623 

3.5 

10.0 

“A”  Pure  Bone  Meal  . . 

4999 

3.0 

20.0 

Pulverized  Manure  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Wizard  Brand  Pure  Ground  Bone 

4610 

2.0 

20.0 

Wizard  Brand  Pure  Manure  

4666 

1.7 

"iTo 

1.0 

Wizard  Brand  Pulverized  Sheep  Manure 

4974 

2.5 

1.5 

1.5 

Quebbeman  & Son,  Louis,  Corydon,  Ind. 

Corydon  Tankage  & Phosphate  _ . . 

5743 

1.7 

6.2 

9.0 

Rasin-Monumental  Company,  Subsidiary  of  the  Virginia-Carolina 
Chemical  Co.,  Cincinnati  Division,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Rasin’s  Special  Wheat  Fertilizer 

6717 

1.6 

3.0 

8.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  General  Favorite 

6718 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Fenhumus  Fertilizer 

6720 

0.4 

12.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Acid  Phosphate 

6834 

14.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  16%  Acid  Phosphate  _ . _ 

6835 

16.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  20%  Acid  Phosphate 

6836 

20.0 

1.5 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Roval  Grain  Grower 

6837 

I'o 

12.0 

Rasin’s  Grain  Fertilizer 

6838 

0.8 

13.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Special  Plant  Food 

6839 

1.6 

11.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Western  Guano  

6840 

0.4 

"i'o 

13.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Farmers’  Success _ _ ___  

6841 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Reliable  Wheat  and  Corn  Fertilizer  _ _ _ . 

6842 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Bie  Giant  Phosphate 

6843 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

1.5 

Rasin’s  Phosphate  and  Bone  Meal 

6844 

0.8 

10.0 

12.0 

11.0 

Rasin’s  Bone  Meal  Phosphate  and  Potash  Mixture 

6845 

0.8 

To 

9.0 

1 "71 

io8 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  In  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 


LABEL, 

Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent.  ^ 

Potash,  KoO,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

PoOs,  per  cent. 

0 . 

1 s 

a" 

o 2 
.c  a 

P.  £ 

<D  O 

3 

o fo 
w — , 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  PoOs,  per  cent. 

Rauh  & Sons  Fertilizer  Company,  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Rauh’s  Red  Star  Phosphate _ __ 

3186 

14.0 

Ranh’s  Half  Pure  Raw  Bone  & Half  Pure  Bone  Phosphate _ 

3193 

1.2 



8.5 

ii'o 



Corn  & Wheat  Grower : 

3658 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda 

3742 

15.6 









Pure  Bone  ...  ...... 

38104 

1.6 

22.0 

4704 

2.4 

4796 

1.6 

"2"o 

's^o 

Soluble  Fertilizer  _ 

5801 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

5802 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

Rauhumus  Manure 

5854 

2.0 

1.5 

"iis 

16%  Acid  Phosphate  __  

6185 





16.0 





Superphosphated  Manure 

6240 

1.0 



10.0 

i.o 



Corn  & Wheat  Grower  without  Potash 

0287 

0.8 



8.0 





Plant  Fond 

6288 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

Black  Soil  Formula  

6289 

0.4 

3.0 

5.0 

Tankage  & Bone  Phosphate 

6290 

2.0 

0.0 

8.0 





Soil  Food  

0291 

0.8 

0.5 

8.0 

Dissolved  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash  

0701 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

Read  Phosphate  Company,  New  Albany  Sales  Department, 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Read’s  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate 

3040 

14.0 

1.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda  _ 

3045 

14.7 

Read’s  Complete  Fertilizer 

4250 

0.8 

I'o 

's'o 

'iio 

Read’s  Pure  Raw  Bone 

4597 

3.5 

2ii5 

Raw  Rock  Phosphate 

5134 

__ 





30.0 

Indiana  Special  No.  1 

5783 

0.4 

3.0 

13.0 

'iio 

Complete  No.  1 

5785 

0.8 

2.0 

10.0 

1.0 

Good  Enough  No.  1 _ _ 

5786 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

1.0 

Read’s  Climax  Acid  Phosphate _ _ 

ems 

16.0 

1.0 

Indiana  Special  No.  2 _ . 

6211 

'oTs 

'i"o 

16.0 

1.0 

Half  & Half  No.  1 

6312 

1.6 

1.0 

6.0 

6.0 

Hoosier  Special 

6313 

0.4 

0.5 

8.0 

1.0 

Tankage  & Phosphate  Special  _ _ 

6814 

0.8 

__ 

12.0 

1.0 



Ammoniated  Potash  & Phosphate  No.  1 

6316 

0.4 

i.o 

10.0 

1.0 



Complete  No.  2 __  _ _ __  _ _ 

6316 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

1.0 

Favorite  . . 

0317 

1.6 

12.0 

1.0 

Truck  Grower  No.  1 

i 6484 

0.6 

~¥.5 

7.0 

1.0 

Half-Seven-Three  _ __ 

6006 

0.4 

3.0 

7.0 

1.0 



Blood  Bone  & Phosphate  No.  1 

0706 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 



Read’s  Steamed  Bone  

6749 

0.8 



_ 



29.0 

Read’s  Five-Five _ 

6866 



5.0 

5.0 

i.o 



Ammoniated  Potash  & Phosphate  No.  2 

6929 

0.5 

1.1 

9.4 

2.5 

Ruhm,  Jr.,  John,  Mt.  Pleasant,  Tenn. 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock _ 

4480 

.... 

.... 

23.0 

Royster  Guano  Company,  F.  S.,  Northern  Division,  Baltimore,  Md. 

Royster’s  14%  Acid  Phosphate ___ 

0782 





14.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  H.  G.  16%  Acid  Phosphate  _ _ 

0783 





16.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  18%  Acid  Phosphate 

0784 

__ 



18.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Special  Wheat  Grower  

0785 

0.8 



12.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Penguin  Ammoniated  Superphosphate 

1 6786 

1.6 



10.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Cuckoo  Crop  Grower . 

! 6787 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Wheat  Oats  & Barley  Fertilizer 

i 6788 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Special  Fish  Guano 

6789 

0.8 

2.0 

11.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Logical  Compound  . 

6790 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Dreadnought  Fertilizer  ___  

6791 

1.6 

2.0 

8,0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Wonder  Worker  Guano ___  _ 

0792 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Fine  Ground  Bone  Meal  _ _ 

1 6798 

2.4 







22.9 

Ground  Bone  Meal ___  

0794 

0.8 





29.0 

Royster’s  Fish  Flesh  & Fowl 

6829 

1.6 

3.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Flamingo  Ammoniated  Superphosphate 

1 6830 

2.0 



12.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Dependo  Grain  Grower 

j 6904 

0.4 

0.5 

13.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Curfew  Ammoniated  Superphosphate  

6906 

3.2 



8.0 

0.5 



Royster’s  Innovation  Ammoniated  Superphosphate __ 

i 6906 

2.4 

— 

8.0 

0.5 

— 

109 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


I^ABELi 

Official  number  j 

1 

Guara 
ers  1 

C .r 

01 

2 ^ 

S ft 

b s ; 

Potash,  KoO,  soiuble  n S'  i 

in  water,  per  cent.  g ; 

jy  the : 
ain  not 

<v 

. 

^ 

ft 

3 a ,0 

^ w ^ 
ft  0 0 

m ftP-( 

manuh 
; less  tl 

0 , 

■ns 

ft 
ft  . 

ft  a 
a ro 
<V  0 

0 ^ 

W -r-t 

ictur- 

lan 

c 

0 

1 ^ 
ag; 

M la 

ftO 

ftpn 

oU 

E-I  c3 

Slover  Fertilizer  Company,  The  Edward,  Camden,  Ohio. 

6101 

0.4 

12.0 

1.0 

6102 

16.0 

1.0 

Tankage  Bone  and  Phosphate 

6669 

"2T0 

12.0 

3.0 

— 

Smith  Agricultural  Chemical  Company,  The,  Indianapolis  Factory, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Dried  Blood  - 

5073 

12.0 

Tankage  

! 5i07"4 

8.0 

ini 

nil 

5075 

14.4 

Pnnfl  MprI  . . . _ 

5068 

1.6 

20IO 

Ground  Phosphate  Rock  

5175 

nil 

nil 

28.0 

Raw  Bone  Meal — _ _ 

5'265 

~3~2 







20.0 

5337 

0.8 

27.0 

Sixteen  Percent  Acid  Phosphate 

5526 

ino 

Alkaline  Phosphate 

ei'oe 

_ __ 



14.0 



Smith’s  No.  2 Wheat  Maker  & Seeding  Down 

6607 

0.8 



10.0 

Smith’s  No.  2 Crop  Producer 

6598 

1.6 

10.0 

Smith’s  General  Crop  Fertilizer  

6500 

0.8 

'ilo 

7.0 

Smith’s  No.  2 Corn  Oats  & Wheat  Fertilizer 

6600 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

Smith’s  No.  2 Vegetable  Grower 

6601 

2.4 

1.0 

8.0 

Smith’s  No.  2 Ammoniated  Phosphate  & Potash 

6602 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

Smith’s  Grain  Grower  : 

6603 

0.8 

1.0 

15.0 

Smith’s  Eight  Three 

6604 

3.0 

8.0 

Smith’s  14%  Acid  Phosphate 

6624 

_ 

14.0 

Smith’s  One-Eight-Two  

6625 

0.8 

’2I0 

8.0 

Smith’s  TWo-Eight-Two  

6626 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

Smith’s  One-Eight-Three 

6740 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

Smith’s  18%  Acid  Phosphate 

6860 

18.0 

Smith’s  No.  3 Wheat  Maker  & Seeding  Down 

6002 

’ol 

12.0 

Smith’s  No.  3 Crop  Producer  

6903 

1.6 

— 

12.0 





Southern  Fertilizer  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Elk  Corn  and  Wheat  Grower  ’ 

5486 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

1.0 

Elk  Standard  Guano 

5487 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Special  Grain  Grower 

5718 

0.4 

2.0 

11.0 

1.0 

Elk  General  Crop  Grower 

5906 

0.4 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

Elk  Special  Lime  Fertilizer 

6121 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

1.0 

Elk  Indiana  Tobacco  and  Truck  Grower  . ..  _ . 

6163 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Elk  Phosphate  — _ 

6245 

14.0 

1.0 

Indiana  Standard  Guano 

6618 

~U6 

"ilo 

8!o 

o!5 

nil 

Stadler  Rendering  & Fertilizer  Co.,  J.  L.  & H.,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Stadler’s  Acid  Phosphate 

5465 

14.0 

1.0 

Stadler’s  Pure  Bone  Meal 

5474 

"2^8 

20I0 

Valley  Phosphate  __  

6659 

2.0 

'il5 

~9~2 

'il2 

16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6660 

16.0 

1.0 

Harvest  King 

6661 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

0.5 

Vegetable  & Grain  Grower 

6662 

0.8 

0.5 

10.0 

0.7 

General  Crop  Grower 

6663 

1.6 

1.0 

10.0 

1.0 

Ammoniated  Phosphate  and  Potash 

6664 

0.4 

1.0 

13.0 

1.0 

Ammoniated  Acid  Phosphate 

6665 

0.4 

12.0 

1.0 

Stadler’s  Ammoniated  Acid  Phosphate 

6861 

0.8 

10.0 

1.0 

Vegetable  Manure 

6862 

1.2 

12.0 

1.0 

Grain  Grower 

6863 

1.6 

10.0 

1.0 

Stadler’s  Onion  Growers  Special 

6914 

0.8 

"3I0 

8!o 

nil 

Stephenson  & Armstrong,  Brazil,  Ind. 

The  Hoosier  Fertilizer _ 

6738 

5.5 







12.0 

Sterling  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Sterling  Raw  Bone  Meal 

6091 

3.3 

21.0 

Sterling  Pure  Bone  Meal 

6092 

1.8 

28.0 

Sterling  16%  Acid  Phosphate _ 

6638 

16.0 

Sterling  Special  Grain  Grower 

6639 

”o~8 

"ilo 

9.0 

"no 

Sterling  Universal  Fertilizer 

0640 

1.6 

12.0 

2.0 

Sterling  Golden  Harvest  Fertilizer 

6641 

0.8 

'0I5 

10.0 

2.0 

Sterling  Harvest  Queen  Fertilizer 

0642 

1.6 

1.0 

12.0 

2.0 

Sterling  Harvest  King  Fertilizer 

6643 

2.4 

1.0 

8.0 

2.0 

Sterling’s  Half  & Half  Brand _ 

6685 

0.8 

12.0 

11.0 

nil 

no 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 

LABEL 

Official  number 

Nitrogen,  N, 

per  cent. 

Potash,  K2O,  soluble 

in  water,  per  cent. 

Soluble  and  reverted 

phosphoric  acid, 

P2OB,  per  cent. 

Insoluble  phosphoric 

acid,  PoOe,  per  cent. 

Total  phosphoric 

acid,  P2O5,  per  cent. 

Stolle  & Sons,  Anton,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Stolle’s  Animal  Fertilizer __ 

6147 

4.5 

10.0 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Swift’s  Garden  City  Phosphate 

2716 

14.0 

Swift’s  Pure  Raw  Bone  Meal ___ 

2755 

’3’7 

^io 

Swift’s  Lawn  Fertilizer  

1 3056 

3.7 

23.0 

Swift’s  Pure  Bone  Meal  & Blood  

: 3889 

3.7 

23.0 

Swift’s  Ground  Dried  Blood 

i 4113 

13.1 

Swift’s  Ground  Steamed  Bone 

1 4348 

1.6 

20io 

Swift’s  Pure  Ground  Bone  Meal 

4874 

2.5 

24.0 

Swift’s  Pure  Complete  Fertilizer 

5154 

0.8 

"i’o 

’sio 

’lio 

Swift’s  Nitrate  of  Soda — . __  

5185 

15.2 

Swift’s  Ground  Beef  Bone _ 

5186 

2.0 

27io 

Swift’s  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate  _ 

5369 

ieio 

Swift’s  Pure  Dissolved  Bone __  

5371 

'i’e 

16.0 

’sio 

Swift’s  1—8—3  Fertilizer 

5710 

0.8 

"s'o 

8.0 

0.5 

Pioneer  1--S— 3 Fertilizer 

5729 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Swift’s  Diamond  K.  Grain  Grower 

5791 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

0.5 

Swift’s  Diamond  M.  Grain  Grower . 

5793 

1.6 

1.0 

11.0 

1.0 

Swift’s  Bone,  Phosphate  and  Potash 

6118 

0.8 

1.5 

10.0 

11.0 

Swifts  Bone  Meal  and  Phosphate  

6199 

0.8 

13.0 

7.0 

Pioneer  Bone  Meal  & Phosphate  _ 

6242 

0.8 

13.0 

7.0 

Swift’s  Special  Superphosphate  

6366 

1.6 

'iTo 

8.0 

1.0 

Swift’s  Clay  Soil  Special 

6367 

1.6 

12.0 

1.0 

Swifts  1,^— 10— 1 Fertilizer 

6368 

0.4 

’i’o 

10.0 

Swift’s  Ammoniated  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash _ 

6369 

1.6 

0.5 

10.0 

’iio 

Swift’s  Tankage  and  Bone  Phosphate 

6370 

0.8 

12.0 

0.5 

Swift’s  Dissolved  Animal  Bone— Potash  Mixture 

6371 

1.2 

’iio 

16.0 

4.5 

Swift’s  Truck  Fertilizer  __  _ ___  

6562 

2.4 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Pioneer  No.  5 Grain  Grower 

6611 

1.6 



12.0 

1.0 

Pioneer  No.  4 Grain  Grower  _ _ 

6612 

0.8 

i.o 

8.0 

0.5 

Pioneer  General  Crop  Grower  Special 

6613 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

Pioneer  Corn  and  Oats  Fertilizer  __  

6614 

0.8 

12.0 

0.5 

Pioneer  High  Grade  Acid  Phosphate  ! 

6781 

__ 

14.0 

Swift’s  Sheep  Manure  Fertilizer 1 

6864 

i.6 

~2'o 



’iis 

Swift’s  1—8—2  Fertilizer 

6899 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 

’ois 

Swift’s  Special  Half  and  Half  Fertilizer _ 

6915 

1.6 



6.0 

10.0 

Swift’s  1— 8^— 6 Fertilizer 

6916 

0.8 

6.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Tennessee  Chemical  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Ox  Standard  Raw  Bone  ___  __  

4619 

3.7 

22.0 

Ox  Fine  Raw  Bone  Meal  _ | 

5314 

2.4 

24.0 

Ox  Special  Grain  Grower  

5717 

0.4 

’3io 

’sio 

’0T5 

Ox  Dissolved  Bone  Phosphate  _ 

5992 

14.0 

0.5 

Ox  Sixteen  Percent  

5993 

16.0 

0.5 

Ox  Bone  Phosphate  & Potash | 

5994 

'OA 

’iio 

11.0 

0.5 

Ox  Ammoniated  Potash  Mixture _ 

5995 

0.2 

2.0 

12.0 

0.5 

Ox  Slaughter  House  Bone  & Phosphate 

5996 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Ox  Ammoniated  Bone  Phosphate  _ 

5997 

1.6 

2.0 

10.0 

0.5 

Ox  Special  Truck  Grower  

5999 

1.6 

3.0 

10.0 

0.5 

Special  Grain  Grower  Formula  

6254 

0.4 

2.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Ox  Special  Slaughter  House  Bone  Phosphate  _ 

6406 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Ox  Grain  Grow'er  Special 

6407 

0.4 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Ox  Ammoniated  Phosphate  

6408 

1.6 

— 

10.0 

0.5 

Tennessee  Coal,  Iron  & Railroad  Company,  Birmingham,  Ala. 

Duplex  Basie  Phosphate  ‘A  A’ 

6257 

— 

18.0 

Toledo  Seed  & Oil  Company,  The,  Toledo,  Ohio. 

Owl  Brand  Fertilizer 

6169 

3.8 

0.2 

— 

— 

0.2 

Ill 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


LABEL, 

Official  number  | 

1 

Guara; 
ers  t 

'A 

2 ^ 
u 

g p. 

ntced  1 
0 cent; 

o 

1= 

O O' 

w o 

d g 

U 

II 

)y  the  T 
lin  not 

0) 

u 

O ‘o  4^ 

5 s 

'O  o o 

^ Sh 

« o 0) 
p, 

.H  p 0 

O rp  ^ 

m P<lii 

nanufa 
less  th 

o . 

2 p 

•S  « 

“ 2 
o P 

S) 

0)  0 

Is 

ctur- 

an 

P 

.2  o 

m £ 

O'o 

Tuscarora  Fertilizer  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Tuscarora  Raw  Bone . 

3461 

3.7 







22.0 

Ammoniated  Phosphate 

3462 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

2.0 



Acid  Phosphate 

3465 





14.0 

2.0 



3466 

2.4 

24.0 

Tuscarora  Steamed  Bone __  

3530 

1.6 

nil 

nil 

20.0 

A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Co.,  Brand,  “Norris  Bone  Meal”  

3610 

1.6 







20.0 

A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Co.,  Brand  “Wheat  & Clover” 

3613 

_ 



16.0 

2.0 



A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Co’s.,  Brand,  Fish  Guano  

4000 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 





A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Co’s.,  Brand,  Tobacco  Special 

4001 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 





W.  A.  Hart  Formula  D 

5248 





16.0 

2.0 



A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Company  Soluble  Phosphate 

5967 





14.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  1—9—1  Fertilizer  __  

0028 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  li— 12— 1'  Fertilizer  

6030 

0.8 

1.0 

12.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6083 





16.0 

0.5 



W.  A.  Hart’s  Special  Brand  Formula  “F” 

6034 





18.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  Bone  Meal 

6123 

i.6 







27.0 

’ITiscarora  Special  Standard 

6473 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  Ammoniated  Phosphate 

6474 

0.8 

1.0 

7.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  Tankage  & Phosphate  

6475 

1.6 



10.0 

0.5 



A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Company  Corn  & Wheat  No.  2 _ 

6624 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Company  Corn  & Wheat  

6529 

1.2 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 



A.  R.  Norris  Fertilizer  GompaTiy  Special  Gnrn  Fertilizer 

6663 

1.2 

10.0 

0.5 

W.  A.  Hart’s  Formula  “G”  __ 

6673 

nil 

10.0 

13.5 

nil 

A.  B.  Norris  Fertilizer  Company  Wheat  & Clover  Special.  

6'710 

"o’s 



12.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  Special  Phosphate  & Potash  

6711 



i.o 

10.0 

0.5 



Tuscarora  1—12  Fertilizer  

6883 

0.8 

— 

12.0 

0.6 

— 

Virginia-Carolina  Chemical  Company,  Cincinnati  Division, 

Cincinnati,  Oho. 

Complete  Fertilizer  

5181 

1.6 

2.0 

8.0 





^ Champion  Corn  & Wheat  Grower 

5221 

0.8 

2.0 

8.0 





Ground  Animal  Bone 

5882 

1.6 







28.0 

20%  Acid  Phosphate 

5961 





20.0 





^ 16%  Acid  Phosphate 

6133 





16.0 





^ Prolific  Grain  Grower 

6221 



2.0 

12.0 

1.5 



^ Sure  Grain  Producer 

6497 

0.8 



13.0 

1.5 



^ Rescue  Fertilizer 

6498 

1.6 



•11. 0 

1.5 



^ Monarch  Manure  __ 

6500 

0.4 

1.0 

13.0 

1.5 



^ Complete  Manure 

6501 

O'.  8 

1.0 

8.0 

1.5 



5^  Bone  Meal,  Phosphate  with  Potash  __  

6506 

0.8 

1.0 

9.0 

11.0 



^ Ideal  Potash  Mixture  

6714 

1.6 

3.0 

8.0 

1.5 



^ Richumus  Fertilizer  ___  _T. 

6716 

0.4 

12.0 

1.5 



^ Red  Cross  14% ! 

6846 





14.0 

1.5 



^ Farmers’  Friend  

6847 

0.8 

3.0 

8.0 

1.5 

— 

^ Bone  Meal  and  Phosphate 

6848 

0.8 

.... 

10.0 

12.0 

.... 

Wachtel  Rendering  Plant,  John,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Waehtels  Fertilizer 

5004 

2.5 

— 

— 

— 

16.0 

Weidman,  Augustus,  Hagerstown,  Ind. 

An  Acid  Phosphate 

4474 

14.0 

“One-Twelve”  

6225 

1.0 

12.0 

"ilo 

Bone  and  Acid  Phosphate 

6743 

1.5 

— 

9.0 

9.0 

— 

112 


Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufactur- 
ers to  contain  not  less  than 

LABEL, 

U 

rQ 

a 

C 

"a 

'3 

s 

o 

2 ^ 
g P. 

O 

3 . 

'3  ^ 

O <D 

W O 

o g 

iS.a 

u 

^ '3  -M 

o S 

d ^ ^ 

” O <D 

<U  rj  p, 

3 a 

P o O 

0 4:!  « 
M oPt, 

o , 

P 

■S  ^ 

pH  , 

O V 

44  a. 
ft  5 
o 0 

1^' 
o ^ 

W 

c 

pS 

1 « 
'g.a 

w o 

.§9. 

ftp;, 

H a 

Western  Fertilizer  Works,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Whfiat  and  Corn  Sparial 

3397 

0.8 

1.0 

8.0 

0.5 

Oompletfi  Fertilizpr 

3396 

0.4 

1.0 

7.0 

0.5 

Arid  Phnsphatft 

3490 

12.0 

0.5 

Bona  Mftal 

3401 

1.7 

25'o 

Garden  Special  

5>760 

1.6 

~iTo 

10.0 

Ammoniatcd  Mixtnra 

5768 

1.6 

12.0 

Availablft  Plant  Food 

6227 

1.2 

10.0 

Hiah  Grade  Phosphate 

6262 

16.0 

Corn  King 

6263 

0.8 

0.5 

12.0 

Special  Spring  Fertilizer : 

6264 

0.4 

0.5 

13.0 

14%  Acid  Phosphate 

6865 

14.0 

Special  Wheat  Fertilizer 

6691 

"o^s 

o's 

12.0 

Special  Fall  Fertilizer 

6692 

0.4 

0.5 

18.0 

Wing  Seed  Company,  The,  Mechanicsburg,  Ohio. 

Thomas  Phosphate  Powder  IRasic  Slag  Phosphatel 

5608 

17.0 

Woodward  & Dickerson,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Acid  Phosphate 

6131 

14.0 

Nitrate  of  Soda  

6132 

ii’s 

Worm  & Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Enreka  Garden  Fertilizer  ..  .... 

6731 

6.0 

0.3 

8.0 

Wuichet  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Dayton,  Ohio. 

16%  Acid  Phosphate 

0243 

16.0 

1.0 

“E”  Spot  Cash  Fertilizer  .... 

6568 

1.6 

1.0 

8.0 

1.0 

“E”  Raw  Bone  & Phosphate  . 

6559 

1.6 

0.5 

8.0 

6.0 

“E”  Ammonia  Special 

6500 

1.6 

10.0 

1.0 

“E”  Ruby  . 

6561 

1.0 

'o's 

9.0 

1.0 



II3 

INDEX 


Page 


Action  of  plant  foods 13 

Attention  purchasers  of  fertilizer 33 

Comments  of  mf’rs  and  agents 28 

Comparative  results  by  m’fr’s  chemists—  31 

Refunds  28 

Shipments  returned  29 

Shipments  withdrawn  from  sale 28 

Shipments  sold  under  names  indicating 

animal  by-products 30 

Special  remarks  32 

Explanation  of  tables 32 

Explanation  of  terms— 

General  8 

Chemical  10 

Guarantees  12 

Equivalent  values  4 

Fertilizer  map.  Towns  added  in  1916 14 

Handling  and  storing  fertilizer 5 

Indiana  Fertilizer  Law 3 

Administration  6 

Cases  reported 8 

Summarized  for  agents  and  dealers 3 

Summarized  for  consumers 5 

Summarized  for  manufacturers 3 

State  Chemist’s  label 6 

Special  subject.  Nu-Life  fertilizer 13 

Inspection- 

Classification  brands  deficient  in  value...  24 


Pago 


Classification  deficient  brands 24 

Discussion  of  results,  1916 25 

Method  of  obtaining  inspections 7 

Report  of  1916  19 

Summary  of  results,  spring  and  fall 20 

Summary  of  results  by  classes 23 

Summary  of  results,  17  years,  1900-1916 21 

Summary  spring  and  fall  samples,  1916 21 

Materials  for  home  mixing 19 

Prices  26 

Purchasing  fertilizers  18 

Sales  16 

Standing  of  manufacturers  19 

Tables— 

I  Summary  inspection  samples  by 

classes  23 

II  Summary  of  manufacturers  by 

analysis,  spring,  1916 34 

III  Summary  of  manufacturers  by 

analysis,  fall,  1916 36 

IV  Summary  of  manufacturers  by 

analysis,  1916  38 

V  Summary  of  samples  by  counties,  1916  40 

VI  Details  of  inspection  results 42 

VII  Rock  phosphate,  fineness  92 

VIII  Materials  for  home  mixing 93 

IX  Manufacturers  and  brands  bn  sale  1917  94 


TABLE  CONTENTS 


MANUFACTURER 

Inspe 

Sum- 

maries 

ction 

Details 

Fine- 

ness 

Mate- 
rials for 
home 
mixing 

Brands 

certified 

on 

sale 

Alphano  Humus  Co.  

34-38 

42 

94 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

New  York  _ 

34-38 

42 

94 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

Rnwker  Fertilizer  Works 

34-38 

43 

93 

94 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

Detroit  Sales  Dep’t 

34-38 

43 

93 

94 

Ameriean  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

Great  Eastern  Branch  ...  ... 

34-38 

46 

95 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

Michigan  Carbon  Works 

34-38 

46 

95 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

Western  Union  Chemical  Co.  Branch 

38 

47 

96 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

M.  E.  Wheeler  & Co.,  Branch 

34-38 

47 

95 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works . _ 

34-38 

48 

93 

96 

Ballard  Packing  Co.  . . 

34-38 

50 

93 

96 

Rarwell,  J-  W. 

96 

Bausback  & Sons,  Robert  . _ 

34-38 

50 

96 

Buhner  Fertilizer  Co.  

34-38 

50 

93 

96 

Central  Phosphate  Co. 

34-38 

51 

92 

93 

97 

Chicago  Feed  Fertilizer  Co. 

34-38 

51 

93 

97 

Chicago  Raw  Prodnets  Uo 

34-38 

51 

97 

Cincinnati  Phosphate  Co. 

34-38 

52 

97 

Clendenin  Fertilizer  Co.  . _ 

34-38 

53 

97 

Cleveland  Provision  Co.  

97 

Darling  Company 

34-38 

53 

93 

97 

D.  X.  Fertilizer  Co. 

34-38 

54 

93 

98 

Dryfus  Packing  & Provision  Co. 

34-38 

55 

93 

98 

Eckart  Packing  Co. _ 

34-38 

55 

93 

98 

Empire  Carbon  Works  

98 

P.mpire  Gnano  Co 

34-38 

55 

93 

98 

Evansville  Packing  Co.  

34-38 

56 

99 

Ewing,  Ceo  M. 

99 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Co  , Colnmhns,  Ohio 

34-38 

56 

93 

99 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Co  , Indianapolis,  Tnd. 

34-38 

57 

93 

99 

Farmers  Cronnd  Roek  Phosphate  Co 

34-38 

57 

92 

Federal  Chemical  Co.  

34-38 

57 

92 

93 

101 

NDEX  (continued) 


MANUFACTURER 

Inspe 

Sum- 

maries 

ction 

Details 

Fine- 

ness 

Mate- 
rials for 
home 
mixing  | 

Brands 

certified 

on 

sale 

Fertilizer  Co.  Paris,  III. 

101 

Fe.s.wenrien,  F.  1.. 

38 

60 

93 

101 

Fluhrer  Tobacco  & Snuff  Co. __ 

34-38 

60 

93 

101 

Fox  Chemical  Co. _ 

34-38 

60 

101 

Gleaner  Clearing  House  Association  

101 

Globe  Fertilizer  Co. 

34-38 

61 

93 

101 

Goldreich  Fertilizer  Co. 

38 

62 

93 

102 

Goodrich,  W.  J.  

102 

Groves  Fertilizer  Works  (The  Joslin-Schmidt  Co.) 

34-38 

62 

102 

Hess  & Bro.,  S.  M. 

34-39 

63 

102 

Hirsh,  Stein  & Co. 

34-39 

64 

93 

102 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Co. 

65 

93 

103 

Hubbell  Fertilizer  C/O.,  T..  W 

39 

66 

Hurst  & Co. 

103 

Independent  Packers  Fertilizing  Co. 

35-39 

67 

Independent  Packers  Fertilizer  Co.  

35-39 

67 

■ 103 

Indianapolis  Rendering  Co.  _ _ 

35-39 

67 

93 

103 

International  Agric.  Corporation,  Lockland,  Ohio 

35-39 

68 

International  Agric.  Corporation,  Buffalo,  N.  Y.__ 

35-39 

68 

International  Agric.  Corporation,  Cincinnati,  0.__ 

35-39 

69 

1 104 

Jarecki  Chemical  Co.  __  

35-39 

69 

j 104 

Johnson  & Co.,  D.  D. _ __  __ 

35-39 

70 

Jones  Fertilizer  Co.  

35-39 

71 

Jones  Phosphate  Co.,  Robin 

35-39 

71 

92 

93 

‘ 104 

Kaufman  Fertilizer  Co. 

35-39 

72 

105 

Kentucky  Fertilizer  Co.,  Branch  Federal 

Chemical  Co. 

35-39 

72 

105 

Kirke  Chemical  Co. 

39 

73 

; 105 

Louisville  Fertilizer  Co. - - 

35-39 

73 

93 

35-39 

74 

j 105 

Major  Bros.  Packing  Co. _ 

35-39 

74 

93 

1 106 

McCartnev  Brn.c;. 

106 

Mineral  Fertilizer  Co.,  The 

35-39 

74 

Morris  & Company  _ __  _ _ 

35-39 

75 

106 

Mt.  Pleasant  Fertilizer  Co. _ 

35-39 

76 

92 

93 

106 

McCullough  Seed  Co. __  _ 

35-39 

76 

1 

Niederhaus,  Fred  

39 

76 

Nitrate  Agencies  Co.,  Western  Branch  

35-39 

76 

93 

j 106 

Packer  Fertilizer  Co.,  Indianapolis — 

35-39 

76 

93 

! 107 

Packers  Pertilizer  Cn.,  riincinnati 

35-39 

77 

107 

Pan  American  Fertilizer  Co. 

35-39 

78 

Pearl  Packing  Hnnse,  '^Phe 

3.5-39 

78 

93 

107 

Pero  & Stoecker 

35-39 

78 

93 

107 

Prairie  State  Phosphate  Co.  _ _ _ _ 

35-39 

78 

92 

Pulverized  Manure  Co. 

35-39 

79 

93 

107 

Quebbeman  & Son,  Louis  _ _ __ 

39 

79 

1 107 

Rasin-Monumental  Co. 

35-39 

79 

107 

Rauh  & Sons  Fertilizer  Co.,  E.  

35-39 

79 

93 

' 108 

Read  Phosphate  Co.  __  

35-39 

81 

93 

108 

Royster  t^iiann  t'lompany^  F.  S. 

108 

Kuhm,  Jr.,  John 

35-39 

82 

92 

93 

108 

Schmadel  Packing  & Ice  Co.  _ _ __  

39 

83 

Slover  Fertilizer  Co. , 

109 

Smith,  Jr.,  Wm.  

35-39 

83 

Smith  Agricultural  Chemical  Cn. 

35-39 

83 

93 

109 

Southern  Fertilizer  rio. 

35-39 

84 

109 

Stabler  Fertilizer  Rendering  Co. 

35-39 

85 

109 

Stephenson  ArmstronrJ 

109 

Sterling  Fertilizer  Co.  __  

35-39 

85 

109 

Stolle  & Sons,  Anton  _ 

35-39 

85 

93 

110 

Swift  Companv 

35-39 

86 

93 

110 

'Pennessee  (Chemical  P.o. 

39 

88 

110 

n’ennessee.  Poal  Po.  

93 

no 

’■Poledo  Seed  Oil  Po. 

93 

no 

d’liscarora  Fertilizer  Po 

35-39 

89 

111 

Virginia-Parolina  Chemical  Co. 

35-39 

89 

111 

Wachtel  Rendering  Co.  __  _ 

93 

111 

Weidman,  Augustus 

35-39 

90 

111 

Western  Fertilizer  We'rks 

35-39 

90 

112 

Wing  Seed  Co 

39 

91 

93 

112 

Woodward  Dickerson 

93 

112 

Worm  & Company 

39 

91 

112 

Wuichet  Fertilizer  Co.,  The  

35-39 

91 

112 



_ . .. 

PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


I 


■ ' ^/s  usmifr 


Agricultural  Experiment  StaticAi’^'^ 


Bulletin  No.  200, ^Vol.  XX 
JuLY^  1917 


STRAWBERRY  VARIETIES  AND 
CULTURAL  HINTS 


PnDlislied  Dy  tie  Station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


I 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 

Joseph  D.  Oliver,  President South  Bend.  St.  Joseph  County 

Fay  S.  Chandler Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

Charles  Downing Greenfield  Hancock  County 

John  A.  Hillenbrand Batesville,  Ripley  County 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs Bridgeport,  Marion  County 

Warren  T.  McCray Kentland.  Newton  County 

James  W.  Noel Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

George  W.  Purcell Vincennes.  Knox  County 

Andrew  E.  Reynolds Crawfordsville.  Montgomery  County 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D President  of  the  University 

STATION  STAFF 

HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS 

Arthur  GosSj  M.  S.,  A.  C : Director 

George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A Sup’t  Agricultural  Extension 

Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V.  M Chief  Veterinarian 

Otto  F.  Hunziker,  M.  S Chief  in  Dairy  Husbandry 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B Chief  in  Botany 

William  J.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S.,  A.  C.^ State  Chemist 

John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S Chief  in  Animal  Husbandry 

James  Troop,  M.  S Chief  in  Entomology 

Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S Chief  in  Horticulture 

ASSOCIATES  AND  ASSISTANTS 

John  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.^ Entomological  Assistant 

Evelyn  Allison,  B.  S... Assistant  in  Botany 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Paul  R.  Bausman,  B.  S.^.. Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

James  C.  Beavers,  B.  Agr Associate  in  Soils  and  Crops  Extension 

Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S.'^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Harry  D.  Burnside.  B.  S.  A.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S Associate  in  Milk  Production 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  SJ .'.Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C Assistant  Veterinarian 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader  Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops 

Carleton  Cutler,  B.  S.^ First  Deputy  State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 

John  J.  Davis,  B.  S.^ Entomological  Assistant  in  Charge 

Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.‘* Deputy  State  Chemist 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A ....Associate  in  Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

Mabel  L Harlan Assistant  in  Agricultural  Extension 

Cora  A.  Jacobs,  A.  M.^ Seed  Analyst 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Assistant  in  Soils 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Franklin  G.  King,  B.  S Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Walter  H.  Larrimer.  B.  S.^ Scientific  Assistant 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S Assistant  in  Entomology 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B.« Scientific  Assistant 

Horace  C.  Mills,  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S.'‘ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S.. .Research  Assistant  in  Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 

Joseph  Oskamp,  B.  S Research  Assistant  in  Pomology 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Harry  C.  Paine,  D.  V.  M Associate  Veterinarian 

Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.'* First  Deputy  State  Chemist  (Fertilizers) 

Harry  J.  Reed Associate  in  Horticulture 

Charles  C.  Rees,  M.  A Assistant  in  Botany 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S.^ Scientific  Assistant 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.* Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G..  B.  S... Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Swine  Production  and  Management 

Herbert  B.  Switzer,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Samuel  F.  Thornton,  B.  S* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  S.^ Scientific  Assistant 

Gilbert  P.  Walker,  B.  S Assistant  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Nellie  Tracy Secretary  to  the  Director  and  Librarian 

Mary  K.  Bloom Bookkeeper 

1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Seed  Testing 

3 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  In- 

sect Investigations 

^ Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 

(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909) 

J P.  Prigg,  Daleville State  Live  Stock  Association 

U R Fishel,  Hope State  Poultry  Fanciers’  Association 

H H.  SwAiM,  South  Bend State  Horticultural  Society 

D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville State  Dairy  Association 

D F Maish  Frankfort State  Corn  Growers’  Association 


STRAWBERRY  VARIETIES  AND 
CULTURAL  HINTS 

Prepared  under  the  direction  of  C.  G.  Woodbury 
By  Joseph  Oskamp 


Strawberries  constitute  an  important  fruit  crop  in  Indiana. 
There  are  sections  in  this  state  which  ship  upwards  of  fifty  carloads 
during  a single  season.  Indiana  has  immense  natural  advantages  in 
its  geographical  location  and  nearness  to  markets,  but  the  industry 
has  received  very  little  intelligent  stimulus.  The  crop  has  been  given 
insufficient  attention  and  as  a result,  the  State  has  an  average  produc- 
tion of  some  1500  quarts  per  acre.  Unless  prices  are  unusually  high, 
such  a yield  would  scarcely  meet  the  expenses  of  growing  and  mar- 
keting. There  is  not  the  slightest  doubt  that  the  growers  of  Indiana 
could  double  their  output  of  strawberries  by  judicious  attention  to 
varieties  and  culture. 


Fig.  1.  Strawberry  plants  should  be  set  so  the  crowns  are  just  above  ground. 
The  plant  in  the  middle  is  set  properly,  that  on  the  rig:ht  too  deep,  on  the  left  not 
deep  enougrh 


A poor  stand  of  plants  is  often  the  result  of  late  planting.  Or- 
der the  plants  and  have  them  on  hand  early  in  the  spring  so  that 
they  may  be  set  out  at  the  earliest  opportunity.  Have  the  bed  well 
prepared  as  for  a garden  crop.  Mark  the  rows  off  three  and  one- 
half  or  four  feet  apart  and  set  the  plants  every  one  and  one-half  or 
two  feet  in  the  row.  Place  the  plants  so  that  the  crowns  are  just 
above  the  ground,  as  shown  in  Fig.  i,  and  firm  the  earth  well  about 
the  roots. 

Before  planting,  if  the  roots  are  too  long,  they  should  be  short- 
ened in  as  it  is  no  advantage  to  have  them  longer  than  four  or  five 
inches.  It  is  a well  known  fact  that  plants  absorb  water  by  means 
of  their  roots  and  give  water  up  to  the  air  through  their  leaves.  In 
a newly  set  plant  which  has  not  yet  become  established  in  the  soil, 
the  absorption  of  water  is  very  slow,  but  the  loss  of  water  through 


4 


the  leaves  continues.  In  a dry  season,  therefore,  we  should  reduce 
this  loss  to  a minimum  by  removing  all  leaves  which  have  opened, 
when  we  transplant;  ordinarily  two  leaves  are  left.  Do  not  ex- 
pose the  plants  unnecessarily  to  the  drying  efifects  of  the  wind  and 
sun,  but  keep  them  shaded  and  moist  while  planting. 


Fig.  2.  Plants  should  be  pruned  before  setting.  The  plant  on  the  right  is  as 
dug;  the  one  on  the  left  is  pruned 

The  future  productiveness  of  the  plants  will  depend  to  no  small 
extent  upon  the  thoroughness  of  cultivation  during  the  first  sum- 
mer. Stir  the  soil  frequently  with  a small  cultivator  to  keep  it  loose 
and  friable.  Several  hand  hoeings  will, be  necessary  to  maintain 
the  soil  in  the  row  in  good  condition  and  free  from  weeds.  A mulch 
of  clean  straw  two  or  three  inches  deep  should  be  spread  over  the 
patch  after  the  ground  becomes  frozen  in  the  fall.  With  the  opening 
of  spring  the  mulch  is  raised  from  over  the  plants  but  is  left  on  the 
bed  between  plants  and  between  rows  to  conserve  the  moisture  and 
keep  the  fruit  clean. 

An  important  factor  in  the  first  season’s  management  is  the 
pinching  off  of  the  blossoms  as  they  appear  on  the  young  plants.  It 
has  been  found  experimentally  that  the  stand  of  plants  may  be  in- 
creased four  or  five  fold  by  this  operation  alone,  which  with  some 
varieties  is  quite  an  item. 


5 


Manures  and  fertilizers  should  be  more  generally  used  by  straw- 
berry growers.  Barnyard  manure  is  one  of  the  best  fertilizers, 
where  it  can  be  obtained,  as  it  not  only  enriches  the  soil  but  improves 
its  mechanical  condition.  At  least  ten  tons  should  be  applied  per 
acre  and  turned  under  in  preparing  the  bed.  The  great  drawback  to 
manure  is  the  many  weed  and  grass  seeds  which  it  often  contains, 
making  the  berry  field  very  foul.  This  can  be  obviated  by  applying 
the  manure  to  the  preceding  crop.  In  addition  to  the  manure,  it  is 
well  to  apply  400  pounds  or  so  of  acid  phosphate,  which  can  either 
be  worked  in  with  the  manure  or  applied  afterwards,  broadcast  or 
with  a fertilizer  drill.  Where  manure  is  not  available,  100  pounds 
of  nitrate  of  soda  should  be  mixed  with  the  phosphate.  Commercial 
fertilizers  should  not  be  applied  in  the  hole  when  setting  the  plants 
or  allowed  to  come  in  contact  with  the  plants,  but  should  be  broad- 
casted and  harrowed  into  the  soil  before  the  plants  are  set,  or  applied 
later  as  a top  dressing.  Fertilizer  is  also  profitably  used  in  renewing 
an  old  patch  after  the  picking  season  is  over. ' 

Much  good  can  be  accomplished  in  the  judicious  rejuvenation 
of  an  old  bed.  Instead  of  allowing  the  patch  to  grow  up  in  weeds 
after  the  picking  season,  rake  off  the  mulch  and  begin  cultivation. 
Plow  out  a portion  of  the  old  rows  where  it  seems  desirable  and 
harrow  the  bed  both  ways.  This  is  an  entirely  safe  practice  in  a 
season  of  normal  rainfall  and  with  a variety  producing  an  abundance 
of  runners,  but  with  a shy  plant  maker  such  as  Chesapeake,  or  in  a 
dry  season,  but  few  plants  should  be  plowed  out.  The  soil  should  be 
worked  during  the  remainder  of  the  summer  as  for  a young  bed. 

Strawberries  do  not  ordinarily  require  spraying  but  in  case  of 
attack  by  leaf  eating  insects,  spray  with  arsenate  of  lead,  two  pounds 
of  paste  or  one  pound  of  powder  to  50  gallons  of  water.  Leaf  spot 
or  rust  may  be  controlled  most  effectively  by  spraying  with  Bor- 
deaux mixture,  although  commercial  lime-sulfur  may  be  used,  one 
gallon  to  25  gallons  of  water,  if  of  ordinary  strength. 

HARVESTING  AND  MARKETING 

The  berries  should  be  picked  carefully  without  bruising.  The 
pickers  are  generally  provided  with  a six-basket  tray  and  they  pick 
directly  into  the  quart  boxes.  Fruit  for  shipping  will  have  to  be 
picked  every  day,  as  it  will  remain  in  the  right  condition  only  a 
short  time.  For  local  market  or  short  distance  haul,  it  can  be  picked 
ripe,  but  not  soft.  For  a long  haul,  the  fruit  should  be  slightly 
green,  about  one-eighth,  but  of  full  size.  The  fruit  should  not  re- 
main in  the  field  exposed  to  the  sun  after  picking,  but  should  be 
taken  at  once  to  the  packing  shed.  After  a rain,  it  is  best  to  wait 
for  the  water  to  dry  off  before  attempting  to  pick.  Berries  wet 
with  rain  or  dew  go  down  quickly  and  do  not  ship  well.  If  very 
much  rain  falls,  the  fruit  will  become  watery  and  soft  while  yet 
green,  and  must  be  harvested  in  poor  condition. 


6 


Grade  the  berries  and  have  them  uniform.  Different  varieties 
packed  together  in  the  same  carrier  will  lessen  the  attractiveness. 
Berries  of  light  red  color,  which  might  look  very  well  by  themselves 
would  show  up  poorly  beside  darker  ones.  The  same  thing  is  true 
of  size.  Medium  small  berries  which  could  command  a fair  price, 
would  if  packed  with  larger  fruit,  look  very  inferior  and  spoil  the 
sale  of  both.  Grading  may  be  done  in  a rough  way  by  the  pickers 
as  they  pick.  All  malformed,  bruised  or  over-ripe  fruit  should  be 
discarded.  The  contents  of  each  box,  however,  should  be  examined 
at  the  packing  shed  before  crating.  This  can  be  expeditiously  done 
by  emptying  the  berries  out  on  a large,  tin  scoop  where  they  are  all 
in  full  view  and  can  be  quickly  culled  and  returned  to  their  box. 
Fill  the  boxes  full;  in  fact  round  them  up  a little.  They  will  keep 
tight  and  ride  better  in  this  way. 

The  marketing  end  of  the  strawberry  business  is  the  one  too 
often  neglected.  With  the  small  grower  who  supplies  a local  trade 
this  is  not  such  a problem.  However,  with  the  large  grower  who 
lives  in  a community  where  strawberries  are  an  important  crop  and 
who  ships  his  fruit,  it  becomes  a vital  matter.  It  is  folly  to  expect 
to  receive  profitable  returns  on  consignments  of  fruit  shipped  pro- 
miscuously to  various  markets.  All  possible  points  should  be  in- 
vestigated before  shipment  so  that  the  fruit  may  be  put  on  a market 
which  is  firm,  instead  of  one  already  well  supplied  or  perhaps  even 
glutted.  To  do  this  economically  the  growers  should  organize,  form 
an  association,  and  employ  a manager  to  personally  supervise  the 
marketing  branch  of  the  business. 

HILL  SYSTEM  VS.  MATTED  ROW 

Although  one  hears  of  the  hill  system  in  print,  it  is  seldom  used 
even  in  the  home  garden  and  apparently  this  is  as  it  should  be,  if  our 
own  experience  with  a two  years’  comparative  test  of  the  hill  system 
and  matted  row  system  gives  an  indication  of  relative  merit. 

During  two  seasons  all  the  varieties  fruited  were  grown  both  in 
the  hill  system  and  matted  row  which  gave  an  opportunity  of  observ- 
ing the  behavior  of  each  under  both  systems.  The  results  of  the 
first  season  showed  that  of  the  43  varieties  under  observation,  those 
in  the  hill  system  produced  an  average  of  70  per  cent,  less  fruit  than 
those  in  the  matted  row.  Further,  there  was  not  a single  variety  that 
did  not  yield  notably  less  berries  in  the  hill  system  than  in  the 
matted  row. 

There  appeared  to  be  no  special  fitness  of  some  varieties  for  the 
hill  system,  in  that  they  were  more  productive  under  that  system. 
In  general,  those  varieties  that  gave  high  yields  in  the  row  also  gave 
high  yields  in  the  hill.  Of  course,  some  varieties  make  fewer  run- 
ners and  it  is  therefore  less  trouble  to  keep  the  runners  cut  off  such 
varieties  when  planted  to  the  hill  system  than  more  prolific  runner 
makers. 


7 


As  far  as  could  be  observed,  the  berries  from  the  matted  row 
were  equal  in  earliness,  size,  color  and  quality  to  those  from  the  hills. 

The  second  year’s  results  verified  those  of  the  first  year.  The 
hill  system,  as  an  average  of  all  varieties,  produced  58  per  cent,  less 


Fig.  3.  The  matted  row  system  of  training  is  to  be  generally  recommended 


Fig.  4.  The  hill  system  gave  greatly  reduced  yields  with  no  compensating  advantages 

fruit  than  the  matted  row.  The  yields  of  the  individual  varieties 
composing  the  hill  system  were  uniformly  low  ; not  a single  instance 
in  which  a variety  under  this  system  gave  a yield  even  nearly  equal 


8 


to  that  of  the  matted  row.  Not  only  did  the  hill  system  give  reduced 
yields,  but  there  were  no  compensating  advantages  either  in  larger 
size,  enhanced  color  or  improved  quality  of  fruit. 


VARIETIES 

The  selection  of  proper  varieties  is  a very  important  consider- 
ation to  the  strawberry  grower.  Many  hundreds  of  varieties  have 
been  grown  and  fruited  in  the  United  States  with  varying  degrees  of 
success  and  the  number  is  being  constantly  increased.  The  unde- 
sirable varieties  are,  of  course,  gradually  weeded  out  and  the  special 
requirements  of  others  ascertained,  but  at  a considerable  expense  to 
production  in  the  meantime.  Of  the  multitude  of  new  sorts  intro- 
duced each  year  but  few  ever  become  of  even  passing  importance. 

If  it  were  possible  to  eliminate  these  undesirables  and  misfits 
before  they  took  their  toll  from  production,  by  an  impartial  trial,  a 
great  step  would  be  made  in  variety  testing.  A strawberry,  how- 
ever, is  most  susceptible  to  its  environment.  The  characteristics  of 
a variety  are  not  stable  but  vary  widely  with  even  minor  changes  in 
locality.  Therefore,  variety  tests  can  in  no  sense  be  final  except  as 
applying  to  entirely  similar  conditions.  This  should  be  fully  real- 
ized in  studying  the  variety  notes  that  are  to  follow.  While  the 
value  of  variety  tests  is  limited,  they  serve  in  many  cases  to  bring 
out  the  most  striking  characteristics  of  a variety  and  furnish  a basis 
of  selection  for  further  trials  by  the  growers. 


Fig.  5.  The  smaller  blossom,  A,  is  pistillate  or  imperfect.  Varieties  bearing  such 
flowers  must  be  set  with  those  bearing  perfect  or  staminate  flowers,  as  shown  at  B 


Thirty-two  comparatively  new  varieties  are  here  described  in 
some  detail.  To  make  the  publication  of  greater  practical  value  to 
all,  brief  mention  of  such  other  varieties  as  are  popular  in  Indiana 
and  which  have  been  previously  described  ^ is  included. 

One  hundred  plants  of  a variety  have  served  as  a basis  of  com- 
parison in  each  case.  The  yields  appear  as  per  cents,  lOO  being 
taken  as  the  average  yield  of  all  varieties. 

The  sex  is  denoted  by  the  letters  S and  P,  the  former  standing 
for  stamen-bearing  or  self-fertile  flowers  and  the  latter  for  pistillate 
or  imperfect  blossoms.  In  planting  pistillate  sorts,  a staminate 


1 Bulletin  No.  164,  Purdue  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


9 


variety  should  be  set  every  four  rows  to  insure  proper  pollination. 

The  person  or  firm  supplying  the  original  plants  is  indicated  in 
the  description. 

Varieties  which  have  proved  popular  in  Indiana  and  those  rec- 
ommended for  trial  are  starred. 

Anna,  P. — Berry  regular,  roundish,  conical,  medium  size,  fairly  uni- 
form, dark  red;  flesh  dark  red,  acid  to  subacid,  not  high  in  flavor,  mod- 
erately Arm,  medium  grain,  quality  fair;  core  dark  red,  spongy;  calyx 
medium  size,  adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  decidedly  depressed.  Plants 
show  little  leaf  spot.  Yield  index  162.  Mid-season.  This  variety  is  ex- 
celled by  others.  (W.  W.  Thomas,  Anna,  111.) 

Baldwin’s  Pride,  S. — Berry  somewhat  irregular,  conical,  medium  size, 
not  uniform,  dark  red;  flesh  light  red,  subacid,  medium  Arm,  flne  grained, 
quality  fair  to  almost  good;  core  light  red,  solid;  calyx  large,  easily  de- 
tached; seeds  numerous,  large,  protrusive.  Plants  medium  in  vigor  with 
medium  size,  dark  green  leaves,  medium  amount  of  leaf  spot,  a medium 
runner  maker.  Yield  index  51.  Mid-season.  A low  yielding  variety,  pro- 
ducing too  many  nubbins.  (O.  D.  Baldwin,  Bridgman,  Mich.) 

Baltimore,  S. — Berry  wedge  shape,  often  coxcomb,  quite  irregular; 
medium  to  large,  not  uniform,  medium  red;  flesh  medium  in  color  and 
texture,  subacid,  sprightly,  pleasant,  quality  good;  core  red,  partly  hollow; 
calyx  large,  generally  adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  depressed.  Plant 
medium  in  vigor,  foliage  light  green,  Ibaf  spot  considerable;  runners  many. 
Yield  index  106.  Medium  late.  Runs  most  too  variable  in  shape  and  size 
for  a commercial  berry.  (E.  W.  Townsend,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

Barrymore,  S. — ^Berry  regular,  conical,  medium  large,  dark  red;  flesh 
light  red,  subacid,  medium  in  grain  and  firmness,  quality  fair;  core  pink, 
solid;  calyx  medium  size,  adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  depressed  to  pro- 
trusive. Plant  rather  weak  with  small,  medium  dark  green  leaves  show- 
ing medium  amount  of  leaf  spot,  runners  medium  to  few  in  number.  Yield 
index  55.  Mid-season.  Low  in  yield  and  not  recommended.  (W.  F.  Allen, 
Salisbury,  Md.) 

Bauer,  P. — Berry  regular,  conical,  medium  to  small  in  size,  dark  red; 
flesh  dark  red,  decidedly  acid.  Arm,  flne  grain,  quality  fair  to  poor;  core 
white,  solid;  calyx  small,  adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  depressed  to  pro- 
trusive. Plant  moderately  vigorous  with  small,  medium  dark  green  leaves 
showing  very  little  leaf  spot,  runners  medium  to  few  in  number.  Yield 
index  59.  Mid-season.  P^-uit  inferior.  (J.  C.  Bauer,  Judsonia,  Ark.) 

Big  Early,  P. — Berry  roundish,  conical, 
sometimes  double,  regular,  medium  to  large, 
fairly  uniform,  medium  red;  flesh  medium 
to  light  red,  rather  soft,  subacid  to  near- 
ly sweet,  quality  fair,  core  light  red, 
spongy;  calyx  medium  size,  adherent;  seeds 
medium  size,  depressed  to  variable.  Plant 
very  vigorous,  tall,  large,  dark  green  leaves, 
medium  to  no  spot,  runners  numerous.  Yield 
index  139.  Early.  Although  excelled  by 
some,  it  is  worthy  of  trial  for  home  use  and 
near  markets  where  firmness  and  color  are 
not  the  main  considerations.  (A  chance 
seedling  discovered  in  1910  by  E.  Overman, 
Fairmount,  Ind.  Not  yet  introduced.) 

Chesapeake,  ^ S. — Previously  described 
and  recommended  in  Bulletin  No.  164.  Good 
Fi*.  6.  Chesapeake-a  very  quality  and  very  showy.  The  large,  bright 

showy  berry  Colored  berry  makes  a striking  contrast  with 


lO 


the  dark  green  leafy  calyx  and  prominent  deep  yellow  seeds.  Medium 
late.  Has  given  good  yields  under  favorable  conditions. 

Class  A,  S. — Berry  regular,  conical,  medium  size,  uniform,  dark  red, 
some  hard  green  tips;  flesh  dark  red,  subacid,  rather  coarse  texture  and 
medium  firmness,  quality  fair,  seedy;  core  dark  red,  solid;  calyx  medium 
size,  easily  detached;  seeds  numerous,  large,  protrusive,  yellow.  Plant 
vigorous  with  large,  dark  green  leaves  showing  only  a trace  of  leaf  spot, 
runners  abundant.  Yield  index  74.  Medium  early.  Attractive  but  lacking 
in  quality  and  yield.  (C.  Nation,  Gilead,  Ind.) 

Class  B,  P. — Berry  irregular,  conical,  wedge  to  coxcomb,  large,  fairly 
uniform,  medium  red;  flesh  pink,  subacid,  insipid,  coarse  grained,  medium 
Arm,  quality  fair;  core  pink,  solid;  calyx  medium  in  size  and  adherence; 
seeds  large,  variable.  Plant  medium  to  vigorous  with  large,  dark  green 
foliage  showing  medium  leaf  spot,  runner 
production  medium.  Yield  index  90.  Medi- 
um late.  Not  recommended.  (C.  Nation, 

Gilead,  Ind.) 

Columbia,  * P. — Previously  described 
and  recommended  in  Bulletin  No.  164.  Large, 

Arm,  good  quality,  productive.  May  be 
planted  on  sandy  lands  where  Gandy  is  not 
suited.  Late. 

Early  Jersey  Giant*,  S.  — Berry  ob- 
long, conical  to  wedge,  large,  fairly  uniform, 
dull  red;  flesh  medium  red,  medium  grain. 

Arm,  subacid,  mild,  quality  rather  good;  core 
red,  spongy;  calyx  large,  dark  green,  slightly 
raised;  seeds  variable.  Plant  very  vigorous, 
tall,  large,  dark  green  foliage,  very  little  leaf 
spot,  runners  many.  Yield  index  139.  Early. 

The  most  promising  early  variety  yet  fruit- 
ed. It  has  good  size,  color  and  quality  for 
an  early  berry  and  is  Arm  and  very  productive.  (J.  T.  Lovett,  Little 
Silver,  N.  J.) 

Early  Market,  S. — Berry  regular,  conical,  medium  to  small,  not  uni- 
form, dark  red;  flesh  dark  red,  subacid  to  acid,  texture  coarse,  moderately 
Arm,  quality  fair;  core  dark  red,  solid;  calyx  medium  to  large,  easily  de- 
tached; seeds  uneven.  Plant  weak  grower  having  small,  dark  green 
leaves  showing  little  leaf  spot,  runners  few.  Yield  index  43.  Early.  Not 
desirable.  (W.  F.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

Early  Ozark,  * S. — ^Berry  regular,  roundish  conical,  medium  size,  some- 
times small,  fairly  uniform,  dark  red;  flesh  dark  red,  subacid,  medium 
grain.  Arm,  quality  very  good;  core  dark  red,  solid;  calyx  small,  adherent; 
seeds  medium  size,  protrusive.  Plant  fairly  vigorous  with  medium  size, 
dark  green  leaves  showing  little  leaf  spot;  number  production  medium. 
Yield  index  50.  Early.  A variety  of  fine  quality,  but  lacking  in  size  and 
yield  under  our  conditions.  Is  worthy  of  trial  in  other  locations.  A good 
canning  type.  (Flandsburg  & Potter,  Leslie,  Mich.) 

Evening  Star,  S. — Berry  generally  roundish  conical  to  wedge,  somewhat 
irregular,  medium  size,  fairly  uniform,  medium  red;  flesh  pink,  watery, 
sweetish,  flne  grain,  rather  soft,  quality  fair;  core  pink,  solid;  calyx 
medium  small;  seeds  medium  size,  protrusive.  Plant  vigorous  with 
large,  dark  green  foliage  and  very  little  leaf  spot,  runners  medium  in 
number.  Yield  index  47.  Late.  Not  recommended.  (J.  A.  Bauer,  Jud- 
sonia,  Mich.) 

Fuller,  S. — Berry  fairly  regular,  generally  conical,  necked,  medium  to 
large,  moderately  uniform,  dark  red;  flesh  medium  red,  subacid,  medium 
grain,  firm,  quality  fair  to  good;  core  red,  solid;  calyx  medium  large. 


Fig:.  7.  Early  Jersey  Giant — 
a most  promising  early  variety 


easily  detached;  seeds  medium  size,  depressed  to  protrusive.  Plant 

rather  poor,  small,  dark  green  foliage,  medium 
leaf  spot  and  few  runners.  Yield  index  62. 
Mid-season.  Other  varieties  excel  it.  (W.  W. 
Thomas,  Anna,  111.) 

Gandy,  * S. — Previously  described  and 
recommended  in  Bulletin  No.  164.  The  most 
popular  late  variety  in  Indiana,  especially  on 
clay  or  soil  retentive  of  moisture.  An  ex- 
cellent shipper. 

Grand  Marie,  * S. — Previously  described 
and  recommended  in  Bulletin  No.  164.  A 
handsome  berry  peculiarly  adapted  to  a select 
trade  for  eating  out  of  hand.  Mid-season. 

Haverland,  * P. — Previously  described  and 
recommended  in  Bulletin  No.  164.  One  of  the 
. standard  mid-season  berries  for  Indiana.  Es- 
^^ar‘iate*^vJriety^i™indiana^'  pecially  Suitable  for  local  market  or  home  use. 


Helen  Davis,  S. — ^Berry  regular,  conical,  sometimes  coxcomb,  medium 
large,  light  red;  flesh  pink,  subacid  to  sweet,  rather  insipid,  flne  grain, 
soft,  quality  fair;  core  pink,  solid;  calyx  medium  size,  adherent;  seeds 
medium  size,  depressed  to  protrusive.  Plant  above  medium  in  vigor, 
leaves  medium  size  and  color,  leaf  spot  medium, 
runner  production  medium.  Yield  index  155.  Mid- 
season. Fruit  light  in  color,  soft  and  poor  flavor. 

(G.  W.  Davis,  Brazil,  Ind.) 

Hub,  S. — Berry  conical  to  double,  medium 
large,  dark  red;  flesh  dark  red,  medium  texture, 
subacid,  quality  fair;  core  red,  spongy;  calyx 
medium  size,  adherent;  seeds  variable.  Plant 
rather  weak,  dwarAsh;  little  leaf  spot,  few  run- 
ners. Yield  index  123.  Mid-season.  A fancy 
looking  berry  but  not  otherwise  superior.  (M. 

Crawford  Co.,  Cuyahoga  Falls,  Ohio.) 

Indiana,  S. — ^Berry  wedge  shape,  irregular, 
many  nubbins,  large,  dark  red;  flesh  dark  red, 
medium  texture,  subacid,  quality  fair  to  good; 
core  solid,  dark  red;  calyx  medium  large,  some- 
times adherent;  seeds  raised.  Plant  weak,  small 
leaves,  medium  spot,  few  runners.  Yield  index  44. 

Mid-season.  Unproductive.  (H.  J.  Schild,  Ionia,  market 


Mich.) 


Joe  Johnson,  S. — Berry  regular,  round,  conical  to  coxcomb,  large,  dark 
red;  flesh  medium  to  Arm,  medium  red;  subacid,  quality  fair  to  good;  core 
red,  spongy;  calyx  medium  size,  generally  adherent;  seeds  variable.  Plant 
moderately  vigorous,  medium  foliage,  very  little  leaf  spot,  runners  medium 
in  number.  Yield  index  111.  Medium  late.  (E.  W.  Townsend,  Salisbury, 
Md.) 

Knaub  No.  1,  P. — Berry  regular,  conical  to  wedge,  medium  to  gener- 
ally small,  uniform,  light  red;  flesh  light  red,  subacid,  not  attractive, 
coarse  grain,  medium  Arm,  fair  quality;  core  pink,  solid;  calyx  medium 
size,  adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  protrusive.  Plant  very  vigorous,  foli- 
age medium  in  size,  color  and  amount  of  leaf  spot,  runners  abundant. 
Yield  index  186.  Medium  early.  A heavy  yielder,  but  small  and  unattrac- 
tive. (B.  Knaub,  North  Vernon,  Ind.) 

Knaub  No.  6,  P. — Berry  regular,  conical,  small,  light  red;  flesh  light 
pink,  acid,  soft,  poor  quality;  core  pink,  solid;  seeds  small,  depressed. 
Plant  medium  in  vigor,  light  green  leaves  with  medium  infection  of  leat 


12 


spot,  runners  few.  Yield  index  140.  Mid-season.  Inferior.  (B.  Knaub, 
North  Vernon,  Ind.) 

Late  Jersey  Giant,  S. — Berry  roundish,  bluntly  conical  to  oblate, 
sometimes  truncate,  large,  dark  red;  flesh  light  red,  medium  coarse,  tend- 
ing to  soft,  subacid,  quality  good;  core  partly  hollow;  calyx  large,  gen- 
erally adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  variable  in  depression.  Plant  vigor- 
ous, large,  dark  green  leavesi,  medium  leaf  spot,  medium  number  runners. 
Yield  index  89.  Late.  May  have  a place  as  a late  variety.  (J.  T.  Lovett, 
Little  Silver,  N.  J.) 

Lea,  S. — Berry  regular,  conical,  medium  size,  dark  red;  flesh  medium 
red,  subacid,  medium  grain.  Arm,  quality  fair;  core  hollow;  calyx  medium 
size,  adherent;  seeds  rather  large,  protrusive.  Plant  vigorous  with  leaves 
medium  in  size  and  color,  very  little  leaf  spot,  runners  abundant.  Yield 
index  97.  Medium  early.  Not  attractive.  (W.  F.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

Manhattan,  S.- — Berry  conical,  often  double  and  irregular,  large  medi- 
um red;  flesh  light  red,  rather  coarse,  medium  firm,  subacid,  quality  fair; 
core  light  red,  hard;  calyx  medium  size,  adherent;  seeds  protrusive.  Plant 
small,  weak,  few  runners,  medium  leaf  spot.  Yield  index  100.  Medium 
late.  Poor  plant,  and  berries  do  not  hold  up  their  size  through  the  season. 
(W.  P.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

Missionary,  S. — Berry  conical  to  angular,  often  double,  medium  size, 
dark  red;  flesh  firm,  dark  red,  acid,  quality  fair;  core  red,  partly  hollow; 
calyx  medium  size,  adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  raised.  Plant  tall,  vig- 
orous, medium  foliage,  very  little  leaf  spot,  many  runners.  Yield  index 
84.  Medium  early.  Fruit  runs  small  after  first  picking  and  is  almost  too 
sour.  (W.  F.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

Ohio  Boy,  S. — Berry  regular,  conical  to  wedge,  large,  medium  red; 
flesh  light  red,  subacid,  juicy,  medium  grain,  firm,  quality  good;  core  pink, 
solid;  calyx  large,  easily  detached;  seeds  numerous,  protrusive.  Plants 
rather  below  medium  in  vigor,  leaves  medium  in  size,  color  and  amount 
of  leaf  spot,  runners  few.  Yield  index  103.  Medium  late.  Surpassed  by 
other  sorts.  (A.  A.  Eppert,  Amelia,  Ohio.) 

Orem,  * S. — Previously  described  and  rec- 
ommended in  Bulletin  No.  164.  A large,  firm 
berry  of  good  quality  that  will  outyield  Gandy 
on  sandy  soils  or  under  adverse  moisture  condi- 
tions. Late. 

Pearl,  S. — Berry  conical  to  wedge,  some- 
times coxcomb,  rough,  large  size,  dark,  glossy 
red;  flesh  red  throughout,  fine  grain,  moderately 
firm,  acid,  sprightly,  quality  good;  core  red, 
spongy;  calyx  large,  adherent;  seeds  variable. 
Plant  vigorous,  large,  dark  green  foliage,  little 
leaf  spot,  runners  medium  to  few.  Yield  index 
80.  Medium  late.  A fancy  berry  but  does  not 
yield  up  to  the  average.  (M.  Crawford  Co.,  Cuya- 
hoga Falls,  Ohio.) 

Posey,  S. — ^Berry  regular,  long  wedge  shape, 
large,  fairly  uniform,  dark  red;  flesh  medium  red, 
subacid,  mild,  medium  grain,  firm,  fair  quality, 
somewhat  seedy;  core  red,  spongy;  calyx  very  large,  dark  green,  easily 
detached;  seeds  many,  protrusive.  Plant  vigorous  with  large,  dark  green 
foliage  showing  medium  amount  of  leaf  spot,  runners  numerous.  Yield 
index  132.  Mid-season.  A productive  and  attractive  berry  but  not  high 
in  quality.  (O.  C.  Herron,  Brazil,  Ind.) 


Fis:.  10.  Orem — worthy  of 
trial  as  a late  sort  where 


(iandy  does  not  succeed 


13 


riff.  11.  Rewastico — a 

new  variety  worthy  of  trial 


Rewastico,  * S. — Berry  bluntly  conical  to 
wedge,  large,  dark  red;  flesh  dark  red,  medium 
texture,  sharply  subacid,  quality  good;  core  red, 
partly  hollow;  calyx  medium  size,  adherent; 
seeds  medium  size,  depressed.  Plant  vigorous, 
medium  foliage  and  leaf  spot,  runners  medium 
in  number.  Yield  index  154.  Medium  late.  A 
large,  well  colored  and  productive  berry  worthy 
of  trial.  (W.  F.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

Sample,  * P. — Previously  described  and 
recommended  in  Bulletin  No.  164.  Berry  large, 
glossy  red.  Arm,  good,  very  productive.  A good, 
dependable  variety.  Medium  late. 

Senator  Dunlap,  * S. — Previously  described 
and  recommended  in  Bulletin  No.  164.  One 
of  the  most  deiservedly  popular  and  welll  known 

varieties  in  the  United  States.  A good  cropper 
and  suitable  for  canning.  Mid-season. 

Sons  Prolific,  S. — ^Berry  conical  to  wedge,  large, 
light  red;  flesh  light  red,  subacid,  not  high  flavor, 
coarse  grain.  Arm,  quality  fair;  core  pink,  solid; 
calyx  large,  adherent;  seeds  rather  large,  protru- 
sive. Plant  vigorous,  dark  green  foliage,  little  leaf 
spot,  runner  production  medium.  Yield  index  93. 
Mid-season.  Excelled  by  others.  (D.  McNallie,  Sar- 
coxie.  Mo.) 

St.  Louis,  * S. — Berry  regular,  long  conical, 
large,  uniform,,  light  red;  flesh  subacid,  lacking  in 
flavor,  pink,  medium  in  firmness,  quality  good  for 
an  early  berry;  core  pink,  solid;  calyx  large,  easily 
detached;  seeds  medium  size,  depressed  to  pro- 
trusive. Plant  vigorous  with  foliage  medium  in  size 
home  use  or  camiing;  and  color.  Showing  very  little  leaf  spot,  runners 
abundant.  Yield  index  130.  Early.  Although  this  berry  is  lacking  in 
color,  firmness  and  flavor,  yet  as  an  early  variety 
it  is  superior  to  many,  being  productive,  large  in 
size  and  very  early.  (J.  A.  Bauer,  Judsonia,  Ark.) 

Twilley,  S. — Berry  bluntly  conical  to  wedge, 
medium  large,  medium  red;  flesh  medium,  subacid, 
rather  dry,  medium  firm,  quality  fair  to  poor;  core 
pink,  solid;  calyx  large,  easily  detached;  seeds 
many.  Plant  below  medium  in  vigor  with  medium 
size,  light  green  foliage  and  considerable  leaf  spot, 
runners  medium  in  number.  Yield  index  76.  Mid- 
season. Inferior.  (W.  P.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

Warfield,  * P. — Previously  described  and  rec- 
ommended in  Bulletin  No.  164.  It  is  a high  class 
berry  in  every  respect.  Extremely  productive,  a 
good  shipper  and  exceptionally  fine  for  canning. 

Ripens  nearer  mid-season  here  although  listed  as 
early  by  some. 

Warren,  S. — Berry  conical,  sometimes  cox- 
comb, large,  dark  red;  flesh  dark  red,  medium 
texture,  subacid,  lacks  character;  core  red, 
spongy;  calyx  medium  size,  adherent;  seeds  raised, 

prominent.  Plant,  moderately  vigorous,  dark  green  foliage,  medium  leaf 
spot,  runners  rather  few.  Yield  index  77.  Mid-season.  An  attractive 
berry,  but  otherwise  undesirable.  (W.  F.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 


Fig:.  12.  Senator  Dunlap 
-desirable  for  market, 


Fiff.  13.  Warfield — ex- 
ceptionally fine  for  can- 
ning: 


William  Belt,  * S. — Previously  described  and  recommended  in  Bulle- 
tin No.  164,  Has  a fine  fiavor  and  popular  for  local,  home  use  and  can- 
ning. Has  been  quite  productive  under  favorable  moisture,  conditions. 
Mid-season. 

Winner,  S. — Berry  somewhat  irregular,  conical  to  wedge,  large  not 
uniform,  medium  red,  glossy;  flesh  medium  red,  subacid,  mild,  firm,  coarse 
grained,  fair  quality;  core  light  red,  solid;  calyx  large,  adherent;  seeds 
large,  variable  in  depression.  Plant  vigorous  with  large  leaves  and 
very  little  leaf  spot,  runners  numerous.  Yield  index  119.  Mid-season. 
Surpassed  by  others.  (W.  F.  Allen,  Salisbury,  Md.) 

FALL  BEARING  VARIETIES 

Various  inquiries  have  been  received  during  the  last  few  years 
in  regard  to  fall  or  everbearing  strawberries.  An  investigation  of 
these  varieties  and  their  economic  possibilities  is  in  progress  and  cer- 
tain comments  on  their  behavior  have  been  considered  advisable  at 
this  time. 

Apparently  the  so-called  fall  or  everbearing  varieties  are  yet 
far  from  having  the  peculiarity  of  abnormal  fruiting  season  estab- 
lished as  a definite  character.  When  they  bear  the  normal  spring 
crop  as  they  abundantly  will,  if  permitted  to  do  so,  the  amount  of 
fruit  produced  in  commercial  quantities  later  in  the  season  becomes 
negligible.  It  has  therefore  been  found  necessary  to  remove  the 
spring  bloom  until  July  to  the  end -that  a fall  crop  may  be  harvested. 

Even  with  this  precaution  to  ^insure  an  autumn  crop,  the  yield 
has  been  less  than  half  that  of  tlie  average  variety  fruiting  in  the 
spring. 

Although  the  yield  is  small,  the  price  of  the  fall  fruit  is  generally 
quite  satisfactory,  being  very  often  more  than  twice  that  obtained 
for  the  spring  crop,  thus  offsetting  in  a way,  the  reduced  production. 
Fall  strawberries  may  be  highly  profitable  under  special  conditions, 
but  as  an  ordinary  commercial  venture  they  should  be  gradually  ap- 
proached and  the  above  suggestions  borne  in  mind. 

Following  are  descriptions  of  the  fall  bearing  varieties  which 
have  fruited  on  the  Station  grounds : 

Americus,  S. — Berry  variable,  round  to  conical  or  wedge,  medium 
size,  light  red;  flesh  pink,  fine  grain,  medium  firm,  mild,  almost  sweet, 
pleasant,  quality  good;  core  spongy,  pink;  calyx  medium  size,  often  raised; 
seeds  small,  depressed.  Plant  only  fair  in  vigor,  quite  small,  medium 
green  leaves,  showing  little  leaf  spot,  medium  number  of  runners.  Lack- 
ing in  color  and  yield. 

Dewdrop,  S. — Berry  sometimes  conical,  but  generally  very  rough, 
irregular  and  malformed  with  seedy,  green  tips,  size  variable,  color  dark 
red;  flesh  almost  white,  medium  texture,  subacid,  not  high,  quality  fair; 
core  partly  hollow;  calyx  rather  large,  very  adherent;  seeds  medium 
sized,  raised.  Plant  not  robust,  runners  few,  leaf  spot  little.  Berries  too 
rough  and  malformed  to  be  of  value. 

Pan  American,  S. — Berry  oblate,  medium,  not  uniform,  light  red; 
flesh  very  light,  fine  grained,  rather  soft,  mildly  subacid,  quality  fair;  core 
partly  hollow,  light  red;  calyx  medium  to  small,  adherent;  seeds  medium 


15 


sized,  raised.  Not  a robust  plant,  runners  very  few,  very  little  leaf  spot. 
Unproductive  and  not  otherwise  desirable. 

Productive,  P. — Berry  conical,  medium  size,  light  red;  flesh  light  red, 
medium  texture,  subacid,  insipid,  quality  fair  to  poor;  core  pink,  spongy; 
calyx  small,  adherent;  seeds  very  prominent. 

Plant  vigorous,  dark  green,  medium  sized  leaves, 
leaf  spot  bad,  runners  medium.  Moderately  pro- 
ductive but  not  attractive  in  color  or  quality. 

Progressive,  S. — ^Berry  conlical,  medium  size, 
medium  red;  flesh  dark  red  throughout,  medium 
texture,  mildly  subacid,  quality  fair  to  good;  core 
red,  solid;  calyx  medium  size,  variable;  seeds 
medium  size,  raised.  Plant  vigorous,  small,  medi- 
um green  leaves,  little  leaf  spot,  runners  abundant, 
inclined  to  become  small  in  size,  but  worthy  of  trial. 

Superb,  S. — Berry  roundish  conical,  medium 
large,  dark,  glossy  red;  flesh  dark  red  throughout, 
fine  grained,  rather  firm,  mildly  subacid,  quality 
good;  core  dark  red,  spongy;  calyx  medium  size, 
adherent;  seeds  medium  size,  protrusive.  Plant 
vigorous,  medium  in  foliage,  leaf  spot  and  runners. 

Large  sized,  well  colored,  good  quality,  productive. 

A superior  fall  variety. 

INSECT  ENEMIES 

White:  Grubs. — These  are  the  larvae  of  the  June  bug  or  May 
beetle,  which  lays  its  eggs  in  grass  lands  in  June.  The  larvae  feed 
upon  the  roots  of  a great  variety  of  crops. 

Control ; Do  not  follow  sod  with  strawberries.  In  case  of  bad 
infestation,  fall  plow  the  land  and  turn  in  hogs  or  chickens.  Buck- 
wheat and  clover  are  about  the  only  crops  whose  roots  they  will 
not  bother. 

Strawbe:rry  Leap  Robbers. — The  eggs  are  deposited  by  a 
moth  in  the  early  spring  and  the  young,  greenish  larvae  feed  upon 
the  leaves  a few  days  before  drawing  them  together. 

Control : Spraying  will  be  more  effective  if  given  early  before 
the  larvae  roll  up  the  leaves.  Two  or  three  sprayings  at  intervals 
of  a week,  using  two  pounds  of  arsenate  of  lead  paste  or  one  pound 
of  powder  to  50  gallons  of  water  will  usually  prevent  the  appear- 
ance of  a second  brood.  Inasmuch  as  the  spray  applications  for 
the  leaf  roller  generally  come  after  the  berries  are  formed,  it  might 
be  said  that  authorities  disagree  as  to  the  danger  of  rendering  the 
berries  poisonous  for  human  consumption  if  sprayed  after  the  fruit 
is  set,  with  an  arsenical.^  Mowing  the  vines  and  burning  the  patch 
over  as  soon  as  the  crop  is  harvested  will  aid  in  eradicating  the  pest. 

Strawberry  Rootworms. — The  larvae  of  a leaf  beetle,  re- 
sembling small  white  grubs,  but  being  much  thicker  and  not  having 
the  large  abdomen  of  that  larva.  They  feed  upon  the  roots  and  ^ss 

1 In  the  home  garden,  fresh,  powdered,  white  hellebore  may  take  the  place  of 
the  arsenate,  using  one  ounce  to  three  gallons  of  water  or,  used  dry,  one  part  of 
hellebore  to  three  parts  of  air-slaked  lime.  Hellebore  is  not  poisonous,  but  is  much 
more  expensive  than  arsenate  of  lead 


Fig.  14.  Superb — one  of 
the  best  fall  bearing  sorts 


i6 


the  pupa  stage  in  earthen  cells  emerging  as  adult  beetles  in  July; 
at  this  time  they  feed  upon  the  leaves.  There  are  more  than  one 
species. 

Control:  When  the  beetles  are  on  the  foliage  in  late  sunnier, 
spray  with  arsenate  of  lead, 

Strawberry  Crown  Borers. — The  legless  larvae  of  a snout 
beetle.  The  beetle  lays  its  eggs  in  June  and  the  larvae  eat  out  the 
interior  of  the  crowns. 

Control : The  beetles  do  not  fly  and  hence,  migrate  very  slowly. 
A rotation  of  the  bed  will  hold  them  in  check.  Burning  over  the 
patch  is  also  helpful.  They  are  beyond  the  reach  of  poisons. 

Strawberry  SawElies. — These  are  the  larvae  of  a fly  which 
deposits  its  eggs  under  the  epidermis  of  the  leaves.  The  eggs  hatch 
about  the  time  the  plants  are  in  bloom  and  the  slugs  skeletonize  the 
foliage. 

Control : Spraying  with  arsenate  of  lead  as  the  slugs  appear  is 
very  effective. 

Strawberry  Weevies. — The  adult  female  beetles  deposit  their 
eggs  in  the  maturing  staminate  strawberry  buds,  cutting  the  stalks, 
so  the  buds  fall  to  the  ground.  The  larvae  feed  upon  the  pollen, 
pupate,  and  emerge  as  adults  in  about  a month. 

Control : Burning  the  field  will  help  to  destroy  the  hibernating 
beetles.  Spray  thoroughly  with  arsenate  of  lead  as  the  first  blos- 
soms appear.  Plant  largely  to  pistillate  varieties. 

DISEASES 

Strawberry  Leae  Spot. — This  is  the  most  common  disease  of 
the  strawberry.  It  appears  at  blooming  time  and  becomes  worse  as 
the  season  advances.  The  spots  are  small,  usually  round  and  purple 
in  color.  Later  they  become  grayish* and  often  drop  out,  leaving 
holes  in  the  leaves.  Many  leaves  are  thus  sacrificed  and  the  vigor 
of  the  plants  greatly  reduced. 

Control : Spray  with  Bordeaux  mixture  (4-6-50  and  add  two 
pounds  of  lead  arsenate  paste  or  one  pound  of  powder,  for  leaf  eat- 
ing insects)  when  the  foliage  first  comes  out,  and  later  just  before 
blooming.  If  the  patch  is  to  be  fruited  again,  after  mowing  down 
and  destroying  the  old  growth,  give  two  more  applications  of 
Bordeaux  at  intervals  of  two  weeks.  Plant  varieties  which  are 
resistant  to  leaf  spot. 

Powdery  mildew  and  leaf  blight  also  affect  the  strawberry  oc- 
casionally. 

Control  measures  are  the  same  as  for  leaf  spot. 


I 


USlYcn  .. 


‘i  UijSi 


^0.7 

h^Z'ih 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


4 !918 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


Bulletin  No.  201,  Vol.  XX 
August^  1917 


VARIETIES  OF  BLACKBERRIES  AND  RASP- 
BERRIES WITH  NOTES  ON  THEIR  CARE 


Published  by  the  Station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 


Joseph  D.  Oliver,  President 

Pay  S.  Chandler / 

Charles  Downing 

John  A.  Hillenbrand 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs 

Warren  T.  McCray 

James  W.  Noel 

George  W.  Purcell 

Andrew  E.  Reynolds 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D, 


South  Bend,  St.  Joseph  County 

Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

Greenfield,  Hancock  County 

Batesville,  Ripley  County 

Bridgeport,  Marion  County 

Kentland,  Newton  County 

Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

Vincennes,  Knox  County 

•Crawfordsville,  Montgomery  County 
President  of  the  University 


STATION  STAFF 


HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS 

Arthur  Goss^  M.  S.,  A.  C 

George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A 

Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V,  M 

Otto  F.  Hunziker,  M.  S 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B 

William  J.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S.,  A.  C.^ 

John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S 

James  Troop,  M.  S 

Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S 


Director 

Sup’t  Agricultural  Extension 

Chief  Veterinarian 

...-Chief  in  Dairy  Husbandry 

Chief  in  Botany 

State  Chemist 

..Chief  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Chief  in  Entomology 

Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Chief  in  Horticulture 


ASSOCIATES  AND  ASSISTANTS 

JOHN  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D,^ Entomological  Assistant 

Evelyn  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Paul  R.  Bausman,  B.  S.^ inspector  State  Chemist  department 

James  C.  Beavers,  B.  Agr Associate  in  Soils  and  Crops  Extension 

Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S .Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A.-* Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S Associate  in  Milk  Production 

Glenn  G,  Carter,  B.  S.* Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

David  B.  Clark',  D.  M.  C Assistant  Veterinarian 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass't  State  Leader  Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops 

CARLETON  Cutler,  B.  S.^ P"irst  Deputy  State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 

John  J.  Davis,  B.  S.^ Entomological  Assistant  in  Charge 

Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

Mabel  L.  Harlan Assistant  in  Agricultural  Extension 

Cora  A.  Jacobs,  A.  M.^ Seed  Analyst 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Assistant  in  Soils 

LAWRENCE  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Franklin  G.  King,  B.  S Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Walter  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S.^ : Scientific  Assistant 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S Assistant  in  Entomology 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B.s Scientific  Assistant 

Horace  C.  Mills,  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S.. .Research  Assistant  in  Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 

JOSEPH  OSKAMP,  B.  S Research  Assistant  in  Pomology 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Harry  C.  Paine,  D.  V.  M Associate  Veterinarian 

Allen  G.  Phillips,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.^ First  Deputy  State  Chemist  (Fertilizers) 

Harry  J.  Reed Associate  in  Horticulture 

Charles  C.  Rees,  M.  A Assistant  in  Botany 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S.^ Scientific  Assistant 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.^ Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G..  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Chester  G.  Starr.  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Swine  Production  and  Management 

Herbert  B.  Switzer.  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Samuel  F.  Thornton,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  S.^ Scientific  Assistant 

Gilbert  P.  Walker.  B.  S Assistant  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Nellie  Tracy Secretary  to  the  Director  and  Librarian 

Mary  K.  Bloom Bookkeeper 

1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Seed  Testing 

3 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  AgHculture — Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  In- 

sect Inyestigations 

■*  Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 

(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909) 

J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleyille State  Liye  Stock  Association 

U.  R.  Fishel,  Hope State  Poultry  Fanciers’  Association 

H.  H.  SwAiM,  South  Bend... State  Horticultural  Society 

n.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresyille State  Dairy  Association 

D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort State  Corn  Growers’  Association 


VARIETIES  OF  BLACKBERRIES  AND  RASP- 
BERRIES WITH  NOTES  ON  THEIR  CARE 

Prepared  under  the  direction  of  C.  G.  Woodbury 
By  Jose:ph  Oskamp 


Many  growers  of  blackberries  and  raspberries  have  become  dis- 
couraged in  the  last  few  years  because  these  crops  no  longer  do  well 
and  have  “run  out,”  as  the  expression  goes,  in  their  localities.  This 
has  indeed  happened,  but  it  is  not  to  be  blamed  to  the  “running  out”' 
of  the  variety  but  to  other  perfectly  definite,  although  not  always 
obvious  causes.  The  prevalence  of  diseases  on  these  fruits  has 
greatly  increased,  due  to  the  dissemination  of  infected  nursery  stock 
and  to  general  neglect  of  the  plantations,  and  is  responsible  in  a large 
measure  for  reduced  yields.  Lack  of  good  tillage,  poor  cultural 
methods,  failure  to  use  manure  or  other  fertilizers,  have  all  had  their 
direct  efifect  on  reducing  yields  as  well  as  their  indirect  efifect  in  en- 
couraging development  of  diseases. 

The  most  careful  attention  should  be  given  to  the  purchase  of 
nursery  stock.  Buying  from  only  the  most  reliable  plant  men  who 
have  a reputation  to  sustain  is  a safeguard.  Young  plants  should 
not  be  taken  from  an  old  plantation  unless  one  is  satisfied  that  the 
stock  is  not  diseased.  Spraying  will  help  to  keep  the  plants  healthy 
hut  is  a preventive  measure  rather  than  a specific  remedy.  Cutting- 
out  all  the  old  canes  as  soon  as  the  crop  is  harvested  and  burning 
them,  is  a simple  but  important  control  measure. 

It  also  seems  advisable  to  rotate  the  patch  more  frequently  than 
has  heretofore  been  practiced.  Aim  to  give  the  plants  excellent  care 
so  that  they  may  attain  maximum  production  early,  and  discard  them 
before  they  lose  vitality  and  become  diseased ; start  the  new  patch 
always  on  a fresh  piece  of  land. 


SOIL 

The  brambles  are  moisture  and  humus  loving  plants.  They 
naturally  thrive  in  moist  locations  where  leaf  mold  is  abundant,  as 
in  old  fence  corners  and  clearings  in  the  woods.  They  may  be 
grown,  however,  on  almost  any  well  drained  soil,  but  the  fruit  does 
not  attain  its  maximum  size  and  perfection  except  on  a deep,  rich 
loam.  A clay  subsoil  is  an  advantage  on  account  of  its  moisture 
holding  capacity.  As  a general  rule,  the  heavier  types  of  soil  are 
better  adapted  to  blackberries  and  the  lighter  loams  to  raspberries. 

The  soil  can  be  greatly  improved  by  liberal  applications  of  barn- 
yard manure,  which  is  preferable  to  using  Commercial  fertilizers 
exclusively.  In  blackberry  and  raspberry  culture,  moisture  is  more 
often  the  limiting  factor  than  plant  food ; hence  it  becomes  highly 


4 


important  to  improve  the  moisture  condition  of  the  soil.  This  is 
exactly  what  manure  does  and  commercial  fertilizers  do  not  do. 
Manure  adds  humus,  which  greatly  increases  the  water  holding 
capacity  of  the  soil.  Manure  may  be  turned  under  when  preparing 
the  soil  for  planting  or  it  may  be  applied  in  the  fall  as  a winter 
mulch.  It  can  be  used  freely;  there  is  little  danger  of  manuring 
these  fruits  too  heavily. 

PLANTING 

Plow  the  land  deeply  and  work  the  soil  down  to  a finely  pulver- 
ized condition  before  planting.  Plants  should  be  set  three  or  four 
feet  apart  in  rows  seven  to  eight  feet  apart.  Planting  may  be  done 
in  any  convenient  manner,  but  in  field  culture  the  plants  are  gen- 
erally set  in  furrows,  which  makes  the  work  much  more  rapid.  The 
important  thing  is  to  set  the  crowns  slightly  below  the  surface  of  the 
ground  and  firm  the  earth  about  the  plant  roots,  leaving  the  plants 
set  tight  in  the  soil.  Spring  planting  generally  is  to  be  preferred,  but 
if  fall  planting  is  done  the  plants  should  be  mulched  with  straw  or 
other  material. 

CULTIVATION 

Lack  of  cultivation  is  a common  cause  of  the  failure  of  berries 
in  Indiana.  Dry  weather  about  the  time  of  ripening,  especially  of 


Fig.  1.  Frequent  cultivation  is  the  keynote  in  securing  large,  perfect  berries 
throughout  the  season 


blackberries,  is  not  unusual  in  this  state.  Without  proper  cultivation 
the  berries  soon  go  to  “nubbins”  and  become  dry  and  tasteless. 


5 


Earliness  of  cultivation  is  important.  If  plowing  is  delayed 
until  late,  many  of  the  new  feeding  roots  which  have  already  de- 
veloped, will  be  cut  off.  This  is  a distinct  loss  to  the  plants  at  this 
time.  Plow  and  prepare  the  land  as  early  in  the  spring  as  it  is  fit 
to  work ; then  keep  a dust  mulch  on  the  surface  of  the  ground  by 
frequent  cultivation.  A small,  berry  cultivator  is  suitable  for  this 
purpose.  Deep  tillage  is  not  desired;  it  should  be  just  deep  enough 
to  break  the  surface  crust.  Remember  that  frequent  cultivation  will 
help  to  secure  large,  perfect  berries  throughout  the  season. 

A cover  crop  of  some  sort  should  be  sown  in  late  summer. 
Probably  millet  for  this  purpose  is  as  good  as  anything.  It  fur- 
nishes one  of  the  best  covers  of  the  non-hardy  crops  and  leaves  the 
soil  in  particularly  fine  condition  for  spring  work.  Rye  is  an  excel- 
lent winter  surviving  crop  but  more  difficulty  is  experienced  in  turn- 
ing it  under  and  getting  the  ground  in  shape  afterwards. 


Fig:.  2.  The  tools  necessary  for  effective  cultivation  in  the  herry  field.  Note 
especially  the  home-made,  one-horse  drag  for  crushing  clods 


Where  straw  can  be  procured  cheaply,  mulching  may  take  the 
place  of  cultivation.  A deep  mulch  will  conserve  the  soil  moisture 
quite  as  effectively  as  cultivation  and  very  satisfactory  crops  will 
result.  The  soil  should  never  lie  bare  over  winter,  but  either  a mulch 
or  cover  crop  may  furnish  protection. 

TRAINING 

The  training  of  the  canes  is  a matter  that  should  suit  the  con- 
venience of  the  individual  grower.  There  are  two  considerations, 
however,  which  should  not  be  lost  sight  of.  The  plantation  should 
be  confined  either  to  hills  or  narrow  rows.  All  suckers  or  new  plants 
which  arise  outside  of  these  confines  should  be  destroyed  by  hoe  or 


6 


cultivator,  for  without  such  attention  the  patch  will  become  a verit- 
able thicket.  When  the  fruit  has  been  harvested,  the  old  canes 
should  be  cut  out  at  once  and  burned.  This  not  only  gives  the 
younger  canes  a better  opportunity  to  develop  but  greatly  reduces 
the  chance  of  infecting  the  new  growth  with  any  diseases  the  old 
canes  may  harbor. 


Fijj.  3.  Berry  bush  after  old  canes  have  been  removed  and  new  canes  have 
sent  out  lateral  branches  as  a result  of  summer  pinching  back 


When  the  plants  are  grown  without  artificial  support  it  is  ad- 
vantageous to  pinch  off  the  tips  of  the  young  shoots  in  the  summer 
when  they  have  reached  a height  of  two  feet.  This  retards  the  im- 
mediate elongation  of  the  cane  and  causes  lateral  shoots  to  push  out, 
making  the  bush  lower  and  more  nearly  self  supporting  when  laden 
with  fruit.  If  the  shoots  are  not  pinched  when  young,  it  had  better 
not  be  done  at  all.  Late  cutting  often  results  in  weak,  spindling 
laterals. 


7 


Providing  some  means 
of  support  for  the  canes, 
probably  pays  in  the  long 
run  in  convenience  in  cul- 
tivation and  picking  and 
in  less  loss  of  fruit.  The 
canes  may  be  tied  to  a 
single  wire,  running  the 
length  of  the  row  and 
about  three  and  one-half  or 
four  feet  high ; or  two 
wires ; one  at  three  feet 
and  one  at  five  feet,  make 
a satisfactory  trellis. 

PROPAGATION 

The  red  raspberry  and 
the  blackberry  may  be 
propagated  from  suckers, 
as  the  one-year-old  root 
sprouts  can  be  readily 
transplanted.  These  fruits 
may  also  be  propagated  by 
root  cuttings  made  in  the 


Fig.  4.  Berry  bush  in  the  winter  showing 
stocky  lateral  canes  as  the  result  of  summer 
pinching  back 


Fig.  5.  Same  bush  as  in  Fig.  4,  hut  in  the 
spring  after  properly  pruning  the  lateral  growth. 
If  such  a practice  as  shown  in  these  two  figures 
is  followed,  a stocky,  self-supporting  hush  as  ap- 
pears on  the  cover  page  will  result 


fall  and  stored  in  sand  in 
the  cellar  or  buried  outside 
in  a well  drained  spot. 
Roots  about  the  size  of  a 
lead  pencil  are  dug  and  cut 
in  three  or  four  inch 
lengths ; in  the  spring  these 
are  planted  in  nursery 
rows. 

The  black  raspberry  is 
propagated  from  stolons  or 
rooted  cane  tips.  In  late 
summer  the  long  canes 
trailing  upon  the  ground 
take  root  and  form  new 
plants.  In  the  spring  these 
can  be  severed  from  the 
parent  plant  and  trans- 
planted to  new  locations. 

ENEMIES 

It  is  seldom  that  rasp- 
berries or  blackberries  are 
bothered  by  leaf-eating  in- 
sects. In  case  they  appear. 


8 


however,  they  may  be  poisoned  by  spraying  the  bushes  with  arsenate 
of  lead,  using  two  pounds  of  paste  or  one  pound  of  powder  to 
each  50  gallons  of  water. 

Borers. — There  are  two  borers  which  infest  raspberries  and 
blackberries.  The  crown  borer  is  generally  found  working  in  the 
roots  or  canes  near  the  ground,  while  the  cane  borer  works  in  the 
young  canes  early  in  the  summer.  The  moth  laying  the  eggs  girdles 
the  cane  near  the  top,  causing  it  to  wilt  and  drop  off  above  the  girdle. 

Remedies : The  only  remedy  for  the  crown  borer  is  to  examine 
each  plant  and  destroy  the  borers.  The  cane  borer  makes  itself 
known  by  the  girdled  tops.  Cut  off  the  canes  well  below  the  girdle 
and  burn  them. 

AnthracnosK. — This  is  one  of  the  most  widespread  and  serious 
troubles  of  raspberries  and  blackberries  in  Indiana.  The  disease  is 
most  noticeable  on  the  canes,  where  it  causes  purplish  spots  which 
change  to  grayish  white  and  become  slightly  sunken.  When  the  dis- 
ease is  severe  these  spots  become  so  numerous  as  to  cover  large  por- 
tions of  the  older  canes,  causing  the  bark  to  scale  off  and  the  wood 
to  crack. 


Fig.  6.  A typical  case  of  canes  infect- 
ed with  anthracnose.  In  controlling  this 
disease  it  is  very  helpful  to  cut  out  and 
burn  the  old  canes  as  soon  as  the  fruit  is 
harvested;  then  spray  with  Bordeaux 


9 


Remedy : The  simplest  and  one  of  the  most  important  control 
measures  is  to  cut  out  all  old  canes,  as  soon  as  the  crop  is  harvested, 
and  all  young  canes  which  are  diseased,  and  burn  them.  Spraying, 
as  follows,  will  serve  to  hold  the  disease  in  check : i.  Before  the  leaf 
buds  open,  with  copper  sulphate  solution,  one  pound  copper  sulphate 
to  25  gallons  of  water.  2.  When  the  leaves  are  out,  with  Bordeaux 
' mixture.^  3.  After  the  fruit  is  harvested  and  the  old  canes  removed, 
use  Bordeaux  again. 

Cane:  Bught. — This  is  a fungous  disease  that  attacks  the  rasp- 
berries, infecting  the  bark  and  wood  at  some  local  point  on  the  cane, 
causing  the  part  above  to  die.  Thus,  an  entire  cane  or  a portion  of  it 
may  succumb.  The  disease  manifests  itself  about  the  time  the  fruit 
ripens  and  is  characterized  by  the  drying  up  of  the  leaves  and  berries. 

Remedy : The  best  that  can  be  done  is  preventive  treatment  as 
suggested  in  the  case  of  anthracnose. 

Orange:  Rust. — This  serious  disease  of  blackberries  and  black 
raspberries  is  easily  recognized  by  orange-red  pimples  appearing  on 
the  under  sides  of  the  leaves.  These  burst  and  discharge  spores 
which  enter  other  plants  through  the  foliage,  thus  spreading  the  dis- 
ease. The  mycelium  or  root-like  parts  of  the  fungus  finds  its  way 
into  the  pith  of  the  cane  and  even  extends  below  the  ground,  be- 
coming a perpetual  source  of  infection  to  all  future  growth  of  the 
plant. 

Remedy : Since  it  is  impossible  to  save  an  infected  plant,  it 
should  be  dug  up  and  burned  at  once  so  as  to  eliminate  the  spread 
of  the  rust'to  healthy  plants.  Bordeaux  mixture  applied  to  the  foli- 
age will  tend  to  prevent  the  entrance  of  the  spores. 

CHOOSING  VARIETIES 

For  commercial  success  much  depends  upon  the  variety  or 
varieties  chosen.  Almost  any  of  the  named  varieties  or  even  the  wild 
sorts  would  furnish  sufficient  berries  for  home  use  but  even  for  that 
purpose,  one  likes  to  procure  a productive  kind  of  good  quality.  It 
should  always  be  understood  that  some  varieties  only  show  their 
best  behavior  under  especially  favorable  surroundings.  Thus,  it 
frequently  happens  that  certain  localities  become  well  known  for  the 
production  of  a variety  which  elsewhere  does  but  indifferently. 

The  notes  on  the  following  listed  varieties  are  the  results  of  a 
five  years’  test  at  this  station.  Each  variety  has  been  represented  by 
twenty-five  plants  from  which  yield  records  have  been  kept  and 
other  notes  recorded.  These  have  been  greatly  abbreviated  for  pur- 

1 For  the  method  of  preparing  Bordeaux  mixture,  send  for  Purdue  Extension 
Leaflet  No.  39 


10 


poses  of  this  publication.  The  notes  to  follow  have  been  fortified 
further  by  observations  in  the  field  and  by  the  experience  of  prac- 
tical g^rowers. 

For  those  who  must  depend  upon  the  recommendations  of  others 
for  their  selection  of  varieties,  those  sorts  that  have  been  found  gen- 
erally satisfactory  over  the  State  are  to  be  advised.  Such  varieties 
have  been  starred  in  the  lists  that  follow. 

Blackberries 

Agawam.* — Fruit  roundish  to  oblong  conical,  medium  large,  individual 
drupes  large;  flavor  subacid  but  sweet  when  dead  ripe,  quality  good.  Bush 
medium  to  low,  spreading,  vigorous,  very  hardy  and  productive.  Can  be 
recommended  as  an  early  variety. 

Ancient  Briton.* — Fruit  oblong,  large,  individual  drupes  large,  flavor 
sweet,  melting,  good.  Bush  tall,  generally  upright,  vigorous,  very  hardy 
and  productive.  Late. 

Blowers. — Fruit  roundish,  medium  size,  individual  drupes  medium, 
flavor  acid  to  sweet,  not  high,  quality  fair.  Bush  tall,  generally  upright, 
vigorous,  moderately  hardy.  Not  productive.  Mid-season. 

Early  Harvest. — A popular  berry  in  some  sections,  but  kills  to  the 
ground  practically  every  winter  at  the  Station. 

Early  King. — Another  tender  variety. 

Eldorado.* — Fruit  roundish  to  long  conical,  large,  individual  drupes 
quite  large,  sweet,  pleasing  flavor,  quality  very  good.  Bush  medium 
height,  somewhat  spreading,  very  vigorous,  very  hardy,  productive.  Early. 
An  excellent  variety. 

Giant  Himalaya.- — A berry  perhaps  suited  to  the  milder  climate  of  the 
Pacific  coast.  Worthless  in  this  state. 

Illinois. — Fruit  roundish  to  conical,  medium  large,  individual  drupes 
large,  sweet  when  quite  ripe,  quality  medium  to  good.  Bush  low,  spread- 
ing, vigorous,  half  hardy.  Unproductive.  Medium  late. 

Kenoyer. — Winter-kills  as  badly  as  Early  Harvest. 

Kittatinny. — Hardy,  but  not  otherwise  meritorious. 

LaGrange. — Rather  tender,  not  promising. 

Lawton. — Fruit  roundish,  oval,  medium  size,  drupes  medium,  flavor 
subacid,  not  high,  quality  fair.  Bush  tall,  upright  to  somewhat  spreading, 
vigorous,  moderately  hardy  and  productive.  Mid-season. 

Lucretia  Dewberry. — ^Fruit  oblong  to  long  conical,  large,  drupes  large, 
quality  fair.  Bush  low,  spreading,  vigorous,  canes  trailing.  There  is 
probably  more  than  one  variety  being  disseminated  under  the  name  of 
Lucretia.  This  one  could  certainly  not  be  recommended  for  Indiana  plant- 
ing upon  its  performance  at  this  station.  It  winter-kills  considerably  and 
is  a very  shy  bearer,  producing  many  nubbins. 

Mersereau. — ^Fruit  oblong,  large,  individual  drupes  large,  flavor  sweet 
and  pleasing,  quality  good.  Bush  tall,  upright,  moderately  vigorous,  hardy, 
but  not  as  productive  as  desired.  Mid-season. 

Minnewaski. — Fruit  roundish,  medium  large,  drupes  medium  size, 
flavor  rather  acid  but  sweet  when  dead  ripe,  quality  fair.  Bush  tall,  up- 
right, vigorous,  hardy,  but  lacking  in  yield.  Mid  season. 

Ohmer. — Fruit  roundish,  medium  large,  drupes  medium  size,  flavor 
subacid  to  sweet,  quality  fair  to  good.  Bush  tall,  upright,  vigorous,  hardy, 
yield  low.  Mid-season. 

Rathburn. — Mid-season.  Only  half  hardy. 


II 

Robinson. — Fruit  round,  medium  large,  individual  drupes  medium  size, 
flavor  subacid,  not  attractive,  quality  only  fair.  Bush  tall,  upright,  very 
vigorous,  and  productive.  Mid-season. 

Stones  Hardy.* — Fruit  roundish  to  oblong,  large,  some  red  drupes,  in- 
dividual drupes  medium  size,  flavor  subacid  to  sweet,  pleasing  when  dead 
ripe,  quality  fair  to  good.  Bush  tall,  upright,  very  vigorous,  very  hardy 
and  a reliable  cropper.  Late. 

Snyder. — Fruit  globular,  medium  size,  individual  drupes  medium  size, 
flavor  subacid,  fair.  Bush  medium  tall,  somewhat  spreading,  vigorous, 
fairly  productive,  hardy.  One  of  the  old  stand-bys,  but  is  now  surpassed 
by  other  sorts.  Mid-season. 

Taylor.* — Fruit  roundish  to  conical,  medium  size,  individual  drupes 
medium,  flavor  sweet  with  true  blackberry  character,  quality  good.  Bush 
tall,  upright, 'vigorous,  hardy  and  productive.  Medium  late. 

Ward. — Too  tender  for  good  results. 

Wauchusetts. — A moderately  hardy  variety,  but  surpassed  by  others. 

Western  Triumph. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  individual  drupes, 
medium  to  below  in  size,  flavor  rather  flat  and  lacking  character,  quality 
fair.  Bush  medium  tall,  slightly  spreading,  very  vigorous.  Hardy  and 
productive.  Late. 

Wilson. — Winter-kills  very  severely  under  our  conditions. 

Black  Raspberries 

Cumberland.* — Fruit  roundish,  conical,  large,  drupes  rather  small, 
compact,  flesh  firm,  subacid,  slightly  sweet,  very  good.  Plant  tall,  up- 
right, very  vigorous,  very  prolific.  The  best  mid-season  berry  for  com- 
mercial or  home  use. 

Eureka. — ^Fruit  round,  medium  size,  drupes  medium  large,  open,  mod- 
erately firm,  flavor  slightly  subacid  to  nearly  sweet,  fair.  Plant  medium 
height,  vigorous,  productive.  Early. 

Gregg. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  gray  bloom,  drupes  medium  size, 
rather  open,  flavor  mild  subacid,  good.  Plant  medium  to  low,  somewhat 
spreading,  moderately  vigorous,  fairly  productive.  This  is  an  old  stand-by 
and  still  a leading  late  variety. 

H cosier. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  not  uniform  in  size,  grayish 
bloom,  drupes  large,  compact,  medium  firm,  flavor  slightly  subacid  to 
sweet,  good.  Plant  medium  to  tall,  moderately  spreading,  vigorous,  early 
productive.  About  the  same  season  as  Plum  Farmer,  which  it  resembles. 

Kansas.* — Fruit  round,  medium  large,  glossy,  occasional  red  drupes, 
drupes  medium  large,  sometimes  inclined  to  separate,  flesh  firm,  flavor 
slightly  subacid  to  sweet,  good.  Plant  tall,  moderately  upright,  very  vig- 
orous, heavy  bearer.  An  excellent  early  variety. 

Monger. — Berry  round,  medium  size,  grayish  bloom,  drupes  medium 
size,  rather  open,  flesh  firm,  flavor  mild  subacid,  quality  fair  to  good.  Plant 
medium  tall,  upright,  moderately  vigorous,  medium  to  late,  shy  bearer. 

New  Stone  Fort.* — Fruit  roundish,  conical,  large,  glossy,  drupes 
medium  small,  compact,  flesh  firm,  subacid,  sweetish,  quality  good.  Plant 
medium  height  somewhat  spreading,  vigorous,  medium  to  late,  moderately 
productive.  A promising  late  variety. 

Palmer. — ^Fruit  round,  small,  drupes  medium  size,  compact,  mod- 
erately firm,  flavor  slightly  subacid,  not  pleasing,  quality  fair.  Plant  low, 
spreading,  medium  to  weak,  early,  unproductive. 

Plum  Farmer.* — Fruit  round,  large,  grayish  bloom,  drupes  medium 
size,  compact,  flesh  firm,  flavor  subacid,  mild,  sweetish,  juicy,  quality 
very  good.  Plant  medium  to  tall,  upright  to  somewhat  spreading,  vigor- 
ous. A trifle  later  than  Kansas.  Not  quite  so  productive  as  that  variety 
but  superior  in  quality.  One  of  the  best  for  either  market  or  home  use. 


12 


Red  Raspberries 

Buckeye  Everbearing. — ^Fruit  conical,  large,  dark  red,  drupes  large, 
open,  texture  soft,  flavor  sweetish,  not  good,  duality  fair.  Bush  medium 
height,  upright  to  somewhat  spreading,  medium  vigor,  unproductive. 
Medium  late. 

Cardinal. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  deep  purplish  red,  grayish 
bloom,  drupes  medium  size,  compact,  texture  medium,  flavor  mild  subacid, 
flat,  not  juicy,  quality  fair.  Bush  medium  tall,  moderately  spreading,  vig- 
orous, moderately  productive.  Mid-season. 

Columbian. — Fruit  roundish  conical,  large,  purple,  drupes  large,  open, 
texture  medium  Arm,  flavor  sweetish,  not  high,  quality  fair.  Bush  mod- 
erately tall,  somewhat  spreading,  vigorous,  fairly  productive.  Medium  to 
late. 

Cuthbert.* — Fruit  conical,  large,  dull  red,  drupes  small,  flesh  moder- 
ately Arm,  flavor  sweetish,  sprightly  pleasant,  quality  very  good.  Bush 
tall,  upright,  very  vigorous,  productive.  An  old  popular  variety,  but 
surpassed  by  few.  Mid-season. 

Eaton. — Fruit  round,  very  large,  dark  red,  drupes  very  large,  open, 
moderately  Arm,  flavor  slightly  tart,  quality  fair.  Bush  low,  spreading, 
medium  vigor,  unproductive.  Medium  late. 

Early  King*  (King). — Fruit  round,  large,  red,  light  bloom,  drupes 
large,  texture  Arm,  juicy,  flavor  sweet  and  quality  good.  Bush  tall,  up- 
right, very  vigorous,  productive.  Early.  An  excellent  early  sort. 

Haymaker. — Fruit  round,  large,  purple,  drupes  medium  in  size  and 
compactness,  moderately  Arm,  flavor  subacid  to  sweetish,  but  not  pleasing, 
quality  fair.  Bush  tall,  upright,  vigorous,  fairly  productive.  Late. 

Herbert. — ^Fruit  conical,  very  large,  dark  red,  drupes  very  large,  com- 
pact, soft,  flavor  subacid  to  sweet,  quality  good.  Bush  medium  height,  up- 
right, medium  vigor,  unproductive.  Late. 

Loudon.* — Fruit  round,  large,  purplish  red,  drupes  large,  moderately 
Arm,  flavor  subacid  to  sweet,  good.  Bush  tall,  upright,  vigorous,  produc- 
tive. Medium  late.  A reliable  cropper  of  good  quality. 

Miller. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  bright  red,  drupes  medium  Arm, 
flavor  approaching  sweet,  rather  flat,  quality  fair.  Bush  medium  height, 
upright,  fairly  vigorous,  unproductive.  Mid-season. 

Marlboro. — Fruit  roundish,  medium  size,  drupes  large.  Arm,  flavor 
sweet,  quality  good.  Bush  tall,  upright,  vigorous,  yield  below  medium. 
Medium  early. 

Ruby. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  bright  red,  drupes  medium  large. 
Arm,  flavor  subacid,  flat,  dry,  quality  fair.  Bush  moderately  tall,  upright, 
medium  in  vigor,  unproductive.  Mid-season. 

St.  Regis. — Fruit  round,  medium  in  size,  deep  red,  drupes  moderately 
Arm,  flavor  rather  flat,  dry,  quality  fair.  Bush  moderately  tall,  upright, 
vigorous,  a so-called  everbearing.  Bears  a few  ripe  berries  about  a week 
ahead  of  any  other  sort.  The  fruit  is  disappointing  in  size  and  quality. 
While  this  variety  shows  signs  of  everbearing,  it  would  be  necessary  to 
have  a very  large  planting  in  order  to  secure  a marketable  quantity  of 
fruit  at  any  but  the  regular  season.  Would  not  be  out  of  place  in  the 
home  garden. 

Thompson’s  Early. — Fruit  round,  medium  large,  bright  red,  drupes 
large,  medium  Arm,  flavor  sweet,  juicy,  quality  good.  Bush  moderately 
tall,  upright,  fairly  vigorous,  unproductive.  Early. 

Thwack. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  medium’  red,  drupes  medium 
large,  soft,  flavor  sweet,  agreeable,  quality  fair  to  good.  Bush  medium 
height,  slightly  spreading,  fairly  vigorous,  moderatdly  productive.  Medium 
early. 


-m 


jTn  ? h 


PURDUE  universjp:y 

OF  ILLINOIS  LiSR/L.  ^ 

Agricultural  ELxperiirjj^  St^jljon 


Bulletin  No.  202,  Vol.  XX 
August,  1917 


SHEEP  FEEDING 

VII 

FATTENING  WESTERN  LAMBS 

1916-1917 


Published  by  the  Station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 

Joseph  D.  Oliver,  President South  Bend,  St.  Joseph  County 

Fay  S.  Chandler Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

Charles  Doivning Greenfield,  Hancock  County 

John  A.  Hillenbrand Batesville,  Ripley  County 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs Bridgeport,  Marion  County 

Warren  T.  McCray Kentland,  Newton  County 

James  W.  Noel Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

George  W.  Purcell Vincennes,  Knox  County 

Andrew  E.  Reynolds Crawfordsville,  Montgomery  County 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D President  of  the  University 

STATION  STA F F 

HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS 

Arthur  Goss^  M.  S.,  A.  C Director 

George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A Sup’t  Agricultural  Extension 

Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V.  M Chief  Veterinarian 

Otto  F.  Hunziker,  M.  S Chief  in  Dairy  Husbandry 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B Chief  in  Botany 

William  J.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S.,  A.  C.i State  Chemist 

John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S Chief  in  Animal  Husbandry 

James  Troop,  M.  S Chief  in  Entomology 

Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Charles  G,  Woodbury,  M.  S Chief  in  Horticulture 

ASSOCIATES  AND  ASSISTANTS 

JOHN  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.^ Entomological  Assistant 

Evelyn  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Paul  R.  Bausman,  B.  S.^ ..Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

James  C.  Beavers,  B.  Agr Associate  in  Soils  and  Crops  Extension 

Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S.'^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S Associate  in  Milk  Production 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  S.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C Assistant  Veterinarian 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader  Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops 

Carleton  Cutler,  B.  S.'^ First  Deputy  State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 

John  J.  Davis,  B.  S.^ Entomological  Assistant  in  Charge 

Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S Assistant  In  Animal  Pathology 

Mabel  L.  Harlan Assistant  in  Agricultural  Extension 

Cora  A.  Jacobs,  A.  M.- Seed  Analyst 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Assistant  in  Soils 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Franklin  G.  King,  B.  S Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Walter  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S.^ Scientific  Assistant 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S Assistant  in  Entomology 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B.3 Scientific  Assistant 

Horace  C.  Mills,  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S. ..Research  Assistant  in  Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 

JOSEPH  OSKAMP,  B.  S Research  Assistant  in  Pomology 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Harry  C.  Paine,  D.  V.  M Associate  Veterinarian 

Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.^ First  Deputy  State  Chemist  (Fertilizers) 

Harry  J.  Reed Associate  in  Horticulture 

Charles  C.  Rees,  M.  A Assistant  in  Botany 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S.^ ^ Scientific  Assistant 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.* * Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G..  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

CiHESTER  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Swine  Production  and  Management 

Herbert  B.  Switzer,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Samuel  F.  Thornton,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B,  S.^ Scientific  Assistant 

Gilbert  P.  Walker,  B.  S Assistant  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Nellie  Tracy Secretary  to  the  Director  and  Librarian 

Mary  K.  Bloom Bookkeeper 

1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Seed  Testing 

3 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  In- 

sect Investigations 

* Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909) 

.1/  P.  Prigg,  Daleville State  Live  Stock  Association 

U.  R.  Fished,  Hope State  Poultry  Fanciers’  Association 

H.  H.  Swaim,  South  Bend State  Horticultural  Society 

D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville State  Dairy  Association 

D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort State  Corn  Growers’  Association 


FATTENING  WESTERN  LAMBS 


1916-1917 

J.  H.  Skinnkr  F.  G.  King 

SUMMARY 

PART  I 

1.  Lambs  receiving  corn  silage  alone  as  roughage  did  not  con- 
sume as  large  quantities  of  grain  as  those  fed  clover  hay  in  addi- 
tion to  silage  as  roughage. 

2.  Lambs  fed  clover  hay  once  every  five  days  consumed  prac- 
tically the  same  amount  of  grain  as  those  fed  clover  hay  according 
to  appetite. 

3.  Lambs  fed  silage  alone  as  roughage  gained  17.5  pounds  per 
head  at  a cost  of  $15.43  per  hundred  pounds;  those  fed  silage  and 
clover  hay  once  every  five  days  gained  28.6  pounds  per  head  at  a 
cost  of  $10.97  P6i*  hundred  pounds;  those  fed  silage  and  clover  hay 
according  to  appetite  gained  36.5  pounds  at  a cost  of  $9.92  per 
hundred  pounds. 

4.  Lambs  fed  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  and  corn  silage 
were  valued  at  $13.50  per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  of  83  cents  per 
head ; those  fed  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover 
hay  every  fifth  day,  were  valued  at  $13.90  per  cwt.,  and  returned  a 
profit  of  $2.23  per  head ; those  fed  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage  and  clover  hay  according  to  appetite  were  valued  at 
$14.25  per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  of  $3.18  per  head. 

PART  II 

5.  Lambs  fed  shelled  corn  and  clover  hay  ate  practically  the 
same  quantity  of  corn  but  slightly  more  hay  than  lambs  fed  shelled 
corn  and  alfalfa  hay. 

6.  Lambs  fed  shelled  corn  and  clover  hay  gained  34.4  pounds 
per  head  at  a cost  of  $9.71  per  hundred  pounds;  those  fed  shelled 
corn  and  alfalfa  hay  gained  36.6  pounds  per  head  at  a cost  of 
v$9.i2  per  hundred  pounds. 

7.  Lambs  fed  shelled  corn  and  clover  hay  were  valued  at 
$13.75  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  of  $2.69  per  head;  those  fed 
shelled  corn  and  alfalfa  hay  were  valued  at  $14.00  per  cwt.,  and 
returned  a profit  of  $3.22  per  head. 

PART  III 

8.  The  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of  shelled  corn  and 
alfalfa  hay  did  not  affect  the  grain  consumption,  but  1.40  pounds  of 
corn  silage  replaced  .64  pound  of  hay  in  the  daily  ration  per  lamb. 


4 


9-  Lambs  fed  shelled  corn  and  alfalfa  hay  gained  36.6  pounds 
per  head  at  a cost  of  $9.12  per  hundred  pounds  as  compared  to 
34.6  pounds  gain  at  a cost  of  $9.85  per  hundred  pounds  by  lambs 
fed  shelled  corn,  alfalfa  hay  and  corn  silage. 

10.  Lambs  fed  shelled  corn  and  alfalfa  hay  were  valued  at 
$14.00  per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  of  $3.22  per  head;  those  fed 
shelled  corn,  alfalfa  hay  and  corn  silage  were  valued  at  $14.10  per 
hundred  pounds  and  returned  a profit  of  $2.99  per  head. 

PART  IV 

11.  Lambs  fed  ground  soybeans  as  supplement  to  shelled 
corn,  clover  hay  and  corn  silage,  maintained  eager  appetites  but 
failed  to  consume  as  large  quantities  of  feed  as  those  fed  cotton- 
seed meal  as  supplement  to  the  ration. 

12.  Lambs  fed  ground  soybeans  gained  35.1  pounds  per  head 
as  compared  to  36.5  pounds  per  head  by  those  fed  cottonseed  meal 
as  supplement. 

13.  Lambs  fed  ground  soybeans  as  supplement  made  gains  at 
a cost  of  $9.76  per  hundred  pounds  as  compared  to  a cost  of  $9.92 
per  hundred  pounds  by  those  fed  cottonseed  meal  as  supplement. 

14.  Lambs  fed  ground  soybeans  as  supplement  were  valued  at 
$14.15  per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  of  $3.09  per  head;  those  fed 
cottonseed  meal  as  supplement  were  valued  at  $14.25  per  cwt.  and 
returned  a profit  of  $3.18  per  head. 

PART  V 

15.  Shorn  lambs  consumed  slightly  larger  quantities  of  feed 
than  wooled  lambs. 

16.  Shorn  lambs  gained  33.8  pounds  per  head  as  compared 
to  36.5  pounds  per  head  by  wooled  lambs. 

17.  Shorn  lambs  made  less  economical  gains  than  wooled 
lambs,  the  cost  per  hundred  pounds  being  $10.72  and  $9.92  re- 
spectively. 

18.  Twenty-five  lambs  sheared  57  pounds  of  wool. 

19.  Shorn  lambs  were  valued  at  $11.75  cwt.  and  returned 
a profit  of  96  cents  per  head;  wooled  lambs  were  valued  at  $14.25 
per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  of  $3.18  per  head. 

PART  VI 

20.  Lambs  fed  in  a well  ventilated  barn  ate  the  same  quantity 
of  grain  and  silage  but  slightly  less  hay  than  those  fed  in  an  open 
shed. 


5 


21.  The  gain  per  lamb  was  33.1  pounds  when  the  lambs  were 
fed  in  a barn  as  compared  to  33.8  pounds  with  lambs  in  an  open 
shed. 

22.  Lambs  fed  in  a barn  gained  100  pounds  at  a cost  of  $10.68 ; 
those  fed  in  an  open  shed  gained  100  pounds  at  a cost  of  $10.72. 

23.  Lambs  fed  in  a barn  were  valued  at  $11.25  per  cwt.,  and 
returned  a profit  of  51  cents  per  head;  those  fed  in  an  open  shed 
were  valued  at  $11.75  cwt.,  and  returned  a profit  of  96  cents 
per  head. 

INTRODUCTION 

The  cost  of  production  is  usually  taken  as  the  standard  meas- 
ure of  economy  of  an  enterprise.  The  selling  price  in  relation 
to  the  cost  of  production  is  the  factor  really  determining  the  profit. 
During  times  when  economic  conditions  permit  the  consuming  pub- 
lic to  pay  a high  price  for  meat,  high  cost  of  production  may  be  a 
benefit  instead  of  a hindrance  to  live  stock  feeders,  because  many 
timid  feeders  are  induced  to  limit  their  operations,  thus  tending  to 
further  limit  supplies  and  thereby  increasing  the  selling  price  of 
the  stock  actually  fed.  The  trial  in  lamb  feeding  reported  in  this 
bulletin  is  a good  example  of  this  fact.  The  original  cost  of  the 
lambs  was  the  highest  on  record  at  the  Station.  The  cost  of  gains 
was  also  the  highest  on  record,  yet  the  profit  was  higher  than  for  any 
other  drove  of  lambs  used  in  experimental  work  at  the  Purdue  Uni- 
versity Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

OBJECT 

The  object  of  this  work  was  to  obtain  additional  information 
on  the  comparative  feeding  value  of  the  more  common  roughages  of 
the  farm  and  on  the  advisability  of  using  some  concentrated  com- 
mercial feeding  stuff  for  fattening  lambs.  This  includes  a com- 
parison of  alfalfa  hay  and  corn  silage  alone  and  in  combination  as 
roughage  for  fattening  lambs ; the  value  of  corn  silage  alone  as 
roughage  and  in  combination  with  dry  roughage  for  fattening 
lambs;  a comparison  of  the  feeding  value  of  clover  hay  and  alfalfa 
hay  for  fattening  lambs;  the  value  of  cottonseed  meal  for  supple- 
menting rations  of  corn,  clover  hay  and  corn  silage;  the  compara- 
tive value  of  cottonseed  meal  and  ground  soybeans  as  supplements 
to  rations  for  fattening  lambs;  the  influence  of  shearing  on  fatten- 
ing lambs ; and  the  influence  of  shelter  on  fattening  lambs. 

PLAN 

The  plan  of  the  work  was  to  secure  strong,  vigorous  western 
lambs,  and  discard  the  smallest  and  any  extremely  large  ones,  in 
order  to  secure  a flock  as  uniform  as  possible.  This  flock  was 
divided  into  nine  lots  of  twenty-five  lambs  each.  All  lots  were  as 


6 


nearly  uniform  as  possible  as  to  size,  condition,  quality,  thrift,  sex 
and  breeding.  Seven  of  the  nine  lots  were  placed  in  an  open  shed 
and  fed  different  rations.  Two  lots  of  lambs  were  shorn  and  fed 
the  same  ration  as  Lot  7.  One  shorn  lot  was  fed  in  an  open  shed 
and  the  other  in  a barn. 

The  following  rations  were  fed : 

Lot  I.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage. 

Lot  2.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  clover  hay,  corn  silage, 
(lambs  shorn) 

Lot  3.  Shelled  corn  and  clover  hay. 

Lot  4.  Shelled  corn  and  alfalfa  hay. 

Lot  5.  Shelled  corn,  alfalfa  hay,  corn  silage. 

Lot  6.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage,  clover  hay. 
(every  fifth  day) 

Lot  7.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  clover  hay,  corn  silage. 

Lot  8.  Shelled  corn,  ground  soybeans,  clover  hay,  corn  silage. 

Lot  9.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  clover  hay,  corn  silage, 
(shorn  and  fed  in  barn) 

SHELTER,  FEEDING  YARDS  AND  WATER  SUPPLY 

The  conditions  surrounding  the  lambs  were  no  better  than  those 
in  many  feed  lots  of  the  State.  Eight  lots  of  twenty-five  lambs 
each  were  fed  in  an  open  shed  facing  south,  opening  into  a yard  14 
feet  deep.  Each  lot  of  lambs  occupied  a covered  shed  14  by  16 
feet  and  an  open  lot  14  by  14  feet.  No  pavement,  cinders,  or  stone 
was  placed  in  either  yard  or  shed.  The  sheds  were  dry  and  no 
bedding  other  than  the  waste,  which  was  small,  from  the  feed 
racks  was  used,  except  when  the  sheds  were  bedded  at  the  begin- 
ning of  the  experiment.  The  open  yards  were  often  muddy  in  wet 
weather  but  the  lambs  at  all  times  had  dry  ground  in  the  shed  on 
which  to  lie.  The  lot  of  lambs  fed  in  the  barn  was  confined  to  a 
space  14  by  24  feet  with  a concrete  floor  and  was  not  allowed  out 
of  the  barn  during  the  experiment.  The  barn  was  well  ventilated 
and  did  not  become  unduly  warm,  nor  did  the  air  become  heavy  or 
stagnant  at  any  time.  The  floor  was  kept  well  bedded  at  all  times. 

Water  was  supplied  to  all  lots  from  the  West  LaEayette  Water 
Works  in  galvanized  iron  tubs  which  were  regularly  cleaned  once 
daily  and  more  often  when  necessary.  They  were  refilled  twice 
daily  so  that  fresh  water  was  kept  before  the  lambs  at  all  times. 

WEIGHTS 

Weights  were  taken  by  lots  on  three  consecutive  days  at  the 
beginning  and  end  of  the  trial  and  every  tenth  day  during  the 
])rogress  of  the  same.  The  average  of  the  three  consecutive  weights 


7 


at  the  beginning  and  end  of  the  trial  was  used  as  the  initial  and 
final  weights.  Individual  weights  in  addition  to  lot  weights  were 
taken  on  three  consecutive  days  at  the  beginning  and  end  of  the 
trial,  and  every  thirtieth  day  throughout  the  progress  of  the  same. 
The  identity  of  each  lamb  was  known  by  a numbered  tag  fastened 
to  the  ear.  Weights  were  taken  in  the  morning  after  the  lambs  had 
finished  eating. 

METHOD  OF  FEEDING 

The  method  of  feeding  was  the  same  in  all  lots  reported  in 
this  bulletin.  The  grain  was  fed  at  6:oo  A.  M.  and  4:40  P.  M. 
under  cover,  in  narrow  grain  troughs.  When  ground  soybeans  or 
cottonseed  meal  was  fed  in  addition  to  corn,  it  was  mixed  with  the 
corn  before  it  was  placed  in  the  troughs.  Grain  was  fed  in  such 
quantities  as  would  be  eaten  before  the  lambs  left  the  troughs. 
When  starting  on  feed,  about  one-fourth  of  a pound  of  oats  per 
head  was  fed  twice  daily.  After  the  lambs  had  learned  to  eat  oats, 
small  amounts  of  corn  were  added  to  the  rations.  Within  a few 
days  the  lambs  were  eating  corn  readily  and  the  oats  were  gradu- 
ally dropped  from  the  ration,  and  in  Lots  i,  2,  5,  7 and  9,  cottonseed 
meal,  and  in  Lot  8 ground  soybeans  were  added.  Within  sixteen  days 
all  lots  were  on  the  experimental  rations.  The  grain  was  increased 
until  they  were  on  full  feed  at  the  end  of  four  weeks.  After  the 
lambs  had  cleaned  up  the  grain,  roughage  was  fed  in  combination 
racks  and  troughs  and  all  roughage  was  fed  twice  daily.  Hay  and 
straw  were  fed  in  such  quantities  as  would  be  cleaned  up  before  the 
time  for  the  next  feed.  Silage  was  fed  in  such  quantities  as  would 
be  consumed  within  an  hour  to  an  hour  and  a half.  Feed  not  con- 
sumed was  removed  from  the  troughs  and  weighed  and  when  feed 
was  not  all  consumed  the  quantity  offered  at  the  next  feed  was 
reduced. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  LAMBS 

The  animals  used  in  this  trial  were  choice  lambs  purchased  on 
the  Chicago  market,  October  18,  1916.  They  were  bred  in  southern 
Colorado  but  had  as  much  strength  and  bone  as  northern  bred 
lambs.  They  were  highly  improved — got  by  mutton  rams.  The 
lambs  were  of  excellent  quality  and  type  but  not  strictly  uniform 
in  size  and  condition.  They  were  dipped  under  government  super- 
vision and  arrived  in  LaFayette,  October  20,  1916.  A severe  storm 
had  been  raging  while  the  lambs  were  in  transit,  which  produced 
several  severe  cases  of  pneumonia,  and  trouble  from  this  cause  was 
experienced  during  the  entire  length  of  the  trial.  Two  hundred 
fifty  lambs  were  purchased  and  on  October  29,  the  lambs  were 
divided  into  experimental  lots  of  twenty-five  animals  each.  Twenty- 
five  were  discarded  when  the  experimental  groups  were  made. 
Considering  the  original  cost  of  the  lambs,  freight,  cost  of  feed 
before  the  experiment  began,  the  actual  cost  of  the  lambs  when 
started  on  trial  was  $10.99  cwt. 


8 


METHOD  OF  VALUING  THE  LAMBS 

The  initial  value  of  the  lambs  was  taken  as  $8.85  per  cwt.  or 
actual  cost.  It  was  impossible  to  base  the  initial  value  on  the  Chi- 
cago market  as  has  been  done  in  the  past,  because  the  Chicago  mar- 
ket was  not  open  for  feeding  lambs  and  was,  therefore,  making  no 
price  quotations.  Final  values  were  placed  on  the  fat  lambs  by 
Mr.  Chas.  H.  Shurte  of  the  Knollin  Sheep  Commission  Co., 
Chicago ; final  values  of  fat  lambs  are  on  the  basis  of  Chicago  prices 
less  75  cents  per  hundred  pounds,  to  cover  cost  of  shipping.  All 
financial  statements  are  based  on  the  actual  cost  of  the  lambs  and 
Chicago  valuation  for  fat  lambs  less  75  cents  per  hundred  pounds. 

QUALITY  OF  FEEDS 

The  rations  fed  were  composed  of  various  combinations  of  all 
or  part  of  the  following  feeds:  shelled  corn,  oats,  cottonseed  meal, 
ground  soybeans,  clover  hay,  alfalfa  hay  and  corn  silage.  The  corn 
and  oats  were  of  good  quality;  the  cottonseed  meal  was  of  choice 
grade  guaranteed  to  contain  41  per  cent,  crude  protein  and  8 per 
cent,  fat;  the  soybeans  were  good  and  contained  39  per  cent,  protein. 
The  clover  hay  was  of  medium  quality;  the  alfalfa  hay  was  of 
first,  second  and  third  cutting  and  of  excellent  quality.  The  corn  sil- 
age was  made  from  corn  produced  on  Purdue  farm,  yielding  ap- 
proximately 30  bushels  to  the  acre.  The  corn  was  well  matured 
when  put  into  the  silo ; care  was  taken  at  all  times  that  no  moldy  or 
spoiled  silage  was  fed. 

PRICES  OF  FEEDS 

The  prices  of  corn  used  in  presenting  financial  results  are  based 
on  the  actual  prices  at  TaFayette  elevators  during  the  time  the  ex- 
periment was  in  progress,  which  were  as  follows : first  month  86.4 
cents;  second  month  85  cents;  third  month  93.7  cents;  fourth  month 
97  cents  per  bushel.  Oats  are  valued  at  50  cents  per  bushel ; cotton- 
seed meal  and  ground  soybeans  at  $45.00  per  ton;  clover  and  al- 
falfa hay  are  valued  at  $12.00  per  ton;  corn  silage  at  $6.00  per  ton. 
All  financial  statements  are  based  on  the  principle  that  the  value  of 
the  manure  offsets  the  labor  of  feeding  and  cost  of  bedding. 


9 


PART  I 

CORN  SILAGE  ALONE  VS.  CORN  SILAGE  AND  DRY  ROUGH- 
AGE  FOR  FATTENING  LAMBS 

Part  I of  this  bulletin  is  a discussion  of  results  in  which  corn 
silage  was  compared  as  the  only  roughage  for  fattening  lambs  with 
the  same  ration  and  different  amounts  of  clover  hay.  Previous 
trials  at  this  station  have  shown  that  lambs  receiving  corn  silage 
as  their  only  roughage  have  developed  fickle  appetites  and  have  re- 
quired an  occasional  feed  of  hay  to  keep  them  on  feed.  As  long 
as  they  maintained  keen  appetites  the  ration  containing  silage  alone 
as  roughage  produced  very  economical  results.  So  serious,  however, 
has  been  the  loss  of  appetite  that  the  ration  containing  clover  hay  in 
addition  to  silage  has  invariably  made  more  rapid  and  more  eco- 
nomical gains  than  where  no  clover  hay  was  fed.  Because  of  the 
fact  that  in  previous  tests  clover  hay  has  tended  to  cause  lambs  to  re- 
gain their  appetites  after  they  had  gone  off  feed  on  silage  alone  as 
roughage,  an  attempt  was  made  to  maintain  the  appetites  of  one  lot 
of  lambs  in  this  trial  by  giving  them  one  feed  of  clover  hay  every  five 
days  in  order  to  test  the  practicability  of  maintaining  the  appetites  of 
the  lambs  with  an  occasional  feed  of  hay  and  at  the  same  time  secure 
the  economical  gains  due  to  rations  containing  silage  alone  as 
roughage. 

Three  lots  of  lambs  were  fed  a grain  ration  consisting  of  seven 
parts  corn  and  one  part  cottonseed  meal.  Lot  i received  corn  sil- 
age alone  as  roughage;  Lot  6 received  the  same  ration  except  that 
once  every  five  days  clover  hay  was  fed  instead  of  corn  silage.  Lot 
7 received  both  corn  silage  and  clover  hay  according  to  the  appetites 
of  the  lambs.  Owing  to  the  fact  that  lambs  could  not  be  fed  im- 
mediately on  a ration  of  silage  without  hay,  some  clover  hay  was 
given  during  the  first  few  days  of  the  trial.  After  the  first  five 
days  on  trial.  Lot  i did  not  receive  clover  hay.  For  the  first  month 
all  lots  of  lambs  received  i6  pounds  of  grain  daily  per  lot;  the  sec- 
ond month  they  received  24  pounds  per  lot ; the  third  month  they  re- 
ceived 32  pounds  of  grain  daily  per  lot,  except  that  in  Lot  i,  after 
three  weeks  of  this  ration  the  lambs  lost  their  appetites  and  did  not 
thereafter  consume  more  than  24  pounds  of  grain  daily  per  lot.  At 
the  beginning  of  the  fourth  month.  Lots  6 and  7 were  raised  to  36 
pounds  of  grain  daily  per  lot  and  10  days  later  to  40  pounds  daily 
per  lot.  The  maximum  silage  consumption  in  Lots  i and  6 was 
60  pounds  daily  and  in  Lot  7,  40  pounds  daily.  After  the  end  of 
the  second  month,  Lots  i and  6 failed  to  consume  more  than  40 
pounds  of  silage  daily  and  Lot  7 more  than  30  pounds  daily.  Dur- 
ing the  third  and  fourth  months,  however,  attempts  were  made  to 
increase  either  silage  or  grain  in  Lot  i but  without  success  in  any 
case. 


lO 


Table:  L — Corn  Silage  vs.  Corn  Silage  and  Dry  Roughage  for  Fat- 
tening Lambs,  November  2,  1916  to  March  2,  1917 


RATION 

Lot  1 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage 

Lot  6 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
(clover  hay 
every  fifth 
day) 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Average  initial  weight 

60.1  lbs. 

59.7  lbs. 

59.6  lbs. 

Average  final  weight 

77.6  “ 

88.3  “ 

96.1  “ 

Gain  per  lamb 

17.5  “ 

28.6  “ 

36.5  “ 

Average  daily  gain 

.145  “ 

.238  “ 

.304  “ 

Average  daily  feed  per  lamb 

grain 

.97  “ 

1.13  “ 

1.16  “ 

hay 

.04  “ 

.23  “ 

.99  “ 

silage 

1.92  “ 

1.79  “ 

1.42  “ 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

grain 

6.65  “ 

4.74  “ 

3.82  “ 

hay 

.26  “ 

.97  “ 

3.25  “ 

silage 

13.22  “ 

7.52  “ 

4.69  “ 

Cost  per  100  lbs.  gain 

$15.43 

$10.97 

$ 9.92 

Selling  value  of  lambs  in  feed  lots 

13.50 

13.90 

14.25 

Profit  per  lamb 

.83 

2.23 

1 

3.18 

It  will  be  noted  in  Table  I,  that  the  addition  of  dry  roughage 
to  the  ration  made  a decided  increase  in  the  feed  consumption  of 
the  lambs.  This  occurred  principally  during  the  latter  part  of  the 
feeding  period  when  the  appetites  of  fattening  animals  is  of  utmost 
importance.  There  was  an  increase  of  both  grain  and  roughage 
and  this  increase  was  very  marked  when  the  dry  matter  in  the  ra- 
tion is  considered. 

The  lambs  receiving  silage  alone  as  roughage  made  a gain  of 
17.5  pounds  daily  per  head  during  the  feeding  period  as  compared 
with  a gain  of  28.6  pounds  when  clover  hay  was  fed  every  five 
days  and  a gain  of  36.5  pounds  per  head  when  clover  hay  was  fed 
every  day.  This  represents  an  average  daily  gain  of  .145,  .238, 
.304  pound  for  Lots  i,  6 and  7,  respectively.  The  feed  required 
to  make  a pound  of  gain  was  much  higher  in  Lot  i than  in  either 
of  the  other  two  lots.  Every  pound  of  gain  in  Lot  i required  6.65 
])ounds  of  grain,  .26  pound  of  hay,  and  13.22  pounds  of  silage.  In 
Lot  6,  receiving  a feed  of  clover  hay,  every  fifth  day,  it  required 
4.94  pounds  of  grain,  .97  pound  of  hay,  and  7.52  pounds  of  silage 
to  make  one  pound  of  gain.  In  Lot  7 receiving  both  silage  and  hay, 
it  required  3.82  pounds  of  grain,  3.25  pounds  of  hay,  and  4.69 


II 


pounds  of  silage  to  make  one  pound  of  gain.  At  prevailing  prices 
of  feed,  lOO  pounds  of  gain  in  Lot  i cost  $15.42;  in  Lot  6,  $10.97, 
and  in  Lot  7,  $9.92.  The  lambs,  receiving  silage  alone  as  roughage 
were  valued  at  $13.50  per  100  pounds  in  the  lots  and  returned  a 
profit  of  83  cents  per  head.  The  lambs  receiving  corn  silage  with 
a feed  of  hay  once  every  five  days  were  valued  at  $13.90  per  100 
pounds  and  returned  a profit  of  $2.23  per  head.  The  lambs  receiv- 
ing both  clover  hay  and  corn  silage  every  day  were  valued  at  $14.25 
per  100  pounds  in  the  lots  and  returned  a profit  of  $3.18  per  head. 

PART  II 

CLOVER  HAY  VS.  ALFALFA  HAY  AS  ROUGHAGE  FOR 
FATTENING  LAMBS 

Part  II  is  a discussion  of  the  results  secured  from  feeding  two 
equal  lots  of  lambs  upon  the  same  ration  with  the  exception  that 
one  lot  received  clover  hay  while  the  other  received  alfalfa  hay.  Both 
lots  of  lambs  were  fed  the  same  quantity  of  corn  and  as  much  hay 
as  would  be  consumed  before  the  time  for  the  next  feed.  The 
clover  hay  used  was  of  medium  quality.  The  alfalfa  hay  used  was 
of  excellent  quality. 

It  will  be  noted  in  Table  II  that  there  was  practically  no  dififer- 
ence  in  the  grain  consumption  between  the  two  lots.  The  slightly 
higher  grain  consumption  in  Lot  4 was  due  to  the  fact  that  one 
lamb  had  died  towards  the  latter  part  of  the  trial,  and  the  remaining 
lambs  were  fed  the  same  quantity  of  feed  as  had  formerly  been 
ofifered. 


Table:  II. — Clover  Hay  vs.  Alfalfa  Hay  for  Fattening  Lambs, 
November  2,  1916  to  March  2,  1917 


RATION 

Lot  3 

Shelled  corn, 

clover  hay 

Lot  4 . 
Shelled  corn, 
alfalfa  hay 

Average  initial  weight 

59.2  lbs. 

58.8  lbs. 

Average  final  weight 

93.6  “ 

95.4  “ 

Gain  per  lamb 

34.4  “ 

36.6  “ 

Average  daily  gain 

.287  “ 

.305  “ 

Average  daily  feed  per  lamb 

grain 

1.09  “ 

1.11  “ 

hay 

1.65  “ 

1.59  “ 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

grain 

3.81  “ 

3.64  “ 

hay 

5.76  “ 

5.22  “ 

Cost  per  100  lbs.  gain 

$ 9.71 

$ 9.12 

Selling  value  of  lambs  in  feed  lots 

13.75 

14.00 

Profit  per  lamb 

2.69 

3.22 

12 


It  will  be  noted  also  that  there  was  a higher  hay  consumption 
in  Lot  3 fed  clover  hay  than  in  Lot  4 fed  alfalfa  hay.  A peculiar 
condition  has  been  noted  in  comparing  alfalfa  and  clover  hay  in 
that  in  all  trials  the  hay  of  the  poorer  quality  is  consumed  in  larger 
quantities  than  that  of  the  higher  quality,  while  the  rate  of  gain  has 
in  every  case  been  in  favor  of  the  higher  quality  of  hay. 

The  lambs  fed  corn  and  clover  hay  gained  34.4  pounds  during 
the  feeding  period  as  compared  with  36.6  pounds  per  lamb  by  those 
fed  corn  and  alfalfa  hay.  It  required  3.81  pounds  of  grain  and 
5.76  pounds  of  clover  hay  to  make  one  pound  of  gain;  it  required 
3.64  pounds  of  grain  and  5.22  pounds  of  alfalfa  hay  to  produce  the 
same  results.  One  hundred  pounds  of  gain  cost  $9.71  when  pro- 
duced by  corn  and  clover  hay  as  compared  with  $9.12  when  corn 
and  alfalfa  hay  were  fed. 

The  lambs  finished  on  corn  and  clover  hay  were  valued  at 
$13.75  per  100  pounds  and  returned  a profit  of  $2.69  per  head.  The 
lambs  fed  corn  and  alfalfa  hay  were  valued  at  $14.00  per  hundred 
pounds  and  returned  a profit  of  $3.22  per  head. 

This  is  the  fourth  trial  in  which  clover  hay  and  alfalfa  hay 
have  been  compared.  In  two  of  the  trials,  clover  hay  produced  bet- 
ter results,  while  in  two  other  trials,  alfalfa  hay  was  the  more  profit- 
able. In  every  case  where  there  was  a difference  in  the  quality  of 
the  hay,  the  superior  quality  has  produced  the  better  results.  It 
would  appear  that  when  there  is  a difference  in  the  feeding  value 
of  clover  hay  and  alfalfa  hay,  it  is  the  quality  and  not  the  variety 
of  the  hay  that  affects  the  results. 


13 


PART  III 

ALFALFA  HAY  VS.  ALFALFA  HAY  AND  CORN  SILAGE 
FOR  FATTENING  LAMBS 

Part  III  reports  results  of  a trial  in  which  is  shown  the  in- 
fluence of  the  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of  shelled  corn  and 
alfalfa  hay.  The  lambs  received  the  same  grain  ration  and  all  the 
alfalfa  hay  they  would  eat  twice  daily,  while  those  in  Lot  5 also  re- 
ceived corn  silage  according  to  their  appetites,  twice  daily. 

Tabi,k  III. — Alfalfa  Hay  vs.  Alfalfa  Hay  and  Corn  Silage  for  Fat- 
tening Lambs,  November  2,  1916  to  March  2,  1917 


RATION 

Lot  4 

Shelled  corn, 

alfalfa  hay 

Lot  5 

Shelled  corn, 
corn  silagre, 
alfalfa  hay 

Average  initial  weight 

58.8  lbs. 

59.6  lbs. 

Average  final  weight 

95.4  “ 

04.2  “ 

Gain  per  lamb 

36.6  “ 

34.6  “ 

Average  daily  gain 

.305  “ 

.288  “ 

Average  daily  feed  per  lamb 

grain 

1.11  “ 

1.12  “ 

hay 

1.59  “ 

.95  “ 

silage 

1.40  “ 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

grain 

3.64  “ 

3.90  “ 

hay 

5.22  “ 

3.31  “ 

silage 

4.87  “ 

Cost  per  100  lbs.  gain 

$ 9.12 

$ 9.85 

Selling  value  of  lambs  in  feed  lots 

14.00 

14.10 

Profit  per  lamb 

3.22 

2.99 

It  will  be  noted  that  there  was  practically  the  same  amount  of 
grain  consumed  daily  per  head  in  each  lot.  The  lambs  receiving 
silage  ate  only  60  per  cent,  as  much  hay  as  those  fed  alfalfa  hay 
alone  for  roughage.  The  average  silage  consumption  was  1.4 
pounds  daily  per  head,  and  the  maximum  silage  consumption  at  any 
time  during  the  test  was  1.6  pounds  daily  per  head.  The  lambs 
fed  corn  and  alfalfa  gained  36.6  pounds  per  head  during  the  feeding 
period  as  compared  with  34.6  pounds  when  corn  silage  was  added 
to  the  ration.  It  required  3.64  pounds  of  grain  and  5.22  pounds  of 
alfalfa  hay  to  make  one  pound  of  gain,  at  a cost  of  $9.12  per 
hundred  pounds.  When  corn  silage  was  added  to  the  ration,  it 
required  3.94  pounds  of  grain,  3.31  pounds  of  hay  and  4.87  pounds 
of  corn  silage  to  make  one  pound  of  gain,  at  a cost  of  $9.85  for 
each  100  pounds.  The  lambs  fed  alfalfa  hay  alone  for  roughage 
were  valued  at  $14.00  per  hundred  pounds  and  returned  a profit  of 
$3.22  per  head.  Those  fed  corn  silage  in  addition  to  alfalfa,  were 
valued  at  $14.10  per  100  pounds  and  returned  a profit  of  $2.99  per 
head. 


14 


PART  IV 

GROUND  SOYBEANS  VS.  COTTONSEED  MEAL  AS  SUPPLE- 
MENT TO  RATION  FOR  FATTENING  LAMBS 

Part  IV  shows  the  results  of  feeding  two  lots  of  lambs  alike 
in  all  particulars  except  that  one  received  cottonseed  meal  and  the 
other  ground  soybeans.  Both  supplements  were  fed  in  the  propor- 
tions of  one  pound  of  cottonseed  meal  or  ground  soybeans  to  seven 
pounds  of  corn.  During  a part  of  the  period,  the  lot  receiving  cot- 
tonseed meal  contained  only  23  lambs,  but  these  lambs  ate  as  much 
feed  as  the  25  lambs  in  Lot  8;  hence  there  was  a slight  difference 
in  the  daily  amount  of  feed  eaten  in  the  two  lots.  However,  lambs 
in  Lot  7 had  as  keen  appetites  as  those  in  Lot  8. 


Table:  IV. — Ground  Soybeans  vs.  Cottonseed  Meal  as  Supplement 
to  Ration  for  Fattening  Lambs,  November  2,  1916  to 
March  2,  1917 


RATION 

Lot  7 

! Shelled  corn, 

cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Lot  8 

Shelled  corn, 
ground  soybeans, 
corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Average  initial  weight 

59,6  lbs. 

59.8  lbs. 

Average  final  weight 

96.1  “ 

94.9  “ 

Gain  per  lamb 

36.5  “ 

35.1  “ 

Average  daily  gain 

.304  “ 

.293  “ 

Average  daily  feed  per  lamb 

grain 

1.16  “ 

1.09  “ 

hay 

.99  “ 

.96  “ 

silage 

1.42  “ 

1.36  “ 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

grain 

3.82  “ 

3.74  “ 

hay 

3.25  “ 

3.28  “ 

silage 

4.69  “ 

4.63  “ 

Cost  per  100  lbs.  gain 

$ 9.92 

$ 9.76 

Selling  value  of  lambs  in  feed  lots 

14.25 

14.15 

Profit  per  lamb 

3.18 

3.09 

It  will  be  noted  that  there  was  a slightly  larger  grain  consump- 
tion in  Lot  7 than  in  Lot  8 due  to  a smaller  number  of  lambs  being 
in  Lot  7 for  a part  of  the  trial.  The  lambs  receiving  cottonseed 
meal  made  a gain  of  36.5  pounds  per  head  as  compared  to  35.1 


15 


pounds  when  ground  soybeans  were  fed.  It  also  required  a larger 
quantity  of  feed  to  make  a pound  of  gain  in  Lot  7 than  in  Lot  8. 
Each  pound  of  gain  in  Lot  7 was  produced  by  3.82  pounds  of 
grain,  3.25  pounds  of  hay,  and  4.69  pounds  of  silage  at  a cost  of 
$9.90  per  hundred  pounds.  Each  pound  of  gain  in  Lot  8 required 
3.79  pounds  of  grain,  3.28  pounds  of  hay,  and  4.63  pounds  of  silage, 
at  a cost  of  $9.63  for  each  hundred  pounds.  The  lambs  in  Lot  7 
were  valued  at  $14.25  per  hundred  pounds  and  returned  a profit  of 
$3.18  per  head.  The  lambs  in  Lot  8 fed  corn  and  soybeans  were 
valued  at  $14.15  per  hundred  pounds  and  returned  a profit  of 
$3.09  per  head. 


PART  V 

INFLUENCE  OF  SHEARING  ON  FATTENING  LAMBS 

Part  V is  a discussion  of  the  influence  of  shearing  on  the  rate 
in  economy  of  gain.  Two  lots  of  lambs  were  made  as  nearly  alike 
as  possible  and  were  fed  the  same  ration.  After  initial  weights 
were  taken  the  lambs  in  one  lot  were  shorn ; other  than  the  shear- 
ing, the  two  lots  of  lambs  were  treated  exactly  the  same. 


Tabi,!:  V. — Influence  of  Shearing  on  Fattening  Lambs,  November 
2,  1916  to  March  2,  1917 


RATION 

Lot  2 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage, 
clover  hay 
(shorn) 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Average  initial  weight 

60.1  lbs. 

59.6  lbs. 

Average  final  weight 

93.9^  “ 

96.1  “ 

Gain  per  lamb 

33.8  “ 

•36.5  “ 

Average  daily  gain 

.281  “ 

.304  “ 

Average  daily  feed  per  lamb 

grain 

1.09  “ 

1.16  “ 

hay 

1.16  “ 

.99  “ 

silage 

1.50  “ 

1.42  “ 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

grain 

3.88  “ 

3.82  “ 

hay 

4.11  “ 

3.25  “ 

silage 

5.32  “ 

4.69  “ 

Cost  per  100  lbs.  gain 

$10.72 

$ 9.92 

Selling  value  of  lambs  in  feed  lots 

11.75 

14.25 

Profit  per  lamb 

.96 

3.18 

1 Includes  2.3  pounds  of  wool 


i6 


It  will  be  noted  that  the  shorn  lambs  had  keener  appetites  than 
the  lambs  carrying  their  wool.  This  was  not  noticeable  during  the 
first  half  of  the  feeding  period  although  the  shorn  lambs  were  much 
more  active  and  seemed  more  eager  for  their  feed,  but  the  feed 
record  shows  that  they  did  not  consume  any  more  feed  than  the 
lambs  carrying  their  wool.  During  the  last  half  of  the  feeding 
period  the  feed  record  shows  that  the  shorn  lambs  consumed 
larger  quantities  of  both  hay  and  silage  than  the  wooled  lambs. 
The  shorn  lambs  gained  33.8  pounds  per  lamb  during  the  feeding 
period  as  compared  with  33.5  pounds  per  head  by  the  wooled  lambs. 
It  required  more  feed  to  make  a pound  of  gain  on  the^  shorn  lambs 
than  on  the  wooled  lambs,  the  relative  cost  being  $10.72  per  hundred 
pounds  and  $9.92  per  hundred  pounds  respectively.  The  shorn 
lambs  were  valued  at  $11.75  hundred  pounds  in  the  lots  and 
returned  a profit  including  the  wool  of  96  cents  per  head.  The 
wooled  lambs  were  valued  at  $14.25  per  hundred  pounds  and  re- 
turned a profit  of  $3.18  per  head.  These  lambs  were  not  heavy 
shearers,  since  25  lambs  sheared  only  57  pounds  of  wool  but  even 
had  they  produced  twice  this  amount,  shearing  would  have  been 
decidedly  unprofitable. 


PART  VI 

OPEN  SHED  VS.  BARN  AS  SHELTER  FOR 
FATTENING  LAMBS 

Part  VI  is  a report  of  a trial  comparing  an  open  shed  with  a 
well  ventilated  barn  as  shelter  for  fattening  lambs.  Both  lots  of 
lambs  were  shorn  immediately  after  the  experiment  was  started  and 
fed  a ration  of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover 
hay.  Lot  2 was  fed  in  an  open  shed  and  Lot  9 in  a barn,  but  there 
was  little  difference  in  the  appetites  of  the  lambs  in  the  two  lots. 
The  amount  of  corn  and  silage  consumed  was  the  same  in  both 
lots.  The  lambs  fed  in  an  open  shed  consumed  a slightly  larger 
amount  of  hay  but  this  difference  occurred  during  the  last  half  of 
the  feeding  period.  The  lambs  fed  in  the  open  shed  gained  33.8 
pounds  per  head  as  compared  with  33.1  pounds  per  head  by  the 
lambs  fed  in  the  barn.  There  was  practically  no  difference  in  the 
feed  required  to  make  a pound  of  gain.  Each  pound  of  gain  made 
by  the  lambs  fed  in  the  open  shed,  required  3.88  pounds  of  grain, 
4. 1 1 pounds  of  hay  and  5.32  pounds  of  silage  as  compared  with  3.97 
pounds  of  grain,  3.79  pounds  of  hay  and  5.43  pounds  of  silage  for 
each  pound  of  gain  by  the  lambs  fed  in  the  barn,  which  was  only 
four  cents  per  hundred  pounds  difference  in  the  cost  of  each  one 
hundred  pounds  of  gain. 


17 


I 


The  lambs  fed  in  the  open  shed  were  valued  at  $11.75 
hundred  pounds  in  the  lots  and  returned  a profit  of  96  cents  per 
head.  The  lambs  fed  in  the  barn  were  valued  at  $11.25  per  hundred 
pounds  and  returned  a profit  of  51  cents  per  head.  This  trial  is  in 
accordance  with  five  other  trials  in  which  it  was  shown  that  the 
lambs  in  the  open  shed  returned  larger  profits  than  those  fed  in  the 
barn.  However,  all  previous  trials  have  been  conducted  with 
wooled  lambs. 


Table:  VI. — Open  Shed  vs.  Barn  as  Shelter  for  Fattening  (Shorn) 
Tambs,  November  2,  1916  to  March  2,  1917 


RATION 

Lot  2 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage, 
clove, r hay 
(shorn  and  fed  in 
open  shed) 

Lot  9 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

(shorn  and 
fed  in  barn) 

Average  initial  weight 

60.1  lbs. 

59.0  lbs. 

Average  final  weight 

93.9^  “ 

92.1^  “ 

Gain  per  lamb 

33.8  “ 

33.1  “ 

Average  daily  gain 

.281  “ 

.276  “ 

Average  daily  feed  per  lamb 

grain 

1.09  “ 

1.09  “ 

hay 

1.16  “ 

1.05  “ 

silage 

1.50  “ 

1.50  “ 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

grain 

3.88  “ 

3.97  “ 

hay 

4.11  “ 

3.79  “ 

silage 

5.32  “ 

5.43  “ 

Cost  per  100  lbs.  gain 

$10.72 

$10.68 

Selling  value  of  I'ambs  in  feed  lots 

11.75 

11.25 

Profit  per  lamb 

.96 

.51 

1 Includes  2.3  pounds  of  wool 


Tablk  VII. — Summary  of  Lamb  Feeding  Experiment,  November  2,  1916,  to  March  2,  1917 


18 


O ' o 

o oq 

1-5  00  CO 

C<1  tH  CO  CO 

&0-CO  10  oq 
CO  o 
1—1  oq 


LQ  10 

CT5  CO  CO  t2  (Oq  00  00 
00  O 1— < 00  10  O CO 
00  CO  oi  CO  Tf  oq  CO 
LQ  T-i  1— I (oq  00 

cq  CO  1—1 


■o  . o . 

a 220:  !=! 

— ® 

S o O g o 


CO 


1 T3o 

' C3  O 


10  1-H  IQ  CO  00 

oa  1— 1 '-fi  CM 

(M  00 

1—1  (M 


iO 

iO  t>5  CO  10 

'Cft  00  CC)CO 

1— I CO  ^ 1— I 

(M  ^ CO 


oc  O »0  <M  C» 

O 10  O 

1— 5 1— 1 1-H  CO 


I n 1 S S ^ I 

'^OO-QO^oS 

HI 


CO 

o o 

O <M 

>0 1-5 10  CO  00 

(M  1— I OC) 

60- CO  00 
1— I CM 


10  iO 

t2  (30  CO 
00  CO  00 
CO  o 00 
'cf  (M 


03  CO  CO  CO 

O CO  03  I-H  1-H 

1-H  1-5  ‘ CO  * 


03 

a> 

_ R =3  £ tlX) 

o O § o « b 

cr  -M  05  O 

o 

a 


,S2c3rr  — hflg"^ 


O I 

10  1—5  03  1-H  (M 
CM  1-H  00  O 1— I 
eo-ot<  'Tf  03 
1-H  CM 


(M 

CO 
01  (03 
^(M 


CO  CM  <03  1-H  CO  10 

1-H  03  CM  1-H 

1-5  1-H  ■ CO  ‘ ' 


Sg 

“ b 

C 


1 ^ 
C S ^ > 


'O  ^ W 

S S S jh  7^  ^ 

' o ® 0.3  O 

s " -S  O, 


<u  d 


00 

O CO 

<0  CM 

10  1-H  CM  »0) 

CM  rH  (03  O 1-H 
eo-^  CM 
1-H  C<1 


00  10  (M  ^ 

-Cfl  O <03 

00  1-H  ’'Cf  CO  CO 

CM  10 


CO  03  CO  00  O CO 
1-H  t>;  CM  03  CM  10 

1-5 1-5  ’ CO  ’ ' 


2 o o.S'2 
^^0:33  — 
HI  d 


m 


00 

o 00 

CO  CM 

XO  1-H  1-H  10  Ttl 
(M  1-H  <03  10  CO 
CO  00 
1-H  CM 


»o 

CO  ICO  CO 

CM  <0> 

CM  1-H  CM 

CO 


.sj  a: 

% O. 


■a 

.S  n « !>. 

S o o S 

cS  " 


10 

o o 

<03  CO 

10  1-H  o CO  CO 
CM  1-H  (X)  1-H 

SO-'CfH  CO  03 
1-H  (M 


10  1-H  O O O 
CM  t-H  00  Hf  CO 
SO-'C^l  CO  CO 
1-H  CM 


^ a 
S o 


>iS 

o ® o ^ O ^ o 

H cj  rzi  fX 
4-i  ^ 05  O 02 

o 

<y 


o 00 

<0  H 

10  1-5  CO  o ■ t^>ot2  CO  <M 

CMi-H003^  ^icftoo  03 

e/5-iocMco  i'- 1-H  CO  xti 

1—1  CM  (M  ^ CO 


<03  o CO  10  t:^  CO 

CO  10  1-H  CM  1-H  TP 

1-H  t-H  1-H  (TO 


-d 

03  „ (U  , 
s £ fl'3 
%oo% 

<33  -H  cj 

cc 


P bX) 


o 

<03 

TP  1-H  CO  CM  03 
CM  ^ tP  CO  1-H 

ee-TP  00  tp 


10  10 

cid  CO  cd 
1-H  tP  CM 
CO  t-H  CO 
CM 


00  o 

• CO  1-H 
i-O  tH 

10 


og 

^ r-H 

-§•2 


T3 

01 

'3  S 


&J0ia 
O.^ 
fO  <3^ 

C3  ^ 
5m  2 

^5  ^ 


m 

T § s 

„ 3 “ o 

<3^ 

'3  03 

^ hl3«PH  dn 


bDr 


M ^ fl 


— >5  O ^ >30H 

^ ® ^ & S 

O)  C3  ^ r— I 

C3  1— c >-H  ^ •+-*  ^ fl  L>  C3  C3  ^ ”i-H 

Qb*QaiOo&X)aoc!3>fcfl<o'T3?^cc 


M,  o o 

c3  ^ a <0 


03  o 

O <0 


19 


no  oo 

CM 

CO 

Ob 

CO 

<M 

CO 

■'Ct^ 

CO 

l>* 

oo 

CM 

O 

no 

e- 

no 

CM 

o 

o 

O 

no 

o 

no 

CO 

rH 

l>; 

CO 

CM 

oq 

CM 

CO 

1—1 

o 

<:£5 

CO 

no 

tH 

t>; 

CM 

' 

(M 

no 

o 

co’ 

cbd 

Ob 

no 

Cb 

o 

l>^ 

oo‘ 

o 

CO 

CO* 

Ob 

CM* 

CM 

CM 

Ob 

o 

>o 

tH 

CO 

CO 

T— 1 

rH 

oo 

o 

Ob 

tH 

CM 

se- 

GO- 

CM 

CM 

CM 

5.43 

3.79 

$45.17 

2.27 

8.72 

13.48 

18.81 

nooOi-OOOCM»OOOCMCOCOi— 1 
''CJH  CO  CM  o CO  CM  CO  CO  CO  CO  no 

00*  O CM  O*  Ob*  O rH*  1-H  oo*  CO  CM* 
OOi-HCOX-Ot— IrHi— COi— 1 
ee-  1— 1 CM  CM  <M 

Tti  CO  oo  CM  1—1  O 

rfCOCM  1—1  CM  l>;CMCO 

* CO  no  CM  oo  CM* 

rlH  1— 1 1— 1 

t^conocM  ^nsoocMcO'^rSOb 

CO  !>.  rji  1-H  iq  1-H  i>.  cq  'iq  cq  O 

no  Ob  TJH*  Q o*  no  oo*  CO 

oo  cono  1-Hi-Hco  coa 

1-H  COI  CO  CO 

4.69 

3.25 

$48.27 

2.27 

9.29 

12.83 

17.77 

OOcMObCM  cx)no^(Moaooo 
'rJiObt^CM  nOcMi-HCOOOCDi-H 

o Ob  CO*  ^*  o*  -ctH*  (M  od  CO*  Ob  CO 

Ob  cono  1-H  1-H  Hfi  CO 

60-  rH  CM  CO  CO 

7.52 

.97 

$46.85 

2.27 

9.05 

16.13 

4.16 

COt^CMOO  Ob  o l>- (M  no  CO 

rjHobi-Hnq  Ob  Ob  i>- cq 'q  oq  CM 
odo^CM  OCO*CDCx5odnO{M 

1-H  CO  1-H  1-H  o CGi  no 

se-  1-H  CM  CO  (M 

4.87 

3.31 

$53.06 

2.27 

12.62 

17.14 

ObnOi-HO  oo  o CO  CM Ob 
<0  oo  o 1-H  iq  1-H  o cq  I'';  cq  Ob 
ndob'st^ob  orSHc^iodcdrct^cci 
oo  CO  rif  1-H  rH  CO  M t>- 

&0-  tHCM  CO  CO 

5.22 

$52.55 

2.27 

28.69 

1-HCMOrH  CM  O HJH  CM  rH  CM 

noi-HtqCM  cq  CD  c:q  CO  no  CM 
cdobrHnd  oiciH^odndocd 

oo  CO  rfl  rHi-HCO  (MOO 

60-  1-H  CM  CO  CO 

5.76 

$51.52 

2.27 

29.71 

O rH  o O CO  no  no  CM  CO  cro  (Ob 
nqt^ooco  nqtqtqcOioirHcq 
cd(ObCMcd  ocdrHodcdt^cM* 

oo  CO  rHi-HCM  ‘ i-H  CO 

C/S-  1-H  CM  CO  CO 

5.32 

4.11 

$45.17 

2.27 

8.72 

13.48 

20.83 

t^cMcofto-n^nobocMcococo 
'qi>.cqoqcqcqi>-ocqi>.ab(Ob 
o o*  no  no  cd  o*  rH  oo*  od  cb  cd 

(Ob  rH  CD  no  1-H  rH  i-H  oo  (M 

oo-  rH  CM  (MM 

13.22 

.26 

$37.81 

2.23 

7.35 

16.61 

.66 

COCOCOcOb  O O (Ob  OO  CTb  CO 

cq  rq  tq  cq  O nq  cq  <0b  cq  CD  OO 

rct^  no  Cbd  cd  CM*  cd  rH  l>I  CO*  (Ob 

cOi-nnocM  rH  i-H  no  'O' i 

rH  CM  CM  CM 

i 


m 

a 

c3 

O) 

O bX) 

xfi  c3 


m 


a 

S « 

O ;h 
^ O 
bX)  o 


,— I CO 

cS  G 
q;  c3 
G o 

^ O bX3  ^ 
a;  C3  2 ' 
CO  — fG 

CO 

co3|g^' 

r-,r-H-g^  G O ^ 0,Gr 
oGQOoOobXloo 

O 


^ G g_|  O 
G ^ (D  o 
'+^ 

°'3 


G 

bJO 

CO 

o G 


G 


ICh 

CO  bX3  * 

CO  G-g 
5S  CO 


o G 

CC-rH 
-L^  ^ rH 

E S 

o 


Gh„  CO  ■+J  ;g 
o co-g^cG  ^ 

« “ 3 o S 

O s Q, 
s ft  ^ 


a O rH  o 

r-*  ^ i-HCOcoG,— IfG^t— 1,^ 

G^-J-MG^O-GG+f  G^fi 

c«  CO -Ml— I O'— G-M+a  O 

OOOOf^oGoo^O^ 


tc 

G 

gj  o 


a oj  - 
p PG 
S'a  a 
a > o 

.S  bX)  3 


ss 

s| 

(N  O 


'S  tuO  O t>j’^ 

S3  p,  a y 


£ Sag' 
> oca 

bJD^  ..  OT  H I 


G G 

P3  as 

bXI  O 


a 'O  E,G  rt 

tu  oj  OJO  (3  cj 

" S “ a a 
,9  a'M 


KS  (3 

cc  4J  a >•  > 

+J  fH  o 

a o oS-3 
O O O 0 .2 


<1G 


Final  values  of  the  lambs  are  75  cents  below  Chicago  valuation  for  fat  lambs 

1 Total  gains  in  Lots  2 and  9 include  57  pounds  of  wool  each 

2 Total  receipts  in  Lots  2 and  9 include  $19.00  in  each  lot  from  wool 

3 Death  losses  are  evenly  distributed  between  all  lots 


20 


Actual  Expenditures 


Original  cost  of  250  lambs  in  feed  lot $1558.06 

Cost  of  feed  while  on  experiment 750-24 

Cost  of  feed  for  cull  lambs 9.50 

Cost  of  feed  after  experiment  closed 82.41 


Total  cost  $2400.21 


Actual  Receipts 


Dryfus  Packing  Co 

29.25 

Dryfus  Packing  Co 

• ■ . . 358-15 

Dryfus  Packing  Co 

. . . . 25  shorn  lambs 

• • • • 275.95 

L.  Pfaelser 

. . . . 1774.48 

Swift  & Co 

— 284.15 

Bogan-Jacques 

....  57.40 

Total  receipts $2779.38 

Total  actual  profit $ 379.17 


3f),l 


'lA,  O 
PURDUE  UMVERSITY 


I I 


.'ll 


'VtKbl,-;  Oi'lLUJtilS  LIU 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station  , 

^ “Lu  1 4 1918 


Bueeetin  No.  203,  Vou.  XX 
August,  1917 


TEST  OF  THREE  PROTEIN  CONCENTRATES 
AND  TWO  LEGUMINOUS  ROUGHAGES 
IN  MILK  PRODUCTION 


Published  by  the  Station; 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL  ^ ^ ^ . 

Joseph  D.  Oliver,  President South  Bend.  St.  Joseph  County 

tj’av  <?  PWANOT-ER  Indianupolis,  Marion  County 

PHARi  PS  Downing V.'. Greenfield.  Hancock  County 

Vincennes.  Knox  County 

Andrew  E.  Reynolds Crawfordsville.  Montgomery  County 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone.  A.  M..  Ph.  D President  of  the  University 

STATION  STAFF 

HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS 

Arthur  Goss^  M.  S.,  A.  C - ..^Director 

George  I.  Christie.  B.  S^^A - Sup’t 

Otto  Hunziker  M^  S ^ Dairy  Husbandry 

^sTlSrl^V-s"^-c-i 

ASSOCIATES  AND  ASSISTANTS  ,.,*•** 

JOHN  M.  Aldrich.  Ph.  D.3 

shSiVl“Se?son--b"s :;--\\-;;;;:;::;::;:;;A7sistanrin"^^^^^^^  inspection 

SHERMAN  L.  Anderson  b.  s -- inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

JaSes^6.  bLvers.  B.  Agr;:::: Associate  in  Soils  an^  Crops  Extenm^ 

SlL'^sXewster  M-'s v;;;r::;:;zv;Ass^^^^^^^^^^ 

tJ?r5er  H BrouSS  b;  s: Assistant  in  creamery  Inspection 

lurry  D Burnside  B S A ^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

PM  S'  cI^  DWFLL  B S ^ Associate  in  Milk  Production 

cfpNN  G CartSi  b’  S^  ■' - Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

S^rt  H CLINK  B S Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

THcmfs  A CoLEMAN"::::":::"::;:;"A7s’t  "state  Leader  Field  studies  and  Demonstrations 

c™oN  S)  cSoS.  c?S?s 

Parlfton  Cutler  B S ^ First  Deputy  State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 



f'tn  V Doyt?  B S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

KS  t Assistant  m Agrlcu,tural^E.tensU,„ 

^AnoF^^'  p^^lrmFS^  M^  S Assistant  in  Soils 

B S Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

!:<  RAN  KLIN  Ij.  IVING,  Xj.  Qr^iantifio  A Tit 

finp^rr  P^'^Dtt«  Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

MtamtV  R S 4 Deputy  State  Chemist 

gS£V^£o^KS  k S...ReseirchAssista:^nnH^ 

P'  Philips^  B^'S^A Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Fdward^G^pSuSc  M S^ First  Deputy  State  Chemist  (Fertilizers) 

’ Associate  in  Horticulture 

pmarTf^'  p^^ffs”  M "a Assistant  in  Botany 

A® -rp^^^fr^  R ‘s '3 Scientific  Assistant 

Otts  S^'robeSs’  B S4 ;;;;;:;:;;;"::;."-(3hief  inspector  state  chemist  Department 

SeSr^G  Starr  B S.  A..  ///."".""/".Assistant  in  Swine  Production  and  Management 

Srrrrr-  r'  qwTTZFR  B S A Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 



rSam!?'p^'WALK™’ B ’ S 'k'.k! Assistant  in  Soils  and  Crops 

rS™a  mtiSo’D.'  Associate  in  Ammai  pathology 

5eLe  Scv  ....: Secretary  to  the  Director  and  Librarj^an 

1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Seed  Testing 

3 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  In- 

sect Investigations  ....  , 

4 Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 

(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909) 

T p Prtff  Dalpville  State  Live  Stock  Association 



S'  u'  Tohm^Kn  MoorlsviH  State  Dairy  Association 

B:  B:  Ma?sh.  BVanffort  state  com  Growers*  Association 


TEST  OF  THREE  PROTEIN  CONCENTRATES 
AND  TWO  LEGUMINOUS  ROUGHAGES 
IN  MILK  PRODUCTION 

O.  F.  Hunziker  R.  E.  Caedweee 

SUMMARY 

1.  A ration  used  in  milk  production,  which  contains  ground 
corn,  corn  silage  and  a leguminous  hay,  requires  a very  limited 
amount  of  protein-carrying  concentrates  in  order  that  it  may  be 
properly  balanced. 

2.  The  three  protein-carrying  concentrates  used  in  this  experi- 
ment, cottonseed  meal,  linseed  meal  and  gluten  feed,  affected  the 
cost  of  the  rations  less  than  any  other  of  the  four  feeds  of  which 
the  ration  was  composed. 

3.  When  fed  in  connection  with  alfalfa  hay,  cottonseed  meal 
is  the  most  economical  source  of  protein,  gluten  feed  ranking  sec- 
ond and  linseed  meal  standing  third,  using  prices  as  shown  in 
Table  IV. 

4.  Alfalfa  hay  is  12  per  cent,  more  economical  as  a milk- 
producing  roughage  than  soybean  hay  when  both  are  selling  at  the 
same  price  per  ton.  This  does  not  take  into  account  the  greater 
quantity  of  soybean  hay  refused,  due  to  its  unpalatable  character. 

5.  The  cost  of  milk  was  affected  to  the  greatest  degree  by 
varying  the  price  of  corn.  Hay  ranked  second,  corn  silage  third, 
and  the  protein-carrying  concentrates  fourth.  The  hay  and  corn 
exert  practically  the  same  influence  upon  the  cost  of  milk. 

6.  The  use  of  soybean  hay  caused  an  increase  in  body  weight 
and  a decrease  in  daily  milk  and  butter  fat  production. 

7.  Properly  balanced  rations  are,  approximately,  equally  effic- 
ient in  the  production  of  milk  and  butter  fat  per  unit  consumption 
of  dry  matter. 

8.  The  nutritive  ratio  of  ^ ration  may  be  varied  within  reason- 
able limits,  without  materially  affecting  the  productive  power  of 
the  ration. 

PURPOSE 

The  purpose  of  this  bulletin  is  to  offer  the  results  of  an  ex- 
periment designed  to  give  directions  to  feeders  of  dairy  cows,  re- 
garding the  type  of  protein-carrying  concentrates  and  leguminous 
roughages  best  adapted  for  maximum  and  economical  milk  yield. 

WHAT  FEEDS  TO  BUY 

The  importance  of  feeding  a ration  to  milk  cows,  which  contains 
the  proper  ingredients  for  milk  production,  is  becoming  more  thor- 
oughly appreciated  each  year.  One  of  the  common  questions  that 


4 


arises  in  the  minds  of  the  feeders  of  dairy  stock  at  the  present  time 
is,  “What  is  the  most  economical  protein-carrying  feed  that  I can 
purchase?”  He  also  frequently  asks,  “Is  there  any  difference  in  the 
feeding  value  of  two  feeds  equally  high  in  protein?”  Such  questions 
as  these  demand  a careful  study  before  an  intelligent  answer  can  be 
given. 

In  order  that  this  station  might  be  better  able  to  consider  ques- 
tions of  this  type,  an  experiment  was  conducted  and  a study  of 
three  of  our  most  common  protein-carrying  concentrates  was 
made.  It  was  also  possible  to  include  two  of  our  well  known 
leguminous  hays  in  this  experiment.  The  following  is  a discus- 
sion of  the  experiment,  as  conducted. 

PLAN 

The  experiment  covered  a period  of  i8o  days  and  was  divided 
into  six  periods  of  30  days  each.  It  began  on  December  28,  1914 
and  continued  until  June  28,  1915.  Fifteen  cows  were  used  in 
conducting  the  test,  being  divided  into  three  lots  of  five  cows 
each.  The  three  protein-carrying  concentrates  under  test  were  cot- 
tonseed meal,  linseed  meal  and  gluten  feed,  and  the  hays  fed  were 
alfalfa  hay  and  soybean  hay.  The  following  table  indicates 
exactly  how  the  lots  were  divided  and  the  feeds  which  each  lot 
received  during  the  period  of  the  test. 

Table  I. — Showing  Periods  of  Feeding  and  Rations  Received  by 
the  Three  Lots  of  Cows 


number  i Length  of  experiment,  180  days,  divided  into  six  periods  of  30  days  each 


I 

j 

First 

period 

Second 

period 

Third 

period 

Fourth  ; 
period 

Fifth  1 

period  1 

Sixth 

period 

1 

( 

I 1 

1 

ground  ( 
corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage 

ground  C 
corn, 

gluten  feed, 
soybean 
hay, 

corn  silage 

ground  _3 
corn, 

linseed  meal, 
alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage 

ground  ^ 
corn, 

cottonseed  ^ 
meal,  1 

soybean  ; 
hay, 

corn  silage  | 

ground 

corn, 

gluten  feed, 
alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage 

ground 
corn,  ^ 
linseed  meal, 
soybean 
hay, 

corn  silage 

ground  5 
corn, 

linseed  meal, 
alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage 

ground  y 
corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

soybean 

hay, 

corn  silage 

ground 

corn, 

gluten  feed, 
alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage 

ground 

corn, 

linseed  meal, 
soybean 
hay, 

corn  silage  ‘ 

ground  ^ 
corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage 

ground 

corn, 

gluten  feed, 
soybean 
hay, 

corn  silage 

in 

ground  / 
corn,  ^ 
gluten  feed, 

1 alfalfa  hay, 

1 corn  silage 

1 ' 

1 1 

ground 

corn, 

linseed  meal, 
soybean 
hay, 

corn  silage 

ground  1 
corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage 

ground  / 
corn, 

gluten  feed, 
soybean 
hay, 

corn  silage 

ground 

corn, 

linseed  meal, 
alfalfa  hay, 
corn  silage  ; 

ground 

corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

soybean 

hay, 

corn  silage 

5 


The  rations  used  in  the  experiment  are  given  in  the  following 
schedule  and  will  be  referred  to  in  the  tables  and  discussion  by 
number. 

1.  Ground  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa  hay  and  corn  silage. 

2.  Ground  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  soybean  hay  and  corn  silage. 

3.  Ground  corn,  linseed  meal,  alfalfa  hay  and  corn  silage. 

4.  Ground  corn,  linseed  meal,  soybean  hay  and  corn  silage. 

5.  Ground  corn,  gluten  feed,  alfalfa  hay  and  corn  silage. 

6.  Ground  corn,  gluten  feed,  soybean  hay  and  corn  silage. 

cows  USED  IN  THE  EXPERIMENT 

The  cows  used  in  this  experiment  w^re  pure-bred  individuals 
maintained  by  the  Experiment  Station  for  experimental  purposes. 
Lot  I contained  four  Jerseys  and  one  Ayrshire;  Lot  II,  five  Jerseys; 
and  Lot  III,  four  Jerseys  and  one  Ayrshire.  The  average  age  of  Lot 
I at  the  time  the  experiment  began  (December  28,  1914)  was  four 
years,  five  months  and  21  days;  Lot  II,  three  years,  four  months 
and  18  days;  and  Lot  III,  three  years,  eight  months  and  23  days. 
The  oldest  cow  was  eight  years,  four  months  and  26  days  of  age 
and  the  youngest,  two  years,  five  months  and  t8  days. 


Tabi,e  II. — Showing  Breeding  and  History  of  Cows  in  Experiment 


Lot 

number 

Breed 

* 

Date  of 

Date  bred 

Jersey  j 

Ayrshire 

Average  age 

calving 

average 

month 

■ average 

month 

X 

4 

1 

4 yrs.  5 mos.  21  days 

j October 

January 

IT 

5 

0 

3 “ 4 “ 18  “ 

1 October 

December 

TTI 

4 

1 

3 “ 8 “ 23  “ 

j October 

i 

December 

In  each  lot,  there  were  two  cows  with  first  calf. 

All  the  cows  in  Lot  I calved  during  the  month  of  October  prev- 
ious to  the  time  the  experiment  began.  Two  of  the  cows  in  Lot  II 
calved  in  September  and  one  in  November.  The  cows  in  Lot  III 
calved  as  follows : one  in  August,  two  in  September,  and  two  in 
October.  As  an  average,  the  cows  in  all  lots  had  been  fresh  ap- 
proximately 75  days  before  they  were  placed  on  the  experiment. 
This  is  believed  to  be  sufficient  time  for  the  cows  to  have  utilized  all 
surplus  flesh  which  they  stored  upon  their  bodies  during  their  un- 
productive periods. 

The  cows  in  Lot  I were  all  bred  prior  or  during  the  first  part  of 
the  experiment.  Two  cows  were  bred  in  December;  two  in  Janu- 
ary, and  one  in  April.  All  of  the  cows  in  Lot  II,  with  one  exception, 
were  bred  before  the  experiment  started,  and  that  one  was  bred 
very  shortly  afterwards.  The  cows  in  Lot  III,  with  one  exception, 
were  bred  previous  to  the  time  the  test  began.  This  cow  was  not 


6 


bred  until  the  latter  part  of  February.  It  is  believed  that  the  periods 
of  pregnancy  was  sufficiently  uniform,  so  as  not  to  cause  undue 
variation  in  the  results  secured. 

COMPOSITION  OF  FEEDS  USED  DURING  THE  EXPERIMENT 

Table  III  shows  the  total  composition  of  all  feeds  used 
during  the  entire  test.  Such  feeds  as  corn,  alfalfa  hay,  soybean  hay 
and  corn  silage  were  analyzed  more  than  once  during  the  test.  Due 
to  a variation  in  the  moisture  content  of  corn,  it  was  analyzed  every 
30  days  and  represents  the  composition  of  the  corn  fed  during  that 
period.  The  hays  were  analyzed  every  60  days,  although  the 
same  supply  of  hay  was  used  throughout  the  experiment.  The  corn 
silage  was  analyzed  every  10  days  and  the  three  analyses  made  each 
period  were  averaged  and  the  figures  thus  secured  were  used  in  all 
calculations  in  that  period.  The  protein-carrying  concentrates  were 
purchased  in  sufficient  quantities  to  last  during  the  entire  test; 
hence,  but  one  analysis  was  made. 


TablK  III. — Showing  Composition  of  Feeds  Used  in  Experiment 


1 

Name  of  feed  j 

Num- 

ber 

anal- 

ypes 

Dry 
matter 
per  cent. 

1 

Protein  j 
per  cent,  j 

Carbo- 
hydrates 
per  cent. 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Ash 

per  cent. 

Cottonseed  meal 

1 

89.99 

41.74 

37.18 

5.58 

5.49 

Linseed  meal 

1 

89.40 

33.27 

47.76 

2.97 

5.40 

Gluten  feed 

1 

86.82 

25.38 

55.77 

1.26 

4.41 

Ground  corn 

6 

87.25 

9.73 

71.92 

3.89 

1.71 

Alfalfa  hay 

3 

89.93 

11.26 

71.38 

1.37 

5.91 

Soybean  hay 

3 

88.74 

12.98 

67.34 

3.09 

5.33 

Corn  silage 

18 

30.79 



2.60 

25.57 

.81 

1.81 

The  importance  of  frequent  analyses  is  shown  by  the  fact  that 
the  corn  varied  from  85  to  91  per  cent,  dry  matter  and  from  8.31 
]ier  cent,  to  10.25  per  cent,  protein.  There  was  also  a rather 
marked-  variation  in  the  ash  and  fat  content  of  the  corn.  The  dry 
matter  in  corn  silage  varied  from  26.97  cent,  to  36.56  per  cent, 
and  the  fat  fron  .7  per  cent,  to  1.2  per  cent.  The  alfalfa  hay  was 
quite  uniform  in  dry  matter  although  it  varied  from  9.54  per  cent, 
to  12.8  per  cent,  in  protein  content.  The  ash  of  the  alfalfa  hay 
varied  from  4.55  per  cent,  to  7.69  per  cent.  The  soybean  hay  varied, 
approximately,  5 per  cent,  in  dry  matter,  4 per  cent,  in  protein  and 
almost  3 per  cent,  in  fat. 


PRICES  OF  FEEDS 

The  prices  given  in  Table  IV  were  selected  as  being  approxi- 
mately the  average  market  prices  for  such  materials  during  the 
time  the  experiment  was  in  progress. 


7 

Table  IV. — Showing  Prices  of  Feeds  and  Product 


Cottonseed  meal 
Linseed  meal 

Gluten  feed  

Ground  corn 

Alfalfa  hay 

Soybean  hay 

Corn  silage 

Butter  fat 

Skim  milk  


$30.00  per  ton 
. 36.00  per  ton 
. 28.50  per  ton 
.60  per  bushel 
. 15.00  per  ton 
. 15.00  per  ton 
, 3.50  per  ton 
.30  per  pound 
.25  per  cwt. 


FEEDS  CONSUMED 

The  amount  of  feed  consumed,  as  indicated  in  the  following 
table,  represents  all  of  the  various  feeds  that  the  cows  would  eat 
without  waste.  A standard  grain  mixture  was  made  for  each  period 
and  the  grain  fed  in  as  large  quantities  as  the  cows  would  consume. 
All  feeds  were  fed  twice  daily  and  each  ingredient  fed  separately, 
so  that  it  was  possible  to  weigh  back  all  feeds  that  were  refused. 

In  comparing  the  total  amount  of  the  various  feeds  consumed, 
it  appears  that  the  cows  consumed  approximately  one  pound  of  grain 
and  one  pound  of  hay  for  each  hundred  pounds  of  body  weight. 
A larger  quantity  of  alfalfa  hay  was  consumed  than  of  soybean  hay. 
The  ratio  between  the  amount  of  hay  and  corn  silage  consumed 
was  in  the  ratio  of  i : 3 when  alfalfa  hay  was  fed  and  i : 3.3  when 
soybean  hay  was  fed.  The  cows  consumed  approximately  one 
pound  of  grain  for  each  two  or  two  and  one-half  pounds  of  milk 
produced. 


Table  V. — Showing  Average  Daily  Feeds  Consumed — Entire 

Experiment 


N. 

Ration 

Ground 

corn 

i pounds  : 

Cottonseed 

meal 

pounds  i 

Linseed 

meal 

pounds 

i Gluten 
feed 

pounds  1 

Alfalfa 

hay 

i pounds 

Soybean 

hay 

pounds 

i 

! Corn 
! silage 

1 pounds 

1 

7.88 

.49 

8.52 

24.50 

2 

7.44 

.78 

7.43 

25.07 

3 

7.66 

.55 

8.54 

25.00 

4 

7.40 

1.06 

7.65 

24.81 

5 

7.24 

.90 

8.27 

25.10 

6 

6.02 

1 

1.61 

7.62 

1 

25.24 

The  grain  mixture  was  compounded  according  to  a standard 
that  would  insure  a uniform  nutritive  ratio  of  all  the  rations  tested„ 
The  corn  and  cottonseed  meal  were  mixed  in  the  proportion  of  16 
parts  corn  to  one  part  cottonseed  meal  when  fed  in  connection  with 
alfalfa  hay.  When  the  same  grain  ration  was  fed  in  connection 
with  soybean  hay,  the  grain  mixture  contained  one  part  cottonseed 


8 


meal  for  each  lo  parts  corn.  When  linseed  meal  was  substituted 
for  cottonseed  meal  and  the  grain  ration  fed  with  alfalfa  hay,  the 
mixture  contained  one  part  linseed  meal  to  14  parts  corn.  The 
ratio  was  reduced  to  seven  parts  corn  and  one  part  linseed  meal 
when  soybean  hay  was  substituted  for  the  alfalfa  hay.  The  gluten 
feed  and  corn  were  mixed  in  the  proportion  of  one  part  gluten  feed 
to  eight  parts  corn,  when  fed  in  connection  with  alfalfa  hay,  and 
one  part  gluten  feed  to  four  parts  corn  when  fed  in  connection  with 
soybean  hay.  As  will  be  seen  later,  this  maintained  a practically 
uniform  ratio  throughout  the  entire  test. 

AVERAGE  DAILY  NUTRIENTS  CONSUMED 

There  was  less  variation  in  the  amount  of  dry  matter  consumed 
by  the  cows  receiving  the  three  grain  rations  than  there  was  by  the 
cows  receiving  the  two  roughages.  The  difference  in  the  amount  of 
dry  matter  consumed  by  the  cows  receiving  the  three  grain  rations 
was  so  slight  that  no  conclusion  can  be  drawn. 


Table  VI. — Showing  the  Average  Daily  Nutrients  Consumed 
from  Each  Ration 


1 

Ration  ' 

1 

f Dry  matter 
pounds 

Protein 

pounds 

Carbohydrates 

pounds 

Eat 

pounds 

Ash 

pounds 

1 

22.889 

2.583 

18.515 

.664 

1.127 

2 

21.120 

2.641 

16.723 

.751 

1.005 

3 

22.901 

2.555 

18.565 

.649 

1.133 

4 

21.483 

2.705 

17.006 

.747 

1.028 

5 

22.605 

2.524 

18.339 

.623 

1.118 

(j 

20.817 

2.628 

16.503 

.684 

1.025 

The  ratio  between  the  dry  matter  consumed  and  the  body 
weight  of  the  cows  on  experiment  for  the  two  rough  feeds,  are  as 
follows: — alfalfa  hay,  one  pound  of  dry  matter  for  each  36  pounds 
of  body  weight;  soybean  hay,  one  pound  of  dry  matter  for  each  40 
pounds  of  body  weight.  The  amount  of  protein  consumed  by  each 
of  the  three  lots  was  very  uniform  for  all  lots  receiving  the  same 
roughage.  As.  long  as  they  received  the  roughage,  the  variation  in 
the  amount  of  protein  consumed  by  the  cows  when  receiving  the  dif- 
ferent types  of  concentrates  was  so  slight  that  no  significance 
can  be  placed  on  the  figures  obtained.  The  extremes  in  daily  pro- 
tein consumption  for  all  rations  was  from  2.52  pounds  to  2.7  pounds. 

The  rations  which  contained  the  alfalfa  hay  varied  slightly  in 
the  amount  of  carbohydrates  which  they  supplied.  The  soybean 
hay  reduced  the  amount  of  carbohydrates  consumed  slightly  over 
one  pound  per  cow  per  day.  This  deficit  was,  in  a measure,  taken 
care  of  by  the  higher  fat  content  of  this  ration.  The  average  daily 
fat  consumed  by  the  cows  receiving  the  soybean  hay  was  approxi- 


9 


mately  one-tenth  of  a pound  above  that  of  the  ration  containing  the 
alfalfa  hay.  Little,  if  any,  variation  was  evident  as  the  result  of  a 
variation  in  the  protein-carrying  concentrate. 

The  alfalfa  hay  supplied  the  largest  quantity  of  ash,  although 
doubtless  a sufficient  quantity  was  supplied  by  the  rations  which  con- 
tained the  soybean  hay. 

SUMMARY  OF  BODY  WEIGHTS 

In  order  to  determine  the  influence  of  the  various  feeds  used  in 
this  experiment  upon  the  body  weight  of  all  animals  under  test,  the 
cows  were  weighed  for  three  days  in  succession  at  the  beginning 
of  the  experiment  and  at  the  beginning  and  end  of  each  of  the  six 
periods.  In  order  that  the  herdsman  might  have  a guide  by  which 
to  feed  during  the  intermediate  time,  a single  day’s  weight  was 
taken  each  lo  days. 


Table  VII. — Showing  Summary  of  Body  Weights 


Lot 

number 

Average 
weight  at 
beginning 
of  test 

Cotton- 
seed meal, 
alfalfa 
hay 

Cotton- 
seed meal, 
soybean 
hay 

Linseed 

meal, 

alfalfa 

hay 

Linseed 

meal, 

soybean 

hay 

Gluten 

feed, 

alfalfa 

hay 

Gluten 

feed, 

soybean 

hay 

I 

873.8 

886.0 

906.0 

938.0 

885.2 

903.0 

964.0 

TI 

836.6 

967.2 

936.8 

858.0 

887.6 

905.8 

854.6 

TIT 

810.6 

874.0 

823.0 

839.6 

893.0 

825.6 

852.6 

Average 

840.3 

875.7 

888.6 

878.5 

888.6 

878.1 

890.4 

Loss  or  gain  in 
weight 

35.4 

12.9 

-10.1 

10.1 

-10.5 

12.3 

The  weights  as  shown  in  the  above  table  represent  the  average 
of  the  three-day  weights  and  do  not  take  into  account  the  single 
lo-day  weights.  During  the  first  30-day  period,  the  cows  gained  an 
average  of  slightly  over  35  pounds  each.  When  transferred  to  the 
ration  containing  soybean  hay,  they  continued  to  gain  but  gained 
only  about  one-third  as  much  as  during  the  previous  period.  When 
they  were  again  transferred  to  an  alfalfa  hay  ration  they  lost  in 
weight  at  the  rate  of  one-third  of  a pound  per  day.  This  weight 
was  regained  as  soon  as  they  were  placed  on  a ration  containing  the 
soybean  hay.  They  again  lost,  when  receiving  alfalfa  hay,  at  approxi- 
mately the  same  rate  as  was  recorded  previously.  Again,  the  cows 
gained  in  weight  as  soon  as  they  received  the  soybean  hay.  So  con- 
stant and  uniform  was  this  variation  in  weight  when  placed  upon  the 
two  rations,  that  one  is  forced  to  conclude  that  the  rations  contain- 
ing the  soybean  hay  were  considerably  more  fattening.  No  varia- 
tion in  weights  was  apparent,  due  to  the  type  of  protein-concentrate 
used. 


lO 


At  the  end  of  6o  days,  the  average  weight  of  the  cows  was 
increased  from  840  to  888  pounds.  After  this  time,  they  gained  in 
weight,  1 1.2  pounds  and  lost  10.3  pounds  or,  in  other  words,  prac- 
tically maintained  their  body  weight. 

Referring  again  to  Table  IV,  it  would  appear,  from  the  nutri- 
tive ratio  of  the  six  rations,  that  the  loss  and  gain  in  weight  should 
be  exactly  opposite  that  which  actually  occurred.  The  average 
nutritive  ratio  of  all  rations  containing  alfalfa  hay  was  i : 7.81  and 
the  average  of  all  rations  containing  soybean  hay  was  i : 6.92.  Even 
though  there  was  a marked  increase  in  the  amount  of  carbohydrates 
found  in  the  alfalfa  rations,  it  is  quite  evident  that  it  was  not  used 
for  the  production  of  body  fat. 

AVERAGE  DAILY  PRODUCTION  AND  AMOUNT  OF  DRY 
MATTER  CONSUMED 

The  average  daily  production  of  milk  for  each  of  the  six  per- 
iods of  the  experiment  was  not  especially  high,  averaging  19.64 
pounds  for  all  cows  when  receiving  alfalfa  hay  and  18.41  pounds 
for  all  cows  when  receiving  soybean  hay.  Little,  if  any  variation  in 
the  amount  of  milk  produced  can  be  attributed  to  the  type  of  protein- 
concentrate  used.  The  low  daily  milk  production  may  be  accredited 
to  the  fact  that  the  cows  were  mostly  pure-bred  Jerseys,  having  a 
rather  high  fat  content.  The  daily  fat  production  is  slightly  under 
one  pound  for  the  cows  receiving  alfalfa  hay  and  .85  pound  for 
the  cows  receiving  soybean  hay. 

Tap.lK  VIII. — Showing  the  Amount  of  Dry  Matter  Required  to 
Produce  a Unit  of  Product 


Ration 

Average 
daily  milk 
produced 
pounds 

Average 

daily 

butter  fat 
produced 
pounds 

Average  daily 
dry  matter 
consumed 
pounds 

Dry  matter 
per  100  pounds 
milk 
pounds 

Dry  matter 
per  pound 
butter  fat 
pounds 

1 

20.18 

.9244 

22.889 

113.42 

24.76 

2 

19.93 

.9346 

22.901  1 

121.99 

25.88 

3 

19.85 

.9064 

22.605 

114.92 

24.47 

4 

17.31 

.8161 

21.102  i 

113.75 

24.35 

5 

18.89 

.8822 

21.483  ; 

113.85 

24.94 

(j 

17.98 

.8246 

20.817 

115.74 

25.25 

With  one  exception,  the  amount  of  dry  matter  required  to 
produce  100  pounds  of  milk  was  very  uniform,  the  extreme  varia- 
tion in  this  respect,  being  113.42  pounds  to  approximately  122 
pounds.  This  variation  happened  when  the  cows  were  receiving 
exactly  the  same  ration  except  that  the  dry  roughage  was  changed 
from  alfalfa  to  soybean  hay.  The  figures  as  shown  in  Table  VIII, 
with  respect  to  the  amount  of  dry  matter  required  to  produce  a unit 
of  product,  checks  very  closely  with  other  figures  obtained  in  a 
similar  test.  It  would  appear  that  the  cow’s  ability  to  produce  is 


II 


governed  largely,  by  her  ability  to  consume  large  quantities  of  feed, 
assuming,  of  course,  that  the  rations  are  balanced,  at  least,  within 
reasonable  limits. 

COST  OF  PRODUCT 

The  cost  of  the  product  considering  feed  cost  alone,  using  the 
feeds  as  shown  in  Table  IV,  is  given  in  Table  IX. 


Table  IX. — Showing  Cost  of  Product 


Ration  j 

! 

Total  cost 
of  feed 

Average  daily 
cost  of  feed 

Cost  per 

TOO  pounds 
milk  produced 

Cost  per  pound 
butter  fat 
produced 

1 

$5.95G 

$ .1985 

$ .98 

$ .216 

2 

5.73 

.1901 

1.10 

.234 

3 

5.99 

.1997 

1.00 

.213 

4 

5.97 

.1990 

1.05 

.226 

5 

5.903 

.1968 

.99 

.218 

6 

5.686 

.1895 

1.05 

.229 

The  extreme  variation  in  daily  cost  of  all  six  rations  tested  was 
slightly  over  one  cent  per  day.  The  average  daily  cost  apparently 
was  not  influenced  by  the  type  of  protein-carrying  concentrates 
used.  The  variation  in  cost,  as  mentioned  above,  was  doubtless  in- 
fluenced chiefly  by  the  roughage  fed.  The  cost  of  producing  lOO 
pounds  of  milk  averaged  99  cents  for  all  lots  receiving  the  alfalfa 
hay,  the  extreme  variation  in  cost  being  about  two  cents.  The  cost 
of  100  pounds  of  milk  for  the  lot  receiving  soybean  hay  was  $1.07, 
the  extreme  variation  being  five  cents.  When  reduced  to  the  basis 
of  butter  fat  production,  no  difference  is  apparent  due  to  the  protein- 
carrying concentrate.  The  type  of  roughage  used  produces  a cost 
of  approximately  two  cents  per  pound  butter  fat  more ’for  the  lot 
receiving  soybean  hay  over  that  of  the  lot  receiving  alfalfa  hay. 

VALUE  OF  PRODUCT 

The  total  value  of  the  product  was  determined  by  calculating 
all  butter  fat  at  30  cents  per  pound.  To  this  was  added  the  value  of 
the  skim  milk  after  a 25  per  cent,  cream  had  been  removed.  The 
skim  milk  was  valued  at  25  cents  per  hundred  pounds. 


Table  X. — Showing  Value  of  Product 


Ration  ' 

Butter  fat 

1 Skim  milk 

Total 

1 

[ Average 
daily  value 
i of  product 

I Production 

1 per  $1.00  worth 

1 of  feed 

1 

$8.32 

$1.24 

$9.56 

$ .32 

$1,605 

2 

7.34 

1.05 

8.39 

.28 

1.464 

3 

8.41 

1.21 

9.62 

.32 

1.602 

4 

7.94 

1.15 

9.09 

.30 

1.523 

5 

8.16 

1.22 

9.38 

.31 

1.589 

6 

7.42 

1.10 

8.52 

.28 

1.498 

12 


The  types  of  concentrate  used  did  not  noticeably  affect  the  total 
value  of  the  product.  The  type  of  roughage  used  produced  an  aver- 
age variation  in  the  total  value  of  the  product  from  $9.52  when  al- 
falfa hay  was  fed  to  $8.67  when  soybean  hay  was  fed.  When  re- 
duced to  the  average  daily  value  of  product,  the  same  two  feeds 
caused  a variation  of  four  cents  per  day. 

The  returns  for  each  dollar  invested  in  feed  were  10  cents  higher 
when  alfalfa  hay  was  fed  than  when  soybean  hay  was  fed. 

GRAPHICAL  PRESENTATION  OF  DATA 

In  the  foregoing  pages  has  been  given  a detailed  presentation  of 
all  data  relative  to  the  experiment.  In  the  following  pages  are  given  a 
few  graphic  illustrations  presenting  the  data  in  a form  that  can  be 
more  easily  compared. 

Special  attention  is  directed  to  Plates  5 to  8,  inclusive,  designed 
to  make  it  possible  for  those  interested  to  interpret  the  results  of 
this  experiment  at  feed  prices  other  than  those  shown  in  Table  IV. 
Each  plate  shows  the  effect  produced  upon  the  cost  of  100  pounds 
of  milk  by  varying  the  price  of  one  particular  ingredient  of  the 
ration  between  rather  wide  limits.  In  order  to  judge  the  effect  of 
varying  the  cost  of  these  feeds,  locate,  under  the  heading  “Cost  of 
corn  per  bushel,”  or  “Cost  of  hay  per  ton,”  etc.,  the  figure  repre- 
senting the  existing  local  price  of  feeds.  By  projecting  a line  to  the 
left  margin  of  the  table  horizontally  from  the  point  of  intersection 
of  the  feed  price  line  with  the  line  representing  the  feed  fed,  it  is 
possible  to  read  directly,  the  feed  cost  of  milk  per  hundred  pounds 
in  place  of  the  price  of  that  feed  as  shown  in  Table  IV.  For  ex- 
ample, suppose  alfalfa  hay  was  available  at  v$io.oo  per  ton  (See 
Plate  7),  other  feeds  remaining  the  same  as  shown  in  Table 
IV : follow  the  perpendicular  line  headed  “$10.00”  to  point  of  inter- 
section with  curve  marked  “alfalfa  hay.”  From  this  point,  project 
a horizontal  line  to  the  left  to  column  of  figures  headed  “Feed  cost  of 
milk  per  cwt.”  In  this  column,'  it  is  possible  to  read  directly,  the 
cost  of  milk  when  alfalfa  hay,  costing  $10.00  per  ton  is  substituted 
for  hay  costing  $15.00  per  ton.  The  same  estimation  may  be  made 
for  other  feeds  used  in  the  experiment  and  for  various  prices  of 
each  feed. 


PERIODS  OF  EXPERIMENT 


13 


PERIODS  OF  EXPERIMENT 


14 


PERIODS  OF  EXPERIMENT 


15 


PERIODS  OF  EXPERIMENT 


i6 


17 


\ 


i8 


COST  OF  HAY  PER  TON 


19 


FEED  COST  OF  MILK  COST  OF  SILAGE  PER  TON 


20 


Iv. 


7 


(Xa  , 

PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


• •!  I 


DEC  1 4 1^ 

Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


Buici:.e:tin  No.  204,  Vol.  XX 
August,  1917 


EXPERIMENTAL  STUDIES  IN  HOG-CHOLERA 


PflDMed  liy  tlie  station: 
LAFAYETTE.  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


BO/r?D  OF  CONTROL 

r-,  • 1 Sou^'i  Bend.  S;.  Joseph  County 

JOSEPH  OuvExi,  I resident ^ idianapolis,  Marion  County 

Fay  S.  (.  ' rt.x'iDEER ■ - Greenfield,  Hancock  County 

CHAKEr.s  Downing Batesville,  Ripley  County 

JOHN  A..  Bridgeport.  Marion  County 

Cyri  s M.  Hobbs Kentland.  Newton  County 

Warren  T.  McCray Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

JAMES  W.  Noel, ..Vincennes,  Knox  County 

George  W.  Pjjrcell Montgomery  County 

ANDREW  E.  Reynolds President  of  the  University 


Reynolds. 
WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M..  Ph. 


STATION  STAFF 

HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS  Director 

ARTHUR  Goss,  M.  S.,  A.^C.. Sup’t  Agricuitural  Extension 

George  I.  Christie,  B.  b . A Chief  Veterinarian 

ROBERT  A.  Craig,  D.  Chief  in  Dairy  Husbandry 

OTTO  F.  Hunziker,  M.  ....Chief  in  Botany 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B..  ...  .^ Chemist 

William  J.  Jones,  Jr.^  M.  b.,  A.  Chief  in  Animal  Husbandry 


JOHN  H.  Skinner,  B,  S. 
JaxMES  Troop,  M.  S. ...... 

Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B. 
Charles  G.  Woodbury, 


.Chief  in  Entomology 

-A—-; Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

A. Chief  in  Horticulture 

M.  


ASSOCIATES  AND  ASSISTANTS  Assistant 

JOHN  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  Assistant  in  Botany 

EVELYN  Allison,  B.  b....^.— Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Sherman  L.  Anderson^  B.  b.— 'inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

PAUL  R.  Bausman,  B.  'Associate  in  Soils  and  Crops  Extension 

James  C.  Beavers,  B.  Agr ....Deputy  State  Chemist 

Reuben  O.  Bitlbr,  B.  S.C— 'Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  'inspector  State  Chemist  Departinent 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A." Associate  in  Milk  Production 

Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.^  inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

Glenn  G,  Carter,  B.  S.  Assistant  Veterinarian 

David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S ro«'T''<i't'ate' Leader  'Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

THOMAS  A.  COLEMAN......^ Ass  t State  ^®^\ggogiate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  Associate  in  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.b Fi'r's'r'Deputy ''state' Chemi’st  and  Micr9scopist  (Feeds) 

Carleton  CUTLER,  B^  S.^ Urst  Deputy  ota  Entomological  Assistant  in  Charge 

JOHN  J.  Davis,  B.  SA...  ^...Deputy  State  Chemist 

Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

LEO  P.  Doyle,  B.  S.....—- ^ '.'.'..Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

William  F,  Epple,  Ph.^G 'Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  .Deputy  State  Chemist 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.L.- ■- A;s'oc'i'at'e''i'n'‘c'h'a'rg'e''of  'Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.^  A Associate  in  ft  Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

Leslie  R.  George.  B.  Assistant  in  Agricultural  Extension 

Mabel  L.  Harlan - Seed  Analyst 

CORA  A.  Jacobs  A.  Assistant  in  Soils 

Sadocie  C.  Jonks,  M.  S Assistant  Veterinarian 

LAWRENCE  C.  KIGIN.  D^\.  'Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

FRANKLIN  G.  King,  B.  S.....^-^- Scientific  Assistant 

WALTER  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S.^--- 'Ass'is'ta'n't'i'n'Animal  Husbandry  Ex^nsion 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A J.  ..Z Assistant  in  Botany 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D.^ ....Assistant  in  Entomology 

Prf.ston  W.  Mason,  B.  S... Scientific  Assistant 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.^B.^ - 'Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

Horace  C.  Mills,  B.  Sj.— Deputy  State  Chemist 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  % ;-;-------v--;-;-:v;;a'n't'i'n''H'o'^^^^^^^  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.^S...Research  Assistant  in  irorLic  Assistant  in  Pomology 

JOSEPH  OSKAMP,  B.  Associate  in  Botany 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D.. Associate  Veterinarian 

Harry  C.  Paine,  D.^V.^M.^ Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

ALLEN  G.  PHILIPS,  B-^S^A F'i'r'st'"Deputy  State  Chemist  CFertilizers)^ 

Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S ....Associate  in  Horticulture 

Harry  J.  Reed Assistant  in  Botany 

CHARLES  C.  Rees,  M.  A Scientific  Assistant 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  R S.^ Chiet"  l’n's"pect'or  State  Chemist  Department 

J Howard  Roop,  B.  ...Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  .'.'.'.Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

George  Spitzer.  Pb-  B..  B.  b 'Assi's't’ant  in  Swine  Production  and  Management 

Chester  G.  Starr.  B.  S.  A.... ..Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Herbert  B.  Switzer,  L.  S.^A Deputy  State  Chemist 

Samuel  F.  Thornton,  B.  Scientific  Assistant 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  .'.Assistant  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Gilbert  P.  Walker,  H Assistant  Veterinarian 

Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  ^M.- [Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Rex  a.  Whiting.  D.  V.  Secr’eta’ry  to  the  Director  and  Librarian 

Nellie  Tracy secretary  lo  Bookkeeper 

. Connectirwah 

(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909J  Association 

J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleyille 'state  Poultry  Fanciers’  Association 

U R.  Fishel,  Hope - State  Horticultural  Society 

H.  H.  Swaim,  South  Bend... ....State  Dairy  Association 

D.  B.  JOHNSON,  Mooresyille Corn  Growers’  Association 

D.  F.  Maish.  Frankfort 


EXPERIMENTAL  STUDIES  IN  HOG-CHOLERA 


R.  A.  Craig 


R.  A.  Whiting 


INTRODUCTION 

Following  the  early  hog-cholera  investigations  of  Salmon  and 
Smith,  and  until  the  investigations  of  de  Schweinitz  and  Dorset  in 
1903,  the  B.  cholera  suis  was  considered  the  specific  cause  of  hog- 
cholera.  A few  years  later  Dorset,  Bolton  and  McBryde  proved 
by  further  investigations,  the  secondary  importance  of  this  bacillus, 
and  that  the  specific  cause  of  this  disease  is  a filterable  organism. 
This  period  in  the  history  of  hog-cholera  (1903-1908)  closed  with 
a demonstration  before  the  health  officers  and  experiment  station 
veterinarians  at  Ames,  Iowa,  of  methods  of  producing  anti-hog- 
cholera  serum  which  resulted  from  the  investigations  of  Dorset, 
Niles  and  McBryde. 

Although  greater  attention  has  been  given  to  serum  production 
and  field  work,  much  laboratory  research  work  has  been  done  by 
investigators  in  this  and  foreign  countries.  The  discovery  that  hog- 
cholera  is  caused  by  a filterable  virus,  and  the  economic  importance 
that  a more  perfect  knowledge  of  this  Aurus  may  have  in  controlling 
the  disease,  have  stimulated  the  latter  phase  of  the  work. 

The  principal  lines  of  hog-cholera  investigational  work  that 
have  been  pursued  at  this  station,  are  microscopical  and  cultural 
examinations  of  blood  and  other  virulent  material  from  cholera 
hogs,  and  inoculation  and  blood  attenuation  experiments. 

SECONDARY  ORGANISMS  IN  HOG-CHOLERA  BLOOD 

The  kind  of  bacteria  present  in  the  blood  and  tissues  of  cholera 
hogs  may  not  be  the  same  in  different  outbreaks  of  the  disease. 
The  bacteria  present  may  be  B.  suipestifer,  B.  suisepticus,  B.  coli 
and  diplococci.  Although  B.  suipestifer  is  usually  met  with,  B.  coli 
is  not  uncommonly  present  in  highly  virulent  strains  of  blood. 

It  has  been  found  necessary  in  the  manufacture  of  anti-hog- 
cholera  serum,  in  order  to  prevent  blood  used  for  virus  from  los- 
ing its  virulence,  and  avoid  losses  from  septicemia  in  the  hyperim- 
munes, to  inoculate  pigs  a few  weeks  old  with  filtered  hog-cholera 
blood  and  use  their  blood  for  inoculating  the  hogs  used  for  pro- 
ducing virus.  There  is  danger  of  stock  virus  losing  its  virulence  if 
every  generation  is  filtered,  and  our  practice  is  to  filter  every  sec- 
ond generation  of  blood  used  for  inoculating  young  pigs.  As  a 
further  precaution  against  losses  from  septicemia  among  the  serum- 
producing  hogs,  virus  hogs  are  killed  and  bled  before  fatal  cholera 
symptoms  develop,  or  before  extreme  invasion  of  the  blood  by  sec- 
ondary organisms  occurs. 


4 


FILTRATION  AND  BLOOD  EXAMINATION  WORK 

A large  amount  of  time  has  been  given  to  filtration  work.  More 
than  500  bacteria-free  filtrates,  mostly  blood  and  virulent  salt  solu- 
tion from  cholera  hogs  were  studied.  Berkefeld  M,  N and  V,  and 
Pasteur  Chamberland  B and  F filters  were  used.  It  was  found  by 
inoculation  tests  that  the  filterable  virus  did  not  uniformly  pass 
through  filter  B.  It  was  also  noted  that  when  filtration  took  place 
very  slowly,  extending  over  a period  of  several  hours  and  a vacuum 
maintained,  that  bacteria  would  pass  through  the  different  filters 
used. 

Although  less  virulent  than  unfiltered  blood,  many  of  the 
filtrates  retained  their  virulence  and  produced  hog-cholera  when 
held  in  the  refrigerator  or  incubator  for  30  days.  Old  filtrates, 
especially  if  incubated  at  37.5  degrees  C.  became  slightly  clouded 
and  a precipitate  formed  at  the  bottom  of  the  flask. 

Microscopical  examinations  of  cholera  blood  filtrates  that  were 
kept  at  room  temperature  or  incubated,  showed  the  presence  of 
granular-like  bodies  that  varied  greatly  in  size  and  shape.  They 
were  basic  staining,  oval  or  irregular  in  outline,  sometimes  occurring 
in  pairs,  and  usually  from  one-tenth  to  one-fourth  u.  in  diameter. 
Incubated  filtrates  showed  an  increase  in  the  number  of  these 
granules. 

Blood  collected  by  bleeding  healthy  and  cholera  pigs  directly 
into  sterile  flasks  and  test  tubes  was  examined  before  and  after  in- 
cubation at  37.5  degrees  C.  Outside  of  invading  bacteria,  no  uni- 
fomi  difference  between  cholera  blood  and  blood  from  non-immune 
healthy  hogs  could  be  determined  by  cultural  and  dark  field  ex- 
aminations. 

CHARACTER  OF  HOG-CHOLERA  LESIONS 

The  following  experiment  was  undertaken  for  the  purpose  of 
determining  the  character  of  the  lesions  produced  by  the  filterable 
virus. 

Eight  pigs  from  non-immune  mothers,  immediately  after  birth, 
were  placed  in  clean  boxes  and  fed  pasteurized  cow’s  milk.  Five 
received  intravenous  and  intraperitoneal  injections  of  60  cubic 
centimeters  each  of  a cholera  blood-serum  filtrate.  Three  pigs 
received  no  filtrate.  Four  days  later  the  inoculated  pigs  became 
weak,  and  all  of  the  pigs  were  killed  by  cutting  the  carotid  artery, 
and  their  blood  collected  in  sterile  test  tubes.  Cultures  made  from 
the  blood  did  not  show  any  bacterial  growths.  Microscopical  ex- 
aminations of  the  blood  from  the  inoculated  and  non-inoculated 
pigs  did  not  demonstrate  any  difference  between  them.  Very  small 
petechiae  were  present  in  the  kidneys  of  all  the  pigs,  and  there  was 
slight  evidence  of  ecchymosis  in  the  lymphatic  glands  and  lungs  of 
the  inoculated  pigs. 


5 


Fig:.  1.  Chart  showing:  averag:e  body  temperature  of  pigs  exposed  to  hog-cholera  by  inoenlation,  and  exposure  or  control  pigs; 
solid  line,  temperature  curve  of  inoculated  pigs;  broken  line,  temperature  curve  of  control  pigs 


6 


HOG-CHOLERA  BLOOD  AND  BLOOD  FILTRATE  INOCULATION 
EXPERIMENTS 

Pigs  having  non-immune  mothers  and  weighing  from  40  to 
60  pounds  were  inoculated  with  hog-cholera  blood  and  blood  fil- 
trates bled  from  the  tails  of  virus  hogs  four  to  eight  days  following 
inoculation.  The  following  tables  give  the  data  of  the  different 
experiments. 

Table  I 


Number 

pigs 

Virus  used 

Quantity  virus 

Incubation 

period 

Average  days 
lived 

18 

4 day 

1 C.C. 

3.5  days 

22.1 

13 

6 day 

1 C.C. 

3.5  days 

23.1 

1 

control 

7.0  days 

15.0 

Table  II 


Number 

pigs 

Virus  used 

Quantity  virus 

Incubation 

period 

Average  days 
lived 

11 

4 day 

.5  C.C. 

3.7  days 

15.8 

3 

5 day 

.5  C.C. 

2.0  days 

17.0 

2 

7 day 

.5  C.C. 

3.5  days 

14.5 

5 

8 day 

.5  C.C. 

4.0  days 

13.0 

9 

controls 

9.5  days 

19.5 

Table  III 


Number 

pigs 

Virus  used 

Quantity  virus 

Incubation 

period 

Average  days 
lived 

8 

5 day 

1.0  C.C. 

2.3  days 

16.3 

7 

5 day 

.5  C.C. 

2.8  days 

19.1 

2 

6 day 

1.0  C.C. 

3.0  days 

13.5 

2 

6 day 

.5  C.C. 

2.5  days 

16.0 

5 

7 day 

1.0  C.C. 

2.4  days 

12.6 

5 

7 day 

.5  C.C. 

3.2  days 

12.4 

2 

8 day 

1.0  C.C. 

5.5  days 

11.5 

2 

8 day 

.5  C.C. 

6.5  days 

11.0 

13 

controls 

8.8  days 

26.6 

Table  IV 


Number 

pigs 

Blood  filtrate 

Quantity  virus 

Incubation 

period 

Average  days 
lived 

5 

4 day 

5 C.C. 

4.6  days 

21.6 

5 

6 day 

5 C.C. 

2.4  days 

18.4 

4 

8 day 

5 C.C. 

2.2  days 

21.0 

7 

controls 

6.0  days 

18.5 

The  difficulties  met  with  in  carrying  out  these  inoculation  ex- 
periments were  the  recovery  or  death  of  the  virus  hogs  selected  for 
tail  bleeding,  between  the  fourth  and  eighth  days,  and  the  difficulty 
in  keeping  down  pen  infection.  This  made  it  necessary  to  reject 
data  and  repeat  experiments. 


7 


Daily  body  temperatures  were  taken  and  the  period  of  incuba- 
tion ended  when  the  pig’s  temperature  reached  104  degrees  F. 
The  controls  showed  infection  in  from  four  to  10  days  after  one 
or  more  of  the  inoculated  pigs  developed  this  temperature. 

Table  III  shows  the  relation  that  the  quantity  of  virus  has  to 
the  incubation,  period,  which  was  less  when  the  larger  dose  was 
given.  The  quantity  of  virus  and  incubation  period  does  not  seem 
to  bear  any  relation  to  the  number  of  days  that  the  pigs  lived. 

The  different  tables  show  that  the  pigs  inoculated  wdth  the 
seven  and  eight-day  virus  did  not  live  as  long  as  those  receiving 
four,  five  and  six-day  virus. 

Table  IV  shows  the  effect  of  removing  secondary  organisms  by 
filtering  virus.  This  indicates  that  eight-day  virus  is  no  more  viru- 
lent than  four-day  and  less  virulent  than  six-day  virus.  This  is  borne 
out  to  a certain  extent  in  the  production  of  anti-hog-cholera  serum, 
when  virus  hogs  having  high  body  temperatures  are  killed  on  the 
sixth  day  after  inoculation  and  before  fatal  symptoms  of  hog- 
cholera  develop. 

EFFECT  OF  HEAT  ON  HOG-CHOLERA  BLOOD  AND  VIRULENT 
SALT  SOLUTION 

Hog-cholera  blood  was  heated  in  a water  bath  for  different 
periods  ranging  from  30  minutes  to  two  hours,  and  at  different 
temperatures.  One  lot  of  virus  heated  to  57  degrees  C.  and  three  lots 
heated  to  51-55  degrees  C.  for  two  hours  produced  the  acute  form 
of  hog-cholera  in  pigs  that  were  inoculated  with  them. 

Virulent  salt  solution  heated  to  55  and  60  degrees  C.  in  a water 
bath  for  one  hour,  produced  hog-cholera  in  pigs  inoculated  with  it. 

Hog-cholera  blood  to  which  normal  salt  solution  had  been  add- 
ed in  the  proportion  of  i :2  was  incubated  21  to  72  hours  at  36.5 
degrees  C.,  and  afterward  heated  one  hour  in  a water  bath  at  60 
degrees  C.  A preservative  (.5  per  cent,  phenol)  was  then  added. 
Several  lots  of  pigs  were  inoculated  with  two  cubic  centimeters 
each.  The  following  table  summarizes  these  inoculation  experiments. 


Tabli:  V 


Number 

inoculated 

pigs 

Number 

control 

pigs 

Inoculation 

dose 

Kesults 

4 

3 

2 C.C. 

no  reaction;  contracted  hog-cholera 
when  exposed  later 

4 

3 

2 C.C. 

no  reaction;  contracted  hog-cholera 
when  exposed  later 

4 

2 

2 C.C. 
repeated 

5 days  later 

no  reaction;  contracted  hog-cholera 
when  exposed  later 

4 

3 

2 C.C. 
repeated 

5 days  later 

no  reaction;  contracted  hog-cholera 
when  exposed  later 

8 


HEATED  HOG-CHOLERA  BLOOD  AND  ANTI-HOG-CHOLERA  SERUM 

Different  proportions  of  hog-cholera  blood  and  anti-hdg- 
cholera  serum  were  mixed  and  kept  in  a refrigerator  one  day.  The 
mixture  was  then  heated  to  6o  degrees  C.  in  a water  bath  for  one 
hour  and  .5  per  cent,  phenol  added. 

The  protective  properties  of  mixed  heated  serum  and  virus 
were  tested  by  inoculating  five  lots  of  from  four  to  six  pigs  each. 
From  two  to  four  control  pigs  were  used  in  each  lot.  None  of  the 
pigs  showed  temperature  reactions  and  after  two  or  three  weeks 
their  immunity  was  tested  by  exposing  them  to  hog-cholera. 

The  following  table  is  a summary  of  the  results  of  the  different 
experiments : 

Table  VI 


Number 

lot 

Per  cent, 
virus 

Per  cent, 
serum 

Quantity 

injected 

Results 

1 

.80 

.20 

1 C.C. 

virus  destroyed;  contracted  hog- 
cholera  on  exposure 

2 

.60 

.40 

1-2  C.C. 

virus  destroyed;  contracted  hog- 
cholera  on  exposure 

3 

.50 

.50 

2-4  C.C. 

virus  destroyed;  contracted  hog- 
cholera  on  exposure 

4 

.50 

.50 

2-4  C.C. 

virus  destroyed;  contracted  hog- 
cholera  on  exposure 

5 

.40 

.60 

2-4  C.C. 

virus  destroyed;  contracted  hog- 
cholera  on  exposure 

PHENOLIZED  HOG-CHOLERA  BLOOD 

Carbolic  acid  is  commonly  used  as  a preservative  for  cholera 
blood  that  is  held  for  several  days  or  weeks  in  a refrigerator  and 
used  for  stock  virus,  or  shipped  into  the  field  to  be  used  for  vaccin- 
ating hogs  by  the  simultaneous  method.  It  is  the  practice  at  this 
station  to  add  .75  per  cent,  carbolic  acid  to  shipping  or  stock  virus. 
For  this  reason  the  effect  that  this  percentage  of  phenol  may  have 
on  the  virulence  of  hog-cholera  blood  that  is  kept  at  about  42  de- 
grees F.  was  studied  in  a series  of  experiments  by  L.  R.  George. 
The  following  table  is  a summary  of  the  experiments. 


9 


Tabli:  VII 


Num- 

ber 

hogs 

Virus  used 

Dose 

Incuba- 

tion 

period 

Results 

5 

stock  114,  carbolized  4 days 

2.5  c.c. 

2-3  days 

killed  8th  day;  good 
cholera  lesions 

5 

Stock  114,  carbolized  5 days 

2.5  c.c. 

3-4  days 

killed  8th-9th  days; 
good  cholera  lesions 

5 

Stock  114,  carbolized  6 days 

2.5  c.c. 

2-5  days 

killed  8th-9th  days; 
good  cholera  lesions 

5 

Stock  116,  carbolized  7 days 

2.5  c.c. 

3-4  days 

killed  6th  day;  well 
marked  cholera 
lesions 

5 

Stock  114  and  115,  carbolized  12  days 

2.5  c.c. 

2-4  days 

killed  7th  day;  good 
cholera  lesions 

5 

Stock  114  and  115,  carbolized  14  days 

2.5  c.c. 

2-4  days 

killed  7th-9th  days; 
good  cholera  lesions 

5 

Stock  114,  carbolized  19  days 

2.5  c.c. 

1-3  daysi 

2 recovered;  3 killed; 
1 slight  and  2 good 
cholera  lesions 

5 

Stock  114,  carbolized  20  days 

2.5  C.C. 

2-5  days 

killed  8th-10th  days; 
well  marked  cholera 
lesions 

5 

Stock  118,  carbolized  26  days 

2.5  C.C. 

8-7  days 

killed  8th-llth  days; 

2 showed  excellent, 

3 slight  cholera 
lesions 

fj 

Stock  118,  carbolized  28  days 

2.5  C.C. 

2-7  days 

4 killed  7th-9th  days; 
good  cholera  lesions; 
one  lived 

5 

Stock  114  and  115,  carbolized  54  days 

2.5  C.C. 

4-6  days 

killed  8th-llth  days; 
good  cholera  lesions 

5 

Stock  114,  carbolized  62  days 

2.5  c.c. 

4-8  days 

4 killed  8th  day; 
good  cholera  lesions; 
one  lived 

5 

Stock  114  and  115,  carbolized  113  days 

2.5  C.C. 

5-6  days 

4 killed  11th  day; 
good  cholera  lesions; 
one  recovered 

5 

Stock  114,  carbolized  135  days 

2.5  C.C. 

3-5  days 

4 killed  8th  day; 
good  cholera  lesions; 
one  died  12th  day 

1 One  hog  reacted  the  first  day  and  four  the  third  day 


If  we  consider  that  the  different  lots  of  virus  hogs  were  equally 
susceptible  to  hog-cholera,  blood  that  has  been  carbolized  19  days 
or  longer  loses  virulence,  as  shown  by  the  longer  incubation  period, 
the  percentage  of  recoveries,  and  the  slowing  up  of  the  symptoms  of 
disease 

DESICCATED  HOG-CHOLERA  BLOOD 

The  hog-cholera  blood  used  in  the  following  experiments  was 
as  nearly  a standard  eight-day  virus  as  is  possible  to  obtain.  It  was 
desiccated  in  vacuum  over  sulphuric  acid  at  o degrees  C.,  ground 
to  powder,  sealed  in  glass  tubes,  and  with  the  exception  of  Experi- 
ment I,  placed  in  a small  refrigerator.  Whenever  possible  pigs 
that  were  litter  mates  were  used  in  the  different  experiments.  Their 
average  weight  was  50  pounds,  and  the  mothers  were  non-immune. 

Experiment  i.  Eight  pigs,  two  of  which  were  controls,  were 
used.  The  dried  blood  was  exposed  to  daylight  and  room  temperature 
for  35  days.  Three  pigs  were  inoculated  subcutaneously  with  two 
cubic  centimeters  of  a glycerine  normal  salt  solution  of  dried  blood 
(2  grams  blood,  10  c.  c.  glycerine  and  10  c.  c.  normal  salt  solution). 


10 


and  three  with  two  cubic  centimeters  of  a normal  salt  solution  of 
dried  blood  (i  gram  blood,  lo  c.  c.  normal  salt  solution). 

Daily  body  temperatures  of  the  pigs  were  taken  and  no  evi- 
dence of  a temperature  reaction  was  noted.  Twenty-one  days  from 
date  of  inoculation  the  pigs  were  exposed  to  cholera  by  placing 
them  in  an  infected  pen.  Seven  pigs  developed  the  acute,  and  one 
the  chronic  form  of  hog-cholera.  All  were  killed  when  fatal  symp- 
toms developed,  or  died. 

Experiment  2.  One  gram  of  dried  blood,  75  days  old  that  was 
exposed  to  daylight  and  room  temperature  for  a period  of  15 
days,  was  dissolved  in  10  cubic  centimeters  of  a .25  per  cent,  form- 
alized normal  salt  solution.  One  gram  of  dried  blood  90  days  old 
was  dissolved  in  10  cubic  centimeters  of  a .25  per  cent,  formalized 
normal  salt  solution.  Four  pigs  were  inoculated  with  the  two  solu- 
tions, and  two  were  used  for  controls.  The  four  inoculated  pigs 
showed  temperature  reactions  the  fourth  day,  and  the  controls  the 
eighth  day.  All  contracted  acute  hog-cholera  and  died  or  were  killed. 

Experiment  3.  Dried  blood  104  days  old  was  exposed  to  day- 
light and  room  temperature  for  periods  of  20  and  25  days  re- 
spectively. Each  lot  was  dissolved  in  10  cubic  centimeters 
of  .25  per  cent,  formalized  normal  salt  solution.  Two  pigs  were 
inoculated  with  one  cubic  centimeter  each  of  the  20-day  old  solu- 
tion, and  two  with  the  25-day  old  solution.  Two  control  pigs  were 
used.  None  of  the  pigs  showed  temperature  reactions  at  the  end  of 
12  days.  They  were  then  given  pen  exposure  and  later  died  of  acute 
cholera. 

Experiment  4.  One  gram  of  dried  blood  153  days  old  was  ex- 
posed to  daylight  and  room  temperature  for  a period  of  20  days, 
and  then  dissolved  in  a .25  per  cent,  formalized  normal  salt  solu- 
tion. Four  pigs  were  inoculated,  two  receiving  five  cubic  centi- 
meters, two,  one  cubic  centimeter  of  the  solution,  and  two  were 
used  for  controls.  The  pigs  receiving  five  cubic  centimeters,,  de- 
veloped high  body  temperatures  on  the  third  day  following  inocu- 
lation, and  died  on  the  seventeenth  and  twenty-sixth  days.  The 
low-dose  and  check  pigs  developed  high  body  temperatures  four 
days  after  they  were  given  pen  exposure,  and  died  from  the  tenth 
to  the  fifteenth  day. 

Experiment  5.  Dried  blood  176  days  old  was  exposed  to  day- 
light and  room  temperature  for  26  days.  At  the  end  of  this  period 
one  gram  was  dissolved  in  .25  per  cent,  formalized  normal  salt 
solution.  Four  pigs  were  inoculated  with  2.5  cubic  centimeters  of 
this  solution  and  two  pigs  were  used  for  controls.  One  check  and 
one  inoculated  pig  showed  temperature  reactions  on  the  ninth  day, 
and  nine  days  later  the  other  two  pigs  showed  abnormal  tempera- 
tures. As  one  check  pig  showed  cholera  simultaneously  with  the 
inoculated  pig,  and  nine  days  had  elapsed  from  the  time  of  inocu- 
lation, it  was  quite  evident  that  this  was  caused  by  “pen  exposure.” 

In  summing  up  the  results  of  the  above  experiments,  it  is  very 
evident  that  the  virus  in  hog-cholera  blood  can  not  be  attenuated  by 
the  methods  practiced  and  that  desiccated  blood  exposed  to  daylight 
and  room  temperature  is  usually  destroyed  within  a short  time. 


II 


SENSITIZED  VIRUS 


In  order  to  determine  the  possibility  of  using  sensitized  virus 
as  a means  of  immunizing  hogs  against  hog-cholera,  the  following 
experiment  was  undertaken : 

Ten  parts  of  anti-hog  cholera  serum  that  had  been  heated  for 
30  minutes  at  56  degrees  C.  and  one  part  of  virulent  blood  serum 
were  mixed  and  incubated  at  37.5  degrees  C.  for  24  hours.  The 
mixture  was  divided  and  the  different  portions  were  desiccated 
over  sulphuric  acid  in  a vacuum  at  o degrees  C.,  complete  desiccation 
taking  place  in  from  two  to  four  days.  The  material  was  then 
ground  to  a fine  powder.  The  sensitized  virus  was  kept  in  sealed 
glass  tubes,  in  vacuum,  until  used  three  months  later. 

Ten  pigs  were  used  in  the  experiment.  Although  the  pigs 
were  farrowed  by  a non-immune  mother,  the  susceptibility  of  the 
litter  was  tested  by  inoculating  two  of  them  with  hog-cholera  blood. 
Both  pigs  had  the  acute  form  of  the  disease  and  were  killed  for 
virus  10  days  after  inoculation. 

Six  pigs  were  inoculated  with  from  one  to  seven  decigrams  of 
the  sensitized  virus,  dissolved  in  normal  salt  solution  in  the  propor- 
tion of  one  gram  of  sensitized  virus  to  lo  cubic  centimeters  of 
normal  salt  solution.  Two  pigs  were  used  as  controls.  The  body 
temperatures  of  all  the  pigs  remained  normal  for  ii  days. 

The  pigs  were  reinjected  with  one  decigram  each  of  freshly 
prepared  sensitized  virus.  No  body  temperature  reactions  followed, 
and  the  pigs  remained  normal  for  14  days,  when  all  of  the  pigs  were 
inoculated  with  one  cubic  centimeter  of  hog-cholera  blood  with  the 
following  results:  one  check  pig  died  of  cholera  10  days  following 
the  inoculation,  and  the  second  check  pig  showed  a maximum  body 
temperature  of  107. i degrees  F.,  but  recovered  later.  None  of  the 
inoculated  pigs,  with  the  exception  of  the  two  receiving  small  doses 
of  sensitized  virus,  showed  temperature  reactions.  The  two  men- 
tioned reacted  slightly,  but  showed  no  other  symptoms  of  disease. 

The  results  indicate  that  it  is  possible  to  immunize  hogs  against 
hog-cholera  with  sensitized  virus. 


INOCULATION  EXPERIMENTS  WITH  FILTRATES  MADE 
FROM  RABBITS 

Rabbits  inoculated  with  one  cubic  centimeter  of  hog-cholera 
blood  die  of  septicemia  in  from  four  to  six  days.  When  inocula- 
ted with  cholera  blood  filtrates,  no  ill  effect  results  other  than  a 
few  petechial  spots  on  the  surface  of  the  lungs. 

For  the  purpose  of  determining  whether  the  filterable  virus  sur- 
vives rabbit  inoculation,  several  inoculation  experiments  with  filtrates 
from  rabbits  were  undertaken.  The  general  methods  practiced  were 
as  follows:  rabbits  inoculated  with  15  cubic  centimeters  of  hog-chol- 
era blood  filtrate,  or  “rabbit  filtrate”  were  killed  five  to  seven  days 
later,  the  carcasses  dressed,  passed  through  a meat  chopper  and 
mixed  with  normal  salt  solution  in  the  proportion  of  one  part  chop- 
ped carcass  to  two  parts  normal  salt  solution.  After  standing  at  room 


12 


temperature  for  12  to  24  hours,  the  meat  was  removed  and  the  fluid 
portion  passed  through  Berkefeld  and  Pasteur  Chamberland  filters. 
Several  lots  of  pigs  were  inoculated  with  these  filtrates  with  the 
following  results : 

Experiment  i.  There  were  two  inoculated  and  two  control 
pigs  in  this  experiment.  Five  days  after  receiving  five  cubic  centi- 
meters of  rabbit  filtrate,  the  body  temperatures  of  the  inoculated 
pigs  were  above  104  degrees  F.,  and  five  and  12  days  later  they  died 
of  acute  hog-cholera.  One  control  pig  developed  a body  tempera- 
ture above  104  degrees  F.,  six  days  later  than  the  inoculated  pigs, 
and  finally  died  of  hog-cholera.  The  second  control  pig  lived  after 
showing  a slight  temperature  reaction. 

Experiment  2.  Two  pigs  were  inoculated  with  five  cubic  centi- 
meters of  rabbit  filtrate,  and  four  and  eight  days  later  their  body 
temperatures  became  abnormal.  They  were  killed  on  the  ninth  and 
twentieth  days  following  inoculation.  The  lesions  were  those  of 
acute  hog-cholera.  The  control  pig’s  body  temperature  became  ab- 
normal three  days  after  the  first  inoculated  pig  reacted,  and  it  was 
killed  13  days  later.  Fair  lesions  of  cholera  were  found  on  post 
mortem. 

Experiment  3.  The  filtrate  used  for  inoculating  the  pigs  in  this 
experiment  was  from  a rabbit  that  had  been  inoculated  with  the 
rabbit  filtrate  used  in  Experiment  i.  The  two  inoculated  pigs 
showed  temperature  reactions  of  104.2  and  104.6  degrees  F.  the 
second  and  fourth  days,  and  the  control  pig  reacted  the  twelfth 
day.  As  the  pig  reacting  on  the  second  day  may  have  contracted 
hog-cholera  from  outside  sources,  the  experiment  was  repeated. 
The  filtrate  used  in  repeating  the  experiment  had  been  kept  in  a 
refrigerator  for  10  days.  None  of  the  inoculated  pigs  reacted,  but 
later  when  exposed  to  hog-cholera,  sickened  and  died. 

Experiment  4.  The  four  pigs  inoculated  with  five  cubic  centi- 
meters of  rabbit  filtrate,  developed  abnormal  temperatures  the  fourth 
and  seventh  days  of  the  experiment.  The  body  temperatures  of  the 
two  checks  and  all  of  the  inoculated  pigs  were  irregular  and  not 
typical  of  cholera  until  exposed  to  hog-cholera  on  the  twenty-fifth 
day  of  the  experiment.  All  of  the  pigs  died  of  hog-cholera  after  hav- 
ing been  exposed  to  the  disease. 

Experiment  5.  The  inoculated  pigs  received  five  cubic  centi- 
meters of  filtrate  from  a rabbit  that  was  inoculated  with  15  cubic 
centimeters  of  rabbit  filtrate  used  in  Experiment  4.  One  inoculated 
pig  developed  an  abnormal  body  temperature  the  fifth  day  of  the 
experiment.  Its  temperature  was  irregular  until  the  fourteenth 
day.  The  control,  and  two  inoculated  pigs  were  given  pen  exposure 
on  the  twenty-sixth  day,  and  the  inoculated  pig  that  reacted  the  fifth 
day  was  the  only  one  that  contracted  acute  hog-cholera. 

These  experiments  show  that  the  filterable  virus  maintains  its 
virulence  in  the  body  of  a rabbit  for  a period  of  seven  days,  but 
when  passed  through  two  rabbits  it  does  not  produce  a typical  hog- 
cholera  temperature  reaction. 


^3  0,  I 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


■:VER:lir  - I -t. 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station  ^ ^ 


Bulletin  No.  205,  Voe.  XX 
September,  1917 


SOIL  MANAGEMENT  INVESTIGATIONS  IN  A 
YOUNG  APPLE  ORCHARD 


PatiMed  liy  tae  station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY  AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT  STATION 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 
Joseph  D.  Oliver,  President,  South  Bend 

Pay  S.  Chandler Indianapolis  Warren  T.  McCray Kentland 

Charles  Downi.'JG  Greenfield  James  W.  Noel Indianapolis 

John  A.  Hillenbrand Batesville  George  W.  Purcell Vincennes 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs Bridgeport  Andrew  E.  Reynolds Crawfordsville 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D President  of  the  University 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(Under  Legislative  Act  of  1909) 

U.  R.  Fishel,  Hope D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort 

State  Poultry  Fanciers'  Association  State  Corn  Growers'  Association 

D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleville 

State  Dairy  Association  State  Live  Stock  Association 

H.  H.  SwAiM,  South  Bend. ...Indiana  Horticultural  Society 


ADMINISTRATION 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S.,  Director 

Harry  J.  Reed Assistant  to  the  Director 

Nellie  Tracy Administrative  Assistant 

Mary  K.  Bloom Bookkeeper 

AGRICULTURAL  EXTENSION 
George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A..  Superintendent 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader 

Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A. Associate  in 

Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 
Mabel  L.  Harlan. .Ass’t  in  Agricultural  Extension 

ANIMAL  HUSBANDRY 
John  H.  Skinner,  B,  S.,  Chief 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A 

Acting  Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A 

Ass’t  in  .Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

BOTANY 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B.,  Chief 

George  N,  Hoffer,  M.  S Associate  in  Botany 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Luna  E.  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S.,  Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

DAIRY  HUSBANDRY 
Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S.,  Acting  Chief 

Howard  W.  Gregory,  B,  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G.,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 
Harry  M.  Weeter,  M.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B,  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G 

Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

ENTOMOLOGY 
James  Troop,  M.  S.,  Chief 
Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S.,  Ass’t  in  Entomology 

HORTICULTURE 
Laubenz  Greene,  M.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S Associate  in 

Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 
Joseph  Oskamp,  B.  S.,  Associate  in  Pomology 


POULTRY  HUSBANDRY 
Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S 

Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

SOILS  AND  CROPS 
Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S 

Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S 

Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Associate  in  Soils 

STATE  CHEMIST 

Wm.  j.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S.,  A.  C.^  State  Chemist 
Edward  G.  Pkoul.x,  M.  S.^.. Acting  State  Chemist 
Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S...... Deputy  State  Chemist 

Carleton  Cutler,  B.  S.- First  Deputy 

State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 
Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S.-.. Deputy  State  Chemist 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S.-.. Deputy  State  Chemist 
J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S...... Deputy  State  Chemist 

Samuel  P.  Thornton,  B.  S.- 

Deputy  State  Chemist 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.^ 

Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Paul  R.  Bausman,  B.  S.- 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A.- 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  S.- 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

VETERINARY  SCIENCE 
Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V.  M.,  Chief 
David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C... Associate  Veterinarian 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D,  V.  M 

Associate  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Serum  Production 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Animal  Pathology 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 
Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Ass’t  Veterinarian 

DETAILED  BY  U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OP 
AGRICULTURE 

Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  Insect  Investigations 
John  J.  Davis,  B.  S.,  Entomological 
Assistant  in  Charge 

John  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.,  Entomological  Assistant 
Walter  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S... Scientific  Assistant 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B Scientific  Assistant 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B,  S Scientific  Assistant 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Seed  Testing 

Anna  M.  Lute,  M.  A Seed  Analyst 


1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 
8 Died  August  31,  1917 


SOIL  MANAGEMENT  INVESTIGATIONS  IN  A 
YOUNG  APPLE  ORCHARD ' 


C.  G.  Woodbury  H.  A.  Noyes  Joseph  Oskamp 

SUMMARY 

1.  The  object  of  this  investigation  has  been  to  study  the  ef- 
fects, and  particularly  the  factors  responsible  for  the  effects  of 
tillage  with  cover  crop,  mulch  and  sod  on  apple  trees.  The  present 
report  covers  the  formative  period  of  the  life  of  the  trees. 

2.  The  soil  of  the  upland  plots  is  of  Illinoian  glacial  drift 
origin  while  the  soil  of  the  hillside  plot  is  residual  in  nature.  The 
land  comprising  the  experimental  plots  had  been  used  as  a perman- 
ent pasture  for  nearly  40  years  previous  to  planting  the  orchard. 

3.  The  investigation  has  to  do  mainly  with  the  upland  area, 
the  hillside  plot  being  included  for  any  additional  light  it  might 
throw  on  the  behavior  of  the  upland  plots.  The  systems  of  soil 
management  include  four  major  treatments,  viz.,  clean  cultivation 
with  a winter  cover  crop ; a heavy  mulch  of  straw  applied  to  the 
trees  and  the  grass  cut  and  let  lie ; the  grass  cut  and  allowed  to  lie 
where  it  falls,  no  mulch  given  the  trees ; the  grass  cut  and  raked  up 
to  form  a mulch  collar  about  the  trees. 

4.  In  all  soil  work,  the  samples  of  surface  soil  have  included 
the  soil  from  the  surface  to  a depth  of  nine  inches  and  the  samples 
of  subsoil  from  a depth  of  nine  to  18  inches.  The  soil  data  repre- 
sent plot  averages  which  are  the  result  of  individual  determinations 
and  not  composite  samples.  The  Laurel  soil  contains  a high  per- 
centage of  silt  and  clay,  and  varies  but  little  in  its  physical  composi- 
tion, as  shown  by  mechanical  analysis. 

5.  The  average  annual  precipitation  during  the  five-year  period 
has  been  38.71  inches.  The  spring  months  are  usually  much  better 
supplied  with  moisture  than  the  fall  months.  Periods  of  dry 
weather  frequently  prevail  in  June  and  July,  which  are  commonly 
broken  by  heavy  precipitations  in  August. 

6.  While  there  have  been  no  wide  variations  in  phenological 
behavior  of  trees  under  different  systems  of  soil  management,  yet 
there  does  occur  a marked  slacking  up  of  growth  on  grass  plots 
during  dry  periods  in  summer. 

7.  Trees  grown  under  a clean  culture  cover  crop  system  or 
under  a heavy  mulch  made  44.5  per  cent,  greater  average  yearly 
gains  in  trunk  girth  than  trees  grown  in  grass  with  a light  mulch  or 
no  mulch  at  all.  There  has  been  no  significant  difference  between 
the  three  varieties,  in  their  response  to  soil  management  treatments. 
The  Stayman  variety  made  slightly  greater  gains  in  girth  of  trunk 
on  all  plots  than  did  Grimes  or  Jonathan. 

8.  Determinations  of  the  specific  gravity  and  water-holding 
capacity  of  the  soil  bear  out  the  uniformity  found  in  the  mechanical 


1 For  explanation  of  relation  of  authors  to  investigations,  see  page  52 


4 


analysis.  It  appears  from  the  chemical  analysis  that  the  soil  is  not 
notably  deficient  in  any  essential  element.  In  reality,  however,  it 
is  not  as  productive  a soil  as  its  chemical  analysis  might  signify. 
The  low  organic  matter  content  and  the  high  proportions  of  silt 
and  clay,  make  the  soil  one  through  which  water  percolates  slowly 
and  one  which  is  easily  puddled;  coupled  with  these  conditions  is  a 
slight  acidity.  The  mechanical  and  chemical  analyses  show  that  the 
subsoil  is  not  greatly  different  from  the  surface  soil. 

9.  The  effect  of  the  various  systems  of  soil  management  on 
the  soil  moisture  at  Laurel  cannot  be  directly  applied  in  the  abstract 
to  the  humid  region  in  general.  The  present  report  is  based  on  the 
moisture  content  of  the  surface  nine  inches  of  soil.  Inasmuch  ^s 
the  cultural  practices  are  conservation  measures,  preventing  the  loss 
of  water  after  it  enters  the  soil,  it  is  largely  in  dry  periods  that  the 
value  of  certain  systems  of  management  in  conserving  soil  mois- 
ture are  made  manifest.  During  two  such  periods,  occuring  in 
June  two  out  of  the  five  years,  where  an  adequate  mulch  was  main- 
tained on  the  surface  of  the  ground  either  through  the  agency  of 
cultivation  or  a heavy  supplemental  covering,  the  percentage  of 
soil  moisture  was  more  than  twice  that  in  grass  land.  These  soil 
moisture  conditions  are  closely  correlated  with  the  girth  increase 
made  by  the  trees.  The  great  importance  of  water  in  tree  growth 
is  further  emphasized  by  a study  of  the  precipitation  data  which 
show  that  the  variation  in  growth  due  to  seasonal  moisture  con- 
ditions, appears  to  have  been  quite  as  large  as  that  due  to  cultural 
practices. 

10.  The  soil  temperature  studies  have  been  carried  on  under 
field  conditions  (at  a uniform  depth  of  nine  inches  on  all  plots)  by 
means  of  soil  thermographs.  As  the  soil  temperature  is  largely  a 
reflection  of  the  air  temperature,  the  extent  to  which  soil  tempera- 
ture can  be  controlled  by  cultural  practices  is  quite  limited.  The 
data  do  not  support  the  opinion  that  rains  are  an  important  adjunct 
in  warming  the  soil.  There  is  no  indication  that  the  single  factor  of 
soil  moisture  has  had  an  influential  bearing  upon  the  temperatures 
existing  under  the  different  systems  of  soil  management.  The  tem- 
perature range  varies  inversely  with  the  amount  of  mulch  covering 
the  soil.  The  role  of  soil  temperature  within  the  limits  of  ordinary 
cultural  practices  appears  to  be  a neutral  factor  in  tree  growth  in 
this  region. 

11.  From  a study  of  the  chemical  changes  induced  in  the 
Laurel  soil  by  cultural  practices  during  the  period  1910  to  1915,  F 
appears  that  clean  cultivation  tends  to  deplete  the  soil  of  its  organic 
matter,  despite  the  fact  that  a cover  crop  is  being  turned  under  each 
year.  The  straw  mulch  plot  has  increased  slightly  in  organic  matter 
while  the  sod  plots,  as  a whole,  have  come  nearer  to  holding  their 
own  in  volatile  matter,  humus  and  nitrogen  than  the  clean  culture 


5 


cover  crop  plots.  There  is  no  apparent  correlation  between  the 
previously  mentioned  chemical  factors  and  tree  growth. 

12.  A study  of  the  average  bacterial  population  shows  that 
there  are  in  most  cases,  more  bacteria  present  in  the  sod  ground  at 
Laurel  than  in  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots ; that  the  variations 
in  mulch  on  the  sod  plots  have  some  influence  on  bacterial  numbers ; 
that  tree  growth  and  soil  moisture  cannot  be  correlated  with  bacter- 
ial numbers. 

13.  Tests  show  that  ammonification  varies  with  the  season. 
Differences  between  plots  are  not  consistent  with  seasonal  climatic 
variations  and  it  is  impossible  to  say  that  any  cultural  practice  has 
affected  the  ammonifying  power  of  this  soil. 

14.  Tests  show  that  nitrification  varies  with  the  season,  but 
that  a growing  crop  of  grass  or  rye  lowers  the  nitrate  content  of 
the  soil ; that  the  most  nitrates  are  found  under  the  clean  culture 
cover  crop  system,  the  straw  mulch  ranking  second  in  amount  of 
nitrates ; that  the  girth  gains  of  the  trees  are  roughly  proportional 
to  the  nitrate  content  of  the  soil ; that  there  is  no  relation  between 
the  nitrifying  power  of  the  soil  and  either  cultural  practices  or  tree 
growth ; however,  the  ratio  between  the  nitrates  present  in  the 
field  and  the  nitrifying  power  of  the  soil  does  bear  a relation  to  tree 
growth. 

INTRODUCTION 

Object  and  Scope. — The  object  of  this  investigation,  broadly 
speaking,  has  been  to  study  the  effects,  and  particularly  the  factors 
responsible  for  the  effects,  of  tillage  with  cover  crop,  mulch  and 
sod  on  apple  trees.  Soil  management  practices  and  recommenda- 
tions vary  widely  and  have  been  the  subjects  of  considerable  con- 
troversy. The  points  in  question  have  a high  practical  and  scien- 
tific value.  An  adequate  explanation  of  the  principles  underlying 
this  problem  is  especially  needed, — an  explanation  built  upon 
comprehensive  data  and  not  theory,  as  has  too  often  been  the  case 
in  the  past.  The  accumulation  and  interpretation  of  such  funda- 
mental evidence,  has  been  the  chief  goal  in  mind  in  the  prosecution 
of  this  work. 

The  data  presented  in  this  bulletin  bearing  on  various  factors 
of  soil  environment  are  published  at  this  time,  with  the  full  reali- 
zation that  they  are  not  as  complete  as  might  be  desired.  They 
should  be  considered  as  tentative  and  the  authors  realize  that  a 
reinterpretation  of  these  data  may  be  desirable  a few  years  hence, 
when  the  work  has  been  carried  further.  It  should  be  said  also 
that  the  laboratory  work  has  been  carried  further  along  some  lines 
than  the  data  presented  indicate.  Detailed  studies  have  been  made 
of  the  soil  environment  of  many  of  the  station  trees.  As  would  be 
expected  in  work  of  this  kind,  the  individual  tree  results  were  not 
always  in  the  closest  agreement  with  the  plot  averages.  It  was  felt, 


6 


Fig-.  1.  Location  of  Laurel  upland  plots.  Experimental  plots  shown  in  fore- 
ground, are  situated  on  the  bluffs  overlooking  the  White  Water  river  in  Franklin 
county,  Indiana 


however,  that  in  the  present  stage  of  the  investigation  the  results 
of  the  plot  averages  reflect  the  factors  influencing  the  behavior  of 
the  trees  more  accurately  than  these  conditions  could  be  represented 
by  presenting  the  results  from  any  individual  tree. 

This  publication  will  discuss  only  the  formative  period  of  the 
life  of  the  trees.  While  the  trees  have  shown  a light  sprinkling  of 
fruit  for  four  seasons,  the  crop  data  will  be  reserved  for  analysis 
until  the  trees  are  in  established  bearing. 

Location  and  History. — The  upland  experimental  plots  are 
located  on  the  highlands  overlooking  the  White  Water  river  in 
Franklin  County,  Indiana.  They  are  covered  by  the  Illinoian 
glacial  drift  soils. The  topography  of  the  uplands  varies  from 
gently  rolling  to  very  rolling.  The  rocks  of  the  region  are  lime- 
stone which  outcrop  on  the  steeper  hillsides. 

The  hillside  plot  is  located  about  a third  of  the  way  down  the 
main  valley  slope.  The  soil  of  the  upland  grades  into  the  limestone 
slope  clay  loam  of  the  hillside  at  the  upper  edges  of  the  slope.  The 
latter  soil  is  largely  residual  in  nature,  being  a product  of  limestone 
disintegration. 

The  early  agricultural  history  of  the  site  under  consideration 
gleaned  from  the  oldest  inhabitants,  reveals  the  fact  that  the  land 
was  cleared  of  its  heavy  growth  of  virgin  timber  about  1840.  From 
1848  to  1871  it  was  subjected  to  a more  or  less  irregular  rotation  of 
corn,  wheat,  oats,  and  pasture.  In  the  spring  of  1871  the  whole 
area  was  plowed  and  sowed  to  oats,  timothy  and  blue  grass  .with 
the  purpose  of  securing  a blue  grass  sod.  From  that  date  until  the 
spring  of  1909  the  land  was  used  as  a permanent  pasture. 

In  the  spring  of  1909,  the  area  comprising  the  upland  plots  was 
broken  and  potatoes  planted  as  an  intercrop  between  the  newly  set 
trees.  In  the  fall,  wheat  and 'clover  were  sown  and  the  wheat  being 

1 In  the  Report  of  the  Indiana  State  Geologist  for  1909,  page  120,  the  soil  of 
this  region  is  classified  as  the  Oak  Forest  silt  loam.  It  resembles  the  Miami  silt 
loam  in  chemical  analysis 


7 


harvested  in  1910  left  the  clover  occupying  the  ground.  The  hill- 
side plot  remained  in  the  original  blue  grass  sod. 

The  only  commercial  fertilizer  ever  applied  to  the  land,  so  far 
as  is  known,  was  an  application  to  the  wheat  above  mentioned  of 
250  pounds  per  acre  of  a fertilizer  containing  14  per  cent,  soluble 
and  reverted  phosphoric  acid  and  two  per  cent,  insoluble. 

THE  SYSTEMS  OF  MANAGEMENT  OUTLINED 

The  investigation  was  initiated  in  1910.  The  areas  under  in- 
vestigation, comprising  about  17  acres  on  the  upland  and  three 
acres  on  the  hillside,  are  reserved  by  agreement  with  the  owners  of 
the  ground  for  the  use  of  the  Experiment  Station  for  a period  of 
15  years,  or  until  the  1925  crop  is  harvested.  The  orchard  is  the 
property  of  the  Laurel  Company  of  Laurel,  Indiana,  without  whose 
kindly  cooperation  this  experiment  in  its  present  form  would  not 
have  been  possible. 

The  trees  are  apple  of  the  Grimes,  Jonathan  and  Stayman 
varieties  and  were  set  in  1909,  35  feet  apart  each  way,  which  gives 
35  trees  to  the  acre,  (see  Fig.  2.)  Interplants  have  been  added 
subsequently  for  future  removal  in  connection  with  the  study  of 
root  development  and  physiological  problems. 

The  investigation  has  to  do  mainly  with  the  upland  area,  the 
hillside  plot  being  included  for  any  additional  light  it  might  throw 
on  the  behavior  of  the  upland  plots.  The  outline  of  treatment  for 
each  plot  is  as  follows : 

Plot  A. — Clean  cultivation  with  cover  crop  for  the  entire  15- 
year  period.  A cover  crop  has  always  been  used  in  connection  with 
clean  cultivation  in  this  experiment.  Cultivation  without  a cover 
crop  is  not  a practical  system  of  soil  management  under  these  topo- 
graphical and  soil  conditions. 

Plot  B. — Same  treatment  as  A for  first  five  years ; then  seed- 
ed to  grass  and  the  grass  cut  and  let  lie  during  the  last  10  years. 


8 


riff.  2.  Map  of  T.aurel  upland  plots  showing;  size  of  plots  and  location  of  soil  sampling;  stations 


9 


Plot  C. — In  grass,  which  is  cut  and  let  lie,  but  the  trees  given 
an  adequate  mulch  of  straw  during  the  entire  period.  It  should  be 
understood  that  the  straw  mulch  plot  was  included  for  the  purpose 
of  gaining  information  on  the  response  of  the  tree  to  a heavy  mulch 
of  organic  material.  Straw  was  selected  for  this  purpose  because 
it  was  always  available  and  a material  of  fairly  uniform  composi- 
tion and  one  which  it  was  possible  to  apply  in  known  amounts.  It 
should  not  be  inferred  that  the  heavy  mulching  with  straw  of  a 
large  commercial  orchard  is  considered  a practicable  system  of 
orchard  management.  We  believe  we  are  justified  in  interpreting 
the  behavior  of  the  straw  mulched  trees  as  a reaction  to  mulch 
rather  than  a reaction  to  strazv. 

Plot  D. — In  grass  which  is  cut  and  let  lie  where  it  falls  for  15 
years. 

Plot  E. — In  grass  which  is  cut  and  raked  about  the  trees  as  a 
mulch  collar  for  the  first  five  years,  and  then  supplemented  with 
straw  during  the  last  10  years. 

Plot  F. — In  grass  which  is  cut  and  raked  about  the  trees  as 
a mulch  during  the  entire  period. 

Plot  O. — This  plot  has  not  been  disturbed  since  it  was  in  clover 
(following  the  wheat  as  before  mentioned),  except  to  cut  the  crop 
of  clover  and  weeds  and  rake  up  as  a mulch  about  the  trees.  This 
plot  was  not  included  in  the  experiment  until  1913. 

Plot  H. — Located  on  the  hillside  in  the  original  blue  grass  sod ; 
the  grass  being  cut  and  raked  up  to  form  a mulch  collar  about  the 
trees. 

In  order  to  establish  a uniform  starting  point  in  the  work,  plots 
A,  B,  C,  D,  E and  F were  plowed  in  the  spring  of  1911.  Plots  A 
and  B received  clean  cultivation  and  C,  D,  E and  F were  seeded  to 
grass.  The  grass  did  not  catch  and  it  was  necessary  to  sow  oats  to 
prevent  the  soil  from  washing.  Plots  A and  B were  seeded  to  cow- 
peas  in  early  July. 

Plot  O remained  in  clover  and  H in  blue  grass  and  in  each  the 
hay  was  raked  in  about  the  trees  as  a mulch. 

In  August,  1912,  plots  D,  E and  F were  broken  and  again 
sown  to  grass  about  the  middle  of  September.  While  a mixture  of 
seed^  was  used,  so  far  as  the  resulting  stand  is  concerned  it  may  be 
considered  a timothy  meadow.  The  timothy  made  a good  stand, 
produced  a sod  and  yielded  a light  cutting  of  hay  the  next  summer. 

The  spring  of  1913  was  the  first  season  that  a complete  fertil- 
izer was  applied  to  two  rows  running  across  all  the  upland  plots. 
The  object  was  to  determine  whether  or  not  there  might  be  any 
pronounced  lack  of  any  element  of  plant  food,  which  would  so 
limit  growth  or  crop  production  as  to  overlie  or  make  misleading  the 

1 Twelve  pounds  timothy,  five  pounds  Kentucky  blue  grass,  three  pounds  red  top, 
two  pounds  white  and  one  pound  alsike  clover 


lO 


apparent  responses  of  the  trees  to  differences  in  soil  management. 
For  this  purpose  we  have  used  each  spring,  lo  pounds  per  tree  of  a 
4 — 7 — 6 fertilizer^  scattered  broadcast  beneath  the  spread  of 
branches. 

A brief  description  of  the  systems  of  soil  management  as 
actually  carried  out  subsequent  to  1910  is  given  in  Table  L 


1 Composition — sodium  nitrate  15  per  cent.  N. ; tankage  10  per  cent.  N. ; acid 
phosphate  15  per  cent.  P2O5;  muriate  of  potash  50  per  cent.  K2O.  In  1916  the 
sulphate  of  potash  was  substituted  for  the  muriate 

2 Aside  from  the  soil  management  practices,  all  plots  have  received  identical 
treatment  in  other  respects.  Such  spraying  was  done  as  seemed  necessary  to  keep 
the  trees  reasonably  free  from  insect  and  fungous  enemies.  Blight  first  appeared 
to  an  appreciable  extent  in  1916,  and  then  was  practically  confined  to  the  Jonathan 
trees.  It  has  been  fought  according  to  the  most  approved  methods  of  control.  The 
trees  were  trained  to  the  open  head  form  and  the  annual  growth  headed  back  for 
the  first  four  years 


Table  I. — Systems  of  Soil  Management  as  Actually  Carried  Out 


I 


'O  03  O) 

‘a]  ^ ^ 

I ^ % 
wg-i 

"o  '5. 


'S- 

tC  Xj  ^ 
"S,  »3 

bo  OJ  03 


S)‘S*SJ 


'2  i CO 

c _g  ,5  H g OJ 

_oc2o’-'o- 

'C4J  2 O ft  tH  03 

' <4-1  :3  05  ® !-i 

S 'C  O s OJ  SI 

O oj  ^ C „ a>  a 

2 -g  x:  -c  ,2  t2  05 

— ' bo  sh  , O 

n , G ^ cj  «3  ^ 


G G 4^  ^ 

s-sg|l 

'C  -4:;  o -*-' 

03  “ ^ bo 

o->  03  'a 
13  g bo  o 

m 


“'O'C  ^ g O 
2 G "3  •»  sh  ^ 

“ ■^. « M 

oiol^i^a^ 

% O^’S  “ o 


O ^ 
w ^ O) 
^ ^ 2 ss  t 

” G o O c 

rr-  >>  I 


|S 


t-*  'o  — 
^ o;  ^ 
> 

' I « a 


o 2 h 
r 2 S 

^ bo 


O 00  ^ 

5 e ’ 


-a 


E ^ 

" 03 


l§  ■« 

o-g 

2 'o  “ G 

3^  •*  ij  > 

S'C  3) 
Q C 


02  rrt 

qj  n c3  I-J 


<l) 


l'g.2 


a tn 

g a ^ 

^ -c  S 


® 2 

(J  03 


5^  oj?  S 

fcH 

-O  C 2l 

O .Si  08  J_,  S 

g ^ >-.a;  ^ a 

S o)  • -'C  ^ c3 
S'?  5R  g “ o 


0-1  G 


Ph  s 


° CH  2 

bo-|.>-^^2S- 
5 73  3 O ti  "G 


eo  r’ 


bO'o 

olS 


aii  o^ 
“’2  pis 


'g 


W73  0 
CO  O)  .13 
C3  73 


o SS 

^ ' 


^ ^2 

^ o O) 

fl  4J,  ^ 

E 73  £“ 

^ (V  a 
O S'- 
Ph 


bo  „ 

O 

■r  33  03 

a2i  o__ 

”•5  0-3 
73  w*S  .2 

cu  ara 

j:  »-i  oj 

O S 


D cc  tH 

Sf  2 o 

^ "*2 

O a; 

•S;2& 

— WO) 

'J1 


S73 


S G 


33  00  .a 

G !_  -O  bo 
o3  Qj  o)  • -;a 

0-2  is  .Si  a, 

gs  2 «.2 

g a CO  ” 

g 

bo 


bo 


CSa  so  ~ 03 

’-I  a oE  t>fl 
S^2;£.2 
rj  a to 


>, 

73  03  iH 

03  • O; 

rr-'  I~, 


2ii  ggs 

Ig"!- 

^ a 'M  o o 


73  G fi  ^ 

o)  • ■■  (3  O)  G 

s='g:5  ^2 

G .Si  2 a S o 

I 2 2a/'' 


•4H  2 

O O ..  O) 
55  tM  3^  s;  s 

“ -7<  ^ So 

fa  ^52  2 T- 

5I3  a G.2’ 


" P 

2 2' 


111! 
S G bX) 
ri  1^ 


— tr- 

^ C<\ 

^ ^ 

f ^ 2 ^ 2 


'C  ..a  03  a 

a 


00  p T-  _ . a 

S'l  £ g;  „ 

a - 2 2 <? 


"o  3)  2 1; 
'GSag  « o 

2 .-  >.  tH  ^ 2 : 

C ZJ  ' 

^ rr-  ^ G f 

o a 2;  a cn 

in 


; C ■*£  bo 

I a t.  G 


^ cu 
CO  ® g S 

s^lgS|§ 

.bggSgS 

G 2-  s 2^ 

" 2 ^2 


1 

ft  "a 


'S  'G  03 

aii  o_ 
*«  0-0 


G ^ M 

s 


G 

a Qo* 

G a 

03  03  QJ  . 

s-e  i=-: 

^ 24 

SI 

a G.  03  ^ 
a 03  73 
^OJ  03 

^4 

bo 


^^Ga 
2a  o 03 

5£  *4-^  4->  Sh 

I 5 Q ^ O 
Iflj  ^ C'l  ” 


a>  . 02  D x: 

, *pG  ^ <v  hr  ^ _ 

| ,G  Sh 

: O)  r^ 


o Gi  r 


bo.Si  >. 

I ^ !h  bo  o 


03  >»  03 

03  G< 

a 


^ r\ 


^ ag- 
1^0  3 g-G  o g-g 
' is  2 Z tJ3  is  E 2 

>Oa)i2GO>iaG 

2 '2>  ■ ^ 2 S G 


>.  03 


•-  >> 


I o a 03 

I G ^ a 

G ^ 


is2o 

O 03  Ift 

2'^  ■ 


^tja 

2 o 2 

43  CO  G 

' cc  a 4J  .2 

i o S” 

Oa  02^ 

^ ^ C/j 

o a 2 

pI  2 ’M 


G ^ g 

G 03  £ 

.Si  > bo 

2 S ^ 

OP 

J^  ^ 

CP  g « 

a 

Ph  2 o 


^*2  ^ CO  S G s 
G 03  G o a.*—  44 

“ 02  •«  a E 4-< 

a--aots.a'ao3 

03  a — G>  g ^ g 
aa“a-i^SOo3 

03  ® ^4 

a*Moa:+3>»Go3 

|“o-SgG2 

a 


O 03  ' 


" 2 03  4- 

, G-S'  g'cS 


^ 03  2 O 

G 4_^  o a 
o Gm-i  c3-~ 
O G G P ^ 


El' 

S'2-2g 


^ aS 

03  O.  W) 


O g 


a a2  ^^at^ 

^ . 4-'  to  C3  !4 

o !S  _ G CO  03 

>-1  G a o ^ a 
V.,  !-i  Si  +^  .G  c3  a 


a G G ■-  03  a S^ 

“ 2 2 .2  2 aoj 

,2  k 'S  G « 


he  Ch  ^ 

a o > a 

a ‘44  o G 

a G G 03 

_ a o G 03 
G a O ft 
E GGJ^.,  5s 
^ " 2 O O 
a ^ ^ G 

;s  a o a 

.2  2a  o 
E o G o 


. •w 

CC  C^l 

“2 

g'^  aoa 

rrt  C3  G 

O)  3 ^ — <3j 

^gGaa, 
.2  g O-g  G 


•G  > 

■g  O G ^ 

' 02  O "S 

!>>  to  ^ 

a bo 

O 3 


^ g •'! 


44  0 »0  o G 
<S  43  CO  nj  o ^ 

G _ 4 £ 3 a 

a a n C4  ^ 02 

> Oi  M 44>  ^4  s m 

I p2G2|;; 

^ c«  O G 02  C ^ 
(M  ^ ^ G 4J  ^ 

&4I  g a 03  ^ 

<1  02  2 o 'I 

a--H 


^ ji  ^ o 

^ ^ a>  ^-p*  c) 

(M  ^ a a a S 

^ ^ O 

§^2a 


PT'S  2 G ai2 
-H  Ga  t;  o 3';;^ 
^ - S g’-2  S7  g 


^Sg 

>S  .Sf  Tj  2 > ^ bo 
1^  03  S a'43  S^ 

»?-4  ts  a ,4  — ' P . 


*d  |S  G ooa  o 

I G ^ G G O 

5 <1^ 


« ^ a o^ 

3 2 G G c 


o o!-^  -G  G 

^ !4  22  „ 03 

Ph  bo>.;g  > 

f-,  00  03 


^a  G 

ob^  ^ o; 
a S G G •'-'  g ^4 

gE  g a 02  aa 


3 a g « * 
^ 3 bO  g 


^ ^ o 2 ^ „ 

is.2  ^ a G g. 

o a ^ ^>>v} 

n Si  (72  G 44  0 

Ph  3 G 0^  03 


|•''2  2 2 
2 -2  2 1 


2^° 


Si  G 


p a a 
I a o G' 
at  G GJS 
tc  fe-G  M 3 
S 03  a 43 

|Sa2;: 


a >>  _ 

(4  .453 44  a 

a a ^ o 

02  a p G.-4 


-o  (/)  0 a;  03 
03  t®  1-4  _ is 

a G a'G  3 


G u 

03  o 
<y  oj 

J10 

<\  o 

-u» 

si 


t>c  a 03  73 
G o > a 

44  +1;  o G 
a C3  « 02  02 
' ^ 

aa  G G 
G G 

^ =44  is 

34  ®S 
6 G 


.a 

a ^ w 

03  03  02 
^ ' 


"SO 


•g*  > ^ g ^ 
'gPS  oa  2* 

03  a G •3  G 
;S  G 0 44CC 

O 03  02  S G 
a G rj  ^ > 

P4  S-!  Sm-i  a 


.4  a 03 
r-H  O > 

Pam 


^ a >.^B 

r0  >1  a bo 

O'  O • O 23 
^ n C ^ 


sA  2 G g m 

. 2 G 

^ .zf  ^ Q.)  S-*  tlX) 


ft  > 


G bo 


■S  G 3 Js 

p•^  ^ 4^  ^ 

0 a;  u-i  ;r 

jr  sh  ^ p o 

Ph  bo  >1  . t*  ^ 02 

1 ^ ^ 


G Is 

o 


^ 44-  ^ G 03  3 
-4  7"  '-'  G >>  4;  r-l 

'Sbo-S~2^ 
so  G G 03  34  !h  a 
GO  g ^ 

3 O 2^  o 

I ^ +J  a 


5 ^ <15  S ^ t. 

^G^ggg'l 
^^25.g2| 
^.S  “>3''S  2 & 

G c w S 4^  >02 

n,  (4  a G O 

7 3 O G G 

I 4^44 


1 Rye  seeded  at  the  rate  of  one  and  one-half  bushels  per  acre 

“ Orchard  grass  seeded  at  the  rate  of  one  and  one-half  bushels  or  20  pounds  per  acre 


12 


MECHANICAL  ANALYSIS  OF  THE  LAUREL  SOIL 

The  soil  work  started  in  November,  1910,  when  samples  were 
taken  for  mechanical  analysis/  What  are  known  as  soil  sampling 
stations,  were  laid  out  at  this  time.  There  are  at  least  six  such  sta- 
tions on  each  plot  located  as  shown  in  Fig.  2.  It  is  considered  that 
these  stations  give  approximately  as  accurate  a representation  of  con- 
ditions throughout  the  respective  plots,  as  if  a larger  number  had 
been  taken.  The  samples  secured  were  air  dried,  mixed  and  divided 
into  two  sets.  One  set  was  sent  to  the  Bureau  of  Soils,  United  States 
Department  of  Agriculture  for  mechanicar  analysis,  and  the  other 
was  kept  at  the  Station  for  chemical  analysis. 


ilili 

id- 

Ld-  'i  - 

: '-  -di 

■‘td-  3tr 

■ pl  tip  irii 

L 

xTzi'A:  ■ 

r.  '.‘.pL 

i’ii  i4f 

r 

tjt- 

iPj: 

tp 

r-:. 

iT'i  i- 

mwm 

III: 

IP 

r- 

:'rt5  ## 

ir 

pp 

|:::  li 

ttlT  : : 7?  P- 

:iEp4 

::p;; :::::  5 

km 

p 

fei  iiiii 

ip  F 

p-i 

Pi 

If  ltd 

BU+T 

‘lli 

Et-i 

Mr 

H Pi- 

p 

j;:):: 

ip 

■g;|| 

d; 

id  :1# 

ip  r 

BpiSb 

J;  ij  1 

ty 

Pt: 

ii 

m Mi 

PP 

'p4 

Itt  w 

jj-ij 

' 

i®' 

in  yp 

Pr 

ibii 

44 

MM 

m 

't  1 ■ 

-i--:  - - 

Litf 

. ; i 

— :ib 

rig.  3.  Average  mechanical  analysis  of  Laurel  soil 


It  has  been  deemed  best  in  all  analyses  to  analyze  the  sample 
from  each  station  individually  and  compute  the  plot  averages.  This 
practice  has  been  followed  in  reporting  on  the  mechanical  analysis 
made  by  the  Bureau  of  Soils,  in  Table  II.  It  is  noted  that  there  is 
no  marked  variation  between  the  soils  of  the  various  plots.  The 
principal  variation  is  in  the  proportion  of  silt  and  clay,  more  silt 
denoting  less  clay  and  vice  versa.  The  Laurel  soil  may  be  said  to  be 
a clay  silt  containing  on  an  average  approximately  70  per  cent,  silt 
and  16  per  cent,  clay  as  shown  in  Fig.  3. 

1 Unlike  subsequent  samplings,  the  spade  method  was  here  employed  with  pro- 
cedure as  follows:  at  about  four  feet  due  north  of  tree,  a hole  was  dug  to  the  depth 
of  one  foot,  and  one  side  of  this  hole  was  cut  off  perpendicularly.  The  leaves, 
grass  and  other  debris  were  scraped  back  from  the  surface  of  the  ground  and  with  a 
large  knife,  a slice  of  soil  varying  from  one-half  to  one  inch  in  thickness  was  cut 
from  the  perpendicular  face  of  the  soil  to  a depth  of  nine  inches 


13 


Table:  II. — Mechanical  Analysis  of  Laurel  Soil^ — 1910 


Systems  of  management 

Plot 

Fine  gravel  j 

2 to  1 mm.  1 

per  cent. 

Coarse  sand  ‘ 

1 to  0.5  mm. 
per  cent.  ! 

Medium  sand 

0.5  to  .25  mm.  i 

per  cent. 

Fine  sand 

0.25  to  0.1  mm.  j 

per  cent. 

Very  fine  sand  i 

0.1  to  0.05  mm. 

per  cent. 

Silt 

.05  to  .005  mm. 

per  cent. 

Clay 

.005  to  0 mm. 

per  cent. 

Clean  culture  cover 

A 

0.2 

1.2 

2.6 

3.6 

2.8 

75.9 

13.6 

crop 

B 

0.3 

1.7 

4.6 

6.8 

4.3 

70.0 

12.3 

Straw  mulch 

grass  cut,  let  lie 

C 

0.3 

1.4 

1.8 

3.2 

4.5 

71.0 

17.7 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

0.3 

1.5 

2.0 

3.6 

5.5 

74.1 

13.8 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

0.3 

1.8 

2.2 

4.1 

6.2 

69.5 

15.9 

E 

0.3 

1.4 

2.5 

4.1 

5.9 

68.1 

17.3 

Hillside 
grass  cut,  piled 

H 

0.4 

2.3 

5.7 

7.3 

4.0 

59.6 

20.4 

Average 

0.3 

1.6 

3.1 

4.7 

4.7 

69.7 

15.9 

1 This  table  is  computed  from  results  of  complete  mechanical  analyses  of  52 
samples  of  this  soil  made  by  the  Bureau  of  Soils,  United  States  Department  of  Agri- 
culture 


Table  III. — Mechanical  (Sieve)  Analysis  of  Laurel  Soil — 1913 


Systems  of  management 

Plot 

Depth  of 
sampling 
inches 

Size  of  separates 

over 

5 mm. 

between 

5.0  and 

3.0  mm. 

between 

3.0  and 

2.0  mm. 

between 
2.0  and 
1.5  mm. 

between 
1.5  and 
1.0  mm. 

less 

than 

1.0  mm. 

Clean  culture  cover 

A 

0-9 

0.9^ 

0.2 

0.2 

0.5 

2.4 

995.8 

crop 

9-18 

7.4 

0.2 

0.2 

0.5 

0.5 

991.2 

B 

0-9 

0.0 

0.2 

0.2 

0.4 

6.0 

993.2 

9-18 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.2 

0.7 

999.3 

Straw  mulch 

grass  cut,  let  lie 

C 

0-9 

0.5 

0.2 

0.7 

1.2 

4.6 

992.8 

9-18 

0.2 

0.5 

0.7 

6.2 

1.4 

991.0 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

0-9 

1.8 

0.9 

1.3 

2.5 

4.4 

989.1 

9-18 

6.8 

2.9 

2.9 

4.6 

5.1 

977.3 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

0-9 

0.8 

0.8 

1.7 

3.6 

4.4 

988.7 

9-18 

0.6 

0.6 

1.3 

1.1 

0.8 

995.6 

E 

0-9 

3.4 

2.1 

2.3 

1.7 

1.6 

988.9 

9-18 

10.7 

4.4 

1.5 

2.5 

1.5 

979.4 

Hillside 

grass  cut,  piled 

H 

0-9 

18.5 

4.3 

3.4 

7.2 

4.8' 

961.8 

9-18 

25.3 

3.5 

2.8 

2.3 

1.0 

965.1 

Average 

0-9 

4.7 

1.2 

1.4 

2.4 

4.0 

987.2 

9-18 

7.3 

1.7 

1.3 

2.5 

1.6 

985.5 

1 Figures  express  parts  per  1000  parts  of  dry  soil 


14 


In  Table  III,  we  have  what  may  be  termed  gross  mechanical 
analyses  of  the  soil  and  subsoil/  The  tables  show  that  there  is 
very  little  of  the  soil  that  will  not  pass  through  a one-millimeter 
sieve.  The  subsoil  is  not  greatly  dififerent  from  the  surface  soil  in 
its  mechanical  make-up ; the  hillside  plot  has  the  larger  amounts  of 
coarser  soil  particles ; the  variations  in  the  coarser  materials  are 
largely  due  to  the  presence  'of  limestone  fragments  that  are  under- 
going disintegration. 

THE  WEATHER  AT  LAUREL 

The  weather  station  at  Laurel  is  located  on  the  experimental- 
plots.  The  instruments  in  use  are  of  the  United  States  Weather 
Bureau  pattern;  in  addition,  Friez  thermographs  are  installed  on 
the  upland  and  hillside  plots,  giving  continuous  air  temperature 
records. 


Table  IV. — Total  Precipitation,  Monthly  and  Yearly — 1912  to  1916 


1912 

inches 

1913 

inches 

1914 

inches 

191.0 

inches 

191G 

inches 

Average 

inches 

Varia- 

tion 

inches 

January  

2.51 

8.65^ 

2.37 

4.60 

6.62 

4.95 

6.28 

February  

2.64 

1.91 

3.50^ 

1.03 

1.76 

2.17 

2.47 

March  

6.05 

11.53^ 

3.01 

1.91 

2.46 

4.99 

9.62 

April  

5.79^ 

5.60 

3.25 

2.49 

2.37 

3.70 

3.42 

May 

2.20 

1.96 

0.70 

5.17^ 

2.69 

2.54 

4.47 

June 

1.71 

2.67 

1.47 

2.31 

4.54^ 

2.54 

3.07 

July 

3.75 

3.09 

1.58 

4.3P 

2.48 

3.04 

2.73 

August 

5.32 

6.11 

6.82^ 

6.82^ 

2.80 

5.57 

4.02 

September  

2.14 

2.78 

1.23 

2.90^ 

2.64 

2.34 

1.67 

October 

1.58 

3.20^ 

2.80 

0.74 

2.44 

2.15 

2.46 

November 

0.78 

4.92^ 

1.41 

2.20 

1.57 

2.18 

4.14 

December 

1.36 

0.42 

1.90 

5.05^ 

1.98 

2.14 

4.63 

Total  

35.83 

52.84 

30.04 

39.53 

35.35 

38.71 

22.80 

Total  for  May, 
June  and  July  __ 

7.66 

7.72 

3.75 

11.79 

9.71 

8.13 

8.13 

1 Highest  precipitation  for  each  month  during  the  five-year  period 


From  the  precipitations  data  in  Table  IV,  it  may  be  seen  that 
the  average  annual  rainfall  at  Laurel  during  the  hve-year  period  has 
been  38.71  inches,  which  is  a good  normal  rainfall.  While  there  is  no 
periodicity  in  the  rainfall,  yet  the  variation  during  the  five-year 
period  has  been  over  half  the  average  yearly  rainfall  during  this 

1 The  method  of  taking  these  and  all  subsequent  samples  was  with  a soil 
auger;  three  borings  being  made  to  a depth  of  0-9  and  9-18  inches  about  four 
feet  northeast  of  the  trees  at  which  these  samples  were  taken  in  1910.  The  soil, 
thus  obtained,  was  thoroughly  mixed,  put  in  jars,  which  were  immediately  sealed, 
and  brought  to  the  laboratory.  It  was  air  dried,  care  being  taken  to  break  up  all 
lumps  with  the  hand,  when  drying  had  proceeded  to  just  the  point  where  the  soil 
crumbled  easiest.  The  portions  of  the  soil  xohieh  passed  the  one-millimeter  sieve 
loere  ^iscd  for  all  determinations  made  on  soil 


15 


period.  The  monthly  variations  from  year  to  year  are  also  large. 
The  spring  months  are  usually  well  supplied  with  moisture,  much 
better  than  the  fall  months.  Periods  of  dry  weather  frequently 
prevail  in  June  and  July,  which  are  commonly  broken  by  heavy 
precipitations  in  August. 

The  detailed  maximum  and  minimum  temperatures  by  weeks 
will  be  found  in  Table  V.  Three  years'  temperature  records  are 
shown  graphically  in  charts  in  connection  with  soil  temperatures. 

In  Table  V the  air  temperatures  of  both  the  upland  and 
hillside  plots  are  given.  The  hillside  plot  is  considerably  lower  than 
the  upland  and  anyone  interested  in  making  comparisons  as  to  the 
effect  of  elevation  and  exposure  upon  temperature  will  find  that 
the  lower  elevation  with  a western  exposure  exhibits  greater  ex- 
tremes of  temperature  throughout  the  period  that  records  have  been 
taken.  Occasions  arise  when  such  differences  in  temperature  may 
influence  fruit  production. 


i6 


Table:  V. — Air  Temperatures  at  Laurel  by  Weeks 


Month 

Week 

Minimum 

Upland 

Hillside 

1913 

degrees 

F. 

1914 

degrees 

F. 

1915 

degrees 

F. 

1916 

degrees 

F. 

1913 

degrees 

F. 

1914 

degrees 

F. 

1915 

degrees 

F. 

1916 

degrees 

F. 

January  

1 

17.0 

23.0 

2.0 

22.0 

15.0 

23.0 

2.0 

22.5 

2 

12.5 

10.0 

13.0 

12.0 

10. 0 

10.0 

12.0 

11.0 

3 

21.0 

9.0 

19.5 

-3.5 

20.0 

8.0 

18.5 

-3.5 

4 

17.0 

22.5 

-17.5 

0.5 

16.0 

22.0 

-18.5 

0.0 

5 

32.5 

32.0 

February  

1 

2.0 

19.0 

-13.0 

2.5 

-1.0 

18.0 

-14.5 

3.0 

2 

-2.0 

1.0 

]7.0 

-9.0 

-2.5 

1.0 

17.0 

-9.0 

3 

-2.5 

-6.0 

14.0 

2.0 

-4.0 

-8.0 

13.0 

2.0 

4 

15.0 

4.0 

16.5 

10.5 

14.0 

5.0 

15.0 

10.5 

March  

1 

6.0 

-11.5 

16.0 

5.0 

4.5 

-15.0 

14.0 

5.0 

2 

8.0 

12.5 

20.0 

14.5 

6.0 

11.0 

20.0 

14.0 

3 

13.0 

7.0 

18.0 

8.0 

9.0 

5.0 

17.0 

7.0 

4 

18.5 

15.5 

20.0 

21.0 

17.0 

14.5 

18.5 

20.0 

5 

24.0 

26.0 

16.0 

22.0 

25.0 

14.0 

April  

1 

30.5 

26.0 

16.5 

29.0 

29.0 

25.5 

15.5 

27.5 

2 

29.0 

19.0 

37.0 

23.0 

29.0 

19.0 

36.0 

22.0 

3 

31.0 

33.0 

29.0 

31.5 

30.0 

33.0 

27.0 

31.5 

4 

38.0 

28.0 

49.0 

33.5 

27.0 

47.0 

31.0 

May  

1 

36.0 

30.0 

38.0 

38.0 

35.0 

29.0 

37.0 

37.0 

2 

30.0 

44.0 

31.0 

37.5 

28.0 

44.0 

31.5 

37.5 

3 

42.0 

31.5 

38.0 

46.0 

41.0 

31.0 

37.0 

44.5 

4 

40.0 

41.0 

32.0 

30.0 

38.5 

40.0 

31.5 

30.0 

5 

43.0 

52.0 

43.0 

51.0 

June  

1 

42.5 

43.0 

51.0 

47.0 

42.0 

42.0 

51.5 

46.0 

2 

38.5 

42.0 

40.0 

45.0 

38.0 

41.0 

41.0 

45.0 

3 

38.0 

54.0 

48.0 

51.0 

38.0 

53.0 

49.0 

50.5 

4 

59.0 

44.0 

43.0 

45.0 

58.0 

41.0 

43.0 

45.0 

5 

64.0 

54.0 

64.0 

54.5 

July  

1 

50.5 

44.0 

48.5 

53.0 

49.0 

44.0 

49.0 

52.0 

2 

53.0 

55.0 

46.0 

51.0 

53.0 

54.0 

46.0 

51.0 

3 

54.5 

49.0 

61.5 

63.5 

54.0 

48.0 

61.5 

63.0 

4 

50.0 

60.0 

49.0 

56.0 

48.0 

60.0 

47.0 

54.5 

5 

63.0 

63.0 

August  

1 

54.0 

48.0 

60.0 

59.0 

52.5 

46.5 

60.0 

59.0 

2 

49.0 

51.0 

53.5 

45.0 

48.0 

50.0 

53.0 

45.0 

3 

66.0 

50.0 

59.0 

59.5 

65.5 

49.0 

59.0 

59.5 

4 

49.5 

55.0 

47.0 

47.0 

49.5 

54.5 

46.0 

47.0 

5 

54.0 

47.5 

53.0 

48.0 

September  

1 

48.0 

44.5 

38.0 

43.0 

46.5 

44.5 

37.0 

43.5 

2 

58.5 

41.0 

61.0 

49.0 

57.0 

40.0 

59.0 

48.0 

3 

40.0 

46.0 

55.0 

29.0 

38.5 

45.0 

55.0 

29.0 

4 

38.5 

35.0 

35.5 

30.0 

38.0 

34.0 

35.5 

29.0 

5 

28.5 

27.0 

October  

1 

36.5 

39.0 

39.0 

28.0 

27.5 

37.0 

40.0 

28.5 

2 

32.0 

36.0 

23.0 

33.0 

31.0 

35.0 

22.5 

32.0 

3 

32.5 

45.0 

38.0 

27.0 

32.0 

43.0 

36.5 

26.0 

4 

22.0 

39.5 

34.0 

23.0 

20.0 

40.0 

34.0 

23.0 

5 

27.5 

27.0 

November  

1 

22.0 

23.5 

29.0 

24.0 

23.0 

28.0 

22.5 

2 

15.0 

26.0 

25.5 

26.0 

25.0 

3 

32.0 

24.0 

22.5 

6.5 

25.0 

22.0 

4.5 

4 

7.5 

20.0 

16.0 

7.5 

19.0 

*16.0 

5 

18.0 

23.5 

17.0 

22.0 

December  

1 

22.0 

36.0 

17.0 

18.0 

21.0 

36.0 

17.0 

17.0 

2 

15.0 

-1.0 

15.0 

12.0 

14.0 

-0.5 

15.0 

11.0 

3 

18.0 

-12.5 

6.0 

-5.0 

17.0 

-13.0 

5.5 

-9.0 

4 

15.5 

-7.0 

14.5 

-3.5 

14.5 

-8.0 

13.5 

-4.0 

5 

14.5 

7.0 

7.0 

17 


Tabli:  V. — Air  Temperatures  at  Laurel  by  Weeks— (continued) 


Maximum 

Month 

Week 

Upland 

Hillside 

1913 

1914 

1915 

1916 

1913 

1914 

1915 

1916 

degrees 

degrees 

degrees 

degrees 

degrees 

degrees 

degrees 

degrees 

F. 

F. 

F. 

F. 

F. 

F. 

F. 

F. 

January  

1 

48.0 

35.0 

42.0 

62.0 

48.0 

35.0 

41.0 

62.0 

2 

54.0 

48.0 

47.0 

55.0 

53.0 

50.0 

48.0 

56.0 

3 

56.0 

51.0 

54.0 

68.0 

56.0 

52.5 

54.0 

68.5 

4 

60.0 

58.0 

36.5 

66.5 

62.0 

58.5 

37.0 

67.5 

5 

68.0 

68.0 

February  

1 

57.0 

68.0 

49.0 

41.5 

58.0 

69.0 

47.0 

42.0 

2 

30.0 

52.5 

48.0 

56.0 

30.0 

53.0 

48.0 

56.0 

3 

57.0 

38.0 

63.0 

55.0 

58.0 

39.0 

64.0 

55.0 

4 

64.0 

45.0 

58.0 

65.0 

65.0 

47.0 

60.0 

65.0 

1 

46.0 

45.5 

60.5 

57.5 

44.0 

46.0 

61.0 

58.0 

2 

62.0 

46.5 

48.0 

64.5 

63.0 

48.0 

50.0 

64.5 

3 

76.0 

67.0 

55.0 

66.5 

76.0 

68.5 

56.0 

68.0 

4 

74.0 

54.0 

47.0 

72.5 

75.0 

55.0 

46.0 

73.5 

5 

65.5 

68.5 

51.0 

66.0 

70.5 

52.0 

April 

1 

74.0 

64.0 

56.0 

68.0 

75.0 

63.5 

59.0 

69.5 

2 

58.0 

60.5 

79.0 

60.0 

59.0 

61.0 

79.0 

61.0 

3 

76.0 

82.0 

74.0 

77.5 

78.0 

83.0 

75.0 

80.0 

4 

78.0 

81.0 

87.0 

80.0 

78.0 

81.5 

86.0 

81.0 

May  

1 

85.0 

83.5 

86.0 

75.0 

84.0 

84.5 

87.0 

77.0 

2 

85.0 

78.0 

78.5 

84.0 

84.0 

77.5 

80.0 

83.0 

3 

84.0 

81.5 

80.5 

87.0 

85.0 

82.0 

80.5 

88.5 

4 

80.0 

86.0 

80.5 

71.5 

80.0 

87.5 

82.5 

72.0 

5 

76.5 

88.5 

78.5 

88.0 

June  _ 

1 

88.0 

93.5 

81.0 

79.0 

88.0 

95.0 

85.0 

79.0 

2 

89.0 

93.0 

88.0 

78.0 

89.0 

92.5 

89.0 

78.0 

3 

92.0 

97.5 

83.0 

82.0 

92.5 

97.0 

84.0 

83.5 

4 

98.0 

96.5 

87.0 

84.5 

98.0 

97.0 

86.0 

87.5 

5 

95.0 

98.5 

96.0 

100.5 

July  

1 

98.0 

89.0 

87.0 

90.0 

98.0 

90.0 

88.0 

90.0 

2 

95.5 

103.0 

83.5 

91.5 

95.0 

103.0 

85.0 

92.0 

3 

91.5 

96.0 

91.5 

93.0 

92.0 

95.0 

92.5 

94.0 

4 

91.5 

100.0 

88.0 

95.0 

92.5 

99.0 

86.0 

96.0 

5 

98.5 

99.0 

August  

1 

101.0 

94.0 

92.0 

94.5 

102.0 

94.5 

92.0 

94.0 

2 

96.0 

95.0 

85.5 

95.0 

98.0 

96.0 

87.0 

96.0 

3 

92.0 

90.0 

82.0 

94.5 

92.5 

91.0 

85.0 

95.5 

4 

89.5 

95.5 

87.0 

94.5 

90.0 

95.5 

90.0 

92.0 

5 

84.0 

80.0 

86.5 

82.0 

September  

1 

93.0 

87.0 

81.5 

86.0 

93.0 

88.5 

83.0 

88.0 

2 

96.0 

78.5 

88.0 

93.0 

97.0 

79.0 

89.5 

92.5 

3 

87.0 

91.5 

89.0 

86.5 

87.0 

92.5 

90.0 

90.0 

4 

78.0 

90.5 

81.0 

76.5 

78.0 

91.5 

81.0 

79.5 

5 

81.0 

82.0 

October  

1 

80.0 

79.0 

79.0 

87.5 

81.5 

79.5 

81.0 

88.5 

2 

86.0 

84.0 

81.0 

38.0 

87.0 

84.5 

81.0 

88.5 

3 

76.5 

68.0 

77.0 

72.5 

77.0 

69.0 

78.5 

74.0 

4 

61.5 

76.0 

76.5 

67.0 

63.0 

77.0 

77.0 

67.0 

5 

72.0 

73.0 

November  

1 

65.0 

72.0 

76.0 

74.0 

73.0 

76.0 

74.0 

2 

65.0 

82.0 

77.0 

83.5 

78.0 

3 

74.0 

67.0 

71.0 

60.5 

68.0 

71.0 

61.0 

4 

45.0 

56.5 

68.0 

45.5 

57.0 

67.0 

5 

62.0 

68.0 

62.5 

68.5 

December  

1 

59.5 

62.0 

39.5 

58.0 

61.0 

64.0 

41.0 

58.0 

2 

59.5 

40.0 

45.0 

63.0 

61.0 

40.0 

45.0 

63.0 

3 

54.5 

36.0 

52.0 

42.0 

55.5 

36.0 

52.0 

42.0 

4 

50.0 

34.0 

47.0 

33.0 

51.0 

34.0 

48.0 

33.0 

5 

40.5 

54.0 

54.0 

8 


The  chief  points  of  interest  in  the  weather  phenomena  of  each 
season  were  as  follows : 

The  season  of  1912  was  about  normal  from  the  standpoint  of 
precipitation,  both  as  regards  total  precipitation  and- its  distribution 
throughout  the  year.  The  winter  temperatures  were  the  coldest 
recorded  during  the  period  here  reported  upon.  The  mercury  went 
to  25  degrees  below  zero  Fahrenheit  on  the  upland  plots  and  28 
degrees  below  on  the  hillside  plot  in  January. 

The  season  of  1913  was  characterized  by  extremely  heavy  rain- 
fall. The  winter  might  be  termed  moderate  or  even  “open,”  fol- 
lowed by  a rather  hot  summer. 

The  peculiarities  of  the  season  of  1914,  were  the  protracted 
dryness  and  heat  of  the  summer  and  the  heavy  snowfall  and  cold 
weather  of  February  and  December. 

The  principal  features  of  the  weather  of  1915  were  the  extreme 
coolness  and  wetness  of  the  summer.  This  season  is  a great  con- 
trast to  1914. 

The  outstanding  weather  conditions  of  1916  were  a very  cool 
and  wet  June  and  an  unusually  early  freeze  occuring  September  18. 

THE  RESPONSE  OF  THE  TREES  TO  CULTURAL  PRACTICES 

PiiENOLOGiCAL  Behavior. — Phenological  notes  have  been 
kept  on  all  plots,  by  varieties,  during  the  five-year  period.  The  dif- 
ferences due  to  variety  have  been  quite  constant.  Table  VI  is  in- 
cluded to  show  the  general  yearly  changes,  but  it  is  the  changes,  if 
any,  induced  by  soil  treatments  in  which  we  are  primarily  interested. 


Table  VI. — Phenological  Notes  on  Grimes  Trees  under  Clean 

Cultivation 


Year 

Leaf 

buds 

open 

First 

bloom 

Full 

bloom 

Petals 

fall 

Terminal 

buds 

form 

First 

leaf 

fall 

Main 

leaf 

fall 

Last 

leaf 

fall 

1912 

191.3 

1914 

191.5 

1916 

Apr.  20 
Apr.  22 
Apr.  24 
Apr.  24 
Apr.  24 

Apr.  28 
Apr.  30 
Apr.  27 
Apr.  29 

May  4 
Apr.  29 
May  5 

May  9 
May  9 
May  3 
May  8 

Aug.  24 
Aug.  4 
Aug.  17 
Sep.  15 
Sep.  2 

Oct.  30 
Nov.  3 
Nov.  16 
Nov.  20 
Nov.  6 

Nov.  30 
Dec.  4 
Nov.  14 

Nov.  30 
Nov.  24 
Dec.  6 
Dec.  13 
Nov.  20 

Cultural  practices  have  not  had  a marked  efifect  on  phenological 
behavior.  The  only  dififerences  that  appeared  may  be  noted  as  fol- 
lows: in  1914,  the  terminal  bud  formation  and  the  main  leaf  fall 
were  five  days  earlier  on  the  grass  land.  In  1916  the  leaf  fall  on  the 
cultivated  and  straw  mulched  plots  was  about  a week  later  than  on 
grassed  plots,  and  the  trees  on  the  hillside  plot  formed  their  termin- 
als about  12  days  earlier  than  on  the  cultivated  plots. 

While  there  have  been  no  startling  differences  in  phenological 
behavior,  yet  there  does  occur  a marked  slacking  up  of  growth  on 
certain  plots  during  the  dry  periods  in  summer,  which  a usual 
phenological  report  does  not  take  into  account.  Dry  weather  checks 
the  growth  much  more  quickly  on  the  trees  on  the  grass  plots,  often 


19 


nearly  causing  them  to  set  terminal  buds.  If  a spell  of  rainy 
weather  intervenes  all  plots  will  respond  with  renewed  activity,  with 
the  result  that  the  final  date  of  terminal  formation  may  be  the  same 
on  all  plots.  Thus,  in  1913,  following  a dry  spell,  the  approximate 
number  of  growing  terminals  per  tree  on  the  clean  culture  plot  was 
30,  on  the  straw  mulch  plot  20,  on  the  grass  mulch  plot  10,  and  on 
the  plot  where  the  grass  was  cut  and  let  lie,  only  three. 

Thk  Effect  of  Variety  on  Growth. — The  circumference  or 
girth  increment  made  by  the  trees  from  year  to  year  has  been  used 
as  an  index  of  growth.  Such  measurements  have  been  recorded  at 
the  end  of  each  growing  season.  Although  the  point  of  measure- 
ment has  varied  slightly  with  the  height  at  which  the  trees  were 
headed,  etc.,  the  measurement  has  been  taken  where  possible,  about 
18  inches  from  the  ground  and  this  point  definitely  located  by  a 
brass  escutcheon  pin  driven  into  the  tree.  A steel  tape  graduated  in 
millimeters  was  the  rule  of  measure.  The  terminal  twig  growth 
has  been  measured  and  found  to  correlate  satisfactorily  with  girth 
increase. 

In  compiling  the  growth  data,  there  have  been  two  possible  pro- 
cedures, i.  e. : I.  Each  variety  could  be  averaged  separately  and  then 
an  average  taken  of  these  averages,  thus  giving  a weighted  average, 
where  each  variety  has  equal  weight  in  the  final  average.  2.  The 
growth  made  by  all  the  trees  on  a plot  could  be  added  together  re- 
gardless of  variety  and  an  average  taken,  thus  giving  a general  aver- 
age. The  Laurel  orchard  is  planted  in  alternating  blocks  of  four 
rows  each  in  such  a way  that  there  are  twice  as  many  Grimes  as 
either  Jonathan  or  Stayman.  If  there  was  much  difference  in  growth 
between  varieties,  therefore,  it  would  be  of  considerable  moment  as 
to  whether  a weighted  or  general  average  was  used. 

Table  VII  shows  the  results  obtained  with  each  of  the  above 
methods  of  computation.  It  will  be  seen  that  the  Stayman  variety 
made  slightly  greater  girth  gains  during  the  five-year  period  than 
either  Grimes  or  Jonathan.  This  was  uniformly  the  case  on  all 
plots.  However,  the  increase  was  not  of  sufficient  magnitude  to  affect 
the  averages  materially,  as  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  five  years’  re- 
sults on  all  plots  on  the  basis  of  a weighted  average,  was  21.87 
centimeters  and  on  the  basis  of  a general  average  21.71  centimeters 
or  a trifling  difference.  All  subsequent  growth  data,  therefore,  are 
reported  on  the  basis  of  a general  average,  regardless  of  variety. 


20 


Table  VIL — The  Effect  of  the  Variety  on  Girth  Increase  of  Trunk 


Girth  gain  in  centimeters,  1912-1916 

Systems  of  management 

Plot 

Grimes 

Jona- 

than 

stay- 

man 

Weighted 

average 

General 

average 

Clean  culture  cover  crop 

A 

25.65^ 

25.46 

26.54 

25.88 

25.86 

B 

23.67 

26.38 

26.61 

25.55 

25.14 

Straw  mulch 
grass  cut,  let  lie 

C 

25.19 

26.36 

26.90 

26.15 

25.94 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

16.67 

17.54 

17.82 

17.34 

17.15 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

17.81 

17.63 

18.96 

18.13 

18.10 

E 

17.78 

17.78 

18.95 

18.17 

18.06 

Average 

21.13 

21.86 

22.63 

21.87 

21.71 

Hillside 
grass  cut,  piled 

H 

20.54 

23.75 

22.14 

22.30 

1 Field  measurements  were  made  to  tenths  of  centimeters.  It  is  necessary  to 
carry  two  decimal  places,  however,  in  calculating  averages,  and  these  are  retained  in 
the  table.  It  should  not  be  inferred  that  the  second  decimal  is  significant  from  the 
standpoint  of  actual  tree  growth 


Growth  Records  by  Plots. — In  Table  VIII  we  have  the  cir- 
cumference of  the  trees  at  the  beginning  and  end  of  the  five-year 
period  and  the  gain  in  girth  made  each  year,  together  with  the  av- 
erage gain  for  the  period.  Only  such  trees  have  been  included  in 
these  data  as  were  permanent  throughout  the  entire  period.  The 
trees,  at  the  close  of  the  season  of  1911,  were  practically  uniform  in 
size,  with  the  possible  exception  of  the  trees  on  plots  A and  E 
which  had  a slight,  although  not  significant  advantage.  This  is 
graphically  shown  in  Fig.  4.  After  the  lapse  of  five  years,  an  out- 
standing difference  is  noted  in  the  average  girth  of  the  trees  on  the 
various  plots.  It  will  be  seen  that  the  major  plots  at  this  time  group 
themselves  into  two  divisions,  i.  e.,  one  composed  of  large  trees,  and 
the  other  of  much  smaller  trees.  To  the  former  belong  plots  A,  B 
and  C,  and  to  the  latter,  D,  E and  E.  The  individual  differences  in 
growth  between  plots  in  either  of  these  two  groups  are  not  of  suffi- 
cient-magnitude to  merit  special  mention. 

The  above  relations  are  further  emphasized  by  the  gains  made 
in  girth  during  each  season.  Plots  A,  B and  C,  without  exception, 
ranked  as  the  three  highest  plots  while  D,  E and  F ranked  as  the 
three  lowest,  (see  Fig.  4)  The  growth  data  in  brief,  show  that 


21 


Fig:.  4.  The  relative  increase  in  trunk  g:irth  of  trees  by  years  undea:  the  four 
main  systems  of  soil  manag:ement 


Table:  VIII. — Detailed  Growth  Record  of  Permanent  Trees  for 
Five-Year  Period 


Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

Number  1 

trees  in- 
cluded in 
averages 

Average  girth 

Average  gain  in  girth 

1916 

cm. 

1911 

cm. 

1912- 

1916 

cm. 

1912 

cm. 

1913 

cm. 

1914 

cm. 

1915 

cm. 

1916 

cm. 

Year- 

ly 

cm. 

Clean  culture  cover 

crop 

A 

90 

33.88 

“8.02 

25.86 

4.32 

4.80 

4.45 

6.85 

5.44 

5.17 

B 

62 

32.68 

7.54 

25.14 

3.90 

4.85 

4.60 

6.59 

5.20 

5.03 

Straw  mulch 

grass  cut,  let  lie 

0 

61 

33.24 

7.30 

25.94 

3.69 

4.66 

4.80 

7.15 

5.64 

5.19 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

84 

24.32 

7.17 

17.15 

3.08 

3.02 

2.71 

5.10 

3.24 

3.43 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

47 

26.00 

7.90 

18.10 

2.47 

3.17 

2.60 

5.42 

4.44 

3.62 

F 

79 

25.31 

7.25 

18.06 

2.89 

3.07 

2.52 

5.20 

4.38 

3.61 

Average 

70.5 

29.24 

7.53 

21.71 

3.39 

3.93 

3.61 

6.05 

4.72 

4.34 

Hillside 

grass  cut,  piled 

0 

53 

28.93 

15. 151 

13.782 

3.48 

5.89 

4.41 

4.59 

H 

89 

30.71 

8.41 

22.30 

4.20 

4.04 

3.60 

6.31 

4.15 

4.46 

1 Girth  1913 

2 Gain  in  girth,  1914  to  1916 


22 


Figr.  5.  Average  conditions  on  clean  culture  cover  crop  plot.  This  system  of 
manaffement  while  efficient  in  conserving:  moisture  tends  to  deplete  the  org:anic  mat- 
ter in  the  soil.  Averag:e  yearly  grain  in  grirth  of  trees  5.2  centimeters. 


Fig:,  t).  Averagre  c<mditions  on  straw  mulch  plot.  Each  tree  is  mulched  with  ap- 
proximately 80  pounds  of  straw  per  year.  This  method  shows  some  accumulation 
of  orgranic  matter  and  is  very  effective  in  the  conservation  of  soil  moisture.  Averagre 
yearly  grain  in  girth  of  trees  5.2  centimeters. 


23 


Fig.  7.  Average  eonditions  on  grass  muleh  plot.  The  trees  on  this  plot  received 
as  a mulch  only,  the  grass  cut  from  the  plot  area.  The  amount  of  mulch  thus  pro- 
duced being  very  light,  the  conservation  of  soil  moisture  was  correspondingly  poor. 
Average  yearly  gain  in  girth  of  trees  3.(5  centimeters. 


Fig.  8.  Average  conditions  on  grass  plot,  where  grass  is  cut  and  let  lie.  This 
is  the  least  efficient  method  in  conserving  soil  moisture.  Average  yearly  gain  in 
girth  of  trees  3.4  centimeters 


24 


tilled  or  heavily  mulched  trees  made  44.5  per  cent,  greater  average 
yearly  gains  in  girth  than  trees  grown  in  grass  with  a light  mulch 
(such  as  the  grass  afforded  in  these  cases)  or  no  mulch  at  all. 

The  average  yearly  growth  gain  of  the  six  major  plots  in  the 
experiment  was  4.34  centimeters.  Plots  A,  B and  C as  a whole  were 
18  per  cent,  above  this  average,  while  D,  E and  F fell  18  per  cent, 
below.  Plots  O and  H have  not  been  included  in  the  growth  aver- 
ages for  reasons  which  are  obvious  from  the  history  of  the  experi- 
ment. (See  page  6) 

Growth  of  Soil  Station  TrFES. — As  heretofore  mentioned, 
there  are  certain  specified  locations  on  each  plot,  which  have  been 
chosen  as  places  for  taking  soil  samples,  (see  Fig.  i)  Such  areas 
have  been  known  as  soil  stations,  and  the  trees  located  therein  as 
soil  station  trees.  In  Table  IX,  the  girth  gains  made  by  these  soil 
station  trees  are  compared  with  all  plot  trees.  The  agreement  be- 
tween them  seems  quite  satisfactory  in  view  of  the  smaller  number 
of  station  trees.  It  shows  that  these  locations  are  quite  representa- 
tive of  the  plots  from  the  standpoint  of  the  tree.  There  are  differ- 
ences it  is  true,  but  the  broad  relationships  still  persist. 


TabtE  IX. — Girth  Gains  Made  by  Soil  Station  Trees  Compared 
With  All  Plot  Trees 


1 Average  girth 

Average  gain  in  girth 

Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

Number 
trees  in- 
cluded in 
averages 

station 
j treesi 

station 

trees 

plot 

trees 

varia- 

tion 

1916 

cm. 

1911 

cm. 

1912-1916 

cm. 

1912-1916 

cm. 

1912-1916 

cm. 

Clean  culture  cover 

crop 

A 

7 

32.37 

7.47 

24.90 

25.86 

-0.96 

B 

6 

30.07 

7.37 

22.70 

25.14 

-2.44 

Straw  mulch 
grass  cut,  let  lie 

C 

6 

31.40 

6.43 

24.97 

25.94 

-h0.03 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

6 

25.70 

7.57 

18.13 

17.15 

4-0.98 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

6 

28.43 

8.42 

20.01 

18.10 

-fl.91 

E 

7 

25.71 

7.00 

18.71 

18.06 

4-0.65 

Average 

6.6 

29.17 

7.37 

21.80 

21.71 

Hillside 

+0.02 

grass  cut,  let  lie 

0 

5 

29.28 

15.48^ 

13.80^ 

13.78'^ 

H 

7 

29.00 

8.24 

20.76 

22.30 

-1.54 

1 For  average  girth  of  plot  trees  see  Table  VIII 

2 Girth  1913 

3 Girth  gain  1914  to  1916 


Fertilizer  Effect. — As  already  pointed  out,  two  rows  of  trees 
crossing  the  upland  plots  have  been  fertilized  with  a complete  fer- 
tilizer during  four  seasons.  Gains  made  in  trunk  girth  by  these 
trees  are  compared  with  trees  on  the  same  plot  not  fertilized  in 


25 


Table  X.  It  would  seem  from  these  data  that  fertilization  has  had 
little  effect.  The  same  variations  due  to  differences  in  soil  manage^ 
ment  hold  practically  the  same  on  fertilized  as  on  unfertilized  trees. 


Table;  X. — Girth  Gains  Made  by  Fertilized  Trees  Compared  With 
Those  Not  Fertilized,  On  Same  Plot 


Average  girth 

Average  girth  gain 

Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

■g  ""g  s 

fertilized 
trees  ^ 

fertilized 

trees 

plot 

trees 

S cu  ns  5r! 

^ S.5  > 

^ "o 

1916 

cm. 

1912 

cm. 

1913-1916 

cm. 

1913-1916 

cm. 

Clean  culture  cover  crop 

A 

6 

31.46 

9.75 

21.71 

21.54 

B 

4 

32.80 

12.28 

20.52 

21.24 

Straw  mulch 
grass  cut,  let  lie 

C 

4 

36.45 

12.78 

23.67 

22.25 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

5 

21.30 

7.28 

14.02 

14.07 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

2 

29.50 

10.5 

19.00 

15.63 

r 

2 

20.85 

6.85 

14.00 

15.17 

Average 

3.8 

28.73 

9.91 

18.82 

18.31 

1 For  average  girth  of  plot  trees  (unfertilized)  see  Table  VIII 


It  should  be  borne  in  mind,  that  a fertilizer  experiment  was  not 
here  attempted  and  that  the  number  of  trees  is  far  too  few  upon 
which  to  base  a final  judgment.  The  purpose  of  the  fertilizer  ap- 
plication was  rather  to  prevent  the  possibility  of  interpreting  wrong- 
ly the  responses  of  the  trees  to  soil  management  methods  as  men- 
tioned on  page  9. 

Many  examples  in  the  community  afford  ample  evidence  that 
farm  crops  on  this  soil  are  by  no  means  unresponsive  to  fertilization ; 
the  data  bear  this  out.  Samples  of  the  rye  cover  crop  have  been 
weighed  from  fertilized  and  unfertilized  areas,  just  before  turn- 
ing under  in  the  spring,  with  the  result,  that  for  the  average 
of  1914,  1915  and  1916,  the  fertilized  rye  gave  a green  weight  of 
8.77  tons  per  acre  and  the  unfertilized  only  2.51  tons  per  acre. 

PHYSICAL  AND  CHEMICAL  ANALYSES  OF  LAUREL  SOIL 

Physical  Analysis. — Three  determinations  have  been  made 
to  show  the.  physical  character  of  the  Laurel  soil : — hygroscopic 
moisture,  water-holding  capacity  and  specific  gravity.  The  results 
of  these  determinations  from  samples  secured  in  September,  1913, 
are  given  in  Table  XI. 

The  hygroscopic  moisture^  content  of  the  subsoil  samples  is 
uniformly  greater  than  that  of  the  surface  soil.  This  difference  is 
large  enough,  so  that  it  may  be  concluded  that  the  subsoil  contains 
more  clay,  as  clay  increases  the  moisture  absorption  of  a soil. 

1 Hygroscopic  moisture  was  determined  by  heating  five  gram  aliquots  of  the  air 
— dry  samples  for  five  hours  in  an  oven  kept  at  100  degrees  C. 


26 


Tabi,k  XI. — Physical  Analyses  of  Laurel  Soil  and  Subsoil 


Specific  gravity 

Hygroscopic 

moisture 

Water  holding 
capacity 

Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

sur- 

face 

sub- 

soil 

differ- 

ence 

sur- 

face 

per 

cent. 

sub- 

soil 

per 

cent. 

differ- 

ence 

per 

cent. 

sur- 

face 

grams 

sub- 

soil 

grams 

differ- 

ence 

grams 

Clean  culture  cover 
crop 

A 

2.44 

2.53 

-1-.09 

1.31 

1.40 

•f  .09 

.544 

.501 

.043 

B 

2.40 

2.52 

-f.12 

1.06 

1.74 

-1-.68 

.514 

.459 

.055 

Straw  mulch 
grass  cut,  let  lie 

C 

2.37 

2.47 

-f  .10 

1.57 

2.09 

-f.52 

.516 

.575 

+ .059 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

2.45 

2.45 

.00 

1.87 

2.10 

+ .23 

.612 

.530 

.082 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

2.48 

2.41 

.07 

1.79 

2.10 

+ .31 

.5.58 

.535 

.023 

F 

2.43 

2.44 

-f  .01 

1.53 

1.80 

+ .27 

.554 

.548 

.006 

0 

2.42 

2.48 

-f  .06 

1.10 

1.66 

+ .56 

.493 

.477 

.016 

Hillside 

grass  cut,  piled 

H 

2.43 

2.37 

.06 

1.63 

2.66 

+1.03 

.610 

.585 

.025 

Average 

2.43 

2.46 

-f  .03 

1.48 

1.94 

+ .46 

.550^ 

.526 

.024 

Variation 

0.11 

0.16 

0.19 

0.81 

1.26 

0.94 

.1172 

.126 

.152 

1 Equivalent  to  35.5  per  cent,  of  moisture 

2 Equivalent  to  10.4  per  cent,  of  moisture 


The  soil  containing  as  it  does  a high  percentage  of  silt  and 
clay,  a high  water  holding  capacity^  would  naturally  be  expected. 
The  water  holding  capacity  of  the  soil  of  the  various  plots  is  quite 
uniform.  This  bears  out  the  uniformity  found  in  the  mechanical 
analysis  of  the  soil. 

The  specific  gravity"  of  the  subsoil  is  slightly  greater  than  that 
of  the  surface  soil.  This  would  indicate  either  one  or  both  of  two 
things ; namely,  that  there  is  a little  more  organic  matter  in  the 
surface  soil  than  in  the  subsoil,  or  that  the  subsoil  contains  slightly 
more  of  the  heavier  constituents.  The  variation  between  the  .spe- 
cific gravity  of  the  soils  of  the  various  plots  is  small. 

1 Water  liokling-  capacity  was  determined  by  the  volumetric  method  of  Fuelling, 
given  in  Wiley’s  “Principles  and  Practices  of  Agricultural  Analysis,’’  Vol.  I,  p.  151, 
edition  of  1906.  This  method  was  chosen  because  it  can  be  used  satisfactorily  on 
samples  of  air-dry  soil 

“The  specific  gravity  of  the  soil  was  determined  as  follows:  five  grams  of  the 
air-dry,  prepared  samples  were  placed  in  25  c.  c.  tared  specific  gravity  bottles;  dis- 
tilled water  was  added  until  the  bottles  were  three-fourths  full.  They  were  boiled 
in  a water  bath  to  drive  out  air,  placed  in  a thermostat  kept  at  30  degrees  C.  for 
one  hour,  filled  with  distilled  water  free  from  gases  and  let  stand  for  half  an  hour  in 
bath.  The  stoppers  were  inserted,'  the  bottles  dried  and  weighed 


27 


Chemical  Analysis. — The  chemical  analysis^  of  the  Laurel 
soil  appears  in  Table  XII,  and  serves  to  place  the  soil  in  regard  to 
its  total  elements  of  plant  food.  This  analysis  is  not  indicative 
of  the  crop  producing  power  of  this  soil  or  of  its  fertilizer  re- 
quirements. 

Not  all  samples  of  soil  taken  from  the  66  sampling  stations 
have  been  analyzed.  It  has  been  necessary  to  pick  out  and  make 
determinations  of  those  substances^  the  amounts  present  of  which 
it  was  thought  would  be  varied  by  the  cultural  practices.  The  de- 
terminations chosen  and  which  have  been  made  upon  all  samples  of 
soil  taken  in  September,  1913,  both  surface  and  subsoil,  are  vola- 
tile matter,  humus,  total  nitrogen,  and  total  phosphorus.  The  acidity 
of  the  surface  soil  has  also  been  determined.  With  the  results  of 
these  determinations  as  a basis,  those  samples  where  the  chemical 
analysis  of  the  soil  varied  considerably  were  picked  out  (there  be- 
ing 12  in  number)  and  further  analyses  made. 

While  it  appears  from  the  chemical  analysis,  that  the  soil  has 
a fair  amount  of  the  soil  elements,  yet  in  reality  it  is  not  as  produc- 
tive a soil  as  its  chemical  analysis  might  signify.  Its  low  organic 
matter  content  and  its  high  proportion  of  silt  and  clay  are  largely 
responsible  for  this  condition,  making  a soil  through  which  water 
percolates  slowly  and  one  which  is  easily  puddled.  Its  high  water- 
holding capacity  is  due  to  its  silt  and  clay  and  not  to  its  organic 
matter  content.  Plowing  is  often  delayed  in  the  spring  because  the 
soil  dries  off  very  slowly. 

Coupled  with  these  conditions,  as  might  be  expected,  is  a 
slight  acidity.  A further  study  of  the  acidity  at  five  different 
places  on  the  plots,  shows  no.  correlation  of  acidity  with  depth.  An 


1 The  methods  used  in  analyzing  the  Laurel  soil  were  the  “official  methods”  as 
published  by  the  Association  of  the  Official  Agricultural  Chemists  of  the  United 
States,  in  the  main.  The  soil  was  prepared  according  to  the  directions  given  in 
these  methods, — 10  gram  portions  were  taken  and  digested  with  hydrochloric  acid, 
specific  gracity  1.115  (constant  boiling  point)  for  10  hours.  Shakings  were  made 
hourly  as  methods  required;  and  until  the  acid  extracts  were  fully  prepared,  the 
only  possible  variation  from  the  official  rulings  was  that  especial  care  was  taken 
to  see  that  filtrations  were  clear.  If  the  filtrates  were  at  all  cloudy  the  solution 
was  poured  back  through  the  filters  time  and  time  again,  until  the  filtrate  was 
absolutely  clear,  as  far  as  the  eye  could  determine. 

Phosphorus  was  determined  in  the  acid  extract  thus  prepared  and  compared 
with  the  results  of  the  determinations  ^made  by  the  Method  of  Goss,  as  given  in 
Wiley’s  Principles  of  Agricultural  Analysis,  Vol.  T.  The  Method  of  Goss,  even 
when  modified,  as  published  by  Noyes  in  the  .Tournal  of  the  Association  of  Official 
Agricultural  Chemists,  May,  1917,  gives  results  slightly  higher  than  those  obtained 
in  the  acid  extract.  This  is  also  true  when  the  modification  is  applied  in  determining 
the  phosphorus  in  the  acid  extract.  The  Method  of  Goss  was  used  with  modification 
referred  to  for  determining  the  phosphorus  present. 

The  method  used  for  determining  humus  was  the  “official  method”  as  modified 
by  Smith,  and  published  in  the  Journal  of  Industrial  and  Engineering  Chemistry, 
December,  1913.  In  soils  that  contain  large  amounts  of  very  fine  silt  and  clay,  it  is 
necessary  to  have  clean,  clear  filtrates  if  determinations  are  to  be  even  comparable. 

Iron  was  determined  by  treating  an  aliquot  of  the  acid  extract  with  sulfuric 
acid,  and  evaporating  off  the  hydrochloric  acid.  The  procedure  published  in  the 
laboratory  directions  of  the  Yale  Sheffield  Scientific  Schools  was  followed  from^  this 
point: — reduce  with  hydrogen  sulphide,  boil  off  excess  hydrogen  sulphide,  cool,  dilute, 
and  titrate  with  N/10  potassium  permanganate 


28 


Table  XII. — Chemical  Analysis  of  Laurel  SoiL 


Substances  determined 

Re- 

ported 

as 

Surface  soil 

0-9  inches 
per  cent. 

Subsoil 

9-18  inches 
per  cent. 

Insoluble  matter  and 
soluble  Si02  _ _ __ 

86.21 

83.17 

3.89" 

1.94" 

0.33 

undetermined 

0.58 

0.26 

Volatile  matter 

4.62 

Hvgroseopie  water 

1.48" 

Potassium 

K 

0.24 

Sodium 

Na 

undetermined 

Paleium 

Ca 

0.38 

Mag-nesinm 

Mg 

Mn 

0.35 

Manganese 

0.06 

0 01 

Iron 

Pe 

2.18 

2.77 

2.47 

Aluminum 

A1 

1.57 

Phosphorus 

P 

0.079" 

0.12 

Sulphur 

S 

0.03 

0.03 

ISTi  tro  geu 

N 

0.15" 

0.10 

Humus 

1.25" 

0.76" 

Acidity^ 

0.0127" 

1 Based  on  air-dry  soil 

2 Average  of  determinations  from  all  sampling  stations 

3 Acidity  expressed  as  units  of  CaCOs  necessary  to  neutralize  100  units  of  soil 

interesting  thing  in  this  connection  was  the  discovery  in  some  places 
of  an  acid  soil  in  close  proximity  to  limestone  fragments. 

SOIL  MOISTURE 

Having  nO'  apparatus  by  which  the  moisture  content  of  the  soil 
can  be  recorded  continuously,  the  moisture  determinations  indicate 
the  moisture  present  at  specific  times.  One  has  no  right  to  assume 
that  the  change  in  moisture  between  two  dates  of  sampling  can  be 
graphed  by  a straight  line  between  those  dates.  Variations  in  the 
manner  of  and  the  intervals  between  precipitations  in  the  humid 
regions  may  be  so  great  that  soil  moisture  determinations  at  some 
periods  or  the  average  moisture  for  the  season  are  meaningless.  It 
is  the  progressive  changes  that  occur,  where  different  systems  of 
soil  management  are  practiced,  that  are  important.  It  is  conceiv- 
able that  a certain  system  of  soil  management  might  be  beneficial  to 
the  tree  for  a particular  year,  while  it  might  be  detrimental  if  prac- 
ticed in  another  season  or  for  a longer  time. 

The  effect  of  the  various  systems  of  soil  management  on  the 
soil  moisture  at  Laurel  cannot  be  directly  applied  in  the  abstract  to 
the  humid  region  in  general.  Of  very  great  importance  in  the  in- 
terpretation of  results  is  the  type  of  soil  on  which  an  investigation 
is  carried  out.  The  soils  through  which  water  can  percolate  rapidly 
may  give  entirely  different  results,  in  the  same  locality,  from  a soil 
like  that  at  Laurel  where  the  water  percolates  very  slowly. 

1 Noyes,  H.  A.,  “Study  of  Soil  Containing  Residual  Limestone.”  The  Journal  of 
The  Association  of  Official  Agricultural  Chemists,  Vol.  Ill,  No.  1 


29 


The  present  report  is  based  on  the  moisture  content  of  the  sur- 
face nine  inches  of  soild  Samples  for  all  soil  studies  have  been 
taken  at  this,  rather  than  a shallower  depth,  so  as  to  be  sure  and 
obtain  all  the  soil  that  has  been  subject  to  changes  by  plowing. 
(Depth  of  plowing  has  averaged  about  seven  inches.)  This  depth 
would  also  be  more  representative  from  the  standpoint  of  the  tree. 

There  is  considerable  lack  of  uniformity  among  investigators 
in  reporting  soil  moisture.  Two  methods  of  expressing  this  are  com- 
monly adopted,  namely:  i.  The  moisture  content  is  reported  as  a cer- 
tain per  cent,  of  the  weight  of  the  soil  as  it  comes  from  the  field. 
2.  The  moisture  is  reported  as  a certain  per  cent,  of  the  oven-dry 
soil,  or  on  the  dry  basis.  The  former  method  has  been  adhered  to  in 
this  publication  and  the  figures  represent  that  part  of  the  weight  of 
the  soil  sample  taken  for  analysis,  which  is  lost  on  drying  the 
sample  at  lOO  degrees  C.  In  all  cases  in  this  publication,  per  cent, 
means  parts  in  a hundred  and  not  with  a hundred. 

In  Table  XIII,  there  is  given  a review  of  the  soil  moisture  de- 
terminations during  the  five-year  period.  From  the  samples  taken, 
the  soil  on  all  plots  seems  to  be  plentifully  supplied  with  moisture  in 
the  spring  and  fall  in  all  of  the  five  years  and  three  out  of  the  five 
years  (1912,  1915  and  1916)  this  condition  seemed  to  hold  through- 
out the  season.  However,  the  moisture  is  not  known  on  a sufficient 
number  of  dates  to  speak  without  reservation  on  the  last  point.  On 
the  dates  that  are  known,  the  moisture  during  these  years  has  not 
been  so  depleted  as  to  be  significantly  low  from  the  standpoint  of 
the  tree. 

The  precipitation  data  show  (see  Table  IV)  that  the  rainfall, 
at  least  in  1915  and  1916,  during  May,  June  and  July  was  suffi- 
ciently ample  so  that  the  soil  moisture  was  probably  not  depleted  at 
any  time  much  below  that  given  in  the  table.  The  same  cannot  be 
said  of  the  season  of  1912.  It  appears  from  the  rainfall  of  that  year, 

1 Three  borings  were  made  and  mixed  together  on  an  oilcloth.  A part  of  this 
mixture  was  put  in  a glass  jar  which  was  immediately  sealed  and  taken  to  the 
laboratory.  Samples  were  not  taken  at  the  same  spot  each  time,  but  at  different 
points  in  a circle  about  the  tree.  The  increase  in  the  size  of  the  mulch  collar  de- 
termines the  increased  distance  from  the  tree.  A departure  was  made  from  the 
method  of  the  Association  of  Official  Agricultural  Chemists  for  moisture  determin- 
ations, because  it  has  been  necessary  to  make  an  immense  number  of  determina- 
tions with  dispatch  and  a fair  degree  of  accuracy.  First,  however,  a test  was  made 
to  find  out  how  small  a sample  of  soil  could  be  taken  directly  from  the  jars  and 
give  moisture  results  that  checked  inside  of  0.1  per  cent.  The  procedure  followed 
in  this  test  was  as  follows:  aluminum  and  porcelain  moisture  dishes  of  such  size, 
that  when  full  would  hold  about  30  grams  of  soil,  were  used.  The  dishes  were 
weighed  accurately  to  0.1  of  a milligram  and  the  weights  recorded.  A jar  of  soil, 
as  it  came  from  the  field  was  opened,  a spatula  inserted,  and  the  soil  mixed.  Any 
pieces  of  roots  or  limestone  particles  seen  were  picked  out.  Aliquots  of  soil  were 
transferred  from  the  jar  to  the  moisture  dishes  with  the  spatula.  The  aliquots 
used  were  2,  5,  7.5,  10,  15  and  20  grams  and  duplicate  aliquots  were  weighed  out. 
They  were  all  dried  in  an  oven  kept  at  100  degrees  C.,  and  the  loss  of  weight  de- 
termined. The  10,  15  and  20  gram  aliquots  checked  to  the  degree  desired,  while 
the  other  aliquots  gave  disagreeing  results  as  the  size  of  the  sample  decreased.  It 
was  decided  from  these  results  that  10  grams  of  this  soil  could  be  used  for  trust- 
worthy moisture  determinations  as  this  aliquot  of  field  soil  was  large  enough  so  that 
variations  in  the  proportions  of  the  different  soil  constituents,  that  might  be  in  dif- 
ferent aliquots,  was  overcome.  The  procedure  decided  upon  for  subsequent  deter- 
minations was  as  follows:  the  soil  as  it  came  from  the  field  was  mixed  with  a 
spatula.  Ten  gram  aliquots  were  weighed  out,  in  duplicate,  into  tared  moisture 
dishes,  dried  in  the  oven  kept  at  100  degrees  C.  for  three  hours  and  the  loss  of 
weight  determined.  All  moisture  results  were  reported  to  tenths  of  a per  cent.  This 
method  has  been  followed  in  making  all  soil  moisture  determinations 


Table  XIII. — Moisture  (total)  in  Soil 


Clean  culture 
cover  crop 

straw 
mulch, 
grass 
cut, 
let  lie 

Grass 
cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
piled 

Hill- 

side 

grass 

cut, 

piled 

Aver- 

age 

Varia- 

tion 

A 

B 

C 

D 

E 

F 

0 

H 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

1912 

May  30 

17.7 

16.9 

23.1 

18.3 

15.8 

18.3 

22.1 

18.9 

7.3 

July  23 

16.1 

14.5 

21.0 

16.0 

14.1 

15.9 

20.5 

16.9 

6.9 

Average 

16.9 

15.7 

22.1 

17.2 

15.0 

17.1 

21.3 

17.9 

7.1 

Variation 

1.6 

2.4 

2.1 

2.3 

1.7 

2.4 

1.6 

2.0 

0.8 

1913 

Apr.  29 

18.9 

19.1 

19.2 

19.6 

18.5 

19.5 

23.6 

19.8 

5.1 

June  17 

14.6 

15.0 

18.8 

7.2 

6.1 

6.5 

18.0 

12.3 

12.7 

Sep.  4 

14.0 

13.8 

15.6 

9.4 

9.4 

9.4 

15.7 

12.5 

6.3 

Nov.  25 

20.4 

20.1 

21.3 

21.2 

20.3 

20.2 

21.5^ 

20.9 

20.6 

1.2 

Average 

17.0 

17.0 

18.7 

14.4 

13.6 

13.9 

19.6 

16.3 

6.0 

Variation 

6.4 

6.3 

5.7 

14.0 

14.2 

13.7 

7.9 

9.7 

8.5 

1914 

May  6 

19.9 

19.8 

22.2 

21.6 

20.0 

21.0 

21.0 

20.5 

20.8 

2.4 

June  17 

15.3 

15.0 

m] 

6.5 

6.1 

6.0 

10.4 

13.5 

11.3 

11.6 

Aug.  13 

11.4 

10.4 

10.9 

7.2 

7.1 

7.9 

8.1 

11.2 

9.3 

4.3 

Nov.  25 

14.3 

14.7 

18.6 

16.1 

15.9 

17.3 

15.6 

20.2 

16.6 

5.9 

Average 

15.2 

15.0 

17.3 

12.9 

r2.3 

13.1 

13.8 

16.4 

14.5 

5.0 

Variation 

8.5 

9.4 

11.3 

14.4 

13.9 

15.0 

12.9 

9.3 

11.8 

6.5 

1915 

Apr.  8 

18.5 

18.5 

21.8 

21.7 

'20.8 

21.3 

21.5 

21.3 

20.7 

3.3 

Apr.  30 

17.5 

18.2 

21.6 

20.4 

20.0 

21.0 

20.6 

20.4 

20.7 

4.1 

June  10- 

17.3 

17.5 

20.7 

18.9 

17.3 

18.9 

19.4 

20.3 

18.8 

3.4 

July  14 

17.1 

16.2 

20.9 

20.7 

19.6 

20.8 

16.3 

19.6 

18.9 

4.7 

Aug.  18 

19.8 

18.2 

21.6 

22.3 

22.2 

21.5 

19.8 

20.6 

20.8 

4.1 

Sep.  14 

16.9 

16.4 

20.2 

20.1 

19.6 

20.3 

18.0 

19.7 

18.9 

3.9 

Nov.  26 

19.0 

19.0 

21.0 

20.4 

20.2 

21.0 

19.2 

21.2 

20.1 

2.2 

Average 

18.0 

17.9 

21.1 

20.6 

20.0 

20.9 

19.3 

20.4 

19.8 

32 

Variation 

2.9 

2.8 

1.6 

3.4 

4.9 

2.6 

5.2 

1.7 

3.1 

3.6 

1916 

May  9 

19.9 

19.5^ 

21.7 

21.9 

21.2 

21.5 

20.4 

21.2 

20.9 

2.0 

June  27 

16.4 

14.0 

20.8 

16.0 

14.7 

16.2 

14.7 

15.5 

16.0 

6.8 

July  31 

15.3 

10.6  ■ 

14.4 

12.9 

12.9 

13.5 

11.9 

13.6 

13.1 

2.5 

Aug.  19 

13.1 

8.4 

13.3 

13.9 

12.6 

14.0 

11.8 

13.2 

12.5 

56 

Average 

16.2 

13.1 

17.6 

16.2 

15.4 

16.3 

14.7 

15.9 

15.8 

4.5 

Vai'iation 

6.8 

11.1 

8.4 

9.0 

8.6 

8.0 

8.6 

8.0 

8.6 

4.3 

1 Plot  O not  in  experiment  until  1913 
- Plot  B seeded  to  grass — spring  191G 


31 


that  had  soil  moisture  samples  been 'taken  in  June  they  might  have 
shown  as  low  moisture  as  in  June,  1913. 

During  the  seasons  1913  and  1914  we  have  a positive  indication 
of  the  effects  of  different  soil  treatments  on  soil  moisture.  In  both 
of  these  seasons,  the  rainfall  during  the  active  growing  period  of 
the  trees  (May,  June  and  July)  was  considerably  below  the  five- 
year  average  for  those  months.  Inasmuch  as  the  cultural  practices 
are  conservation  measures,  preventing  the  loss  of  water  after  it 
enters  the  soil,  it  is  largely  in  such  dry  periods  that  the  value  of  cer- 
tain systems  of  management  in  conserving  soil  moisture  are  made 
manifest. 

In  both  of  these  years,  during  the  month  of  June,  the  upland 
plots  (D,  E and  F ) either  where  the  grass  was  cut  and  let  lie  or 
piled  about  the  trees,  were  low  in  soil  moisture.  Where  an  ade- 
quate mulch  was  maintained  (plots  A,  B,  C)  on  the  surface  of  the 
soil  either  through  the  agency  of  cultivation  or  a heavy  straw  cover- 
ing, the  percentage  of  moisture  was  more  than  twice  that  in  straight 
grass  land.  The  major  plots  thus  naturally  divide  themselves  into 
two  groups  as  regards  I'noisture,  and  the  difference  in  moisture  be- 
tween plots  in  either  group  is  not  significant. 

It  will  be  seen  by  referring  to  Table  I that  the  cutting  of  grass 
from  plots  E and  F was  very  light  and  the  mulch  consequently  in- 
adequate. It  frequently  happens  in  orchard  practice,  as  in  this  case, 
that  the  yield  of  grass  from  an  area  of  orchard  is  not  to  be  relied 
upon  to  mulch  the  trees  on  that  area  effectively.  If  a greater 
amount  of  hay  is  produced,  the  mulching  effect  is  more  satisfactory, 
as  shown  by  plot  H which  had  a good  sod  from  the  start.  How- 
ever, the  extra  mulch  may  not  be  entirely  responsible  for  this,  as 
there  are  other  slightly  different  conditions  on  plot  H,  not  the  re- 
sult of  soil  management  treatment. 

The  interesting  relation  is  between  the  moisture  content  of  the 
soil  and  tree  growth.  By  comparing  the  moisture  content  of  the 
soil  during  the  growing  season  of  the  trees  in  1913  and  1914  with 
the  growth  of  the  trees  as  shown  in  Fig.  4,  we  see  that  plots  low  in 
moisture  are  also  low  in  tree  growth.  Just  as  the  major  plots  in 
the  experiment  naturally  fall  into  two  groupings,  when  soil  moisture 
is  considered,  so  do  they  divide  themselves  as  to  free  growth. 

The  great  importance  of  water  in  the  growth  of  apple  trees  is 
further  emphasized  by  a study  of  the  precipitation  data  in  Table  IV. 
At  the  bottom  of  this  table,  the  rainfall  for  May,  June  and  July, 
of  each  year,  is  summarized.  It  is  during  this  period  that  the  sea- 
son’s growth  is  largely  determined.  There  is  a close  relation  be- 
tween the  precipitation  at  this  time  and  growth.  In  fact,  the  varia- 
tion in  growth  due  to  seasonal  moisture  conditions  appears  to  have 
been  quite  as  large  as  that  due  to  cultural  practices.  Furthermore, 
those  plots  lowest  in  soil  moisture  are  more  closely  correlated  with 
the  precipitation  than  those  having  a higher  moisture  content,  thus 
showing  the  greater  dependence  of  the  former,  upon  the  rainfall, 
as  might  well  be  expected.  An  exact  correlation,  however,  is  not 


32 


to  be  looked  for,  because  of  the  age  factor  introduced  in  comparing 
the  growth  of  one  year  with  another. 

The  moisture  data  accumulated  have  been  studied  from  various 
angles.  Some  attempt  has  been  made  to  interpret  moisture  data 
with  reference  to  rate  of  precipitation  at  various  times,  rate  of  per- 
colation, rate  and  amount  of  run  off,  capillary  rise  of  subsoil  mois- 
ture and  fluctuations  in  the  water  table.  It  is  felt  that  further  in- 
formation from  such  studies  may  throw  additional  light  on  the 
interpretation  of  moisture  conditions. 

The  question  arises  also,  as  to  whether  the  correlation  between 
tree  growth  and  moisture,  expresses  a simple  relation  between  the 
plant  and  its  moisture  supply,  or  whether  the  moisture  conditions 
induced  by  variations  in  soil  management  may  not  present  a com- 
plex of  environmental  factors  related  perhaps  to  humification,  bac- 
terial numbers  and  activities  in  the  soil,  the  combined  effect  of 
which  may  account  indirectly  for  the  apparent  reaction  of  tree  to 
moisture. 

It  is  quite  possible  that  the  moisture  data  reported  here  may 
also  need  to  be  reinterpreted  when  additional  information  has  been 
developed  on  the  factors  influencing  the  availability  of  moisture  to 
the  tree. 

SOIL  TEMPERATURES 

The  soil  temperature  work  has  been  carried  on  under  field  con- 
ditions at  a uniform  depth  of  nine  inches  on  all  plots,  i.  e.,  the 
same  depth  included  in  samples  taken  for  soil  analysis.  The 
thermometer  bulb  on  mulched  plots  was  planted  beneath  the  mulch 
collar,  about  a foot  from  its  outer  edge  and  on  other  plots,  at  an 
equivalent  distance  from  the  tree.  The  data  have  been  secured 
by  soil  thermographs  which  give  continuous,  automatic  records. 
Thus  the  actual  maximum  and  minimum  temperatures  are  ob- 
tained, and  not  so-called  extremes,  as  represented  by  morning  and 
evening  readings  of  thermometers. 

In  Figs.  10  and  ii,  the  maximum  and  minimum  temperatures 
are  given  respectively  by  weeks  under  clean  cultivation  with  cover 
crop,  straw  mulch  and  grass.  Maxima  and  minima  have  been  con- 
sidered preferable  to  averages  or  means  in  reporting  temperatures. 
The  extremes  which  are  very  significant  to  the  growing  plant  are 
often  entirely  hidden  when  averages  or  means  alone  are  reported. 
Clean  cultivation  with  cover  crop  and  the  straw  mulch  occupy  the 
extreme  positions  in  soil  temperature  behavior  that  have  been  here 
experienced.  If  these  two  plots  are  followed  through  their  temper- 
ature cycles  the  maximum  differences  that  have  been  induced  in 
the  temperature  of  the  soil  by  the  cultural  methods  will  have  been 
observed.  The  curves  for  the  other  plots  lie  in  general  between 
these  two  extreme  plots.  Such  a condition  is  expressed  by  the 
green  line,  in  the  figures  representing  the  plot  where  the  grass  is  cut 


33 


and  let  lie  where  it  falls.  The  grass  mulched  plots  have  not  been 
shown  graphically  (See  Table  XIV),  because  they  follow  very 

closely  the  temperature  line  made 
by  the  straw  mulch  plot. 

The  air  temperatures  and  pre- 
cipitation have  been  included  in 
Figs.  lo  and  ii  for  purposes  of 
ready  comparison  with  soil  tem- 
peratures. The  striking  corre- 
lation between  the  temperature 
of  the  air  and  that  of  the  soil  is 
apparent  at  a glance.  The  air 
temperature  is  the  most  potent 
factor  in  influencing  the  temper- 
ature of  the  soil.  There  is  no 
indication  that  the  single  factor 
of  soil  moisture  has  had  an  in- 
fluential bearing  upon  the  tem- 
perature of  the  soil  under  ordi- 
nary field  conditions.  So  far  as 
the  rainfall  is  concerned,  there 
seems  to  be  a relation  only  in  so 
far  as  excessive  moisture  condi- 
tions are  generally  a presage  of 
lower  air  temperatures,  which  in 
turn  affect  the  temperature  of 

Fig.  9.  Soil  thermograph  in  shelter  Soil. 

house.  By  means  of  these  instruments, 

continuous  records  of  the  temperature  of  There  is  alsO  UO  evidence  tO 
the  soil  under  the  different  systems  of  , . , • ' 

management  were  obtained  SUpport  the  popular  OpilllOn  tfiat 

rains  warm  the  soil.  If  the  rain  water  happens  to  be  appreciably 
warmer  than  the  soil  at  the  time,  which  is  very  seldom  the  case  even 
in  the  spring,  the  result  is  to  warm  the  soil.  However,  a warm, 
sunny  day  would  be  even  more  influential  in  this  respect.  The  re- 
sult of  a summer  rain  is  almost  invariably  to  lower  the  temperature 
of  the  soil  because  the  rain  water  is  colder  than  the  soil  at  this  time 
and  the  cloudy  weather  coincident  with  the  rain,  reduces  the  absorp- 
tion of  heat.  Greater  evaporation  after  a rain  would  further  tend  to 
lower  soil  temperature.  The  immediate  effect  of  a heavy  rain  is  a 
tendency  to  bring  the  temperature  of  the  soil  to  that  of  the  rain  wat- 
er, resulting  in  almost  the  complete  disappearance  of  variations  be- 
tween plots.  This  effect  is  practically  limited  to  the  time  the  rain  falls. 
The  three  thermograph  charts  shown  in  Fig.  12  illustrate  this  point. 
They  comprise  clean  cultivation  with  cover  crop,  straw  mulch  and 
grass  for  the  week  ending  August  23,  1915.  Note  the  straightening  of 
the  temperature  curve  under  clean  culture  cover  crop,  on  Friday  and 
Saturday  when  1.63  inches  of  rain  fell.  The  straw  mulch  already 
having  a low  temperature,  made  little  response. 


34 


It  has  not  been  the  purpose  to  investigate  the  many  complex 
factors  that  influence  the  temperature  of  the  soil,  but  rather  to 
ascertain  the  degree  to  which  changes  in  soil  temperatures  might 
be  induced  by  cultural  practices  and  the  efifect  of  such  changes  upon 
the  apple  tree.  Attention  has  been  called  to  the  dependence  of  soil 
temperature  upon  the  temperature  of  the  air,  to  emphasize  the  fact 
that  probably  the  most  influential  factor  in  governing  soil  tempera- 
ture is  one  beyond  our  control. 

It  will  be  noted,  however,  that  once  the  soil  has  reached  the 
neighborhood  of  the  freezing  point,  there  is  a very  reluctant  and  re- 
duced response  to  a further  lowering  of  the  air  temperature.  This 
was  due  in  some  few  cases  to  snow.  The  protecting  effect  of  snow 
will  be  noted  especially  during  the  winter  of  1914-1915,  when  the 
ground  was  covered  during  the  greater  part  of  December  and  Jan- 
uary. Although  the  air  temperature  reached  a lower  point  that 
winter  than  at  any  other  time  during  the  period  shown,  the  mini- 
mum soil  temperature  on  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plot  was 
actually  the  highest  of  any  winter ; that  snow  is  not  the  only 
factor  responsible  for  the  smaller  range  in  soil  temperature  during 
the  winter  is  quite  evident.  Undoubtedly  the  latent  heat  of  ice, 
and  the  fact  that  no  absorption  of  heat  is  taking  place  in  winter, 
serve  to  keep  a more  constant  soil  temperature. 

As  shown  in  Figs.  10  and  ii,  the  most  that  soil  temperatures 
have  been  influenced  by  cultural  practices  has  been  seven  degrees  in 
minimum  and  ii  degrees  in  maximum  temperature.  The  extreme 
variations  between  plots  have  always  occurred  about  midsummer 
and  are  very  small  in  late  fall  and  winter.  A straw  mulch  tends  to 
keep  the  soil  a few  degrees  warmer  in  winter  than  clean  culture 
cover  crop  and  much  cooler  in  summer.  The  same  thing  is  true  of 
a grass  mulch,  although  not  so  marked  in  this  case  because  of  less 
mulching  material.  Under  ordinary  meadow  conditions,  where  the 
grass  is  cut  and  let  lie  where  it  falls,  the  sod  has  a warming  effect 
in  winter  and  a cooling  effect  in  summer,  as  compared  to  clean 
cultivation,  although  this  effect  is  not  so  great  as  in  the  case  of  grass 
mulch.  The  result,  therefore,  is  to  give  clean  cultivation  with 
cover  crop  the  greatest  range ; grass  cut,  next ; then  grass  mulch 
and  least  range  of  all,  the  straw  mulch.  The  range  of  variation 
varies  inversely  with  the  quantity  of  organic  mulch  material  pro- 
vided. It  should  be  remembered  in  connection  with  the  temperature 
of  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plot,  that  that  plot  was  covered  with  a 
growing  crop  of  rye  from  about  September  4 to  May  17  of  each 
season,  which  would  tend  to  make  the  temperature  more  moderate 
than  if  the  ground  had  been  left  bare. 

In  considering  the  diurnal  progress  of  soil  temperatures  during 
the  different  seasons  of  the  year  it  has  been  found^  that  in  winter 

1 Oekamp,  J.,  “Soil  Temperatures  as  Influenced  by  Cultural  Methods.”  Journal 
of  Agricultural  Research,  Vol.  V,  No.  4 


iWl 


rig:ur< 


Figrure  10 


Figure  11 


SATURDAY. 


35 


of  tM;  :^"t'he"fempVrSo"'  " »"  ‘-f  tom, .era, pro 

temperature  between  plot,  „„  Friday  and  SaturdarXeii  Fc7  i“ts  of  ram^eT"""^ 


36 


Tabi^e:  XIV. — Soil  Temperatures  Under  Different  Systems 
of  Management — 1913  to  1916 


1913 


1914 


Month 

Week 

Clean 
culture 
cover  crop 

Straw 
mulch 
grass  cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
let  lie 

Clean 
culture 
cover  crop 

Straw 
mulch 
grass  cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
let  lie 

de- 

grees 

F 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

January 

1 

35.0 

36.0 

37.5 

38.5 

36.0 

37.0 

2 

34.0 

35.0 

36.0 

39.0 

35.5 

37.0 

3 

33.0 

34.0 

34.0 

36.0 

33.5 

36.5 

4 

33.0 

37.0 

36.0 

38.0 

33.0 

36.5 

Tebruary 

1 

34.0 

46.5 

37.0 

41.5 

35.0 

44.0 

2 

34.0 

40.0 

35.0 

39.0 

35.0 

39.5 

3 

33.0 

34.0 

34.0 

35.0 

34.0 

36.0 

4 

32.0 

33.0 

32.5 

35.0 

32.5 

35.0 

March 

1 

31.0 

33.0 

33.0 

34.0 

32.0 

35.0 

2 

31.0 

32.0 

33.0 

34.0 

32.0 

34.0 

3 

30.0 

32.5 

33.0 

33.5 

31.0 

34.0 

4 

31.0 

34.0 

33.0 

34.0 

33.0 

34.0 

5 

33.0 

50.0 

33.0 

37.0 

32.0 

46.0 

April 

1 

41.0 

51.0 

37.5 

42.0 

40.0 

48.0 

2 

38.0 

46.0 

38.0 

43.0 

37.5 

44.0 

3 

42.5 

55.5 

40.0 

48.0 

41.0 

53.0 

4 

44.0 

61.5 

44.5 

49.5 

44.0 

57.0 

May 

1 

45.0 

58.5 

47.0 

53.0 

44.5 

57.5 

51.5 

66.0 

49.0 

51.5 

50.5 

61.0 

2 

53.0 

60.0 

50.0 

53.0 

48.5 

59.0 

52.5 

63.0 

51.0 

52.5 

52.0 

58.5 

3 

53.0 

63.0  . 

50.0 

56.0 

49.0 

62.0 

52.5 

64.0 

51.0 

54.5 

53.0 

60.5 

4 

54.0 

63.0 

55.0 

57.0 

53.0 

62.5 

56.0 

67.0 

52.0 

55.0 

54.0 

62.0 

June 

1 

54.5 

66.5 

56.0 

60.0 

53.5 

66.0 

64.0 

74.0 

56.0 

59.5 

60.5 

67.0 

2 

60.0 

69.0 

58.5 

61.5 

58.0 

67.0 

65.5 

73.5 

58.0 

62.0 

60.5 

69.0 

3 

58.5 

68.0 

57.0 

60.0 

57.0 

69.0 

70.0 

77.0 

63.0 

65.0 

65.0 

71.0 

4 

67.0 

74.0 

60.0 

65.0 

66.0 

74.0 

67.0 

74.0 

60.5 

64.0 

63.5 

70.0 

5 

67.5 

78.0 

64.0 

70.0 

65.0 

76.5 

68.0 

79.0 

64.0 

67.0 

67.5 

73.5 

July 

1 

73.0 

80.5 

68.0 

71.0 

70.0 

78.5 

72.0 

2 

69.0 

77.5 

67.0 

69.0 

67.5 

76.0 

65.0 

75.5 

63.0 

65.0 

63.5 

3 

69.0 

77.5 

68.0 

71.0 

70.0 

80.0 

64.0 

67.5 

68.0 

76.0 

4 

67!o 

76.0 

66.0 

68.5 

68.0 

78.0 

66.0 

68.0 

67.0 

75.0 

5 

70.0 

80.0 

66.0 

69.0 

68.0 

77.0 

August 

1 

72.0 

80.0 

68.0 

70.0 

69.0 

76.0 

71.0 

79.0 

65.0 

70.0 

68.0 

74.0 

2 

70.0 

77.5 

66.0 

70.0 

67.0 

74.5 

72.0 

78.0 

65.0 

67.5 

69.0 

74.0 

3 

71.0 

78.0 

70.0 

72.0 

68.0 

74.0 

70.0 

77.5 

65.0 

68.5 

67.0 

73.5 

4 

66.0 

77.0 

68.0 

72.0 

64.0 

73.5 

70.0 

80.0 

66.0 

68.5 

68.0 

75.5 

5 

66.5 

74.5 

65.0 

68.0 

65.0 

71.0 

September 

1 

66.0 

73.0 

66.0 

69.0 

62.5 

68.5 

64.0 

74.5 

64.0 

67.5 

63.0 

. 70.0 

2 

68.0 

76.5 

66.0 

70.0 

64.0 

69.5 

59.5 

72.0 

61.5 

66.0 

60.0 

67.5 

3 

59.0 

75.0 

62.0 

69.0 

57.5 

69.0 

61.5 

73.5 

61.5 

64.0 

60.0 

66.0 

4 

55.5 

66.0 

61.0 

64.5 

55.5 

62.5 

57.0 

74.0 

59.0 

65.0 

56.0 

66.5 

5 

51.0 

61.0 

57.5 

61.0 

51.0 

57.0 

October 

1 

55.0 

63.0 

58.0 

61.0 

52.5 

59.5 

58.0 

64.5 

58.0 

60.0 

55.0 

60.0 

2 

54.0 

65.0 

57.0 

61.5 

52.0 

60.0 

59.0 

67.5 

60.0 

62.5 

58.0 

62.5 

3 

50.0 

59.0 

51.5 

58.5 

49.0 

56.0 

56.0 

60.0 

58.0 

60.0 

56.0 

58.0 

4 

43.5 

51.0 

50.0 

54.0 

43.0 

47.0 

53.0 

60.0 

51.0 

56.0 

54.0 

56.5 

November 

1 

41.5 

47.0 

45.0 

57.5 

56.0 

58.0 

46.0 

53.0 

2 

41.0 

48.0 

45.0 

48.0 

39.0 

49.0 

45.0 

53.0 

51.0 

52.5 

47.0 

51.0 

3 

37.0 

48.5 

42.0 

47.0 

45.0 

54.0 

43.0 

52.0 

48.5 

52.0 

44.0 

50.0 

4 

45.0 

56.0 

46.0 

51.5 

34.0 

46.0 

40.0 

50.0 

37.0 

47.0 

5 

33.0 

45.0 

41.0 

45.0 

35.0 

44.0 

December 

1 

43.0 

52.5 

47.0 

51.0 

43.5 

51.5 

43.0 

50.5 

45.5 

47.5 

44.0 

47.5 

2 

43.0 

53.0 

46.5 

51.0 

44.0 

52.0 

37.0 

43.0 

43.0 

46.0 

40.0 

44.0 

3 

36.0 

42.0 

41.0 

47.0 

36.5 

44.5 

34.5 

37.0 

38.0 

43.0 

35.5 

41.0 

4 

36.0 

41.0 

39.5 

42.5 

36.5 

41.0 

34.0 

35.0 

36.0 

38.5 

34.5 

36.5 

5 

36.0 

37.0 

38.0 

40.0 

36.5 

37.0 



37 


Table:  XIV. — Soil  Temperatures  Under  Different  Systems 
of  Management — 1913  to  1916  (continued) 


1915 


Month 

Week 

Clean 
culture 
cover  crop 

Straw  mulch 
grass  cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
piled 

Hillside 
grass  cut, 
piled 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

January 

1 

32.0 

33.5 

35.0 

37.0 

35.0 

37.0 

34.0 

36.0 

35.0 

35.5 

2 

31.0 

32.0 

34.0 

36.0 

32.5 

35.0 

34.0 

36.0 

33.5 

35.0 

3 

31.0 

32.0 

35.0 

36.0 

33.0 

34.0 

34.0 

35.5 

34.0 

35.0 

4 

32.0 

33.0 

35.0 

36.5 

33.5 

35.5 

35.0 

37.0 

35.0 

35.5 

February 

1 

33.0 

34.0 

35.0 

36.0 

33.0 

35.0 

34.0 

37.0 

33.0 

35.0 

2 

33.0 

.^.0- 

35.0 

37.0 

33.0 

35.0 

34.0 

35.0 

32.5 

35.0 

3 

32.0 

45.0 

35.0 

39.0 

32.5 

38.5 

33.5 

37.5 

33.0 

38.5 

4 

35.0 

40.0 

36.0 

38.5 

33.0 

38.0 

34.0 

37.0 

35.0 

38.0 

March 

1 

35.0 

47.0 

36.0 

40.0 

35.0 

41.0 

36.0 

41.0 

36.0 

40.0 

2 

34.0 

37.0 

36.0 

37.0 

33.0 

35.0 

35.0 

37.0 

34.0 

36.0 

3 

35.0 

41.5 

36.0 

37.0 

33.5 

36.5 

35.0 

37.0 

34.5 

36.0 

4 

36.0 

40.0 

37.0 

38.0 

35.0 

37.0 

35.5 

38.0 

35.5 

36.5 

5 

35.0 

41.0 

36.5 

38.0 

35.0 

38.0 

36.0 

38.5 

35.5 

37.5 

April 

1 

35.0 

42.0 

35.0 

37.0 

34.0 

38.0 

35.5 

38.0 

35.0 

37.0 

2 

40.0 

52.5 

38.0 

45.0 

37.0 

47.5 

37.0 

47.0 

37.0 

44.0 

3 

44.0 

55.0 

42.0 

45.0 

42.5 

48.0 

43.0 

47.0 

42.0 

45.0 

4 

50.0 

66.0 

45.0 

53.0 

46.0 

58.0 

45.0 

56.0 

44.5 

53.0 

May 

1 

57.0 

67.0 

52.0 

55.0 

53.0 

59.0 

52.5 

57.5 

50.0 

54.0 

2 

50.0 

64.0 

51.5 

54.0 

52.0 

57.0 

52.5 

55.5 

50.0 

52.5 

3 

50.0 

65.5 

51.0 

56.0 

52.0 

60.0 

52.0 

58.0 

50.0 

54.5 

4 

54.0 

63.0 

51.5 

55.0 

52.0 

58.0 

52.0 

57.0 

50.0 

54.0 

5 

55.5 

63.5 

55.0 

56.0 

55.0 

59.0 

55.0 

59.0 

54.0 

56.0 

June 

1 

58.0 

68.5 

56.0* 

59.0 

57.0 

62.5 

57.0 

62.0 

55.0 

59.0 

2 

60.0 

71.0 

57.0 

60.0 

58.5 

65.5 

58.5 

64.0 

56.0 

60.0 

3 

63.0 

70.5 

60.0 

62.0 

62.0 

65.5 

61.5 

65.0 

58.5 

61.0 

4 

62.0 

72.0 

60.0 

62.5 

62.0 

66.0 

61.0 

65.0 

59.0 

61.5 

July 

1 

62.0 

74.0 

62.0 

64.0 

62.0 

66.0 

63.0 

64.5 

60.0 

62.0 

2 

61.0 

71.0 

61.0 

64.0 

61.5 

66.5 

62.0 

65.0 

59.5 

62.5 

3 

68.0 

80.0 

64.0 

67.5 

66.0 

71.0 

64.5 

69.5 

63.0 

66.0 

4 

67.0 

77.0 

64.0 

67.5 

64.5 

71.0 

65.0 

70.0 

62.0 

66.5 

August 

1 

71.0 

80.0 

65.0 

69.0 

66.0 

71.0 

66.0 

71.0 

63.0 

67.0 

2 

64.0 

79.0 

65.0 

69.0 

65.0 

71.0 

65.5 

71.0 

63.5 

67.5 

3 

65.5 

75.0 

65.0 

66.0 

65.0 

68.0 

66.0 

68.0 

64.0 

65.0 

4 

61.0 

76.5 

64.0 

66.5 

63.0 

68.0 

64.0 

68.0 

62.5 

65.5 

5 

62.0 

71.0 

62.0 

64.5 

62.0 

65.0 

63.0 

66.0 

61.0 

63.0 

September 

1 

57.0 

70.0 

60.0 

63.0 

58.5 

63.5 

60.0 

64.0 

59.0 

61.5 

2 

62.0 

75.0 

63.0 

66.5 

61.5 

67.0 

63.0 

67.5 

61.0 

65.0 

3 

68.0 

76.0 

66.0 

67.0 

66.0 

68.0 

67.0 

68.5 

65.0 

66.0 

4 

56.0 

70.0 

61.0 

67.0 

57.0 

66.0 

60.0 

68.0 

59.0 

65.0 

October 

1 

54.5 

63.0 

59.0 

62.0 

56.5 

61.0 

58.5 

63.0 

57.5 

60.0 

2 

45.5 

65.0 

53.0 

61.0 

49.5 

60.5 

52.5 

62.0 

52.0 

59.0 

3 

47.0 

62.0 

54.0 

58.0 

50.0 

57.0 

53.0 

59.0 

52.0 

57.0 

4 

50.5 

61.0 

55.0 

59.0 

52.0 

58.0 

54.5 

59.0 

53.0 

57.0 

November 

1 

47.0 

54.5 

53.0 

56.0 

48.0 

53.0 

52.0 

56.0 

51.0 

53.5 

2 

46.0 

55.0 

52.0 

55.0 

47.0 

51.5 

50.5 

55.0 

50.0 

52.5 

3 

42.5 

55.5 

50.0 

54.0 

46.0 

52.0 

50.0 

54.5 

47.5 

52.0 

4 

38.0 

43.5 

45.0 

50.0 

41.5 

46.5 

45.0 

50.0 

43.5 

47.5 

5 

38.0 

48.0 

45.0 

47.5 

40.0 

45.0 

43.0 

47.0 

43.0 

45.0 

December 

1 

35.0 

39.0 

41.0 

46.0 

37.0 

43.0 

40.5 

46.0 

39.5 

43.0 

2 

34.5 

35.0 

40.0 

41.5 

36.0 

38.0 

39.0 

41.0 

38.0 

39.5 

3 

32.5 

34.5 

38.0 

40.5 

34.0 

37.0 

36.0 

40.0 

36.0 

38.0 

■ 

4 

32.5 

33.5 

38.0 

39.0 

34.0 

35.5 

36.0 

38.5 

35.0 

36.5 

Table  XIV. — Soil  Temperatures  Under  Different  Systems 
of  Management — 1913  to  1916  (continued) 


1916 


Month 

Week 

Clean 
culture 
cover  crop 

Straw  mulch 
grass  cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
piled 

Hillside 
grass  cut, 
piled 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min . 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

min. 

de- 

grees 

F. 

max. 

January 

1 

33.0 

43.5 

38.0 

41.0 

35.0 

41.0 

37.5 

42.0 

40.0 

36.0 

2 

33.0 

41.0 

37.0 

40.0 

34.0 

39.0 

37.0 

41.0 

3 

32.0 

42.0 

36.0 

41.0 

34.0 

40.0 

37.0 

41.5 

4 

28. 5 

32.5 

35.0 

36.0 

32.0 

35.5 

5 

31.0 

47.5 

35.5 

44.5 

32.0 

43.0 

44.5 

33.0 

Fe  or nary 

1. 

33.0 

47.5 

36.0 

45.0 

34.0 

' 43.0 

36.0 

44.0 

45.0 

35.0 

*7 

32.0 

33.5 

35.0 

36.5 

32.0 

35.0 

35.0 

38.0 

35.0 

33.5 

3 

32.0 

33.0 

35.0 

35.5 

32.0 

34.5 

33.0 

36.0 

35.0 

33.0 

4 

32.5 

40.0 

35.0 

36.5 

32.0 

34.0 

34.0 

36.5 

36.0 

33.5 

March 

1 

32.0 

34.0 

35.0 

36.0 

32.0 

34.0 

34.0 

36.0 

34.5 

33.0 

2 

31.5 

40.5 

35.0 

38.0 

32.0 

35.0 

34.0 

36.0 

36.0 

33.0 

3 

33.0 

45.5 

35.0 

37.0 

32.0 

36.0 

34.0 

37.5 

36.5 

33.0 

4 

34.0 

53.0 

35.0 

43.0 

32.5 

45.0 

34.0 

43.5 

42.5 

33.5 

April 

1 

41.0 

52.0 

41.0 

43.0 

40.0 

44.5 

41.0 

43.5 

42.0 

40.0 

2 

35.5 

49.0 

39.5 

43.0 

37.0 

43.0 

39.5 

43.5 

42.0 

37.5 

3 

35.0 

57.0 

40.0 

47.0 

36.0 

48.0 

38.5 

47.5- 

46.0 

37.0 

A 

44.0 

56.0 

46.0 

50.0 

45.0 

50.5 

45.0 

50.0 

50.0 

43.5 

May 

1 

46.5 

60.0 

46.5 

49.0 

45-5 

50.5 

46.0 

49.0 

47.5 

45.0 

2 

49.0 

68.0 

49.0 

53.0 

48.0 

56.0 

49.0 

54.0 

51.5 

47.0 

3 

54.0 

67.5 

51.5 

53.5 

53.0 

57.0 

53.0 

55.0 

52.0 

.50.0 

4 

51.0 

64.0 

51.0 

54.0 

51.0 

58.0 

51.0 

56.0 

53.0 

48.0 

5 

58.5 

76.5 

52.0 

57.5 

54.0 

63.5 

53.0 

60.0 

57.0 

50.0 

June 

1 

57.0 

58.0 

59.0 

62.0 

58.0 

60.5 

57.5 

55.0 

2 

57.0 

58.5 

58.0 

62.0 

57.0 

60.0 

56.0 

54.0 

3 

57.0 

59.0 

59.0 

62.0 

58.0 

60.0 

57.0 

54.5 

4 

58.0 

60.0 

59.0 

64.0 

59.0 

62.0 

58.0 

56.0 

July  • 

1 

60.0 

64.0 

62.0 

67.0 

61.0 

65.0 

61.0 

57.0 

2 

62.0 

63.5 

63.0 

67.5 

63.0 

65.5 

61.5 

59.0 

3 

4 

70.5 

78.0 

67.0 

69.0 

68.5 

73.0 

68.5 

72.0 

71.0 

69.0 

5 

72.0 

78.5 

67.0 

70.0 

68.5 

73.0 

69.0 

73.0 

73.0 

69.0 

August 

1 

70.5 

78.5 

68.0 

71.0 

69.0 

73.5 

69.0 

73.5 

74.5 

71.0 

2 

67.0 

80.0 

68.0 

71.5 

68.0 

74.0 

69.0 

74.0 

75.0 

71.0 

3 

67.0 

77.0 

68.0 

70.5 

67.5 

72.0 

68.0 

71.0 

71.5 

70.0 

4 

66.0 

78.0 

66.0 

71.0 

66.0 

72.5 

67.0 

72.5 

72.5 

69.0 

September 

1 

62.5 

69.5 

64.0 

66.0 

62.0 

67.0 

62.5 

67.0 

68.5 

65.0 

2 

63.0 

72.0 

64.0 

68.0 

62.5 

68.0 

63.0 

68.5 

68.5 

65.0 

3 

61.0 

71.5 

60.0 

66.5 

59.0 

66.5 

59.0 

67.0 

67.5 

62.5 

4 

58.0 

63.5 

58.0 

60.5 

56.0 

61.0 

57.0 

60.0 

62.0 

60.0 

October 

1 

51.0 

65.5 

56.0 

62.0 

53.0 

61.0 

54.0 

62.0 

62.5 

57.0 

2 

51.5 

62.0 

55.5 

60.0 

52.0 

58.0 

53.0 

59.0 

59.0 

56.0 

3 

50.0 

62.5 

53.0 

59.5 

51.0 

60.0 

52.5 

61.0 

62.5 

56.0 

4 

43.0 

54.5 

49.0 

55.5 

46.5 

55.0 

48.0 

56.0 

56.5 

51.0 

5 

44.0 

49.0 

49.0 

50.5 

47.0 

50.0 

51.0 

50.0 

November 

1 

44.5 

52.0 

'48.5 

51.0 

45.0 

50.0 

47.0 

51.0 

52.0 

50.0 

2 

44.5 

52.5 

49.0 

52.0 

45.0 

50.0 

47.0 

52.5 

52.0 

50.0 

3 

38.0 

47.0 

43.0 

48.0 

38.0 

46.5 

40.0 

49.0 

50.0 

43.0 

4 

37.0 

44.5 

41.0 

46.0 

37.5 

43.0 

41.0 

45.0 

46.0 

42.5 

December 

1 

37.0 

45.5 

41.0 

45.0 

37.5 

44.0 

40.0 

45.5 

45.5 

42.5 

2 

39.0 

46.5 

42.5 

46.5 

39.0 

45.0 

41.0 

46.5 

46.5 

43.0 

3 

35.0 

40.0 

37.0 

42.0 

35.0 

40.0 

37.0 

43.0 

44.0 

39.0 

4 

34.0 

35.5 

36.0 

37.0 

35.0 

37.0 

35.5 

38.0 

39.0 

38.0 

5 

33.0 

35.0 

35.0 

37.0 

33.5 

37.5 

34.5 

37.0 

38.0 

87.0 

39 


when  the  soil  is  near  the  freezing  point,  the  temperature  remains 
fairly  constant  on  all  plots  from  day  to  day  with  comparatively 
small  variation  between  plots  clean  culture  cover  crop,  exhib- 
iting the  lowest  and  mulch  the  highest  temperatures.  With  the 
coming  of  spring  and  the  rapid  rise  in  air  temperature,  the  clean  cul- 
ture cover  crop  plot  is  the  first  to  respond,  and  now  becomes  the 
warmest  plot.  This  plot  invariably  gives  the  quickest  and  greatest 
response  to  changes  in  air  temperature.  The  straw  mulch  plot  warms 
up  very  slowly  with  little  daily  fluctuations  and  never  reaches  a very 
high  maximum.  During  the  summer,  the  tided  plot  undergoes  the 
greatest  fluctuations ; the  grass  also  exhibits  wide  daily  changes, 
while  the  straw  mulch  maintains  its  narrow  range.  In  the  fall,  the 
diurnal  temperatures  exhibit  the  same  general  phenomena  as  in  the 
spring,  although  the  trend  of  course  is  downward  in  the  fall. 

As  to  the  role  of  soil  temperatures  in  tree  growth,  the  varia- 
tions in  temperature  that  have  been  induced  by  cultural  methods, 
are  neither  detrimental  nor  beneficial  to  growth,  so  far  as  we  can 
segregate  the  temperature  factor  from  other  factors.  The  two  best 
plots,  clean  cultivation  with  cover  crop  and  straw  mulch,  while  they 
stand  close  together  in  tree  growth,  yet  exhibit  the  extremes  in  soil 
temperature  behavior  as  here  experienced.  A cool  soil  tempera- 
ture during  the  growing  season  of  the  trees,  has  apparently  not  been 
inimical  to  tree  growth  under  the  conditions  of  this  experiment.  It 
may  be  suspected  from  the  behavior  of  the  trees  under  observa- 
tion, that  the  tolerance  of  the  apple  tree  for  variations  in  soil 
temperature  is  great  enough  to  make  the  variations  induced  by  dif- 
ferent systems  of  soil  management  of  no  direct  significance.  Varia- 
tions of  the  range  of  those  induced,  however,  may  have  an  indirect 
effect  through  their  influence  on  nitrification,  ammonification  and 
other  processes  connected  with  the  metabolism  of  soil  microorgan- 
isms. 

In  summing  up  the  results  of  the  soil  temperature  studies  it 
may  be  said;  i.  That  as  the  soil  temperature  is  largely  a reflection 
of  the  air  temperature,  the  extent  to  which  soil  temperature  can  be 
controlled  by  cultural  practices,  is  quite  limited.  2.  The  evidence 
does  not  support  the  opinion  sometimes  expressed  that  rains  are  an 
important  adjunct  in  warming  the  soil.  3.  There  is  no  indication 
that  the  single  factor  of  soil  moisture  has  had  an  influential  bearing 
upon  the  temperature  of  the  soil.  4.  Clean  culture  cover  crop  ex- 
hibited the  greatest  diurnal  and  annual  extremes  in  soil  tempera- 
tures. 5.  The  mulch  system  of  management,  either  straw  or  grass, 
maintained  the  most  uniform  temperature  throughout  the  year. 
6.  Sod,  in  general,  showed  a temperature  curve  intermediate  be- 
tween cultivation  and  mulch.  7.  The  role  of  soil  temperature  within 
the  limits  of  ordinary  cultural  practices  appears  to  be  a neutral  fac- 
tor in  tree  growth. 


40 


SOIL  CHANGES  INDUCED  BY  CULTURAL  PRACTICES 

Determinations^  of  the  four  factors  that  were  thought  would 
be  the  most  likely  to  undergo  changes  in  the  Laurel  soil,  as  the  re- 
sult of  different  cultural  treatments  are  given  in  Table  XV.  This 
covers  the  period  1910  to  1915,  and  the  determinations  for  1913 
show  the  midway  point. 

It  appears  that  the  cultural  treatments  are  having  an  effect  on 
the  organic  matter  content  of  the  soil.  Clean  cultivation  tends  to 
deplete  the  soil  of  its  organic  matter,  despite  the  fact  that  a cover 
crop  of  rye  is  being  turned  under  each  year.  Straw  mulch  has 
made  a slight  increase  in  organic  matter,  while  the  straight  sod  plots, 
as  a whole,  have  come  nearer  to  holding  their  own  in  volatile  mat- 
ter, humus  and  nitrogen,  than  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots. 

There  is  no  apparent  correlation  between  these  factors  and 
tree  growth.  True,  the  straw  mulch  plot  which  is  showing 


Table:  XV. — Changes  in  Laurel  Soil — 1910  to  1915 


Year 

Clean 
culture 
cover  crop 

Straw 
mulch 
grass 
cut, 
let  lie 

Grass 
cut, 
let  lie 

Grass  cut, 
piled 

Grass 

cut, 

piled 

Hill- 

side 

grass 

cut, 

piled 

Aver- 

age 

A 

B 

C 

D 

E 

E 

0 

H 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

cent. 

Hygroscopic 

1910 

1.06 

1.27 

1.31 

1.39 

1.24 

1.39 

1.77 

1.35 

moisture 

1913 

1.15 

1.10 

1.41 

1.38 

1.43 

1.39 

1.03 

1.66 

1.32 

1915 

1.20 

1.24 

1.36 

1.10 

1.25 

1.32 

1.08 

1.58 

1.27 

Volatile  matter 

1910 

4.35 

4.32 

4.29 

4.71 

4.54 

4.55 

6.24 

4.71 

1913 

3.88 

4.08 

4.44 

4.37 

4.38 

4.86 

4.23 

5.65 

4.49 

1915 

3.80 

3.64 

4.34 

4.60 

4.39 

4.75 

4.31 

5.74 

4.45 

Humus 

1910 

1.52 

1.52 

1.42 

1.78 

1.80 

1.85 

2.06 

1.71 

1913 

1.21 

1.31 

1.48 

1.48 

1.54 

1.38 

0.89 

1.68 

1.37 

1915 

1.25 

0.89 

1.34 

1.35 

1.29 

1.76 

1.25 

1.99 

1.39 

Total  nitrogen 

1910 

0.148 

0.134 

0.184 

0.148 

0.137 

0.146 

0.217 

0.152 

1913 

0.122 

0.136 

0.134 

0.135 

0.124 

0.137 

0.139 

0.167 

0.187 

1915 

0.108 

O.liOO 

0.142 

0.139 

0.134 

0.145 

0.129 

0.181 

0.135 

Subsoil  1913 

1.35 

Hygroscopic  H2O 

1.16 

1.18 

1.21 

1.33 

1.28 

1.58 

1.23 

1.81 

Volatile  matter 

3.54 

3.42 

4.45 

3.85 

3.85 

3.83 

3.51 

4.90 

3.92 

Humus 

0.45 

0.65 

1.32 

0.55 

0.80 

0.84 

0.78 

0.88 

0.78 

Total  nitrogen 

0.085 

0.067 

0.096 

0.077 

0.074 

0.079 

0.062 

0.107 

0.081 

1 Part  of  the  duplicate  samples  taken  in  1910  have  been  retained  in  the  labora- 
tory. They  represent  five-sixths  of  the  sampling  stations,  and  the  missing  samples 
are  practically  evenly  distributed  over  all  plots.  One  hundred  gram  portions  of  each 
sample  of  soil  taken  in  1910  were  taken,  and  put  with  100  gram  portions  of  all 
other  samples  taken  on  the  same  plot.  The  composite  samples  were  mixed  and 
analyzed  for  hygroscopic  moisture,  volatile  matter,  humus,  and  total  nitrogen. 
These  samples  were  representative  of  the  Laurel  soil  at  the  start  of  the  investiga- 
tion in  1910. 

One  hundred  gram  portions  of  the  1913  soil  and  subsoil  samples  were  taken 
from  those  samples,  corresponding  in  number  to  the  1910  samples.  These  were  put 
together  according  to  plots  and  composites  made.  The  same  determinations  were 
made  on  these  samples  as  were  made  on  the  1910  samples.  Again  in  1915  another 
set  of  aliquots  were  taken  from  corresponding  samples,  composited  according  to 
plots,  and  the  same  determinations  made 


some  accumulation  of  organic  matter  has  also  made  the  best  tree 
growth;  but  at  the  same  time  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots 
which  have  made  an  equally  good  tree  growth,  have  lost  in  organic 
matter. 

The  fact  that  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots  have  lost  in 
nitrogen  need  not  be  taken  to  mean  that  these  plots  are  low  in 
nitrates,  (see  Table  XXII) 

BACTERIOLOGICAL  STUDIES 

Attacking  thi:  Problem. — The  field  of  soil  biology  is  new ; 
there  is  at  the  present  time  no  definite  agreement  as  to  methods  of 
attack.  Investigators  are  applying  industrial  and  medical  technique 
with  varying  success.  For  these  reasons,  it  has  been  hard  to 
choose  methods  and  technique  for  investigating  the  bacteriological 
changes  in  the  Laurel  soil. 

The  Laurel  problem  is  a little  different  from  the  ordinary  soil 
problem,  in  that  the  orchard  is  located  about  120  miles  from  the 
laboratory.  Samples  have  to  be  transported.  The  soil  under  the 
various  systems  of  management  is  under  different  conditions  as  to 
temperature  and  soil  moisture.  Care  has  to  be  taken  subsequent  to 
sampling,  to  see  that  an  environment  is  not  produced  whereby  a 
class  of  organisms  in  the  minority  in  a certain  soil  sample  will  not 
be  in  the  majority  when  the  sample  reaches  the  laboratory.  It  is 
common  practice  in  soil  bacteriology  to  remove  the  surface  inch  or 
so  of  soil  before  taking  samples  for  analysis.  As  far  as  can  be 
learned,  this  is  based  on  work  which  shows  that  ordinarily  there  are 
fewer  bacteria  in  the  surface  inch  or  two  of  soil  than  there  are  in 
the  depths  just  below.  The  systems  of  soil  management  in  practice 
at  Laurel  have  to  do  with  changes  in  the  surface  two  inches  of  soil; 
and  thus  in  all  the  bacteriological  work  done  the  soil  has  been  in- 
cluded from  the  surface  to  a depth  of  nine  inches. 

Investigators  are  not  agreed  as  to  the  depth  at  which  the  maxi- 
mum number  of  bacteria  are  present.  This  maximum  number 
varies  with  the  soil ; not  only  as  to  its  texture  and  chemical  composi- 
tion, but,  it  is  believed,  in  proportion  to  variations  in  soil  aeration. 
The  soil  at  Laurel  under  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots  is  plowed 
to  a depth  of  approximately  seven  inches.  Thus,  if  samples  are 
taken  to  a depth  of  nine  inches  on  this  plot,  all  the  soil  is  sampled 
that  is  being  turned  over.  If  it  is  wise  to  conduct  studies 
on  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots  to  a depth  of  nine  inches, 
studies  must  also  be  conducted  to  that  depth  on  all  the  other  plots. 

There  are  various  methods  for  obtaining  samples  of  soil  for 
bacteriological  analysis.  A new  method  has  been  devised  and  used 
in  this  work.^  Bacteria  decompose  organic  matter,  using  it  as  food ; 
since  the  different  systems  of  management  at  Laurel  are  con- 
cerned with  the  utilization  of  organic  matter  in  different  ways,  it 
was  thought  worth  while  to  adopt  a method  of  sampling  which 


^ Noyes,  H.  A.,  Journal  American  Society  of  Agronomy,  December,  1915 


42 


would  sample  soil  as  accurately  under  sod  as  under  clean  cultivation. 
At  some  periods  of  the  year,  the  maximum  number  of  bacteria  un- 
der sod  are  much  nearer  the  surface  than  they  are  at  others;  also, 
bacterial  activities  vary  in  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plot  where 
rye  is  turned  under  every  spring.  The  method  of  sampling  em- 
ployed, namely,  that  of  obtaining  a column  of  soil  two  inches  in 
diameter  and  to  a depth  of  nine  inches,  and  keeping  that  column 
of  soil  upright  in  the  sampler  while  it  is  being  transported  from 
the  held  to  the  laboratory,  keeps  the  classes  of  bacteria  relatively 
in  the  same  position  as  they  were  in  the  held. 

The  studies  made  in  connection  with  the  bacteriology  of  the 
soil  have  been  limited  because  of  indecision  regarding  the  selection 
of  tests  which  are  important  for  the  purposes  of  these  investiga- 
tions. Much  time  has  been  devoted  to  developing  a technique^  by 
which  certain  errors  may  be  eliminated. 

The  so-called  '‘synthetic”  agar,  recommended  by  Lipman  and 
Trown,"  has  been  used  for  all  plating  work  reported  upon.  On  the 
soils  on  which  the  work  has  been  done,  the  Lipman  and  Brown  agar 
is  much  superior  to  the  sodium  asparaginate  agar  of  Conn.  The 
colony  development  on  the  synthetic  agar,  in  comparison  with  the 
sodium  asparaginate  agar  is  roughly  in  the  proportion  of  3 to  2 
when  incubated  for  ten  days  at  20  degrees  C. 

1 The  main  points  in  the  technique,  for  details  of  which,  see  Noyes,  H.  A., 
Proceedings  Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  1915  and  1916,  are: — 

(a)  A sample  of  soil  whicTi  is  representative,  is  taken  in  an  accurate  way  with 
a special  apparatus  and  kept  practically  under  field  conditions  until  it  reaches  the 
laboratory. 

(b)  A thorough  mixing  of  the  soil  sample,  and  the  taking  from  that  sample  of 
an  aliquot  large  enough  to  be  representative  have  been  proven  necessary. 

Literature  and  answers  to  questionnaire  vary  considerably  as  to  the  size  of 
sample  that  is  necessary  for  bacterial  analysis.  The  amounts  given  vary  all  the 
way  from  0.1  to  100  grams.  (The  amount  used  in  this  laboratory  is  50  grams  of 
field  soil.) 

(c)  The  making  of  a large  number  of  dilutions,  the  using  of  large  aliquots  and 
the  making  of  each  successive  higher  dilution  just  10  times  the  previous  one,  so 
that  clumps  of  bacteria  may  be  more  evenly  aliquoted  in  the  low  dilutions  and  more 
thoroughly  disintegrated  by  the  time  the  higher  dilutions  are  made. 

(d)  in  using  a one  c.  c.  aliquot  for  plating,  and  triplicate  platings  for  com- 
parison, we  depend  upon  large  aliquots  to  give  uniformity,  and  triplicate  plates  for 
a fair  average. 

Much  of  the  criticism  of  the  plate  method  of  determining  the  number  of  bac- 
teria in  soil  is  based  on  the  fact  that  plates  rarely  check.  In  order  to  find  out  how 
closely  we  may  expect  triplicate  plates  to  check,  we.  have  undertaken.  1.  To  study  vari- 
ations in  media,  to  see  what  effect  they  have  on  colony  development.  This  has  been 
done  in  connection  with  increased  length  of  time  for  holding  plates.  2.  To  determine 
the  proportion  of  bacteria  which  are  facultative  aerobes  in  proportion  to  the  number 
that  are  facultative  anaerobes. 

Soil  samples  are  taken  from  the  three  sampling  stations  on  each  plot  where  the 
soil  conditions  are  nearest  alike.  These  samples  are  taken  several  times  during  the 
season,  and  the  results  of  bacteriological  counts  are  tabulated  for  the  individual 
stations  and  for  the  plots  as  well. 

- This  media  is  made  up  of  the  following  constituents:  .05  grams  Witte  peptone 
.2  gram  magnesium  sulphate,  (MgS04  TH^O),  .5  gram  potassium  acid  phosphate 
(K2HLO4),  10  grams  of  dextrose  (C«Hi20fi),  15  grams  agar-agar,  and  distilled  water, 
to  make  1000  grams.  In  this  laboratory,  only  chemically  pure  dextrose  has  been 
used,  and  the  other  chemicals  have  been  the  purest  obtainable.  The  agar-agar  is 
selected  by  the  procedure  outlined  in  “Science,”  December  1,  1916. 

The  agar  is  dissolved  in  a double  boiler;  when  solution  is  complete,  the  chemi- 
cals are  added,  the  mixture  is  brought  up  to  weight  with  boiling  distilled  water, 
titrated,  tubed,  and  sterilized.  The  quality  of  the  chemicals  and  agar  used,  has 
made  filtering  superfluous.  It  has  been  unnecessary  to  adjust  the  reaction  of  the 
media,  for  we  find  that  when  proper  precautions  (see  Journal  of  Bacteriology,  Vol. 
I,  No.  1,  p.  87),  are  taken  the  reaction  of  the  media  is  never  over  -j-.4  acid 


43 


In  reporting  on  the  bacterial  flora  it  may  be  well  to  state  that 
the  figures  represent  plot  averages  which  are  the  result  of  individual 
determinations  and  not  composite  samples. 

Bacterial  Counts. — The  bacterial  numbers  are  discussed  by 
seasons  in  relation  to  soil  moisture  and  soil  temperature.  The  fig- 
ures express  millions  of  bacteria  per  gram  of  dry  soil.  The  moisture 
figure  is  per  cent.  The  column  in  Table  XVII,  headed  ‘‘Average 
Soil  Temperature,”  is  the  mean  average  temperature  of  the  soil  at  a 
depth  of  nine  inches  for  the  week  during  which  the  bacterial 
samples  were  taken.  The  column  headed  “Range  in  Soil  Tempera- 
ture,” is  the  difference  between  the  highest  and  lowest  soil  tempera- 
ture registered  the  week  the  samples  were  taken. 

Season  of  1914. — On  August  19,  plot  C,  under  the  straw  mulch 
system  of  management,  had  the  lowest  bacterial  count.  There  is  no 
relation  between  the  moisture  on  the  various  plots  and  bacterial 
numbers. 


Table  XVI. — Bacterial  Counts  in  Relation  to  Soil  Moisture — 1914 


August  19 

September  16 

November  9 

Systems  of  management 

Plot 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

Moist- 

ure 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

Moist- 

ure 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

Moist- 

ure 

per 

cent. 

Clean  culture  cover  crop 

A 

3.14 

10.6 

7.94 

13.8 

10.27 

17.7 

Straw  mulch 

B 

2.68 

9.8 

6.90 

14.2 

7.23 

19.3 

grass  cut,  let  lie 

C 

1.32 

10.6 

4.93 

17.3 

13.67 

23.5 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

4.37 

5.0 

8.37 

15.4 

10.44 

19.4 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

3.02 

5.2 

8.53 

14.2 

7.06 

21.4 

E 

2.24 

6.4 

7.68 

17.9 

8.57 

20.0 

Hillside 

0 

1.89 

8.4 

9.18 

17.2 

12.54 

20.7 

grass  cut,  piled 

H 

3.74 

8.3 

8.29 

18.5 

11.63 

20.4 

Average 

2.80 

8.0 

7.73 

16.1 

10.18 

20.3 

Variation 

3.05 

5.6 

4.25 

4.7 

6.61 

5.8 

September  16,  plot  C,  the  straw  mulch  plot,  has  the  lowest  bac- 
terial content.  There  is  neither  any  relation  between  moisture  and 
bacterial  numbers,  nor  between  cultural  practice  and  bacterial 
numbers. 

November  9,  plot  C,  the  straw  mulch  plot,  which  was  lowest  on 
the  two  preceding  dates  on  which  samples  have  been  taken  for  bac- 
terial analysis,  has  the  largest  number  of  bacteria  of  any  of  the  plots 
at  this  time.  The  amount  of  moisture  in  the  soil  on  November  9 
is  much  greater  than  it  was  on  August  19  or  September  16.  There 


44 


is  no  direct  correlation  between  moisture  and  numbers,  or  between 
the  cultural  practice  and  the  number  of  bacteria. 

The  averages  of  the  moisture  and  bacteria  for  all  plots  on  the 
different  dates  show  that  there  is  some  correlation  between  moisture 
and  bacterial  numbers.  Double  moisture  on  September  i6  means 
more  than  double  the  number  of  bacteria.  A further  increase  of 
moisture  on  November  9 means  a proportionately  greater  number 
of  bacteria  on  that  date. 

Table  XVII  gives  the  bacterial  counts  in  relation  to  soil  tem- 
perature for  1914.  There  is  no  correlation  between  the  number  of 
bacteria  per  gram  of  soil,  and  the  mean  average  soil  tempera- 
ture or  the  range  in  soil  temperature  for  the  week.  There  is  a grad- 
ual lowering  of  the  temperature  of  the  soil  from  August  19  to 
November  9,  and  the  number  of  bacteria  increases  during  this 
period. 

Using  the  averages  for  the  different  dates,  we  should  conclude 
from  these  data  that  bacterial  numbers  are  increasing  with  decreas- 
ing soil  temperatures.  Looking  at  the  season’s  results  as  a whole, 
it  might  be  suspected  that  high  soil  temperature  and  low  moisture 
content  mean  low  bacterial  content  but  this  would  be  unwarranted. 


Tabi,k  XVII. — Bacterial  Counts  in  Relation  to  Soil 'Temperature 

—1914 


August  19 

September  16 

November  9 

Aver- 

Aver- 

Aver- 

Bac- 

age 

Range 

Bac- 

age 

Range 

Bac- 

age 

Range 

teria 

soil 

soil 

teria 

soil 

soil 

teria 

soil 

soil 

Systems  of 

Plot 

mil- 

temper- 

temper- 

mil- 

temper- 

temper- 

mil- 

temper- 

temper- 

management 

lions 

ature 

ature 

lions 

ature 

ature 

lions 

ature 

ature 

per 

de- 

de- 

per 

de- 

de- 

per 

de- 

de- 

gram 

grees 

grees 

gram 

grees 

grees 

gram 

grees 

grees 

soil 

F. 

F. 

soil 

F. 

F. 

soil 

F. 

F. 

Clean  culture 

A 

3.14 

75.0 

10.0 

7.94 

67.5 

12.0 

10.27 

49.0 

8.0 

cover  crop 

B 

2.68 

75.0 

10.0 

6.90 

67.5 

12.0 

7.23 

49.0 

8.0 

Straw  mulch 

grass  cut, 

let  lie 

C 

1.32 

67.2 

2.5 

4.93 

62.8 

2.5 

13.67 

51.7 

1.5 

Grass  cut, 

let  lie 

D 

4.37 

72.8 

7.5 

8.37 

63.0 

6.0 

10.44 

49.0 

2.0 

Grass  cut. 

piled 

E 

3.02 

72.8 

7.5 

8.53 

63.0 

6.0 

7.06 

49.0 

2.0 

F 

2.24 

72.8 

7.5 

7.68 

63.0 

6.0 

8.57 

49.0 

2.0 

0 

1.89 

72.8 

7.5 

9.18 

63.0 

6.0 

12.54 

49.0 

2.0 

Hillside 

grass  cut. 

piled 

H 

3.74 

72.8 

7.5 

8.29 

63.0 

6.0 

11.63 

49.0 

2.0 

Average 

2.80 

7.73 

10.18 

Variation 

3.05 

4.25 

6.61 

45 


Season  of  1915. — The  samples  taken  on  June  14  show  the 
straw  mulch  plot  to  have  had  the  largest  number  of  bacteria  pres- 
ent. The  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots,  when  compared  with  plots 
E,  F and  O,  where  the  grass  is  cut  and  piled,  cannot  be  said  to  have 
more  bacteria  than  these  plots. 

It  is  surprising  that  the  hillside  plot  is  almost  as  low  in  bac- 
terial count  as  plot  D,  which  received  no  mulching  material.  There 
is  no  correlation  between  the  amount  of  moisture  in  the  soil  and 
the  bacterial  content. 

On  July  I plot  C,  the  straw  mulch  plot,  again  contains  more  bac- 
teria than  any  other  plot.  The  grass  mulched  plots,  O and  H,  rank 
next  in  order,  and  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots  come  last  The 
only  correlation  between  moisture  and  bacterial  counts  is  on  plot  C, 
which  is  highest  both  in  moisture  and  bacterial  content.  The  aver- 
age number  of  bacteria,  when  all  plots  are  taken  into  consideration, 
decreases  slightly  from  June  14  to  July  i.  The  soil  moisture  has 
decreased  9.5  per  cent. 

On  July  27,  bacterial  numbers  have  decreased  on  all  plots  when 
compared  with  counts  made  on  July  i samples,  except  on  plot  B.  It 
is  noted  that  plots  A and  B,  which  are  duplicates,  do  not  check  well 
either  on  July  i or  July  27.  From  the  study  of  the  individual  de- 
terminations, from  which  the  averages  for  the  plots  are  made,  it 
seems  that  the  difference  in  time  of  plowing  is  responsible  for  dis- 
crepancies. The  season  was  wet,  the  ground  contained  a large 


Tabi^e  XVIII. — Bacterial  Counts  in  Relation  to  Soil  Moisture — 1915 


Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

June  14 

July  1 

July  27 

August  19 

Average 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac-  1 
teria 
mil- 
lions 
per 
gram 
soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Clean  culture 

A 

11.24 

25.7 

9.13 

15.4 

3.33 

15.1 

6.60 

18.7 

7.58 

18.7 

cover  crop 

B 

13.55 

27.6 

4.55 

14.7 

10.75 

14.8 

7.51 

19.0 

9.09 

19.0 

Straw  mulch 

grass  cut, 

let  lie, 

C 

17.12 

29.8 

18.83 

19.8 

5.99 

17.2 

11.12 

20.5 

13.27 

2.18 

Grass  cut. 

let  lie 

D 

8.74 

26.5 

11.71 

16.5 

7.02 

15.8 

12.88 

21.5 

10.09 

20.1 

Grass  cut. 

piled 

E 

12.85 

24.9 

11.21 

15.1 

8.07 

17.9 

13.76 

20.6 

11.47 

19.6 

P 

10.05 

26.3 

11.10 

16.7 

8.97 

18.8 

23.59 

22.0 

13.93 

21.0 

0 

12.94 

29.6 

14.75 

14.1 

12.71 

10.1 

12.38 

19.8 

13.20 

18.4 

Hillside 

grass  cut. 

piled 

H 

9.52 

21.7 

12.96 

15.9 

12.51 

14.0 

14.98 

19.4 

12.49 

17.8 

Average 

12.01 

26.5 

11.78 

16.0 

8.67 

15.5 

12.85 

20.2 

11.33 

19.6 

Variation 

8.38 

8.1 

14.28 

5.7 

9.38 

8.7 

16.99 

3.3 

46 


amount  of  moisture,  and  when  plowing  was  started,  it  had  to  be 
discontinued  for  a week,  because  of  rain.  Plot  A was  plowed  first, 
and  bacterial  activities  increased  on  this  plot  before  they  did  on 
plot  B. 

On  August  19,  bacterial  counts  on  the  clean  culture  cover  crop 
plot  are  lowest,  on  the  straw  mulch  plot  next,  and  those  for  the 
grass,  which  is  cut  and  piled  about  the  trees,  are  highest.  There  is 
no  correlation  between  moisture  and  bacterial  numbers. 

When  the  bacterial  numbers  are  averaged  for  all  plots  on  June 
14  and  July  i,  and  compared  with  soil  moisture,  there  is  no  correla- 
tion between  moisture  and  bacterial  counts.  The  average  figures 
for  July  I,  July  27  and  August  19,  however,  may  be  roughly  said  to 
confirm  the  assumption  made  in  regard  to  the  1914  season’s  results; 
that  bacterial  numbers  are  somewhat  dependent  upon  moisture,  and 
they  vary  roughly  in  proportion  to  moisture  increases  and  decreases. 
As  an  average  for  the  season,  the  straw  mulch  plot  has  the  highest 
average  bacterial  content  and  the  highest  average  moisture  content. 
The  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots  have  the  lowest  average  bacterial 
content  and  medium  low  moisture  averages.  The  fact  that  plot  C 
was  highest  in  bacteria  and  highest  in  moisture  on  July  i,  next  to 
lowest  in  bacteria  and  high  in  moisture  on  July  27,  shows  that  there 
can  be  no  correlation  between  the  moisture  present  in  the  ground 
during  the  growing  season  of  the  trees,  and  the  bacterial  population. 

Season  of  1916. — In  1914,  bacterial  counts  were  made  between 
August  19  and  November  10,  after  the  active  growing  season  of  the 
trees.  In  1915,  the  four  sets  of  counts  of  bacteria  were  made  be- 
tween June  14  and  August  19,  at  the  time  when  the  trees  were 
actively  growing.  In  1916,  it  was  planned  to  ascertain  bacterial 
numbers  present  in  the  winter,  at  the  start  of  the  growing  season  of 
the  trees,  at  the  height  of  the  growing  season  of  the  trees,  and  late 
in  the  fall. 

On  January  24,  it  seems  impossible  to  find  any  correlation  be- 
tween bacterial  counts,  consistent  with  soil  management.  It  hap- 
pens, however,  that  a grass  mulched  plot  is  highest  in  bacterial  num- 
bers, and  one  of  the  plots,  having  a rye  cover  crop  is  lowest  in  bac- 
terial numbers.  Variation  between  moisture  in  the  ground  under 
the  various  systems  of  management  at  this  time  are  so  slight  that 
any  correlation  between  bacterial  numbers  and  soil  moisture 
would  not  be  expected. 

On  May  2,  there  is  not  enough  difference  between  the  moisture 
content  of  the  soil  of  the  various  plots  to  make  any  comparisons  be- 
tween bacterial  numbers  and  soil  moisture.  The  bacterial  numbers 
vary  from  9.78  millions  per  gram  of  dry  soil  on  plot  B,  to  20.32 
millions  on  plot  D ; but,  any  correlations  between  counts  and  cul- 
tural ])ractice  are  undetermined. 

On  July  18,  the  bacterial  content  of  various  plots  has  increased 
over  that  of  May  2,  and  the  moisture  content  has  decreased.  There  is 


47 


considerable  variation  between  the  moisture  present  in  the  soil 
under  the  various  systems  of  management,  but  little  variation  be- 
tween bacterial  counts  on  this  date.  The  only  significant  figures 
are  those  for  plot  B,  which  has  just  been  changed  over  from  a 
clean  culture  cover  crop  plot  to  a sod  plot.  It  is  low  both  in  moisture 
and  in  bacterial  content,  and  this  is  undoubtedly  due  to  the  change 
in  system  of  management. 

On  November  23,  plot  B was  again  found  to  be  low  in  bacterial 
content.  There  is  very  little  difiference  between  the  moisture  con- 
tent found  on  the  various  plots,  and  therefore  the  low  bacterial 
content  is  ascribed  to  the  change  in  system  of  soil  management. 


Table  XIX. — Bacterial  Counts  in  Relation  to  Soil  Moisture — 1916 


Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

January  24 

May  2 

July  18 

November  23 

Average 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Bac- 

teria 

mil- 

lions 

per 

gram 

soil 

Moist- 

ture 

per 

cent. 

Clean  culture 

A 

10.40 

21.6 

15.72 

21.3 

19.58 

14.5 

13.90 

15.9 

14.90 

18.3 

cover  crop 

B 

15.37 

23.6 

9.781 

20.6 

10.54 

9.7 

9.74 

14.5 

11.11 

17.1 

Straw  mulch 

grass  cut, 

let  lie 

C 

12.92 

23.0 

10.05 

22.8 

21.73 

14.6 

15.27 

14.9 

14.99 

18.8 

Grass  cut, 

let  lie. 

D 

14.31 

24.6 

20.32 

22.7 

18.88 

8.8 

12.87 

17.5 

16.60 

18.4 

Grass  cut, 

piled 

E 

18.09 

22.9 

15.81 

22.2 

18.83 

7.3 

12.16 

17.3 

16.10 

17.4 

F 

18.92 

23.0 

12.26 

22.9 

19.14 

7.9 

14.63 

17.0 

0 

17.16 

23.9 

13.63 

23.0 

20.42 

7.3 

15.44 

16.9 

16.66 

17.8 

Hillside 

grass  cut. 

piled 

H 

15.86 

20.4 

14.47 

21.1 

18.20 

8.8 

19.30 

18.8 

16.96 

17.3 

Average 

15.38 

22.9 

14.01 

22.1 

18.42 

9.9 

14.16 

16.6 

16.26 

17.7 

1 Plot  B seeded  to  grass  in  April 


Summary  of  Counts. — Covering  a period  of  three  seasons, 
eleven  sets  of  soil  samples  have  been  taken  for  bacteriological 
anaylsis.  The  averages  of  these  samples  appear  in  Table  XX. 


Table  XX. — Average  of  Bacterial  Counts  and  Soil  Moisture  on 
Eleven  Dates  Covering  Three  Seasons 


Clean  culture 

Clean  culture 

Grass  cut. 

Grass  cut. 

cover  crop 

Straw  mulch 

cover  crop 

let  lie 

piled 

4 years, 

then  in 

grass 

Bacteria 

Moist- 

Bacteria 

Moist- 

Bacteria 

Moist- 

Bacteria 

Moist- 

Bacteria 

Moist- 

millions 

ture 

millions 

ture 

millions 

ture 

millions 

ture 

millions 

ture 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

per 

gram 

cent. 

gram 

cent. 

gram 

cent. 

gram 

cent. 

gram 

cent. 

soil 

soil 

soil 

soil 

soil 

11.18 

19.5 

10.11 

17.4 

11.81 

17.5 

12.52 

17.4 

18.96 

17.1 

48 

The  general  conclusions  are : — 

1.  That  there  are  more  bacteria  present  in  the  sodded  ground 
at  Laurel  than  in  the  clean  culture  cover  crop  plots. 

2.  That  the  variation  in  mulching  on  the  sod  plots  has  some 
influence  on  bacterial  content,  for  the  grass  mulch  plots  have  high- 
er average  bacterial  content  than  the  straw  mulch  plot. 

3.  Changing  plot  B from  a clean  culture  cover  crop  plot  to  a 
sod  plot  decreased  bacterial  numbers  during  the  season  of  1916. 

4.  Tree  growth  cannot  be  correlated  with  bacterial  counts. 

5.  There  is  no  correlation 'between  bacterial  numbers  and 
soil  moisture. 

AmmoniFication  Tests. — One  hundred  grams  of  thoroughly 
mixed  soil,  which  is  an  aliquot  of  the  same  samples  on  which  the 
counts  were  made,  were  weighed  out  in  jell  glasses  and  incubated 
for  five  days  at  20  degrees  C.  for  ammonia  production."^  The  re- 
sults of  the  ammonification  tests  made  are  given  in  Table  XXI. 


Table  XXL— Ammonification  in  Relation  to  Cultural  Practices 


1914 

1915 

1916 

Aver 

age 

Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

Aug. 

19 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

.gram 

soil 

Sep. 

16 

Grams 

(NHa) 

per 

gram 

soil 

Nov. 

9 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

gram 

soil 

June 

14 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

gram 

soil 

July 

1 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

gram 

soil 

July 

27 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

gram 

soil 

Aug. 

19 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

gram 

soil 

May 

2 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

gram 

soil 

Grams 

(NHs) 

per 

gram 

soil 

Clean  culture  cover 

A 

.00185 

.00105 

.00113 

.00128 

.00122 

.00121 

.00131 

.00099 

.00126 

crop 

Straw  mulch 

B 

.00155 

. 00102 

.00112 

.00148 

.00112 

.00120 

.00143 

.00093 

.00123 

grass  cut,  let  lie 

0 

.00123 

.00118 

.00117 

.00142 

.00128 

.00127 

.00139 

.00095 

.00124 

Grass  cut,  let  lie 

D 

.00108 

.00121 

.00111 

.00149 

.00132 

.00122 

.00131 

.00093 

.00121 

Grass  cut,  piled 

E 

.00079 

.00105 

.00119 

.00139 

.00121 

.00127 

.00129 

.00107 

.00116 

P 

.00114 

.00121 

.00119 

.00148 

.00115 

.00131 

.00130 

.00098 

.00122 

Hillside 

0 

.00190 

.00109 

.00114 

. 00137 

.00116 

.00107 

.00146 

.00099 

.00127 

grass  cut,  piled 

H 

.00132 

.00114 

.00115 

.00138 

.00110 

.00115 

.00125 

lost 

.00121 

Average 

.00136 

.00112 

.00115 

.00141 

.00120 

.00121 

.00134 

.00098 

1 The  method  followed  is  identical  with  that  published  in  Research  Bulletin 
No.  12  of  the  Iowa  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  i.  e.,  20  grams  of  casein  is 
made  up  to  200  c.  c.  with  water  and  14  c.  c.  of  normal  sodium  hydroxide  solution. 
A 10  c.  c.  aliquot  is  pipetted  out  and  placed  upon  and  mixed  with  every  hundred 
gram  aliquot  of  field  soil.  There  were  times  during  the  season  when  there  were 
as  much  as  12  per  cent,  differences  between  the  moisture  content  of  the  soil  on 
the  various  plots.  Published  methods  advocate  bringing  the  soil  to  optimum;  i.  e., 
to  one-half  of  its  water-holding  capacity,  and  keeping  it  with  this  amount  of  mois- 
ture throughout  the  period  of  incubation.  The  object  was  to  find  out  differences 
due  to  variations  in  cultural  practice,  and  it  was  not  deemed  best  to  alter  the  moisture 
content  of  the  soil,  except  as  was  absolutely  necessary  in  mixing  the  aliquots,  and 
in  adding  the  chemicals. 

The  inability  to  obtain  casein,  chemically  pure,  according  to  Hammarstein,  is 
the  reason  for  not  making  ammonification  tests  on  all  samples  taken  in  1916.  Var- 
ious publications  have  given  data  indicating  that  when  soil  is  distilled  with  magne- 
sium oxide  in  copper  flasks,  more  ammonia  is  given  off  than  should  be.  The  results 
reported  in  the  above  table  are  not  attributed  to  the  uniformity  of  the  organic  matter 
in  the  various  samples  tested,  or  to  its  uniform  decomposition  due  to  distillation  with 
magnesium  oxide.  The  procedure  for  distilling  off  the  ammonia  was  as  follows: 

Eight  hundred  c.  c.  Kjeldahl  flasks  made  of  non-soluble  glass,  were  secured.  One 
hundred  gram  portions  of  soil  which  had  been  incubated  was  transferred  to  a 
flask  with  250  c.  c.  of  distilled  water.  The  flasks  were  set  in  baths  of  melted  paraf- 
fin after  magnesium  oxide  was  added  at  the  rate  of  five  grams  to  100  grams  of 
soil;  the  ammonia  was  distilled  into  one-fifth  normal  acid.  The  length  of  time  of 
distillation  was  approximately  one  and  one-half  hours.  It  was  found  that  only  rarely, 
with  this  method  of  distillation,  does  the  soil  cake  down  or  stick  to  the  bottom  of 
the  flasks,  whereas  when  copper  flasks  are  used,  fhe  soil  sometimes  burns  down  so 
badly  that  it  is  removed  with  great  difficulty 


49 


Ammonification  tests  were  made  on  all  three  sets  of  samples  taken 
for  bacterial  analysis  in  1914,  on  four  sets  taken  in  1915,  but 
on  only  one  set  taken  on  May  2,  1916. 

The  table  may  be  summarized  as  follows : — 

1.  Ammonification  varies  with  the  season. 

2.  Plot  variations  are  not  consistent  with  seasonal  variations. 

3.  It  is  impossible  to  say  that  any  cultural  practice  has  af- 
fected the  ammonifying  power  of  this  soil. 

In  only  two  samples  of  all  those  tested  were  we  able  to  find  any 
ammonia  present  in  the  soil  before  incubation. 

Nitrogen  Fixation. — For  nitrogen  fixation,  100  gram  ali- 
quots of  the  sample  of  soil  taken  for  bacterial  analysis,  are  incu- 
bated for  10  days  with  10  c.  c.  aliquots,  or  a mannite  solution  pre- 
pared by  dissolving  30  grams  of  chemically  pure  mannite  in  water, 
and  making  up  to  a volume  of  300  c.  c.  The  number  of  nitrogen 
fixation  tests  made  on  the  Laurel  soil  has  been  limited,  for  the 
amount  of  nitrogen  fixed  has  been  small  or  negligible.  No  data  are 
presented,  as  the  nitrogen  changes  obtained  were  practically  all 
within  experimental  error. 

Nitrification  Tests. — These  tests  are  carried  out  by  incu- 
bating 100  gram  aliquots  of  the  prepared  bacterial  samples  of  soil 
with  ammonium  sulphate  solution  for  six  weeks.  Incubation  is 
carried  out  at  20  degrees  C.,  and  the  beaker  method  is  employed.^ 
It  happens  that  with  the  facilities  available  for  incubation,  approxi- 
mately five  grams  of  moisture  are  evaporated  from  each  jell  glass 
during  the  six  weeks.  Thus,  the  samples  are  taken  out  with  the  same 
moisture  content  that  they  had  when  they  were  placed  in  the  in- 
cubator. In  addition  to  making  nitrification  tests,  detailed  studies 
of  the  nitrate  content  of  the  soil  are  made  before  it  is  subjected  to 
the  incubation  tests.  The  method  used  for  determining  nitrates  is 
the  phenol-disulphonic  acid  method^  proposed  by  the  Bureau  of 
Soils,  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture,  in  Bulletin  No.  31. 

1 The  method  is  described  in  Research  Bulletin  No.  12  of  the  Iowa  Experiment 
Station.  It  has  been  carried  out  as  follows:  four  grams  of  chemically  pure  am- 
monium sulphate  is  made  up  to  200  c.  c.  with  sterile  distilled  water.  A five  c.  c.  ali- 
quot of  this  solution  is  added  to  each  100  gram  aliquot  of  soil.  In  discussing  meth- 
ods for  ammonification,  it  has  been  stated  that  in  the  Laurel  work  the  moisture 
content  of  the  different  samples  has  not  been  brought  up  to  optimum.  The  same 
procedure  is  followed  in  the  nitrate  work,  and  the  results  are  believed  to  come 
nearer  to  field  conditions  than  would  be  the  case  if  incubations  had  been  carried 
out  under  optimum  moisture  conditions 

2 The  method  was  carried  out  as  follows:  fifty  grams  of  the  field  soil  were  put 
in  16  ounce  bottles,  and  200  c.  c.  of  distilled  water  added.  The  bottles  are  stoppered; 
shaken  at  intervals,  and  allowed  to  stand  over  night.  The  next  morning  they  are 
thoroughly  shaken,  and  a large  proportion  of  the  solution  filtered  off. 

The  procedure  in  filtering  is  to  thoroughly  shake  the  bottle  and  turn  the  soil 
and  water  emulsion  into  a 24  centimeter  filter  that  has  been  placed  in  a proper 
funnel.  The  filtrate  is  invariably  cloudy,  and  is  poured  back  into  the  filter  until 
the  solution  comes  through  clear. 

Twenty-five  c.  c.  aliquots  of  the  filtrate  are  placed  in  evaporating  dishes,  evap- 
orated to  dryness,  treated  with  a one  c.  c.  portion  of  phenol-disulphonic  acid,  and 
allowed  to  stand  a few  minutes,  and  then  diluted  with  about  10  c.  c.  of  water,  and 
made  alkaline  with  four  per  cent,  ammonium  hydroxide  solution.  Standard  solu- 
tions containing  known  amounts  of  nitrates  are  prepared  and  handled  in  the  same 
manner  as  the  solutions  under  test. 

After  considerable  testing  it  was  decided  that  all  solutions  should  be  read  by 
either  one  or  the  other  of  the  following  standards:  10  c.  c.  of  a solution  containing 
.1  milligram  of  nitrate  per  cubic  centimeter,  or  10  c.  c.  of  one  containing  one  milli- 
gram of  nitrate  per  cubic  centimeter.  In  coiyiparing  the  unknowns  with  a known, 
the  raising  or  lowering  of  the  standard  gives  distinct  color  changes 


50 


Nitrates  in  Soil. — The  nitrates  in  the  Laurel  soil  are  shown 
in  Table  XXII.  This  table  may  be  summarized  as  follows: 


Tabi^e:  XXII. — Nitrates  in  Laurel  Soil 


Systems  of 
management 

Plot 

1914 

1915 

1916 

Aver- 

age 

all 

Aug. 

19 

Sep. 

16 

Nov. 

9 

Aver- 

age 

June 

14 

July 

1 

July 

27 

Aug. 

19 

Aver- 

age 

Jan. 

24 

May 

2 

July 

18 

Nov. 

23 

Aver- 

age 

Parts  (NO3) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3') 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NO3) 

per  million 

parts  soil  j 

Parts  (NOs) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NOs) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NOs) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NOs) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Clean 

A 

118 

98 

4 

73 

63 

112 

77 

63 

79 

22 

0 

80 

0 

26 

59 

culture 

cover  crop 

B 

120 

106 

18 

81 

47 

91 

100 

76 

79 

30 

01 

0 

0 

81 

56 

Straw  mulch 

grass  cut, 

let  lie 

C 

48 

168 

28 

81 

25 

7 

60 

9 

25 

33 

66 

41 

trace 

35 

47 

Grass  cut. 

let  lie 

D 

22 

47 

4 

24 

6 

6 

9 

9 

8 

23 

14 

trace 

0 

9 

14 

Grass  cut, 

piled 

E 

16 

58 

2 

25 

8 

0 

7 

6 

5 

0 

25 

trace 

0 

6 

12 

P 

40 

42 

2 

28 

8 

0 

10 

10 

7 

0 

24 

trace 

0 

6 

14 

0 

31 

79 

6 

39 

24 

6 

4 

4 

10 

0 

14 

0 

0 

4 

18 

Hillside 

grass  cut. 

piled 

H 

33 

86 

24 

48 

5 

2 

10 

7 

6 

11 

90 

58 

trace 

40 

31 

Average 

54 

86 

11 

50 

23 

28 

34 

23 

27 

15 

39 

22 

0 

19 

32 

Variation 

104 

126 

26 

100 

58 

112 

96 

72 

54 

33 

90 

80 

0 

90 

1 Plot  B seeded  to  grass  in  April,  1916 


1.  A growing  crop  of  grass  or  rye  lowers  the  nitrate  content 
of  the  soil ; shown  especially  by  nitrate  content  of  plots  D,  E and 
F,  by  the  absence  of  nitrates  on  plot  B in  1916  and  on  plot  A on 
May  2 and  November  23,  1916. 

2.  The  most  nitrates  are  found  under  the  clean  culture  cover 
crop  system  of  soil  management.  This  is  plainly  shown  in  the 
averages. 

3.  The  straw  mulch  ranks  next  to  cultivation  in  its  field 
nitrate  content. 

4.  The  nitrate  content  of  the  soil  on  all  plots  varies  with  the 
season  and  time  of  year  samples  were  taken. 

(a)  Very  little  nitrate  was  found  in  late  fall  and  winter. 

(b)  The  nitrate  content  in  August,  1915  was  much  higher 
than  on  the  same  date  in  1914. 

(c)  The  soil  nitrates  were  low  in  May  and  July,  1916. 

5.  In  November,  more  nitrates  were  present  under  the  heavier 
mulches  on  plots  C and  H,  indicating  that  bacterial  activities  persist 
later  in  the  season  in  the  warmer  soil,  as  found  under  the  mulch 
system  at  this  time. 

6.  The  girth  gains  made  by  the  trees  were  roughly  propor- 
tional to  the  nitrate  content  of  the  soil. 


51 


_ Nitrates  After  Incubation.— Table  XXIII  are  tabulated  the 
nitrates  m the  Laurel  soil  after  incubation  with  ammonium  sulphate 
1 his  table  shows : 

I.  That  the  nitrates  present  after  the  incubation  of  the  soil 
vary  with  the  season  and  the  time  of  year  samples  were  taken. 

That  there  is  no  relation  between  nitrifyinp-  power  of  the 
soil  and  cultural  practices. 

u ^-1  relation  between  the  nitrifying  power  of 

the  soil  and  tree  growth. 

Tabi,k  XXIII.  Nitrates  in  Soil  after  Incubation  with  IN  H I 

Q rA  A .* 1 1 4/2 


1 

1914 

1 

1915 

1 1916 

1 

Aug. 

19 

Sep. 

16 

Nov. 

9 

Aver 

age 

- June 
14 

July 

1 

July 

27 

Aug. 

19 

Aver- 

age 

1 

1 Jan. 
24 

May 

2 

July 

18 

Nov. 

23 

Aver- 

age 

Aver- 

age 

all 

Systems  of 

’ Plot 

/ 

management 

Parts  CNOsl 
per  million 
parts  soil 
Parts  (NOs) 
per  million 
parts  soil 
Parts  (NOs) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  fNOa) 
per  million 
parts  soil 
Parts  (NOa) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  (NOa) 
per  million 
parts  soil 
Parts  (NOa) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  CNOa) 
per  million 
parts  soil 
Parts  (NOa) 
per  million 
parts  soil 
Parts  (NOa) 
per  million 
partsjsoll 

Parts  (NOa) 
per  million 
parts  soil 

Parts  (NOa) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NOa) 

per  million 

parts  soil 

Parts  (NOa) 

per  million 

3arts  soil 

Parts  (NOa) 

Vermillion 

varts  soil 

Clean 

culture 

A 

175 

211 

163 

183 

189 

223 

231 

215 

214 

278 

2355 

936 

159 

932 

443 

cover  crop 
Straw  mulch 

B 

228 

207 

225 

220 

448 

275 

305 

261 

322 

364 

32861 

4351 

1421 

10571 

533 

grass  cut, 
let  lie 
3rass  cut, 

C 

262 

242 

362 

289 

234 

426 

274 

289 

305 

411 

5017 

885 

167 

1620 

738 

let  lie 
3rass  cut, 

D 

170 

237 

235 

214 

303 

290 

262 

268 

280 

359 

4845 

771 

167 

1536 

677 

piled 

iillside 

E 

P 

0 

180 

184 

286 

197 

288 

379 

197 

143 

305 

191 

188 

323 

338 

322 

391 

206 

289 

368 

203 

295 

119 

246 

274 

227 

248 

295 

276 

400 

654 

1028 

7247 

4352 

3772 

461 

470 

649 

148 

169 

154 

2064 

1411 

1401 

834 

631 

667 

grass  cut, 

piled 

H 

246 

492 

438 

392 

366 

567 

331 

384 

412 

445 

5583 

621 

199 

1712 

839 

iverage 

'ariation 

1 TmTj. 

209 

116 

275 

295 

259 

295 

250 

209 

323 

202 

330 

361 

252 

212 

270 

169 

294 
192  1 

492 

750 

4557 

4892 

654 

501 

163 

57 

1467 

1132 

670 

to  grass  in  April,  1916 


Field  Efficiency.— A table  has  been  prepared  from  the  tables 
already  given  to  show  the  ratio  between  the  nitrates  present  in  the 
held  and  the  nitrates  present  in  the  soil  after  the  soil  is  brought  to 
pe  laboratory,  rnixed  with  ammonium  sulphate  and  allowed  to  incu- 
bate  for  six  weeks.  Table  XXIV  shows  the  per  cent,  efficiency  of 
field  conditions.  The  figures  obtained  for  the  individ- 
ua  dates  vary.  Those  cultural  practices  having  a high  per  cent  of 

efficiencron'otherTtes'*"’ 


52 


The  table  may  be  summarized  then  as  showing  that  those  plots 
having  a high  per  cent,  of  field  efficiency  may  be  correlated  with 
cultural  practices  and  tree  growth  and  the  ratio  between  the'nitrates 
present  in  the  field  and  the  nitrifying  power  of  the  soil  bears  also  a 
relation  to  tree  growth. 


Table:  XXIV.— The  Ratio  Between  the  Nitrates  Present  in  the 
Field  and  the  Nitrifying  Power  of  the  Soil  


Systems 

1914 

1915 

1916 

Aver- 

of 

manage- 

ment 

Plot 

Aug. 

19 

Sep. 

16 

Nov. 

9 

Aver- 

age 

June 

14 

July 

1 

July 

27 

Aug. 

19 

Aver- 

age 

Jan. 

24 

May 

2 

July 

18 

Nov. 

23 

Aver- 

age 

age 

aU 

Clean 

A 

67.4 

46.4 

2.5 

38.8 

33.3 

50.2 

33.3 

29.3 

36.5 

7.9 

0.0 

8.5 

0.0 

4.1 

26.5 

culture 
cover  crop 

B 

52.6 

51.2 

8.0 

37.3 

10.5 

33.1 

32.7 

29.1 

26.4 

8.2 

O.Oi 

0.01 

O.Qi 

2.1 

21.9 

Straw  mulch 
grass  cut, 
let  lie 

0 

18.3 

69.4 

7.7 

31.8 

10.7 

1.6 

21.9 

3.1 

9.3 

6.5 

1.3 

4.6 

0.0 

3.1 

14.7 

Grass  cut, 
let  lie 

D 

12.9 

19.8 

1.7 

11.5 

2.0 

2.1 

3.4 

3.4 

2.7 

6.4 

0.3 

0.0 

0.0 

1.8 

5.3 

Grass  cut, 
piled 

E 

F 

0 

8.9 

21.7 

10.8 

29.4 

17.6 

20.8 

1.0 

1.4 

2.0 

13.1 
13.6 

11.2 

2.4 

2.5 
6.1 

0.0 

0.0 

1.6 

3.4 

3.4 

3.4 

2.4 

3.6 

1.8 

2.1 

2.6 

3.2 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.3 

0.5 

0.4 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.1 

0.1 

0.1 

5.1 

5.4 

4.8 

HiUside 
grass  cut, 
piled 

H 

13.4 

17.5 

5.5 

12.1 

1.4 

0.4 

3.0 

1.8 

1.7 

2.5 

1.9 

9.3 

0.0 

3.4 

5.7 

Average 

25.8 

34.0 

1 3.1 

1 8.6 

11.1 

1 13.1 

1 9.3 

3.9 

1 0.6 

2.8 

0.0 

— 

1 Plot  B seeded  to  grass  in  April,  1916 

AUTHORSHIP  AND  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Authorship. — The  investigation  of  which  this  publication  is 
a preliminary  report,  was  planned  and  organized  and  has  been  car- 
rib  out  under  the  general  administrative  airection  of  C.  G.  Wood- 
bury Chief  in  Horticulture.  , , j i 

Vhe  supervision  of  the  field  work,  the  cultural  and  orchard 
management  practices,  the  obtaining  of  physiological  data,  the  me- 
teorological and  soil  temperature  records  and  m general,  Hso,  Ae 
horticuftural  phases  of  the  investigation,  have  been  under  the  active 
oversight  of  Joseph  Oskanip,  Research  Associate  m Porno  ogy. 

The  taking  of  soil  samples  for  various  purposes,  the  labora  ory 
work  in  soil  chemistry  and  soil  bacteriology,  the  stupes  m technique 
etc  have  been  in  immediate  charge  of  H.  A.  Noyes,  Kesearc 
Associate  in  Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.-The  authors  wish  to  make  acknowledg- 
ment to  Mr.  Joseph  W.  Wellington  for  field  work  done  i"  ^e  e^r^y 
years  of  the  investigation  and  to  Messrs.  Edwin  Voigt,  Lester  Yo 
Lr,  J.  D.  Luckett  and  E.  L.  Whitsitt  for  assistance  m laboratory 

work  at  various  times.  ^ iv/r,.  rr  a ^rbiiltze 

Special  acknowledgment  is  due  also  to  Mr  F.  A.  bcnult  , 

managb  of  the  Laurel  Company,  Laurel,  Ind.,  whose  keen  interest 
in  the^work  from  its  inception,  and  whose  hearty  co-operation  have 
been  invaluable  in  the  prosecution  of  the  investigation. 


( 


so '7 

2- 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


H YEHilir  OF  ILU-iOIS 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station  ^ ^ 


Bulletin  No.  206,  Vol.  XX 
September,  1917 


CATTLE  FEEDING 
XIII 


Part  I. 
Part  IL 
Part  III. 


WINTER  STEER  FEEDING 

1916-1917 

Corn  Silage  and  Leguminous  Hay  vs.  Leguminous  Hay  ' 
as  Roughage  for  Fattening  Steers 
A Limited  Feed  of  Corn  as  Compared  with  a Full  Feed  ^ 
of  Corn  for  Fattening  Cattle 
Clover  vs.  Alfalfa  Hay  as  Roughage  for  Fattening  Steers 


Published  by  the  Station; 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


1 


i 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY  AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT.  STATION 


BOARD  OP  CONTROL 
Joseph  D,  Oliver,  President,  South  Bend 

Pay  S.  Chandler Indianapolis  Warren  T.  McCray Kentland 

Charles  Downing  Greenfield  James  W.  Noel Indianapolis 

John  A.  IIh^lenbrand Batisville  George  W.  Purcell Vincennes 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs Bridgeport  Andrew  E.  Reynolds Crawfordaville 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D President  of  the  University 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(Under  Legislative  Act  of  1909) 

U.  R.  PisHEL,  Hope D.  P.  Maish,  Prankfort 

State  Poultry  Panciers^  Association  State  Corn  Growers^  Association 

D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville..r J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleville 

State  Dairy  Association  State  Live  Stock  Association 

H.  H.  SvvAiM,  South  Bend Indiana  Horticultural  Society 


ADMINISTRATION 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S.,  Director 

Harry  J.  Reed Assistant  to  the  Director 

Nellie  TracY... Administrative  Assistant 

Mary  K.  \1^oom Bookkeeper 

J r;'*' 

AGRICULTURAL  EXTENSION 
George  I.  Christie,  B,  S.  A.,  Superintendent 

Thomas  A,  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader 

Pield  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

George  M.  Prier,  B.  S.  A Associate  in 

Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 
Mabel  L.  Harlan. .Ass’t  in  Agricultural  Extension 

ANIMAL  HUSBANDRY 
John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S.,  Chief 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A 

Acting  Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A 

Ass’t  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

BOTANY 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B.,  Chief 

George  N.  Hoffer,  M.  S Associate  in  Botany 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Luna  E.  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

DAIRY  HUSBANDRY 
Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S.,  Acting  Chief 

Howard  W.  Gregory,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G..  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Harry  M.  Weeter,  M.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Sherman  L.  Ander.son,  B.  S 

Assistant  In  Creamery  Inspection 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

William  P.  Epple,  Ph.  G 

Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

ENTOMOLOGY 
James  Troop,  M.  S.,  Chief 
Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S.,  Ass’t  in  Entomology 

HORTICULTURE 

Laurenz  Greene,  M.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S Associate  in 

Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 
JOSEPH  Oskamp,  B.  S Associate  in  Pomology 


POULTRY  HUSBANDRY 
Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S 

Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

SOILS  AND  CROPS 
Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S 

Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S 

Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Associate  in  Soils 

STATE  CHEMIST 

Wm.  j.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S..  A.  C.*  State  Chemist 
Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.^.. Acting  State  Chemist 
Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S.2....Deputy  State  Chemist 

Carleton  Cutler,  B.  S.^ First  Deputy 

State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 
Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S.^.... Deputy  State  Chemist 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.2 Deputy  State  Chemist 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S.2„..Deputy  State  Chemist 

J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Samuel  P.  Thornton,  B.  S.=^ 

Deputy  State  Chemist 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.^ 

Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Paul  R,  Bausman,  B.  S.^ 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Harry  D.  Bur.\;side,  B.  S.  A. 2 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  S.2 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

VETERINARY  SCIENCE 
Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V.  M..  Chief 
David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C.. .Associate  Veterinarian 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D,  V.  M 

Associate  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 
Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S.„Ass’t  in  Serum  Production 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Animal  Pathology 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S. 

Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 
Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Ass’t  Veterinarian 

DETAILED  BY  U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OP 
AGRICULTURE 

Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  Insect  Investigations 
John  J.  Davis,  B.  S.,  Entomological 
Assistant  in  Charge 

John  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.,  Entomological  Assistant 
Walter  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S... Scientific  Assistant 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B Scientific  Assistant 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Chester  P.  Turner,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Seed  Testing 

Anna  M.  Lute,  M.  A Seed  Analyst 


1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 
’ Died  August  31,  1917 


WINTERMSTEER  feeding 

1916-1917 


J.  H.  Skinne:r  F.  G.  King^ 

SUMMARY 

PART  I 

1.  The  addition  of  33.88  pounds  of  corn  silage  to  a ration 
of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  clover  hay,  decreased  the  daily 
corn  consumption  2.79  pounds  per  head  and  the  daily  hay  con-  • 
sumption  11.46  pounds  per  steer: 

2.  The  addition  of  34.21  pounds  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of 
shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  alfalfa  hay,  decreased  the  daily 
corn  consumption  3.06  pounds  per  head  and  the  daily  hay  consump- 
tion 13.00  pounds  per  steer. 

3.  The  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of  shelled  corn,  cot- 
tonseed meal,  and  clover  hay  increased  the  rate  of  gain  .19  pound 
daily  per  steer. 

4.  The  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of  shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal,  and  alfalfa  hay  decreased  the  rate  of  gain  .15 
pound  daily  per  head. 

5.  The  addition  of  corn  silage  to  the  ration,  decreased  the  cost 
of  gain  $2.48  per  hundred  pounds  when  clover  hay  was  fed  and  41 
cents  per  hundred  pounds  when  alfalfa  hay  comprised  a part  of 
the  ration. 

6.  Corn  silage  in  the  ration  increased  the  selling  value  of  the 
cattle  25  cents  per  cwt. 

7.  The  profit  per  steer  not  including  pork  was  increased 
$10.08  per  steer  by  adding  corn  silage  to  a ration  of  shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal  and  clover  hay;  the  profit  per  steer  not  including 
pork  was  increased  $6.10  by  the  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration 
of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  alfalfa  hay. 

PART  II 

8.  The  elimination  of  corn  from  the  ration  of  shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay  induced  the  cattle  to  in- 
crease the  roughage  consumption  19.33  pounds  of  corn  silage  and 
.87  pound  of  hay  daily  per  head. 

9.  The  elimination  of  one-half  the  corn  in  the  ration  of 
shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay  induced 
the  cattle  to  increase  the  roughage  consumption  8.77  pounds  of  corn 
silage  and  .7  pound  of  hay  daily  per  head. 

10.  Feeding  no  corn  during  the  first  month  and  afterward  a 
gradually  increasing  amount  until  the  fifth  month  when  it  amounted 
to  II  pounds  daily  per  head,  induced  the  cattle  to  increase  the  con- 

1 Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry.  Withdrew  July  31,  1917  to  serve  In  the 
United  States  Army  as  Captain 


4 


sumption  of  roughage  10.15  pounds  of  corn  silage  and  1.97  pounds 
of  hay  daily  per  head. 

11.  Cattle  receiving  a full  feed  of  shelled  corn  in  addition  to 
cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay,  gained  2.50  pounds 
daily  per  head  at  a cost  of  $17.51  per  one  hundred  pounds  gain. 

12.  Cattle  receiving  no  corn  in  addition  to  cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage  and  clover  hay,  gained  1.63  pounds  daily  per  head  at  a 
cost  of  $14.87  per  hundred  pounds  gain. 

13.  Cattle  receiving  one-half  feed  of  shelled  corn  in  addition 
to  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay,  gained  1.62  pounds 
daily  per  head  at  a cost  of  $20.97  P^^  hundred  pounds. 

14.  Cattle  receiving  a gradually  increasing  amount  of  corn  in 
addition  to  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay,  gained  1.91 
pounds  daily  per  head  at  a cost  of  $18.12  per  hundred  pounds. 

15.  Cattle  receiving  a full  feed  of  shelled  corn  in  addition  to 
cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay,  were  valued  at  $12.00 
per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  including  pork  of  $35.65  per  head. 

16.  Cattle  receiving  no  corn  in  addition  to  cottonseed  meal, 
corn  silage  and  clover  hay  were  valued  at  $10.75  P^^  cwt.  and  re- 
turned a profit  including  pork  of  $21.21  per  head. 

17.  Cattle  receiving  one-half  feed  of  shelled  corn,  in  addition 
to  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay,  were  valued  at  $10.85 
per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  including  pork  of  $14.95  pcr  head. 

18.  Cattle  receiving  a gradually  increasing  amount  of  shelled 
corn  in  addition  to  cottonseed  meal,  corn  silage  and  clover  hay, 
were  valued  at  $10.85  pcr  cwt.  and  returned  a profit  including 
pork  of  $20.53. 

PART  III 

19.  Cattle  fed  a ration  of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and 
clover  hay,  consumed  slightly  less  corn  and  considerably  less  hay 
than  cattle  fed  alfalfa  hay  instead  of  clover  hay. 

20.  Cattle  fed  a ration  of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  corn 
silage  and  clover  hay  consumed  slightly  more  grain  and  hay  but 
less  silage,  than  cattle  receiving  a similar  ration  with  alfalfa  hay 
replacing  the  clover  hay. 

21.  Cattle  fed  hay  in  addition  to  shelled  corn  and  cottonseed 
meal,  gained  2.31  pounds  daily  per  head  when  clover  hay  was  fed 
and  2.16  pounds  daily  per  head  when  alfalfa  hay  was  fed. 

22.  Cattle  fed  hay  in  addition  to  shelled  corn,  cottonseed 
meal  and  corn  silage,  gained  2.5  pounds  daily  per  head  when  the 
hay  was  clover  and  2.01  pounds  daily  per  head  when  it  was  alfalfa. 

23.  Gains  on  cattle  were  made  at  a cost  of  $19.99  hundred 
pounds  when  the  roughage  was  clover  hay  and  $21.77  P^^  hundred 
pounds  when  it  was  alfalfa  hay. 

24.  Gains  on  cattle  were  made  at  a cost  of  $17.51  per  hundred 
pounds  when  the  roughage  fed  consif'led  of  corn  silage  and  clover 


5 


hay  as  compared  to  a cost  of  $21.36  per  hundred  pounds  when  the 
roughage  consisted  of  corn  silage  and  alfalfa  hay. 

25.  Cattle  fed  a ration  of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and 
clover  hay,  were  valued  at  $11.75  per  cwt.  and  returned  a profit 
not  including  pork  of  $10.85  head,  as  compared  to  a value  of 
$11.75  cwt.  and  a profit  of  $7.74  per  head  when  clover  hay  was 
replaced  by  alfalfa  hay. 

26.  Cattle  fed  a ration  of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  corn 
silage  and  clover  hay  were  valued  at  $12.00  per  cwt.  and  returned 
a profit  not  including  pork  of  $20.93  as  compared  to  a value  of 
$12.00  per  cwt.  and  a profit  of  $13.84  per  head  when  clover  hay 
was  replaced  by  alfalfa  hay. 

INTRODUCTION 

The  cattle  feeding  trials  reported  in  this  bulletin  were  conduct- 
ed under  exceptional  economic  conditions.  The  corn  was  low  in 
yield  but  of  good  quality  and  the  price  the  highest  in  years.  Feed- 
ing cattle  were  not  selling  at  an  exceptionally  high  price  in  the  fall 
but  the  scarcity  of  fat  cattle  the  following  spring  caused  very  high 
prices  for  finished  cattle,  thus  enabling  the  cattle  in  these  trials  to 
return  a handsome  profit  in  spite  of  the  continually  increasing  price 
of  corn. 

OBJECT 

The  object  of  the  trial  was  to  obtain  additional  information  on 
the  comparative  value  of  leguminous  hay  alone  and  in  combination 
with  corn  silage  as  roughage  for  fattening  cattle;  to  test  the  com- 
parative value  of  clover  hay  and  alfalfa  hay  as  roughage  for  full-fed 
cattle;  and  to  test  the  value  of  different  rations  with  a limited  feed 
of  corn  with  corn  silage  as  compared  with  a full  feed  of  corn  for 
finishing  steers. 

PLAN 

Seventy  medium  feeding  cattle  were  secured  and  divided  into 
seven  lots  of  ten  steers  each,  as  nearly  alike  as  possible  in  size,  con- 
dition, quality,  thrift  and  breeding.  Each  lot  of  cattle  was  placed 
in  similar  surroundings  and  fed  for  one  hundred  forty  days.  The 
only  differences  between  lots  were  in  the  rations  fed  which  were  as 
follows : 

Lot  I.  No  corn  during  the  first  month  and  a gradually  in- 
creasing amount  of  shelled  corn  for  the  remainder  of  the  period, 
cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per  1000  pounds  live  weight,  corn 
silage,  clover  hay  throughout  entire  period. 

Lot  2.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per 
1000  pounds  live  weight,  clover  hay. 

Lot  3.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per  1000 
pounds  live  weight,  alfalfa  hay. 

Lot  4.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per 
1000  pounds  live  weight,  corn  silage,  clover  hay. 


6 


Lot  5.  No  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per  1000 
pounds  live  weight,  corn  silage,  clover  hay. 

Lot  6.  One-half  feed  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily 
per  1000  pounds  live  weight,  corn  silage,  clover  hay. 

Lot  7.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per 
1000  pounds  live  weight,  corn  silage,  alfalfa  hay. 

SHELTER,  FEED  LOTS  AND  WATER  SUPPLY 

Each  lot  of  cattle  occupied  similar  quarters  which  consisted  of 
an  open,  concreted  lot  20  by  28  feet  joined  on  the  west  by  an  open 
shed  16  by  28  feet.^  The  concrete  floors  which  were  cleaned  every 
two  or  three  weeks,  kept  the  yards  in  comfortable  condition  during 
the  entire  season.  The  sheds  were  kept  well  bedded. 

Both  grain  and  roughage  were  fed  under  cover.  Grain  and 
silage  were  fed  in  troughs,  30  inches  wide,  arranged  along  the  feed 
alley.  Hay  was  fed  in  the  racks  under  the  shed  on  either  side  of 
the  lots.  Water  was  supplied  in  galvanized  iron  tanks  (surrounded 
by  flve  or  six  inches  of  manure  held  in  place  by  wooden  jackets) 
and  adjacent  to  the  open  lots.  No  heaters  were  used  but  ice  was  re- 
moved regularly  in  severe  weather.  A fresh  supply  of  water  was 
kept  before  the  cattle  at  all  times. 

WEIGHTS 

Each  steer  was  weighed  individually  for  three  consecutive  days 
at  the  beginning  and  end  of  the  trial,  and  every  thirty  days  during 
the  progress  of  the  same.  The  averages  of  the  three  weights  at  the 
beginning  and  end  of  the  trial  were  taken  as  the  initial  and  final 
weights  respectively.  The  identity  of  each  steer  was  known  by 
means  of  a numbered  tag  on  a strap  fastened  around  the  neck. 
Lot  weights  were  taken  every  ten  days  in  order  to  facilitate  keep- 
ing records  of  feed  consumed  and  gains  made.  Weights  were  taken 
at  9:00  A.  M.,  without  change  in  the  ration  or  water  of  the  cattle. 
Each  lot  of  hogs  was  weighed  every  ten  days. 

METHOD  OF  FEEDING 

The  method  of  feeding  was  practically  the  same  in  all  lots. 
Grain  was  fed  at  6:00  A.  M.  and  4:30  P.  M.  in  troughs,  under 
cover.  The  corn  was  placed  in  the  trough  and  cottonseed  meal 
poured  upon  and  mixed  with  it.  After  the  cattle  had  cleaned  up 
the  grain,  which  usually  required  from  a half  to  three-quarters  of 
an  hour,  roughage  was  fed.  The  lots  receiving  silage  were  fed  this 
roughage  both  morning  and  evening.  Lots  2 and  3 received  hay 
twice  daily;  the  other  lots  received  dr}^  roughage  at  the  morning 
feed.  It  was  the  intention  to  have  all  silage  cleaned  up  within  two 
hours  after  it  was  offered  and  all  dry  roughage  before  time  for 
the  next  feed.  Salt  was  kept  before  the  cattle  at  all  times. 


7 


DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  CATTLE 

The  cattle  used  in  this  trial  were  choice  ^rade  vShorthorns  and 
Herefords  purchased  on  the  Chicago  market.  They  were  very  uni- 
form in  quality  and  condition.  All  showed  evidence  of  Shorthorn 
blood  and  were  two  and  three  years  old. 

METHOD  OF  VALUING  THE  CATTLE 

The  feed  lots  were  visited  at  the  beginning  of  the  trial  by 
Messrs.  J.  T.  Alexander  of  Chicago  and  J.  S.  Taylor  of  Indianapolis 
who  placed  a value  on  the  cattle  on  the  basis  of  the  Chicago  mar- 
ket. At  the  end  of  the  trial  the  cattle  were' valued  by  Messrs.  J.  T. 
Alexander  and  Thomas  Murray  of  Chicago.  Financial  statements 
are  based  on  the  Chicago  value  of  feeding  cattle,  plus  15  cents  per 
hundred  pounds,  and  Chicago  prices  for  fat  cattle,  less  75  cents 
per  hundred  pounds. 

QUALITY  OF  FEEDS 

Rations  fed  in  this  trial  consisted  of  various  combinations  of 
the  following  feeds : shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal,  clover  hay,  al- 
falfa hay,  and  corn  silage.  The  corn  was  of  good  quality  at  all 
times.  Cottonseed  meal  was  of  choice  grade  guaranteed  to  contain 
41  per  cent,  protein  and  6 per  cent,  crude  fat.  Clover  hay  was  of 
medium  quality.  Alfalfa  hay  consisted  of  about  equal  parts  first, 
second,  and  third  cuttings  and  was  of  good  quality.  Corn  silage 
was  made  from  corn  produced  on  Purdue  Farm,  yielding  approx- 
imately 30  bushels  per  acre.  The  corn  was  well  matured  when  put 
into  the  silo. 

PRICES  OF  FEEDS 

The  prices  of  feeds  used  in  presenting  financial  results  are 
based  on  the  actual  market  prices  at  the  time  the  experiment  was 
in  progress.  The  average  price  of  corn  in  LaFayette  was  as  fol- 
lows: first  month  88.3  cents;  second  month  93.9  cents;  third  month 
$1,007;  fourth  month  $1,138;  fifth  month  $1,431  per  bushel;  cot- 
tonseed meal  $45.00  per  ton;  clover  hay  and  alfalfa  hay,  $12.00  per 
ton ; corn  silage  $6.00  per  ton.  All  financial  statements  are  based 
on  the  above  mentioned  prices  of  feeds. 

HOGS 

Each  lot  of  cattle  also  contained  ten  hogs.  They  were  of  good 
quality  and  averaged  approximately  105  pounds  per  head  at  the 
time  the  experiment  started.  All  lots  of  hogs  received  corn  in 
addition  to  droppings  from  the  cattle.  The  amount  of  corn  fed  de- 
pended on  the  appetites  of  the  hogs.  Five  hogs  in  each  of  the  three 
lots  (2,  3,  and  4)  of  cattle  were  fed  a small  quantity  of  shorts  and 
tankage  in  addition  to  the  corn  and  droppings. 


8 


METHOD  OF  STARTING  CATTLE  ON  FEED 

The  cattle  had  been  in  the  feed  yards  six  weeks  before  they 
were  started  in  the  experiment.  During  that  time  they  received 
one-half  feed  of  corn  silage  and  all  the  second  class  hay  they  would 
eat.  When  the  experiment  started,  silage  was  dropped  from  the 
ration  in  Lots  2 and  3 and  alfalfa  substituted  for  clover  hay  in 
Lots  3 and  7.  During  the  first  part  of  the  experiment  the  ration 
consisted  of  all  the  roughage  the  cattle  would  eat,  one  pound  of 
cottonseed  meal  in  all  lots  and  five  pounds  of  corn  daily  per  head 
in  all  lots  except  Lots  i and  5 which  received  no  corn,  and  Lot 
6 which  received  two  pounds  of  corn.  The  corn  was  slowly  in- 
creased in  Lots  2,  3,  4,  and  7,  until  within  six  weeks  they  were  on 
full  feed.  Lot  6 was  fed  one-half  as  much  corn  as  Lot  4.  Lot  5 
received  no  corn  during  the  experiment.  Lot  i received  no  corn 
the  first  month,  five  pounds  daily  per  head  the  second  month,  seven 
pounds  the  third  month,  nine  pounds  the  fourth  month  and  ii 
pounds  the  fifth  month.  The  cottonseed  meal  was  increased  until 
at  the  end  of  10  days  it  was  being  fed  at  the  rate  of  2.5  pounds  per 
1000  pounds  of  live  weight,  which  amount  was  fed  throughout  the 
experiment.  Roughage  was  fed  according  to  appetite. 

PART  I 

CORN  SILAGE  AND  LEGUMINOUS  HAY  VS.  LEGUMINOUS 
HAY  AS  ROUGHAGE  FOR  FATTENING  STEERS 

The  trials  herein  reported  in  this  bulletin  giving  data  on  the 
value  of  corn  silage  as  compared  with  hay  as  roughage- for  fattening 
cattle  are  a duplication  of  the  tests  conducted  at  this  station  during 
the  winters  of  1914-15  and  1915-16.  This  publication  gives  in- 
formation as  to  the  comparative  economy  of  adding  corn  silage  to 
rations  of  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  clover  hay  and  corn,  cotton- 
seed meal  and  alfalfa  hay.  The  rations  fed  were  as  follows: 

Lot  2.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per 
1000  pounds  live  weight,  clover  hay. 

Lot  4.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per 
1000  pounds  live  weight,  clover  hay,  corn  silage. 

Lot  3.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per 
1000  pounds  live  weight,  alfalfa  hay. 

Lot  7.  Shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  2.5  pounds  daily  per 
1000  pounds  live  weight,  alfalfa  hay,  corn  silage. 

The  only  difiference  in  the  rations  between  Lots  2 and  4 and 
Lots  3 and  7 was  the  addition  of  corn  silage.  Cottonseed  meal  was 
fed  in  all  lots  in  the  proportion  of  2.5  pounds  daily  per  1000  pounds 
live  weight.  The  cattle  used  in  the  trial  and  the  method  of  starting 
them  on  feed  are  reported  on  pages  7 and  8. 


9 


Daily  Ration. — Table  I shows  the  influence  of  the  dififerent 
feeds  on  the  daily  consumption  of  the  various  constituents  of  the 
ration  by  30-day  periods. 

fl'AnivE  I. — Showing  Average  Amount  of  Feed  Consumed  Daily  Per 
Head  by  Fattening  Steers,  December  13,  1916,  to  May 
2,  1917  (140  days) 


Lot  2 

Lot  4 

Lot  3 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 

Shelled  corn. 

Shelled  corn. 

Shelled  corn. 

RATION 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

meal, 

meal. 

meal. 

meal. 

clover  hay 

corn  silage, 

alfalfa  hay 

corn  silage, 

clover  hay 

alfalfa  hay 

First  month 

shelled  corn 

8.12  lbs. 

8.12  lbs. 

8.12  lbs. 

8.12  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

2.36  “ 

2.36 

2.36  “ 

2.36  “ 

corn  silage 

45.90 

a 

45.80  “ 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

17.53  “ 

2.07 

a 

17.87  “ 

2.46  “ 

Second  month 

1 

shelled  corn 

14.40  “ 

12.40 

n 

! 14.89  “ 

12.40  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

2.83  “ 

2.90 

2.93  “ 

2.85  “ 

corn  silage 

39.63 

40.10  “ 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

16.00  “ 

2.12 

17.85  “ 

1.65  “ 

Third  month 

shelled  corn 

17.10  “ 

14.67 

4( 

17.13  “ 

14.67  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

2.98  “ 

3.12 

(4 

2.98  “ 

2.98  “ 

corn  silage 

30.88 

44 

32.07  “ 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

14.28  “ 

2.08 

44 

15.00  “ 

1.20  “ 

Fourth  month 

shelled  corn 

20.57  “ 

16.00 

20.57  “ 

16.00  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

3.13  “ 

3.28 

3.17  “ 

3.13  “ 

corn  silage 

25.00 

44 

25.00  “ 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

9.18  “ 

1.93 

11.33  “ 

no 

CO 

T— 1 

Last  20  days 

shelled  corn 

22.00  “ 

16.00 

22.00  “ 

14.85  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

3.33  “ 

3.43 

44 

3.36  “ 

3.25  “ 

corn  silage 

25.00 

44 

25.00  “ 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

9.00  “ 

2.00 

44 

9.11  “ 

1.20  “ 

Average  daily  feed  for 

entire  period 

shelled  corn 

16.04  lbs. 

13.25  lbs. 

16.15  lbs. 

13.09  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

2.90  “ 

2.99 

,2.93  “ 

2.89  “ 

corn  silage 

33.88 

44 

34.21  “ 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

13.50  “ 

2.04 

14.60  “ 

1.60  “ 

lO 


Table  I shows  that  during  the  first  month,  while  the  cattle 
were  being  placed  on  feed,  there  was  no  difference  between  the 
amounts  of  grain  eaten  by  the  cattle  receiving  silage  and  those  not 
receiving  silage.  As  the  cattle  were  raised  to  full  feed,  it  required 
larger  amounts  of  corn  to  satisfy  the  appetites  of  the  cattle  not  re- 
ceiving silage  than  it  did  to  satisfy  those  receiving  this  roughage. 
As  the  feeding  period  prdgressed  the  difference  in  grain  consump- 
tion between  the  lots  increased  until  during  the  last  20  days,  the 
cattle  receiving  clover  and  no  silage  consumed  six  pounds  of  corn 
more  than  those  receiving  silage,  in  addition  to  the  clover ; and  in 
the  lots  receiving  alfalfa  hay  in  combination  with  the  silage,  there 
was  a greater  difference,  also  corn  silage  replaced  practically  all  the 
hay  in  the  ration.  The  average  amount  of  corn  consumed  in  Lot  2, 
not  receiving  silage,  was  16.04  pounds  daily  per  head  as  compared 
to  13.25  pounds  in  Lot  4 receiving  silage.  In  Lot  3,  not  receiving 
silage,  the  daily  corn  consumption  was  16.15  pounds  as  compared 
to  13.09  pounds  in  Lot  7 receiving  silage.  In  Lot  4,  33.88  pounds 
of  silage  replaced  2.79  pounds  of  corn  and  11.46  pounds  of  hay  in 
the  daily  feed  consumption.  In  Lot  7,  34.21  pounds  of  silage  re- 
placed 3.06  pounds  of  corn  and  13  pounds  of  hay  in  the  daily  feed 
consumption. 

Gains. — Table  II  shows  the  gains  made  by  the  four  lots  of 
cattle. 


Table  II. — Showing  Average  Daily  Gain  per  Steer  by  Months, 
December  13,  1916  to  May  2,  1917  (140  days) 


Rot  2 

Rot  4 

Rot  3 

Rot  7 

Shelled  corn, 

Shelled  corn. 

Shelled  corn. 

Shelled  corn. 

RATION 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

meal, 

meal, 

meal. 

meal. 

clover  hay 

corn  silage, 

alfalfa  hay 

corn  silage, 

clover  hay 

alfalfa  hay 

First  month 

1.92  lbs. 

2.74  lbs. 

2.01  lbs. 

2.39  lbs. 

Second  month 

1.95  “ 

2.10  “ 

1.17  “ 

1.72  “ 

Third  month 

2.62  “ 

3.48  “ 

2.74  “ 

•2.12  “ 

Fourth  month 

2.45  “ 

2.23  “ 

2.98  “ 

2.07  “ 

Last  20  days 

2.74  “ 

1.67  “ 

1.78  “ 

1.64  “ 

Total  gain  per  steer 
Average  daily  gain  for 

322.9  lbs. 

350.0  lbs. 

302.4  lbs. 

2.16  “ 

281.6  lbs. 

2.01  “ 

entire  period 

2.31  “ 

2.50  “ 

Table  II  shows  that  the  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of 
shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  clover  hay  increased  the  rate  of 
gain  during  the  entire  period  from  2.31  pounds  daily  per  head  to 
2.50  pounds  daily  per  head.  During  only  two  periods  of  the  five 
did  the  cattle  not  receiving  silage,  make  as  rapid  gains  as  those  in 
Lot  4 receiving  silage.  The  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of 
shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  alfalfa  hay  did  not  increase  the 
rate  of  gain.  This  can  be  accounted  for  by  the  fact  that  one  steer 


II 


in  Lot  7,  proved  to  be  far  below  the  average  in  ability  to  make 
gains.  The  other  nine  steers  in  the  lot  made  more  rapid  gains 
than  the  steers  in  Lot  3,  not  receiving  silage.  The  average  of  the 
two  lots  receiving  silage  compared  with  the  average  of  the  lots  not 
receiving  silage  shows  that  the  addition  of  silage  to  the  ration  pro- 
duced more  rapid  gains  than  where  it  was  not  used  in  the  ration. 

Cost  ot  Gains. — ‘The  influence  of  corn  silage  on  the  cost  of 
gains  is  shown  in  Table  III. 

Tabte)  III. — Showing  Average  Amount  of  Feed  Consumed  per 
Pound  Gain  and  Cost  per  Hundred  Pounds  Gain 


Lot  2 

Lot  4 

Lot  3 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 

Shelled  corn. 

Shelled  corn. 

Shelled  corn. 

RATION 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

meal, 

meal. 

meal. 

meal. 

clover  hay 

corn  silage, 

alfalfa  hay 

corn  silage, 

clover  hay 

alfalfa  hay 

Peed  per  pound  gain 

shelled  corn 

6.95  lbs. 

5.30  lbs. 

7.48  lbs. 

6.51  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

1.26  “ 

1.20  “ 

1.36  “ 

1.44  “ 

corn  silage 

13.55  “ 

17.01  “ 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

5.85  “ 

.82  “ 

6.76  “ 

.79  “ 

Cost  per  cwt.  gain 

$19.99 

$17.51 

$21.77 

$21.36 

It  will  be  noted  in  Table  III,  that  in  both  lots  where  silage  was 
fed,  it  required  a smaller  amount  of  corn  to  produce  a pound 
of  gain  than  where  the  silage  was  not  fed.  Thirteen  and  fifty-five 
hundredths  pounds  of  silage  replaced  1.65  pounds  of  corn  and '5-03 
pounds  of  clover  hay  and  17.01  pounds  of  silage  replaced  .97  pound 
of  corn  and  5.97  pounds  of  alfalfa  hay  in  the  feed  required  to  make 
a pound  of  gain.  Since  silage  replaced  a large  amount  of  hay,  the 
economy  of  gain  depends  primarily  upon  the  value  affixed  to  these 
two  classes  of  roughages.  Silage  was  comparatively  high  in  price 
while  hay  was  at  a moderate  price.  When  silage  was  added  to  a 
ration  of  shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  clover  hay,  gains  were 
made  at  a cost  of  $2.48  per  hundred  pounds  less  than  when  no  sil.age 
was  fed.  When  corn  silage  was  added  to  a ration  of  shelled  corn, 
cottonseed  meal  and  alfalfa  hay,  there  was  a saving  of  41  cents  per 
hundred  pounds  of  gain.  However,  since  one  steer  in  Lot  7 failed 
to  gain  satisfactorily,  we  would  normally  expect  a greater  spread  in 
cost  than  is  shown  between  Lots  3 and  7. 


12 


Tabi^e:  IV. — Summary  of  Part  I 


Lot  2 

Lot  4 

Lot  3 ^ 

L 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 

Shelled  corn. 

Shelled  corn, 

Shelled  corn. 

RATION 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

meal, 

meal. 

meal. 

meal. 

clover  hay 

corn  silage, 

alfalfa  hay 

corn  silage, 

clover  hay 

alfalfa  hay 

Initial  value 

$8.15 

$8.15 

$8.15 

$8.15 

Initial  weight 

10408 

lbs. 

10443 

lbs. 

9513 

lbs. 

10442 

lbs. 

Final  weight 

13637 

“ 

13943 

a 

12235 

44 

13258 

“ 

Total  gain 

3229 

44 

3500 

a 

2722 

44 

2816 

44 

Average  daily  gain 

2.31 

44 

1 

2.50 

“ 

2.16 

2.01 

44 

Total  feed  consumed 

i 

18555 

shelled  corn 

22455 

“ 

“ 

20350 

18325 

cottonseed  meal 

4059 

i 4184 

“ 

3693 

4049 . 

corn  silage 

147425 

“ 

47891 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

18900 

44 

2860 

18394 

“ 

2237 

] 

44 

Daily  feed  per  steer 

1 

shelled  corn 

16.04 

44 

' 13.25 

n 

16.15 

44 

j 13.09 

44 

cottonseed  meal 

2.90 

1 2.99 

“ 

2.93 

44 

1 2.89 

44 

corn  silage 

1 33.88 

“ 

i 34.21 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

13.50 

44 

i 2.04 

i 

14.60 

“ 

1.60 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

1 

shelled  corn 

6.95 

5.30 

“ 

7.48 

44 

6.51 

cottonseed  meal 

1.26 

1.20 

(( 

1.36 

44 

1.44 

44 

corn  silage 

13.55 

“ 

1 

17.01 

44 

clover  hay 
alfalfa  hay 

5.85 

.82 

1 

6.76 

99 

.79 

Cost  of  gain  per  cwT. 

$19.99 

$17.51 

$21.77 

$21.36 

Necessary  selling  price 

Actual  selling  price  in 

10.95 

t 

10.50 

1 

i 11.18 

1 

1 

1 10.96 

lots  without  shrink 

j 11.75 

I 12.00 

i 11.75 

i 12.00 

Profit  per  steer 

i 

not  including  pork 

10.85 

20.93 

7.74 

13.84 

Pork  produced 

1479 

lbs. 

1275 

lbs. 

1586 

lbs. 

990 

lbs. 

Corn  fed  to  hogs 

2594 

“ 

1996 

“ 

2594 

“ 

1959 

“ 

Shorts  fed  to  hogs 

210 

“ 

210 

44 

210 

“ 

Tankage  fed  to  hogs 

Profit  per  steer 

210 

210 

1 

210 

$25.48 

including  pork 

$27.60 

! $35.65 

1 

$28.20 

i 

1 Nine  steers  in  Lot  3 

Pork  is  valued  at  $15.50  per  cwt.,  and  cost  of  additional  feed  consumed  by  hogs 
is  deducted  before  value  of  pork  from  droppings  is  accredited  to  receipts  from  cattle 
Based  on  the  following  prices  for  feeds:  shelled  corn,  first  month  88.3  cents; 
second  month  93.9  cents;  third  month  $1,007;  fourth  month  $1,138;  last  20  days 
$1,431  per  bushel;  cottonseed  meal  $45.00  per  ton;  corn  silage  $6.00  per  ton;  clover 
and  alfalfa  hay  $12.00  per  ton 


13 


Summary. — A summary  of  the  data  secured  from  the  four 
lots  of  cattle  is  shown  in  Table  IV.  Prices  of  feeds  are  given  on 
page  7.  No  charge  was  made  for  straw  used  for  bedding  nor  for 
labor  of  feeding;  neither  is  any  credit  given  for  any  manure  pro- 
duced by  the  cattle,  it  being  considered  that  this  by-product  will  pay 
for  the  labor  of  feeding  and  the  straw  used  for  bedding. 

There  were  10  hogs  in  each  lot  throughout  the  progress  of  the 
trial.  Enough  corn  was  fed  these  hogs  to  make  them  gain  satisfac- 
torily. Five  hogs  in  Lots  2,  3 and  4,  received  a small  quantity  of 
shorts  and  tankage  in  addition  to  corn  and  droppings.  Corn  fed  to 
hogs  was  valued  at  $1.06  per  bushel,  shorts  at  $50.00  per  ton  and 
tankage  at  $70.00  per  ton,  and  the  cost  of  these  feeds  was  deducted 
from  the  value  of  the  pork  actually  produced  before  pork  pro- 
duced from  droppings  is  accredited  to  the  receipts  from  the  cattle. 

Table  IV  shows  that  the  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of 
shelled  corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  clover  hay,  resulted  in  an  increase 
in  the  gains  of  the  cattle  and  a decrease  in  the  cost  of  gain  amount- 
ing to  $2.48  per  hundred  pounds.  With  an  initial  weight  of  1040.8 
pounds  per  head,  cattle  fed  clover  hay  alone  as  a roughage  required 
a selling  price  of  $10.95  hundred  pounds  in  order  to  break  even 
at  the  end  of  the  140-day  feeding  period.  They  actually  sold  for 
$11.75  returned  a profit  of  $10.85  head,  not  including  pork. 
When  pork  is  considered,  the  profit  was  $27.60  per  head.  When  corn 
silage  was  added  to  the  above  ration,  similar  cattle  could  have  sold 
at  the  end  of  140  days  for  $10.50  per  hundred  pounds  without 
returning  a profit  or  loss.  They  actually  sold  for  $12.00  per 
hundred  pounds  and  returned  a profit  not  including  pork  of  $20.93 
per  head.  When  pork  is  considered  they  returned  a profit  of  $35.65 
per  head  or  $8.05  per  head  more  than  when  silage  was  not  fed. 

The  addition  of  corn  silage  to  a ration  of  corn,  cottonseed  meal 
and  alfalfa  hay  did  not  increase  the  rate  of  gain,  unless  nine  steers 
in  Lot  7 are  considered.  There  was  a slight  reduction  in  cost  of 
gain  and  in  the  necessary  selling  price.  Cattle  averaging  1057 
pounds  at  the  beginning  and  fed  for  a period  of  140  days  on  shelled 
corn,  cottonseed  meal  and  alfalfa  hay,  would  have  had  to  sell  at 
$11.18  per  hundred  weight  in  order  to  equalize  expenditures.  They 
actually  sold  for  $11.75  hundred  weight  and  returned  a profit  of 
’ $7.74  per  head  not  including  pork  and  $28.20  per  head  including 

pork.  Cattle  fed  a similar  ration  with  silage  added,  could  have  sold 
at  $10.96  per  head  without  profit  or  loss.  They  actually  sold  for 
$12.00  per  hundred  pounds  and  returned  a profit  of  $13.84  without 
pork  and  $25.48  with  pork.  In  these  two  lots  the  difiference  in 
pork  production  made  a material  difiference  in  the  relative  standing 
in  the  lots. 


14 


PART  II 

A LIMITED  FEED  OF  CORN  AS  COMPARED  WITH  A FULL 
FEED  OF  CORN  FOR  FATTENING  CATTLE 

The  high  price  of  corn  and  the  possibility  of  utilizing  large  quan- 
tities of  roughage  in  the  form  of  ensilage  with  cattle  have  aroused 
feeders  to  a realization  of  the  desirability  of  feeding  as  much  rough- 
age  as  possible  to  fattening  cattle  with  the  view  of  saving  corn  that 
might  be  used  for  other  purposes.  It  was  for  the  purpose  of  secur- 
ing data  on  the  amounts  of  corn  that  could  be  most  profitably  used 
in  the  rations  for  fattening  cattle  that  this  trial  with  four  lots  of 
cattle  was  undertaken.  The  feeds  used  in  all  lots  were  the  same, 
with  the  exception  that  one  lot  received  no  corn,  viz.  shelled  corn, 
corn  silage,  cottonseed  meal,  clover  hay.  Different  amounts  of 
corn  were  fed  those  receiving  corn,  and  the  amounts  of  the  other 
feeds  consumed  varied  in  the  different  lots. 

The  cattle  in  Lot  4 were  fed  a ration  of  cottonseed  meal,  clover 
hay,  corn  silage,  and  as  much  shelled  corn  as  they  would  consume 
twice  daily.  Lot  6 was  fed  one-half  as  much  corn  as  the  cattle  in 
Lot  4,  and  all  the  roughage  they  would  consume.  The  cattle 
in  Lot  5 were  fed  no  corn  but  all  the  silage  and  hay  they  would 
eat.  The  cattle  in  Lot  i were  fed  no  corn  during  the  first  month 
and  a gradually  increasing  amount  of  corn  thereafter.  The  follow- 
ing amounts  of  corn  were  fed  after  the  first  month;  second  month, 
5 pounds  daily  per  steer ; third  month,  7 pounds  daily  per  steer  ; 
fourth  month,  9 pounds  daily  per  steer;  last  20  days,  ii  pounds 
daily  per  steer.  All  lots  of  cattle  received  cottonseed  meal  at  the 
rate  of  2.5  pounds  daily  per  1000  pounds  of  live  weight. 

Daily  Ration. — The  average  daily  feed  consumed  per  head  is 
shown  in  Table  V. 


15 


Table  V. — Showing  Average  Amount  of  Feed  Consumed  Daily  per 
Head  by  Fattening  Steers,  December  13,  1916 
to  May  2,  1917  (140  days) 


■ 

Lot  4 

' Lot  1 

Lot  6 

Lot  5 

Shelled  corn,i 

Shelled  corn, 2 

One-half  feed 

No  corn. 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

corn, 

cottonseed 

RATION 

meal, 

meal. 

cottonseed 

meal. 

corn  silage, 

corn  silage. 

meal, 

corn  silage. 

clover  hay 

clover  hay 

corn  silage. 

! clover  hay 

clover  hay 

First  month 

shelled  corn 

8.12  lbs. 

4.73  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal  ‘ 

2.36  “ 

2.36  lbs. 

2.36  “ 

2.36  lbs. 

corn  silage 

45.^0  “ 

47.47  “ 

46.17  “ 

47.47  “ 

clover  hay 

2.07  “ 

4.97  “ 

4.17  “ 

5.09  “ 

Second  month 

shelled  corn 

12.40  “ 

5.00  “ 

6.20  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

2.90  “ 

2.83  “ 

2.83  “ 

2.83  “ 

corn  silage 

39.63  “ 

48.20  “ 

45.00  “ 

52.13  “ 

clover  hay 

2.12  “ 

1 

4.27  “ 

3.18  “ 

3.35 

Third  month 

1 

I 

shelled  corn 

14.67  “ 

7.00  “ 

7.33  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

3.12  “ 

3.00  “ 

2.97  “ 

2.97  “ 

corn  silage 

30.88  “ 

42.02  “ 

i 42.87  “ 

55.38  “ 

clover  hay 

2.08  “ 

4.02  “ 

2.08  “ 

2.08  “ 

Fourth  month 

1 

shelled  corn 

16.00  “ 

9.00  “ 

8.00  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

3.28  “ 

3.15  “ 

3.07  “ 

3.10  “ 

corn  silage 

25.00  “ 

• 41.30  “ 

39.00  “ 

56.00  “ 

clover  hay 

1.93  “ 

3.45  “ 

2.00  “ 

2.00  “ 

Last  20  days 

1 

i 

shelled  corn 

16.00  “ 

11.00  “ 

8.00  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

3.43  “ 

3.28  “ 

3.15  “ 

i 3.18  “ 

corn  silage 

25.00  “ 

39.70  “ 

39.00  “ 

56.00  “ 

clover  hay 

2.00  “ 

3.03  “ 

2.00  “ 

1.60  “ 

Average  daily  feed 

i 

for  entire  period 

shelled  corn 

i 13.25  lbs. 

6.07  lbs. 

6.77  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

! 2.99  “ 

2.90  “ 

2.86  “ 

2.87  “ 

corn  silage 

33.88  “ 

44.03  “ 

1 42.65  “ 

53.21  “ 

clover  hay 

! 2.04  “ 

4.01  “ 

1 

2.74  “ 

2.91  “ 

1 

1 Fed  full  feed  of  corn 

- Fed  no  corn  first  month  and  gradually  increasing  amount  of  corn  thereafter 


It  will  be  noted  that  during  the  first  month  there  was  little 
difiference  in  the  silage  consumption  in  the  four  lots.  After  the  first 
month,  as  the  amounts  of  corn  consumed  increased,  the  amount  of 
silage  consumed  decreased,  until  during  the  last  20  days  the  cattle 
receiving  no  corn  ate  56  pounds  of  silage  daily  per  head ; those 
receiving  one-half  feed  of  corn  consumed  39  pounds  per  head ; those 


i6 


receiving  a gradually  increasing  amount  of  corn  consumed  39.70 
pounds  per  head ; while  the  cattle  receiving  a full  feed  of  corn  con- 
sumed only  25  pounds  of  silage  per  head.  The  average  of  the  en- 
tire period  shows  tliat  the  cattle  not  receiving  corn  consumed  53.21 
pounds  of  silage  and  2.91  pounds  of  hay  daily  per  head;  those  re- 
ceiving one-half  feed  of  corn  consumed  42.65  pounds  of  silage, 
2.74  pounds  of  hay  and  6.77  pounds  of  corn,  daily  per  head.  The 
cattle  receiving  a gradually  increasing  amount  of  corn  after  the  first 
month  consumed  44.03  pounds  of  silage,  4.01  pounds  of  hay  and 
6.07  pounds  of  shelled  corn.  The  cattle  receiving  a full  feed  of 
corn  consumed  33.88  pounds  of  silage,  2.04  pounds  of  hay  and 
13.25  pounds  of  corn. 

Gains. — The  influence  of  the  limited  amount  of  corn  on  the 
rate  of  gain  made  by  the  cattle  is  shown  in  Table  VI. 


Table:  VI. — Showing  Average  Daily  Gain  ,per  Steer  by  Months, 
December  13,  1916  to  May  2,  1917  (140  days) 


Lot  4 

Lot  1 

Lot  6 1 

Lot  5 

Shelled  corn.i 

Shelled  corn, 2 

One-half  feed 

No  corn. 

cottonseed 

cottonseed 

• corn. 

cottonseed 

RATION 

meal, 

meal. 

cottonseed 

meal. 

corn  silage. 

corn  silage. 

meal. 

corn  silage, 

clover  hay 

clover  hay 

corn  silage. 

clover  hay 

clover  hay 

First  month 

2.74  lbs. 

1.63  lbs. 

2.07  lbs. 

1.93  lbs. 

Second  month 

2.10  “ 

1.43  “ 

1.57  “ 

1.53  “ 

Third  month 

3.48  “ 

3.15  “ 

1.78  “ 

2.05  “ 

Fourth  month 

2.23  “ 

1.92  “ 

1.50  “ 

1.90  ” 

Last  20  days 

1.67  “ 

1.17  “ 

.94  “ 

.26  “ 

Total  gain  per  steer 
Average  daily  gain 

350.0  lbs. 

267.1  lbs. 

226.5  lbs. 

227.5  lbs. 

for  entire  period 

2.50  “ 

1.91  “ 

1.62  “ 

1.63  “ 

1 Full  feed 

~ No  corn  first  month,  gradually  increasing  amount  of  corn  thereafter 


It  will  be  noted  that  the  most  rapid  gains  were  made  by  the  full- 
fed  cattle.  Each  steer  made  an  average  total  gain  of  350.0  pounds, 
an  average  of  2.5  pounds  daily  per  head.  When  a gradually 
increasing  amount  of  corn  was  fed,  each  steer  gained  on  an  average 
267.1  pounds  per  head  or  1.91  pounds  daily.  Where  one-half  feed 
of  corn  was  fed,  the  rate  of  gain  was  1.62  pounds  daily  per  head. 
When  no  corn  was  fed,  there  was  an  average  daily  gain  of  1.63 
pounds ; thus  showing  that  the  cattle  receiving  no  corn  made  more 
rapid  gains  than  those  having  one-half  feed  of  corn.  However,  the 
shrink  of  the  cattle  in  shipment  and  the  dressing  percentage  show 
that  Lot  6 taken  on  the  basis  of  market  weights  should  have  weighed 
out  of  the  experiment  with  practically  the  same  gains  as  the  cattle 
in  Lot  I. 


17 


Cost  of  Gains. — The  influence  of  limiting  the  feed  of  corn  on 
cost  of  gains  is  shown  in  Table  VII. 

Table  VIL — Showing  Average  Amount  of  Feed  Consumed  per 
Pound  Gain  and  Cost  per  Hundred  Pounds  Gain 


Lot  4 

"Loti 

Lot  6 

Lot  5 

RATION 

Shelled  corn,i 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn,^ 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

One-half  feed 
corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

No  corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Feed  per  pound  gain 
shelled  corn 
cottonseed  meal 
corn  silage 
clover  hay 

5.30  lbs. 
1.20  “ 
13.55  “ 

.82  “ 

3.18  lbs. 
1.52  “ 
23.08  “ 
2.10  “ 

4.19  lbs. 
1.77  “ 
26.36  “ 
1.69  “ 

1.76  lbs. 
32.75  “ 
1.79  “ 

Cost  per  cwt.  gain 

$17.51 

$18.12 

$20.97 

$14.87 

1 Full  feed  of  corn 

2 Fed  a limited  grain  ration 


Table  VII  shows  that  the  ration  containing  no  corn  made  the 
most  economical  gain  of  the  four  lots.  The  next  lot  in  point  of 
economy,  was  the  one  receiving  a full  feed  of  corn.  The  cost  of 
gains  where  a limited  amount  of  corn  was  fed,  was  greater  than 
when  a full  allowance  of  corn  was  given.  Eliminating  corn  from 
the  ration  reduced  the  cost  $2.64  on  each  hundred  pounds  of  gain, 
while  feeding  the  half  feed  of  corn  increased  the  cost  of  gain 
$3.46  per  hundred  pounds  above  the  cost  of  the  gain  on  cattle  receiv- 
ing a full  feed  of  corn.  Feeding  a gradually  increasing  amount  of 
corn  after  the  first  month  increased  the  cost  of  gain  61  cents  per 
hundred  pounds  over  a full  feed  of  corn. 

Summary. — Table  VIII  shows  a summary  of  the  results  ob- 
tained with  four  different  amounts  of  corn  in  the  rations.  The 
prices  of  the  feeds  are  given  on  page  7. 

It  will  be  noted  that  the  cattle  receiving  a full  feed  of  corn, 
made  more  rapid  gains  and  more  economical  gains  than  any  of 
the  lots,  except  the  one  receiving  no  corn.  It  would  have  been 
necessary  for  the  cattle  receiving  a full  feed  of  corn  to  sell  at  $10.50 
per  hundred  in  order  to  equalize  cost  of  production.  The  actual 
selling  price  was  $12.00  per  hundred,  thus  leaving  a profit  of  $1.50 
per  hundred  weight  on  the  final  weights  of  the  cattle.  In  the  lot 
receiving  a gradually  increasing  amount  of  corn,  the  necessary  sell- 
ing price  was  $to.i8  per  hundred  weight  and  the  actual  selling  price 
was  $10.85,  thus  leaving  a profit  of  67  cents  per  hundred  weight. 
The  cattle  receiving  one-half  feed  of  corn  would  have  had  to  sell 
at  $10.43  hundred  weight  and  actually  sold  at  $10.85.  The 
cattle  receiving  no  corn  could  have  sold  for  $9.35  per  hundred 
weight;  the  actual  selling  price  was  $10.75  hundred,  and  the 


i8 


TarlE  VIII. — Summary  of  Part  II 


RATION 

Lot  4 

Lot  1 

Lot  6 

Lot  0 

Shelled  corn.i 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn,^ 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

One-half  feed 
corn. 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

No  corn, 

cottonseed 
i meal, 

j corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

i 

Initial  value 

$8.15 

$8.15 

■ee 

po 

1—1 

Ot 

' $8.15 

Initial  weight 

10443  lbs. 

10472  lbs. 

10448  lbs. 

1 10452  lbs. 

Final  weight 

13943 

113143 

12713 

112727 

Total  gain 

3500 

i 2671 

2265 

2275 

Average  daily  gain 

2.50  “ 

i 1.91  “ 

1.62  “ 

1 1.63  “ 

Total  feed  consumed 

1 

shelled  corn 

18555 

8500 

9480 

cottonseed  meal 

4184 

! 4059 

3999 

I 4014 

corn  silage 

47425 

!61635 

59710 

74495 

clover  hay 

2860 

1 5615 

3830 

1 4076 

Daily  feed  per  steer 

shelled  corn 

13.25  “ 

6.07  “ 

6.77  “ 

1 

cottonseed  meal 

1 2.99  ” 

2.90  “ 

2.86  “ 

2.87  “ 

corn  silage 

! 33.88  “ 

! 44.03  “ 

42.65  “ 

53.21  “ 

clover  hay 

2.04  “ 

4.01  “ 

2.74  “ 

2.91  “ 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

, 

shelled  corn 

5.30  “ 

3.18  “ 

4.19  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

1.20  “ 

1.52  “ 

1.77  “ 

1.76  “ 

corn  silage 

13.55  “ 

23.08  “ 

26.36  “ 

32.75  “ 

clover  hay 

.82  “ 

2.10  “ 

1.69  “ 

1.79  “ 

Cost  of  gain  per  cwt. 

$17.51  ! 

$18.12 

$20.97 

$14.87 

Necessary  selling  price 

10.50  ! 

10.18 

i 

10.43 

1 

9.35 

j 

Actual  selling  price  in 

i 

1 

1 

lots  without  shrink 

1 

12.00  1 

10.85 

10.85 

10.75 

Profit  per  steer  not 

. 

including  pork 

20.93 

8.86 

5.30  j 

17.80 

Pork  produced 

1275  lbs. 

1143  lbs. 

1035  lbs. 

748  lbs. 

Corn  fed  to  hogs 

1996 

3198 

3374 

4324 

Shorts  fed  to  hogs 

210 

1 

Tankage  fed  to  hogs 

210 

Profit  per  steer 

including  pork 

$35.65 

$20.53 

$14.95 

1 

$21.21 

1 Pull  feed  of  corn 

2 Fed  limited  grain  ration 


19 


profit  $1.40  on  each  hundred  pounds  of  weight.  It  will  be  noted 
that  the  margin  between  necessary  selling  price  and  the  estimated 
selling  price  by  commission  men  was  greater  in  Lot  4 receiving  a full 
feed  of  corn.  Without  pork  this  lot  of  cattle  returned  the  greatest 
profit ; with  pork  considered  there  was  a greater  difference  in  favor 
of  the  full-fed  cattle.  This  summary  is  based  on  the  valuation  of 
the  cattle  at  the  end  of  the  experiment.  When  the  cattle  were  sold 
in  Chicago,  there  was  a slightly  greater  increase  in  the  price  of  Lots 
I and  6 in  proportion  to  the  other  two  lots.  This  was  enough  to 
amount  to  ^2.35  per  steer  in  Lot  i and  $1.47  in  Lot  6. 

Since  the  cost  of  feed  has  a very  marked  influence  on  the  profits 
to  be  derived  from  the  use  of  different  amounts  of  corn  in  the 
ration,  the  following  table  is  presented  for  the  purpose  of  showing 
the  necessary  selling  price  of  cattle  with  corn  at  different  prices. 
In  making  comparisons  in  this  table,  it  is  essential  to  remember  that 
the  cattle  in  Lot  4 were  valued  $1.25  per  hundred  more  than  those 
in  Lot  5,  and  $1.15  per  hundred  more  than  those  in  Lots-  i and  6. 

The  shrinkage  and  dressing  percentage  of  the  different  lots 
showed  that  Lots  i and  6 were  valued  low  in  comparison  with  the 
other  lots.  This  would  have  made  considerable  difference  in  rela- 
tive financial  results,  but  would  not  have  changed  the  relative  finan- 
cial standing  of  the  four  lots.  Table  IX  shows  the  necessary 
selling  prices  of  the  cattle  with  corn  at  different  prices. 


Table  IX. — Showing  Necessary  Selling  Price  with  Corn  at  Vary- 
ing Prices  and  Corn  Silage  at  Corresponding  Prices. 

Pork  Not  Included 


Price 

corn 

per  bushel 

Price 
silage 
lier  ton 

Lot  5 

Lot  6 

Lot  1 

Lot  4 

No  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

One-half  feed 
corn, 

cottonseed 

meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn,i 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

$ .50 

$3.50 

$8.62 

$9.07 

$8.84 

$8.69 

.75 

4.75 

8.98 

9.70 

9.42 

9.49 

1.00 

6.00 

9.35 

10.33 

10.01 

10.30 

1.25 

7.25 

9.72 

10.95 

10.59 

11.10 

1.50 

8.50 

10.08 

11.58 

11.16 

11.91 

1.75 

9.75 

10.45 

12.21 

11.75 

12.71 

2.00 

11.00 

10.81 

12.83 

12.33 

13.52 

1 Lot  1 fed  no  corn  first  month  and  a g-radually  increasing-  amount  thereafter. 
Hay  was  valued  at  $12.00  per  ton  and  cottonseed  meal  at  $45.00  per  ton 

With  corn  at  $1.06  per  bushel  the  pork  produced,  reduced  the  necessary  selling 
price  as  follows: 

Lot  1 — 89  cents  per  hundred  pounds 
Lot  4 — $1.06  per  hundred  pounds 
Lot  5 — 27  cents  per  hundred  pounds 
Lot  6 — 76  cents  per  hundred  pounds 


20 


PART  III 

CLOVER  HAY  vs.  ALFALFA  HAY  AS  ROUGHAGE  FOR 
FATTENING  STEERS 

Part  III  of  this  bulletin  is  a report  of  trials  to  determine  the 
comparative  value  of  clover  hay  and  alfalfa  hay  as  roughage  for 
fattening  steers.  Three  previous  trials  have  shown  that  on  an 
average  there  has  been  practically  no  difference  between  these  two 
hays  for  fattening  cattle.  The  results  of  the  fourth  trial  of  this 
series  are  reported  in  this  bulletin. 

Daily  Ration. — The  average  daily  feed  per  steer  by  30-day 
periods  is  shown  in  Table  X. 

It  will  be  noted  in  Table  X,  that  for  all  practical  purposes  there 
was  no  difference  in  the  grain  consumption  of  the  cattle  re- 
ceiving clover  hay  and  those  receiving  alfalfa  hay.  During  one 
month  when  adjustment  was  being  made  for  a sick  steer  in  Lot  3, 
there  was  a slight  difference  in  grain  consumption ; also  during  the 
last  month,  in  Lot  7,  when  the  cattle  were  off  feed  slightly  for  a few 
days.  However,  it  can  be  considered  that  the  appetites  of  the  cattle 
were  equal  in  the  two  lots  in  which  clover  was  compared  with 
alfalfa. 


21 


TablK  X. — Showing  Average  Amount  of  Feed  Consumed  Daily  per 
Head  by  Fattening  Steers,  December  13,  1916  , 

to  May  2,  1917  (140  days) 


RATION 

Lot  2 

Lot  3 

Lot  4 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

alfalfa  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

' corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
alfalfa  hay 

First  month 

shelled  corn 

8.12  lbs. 

8.12  lbs. 

8.12  lbs. 

8.12  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

2.36  “ 

2.36  “ 

2.36 

“ 

2.36  “ 

corn  silage 

45.90 

“ 

45.80  “ 

clover  hay 

17.53  “ 

2.07 

“ 

alfalfa  hay 

17.87  - “ 

2.46  “ 

Second  month 

shelled  corn 

14.40  “ 

14.89  “ 

12.40 

(( 

12.40  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

2.83  “ 

2.93  “ 

2.90 

(( 

2.85  “ 

corn  silage 

39.63 

(( 

40.10  “ 

clover  hay 

16.00  “ 

2.12 

alfalfa  hay 

17.85  “ 

1.65  “ 

Third  month 

shelled  corn 

17.10  “ 

17.13  “ 

14.67 

“ 

14.67  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

2.98  “ 

■ 2.98  “ 

3.12 

“ 

2.98  “ 

corn  silage 

30.88 

“ 

32.07  “ 

clover  hay 

14.28  “ 

2.08 

(( 

alfalfa  hay 

15.00  “ 

1.20  “ 

Fourth  month 

shelled  corn 

20.57  “ 

20.57  “ 

16.00 

“ 

16.00  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

3.13  “ 

3.17  “ 

3.28 

“ 

3.13  “ 

corn  silage 

25.00 

“ 

25.00  “ 

clover  hay 

9.18  “ 

1.93 

“ 

alfalfa  hay 

11.33  “ 

1.35  “ 

Last  20  days 

shelled  corn 

22.00  “ 

22.00  “ 

16.00 

it 

14.85  “ 

cottonseed  meal 

3.33  “ 

3.36  “ 

3.43 

(( 

3.25  “ 

corn  silage 

25.00 

“ 

25.00  “ 

clover  hay 

9.00  “ 

2.00 

“ 

alfalfa  hay 

9.11  “ 

1.20  “ 

Average  daily  feed 

for  entire  period 

shelled  corn 

16.04  lbs. 

16.15  lbs. 

13.25  lbs. 

13.09  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

2.90  “ 

2.93  “ 

2.*99 

2.89  “ 

corn  silage 

33.88 

34.21  “ 

clover  hay 

13.50  “ 

2.04 

alfalfa  hay 

14.60  “ 

1.60  “ 

22 


Gains. — The  gains  made  by  each  lot  of  steers  are  shown  in 
Table  XL 


TablK  XL— Showing  Average  Daily  Gain  per  Steer  by  Months, 
December  13,  1916  to  May  2,  1917  (140  days) 


Lot  2 

Lot  3 

Lot  4 

1 Lot  7 

RATION 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

alfalfa  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silag:e, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silagre, 
alfalfa  hay 

First  month 

1.92  lbs. 

2.01  lbs. 

2.74  lbs. 

2.39  lbs. 

Second  month 

1.95  “ 

1.17  “ 

2.10  “ 

1.72  “ 

Third  month 

2.62  “ 

! 2.74  “ 

3.48  “ 

2.12  “ 

Fourth  month 

2.45  “ 

2.98  “ 

2.23  “ 

2.07  ” 

Last  20  days 

2.74  “ 

I 1.78  “ 

1.67  “ 

1.64  “ 

Total  gain  per  steer 

322.9  lbs. 

302.4  lbs. 

350.0  lbs. 

281.6  lbs. 

Average  daily  gain 
for  entire  period 

2.31  “ 

i 2.16  “ 

2.50 

2.01  “ 

It  will  be  noted  that  there  was  a slight  increase  in  rate  of  gain 
when  clover  hay  was  compared  with  alfalfa  hay  with  no  other 
roughage  available  to  the  cattle.  There  was  an  additional  gain  of 
20.5  pounds  per  steer  during  the  feeding  period  in  favor  of  the 
clover  hay.  When  clover  hay  was  compared  with  alfalfa  hay  with 
corn  silage  in  both  lots,  the  rate  of  gain  was  much  more  rapid  with 
clover  hay  than  with  alfalfa  hay.  This  is  in  part  accounted  for  by 
the  fact  that  one  steer  in  Lot  7 was  not  as  thrifty  as  he  should 
have  been. 

Cost  of  Gains. — Table  XII  shows  the  average  amount  of  feed 
per  pound  of  gain  and  the  cost  of  a hundred  pounds  of  gain. 


Table  XII. — Showing  Average  Amount  of  Feed  Consumed  per 
Pound  Gain  and  Cost  per  Hundred  Pounds  Gain 


RATION 

Lot  2 

Lot  3 

Lot  4 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

alfalfa  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
alfalfa  hay 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

shelled  corn 

6.95  lbs. 

7.48  lbs. 

5.30  lbs. 

6.51  lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

1.26  “ 

1.36  “ 

1.20  “ 

1.44  “ 

corn  silage 

13.55  “ 

17.01  “ 

clover  hay 

5.85  “ 

.82  “ 

alfalfa  hay 

6.76  “ 

.79  “ 

Cost  per  cwt.  gain 

$19.99 

$21.77 

$17.51 

$21.36 

It  will  be  noted  that  in  both  instances  the  clover  hay  produced 
gains  at  less  expenditure  of  feed  and  at  a lower  cost  than  where 
alfalfa  was  fed.  This  is  slightly  contrary  to  the  average  of  previous 
trials  which  have  shown  that  for  all  practical  purposes  cost  of  gains 
is  the  same  with  the  two  classes  of  hay  of  equal  quality. 


23 


Table:  XIII. — Summary  of  Part  III 


RATION 

Lot  2 

Lot  3 ^ 

L 

Lot  4 

Lot  7 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

alfalfa  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

com  silage, 
clover  hay 

Shelled  corn, 
cottonseed 
meal, 

corn  silage, 
alfalfa  hay 

Initial  value 

$8.15 

$8.15 

$8.15 

$8.15 

Initial  weight 

10408 

lbs. 

9513 

lbs. 

10443 

lbs. 

10442 

lbs. 

Final  weight 

13637 

(( 

12235 

44 

13943 

“ 

13258 

“ 

Total  gain 

3229 

(( 

2722 

3500 

“ 

2816 

“ 

Average  daily  gain 

2.31 

2.16 

44 

2.50 

“ 

2.01 

44 

Total  feed  consumed 

shelled  corn 

22455 

20350 

18555 

44 

18325 

44 

cottonseed  meal 

4059 

3693 

44 

4184 

44 

4049 

corn  silage 

47425 

44 

47891 

44 

clover  hay 

18900 

2860 

alfalfa  hay 

18394 

44 

2237 

Daily  feed  per  steer 

shelled  corn 

16.04 

(( 

16.15 

13.25 

13.09 

cottonseed  meal 

2.90 

2.93 

44 

2.99 

2.89 

44 

corn  silage 

33.88 

34.21 

clover  hay 

13.50 

2.04 

44 

alfalfa  hay 

14.60 

1.60 

Feed  per  pound  gain 

shelled  corn 

6.95 

7.48 

5.30 

6.51 

44 

cottonseed  meal 

1.26 

1.36 

44 

1.20 

44 

1.44 

corn  silage 

13.55 

44 

17.01 

44 

clover  hay 

5.85 

.82 

44 

alfalfa  hay 

6.76 

44 

.79 

Cost  of  gain  per  cwt. 

$19.99 

$21.77 

$17.51 

$21.36 

Necessary  selling  price 

10.95 

11.18 

10.50 

10.96 

Actual  selling  price  in 

lots  without  shrink 

11.75 

11.75 

12.00 

12.00 

Proht  per  steer 

not  including  pork 

10.85 

7.74 

20.93 

13.84 

Pork  produced 

1479 

lbs. 

1586 

lbs. 

1275 

lbs. 

990 

lbs. 

Corn  fed  to  hogs 

2594 

(4 

2594 

44 

1996 

“ 

1959 

44 

Shorts  fed  to  hogs 

210 

210 

44 

210 

44 

Tankage  fed  to  hogs 

210 

<4 

210 

210 

44 

Profit  per  steer 

including  pork 

$27.60 

$28.20 

$35.65 

$25.48 

1 Nine  steers  in  Lot  3 


24 


Summary. — Table  XIII  shows  a summary  of  the  feeding  op- 
erations as  relating  to  the  four  lots  comparing  clover  and  alfalfa 
hay.  The  prices  of  feeds  are  given  on  page  7.  It  will  be  noted 
that  practically  all  factors  in  this  trial  are  in  favor  of  clover  hay. 
The  rate  of  gain  is  more  rapid  and  the  cost  of  gain  is  less  in  both 
instances.  However,  the  selling  value  of  the  cattle  is  the  same  for 
the  clover  and  the  alfalfa  hay  in  both  cases.  Without  including  the 
pork,  there  was  a larger  profit  when  clover  hay  was  fed  than  when 
alfalfa  hay  was  fed,  but  with  the  pork  included,  there  was  a greater 
profit  with  alfalfa  hay  when  corn  silage  was  not  fed  in  combination 
with  the  two  than  there  was  with  clover  hay. 

An  average  of  the  two  tests  in  this  experiment  shows  that  the 
clover  was  more  profitable  than  the  alfalfa. 


FINANCIAL  STATEMENT 


Lot  I. — Ten  Steers  Fed  Shelled  Corn  (limited).  Cottonseed  Meal, 
Clover  Hay  and  Corn  Silage,  1916-17 


Dec.  13,  To  10  steers,  weight  10472  lbs*.  @ $8.15  per  cwt 

$ 853.47 

Jan.  12-Feb. 

11, 

To 

1500 

lbs. 

shelled  corn  @ 

93.9  cts. 

per 

bu. 

25.15 

Feb.  11-Mar. 

13, 

To 

2100 

lbs. 

shelled  corn  @ 

$1,007 

per 

bu. 

37.76 

Mar.  13-Apr. 

12, 

To 

2700 

lbs. 

shelled  corn  @ 

$1,138 

per 

bu. 

54.87 

Apr.  12-May 

2, 

To 

2200 

lbs. 

shelled  corn  @ 

$1,431 

per 

bu. 

56.22 

Dec.  13-May 

2, 

To 

4059 

lbs. 

cottonseed  meal 

@ $45.00  per  ton 

91.33 

Dec.  13-'May 

2, 

To 

61635 

lbs. 

silage  @ $6.00 

per  ton... 

184.91 

Dec.  13-May 

2, 

To 

5615 

lbs. 

clover  hay  @ $12.00  per 

ton.. 

33.69 

Total  expenditures  $1337.40 

May  2,  By  10  steers,  weight  13143  lbs.  @ $10.85  per  cwt 1426.02 

Total  profit  without  pork  88.62 

Profit  per  steer  without  pork  8.86 

Dec.  13^May  2,  To  3198  lbs.  shelled  corn  fed  hogs  @ 

$1.06  per  bu $ 60.53 

Dec.  13-May  2,  By  1143  lbs.  pork  @ $15.50  per  cwt 177.17 


Value  of  pork  produced  from  droppings  $ 116.64 

Total  receipts  including  pork  1542.66 

Total  profits  including  pork  205.26 

Profit  per  steer  including  pork  20.53 

Price  received  per  bushel  of  corn  fed  cattle 2.499 


Lot  2. — Ten  Steers  Fed  Shelled  Corn,  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Clover 

Hay,  1916-17 

Dec.  13,  To  10  steers,  weight  10408  lbs.  @ $8.15  per  cwt $ 848.25 

Dec.  13-Jan.  12,  To  2435  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ 88.3  cts.  per  bu.  38.39 

Jan.  12-Feb.  11,  To  4320  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ 93.9  cts.  per  bu.  72.44 

Feb.  11-Mar.  13,  To  5130  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,007  per  bu.  92.25 

Mar.  13-Apr.  12,  To  6170  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,138  per  bu.  125.38 

Apr.  12-May  2,  To  4400  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,431  per  bu.  112.44 

Dec.  13-'May  2,  To  4059  lbs.  cottonseed  meal  @ $45.00  per  ton  91.33 
Dec.  13-May  2,  To  18900  lbs.  clover  hay  @ $12.00  per  ton 113.40 


Total  expenditures 


.$1493.88 


25 


FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS— Continued 

May  2,  By  10  steers,  weight  13637  lbs.  @ $11.75  per  cwt 1602.35 


Total  profit  without  pork  108.47 

Profit  per  steer  without  pork  10.85 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  2594  lbs.  shelled  corn  fed  hogs  @ 

$1.06  per  bu $49.10 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  210  lbs.  tankage  fed  hogs  @ 

$70.00  per  ton  7.35 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  210  lbs.  shorts  fed  hogs  @ 

$50.00  per  ton 5.25 


Total  cost  of  extra  feed  for  hogs ...$61.70 

May  2,  By  1479  lbs.  pork  @ $15.50  per  cwt 229.25  • 


Value  of  pork  produced  from  droppings  $ 167.55 

Total  receipts  including  pork  1769.90 

Total  profit  including  pork  276.02 

Profit  per  steer  including  pork  27.60-^ 

Price  received  per  bushel  of  corn  fed  cattle 1.788 

Lot  3- — Nine  Steers  Fed  Shelled  Corn  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Alfalfa 

Hay,  1916-17 

Dec.  13,  To  9 steers,  weight  9513  lbs.  @ $8.15  per  cwt... $ 775.31 

Dec.  13-Jan.  12,  To  2191  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ 88.3  cts.  per  bu.  34.55 

Jan.  12-Feb.  11,  To  4020  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ 93.9  cts.  per  bu.  67.41 

Feb.  11-Mar.  13,  To  4626  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,007  per  bu.  83.19 

Mar.  13-Apr.  12,  To  5553  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,138  per  bu.  112.85 

Apr.  12-May  2,  To  3960  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,431  per  bu.  101.19 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  3693  lbs.  cottonseed  meal  @ $45.00  per  ton  83.09 
Dec.  13-May  2,  To  18394  lbs.  alfalfa  hay  @ $12.00  per  ton 110.36 


Total  expenditures  $1367.95 

May  2,  By  9 steers,  weight  12235  lbs.  @ $11.75  per  cwt 1437.61 


Total  profit  without  pork  $ 69.66 

Profit  per  steer  without  pork  7.74 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  2594  lbs.  shelled  corn  fed  hogs  @ 

$1.06  per  bu $ 49.10 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  210  lbs.  tankage  fed  hogs  @ 

$70.00  per  ton  7.35 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  210  ibs.  shorts  fed  hogs  @ 

$50.00  per  ton  5.25 

Total  cost  of  extra  feed  for  hogs 61.70 

May  2,  By  1586  lbs.  pork  @ $15.50  per  cwt 245.83 


Value  of  pork  produced  from  droppings $ 184.13 

Total  receipts  including  pork  1621.74 

Total  profit  including  pork  253.79 

Profit  per  steer  including  pork  , 28.20 

Price  received  per  bushel  of  corn  fed  cattle 1.797 


26 


FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS— Continued 

Lot  4. — Ten  Steers  Fed  Shelled  Corn,  Cottonseed  Meal,  Corn  Silage 
and  Clover  Hay,  1916-17 

Dec.  13,  To  10  steers,  weight  10443  lbs.  @ $8.15  per  cwt $ 851.10 

Dec.  13-Jaii.  12,  To  2435  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ 88.3  cts.  per  bu.  38.39 

Jan.  12-Feb.  11,  To  3720  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ 93.9  cts.  per  bu.  62.38 

Feb.  ll'Mar.  13,  To  4400  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,007  per  bu.  79.12 

Mar.  13-Apr.  12,  To  4800  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,138  per  bu.  97.54 

Apr.  12-May  2,  To  3200  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,431  per  bu.  81.77 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  4184  lbs.  cottonseed  meal  @ $45.00  per  ton  94.14 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  47425  lbs.  corn  silage  @ $6.00  per  ton 142.28 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  2860  lbs.  clover  hay  @ $12.00  per  ton 17.16 


Total  expenditures  $1463.88 

May  2,  By  10  steers,  weight  13943  lbs.  @ $12.00  per  cwt 1673.16 


Total  profit  without  pork  $ 209.28 

Profit  per  steer  without  pork  20.93 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  1996  lbs.  shelled  corn  fed  hogs  @ 

$1.06  per  bu $ 37.78 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  210  lbs.  tankage  fed.  hogs  @ 

$70.00  per  ton  7.35 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  210  lbs.  shorts  fed  hogs  @ 

$50.00  per  ton  5.25 


Total  cost  of  extra  feed  for  hogs  $ 50.38 

May  2,  By  1275  lbs.  pork  @ $15.50  per  cwt 197.63 


Value  of  pork  produced  from  droppings 

Total  receipts  including  pork  

Total  profit  including  pork  

Profit  per  steer  including  pork  

Price  received  per  bushel  of  corn  fed  cattle 


.$  147.25 
. 1820.41 
. 356.53 
. 35.65 

2.16 


Lot  5. — Ten  Steers  Fed  No  Corn,  Cottonseed  Meal,  Corn  Silage 
and  Clover  Hay,  1916-17 

Dec.  13,  To  10  steers,  weight  10452  lbs.  @ $8.15  per  cwt $ 851.84 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  4014  lbs.  cottonseed  meal  @ $45.00  per  ton  90.32 

Dec.  13-May  2,  •To  74495  lbs.  corn  silage  @ $6.00  per  ton 223.49 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  4076  lbs.  clover  hay  @ $12.00  per  ton 24.46 


Total  expenditures  $1190.11 

May  2,  By  10  steers,  weight  12727  Ihs.  @ $10.75  per  cwt 1368.15 

Total  profit  without  pork  178.04 

Total  profit  per  steer  without  pork  17.80 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  4324  lbs.  shelled  corn  fed  hogs  @ 

$1.06  per  bu $ 81.85 

May  2,  By  748  lbs.  pork  @ $15.50  per  cwt 115.94 


Value  of  pork  produced  from  droppings $ 34.09 

Total  receipts  including  pork  1402.24 

Total  profit  including  pork  212.13 

Profit  per  steer  including  pork  21.21 


2? 


FINANCiAL  ST ATEM ENTS— Continued 

Lot  6. — Ten  Steers  Fed  One-half  Feed  Corn,  Cottonseed  Meal, 
Corn  Silage,  and  Clover  Hay,  1916-17 

Dec.  13,  To  lO  steers,  weight  10448  lbs.  @ $8.15  per  cwt $ 851.51 

Dec.  13-Jan.  12,  To  1420  lbs.  shelled  corn  (g)  88.3  cts.  per  bu  22.39 

Jan.  12-Peb.  11,  To  1860  lbs.  shelled  corn  (g)  93.9  cts.  per  bu.  31.19 

Feb.  11-Mar.  13,  To  2200  lbs.  shelled  corn  (g)  $1,007  per  bu.  39.56 

Mar.  13-Apr.  12,  To  2400  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,138  per  bu.  48.77 

Apr.  12-May  2,  To  1600  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,431  per  bu.  40.89 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  3999  lbs.  cottonseed  meal  @ $45.00  per  ton  89.98 


Dec.  13-May  2,  To  59710  lbs.  corn  silage  (g)  $6.00  per  ton 179.13 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  3830  lbs.  clover  hay  @ $12.00  per  ton 22.98 


Total  expenditures  $1326.40 

May  2,  By  10  steers,  weight  12713  lbs.  (g)  $10.85  per  cwt 1379.36 

Total  profit  without  pork  52.96 

Profit  per  steer  without  pork  5.30 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  3374  lbs.  shelled  corn  fed  hogs  (g) 


$1.06  per  bu $ 63.87 

May  2,  By  1035  lbs.  pork  (g)  $15.50  per  cwt 160.43 


Value  of  pork  produced  from  droppings $ 96.56 

Total  receipts  including  pork  1475.92 

Total  profit  including  pork  149.52 

Profit  per  steer  including  pork  14.95 

Price  received  per  bushel  of  corn  fed  cattle 1.963 


Lot  7. — Ten  Steers  Fed  Shelled  Corn,  Cottonseed  Meal,  Corn 
Silage,  and  Alfalfa  Hay,  1916-17 

Dec.  13,  To  10  steers,  weight  10442  lbs.  @ $8.15  per  cwt $ 851.02 

Dec.  13-Jan.  12,  To  2435  lbs.  shelled  corn  (g)  88.3  cts.  per  bu.  38.39 

Jan.  12-Feb.  11,  To  3720  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ 93.9  cts.  per  bu.  62.38 

Feb.  11-Mar.  13,  To  4400  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,007  per  bu.  79  12 

Mar.  13-Apr.  12,  To  4800  lbs.  shelled  corn  @ $1,138  per  bu.  97.54 

Apr.  12-May  2,  To  2970  lbs.  shelled  corn  at  $1,431  per  bu.  75.89 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  4049  lbs.  cottonseed  meal  (g)  $45.00  per  ton  91.10 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  47891  lbs.  corn  silage  @ $6.00  per  ton 143.67 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  2237  lbs.  clover  hay  (g)  $12.00  per  ton 13.42 


Total  expenditures  $1452  53 

May  2,  By  10  steers,  weight  13258  lbs.  @ $12.00  per  cwt 1590.96 


Total  profit  without  pork  $ 138.43 

Profit  per  steer  without  pork  13.84 

Dec.  13-May  2,  To  1959  lbs.  shelled  corn  fed  to  hogs  (g) 

$1.06  per  bu $ 37.08 

May  2,  By  990  lbs.  pork  @ $15.50  per  cwt 153.45 


Value  of  pork  produced  from  droppings  $ 116.37 

Total  receipts  including  pork  1707.33 

Total  profit  including  pork  254.80 

Profit  per  steer  including  pork  25.48 

Price  received  per  bushel  of  corn  fed  cattle  1 1.858 


3D, 7 

1 7j- 


.AJ3t  , 

PukoUE 


CV 


ILI 


UNIVERSITY  0EQ  1 4 

Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


Bulletin  No.  207,  Vol.  XX 
August,  1917 


GOOSEBERRIES  AND  CURRANTS 


Published  by  the  Station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


•i  ,jlS  i 

t 191E 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 


Joseph  D.  Oliver,  President 

Fay  S.  Chandler 

Charles  Dow^ning 

John  A.  Hillenbrand 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs 

Warren  T.  McCray 

James  W.  Noel 

George  W.  Purcell 

Andrew  E.  Reynolds 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Pli.  D. 


South  Bend,  St.  Joseph  County 

Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

Greenfield,  Hancock  County 

Batesville,  Ripley  County 

Bridgeport,  Marion  County 

Kentland.  Newton  County 

Indianapolis,  Marion  County 

Vincennes,  Knox  County 

■Crawfordsville,  Montgomery  County 
President  of  the  University 


STATION  STAFF 
HEADS  OF  DEPARTMENTS 


Arthur  Goss^  M.  S.,  A.  C 

George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A 

Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V.  M 

Otto  F.  Hunziker,  M.  S 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B 

William  J.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S.,  A.  C.^. 

John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S 

James  Troop,  M.  S 

Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B,  S.  A 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S 


Director 

■Sup’t  Agricultural  Extension 

Chief  Veterinarian 

....Chief  in  Dairy  Husbandry 

Chief  in  Botany 

State  Chemist 

-Chief  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Chief  in  Entomology 

Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Chief  in  Horticulture 


ASSOCIATES  AND  ASSISTANTS 

JOHN  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.s Entomological  Assistant 

Evelyn  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Paul  R.  Bausman,  B.  S.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

James  C.  Beavers,  B.  Agr Associate  in  Soils  and  Crops  Extension 

Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Charles  S.  Brewster.  M.  S Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S Associate  in  Milk  Production 

Glenn  G.  Carter.  B.  S.^ Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C Assistant  Veterinarian 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B,  S Assistant  in  Serum  Production 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader  Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B,  S Associate  in  Crops 

Carleton  Cutler,  B.  S.* First  Deputy  State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 

JOHN  J.  Davis,  B,  S.^ Entomological  Assistant  in  Charge 

Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A Associate  iu  Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 

Leslie  R,  George,  B.  S Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 

Mabel  L.  Harlan Assistant  in  Agricultural  Extension 

Cora  A.  Jacobs,  A.  M.^ Seed  Analyst 

Sadocib  C.  Jones,  M.  S Assistant  in  Soils 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Franklin  G.  King,  B.  S Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Walter  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S.* Scientific  Assistant 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S Assistant  in  Entomology 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B.* Scientific  Assistant 

Horace  C.  Mills,  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S. ..Research  Assistant  in  Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 

Joseph  Oskamp,  B.  S Research  Assistant  in  Pomology 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Harry  C.  Paine,  D.  V.  M Associate  Veterinarian 

Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A Associate  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.* First  Deputy  State  Chemist  (Fertilizers) 

Harry  J.  Reed Associate  in  Horticulture 

Charles  C Rees,  M.  A Assistant  in  Botany 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S.s Scientific  Assistant 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.* Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist  Department 

J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G..  B.  S Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Swine  Production  and  Management 

Herbert  B.  Switzer,  B.  S.  A Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Samuel  F.  Thornton,  B.  S.* Deputy  State  Chemist 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  S.» Scientific  Assistant 

Gilbert  P.  Walker,  B.  S Assistant  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Assistant  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Nellie  Tracy Secretary  to  the  Director  and  Librarian 

Mary  K.  Bloom Bookkeeper 

1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Seed  Testing 

« Detailed  by  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture — Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  In- 
sect Investigations 

* Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(UNDER  LEGISLATIVE  ACT  OF  1909) 

J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleville State  Live  Stock  Association 

U.  R.  Fishel,  Hope State  Poultry  Fanciers’  Association 

H.  H,  SwAiM,  South  Bend State  Horticultural  Society 

D.  B,  Johnson,  Mooresville State  Dairy  Association 

D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort State  Corn  Growers’  Association 


GOOSEBERRIES  AND  CURRANTS 


Prepared  under  the  direction  of  C.  G.  Woodbury 
By  JOSKPH  OSKAMP 

Gooseberries  and  currants  are  the  least  important  commercially 
of  the  small  fruits  in  Indiana.  They  are  quite  common  in  the  home 
gardens  of  the  State  where  they  are  usually  grown  under  continual 
neglect.  Considering  the  many  culinary  uses  to  which  they  can  be 
put,  it  is  surprising  they  are  not  more  extensively  grown.  These 
fruits,  however,  seem  to  have  been  more  popular  with  our  for- 
bears than  with  this  generation.  Currants  have  long  been  prized  by 
the  housewife  and  are  the  standard  par  excellence  in  jellies.  Goose- 
berries make  a very  fine  jelly,  preserve,  or  when  canned  ripe  and 
made  into  a sauce,  serve  as  an  excellent  tart  to  eat  with  meat 
or  fowl. 

LOCATION 

Both  of  these  crops  require  similar  climatic  and  soil  con- 
ditions. They  do  best  in  a cool  climate  and  rich  soil,  but 
have  a sufficiently  wide  range  of  adaptation  to  thrive  in  all  parts 
of  the  State.  They  will  stand  excessively  low  temperatures  without 
winter-killing  in  either  bud  or  wood,  which  adds  to  their  reliability 
as  croppers.  While  the  climatic  conditions  in  southern  Indiana 
are  not  as  congenial  as  might  be  wished,  the  clayey  character  of  the 
soil  of  much  of  that  region  is  a distinct  advantage.  Gooseberries 
and  currants  will  thrive  but  indifferently  where  the  summers  are 
very  hot  and  the  soil  is  light  and  sandy.  In  the  southern  part  of 
the  State  more  spraying  will  be  necessary  to  maintain  a healthy 
foliage.  A northern  exposure  is  desirable  when  possible,  or  plant- 
ing in  the  orchard  where  the  plants  will  be  shaded  a portion  of  the 
day,  is  practical  with  these  crops. 

In  the  home  garden,  planting  on  the  north  side  of  a fence  or 
building  is  permissible. 

PLANTING 

It  is  essential  that  the  soil  be  suitably  prepared  to  receive 
the  plants,  by  deep  plowing,  thorough  disking,  dragging  and 
harrowing,  or  in  the  small  garden  by  a deep  spading  and  raking. 
These  fruits  should  be  set  in  ground  that  has  previously  been  in  a 
cultivated  crop.  They  should  not  follow  sod. 

The  distance  of  planting  will-vary  with  the  richness  of  the  soil 
and  the  habits  of  the  variety  chosen.  The  comnaon  spacing  is 
five  by  five  feet  or  rows  six  feet  apart  and  plants  four  feet  apart  in 
the  row.  Five  by  five  feet  does  very  nicely  for  many  of  the  less 
vigorous  European  sorts  or  with  a trim  bush  like  Oregon  Champion, 
but  scarcely  suffices  for  a variety  like  Houghton  when  the  plants 
have  reached  an  age  of  six  or  seven  years.  Four  by  six  feet  or  six 
by  six  feet  is  preferable  to  a less  distance  for  planting  gooseberries 
or  currants. 

Both  spring  and  fall  planting  are  practiced  successfully.  Fall 
planting  may  often  be  a distinct  advantage  because  the  plants  natur- 


4 


ally  lose  their  leaves  early  in  the  fall  and  are  soon  ready  to  set, 
whereas  they  leaf  out  very  early  in  the  spring.  In  fall  planting,  it 
is  well  to  protect  the  plants  with  straw  or  leaves.  Planting  in  the 
spring,  if  done  early  is  safe  and  the  uncertain  effects  of  the  winter 
are  avoided. 

Having  the  land  properly  prepared,  it  may  be  laid  off  by  run- 
ning a marker  in  one  direction  and  plowing  deep  furrows  in  the 
other.  The  plants  are  set  in  the  furrows  by  drawing  the  earth  about 
their  roots  and  firming  it  well.  In  the  home  garden,  the  spade  is 
generally  used  but  whatever  the  method  of  setting,  it  is  highly  im- 
portant to  have  the  soil  pressed  tightly  about  the  roots  of  the  plants. 

CULTURE 

Some  means  must  be  taken  to  conserve  the  soil  moisture  and 
keep  down  weeds.  In  plantings  of  any  size,  cultivation  is  generally 
the  most  feasible. way  to  accomplish  this  end.  The  surface  of  the 


Fig-.  1.  A well  cultivated  field  of  currants.  Good  cultivation  means  increased 
production 


ground  should  be  kept  pulverized  until  the  bushes  have  made  their 
growth,  when  a cover  crop  may  be  sown.  Millet  is  quite  satisfactory 
for  this  purpose.  Shallow  cultivation  is  the  best,  so  as  to  avoid  dis- 
turbing the  feeding  roots  which  are  near  the  surface. 

In  the  home  garden  if  cultivation  is  inconvenient,  instead  of 
allowing  a sod  to  form  about  the  plants,  give  them  a heavy  mulch  of 
straw,  cuttings  from  the  lawn,  etc.  This  will  keep  the  soil  moist  and 
cool  and  it  will  be  found  that  the  bushes  will  do  much  better  than 
where  left  to  compete  with  grass  and  weeds.  In  cases  where  it  is 
practicable,  mulch  could  take  the  place  of  cultivation  even  on  a 
large  scale. 


5 


While  the  bushes  may  survive  under  almost  complete  neglect, 
there  is  no  profit  in  this  way  of  growing  them.  They  will  be  found 
to  respond  bountifully  to  the  best  attentions  of  the  grower.  It  is 
especially  beneficial  if  the  plants  can  be  heavily  manured  each  fall. 
No  fear  of  applying  too  much  manure  need  be  entertained. 

PRUNING 

The  principle  which  should  govern  the  pruning  of  goose- 
berries and  currants  is  the  fact  that  the  finer  fruit  and  the  most 
fruit  is  borne  on  the  younger  wood, — two  year  old  wood  is  in  its 
prime  and  four  year  old  wood  is  much  deteriorated.  Pruning  then, 
consists  in  cutting  off  the  oldest  canes  each  year  at  the  surface  of 
the  ground  and  thinning  out  the  weakest  of  the  young  growth, 
leaving  the  stouter  shoots  for  renewal.  Eight  to  12  canes  make  a 
bush  of  ample  proportions. 

While  clipping  back  the  annual  growth  is  sometimes  practiced, 
this  but  serves  to  increase  the  denseness  of  the  bushes  which  are 
sufficiently  crowded  and  difficult  to  pick  at  best.  Such  a procedure 
will  succeed  in  keeping  young  wood  coming  on  but  renewal  is 
better  accomplished  by  saving  a certain  number  of  new  sprouts 
which  spring  up  from  the  roots  each  year. 

INSECTS 

There  are  four  types  of  insects  which  are  more  or  less  common 
on  gooseberry  and  currant  plants  in  the  State;  scale,  leaf  eating 
worms,  borers  and  plant  lice. 

The  scale  which  infests  the  stems  of  the  plant  can  be  controlled 
by  giving  a winter  spray  of  concentrated  lime-sulfur, — 5 degrees 
Baume,  or  approximately  one  gallon  to  eight  gallons  of  water. 

Leaf  eating  worms  can  be  poisoned  by  spraying  as  soon  as  they 
appear,  with  arsenate  of  lead,  two  pounds  of  the  paste  or  one  pound 
of  the  powder  and  two  pounds  of  lime  to  50  gallons  of  water. 

The  borers  are  difficult  to  control,  as  the  grub-like  worms  bur- 
row in  the  pith  of  the  canes  where  they  are  beyond  the  reach  of 
sprays.  About  the  only  remedy  is  to  cut  out  all  infested  canes  in 
the  spring  before  the  borers  emerge,  and  burn  them. 

Occasionally  small,  green  or  yellow  bugs  will  be  found  on  the 
under  sides  of  currant  leaves,  causing  the  foliage  to  curl.  These 
are  plant  lice  or  aphids  which  suck  the  sap  of  the  foliage  to  the 
great  detriment  of  the  plants.  They  can  be  killed  if  spraying  is 
done  early,  before  the  leaves  curl  and  protect  the  lice  from  the 
spray  solution.  Use  nicotine-sulfate,  one  fluid  ounce^  to  eight  gal- 
lons of  water,  and  add  four  ounces  of  laundry  soap.  Use  an  angle 
nozzle,  so  the  under  sides  of  the  leaves  can  be  sprayed  thoroughly, 
for  each  louse  must  be  hit  with  the  solution  to  kill  it. 

DISEASES 

Diseases  probably  do  more  damage  to  gooseberries  and  currants 
than  insects,  because  the  cause  of  the  trouble  is  often  less  apparent. 

1 This  recommendation  is  based  on  nicotine-sulfate  containing  40  per  cent,  nico- 
tine. For  nicotine-sulfate  of  less  strength,  use  proportionately  more  material 


6 


The  mildew  is  a very  common  disease  affecting  especially  the 
European  varieties  of  gooseberries.  The  native  sorts  are  almost 
immune.  It  appears  on  the  young,  growing  parts  of  the  plants  pro- 
ducing a white,  powdery,  thread-like  effect.  The  disease  may  be  con- 
trolled by  spraying  the  bushes  either  with  potassium  sulfide  one 
ounce  to  two  gallons  of  water,  or  concentrated  lime-sulfur  one  part 
to  forty  parts  of  water.  The  first  application  should  be  made  as 
the  buds  are  opening  and  every  two  weeks  thereafter  if  the  dis- 
ease is  serious. 

Leaf  spot  is  one  of  the  most  serious  diseases  of  gooseberries 
and  currants  in  the  State  and  one  generally  ignored  by  the  grower. 
It  is  responsible  for  the  defoliating  of  the  bushes  early  in  the  sea- 
son, often  before  the  fruit  is  picked  and  the  bushes  become  weaker 
and  weaker  each  year. 

Spraying  with  concentrated  lime-sulfur^  when  the  buds  open 
in  the  spring  and  at  intervals  of  three  weeks  or  as  often  thereafter 
as  seems  necessary,  will  keep  the  foliage  healthy. 

PICKING  AND  MARKETING 

Currants  must  be  picked  with  care  if  they  are  to  hold  up  under 
shipment  and  present  a fresh  and  attractive  appearance  in  the  pack- 
age. Each  cluster  should  be  handled  by  the  stem  so  as  not  to  crush 
the  fruit.  For  distant  shipment,  pick  while  the  fruit  is  yet  firm.  The 
i6-quart  hallock  case  is  generally  preferred  to  larger  containers  for 
shipping  currants. 

Gooseberries  are  practically  always  marketed  in  the  green 
state,  making  them  one  of  the  easiest  fruits  to  handle  after  they 
are  once  off  the  bushes.  Picking  is  a tedious  task  especially  with 
the  more  thorny  varieties.  On  a commercial  scale,  the  .fruit  is  often 
stripped  from  the  bushes,  leaves  and  all,  by  pickers  wearing  heavy 
gloves.  This  makes  a quick  job  of  picking,  after  which  the  fruit 
is  passed  through  an  ordinary  grain  fanning  mill  to  rid  it  of  leaves. 
Sixteen  and  twenty-four-quart  cases  are  in  common  use  for  this 
fruit,  although  in  special  cases  grape  baskets  or  even  barrels  are 
used. 

PROPAGATION 

The  currant  and  gooseberry  may  be  propagated  from  eight 
or  ten-inch  cuttings  taken  from  one  year  old  wood.  If  taken 
in  the  fall,  they  can  be  kept  in  damp  sand  or  sawdust  in  the 
cellar  or  buried  butt  ends  up,  in  a well  drained  spot  out-of-doors 
and  planted  in  the  spring.  The  cuttings  may  also  be  made  early  in 
the  spring  before  the  bushes  leaf  out  and  planted  directly  in  the  field. 

As  many  varieties  of  gooseberries  do  not  root  readily  from 
cuttings,  they  are  often  mound-layered.  This  practice  consists  in 
cutting  back  the  bushes  very  severely  and  the  following  summer 
when  the  shoots  have  about  made  their  growth,  the  bushes  are 
mounded  up  with  earth  to  within  a few  inches  of  the  ends  of  these 
young  shoots,  each  of  which  will  make  a plant.  The  American 

1 For  the  preparation  and  dilution  of  concentrated  lime-sulfur  see  Purdue  Uni- 
versity Extension  Leaflet  No.  48 


7 


varieties  will  produce  a satisfactory  root  system  the  same  season 
and  are  ready  for  transplanting  in  the  fall,  while  European  varie- 
ties are  left  two  seasons  before  separating. 


VARIETIES 

Varieties  oe  Gooseberries. — The  descriptions  of  the  follow- 
ing varieties  are  the  results  of  five  years’  notes  and  observations  at 
this  station  on  25  plants  of  each  variety  set  in  1910.  Those  varie- 
ties that  can  be  particularly  recommended  are  indicated  by  an 
asterisk. 

The  European  gooseberries  are  not  to  be  generally  advocated 
for  Indiana  planting,  except  possibly  as  a novelty  in  the  home 
garden  where  their  large  size  and  attractiveness 
make  them  desirable  to  eat  out  of  hand  when 
ripe.  This  is  a favorite  way  to  utilize  the  fruit  in 
England,  but  as  Americans  use  gooseberries  ex- 
clusively for  culinary  purposes  and  have  become 
accustomed  to  using  them  green,  there  is  little 
demand  for  the  ripe  fruit.  The  chief  virtue  of 
the  European  varieties  is  their  large  size.  They 
can  not  be  said  to  be  superior  in  quality  when 
ripe  to  our  best  native  sorts  and  they  are  much 
inferior  in  yield. 


Carman. — ^Fruit  oval,  medium  to  large,  green- 
ish yellow;  skin  covered  with  hairy  spines,  medium 
to  thin,  slightly  transparent,  veins  distinct;  pulp 
medium  firm,  subacid,  fair.  Bush  low,  spreading, 
medium  to  below  in  vigor,  thorns  many,  long;  foli- 
age medium  small,  dark,  glossy.  Very  unproductive. 

Plants  begin  to  fail  at  six  to  eight  years  old. 

Chautauqua. — Fruit  round,  medium  size,  pale 
green;  skin  moderately  thick,  smooth,  transparent, 
veins  inconspicuous;  pulp  moderately  firm,  juicy, 
fine  grained,  subacid,  tart,  attractive,  very  good. 

Fruit  resembles  Downing  in  appearance.  Bush  tall, 
upright,  vigorous;  thorns  many,  moderately  long; 
foliage  medium,  slightly  glossy;  suckers  many. 

Fairly  productive.  European-American. 

Columbus. — ^^Fruit  round  to  oblong,  large,  light 
green;  skin  smooth,  thick,  veins  distinct;  pulp 
medium,  subacid  to  sweet,  good.  Bush  moderately 
tall,  upright,  vigorous;  foliage  medium  in  size  and 
color,  glossy,  leathery;  suckers  few.  Fairly  pro- 
ductive. One  of  the  healthiest  of  the  European 
varieties.  European. 

Crown  Bob. — Fruit  round  to  oval,  large,  medium 
green  turning  to  reddish  purple;  skin  hairy,  mod- 
erately thick,  not  transparent,  veins  distinct;  pulp 
medium  firm,  subacid  to  almost  sweet,  good.  Bush 

low,  small,  moderately  upright;  foliage  small,  dark,  factory  European 
glossy,  leathery;  suckers  few.  Very  unproductive,  varieties.  B^ause  of 
Plants  begin  to  fail  at  six  to  eight  years  old.  pi*®  j*  i’® 

o .7  planted  m the  home 

European.  garden  as  a novelty 


Fig.  2.  Columbus — 
one  of  the  most  satis- 


8 


Downing*. — ^Fruit  round,  medium  size,  light  green; 
skin  moderately  thick,  smooth,  not  transparent,  veins 
distinct;  pulp  moderately  firm,  juicy,  sub-acid,  tart,  at- 
tractive, very  good.  Bush  moderately  tall,  somewhat 
spreading,  very  vigorous;  thorns  many,  medium  length; 
foliage  medium;  suckers  many,  stocky.  Productive.  One 
of  the  most  popular  and  reliable  varieties,  American- 
European. 

Houghton*. — Fruit  round,  small,  light  green,  turn- 
ing reddish  purple  when  ripe;  skin  medium  thick,  trans- 
parent, smooth,  veins  prominent;  pulp  moderately  firm, 
fine  grained,  subacid,  tart,  “spicy,”  attractive,  very  good. 
Bush  quite  tall,  gradually  spreading,  ends  of  branches 
slender,  very  vigorous;  foliage  medium,  thorns  medium; 
suckers  many,  rather  slender.  Very  productive.  A 
standard  American  variety,  but  the  fruit  is  quite  small. 
American. 

Industry. — Fruit  round,  oval,  large,  green  turning  to 
reddish  purple,  skin  moderately  thick,  covered  with  a few 
hairy  spines,  not  transparent,  veins  distinct;  pulp  medi- 
um firm,  subacid,  quality  fair.  Bush  moderately  tall, 
generally  upright,  moderately  vigorous; 
thorns  many,  long;  foliage  medium  small, 
dark,  glossy,  leathery;  suckers  few.  Fair- 
W ly  productive.  Plants  begin  to  fail  at 

six  to  eight  years  old.  European. 

jJosselyn*  (American  Red  Jacket.) — 

Fruit  generally  round,  medium  large, 
light  green  shading  to  red  when  ripe; 

— skin  medium  smooth,  veins  distinct;  pulp 
medium  firm,  subacid,  lively,  good.  Bush 
medium  height,  spreading,  very  vigorous; 
thorns  many,  quite  long;  foliage  medium 
in  color,  glossy;  suckers  numerous, 
stocky.  Productive.  A dependable 
variety,  slightly  larger  than  Downing. 
American-European. 

Keepsake. — Fruit  oval  to  round, 
large,  light  green;  skin  almost  smooth, 
moderately  thick,  not  transparent,  veins 
distinct;  pulp  moderately  firm,  subacid, 
suitable  for  home  sharp,  fair  to  good.  Bush  moderately 
Upright  to  spreading,  vigorous; 
thorns  medium  number,  long;  foliage 
medium  size,  dark,  glossy,  leathery;  suckers  medium 
number,  stocky.  Unproductive.  Plants  begin  to  fail  at 
six  to  eight  years  old.  European. 

Lancashire  Lad. — ^Fruit  round  to  oval,  large,  green 
shaded  with  purplish  red  when  ripe;  skin  slightly  hairy, 
rather  thin,  dense,  veins  moderately  distinct;  pulp  some- 
what soft,  juicy,  almost  sweet,  good.  Bush  low,  moder- 
ately upright,  rather  weak;  foliage  medium  size,  dark, 
glossy;  thorns  many,  long;  suckers  few.  Very  unproduc- 
tive. Plants  fail  at  an  early  age.  European. 

Mountain. — Fruit  round,  occasionally  oval,  medium  4 Hough- 

to  small,  green  changing  to  brownish  purple;  skin  trans-  ton— very produc 


Fig.  3.  Down- 
ing— long  a favo- 
rite variety ; 
larger  than 
Houghton  and 


tive,  small,  but 
has  an  excellent 
j flavor  when  ripe, 
to  very  good.  Bush  low,  vigorous,  very  thorny,  slender  Fine  for  home  use 


parent,  smooth,  veins  prominent,  thread-like;  pulp  mod- 
erately firm,  subacid,  sweetish,  “snappy,”  quality  good 


9 


drooping  branches,  a tangled  mass  very  difficult  to  pick; 
foliage  medium.  Unproductive.  American-European. 

Oregon  Champion*. — Fruit  round,  light  green  becom- 
ing yellow  when  ripe;  skin  thin,  transparent,  smooth, 
veins  distinct;  pulp  soft  when  ripe,  subacid,  somewhat 
flat,  fair  to  good.  Bush  tall,  upright,  very  vigorous; 
foliage  small,  dark,  glossy,  leathery;  thorns  medium; 
suckers  medium  to  few,  stocky.  Immensely  productive. 
A very  heavy  cropper  and  desirable  commercial  sort,  but 
should  be  picked  quite  green,  for  if  allowed  to  hang,  it 
sunburns  and  becomes  soft  and  worthless  for  market. 
EuropeannAmerican. 

Pearl*. — Fruit  round,  medium 
size,  light  green,  skin  moderately 
thick,  smooth,  dense,  veins  distinct; 
pulp  moderately  firm,  juicy,  subacid, 
tart,  attractive,  very  good.  Bush 
medium  tall,  upright  to  moderately 
spreading,  very  vigorous;  foliage 
medium;  thorns  numerous,  medium 
long;  suckers  many,  stocky.  Produc- 
tive. Similar  to  Downing  and  can  be 
reconimended  for  planting.  American- 
European. 

Portage. — Fruit  round  to  oval, 
large,  light  green;  skin  thick,  hairy, 
veins  distinct;  pulp  moderately  firm, 
coarse,  subacid,  fair  to  good.  Bush 
low,  moderately  upright,  below  medi- 
um in  vigor;  foliage  medium  small, 
dark,  glossy,  leathery;  thorns  many, 
long;  suckers  few,  stocky.  Very  un- 
productive. Plants  fail  at  an  early 
age.  European. 

Smith  (Smith  Improved). — Fruit 
roundish,  oval,  large,  grass  green; 

Fig.  5.  Oregon  Skin  thin,  practically  smooth,  trans- 
champion  — the  parent,  veins  distinct;  pulp  soft,  sub- 
^rvar^eS^test-  sweetish,  quality  good.  Bush 

ed  at  this  sta-  low  and  flat,  vigorous;  foliage  medi- 
tion.  An  excel-  um;  thoms  many,  long;  suckers 
sort  medium.  Very  unproductive.  Euro- 

peamAmerican. 

Whitesmith. — Fruit  practically  round,  large,  pale 
green,  skin  thick,  dense,  veins  distinct;  pulp  moder- 
ately firm,  subacid,  tart,  good.  Bush  medium  tall, 
upright,  vigorous;  foliage  medium  small,  dark,  glossy, 
leathery;  thorns  medium,  many,  very  long;  suckers 
very  few.  Unproductive.  European. 

Varieties  of  Currants. — Seventeen  vari- 
eties of  currants  were  planted  at  this  station  at 
the  same  time  the  gooseberries  were  set  out.  Three 
of  these  varieties  were  black  currants, — Lee 
Black,  Black  Champion  and  Black  Victoria.  They 


Fig.  6.  White- 
smith is  quite  repre- 
sentative of  other 
European  varieties. 
Its  chief  merit  is  its 


are  very  unproductive,  have  a peculiarly  disagree-  large  size,  it  is  not 

recommended  f — 
Indiana  planting 


able  odor  and  the  black  fruit  is  not  generally 


10 


saleable  except  in  cities  having  a large 
foreign  population. 

There  is  not  much  choice  between  the 
varieties  of  red  currants,  except  in  produc- 
tiveness and  size.  Red  Cross  is  one  of  the 
best  commercial  sorts  and  equally  good  for 
home  use,  being  very  productive  and  of 
medium  size.  North  Star  is  also  a very 
productive  variety.  Wilder  is  a larger 
currant,  but  somewhat  less  productive  than 
Red  Cross.  Red  Dutch  is  very  productive, 
but  small. 


Cherry. — Cluster  short,  berries  medium  to 
large,  bright  red,  good  flavor.  Bush  medium 
height,  moderately  spreading,  fairly  vigorous; 
foliage  medium  to  large,  light  green.  Unpro- 
ductive. 

Diploma. — Cluster  short,  round  to  oblong, 
berries  large,  medium  to  light  red,  mild  flavor. 
Bush  tall,  upright,  very -vigorous;  large  dark 
green  foliage.  Fairly  productive. 

Fays. — Cluster  short,  berries  medium  to 
large,  bright  red,  juicy,  good  quality.  Bush 
medium  to  short,  spreading,  fairly  vigorous. 
Fig.  7.  Diploma— one  of  large,  dark  green  foliage.  Unproductive, 
the  largrest  currants  in  size,  London  Market. — ^^Cluster  medium  length, 
man  productive  as  slightly  tapering,  berries  medium  in  size,  dark 

red,  quality  good.  Bush  tall,  slightly  spreading, 
very  vigorous,  foliage  medium  size  and  color.  Very 
productive. 

North  Star. — Cluster  medium  length,  berries 
medium  size,  bright  red,  moderately  juicy,  acid, 
good.  Bush  tall,  upright,  very  vigorous;  foliage 
medium  size,  dark  green.  Very  productive. 

Perfection. — Cluster  medium,  berries  large 
bright  red,  juicy,  very  good.  Bush  medium  size, 
spreading,  vigorous;  foliage  medium.  Productive. 

Pomona. — ^Cluster  medium  length,  slightly  taper- 
ing, berries  medium  red,  flavor  sprightly,  good.  Bush 
low,  moderately  spreading,  fairly  vigorous;  foliage 
dark  green,  medium  to  small.  Productive. 

Red  Cross. — ^^Cluster  medium  length,  rectagular, 
berries  medium  size,  bright  red,  juicy,  quality  good. 

Bush  tall,  upright,  very  vigorous;  foliage  medium  to 
small,  dark  green.  Very  productive. 

Red  Dutch. — ^Cluster  medium  length,  slightly 
tapering,  berries  medium  to  small,  dark  red,  flavor 
acid,  good.  Bush  tall,  slightly  spreading,  very  vigor- 
ous; foliage  medium  size,  dark  green.  Very  produc- 
tive. 


Versailles. — ^Cluster  medium  length,  berries  medi- 
um to  large,  bright  red,  juicy,  acid,  good.  Bush 
medium  to  tall,  upright,  vigorous;  foliage  medium 
size,  dark  green.  Unproductive. 


Fig.  8.  Red  Cross 
— a good  commer- 
cial variety ; very 
productive 


rig.  9.  Wilder — ^larger 
than  Red  Cross  but  not  so 
productive,  although  still  a 
good  market  sort 


Victoria. — Cluster  medium  length,  ber- 
ries small,  deep  red,  acid,  quality  medium 
to  good.  Bush  rather  small,  upright,  fairly 
vigorous;  foliage  medium.  Productive. 

White  Grape. — Cluster  medium  long, 
tapering,  berries  medium  size,  white,  sub- 
acid, good.  Bush  medium  height,  slightly 
spreading,  vigorous;  foliage  medium.  Fair- 
ly productive. 

White  Imperial. — Cluster  rather  long, 
very  little  taper,  berries  medium  size,  white, 
subacid,  good.  Bush  medium  height,  spread- 
ing, vigorous;  foliage  medium.  Fairly  pro- 
ductive. 

Wilder.—Cluster  medium  to  short,  ber- 
ries large,  light  red,  thin  skin,  juicy,  mild, 
subacid,  very  good.  Bush  medium  to  tall, 
upright,  very  vigorous;  foliage  small,  dark. 
Productive. 


Fig.  10.  The  tools  necessary  for  effective  cultivation  in  the  berry  field.  Note 
especially  the  home-made,  one-horse  drag  for  crushing  clods 


✓ 


A.  j!..  U ■ 

/ / 

' / 

PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


DEC 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


BULtETIN  No.  208,  VOL.  XX 
September,  1917 


THE  PASTEURIZATION  OF  SOUR  FARM- 
SKIMMED  CREAM  FOR  BUTTERMAKING 


Published  by  the'Station: 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY  AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT  STATION 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 
Joseph  D.  Oliver^  President,  South  Bend 

Pay  S.  Chandler Indianapolis  Warren  T.  McCray Kentland 

Charles  Downing  Greenfield  James  W.  Noel Indianapolis 

John  A.  Hillenbrand Batesville  George  W.  Purcell Vincennes 

CYRUS  M.  Hobbs Bridgeport  Andrew  E.  Reynolds Crawfordsville 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D President  of  the  University 

ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(Under  Legislative  Act  of  1909) 

U.  R.  Fishel,  Hope D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort 

State  Poultry  Fanciers^  Association  State  Corn  Growers^  Association 

D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleville 

State  Dairy  Association  State  Live  Stock  Association 

H.  H.  Swaim,  South  Bend.. -Indiana  Horticultural  Society 


ADMINISTRATION 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S.,  Director 

Harry  J.  Reed Assistant  to  the  Director 

Nellie  Tracy Administrative  Assistant 

Mary  K.  Bloom Bookkeeper 

AGRICULTURAL  EXTENSION 
George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A.,  Superintendent 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader 

Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A Associate  in 

Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 
Mabel  L.  Harlan. .Ass’t  in  Agricultural  Extension 

ANIMAL  HUSBANDRY 
John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S.,  Chief 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B,  S.  A 

Acting  Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

.Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A 

Ass’t  in  -4nimal  Husbandry  Extension 

BOTANY 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B.,  Chief 

George  N.  Hoffer,  M.  S Associate  in  Botany 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Luna  E.  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S.,  Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

DAIRY  HUSBANDRY 
Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S.,  Acting  Chief 

Howard  W.  Gregory,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G.,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 
Harry  M.  Weeter,  M.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G 

Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

ENTOMOLOGY 
James  Troop,  M.  S.,  Chief 
Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S.,  Ass’t  in  Entomology 

HORTICULTURE 
Laurenz  Greene,  M.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S Associate  in 

Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 
JOSEPH  Oskamp,  B.  S.,  Associate  in  Pomology 


POULTRY  HUSBANDRY 
Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S 

Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

SOILS  AND  CROPS 
Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S 

Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S 

Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Associate  in  Soils 

STATE  CHEMIST 

Wm.  j.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S.,  A.  C.^  State  Chemist 
Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.^.. Acting  State  Chemist 
Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S. 2.. ..Deputy  State  Chemist 

Carleton  Cutler,  B.  S.^ First  Deputy 

State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 
Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S. 2.. Deputy  State  Chemist 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S. 2. .Deputy  State  Chemist 
J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.2....Deputy  State  Chemist 

Samuel  P.  Thornton,  B.  S.^ 

Deputy  State  Chemist 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.^ 

Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Paul  R.  Bausman,  B.  S.^ 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A.2 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  S.^ 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

VETERINARY  SCIENCE 
Robert  A.  Cr-4.ig,  D.  V.  M.,  Chief 
David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C... Associate  Veterinarian 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  in  Animal  Pathology, 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Serum  Production 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Animal  Pathology 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 
Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Ass’t  Veterinarian 

DETAILED  BY  U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF 
AGRICULTURE 

Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  Insect  Investigations 
John  J.  Davis,  B.  S.,  Entomological 
Assistant  in  Charge 

JOHN  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.,  Entomological  Assistant 
Walter  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S... Scientific  Assistant 

Shirley  L.  Mason,  A.  B Scientific  Assistant 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Seed  Testing 

Anna  M.  Lute,  M.  A Seed  Analyst 


» In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 
* Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 
8 Died  August  31,  1917 


THE  PASTEURIZATION  OF  SOUR,  FARM- 
SKIMMED  CREAM  FOR  BUTTERMAKING' 

O.  F.  Hunziker  Ge:orge:  Spitzkr  H.  C.  Mirrs  H.  B.  Switzrr 

SUMMARY 

1.  Fresh  butter  made  from  sour  cream  pasteurized  at  145  de- 
grees F.  and  held  for  20  minutes,  scored  2.9  points  higher  than  fresh 
butter  made  from  raw  sour  cream.  Fresh  butter  made  from  sour 
cream  pasteurized  at  165  degrees  F.  flash  and  at  185  degrees  F. 
flash  respectively,  scored  practically  the  same  as  fresh  butter  made 
from  raw  sour  cream. 

2.  After  30  days  cold  storage,  the  butter  made  from  sour  cream 
pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.  holding,  and  165  degrees  F.  and  185 
degrees  F.  flash  process,  scored  3.9  points,  2.0  points  and  2.4  points 
higher,  respectively,  than  the  butter  made  from  raw  sour  cream. 

3.  After  90  days  storage,  the  pasteurized  cream  butter  scored 
4.5  points,  2.9  points  and  3.2  points,  respectively,  higher  than  butter 
made  from  raw  cream. 

4.  On  the  basis  of  a difference  of  two  cents  between  extras 
and  firsts,  and  two  cents  between  firsts  and  seconds,  and  assuming 
that  extras  are  worth  30  cents,  the  holding  process  butter  would  sell 
at  1.6  cents,  1.7  cents,  1.7  cents  and  2.0  cents  higher  when  fresh  and 
when  30,  60  and  90  days  old,  respectively,  than  the  raw  cream  butter. 

On  the  same  basis,  butter  from  the  flash  process  at  185  degrees 
F.  would  sell  at  -.2  cent,  .9  cent,  i.i  cents  and  1.3  cents  higher  when 
fresh  and  when  30,  60  and  90  days  old,  respectively,  than  raw  cream 
butter. 

5.  The  holding  process  at  145  degrees  F.  for  20  minutes 
proved  more  efficient  in  its  germ  killing  effect  than  either  of  the  two 
flash  processes,  averaging  a germ  killing  efficiency  of  over  99.9  per 
cent.  The  flash  process  at  185  degrees  F.  showed  a slightly  lower 
germ  killing  efficiency  than  the  holding  process  and  the  165  degrees 
F.  flash  process  had  a germ  killing  efficiency  of  not  to  exceed  90 
per  cent. 

6.  The  minimum  temperature  and  time  at  which  the  holding 
process  insures  maximum  germ  killing  efficiency  and  keeping  qual- 
ity is  145  degrees  F.  for  20  minutes.  Nothing  is  gained  by  longer 
exposure  to  145  degrees  F. ; in  fact,  excessive  exposure  is  undesir- 
able, because  it  tends  to  give  the  butter  a mealy  body. 

7.  The  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F. 
flash  showed  the  best  keeping  quality.  This  is  probably  due  to  its 
power  not  only  to  destroy  germs  but  also  to  inhibit  the  action  of 
enzymes. 

1 Acknowledgment  is  due  Mr.  M.  S.  Libbert,  Assistant  in  Dairy  Bacteriology, 
for  assistance  in  baoterioiogical  work,  and  Mr.  W.  P.  Epple,  Assistant  in  Dairy 
Chemistry  for  valuable  assistance  in  chemical  analyses 


4 


8.  " The  185  degrees  F.  flash  process  proved  unsuitable  for 
pasteurization  of  sour  cream,  causing  the  butter  to  have  a distinct 
oily  flavor.  This  appears  to  be  due  to  the  combined  action  of  high 
heat  and  high  acid.  In  the  case  of  sweet  cream  or  sour  cream  in 
which  the  acid  has  been  properly  reduced  by  neutralization  before 
pasteurization  this  oily  flavor  is  much  less  pronounced. 

9.  The  germ  killing  efficiency  of  pasteurization  in  summer  is 
greater  and  the  keeping  quality  of  such  butter  is  better  than  that  of 
winter  cream  and  butter,  showing  that  winter  cream  contains  more 
resistant  and  undesirable  ferments  than  summer  cream. 

10.  The  quality  and  sweetness  of  cream  affect  both  raw  and 
pasteurized  cream  butter  in  the  same  direction,  but  proper  pasteur- 
ization is  capable  of  producing  marked  improvement  in  the  quality 
of  butter  even  from  inferior  cream. 

11.  In  order  to  reap  the  full  benefit  of  pasteurization,  cream 
and  butter  must  be  guarded  against  recontamination  after  pasteur- 
ization. An  unclean  vat  may  reduce  the  efficiency  of  pasteurization 
50  per  cent.  Pure  air,  sanitary  condition  of  sewers,  freedom  of  the 
factory  from  flies,  cleanliness  of  vats,  pipes,  conduits,  coolers  and 
churns,  purity  of  starter  and  wash  water,  and  the  sanitary  condition 
of  the  packing  equipment  are  all  essential  in  safeguarding  the  bene- 
fits of  pasteurization. 

12.  When  cream  is  put  in  proper  condition  for  pasteurization, 
and  other  conditions  are  as  they  should  be,  there  is  no  danger  of 
excessive  loss  of  fat  in  the  buttermilk  from  pasteurized  cream. 
Pasteurization  of  mixed  sweet  and  sour  cream  without  giving  the 
acid  in  the  sour  cream  time  to  act  normally  on  the  curd  in  the  sweet 
cream,  pasteurization  of  excessively  thin  sour  cream,  the  churning 
at  too  high  temperatures  or  not  holding  the  cream  long  enough  at 
the  churning  temperature,  and  the  overcrowding  of  the  churn,  are 
bound  to  reduce  the  exhaustiveness  of  the  churning  and  to  cause 
heavy  loss  of  fat  in  the  buttermilk. 

13.  Pasteurization  does  not  materially  affect  the  chemical  com- 
position of  butter.  It  has  a tendency,  however,  to  slightly  lower  the 
per  cent,  moisture,  curd  and  acid  in  butter. 

14.  In  storage,  the  per  cent,  lactose  in  butter  decreases  and  • 
the  acidity  increases.  These  changes  are  greater  in  raw  cream 
butter  than  in  pasteurized  cream  butter.  The  increase  in  acidity  is 
not  proportionate  to  the  decrease  in  lactose. 

15.  The  fat  constants  in  butter  in  storage  undergo  but  very 
slight  changes.  These  changes  average  somewhat  greater  in  raw 
cream  butter  than  in  pasteurized  cream  butter,  but  they  are  too  far 
within  the  limits  of  the  experimental  error  to  permit  of  serious  com- 
parison. The  fat  constants  in  butter  fat  held  at  room  temperature 
for  II  months  showed  slightly  greater  changes,  but  even  these 
changes  were  in  no  way  commensurate  with  the  intense  deterioration 
of  the  flavor  of  the  fat. 


5 


1 6.  These  results  suggest  the  probability  that  some  of  the 
flavor  defects  in  storage  butter  may  be  due,  at  least  in  part,  to 
hydrolysis  or  oxidation  of  some  of  the  fats  and  that  very  slight 
changes  in  the  fat  constants  may  create  most  intense  depreciation 
in  the  flavor  of  butter  fat  and  butter. 

17.  All  butter  held  in  cold  storage  showed  an  increase  of 
cleavage  products  of  the  proteins  as  determined  by  proteins  not 
precipitated  by  bromine,  copper  sulphate,  phosphotungstic  and  tan- 
nic acid.  This  increase  in  protein  decomposition  was  much  more 
rapid  after  butter  had  been  transferred  from  cold  storage  to  room 
temperature. 

18.  The  protein  decomposition  was  greatest  in  the  raw  cream 
butter  and  least  in  the  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  185 
degrees  F.  flash  process,  showing  that  this  process  proved  most  ef- 
ficient in  retarding  protein  hydrolysis,  probably  due  to  its  power  to 
destroy  the  activity  of  enzymes  contained  in  cream. 

19.  Protein  hydrolysis  in  butter  may  be  brought  about  by 
such  agents  as  ferments,  both  microorganisms  and  enzymes,  acids, 
salts  and  metals  through  catalytic  action.  Cream  of  poor  quality 
and  old  cream  furnish  favorable  conditions  for  rapid  protein  hy- 
drolysis in  butter. 

20.  Protein  hydrolysis  plays  a prominent  role  in  the  deteriora- 
tion of  butter  in  storage.  It  can  be  minimized  by  improving  the 
quality  of  the  cream,  proper  pasteurization,  reduction  of  acidity,  dis- 
carding of  rusty  cans,  protection  of  cream  and  butter  against  con- 
tamination with  metals  and  metallic  salts,  sanitary  equipment  such 
as  cans,  forewarmers,  vats,  conduits,  pipes,  pumps  and  churns,  thor- 
ough washing  of  the  butter,  proper  treatment  of  liners  and  wrap- 
pers, cleanliness  of  packing  and  printing  equipment  and  guarding 
butter  against  exposure  to  high  temperatures  in  storage  and  in 
transit. 

PURPOSE 

The  purpose  of  the  experiments  recorded  in  this  bulletin  was : 

1.  To  determine  the  effect  of  pasteurization  of  sour,  farm  sep- 
arator cream  on  the  flavor,  keeping  quality  and  market  value  of 
butter. 

2.  To  study  the  effect  of  different  processes  of  pasteurization 
on  the  bacterial  count  of  cream  and  butter  and  on  the  flavor  and 
keeping  quality  of  butter. 

3.  To  study  the  effect  of  pasteurization  on  the  chemical  prop- 
erties of  fresh  and  stored  butter. 

4.  To  determine  the  causes  underlying  the  changes  of  the 
flavor  of  raw  and  pasteurized  cream  butter  in  storage. 


6 


BRIEF  DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  EXPERIMENT 

In  order  to  render  the  results  of  this  investigation  conclusive, 
every  reasonable  effort  was  made  to  eliminate  from  the  experiment, 
as  far  as  possible,  all  factors  interfering  with  uniformity  and  com- 
parableness of  operation  and  results,  and  to  study  this  complex 
problem  from  all  apparent  angles. 

Approximately  1600  pounds  of  cream  were  used  for  each  set  of 
experiments.  After  grading  and  testing  for  fat  and  acid,  this  cream 
was  poured  into  a 300-gallon  vat,  where  it  was  mixed  thoroughly. 

This  mixed  cream  was  then  divided  into  four  equal  portions, 
or  churnings,  which  were  used  as  follows: 

Churning  i — churned  raw. 

Churning  2 — pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.  holding  for  20 
minutes. 

Churning  3 — pasteurized  at  165  degrees  F.  flash  process. 

Churning  4 — pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.  flash  process. 

The  cream  was  of  average  quality  such  as  is  received  from 
routes,  stations  and  direct  shippers,  testing  between  30  and  40  per 
cent,  fat  and  having  an  acidity  of  .3  to  .7  per  cent. 

None  of  the  cream  was  neutralized  and  to  each  of  the  four 
churnings  of  cream  of  one  and  the  same  experiment,  10  per  cent, 
lactic  acid  starter,  taken  from  the  same  lot  of  starter  milk  for  each 
set  of  experiments,  was  added.  The  cream  of  each  churning  was 
held  at  the  churning  temperature  over  night ; was  then  churned, 
salted  and  worked  in  the  usual  manner. 

The  cream  pasteurized  with  the  holding  process  was  heated  in 
a coil  ripening  vat  to  145  degrees  F.  and  held  at  that  temperature 
for  20  minutes.  It  was  then  cooled  rapidly  to  the  churning  tempera- 
ture. 

The  cream  pasteurized  at  165  degrees  F.  flash  process  was  run 
through  a Jensen  No.  4 pasteurizer  at  165  degrees  F.  and  then  over 
a surface  cooler  into  a ripening  vat. 

The  cream  pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.  flash  process  was 
heated  and  cooled  in  the  same  manner  as  that  pasteurized  at  165 
degrees  F.,  except  that  the  temperature  was  raised  to  185  degrees  F. 

All  cream  was  held  over  night  and  churned  the  following  morn- 
ing. All  churnings  were  made  in  the  Simplex  Churn  No.  3. 

All  churnings  of  cream  were  sampled  and  tested  for  total  bac- 
terial count,  acid  bacteria,  liquefying  bacteria,  yeasts  and  molds,  be- 
fore and  after  pasteurization. 

Six  five-pound  fibre  boxes  were  filled  with  the  butter  from  each  ’ 
churning  and  the  butter  was  scored  by  two  judges  while  fresh,  and 
when  30,  60  and  90  days  old.  These  five-pound  boxes  of  butter 
were  held  in  storage  at  o degrees  F.  to  20  degrees  F. 


7 


Bacterial  and  chemical  analyses  were  also  made  of  the  butter. 
The  chemical  analyses  of  this  portion  of  the  experiment  were  con- 
fined to  determinations  of  the  per  cent,  moisture,  salt,  curd  and  acid 
in  butter. 

In  another  and  separate  experiment  conducted  in  a similar 
manner,  the  butter  fat  constants  and  protein  cleavage  products  in 
the  fresh  and  stored  butter  were  determined.  In  this  case,  the 
butter  was  not  scored  regularly  as  it  was  held  in  storage  in  Chicago, 
and  no  scores  are  herein  inserted  of  the  butter  which  was  used  for 
the  determination  of  the  fat  constants  and  protein  cleavage  products. 

EFFECT  OF  PASTEURIZATION  OF  SOUR  CREAM  ON  THE  SCORE 
OF  BUTTER  WHEN  FRESH  AND  WHEN  30,  60  AND  90  DAYS  OLD 

The  detailed  scores  of  the  fresh  and  stored  butter  are  recorded 
in  Tables  XXVII,  XXVIII,  XXIX  and  XXX,  herein  appended. 
The  average  scores  of  132  churnings  of  fresh  butter  and  butter 
30  and  60  days  old  made  from  raw  cream  and  from  cream  pas- 
teurized at  145  degrees  F.  and  held  for  20  minutes,  at  165  degrees 
F.  flash  process,  and  at  185  degrees  F.  flash  process,  are  shown  in 
Table  I. 


Tabli^  I. — Showing  Average  Scores  of  132  Churnings  of  Butter 
when  Fresh  and  when  30  and  60  Days  Old,  Respectively 


Raw  and  pasteurized  cream  butter 

Scores  of  butter 

fresh 

30  days 

60  days 

Raw  cream  butter 

88.48 

86.03 

85.23 

Pasteurized  at  145  degrees  P.  and  held 
for  20  minutes 

91.02 

89.82 

88.97 

Pasteurized  at  165  degrees  P.  flash 

89.45 

88.25 

87.93 

Pasteurized  at  185  degrees  P.  flash 

87.78 

88.18 

88.03 

Similar  results  were  obtained  in  72  churnings  which  were 
scored  when  fresh  and  when  30,  60  and  90  days  old  as  shown  in 
Table  II. 


TablK  II. — Showing  Scores  of  72  Churnings  of  Butter  when  Fresh, 
and  after  Storage  for  30,  60  and  90  Days,  Respectively 


Raw  and  pasteurized  cream  butter 

Scores  of  butter 

fresh 

30  days 

60  days 

90  days 

Raw  cream  butter 

87.63 

85.46 

85.56 

84.75 

Pasteurized  at  145  degrees  P.  and 
held  for  20  minutes 

90.66 

89.44 

89.37 

89.26 

Pasteurized  at  165  degrees  P.  flash 

87.96 

87.48 

88.13 

87.94 

Pasteurized  at  185  degrees  P.  flash 

87.12 

87.78 

88.16 

87.97 

8 


There  is  a striking  similarity  in  the  results  presented  in  both 
Table  I and  Table  11.  In  each  case,  the  raw  cream  butter  showed 
the  poorest  keeping  quality  and  tlie  butter  made  from  cream  which 
was  pasteurized  by  use  of  the  holding  process,  heating  in  vat  to  145 
degrees  F.  and  holding  at  that  temperature  for  20  minutes,  scored 
highest  when  fresh  and  after  storage.  When  fresh,  it  scored  3.03 
points  higher,  and  when  90  days  old  it  scored  4.51  points  higher 
than  the  raw  cream  butter.  The  butter  from  the  165  degrees  F. 
and  185  degrees  F.  flash  process  scored  relatively  low  when  fresh. 
This  low  score  was  largely  due  to  a pronounced  oily  flavor.  With 
age,  this  oily  flavor  became  less  marked  and  in  some  cases  disap- 
peared entirely.  This  improvement  in  flavor  resulting  from  the  re- 
moval of  the  oiliness  was  ofTset,  however,  by  the  natural  disappear- 
ance of  the  flavor  characteristic  of  fresh  butter  and  the  development 
of  flavors  characteristic  of  storage  butter. 

The  butter  made  from  the  cream  pasteurized  with  the  holding 
process  scored  appreciably  higher,  both  when  fresh  and  after  stor- 
age, than  that  made  from  cream  with  the  flash  process,  but  it 
suffered  a greater  drop  in  score  while  in  storage  than  the  butter 
of  the  185  degrees  F.  flash  process. 

This  would  indicate  that,  while  heating  sour  cream  to  145  de- 
grees F.  and  holding  for  20  minutes,  does  not  seriously  injure  the 
flavor  of  butter ; it  does  not  produce  an  oily  flavor ; the  keeping 
quality  of  the  butter  so  made,  is  inferior  to  that  of  the  butter  in 
the  manufacture  of  which  the  flash  process  at  185  degrees  F.  is  used. 

As  shown  in  subsequent  parts,  the  germ  killing  efficiency 
of  the  145  degree  F.  holding  process  is  very  great,  averaging  a re- 
duction in  germ  content  of  99.9  per  cent.  Bacteriologically,  there- 
fore, the  holding  process  should  produce  butter  with  superior  keep- 
ing quality. 

That  this  butter  did  not  keep  as  well  as  the  butter  pasteurized 
with  the  185  degrees  F.  flash  process,  must  be  attributed  to  the  fact 
that  the  enzymes  present  in  the  cream  are  not  seriously  disturbed 
and  their  activity  is  not  checked  at  145  degrees  F.,  while  at  185 
degrees  F.  the  great  majority  of  enzymes  are  rendered  inactive. 

Comparatively  little  is  definitely  known  as  yet  concerning  the 
relation  of  enzymes  in  butter  to  keeping  quality;  but  it  is  reason- 
able to  assume,  on  the  basis  of  our  general  knowledge  of  enzyme 
action,  that  these  ferments,  most  of  which  are  the  by-products  of 
bacteria  and  other  microorganisms,  are  quite  as  harmful  to  the 
keeping  quality  of  butter,  as  the  microorganisms  themselves. 

Therefore,  a process  of  pasteurization,  while  efficient  in  de- 
stroying the  germ  life  of  the  cream  but  inadequate  to  destroy  also 
the  action  of  enzymes  may,  after  all,  not  be  capable  of  greatly  im- 
proving the  keeping  quality  of  the  butter. 


9 


Furthermore,  it  has  been  quite  conclusively  demonstrated  by 
experiments  conducted  by  the  United  States  Dairy  Division  under 
the  immediate  direction  of  L.  A.  Rogers,  and  also  by  practical  ex- 
perience in  the  manufacture  of  butter,  that  butter  made  from  sour 
cream  does  not  keep  as  well  as  butter  made  from  sweet  cream,  and 
that  in  the  deterioration  of  butter  in  storage,  the  acidity  of  the 
cream  from  which  the  butter  is  made,  plays  an  important  role. 

The  development  of  acid  in  cream  is  usually  accompanied  by 
certain  other  fermentations  or  decompositions  leaving  the  products 
so  attacked  in  a condition  in  which  they  more  readily  yield  to  fur- 
ther decomposition  as  the  result  of  the  acid  present. 

It  is  obvious,  therefore,  that  butter  made  from  sweet  cream 
or  from  sour  cream  in  which  the  acid  was  neutralized  before  pas- 
teurization, will  have  a better  keeping  quality  than  butter  made  from 
sour  cream,  especially  when  the  acidity  of  this  sour  cream  was  de- 
veloped before,  and  is  present  at  the  time  the  cream  is  pasteurized. 

Butter  made  from  sweet  cream  and  butter  made  from  sour 
cream  in  which  the  acid  was  reduced  before  pasteurization,  not  only 
will  have  improved  keeping  quality  but  it  will  also  have  a better 
flavor  when  fresh.  This  is  the  case  particularly  with  butter  made 
from  cream  that  is  pasteurized  with  the  flash  process  at  185  degrees 
F.  which  is  prone  to  show  a distinctly  oily  flavor  unless  made  from 
sweet  cream  or  from  sour  cream  in  which  the  acid  is  reduced  to 
about  .3  per  cent,  or  lower  before  pasteurization. 

EFFECT  OF  PASTEURIZATION  OF  SOUR  CREAM  ON  THE 
MARKET  VALUE  OF  BUTTER 

Inasmuch  as  there  is  still  considerable  doubt  in  the  mind  of 
the  average  buttermaker  concerning  the  economic  value  of  pasteur- 
ization of  cream  for  buttermaking,  it  was  deemed  desirable  to  cal- 
culate the  market  value  of  the  butter  made  in  these  experiments  as 
based  on  its  score.  Table  III  was  therefore  assembled  showing  the 
value  of  each  lot  of  butter  made  according  to  Chicago  and  New 
York  market  quotations  on  the  respective  grades,  which  prevailed 
on  the  dates  when  the  butter  was  scored.  The  prices  shown  in  Table 
III  were  arrived  at  in  the  following  manner. 

The  scores  of  the  several  established  market  grades  of  butter 
were  as  follows : extras  92,  firsts  88,  seconds  83,  thirds  76. 

The  prices  for  the  different  grades  were  taken  from  market 
quotations  at  the  time  the  freshly  made  butter  was  scored.  In  order 
to  determine  the  price  of  butter  which  scored  between  the  nearest 
low  and  high  grade  indicated  above,  the  difference  in  the  price  of 
the  next  highest  and  next  lowest  market  grade  was  divided  by  the 
difference  between  these  respective  scores,  thus  establishing  a price 
value  for  each  score  point.  This  value  was  then  multiplied  by  the 
difference  between  the  score  of  the  butter  and  the  nearest  market 


10 


grade  score  below  the  butter  score  and  the  amount  thus  obtained 
was  added  to  the  price  of  the  market  grade  used  in  the  calculation. 

For  example:  Butter  from  churning  No.  21  scored  89.8  points. 
Firsts  on  the  Chicago  market  on  that  date,  September  23,  1915,  were 
quoted  at  24  cents.  Extras  were  worth  25.5  cents,  a difference  in 
price  between  extras  and  firsts  of  1.5  cents. 

The  difference  in  score  between  extras  and  firsts  (92  - 88) 

^•5 

was  4 points.  = .375  cent,  which  is  the  price  value  of  one 

4 

score  point  between  extras  and  firsts.  The  difference  between  the 
score  of  the  butter  of  churning  No.  21  and  Chicago  firsts  was 
(89.8  - 88)  1.8  points.  The  value  of  one  point  was  .375  cent. 
The  value  of  1.8  points  was  (1.8  X -375)  -675  cent.  The  price 
of  Chicago  firsts  being  24  cents,  the  value  of  butter  of  churning  No. 
21  was  (24  -f  .675)  24.7  cents. 

It  is  fully  realized  by  the  writers  that  butter  on  the  market  is 
not  sold  and  paid  for  on  this  mathematically  accurate  basis,  but  since 
the  relatively  small  churnings  did  not  permit  the  placing  of  this 
experimental  butter  on  the  open  market,  the  above  valuation  of 
butter  on  the  basis  of  its  scores  appears  logical  and  for  all  prac- 
tical purposes  correct. 


II 


O) 

(U 

u 


(U 

> 

bx) 

C 

o 


w 

a 

cq 

< 


185 

degrees  F. 
flash 
cents 

cn'rMi>.t^i>.TdHcoi:ooq(>:iaiGqcoi>;CiC<ii>^cD05aioa5COCTicoorjHT}^c^^'^o:)'^i-H 

ior^oot:^ooh~aiocdco»ocooio4o^c£5i-OPDi:rj)0(>cic^o6ciCTio:5C^crjododc^cx5od 

C^^(NC^^C^C<^(^^C^COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOOOCOCOOOCOCOOO(^^(^^<^^C^I(^^(^J(^^(^^C^IC^^(^^ 

31.07 

i <v 

> ^ 

1 ^ 
la 

165 

degrees  F. 
flash 
cents 

oiooa2oas^oc^cqt^'^r-joi>;CO'rHi:oc^i>;':oTj<i:^a5a5ioot^n:)coi— lasooco 
t:';|i>^a2Cx5cit^OCvi'^'^iOT:t^coc6CTit^i:£5CDi^':dr3ioic^a:;aiaiaio6a2aiodt^odod 
C^(^^C^IC^^C^CS^COCOCOCOCOCOCOCO(^^COCOCOOOCOOOCOCO(^^C^^(^^C^^C^lC^^t^^C^^(^^(^^C^^ 

31.43 

145 

igrees  F. 
minutes 
cents 

oo  CO 

THioaiTHcn'?i^GqT^^asciT-jLqo^t>.i>.oqooio^^ooooooo(MO'i— (rH^ot^criT— 1 
i>^t^QdCT5odo:joT-HTjHcopd'^cvio4oPDt>^i^r-'^t^iocvio4(3:ioooo:jcicrio:jcxDodod 
C^^C^C^C^C^q(^^OOCOCOCOCOCOCOOOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO(^^COCOCO(:^^(^^^C^^(^^<^^(^^ 

31.73 

1 

^ <=> 

'O  (N 

raw 

cents 

PD 

»;Oi>;Oocr5t^O'PHt^a5T-jt^'TjHioc<iTii-<^<:ocvj-^i>-co'^cooooocoapooc^fo-^oo 

cDt^oooooooocpO^cotOTrt^c^oioir^pdpDc^t^idcviocTicriodCTicPioo'odaiooodt^ 

Dq(Dl(D^(DlD^C^C^.COCOOT>COCOCOCOOOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO(NCNlD<ICS|C^CNCV|iDJ|CS|C^C^ 

05 

05 

CO 

185 

degrees  F. 
flash 
cents 

Ti^cooqc<iTHrHtqoo-^-'Tf^Dar>;Oi:DT--jT-Ho<:Dcx^oqioco-'^aioococo»oc^Tti'rfioocx)PD 

coioion:5t^KDQdodoocsioc\iaiod^iOTt^coc6c^T-HQdpDt^i>^t^t^t>Ipo':D>oiopo 

C^^C^(^^C^^(^^^(^^(^^(^^COCOCC)COCO(^^C^^COCOCOCQCOCOCOC^JD^Da(^^(^^(^^(^^C^^(^aCS^(^^(^^ 

28.85 

^ 'S 

I 

165 

degrees  F. 
flash 
cents 

oqc^»^oaiot>.coioajoPDooiO^THcr5t>-Tfcoa2Tji-rH,— (ioi:^cai>-xooorHoooi— 1 
i>I  CD*  o6  lo  o o r-H  CO  T-?  05  cvi  o pd'  pd’  CO*  'PiH  co’  r-I  cri  od  od  pd  pd  i6 

O5DQ(05D5O5<D5C0COC0C0C0C0C0C005C0  00C0C0C0C0CO050505O5D5O5O5O5O5O5O50q 

29.51 

o 

, 1 O 

1 tu) 

1 c3 

1 ' <y 

P 

jj 

145 

degrees  F. 
26  minutes 
cents 

GOO'Pl^’-Ha^^OPDCTiOPDlOOPDPD'^»OnOOOqcX3i-HlOi— it^COnOOl'PtiCOOasO^'PtH 
ndi>^r^t^i>^odT-HOP050505oicdcdt^>oiidLondri^cdC'i3PodGdododGdododr^PDt'^PD 
050505050505C005COCOCOCOCOD5C5COCOCOCOCOCOC0  05D5050505050505D505tOICS| 

30.05 

I 

raw 

cents 

1 

t^ooq»oa^'phTHOT-HPD05x)HnoT3H<z:oqcqapt>-cqpqaD05^ooo5i— icootiooPDi— 10500 
rji».oiondioi'-Ia5odo5'-HoiT-H050Pi>^>d^c'd^'pj^cdododt^t^i''^odi'^pDPDi>IpDPDio 
0505050505CM05C5COCOCOCOC00505COCOCOCOCOC00505D505{0505(05  05  05  05  05  05  05 

29.07 

1 

11 

O) 

-o 

;S!^23^22322?^?SSl^?S^PSSl°0‘^'^'=>'^0005PDO'^00  05PDO'Pf0005PD) 
D505COCO'^'^'Prin:»^POPDPDI>-l'^CX)OOoOCPCiOOCD’— lT-H05  05  05C0C0'^'^'^iOn0 

1 

II 

|j 

1 

a 

p 

Pi 

bo 

a 

‘a 

05C05C0C0C0'^'rril0n010p0CD^-l>.|:^Q0CX)0PiaiaPOOT— It— tT-(05  05COCOCO'^'Pt<iOnO 

tH  tH  tH  rH  tH  tH  5^  t-H  tH  t-H  t-H  t— 1 t— 1 rH 

oa*"  pd"  o'  'Pj^*'  od'  05  pd"  CD  'PtH*'  00"  C^*"  PD  O T^tn" 
D505COCOCO'Pf^lOnOn:)PDPDt>-l>-C^OOOOOOOPOOT— (tHt— (05  05COCOCO'^'PfiOlO 

rH  rH  tH  tH  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t— i rH  t-H 

1 

il 

t 

6 

S 2^J>"'^ndocoi>^T-^'nocd'cot^rHioocdi>^T--?'ndaicd 

D5C5D5COCO'Pf'Pf'PCinDnOPDPDPDl>-l'-OOOOOOaoOP)OOOT— It— IO505O5C0C0'Pf'Pf'rf'^ 

t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H 

! 

h 

Date 

nonou:)nonoioiout)ioroiout)nopDPOOc£;iX>popopDppiopopopoooocDco(o;oiPO 

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 

t-Ht— 11— (T-lT-tT— ItHt— (t-Ht— 11— il— It— It— It— 11— 1,-Ht— IrHi— (tHt-Ht— ItHt— It-It—It— It-HtHt— It— ItHt— ( 

D5D5  T-I05  T-H  t-H  i— 1 05  CO  05  CO  i— i ,— | i_i  o5  05  i— 1 rH  05  05  05  CO 

o 

bx]  1 
a 1 

fH 

! 

1 

a 4H+ij>>^000« 

^ ^ aa  « « ggg§§§g§g 

> 

< 

12 


The  figures  contained  in  Table  III  show  that  on  the  Chicago 
market,  the  average  price  for  all  butter  pasteurized  at  145  degrees 
F.  (20  minutes)  was  .98  cent  higher  than  the  average  price  of  all  the 
raw  cream  butter,  while  the  butter  from  the  flash  process  at  165 
degrees  F.  gained  .44  cent  and  that  from  the  flash  process  at  185 
degrees  F.  lost  .22  cent. 

In  interpreting  these  figures,  it  should  be  borne  in  mind  that 
the  high  temperature  flash  process  affects  the  flavor  of  the  butter 
made  from  high  acid  cream  very  unfavorably,  causing  it  to  be  dis- 
agreeably oily  and  this  oiliness  greatly  depressed  the  score  of  this 
butter. 

Again  it  should  be  remembered  that  in  1915  and  1916,  market 
quotations  of  butter  made  unusually  slight  distinctions  in  price  be- 
tween different  grades.  The  large  export  trade  in  butter,  owing  to 
the  European  war,  augmented  the  demand  for  and  decreased  the 
supply  of  butter  on  the  market,  causing  the  trade  to  be  butter  hungry. 
This  briskness  of  the  market  always  increases  the  demand  and 
raises  the  price  of  the  lower  grades.  The  consumer  will  have  but- 
ter and  he  is  willing  to  put  up,  temporarily,  at  least,  with  butter 
of  lesser  quality,  rather  than  to  go  without  butter  at  all.  During 
times  of  normal  market  conditions,  the  difference  in  price  between 
extras  and  firsts,  etc.,  is  considerably  greater  than  that  shown  in  the 
quotations  in  1915  and  1916.  This  would  show  the  advantage  of 
pasteurization  more  conspicuously. 

Finally,  the  fundamental  purpose  and  effect  of  pasteurization 
is  not  so  much  to  improve  the  flavor  of  the  fresh  butter,  as  it  is  to 
prevent  its  deterioration  with  age.  On  the  basis  of  a difference  in 
price  of  the  market  grades  of  two  cents  between  extras  and  firsts, 
and  two  cents  between  firsts  and  seconds,  which  is  very  conserva- 
tive, the  average  market  value  of  the  butter  made  in  this  experiment 
as  based  on  its  score  when  fresh  and  when  30,  60  and  90  days  old 
would  be  as  follows: 


Table  IV. — Showing  Average  Score  and  Value  of  Butter  made 
from  Raw  and  Pasteurized  Cream.  It  is  Assumed 


that  Extras  are  Worth  30  Cents 


Age  of 
butter 

Scores  and  market  value  of  butter 

raw  cream 

1 pasteurized  cream 

1 145  degrees  F. 

20  minutes 

1 165  degrees  F. 

1 flash 

185  degrees  F. 
flash 

score 

price 

1 score 

price 

score 

price 

score 

1 price 

cents 

1 

cents 

1 

' cents 

1 

' cents 

Fresh 

87.8 

27.8 

90.7 

29.4 

88.0 

28.0 

87.1 

27.6 

30  days 

85.5 

27.0 

89.4 

28.7 

87.5 

27.8 

87.8 

27.9 

60  days 

85.6 

27.0 

89.4 

28.7 

88.1 

28.0 

88.2 

28.1 

90  days 

84.8 

26.7 

89.3 

28.7 

87.9 

28.0 

88.0 

28.0 

13 


Table  V. — Showing  Increase  in  Value  of  Butter  made  from  Pas- 
teurized Cream  over  the  Value  of  Raw  Cream  Butter 


Age  of  butter 

Increase  in  value  due  to  pasteurization 

145  degrees  F. 

20  minutes 
cents 

165  degrees  F.  j 

flash  1 

cents  ! 

185  degrees  F. 
flash 
cents 

Fresh 

1.6 

.2 

-.2 

30  days 

1.7 

.8 

.9 

60  days 

1.7 

1.0 

1.1 

90  days 

2.0 

1.3 

1.3 

The  figures  in  Tables  IV  and  V leave  no  doubt  as  to  the  ad- 
vantages to  the  creamery  operator  of  pasteurization.  Butter  which 
reaches  the  open  market  is  often  practically  30  days  old  before  it 
is  disposed  of.  At  30  days,  the  butter  made  from  the  pasteurized 
cream  averaged  from  .8  to  .9  cent  in  the  case  of  the  flash  process 
to  1.7  cents  in  the  case  of  the  holding  process  higher  than  the  but- 
ter made  from  raw  cream. 

EFFECT  OF  PASTEURIZATION  ON  BACTERIAL  CONTENT  OF 
CREAM  AND  BUTTER 

Obviously  the  fundamental  purpose  of  pasteurization  of  cream 
for  butter  making  is  to  destroy  germ  life  and  other  ferments  present 
in  the  cream.  Cream,  when  it  arrives  at  the  creamery,  contains  a 
great  multitude  of  bacteria,  yeasts  and  molds,’ many  of  which  are 
capable  of  forming  decomposition  products  injurious  to  the  flavor 
and  keeping  quality  of  butter.  Their  destruction,  therefore,  elim- 
inates some  of  the  most  common  channels  through  which  flavor  de- 
fects and  early  deterioration  of  butter  may  and  usually  do  occur. 
Proper  pasteurization  of  cream  also  frees  butter  and  buttermilk 
of  germs  of  the  most  infectious  human  and  animal  diseases  which 
may  be  present  in  the  cream.  It  therefore  makes  butter  safe  for 
human  consumption  and  protects  the  live  stock  interests  against 
the  dangers  of  spreading  disease  among  young  stock  and  pigs 
through  the  feeding  of  buttermilk. 

Table  VI  shows  the  averages  of  the  total  count  of  bacteria, 
number  of  acidifiers,  number  of  liquefiers  and  number  of  yeasts  and 
molds  found  in  cream  of  136  consecutive  churnings  before  and 
after  pasteurization  with  the  holding  process  at  145  degrees  F. 
(20  minutes),  and  the  flash  process  at  165  degrees  F.,  and  185  de- 
grees F.,  respectively.  Table  VII  gives  the  average  percentage  de- 
crease of  bacteria  in  cream,  as  the  result  of  pasteurization  by  the 
above  methods. 


14 


Table:  VI. — Showing  Average  Number  of  Microorganisms  Present 
in  Raw  Cream  and  in  Cream  Pasteurized  at  145  Degrees  F. 
Holding  Method,  and  165  Degrees  F.  and  185  Degrees 


Types  of  germs 

Raw  cream 
germs 
per  c.c. 

j Pasteurized  cream 

145  degrees  P. 

20  minutes 
germs  per  c.c. 

165  degrees  P. 
flash 

germs  per  c.c. 

185  degrees  P. 

! flash 

! germs  per  c.c. 

Total  count 

Acidiflers 

Liqueflers 

Yeasts  and  molds 

209,714,285 

123,985,714 

16,182,854 

4,032,000 

113,574 

42,928 

3,035 

2,201 

14,768,000 

8.415.000 

1.295.000 
197,911 

1,416,029 

837,352 

81,429 

16,782 

Table:  VII. — Showing  Average  Per  Cent.  Decrease  of  Microorgan- 
isms in  Cream  of  136  Consecutive  Churnings, 

Due  to  Pasteurization 


Per  cent,  decrease  of  germs  in  cream 
due  to  pasteurization  i 


Method  of  pasteurization 

total 
counts 
per  cent. 

acidiflers  i 
per  cent.  [ 

1 

liqueflers 
per  cent. 

yeasts  and 
molds 
per  cent. 

score  of 
butter 

145  degrees  F.  holding 

99.85 

99.95 

99.98 

99.88 

91.01 

165  degrees  F.  flash 

89.82 

89.77 

90.19 

86.18 

89.44 

185  degrees  F.  flash 

98.97 

96.07 

99.63 

98.90 

87.51 

1 These  figures  represent  averages  calculated  from  the  per  cent,  decrease  of 
each  individual  lot  of  cream.  They  were  not  derived  from  the  average  counts  as 
shown  in  Table  VI,  and  vary  therefore  slightly  from  calculations  of  those  averages 


Tables  VI  and  VII  show  that  the  holding  process  of  pasteuri- 
zation, heating  the  cream  to  145  degrees  F.  and  holding  it  there  for 
20  minutes  was  most  efficient  in  its  germ  killing  effect  on  all  types 
of  microorganisms.  Its  efficiency  is  further  emphasized  by  the  rela- 
tively high  score  of  the  butter  (91.01  points),  made  from  the 
cream  so  pasteurized  as  shown  in  the  previous  part. 

The  185  degrees  F.  flash  process,  while  reasonably  efficient  in 
destroying  germs,  yielded  butter  that  averaged  very  low  in  quality, 
87.51  points.  As  explained  elsewhere  in  this  bulletin  the  low  score 
of  butter  made  from  sour  cream  pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.  flash, 
is  due  to  the  development  in  the  butter  of  a distinct  and  disagreeable 
oily  flavor,  which  was  attributed  to  the  probable  unfavorable  effect 
of  the  combination  of  high  acid  and  high  temperature  on  the  butter 
fat. 

It  is  also  noteworthy  that  the  germ  killing  efficiency  of  the 
flash  process  at  185  degrees  F.  lacks  uniformity.  This  is  largely 
due  to  the  difficulty  of  maintaining  a uniform  temperature  in  a 
steam  heated  pasteurizer,  such  as  was  used.  Owing  to  the  limited 
size  of  the  batches  of  cream  and  the  rather  poor  and  irregular 


15 


mechanical  condition  of  the  cream,  the  flow  of  cream  through  the 
pasteurizer  varied,  causing  considerable  fluctuations  in  the  tempera- 
ture to  which  dififerent  portions  of  one  and  the  same  batch  of  cream 
were  subjected.  This  naturally  permits  some  of  the  cream  to  pass 
on  the  cooler  without  having  been  heated  to  the  desired  temperature. 

This  dififlculty  occurs  wherever  the  flash  or  continuous  method 
of  pasteurization  is  employed  with  this  type  of  pasteurizer.  It 
may  be  minimized  to  some  extent  by  the  use  of  a forewarmer  or  by 
a double  flash  process  where  the  cream  passes  through  two  flash 
heaters.  In  flash  machines  heated  with  hot  water,  the  temperature 
is  also  more  easily  controlled  than  in  steam  heated  flash  pasteurizers. 

The  flash  process  at  165  degrees  F.  is  obviously  deficient  in 
germ  killing  efficiency.  As  shown  in  Table  VII  it  failed  to  destroy 
more  than  90  per  cent,  of  the  microorganisms  originally  present  in 
the  cream,  and  it  was  especially  inadequate  in  destroying  yeasts  and 
molds,  the  per  cent,  decrease  being  only  86.18. 

The  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  165  degrees  F. 
flash  scored  over  one  and  one-half  points  lower  than  that  from  the 
holding  process,  but  its  score  was  two  points  higher  than  that  of 
the  flash  process  at  185  degrees  F.  This  phenomenon  may  be  ex- 
plained by  the  fact  that  at  165  degrees  F.,  the  butter  did  not  be- 
come oily  to  the  same  degree  as  at  185  degrees  F.  The  lower  heat 
of  165  degrees  F.  did  not  have  as  injurious  an  effect  on  the  fat  in 
the  sour  cream  as  was  the  case  at  185  degrees  F.  Owing  to  the  in- 
complete destruction  of  germs  at  165  degrees  F.,  the  butter  made 
from  this  cream  was  of  inferior  keeping  quality. 

EFFECT  OF  SEASON  ON  FLAVOR  AND  KEEPING  QUALITY  OF  BUT- 
TER MADE  FROM  PASTEURIZED  SOUR,  FARM-SKIMMED  CREAM 

In  Table  VIII  the  scores  of  all  fresh  and  stored  butter  are 
averaged  by  seasons. 

Table  VIII. — Showing  Effect  of  Season  on  Average  Score  of  Fresh 
and  Stored  Butter  made  from  Raw  Cream  and  from  Cream 

Pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.,  20  minutes,  at  165  degrees 
F.  flash  and  at  185  degrees  F.  flash 


Season 

Age  of 
butter 

Average  butter  scores 

raw 

cream 

pasteurized  cream 

145  degrees  F.  i 105  degrees  F.  185  degrees  F. 
20  minutes  i flash  1 flash 

f 

fresh 

86.97 

90.44 

88.43 

86.65 

Summer  ^ 

30  days 

85.95 

89.25 

87.39 

87.14 

1 

60  days 

85.68 

88.87 

87.73 

87.59 

r 

fresh 

89.49 

91.44 

90.20 

88.78 

Winter  ■{ 

30  days 

86.03 

90.53 

88.85 

88.95 

1 

60  days 

84.90 

89.05 

88.07 

88.35 

i6 


Table  VIII  brings  out  some  interesting  facts  corroborating 
many  of  the  conclusions  drawn  in  previous  parts. 

The  summer  butter,  both  that  made  from  raw  cream  and  that 
made  from  cream  pasteurized  by  the  holding  process  and  by  each 
of  the  two  flash  processes  scored  lower,  when  fresh,  than  the  winter 
butter.  This  may  be  logically  attributed  to  the  high  acid  cream 
received  during  the  summer  months. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  summer  butter  held  up  in  storage  better 
than  the  winter  butter.  Thus  in  6o  days,  the  raw  cream  summer 
butter  depreciated  1.29  points  while  the  raw  cream  winter  butter 
depreciated  4.59  points. 

The  summer  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  by  the  hold- 
ing process  depreciated  in  storage  1.57  points  while  the  winter  but- 
ter made  by  the  same  process  depreciated  2.39  points. 

The  summer  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  165  de- 
grees F.,  flash  process,  depreciated  in  storage  .70  point  while  the 
winter  butter  made  by  the  same  process  depreciated  2.13  points. 

The  summer  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  185  de- 
grees F.  flash  process,  gained  in  storage  .94  point,  while  the  winter 
butter  made  by  the  same  process  depreciated  .43  point. 

The  more  rapid  deterioration  of  the  winter  butter  may  be  ex- 
plained by  the  fact  that  the  winter  cream  contains  a larger  pro- 
portion of  resistant  microorganisms  and  enzymes  most  harmful  to 
keeping  quality  of  the  butter,  the  liquefiers,  yeasts  and  molds,  as  al- 
ready stated  and  shown  by  the  bacteriological  results  in  the  part 
on  “The  Efifect  of  Season  on  the  Germ  Killing  Efficiency  of  Pas- 
teurization of  Cream.” 

The  exceedingly  rapid  deterioration  of  winter  butter  made  from 
raw  cream  is  a striking  example  of  this  fact.  The  very  considera- 
ble deterioration  of  winter  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  by 
the  holding  process,  and  of  winter  butter  made  by  flash  process  at 
165  degrees  F.,  indicates  that  these  processes  of  pasteurization  fail 
to  destroy  the  activity  of  the  enzymes.  The  very  slight  deteriora- 
tion of  winter  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  by  the  flash 
process  at  185  degrees  F.  suggests  that  at  this  high  temperature  the 
action  of  the  enzymes  is  largely  destroyed.  These  facts  fully  cor- 
respond with  our  knowledge  of  the  effect  of  heat  on  enzyme  action. 

The  fact  that  the  summer  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized 
by  the  flash  process  at  185  degrees  F.,  improved  in  storage  must  be 
attributed  to  the  strong  oily  flavor  of  this  butter  when  fresh.  As 
already  stated  in  previous  parts,  high  temperature  pasteurization 
of  sour  cream,  .such  as  was  used  in  this  experiment  in  summer,  al- 
most invariably  yields  butter  with  a marked  disagreeable,  oily  flavor. 
This  oily  flavor  has  been  found  to  “wear  off”  or  disappear  to  some 
extent  in  storage,  so  that  this  butter  came  out  of  storage  with  a 
somewhat  improved  flavor. 


While  all  the  scores,  even  those  of  the  fresh  butter,  were  con- 
demningly  low,  there  can  be  no  question  as  to  the  improvement  of 
quality  and  keeping  quality,  which  proper  pasteurization  of  the 
cream  is  capable  of  making  possible.  The  very  low  scores  of  butter 
made  from  cream  pasteurized  with  the  flash  process,  is  due  in  a large 
measure  to  the  high  acidity  of  the  cream  and  its  tendency,  in  com- 
bination with  high  temperature  pasteurization,  to  give  the  butter  an 
oily  flavor.  Had  the  acidity  in  this  cream  been  reduced  by  neutral- 
ization, the  oily  flavor  would  have  been  less  pronounced  and  the 
butter  made  from  the  flash  pasteurized  cream  might  have  scored 
several  points  higher. 

EFFECT  OF  SEASON  OF  YEAR  ON  GERM  KILLING  EFFICIENCY 
OF  PASTEURIZATION 

It  is  a well  known  fact  that  the  bacterial  flora  of  milk  and 
cream  varies  with  the  season  of  the  year,  and  the  resistance  to  heat 
of  different  types  of  microorganisms  that  predominate  at  different 
seasons  fluctuates  to  a considerable  extent.  In  order  to  demonstrate 
this  fact,  the  average  per  cent,  decrease  of  bacteria  in  cream  due  to 
pasteurization  was  studied  by  seasons  as  shown  in  Table  IX. 

Table  IX. — Showing  Effect  of  Season  on  Per  Cent.  Decrease  of 
Bacteria  in  Cream  Pasteurized  by  the  Holding  Process 
at  145  degrees  F.  and  the  Flash  Process  at  165 
degrees  F.  and  185  degrees  F.,  Respectively 


Method  of 

Total  eount 
per  cent,  decrease 

Acidifiers 
per  cent,  decrease 

Liquefiers 
per  cent,  decrease 

Teasts  and  molds 
per  cent,  decrease 

pasteuriza- 

tion 

1 

summer 

months 

fall  and 
winter 
months 

summer 

months 

fall  and 
winter 
months 

summer 

months 

[ fall  and 
winter 
months 

summer 

months 

fall  and 
winter 
months 

145  degrees 

P. 

99.72 

99.91 

99.97 

99.96 

99.98 

99.97 

99.78 

99.96 

165  degrees 

P. 

93.73 

88.25 

94.32 

86.42 

94.61 

86.29 

92.02 

76.63 

185  degrees 

P. 

99.82 

98.15 

99.76 

97.97 

99.94 

99.29 

99.16 

97.17 

The  figures  in  Table  IX  are  grouped  according  to  summer 
months  and  fall  and  winter  months.  In  the  columns  specified  as 
summer  months  the  average  per  cent,  decrease  of  germs  in  cream 
pasteurized  from  April  to  July  inclusive,  is  shown.  The  columns 
specified  as  fall  and  winter  months  refer  to  the  months  of  Septem- 
ber to  March  inclusive. 

The  table  shows  conspicuously  that  the  per  cent,  decrease  of  bac- 
teria pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.,  holding  for  20  minutes,  was 
uniform  throughout  the  year.  This  suggests  very  forcibly  that  this 
process  is  adequate  to  destroy  over  99  per  cent,  of  the  germ  content 


i8 


of  cream,  regardless  of  season  of  year  and  variations  in  the  resist- 
ance of  different  types  of  germs.  It  can  be  depended  upon  at  all 
seasons  of  the  year. 

The  185  degrees  F.  flash  process  was  slightly  less  efficient  in  win- 
ter than  in  summer,  its  germ  killing  efficiency  being  from  one  to  two 
per  cent,  lower. 

The  165  degrees  F.  flash  process  showed  a marked  preference 
for  summer  cream.  In  winter,  its  power  to  destroy  germs  v/as 
relatively  low,  especially  in  the  case  of  the  germs  most  harmful  to  the 
quality  of  the  butter,  the  liquefying  bacteria  and  the  yeasts  and 
molds,  which  were  destroyed  on  an  average  of  86.29  per  cent,  and 
76.63  per  cent,  respectively  only  during  the  winter  months. 

This  demonstrates  anew  the  inadequacy  of  the  flash  process 
at  165  degrees  F.,  as  a means  to  free  the  cream  and  butter  from  un- 
desirable germs.  It  further  emphasizes  the  need  of  using  either 
the  holding  process  or  a high  temperature  flash  process  during  the 
winter  months,  in  order  to  insure  the  desired  germ  killing  efficiency. 

The  chief  reason  why  fall  and  winter  cream  is  freed  from  its 
germ  content  less  readily  than  summer  cream,  lies  in  the  fact  that 
in  fall  the  crops  are  harvested  and  are  brought  into  the  barn.  These 
crops,  especially  silage  and  grain  crops,  are  loaded  with  various 
types  of  resistant  microorganisms,  and  when  handled  in  the  barn, 
the  dust  incident  to  unloading,  etc.,  is  teeming  with  these  germs, 
causing  the  milk  and  cream  to  become  contaminated  with  them 
through  diverse  channels,  such  as  the  air,  the  coating  of  the  cows, 
the  bedding,  the  utensils,  and  the  milker. 

The  cows  being  stabled  during  the  winter  months,  continue 
to  serve  as  ample  sources  of  contamination  throughout  the  stabling 
season,  although  toward  spring  the  danger  of  contamination  of  the 
cream  with  these  germs  is  somewhat  minimized. 

Fortunately  for  the  butter  industry,  fall  and  winter  butter  us- 
ually moves  rapidly  on  the  market.  Under  normal  conditions  it  is 
not  necessary  to  store  butter  manufactured  at  this  time  of  the  year 
any  great  length  of  time  and  it  is  consumed  before  much  damage 
can  be  done  to  the  butter  froin  contamination  with  these  germs. 

Nevertheless,  the  creamery  operator  should  be  alert  to  the  fact, 
that  fall  and  winter  cream  does  contain  large  numbers  of  undesir- 
able germs  and  that  inefficient  pasteurization  during  the  winter  sea- 
son invites  fermentations  that  may  lead  to  very  serious  butter  de- 
fects. 


19 


EFFECT  OF  TIME  OF  HOLDING  CREAM  AT  145  DEGREES  F.  ON 
SCORE  OF  FRESH  AND  STORED  BUTTER 

In  these  experiments,  butter  was  made  from  cream  that  was 
held  at  the  pasteurizing  temperature  of  145  degrees  F.  for  10,  15,  20, 
30  and  40  minutes,  in  order  to  determine  the  shortest  time  of  holding 
at  145  degrees  F.  that  can  be  depended  upon  to  produce  maximum 
keeping  quality  of  the  resulting  butter.  These  results  are  averaged 
in  Table  X. 


Tabli;  X. — Showing  Average  Scores  of  Butter  when  Fresh  and  after 
Storage  at  o.  degrees  to  20  degrees  F.  for  30  and  60  Days, 
Made  from  Cream  Held  at  145  degrees  F.  for  10, 

15,  20,  30  and  40  Minutes  Respectively 


Date 

Churning-  numbers 

Time  held 
at  145 
degrees  F, 
minutes 

Scores  of  butter  -when 
fresh  and  after  storage 

fresh 

after 

30  days 

; after 

60  days 

159,  162 

10 

90.25 

88.38 

85.00 

July  15 

158,  161 

15 

90.50 

88.38 

88.63 

157,  160 

20 

90.38 

88.63 

89.25 

163,  166,  169,  172,  175 

20 

89.50 

89.50 

87.80 

July  24,  29 

164,  167,  170,  173,  176 

30 

89.55 

89.45 

87.50 

165,  168,  171,  174,  177 

40 

89.85 

89.95 

87.75 

Table  X shows  that  there  was  very  little  difference  in  the 
average  score  of  the  fresh  butter  made  from  cream  which  was  held 
at  145  degrees  F.  for  from  10  to  40  minutes.  When  stored,  how- 
ever, 20  minutes  was  the  minimum  length  of  time  at  which  to  hold 
the  cream  at  145  degrees  F.,  that  would  yield  maximum  keeping 
quality.  When  held  at  145  degrees  F.  for  15  minutes  the  score  of 
the  butter  stored  for  60  days  was  .62  point  lower,  and  when  held 
at  145  degrees  F.  only  10  minutes  the  score  of  the  butter  stored  for 
60  days  was  4.25  points  lower  than  the  score  of  the  butter  made 
from  cream  that  was  held  at  145  degrees  F.  for  20  minutes. 

These  results  are  borne  out  by  the  bacteriological  analysis  of  the 
cream,  which  shows  that  when  the  cream  was  held  at  145  degrees  F. 
for  20  minutes,  the  germ  killing  efficiency  of  the  liquefying  bacteria 
was  99.95  per  cent,  and  that  of  the  yeasts  and  molds  was  99.93  per 
cent,  while  when  held  for  15  minutes  the  germ  killing  efficiency 
was  99.72  per  cent,  and  99.18  per  cent.,  respectively,  and  when  held 
for  only  10  minutes,  the  germ  killing  efficiency  was  98.79  per  cent, 
and  87.50  per  cent,  respectively,  for  the  liquefiers  and  for  the  yeasts 
and  molds. 

These  results  clearly  suggest  that  the  lower  germ  killing  effi- 
ciency in  the  case  of  the  liquefying  bacteria  and  the  yeasts  and  molds 
was  largely  responsible  for  the  inferior  keeping  quality  of  butter 


20 


made  from  cream  held  at  145  degrees  F.  for  less  than  20  minutes. 

Table  X further  shows  that  when  the  cream  was  held  at  145 
degrees  F.  for  more  than  20  minutes,  there  was  no  material  im- 
provement in  the  keeping  quality  of  the  butter.  In  fact,  after  stor- 
age for  60  days,  the  butter  made  from  cream  that  was  held  at  145 
degrees  F.  for  20  minutes,  scored  quite  as  high  as  the  butter  made 
from  cream  held  at  145  degrees  F.  for  30  and  40  minutes  respect- 
ively. 

On  the  basis  of  these  data,  it  appears  reasonable  to  conclude 
that  nothing  is  gained  by  prolonging  the  holding  process  of  pasteur- 
ization at  145  degrees  F.  beyond  20  minutes  and  the  factor  of 
economy  of  time  and  labor  suggests  that  the  preference  for  20  min- 
utes holding  rather  than  holding  longer. 

Excessive  holding  of  the  cream  at  the  pasteurizing  temperature 
has  the  further  disadvantage  that  it  tends  to  yield  butter  with  a 
mealy  body.  This  is  caused  by  the  undue  contraction,  hardening 
and  drying  of  the  particles  of  curd  in  cream  under  certain  condi- 
tions, this  curd  lending  the  butter,  when  tasted,  a coarse  and  mealy 
effect.  In  the  experiments  above  recorded,  however,  this  mealiness 
could  not  be  detected  in  the  butter  of  the  longer  holding  process. 

EFFECT  OF  TIME  OF  HOLDING  CREAM  AT  145  DEGREES  F.  ON 
GERM  KILLING  EFFICIENCY 

The  effect  of  the  length  of  time  the  cream  is  held  at  145  de- 
grees F.  on  the  germ  killing  efficiency  and  score  of  butter  was 
studied  with  21  churnings.  The  cream  was  heated  to  145  degrees 
F.  in  the  coil  ripening  vat  and  held  at  that  temperature  for  10,  15, 
20,  30  and  40  minutes. 

Table  XI. — Average  Per  Cent.  Microorganisms  Destroyed  When 
Held  at  145  Degrees  F.  for  10,  15,  20,  30  and  40 
Minutes,  Respectively 


Per  cent,  decrease  of  germs  due  to  pasteurization 


Time  held  at 
145  degrees  P. 

total  count 

acidifiers 

liqueflers 

yeasts  and 
molds 

10  minutes 

99.39 

99.29 

98.79 

87.50 

15  minutes 

99.89 

99.94 

99.72 

99.18 

20  minutes 

99.98 

99.98 

99.95 

99.93 

30  minutes 

99.99 

99.999 

99.98 

99.94 

40  minutes 

99.995 

99.999 

99.99 

99.98 

Table  XI  shows  that  the  highest  per  cent,  reduction  of  the 
microorganisms  present  in  the  cream  was  secured  when  the  cream 
was  held  at  145  degrees  F.  for  40  minutes,  while  holding  at  145 
degrees  F.  for  10  minutes  produced  the  lowest  germ  killing  efficiency. 


21 


The  shorter  exposure  to  the  pasteurizing  heat  showed  its  inefficiency 
especially  in  the  case  of  the  liquefying  bacteria  and  the  yeasts  and 
molds.  These  are  the  organisms  which  are  most  prone  to  cause 
fermentations  injurious  to  the  quality  of  the  butter. 

These  results  further  demonstrate  that  20  minutes  is  the 
minimum  length  of  exposure  at  which  reasonably  high  germ  killing 
efficiency  may  be  expected.  They  are  further  substantiated  by 
bacterial  counts  of  the  butter  at  the  churn  as  shown  in  Table  XII. 


Tabi,k  XII. — Showing  Average  Number  of  Bacteria  in  Butter 
Made  from  Cream  Pasteurized  at  145  Degrees  F.  and  Held 
For  10,  15,  20,  30  and  40  Minutes,  Respectively 


Date 

Churning  numbers 

Time  held 
at  145 
degrees  F. 
minutes 

Bad 

I 

figure 

tho 

or 

total 

count 

teria  in 
(asteuriz 

s represt 
usand  oi 
le  gram 

acidi- 

fiers 

butter  f 
ed  crean 

int  numl 
E bacteri 
of  butt 

lique- 

fiers 

rom 

1 

Der  of 
a in 
er 

yeasts 

and 

molds 

159,  162 

10 

1865 

300 

213 

3.0 

July  12,  14 

158,  161 

15 

760 

385 

135 

3.5 

157,  160 

20 

440 

165 

105 

0.4 

July  19,  20, 

163,  166,  169,  172,  175 

20 

352 

149 

34 

0.2 

26,  28 

164,  167,  170,  173,  176 

30 

220 

117 

70 

2.5 

165,  168,  171,  174,  177 

40 

177 

97 

55 

0.4 

The  above  table  shows  that  especially  the  liquefiers  and  the 
yeasts  and  molds  required  exposure  of  the  cream  to  145  degrees  F. 
for  at  least  20  minutes  for  effective  destruction.  When  the  time 
of  exposure  is  shortened  to  15  and  10  minutes  respectively,  the 
germ  killing  efficiency  is  greatly  diminished.  It  also  demonstrates 
that  butter  made  from  cream  held  at  145  degrees  F.  for  more  than 
20  minutes,  contains  quite  as  large  a number  of  liquefiers,  yeasts 
and  molds  as  when  held  for  20  minutes  only. 

Both  the  germ  killing  efficiency  in  the  cream  and  the  number 
of  germs  found  in  the  butter  at  the  churn,  suggest  therefore,  that 
in  order  to  secure  the  best  results  from  the  bacteriological  point  of 
view,  with  the  holding  process  at  145  degrees  F.,  the  cream  must 
be  held  at  this  temperature  for  at  least  20  minutes  and  that  holding 
longer  than  20  minutes  does  not  materially  increase  the  germ  kill- 
ing efficiency  of  the  holding  process.  Since,  under  certain  condi- 
tions of  the  cream,  prolonged  holding  at  the  pasteurizing  tempera- 
ture tends  to  give  the  resulting  butter  a disagreeable  mealy  body,  it 
appears  advisable  to  confine  the  time  of  holding  at  145  degrees  F. 
to  20  minutes. 


22 


EXTENT  OF  CONTAMINATION  BETWEEN  PASTEURIZER 
AND  CHURN 

In  a previous  part  an  effort  was  made  to  show  the  per  cent, 
bacteria  removed  from  cream  by  pasteurization.  The  figures  in- 
dicated that  with  efficient  pasteurization,  over  99.9  per  cent,  of 
the  bacteria  originally  present  may  be  destroyed.  If  the  creamery 
is  to  hold  the  full  benefit  of  pasteurization,  it  is  essential  that  all 
channels  through  which  the  cream  may  become  recontaminated 
after  pasteurization  be  as  completely  eliminated  as  possible. 

Bacterial  analysis  made  of  the  butter  at  the  churn  shows  the 
following  decline  of  the  germ  killing  efficiency  of  pasteurization  due 
to  recontamination  of  the  cream  and  butter  after  pasteurization. 

Tabi,i:  XIII. — Average  Per  Cent.  Decrease  of  Bacteria  in  Cream 
and  Butter  Due  to  Pasteurization 


Liqnefiers 

Yeasts  and  molds 

cream 

1 butter 

cream 

butter 

145  degrees  F.  holding  20  minutes 

165  degrees  F.  flash 

185  degrees  F.  flash 

99.98 

90.19 

99.63 

99.05 

86.21 

95.75 

99.88 

86.18 

98.90 

97.16 

87.14 

95.77 

The  figures  in  Table  XIII  are  the  result  of  operation  under 
good  sanitary  conditions  of  factory  and  equipment.  Under  more 
nearly  commercial  conditions  and  less  scrupulous  precautions,  the 
decrease  in  the  per  cent,  reduction  of  bacteria  of  butter  made  from 
the  pasteurized  cream  would  naturally  be  much  greater.  Experi- 
ence has  shown  that  the  running  of  the  pasteurized  cream  into  a 
non-sterile  vat  reduced  the  germ  killing  efficiency  of  pasteurization 
50  per  cent. 

The  purity  of  the  air,  the  sanitary  condition  of  the  sewers,  the 
freedom  from  flies,  the  cleanliness  of  pipes,  conveyers,  pumps, 
coolers,  vats  and  churns,  the  purity  of  the  starter,  the  purity  of  the 
wash  water  and  later  the  sanitary  condition  of  the  packing  equip- 
ment, all  these  factors  determine  the  efficiency  of  pasteurization 
and  the  relative  freedom  of  butter  from  undesirable  germ  life,  such 
as  liquefying  bacteria  and  yeasts  and  molds. 

There  are  those  who  claim  that  the  number  of  yeasts  and  molds 
present  in  the  butter  is  a reliable  index  to  the  efficiency  of  pasteur- 
ization. If  butter  contains  over  a certain  number  of  these  micro- 
organisms they  conclude  that  such  butter  was  made  either  from 
cream  that  was  not  pasteurized  at  all  or  that  was  pasteurized  im- 
properly. This  conclusion  may  or  may  not  be  correct.  The  proba- 
bility is  that  in  a great  many  cases  the  excessive  number  of  yeasts 
and  molds  is  the  result  of  recontamination  of  the  cream  and  butter 
after  pasteurization,  although  the  process  of  pasteurization  may  have 
been  applied  properly  and  may  have  produced  a high  germ  killing 
effect. 


23 


EFFECT  OF  PASTEURIZING  TEMPERATURE  ON  FLAVOR  OF 
BUTTER  MADE  FROM  HIGH  ACID  CREAM 

The  results  of  this  investigation  showed  that  the  exposure 
of  high  acid  cream  to  high  pasteurizing  temperature,  almost  in- 
variably produced  a butter  with  a pronounced  oily  flavor.  This  was 
true  with  remarkable  regularity  of  the  butter  made  from  sour  cream, 
pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.  flash  process.  The  oily  flavor  also 
appeared  in  several  instances  in  butter  made  from  sour  cream  pas- 
teurized at  165  degrees  F.,  but  a great  many  lots  of  this  butter  were 
free  from  oiliness.  In  the  case  of  butter  made  from  sour  cream  pas- 
teurized at  145  degrees  F.,  and  held  for  20  minutes,  there  was  no 
trace  of  oiliness. 

Since  experience  has  shown  that  sweet  cream  may  be  heated 
to  any  temperature,  even  to  sterilizing  heat,  without  yielding  butter 
that  has  pronounced  oily  flavor,  and  since  butter  made  from  .un- 
pasteurized sour  cream  and  from  cream  pasteurized  at  a low  tem- 
perature is  also  free  from  oiliness,  it  appears  reasonable  to  assume 
that  the  oily  flavor  so  persistently  and  pronouncedly  found  in  but- 
ter made  from  sour  cream  pasteurized  at  a high  temperature,  with 
the  flash  process  used,  is  caused  by  the  effect  of  the  combination  of 
high  acid  and  high  heat  on  the  butter  fat.  The  heat  intensified 
the  physical  and  chemical  action  of  the  acid. 

It  is  well  known  that  the  proteins  of  sour  milk  and  cream  pre- 
cipitate when  the  milk  or  cream  is  heated.  The  higher  the  tem- 
perature, the  more  complete  is  this  precipitation,  the  more  the 
curd  contracts,  the  firmer  it  gets  and  the  more  completely  it  expels 
its  water.  When  the  highly  acid  cream  is  pasteurized  at  a high  tem- 
perature, such  as  is  employed  in  the  flash  process,  the  nitrogenous 
and  mucilaginous  film  that  envelops  the  fat  globules  con- 
tracts ; it  is  ruptured  and  partly  destroyed,  robbing  the  individual 
fat  globules  of  their  natural  protection  and  exposing  the  fat  in  these 
globules  to  the  many  agents  which  invite  oxidation  of  the  fat,  such 
as  air,  light  and  heat.  It  is  not  improbable  that  the  fat  so  exposed 
is  more  readily  subjected  to  oxidation,  which  action  may  be  re- 
sponsible for  the  oily  flavor.  This  oxidizing  action  may  be  directly 
brought  about  or  at  least  hastened  by  the  combined  action  of  acid 
and  heat  itself. 

Again  it  is  possible  that  the  oiliness  is  wholly  or  in  part  a 
physical  impression  conveyed  to  the  sense  of  touch  and  taste.  The 
fat  globules  having  lost  their  protecting  film  have  thus  changed  the 
fat  from  the  globular  condition  to  one  similar  to  oil,  and  giving  the 
senses  the  impression  of  oiliness  in  flavor  and  consistency.  This 
assumption  is  further  supported  by  the  fact  that  the  butter  made 
from  sour  cream  pasteurized  at  a high  temperature,  while  very 
oily  when  fresh,  was  much  less  oily  after  one  or  more  months  of 
cold  storage.  The  partial  disappearance  of  the  oily  flavor  of  stored 
butter  in  all  probability  was  partly  due  to  a readjustment  of  the 


24 


physical  and  mechanical  makeup  of  the  fat,  returning  the  latter  to 
a more  granular  condition  which  minimizes  the  impression  of  oili- 
ness conveyed  to  the  palate.  The  lesser  oiliness  in  the  stored  but- 
ter, however,  also  may  have  been  largely  due  to  the  development 
during  storage,  of  other  flavors  which  tended  to  cover  up  the  oily 
flavor. 

The  fact  remains  that  the  pronounced  oily  flavor  of  the  butter 
made  from  sour  cream  pasteurized  at  a high  temperature  (flash 
process  185  degrees  F.)  caused  this  butter  to  score  very  low  when 
fresh.  During  storage  for  30,  60  and  90  days,  the  oily  flavor  be- 
came less  pronounced  but  the  butter  did  not  improve  in  flavor  to 
raise  its  average  score  more  than  one-fourth  of  a point. 

These  results  can  leave  no  doubt  that  flash  pasteurization  at 
185  degrees  F.  of  sour  cream,  while  quite  effective  in  its  germ  kill- 
ing .efficiency  and  in  destroying  the  activity  of  enzymes,  has  a very 
unfavorable  effect  on  the  flavor  of  the  butter  and  is  unsuitable  as 
a means  to  improve  the  quality  of  butter  made  from  sour  cream. 

If  the  flash  process  of  pasteurization  is  to  be  used,  therefore, 
the  cream  should  be  sweet  or  nearly  so,  or  if  sour,  its  acidity 
should  be  reduced  by  neutralization  to  a point  where  it  is  no  longer 
able,  in  combination  with  the  high  pasteurizing  temperature,  to 
seriously  affect  the  flavor  of  butter.  It  is  advisable  to  reduce  the 
acidity  to  about  .25  per  cent. 

When  sour  cream  is  pasteurized  by  the  holding  process,  heat- 
ing to  145  degrees  F.  and  holding  for  20  minutes,  the  butter  does 
not  show  an  oily  flavor.  This  would  indicate  that  this  temperature 
is  not  high  enough  to  injure  the  fat  globules  in  sour  cream. 

The  non-appearance  of  oily  flavor  in  butter  made  from  sour 
cream  with  the  holding  process  of  pasteurization,  may  be  explained 
by  the  fact  that  up  to  a temperature  of  145  degrees  F.,  the  albumin- 
ous parts  of  the  cream  are  not  materially  affected  by  the  heat,  the 
mucilaginous  film  surrounding  the  fat  globules  therefore  is  not 
disturbed ; the  fat  globules  remain  intact ; they  do  not  surrender 
their  protecting  envelope,  the  fat  in  them  is  not  abnormally  exposed 
to  oxidizing  agents  nor  does  it  convey  to  the  palate  the  impression 
of  oiliness. 

If  sour  cream  must  be  pasteurized  without  first  reducing  the 
acid  by  neutralization,  the  holding  process,  heating  to  145  degrees 
F.  and  holding  for  20  minutes,  will  give  by  far  a better  flavored 
butter  than  the  flash  process  at  185  degrees  F. 

But  experience  in  commercial  butter  making  has  demonstrated 
that  even  with  the  holding  process,  a better  keeping  quality  is  se- 
cured when  the  acid  in  the  sour  cream  is  reduced  by  neutralization 
before  pasteurization. 


25 


RELATION  OF  QUALITY  OF  CREAM  TO  FLAVOR  AND  KEEPING 
QUALITY  OF  BUTTER  MADE  FROM  RAW  AND 
PASTEURIZED  CREAM 

Tables  XIV  and  XV  show  the  effect  of  flavor  and  acidity  of 
cream  on  the  score  of  fresh  and  storage  butter  made  from  raw  and 
pasteurized  cream.  In  assembling  Table  XIV,  the  scores  of  all 
churnings  made  from  reasonably  clean-flavored  cream,  and  of  all 
churnings  made  from  cream  that  was  found  fair  to  poor  in  flavor, 
respectively,  were  averaged.  In  assembling  Table  XV,  the  scores 
of  all  churnings  made  from  cream  containing  less  than  .5  per  cent, 
acid,  and  those  of  all  churnings  made  from  cream  containing  .5  per 
cent,  acid  and  over,  respectively,  were  averaged. 


Table  XIV. — Effect  of  Flavor  of  Cream  on  Score  of  Butter  Made 
from  Raw  Cream  and  from  Pasteurized  Cream 


Raw  cream 
butter 

Pasteurized  at 

Flavor  of  cream 

145 

degrees  F. 

20  minutes 

165 

degrees  F. 
flash 

1 185 

, degrees  F. 
flash 

score 

score 

score 

score 

fresh  butter 


Good 

90.1 

91.0 

91.5 

89.3 

Fair  to  poor 

84.4 

91.0 

88.9 

87.3 

30  days  old 

Good 

88.3 

90.9 

90.4 

89.5 

Fair  to  poor 

85.5 

89.7 

87.7 

87.8 

60  days  old 

Good 

86.1 

89.9 

89.3 

88.6 

Fair  to  poor 

85.0 

88.7 

87.5 

87.9 

Table  XV. — Relation  of  Acidity  of  Cream  to  Score  of  Butter  Made 
from  Raw  and  from  Pasteurized  Cream 


Acidity  of  cream 

Raw  cream 
butter 

145 

degrees  F. 

20  minutes 

Pasteurized  at 

165 

degrees  F. 
flash 

1 185 

degrees  F. 

1 flash 

score 

score 

score 

score 

fresh  butter 

Acidity  below  .5  per  cent. 

1 89.5 

1 91.2 

1 90.2 

89.3 

Acidity  above  .5  per  cent. 

1 88.0 

1 90.9 

1 89.1 

87.1 

30  days  old 

Acidity  below  .5  per  cent. 

86.5 

90.4 

1 89.2 

89.6 

Acidity  above  .5  per  cent. 

85.9 

89.8 

1 87.8 

87.6 

60  days  old 

Acidity  below  .5  per  cent. 

85.9 

89.4 

88.8 

88.9 

Acidity  above  .5  per  cent. 

85.0 

88.9 

87.5 

87.6 

26 


The  figures  in  Tables  XIV  and  XV  are  remarkable  for  the  dif- 
ferences they  show  in  favor  of  pasteurization  in  the  case  of  the 
fresh  butter  when  made  from  poor  cream  and  from  high  acid 
cream.  The  difterence  in  quality  between  the  cream  designated  as 
“good”  and  the  cream  marked  “fair  to  poor”  was  not  very  great, 
and  the  range  of  acid  in  all  cream  (Table  XV)  was  only  from  .37 
to  .62  per  cent.  Had  the  experiment  covered  churnings  with  cream 
of  excellent  quality  and  cream  of  very  poor  quality,  respectively, 
and  cream  that  arrived  in  sweet  condition  as  well  as  cream  with 
excessive  acid,  respectively,  the  contrasts  between  the  raw  and 
pasteurized  cream  butter  might  indeed  have  been  a revelation. 

But  even  these  comparatively  slight  dif¥erences  in  the  quality 
and  acidity  of  the  cream  show  unmistakably  the  advantage  of 
pasteurization.  This  is  especially  pronounced  in  the  case  of  heat- 
ing to  145  degrees  F.  and  holding  for  20  minutes,  when  the  but- 
ter made  from  the  fair  to  poor  cream  averaged  6.6  points  higher 
than  the  butter  made  from  the  raw  cream  of  the  same  quality.  In 
the  case  of  the  butter  made  from  the  cream  pasteurized  with  the 
flash  process,  the  difference  in  favor  of  pasteurization  was  not  so 
pronounced.  This  was  due  largely  to  the  oily  flavor  which  much  of 
this  butter  had  and  which  is  assumed  to  be  due  to  the  injurious  ef- 
fect of  the  combination  of  high  heat  and  high  acid  on  the  flavor  of 
the  butter  fat. 

The  superiority  of  the  flavor  of  butter  made  from  pasteurized 
cream  of  poor  quality  is  in  all  probability  due  to  expulsion  of  a 
large  portion  of  volatile  flavor  defects  and  precipitations  and  expul- 
sion of  other  decomposition  products  as  the  result  of  pasteurization. 

In  the  stored  butter,  the  butter  made  from  the  “good”  pasteur- 
ized cream  held  up  appreciably  better  than  that  made  from  the 
cream  marked  “fair  to  poor.”  At  185  degrees  F.,  flash  process, 
however,  there  was  very  little  change  in  the  flavor  of  the  butter 
due  to  storage.  This  is  probably  due  to  the  partial  disappearance  of 
the  oily  flavor,  offsetting  the  development  of  storage  flavor  and 
also  to  the  fact  that  at  185  degrees  F.  most  of  the  milk  enzymes  are 
rendered  inactive,  so  that  they  were  largely  eliminated  from  the 
agencies  which  are  prone  to  cause  deterioration  in  storage. 

In  the  raw  cream  butter  made  from  the  “good”  cream,  the 
score  dropped  four  points  in  60  days,  showing  very  marked  deterior- 
ation. In  the  raw  cream  butter  made  from  the  poorer  grade  of 
cream  there  was  no  further  drop  in  the  score.  The  flavor  of  this 
butter  when  fresh  was  so  poor,  it  seems,  that  it  was  difficult  for 
it  to  get  any  worse  in  cold  storage. 

In  the  case  of  the  acid  content  of  the  cream  (Table  XV),  it 
may  be  seen  that  the  butter  made  from  the  cream  with  the  higher 
per  cent,  acid  scored  uniformly  lower  than  that  made  from  the 
cream  containing  less  than  .5  per  cent.  acid.  Owing  to  the  fact  that 
the  difference  in  acidity  between  the  two  sets  of  churnings  was  very 


27 


small,  not  averaging  more  than  .2  per  cent.,  the  scores  in  favor  of 
the  lower  acid  cream  are  but  slightly  higher  than  those  of  the  more 
sour  cream.  This  is  especially  true  with  reference  to  the  fresh 
butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  with  the  145  degrees  F.  hold- 
ing process,  and  the  165  degrees  F.  flash  process.  At  185  degrees 
F.  flash,  the  high  acid  cream  butter  scored  2.2  points  less  than  the 
low  acid  cream  butter,  showing  that  even  a slight  increase  in  acid 
has  a very  unfavorable  effect  on  the  flavor  of  the  butter  when  the 
cream  is  exposed  to  high  pasteurizing  temperatures. 

In  this  table  again  -the  butter  pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F. 
showed  the  best  keeping  quality,  regardless  of  quality  or  acidity  of 
cream,  while  the  raw  cream  butter  deteriorated  the  most. 

These  comparisons  emphasize  the  fact  that  the  better  the  flavor 
and  the  lower  the  acidity  of  the  cream  at  the  time  of  pasteurization, 
the  better  will  be  the  flavor  of  the  butter  when  fresh  and  when  it 
comes  out  of  storage. 

The  butter  from  both  good  and  poor  cream  is  of  better  quality 
and  keeps  better  when  made  from  properly  pasteurized  cream  than 
from  raw  cream. 

EFFECT  OF  PASTEURIZATION  ON  PER  CENT.  FAT  LOST  IN 
BUTTERMILK 

It  is  the  general  opinion  of  the  buttermaker  that  sour  pasteur- 
ized cream  does  not  churn  out  as  exhaustively  as  raw  cream  and 
that  buttermilk  from  sour  pasteurized  cream  churnings  tends  to 
show  a relatively  high  butter  fat  test. 

The  average  per  cent,  fat  in  the  buttermilk  from  raw  and  pas- 
teurized cream  covered  in  this  investigation  is  shown  below. 


Table  XVI. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Fat  in  Buttermilk  from  Raw 
Cream  and  from  Pasteurized  Cream  Churnings 


Per  cent,  fat  in  buttermilk 

Number  of 
churnings 

from  raw 

j from  pasteurized  cream 

cream 

145  degrees  P. 

1 20  minutes 

1 165  degrees  P. 

1 flash 

185  degrees  P. 
flash 

104 

.101 

.137 

.120 

.120 

The  above  figures  do  not  show  an  appreciable  difference  in  the 
exhaustiveness  of  churning  between  raw  and  pasteurized  cream. 
While  the  raw  cream  buttermilk  contained  the  least  amount  of  fat, 
the  pasteurized  cream  buttermilk  contained  but  very  little  more  fat. 
The  difference  in  the  fat  content  of  the  buttermilk  between  the 
three  different  processes  of  pasteurization  used,  also  is  very  slight. 

In  order  to  more  readily  detect  the  effect  of  acidity  of  the  cream 
on  the  per  cent,  fat  in  the  buttermilk,  the  104  churnings  were 


28 


grouped  into  churnings  which  at  the  time  of  pasteurization  con- 
tained .5  per  cent,  acid  and  above,  and  churnings  which  at  the  time 
of  pasteurization  contained  less  than  .5  per  cent.  acid.  These  re- 
sults are  averaged  in  the  following  table. 


Table  XVII. — Showing  Effect  of  Acid  in  Cream  before  Pasteur- 
ization on  Per  Cent.  Fat  in  Buttermilk 


' Per  cent,  fat 

in  buttermilk 

Number 

Per  cent,  acid  in  cream 

from  pasteurized  cream 

churnings 

before  pasteurization 

from  raw 

1 145 

1 165 

185 

cream 

i degrees  P. 

degrees  F. 

degrees  F. 

20  minutes 

flash 

flash 

44 

less  than  .5  per  cent. 

.100 

.123 

.116 

.104 

60 

.5  per  cent,  or  above 

.093 

.160 

.127 

.136 

The  figures  in  Table  XVII  show  that  the  high  acid  cream  pro- 
duced a somewhat  larger  loss  of  fat  in  the  buttermilk  from  the  pas- 
teurized cream  than  the  low  acid  cream.  The  difference  might  have 
been  considerably  greater  had  the  range  of  acidity  in  the  different 
lots  of  cream  been  wider.  As  it  was,  the  cream  with  the  least  acid 
tested  .376  per  cent,  acid  and  the  sourest  cream  tested  .621  per  cent, 
acid. 

The  pasteurization  of  sour  cream  has  a tendency  to  produce  a 
firm,  contracted  and  dry  curd.  The  particles  of  curd  lock  up  a small 
amount  of  fat.  In  this  contracted  condition,  they  fail  to  surrender 
the  imprisoned  fat  and  carry  it  into  the  buttermilk.  This  auto- 
matically results  in  a slightly  increased  fat  content  of  the  butter- 
milk. Under  normal  conditions  of  properly  mixed  cream  of  uni- 
form acidity,  the  extra  loss  of  fat  due  to  pasteurization  is  small. 

However,  if  sweet  and  sour  cream  are  pasteurized  together 
and  without  proper  mixing  and  holding  before  pasteurization,  the 
loss  of  fat  may  be  very  great.  In  this  case,  the  acid  in  the  sour 
cream  acts  intensely  on  the  curd  in  the  sweet  cream,  in  the  presence 
of  the  pasteurizing  heat.  This  causes  the  formation  of  large  lumps 
of  a tough,  rubbery  and  sticky  curd.  This  curd  locks  up  relatively 
large  amounts  of  fat,  and  since  the  curd  passes  into  the  buttermilk, 
the  loss  of  fat  in  the  buttermilk  is  excessive. 

This  loss  can  best  be  avoided  by  pasteurizing  sweet  and  sour 
cream  separately.  If  sweet  cream  and  sour  cream  must  be  pasteur- 
ized together,  they  should  be  thoroughly  mixed  and  the  mixed 
cream  should  be  given  some  time  before  heating  to  pasteurizing 
temperature.  The  heating  should  be  done  slowly  up  to  about  120 
degrees  F.  and  from  there  on  rapidly.  This  gives  the  curd  in  the 
sweet  cream  an  opportunity  to  be  acted  upon  in  a normal  way  by 
the  acid  of  the  sour  cream,  so  that  the  effect  of  the  subsequent 
high  heat  is  minimized. 


29 


The  pasteurization  of  very  thin,  sour  cream  usually  causes  ex- 
cessive loss  of  fat,  unless  such  cream  is  churned  at  extremely  low 
temperatures. 

Not  infrequently,  excessive  losses  of  fat  in  buttermilk  from 
pasteurized  cream,  while  attributed  to  pasteurization,  are  due  largely 
to  churning  the  pasteurized  cream  at  too  high  a temperature,  or  to 
not  holding  the  cream  at  the  churning  temperature  long  enough. 
For  most  exhaustive  churning,  the  cream  should  be  held  at  the 
churning  temperature  not  less  than  two  hours  and  preferably  three 
hours.  Attempts  to  crowd  the  churns  with  too  large  churnings, 
which  are  prone  to  occur  during  the  flush  of  the  season  in  summer, 
are  a further  common  cause  of  excessive  loss  of  fat  in  the  butter- 
milk. 

CHEMICAL  COMPOSITION  OF  BUTTER  MADE  FROM  RAW  AND 
FROM  PASTEURIZED  CREAM 

The  following  table  contains  averages  of  the  per  cent,  moisture, 
salt,  curd  and  acid  in  76  churnings  of  fresh  butter. 


Table  XVIII. — Showing  Averages  of  Composition  of  76  Churnings 
of  Butter  Made  from  Raw  and  Pasteurized  Cream 


Composition 
per  cent. 

Raw  cream 
butter 

^ Butter  made  from  pasteurized  cream 

145  degrees  F. 

20  minutes 

165  degrees  F. 

1 flash 

185  degrees  F. 
flash 

Moisture 

14.57 

14.14 

14.19 

13.76 

Salt 

2.05 

2.42 

2.40 

2.24 

Curd 

.51 

.50 

.48 

.45 

Acid 

.11 

.09 

.08 

.08 

These  figures  show  very  little  difiference  in  composition  be- 
tween butter  made  from  raw  and  from  pasteurized  cream.  The 
slight  differences  agree,  in  direction,  with  previous  experiments  and 
with  the  general  conception  of  the  effect  of  pasteurization  on  the 
composition  of  butter.  Thus  the  moisture,  curd  and  acid  are  some- 
what lower  in  the  pasteurized  cream  butter  than  in  the  raw  cream 
butter  and  the  highest  temperature  used  for  pasteurization  shows 
the  greatest  difference. 

The  decrease  in  moisture  is  in  all  probability  due  to  the  more 
contracted  and  dry  condition  of  the  particles  of  curd,  which  in  this 
condition  tend  to  diminish  their  power  to  hold  water. 

The  difference  in  curd  content  between  the  raw  cream  and 
the  pasteurized  cream  butter,  as  shown  in  Table  XVIII,  is  very 
slight.  The  curd  content  of  butter  made  from  sour  pasteurized 
cream  is  usually  from  .1  to  .5  per  cent,  lower  than  in  raw  cream 
butter.  The  very  slight  difference  shown  in  the  table  is  in  all 


30 


probability  due  to  the  fact  that  all  the  butter  was  washed  thorough- 
ly with  two  washings  of  water  and  that  the  removal  of  the  butter- 
milk was  facilitated  by  the  relatively  small  churnings. 

The  acid  content  of  this  butter  is  unusually  low  and  this  again 
suggests  that  the  butter  was  washed  thoroughly.  Generally  butter 
contains  from  about  .i  to  .3  per  cent.  acid.  The  acid  content  of 
butter  resulting  from  experiments  described  in  succeeding  parts 
was  very  materially  higher,  averaging  from  .2  to  .3  per  cent. 

RELATION  OF  LACTOSE  TO  ACIDITY  OF  RAW  AND  PASTEURIZED 
CREAM  BUTTER  WHEN  FRESH  AND  AFTER  STORAGE 

The  following  table  shows  the  decrease  of  sugar  of  milk  and 
increase  of  acidity  in  raw  and  pasteurized  cream  butter  during  three 
months  storage. 


Table  XIX. — Showing  Relation  of  Per  Cent.  Lactose  and  Per 
Cent.  Acid  in  Fresh  and  Stored  Butter  Made  from  Raw  and 
Pasteurized  Cream — Averages  of  44  Churnings 


Raw  and  pasteurized 
cream 

Age  of  butter 
months 

Lactose 

Acidity 

per 

cent. 

decrease 
in  3 

months 

per  1 
cent.  ' 

increase 
in  3 

months 

Raw 

fresh 

.399 

.3073 

Raw 

1 month 

.367 

.3613 

Raw 

3 months 

.336 

.063 

.4073 

.1000 

145  degrees  F.  20  minutes 

fresh 

.398 

.2565 

145  degrees  F.  20  minutes 

1 month 

.360 

.2745 

145  degrees  F.  20  minutes 

3 months 

.353 

.045 

.2835 

.027 

165  degrees  F.  flash 

fresh 

.388 

.2295 

165  degrees  F.  flash 

1 month 

.343 

.2543 

165  degrees  F.  flash 

3 months 

.315 

.073 

.2655 

.036 

185  degrees  F.  flash 

fresh 

.389 

.2093 

185  degrees  F.  flash 

1 month 

.360 

.2295 

185  degrees  F.  flash 

3 months 

.350 

.039 

.2655 

.056 

The  above  figures  show  that  there  was  a gradual  decrease  in 
lactose  and  increase  in  acidity  during  the  three  months  storage.  The 
increase  of  acidity  is  not  proportionate  to  the  decrease  of  the  lac- 
tose. The  estimation  of  lactose  of  such  small  amounts  is  attended 
by  considerable  difficulty  and  it  is  quite  probable  that  the  recorded 
decreases  in  the  lactose  do  not  necessarily  represent  the  actual  de- 
crease, but  being  the  average  of  44  lots  of  butter,  they  do  give  some 
indication  as  to  the  rate  of  decrease  of  the  lactose  that  may  be  ex- 
pected in  butter  in  storage. 


X 


31 


The  acidity  in  the  raw  cream  butter  increased  by  far  the  most 
rapidly  and  considerably  faster  than  in  the  butter  made  from  the 
pasteurized  cream. 

Since  there  are  factors  other  than  the  lactose  which  influence 
the  acidity  of  butter,  such  as  the  hydrolysis  of  the  salts  in  butter 
and  changes  in  proteids,  due  to  bacterial  or  enzyme  action,  it  is  not 
surprising  that  the  increase  in  acidity  is  not  proportionate  to  the 
decrease  of  lactose ; nor  is  there  any  conclusive  evidence  that  all 
the  lactose,  not  estimated  as  such,  is  converted  into  an  acid. 

Additional  figures  showing  the  changes  in  the  acidity  of  48 
separate  lots  of  butter  are  presented  in  Table  XX. 


Table  XX. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Acid  in  Butter  Made  from  Raw 
Cream  and  Pasteurized  Cream,  When  Fresh  and  After  Three 
Months  Storage — Averages  of  36  Churnings 


Age  of  butter 

Per  cent,  acid  in  butter 

raw  cream 
butter 

pasteurized  cream  1 
^ 165 

degrees  P.  degrees  F. 

20  minutes  | flash 

butter 

r 185 

i degrees  F. 

^ flash 

Fresh 

.3260 

.2448 

.2250 

.2034 

5 months  old 

.4122 

.2970 

.3006 

.2700 

Increase  in  5 months 

.1062 

.0522 

.0756 

.0666 

This  table  shows  a similar  increase  in  acidity  to  Table  XIX. 
The  raw  cream  butter  again  increased  in  acidity  more  than  any 
of  the  butter  made  from  pasteurized  cream,  and  again  the  145  de- 
grees F.  holding  process  was  most  efficient  in  preventing  formation 
of  acid. 

Aside  from  the  fact  that  the  acidity  increased  less  during  stor- 
age in  the  case  of  the  pasteurized  cream  butter,  the  figures  in  both 
of  the  preceding  tables  show  a decrease  in  the  acidity  of  the  butter 
when  fresh,  due  to  pasteurization.  The  fresh  butter  made  from 
cream  pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.  (20  minutes)  showed  approx- 
imately .05  per  cent,  less  acid  and  the  butter  made  from  cream 
pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.  flash  process,  showed  approximately 
.1  per  cent,  less  acid  than  the  butter  made  from  the  raw  cream. 
This  is  in  all  probability  due  to  the  expulsion  of  carbon  dioxide 
and  other  volatile  acids  due  to  pasteurization,  and  the  higher  the 
temperature  of  pasteurization,  the  more  complete  this  expulsion 
and  therefore  the  greater  the  decrease  in  the  per  cent,  acid  of  the 
pasteurized  cream  butter. 


32 


EFFECT  OF  PASTEURIZATION  ON  BUTTER  FAT  CONSTANTS  IN 
RAW  AND  PASTEURIZED  CREAM  BUTTER  WHEN  FRESH 
AND  AFTER  STORAGE  OF  ONE,  THREE  AND  FIVE  MONTHS 

The  butter  fat  constants  were  determined  in  butter  of  54 
separate  churnings  sampled  when  fresh  and  again  when  one,  three 
and  five  months  old.  This  butter  was  kept  in  the  Chicago  Cold 
Storage  at  -6  degrees  F.  The  results  of  these  analyses  are  sum- 
marized in  Table  XLV  in  the  appendix  and  the  changes  in  the  con- 
stants between  the  fresh  butter  and  the  butter  five  months  old  are 
averaged  in  Table  XXI. 


Tabi^e:  XXL — Showing  Average  Changes  in  the  Butter  Fat  Con- 
stants of  54  Churnings  of  Butter  During  Five  Months 
of  Storage  at  -6  Degrees  F. 


Raw  and  pasteurized 
cream  butter 

Reich- 

ert 

Meissl 

num- 

ber 

Iodine 

num- 

ber 

Sapon 

ifica- 

tion 

num- 

ber 

Melt- 

ing 

point 

degrees 

0. 

Refrac- 

tive 

index 

Acid 

value 

Solu- 

ble 

acids 

per 

cent. 

Insol- 

uble 

acids 

per 

cent. 

Raw 

-f.184 

+.487 

+.358 

+.181 

-.146 

+1.293 

+.057 

+.291 

145  degrees  F. 

20  minutes 

4-.116 

+.803 

+.303 

+.023 

+.036 

+ .512 

+.109 

+.327 

165  degrees  F.  flash 

-f-.160 

+.148 

- .119 

+.150 

-.213 

+ .375 

+.061 

+.272 

185  degrees  F.  flash 

+.090 

+.092 

+.607 

+.225 

-.096 

+ .387 

+.035 

+.382 

The  above  table  clearly  indicates  that  the  changes  in  the  but- 
ter, as  determined  by  the  fat  constants,  are  very  slight. 

RkichKRT-MeissIv  Number. — A considerable  increase  in  the 
Reichert-Meissl  number  would  suggest  an  increase  in  the  volatile 
fatty  acids.  This  might 'be  caused  by  the  breaking  down  of  the 
fatty  acids  into  acids  of  lower  molecular  weight  or  to  oxidation  of 
the  glycerol.  The  figures  in  Table  XXI  show  a slight  increase  in 
the  Reichert-Meissl  number.  This  increase  is  so  small  that  it  may 
be  due  to  experimental  error.  However,  these  figures  represent, 
in  each  case,  an  average  of  the  difference  between  nine  samples  of 
fresh  butter  and  nine  samples  of  butter  five  months  old,  so  that 
they  would  indicate  the  possibility  of  some  change  in  the  butter  fat 
due  to  storage.  This  difference  is  greatest  in  the  raw  cream  butter 
and  least  in  the  butter  made  from  cream  which  was  pasteurized  at 
185  degrees  F.  flash,  suggesting  action  of  enzymes  or  bacteria  or 
both  in  the  raw  cream  butter  which  was  absent  in  the  pasteurized 
butter.  It  is  noteworthy  that  the  butter  made  from  cream  pasteur- 
ized at  165  degrees  F.  flash,  showed  practically  the  same  increase  in 
the  Reichert-Meissl  number  as  the  raw  cream  butter,  again  empha- 
sizing the  inefficiency  of  this  process. 

Even  considering  that  small  differences  may  be  due  to  experi- 
mental error,  it  must  nevertheless  be  admitted  that  slight  changes 


33 


in  the  Reichert-Meissl  number  may  and  often  do  produce  decided 
deterioration  in  the  flavor  of  butter.  This  statement  is  further 
substantiated  by  a subsequent  experiment  in  which  pure  butter  fat 
was  stored  and  which  became  intensely  rancid  without  materially 
affecting  the  butter  fat  constants. 

Iodine:  Number. — A decrease  in  the  iodine  number  would  in- 
dicate oxidation  of  the  unsaturated  fatty  acids,  primarily  the  oleic 
acid  accompanied  by  tallowiness  or  other  off-flavors.  The  figures 
in  Table  XXI  show  no  such  decrease;  the  slight  increase  shown 
may  reasonably  be  attributed  to  experimental  error. 

SaponiEication  VaeuE."^ — The  saponification  value  indicates 
the  number  of  milligrams  of  potassium  hydroxide  required  to 
neutralize  the  total  fatty  acids  in  one  gram  of  fats  and  thereby  to 
completely  saponify  the  fat.  An  increase  in  the  saponification 
value  would  necessarily  indicate  an  increase  in  the  total  fatty 
acids  as  explained  for  the  Reichert-Meissl  number. 

Meeting  Point. — An  increase  in  the  melting  point  would  in- 
dicate that  fatty  acids  of  a higher  melting  point  have  been  formed. 
This  may  be  due  to  the  formation  of  hydroxy  stearic  acids  whose 
melting  point  is  81.5  degrees  C.,  due  to  the  oxidation  of  the  oleic 
acid. 

Under  certain  conditions,  oleic  acid  may  be  oxidized  to  form 
fatty  acids  of  a lower  melting  point,  in  which  case  there  might  be 
a decrease  in  the  melting  point  depending  on  the  extent  of  each  of 
the  above  two  reactions. 

The  increase  of  the  melting  point  at  185  degrees  F.  flash  might 
indicate  the  influence  of  high  temperature  favoring  the  oxidation 
process.  This  might  very  possibly  be  hastened  by  the  high  acidity 
of  the  cream,  pasteurized  at  that  temperature,  causing  the  mucil- 
aginous substances  protecting  the  fat  globules  to  be  removed  and 
thus  subjecting  the  fat  more  readily  to  the  oxidizing  influences. 

Retractive  Index. — Changes  of  the  refractive  index  would 
suggest  deterioration  of  the  fat,  but  would  not  furnish  any  indication 
as  to  the  character  of  the  deterioration.  These  would  have  to  be 
considerable  to  deserve  consideration.  The  changes  shown  in 
Table  XXI  are  very  slight. 

Acid  Vaeue. — This  constant  shows  the  greatest  change  between 
raw  and  pasteurized  cream  butter,  indicating  a greater  reduction  of 
the  butter  fat  into  fatty  acids  in  the  case  of  raw  cream  butter  than 
in  the  case  of  pasteurized  cream  butter.  The  acid  value  may  also 
be  slightly  influenced,  i.  e.,  increased  by  the  acidity  of  the  butter. 

SoeubeE  Acids. — The  soluble  acids  increased  slightly  in  all  but- 
ter during  storage,  which,  owing  to  the  very  slight  change,  may  be 
attributed  to  the  experimental  error,  or  to  the  acidity  of  the  butter, 
or  to  both. 


1 Saponification  value  or  number 


34 


Insoluble:  Acids. — An  increase  in  the  insoluble  acids  would 
indicate  oxidation  of  some  of  the  fats,  primarily  the  olein.  These 
figures  show  the  greatest  increase  in  the  case  of  185  degrees  F. 
flash  and  therefore  corroborate  the  statement  made  concerning  the 
melting  point  and  with  reference  to  the  effect  of  high  temperature 
on  the  fat  in  sour  cream. 

EFFECT  OF  STORAGE  OF  BUTTER  FAT  ON  FAT  CONSTANTS 

The  very  slight  differences  in  the  fat  constants  of  fresh  butter 
and  of  stored  butter,  as  shown  in  the  part  on  the  “Effect  of  Pasteur- 
ization on  Butter  Fat  Constants  in  Raw  and  Pasteurized  Cream  But- 
ter when  Fresh  and  after  Storage,”  made  it  uncertain  as  to  whether 
the  fat  took  part  in  the  deterioration  of  the  butter  flavor  at  all,  and 
suggested  that  defects  in  flavor  may  be  entirely  due  to  the  non- 
fatty ingredients  of  butter.  An  effort  was  therefore  made  to  study 
the  effect  of  storing  pure  butter  fat  on  the  fat  constants.  For  this 
purpose  the  following  experiment  was  conducted : 

Samples  of  butter  were  taken  from  the  Purdue  University 
Creamery  each  month  for  12  consecutive  months.  The  butter  was 
warmed  to  55  degrees  to  60  degrees  C.  in  a beaker,  and  this  melted 
butter  was  allowed  to  separate  by  gravity,  causing  the  water,  curd 
and  other  non-fatty  ingredients  to  settle  and  the  butter  fat  to  form 
a clear  layer  on  top.  After  six  to  eight  hours,  this  clarified  fat  was 
filtered  and  filled  into  four-ounce,  wide-mouthed,  glass-stoppered 
bottles,  which  had  previously  been  thoroughly  cleansed,  dried  and 
sterilized.  The  filled  bottles  were  stoppered,  and  sealed  hermetical- 
ly by  dipping  into  paraffin.  Twelve  bottles  were  prepared  in  this 
way  from  one  churning  each  month,  and  each  set  was  held  for  ii 
months  at  room  temperature,  and  each  month  one  sample  from 
each  set  was  analysed  for  fat  constants. 

Analyse:s  of  Samples  of  Butter  Fat. — These  samples  were 
numbered  from  i to  12,  No.  i representing  the  butter  while  fresh 
and  the  remainder  of  the  numbers  representing  the  ii  months  of 
storage  in  consecutive  order.  These  samples  were  analysed  for  but- 
ter fat  constants  while  fresh  and  again  at  intervals  of  one  month 
for  II  months.  They  were  also  examined  for  flavor. 

During  the  first  two  months  of  storage,  no  appreciable  change 
to6k  place,  neither  in  color  nor  taste  of  these  samples.  By  the 
third  and  fourth  months,  rancidity  began  developing  and  some 
samples  became  bleached,  the  whitening  starting  on  the  surface  and 
proceeding  downward.  After  five  months  storage,  the  rancidity 
had  become  very  intense  and  the  bleaching  continued. 

In  order  to  economize  space  the  detailed  analyses  are  here 
omitted.  Table  XLVI  in  the  appendix  shows  the  average  fat  con- 
stants of  the  12  samples  for  each  separate  month.  Below  are  as- 
sembled the  averages  of  the  first  two  analyses  of  all  the  samples, 


35 


and  the  averages  of  the  last  two  analyses  of  all  the  samples,  show- 
ing the  difference  between  the  fresh  fat  plus  the  fat  one  month  old, 
and  the  fat  after  storage  for  lo  and  ii  months. 


Tabi,k  XXII. — Showing  Average  Butter  Fat  Constants  in  Butter 
Fat  from  12  Separate  Churnings.  (The  fat  was  separated  from 
the  butter  while  fresh  arid  the  fat  only  was  stored.  These 
figures  show  the  averages  of  the  constants  in  the  fresh 
fat  and  in  the  fat  after  12  months  storage  at 
room  temperature) 


Averages  of  12  samples  of  butter  fat  when  fresh  and  after  12  months  storage 


Age  of  t 

fat  i 

Reichert- 

Meissl 

number 

Iodine 

number 

Insoluble 
acids 
per  cent. 

Soluble 
t acids 
per  cent. 

Saponi- 
, flcation 
! value 

! Melting  I 
I point 

1 degrees 
0. 

Acid 
j value 

Refrac- 

tive 

index 

Fresh 

29.177 

36.093 

87.892 

6.073 

229.316 

33.648 

1.391 

44.155 

11  months 

29.645 

35.971 

88.289 

6.206 

231.673 

33.367 

2.235 

43.608 

Difference 

-f.468 

-.122 

-i-.397 

-f.l33 

4-2.357 

-.281 

4- .844 

-.547 

The  above  table  shows  that  the  fat  constants  in  the  stored  but- 
ter fat  underwent  but  very  slight  changes ; not  at  all  commensurate 
with  the  degree  of  rancidity  and  tallowiness  developed  in  this  but- 
ter fat.  These  figures  are  similar,  in  a general  way,  to  those  repre- 
senting the  fat  constants  in  the  stored  butter,  both  in  extent  and  in 
direction,  taking  into  consideration  the  fact  that  the  stored  fat  was 
held  over  twice  as  long  and  at  room  temperature  and  showed  a 
much  more  intense  off-flavor,  extremely  rancid,  than  the  stored 
butter  which  was  held  at  -6  degrees  F.  and  which  showed  only 
ordinary  storage  off-flavor. 

These  results  demonstrate  that  in  this  case,  using  only  filtered 
butter  fat,  the  changes  in  flavor  must  have  been  due  to  changes  in 
the  butter  fat  and  yet  these  changes  were  accompanied  by  only  very 
slight  changes  in  the  butter  fat  constants.  This  fact  indicates  that 
but  slight  changes  in  the  butter  fat  constants  may  and  do  produce 
very  marked  deterioration  of  the  flavor  of  the  butter  fat.  It  further 
suggests  that  in  storage  butter  the  changes  in  flavor  may,  in  part  at 
least,  be  caused  by  the  partial  breaking  down  of  the  fats.  It  should 
be  understood  here,  however,  that  the  flavor  changes  which  the 
butter  fat  underwent  in  storage  at  room  temperature  consisted  ex- 
clusively of  the  development  of  tallowiness  and  rancidity  while  the 
flavor  changes  which  butter  undergoes  in  cold  storage  are  usually 
of  a different  character,  such  as  the  production  of  the  so-called 
storage  flavor,  fishiness,  etc. 


36 


PROTEIN  DECOMPOSITION  IN  RAW  CREAM  AND  PASTEURIZED 
CREAM  BUTTER  WHEN  FRESH  AND  AFTER  STORAGE 

The  hydrolized  or  cleavage  products  of  fhe  proteins  in  butter, 
made  from  raw  and  pasteurized  cream,  when  fresh  and  after  stor- 
age, were  determined  by  the  addition,  to  measured  portions  of  the 
watery  extracts  of  the  melted  butter,  of  the  precipitants  bromine, 
copper  sulphate,  tannic  acid  and  phosphotungstic  acid,  estimating 
the  nitrogen  in  the  filtrates  from  these  reagents.  A detailed  de- 
scription of  the  methods  employed  in  these  protein  determinations 
may  be  found  in  the  part  on  “Methods  Used  for  Analyses.” 

Tables  XLVII  to  L inclusive  in  the  appendix  show  the  de- 
termination of  protein  cleavage  products  in  64  separate  churnings  of 
raw  cream  and  pasteurized  cream  butter  when  fresh  and  after  stor- 
age at  -6  degrees  F.  for  one,  three  and  five  months,  respectively. 
These  figures  have  been  averaged  and  summarized  in  the  following 
tables. 

TabIvi:  XXIII. — Summary  of  Average  Per  Cent,  of  Nitrogen  not 
Precipitated  by  Bromine,  Copper  Sulphate,  Phosphotungstic 

Acid  and  Tannic  Acid.  Representing  64  Churnings  when 
Fresh  and  after  Five  months  Storage  at  -6  Degrees  F. 

(Expressed  in  percentage  of  total  nitrogen  in  butter) 


1 Bromine 

Copper 

sulphate 

Phospho- 
tungstic 1 
I acid 

Tannic 

acid 

I 

Average 

Raw  cream 

Fresh 

5 months 

28.18 

32.23 

17.03 

20.19 

9.92 

13.72 

11.46 

15.08 

16.64 

20.31 

Difference 

4.05 

3.16 

3.80 

3.62 

3.67 

Pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.  20  minutes  holding 

Fresh 

5 months 

28.41 

30.34 

15.63 

18.40 

10.20 

12.88 

12.84 

16.14 

16.77 

19.44 

Difference 

1.93 

2.77 

2.68 

3.30 

2.67 

Pasteurized  at  165  degrees  F.  flash 

Fresh 

5 months 

25.58 

30.76 

16.12 

18.61 

10.96 

13.58 

13.74 

15.47 

16.60 

19.60 

Difference 

5.18 

2.49 

2.62 

2.73 

3.00 

Pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.  flash 

Fresh 

5 months 

26.15 

28.57 

14.82 

17.86 

11.38 

14.51 

14.84 

15.66 

16.80 

19.15 

Difference 

2.42 

3.04 

3.13 

.82 

2.35 

37 


Table  XXIV. — Comparison  of  the  Average  Increase  of  Protein 
(nitrogen)  not  Precipitated,  for  all  Lots  and  Precipi- 
tants  During  Five  Months  Storage 


Raw  cream 

3.67 

Pasteurized  145  degrees  P.  20  minutes  • 

2.67 

Pasteurized  165  degrees  F.  flash 

3.00 

Pasteurized  185  degrees  F.  flash 

2.35 

Tables  XXIII  and  XXIV  show  the  rate  of  protein  hydrolysis  or 
protein  decomposition.  The  nitrogen  not  precipitated  by  the  reagents 
used,  bromine,  copper  sulphate,  phosphotungstic  acid  and  tannic  acid 
is  a measure  of  the  protein  hydrolysis  which  has  taken  place  in  the 
butter  made  from  raw  cream  and  the  butter  made  from  cream 
pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.  (20  minutes),  165  degrees  F.  flash 
and  185  degrees  F.  flash,  during  storage  at  -6  degrees  F.  for  five 
months. 

It  is  generally  considered  that  phosphotungstic  acid  precipitates 
all  proteins  that  are  not  broken  down  to  the  forms  of  amino  acids, 
except  the  hexone  bases.  This  is,  however,  not  the  case,  either  with 
phosphotungstic  acid,  or  with  copper  sulphate,  or  with  tannic  acid, 
which  are  often  considered  complete  precipitants  of  proteins  not 
hydrolized,  and  in  consequence  of  this,  the  nitrogen  not  precipitated 
by  these  acids  does  not  represent  amino  acids  alone,  but  is  usually 
termed  ‘'amid  nitrogen.” 

The  figures  in  the  above  summarized  tables  show  that  in  the 
case  of  all  the  butter,  made  from  raw  and  from  pasteurized  cream, 
the  proteins  not  precipitated  by  these  reagents  increased  during 
storage.  This  indicates  that  there  is  some  protein  hydrolysis  or 
protein  decomposition  taking  place  in  all  butter  during  storage,  even 
at  a temperature  below  zero  Fahrenheit,  and  it  suggests  that  this 
protein  decomposition  may,  in  a large  measure,  be  responsible  for 
the  development  of  ofif-flavors  in  butter  held  in  storage.  On  the 
basis  of  this  deterioration  of  the  protein  in  butter  and  its  consequent 
unfavorable  efifect  on  the  flavor  of  the  butter  stored,  it  appears 
obvious  that,  other  factors  being  equal,  the  amount  of  protein  or 
curd  present  in  butter  largely  governs  its  keeping  quality,  or  the 
rapidity  and  extent  of  its  deterioration.  The  more  protein  butter 
contains,  the  greater  the  possibility  for  protein  decomposition  and 
the  larger  the  amount  of  protein  cleavage  or  decomposition  products 
that  may  result. 

It  is  of  the  greatest  importance,  therefore,  that  butter  that  is. 
not  consumed  while  fresh  and  butter  that  is  intended  for  prolonged 
storage  be  as  free  as  possible  from  curd.  Such  butter  should  be 
churned  do  small  granules  which  yield  up  the  buttermilk  readily 
and  it  should  be  washed  until  it  drains  clear  water.  One  washing  is 
insufficient;  two  or  three  washings  are  necessary  to  remove  the 
buttermilk  and  curd  properly.  The  working  of  curd  into  butter,  in 


38 


the  form  of  starter,  milk  powder  or  dried  curd  added  to  the  churn, 
is  obviously  objectionable  from  the  point  of  view  of  good  keeping 
quality. 

The  results  above  tabulated  further  show  that  the  protein  hy- 
drolysis was  greatest  in  the  raw  cream  butter  and  least  in  the  but- 
ter made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.,  flash  process. 
This  fact  emphasizes  the  correctness  of  the  results  discussed  earlier 
in  this  bulletin,  to  the  effect  that  the  high  germ  killing  efficiency 
and  the  power  of  a temperature  of  185  degrees  F.  to  destroy  the 
activity  of  enzymes  improves  the  keeping  quality  of  butter  made 
from  cream  so  pasteurized. 

The  relatively  small  extent  of  protein  hydrolysis  of  this  butter 
suggests  that  there  was  less  bacterial  or  enzyme  action  or  both,  since 
one  of  the  most  common  agencies  for  the  cleavage  of  the  proteins 
is  bacteria,  yeasts,  molds  and  enzymes. 

CAUSES  OF  PROTEIN  HYDROLYSIS 

There  are  several  and  diverse  factors  which  are  capable  of 
bringing  about  protein  hydrolysis. 

Bacteria,  Yeasts,  Molds  and  Enzymes. — The  presence  and 
activity  in  butter  of  microorganisms  and  enzymes  represent  one  of 
the  most  important  causes  of  protein  decomposition.  These 
agents  are  practically  always  present  in  butter,  although  their  num- 
ber is  greatly  reduced  in  the  case  of  butter  made  from  properly 
pasteurized  cream. 

In  fact  the  protein  content  of  butter  furnishes  a necessary 
food  element  for  most  of  the  germ  life  present  and  without  this, 
bacterial  action  would  be  greatly  retarded  if  not  entirely  inhibited. 

Bacterial  analyses  of  butter  in  storage  show  that  although  the 
total  count  of  bacteria  in  butter  diminishes  comparatively  rapidly  in 
storage,  some  species  of  microorganisms,  especially  those  of  the 
liquefying  order,  are  able  to  multiply  in  butter  in  storage  even  be- 
low zero  degrees  Fahrenheit.  While  it  is  uncertain  whether  these 
germs  enter  into  the  decomposition  of  the  proteins,  their  presence 
and  activity  suggest  this  possibility. 

Of  the  enzyme  action  in  storage  butter,  there  is  but  very 
meagre  experimental  knowledge,  but  knowing  their  power  to  cause 
cleavage  of  proteins,  it  is  reasonable  to  assume  that  they  may  play 
a very  prominent  part  in  protein  hydrolysis  in  butter. 

Acidity. — Independent  of  bacterial  and  enzyme  action,  the 
presence  of  acid  in  butter  may  and  undoubtedly  does  have  a decided 
influence  in  hastening  protein  hydrolysis. 

It  is  known  that  protein  may  hydrolize,  on  long  standing,  in 
the  presence  of  water  alone,  without  the  assistance  of  any  inter- 
mediary agents;  and  water  in  this  sense  may  be  considered  an  acid. 


39 


Rogers  and  Gray  ^ and  others  have  conclusively  demonstrated 
that  sweet  cream  butter  has  better  keeping  quality  than  ripened 
cream  butter,  even  if  the  ripened  cream  is  of  the  best  quality. 

The  practical  creamery  man  has  learned  by  costly  experience 
that  butter  made  from  high  acid  cream  does  not  keep  well  and 
that  both  the  flavor  and  keeping  quality  can  be  materially  improved 
by  reducing  the  acid  in  the  cream  by  neutralization. 

Metals  and  Metallic  Salts. — The  presence  in  butter  of 
metals  or  metallic  salts,  even  in  very  minute  quantities,  may  further 
invite  hydrolysis  of  the  proteins  in  butter.  Such  metals  as  copper, 
iron,  zinc,  nickel,  etc.,  may  and  do  act  catalytically,  often  greatly 
accelerating  the  cleavage  of  protein  products  or  even  directly  or  in- 
directly influencing  the  hydrolysis  of  the  fats,  and  causing  diverse 
and  serious  butter  defects. 

The  results  of  some  of  these  influences  are  brought  out  prom- 
inently in  the  data  obtained  from  the  above  tabulated  analyses  of 
fresh  and  stored  butter  made  from  raw  and  pasteurized  cream.  It 
is  but  natural,  that  in  the  presence  of  acids,  salts,  metals  and  pos- 
sibly bacteria  and  enzymes,  there  should  be  a continual  cleavage  of 
the  proteins  and  that  this  cleavage  take  place  in  proportion  to  the 
kind  and  amount  of  hydrolizing  agents  present. 

Condition  oe  Cream. — It  should  be  understood  that  it  would 
be  difficult  to  secure  cream  and  butter  made  therefrom,  in  which 
hydrolysis  is  not  already  started.  We  cannot  assume  that  because 
butter  is  made  from  so-called  sweet  cream,  chemical  and  possibly 
biological  changes,  have  not  already  begun.  The  character  of  the 
proteids  in  milk  and  cream  is  known  to  be  affected  by  the  health 
and  physical  and  physiological  condition  of  the  cows,  their  feed, 
etc.  This  fact,  together  with  the  presence  of  the  minute  quantities 
of  these  cleavage  products  present,  renders  it  practically  impossible 
to  detect  these  changes  in  sweet  cream  and  butter  by  our  ordinary 
method  of  analysis. 

If  it  is  true  that  even  sweet  cream  may  not  be  free  from  pro- 
tein cleavage  products,  then  it  is  natural  that  butter  made  from  sour 
gathered  cream,  such  as  was  used  in  the  experiments  herein 
recorded  and  such  as  is  largely  available  in  the  manufacture  of 
large  quantities  of  commercial  butter,  contains  a much  larger  per 
cent,  of  cleavage  products  of  the  proteins  or  products  which  do  to 
a greater  or  less  degree  approach  protein  decomposition. 

When  this  butter  then  goes  into  storage,  the  hydrolysis  of  some 
of  the  protein  is  already  started  and  its  action  continues  in  accord- 
ance with  the  stage  of  development,  the  condition  of  the  but- 
ter and  the  temperature  of  storage,  producing  in  a comparatively 
short  time  changes  in  flavor  and  market  value. 

1 Rogers  and  Gray,  “The  Influence  of  Acidity  of  Cream  on  the  Flavor  of  Butter,” 
United  States  Department  of  Agriculture,  Bureau  of  Animal  Industry,  Bulletin  No. 
114,  1909 


40 


PROTEIN  DECOMPOSITION  OF  BUTTER  HELD  AT  ROOM  TEM- 
PERATURE AFTER  ONE  YEAR  OF  COLD  STORAGE 

The  previous  experiment,  determining  the  proteins  in  butter 
not  precipitated  by  bromine,  copper  sulphate  and  phosphotungstic 
acid  was  repeated.  In  this  case  the  butter  was  held  for  12  months 
in  cold  storage,  temperature  o to  20  degrees  F.,  and  then  was  re- 
moved and  held  at  room  temperature  (about  70  degrees  F.)  for  an 
additional  12  months.  The  results  thus  secured  are  summarized  in 
Table  XXV. 

Table  XXV. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Protein  Not  Precipitated  by 
Bromine,  Copper  Sulphate  and  Phosphotungstic  Acid  in  Butter 
Made  from  Raw  and  Pasteurized  Cream,  when  Fresh, 
After  12  Months  Storage  at  o to  20  Degrees  F.  and 
After  12  Months  Additional  Storage  at  Room 
Temperature 

(Expressed  in  percentage  of  total  nitrogen  in  butter) 


Protein  not  precipitated  by 

average 
of  total 
protein 
not  pre- 
cipitated 

Age  of  butter 

bromine 

copper 

sulphate 

phospho- 

tungstie 

acid 

Raw  cream 

Fresh 

After  12  months  storage  at 

0-20  degrees  F. 

After  12  months  additional  storage 
at  room  temperature 

Increase  for  first  12  months 
Increase  at  room  temperature 

33.62 

34.56 

46.22 

.94 

11.66 

17.03 

19.21 

39.76 

2.18 

20.55 

8.9 

11.09 

31.55 

2.18 

20.46 

1.77 

17.56 

Pasteurized  at  145  degrees  P.  20  minutes 


Fresh 

30.23 

15.18 

9.72 

After  12  months  storage  at 

0-20  degrees  F. 

30.82 

16.56 

10.12 

After  12  months  additional  storage 

at  room  temperature 

■ 45.48 

32.30 

27.43 

Increase  for  first  12  months 

.59 

1.38 

.40 

.79 

Increase  at  room  temperature 

14.66 

15.74 

17.31 

15.90 

Pasteurized  at  165  degrees JF.  flash 


Fresh 

After  12  months  storage  at 

30“0l 

”13(82 

8.45 

0-20  degrees  F. 

After  12  months  additional  storage 

.31.35 

19.51 

9.61 

at  room  temperature 

47.89 

39.60 

29.35 

Increase  for  first  12  months 

1.34 

5.69 

1.16 

2.73 

Increase  at  room  temperature 

17.88 

20.09 

19.74 

19.26 

Pasteurized  at  185  degrees  P.  flash 


Fresh 

After  12  months  storage  at 

29.81 

15.49 

9.11 

0-20  degrees  F. 

After  12  months  additional  storage 

31.67 

16.59 

10.27 

at  room  temperature 

44.35 

30.16 

23.11 

1.37 

Increase  for  first  12  months 

1.86 

1.10 

1.16 

Increase  at  room  temperature 

12.68 

13.57 

12.84 

13.03 

41 


The  figures  under  “raw  cream”  represent  the  averages  of 
seven  separate  churnings,  while  the  figures  under  “pasteurized  at 
145  degrees  F.  (20  minutes),  165  degrees  F.  flash  and  185  degrees 
F.  flash”  respectively,  represent  the  averages  of  two  churnings 
each.  The  seven  churnings  of  the  raw  cream  butter  were  made 
from  the  same  cream  as  the  six  churnings  of  the  pasteurized 
cream  butter.  While  the  total  of  the  six  pasteurized  cream  churn- 
ings represents  the  same  cream  as  the  total  of  the  seven  raw  cream 
churnings  of  butter,  each  of  the  three  sets  of  two  churnings  of 
pasteurized  cream  butter  of  which  the  averages  are  given  was  made 
from  the  same  cream  as  that  used  in  two  only  of  the  raw  cream 
churnings.  It  is  obvious  therefore  that  the  average  of  the  seven 
raw  cream  churnings  and  the  averages  of  the  two  pasteurized  cream 
churnings  of  each  of  three  processes  of  pasteurization  are  not  quite 
comparable.  Nevertheless  the  dififerent  lots  of  cream  used  in  this 
experiment  were  very  similar  in  quality  so  that  the  results  should  be 
indicative  of  the  relative  merits  of  different  processes  of  pasteuriza- 
tion as  compared  with  raw  cream  butter. 

The  results  in  Table  XXV  are  similar  to  those  of  the  previous 
experiment.  Again  the  total  non-precipitated  proteins  in  butter 
after  cold  storage  were  greater  in  the  case  of  the  raw  cream  butter 
than  those  in  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  145  degrees 
F.  (20  minutes)  and  at  185  degrees  F.  flash. 

They  further  show  that  after  butter  was  taken  out  of  cold 
storage  and  kept  at  room  temperature  for  12  month's,  the  per  cent, 
non-precipitated  proteins  multiplied  approximately  ten  fold.  This 
suggests  the  hardships  which  butter  encounters  after  it  leaves  stor- 
age and  that  unless  it  is  used  up  promptly,  protein  hydrolysis  may  set 
in  very  rapidly,  causing  speedy  deterioration  of  the  butter. 

The  butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F. 
flash  shows  the  smallest  increase  in  the  per  cent,  of  non-precipitated 
proteins.  This  again  emphasizes  the  probable  relative  freedom  of 
this  butter  from  protein-hydrolizing  bacteria  and  enzymes.  The 
butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  165  degrees  F.  flash  process 
shows  the  greatest  increase  in  non-precipitated  proteins,  suggest- 
ing, as  in  previous  experiments,  the  inadequacy  of  this  process  to 
retard  the  breaking  down  of  the  proteins. 

METHODS  USED  IN  THE  ANALYSES  OF  CREAM  AND  BUTTER 

Factory  Tests 

The  cream,  as  it  arrived  on  the  receiving  platform,  was  graded 
for  flavor  by  taste  and  smell,  and  for  acid  with  decinormal  sodium 
hydroxide. 

The  butter  was  scored  independently  by  two  judges,  regularly 
when  fresh  and  when  30,  60  and  90  days  old.  The  scores  of  the 
two  judges  were  averaged  and  these  averages  only  were  used  in 
the  tables. 


42 


Bacte:riological  Analyses 

Sampling  Cream. — The  sample  representing  the  raw  cream 
was  taken  from  a large  vat  containing  the  entire  batch  of  cream 
used  in  each  series  of  the  experiments,  and  before  the  cream  was 
divided  into  the  four  equal  churnings  of  raw  cream,  and  cream  to 
be  pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.  holding  process,  165  degrees  F. 
flash  process  and  185  degrees  F.  flash  process  respectively.  The  en- 
tire batch  of  cream  was  well  mixed  before  sampling. 

The  samples  of  the  pasteurized  cream  of  each  of  the  three  pro- 
cesses of  pasteurization  were  taken  from  the  ripening  vats  as  soon 
as  all  the  cream  in  them  had  been  cooled  to  a temperature  of  50 
degrees  F. 

All  samples  of  cream  were  taken  by  dipping  from  the  thorough- 
ly stirred  vat  with  a sterile  stirrer,  equal  portions  of  cream  in 
sterile  half-pint  bottles  with  tight  glass  stoppers.  All  samples  were 
then  placed  at  a temperature  of  35  degrees  F.  until  plated.  The 
plating  was  usually  done  within  three  hours  of  the  sampling. 

Sampling  Butter. — The  samples  of  butter  were  taken  from 
the  tubs  24  hours  after  packing.  Plugs,  three  to  four  inches  long, 
were  taken  with  sterile  butter  triers  and  placed  at  once  into  sterile 
petri  dishes. 

Dilutions. — The  dilutions  used  in  making  the  numerical  de- 
terminations are  shown  in  Table  XXVI. 


Table  XXVI. — Showing  Dilutions  Used  for  the  Plating  of  Cream 
and  Butter  for  Bacterial  Counts 


Number  of  plates 

for  each  dilution 

Cream 

Dilution 

cream  pasteurized  at 

and 

one  part 

butter 

in 

raw  cream 

145  degrees  P.  i 

165  degrees  P. 

185  degrees  P. 

1 

20  minutes 

flash 

flash 

Cream 

100 

2 

2 

2 2 

5,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 ' 2 

10,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 1 ; 

100,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 1 ' 

1,000,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 

10,000,000 

2 

2 

Blitter 

100 

2 

2 

, 1 2 

5,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 2 ' 2 

10,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 1 2 i 

100,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1,000,000 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

1 1 

10,000,000 

2 

2 

The  dilutions  were  made  in  250  c.  c.  glass-stoppered  flasks. 
In  the  case  of  the  cream  two  cubic  centimeters  of  cream  in  198 
cubic  centimeters  of  sterile  water  were  used  from  the  flrst  dilution. 
In  the  case  of  butter,  two  grams  of  butter  weighed  into  a tared 


43 


flask  and  mixed  with  enough  sterile  water  at  a temperature  of  98 
degrees  F.  to  make  up  100  cubic  centimeters,  constituted  the  first 
dilution. 

In  extremely  hot  weather,  it  was  found  necessary  to  increase 
the  dilutions  of  the  raw  cream  and  of  the  butter  made  therefrom 
to  dilutions  of  from  1,000,000  to  10,000,000,  in  order  to  secure 
readable  plates. 

Plating. — The  following  culture  media  were  prepared  and 
used  for  the  total  counts,  acidifiers,  liquefiers,  yeasts  and  molds. 

Media  for  Total  Counts 

4 grams  beef  extract 
10  grams  peptone 
30  grams  lactose 
4 grams  sodium  chloride 
12  grams  thread  agar 
1000  c.  c.  distilled  water 
Acidity  o.i  per  cent. 

Media  for  Acidifiers 

The  same  medium  was  used  as  for  the  total  counts,  but  one 
cubic  centimeter  of  sterile  litmus  solution  was  first  added  to  each 
plate. 

Media  for  Liquefiers 
4 grams  beef  extract 
10  grams  peptone 
30  grams  lactose 
4 grams  sodium  chloride 
150  grams  gelatin 
1000  c.  c.  distilled  water 
Acidity  o.i  per  cent. 

Media  for  Yeasts  and  Molds 

4 grams  beef  extract 
10  grams  peptone 
12  grams  agar 
1000  grams  whey 

Acidity  0.2  per  cent 

One  cubic  centimeter  of  sterile  one  per  cent,  tartaric  acid  solu- 
tion was  added  to  each  plate  before  pouring  medium  over  dilution. 

Incubation. — Agar,  litmus  agar  and  whey  agar  plates  were 
incubated  at  35  degrees  C.  for  four  days.  The  plates  were  placed  in 
the  incubator  in  an  inverted  position  to  minimize  the  loss  of  mois- 
ture by  evaporation.  Gelatin  plates  were  incubated  at  21  degrees 
C.  for  five  days. 


44 


Reading  Peatks  and  Recording. — The  culture  plates  were 
read  on  a Jeffers  counting  plate.  A careful  record  was  made  of 
each  reading  together  with  such  other  data  as  were  deemed  im- 
portant for  subsequent  interpretation  of  results. 

Chemicae  Anaeyses  oe  Butter 

This  work  comprises  chemical  determinations  and  analyses  as 
follows : 

1.  Butter 

Salt,  per  cent. 

Moisture,  per  cent. 

Curd,  per  cent. 

Acidity,  per  cent. 

2.  Butter  fat 

Acid  value 

Reichert-Meissl  number 
Saponification  number 
Iodine  number 
Soluble  acids  per  cent. 

Refractive  index 

3.  Protein  of  Butter 

Precipitation  by  bromine 
Precipitation  by  copper  sulphate 
Precipitation  by  tannic  acid 
Precipitation  by  phosphotungstic  acid 

Sampling  oe  Butter  and  Preparation  oe  Samples. — Within 
24  hours  after  the  butter  was  made  and  packed  into  tubs,  a quart 
Mason  fruit  jar,  previously  cleaned  and  sterilized,  was  filled  with 
the  butter  taken  from  three  to  four  different  parts  of  the  tub. 
This  was  taken  to  the  chemical  laboratory  and  at  once  warmed  to 
about  50  degrees  C.  until  the  butter  became  soft  enough  to  be 
thoroughly  mixed  by  frequent  shaking.  After  the  butter  became 
homogeneous,  it  was  then  cooled  to  20  degrees  to  25  degrees  C. 
frequently  shaking  during  this  interval  to  prevent  separation. 

To  avoid  too  frequent  handling  a portion  of  about  50  grams 
was  transferred  to  a wide-mouthed  bottle  and  this  was  used  for 
the  estimation  of  salt,  moisture,  protein  and  acidity.  The  acidity 
was  determined  at  the  earliest  possible  moment.  The  remainder  of 
the  butter  in  the  quart  jar  was  kept  air  tight,  in  a cool,  dark  place 
until  used. 

For  subsequent  analysis  of  the  same  lots  of  butter  after  being 
in  storage  for  periods  as  outlined  in  the  experiment,  samples  of  these 
lots  of  butters  were  brought  to  the  chemical  laboratory  in  quart 
fruit  jars  and  prepared  as  above  described. 


45 


Methods  Used  in  the  ChEmicae  Anaeyses 
I.  Butter 

Saet. — The  salt  was  estimated  by  the  official  method.  (Journal 
of  the  Association  of  Official  Agricultural  Chemists,  Vol.  II,  p.  294). 

Moisture. — About  five  grams  of  butter  were  weighed  into  an 
aluminum  dish  and  dried  to  constant  weight  at  98  degrees  to  99 
degrees  C.  in  a steam  drying  oven. 

Curd. — About  10  grams  of  butter  were  weighed  into  a flat 
bottomed  porcelain,  evaporating  dish  and  dried  in  a steam  drying 
oven  at  about  98  degrees  to  99  degrees  C.  The  fat  was  dissolved 
by  means  of  petroleum  ether  and  passed  through  a hard  grade 
filter  paper;  the  curd  and  salt  remaining  in  the  evaporating  dish 
were  completely  transferred  to  the  filter,  by  means  of  a bent  glass 
rod  and  the  use  of  petroleum  ether.  The  filter  paper  and  contents 
were  transferred  to  a Kjeldahl  flask  and  the  nitrogen  determined  in 
the  usual  manner.  Blanks  were  run  on  filter  paper  and  reagents 
used. 

Acidity. — Five  grams  of  butter  were  weighed  into  a 250  c.  c. 
tall  beaker  and  to  this  25  cubic  centimeters  of  distilled  water  free 
from  CO2  were  added ; the  mixture  was  warmed  to  about  40  de- 
grees C.,  or  until  the  butter  fat  was  melted ; then  .5  cubic  centi- 
meter of  a one  per  cent,  solution  of  phenolphthalein  added  and  the 
mixture  was  titrated  to  a sharp  pink  with  N/io  NaOH  solution. 
(Phenolphthalein  solution.  One  gram  phenolphthalein  and  100  cubic 
centimeters  of  50  per  cent,  alcohol.) 

2.  Butter  Fat 

Preparation  oe  the  Butter  Fat. — About  100  grams  of  but- 
ter were  kept  at  a temperature  of  approximately  50  degrees  C.  until 
the  fat  separated  into  a layer.  The  clear  fat  was  then  removed 
with  a pipette  and  filtered  into  a clean,  sterile  bottle ; the  bottle, 
when  full,  was  securely  corked  and  stored  in  a cool,  dark  place 
until  used. 

Acid  VaeuE. — Ten  grams  of  melted  fat  were  transferred  to  a 
200  c.  c.  tall  beaker  and  25  cubic  centimeters  of  a mixture  of  equal 
parts  of  redistilled  alcohol  and  ether  added.  The  mixture  of  ether 
and  alcohol  was  previously  neutralized  to  phenolphthalein.  To  the 
mixture,  fat-ether-alcohol,  .5  cubic  centimeter  of  phenolphthalein 
solution  was  added  and  it  was  then  titrated  with  N/io  NaOH  to  a 
light  pink.  The  results  were  expressed  in  number  of  cubic  centi- 
meters decinormal  sodium  hydroxide  required  to  neutralize  10 
grams  of  the  fat. 

REichERT-Meisse  Number. — In  determining  the  Reichert- 
Meissl  number  the  official  method  was  used.  (Journal  of  the 
Association  of  Official  Agricultural  Chemists,  Vol.  II,  p.  307,  (2) 
under  pressure  without  alcohol.) 


46 


Saponification  Number. — The  official  method  was  used  in  de- 
termining the  saponification  number.  (Journal  of  the  A.  O.  A.  C., 
Vol.  II,  p.  306) 

Iodine  Number. — The  iodine  absorption  number  was  deter- 
mined by  the  Hubl  method — Official.  (Journal  of  the  A.  O.  A.  C., 
Vol.  II,  p.  304.) 

SoeubeE  Acids. — The  soluble  acids  were  determined  by  the  offi- 
cial method.  (Journal  of  the  A.  O.  A.  C.,  Vol.  II,  p.  306.) 

Index  of  Refraction. — The  refractive  index  was  determined 
by  the  official  method  by  means  of  the  Zeiss-Butyro  refractometer. 
(Journal  of  the  A.  O.  A.  C.,  Vol.  II,  p.  301) 

3.  Proteins  of  Butter 

Preparation  of  the  SampeE. — After  numerous  trials  in  the 
separation  of  the  soluble  and  insoluble  proteins  of  butter,  the  follow- 
ing method  was  used  throughout  the  experiment.  For  the  separa- 
tion of  the  proteins  from  the  butter  fat,  250  grams  of  butter,  having 
been  well  mixed  and  warmed  to  be  conveniently  handled,  was 
weighed  to  .05  gram.  The  butter  was  transferred  to  a 500  c.  c. 
separatory  funnel  and  100  cubic  centimeters  of  water  at  a tempera- 
ture of  70  degrees  C.  added  and  well  shaken,  after  standing  for  five 
to  10  minutes  or  until  separation  took  place.  The  aqueous  portion 
was  drawn  off  into  a 1000  c.  c.  flask.  This  washing  was  repeated, 
using  100  to  150  cubic  centimeters  of  water  at  each  washing  at  the 
above  temperature  until  1000  cubic  centimeters  of  washing  were 
obtained. 

Aliquot  portions  of  100  cubic  centimeters  of  the  washing  were 
measured  and  transferred  to  beakers  of  250  c.  c.  capacity.  To 
these  the  precipitants  were  added.  The  precipitants  used  were  bro- 
mine, copper  sulphate,  tannic  acid  and  phosphotungstic  acid. 

Beakers  and  contents  were  set  aside  and  left  over  night,  care 
being  taken  to  have  somewhat  uniform  temperature  during  this 
period.  The  object  of  leaving  the  beakers  over  night  was  to  save 
time,  the  preparation  and  washing  being  done  in  the  afternoon,  and 
this  procedure  was  carried  out  through  the  entire  experiment. 

The  precipitates  obtained  by  all  the  above  precipitants  are 
more  or  less  soluble  in  water,  depending  on  the  compounds  formed, 
and  the  solubilities  increasing  with  rise  of  temperature.  Precau- 
tions were  taken  in  the  method  of  washing  the  precipitates  and  the 
work  was  done  at  a reasonably  uniform  temperature  ranging  from 
23  degrees  to  24  degrees  C. 

Precipitation  with  Bromine  Water. — To  100  cubic  centi- 
meters of  the  washing,  15  cubic  centimeters  of  a saturated  solution 
of  bromine  water  were  added,  stirred  and  set  aside  over  night.  This 
was  filtered  after  the  liquid  had  passed  through  the  filter.  The  pre- 
cipitate was  washed  with  bromine  water  until  the  filtrate  measured 


47 


150  cubic  centimeters;  The  filtrate  was  transferred  to  a Kjeldahl 
flask  and  the  nitrogen  determined. 

Precipitation  with  Copper  Sulphate. — The  method  of 
Richmond  and  Boseley  was  used.  (The  Analyst,  1893,  p.  172; 
also  Allen’s  Commercial  Organic  Analysis,  Vol.  IV,  p.  87,  sec- 
ond edition.)  One  hundred  cubic  centimeters  of  filtrate  were  taken 
and  neutralized  to  a faint  pink  and  five  cubic  centimeters  of  a six  per 
cent,  copper  sulphate  solution  added.  After  standing  over  night 
the  solution  was  filtered,  the  precipitate  washed  with  water  to  150 
cubic  centimeters.  The  nitrogen  in  this  filtrate  was  determined. 

Precipitation  with  Tannic  Acid. — Almen’s  Tannin  Reagent 
was  used.  This  reagent  consists  of  four  grams  of  tannic  acid  in 
150  cubic  centimeters  of  50  per  cent,  alcohol,  and  eight  cubic  centi- 
meters of  acetic  acid  of  25  per  cent,  strength.  (Allen’s  Commer- 
cial Organic  Analysis,  Vol.  IV,  second  edition).  Ten  cubic  centi- 
meters of  this  reagent  were  added  to  100  cubic  centimeters  of  wash- 
ing, mixed  and  set  aside  over  night.  This  was  filtered  and  the  pre- 
cipitate washed  to  150  cubic  centimeters.  The  nitrogen  in  this 
filtrate  was  determined. 

Precipitation  with  Phosphotungstic  Acid. — Fifty  grams  of 
C.  P.  phosphotungstic  acid  were  dissolved  in  1000  cubic  centimeters 
of  2.5  per  cent,  hydrochloric  acid.  After  standing  for  24  hours, 
this  was  filtered. 

To  each  100  cubic  centimeters  of  washing,  10  cubic  centi- 
meters of  the  phosphotungstic  acid  solution  were  added  and  set 
aside  over  night.  This  was  filtered  and  the  precipitate  washed  with 
water  to  150  cubic  centimeters.  The  nitrogen  in  this  filtrate  was 
determined  in  the  usual  way. 

All  determinations  were  made  in  duplicate.  Duplicates  varying 
more  than  .4  cubic  centimeter  N/20  solution  were  redetermined. 

Discussion  oe  Methods  for  Separating  and  Estimating  the 
Protein  Cleavage  Products  of  Butter 

Preliminary  trials  in  separating  the  hydrolized  products 
were  carried  out  as  follows:  250  grams  of  butter  were  washed  by 
means  of  warm  water  at  70  degrees  C.  in  portions  of  100  to  150 
cubic  centimeters  until  500  cubic  centimeters  of  washing  were  ob- 
tained. Aliquots  of  100  cubic  centimeters  were  transferred  to 
beakers  and  the  respective  precipitants  added.  After  standing  from 
six  to  eight  hours,  or  over  night,  they  were  then  filtered  and  the 
nitrogen  in  the  filtrate  determined.  The  per  cent,  of  nitrogen  was 
expressed  in  terms  of  the  nitrogen  washed  out  of  the  butter.  The 
total  nitrogen  in  the  washing  was  estimated  and  found  to  represent 
only  about  70  to  80  per  cent,  of  the  total  nitrogen  in  the  butter. 
This  would  make  the  per  cent,  of  nitrogen  proportionately  low, 
provided  the  nitrogen  were  not  based  on  the  total  nitrogen  in  the 
butter.  This  could  be  easily  calculated  on  the  total  nitrogen  in  the 


48 


butter,  by  knowing  the  per  cent,  of  nitrogen  in  the  washing.  There 
was  considerable  variation  in  the  per  cent,  of  nitrogen  washed  out, 
and  the  low  per  cent,  washed  out  introduced  considerable  errors. 
To  obviate  this,  the  butter  was  washed  in  the  above  manner,  but 
washed  until  looo  cubic  centimeters  were  obtained.  By  this  modi- 
fication it  was  found  that  95  to  99  per  cent,  of  the  proteins  was 
washed  out.  In  our  experience,  the  proteins  washed  out  from  dif- 
ferent lots  of  butter  are  not  uniform,  depending  on  the  age  and 
physical  and  chemical  conditions  of  the  butter.  The  age  of  the 
butter  seems  to  have  a great  influence  on  the  ease  of  washing  out 
the  proteins ; the  older  the  butter,  the  lower  the  percentage  of  pro- 
teins washed  out.  Butter  made  from  unpasteurized  cream  always 
yielded  washings  richer  in  proteins  than  pasteurized  cream  butter. 
While  this  was  generally  true,  variations  occurred  and  therefore 
no  good  reasons  can  be  given. 

Assuming  that  the  relative  proportion  of  the  proteins  and 
cleavage  products  are  the  same  in  that  portion  not  washed  from  the 
butter  as  that  washed  out,  we  can  base  the  cleavage  products,  ex- 
pressed in  terms  of  nitrogen,  on  the  total  nitrogen  in  butter. 

This  assumption  appears  reasonable  from  our  observation  of 
the  two  methods  of  washing.  When  the  nitrogen  of  the  cleavage 
products  was  based  on  the  total  nitrogen  in  the  butter,  using  both 
methods  of  washing,  the  difiference  came  within  the  experimental 
error  involved  in  the  present  methods  of  estimating  protein  nitro- 
gen ; but  the  washing  made  up  to  1000  cubic  centimeters  was  pre- 
ferred, which  may  be  seen  from  the  following  simple  application. 
If  the  500  cubic  centimeters  washing  gave  only  70  per  cent,  of  the 
total  nitrogen  in  the  butter,  and  the  washing  made  up  to  1000  cubic 
centimeters  gave  98  per  cent,  of  the  total  nitrogen,  the  error  would 
be  proportionately  multiplied.  By  using  washings  made  up  to  lOOO 
cubic  centimeters,  we  have  been  able  to  get  reasonably  good,  com- 
parative results.  The  proteins  and  the  cleavage  products,  in  addi- 
tion to  basing  them  on  the  total  nitrogen  in  the  butter,  were  calcu- 
lated on  the  basis  of  moisture-free  butter.  This  method  of  esti- 
mation and  calculation  has  caused  our  figures  to  appear  somewhat 
high.  This  fact  does  not  detract  from  the  value  of  the  work,  pro- 
vided these  methods  are  uniformly  and  strictly  adhered  to,  since  we 
are  dealing  only  with  relative  changes  in  the  proteins  of  butter. 
The  amount  of  proteins  in  butter  is  too  small  and  the  technique 
too  complicated  and  uncertain  to  separate  the  dififerent  cleavage 
products  quantitatively.  For  example,  it  would  not  be  feasible  to 
separate  quantitatively  the  proteoses,  peptones  and  amino  acids. 
However,  the  results  secured  by  these  methods  are  comparable  and 
show  unmistakably  the  extent  of  protein  decomposition  of  butter  in 
storage  when  made  from  raw  and  pasteurized  cream. 

(See  Appendix  Showing  Tables  of  Detailed  Data) 


49 


lO 


^ C3 
’U  <L) 


O 

0^  j:: 

tn 

<5  E 


-Q  01 

in 

01 

M-H 

01 

O X 

u 

c 

bJO 

G c^ 

01 

o 

c/l 

Q 

’Jh  Pg 

u-> 

ct3 

00 

Oh  ^ 

1— 1 

c <i; 
C 01 

0 u 

03 

U 


CL) 

S 


CAl 

M Oj 


S'S^' 

4-.  N c/) 

:3'n  ^ 

:3 


cq 


-C 

c/) 

(y  >- 

Ph 


C/J  ^ 

"i  Q 


o S 

crt 

8 S 

CO  o 


-H  X) 

> 

X 

X 

y 

a 

< 


bJO 
00  <l-> 


Ph 

lx: 


lO 

LO 

cq 

cq 

lO 

lO 

oo 

cq 

lO 

lO 

iq 

00 

CO 

o 

xq 

o 

iq 

iq 

xo 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

XO 

00 

oq 

o 

o 

o 

o 

xq 

cri 

od 

ci 

oi 

od 

oi 

od 

od 

o 

od 

o 

cc 

o' 

od 

i>^ 

i>^ 

od 

<1D 

XO 

l>^ 

CD 

CD 

CD 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

di 

oo 

Cl 

Cl 

oo 

Cl 

oo 

oo 

oo 

00 

OO 

OO 

oo 

oo 

OO 

oo 

oo 

oo 

OO 

OO 

OO 

oo 

^ TZ 
OJ  !3 


(M 


OOCOOOOOOOOOXOlOOOCOiOOiOOOOOOOOOCOlLOO^lOlOOOOOO^OO 

oo 

Oi  Cl 


cjqooqcooqoqooicoqcoooqiooiooooo^^^cocxjcoiooioioooo^ 

o4o4rHOq-r-5T-5c^OT-5oT-HOT-Hi-Haic^C^io4T-H-rHClioOOaiOrH'i-Hi-Ho6C3T-HOd 

ciOTciciciciciaicicioioioioioocioiciciciaici<^oioociciaiciooaioioo 


oq 

o cq 

O 

XO 

oo 

oq 

o 

oo 

oq 

xq 

xq 

oq 

XO 

CO 

xq 

oo 

oo 

XO 

CD 

cq 

o 

cq 

o 

o 

CO 

CO 

o 

xq 

cq 

xq 

oo 

XO 

ci 

od  ci 

od 

CO 

ci 

od 

o 

ci 

CD 

ci 

CD 

o 

l>^ 

o 

ci 

XO 

XO 

t>^ 

ci 

ID^ 

CD 

t>^ 

ci 

l>^ 

od 

oo 

00  oo 

00 

00 

oo 

GO 

Cl 

oo 

Cl 

oo 

Cl 

Cl 

Cl 

oo 

oo 

Cl 

oo 

Cl 

oo 

oo 

OO 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

oo 

00 

oo 

oo 

oo 

COt^T-l)OClCOt^T— (LOOlCOt^T-HlOCOr^THlOOlCOI 
C^fMCOOOCO'^'^iOlOlOCCCCit^t^OOOOClOiaiO' 


§ -9  -9  S S S s 2 S S g 


Qj  OJ  0)  O 


^ 0,0.0  O 01  o oj  a 


>4  >> 

u u ^ 

9 9 fn  'S  "S  Jh  *&H  ^ 9 


o o o o 


5^ 


c 

CG 


o 

CJ 

bf) 

<v 


IT;  ^17} 
O Oj 

rt 

o ^ ^ • 

^ OJ 

C ^ S 

<N  T ^ 


a 


^ cj 

^ -M  (1) 

o SQ 

xo 

5 1“ 
2 S - 

OJ 

-PC 

2 :! 
a ^ ^ 
bJj'^ 

2 gpH 

(U  cn 
. <U 

<u 

;-l 

bjo 

<L) 

c/3  rt  O 

C C^ 

o O ” 

1^ 

S ^ co" 

^ “ (U 

^ "S 

F=^  C 

s gi 

coo 

i:;  o <N 

j. 

n O 


20 
c > 


o 


2 

2 


Ph 

02 

Sx3 

^ c» 
6J)  83 
W S 

in 


oo>o»r3ii:)ioioiocx)»oao»oeooocooq>o»oocoioooqo>oiqo»o»opcoo 
<:oo6a^cdi-HCOcrjotOocrjodoiT-Hido^cx5oaic>d<:otOcpc»io^oooo^oo^oot^ 
OO  OO  OO  OO  05  C)0  OO  05  C50  05  OO  QO  05  05  C20  OO  <50  05  C50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  GO  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50 


0<^booio^oio0(^oeo<»<5qpppipooo5pppiop»oi0ppppop<5q 

rrx  rn  f~2  lo  i— 5 tP  CO  <35  t— I <?<l  x~l  <7^  <0  I>“  GO  x— I 05  iO  t>»  05  t>-  CO  lO  CO  CD  05  05  <50  lO  CO 

<50  <50  05  <50  05  <50  <50  <50  <50  05  05  05  <05  <05  <50  <50  <05  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50  <50 


« O 
^ G 

eu}'S 

.§s 

!2§ 


XOO<5000001050p<50<=><^bOO>/^»/t><50C505010p^(5q50pppp»OppP 

sjsssgsgsssssggssssssisssssssssssas 


l050<500>/t)0000<50C500>/5'050K3COOpPpppppppppppp»0 


<u 

op:) 

I °'§ 

I— < S ^ 
o 

>1^ 
X ^ 

X § 

go 


S SSSSS  s s$s 


^ ^ Ph  , o pO 


IllliiiiS  |S||  §|-a:g:3S>,>,^>.gg§§§§!>.!^,>. 

g-t^'SoooooS  Soog  i£ftaftap<2222§§ccc  c c c c 


xrt 

bo  03 
-O  ^ 


oooooocoiooococou:)ooo»ooocoiooooqoooiOoq»oocoococqoo 

)nododt>-*':oioajo6oodoodairHCviocrjoo6r^'':j:5odt^cr5>ocpt>^oododcrja3crj 

ooooooooooooooGocriooasoocxjcrsooasQOcnoooooooooooooooocooooooooooocx) 


Ph 

CO 

u _ 
c;  33 

Sh  CO 
bO  03 

TS  ^ 


00cx)i0»0i00c0  00  00  00i0c0n:»0c00t)0»37>0l00l00i0l0c0>330i0000 


00  o cq  oo  oq  o o looo  oqoqocooqoquoiOiOcoooijqcqooQqioiqiLOoooqoqeq 
C3oda^t>^id'3di>lKO':oodoc4i-5oodoo-r-3oi-5oaiaiCTia5«3a3t^cx5a3oaixd 
ooc»ooooooooaocooocxj03a^oocj30oa5C^ai03crjC3oooooooooocx)cxDoocoo30ooo 


Lcqi3qoioo^cDooi3oijqioiiouoio»3o  oooKoiqoo^oiioo^  ooiooooq 
o4(oi-^':£5ccicsiid'^idciO)-6i>^t^odo4csi  ioiouoioiood'^<:ocoi>-‘'c35'^  t^aiodooto 

OOaOOOOOOOCOGOOOCOOOOOC/JOOCOOOOO  OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO  OOOOOOGOOO 


(MC^eoco'oti'^rjHioi 


(Ofl  3D  O 'Of  oo  (M  CO  ' 

CS|  (M  CO  OO  CO  ^ 'f  J 


>>  >> 

'gSSSSr-E>.>.>.t»2222a2l»t»!>. 


lE^lsassfllf 

a®  -S®||||So«oa  '^''^'3 


\ 


Table  XXX. — Scores  of  Butter  when  90  Days  Old.  Storage  Temperature  o to  20  Degrees  F.  Showing 


^2 


to 

<v 

<v 

u 

<v 

'T^  CO 
<V  <V 
N <V 

•c  ^ 

t::  b/D 

rl  <u 


Pm  00 


g ^ 

r-l 


U ^ 

'Tj  Pm 

c . 

^ Fh 

C CO 

a <v 

(U  (D 

oJ 

VO 


%-K  rt 

M-H 

a;  c/T 

'O  <u 

^ .s 

CO  ^ 
CJ 

8 8 

u O 

(L»  M-h 

w ^ 

l-M  Ph 
O 03 


O 

CJ 


M C/3 

to  ce 
O)  C 


^ — 
03  ^ 
t-i  CC 

bx)  cs 

03  C 
rQ't-l 

8 


^ C3 

bjo-S 

-s  a 


0 

0 

CO 

CO 

10 

CO 

10 

10  CO 

CO 

0 

(O 

cq 

iq 

10 

10 

iq 

CO 

CO 

(M 

T— 1 

OS 

T— 1 

(oi 

05 

0 

05 

05  (O 

0 

00’ 

05 

tM 

05 

05 

tM 

cx 

(05 

(J5 

00 

05 

CO 

CO 

05 

CO 

00  05 

(05 

CO 

00 

CO 

CO 

CO 

00 

CO 

CX) 

(X) 

oococoio»oioocooqoqooocqiooooo  as 
cscxiQdai^'tdast^cicsdaitMrMrMooooTMcri 
CX)  CX)  00  00  C30  00  00  00  00  (X)  00  C»  (SO  00  CO  (X)  (50  00  (X) 


OOOlO»0(X)CX)00(X)OOOOiOOOOCO 


lO^lOOOOOiOOKOlOiOO^^^OOO 

T^^lOctDuSlrDTMcx5i0CX(^b(^^C0'^■'tDC0(^0{^^O 

(X)CX)CX)(XICOCX)(X)(X)(X)00(X)(X3COOO(X)(X)OOCO 


Q,  ft  a p,  P(^  . 


§ § ^ 


Table  XXXI. — Showing  Total  Count  of  Bacteria"  in  Cream  and  Per  Cent,  of  Germs  Killed  by 

Pasteurization 


53 


a-a 


CO 

CD 

oo 

XO 

CD 

CO 

1—1 

XO 

'Cf 

OO 

XO 

CO 

xo 

xo 

CO 

o 

CD 

XO 

1—1 

CD 

o 

CD 

i-H 

CD 

CO 

xo 

O 

t50 

xo 

CO 

xo 

O 

CD 

o 

CD 

CD 

zo 

CD 

05 

CO 

05 

CD 

CD 

xq 

05 

CO 

05 

05 

05 

CO 

CD 

05 

05 

»; 

05 

CM 

CO 

CD 

xo 

CD 

CD 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

05* 

05 

05 

05* 

CD 

05 

05* 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

od 

Oi 

o 

CD 

CD 

o 

CD 

05 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

oOOooooooooioooooooooooooo»ooooiloooo 

OOOOOOOOt^OOQOOi— lOlO^OOi^OGOOt^CnOO-^COCOC^COiOCOC^ 
ITS  o c:5  XO  o ^ CO  lo  1— |iX>rHCM(M  CO  t— I CS  t— I i— I CO 

l>^  T-H  CO'i-h'cO  T-i'  o' 


• 

CD 

CD 

CM 

XO 

CM 

XO 

XO 

CO 

C£> 

XO 

o 

OO 

o 

O 

XO 

o 

CD 

o 

CD 

!>. 

XO 

o 

CD 

CM 

o 

CO 

xo 

XO 

t^ 

O 

CO 

CO 

CD 

o 

CM 

XO 

'Cf 

XO 

CM 

xq 

CM 

CD 

CD. 

t-H 

r-- 

cq 

CM 

o 

O 

CO 

O 

CM 

1— j 

oo 

xo 

xq 

xq 

CO 

CO 

OO 

CD 

o- 

oo. 

TT 

^ s 

XO 

xd 

05 

xd 

OO 

CM* 

CM* 

CD 

CO 

od 

od 

l>^ 

O 

O 

CD 

HJH 

o’ 

cd 

05 

i>^ 

cd 

od 

05 

CD 

CD 

05 

O) 

a 

CO 

CD 

05 

OO 

05 

05 

oo 

05 

05 

05 

CM 

CD 

oo 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

CD 

05 

05 

oo 

CD 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

05 

CD 

CD 

05 

00  1 

ooooooooooooooooo 
ooooooooooooooooo 

O 0 0 0 0 0^0  O CD  OOi-HOO»Ot-HO 
»OCOLQrHr-rCDi-H"l>rLOC^JCDCdxOcdodlOT3?'T^iOOOI>ri>^cd 
CX)  T— I CM  T— I 1— I CO  T— I 1— I 1— I CM  T— I CM  I rH  T— I 1— I T— I 


CO 

OO 

CO 

CD 

XO 

t-- 

CM 

CM 

CO 

XO 

OO 

CO 

CM 

CO 

P 'O 

CD 

O 

O 

OO 

CD 

OO 

XO 

05 

CO 

CD 

XO 

CD 

05 

xo 

CD 

OO 

CO 

XO 

CD 

05 

CD 

XO 

00 

05 

OO 

CD 

OO 

05 

OO 

Htl 

OJ  ^ 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

CD 

oq 

05 

05. 

CM. 

05 

CD 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

CD 

00 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

05. 

05. 

CD 

05 

05 

<05 

05 

oq 

^ fp 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

05 

<05 

05* 

05 

05 

05 

05 

<05 

05 

05 

CD 

CD 

05 

05 

CD 

CD 

<05* 

<05 

05 

CD 

05 

<05 

05 

a>  ^ 
ft 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

CD 

05 

CD 

CD 

CD 

05 

CD 

05 

CD 

<05 

05 

CD 

<05 

CD 

CD 

<05 

05 

CD 

05 

05 

CD 

00000l0>00000i00'cf'0>0)0' 


O O O CM  O OO  O »0)  CO  ^ I 

CO  o tH  o CO CM  ^ 1— I CD  O ^ Ol  T— I CX)  CM  CO  CO  CO  1—1  CM  CD  CM  O CO  i— I CM 


O iO  o o o 


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

0^0  CD  O O CD  o O O O o o o o o O^O^O  o o 0^0  o o 

lO  O CD  O o'  ^ o'  O <0  CO  lo  cT  O lO  o CD  O O CD  CD  O CD  O CD  O O CD  O O CD 
t^CMCOOCMCMOOCO  lO  O i-HCMi— li— ICMO»0)Tt^CDlOOOOCX)CX)CMOCX)iiOlOOOCMCMCM 
IlO  O XO  1-H  CM  CO  1— I 1— I 1— I CM  1— I CM  1—1  CM  CM  CM  CM  1— I CM  CM  1-H  CM  i— i CO  i— I i— I CM  i— I i— I t-H  i— I 


OOOOOOOO' 

00000>000' 

OOOOOOOO' 


'^J'OOCMO'- . 

CMCMCO'^'^'^OXOCDCD'Ot^l 


.COt^i-HXOiOCOt^i— lOOCOt^^lcOOK 
iT:}HTfXO)XOXOCDOC^t^t^OO(X)OOiO< 


. 1— I lO  ' 
> 1— I 1—1  ' 

"o 

roTcoi 


^ 0( 


I o ■ 

I lO ; 


p< 


> > > 


« « V 


^ 


!»  w 6 O (5  Q Q Q 0 fS;  S ^ S S I I?  I?  t?  I?  I?  1?  “ 


1 These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  of  cream 
- Per  cent,  increase 


Tabi^e:  XXXII. — Showing  Acid  Producing  Bacteria^  in  Cream  and  Per  Cent,  of  Germs  Killed 

by  Pasteurization 


54 


cd 


!>.  CO  fO  Ol  JO  CO 


o 

lO 

to 

CO 

to 

CD 

TJH 

CO 

CO 

oo 

<3^ 

CD 

CD 

to 

CD 

o 

CD 

oo 

OO 

(O 

oo 

<g 

05 

05 

(05 

oo 

(05 

(05 

(05 

oq 

(05 

<05 

(05 

<05 

g 

(di 

'O 

05 

05 

05 

05 

(05 

05 

(05 

(05 

(05 

(05 

<05 

05 

05 

<05 

CD 

(Ji 

'O 

o 

'05 

<05 

<05 

(05 

(05 

05 

(05 

(05 

<05 

05 

<05 

<05 

05 

<05 

•^2 
(V  ^ 


oooo 

oooo 

COCOOOt-I 

CO 


o o o o o ' 

JOCSJXOCOO' 


CO  CO  CO 

COCNCOO(MCOOCOC^OOCOCOJOCOCOt^l>-'^< 

00'^C0Ot-IC0C0C0C^OJ0'^(MC010C^C0C0< 


i CO  CO  OO  l>-  CO  1^- 


J-l 

a 


O O ' 


o o o o o 
o oo  S 

■^oaTc^oortrc^ooc^o^aj 


OOOOCOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOJOOOO 


iJOiOCOOJOJOCOOSO  o C^iO  1— I 1—1  CO  o 

lCOc4t^OO<ySdiCOCO  rHcdoOrHI>r  cvf 

I T— I 1— t CO 


CO  lO  CO  00  lO  1—1  OO  JO  OO  OOrfi 

oiooTfrHiococoasoocoaciooi^ooooQOo:) 
ociociooo5crs<0i0ioci<os<oi0iojoi020005<05 
0S0^OiO5Ci0iO50^O5C5O5CyiC50CiOT0i  OCi  OCiOCiOiCiOCiOCiOiOtiOCiOiOiOSCSOlOCiCTi 
OSO^CiCSOiOiO^OSOtiOiO^OSOiCTSC^OtiOCiOCiiOJOCiCTlOSOlOiO^CrsO^CSOCiO^OCiO^Ol 


CO  oo  CO  lO  CO  'Cf 

oocotMcooocriOO-^cnt^i-icoioaiCO' 

C50C>0CiC5OS0^0^0^OCi0^C00Ci05C5(0Si 


ooooasJoiooJOJOJOioiocoJOoascoooocooc^coooQJOoooJ-oio 
OOOCOC^I  cocococo  1— ICOlOO  tH  CC|  1— ^'cfCNJlO 


oo  ooooo 
ooooooo  . _ _ 
oooooooooo 


OOOOOOOO' 


'OOOOOOO 

■ ooooooo 

■ ooooooo 


OOOOOOOO' 
OOOOOOOO' 
0^000^<0000' 

oo<o'OT-T<0'OiO'OOoci'<o<o'ooo'o''K5'oo''<oo<o<ogoo)5  o c4' J£2'o 

OOOOOJOOOJOCOt^T— IC^  OOOCOt^T— l'cfrfOOOOO'OCOJOCD'^COOQOOTj''^a5 

Cv|  CO  r—i  tH  1— I 1— I T— i 1— I 1— I 1—1  CM  1—1  (M  1— I T— i 1— t 1— ( 


rJ^C»(MO'Cf'OD<MCDOrt^OO(MCDO'^OOCslCpg;3iOO(M'Og^OOC3g02;£2$^?g 

(M(MCO'^'^'^JO»0'OCD'CDt^l>*GO'X)'X)iOiOOOOi-Hi— l(M(M!MCOCOTfi!d'^iOlO 

t"H 

oot:'rTHcrrcoi>^i-Hioocoi>ri-HJJd<diCOi>^i-H"joa5Coi>^i-Hiocjrco^THJogco^T^JO 
(MOicocO''cfTt(iLOJOiococoi>.ir^t^ooc«cn)'d:"OOOi— ii— Ii-H(M(MCOCOCO;^;^JO^ 

T~^  tH 

C<fcDOOO(MCOO'^“odc4'cOO'd^Cid(MCDO''rj5'od(MCD<=r'TP(5dcMCpg3foOC;i'g  g 

(MCMCOCOTf-^JOlJOJO'O'OlS-O'O-CXlOOO'OOOOi— li— li— 'C^CMCOCOCO-^^IOIO 

i-tiooit^i— rK:)<3ccoc^i-Hioafcot^i-HJO<ocot^i-tjocjrcoi>^rH»oocor^i^>ogco 

<M(M(MCO''^'cri'':t<iOJOCDCOCDl^I>»C(OOOCO<OOOOOrHT— ICMtMCMCOCO^^^^ 


pi  3 O 


1 These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  of  cream 
- Per  cent,  increase 


Table  XXXIII. — Showing  Liquefying  Bacteria^  in  Cream  and  Per  Cent.  Germs  Killed  by  Pasteurization 


55 


fl  'a 

QJ  QJ 


CO  oo  iOCO<XioO':C)'^ 

i-Oi— iioo'— iCM'^ior^coi^coyDCTsocyiCDaiaiioaico^T— lOO^oic^ioi^cTtiOio 
i^cocMcrioqoo'TjHt^ooco^ooqcDCTsi'^cTiaicTJCncrscTscncnt^ooa^aiaicoaicriaicn 
OOOtiClC^CDCTiOtiO^criOOOOCTsCOO^OtiCTJO^O^OtiO^iCTSO^OtiO^O^CTiO^OtiCriOiCTiC^O^ 
OT  05  05  05  05  05  OT  OT  05  05  05  05  C75  05  C75  05  05  05  OT  05  CJi  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05 


lO 


»Q 

LO  Tti  01 


CO  01  Ol  CO  05  >-0  CO 

oocooo»^cooocoioooo'cooq'!-5ocoooocdo'cfioooco(oio>o^ 

ook:)i— i»-0(oiOT-i>oio'criiOo  t— i (OIt— i 

t>»  1—1  r— I CO  T— I OJI 


a o 

<V  QJ 
QJ  — 

p. 


COf'OO  coco  coooco 

1— ICS|0005>0'^<0)OCD>-0»Q005)0)t^OOCOO'^OaCD'.— ICO>OCOtHOOOOC50 
t^l'^O'-QOGO'cfiOCOCDCOCMOOOIC^OOCOOCOOOOt^OCVJOOOOOOOl'^COO 


00<0>00000000000i000000»0  00000»0)00000_ 
COC30C:>OOOC0000  10  010C010»0)<0>>0)'QftCMOCOlO'cri'Q}HT-l050lrHOOOO 

o o o 1— I o c)0  ^ oa  1— I lo  oo  o i— ithco  i— i th  co  ' ~ 


CO 

o 

CO  io 


oo 


1— I T-l  ^ OO 


XO  05  t^OOOOlO-^XOOOt^lOCOOOCO  OOOO  1— IX-0  000505  Tfi— I 

00'cn(0105  05  00r^05c0)05005000505cy5  05  05  05  05  05  00  05  05l^050505x0  050005l0 
05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  05 


lO  XQ  XO 

XO  (Oil— It— lOfli— IXOt-HCOXOt-HCOi-J  XO 

T— ICsixOOOOOT-HCOCOOT— IOC500C5000CD0001— lOXQ-i— 1X0 


OCOCPOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOJCDOCDCOOOOOOOOOOOOO 
OC5OOOC:OOC5O0<0C:.  <OC50CDCOC50COOOOOOOOOC5CO)CDO 
0000  00cr0c00'^005x0  0<05000<0>0x00x000ccc00:oc500 
CO»OC5CDi-t^'c5d^C5XOCO— ro'x0cLcvfc0X0C0CNri'^Q0T-rc0''0ix00rC5  0i'05t^C5<:O 
XO  XO  04  1— I T— I 1— i I— I ^ rH  CO  05  04  rf  04  i— I i— I 


OO 

CM 

O 

CO 

CM 

o 

o 

M* 

CN 

04 

CO 

XO 

XO 

o 

CCJ 

CO 

r-T 

t-H 

CD 

CO 

r-" 

XO 

05 

co" 

CM 

04 

CO 

CO 

XO 

XO 

XO 

o 

CvT 

CD 

oo" 

of 

CD 

o' 

Ml 

od 

cm" 

04 

Ol 

CO 

CO 

XO 

XO 

XO 

‘CC> 

XO 

■oT 

r-T 

XO 

05 

co" 

I'-T 

r— 1 i 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CO 

XO 

XO 

(X> 

1-^00000005050001— IT— i04  04  04COCO'3^'!ti^XOXO 


rr-T XaO  05  CO  1-H  XO  05  CO  1—1  'i.) 
Jt>-l^l^000005050500i-HT-( 


I '• ) 'OP  ^ 

) oo  05  05  05  O O 


XO  05  CO  1-H  XO  oc"  CO  i-T  XO 
GNJCMCOCOCO'^'cr'XOXO 


I ( i ^ 

(GNOICOCOCO'^'^XOXO 


' XO  05  CO  1-t  XO  05  CO  ^ »0  C5  CO  r-i" ) O oT CO  1—1  XO  oT CO 

* CDl^l'-^000000050500  0'i-Hi-H(M04  04COCO'0''Cti^XO 


. . . . K • kJ  A.' Pi  <1^  <1^  05  O CO 

^ ^ O cj  ^ c.-*  ^ ^ cc  Cw  ^ ^ p^ 


1 These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  of  cream 
- Per  cent,  increase 


56 


3 

V 

c/} 

a 

Ph 

T? 

(U 


o 


<u 

CJ 


<u 

cp 


o3 

<L> 

a 


2 

'o 

a 

a 


m 

cS 

<u 

>-1 

bjc 


o 

CO 


a "a 

<v  <v 


a -ci 

^ (U 

Sit  3 


*-<  ri4 

<U  ^ 

P. 


oo 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

GO 

CO 

CO 

o 

o 

CO 

o o 

CM 

CO 

o 

o 

lO 

OS 

OS 

lO 

OO 

T— 1 

CO 

lO 

CO 

o lo 

ID) 

CO 

OS 

tT 

oq 

oq 

OS 

OS 

oo’ 

OS 

OS 

c?s 

OS 

CD  CO 

OS 

OS 

OS 

OS 

os 

OS 

OS 

05 

os 

OS 

■OS 

OS 

OS 

OS 

<os  OS 

OS 

oo 

OS 

OS 

OS 

OS 

os 

OS 

OS 

OS 

I (M  C<I  lO 


(M  t>.  1— I CSI  rH  00 


OOOO^OOOOOOCOCOOOi— li— ic^oqi— lO’— Ib^'^C^^O'XJT-HOTHi-HOOCr: 
O T— I CM  1— I lO  CO  rH  o 

T-i  (M 


OOOOl^OOOi— I0000coc^>00000^00»0*0)0 
(X>Oai':£>OOCOCD-rH  t-HC^CDI^  CMCMCD'TtHTTl-^tMCOOCM'^CM 
Ot— I CM  <CO  CM  T— I CO  Tfi 


CM 

o ' 


CO  CO  ^ 

oooco<ocoa^oooooocniO( 

OOOQOOCrjOiOOOCTJCMCTlO* 


lO  CO 
■ lO  CO  OO  OS  < 
< OS  OS  OS  OS  OS  < 


Ttl  CO  t-H  CO 

'OOOOSCOOOOt^i—IOSOOCDT— I 
I o OS  OS  Os  o OS  OS  OS  OS  i— i os 


LO  T— I T— I <0>  OS  T— I 

oootPoooooOooooooooos 


lO 

CM  -I-H  CO  tH  os  cm  o ^ 
iOOOOt-HOOCMOOCOOt-H 


O0000000100010)00000000000000  0000i0)00 
(OOOCDOOOlO)rHCOOCMOlO)OOCSOO‘OOOCDCDOCOCOOOOCOO'ct< 

CMOOOSO^O  CMt— It— I CO  CM  lO  O^O^O 'cf  O O O O O 'CD  O O O i— I lO  CM 

t-HCO  COtHCM  tH  t-h'cm’'^CO  CMCMtHtci5'^  t>^rHCO  tH 


iCOO'cfOOCMtDO^OOCMCOO^OOCMCOO'^OOCMCOO'chiOOCM' 
ilOCOCOCOt^t^'OOOOOOCJSOSOOOT— It— ICMCMCMCOCO''cfl'cf''ct^Ht): 


TtiOOCMCOO’'C^iOOCMCOO'TtiOOCMCOO'O^OOCMCOO'TfiQOCMCOO' 
iLQlOCOCOt^C^t^OOOOOSOSOSOOi— It— iTHCMCMCOCOCOTtl'^lO; 


'cOI>-T— llOOSCOt^T— I^DlOSCOt^T— llOOSCOt^T— ILOOSCOt^T— l»OOS< 
JiOlOCOCOCOt:^l>-OOOOOOOSCrsOOOT— It— ICMCMCMCOCOTCjTTtiTCti: 


a ft 


jOdPSO  ooc3^ 


C3 


^o'DoOOOooo 


s>,t>.o>.D)OGsoa>cy<oo>, 


1 These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  of  cream 


Table  XXXV. — -Showing  Total  Count  of  Bacteria^  in  Butter  at  Churn  and  Per  Cent.  Germs  Killed  by 

Pasteurization 


57 


• 

00 

0 

1—1 

0 

10 

00 

95 

fl 

0 

0 

10 

1—1 

0 

t— 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

ip 

0 

<05 

CO 

zo 

<05 

10 

0 

00 

<05 

0 

T—i 

10 

10 

0 

05 

O' 

0? 

0 

0 

15- 

0- 

00 

0 

05 

l>- 

0 

xo 

0 

10 

<0 

<oq 

10 

10 

00 

zq 

0 

10 

00 

ZD 

IP 

t-H 

l>; 

<05 

cq 

IP 

0 

0. 

V 

S 

oq* 

0 

CO 

10 

CD 

od 

od 

od 

05 

od 

0 

i>^ 

05 

<05 

<05 

05 

<05 

<05 

<05 

<05 

od 

i>^  <rq' 

od 

od 

<05 

<05 

<05 

CD 

CO 

M 

a> 

00 

05 

05 

0 

05 

05 

05 

<05 

05 

00 

0 

0 

05 

<05 

05 

<05 

<05 

<05 

05 

05 

<05 

<05 

<05 

<05  00 

<05 

<05 

c:) 

<05 

<05 

<05 

<05 

<05 

05  ! 

Oob)OC^t^' 
o ^ CO 


O O O O iO  O ^ O O lO  lO  o o o o o o o o o o 
ooOt^T-iooooTfco'5}<0':oc^<^OJOoo^<M^aio 
COC^OC^  T— li-H  tH  COCOt^COCO'^f  »o 


QJ*-^ 

ft 


OO  Tf  rHOOOS  C£>  CP 

OOOiOO'^fOOOOt^OOOOOOOCOCSOiOCPOOOCPOiOOt^’— lOO 
<:POOoocP'^ooioo)LOcxDcr50ooa5i-jcpo'^cpoo^'^»oiPocnt>;iPO 
(Ni'^xdc<io'^ocoi>^oododoooi>^rH<i6i>^ipio<:pc^cpc^odi>^io(sjo6CTiCTicp 
ooOTOO'=tiooo:>C20ia2oot^t>"a5a5i>-ooa^aiooa^aia^ooooi>.a3o:)a5C^c:iaiait:^ 


ooooo 
o o o o o 

O CT5  C^O  O 
'vE  th  ^“cq 


OOOOOOCDOO' 

OiOOOOOOO^O' 

l>-oocpcDiOTfa:>'^i:^oo: 


t>.  to 

OO  o o < 
O )lO  oO  T— I rH  1 


Tf  Ol  UO  rf 

'TjHai':z)0'=^'oqooooqor^cocric:iOOOiOn>«T— itoooT— iipo 
ioot^iO)0'^aii:^ait:'^ooaiiO)ooiooo<y30ocooo<x>T— i-^osoticN 


0»OOOOOOCOt-IO<.  ^ 
ot^iooiiOiOiiOT— i(oqioio»0) 
Oi  cOi  T— ( T— I 1— ( 05  CO 


s a 
si 


oooQooos<=^'^^'=>'^<=>‘^'^'=’'^ooooooo 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 
oo<poo  OOO^O^O^CPCOOO  oooooo  OCPOOO 
CO  IQ  od  i>r  o'  od  o o"  o o'  05''  t-h  t-h  o'  o -i-T  csT  CO  oi"  i-t  o'  o" 

(Ml— I t-H  .— I tH  1— I tH  rH  1—1  CM  CM  CM  1—1  i—(  1—1  1-1  i-(  1— I 


O O 00  O ( 

tH  1— I (M  ( 

oq 


Ttioooqo'^oooqoo'!foo<MOO'^oo(Moo^oooqoo^oooqoo'^oocMo 

(MOqcO'^'^TtiiOlOOCPOt^t^OOOOOOOOOOO^^^^^^^^^^^^ 

cd'i>^i-to5cdi>^i-Hioo5cd'i>^i--rijd'o5cot^i--ripa5cd't>^i-H'ioa5cot^i-ti05'a5co''t'~’'i-H'»JO 
(McqcocO'^tirfiioiLOiooot^t^c^oooooooooi— ii-Hi— loqoqcococo'^rtiiouo 

T— t 1—1  1— I 1— I 1—1  1—1  1—1  1— I 1—1  1-H  1—1  1—1  1—1  1— ( 

cqoood(^foo■TEodc^*'oo'^od'c^fooTi^od'(^q<o'oTj^'c>d(^q'o'o■>^od'<^q'o'orJ^' 
c<icqcoc0'^'^i0i0i00oi:^t^t^ooooc3505cn>ooi— ii— ti— loqcMcococo'^'^io^ 

1—1  1—1  T— I 1—1  1—1  1— I 1—1  1-H  1—1  1—1  rH  i-H  1—1  1— I 

i-t  10  o"  !>•"  I-T 10"  05"  CO"  I-T  lid  05  CO"  t>r  I-H  ud  05  CO  rH  Ifd  05  CO  l>^  I-H  10  05  CO  i-H  10  CtT  CO 
(Moqoqco'^ '^'^1010  ooot^i>>  00000005050  ooi-Hi—icMoqoqcocO'^TtiTjHio 


5j(yc)«o  ooftO)  P(.S  .5.533  3333333 


These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  gram  of  butter 


58 


V 


Vh 

<v 

o 


c 

<L) 

o 


<u 

C 

3 

u 


1=:  c 

m-B 

rt 

C N 


a; 

*n 

CA) 

03 

Ph 

pq 

bjc 

o 

u 

Ph 


u 

< 

bjo 

c 


c/i 

I 


> 

X 

X 

w 

h4 

« 

< 


l>-  COCO  'CDCO  coco  CO  t>-  CO 

coc^co(McoO'jt^030coocr>oco':c>':r)oou:)ut)oooco':r>coocot^oo'^oooo 
cor-cot^cooiuDO'XicooococococoariGoooooooo^coooat^u:)!— iojoocjo 

1 

T— I 

CM  i 
CO 

1 

-5 

pH 

CO 

S3  5 
a 

coaiodcMt^oooooooicocvioioaicoaiaiCTjaiasodooaicid'^aio^c^odcTiaiajco 

Qoa3o:>c~a3o:i03)a3a:)i>-Go^ooic:icnia3a5a5a:iaio^c3OTa3a^ooa30^o:>aia3C5C^ 

H 

03 

1 

a> 

;h 

bJO 

a> 

'O 

bacteria 
per  c.c. 

oooooooorooooo»ooooo»oi:^cproioooooooc<ii>-oo 

C±>OOCDOlQOt^i-HOOC?i— 1 OrflOCMi— 1 OOCOtMOOOOOCTJT-t  COCO 
O CS  1-H  Ut)  csi  t-H  tH  OOCiOOrH  '30  rH  CO '!f  CS  03  i-H  t— 1 

CO  1-H  tH  tH 

! 

a 

03 

<u 

i O 

"f? 

a ^ 

O)  OJ 

COCO  oo  <X)  no  <x>  cjd  to 

T— I'HfCOCOO'^t'rfl-OCOCOOOOOiXiCOCOt^nOOOnO^OCOJX'OOiMOOOOCOO 

T-iTrico<:oo«:>i-Hoococooooo'x>QDnocooooo(M^Dco':o)ocooanooonocoo 

CO 

1 

H 

N) 

*-'  i5 

':o^’cococD'0)^r^(o4c^cocco6rt5Tfii:ooar^it>^^'L£0':£5i-HCO'rH^o4t^’r-:noa3a3i>lTjH 

ooa^oo<X)QOO3ooo3a3xr'0OcDir^a3<X)!O3a3O3cr3O3a3a:>cr3C^t^<O3O3O30joa3C3C73CO 

cd 

CO 

1 ^ 

Ph 

a 

S 

i ^ 

a; 

s 

, o 

' S-H 

a> 

13 

<3^ 

bacteria 
per  c.c. 

OOOOOCDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCPOOOOOOO 

OOOOC3nOCO»QCMOOOnO^OOOOCDOnO)OOOOOnO<OOOCOC^O 

no-no  o o no  <03  th  ^30  co  C3  03  co  03  co  t-h  cm  cm  th  co  o CM  CO  no  oq 

(M  t-HMi-H  t-H  tH  <30  i-HtHtH  CO 

! 

<v 

C TJ 
o;  O) 

CO  CO  coco  coco 

T— ICOOt^COno-Hf^COOOfOl'ctKCOOOT— It^MGCCOOCOCOCOO'^OOT-lonocOCOO 
T-Ht^<03(MO30(DCOt^t>-<O0q(M0q  00  00  03C0<03  0q0qn0t>;00COC00qCOr3HMCO0C30(3(M 

CO  i 

oi 

a 

o 

33 

^ 2 
a>  ^ 
ft 

C00303t'^o6a3<03  03  03nOC3dC73C33<03<03a303<03  03  03  03  03  a3i030303!03'r}Ha3  03  03  03  03 
i03  03  03CX303C33C30303t^v03C3  03  03<03  03  03  03(03  03  03  03  03  03<0303<03<0303<03030303 

CO 

03 

i 

(N 

1 

Ph 

w 

a> 

<1; 

a> 

in 

Tti 

bacteris 
per  c.c 

OOOCOOOiOOfMOOnOrfiTH-f— loOO(Mt^Or^n0C0OC3OOOOOn0O 
O CM  CO  CO  oo  CM  (M  tH  1— I no 'CO  CO  (M  i— l CM  rH  I— l CM  CM  (M  rH  r^  C30  t-H  CM 

r-  i>-  <30 

1 

S a 

2l 

1 “HI  <U 

1 ^ O 

CS  . 

o;  cj 

OOOOO’OCPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

oocOooo<o:cOooooono<o>oooooooococoocDoooooo 
ooononooononooo  no  no  co^co  o o o o^o^o  <o  <o^co  o o o^o  co  o co  no 

1 ^ 

pq 

C>D<ofconOt>^T^f't^COT}^'cOnO'TCM''  C3dcM"3C'cro'i3DT^''cOCO'COnOCOa3(MOO<COCO(M 

T-i  1-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  1-H  i-H  ’ T-H  .-H  rH  CM 

CO 

a» 

^C0CMO'3t<00(MiC0O'cfHcX)CM'X)C0'TC30CM30OTt<C30CMC0OrtiC0CM3DO'5fC0CMC0 
CMCMCO'3r''T^nono<30i:0'30t^l>.cX)cx)C30<0303000  t-h.t-h  cMcMCMCOco^^'^nono 

1 — 1 1— ( t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H  t-H 

i 

a 

a 

CO  r-TT-H  03  cot-'^T-H  no  <03  co  t>^T— T no  03  co  oT  r-T  no  coT  co  r-T  r-T  no  <03  co  t— T no  03  co  t>^T-H  no 

CMCMC0C0TT'Tn0n0n0'30'30l'^t^C^C)0CX)c030303OOT-HT^T-HCMCMC0C0C0'^^n0n0 

tH  t— 1 "rH  rH  t— 1 t-H  tH  ^H  rH  t— 1 ^H  rH 

<0 

bfl 

CO 

a 

tuO 

.a 

S 

C^foOC>OC^^COO'H^'oCc4'CJ3"0'*^OC(^i'cr^O^OOC^POO'H^odc^^COOHHC/5'(^^COOT^ 
(MCMCOCOTT'^nOnOnO<CO<3Dl^t—  r-OOCX)<03<03(0300T— lT-HT-HCMCMCOCOCO'^'3fnOnO 

^H  ^H  rH  ^H  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH 

<0 

r* 

1 

1 

rH  lO  CrTt^  rH  CO  r-T  lO  oT  CO  r-H  IfS  CO  lO  CO  rH  IlO  CO  rH  CO 

c^cscMco'^*^'^^i-00«:o^i>»i>-ocooooo^a:)Ooo^rHc^c^cMcoco'^’^'^^ 

rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  ^H  rH  rH  rH  rH 

t 

Date 

/-T  ^ 4J  K'K'T^<ij<3i  ciioioci  _o  ^^f-i^^^^wwwC3CC3CJGC3C3G  i-P* 

1 These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  gram  of  butter 


Table:  XXXVII. — Showing  Liquefying  Bacteria  in  Butter  at  Churn  and  Per  Cent.  Germs  Killed  by 

Pasteurization 


59 


CD  lO 


COOOCO  lOCDCCICO 

CDt^OCOOOO>OOCOOfOOOrtlOOCOOCDt^010^COCOlOOt^T-(J-Oair^CO 
rHoqocqooOt^cocoiocvjoqcnioocooqi:Di>.oqcr2CDcocot>-ot>;i>;0;a5C^co 
'^i>^ocoodocia5criCT5o6t>^aio6CTiCT5cqo6o6cDt^aicr5aicria^cot^Griaiodajaiod 
ociaiaiooacic^o^OTiacicxiaicDooOTO^cTiOTcriaciCsQiasacjaiaiaiCsCTiaio^a^cscs 


OlOOOOOOC^'CtiOlOOOOi— lOi— I' 
OO  LO  lO  CM  OO  CM  -T— llOt^CDCM  CM  i— I 

CO  ^ 


tH  ^ 

ft 


CO 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CM 

CD 

1-H 

CO 

o 

o 

CD 

O 

o 

o 

o 

xo 

CD 

o 

o 

o 

O 

CD 

O 

CO 

o 

O 

o 

o 

CO 

o 

o 

XO 

o 

xo 

o 

CD 

CD 

CO 

XO 

CD 

CD 

O 

o 

xq 

o 

CD 

o 

o 

l>; 

o 

xo 

O 

CD 

XO 

CO 

CD 

CD 

o 

o 

xo 

o 

o 

oo 

xq 

CD 

1—1 

CO 

CD 

CD 

o' 

xo 

o6 

05 

x6 

tH 

!>-■ 

CO 

o6 

xo 

oo' 

CD 

OO 

CO 

05 

CD 

xo 

oo' 

CD 

CO 

o' 

CO 

05 

05 

CD 

CD 

oo 

05 

CD 

rH 

oo 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

oo 

CD 

05 

oo 

CD 

05 

OO 

05 

05 

oo 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

OO 

OOOOOOOO^OOOOOC^OCDlOLOOJOOlOOOOOOlOOlOOt^O 
OOOIOOIOCOt— I COCMtHCMCM-i— ICMCOIOCM,— iCMCMt^CMTH^^o 
CMi— ICMCMCMCM  OOCO  rH 


(V  ^ 

ft 


CD 

CD 

t-- 

XO 

XO 

CO 

TtH 

xo 

o 

o 

CD 

O 

O 

XO 

O 

XO 

CD 

CD 

CD 

XO 

CD 

O 

o 

CO 

OO 

O 

o 

OO 

CO 

CO 

xo 

o 

co 

oo 

CM 

OO 

CM 

CO 

CD 

oq 

CD 

CD 

05 

l>; 

CD 

OO 

05 

oq 

CD 

CD 

CO 

oq 

CD 

CD 

CM 

CD 

CO 

!>• 

CD 

CM 

CD 

CD 

<05 

Cq 

o6 

<o 

05 

CD 

05 

<05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

i>^ 

05 

05 

CD 

XO 

05 

co' 

oo 

o' 

<o 

CD 

CD 

od 

CO 

CD 

cd' 

<05 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

CD 

<05 

O 

05 

05 

CD 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

<05 

05 

05 

05 

o 

O 

05 

05 

05 

<05 

<05 

CD 

<05 

CD 

05 

05 

05 

05 

l>;  'Cf'  CO  1-; 

lOOl— ItHCOOIOi— liJO^-OrHTjloOOCOCOO- 


lO 

oq  Di  xo 

iOOi-HCMXOXOCOOXOi-HT— lOOO 
CM  CM 


ii 


OOOOOOOOOOOO' 

OOO'OOOOCDOOO'OI 

CMOIOCOOOOOOOOCO' 


lOOOOOOOOOOOO' 
>OOXOCDOXOO:)OOXOIOO'I 
IXOCMCM  O 1— I XOOCMOXO 


I O O CD  O 0>  O O 

I o o o o o o o 
xo  ^ 'cri  o CD  o 


cot^T— loicot^T-ixoaicot^-i— ixocDcot^T— ixoo^cot^- 

CMCMCOCO  ^TjilOXOXOCOCDt^C^t^OOOOOiCDCnjOO' 


i-HXOOiCOir^’THXOcDco 

CMCMCMCOCOrtiTfiTjiio 


00  o o o 1^; 12;  fi  Q fi  O 0 Ph  S <;  <1 S S S 


1 These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  gram  of  butter 


Table  XXXV'III. — Showing  Yeasts  and  Molds  in  Butter  at  Churn  and  Per  Cent.  Germs  Killed  by 

Pasteurization 


6o 


a-a 

OJ  O) 
V 3 


COJOOOO' 
CO  !>.  O CO  O ) 


to 

CO 

CM 

00 

00 

to 

Tf 

<05 

to 

0 

0 

CO 

to 

0 

0 

C35 

0 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

”'^1 

0. 

CO 

CO 

CM 

to 

CO 

0 

0 

0 

CO 

to 

05 

to 

tq 

to 

CO 

CO 

05 

CO 

05 

00 

CO 

to 

CM 

to 

CO 

05 

CO 

<0 

<0 

cm' 

CO 

to 

C75 

"'T 

05 

05 

05 

06 

CO 

05 

05 

<05 

05 

<05 

<05 

CO 

to 

<05 

cm' 

<05 

<05 

lO 

05 

05 

00 

to 

CM 

i05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

05 

<05 

05 

05 

C50 

05 

<05 

05 

05 

lO  lO  lO  >0  lO 

xouo  oqiocvjcocMC<j-^T3Hi-H(oq(:ooqT-HCvjoo  t>.iLOio»ot^coocx)o:. 
OOOOOrHOrHOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOrHTHT-it^CviT-HCOOi-H'^" 
oa  rH  CV|  i-H  CO 


a n 

a>  a> 
« ^ 


CO  CO  CO  oo  CO  oo 

OCOCOCOOOOOOOOOOOOt^OOOCDCOCDt^OO' 
OCOCOCOOOOOOOCOIOOOIOIOCOI— (COi— It^OOi 


CO  coco  Ttl-^COCO 
ICOCOOOt— IOOCOtHCO 
cDTticx)oo>0)a5o:>Tt<co 


ooocot— icoo^oooooooi— It— loot^ioascoocit^coQoascoooooco^-T-iaiocico 

a50a5CO''j'a5aia5cx)''^ooaiooc^a2a5CT:i:^coait^oc)aiOiTHc^ooa:>C5coaic:)C» 

T— I I>”  T— I 


OOOOiOOOl— 1(0^1— It— IOt— ICV|CO(MlOl0010aiOOOOt>.0' 
CO  rHCSJCOi—li— I (Oa  cq  lOlMCO  1— (■ 

CM 


o 

fl 

a 

o 

(M 


fl  "O 
<u  o 


lO  OO  Tf  CO 


OCOT-l»0)OOC=>COCOCOOTti-^QOOCOCOCOQOOCOOOTtit^Tft^CM»OCMCO 

ocooiGTiOOOcocooiiLOcoT— icoocococc>cx)ooooc»o:)OOooT^oot^o:> 


.2« 
s « 


xo  to 

O tH 

OOOOOOOOOO- 


CMCMCMt-J 

o' OO  CM  OOOOOOOOOO  o' CM  CM '=S^c4o  o' o 


O O ' 
O CO  < 
CO  T— 1 ■ 


C5  CM 

ooooocooooco'ootocMcoooootooooooTi^ooxo 

COOO-i— It— 1 CM  T— I QO  CO  1— 1 O (O  tO  CO  O O O- CM  O (O 

coo  CO  CO  TJTXO  COCOCMCM-^  T— ICM 


*'^OOCMO'clHOOCMCOO'^OOCMCDO''^OOCMC003t?°OCM'^'^'^°®'^'^'^'^°*^'^'^ 

cMCMco-^'^Tjitoxococoot>.i>.QoooooociooOo^^^^^^iyiy^y:)^'^^^y:>^ 

coh^T-roccot>^T-r>ocrrcot>rT-Hxoocot>^T-ttoo^coi>^T-tiO(ocoi>^T--rtoo:rcot>^T-Hto 

CMCMCOCO'Tti'cfitOXOXOCOCOt^t^t^OOGOOasOOO^^H^H^MW^^^^^^ 

CvrcOOodcM''cOO^’‘(XrCMCOO'!lH’'odcM''cOO'^od'CMcO(0'^QdcMCOO'cl^'odCM''cOQ'^ 

CM  CM  CO  CO  "rfi  lo  to  iocpcot>-i>-i>-ootx)a:)OC)<ooo^^r-i(Mi^y:)y5i^^^y:>y:) 
T-txocEr^T— ^l0  0co^^T-^too:^col^T-^locr^col>^T-^'IOa^'co^>^T--^'lOa^'co^>^T-Hxoc^^co 

CMCMCMCO'^'cf<T^tO»OCOCOCC>t^I>"<X)OOC>oaC)OOOOT— It— ICMCMCMCOCO-^TCfM^tO 


a-S-g-ScooSSSSS  S’S  « 5aaft&&«  « « 333333333 


• 


^ These  figures  represent  number  of  thousanfis  bacteria  per  gram  of  butter 


Tablj:  XXXIX. — Showing  Scores  of  Butter  when  Fresh  and  when  30  and  60  Days  Old,  Made  from 
Cream  Pasteurized  at  145  Degrees  F.  and  Held  for  10,  15,  20,  30  and  40  Minutes 


61 


Scores  of  butter 

after  60  days 

average 

OOOiOO  O OOO  lOOOlOOXO 

lO  lO  lO  !>.  lO  lO-  iqxolo  lO  CM  lO  l>. 

oodir^ododcM  ooooooeCt^oo 

OIOOOOOOQOOO  OOCX300QOGOOO  C0  00  00CX)00  00  00  00  00 

rS 

1 

OOO  o o 

lo  lo  iq  lain 

oost^ocioco  oorCcx>eCt^oo  ooot^t^t^aioood 

OOOOOOOOOOO  QOOOOOOOOOOO  OOOOOOOOCXDCXDOOOOOO 

Hunziker 

O O OO  O oo 

iq  LO  iq  iq  lo  to  lO 

ooOQOooaicM  aicx5o:)t>^eCoo  ooooooooooodo 
cnooooGOODoo  oooooooooooo  oooooooooooooooooo 

after  30  days  | 

1 average 

louoioo  O 0»-0  0 »00  OOlO  IlO 

^ iqt^»q  iqiqcM  CM 

odoo’odoooooo  CTioaiooocri  (oaioocjioooo 
oooooooooooo  oooooooooooo  ooooocnoo<oooai 

1 

OOO  O oooooo 

lOiOUO  lO  lOU0»OiO»O)LO 

c^ododoodoo  oodoooocTDod  odcrsoocdoocrio 

oo  oo  oo  oo  oo  oo  oo  OO  oo  oo  oo  oo  oo  oo  05  05  00  05  O oo  05  i 

Hunziker 

O OOO  oooo  ooooo 

iq  iq  iq  iq  iqiqiqiq  jqLqio»O)-i0 

0dO5O5G0l>^G0  005005005  0505CD0050000 

OO  OO  OO  OO  OO  OO  05  OO  05  OO  05  OO  OO  OO  05  05  OO  05  05  05  05 

fresh  j 

average 

lo  m lo  mmmmmio  nooco  oo  m 

fq  l>;t^CMCMr>;CMCM  CMiqiq  ^iq  tq 

oJooJrHT— 1<0  050505odod05  000050005000 
000500050505  OOOOOOOOOOOO  050505000505000500 

CQ 

1 

o o o o o o o 

uo  lo  iq  lo  lo  uo 

050051—11—10  050505000005  i— IOtHOOi— 10005 

00  0500  05  05  05  OOOOOOOOOOOO  05  05  05  05  05  05  05  0500 

Hunziker  j 

o o o - o 

mm  in  lo 

OOOi— It— It— 1 0050505od05  050005000500 

05  05  05  05  05  05  0500  00  00  00  00  00  05  0500  05  0500  05(05 

1 

Time  held  at 
145  degrees  F. 
minutes 

OiOOO^O  OOOOOC?  OOOOOOOCDO 
CMi-li— 1 (NCOTfCMCO-^  CMCOi^CM(X)TriCMCOM^ 

1 

I 

Churning 

numbers 

i:^00O5Oi-HCM  co-'^iocot^oo  (050i— iCMC0'?ti»0><X)i:^ 
lOioiocoocD  m ID  za  zo 

1—1  T— 1 1—1  1— i 1— I 1—1  1— 1 1— 1 1—1  1— 1 1— 1 1— 1 1—1  1—1  1— 1 1— 1 1-H  1— 1 1-H  1— i 1—1  j 

Date 

July  15 

July  24 

July  29 

62 


12 


C/) 

<L» 

(D 

bjo 

Q 

i 


a - 

£ CS 

5 ^ 


to  T3 

03^3  0) 

aS.S3 


u a 

P C3 


(U 

cx’ 

c/2 

cu 


in  in 

a o; 

-2 


- 

O 

O Tf-  j 

G 'td  i: 

••:  o 'i§ 

i:^  8 


<v 

22 


io  oo 

i-ocviooo'^oocx)oot^< 

CTSO^OCTST^OO^O^iCTJOtii 


03  (M  CS|  OO  lO 
it^(:003  03O»-0  03tD00  00 
’03  03  03  03t'-I>-03030303 


JO  lO  20  >0  JO  JO  JO  JO  JO  CM  CN 

JO  T— I T— lOOO  OrtioOJO  OOOO 

tH  I-H  O ‘ JO  JO  ' ’ ‘ 'o  ’ ' ' ’coco 

O Ttl 


OCOOOOOOOOOOOOCDOOOOCOOOOO 
CDOCD00003a3CC3t— li-HrHCMCMCMCDOOCMCMCM 
O O 0^03  a303COCOCOCMCMCM  CO  CO  Cq_CM  CM  CM  rH  r-i  t-H 
CM  CM  CM  r— I T— I T— I t-H  t— I t-H 


CO  COICOCOCMOGJO  JO 

03(03201— l'rt^C0CJD03  03t30l^00J0^:0a3J0J0  03O00C03 
03  03  0I03'T)^C0030303(030303030303030303030303 
03  03  03  03  03  GO  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03 
03  03  C73  03  03  03  03  03  03  (33  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  03  (03 


00002000»0i— I 
1-H  <0  1— I O CD 

03  t-H  CO 


20  20  JO 

’cOCm’t— lOC-CMiOJOi— IOCM1-H 


^ I 

cs  cu 


to  H T3  a 


0000<03cD300< 

0CD<D)C300CD0' 

OOOOOOOO' 


000CD0000CD<D300 

O(CDOOOCD)OOOCD(0)O 

OOOOCOOOOOOOO 


00(30  'TfH  00  (03  (03  <30  CM  00 '(f  (03 

00  30  20  00T-Hc0t^03(03(03(03(03'30<03<03000003<0300(03 
i03(03f'-03  03  00  03(03  03  03  03  03  03  03<0303(03<0303(03(03 


JO  CO 

lOJOCDOJOOt^i-H  *■ 
1— I O rH  1--  20 
20  1— I 


1 20 
' CO  00  ■ CM  CO 


^a 


G 

b/) 


0 

U} 

1 

h4 

W 

.-r 

< 


s « 

5 ?3 
U O 


a^s^  § 3 

V"  • — I 10  (u 
Eh  cj  HI  ir; 

iJl  9 


ao 

o a 


OOOOOcCDOOOOOOOOOOOOCDOO 

<CDCD(CDOOOCDOCDCOOOCDCD<CDO(030CD(00 

OOOOOCDOOOCr^OOOOO<COOOOOO 


CO  <03  CO  CO  CM  CO  CO 

(03JOC0hHhHi— i00(03(0300<xic03r— <03<030000(03c0<03<03 
(03  031— 103  00(30  03  03  03  03  03  03(03<0303(03<03(03:03<0303 


CM  CM  20 

CDOOOOOOCOi-HJOHfCM'oOJOOOCMOt^t'- 
CMCMCDt^OCDi-H  COt-H  CMCM  COt-H 

1-H  (03  CM  10 

cm" 


000000000000000000000 
<000000000000000000000 
000000  000<0<00<0(0<000<0<0<0<0 
o o"  o"  CD  o"  o"  20  2(D  o"  o"  o"  o"  o"  o"  o"  <o  o"  cm"  cm"  cm" 

HfHHHHCOCOCOl^t^l'^COCOCOCOCOCOOOOOOOOOO 
CMCMCM1-H1— It-H  1— I1-H1— It— li— Ii— li-Hi— It-H 


OJ-0O<0  20OOOOOOCDOOOOOOOOO 
CMi— li— lOli— It-HCMCOhHCMCOhT'CMCO^CMCO'cHCMCOhH 


"2 

'G 

TG 

'G 

G3 

Gb 

Tb 

TG 

TG 

G3 

TG 

'G 

Gb 

a 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

►H 

G 

G 

35 

G 

a 

a 

C3 

C3 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

cd 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

> 

a 

03 

03 

C3 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

G 

2i 

fH 

?H 

fH 

fH 

fH 

fH 

fH 

fH 

fH 

fH 

fn 

fH 

fH 

fH 

fH 

►2 


>» 

►2 


1 These  figures  represent  number  of  thousands  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  of 


Tabi^K  XLI. — Showing  Number  of  Bacteria  in  Butter  at  Churn,  When  Made  from  Cream  Pasteurized  at 
145  Degrees  F.  for  10,  15,  20,  30  and  40  Minutes  Respectively 


63 


OOOOOOCPOOCDOOOOOOOOOOO 
CDOOOOOOOOIOIOLQIOIOIOOOOOOCD 
ca  O O O T-l  CD  O rH  i-i  Ot)  CM  (M  CM  CO 


OOOOOCDOOOOOOOOOCDOOOOO 
OCDOCDCPOCDCDCDCDOCDOOCDOOOOOO 
O O CD  O O^CD  CD  O CD  O CD  O CD_^0^0  CD_^0  O CD  O O 
CDCDCDCDCD'uDCDCDOCDCDCDCDCDiOCDCDO'cDcDrCD 
OUDOt— ICMCMt^COC^t^OOCOi— ICOtHi— lOCDr-lT— ICO 
CM  CM  1— I T— I tH 


OOOOOOOOOOOOOCDOOOOOOCD 

ocdooocdooocdcdcdoooooocdcDcd 

CD  CD  CD  CD  o O^CD  CD  O CD  O CD  0^CD_^0  CD  CD  CD  O O CD 
CD  CD  CD  CD  CD  CdT  o'  CD  CD  o'  O o'  o'  CD  10  O o'  CD  o'  CD 
OOCDCOt^CDilOr— ICMlOlOl-^OOt^CDI^OlOCDlOlO 


CO  tD-  10 


CO 


000000000000000000000 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOCDOOOOOO 

o o o o o o o o o o O o o o O o o O o 


DOOOOOOOOOCDOOOOO'_ 

__  do__cdcdocdcDcdocdOcdcdcDooo 

CD  O O O O ' ‘ — ' ( — : c — > ' — ^ ' — > < — < — ' — ^ O^  I 


.^^^^oooocooooooooooooo 

OOOOOCMCOiOTfCOCDCDt^OO^lOOi-OOOO 
00 »0  rH  CM  CM  T-l  1— I CD  CO  1— I tH  1—1  t-H  CM  CM  CM  CM  CO  CM 


—1  “ 03 

Xj  <U  Qj 

^ D 

6fi  rH 

QJ  Qi  .S 

s 


OlOOO'OtOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 
CMi— <1— ICMrHi-HCMCO'=fCMCOHriCMCO^CMCO'Ct^CMCO-^ 


S 

D S 

,G  D 

O « 


CM 

t-s 


64 


a; 

'oc 

< 


.'Si 
< 
u \ 

> 

oii 

h 

OJO' 

I 

O 

U} 

I — I 

h4 

X 


mmxnvimviTnxrimxfix/immmxnifixjimvix/iifimmi/ir/ivimxix'Jiiii  VI  vimm 


cococococ^w>cocococococococococo 


t^  t' 


OOOiOOOiOiOipipOipcOLOCJOipipOOOO 

o >o 

oo^lpipooo 

t>^aiodt^a5cdxocoiococo)ioco'^)LOiocd»oiO'^*coco 

uo  lO 

cricricMt^odooio 

cocococococococococococococococococococococo 

CO  CO 

COCO'^COCO'rfCMCM 

<M  O 

oo  o CO  a:i  1— I CO  c^i  CO  »o  lO  <X)  lo  Tft  CO  rH  QO  t>"  CO  CD  o 

iO  Tti  o oo 'Cf  CO  T— I CO  CM  CV|  O CO  O CD  Ol  CO  CSI  OO  "rri 

10iOiO-^iOUOiO'^TfTti'^'cf''^CO'^iO'^iOcO'rfiOU3LO  lo 


l>.CMI>.THrttOQOO 
COT-Hcoioa:|0^0 


XOiO»0»OiOiOtOCO 


>>  t>> 

'iS  fcj  iH 
^3  c3  03 

O tf-l  'H  « 


•S  j:;  o .5:^  o o o o o oj  o . 


TS  T3  X3 


K*> 

«2 

a>  ;_| 

J30c3c3'00PP0^0^c3c3Sc3XhSSSSSSSSS 

« biD'H  4-1  bJO  Slfl  4>i0  bx)  tuo  <0  bX)4H  4-(4H4H'H  a4-l4H4H4-l«H4H'H4H«H 


;h  ;h  ^ 


;-(  f-i  fH  ?-( 


JH  J-<  U U 


icMcocO'^Tt<^i.oiocococot^t^oocx)ooa5aiooo 


COC^!— I lOi03COI>.T-HLOa5COt>-  rHlOOCCOI>.TH10CTiCO  t^i— liooicot^  T— llOOC)COt>-T— liO 

CMCMco  coco'^'^ioioiococo  t>-t>.i>-ooooo:icria50  ■otHi— it— icmcm  cococo'^'^io^ 


1— llOOiCOt^i-HlOCJCCOt^rHlOCnCOt^T-HlOOCiCOt^T— (lOOdCOt^rHlOasCOt^^^CJCO 
CMCMCMC0C0'^'^'^i0^C0C0C0t>-t>.00CXD000^a5OOOi— IrHCMCMCMCOCO'^'^'^iO 


S 

q; 

-Q 

c 

<v 

>>  t? 

^ 03  - 

-M  O 

s 

o 

s 

<v 

§2|s 

<D 

>> 

S^O 

wO 

o 

X 

a 

o 

Q 

o3 

a 

s 

t-5 

>-5 

Table;  XLIII. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Fat  in  Buttermilk  from  Raw  Cream  and  Pasteurized  Cream  Churnings 

Per  cent,  fat  in  buttermilk 

. , from  pasteurized  cream 

Churning  numbers  1 

from  raw  cream  145  degrees  P.  I 166  degrees  P.  1 185  degrees  P. 

20  minutes  I flash  ! flash 


65 


O oq  00  00  1—1  CO  1—1  1— I 00  10  O CD  CO  CO  CO  00  Oi  O CO  O 10 

1-1  O 1-H  O T-t  O o O O O T-l  O O O oci  T— I O Ofl  tH  CSI 


^ CO  CO  t>.  Tf  CO  1— I (M  O CM  00  O 'cf  xo  T-<  <N  CO  O 1— 1 10  O 

1— I O CM  O O O 1-H  O 1— I O O 1— I o O CM  CM  1— I CM  CM  ca  CM 


CM  icf  CM  O ^ 10  00  10  00  CO  CM  1— I CM  CO  CO  O 00  CO  10  CO  CM 

1— I O CM  1— I O O O O O O 1— I O 1— I 1— I CM  CM  1— I 1— I i-H  1— I CM 


CO  Tf  T^n>.  CO  CM  CM  Tf  CO  O CO  O O 10  10  to  CO  tO 
O O 1— I O o O rH  O O 1— I O O O 1— I 1— I CM  O 1— I o o o 


00  O to  to 

O CM  CM  CM 


CO 

05 


CM  CM  05  tH  i-H 
I-H  r— I O 1—1  1—1 


to  to  to 

1— I 1—1  CM  CO 


CO  05 
OCM  CO 


00 

CD 

O 


00 

O T-l 


O 1— I 


OOCMCOO'c}^OOCMCOOT^^OOCM 

CMCOCO'M^'^'^tOtOCOCOCOI>» 


t^i— itoo5Cor-THtoo5CQr~i— itoo5C^i— itoo5cot^i— itoo5Cor-pDto 

CMC0C0C0-^''ft0t0t0C0C0t>-tr^l>-00  05  05  O5OOi— li-Hi— ICMCM'^tO 

1—1  1— I 1—1  1— ( 1—1  I-H  I-H  1—1  1—1 


COO-^OOCM  CDOtJIOOCMCOO  T}HOOCOO'!fQOCMCOO'^OOCMCDCM-^ 
CMCOCOCO-«Cf  '^t0t0t0C0C0t>*t^t^00  05  05  05OOi— li— li— ICMCM'^tO 


tOCrrC0l>r,-HtOO5COt^i-HtOO5’' 
CMCMCOCO'^  'i^i'-^totocococo 


66 


^ g 

O oj 


o 

O 


O 

b/) 

• S 

o 


m 

I 

> 

I — I 

w 

K-r 

pq 

< 


Oi  OOCTSCH)  •>— I C^COt^r^  1 

1 <33 

S >> 

t— 0:1  o ci  03  a:i  oo  GO  Oi  tio  CM  oo  o CD  o o 

<03 

o 

0 0 T— f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 th  0 T— 1 T— 1 0 

1 

1 

02 

03 

'O 

1 

1 10 

1 CO 

«fH 

cDocx)ioi'-co(MT33u:)i-OT-i'oiHcooo(Mco)oa3oa3 

ID) 

O 

Tti  Ttc  10  ^ ^ ILO  TJ1  T:fH 'Of  CD  CD  CD  Tti  ^ 'Of  CO 'cf 'Of  CO 

s 

1 rH 

a> 

L0G0)L0H0OL!0l0OOOO3iD)OOi003OOOO 

CD 

So 

02 

mois 

ure 

XOOOCMtM'CfcMCM'ofCiqO'Of'ofrfCDOOHOOi— J 
'of»0'of'cf'cf':fCO''fCOc6cO^'cf(M<Mc6':f'33'MCO 

CO 

'O 

rH  '^H  tH  rH  rH  rH  t-H  rH  rH  rH  rH 

rH 

o5 

10 

<MOt^t^C0CD03CX)CDC0CMa3(M<M>D»(M'— ICO'^liO 

>0(M':fa3CDCMO(»CDl:^CO'ofCOCOi— ICOCDOOO 

CM 

i-H  (M  i-H  rH  CM  Cvi  CO  (M  (M*  (M  (M*  (M  (m'  CM  (M*  04  (M  rH  (M 

cm' 

00  03  rH  CX3(M  rHLO'ofJ-Ot:— 

0 

a 

c3 

O03CX3G0rHOt^t:^t^t^(03»-C:)HfC000(MCjD<MCX)C0 
1— lOOOrHrHOOOCDOOOOOrHOrHCDO 

CM 

X3 

.t^ 

c3 

00 

03 

ID) 

10 

CM 

0 

r! 

t^rHO(MrH(M03Hft'rl0)10C0C0CD03»0)L0f^O03 

00 

.2 

<L> 

TfiOlO'cflOTf'rf'ofHfTfCDiOCD'cfCOlOCOlO'cfCO 

Hf 

CQ 

dj 

1 

CM 

4^ 

JLQCOlOrHLOOOOUOOl-O^OOl-OOiOlOiOO 

03 

03 

tuo 

CDCDOOOGOCOOrHt^i— IOOCDCDtHCDCOOOCDO 

rH 

o. 

'O 

lOCOTf'3f»dcOCO^'cf':f'^’'cfCDCMCO'cf»0'rfrHtd 

lO 

T~^  tH  rH  '^H  rH  rH  rH  "rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  tH  rH 

tH 

o 

s 

^-( 

00 

li^ 

s 

THt^rf(MO03CMCD'cf03'CfOCD»0t^rH03lC0  03C0 

03 

c3 

OOCDC^CMCM'CfCOCOOOi— l00  03(MiOO-CD':f'Cf03l^ 

CO 

i-H(MrHrH(04cM‘(M(04(MC0CM’(Mo4cMC0(04(M‘rH  CM 

CM 

03  CJ3  03  »-0  ICO  (M 

0 

>, 

C30300CD03(0303C000t^00CDlOr-f03O03OrHO 

<u 

a 

c3 

OOOOOOOrHCDOOOOOOrHOrHrHrH 

00 

a 

'O 

<MCMrHCDO'Cf0003>D)CT3rHl0)C0r^OCDrHTHCD00 

i 

<03 

o 

(M 

g 

00i0)Lc:)'cflO'cf'^''^^Hf':fCDiOCD'^'^'3fiOCD»O^ 

Hf 

4^ 

T— |Lc:)rH»QcCDOO»0»000»OiOO>D)LOOCD»OiD) 

rH 

cDCM(MC»(M'H3'CfCDC33'3^COD]lOCXDOCD'CfOCDOq 

CD 

<v 

_r 

'^cdcO'CfCDCOCOHfCo’iOCO'cf'-fCMCOlLd'cf'CfCMCO 

-Cf 

THrHrHrHrHrHrHTHrHrHrH-,— IrHrHT-HrHTHrHrHrH 

iOCD»0'cft^cr3(M'cfOOCMOCDrHl:^i-HOCM(30COO 

CM 

lf3 

'TtH 

'^0«D'3fCDCDrHC003l'';CX)C!3(M03OC0GMC0<OC003 

ref 

“ 

tHtHtH  'cMCOCMCOCMCOCMCMtHCOCOCMCMCMtHCM 

cm” 

10 

s >> 

00  03  CD  ref 

§ 

o ^ 

COCDt— IC0303C73'^CMC0rH0303t^i-0OC0(MHfOC0 

rH 

03 

THT-HrHOOOrHrHrHTHOCDOOrHrHT— IrHrHi— 1 

F! 

CM 

tH 

0 

;-t 

KOCO'CfCDCOCD'CfrHCOCO'CflD)03COOOi—liOr^OCD 

t-H 

o; 

115 

'cfCO'^'CfHf'cf'OfiOCDCDiiOlOC^lOCOCD'cflOlO'Cf 

iO 

O 

CD 

c 

3 

OiOiOOrHlOiOrHlOO»OiOOOOiLQ>0»D)JOlO 

CD 

?H 

W 0? 

CDCX3'Cf^_OHf0qCDCM^03CM(MCDC0CJ3rHC003CM 

10 

*o  3 

1010lLCOTlicdldcOCD'^‘cOCM’'Cf’cOc6cO'cfCDCO(M"»D 

ref" 

c 

D 

a 

rH  tH  tH  rH  rH  rH  tH  t-H  tH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH  rH 

4^2 

CM<MtMCDrH03JC:)C33CO'cH'CfOClHCDt^rHCOCOCDlCO 

10 

c3 

CDC0CDrHCDC0'0f0C)(M'CfHfC003CDCDiOCDOrH'3f 

0 

02 

rH  C04  rH  rH  CM  rH  r-l  CO  cm'  <o4  CM  <04  rH  CM  cm”  tH  CM*  (Oi  rH  rH 

cm’ 

'ofOOCMCDO'cfOOCMCDO'cfGOCMCDO'CfOOCMCDO 

CMCMCOCOHf'of'CCLc:)iOCDCDcDl'ri>.GOOOOO(D3030 

bi 

0 02 

1 S 

■D 

a £! 

COr^rHLOC33Ci0t^rH'L<0iO3COt^iHl-C0C!3C0l'r^rHlOO3 

bfl 

cd 

1 a 

CMCMCOCOCO'cf'CfL010lOCDCDlHl''-l'^OOCX)0303<03 

£ 

; 3 
) a 

CMCDc5'';fOc5cMCDCDHfCX)CM*CDCD'CfodCMCDO'CfC!d 

CMCMCOCOCOr^l'ofL{0»iOiOCDCDl'-l>-l^G000030303 

P 

< 

rH»COCOrCOt''^rH>OCOrcOI>rrH1003COf'^rH»Oi03COl^ 

CMCMCMCOCO'0fHf'CflCt)lOCDCDCDl^t>*0OCX)C!OO3O3 

Tabi,!:  XLV. — Showing  Average  Butter  Fat  Constants  of  54  Churnings  of  Butter  when  Fresh  and  After 

Storage  at  -6  Degrees  F.  for  One,  Three  and  Five  Months 


67 


I 1 ^ 

Tti  10  (M  10 

COi-iTfiOCM 

CD  00  0 t-H  0 

Tjt  CO  CO  CD 

1 

iO 

-SrlS  ‘=1 

CO  (M  00  LO 

CD  1—1  CD  0:1  00 

iO  CO  CO  0 

CD  ^ Ttl 

t-H 

00  cn  02)  t-h  ai 

00  CD  CD  1—1  CD 

00  CD  0 1-H  CD 

0 0 l-H 

0 

06 

t>;  06 

i>5  od  od  00 

id  od  od  od 

06 

i S"- 

00  00  00  00  QO 

00  00  00  00  oc 

00  00  00  00  00 

00  QO  00  00 

QO 

oq  T— 1 

CD  coco  CD 

CO  i-H  CO  ^ 

CD  iO  CO  1—1 

CD 

-QTJ  S 

rH  ^ CM  0 

CO  1— 1 D1  Xfi  0 

00  ^ (M  ^ (M 

QO  TcfH  CM 

0 

3'S  « 

CJ>  t-H  tH  t-H  t-H 

<0  rH  t-H  rH 

0>  rH  rH  rH 

0 0 1-H  1-H 

1-H 

3 ^ 

“ ft 

CO  CC)  CO  CO  CO 

0 CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  ^ CO  CO  CO 

CD  CD  CD  CD 

CD 

10  IlO  T— 1 00  l>» 

00  OifO  0 1— 1 

CO  iO  iO  00  00 

QO  0 CO  iO 

ir^ 

'O  § 

00  lo  CTi 

(X)  10  CM  0 CD 

1-H  00  CO 

CO  iO  l-H  CM 

iO 

0 iO)  1— 1 CO 

CD  CD  1—1  CM  CD 

iO  ':d  00  00 

iO  CD  02  CD 

l>- 

CM  CM  CO  CO  CM 

1-5  1-5  CM  CM  I-H 

1-H  1—5  1-H  t-H  1-H 

t-H  l-H  1-H  l-H 

10  a:>  10  oj  CM 

0 1—1  T-H  CD  CM 

CO  CO  iO  0 CO 

0 QO  CO  Tjl 

02 

QO  crj  00  CO  0 

CD  CO  00  CO  1— 1 

CD  CD  r-  1-0  CD 

iO  QO  CD  iO 

QO 

S >2 

^ CO  CO  CO 

'CT'  ^ CO  'CP  rf 

"2  CO  CM  CO 

^ H 

i HJH 

*5  *-P  n 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  cd  CO  CO 

cd  cd  cd  cd  cd 

cd  cd  cd  cd 

1 cd 

M - 

'Cfi 

^ Ttl  rf  iiSH 

HJH  HJH  TCfH  ^ 

'CtH 

bB  0 

CM  05  T-l  CO  1—1 

CO  0 CO  CD  CO 

10  OC)  0 iO  iO 

0 00  CO  iO 

! 

02 

a -e  rry 

CM  CM  in  0 10 

CD  iO  1— t 00  iO 

CM  1-H  0 iO 

<D>  QO  CD  CM 

l-H 

CM  CO  CO 

l-H  CO  CO  t-H  CM 

Hti  CD  CD  iO  iO 

CO  CO  ^2 

-so" 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

cd  cd  cd  cd  cd 

cd  cd  cd  cd  cd 

cd  cd  cd  cd 

cd 

>S  ft  bfl 

(U 

'O 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO 

CM  CM  0 CM 

1— 1 CO  1— 1 ^ CM 

CD  00  00  0 CD 

CD  TCtH  Tcf  CO 

CD 

00  CO  CO  io 

CD  1-H  02)  CD  CO 

l-H  CO  00  0 CO 

0 HtH  CD  l-H 

CO 

G OJ2 

CO  CQ  l>-  00 

xfi  0 CD 

00  CD  !>; 

iO  t>;  iO  l-H 

Ip 

§'-^  a 

CD  0 0 T-^  0 

CD  1-H  cd'  0 CD 

0 CD  0 CD  CD 

CD  CD  CD  1-5 

CD 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO 

02  « 

CM  CM  CM  CM  CM 

CM  CM  CM  tM  CM 

CM  CM  CM  CM  CM 

CM  CM  CM  CM 

CM 

1 

CO  0 'Cfi 

00  0 ^ 1-H  CO 

CO  Tf  l-H  t-H  CM 

CD  TCfH  CD  1-H 

2 a 

1— ( 1— ( 0 0 CO 

CD  00  (D  0 

iO  Tif  CO  CD  00 

0 CD  iO 

0 

0 oci  1—1  io  th 

l>.  t>.  00  iO  CD 

CD  iO  !>;  00  CD 

0 02  l-H  CM 

l-H 

id  id  io  id 

'd  ^ HtH  id  id 

H ^ H 'd  -d 

id  id  id  id 

10 

5 D 1 

a 

1 CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO 

Ol  00  CO  '?f 

Tjt  00  00  0 00 

0 iO  10  0 00 

l-H  CD  'CfH  rH 

1'- 

Jh  a; 

CD  00  00  Oi 

1— 1 CO  CD  CO  CD 

'CT'  0 00  00 

02  CD  iO  0 

CO 

p 

« <u  a 

K G 

1 CD  00  0 1-H  0 

CD  CD  0 00 

Dl  CO  CD  CD  t-H 

CM  CO  l-H  CM 

CM 

CD  cd  o'  CD'  <0 

<D  OC)  CD  0 CD 

0 0 CD  0 CD 

CD  CD  CD  CD 

CD 

CO  CM  CO  CO  CO 

CM  CM  CM  CO  CM 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO 

02  02 

02  02 

VI  -m 

M2  M2 

,C-C,C 

tCpCiC 

•t-i  ;h 

4->  -M  -M 

-+-»+-»  -M 

H->  H-J 

-M  4->  -|H 

0 V 

^ a a a 

. a a a 

. 0 G 

a a a 

CB  4J 

1 -S  0 

tC  0 0 0 

tC  0 0 0 

id  0 0 0 

bB  p 
<1,0 

ft  s s s 

ft  S S S 

(D  D ^ 

ft  S ft  d 

ssss 

i HH  1— H CO  iO 

] 

^ 1-H  CO  iO 

HH  1-H  CO  iO 

1-H  CO  iO 

nd 

0 

N 

m 

02 

F 

• 

s 

•S 

02 

g 

rd 

C3 

VI 

M2 

A 

0 

a 

C3 

02 

d 

CM 

cd 

d! 

02 

rH  ft 

0 

02 

02 

> 

s ^ 

M2  bf) 

M2 

bX) 

S ®3 

02 

£ S 

02  03 

02 

C3 

C3 

<d  ^ 

ft  ^ 

p 

ft  ft 

0 t> 

'S  <1 

bfl  £ 

So 

02 

!> 

02 

d 

10 

iO 

iO 

CD 

QO 

rH 

rH 

68 


<D 

> 

O tH  C^  ,— 1 05  O CO  lO  lO  CVI 

C/5 

bjo 

■g  s 

Sa 

a5CMa5co(Mc^iioa5THa5i^Ttt 

rHT-Hcj5C5C5a5a5oqt^coi:r:io 

CO  CO  CO  o^‘  CO  CO  CO  eo  CO  CO 
rf  rt<  Tf  rt<  Ttt  rft  T^i  Tf  Tti  Ttt  Ttt 

■s-'^ 

M 

C 

; 

O 

CO  CO  K5  1—1  rH  lO  (M  CO  CO  tH  oo  CO 

'o  p 

CO  tH  (Ofl  Ttl 05  CO  (50  <50  I 

(U 

(Ca  iq  CO  !>.  !>.  !>.  !>.  OO  (05  <05  I-H  OvI 

cu 

C3  ^ 

t-5  r-5 1-H  1-5 1-H  t-5  t-h  1-5  th  1-5  (oq  c^i 

b o 

03  -t-' 

CUC/i 

o 

<D 

CO  CD 

a 

2 g 

6^  d 

50)  1— 1 CO  (C^  O CO  lO  CO  rfH  <50  O CO 
(oq  05 o CO  <^^  (50  o <^^  50  <50 

cq  cq  50  50  cq  cq CO  CO 

-2 

O) 

'S  2 S 

coco(cococococo(cicoc<5coco 

n ^ 

a 

a ^ ^ 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

o 

o 

-a 

s 

•I 

50  <50  (50  50  O O 1^' rfl  (Cq  CO  o 

5^50  0 1:^0(50  0 1—150  1—1(35  50 

o 

« p 

<o  50  cq  cq  <q  (cq  50  cq  (o  (O  <50 

tc 

Ss 

(35  05  (35  (35  <0  <0  (O  (O  1-5  ^ 1-5  1-5  i 
(oq  (^q  (oq  (cq  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  ! 

r5  <L> 

a > 

5-1  ’S 

M-h  •*“* 

OP 

o 

ft 

oq  <M  (oq  (cq  (^q  (^q  (cq  (^q  <^q  (oq  <^q  (3q  j 

1 

1 

C nj 

m 

1 1 

c 

fl 

cd 

o3 

® -g 

o CO  (^q  50 <50 C0 1— 1 o o <cq  M 

5-1 

CO 

11“ 

Tf  5^  CO  1— 1 o <^q  CO  (35  <cq 

<u 

O) 

(h 

'R  ^ ^ ^ ^ 

CO 

C 3 

«M 

Cl 

0^  , 

«“s 

(X)CDCO‘tO'X>‘X>CDCO':0'X'COCO  ! 

1 

iSm 

^ 1 

Crt  . 

C 

^ 1 

' 1 

03  1 

1 

o ^ 

(D 

o 

<50  (35  CO  (^q  CO  50  (50  (35  CO  CO 

O 5-h 

3 rr^'S 

O o CO  CO  (M  50  <50  CO  1— 1 'Cfi  CO 
(50C75(35<5q(350i-Hi-;T-l<Oq(OqCO 
|>;t^t^|>:|>:C5d<5d(5o'(5<3(5<D(5d<5d  I 

, 2 
^ ' 

o‘S  " 

X3 

O 

00<50(50<50(50(50  0'JC5000<50<50<50 

5-1 

(D  C 

:3  £ 
pq 

: a 

QQ 

odine 

umber 

t^O'^CO(35i— ICOOOCOrfiCOQO 
(35(35COCO'^0500C^1— li— l(cq 

(U 

2 

cqcqcq<q<5(D(cq(35i-Hi>-(35(35(35 

03 

co(y:j(:oco5oco5ocd505oco50 

c3 

""'  p 

COCOCO  cococococococoeoco 

^ o3 

ft 

S:> 

2 

> Oh 
< ^ 

(M 

«w 

CO 

O 

bjo 

w 

' a> 

2 ^ t-t 

0''!f<^q(^qt^C01C^lO<50(35CO^- 

.S 

b:*.  b> 

; bx) 

*3^  2 ,0 

1— ITr50<50''croOrJHi— l(CqTfi(35(35 

C3 

ill 

O 

(^q1-^cqcqcq(^q(^qTl^5q5q5qcq 

u-t 

(V 

<35(3505(35(35(35i35  05  05  05<35(35 

(3q  (^q  (^q  (cq  (3q  (^q  <^q  <^q  (^q  (M  <^q  (^q  i 

o 

> 

< 

Ph 

I 

1. 

> 

■iJ 

h4 

CO 

X 

.p 

O p 

^1— l(^qC0T^^50C0t>•00<35O1— 1 

® ° 

ft  I-H  1—1 

w 

tuo  a 

«ft 

i-r 

< 

m 

< 

Table:  XLVII. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Nitrogen  in  Butter  Which  is  Not  Precipitated  by  Bromine,  Copper 
Sulphate,  Phosphotungstic  Acid  and  Tannic  Acid,  and  Per  Cent.  Total  Nitrogen  in  Butter,  when 
Fresh  and  after  Storage  at  -6  Degrees  F.  for  One,  Three  and  Five  Months  Respectively 

(Butter  made  from  raw  cream) 


69 


1— 1 crs  CM  Oi 

05  0 CO  !>■ 

iO  10  CO  0 

CM 

50 

00  10  0 rH 

C50  0 CM 

<05  tH  00 

05 

05 

<05 

T— 1 T-H  T-H 

CM  r— 1 1—1  1—1 

CM  1— 1 1— 1 i-H 

<50 

<50 

C50 

0!3 

0000 

0000 

0 0 0 CO 

<0 

<35 

<0 

S 

iO  ^ 10 

0 00  0 <^0 

CO  10  COCO 

<50  50  0 0 

50 

50 

§ 

1 

S ! 

0 »0  <0  CO 

1—1  10  CM  10 

CM  50  CM  50 

CO  CO  rH 

rH 

rH 

CO  T-H  T— 1 1— ( 

CO  1— 1 1— 1 1— 1 

CO  1— 1 1— 1 1— 1 

CO  1— < t-H  T— 1 

<05 

<05 

05 

<05  i 

0 

2 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0000 

1 0 

0 

0 

0 |i 

ii 

a 

CO  00  00  CO 

<05  05  (TO 

05  >0  0 50 

CM  50  50  rH 

0 

<P) 

0 

i 

0 j 

»o  T— 1 

5-0  CM  CO  0 

CM  CO  <50  0 

CO  CO  t-H  CM 

CM 

CO 

CO  0 0 

(OD  CM  1— 1 1— ( 

CO  CM  C5  1—1 

CO  CM  rH  i-H 

0 

0 

0 

0 1 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0000 

1 i-H 

” 1 1 

.Sf 

‘3 

0 

Ij 

10  CO  iQ  CSl 

0 ^ »o 

CM  CM  05  CO 

<J5  CM  t^O 

-,—1 

0 

rH 

50  j 

0 (M  10  05 

CM  CO  0 

50  50  <05  CO 

CO  rH  0 rH 

CO 

CO 

CO 

oa  1—1  0 CO 

CM  i-H  0 1— 1 

CM  1— 1 0 1— 1 

(CM  t-H  rH  rH 

0000 

0000 

0 0 <05  0 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

a 

1' 

T! 

j! 

a? 

'cf  0 00  10 

<0  CO  1— 1 0 

GOCM  0 

0 rH  50  50 

50 

0 

50 

0 

■tH  0 

rf  CM  00  05 

50  CO  <05  1—1 

<CO  0 CM 

CO 

50 

CO 

50 

CM  1-1  0 rH 

CM  i-H  CO  0 

CM  I-H  CO  I-H 

<;M  t-H  rH  t-H 

t— 

*§ 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

CO 

^ !| 

a 

-M 

0 ^ 00  ^ 

<50  CO  CM  0 

50  50  CO  0 
i-H  CM  0 0 

<05  <50  0 <50 

<50 

<50 

- ii 

00  CM  <05 

<50  I-H  <05  0 

CO  50  rH  i-H 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO  1 

CO 

t-H  1-H  0 CO 

t-H  rH  tH 

CM  1—1  1—1  1—1 

CM  T-H  i-H  i-H 

a 

<v 

0 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

CO 

0 

1 

*5 

C5  CM  — 1 0 

CM  0 

0 <50  0 CO 

CO  50  CO 

50 

rH 

50 

i 

0 

• 

CM  t'-  (05 

(05  ^ CO  05 
CM  1—1  CO  0 

0 CO  <50  CO 

<50  CO  CM  0 

CO 

CO 

CO 

r* 

c3 

CM  rH  0 0 

CO  I-H  <0  I-H 

CM  rH  i-H  i-H 

0 

0 

0 

O* 

a 

0000 

COOOO 

0 0 0 CO 

0000 

rH 

u 

O) 

PM 

(M  CO  CM 

CO  th  at) 

CO  50  50 

50  50  <50  CO 

50 

CO 

rH 

50 

CO  »0  CT5  CM 

t>*  CO  t-H 

<50  1— 1 CO 

<0  rH  rH 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO  i 

r-l  1— 1 0 1— 1 

t-H  rH 

1—1  t-H  i-H  1-H 

CM  i-H  rH  i-H 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 0 0 CO 

0 

0 

0 

^ Ii 

— * 

’S 

’0 

"S 

*15 

D 

c; 

p 

P 

cl 

CIS 

C5 

'15  .2 

15.2 

15.2 

[S. 

4J 

c3  CO 

-M 
lO  05 

-M  ^ 

P <Z2 

P <B 

p 

p 

p 

p 

‘0 

pC  ij) 

0:  fclfl 

<15 

bfl 

0 

15 

bo 

0 

H-H 

<15 

0 

;h 

4-5 

<15 

bo 

0 

-|H» 

a 

a 

ft 

05  w 0 

S 

15  05  0 C3 

t§s 

P -M  <15 
15  <»  0 c3 

P-M  <D 

15  CC  0 P 

’S 

0 

•S  fH  ^ C5 

^ 05  ft— 1 

rj  15  ft— 

.9  0 

.9  15 

^ 15  ft.r-l 

'p  ■ 

"p 

'p 

*p 

Sh 

A . 

S ft  fl 

S ft  a 

p ft  P 

P ft  55  P 

"p 

'p 

"p 

'p 

1 

0 ft  0 fl 

0 ft  0 p 

0 ft  0 p 

0 ft  0 p 

-M 

4H 

4H 

4-55 

fH  03 

u O-P  :3 

O'p  P 

fH  of5  P 

0 

0 

0 

0 

wop^e 

mopLHH 

H 

H 

e 

Eh 

2 

m 

1 

t»  1 

CO 

CO 

Ci 

1 

Pp 

Ip 

Ip 

tP 

rP 

.Q 

+5' 

H-5 

H-H 

-M 

4-5 

4-5> 

•w 

a 

p 

p 

P 

P 

p 

0 

0 

0 

0 

fP 

0 

0 

0 

CO 

rH 

rH 

rH 

CO 

rH 

p 

bn 

05 

P 

P 

p 

15 

P 

P 

p 

< 

'4H 

1—1 

CO 

5c:) 

fH 

«HH 

rH 

CO 

50  1; 

Tabli:  XLVIII. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Nitrogen  in  Butter  which  is  not  Precipitated  by  Bromine,  Copper 
Sulphate,  Phosphotungstic  Acid  and  Tannic  Acid,  and  Per  Cent.  Total  Nitrogen  in  Butter,  when 
Fresh  and  after  Storage  at  -6  Degrees  F.  for  One,  Three  and  Five  Months  Respectively 
(Butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  145  Degrees  F.  20  minutes) 


70 


CD  1-0  00 

CO  00  ^ CD 

CD  0 CD  0 

0 

DO 

Tf 

00  CD  CD  0 

TtH  1— 1 CD  i-H 

Ol  CD  CM 

M 

rH  0 tH 

tH  1— ( 1—1 

CM  1— 1 T-(  1— 1 

t— 

M 

0000 

CD  0 0 0 

CD  0 0 0 

CO 

0 

0 

a 

'2 

CD  0 0 0 

CO  0 10  0 

C)  0 0 0 

0 0 

0 

+ 

1 

0 

00  CD  OD  0 

1C.D  CO  OD  T-l 

CD  CD  0 CM 

1-0  1-H  (OI 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

00  ^ CD  T— 1 

CO  1—1  0 ^ 

CO  t-H  I-H  I-H 

1-H  1 — 1 rH 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

0 

0 

0000 

0 CD  0 0 

0 CD  0 0 

000 

1 0 

1 ■ 

0 

0 

0 

s 

a 

CD  CD  0 CD 

oq  0 00  0 

CD  l-O  0 CD 

CO  0 CO 

i 

+ 

CD 

1 

CD  ^ 0 

<OJ  rJH  OD  CD 

C CO  CD  CD 

1-H  CO  CD  (OI 

1 10 

10 

ic 

10 

CO  ^ 0 rH 

CO  I-H  0 1— 1 

CO  T-H  0 1-H 

CO  1-H  0 1-H 

: CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

0 0 CD  0 

0 0 0 CD 

0000 

CD  0 0 CD 

i 0 

0 

0 

0 

is? 

'S 

0 

10  DO  OD 

'dh  oa  th  1-0 

CD  QO  00  0 

0 00  CD  0 

1 

i 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 0 

CO  1—1  CD 

10  CM  I'-  CD 

00  1-H  CD  CD 

1 iO 

iO 

10 

10 

pO 

lO 

■t— I ^ 0 CD 

I-H  1—1  CD  0 

1-H  1-H  0 t-H 

1-H  1-H  0 1-H 

10 

10 

10 

10 

t3 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 0 0 CD 

1 0 

0 

0 

0 

33 

a 

+ 

T} 

O) 

CD  00  CD 

10  Hti  0 ^ 

00  0 <DD  0 

CO  10  0 0 

0 

1 

1 

3 

0 DO  CD 

CD  CD 

0 CM  00  0 

CM  CO  CO  1-H 

OI  CD  0 0 

C<l  0 CD  C> 

CM  T-l  0 1— 1 

CM  1-H  1 — 1 t-H 

ft 

'3 

a> 

0000 

CD  0 0 0 

0000 

CD  0 0 0 

0 

0 

0 

i 

a 

OD  CS| 

0 CD  CD  CD 

1-H  0 0 CO 

CO'  -rH  -If 

1 

0 

t 

+ 

0 

00  CD 

CD  00  0 

CD  CO  CD  1-H 

10  CD  CD 

CD 

1 

Ci 

t-H  -H  0 0 

I-H  t-H  C>  1— I 

1-H  CO  1-H 

1-H  0 t-H 

1 

d 

Sj 

0 

0000 

0000 

0000 

000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

'2 

CD  00  CDD 

CO  CD  'Hf  I-H 

0 00  0 

1 

1 CO 

CO 

I • 

10  CDD  10  00 

00  t-h  CD 

CD  C 10  0 

10 

10 

10 

r-l  CO  CD  0 

t-H  I-H  CD  0 

Ol  1-H  0 1-H 

ID^ 

R 

QJ 

i 

0 0 0 CD 

1 

0 0 CD  0 

0000 

1 0 

1 * 

1 

CD 

CD 

i 3 

10  00  tH  CO 

10 

CD  10  CD  CM 

CD  1-J  10  CO 

i 

1 CD 

+ 

1 

CD 

IDO  ^ Oi  10 

00  CJI  CD  IlO 

00  CO  CD  CD 

0 10  CD  00 

00 

GO 

pO 

■1— 1 1— 1 CD  1— < 

T— < T— < T-H 

1-^  1-H  0 rH 

CM  1-H  1-H  t-H 

0000 

CD  0 0 0 

CD  CD  0 CD 

0000 

1 0 

0 

0 

0 

'S 

"S 

"0 

3 

3 

3 

0.2 

03.2 

03.2 

+H  4H> 

H-> 

4H 

3 V} 

3 t/2 

3 

35  ^ 

35  bn 

35  bn 

^3  -4->  O 
Cl  CC  o 03 

•S  "S  « 

s ft  a 

o ft  2 

O c3 


c o ^ 

.2  o 

^ C ft.r^ 

p:  ft  ^ a 

o ft  2 s 

^ O ^ c3 


13  ^ c 

o C3 

o ft.2 
ft  ^ 31 
ft  O iZ3 
O 03 


.2 

03  c/2 

^ bn 

sgs 

02  C»  o 03 

•2  o ft.2 
2 ft  35 
O ft  O C5 
Oft  03 

PQQ^H 


3 

o 

bn 


3 3 3 


O O 


Table  XLIX. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Nitrogen  in  Butter  Which  is  Not  Precipitated  by  Bromine,  Copper 
Sulphate,  Phosphotungstic  Acid  and  Tannic  Acid,  and  Per  Cent.  Total  Nitrogen  in  Butter,  When 
Fresh  and  after  Storage  at  -6  Degrees  F.  for  One,  Three  and  Five  Months  Respectively 

(Butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  165  degrees  F.  flash) 


71 


to  0 1—1 10 

0 0 to 

0 tH  0 0 

0 

+ 

1 

1 tH  0 

'cf  Tft  Qc  0 

Cl  1— 1 

t-H 

1-H 

<» 

(M  t-H  0 i-H 

(M  1—1  0 1—1 

(M  1—1  0 1—1 

l>- 

02 

0000 

0000 

0000 

C5 

<0 

0 

.9 

'5 

0 ^ iO  CO 

00  0 CO  0 

CO  CO  CO  0 

0000 

(Cl 

(Cl 

1 

+ 

0 0 Cl  I-H 

0 T— 1 Cl  1— 1 

(M  1—1  Cl  1-H 

CO  CM  <0  1-H 

10 

iO 

1— 1 0 1—1 

(M  t-H  0 rH 

CM  1-H  0 1-H 

CM  1-H  1-H  1-H 

C? 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 0 0 CO 

0 

0 

0 

0 

a 

0 0 0 CO 

0 0 CO  0 

CO  GO  10  QO 

0 

0 

0 

CO  10 

CO  CX)  (M 

to  to  0 

00 

Cl 

CO 

0 

CO  T— 1 0 0 

CO  1— 1 0 tH 

CO  1-H  0 1— 1 

(Cl 

(Cl 

(Cl 

0000 

0 0 <0  0 

0000 

(O 

0 

(O 

'3 

0 

CO  CO  0 

rf  0 0 CO 

0 c<l  to  1-H 

0 0 Ttl  iO 

0 

+ 

1 

+ 

S 

00  0 »0  Cl 

Cl  0 CO  Cl 

Cl  (M  Cl 

<C1  CM  CO  (Cl 

0 

1 

T— 1 tH  0 CO 

1—1 1—1  0 0 

1-H  1-H  0 0 

1-H  1-H  0 0 

CO 

to 

CO 

to 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

a 

-a 

2 

00  0 00  LQ 

oq  CO  Cl  (M 

0 0 0 'Cfl 

CO  ^ 0 CO 

Cl  CO  0 CO 

GO  0 

8 

+ 

+ 

y 

CO  10  0 (M 

CO  10  (M 

1 

CM  0 1—1 

(M  1— 1 i-H  1— 1 

(M  1-H  1-H  .1-H 

CM  1-H  1-H 

CX 

CO 

CX 

CO 

’S 

*3 

! 

0000 

0000 

0000 

000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

I ^ 

i 0 

0 00  ILO  0 

0 0 Cl  cx 
0 1— 1 0 

1-H  <M  CO  0 

0 CO  0 0 

0 

1 

1 

+ 

a 

TJH  <0 

0 1-H  CX  Cl 

0 1-H  Cl  0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

T-H  T-l  0 0 

(M  1—1  0 1—1 

CM  1-H  0 0 

0000 

CM  1-H  0 1-H 

' £3 
; 0? 

1 2 

0000 

0000 

0(000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

■•5  i 

(M  LO  0 ^ 

OI  to  CO  icfi 

10  TtllO 

i:^  CX  CO  1— 1 

TJH 

'Ct< 

'Cf 

i 

(M  0 QO  00 

CM  0 00 

to  0 (Cl  Cl 

1-H  0 Cl  (Cl 
(M  1-H  0 0 

1 G 

Cl? 

tH  i-H  0 0 

1— 1 1— 1 0 0 

0000 

1 ^ 

0 

! ci> 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Pk 

CO  00  CO 

to  0 (M  1— 1 

0 to  0 1-H 

0 CM  00  (Cl 

0 

1 

+ 

1 

0 Cl  CCl  (M 

CM  0 0 CO 

to  >0  1-H  CM 

(Cl  CO  -rH  lit' 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

1— 1 0 0 t-H 

tH  1—1  T-H  1-H 

to 

CO 

to 

to 

0000 

0 0 <0  0 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

s 

[ft 

‘0 

’S 

'S 

CCS 

03 

o3 

c3 

: 

s 

Cl." 

01 

01." 

01  .2 

+1> 

•+-> 

H-J+k 

£ 

C3  CC 

o3  m 

o3  CO 

0 m 

ft 

ft 

s 

p 

a 

O) 

P* 

.S 

0:  &X3 

'S 

O)  cc  0 

ft  bfl 

ft  +1  « 
0 0 ft 

ft  i5J3 
ft  Gr0 

ft  -3  ’S 
01  CO  0 c3 

ft 

-4-^  0 

<1^  ^ 0 C3 

01 

bjo 

0 

01 

bJO 

0 

H-H 

01 

bi) 

0 

u 

01 

boo 

0 

H-l 

*3 

0 

•S  0 

^ a;  Ph*>-h 

.2  « 
rj  a>  ft.ft 

•S  ^ '2  01 

0 01  ft— 

.9  fH  ift  0 

^ (31  ft  — 

"ft 

.’ft 

"ft 

"ft 

S-l 

A . 

S ft  2:^  C 

ft  ft  2^  ft 

ft  ft  fO  0 

ft  ft  ft 

C3 

0 

e3 

hH 

0 ft  0 c 

0 ft  0 fl 

0 ft  0 0 

0 ft  0 ft 

+H 

HH> 

fH  0^  C3 

?H  0^  ft 

fH  of3  C3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

WOPhH 

ffiOPnH 

H 

e 

O) 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

=! 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

0 

+H 

4H 

4H 

-M 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

0 

.ft 

0 

0 

0 

ft 

0 

0 

0 

m 

(-3 

0 

0 

c« 

0 

0 

0 

h/1 

O) 

ft 

ft 

ft 

31 

ft 

ft 

ft 

;-i 

U 

-H 

CO 

1-H 

CO 

10 

Table)  T. — Showing  Per  Cent.  Nitrogen  in  Butter  Which  is  Not  Precipitated  by  Bromine,  Copper 
Sulphate,  Phosphotungstic  Acid,  and  Tannic  Acid,  and  Per  Cent.  Total  Nitrogen  in  Butter  When 
Fresh  and  After  Storage  at  -6  Degrees  for  One,  Three  and  Five  Months  Respectively 
(Butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  185  degrees  F.  flash) 


72 


00  eo  CO 

QO  Tfi  CO  0 
CM  CM  OCM 

0 Cd  0 0 

1 

+ 

0 

i-H  0 0 

CO  CO  0 CO 

7—1 

7—1 

CM 

7—10  ^ 
0000 

CM  T-H  0 7—1 

CM  t-H  7—1  t-H 

!>. 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

! 

.9 

'3 

0 0 

Tf  CX)CM  0 
0 CM  Cd  CM 

CO  CM  0 CO 

0 0 CO  20 

0 

1 

+ 

0 

0 CO  Cd  CO 

7—1  CO  0 CM 

CO  1—1  CO 

00 

CM  7—1  0 1—1 

CM  t-H  0 T-H 

CM  1— 1 1— 1 7— 1 

CM  7—1  7—1  t-H 

!>• 

0 

4^ 

0000 

0000 

0000 

<0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Fh 

C3 

G 

0 10  0 rft 

10  0 0 0 

t^OCM  0 

CO  CO  20  TH 

0 

+ 

+ 

+ 

Cd  7— 1 00  Oi 

00  CO  00  7—1 

00  l>- 

CO  Ttl  Cd  Cd 

0 

0 

0 

0 

CM  7—1  0 0 

CM  7—1  0 0 

CM  T-H  00 

CM  7—1  0 0 

0000 

02 

02 

02 

02 

'S 

0000 

0 00  0 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

CO  t-H  0 0 

Cd  10  7— 1 

Cd  0 7— 1 0 

0 'cH  7—1  20 

0 

, 

+ 

+ 

^ CO 

Tti  Gd  CO  00 

20  0 Cd 

O*  0 00 

00 

00 

00 

C20 

•4-> 

7—10  0 0 

^000 

ssss 

t-H  t-H  0 0 

<0000 

20 

20 

20 

20 

"9 

d 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

^ 00  CO 

0 0 1— 1 QO 

C20  t^CM  0 

0 20  Cd  Cd 

20 

0 

+ 

1 

7— I 0 00  0 

CM  0 0 Cd 
CM  T-H  7—1  0 

CM  'i— t 7— 1 0 

rf  CM  7—1  0 

CM 

rft 

S 

CM  T-H  0 0 

CM  T-H  1—1  1—1 

CM  t-H  7—1  7—1 

*3 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

0 

a 

CO  0 0 CO 

cjj  0 CO  CO 

00  7—1 10  0 

20  0 !>•  CO 

+ 

, 

0 

1 

CO  0 CO  CX3 

10  0 00  0 

CO  Cd  00  0 

l>-  0 00  0 

Tfl 

rti 

Tti 

CO 

r-H  T— 1 0 0 

0000 

7—1  7—1  0 7—1 

7—1  0 CO  7—1 

7— ( 7—1  <0  7—1 

CO 

CO 

CO 

0 

tn 

0 

0000 

0000 

OOOCO 

0 

0 

0 

*3 

CM  0 0 0 
^ T-H  0 0 

CO  0 00 

OOt-iO 

CO  7— 1 Cd  cd 

7-1  OCM  0 

0 

+ 

+ 

"f 

UO  CM  Cd 

CO  CM  0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

<M 

7—1  7—1  O)  7—1 

0000 

7—1  7—1  0 0 

t-H  7—1  0 0 
0000 

7—1  CO  0 7—1 

!>• 

(>. 

a> 

a3 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

<=> 

0 

Ph 

ir^CM  0 Tti 

CO  7—1  0 0 

CO  0 'dH  0 

0 CO  TfH  0 

CO  7—1  CM  0 

00 

00 

00 

C20 

7—1  0 0 CM 

CO  Cd  0 CO 

'cH  7—1  0 CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

'O 

7—1  0 0 7—1 

7— 1 0 1— 1 7-H 

7—1  7—1  7— t 7—1 

7—1  1—1  7—1  CO 

CO 

8 

CO 

CO 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0000 

0 

0 

0 

’S 

’S 

'S 

"3 

CO 

c3 

C3 

c3 

a 

c 

c; 

3 

3 

<X>  .rt 

02  .« 

02.2 

02.2 

03  02 

-v* 
o3  CO 

o3  CO 

a to 

a 

a 

a 

a 

’3 

OP 

a 

^ &X) 

O 

^ &X) 

^49  S 

a-i3  3 

A feX) 

a43  3 

02 

fciX) 

0 

Vi 

02 

bx) 

0 

V 

02 

bx) 

0 

V 

02 

buo 

0 

V 

.9 

O)  cc  0 

02  CO  0 03 

02  c«  0 

02  CO  0 c3 

•rH 

r2 

•rH 

O) 

0 

•2  « 

•2  f-c'S  0 

0 02  ft.r-i 

•2^-5  0 
a 02  ft.a 

•2  02 
a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

S ft  a 

S ft  c«  a 

a ft  a 

a ft  * a 

"a 

"a 

"a 

"a 

HH 

0 ft  2 a 

0 ft  0 a 

0 ft  0 a 

0 ft  0 a 

-V 

-v> 

4-2 

-v> 

f-i  O-ft  c3 

vi  c3 

V of3  C3 

^ a 

0 

0 

0 

0 

EH 

H 

(- 

a 

m 

» ! 

CO 

CO 

J 

A 

-a  1 

a: 

a! 

•a 

P 

-v> 

-l-s 

-M 

-v> 

•v» 

u- 

4 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

0 

fen 

CO 

a> 

0 

2 

0 

s 

0 

2 

^a 

CO 

02 

0 

2 

0 

2 

0 

2 

< 

Vi 

r— 4 

CO 

20 

Vi 

CO 

20  1 

73 


^ <u 

m .> 

C tj 
cu 

C P-i 

u 

tn 

c3  O 

^ OJ 

'S.& 

(1) 


a 

flj  aj 


C 

(U 
CJ 

Vh  <U  (U 
(U  Vh  J_| 


(U  Vh  ^ 

^ o ^ 

CUMH 

X . a; 

CO 

s 

<v  <u  , 

-J-J  5-1 

.t:;  <u  tj 

OhQ  n 

(U  VO  w 
u I 
P-I  +-> 

O (D 
C bJO 
_ oJ 
C Vh 
(U  O 

t: 

buO<I 

• S t3 

o 


w 

i-r 

w 

< 


ft  o3 

Cl  S' 


g.SP 

tH  « 

C!.q_, 


OOeOtM  CD 
rH  o 05 
od  1^05  1-5 

C^  1— I T— 1 

1-1  oo  o 

t>.05  KD 

05 1-5  cd 
cq  1— 1 1— 1 1— 1 

O O CO  OO 

CD  oq  o CD 
oiodci'^ 
cq  1—1 1—1 1—1 

CO  05  cq  OO 
cq  1-H  «>.  o 
cq'  o'  cd  id 

CO  cq  rH  rH 

O'^COTf 

I-H  lO  »0  »jO 

oiQcqo 

o lo  CD  O 

IDOOTt^CO 

cqo5ifti-H 

tH  t>^  1-H  cd 

cq'  od  cq 

cdoicio' 

CO  r-l  tH  1—1 

CO  tH  1—1  1^ 

C0 1—1  th  cq 

050  CD 
<M(M  O 

o cq  05 

O 1-H  CD  o 

OO  CD  O 

C5q  !>•  CD  tH 

ococqi-H 

iq  coco  05 

cq  CD  i-H  t>^ 

cq  CDCq'  CD 

cDcd  CD 

id  i>5  !>: 

CO  1—1  1—1  1—1 

CO  1— 1 1— 1 T— 1 

CO  1—1  1—1  1—1 

CO  rH  rH  rH 

O5  0ocqco 

o h:)  oo  o 

o cq  o 

rH  CD 

o ^ (M 

cqcqcDo 

locqoc-^ 

rH  CO  tH 

'^‘  i-H  t>^  t>^ 

id  cq  <o  o 

cq'cdo^o 

id  cq'  1-5  ft 
cocq  ft  ft 

COCM 

cocq  th  1— 1 

cocq  th 

olocq  05 

rJH  CO  1— 1 

1—10  0 

CD  CD  05  00 

OO  lOC^  o 

05CDoooq 

ftCDO 

rH  iq  CD  cq 

CD  CD  t^oq 

od  05  cd 

cdocd 

idodcd'd 

cq  1—1  1—1 

cq  1— 1 1—1 

cocq  1— ( 

CO  ft  ft  ft 

oooo 

ID  t—  1— 1 lO 

CD  O O CD 

1— 1 CO  CD  CV| 

t>.  OO  OO  CD 

CD  O;  iq  05 

CD  oq  o CD 

05  CD  O 

o CD  cDcq 

cd  odcq' 

cq'  CD 

oq  1— ( 1— 1 1— I 

CO  I-H  1—1  1—1 

cq  T—l  rH  1—1 

cocq  ft  ft 

"rf  CO 

OO  CO  00 

o 00  o cq 

TJI  o OO 

cq  CD  CO  CO 

1— 1 lO  cq 

t>;  05  O 

o cq  oq  o 

cd  CD  i-H  ci 

1-5  cd 

odcDcdcd 

o o ^ id 

cq  1—1 1— i 1—1 

cq  I-H  I-H  1—1 

cq  1—1  1—1  rH 

CO  cq  ft  ft 

05  uo  lO 

ID  lO  05  CO 

CD  OO  1— 1 l>. 

lO  05  CO 

1-H  CD 

1— 1 cq  CD 

1-H  lO  CD 

05  cq  CD 

CD  1-1  CD  od 

i>5  cd  CD  od 

od  cq  05 

CD  id  1-5  05 

cq  I-H 

cq  T-t 

cq  1-H 

cq  ft  1— 1 

cq  05  o 

O t-H  OO 

CO  TJI  |>.  CD 

CD  OO  O CD 

O 1-H  i-H  CD 

lo  o o cq 

CD  oq  CD  CD 

oq  oq  iq  oq 

cq‘  O cd  CD 

cd  cq'  id  o 

hh  cd  id  od 

l>5  cd  CD  CD 

cq  cq  1— I rH 

cq  cq  1— 1 cq 

cq  cq  1— 1 th 

cq  cq  1— 1 ft 

s 

’S 

'S 

05 

*s 

C3 

03 

03 

c3 

<D  .a 

05  .a 

05  .a 

05  .a 

-M  -M 

-ft  +3 

-ft  ft 

ft  ft 

03  M 

o3  CO 

o3  CO 

o3  cc 

iC  5y) 

^ bfl 

a 5« 

a ta 

ft  9^3 

f§s 

a ft  c5 

05  w o o3 

05  OO  0 03 

05  CO  Q c3 

05  CO  o 03 

•9  o 

CH  05 

.9  « 

r;  05  ft.-( 

.9  ^ '9  05 

a 05  ft.rl 

•9  ^ '9  o 

0 05  ft— 1 

9 ft  C3 

9 ft  »5  a 

a ft  a 

a ft  05 

O ft  O fl 

o ft  o d 

o ft  2 a 

o ft  2 a 

f-i  03 

o^a  03 

t-i  o-a  a 

MOPhH 

WOPhH 

-a 

CO 

a 

m 

a 

-ft 

ft 

ft 

a 

a 

a 

ift 

CO 

05 

o 

o 

o 

s 

a 

s 

ft 

«ft 

CO 

lO 

Table  LIT — Showing  Nitrogen  not  Precipitated,  Expressed  in  Percentage  of  Total  Nitrogen  in  Butter  When 
Fresh  and  After  Storage  at  -6  Degrees  F.  for  One,  Three  and  Five  Months,  Respectively 
(Butter  made  from  cream  pasteurized  at  145  degrees  F.  20  minutes) 


74 


OJ 

■!— I CO  0 ^ 
rf  CD  04  00 

00  'CM  CO  04 

00  (02  00  "cM 

CD  <D  'CM(04 

'll  0 GO  -rM 

t'';  'CM  -icM  GO 

CO  "cM  GO  rH 

a; 

00  iO  0 04 

GO  CD  rH  'cM 

(02  rH  CD 

CD  GO  (04*  CD 

> 

04  T— I 1—1  T— I 

04  rH  t-H  rH 

(04  rH  rH  rH 

CO  rH  rH  rH 

00  00  Tf  CO 

CO  'CM  10 

(04  l>«  tH  rH 

d 

0 t-h  04 

'CM  02  0 CD 

l''^  (04  HO  (04 

00 

t-5  CO 

04*  HO  'cM  LtO 

(02  CD  CO  CD 

d 

CO  1—1  rH  1—1 

CO  rH  rH  rH 

(04  rH  rH  rH 

Sfl 

>4-3 

CO  CD  0 

CD  rH  HO 

(04  CD  rH  0 

HO  HO  0 

d 

10  CD  CO 

t'r;  CD  00  rcM 

rH  CD  hM  HO 

CO  'CM  HO 

CC  CD  oi  0 

CD  CD  (02  rH* 

(x5cD  (D(04 

CD  rH*  (04 

03 

0 

CO  T— 1 r— 1 

CO  rH  rH 

CO  rH  rH  rH 

rH  rH  rH 

<1? 

1— IC0  0C04 

CO  rH  Ttl 

t'-  rH  HO 

CD  (04  HO 

4^  rjx 

04  CO  10 

00  !>;  CO  00 

HO  04  'CM  rH 

(04  'CM  'CM  (02 

T3 

04'  CD 

CO*  'CM  0 CD 

rH  hM  02  rH 

CO  'cM  02  (04 

0.9 

CO  1— 1 rH 

CO  rH  rH  rH 

CO  rH  rH 

CO  rH  rH 

S 

03 

5, 

0 cn  'CH 

'CM  ^ 0 

Hf  GO  GO 

(04  HO  CD  02 

d " 

O;  OJ 
p +-. 

s 

i— 1 04  0 CO 

CO  CO  02  (04 

CO  04  rH  rH 

tr  rM  CO  rH 

CD  02  C0‘  'CM 

'cM<D04t''^ 

(X3  CO  'cM  CO 

(04*  rH  CD  G(D 

P.  03 

4-d 

0 

(Ol  T— 1 T— 1 t— 1 

(04  04  rH  rH 

(04  04  rH  rH 

C0(01  tH  rH 

P S' 

^ 03 

• 

tH  LfO  04 

0 0 CD  0 

rH  rH  (04  tH 

CO  -hM  rH  'cM 

g 

00  iO  CD  02 
ir^  CD  02  00 

!>;  t'r;  'CM  0 
(04  02  (D 

rH  (04  CD  HO 
GO  CD  rH  CO 

(04  HO  GO 
(02  GO*  CO  'CM 

;h 

04  1—1 

(04  rH  rH 

(04  rH  rH  rH 

(04  tH  rH  rH 

'd 

0000 

'cM  0 rH  0 

GO  HO  HO 

CO  0 (D 
'CM  <D  (02 

<V 

CO  D-  0 04 

rH  (D  rr.  HO 

(04  HO  (X2  rH 

CO 

l-Q  ^ 04*  CO 

0 (04  HO 

GO  (04  CD* 

rH  CO  'CM 

04  04  rH  T— 1 

(04  (04  rH  rH 

(04  rH  rH  rH 

(04  rH  rH 

a 

’S 

<v 

P4 

0000 

0 HO  0 HC) 

HO  GO  -ctl  0 

0 

Oq  !>;  GO  00 

'CM  O;  0(0  (D 

'CM  (04  HO  'CM 

a 

0 04*  iO  t-H 

041—1  1—1 

rcM  HO  02  04 

CD*  tM  CO 

G 

(04  rH  rH 

(04  rH  rH 

a; 

tuo 

p 

0 0 »o  0 

0 0 HO  0 

0 0 CD  CD 

HO  HO  (D  0 

- Xi 

TM  rH  CD  i-H 

CD  CO  rcM  (02 

rH  CO  CO  0(D 

CD  CO  HO  HO 

rH  >0  rH  C72 

CO  CD  (04  02 

CO*  (04  06 

HO  02  CO  CO 

04  rH  1— ( rH 

(04  rH  rH  rH 

GNI  rH  rH  (04 

(04  rH  rH  (04 

3, 

3 

*s 

‘3 

*3 

*3 

M 

e3 

q 

q 

q 

d 

C3 

o S, 

C2  .2 

02." 

02 

-M  4H 

•+H  HH 

'Phh 

B 

c3  m 

q CO 

q cc 

q 02 

*s 

G3  bJO 

pG  t>X) 

pG  &iO 

O) 

a 

fgs 

•t§s 

t§S 

P3  4h  0 

G 4H  (D 

G HH  (12 

G -|H  12 

.S 

02  CO  0 

(D  («  0 G 

D 32  0 q 

02  02  0 q 

'S 

0 

*Ph  0 ft*rH 

.a^^o 

rH  (12  a-r-l 

.a  ^ *3  <D 

G 12  ft.G 
G ft  2? 

.a  ^ "3  12 

H i ft'^H 

;h 

PM 

S a 

a ft  G 

G ft  ^ G 

0 ft  0 q 

0 ft  0 q 

0 ft  2 G 

0 ft  0 q 

fH  0 -ft  c3 

p 0 ft  q 

p oft  q 

p oft  q 

WOdEH 

PQOGEh 

WOdH 

O) 

Tfl 

CO 

G 

G3 

G3 

HH 

HH 

-p 

G 

G 

G 

0 

pG 

0 

0 

0 

<v 

to 

CO 

02 

a 

a 

g 

< 

Pi 

CO 

HO 

\ 


75 


pq  ^ 

rH  ^ 


f!  O 

oT 

^ G ^ 

"o  O ^ 

rZ  nj 

r-'  1^  q:^ 

*4-1  <3^  . 

O fe 

(L>  ^ cA) 

G 

qj  ..  <i-> 

Ji  SO 

(V)  ^ 

•S  o;-^ 

C 

"S  o m) 

cA)  , a; 

S O.^ 

5- 

a . ^ 

q3  qj 

Sog 

Q <u 


u 

;-i 

qj 

2 

*+4 

< 

c-o 
• S c 

03 

o 

f—i 

j:p 

CO 

1 

<U 

u 

1. 

1 — J 

d 

1 — 1 

1 — 1 

<v 

oj  O 

<V  M-l 

^ .. 
a 

vh  -d 

o <n 


w 

a 

m 

< 


a> 

OO  (M  qO 

CO  1-H  CO 

CO  1-H  lO  CO 

CD  1-H  oo  C^ 

d 

LO  1— 1 CTi 

1-j  iq  t-q  CM 

OJ  TiHiq  cq 

CD  lO  Tf 

lO  CO  O CO 

r-l  CO  1-H  id 

gi  odcM  tj5 
04  1-H  tH  1-H 

cdodcdid 

> 

CSl  rH  -r-i  r— 1 

Ol  1-H  1-H  1-H 

CO  1-H  1-H  1-H 

4^ 

4^ 

<1 

(OJ  O O 

Ot-H  coco 
(XD  tq  oq  oc 

oo  lO  c^  o 

rt 

Ttl  CO  O OO 

oo  oo  CO  lO 

.r-. 

o CO  o "'q^ 

cd  cd  1-H  -ijl 

cq  oi  cm’  id 

CO  t-H  1-H  1-H 

a 

CO  rH  rH  rH 

CO  1-H  1-H  1-H 

S) 

4^ 

CO  CO  CO  O 
CO  OO  CO  iO 

cocooo 

CO  CO  o o 

CD  O CO  O 

a 

I>;  cq  HtH  t— 

Cq  ^ cq  Cq 

cq  O cq  Cq 

coco(ciio 

l>-‘  CM  TJH 

cd  id  cm'  ''3H 

o cd'  cd  'ctl 

CS 

4^ 

CSI  tH  r— 1 1-H 

CM  1-H  1-H  t-H 

CM  1—1  1-H  1-H 

CO  tH  tH  1-H 

o 

<D 

O ^ ^ 

lO  CM  lo 

Htl  TJ*  lO  O 

lO  'If  CD  O 

4J  CC 

CO  CO  *— I 

t>-  cq  !>;  CM 

cq  1-H  cq  o 

cq  cq  rH  CD 

^ bfi 

<s 

*« 

CO  LO  t>^ 

I>1  CD  cd  CM 

cd  t>;  td  ^ 

cd  td  od  1-1 

o.a 

a> 

CO  1—1 

CO  —1  1-H 

CO  1-H  1-H 

CO  — ^ , 1-H 

o S 

c3 

43 

+4-3 

o< 

*3 

CP 

O CO  CO  o 

CO  CD  o cq 

CD  CO  CO  '0> 

CD  o CO  CO 

a 

o oo  oo  o 

CO  cq  o iq 

CO  CO  CO  1-H 

cq  cq  cq  oq 

o i 

44 

1-1  (>:  o6  id 

CM  CD  O id 

T-l(dcM'id 

CO  CM  1-H  t-H 

-H  o cd  id 

q1 

CO  1—1  1— 1 

CO  -H  T-H  1-H 

CO  CM  rH  1-H 

ftS 

4-» 

o 

a a* 

CO 

4-3 

001^01 

lO  lO  <0>  1C) 

CqCM  O C^ 

CM  ID)  O 

'Cl 

C! 

lo  o CM  CO 

tq  t>-  iq  t--; 

oq  rH  iqcq 

cq  Cq  cq 

O' 

od  <o  CM  o 

od  od  cm'  CD 

cd  oi  cm’  id 

cd  cd  id 

g.a> 

OJ 

0*4-1 

s 

A 

CM  CM  1-1  1—1 

Ol  1-H  1—1  1-H 

CM  tH  1-H  1-H 

C^l  rH  rH 

£ O 

-a 

o o O o 

tH  00  o 

O O lo  o 

C^  lO  o 

<V 

ti 

O 'Cf  (>•  O 

lO  Cq  CM  ^ 

o oo  cc 

lo  iq  oq  cO 

C3 

CO 

O lo  O CO 

od  id  1-H  id 

od  CD  I-H  CM 

od  CD  CM  Hf 

CM  1— 1 T— 1 1— 1 

CM  tH  ^ 1-1 

CM  1-1  1-H  1-H 

CM  ^ 1-H  rH 

Pi 

*3 

;h 

f-) 

Pi 

O O o o 

OlO  o o 
— H oq  tq  oq 

1-H  CD  O O 

CC  CM  CM  no 

% 

1-H  tqCM  oq 

1-j  iq  cq  iq 

cq  1-H  Cq  Cq 

d 

C'J 

O-  Tt*  1-H  1-H 

od  -rtl  O 1-H 

cd  coed 

o id  cd  cm’ 

d 

1-H  1-H  t-H  1-H 

1-H  t-H  1-H 

CM  1-H  1-H  1-H 

CO  tH  rH  tH 

S) 

o 

44> 

?c 

O lo  lO  o 

o o o o 

O O lO  o 

CD  lO  O lO 

o 

cq  lo  Oi  1-0 

cq  qq  CM  oq 

'cH  oq  rq  OJ 

iq  iq  Cq  cq 

td  id  Hli  cc 

cd  id  cd  o 

id  cd  cd 

CD  id  od  cd 

1-H  1-H  1-H  t-H 

CM  1-H  1-H  CM 

CM  CM  1-H  1-H 

OJ  CM  rH  CM 

j 

■js 

;c 

"S  . 

"S 

'S 

'S 

w 

Cw 

c3 

03 

d 

d 

o .2 

o> 

-IH*  4H 

-HS+S 

-H 

-mIm 

B 

c3  ai 

33  CO 

72  CO 

03  M 1 

*3 

-d  ts} 

a bD 

a bfi 

a)  bJO 

QJ 

E 

f§s 

't§s 

f§s 

^ -4-3 

H HH  O 

.9 

a ^ O 

O'  ^ o S3 

O so  o sc 

o S«  O 03 

<v 

O 

•Ss-S.2 

3 o a-iH 

.3^  fnrg  o 

^ O a-rr  ! 

a c 

a 55  fl 

a 55  c 

=3  a 55  fl  1 

cage 

fH  o<p  cs 

'O  a o a 

o a 2 c 

o ao  q 1 

i O c3 

;h  o£l  03 

Hi  O fn  03  1 

WOPhch 

PPQPn^n 

! 

i 

(H 

W 

44 

•Jl 

m 

s 

OI 

03 

-hs 

-jH 

-tH 

o 

p 

c 

o 

c 

a> 

bjO 

o 

q 

q 

«< 

'HH 

— 

CO 

ID)  1 

Table  LIV. — Showing  Nitrogen  not  Precipitated,  Expressed  in  Percentage  of  Total  Nitrogen  in  Butter, 


76 


<L> 


c 

o 

§ 


1 

a; 

biO 

rt 

u 

O 

-4-» 

CO 

<v 


c 

<u 


Average 

10  (M  00  -Tf 
tH  00  CO  00 
CO  Tji  tJh 

04  I— 1 T— 1 1—1 

0 CD 

CTl  04  04  CO 
CD  l>^  04*  40 
04  rH  i-t  1-1 

>0  CO  iH  TJI 
CO  D CO  iH 
trIcDCOTji 
04  rH  iH  iH 

CD  rH  D 

40  00  40  CD 

06  hJH  to 

04  iH  tH  rH 

0 0 0 CD 

rH  CD  04  0 

Hft  00  40 

rt 

n-l 

i-H  40  tH 

(DTTCiqO 

.-I 

00 

0 TiH  0 10 

04  CO  l>^ 

iP  05  CO  cx5 

c 

CO  T— 1 r— t T— ( 

CO  iH  iH  1— ( 

CO  tH  tH  iH 

tiC 

l>*  CD  0 04 

CD  CD  CO  0 

D CO  1—1  0 

CO  D D 

a 

. 

Oc  iO  CD 

40  04  Tti  04 

tH  00  40  0 

CO  CX2  00  CO 

i>^  04  t-h 

l'^  t^oi  CD 

D*  CO 

CO  1-H  tJH  ol 

a 

4-i 

0 

04  T— 1 I— 1 04 

04  1— 1 — 1 ,H 

04  iH  1— I 1— ( 

CO  04  1-H  iH 

0 

T— 1 00  00  'cft 

CD  ref  00  rH 

"Ttl  40  rH  D 

40  1-H  0 40 

-M  02 

04  00  00 

CD  TJJ  GO  i-j 

40  rH  l>. 

40  1— H 40 

bfl 

-c 

04  04*  00  0 

iH*  Tj^*  00  i-H* 

!>;  40  <05  (CO 

05  CD  0 0 

cp 

0 .9 

® s 

C3 

CO  rH  T— 1 

CO  iH  tH 

04  rH 

04  iH  i-H  iH  1 

p 

00  04  CD 

CTi  00  04  00 

1— 1 /'ij'  1— ( 

,-H  CD  D 00 

(h 

£ 

■.—1  04  CO  0 

CDCOCO 

rr  04  04  40 

CO  05  D CO 

(n 

« E 

10 

40  04  CD  04 

40  CD  0* 

04  40 

05  CO  CD 

04  T— ( T— 1 T-H 

04  tH  iH  1— 1 

04  rH  tH  iH 

04  rH  i—H  1-H 

<V 

i-, 

P.  K 

c 

tJO 

(V 

02 

J • 

0 rf  CO  04 

CO  40 

1— 1 tH  CO  1-H 

1-H  D 00  CO 

n 

c 

40  CO  T— 1 00 

!>.  t>.  CD  Ol 

00  00  1-H  40 

04  00  <D 

0/ 

oi  '^i^*  04*  04* 

oi  od  04* 

0*  40*  40  CO* 

04*  CD  CD  'dH* 

LO 

a> 

04  I”!  I”! 

04  1— ( rH  tH 

CO  1-H  rH  1-H 

CO  rH  i-H  rH 

00 

p 

-o 

0 0 0 0 

rc^t  04  CO  0 

40  04  0 <D 

TtH  04  0 0 

a 

0 CD  rfi  0 

00  CD  CD 

04  04  CO  D 

CO  D CD  tH 

C« 

CO 

40  40  cri  CO 

40  CO  CD 

CD  ■'ct^'  CO  »0 

•>^40  00*  CD 

04  r-l  r— 1 

04  04  1-1  rH 

04  rH  rH  tH 

04  tH  1-H  1-H 

<L> 

N 

'5 

'u 

p< 

0 0 40  0 

0000 

40  tH  0 0 

0 40  rf  0 

<y 

■ 0 

73 

CO  0 CO  CO 

CO  0 0 

00  t>;  0 D 

<D  00  1-H  CO 

-4-* 

(/) 

a 

<D  04  'Cj^* 

04  t^<D 

04  40  CO  CO* 

CO  00  CO  HfH 

rt 

p 1 

04  1— 1 T-l  1— 1 

04  1— 1 r-i  IH 

<04  rH  tH  iH 

04  i-H  rH  iH 

Oh 

1 ^ 1 

1 bx) 

1 0 

)£ 

cd 

40  0 0 40 

0000 

0 40  0 40 

0000 

CJ 

CO  1-H  TSi 

CO  CO  -rf 

<05  04  CO  1-H 

1-H  r-H  rtH  HJH 

u 

(x5  "^  '^*  ai 

tH  TlH  40*  CD 

04  CD  1-H 

40  00  <05  <D 

CJ 

1— I 1— ( T— 1 1— ( 

04  rH  rH  04 

04  1-H  iH  04 

04  1-H  rH  04 

r-; 

0 

i 

u 

j 

M-h 

1 

1 

1 

1 

s 

S 

S i 

'TJ 

*5 

'S 

*« 

*S 

cd 

i 

CQ 

cd 

p 

Cd 

p 1 

£ 

1 

P 

od 

<14  .S 

12  .2 

02 

+34^ 

HH4J 

-P  1 

J— « 

a 

Cd  w 

d m 

Cd  02 

P m \ 

<u 

’S 

rC  tD 

Xi  bfl 

rP  bfl 

rP  t£ 

0) 

a OrQ 

ft  P-O 

ft  2x3 

ft  2x3  ! 

Qi 

p? 

75  p.P 

■Tq  p.p 

pq 

p +j  « 

P+j  0 

P 42>  <12 

P 4H  <15  I 

.9 

04  «2  0 03 

a>  CO  0 P 

<12  02  0 P 

02  «2  0 P 

*S 

•M 

0 

•9  « 

P C4  A>p 

•2  ^ '5  Cd 
P D ft.P 

•9  ^ 'S  12 

P D ft.H 

^ 'S  12  ‘ 

P D ft.P 

A . 

S a c 

P ft  02  p 

P ft  02  p 

P ft  w P 

1 

0 ft  0 a 

0 ft  0 Q 

0 ft  0 P 

0 -ft  0 p 

1 

fH  o-C  cd 

fH  O-P  P 

Pi  0-^  P 

Ph  O'P  P 

PPOP^^ 

WOPhEh 

0) 

m 

w 

p 

rr 

X 

rP 

-M 

4H 

-4H 

P 

P 

p 

0 

rP 

0 

0 

® i 

I? 

02 

H 

p 

p 1 

bjo 

<14 

P 

P 

p < 

f-H 

t+H 

rH 

CO 

40 

COLl-F''" - - ■■ 

UNiVhR'''’  ''  ' 

I J \<<t^  - ^ 


^ltl;  . ■ 

,NO  IS 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


Bulletin  No.  209,  Vol.  XX 
October,  1917 


COMMERCIAL  FEEDING  STUFFS 


Published  by  the  Station; 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY  AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT  STATION 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 
Joseph  D.  Oliver,  President,  South  Bend 


Fay  S.  Chandler Indianapolis  Warren  T.  McCray... 

Charles  Downing  Greenfield  James  W.  Noel 

John  A.  Hillenbrand Batesville  George  W.  Purcell  ... 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs Bridgeport  Andrew  E.  Reynolds. 


WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D President  of  the  University 


Kentland 

-...Indianapolis 

Vincennes 

•Crawfordsville 


ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(Under  Legislative  Act  of  1909) 

U.  R.  Fishel,  Hope D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort 

State  Poultry  Fanciers'  Association  State  Corn  Growers'  Association 

D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville • J.  P.  Prigg,  Daleville 

State  Dairy  Association  State  Live  Stock  Association 

H.  H.  SwAiM,  South  Bend... -Indiana  Horticultural  Society 


ADMINISTRATION 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S.,  Director 

Harry  J.  Reed Assistant  to  the  Director 

Nellie  Tracy Administrative  Assistant 

Mary  K.  Bloom Bookkeeper 

AGRICULTURAL  EXTENSION 
George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A.,  Superintendent 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader 

Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A Associate  in 

Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 
Mabel  L.  HARLAN..Ass’t  in  Agricultural  Extension 

ANIMAL  HUSBANDRY 
John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S.,  Chief 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A 

Acting  Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A 

Ass’t  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

BOTANY 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B.,  Chief 

George  N.  Hoffer,  M.  S Associate  in  Botany 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph.  D Associate  in  Botany 

Luna  E.  Allison,  B,  S ..Assistant  in  Botany 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S.,  Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

DAIRY  HUSBANDRY 
Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S.,  Acting  Chief 

Howard  W.  Gregory,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G.,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 
Harry  M.  Weeter,  M.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Sherman  L.  Anderson,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G 

Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

ENTOMOLOGY 
James  Troop,  M.  S.,  Chief 
Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S.,  Ass’t  in  Entomology 

HORTICULTURE 
Laurenz  Greene,  M.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S Associate  in 

Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 
Joseph  Oskamp,  B.  S.,  Associate  in  Pomology 


POULTRY  HUSBANDRY 
Allen  G.  Philips,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Charles  S.  Brewster,  M.  S 

Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

SOILS  AND  CROPS 
Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S 

Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S 

Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 
Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S...:...Associate  in  Crops 
Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Associate  in  Soils 

STATE  CHEMIST 

Wm.  j.  Jones,  Jr,,  M.  S.,  A.  C.^  State  Chemist 
Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.i..Acting  State  Chemist 
Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S. 2.... Deputy  State  Chemist 

Carleton  Cutler,  B.  S.2 First  Deputy 

State  Chemist  and  Microscopist  (Feeds) 
Ralph  B.  Deemer,  B.  S. 2. .Deputy  State  Chemist 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.2 Deputy  State  Chemist 

Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S,2..Deputy  State  Chemist 
J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S.2....Deputy  State  Chemist 

Samuel  P.  Thornton,  B.  S,2 

Deputy  State  Chemist 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.2 

Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Paul  R.  Bausman,  B.  S.2 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Harry  D.  Burnside,  B.  S.  A.2 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  S.2 

Inspector  State  (Ilhemist’s  Department 

VETERINARY  SCIENCE 
Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V.  M.,  Chief 
David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C. ..Associate  Veterinarian 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 
Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S.  ..Ass’t  in  Serum  Production 

Leo  P,  Doyle,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Animal  Pathology 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 
Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Ass’t  Veterinarian 

DETAILED  BY  U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF 
AGRICULTURE 

Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  Insect  Investigations 
John  J.  Davis,  B.  S.,  Entomological 
Assistant  in  Charge 

John  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.,  Entomological  Assistant 
Walter  H.  Larrimer.  B.  S... Scientific  Assistant 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Seed  Testing 

Anna  M.  Lute,  M.  A Seed  Analyst 


1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 
2 Died  August  31,  1917 


COMMERCIAL  FEEDING  STUFFS 


W.  J.  Jones,  Jr.^ 

E.  G.  Prouex  C.  Cuteer  R.  B.  Deemer  J.  H.  Roop 


The  enactment  of  the  Indiana  Feeding  Stuffs  Control  Law  by  the 
legislature  of  1907  was  accomplished  at  the  request  of  the  farmers’  organ- 
izations and  the  feeders  of  the  State. 

After  ten  years  of  active  enforcement  of  the  law,  if  the  comments 
and  opinions  received  from  purchasers  of  feed,  manufacturers,  agents  and 
dealers  are  representative,  the  Indiana  Feeding  Stuffs  Control  law  is  satis- 
factorily serving  the  purpose  for  which  it  was  enacted. 

The  substantial  growth  in  the  sales  of  feeds  from  year  to  year,  to  a 
large  degree  can  be  directly  attributed  to  the  fact  that  Indiana  pur- 
chasers of  feeds  through  the  enforcement  of  the  law,  have  reasonable 
assurance  that  they  will  secure  the  feed  they  purchase, — not  an  inferior 
or  an  adulterated  article. 

OBJECTS  OF  THE  LAW 

The  principal  objects  sought  by  the  law  are: 

1.  To  protect  the  purchasers  of  feeding  stuffs  against  adulterated 
and  inferior  feeds. 

2.  To  protect  the  honest  manufacturer  and  seller  of  meritorious  feed- 
ing stuffs  against  the  dishonest  manufacturer  and  seller  of  adulterated 
feeds. 

3.  To  furnish  purchasers  with  information  which  will  enable  them 
to  distinguish  between  superior  and  inferior  feeding  stuffs,  between  re- 
liable and  unreliable  manufacturers,  importers,  agents  and  dealers  and 
to  promote  the  intelligent  and  economical  purchase  and  use  of  feeds. 

These  objects  are  attained  through  the  following  provisions  and  regu- 
lations: 

1.  By  requiring  all  persons  desiring  to  offer  feeding  stuffs  for  sale  to 
submit  a sworn  guarantee  of  the  minimum  percentage  each  of  crude  fat 
and  crude  protein,  the  maximum  percentage  of  crude  fiber  and  the  name 
of  each  matelrial  each  brand  of  feeding  stuff  will  contain  and  to  attach  to 
each  package  and  furnish  with  bulk  sales  an  official  label,  procured  from 
the  State  Chemist,  setting  forth  said  guarantee. 

2.  By  requiring  that  the  guarantee  be  stated  in  simple  and  common 
terms  understood  by  the  purchasing  public. 

3.  By  requiring  that  the  names  for  feeding  stuffs  shall  not  mislead  as 
to  the  materials  used  in  their  manufacture. 

4.  By  requiring  that  the  amount  of  each  nutrient  and  each  material 
guaranteed  be  furnished,  thus  prohibiting  the  substitution  of  one  feeding 
ingredient  or  material  for  another  at  the  will  of  the  manufacturer. 

5.  By  providing  for  the  securing  of  inspection  samples  of  any  feeding 
stuff  offered  or  exposed  for  sale,  sold,  distributed  or  held  in  the  State  by 
accredited  inspectors  of  the  State  Chemist  and  the  subsequent  chemical 
and  microscopical  analyses  of  same  for  comparison  with  guarantees. 

6.  By  providing  for  detailed  report  of  each  inspection  to  the  manu- 
facturer, agent,  dealer  or  consumer  from  whom  sample  is  secured  show- 
ing the  amounts  of  feeding  ingredients  and  each  material  guaranteed  and 
found,  with  remarks  pertinent  to  the  inspection. 

7.  By  giving  the  manufacturer,  firm  or  person  responsible  for  the 
registration  advance  report  and  opportunity  to  review  the  results  on  all 
samples  found  deficient  or  adulterated. 

8.  By  providing  for  the  annual  publication  and  free  distribution  (to 
citizens  of  the  State)  of  a bulletin  giving  the  results  of  inspection. 


1 W.  J.  Jones,  Jr.,  State  Chemist,  died  August  31,  1917.  The  work  reported  in  this 
bulletin  was  carried  on  under  his  direction,  the  data  being  prepared  for  publication 
by  Mr.  Cutler 


4 


9.  By  limiting  the  analysis  of  samples  to  those  secured  by  the 
official  inspectors  according  to  published  instructions,  thus  insuring  that 
all  inspections  reported  are  representative  of  the  shipments  sampled  and 
on  a comparative  basis. 

10.  By  providing  that  the  State  Chemist  may  prescribe  such  rules 
and  regulations  as  he  may  deem  necessary  to  carry  into  effect  the  full 
intent  and  purposes  of  the  law,  thus  providing  for  the  meeting  of  new 
conditions  which  may  arise  in  the  trade.  ■ 

11.  By  providing  for  cooperation  with  the  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Chem- 
istry, Department  of  Agriculture,  whereby  manufacturers  and  shippers  of 
deficient  or  adulterated  feeds  from  other  states  may  be  prosecuted  directly 
under  the  Federal  Food  & Drugs  Act. 

12.  By  providing  penalties  for  violation  of  the  law’s  provisions. 

PROVISIONS  OF  THE  LAW 

Manufacturers,  importers,  agents  and  dealers  should  give  careful 
attention  to  the  following  summaries: 


Manufacturers 

Registration.  Before  offering  or  exposing  for  sale,  selling  or  distrib- 
uting by  sample  or  otherwise,  any  feeding  stuffs,  coming  under  the  law,  in 
Indiana,  submit  the  necessary  statement  and  certificate  accompanied  by 
fees  and  an  order  for  State  Chemist’s  labels  to  the  value  of  $5.00  or  some 
multiple  for  each  feeding  stuff  registered. 

Making  guarantee.  In  submitting  guarantees  care  should  be  taken  to 
insure  that  those  for  crude  fat  and  crude  protein  are  a minimum  and  those 
for  crude  fiber  a maximum  and  that  they  are  based  on  results  obtained 
by  the  methods  of  the  A.  O.  A.  C. 

In  designating  ingredients  (materials  used)  the  definitions  and  names 
adopted  by  the  Association  of  Feed  Control  Officials  should  be  followed. 

Samples.  Do  not  forward  samples  for  analysis.  The  only  samples 
analyzed  are  those  obtained  by  the  regular  inspectors.  See  samples, 
page  8. 

Change  in  guarantee.  Annual  registration  is  not  required.  When  it 
is  desired  to  change  the  guarantee  for  a registered  brand  a new  statement 
and  certificate  must  be  submitted  together  with  label  order,  fees  and 
authorization  to  cancel  previous  registration.  The  department  reserves 
the  right  to  refuse  reregistration  without  change  in  name  of  feed  unless 
satisfactory  reasons  for  reregistering  are  furnished. 

Maintain  guarantee.  Ascertain  in  advance  of  shipment  that  all  feed 
shipped  into  Indiana  equals  or  exceeds  the  guarantee  for  crude  fat  and  for 
crude  protein,  contains  less  crude  fiber  and  the  net  weight  and  each  and 
every  matei'ial  printed  on  the  official  labels  which  should  be  attached  to  the 
package  and  accompany  shipments  in  bulk.  Guarantees  must  be  main- 
tained. Excess  of  one  feeding  ingredient  cannot  compensate  for  deficiency 
in  another  nor  can  a material  guaranteed  present  be  replaced  by  another. 

State  Chemist’s  Label.  The  label  which  the  law  requires  to  be  pur- 
chased from  this  department  is  the  only  label  which  can  legally  be  used 
in  the  sale  of  feeding  stuffs  in  Indiana,  contains  all  the  information  required 
hy  law,  and  there  should  be  no  other  labels  attached  or  any  statements  on 
containers  or  in  advertising  matter  which  conflict  in  any  way  with  the 
State  Chemist’s  label  as  regards  composition  or  materials  present. 

Kind  of  labels.  The  labels  furnished  are  of  two  kinds,  one  a manilla 
label  for  attachment  to  bags,  barrels  and  similar  containers  and  a gummed 
label  for  cartons,  etc.  These  are  issued  to  cover  25,  50  and  100  pounds  at 
proportionate  rates,  20,  40  and  80  cents  per  hundred  and  the  $5.00  order 
for  any  feed  may  be  divided  into  the  three  denominations  or  into  manilla 
tags  and  gummed  labels  provided  that  the  aggregate  order  for  each  feed 
amounts  to  $5.00  or  some  multiple. 

Attach  a State  Chemist’s  label  to  each  and  every  package  for  each  100 
pounds  of  feed  or  fraction  and  furnish  with  similar  quantities  in  bulk.  The 


5 


fact  that  each  sale  whether  of  1,  2,  5,  10,  15,  25,  etc.,  pounds,  even  if  made 
from  a labeled  larger  package,  must  be  accompanied  by  the  official  label 
should  receive  special  attention. 

Do  not  make  shipments  of  unregistered  or  unlabeled  feeds  expecting 
to  register  and  furnish  labels  later.  The  law  requires  that  registration 
precede  shipment  and  that  official  labels  be  attached  to  the  packages  at 
time  of  delivery. 

Alteration  of  official  label.  The  only  change  permissible  on  the  offi- 
cial label  is  in  the  net  weight  which  change  must  not  exceed  the  amount 
for  which  the  label  is  issued.  Any  alteration  as  regards  name  of  manufac- 
turer or  feed,  composition  or  materials  used  or  more  than  maximum 
weight  for  which  the  label  is  issued  is  a misdemeanor  and  places  anyone 
using  such  altered  labels  in  position  to  be  prosecuted. 

Annual  Report  of  Sales.  Provision  should  be  made  to  have  available 
data  for  reporting  the  amount  of  each  feed  sold  annually  on  blanks  which 
are  furnished  by  this  department. 

Materials  under  the  law.  The  term  “concentrated  commercial  feed- 
ing stuff”  is  defined  to  include  condimental  feeds  and  aU  materials  offered 
or  exposed  for  sale,  distributed  or  sold  for  feeding  purposes  except  hays, 
straws,  whole  seeds,  the  unmixed  meals  made  directly  from  and  composed 
of  the  entire  grains  of  wheat,  rye,  barley,  oats,  Indian  corn,  buckwheat  and 
broom  corn,  wheat  fiour  or  other  fiours. 

Full  text  of  the  law,  rulings  and  working  regulations  of  the  Depart- 
ment in  so  far  as  they  relate  to  persons  or  firms  who  desire  to  offer  feed- 
ing stuffs  for  sale  in  this  state  and  blank  forms  for  making  such  registra- 
tion will  be  furnished  on  request. 

AGENTS,  DEALERS,  DISTRIBUTORS 

The  law.  Before  offering  or  exposing  for  sale,  selling  or  distributing 
feed  in  Indiana  write  for  copy  of  the  law  and  rulings  and  thoroughly 
acquaint  yourself  with  its  provisions  and  requirements. 

Companies.  Before  accepting  the  ageney  for  any  company,  consult 
the  reports  of  this  department  and  contract  to  represent  such  companies 
whose  record  from  year  to  year  shows  compliance  with  the  law. 

Persons  or  firms  who  continue  to  represent  and  purchase  from  com- 
panies with  poor  record  of  inspection  should  bear  in  mind  that  the  person 
offering  or  exposing  for  sale,  selling  or  distributing  the  feed  in  Indiana 
is  directly  res(ponsible  for  feed  so  exposed,  sold,  or  distributed  meeting  the 
requirements  of  the  law  and  that  repeated  purchases  as  above  will  leave 
this  department  no  option  but  to  file  information  with  the  prosecutor. 

Proprietary  and  compounded  stock  feeds  are  often  compounded  in 
part  or  wholly  of  inferior  ingredients.  Agents,  dealers  and  distributors  are 
advised  not  to  sell  or  distribute  feeds,  for  specific  purposes  or  classes  of 
animals,  which  because  of  their  ingredients  are  entirely  unfitted  for  said 
specific  purposes  or  classes  of  animals.  They  will  be  benefited  by  furnish- 
ing feeds  compounded  of  such  ingredients  as  are  adapted  to  the  needs  of 
the  animal  whether  beef,  pork  or  milk  production,  etc. 

Condimental  stock  and  poultry  feeds,  tonics,  relishes,  conditioners,  etc. 
Experiments  conducted  under  conditions  to  give  authentic  and  comparable 
results  having  in  the  large  majority  of  cases  shown  that  the  claims  and 
prices  made  for  this  class  of  preparations  were  extravagant  and  excessive. 
Agents  and  dealers  are  advised  to  sell  same  only  after  careful  investigation 
and  with  moderation  in  claims  as  to  results  which  may  he  expected  from  their 
use. 

Labels.  A reproduction  of  the  official  label,  which  must  be  purchased 
from  this  department  and  is  the  only  label  that  can  legally  be  used  in  the 
sale  or  distribution  of  feeds  in  Indiana,  will  be  found  on  page  8.  Do  not 
accept,  offer  or  expose  for  sale,  sell,  deliver  or  distribute  any  package  or 
any  quantity  of  commercial  feeding  stuffs  which  does  not  have  attached  or 
which  is  not  accompanied  by  a legal  label  for  each  100  pounds  or  fraction. 


6 


Dealers  cannot  shift  the  responsibility  for  selling  unlabeled  feed  back  to 
the  manufacturer  if  unlabeled  shipments  are  accepted. 

Fractional  sales.  The  sale  of  small  amounts  from  original  labeled 
packages  has  been  held  by  the  Attorney  General  to  be  contrary  to  law  and 
all  sales  whether  of  1,  2,  5, 15,  25,  50,  75  or  100  pounds  must  be  accompanied 
by  a State  Chemist’s  label.  The  special  attention  of  agents  and  dealers 
selling  condimental  feeds,  tonics,  conditioners,  etc.,  and  chicken  feeds  is 
requested  to  the  preceding. 

Shipments  without  legal  labels  attached.  In  cases  where  shipments 
are  made  without  labels  attached  the  latter  being  forwarded  separately  by 
mail  or  express  privilege  of  examination  should  be  required  before  pay- 
ment is  made.  This  is  especially  necessary  in  the  case  of  shipments  from 
other  states.  In  the  majority  of  shipments  there  is  no  valid  reason  for 
shipment  without  labels  but  when  such  shipments  are  necessary  no  repu- 
table manufacturer  or  agent  who  is  fulfilling  his  contract  will  object  to  reason- 
able examination  before  sight  draft  is  met.  Where  manufacturers  or  brokers 
make  unlabeled  shipments  and  refuse  permission  for  examination  refuse 
the  shipment  and  notify  this  department  by  telephone  or  telegraph. 

Contracts.  In  contracting  for  feeds,  do  not  make  purchases  on  the 
basis  of  private  labels  or  advertising  matter.  Ascertain,  1.  That  the  feed 
offered  is  properly  registered  by  examination  of  State  Chemist’s  reports 
or  requiring  manufacturer  or  his  agent  to  show  official  label  (see  repro- 
duction page  8).  2.  Examine  the  record  of  inspection  for  said  brand. 

3.  Contract  on  the  basis  of  the  official  guarantee  and  insert  registration 
number  (which  always  appears  at  top  of  official  label)  in  contract.  4.  Ex- 
amine labels  attached  to  packages  or  accompanying  bulk  shipments  on 
arrival  and  if  not  according  to  contract  refuse  shipment  until  satisfactory 
explanation  is  furnished  for  the  variation.  Notify  this  department 
promptly  of  all  facts  In  the  case. 

If  in  doubt  or  in  need  of  additional  information  write  to  this  department 
which  is  always  ready  to  serve  you. 

Weights.  If  short  weight  shipments  are  suspected,  weigh  not  less 
than  20  packages  selected  at  random  on  a scale  previously  balanced  and 
tested  and  if  an  average  shortage  of  one  pound  or  more  per  100  is  found 
do  not  remove  balance  of  shipment  from  car  but  notify  this  department  by 
telephone  or  telegraph  so  that  an  inspector  can  be  sent  to  make  an  official 
inspection. 

Samples.  Since  the  only  samples  analyzed  are  those  obtained  by  the 
official  inspectors  from  feeds  and  fertilizers  offered  or  exposed  for  sale, 
sold  or  distributed  in  the  open  markets  of  the  state  no  samples  of  any  Tcind 
should  be  forwarded  to  this  department.  In  case  an  inspection  is  desired 
please  cooperate  with  us  by  observing  procedure  under  Samples,  page  8. 

Deficiencies  and  adulteration.  Examine  carefully  the  mailed  report 
of  inspection  of  every  sample  secured  from  feed  in  your  possession  and  if 
the  report  for  any  sample  shows  it  deficient  or  adulterated  sufficient  to 
carry  with  it  (under  “Remarks”)  the  advice  that  the  shipment  should  be 
withdrawn  from  sale  do  so  promptly  and  report  the  amount  and  date  of 
withdrawal  to  this  department.  Some  cases  have  been  brought  to  our 
attention  where  dealers  have  neglected  to  accept  such  advice.  While 
there  may  be  good  grounds  for  claiming  that  the  average  agent  or  dealer 
has  not  the  necessary  equipment  to  determine  whether  guarantees  are 
maintained  until  an  inspection  report  is  received,  after  such  a report  has 
been  made  sjbowing  that  a shipment  does  not  meet  the  requirements  of 
the  law  there  can  be  no  valid  excuse  for  his  continuing  its  sale,  and  in  all 
such  cases  prompt  complaint  will  be  filed  with  the  prosecutor  by  this 
department. 

Rebates.  The  payment  of  rebates  to  cover  deficiencies  has  no  stand- 
ing under  the  law  and  will  have  no  bearing  on  any  action  which  may  be 
considered  advisable  by  this  department  in  cases  of  violation  of  the  law. 
Where  rebates  are  made  it  will  be  expected  and  required  that  the  agents 
or  dealers  pro-rate  such  rebates  to  the  actual  purchasers  and  users  of  the 
deficient  shipments,  securing  and  filing  with  this  department  receipts  from 


7 


each  purchaser  showing  amount  of  feed  purchased,  rebate  received  and 
date.'  While  payment  of  a rebate  cannot  fully  recompense  the  consumer 
for  being  furnished  with  deficient  feed  it  does  in  many  cases  show  the  good 
intention  of  the  manufacturer.  In  order  to  determine  whether  the  latter 
is  true  however,  each  case  must  be  considered  in  connection  with  the 
inspection  record  of  the  manufacturer  or  broker. 

Full  text  of  the  law  and  rulings  will  be  furnished  on  request. 

CONSUMERS 

Bulletins.  The  reports  not  only  contain  the  results  of  inspection  but 
a table  showing  feeds  which  manufacturers  certify  will  be  on  sale  the 
ensuing  year,  together  with  tables  showing  the  complete  analyses  of 
classes  of  feeding  stuffs  collected  and  coefficients  of  digestion  available 
for  feeds  inspected.  The  following  are  offered  with  a view  to  assisting 
consumers,  agents  and  dealers  in  using  this  bulletin  to  the  best  advantage: 

1.  Determine  the  character  of  the  feed  you  wish  to  purchase. 

2.  Consult  Table  VII  to  ascertain  manufacturers  who  have  feed  of  the 
desired  composition  and  materials  registered  for  sale. 

3.  Consult  Table  IV  and  compare  the  inspection  records  of  the  manu- 
facturers in  the  particular  feed  or  feeds  selected  as  well  as  general  record 
for  maintaining  guarantees. 

4.  Consult  Table  III  for  the  average  complete  analysis  and  fertilizing 
ingredients. 

5.  Consult  Table  I for  digestion  coefficients. 

6.  Consult  rebates  and  cases  filed. 

7.  Purchase  brands  and  from  manufacturers  whose  records  show 
compliance  with  the  law. 

8.  Make  your  contracts  and  purchases  on  the  basis  of  official  guar- 
antees and  not  from  private  labels  or  advertising  matter. 

9.  If  in  doubt  or  in  need  of  additional  information  write  to  this  de- 
partment. 

Labels.  The  only  guarantee  recognized  as  legal  in  Indiana  is  that  on 
the  State  Chemist’s  label  (see  reproduction  below)  which  must  be  at- 
tached to  each  package  for  each  100  pounds  or  fraction  of  feed  contained 
therein  and  which  must  accompany  similar  quantities  delivered  in  bulk. 
Refuse  to  accept  any  shipments  unless  official  labels  bearing  the  same 
guarantee  as  contracted  for  are  furnished. 

If  feed  is  purchased  in  appreciable  quantities  from  manufacturers  or 
firms  in  other  states,  insist  on  the  privilege  of  examination  before  paying 
sight  draft  which  usually  accompanies  such  shipments.  There  can  be  no 
valid  excuse  for  manufacturers  who  are  furnishing  feed  contracted  for 
refusing  to  give  such  permission.  In  case  feed  is  received  which  does 
not  meet  the  requirements  of  the  law  or  contract,  refuse  to  accept  and 
notify  this  department  by  telegraph  or  telephone  giving  location  of  ship- 
ment and  amount. 

Clubs,  associations,  etc.  Do  not  accept,  deliver  or  distribute  any  feed- 
ing stuff  without  State  Chemist’s  labels.  The  person  or  persons  to  whom 
shipments  of  feed  are  consigned  are  responsible  for  such  shipments  meet- 
ing all  the  requirements  of  the  law. 

Samples,  inspection.  When  an  inspection  is  desired  do  not  forward  a 
sample  but  observe  and  follow  the  request  and  directions  given  under 
Samples  and  Requests  for  Inspections,  pages  8 and  9. 

Save  freight  bills,  invoices,  etc.  In  order  that  information  essential 
to  the  inspection  may  be  available  for  the  inspectors,  save  all  invoices, 
freight  bills  and  letters  relating  to  feed  purchased. 

WATCH  FOR  STATE  CHEMIST’S  LABEL— ACCEPT  NO  OTHER 

The  official  label,  a reproduction  of  which  follows,  is  always  printed, 
contains  all  the  information  required  by  law  and  the  fac-simile  signature 
of  the  State  Chemist. 


8 


O 


$50  fine  for  using  this  tag  second  time 

No.  9 

Net  Weight  99  Pounds. 

JOHN  DOE  & CO., 
of  LaFayette,  Ind., 


guarantee  this 

DOE’S  NONPAREIL  FEED 


to  contain  not  less  than 


2.0  per  cent,  of  crude  fat, 

8.0  per  cent,  of  crude  protein, 


not  more  than 


15.0  per  cent,  of  crude  fiber 
and  to  be  compounded  from  the 
following  ingredients: 

Corn,  Oats,  Cottonseed  Meal,  Ground 
Screenings  from  Wheat  and  Clover, 
Oat  Hulls,  Salt  and  Molasses. 


Acting  State  Chemist. 
Purdue  University  Agricultural 
Experiment  Station,  Lafayette,  Ind. 


Not  good  for  more  than  100  Pounds. 


ADMINISTRATION 


It  is  provided  by  the  Feeding  Stuffs  Control  law  that  it  shall  be  en- 
forced by  the  State  Chemist,  who  is  directly  responsible  to  the  authorities 
of  the  Purdue  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  to  whom  all 
fees  received  are  paid  on  the  twenty-fifth  day  of  each  month. 

All  expenditures  are  by  duplicate  voucher  and  receipts  and  accounts 
of  the  Department  are  audited  by  the  State  Board  of  Accountants. 

The  State  Chemist  is  assisted  in  carrying  out  the  provisions  of  the 
law  by  regularly  appointed  deputies  and  inspectors  who  are  especially 
trained  for  the  work.  The  inspectors  are  on  the  road  each  working  day, 
collecting  samples  of  feeds  and  fertilizers,  which  are  sent  to  the  laboratory 
where  they  are  analyzed  by  the  deputies. 

Inspections.  It  is  impossible  to  inspect  every  lot  of  feed  distributed 
in  this  state,  but  it  is  the  aim  of  the  Department  as  far  as  possible  to 
make  two  inspections  of  each  brand  offered  for  sale.  In  cases  where 
manufacturers  of  brands  have  poor  records  of  inspection,  duplicate  sam- 
ples are  secured  wherever  shipments  are  found. 

All  reasonable  requests  for  inspection  are  given  prompt  attention. 

Agents,  dealers  and  consumers  are  advised  and  requested  to  cooperate 
with  the  Department  by  giving  prompt  notice  of  the  receipt  of  interstate 
or  other  shipments,  especially  the  former. 

Samples.  Manufacturers,  agents,  dealers  and  consumers  are  requested 
not  to  forioard  samples  of  feeds,  fertilizers  or  other  materials  to  this  de- 
partment since  to  do  so  is  a useless  expense  as  the  only  samples  analyzed 
are  those  secured  by  the  official  inspectors  from  feeding  stuffs  or  ferti- 
lizers found  in  the  open  markets  of  the  State. 

If  an  analysis  for  the  purpose  of  making  guarantee  is  necessary,  it 
must  be  secured  from  a commercial  chemist. 


9 


The  rule  that  only  samples  secured  by  the  inspectors  of  the  Depart- 
ment will  be  analyzed  must  be  rigidly  adhered  to  for  the  following  rea- 
sons: 

1.  In  order  for  the  analysis  of  a sample  of  feed  to  be  of  value  the 
sample  must  be  drawn  in  such  a manner  as  to  be  representative  of  the 
entire  shipment.  Such  a representative  sample  cannot  be  secured  by 
taking  a portion  from  one  bag  or  a handful  from  the  top  of  a number  of 
bags  but  must  be  taken  with  a sampler  which  will  take  a portion  the 
entire  length  of  the  bag  or  container. 

2.  Unless  we  can  show  beyond  doubt  that  the  sample  was  drawn 
by  one  especially  trained  for  the  purpose  and  in  such  a way  as  to  be  repre- 
sentative of  the  shipment,  successful  prosecution  of  the  person  or  firm 
making  the  sale,  should  the  sample  fail  to  equal  guarantee  or  be  adul- 
terated is  impossible. 

3.  The  only  funds  available  for  the  work  of  inspection  are  the  fees 
derived  from  the  sale  of  labels  and  this  amount  is  not  sufficient  nor  is  the 
staff  available  to  permit  of  the  analysis  of  miscellaneous  samples  of  feed- 
ing stuffs  or  more  extensive  duplication  of  samples  of  the  same  brand. 
The  inspection  in  this  state  is  more  general  and  covers  more  territory 
than  in  most  states  having  similar  laws  and  comparison  between  inspec- 
tion reports,  we  think,  justifies  the  belief  that  on  the  basis  of  tonnage  sold 
we  are  analyzing  as  many  if  not  more  inspection  samples  than  other 
states.  In  1916  an  inspection  sample  was  secured  for  each  82  tons  of  feed 
sold. 

Requests  for  inspection.  If  an  inspection  is  desired  write  to  the  State 
Chemist,  to  ivhom  all  communications  regarding  the  ivorlc  of  the  Department 
should  he  addressed,  stating  the  amount  of  feed  on  hand,  name  of  feed  and 
official  number  at  top  of  label  with  any  special  reason  for  desiring  the 
inspection.  In  case  the  amount  present  is  sufficient  to  justify  it  and  a 
large  number  of  samples  of  the  same  brand  have  not  already  been  in- 
spected an  inspector  will  be  sent  to  secure  an  official  sample  without  ex- 
pense to  those  desiring  the  inspection. 

Purchasers  of  feeding  stuffs  in  quantity  should  have  available  for 
the  inspector  the  following  information:  the  total  number  of  tons  in  ship- 
ment; number  and  initials  of  car  in  which  shipment  is  received;  number 
and  date  of  waybill;  name  of  railroad  issuing  waybill;  name  of  town  from 
which  shipment  was  made;  name  of  firm  from  whom  feed  was  purchased; 
date  received  and  price  per  ton.  This  information  is  especially  Important 
when  feed  is  purchased  direct  from  manufacturers  in  other  states. 

Analyses.  Laboratory  numbers  for  identification  of  the  samples  are 
assigned  upon  their  receipt  at  the  laboratory.  The  analysts  are  not  in 
possession  of  facts  as  to  brand,  manufacturer  or  origin  of  samples.  If 
samples  are  found  to  be  deficient  in  crude  fat  or  crude  protein  or  to  con- 
tain an  excess  of  crude  fiber,  at  least  two  analysts  make  independent  de- 
terminations on  separate  portions  of  the  samples,  and  in  case  of  disagree- 
ment these  results  are  checked  by  another  chemist  from  a third  portion  of 
the  sample. 

All  samples  received*  from  the  inspectors  are  examined  microscopic- 
ally and  the  majority  chemically  and  the  results  published,  unless  error 
in  connection  with  the  taking  of  the  same  by  an  employee  of  this  depart- 
ment can  be  shown. 

Reports.  The  results  of  the  chemical  and  microscopical  examination 
of  samples  are  reported  to  the  manufacturer,  agent  and  persons  from 
whom  samples  are  obtained.  In  the  case  of  appreciably  deficient  or  of 
adulterated  samples  the  manufacturer  is  given  ten  (10)  days’  advance 
notice  in  which  to  file  objections  and  review  the  work  for  which  purpose 
a portion  of  the  official  sample  is  furnished  if  requested.  Pending  adjust- 
ment of  such  cases  and  as  soon  as  the  adulteration  or  deficiency  is  de- 
tected the  agent  or  person  offering  the  feeding  stuff  for  sale  is  notified  that 
it  is  not  labeled  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  the  law  and  is 
advised  to  remove  it  from  sale.  Agents  or  persons  so  notified  should  re- 
spond promptly  to  such  advice  as  failure  to  Accept  it  will  necessitate  their 
being  reported  for  wilful  violation  of  the  law. 


10 


No  report  will  be  made  on  samples  secured  from  unlabeled  shipments 
but  results  obtained  will  be  published  in  the  annual  bulletin. 

Analytical  Methods.  The  methods  of  the  Association  of  Official  Agri- 
cultural Chemists  are  official  in  this  department. 

Manufacturers’  Claims  will  be  given  every  consideration  and  every 
effort  will  be  made  to  secure  concordant  results  but  samples  will  not  be 
referred  for  final  settlement  and  only  results  which  can  be  duplicated  in 
the  State  Chemist’s  laboratory  will  be  accepted  as  official. 

Weighing  of  packages.  The  inspection  will  also  include  the  weighing 
of  packages  of  feed  offered  for  sale  to  prevent  the  practice  of  giving  short 
weights  which  has  been  prevalent  in  some  states. 

Official  duties.  The  official  duties  of  the  State  Chemist  are  restricted 
to  the  inspection  of  fertilizers  and  feeding  stuffs  and  the  settlement  of  dis- 
putes between  coal  oil  dealers  and  inspectors.  The  official  work  required 
takes  the  entire  time  of  the  staff  of  the  Department  and  no  miscellaneous 
worh  either  gratis  or  for  pay  can  be  undertaken.  Analyses  of  fertilizers  and 
feeding  stuffs  must  be  restricted  to  samples  secured  by  our  regular  inspectors. 
Analyses  of  water,  soils,  rocks  or  similar  materials  are  not  made  by  this 
department. 

EXPLANATION  OF  TERMS 

Concentrated  feeding  stuffs  as  defined  by  the  Indiana  feed  law  is  a 
term  used  to  distinguish  between  feeding  stuffs  composed  of  grains,  seeds 
or  their  by-products,  and  compounded  feeds  from  such  products  as  hay, 
straw  or  corn  stover. 

Concentrates  ^ are  feed  of  condensed  nature,  which  are  low  in  fiber 
and  hence  furnish  a large  amount  of  digestible  matter. 

Roughages  ^ are  the  coarser  feeding  stuffs  which  are  high  in  fiber  and 
supply  a lower  percentage  of  digestible  matter. 

Nutrient  is  a term  applied  to  any  food  constituent  or  group  of  similar 
food  constituents  that  may  aid  in  the  support  of  animal  life. 

Moisture  is  the  varying  quantity  of  water  occurring  in  feeding  stuffs 
which  can  be  driven  off  by  heat  at  the  temperature  of  boiling  water. 

Dry  matter  is  the  portion  of  feeding  stuff  which  remains  after  the 
moisture  is  driven  off. 

Crude  fat  consists  of  the  fats,  oils  and  small  amounts  of  waxes,  resins, 
coloring  matter  and  similar  substances,  dissolved  from  feeding  stuffs  by 
ether. 

Crude  protein  is  the  term  applied  to  the  nitrogenous  constituents  of 
a feeding  stuff.  It  is  obtained  by  multiplying  the  total  nitrogen  by  6.25. 

Crude  fiber  is  the  woody  portion  of  a feeding  stuff  for  the  most  part 
cellulose,  and  is  insoluble  in  dilute  acids  and  alkalis.  Crude  fiber  when 
present  in  considerable  quantities  exerts  a retarding  influence  on  the 
digestion  of  nutrients  present. 

Crude  ash,  the  mineral  matter  of  plants,  is  the  residue  left  after  burn- 
ing a feeding  stuff  at  low  redness.  It  consists  chiefly  of  the  phosphates, 
sulfates,  chlorides  and  carbonates  of  sodium,  potassium,  calcium  and  mag- 
nesium. 

Nitrogen  free  extract  consists  of  sugars,  starches,  pentoses,  non-nitro- 
genous  organic  acids,  etc.,  and  is  determined  by  subtracting  the  sum  of 
moisture,  crude  fat,  crude  protein,  crude  fiber  and  crude  ash  from  100. 

Carbohydrates  is  the  collective  term  applied  to  crude  fiber  and  nitro- 
gen free  extract. 

Filler  is  the  term  used  to  designate  roughages  which  are  often  used 
as  diluents  of  concentrates  in  the  compounding  of  feeds.  They  may  be 
added  as  a constituent  to  add  bulk  but  are  often  added  to  concentrates  to 
reduce  them  to  such  a grade,  that  they  may  be  sold  at  popular  prices. 
Some  of  the  more  common  fillers  are  cottonseed  hulls,  peanut  hulls,  oat 
hulls,  cob  meal,  oat  clippings,  etc.  The  majority  of  fillers  contain  relatively 
small  amounts  of  crude  fat  and  crude  protein  and  large  amounts  of  crude 
fiber.  Consumers  should  consider  carefully  before  purchasing  compounded 
feeds  of  high  filler  content  as  indicated  by  high  fiber  guarantees. 


1 Feeds  & Feeding.  Henry  and  Morrison 


II 


DIGESTIBLE  NUTRIENTS  IN  FEEDING  STUFFS 

There  has  been  a constant  and  growing  demand  by  the  feeders  who 
wish  to  place  their  feeding  operations  on  the  scientific  basis  of  balanced 
rations  for  the  digestible  nutrients,  for  example,  digestible  protein,  carbo- 
hydrates, etc.,  that  are  to  be  found  in  the  feeding  stuffs  on  the  markets 
of  Indiana.  Complying  with  this  demand  terms  used  in  the  scientific 
compounding  of  rations  together  with  Table  I which  contains  a compila- 
tion of  digestion  coefficients  are  here  presented. 

A balanced  ration  ^ is  the  feed  or  combination  of  feeds  furnishing  the 
several  nutrients — crude  protein,  carbohydrates,  and  fat — in  such  propor- 
tion and  amount  as  will  properly  and  without  excess  of  any  nutrients 
nourish  a given  animal  for  24  hours. 

Digestion  coefficient  is  the  term  used  to  designate  that  portion  or 
percentage  of  a nutrient  that  is  digestible.  These  coefficients  cannot  be 
taken  as  absolute  because  they  vary  with  the  individual  animal  but  being 
secured  as  the  result  of  carefully  conducted  experiments  they  will  closely 
approximate  the  percentage  of  nutrients  in  feeding  stuff  available  for  the 
animal’s  use. 

Nutritive  ratio  is  a term  used  to  designate  the  ratio  between  the 
digestible  crude  protein  and  the  combined  digestible  carbohydrates  and 
crude  fat.  The  nutritive  ratio  of  a feeding  stuff  is  ascertained  by  divid- 
ing the  amount  of  digestible  carbohydrates  + 2.25  X the  digestible  fat  by 
the  amount  of  digestible  protein.  The  amount  of  digestible  fat  is  multi- 
plied by  2.25  to  reduce  it  to  the  same  energy  basis  as  the  carbohydrates, 
it  being  2.25  times  more  valuable  for  the  production  of  energy. 

Example.  To  determine  the  nutritive  ratio  of  the  average  wheat  bran 
containing  2.6  per  cent,  digestible  fat;  12.2  per  cent,  digestible  protein  and 
38.9  per  cent,  digestible  carbohydrates. 

2.6  fat  X 2.25  = 5.85  energy  value  of  fat  in  terms  of  carbohydrates 

5.85  + 38.9  = 44.75  energy  value  of  fat  and  carbohydrates 

44.75  12.2  = 3.67 

1:3.67  = nutritive  ratio  of  the  wheat  bran. 

For  the  benefit  of  consumers  who  wish  to  figure  the  nutritive  ratios 
of  feeding  stuffs.  Table  II  containing  the  analyses  of  feeding  stuffs  on  the 
basis  of  inspection  is  printed.  Carbohydrates  are  not  reported  but  may 
be  obtained  by  taking  the  sum  of  nitrogen  free  extract  plus  the  crude  fiber. 

By  the  use  of  Table  II  in  conjunction  with  Table  I which  contains  the 
digestion  coefficients  and  the  preceding  directions,  the  consumer  can  ob- 
tain the  digestible  crude  fat,  protein  and  carbohydrates  and  by  carrying 
the  calculations  further,  the  nutritive  ratio. 


1 Feeds  & Feeding.  Henry  and  Morrison 


12 


TABLE  I — Average  Digestion  Coefficients  of  Feeding  Stuffs^ 


Per  cent. 


FEEDING  STUFFS 

Crude 

protein 

Crude 

fat 

Crude 

fiber 

Nitro- 
gen free 
extract 

Grains,  seeds,  their  parts  and  factory  by-products 

Bariev  ~ . 

78 

78 

56 

92 

Brewers  dried  grains  

81' 

89 

49 

57 

Buckwheat  2 

T5 

100 

24 

76 

56 

Buckwheat  bran  2 

471 

60 

39 

Buckwheat  middlings  

86 

89 

17 

83 

Cocoanut  meal  » _ 

78 

97' 

83 

68 

Corn  (Dent)  

70 

86 

56 

93 

Corn  meal  - ________  

74 

9i3 

67 

94 

Corn  bran  __  _ 

64 

77 

59 

77 

Corn  and  coh  meal 

84 

45 

88 

Corn  cob  Tueal 

17 

60 

66 

60 

Corn  germ  meal  ^ 

78 

96 

76 

78 

Cottonseed 

68 

87 

76 

59 

Cottonseed  meal  __  

84 

94 

36 

78 

Cottonseed  meal  and  hulls  (cottonseed  feed)”  

51 

83 

40 

56 

Cottonseed  hulls 

6 

79 

47 

34 

Cow(pea  meal  ^ 

82 

74 

64 

93 

Dried  beet  pulp  

64 

84 

91 

Distillers’  dried  grains  (chiefly  corn) 

78 

96 

96 

81 

Distillers’  dried  grains  (chiefly  rye) 

69 

84 

67 

Emmer  2 1 

80 

88 

64 

89 

Flaxseed 

91 

86 

01 

95 

Flax  plant  by-product  (pods,  shives,  seeds)" _ 

68.4 

74.9 

48.3 

43.3 

Flax  shives  ° _ 

811 

92.7 

26.8 

43.5 

frliiten  feed 

86 

88 

76 

89 

88 

98 

88 

66.5 

68.0 

1(7.5 

80.6 

71.8 

88.5 

78.2 

Hominy  feed  _ _ _ __  __  

66 

92 

67 

89 

Fa, fir  corn 

46 

40 

00 

T, inseed  meal  fold  process') 

89 

m 

57 

78 

Linseed  meal  (new  process) _ 

84 

69 

74 

80 

Malt  sprouts  ^ __  

77 

86 

80 

87 

Oats  

77 

89 

31 

77 

Oat  middlings  _ _ 

81' 

94 

40’ 

96 

Oatmeal  by-products  _ 

66 

90 

42 

Oat  hulls  ^ 

50.1 

76.7 

'50.9 

52.7 

Palm  kernel  oil  meal  ® __  

96 

96 

94 

82 

Peanut  cake  from  meats  ^ _ __  

90i 

90 

9 

84 

Peanut  cake,  hulls  and  meats  ^ _ __  

71 

90 

12 

49 

Rice  2 

86 

90 

1100 

Rice  bran  __  _ 

64 

72^ 

21 

78 

Rice  hulls  2 

10 

67 

36 

Rice  meal  ^ __  

62 

91 

4, 

92 

Rice  polish 

67 

82. 

23 

91 

Rye  5 __ 

79.4 

74.5 

79.2 

70.1 

Rye  meal 

84 

64 

92 

Rye  mixed  feed  fhran  and  middlings)2 

80 

90 

88 

Soybean  meal  ^ 

84 

82 

81 

73 

Soybean  oil  meal  2 

■92 

08 

.99 

100 

Wheat  bran  (spring)  __  

70 

68 

44 

74 

Wheat  bran  (winter)  _ _ 

77 

64 

2.7 

05 

Wheat  chaff  2 

26 

40 

39 

33 

Wheat  middlings  (flour)  

Wheat  middlings  (standard)  

88 

77 

86 

68 

36 

30 

88 

78 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings  (shipstuff) 

78 

87 

62 

77 

Roughage 

Corn  fodder  (mature)  _ 

45 

70 

63 

73 

Corn  stover  

86 

67 

64 

50 

Corn  silage  (mature) 

60 

82: 

64 

71 

Barley  straw  _ _ 

20 

42' 

56 

54 

Oat  straw  

28 

39 

60 

51 

Pea  vine  straw 

60 

46 

52 

64 

Rye  straw  ^ 

23 

36 

66 

39 

Soy  bean  vine  straw  ~ 

60 

60 

38 

66 

Wheat  straw  2 

23 

81 

50 

37 

Alfalfa  hay  . 

72 

48 

47 

72 

Alsike  clover  hay 

66 

88 

50 

66 

Cow  pea  hay 

66 

60 

43 

71 

13 


TABLE  1 — Average  Digestion  Coefficients  of  Feeding 

Stuffs 

(continued) 

1 

1 

Per  cent. 

FEEDING  STUFFS 

Crude 

protein 

Crude 

fat 

Crude 

fiber 

Nitro- 
gen free 
extract 

ririmsnn  nlovpr  hay 

60 

44 

46 

62 

68 

56 

54 

04 

Sny  hpan  hay  _ . 

Til 

29 

61. 

60 

Timothy  hay  _ . . 

48 

50 

50 

62 

>Iiscellaneous 

DriPfJ  hlnnrl 

84 

Flax  plant  hv-prorlnat  anrl  mnlassps  3 

62.5 

50.7 

31.8 

62,6 

Molassps,  hppt  7 _ 

62 

91 

Mnlassps,  panp  7 

86 

Molasses  feed  (Sucrene,  Holstein,  Macon) 

63 

"ss” 

”52'" 

00 

Meat  spraps 

98 

90 

Slfim  milF  2 

94 

90 

90 

Tankage  8 

71 

TOO 

TOO 

1 Experiments  -with  Ruminants,  Lindsay’s  compilation. 

Reports  Massachusetts  Agricul- 

tural  Experiment  Station 

2 Henry  & Morrison’s  Feeds  and  Feeding- 

3 Patterson  and  White,  Maryland  Ag-ricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No,  1I6S 

4 German  experiments  give  coelficient  as  2'& 

3 Bulletin  No.  W,  Office  of  Experiment  Stations 
3 Bulletin  No.  168,  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 

7 Bulletin  No.  Iil6,  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 

8 Henry  & Morrison’s  Feeds  and  Feeding.  Experiments  -with  swine 
° Kellner’s  Scientific  Feeding  of  Farm  Animals 


DEFINITIONS  AND  DESCRIPTIONS  OF  FEEDING  STUFFS 

In  the  accepting  of  certificates  for  the  registration  of  feeding  stuffs 
to  be  sold  in  this  state,  the  definitions  adopted  by  the  Association  of  Feed 
Control  Officials  are  followed  closely.  The  following  definitions  include 
in  addition  to  the  official,  those  formulated  by  this  department  from  the 
most  reliable  data  available.  Definitions  not  from  A.  F.  C.  O.  are  marked 
with  an  asterisk  (*). 

When  the  terms  “mill  run  screenings”  and  “screenings  not  exceeding 
mill  run”  are  used  in  connection  with  shorts,  middlings  and  shipstuff, 
they  have  the  same  meaning  as  when  applied  to  wheat  bran. 

From  Wheat 

Wheat  bran  is  the  coarse  outer  coatings  of  the  wheat  berry  obtained 
in  the  usual  commercial  milling  process  from  wheat  that  has  been  cleaned 
and  scoured. 

Shorts  or  standard  middlings  are  the  fine  particles  of  the  outer  and 
inner  bran  separated  from  bran  and  white  middlings. 

Wheat  white  middlings  or  white  middlings  are  that  part  of  the  offal 
of  wheat  intermediate  between  shorts  or  standard  middlings  and  red  dog. 

This  term,  correctly  used,  applies  to  a high  grade  middling,  low  in 
bran  content,  thus  being  highly  digestible.  An  off  grade  fiour  which  con- 
tains 2.5  per  cent,  or  less  fat  and  13  per  cent,  or  less  protein  should  not  be 
confused  with  white  middlings. 

Shipstuff  or  wheat  mixed  feed  is  a mixture  of  the  products  other  than 
the  fiour  obtained  from  the  milling  of  the  wheat  berry. 

Red  dog  is  a low  grade  wheat  fiour  containing  the  finer  particles  of 
bran.  Red  dog  fiour  shows  a variation  of  from  3.5-6  per  cent.^crude  fat  and 
16-20  per  cent,  crude  protein.  Like  white  middlings  they  should  not  be 
confused  with  off-grade  fiours. 

Wheat  bran  with  mill  run  screenings  is  pure  wheat  bran  plus  the 
screenings  which  were  separated  from  the  wheat  used  in  preparing  the 
bran. 


H 


Wheat  bran  with  screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run  is  either  wheat 
bran  with  the  whole  mill  run  of  screenings  or  wheat  bran  with  a portion 
of  the  mill  run  of  screenings,  provided  that  such  portion  is  not  an  inferior 
portion  thereof. 

When  the  terms  “mill  run  screenings''  and  “screenings  not  exceeding 
mill  run"  are  used  in  connection  with  shorts,  middlings  or  shipstuff  they 
have  the  same  meaning  as  when  applied  to  wheat  bran. 

From  Rye* 

The  by-products  from  the  milling  of  rye  correspond  closely  to  those 
defined  under  wheat.  Rye  bran  and  rye  red  dog  are  rarely  found  on  the 
market. 

Rye  shorts  or  middlings  contain  in  addition  to  the  middling  a large 
amount  of  the  bran. 

Rye  mixed  feed  consists  chiefiy  of  rye  bran  and  middlings. 

From  Buckwheat 

Buckwheat  shorts  or  middlings  are  that  portion  of  the  buckwheat 
grain  immediately  inside  of  the  hull  after  separation  from  the  fiour. 

Buckwheat  mixed  feed*  is  composed  of  varying  proportions  of  the 
hulls  and  middlings  obtained  in  the  milling  of  the  buckwheat  grain. 

Buckwheat  hulls*  are  the  outer  coverings  of  the  buckwheat  grain. 
They  are  a low  grade  roughage  probably  about  equal  in  value  to  oat  straw 
for  feeding  purposes. 

From  Corn 

Corn  distillers'  dried  grains  are  the  dried  residues  from  corn  obtained 
in  the  manufacture  of  alcohol  and  distilled  liquors. 

Corn  gluten  meal  is  that  part  of  commercial  shelled  corn  that  remains 
after  the  separation  of  the  larger  part  of  the  starch,  the  germ  and  the 
bran  by  the  processes  employed  in  the  manufacture  of  corn  starch  and 
glucose.  It  may  or  may  not  contain  corn  solubles. 

Corn  gluten  feed  is  that  portion  of  commercial  shelled  corn  that  re- 
mains after  the  separation  of  the  larger  part  of  the  starch  and  the  germ 
by  the  processes  employed  in  the  manufacture  of  corn  starch  and  glucose. 

Corn  germ  meal  is  a product  in  the  manufacture  of  starch,  glucose 
and  other  corn  products  and  is  the  germ  layer  from  which  a part  of  the 
corn  oil  has  been  extracted. 

Owing  to  the  scarcity  of  fats  due  to  the  world  war,  corn  germ  meals 
are  taking  a prominent  place  among  feeding  stuffs.  The  oil  obtained  is 
used  for  edible  purposes,  manufacture  of  soaps,  etc.  According  to  estima- 
tions made  from  data  available,  about  11,375  tons  of  corn  germ  meal  were 
sold  in  1916  as  against  5500  tons  in  1915. 

It  is  of  interest  to  note  that  there  are  two  distinct  classes  of  corn 
germ  meals. 

One  is  a by-product  from  the  germ  separated  mechanically  in  the 
manufacture  of  hominy  and  products  demanding  similar  processes;  and 
will  carry  from  6-8  per  cent,  crude  fat  and  from  17-20  per  cent,  crude  pro- 
tein. 

The  other  is  a by-product  from  the  germ  separated  by  acid  treatment 
in  the  manufacture  of  starch,  glucose,  etc.,  and  will  carry  7-12  per  cent, 
crude  fat  and  18-24  per  cent,  crude  protein. 

Corn  feed  meal  is  the  siftings  obtained  in  the  manufacture  of  cracked 
corn  and  table  meal  made  from  whole  grain.  In  view  of  the  fact  that 
table  meal  is  manufactured  from  the  whole  grain  by  widely  differing  pro- 
cesses it  will  vary  considerable  in  character.  However,  this  department 
will  accept  the  term  corn  feed  meal  to  cover  these  varying  products. 

Corn  bran  is  the  coarse  outer  coating  of  the  corn  kernel. 

From  Flaxseed  and  Flax 

Ground  flaxseed  or  flaxseed  meal  is  the  product  obtained  by  grinding 
flaxseed  which  has  been  screened  and  cleaned  of  weed  seeds  and  other  for- 
eign material  by  the  most,  improved  commercial  processes.  {Tentative 
definition). 


15 


Linseed  meal  is  the  ground  product  obtained  after  extraction  of  part 
of  the  oil  from  ground  flaxseed  screened  and  cleaned  of  weed  seeds  and  other 
foreign  materials  by  the  most  improved  commercial  processes. 

Old  process  linseed  oil  meal  is  the  ground  product  obtained  after  ex- 
traction of  part  of  the  oil  by  crushing,  cooking  and  hydraulic  pressure 
from  flax  seeds  screened  and  cleaned  of  weed  seeds  and  other  foreign  materials 
by  the  most  improved  commercial  processes. 

Six  samples  secured  in  1916  were  found  to  contain  an  excess  of  weed 
seeds.  (See  Tables  IV  and  VI). 

New  process  linseed  oil  meal  is  the  ground  product  obtained  after 
extraction  of  part  of  the  oil  by  crushing,  heating  and  the  use  of  solvents 
from  flaxseed  screened  and  cleaned  of  weed  seeds  and  other  foreign  materials 
by  the  most  improved  commercial  processes. 

Unscreened  flaxseed  oil  feed  is  the  ground  product  obtained  after 
extraction  of  part  of  the  oil  from  unscreened  flaxseed  by  crushing,  cook- 
ing and  hydraulic  pressure  or  by  crushing,  heating  and  the  use  of  sol- 
vents. When  sold  without  grinding  the  unground  product  shall  be  desig- 
nated as  “unscreened  flaxseed  oil  feed  cake.” 

Flax  plant  by-product  is  the  portion  of  the  flax  plant  remaining  after 
the  separation  of  the  seed,  the  bast  fiber  and  a portion  of  the  shives,  and 
consists  of  flax  shives,  flax  pods,  broken  and  immature  flax  seeds  and  the 
cortical  tissue  of  the  straw. 

This  material  has  not  been  offered  for  sale  in  this  state  except  as 
an  ingredient  of  proprietary  feeds  usually  containing  molasses.  It  serves 
largely  as  a make  weight  and  in  general  may  be  classed  with  oat  hulls, 
cottonseed  hulls  and  similar  materials  carrying  high  percentages  of  fiber. 

From  Cottonseed 

Cottonseed  meal  is  a product  of  the  cottonseed,  composed  principally 
of  the  kernel  with  such  portion  of  the  hull  as  is  necessary  in  the  manu- 
facture of  oil;  provided  that  nothing  shall  be  recognized  as  cottonseed 
meal  that  does  not  conform  to  the  foregoing  definition  and  that  does  not- 
contain  36  per  cent,  of  protein. 

Choice  cottonseed  meal  must  be  finely  ground,  not  necessarily  bolted, 
perfectly  sound  and  sweet  in  odor,  yellow,  free  from  excess  of  lint,  and 
must  contain  at  least  41  per  cent,  of  protein. 

Prime  cottonseed  meal  must  be  finely  ground,  not  necessarily  bolted, 
of  sweet  odor,  reasonably  bright  in  color,  yellow,  not  brown  or  reddish, 
free  from  excess  of  lint,  and  must  contain  at  least  38.6  per  cent,  protein. 

Good  cottonseed  meal  must  be  finely  ground,  not  necessarily  bolted, 
of  sweet  odor,  reasonably  bright  in  color  and  must  contain  at  least  36  per 
cent,  of  protein. 

Cottonseed  feed  is  a mixture  of  cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls, 
containing  less  than  36  per  cent,  of  protein. 

Cold  pressed  cottonseed  is  the  product  resulting  from  subjecting  the 
whole  undecorticated  cottonseed  to  the  cold  pressure  process  for  the  ex- 
traction of  oil  and  includes  the  entire  cottonseed  less  the  oil  extracted. 

Cottonseed  hulls*  are  the  outer  portion  of  the  cottonseed.  They  are 
very  high  in  crude  fiber  and  only  a great  scarcity  of  home  grown  roughage 
can  ever  justify  their  purchase  in  Indiana. 

Indiana  purchases  of  cottonseed  meal  should  be  on  the  basis  of  its 
protein  content  and  undoubtedly  the  higher  the  percentage  of  protein  the 
less  the  protein  will  cost  per  pound,  even  though  the  price  per  ton  be  con- 
siderably higher  than  that  of  the  lower  grades.  These  materials  should 
be  purchased  on  the  basis  of  the  cost  of  the  protein  and  its  digestibility 
and  not  on  the  cost  per  ton. 

From  Barley 

Brewers’  dried  grains  are  the  properly  dried  residues  from  cereals 
obtained  in  the  manufacture  of  beer.  Samples  obtained  consist  chiefly  of 
barley  with  rice  and  corn  grits. 


i6 


Malt  sprouts  are  the  sprouts  of  the  barley  grain.  If  the  sprouts  are 
derived  from  any  other  malted  cereal,  the  source  must  be  designated. 
The  samples  secured  were  all  barley  sprouts. 

From  Oats 

Oat  groats  are  the  kernels  of  the  oat  berry  with  the  hulls  removed. 
These  are  used  principally  in  chicken  feeds. 

Oat  hulls  are  the  outer  chaffy  coverings  of  the  oat  grain.  These  con- 
tain on  the  average  in  excess  of  30  per  cent,  crude  fiber. 

Oat  middlings  are  the  fioury  portion  of  the  oat  groat  obtained  in  the 
milling  of  rolled  oats. 

Oat  shorts*  are  the  covering  of  the  oat  grain  lying  immediately  under 
the  hull,  being  a fuzzy  material  carrying  with  it  portions  of  the  tips  of  oat 
groats  obtained  in  the  hulling  of  the  oat. 

Oat  meal  by-product  as  used  by  a large  number  of  manufacturers  of 
proprietary  feeds  is  supposed  to  contain  the  three  products  described 
above.  In  fact  oat  meal  by-product  could  more  properly  be  designated  as 
oat  groat  by-product  as  it  seems  to  be  obtained  in  the  manufacture  of  oat 
groats  and  this  department  finds  it  consists  of  oat  hulls  and  a small 
amount  of  oat  shorts. 

Oat  middlings  as  recognized  by  this  department  is  the  fioury  material 
obtained  in  the  manufacture  of  rolled  oats  and  steel  cut  oats  from  oat 
groats.  They  will  carry  from  4.5-7  per  cent,  crude  fat  and  12-16.5  per  cent, 
crude  protein. 

Clipped  oat  by-product  is  the  resultant  by-product  obtained  in  the 
manufacture  of  clipped  oats.  It  may  contain  light,  chaffy  material  broken 
from  the  ends  of  the  hulls,  empty  hulls,  light,  immature  oats  and  dust.  It 
must  not  contain  an  excessive  amount  of  oat  hulls. 

The  preceding  by-product  is  also  principally  used  as  a constituent  of 
proprietary  molasses  feeds.  When  any  appreciable  amount  of  oat  hulls  is 
present  the  latter  must  be  given  as  an  ingredient  in  this  state. 

From  Rice 

Rice  bran  is  the  cuticle  beneath  the  hull. 

Rice  hulls  are  the  outer  chaffy  coverings  of  the  rice  grain. 

Rice  polish  is  the  finely  powdered  material  obtained  in  polishing  the 
kernel. 

From  Alfalfa 

Alfalfa  meal  is  the  entire  alfalfa  hay  ground,  and  does  not  contain  an 
admixture  of  ground  alfalfa  straw  or  other  foreign  material. 

From  Sugar  Beets 

Dried  sugar  beet  pulp*  is  the  dried  residue  obtained  in  the  manufac- 
ture of  beet  sugar,  after  extraction  of  the  larger  percentage  of  the  sugar 
from  the  beet. 

ANIMAL  BY-PRODUCTS 

Blood  meal  is  ground  dried  blood. 

Cracklings  are  the  residue  after  partially  extracting  the  fats  and  oils 
from  the  animal  tissue.  If  they  bear  a name  descriptive  of  their  kind, 
composition  or  origin,  they  must  correspond  thereto. 

Digester  tankage*  is  the  residue  from  animal  tissue  exclusive  of  hoof 
and  horn  specially  prepared  for  feeding  purposes  by  tanking  under  live 
steam,  drying  under  high  heat,  and  suitable  grinding.  If  it  contains  any 
considerable  amount  of  bone,  it  must  be  designated  Digester  meat  and 
bone  tankage.  This  material  is  often  sold  under  the  names  of  feeding 
tankage  and  tankage.  In  some  cases  the  stomach  offal  is  present  as  an 
ingredient.  In  purchasing  these  materials  careful  attention  should  be 
given  to  the  guarantees  and  inspections  since  the  record  shows  that  some 
manufacturers  have  difficulty  in  maintaining  guarantees. 

Meat  scrap  and  meat  meal*  are  the  ground  residues  from  animal  tissue- 
exclusive  of  hoof  and  horn.  If  they  contain  any  considerable  amount  of 
bone,  they  must  be  designated  meat  and  bone  scrap  or  meat  and  bone 


17 

meal.  If  they  bear  a name  descriptive  of  their  kind,  composition  or  origin, 
they  must  correspond  thereto. 

The  presence  of  pulverized  glass  in  animal  by-products  has  been  de- 
termined in  several  samples  procured  recently  and,  in  the  opinion  of  this 
department,  when  present  in  appreciable  amounts  is  a serious  indication, 
somewhere  in  process  of  compounding  and  building  up  of  these  products, 
of  the  addition  of  garbage  tankage. 

MISCELLANEOUS 

Meal  is  the  clean,  sound,  ground  product  of  the  entire  grain,  cereal 
or  seed  which  it  purports  to  represent. 

Chop  is  a ground  or  chopped  feed  composed  of  one  or  more  different 
cereals  or  by-products  thereof.  If  it  bears  a name  descriptive  of  the  kind 
of  cereals,  it  must  be  made  exclusively  of  the  entire  grains  of  those 
cereals. 

Screenings  are  the  smaller,  imperfect  grains,  weed  seeds  and  other 
foreign  material  having  feeding  value,  separated  in  cleaning  the  grain. 

Alfalfa  meal  is  the  entire  alfalfa  hay  ground,  and  does  not  contain  an 
admixture  of  ground  alfalfa  straw  or  other  foreign  materials. 

Tinplate  by-products*.  These  products  formerly  sold  under  the  name 
of  refuse  cleaning  middlings  now  sold  as  Palmo  Midds  and  Palmo  Mixed 
Feed  are  by-products  secured  in  the  process  of  polishing  the  tinplate,  the 
former  being  a mixture  of  wheat  middlings  and  palm  oil  and  the  latter  a 
mixture  of  wheat  middlings,  peanut  hulls  and  palm  oil. 

So-called  Palmo  Meal  which  has  been  shipped  into  this  state  untagged 
and  misrepresented  as  to  feeding  value,  is  a tinplate  by-product  consisting 
of  peanut  hulls  and  palm  oil.  No  appreciable  amount  of  peanut  meats  are 
present  in  this  product.  This  department  cannot  accept  the  term  Palmo 
Meal  as  an  ingredient  of  compounded  feeds,  but  where  it  is  used  the 
manufacturers  must  state  true  ingredients,  peanut  hulls  and  palm  oil. 

An  analysis  of  two  samples  of  so-called  Palmo  Meal  shipped  unlabeled 
into  this  state  is  as  follows:  moisture  6.9  per  cent.,  crude  fat  6.9  per  cent., 
crude  protein  7.0  per  cent,  and  crude  fiber  49.9  per  cent. 

Manufacturers,  who  now  have  feeds  registered  as  containing  peanut 
meats,  peanut  hulls  and  palm  oil,  will  be  asked  in  the  future  to  reregister 
stating  ingredients  as  peanut  hulls  and  palm  oil  unless  an  appreciable 
amount  of  peanut  meats  are  actually  present  in  their  feed. 

Mixed  feed*  is  a term  used  in  Indiana  to  cover  feeds  composed  of 
mixtures  of  various  cereals,  by-products  and  miscellaneous  materials.  If 
the  term  is  qualified  to  indicate  the  origin  of  the  materials  used,  they  must 
contain  such  materials  or  their  by-products  only. 

Proprietary  feeds*  is  a term  used  to  designate  a large  number  of  com- 
pounded feeds  sold  under  names,  generally  trademarked  or  copyrighted, 
which  have  no  special  relation  to  the  materials  used  in  their  manufacture. 

In  general  this  class  of  feeds  may  be  subdivided  into  those  with  and 
without  molasses,  the  former  containing  from  10  to  60  per  cent,  of  mo- 
lasses being  designated  as  molasses  feeds. 

Calf  meals*  are  proprietary  feeds  advertised  and  sold  as  being  pre- 
pared according  to  special  formulas  for  the  feeding  of  young  calves.  Owing 
to  their  high  cost,  claims  and  guarantee  should  receive  special  attention 
when  their  purchase  is  contemplated. 

Poultry  feeds  may  be  divided  into  two  classes:  those  containing 
cereals,  seeds  and  their  by-products  and  those  containing  in  addition  to 
these  ingredients  grit,  charcoal,  etc.  Oyster  shells  are  also  added  to 
poultry  feeds. 

In  the  opinion  of  this  department  the  addition  of  either  grit  or  oyster 
shells  in  excess  of  5 per  cent,  can  only  be  explained  on  the  basis  of  cheap- 
ening the  selling  price  of  the  feed,  or  reducing  the  cost  of  manufacture 
so  an  unwarranted  profit  may  be  made.  If  above  6 per  cent,  grit,  oyster 


i8 


shells  or  combined  grit  and  oyster  shells  is  present  in  a feed  it  will  be 
reported  as  an  excess,  and  if  the  amounts  exceed  8 per  cent.,  the  feed  will 
be  considered  adulterated  and  will  be  reported  as  such  unless  the  nfanu- 
facturer  has  a higher  percentage  guaranteed. 

The  question  of  whether  it  would  not  be  more  profitable  to  purchase 
grit  separately  rather  than  in  the  form  of  mixtures  containing  it  deserves 
the  careful  attention  of  the  purchasers  of  chicken  feeds. 

Condimental  feeds*,  Under  the  present  rulings  of  the  Department 
this  term  is  defined  to  include:  any  mixture  having  as  a base,  filler  or 
diluent  any  material  of  feeding  value  such  as  wheat  bran,  middlings, 
screenings,  fiaxseed  meal,  linseed  meal,  etc.,  or  any  of  the  materials  used 
as  adulterants  for  feeding  stuffs  such  as  corn  cob  meal,  oat  hulls,  peanut 
hulls,  etc.,  together  with  condiments,  herbs  or  drugs,  one  or  all,  without 
regard  to  names  or  claims  under  which  they  are  sold.  All  preparations 
sold  as  stock  or  poultry  foods  or  feeds,  conditioners,  relishes,  tonics,  regu- 
lators, powders,  egg  producers,  etc.,  if  compounded  as  above  as  well  as  all 
preparations  sold  under  the  name  of  food  or  feed  or  a similar  term  or 
with  claims  for  nutritive  properties  either  on  package  or  advertising  mat- 
ter, come  under  the  law  and  must  be  registered  and  labeled  when  offered 
or  exposed  for  sale,  sold  or  distributed  in  Indiana. 

Legal  opinions  have  been  received  that  the  interpretation  of  the  term 
“condimental  feed”  as  used  in  the  law  can  properly  be  broadened  to  in- 
clude all  materials  used  as  food  adjuncts  for  animals  and  the  issuing  of  a 
ruling  to  this  effect  is  under  consideration. 

In  general  these  preparatibns  are  composed  of  some  ordinary  feeding 
stuff  or  feeding  stuff  adulterant  for  a base  or  carrier  together  with  some 
common  cathartic  generally  Glaubers  but  sometimes  Epsom  salts,  and 
appetizers,  gentian,  fenugreek,  ginger,  common  salt,  anise,  with  small 
amounts  of  worm  seed,  poke  root,  copperas,  sulphur,  etc. 

In  many  cases  after  the  passage  of  the  Feeding  Stuffs  Control  law  names, 
claims  and  methods  of  compounding  were  changed  and  the  feeding  stuff 
base  omitted,  salt,  Glauber’s  salt,  and  similar  cheap  materials  being  used  in 
larger  amounts  and  some  of  the  largest  sellers  on  the  market  today  contain  90 
per  cent,  and  over  of  common  salt.  Most  of  the  latter  are  not  registered 
under  the  law. 

As  stated  in  previous  bulletins  the  large  majority  of  properly  con- 
ducted experiments  fails  to  show  profitable  results  from  the  use  of  these 
preparations  but  those  who  wish  to  use  them  are  requested  both  as  co- 
operation with  this  department  and  for  their  own  protection  to  purchase 
those  which  are  registered  and  thus  obtain  the  protection  which  the  law 
affords. 

Yeast  or  vinegar  dried  grains  are  the  properly  dried  residue  from  the 
mixture  of  cereals,  malt  and  malt  sprouts  (sometimes  cottonseed  meal) 
obtained  in  the  manufacture  of  yeast  or  vinegar,  and  consist  of  corn  or 
corn  and  rye  from  which  most  of  the  starch  has  been  extracted,  together 
with  malt  added  during  the  manufacturing  process  to  change  the  starch  to 
sugars,  and  malt  sprouts  (sometimes  cottonseed  meal)  added  during  the 
manufacturing  process  to  aid  in  filtering  the  residue  from  the  wort  and 
serve  as  a source  of  food  supply  for  the  yeast. 

Representative  samples  secured  from  various  manufacturers  show  an 
average  composition  of:  moisture,  7.1  per  cent.;  crude  fat,  8.5  per  cent.; 
crude  protein,  20.6  per  cent.;  crude  fiber,  16.4  per  cent.;  crude  ash,  2.1  per 
cent.;  nitrogen  free  extract,  45.4  per  cent. 

These  grains  often  resemble  a mixture  of  brewers’  dried  grains  and 
distillers’  dried  grains  and  are  of  the- same  general  character,  but  are  of 
somewhat  less  value  as  a source  of  protein. 

Oil  cake  is  the  residual  cake  obtained  after  extraction  of  part  of  the 
oil  by  crushing,  cooking  and  hydraulic  pressure  from  seeds  screened  and 
cleaned  of  weed  seeds  and  other  foreign  materials  by  the  most  improved 
commercial  processes.  When  used  alone  the  term  “oil  cake”  shall  be  un- 
derstood to  designate  the  product  obtained  from  partially  extracted, 


19 


screened  and  cleaned  flexseed.  When  used  to  cover  any  other  product, 
the  name  of  the  seed  from  which  it  is  obtained  shall  be  prefixd  to  “oil 
cake.” 

Palm  kernel  oil  meal  is  the  ground  residue  from  the  extraction  of  part 
of  the  oil  by  pressure  or  solvents  from  the  kernel  of  the  fruit  of  the 
Elaeis  guineensis  or  Elaeis  malanococca.  This  material  is  also  especially 
valuable  as  a dairy  feed  but  has  only  recently  been  introduced  into  this 
country.  Average  analysis^  shows:  Moisture,  10.9  per  cent.;  crude  fat, 
1.6  per  cent.;  crude  protein,  18.7  per  cent.;  crude  fiber,  25.4  per  cent.; 
crude  ash,  4.3  per  cent.;  nitrogen  free  extract,  39.1  per  cent. 

Ivory  nut  meal  is  ground  ivory  nuts.  The  material  is  secured  as  a 
by-product  in  the  manufacture  of  buttons  and  is  the  ground  trimmings, 
broken  pieces  and  imperfect  nuts.  Analysis  of  a sample  by  this  depart- 
ment showed:  moisture,  10.2  per  cent.;  crude  fat,  0.8  per  cent.;  crude  pro- 
tein, 4.2  per  cent.;  crude  fiber,  8.2  per  cent.;  crude  ash,  0.9  per  cent.; 
nitrogen  free  extract,  75.7  per  cent. 

Cocoanut  meal  or  copra  oil  meal  is  the  ground  product  obtained  after 
extraction  of  part  of  the  oil  from  the  fieshy  portion  of  the  cocoanut  (Cocos 
nucifera).  Average  analysis"  shows:  moisture,  9.6  per  cent.;  crude  fat, 
8.1  per  cent.;  crude  protein,  20.9  per  cent.;  crude  fiber  11.2  per  cent.; 
crude  ash,  4.9  per  cent.;  nitrogen  free  extract,  45.3  per  cent.  This  ma- 
terial in  the  past  has  found  a ready  market  in  Europe,  but  now  owing  to 
the  war,  large  quantities  are  being  sold  in  this  country.  Henry  and  Mor- 
rison report  it  as  having  been  fed  successfully  to  cows,  horses,  swine  and 
sheep.  They  report  it  as  being  about  equal  to  gluten  feed  for  dairy  cows. 

Peanut  oil  cake  is  the  residue  after  the  extraction  of  part  of  the  oil 
by  pressure  or  solvents  from  peanut  kernels.  ' 

Peanut  oil  meal  is  the  ground  residue  after  the  extraction  of  part  of 
the  oil  from  peanut  kernels. 

Unhulled  peanut  oil  feed  is  the  ground  residue  obtained  after  extrac- 
tion of  part  of  the  oil  from  whole  peanuts,  and  the  ingredients  shall  be 
designated  as  “peanut  meal  and  hulls.” 

Peanut  hulls  consists  of  the  ground  shell  or  hull  of  the  peanut. 

Inasmuch  as  Indiana  will  undoubtedly  furnish  a market  for  a part  of 
the  increased  crop  of  peanuts  in  the  south  the  following  contains  analysis 
of  the  several  peanut  products  used  for  feeding  of  animals. 


Moisture 
per  cent. 

Crude 

fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
protein 
per  cent. 

Crude 
fiber 
per  cent. 

Crude 

ash 

per  cent. 

Nitrogen 
free  extract 
per  cent. 

Peanut  oil  meal  i 

110.7 

8.0 

47.6 

5.1 

4.9 

23.7 

Unhulled  peanut  oil  feed  ^ 

5.7 

11.1 

28.4 

23.4 

4.5 

. 27.0 

Peanut  hulls  ^ 

9.1 

2.6 

7.3 

08.6 

6.5 

18.9 

1 Feeds  & Feeding- 


Garbage  tankage  is  manufactured  from  the  kitchen  refuse  of  cities. 
Generally  this  refuse  is  subjected  to  treatment  for  extraction  of  oils  and 
fats,  and  the  by-product  is  sold  as  garbage  tankage;  while  in  other  cases 
the  refuse  is  simply  dried  or  charred.  Thus  it  is  highly  variable  in  char- 
acter and  often  contains  pulverized  glass,  crockery,  and  other  materials 
that  may  be  injurious  if  the  material  is  fed  to  live  stock.  Therefore  gar- 
bage tankage  is  unfit  and  dangerous  for  stock  feeding  purposes  and  the 
registration  of  any  feed  with  garbage  tankage  as  an  ingredient  will  not  be 
accepted  by  this  department. 

DETAILS  OF  INSPECTION  OF  FEEDING  STUFFS 

The  official  inspectors  of  this  department  visited  during  the  year  1916, 
the  92  counties  securing  in  507  of  581  town  visited,  3877  samples  repre- 
senting 2017  brands  and  851  manufacturers.  Ten  to  138  samples  were 
drawn  from  all  counties,  except  seven,  while  in  only  one  county  was  there 
less  than  four  samples  procured. 


1 Kellner,  The  Scientific  Feeding  of  Farm  Animals 

2 Henry  & Morrison’s  Feeds  and  Feedings 


20 


The  inspection  samples  were  obtained  in  the  92  counties  as  follows: 


COUNTY 

No. 

of 

sam- 

ples 

COUNTY 

No. 

of 

sam- 

ples 

COUNTY 

i No. 
of 

sam- 

ples 

1 

Adams 

64 

33 

44 

! 68 

Pike 

77 

,9, 

Allen 

68 

88 

76 

64 

Porter 

52 

3 

Bartholomew 

28 

34 

Howard  

16 

66 

Posey 

38 

4 

Benton  

9 

85 

201 

66 

Pulaski 

26 

5 

Blackford  

.16 

36 

40 

' 67 

Putnam 

30 

e 

Boone  

59 

87 

30 

‘68 

Randolph 

65 

7 

Brown  

8 

38 

.lay 

48 

I 69 

R.iplelv 

41 

8 

Carroll  

20 

39 

85 

' 70 

Rush 

20 

0 

Cass  _____  

46 

40 

35 

71 

Scott 

19 

10 

Clark  

72 

! 41i 

Johnson 

66 

72 

Shelby 

24 

111 

Clay  

43 

42 

Enn^ 

75 

1 78 

Spencer 

47 

13 

Clinton  

30 

48 

Eoseinskn 

34 

' 74 

St.  Joseph 

lil7 

18 

Crawford 

17 

T,aGran2-e 

20 

75 

Starke 

25 

M 

Daviess  

43 

1 45 

Lake  _ 

127 

76 

Stenhen 

65 

16 

Dearborn  

31 

' 46 

TaPnrte 

65 

'77' 

Sullivan 

41 

16 

Decatur  

48 

47 

T.awrenee 

40 

78 

Switzerland 

7 

17 

Dekalb  

24 

48 

Madison 

60 

79 

Tippecanoe 

60 

18 

Delaware  

78 

49 

Marion 

184 

80 

Tipton 

31 

19 

Dubois 

36 

50 

Marshall 

55 

81 

Union 

20 

20 

Elkhart  

77 

51 

Martin 

2 

82 

Vanderburg 

185 

2,1 

Payette  

8 

50 

Miami 

43 

88 

Vermilion 

29 

23 

Ployd  

67 

58 

Monroe 

17 

84 

Vigo 

61 

23 

Pountain  

25 

54 

Montvomery 

20 

85 

Wabash  

38 

24 

Pranklin  .. 

27 

56 

Morgan 

22 

86 

Warren 

3 

26 

Pulton  _ 

33 

66 

Newton 

20 

87 

Warrick 

15 

26 

Gibson 

64 

57 

Noble 

44 

88 

Washington 

72 

27 

Grant  . _ 

71 

58 

Ohio 

2 

80 

Wayne 

60 

28 

Greene 

69 

69 

Orange 

51 

90 

Wells  _ 

57 

29 

Hamilton 

30 

60 

Owen 

22 

01 

White 

28 

30 

Hancock  

22 

611 

Parke 

17 

92 

Whitley 

30 

31 

Harrison  

18 

1® 

Perry  

28 

Table  II,  page  22,  contains  a summary  of  the  results  of  inspection  of 
feeding  stuffs  collected  in  1916.  For  convenience  of  comparison  the  feed- 
ing stuffs  are  divided  into  140  classes;  and  in  turn  class  131,  Proprietary 
Stock  and  Molasses  feeds,  is  subdivided  into  66  classes  according  to  the 
ingredients  from  which  each  is  compounded. 

Similar  classes  of  feeds  inspected  in  1916  compared  with  those  of  1915 
show  a substantial  increase  in  the  retail  prices  of  all  feeds.  The  greatest 
increase  in  prices  is  noted  in  feeds  with  high  protein  content,  such  as 
aniihal  by-products  and  cottonseed  meals. 

It  is-  noted  that  of  3535  samples  analyzed,  2581  or  nearly  75  per  cent, 
were  equal  to  guarantee,  while  only  115  or  3.2  per  cent,  were  deficient  in 
both  crude  fat  and  crude  protein.  It  is  shown  that  only  81  or  less  than  2.3 
per  cent,  contained  adulterants. 

Table  III,  page  30,  contains  the  complete  analysis  of  all  feeding  stuffs 
analyzed  in  1916  classified  in  the  case  of  mill  feeds  under  heading  showing 
actual  ingredients  identified;  while  in  tlie  case  of  animal  by-products,  cot- 
tonseed products,  hominy  feeds  and  proprietary  feeds  they  are  classified 
according  to  trade  name  and  manufacturer.  That  is,  all  mill  by-products 
found  to  be  composed  of  the  same  ingredients  were  composited  making 
one  sample,  and  in  case  of  feeds  reported  under  brand  name  all  inspec- 
tion samples  of  same  brand  were  composited.  Thus,  as  will  be  seen  by 
the  first  column  of  Table  III,  although  many  of  the  analyses  are  only  of 
one  sample,  the  majority  represent  composites  of  from  two  to  228  samples. 

This  table  is  especially  prepared  for  the  use  of  the  consumer  in  con- 
nection with  Table  I which  contains  Digestible  Coefficients  of  Feeding 
Stuffs. 

The  present  high  prices  of  fertilizing  materials  emphasizes  the  neces- 
sity for  the  farmer  who  buys  commercial  feeding  stuffs,  not  only  to  con- 


21 


sider  its  fitness  as  a feed,  but  also  its  value  as  a source  of  fertilizing  ma- 
terials. Henryk  says:  “The  value  of  farm  manures  depends  primarily 
and  principally  on  the  character  of  the  food  from  which  they  originate, 
for  the  animal  merely  works  over  the  food  given  it,  appropriating  for  the 
formation  of  flesh  or  milk,  more  or  less  of  the  fertilizing  constituents  the 
food  furnishes,  and  voiding  the  rest  in  the  excrements.” 

In  fact  experiments  show  that  mature  animals  void  practically  all 
the  nitrogen  and  ash,  containing  potash  and  phosphoric  acid,  which  is 
supplied  by  the  food;  and  even  growing  animals  excrete  considerable  pro- 
portions of  the  fertilizing  materials  contained  in  the  food  eaten. 

That  the  farmer  may  intelligently  purchase  such  feeding  stuffs  as 
will  furnish  together  with  the  desired  food  values  a maximum  amount  of 
fertilizing  materials,  the  percentages  of  the  fertilizing  constituents  of 
different  classes  and  brands  of  feeding  stuffs  is  given  in  Table  III.  The 
figures  are  the  result  of  actual  analyses  and  should  prove  of  value  to 
farmers  in  their  selection  of  classes  or  brands  of  feeding  stuffs  for  feed- 
ing purposes. 


1 Feeds  and  Feeding 


TABLE  II — Summary  6f  Results  of  Inspection 


22 


I 


j 


paiaqBi  :jou 
s:;natn(Jiqs  jequin^ 

C<J  ' CO  1 

l-H  T-H  C<1  1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

J 

1 

1 

1 

paiaqBpj 
s^uaindiqs  ^aquin^^ 

CO  rH  1 

1 

1 

1 

\ 

1 

CO  CO 

1 

1 

f 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

- 

s::^^^Ip^JSuI 
paa^jUBiBoguri 
SuiaiB^jaoD  jaquin^ 

lO  COit-  1 
C<J  1 

1 t 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 i 

1 1 

1-H  <M 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

- 

s:;nBia;inp'B 
SmniB^juoD  jaqinnj^ 

00  t-h  1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 
' ! 

1 1 

1 

1 CO 

t 

1 

1 

1 

t 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

I 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

uia:^oa(I  apruo 
ui’aioai  JO  %i 
^aaiapap  jaquinij; 

1 

I 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t 

t 

1 

1 

1 

1 

- 

(j'Bj  apnja 
ui  aioui  JO  %8'0 
ijuaiagap  jaquin^ 

1 

1 

t lO 

rH  Ui  rH  rH  . 

- 

- 

niaijojd  apnjo  puB  :}bj 

apnja  q:joq  ui  aa^oB 
-jBnS  Aioiaq  jaquinx 

CO  1 1 

1 CO 

1 

> 

( 

I* 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 

J 

1 

< 

1 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

iSiuo  uia:jojd  apnja 
ui  aa:;uBjBnS 
Moiaq  jaquinj^ 

CO  ci<i  1 

1 ffo  eg  00  rH  CO 

- 

eg 

- 

A[uo  :^Bj  apnja 

ni  aa^oBjBnS 
Avoiaq  jaqiun^ 

i 

1 

1 

1 CO 

1 

1 

1 

03  'i'  to  eg 

- 

I-H 

aa^aBJBnS 
o^  [Bnba  jaquinjs[ 

eo  63  oj  <M  c?i03  i-H  (M  <M  c<i  eo  i-i  r-i'  « i-i 

c£><330  r-l63mi>-  C<1  co  co 

1— 1 I— 1 (N  r-( 

paja^siSaj 
t^ou  jaquinj^ 

r-H  1 1 

1 

1 ( 

1 1 

1 rH  C<J  1 

1 1 

1 i 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

noi:;BJ^siSaJ 
ajojaq  uaj[B:j 
saiduiBS  jaqinn^ 

1 

C^^  i-H  CO  [ 

1 

i 

i 

1 

1 

1 

- 

! 

1 

1 

1 

1 

iH 

$ ‘no;^  jad 
aaijd  iiB^jaj 
ill  aSuBH 

O O LO  1— 1 O 

^ CO  CO  ^ 

cl  fM  "If  oi  ei  Jg 
(N  eg  C5  (N  CC  <M  CO 

7 1 

> 00 
1 CO  (M 

1 cil 

1 (M 

27—30 

26—30 

25—32 

22—34 

2.5—30 

: ss 
, 4. 

1 CN 

26—28 

1 t 

1 t 

^ ‘no;  j.ad 
eatJd  iiB:;aj 
’aSBjaAV 

28.00 

27.66 
31.27 

29.50 

34.66 

33.55 

36.00 
29.76 

29.94 

28.15 

26.58 

28.50 

28.00 
27.71 

26.00 

27.55 

27.50 

28.17 

28.00 

32.00 

26.00 

27.00 

24.00 

Average 

composition 

1 *:}naa  Jad 

‘maitojd  apnjQ 

m o (N  CJ  O lA  CO  00  CO  00  C=>l>-COJr^  00  O<I  r-i  r-\ 

loiocot^'^cpirico  ^ CD  CO  id  CDiO  lO  00  iD  lO  id  ^ 2 

•:jnaa  jad 
‘:;bj  apruo 

(M  O CO  CO  lO  CO  Oi  rH  CO  o:)  e<J  05  rH  05rHC<JO  05  (M  C=>  CgO 

'^.'^'^'^CO'^CO'*^^  CO  CO'^  CO  CO  CO  Tjl  'TjH 

•^uaa  jad 

‘ja^BAi 

9.7 
10.1 
10.3 

8.9 

11.2 

9.6 
10.1 

9.8 

10.1 

9.8 

10.1 

9.5 

11.5 

9.9 

9.4 

9.7 

11.6 

10.3 

10.3 

10.9 

12.0 

10.6 

10.1 

pazAiBOB 
- saidraBS  jaqninij 

M t-l  <M  00  ■>:)<  lf3  r-H  CO  lO  <M  (M  i-t  l-Ht-HCg'#  Cg  rH  i-H  (Ml-I 

<S  <?g  eg  ld  55  00  co  g>  eg 

1—1  I-H  60  rH 

FEEDING  STUFF 

1 Wheat  bran  

2 Wheat  bran  and  screenings 

3 Standard  wheat  middlings  or  shorts.. 

4 Wheat  middlings,  reddog  flour „ 

^ Whitfi  TnirlrIHno-c 

1 1 i 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 i 

1 1 1 

i 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 t 
i 1 > 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 i 

1 1 ! 
t 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 i 1 

iJI 

i o (o 

cs 

te- 

J 

5 CO  i> 

8 Wheat  middline-s  and  screenings 

9 Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran  and  wheat 

middlings  

10  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings and  screenings  

11  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings. screenings  and  salt  

12  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings, screenings  and  cleanings 

13  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings and  chatf  

14  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

15  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  corn  bran, 

rye  bran  and  screenings 

16  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  corn  bran 

and  screenings  _ 

17  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  corn  bran 

and  aspirator  dust 

18  Mixed  feed;  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

dlines  and  corn  bran  _ 

19  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

dlings, low  grade  flour  and  corn 
bran 

20  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings, low  grade  flour,  corn  bran 
and  screenings 

21  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

dlings, corn  bran  and  dust  col- 
lector bran ... 

22  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

dlings, corn  bran  and  dust  col- 
lector dust  

23  Mixed  feed:  wheat  bran,  corn  bran 
and  wheat  dust 1 

23 


rH 

1 

1 

1 

1 

r 

i 

- 

- 

1 

t 

1 

t 

1 

1 

i 

^ 

i 

1 

26—32 

! 

! ? 
1 y 

; 3 

24—34 

9^7 — ?bi 

! S 

. <1 

3 C< 

> 

5 

> 

] 

|D 

1>  C 

CO  CO  CO 

J.  J.  J.  1 

CO  CO  CO  O' 

1 

28—32 

o o 


00  00  00  CD  00 

C<l  <M  <M  <M 


W 00 

CD  CD 


ID  rH 


00  00  ID  Oi  CO 


00  00  00 

ID  CD  CO 


CO  (N 


OOOiDllDOit^OOCO 

COCDt>lDCO'^C<I'rt< 


CO  ID  ID  ID 
00  Oi  O Oi* 


Pi 


PI 

S| 

^ .S 


I TD  i ^ 

i’i  a's 

pi+i 


' ^ w ^ 

i S-S  i 
!2«2 
1 es  X2 


2^ 

a 


• dX! 


1 ^ 42  S ' 

|“|ij 

: "2  <4-(  m <4H 

j §j  >73 


<U  ;Q 
iPh 

^ fl 

t-l 

. . O 


•9  a 


cs  bfl 

js  (u 


^ a 


w <u 
bjoaq 
C ^ PI 


X}  03 

■a 

aa 

’^2 

a i 

g o « 

2^1 

03  Jh  m 

S-Q  h 


1 tlio  O 

I c " 

1^  4J 

I2S: 

la-® 


2 s 

o 


Bo 


. 03  ■ 


0 _ bo 

>22.e 
) a.^s 


! “-a  S g -O' 

^ a g .ja  g 

>-«•*-'  OQ  fe  •« 

jj  ^ a T3  ^ 

O .a  73  03  .2 , 

S ^ 

« M 


A <u 

S '9 


!'a2 


I bo-gx2  a 

„ I (H  a g 'o 
"o  1 'S  "^  +=> 

« I O)  pS  03  if 
I if  oj  <u  a 
I S g'C-G  " 

P 1 “2  o iS’9 

^ x'^  ^ 

tc  03  " a 03 -o  02 

bflXJ  'O  g a 03  bo 

a <y  g ^ -a  ^ a 
a if  t-,  a 

O ^ 'O  ^ S T3  S 

f-t  rj  O?  ^ "S  OJ  fH 

CO 


CD  c a 

>>5  iH 

>H  02  O 


'“02^ 
2 ^ 
S'gg 


« 


CO 


“2  TJ  a -o 
bo  02  5 2 

Q 02  ^ <12 

.at-ipQ^i 

ft 

1-2- 

lO  CO 
CO  CO 


i-Q ^ 

I rH  5^.9 

I g a a 

' p a o 

03+2 

2^— . ^ 

^■S|ss 

03  P g ts 

^22'® 

.S  .^.  ,S  S 33  ^ 55  03  53  cu 


C3  £ C3 

I si 11. 

..  o . -*  12 

'0^5-0 


I'p.p;  o 


he  bo 

.a_|5 

2’a^ 

82 

sga 


..  a .. 

T3  o-a' 

4)  S' 


0^  S 'C 

^ <x>  ^ a; 


rrr'o'p'o  a'a2'a2'p 

ao2'rio2oi^r'i'Soj 

g«g  2.^ 

^ ^ S ^ S 

^ S 2 ^ ^ 


8.28  «a 

s s 

2 !i 


TABLE  II — Summary  of  Results  of  Inspection  (continued) 


24 


I p9[9qB[  :;ou 

s:ja3Ui(Iiqs  jaquiaj^ 

- 

1— 1 

paiaq^pj 
s:;u9uidiqs  J9qiuuj»j 

Cq 

sia9ip9JSui 
p99:;uBJBnSun 
Suiuib:}uo9  a9quinx 

- 

s;uBJ9:jinpB 
‘ SniUTB:}U09  j;9quinx 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 UI9:jOJd  9piU9 

U[  9JOUI  JO  %i 
:)U956y9p  J9quiujsf 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 !JBJ  9pnJ9 

UI  9JOIU  JO  %2'Q 
^uaioggp  J9qiunjs[ 

rH  rH 

(N 

- 

UI9!)OJ(J  9pnJD  pUB  ^BJ 
9pnj9  ^:^oq  ui  99:juB 
-jBnS  AiO[9q  J9quin^ 

- 

1 

1 

rH  1 

1 

1 

03 

Aiuo  ui9ioja  9pua9 
UI  99:^uBaBnS 
AVO[9q  J9quinj^ 

1 

i-H 

CD  I-H 

C<1 

<M 

03  r-l 

Ajuo  :;b}  gpnjo 
, UI  99:;uBJBnS 

Avo[9q  J9quinj»j 

C-3  1-H  tH  r-l 

0 

03 

03 

r.  ^ 

e9;uBJBnS 
o:j  IBnb9  J9quin^ 

r-C  CO 

03 

COCO  CD  iO  fMC<IC01OC<JrH 

<M  tH  rH  i-(  T-r 

03  03  03  g 

p9i9:;siS9J 
:jou  J9qiun_fii 

- 

UOi;UJ^SlS9J 

0jo}9q  U9}[b:} 
S9i(IuiBS  J9qinn^ 

1 

1 

! 

1 

1 

(M 

$ ‘uo:j  jgd 
eoijd  iib:;9j 
ill  gSuBa 

29—31 

28—33 

39—34. 

28—33 

22—35 

S 

SS!g 

I'i 

(N  CO  00 

25.45—49 

37—48 

33—38 

39-32 

32—35 

32—36 

20—44 

$ ‘uo;  J9d 
09iJd  iib:j9j 

aSBJBAV 

38.00 

30.53 

30.00  . 

29.00 

30.00  . 
31.20 
30.60 

27.00 

21.25 

33.26 

37.00 

31.00 
39.87 

29.00 
31.15  ; 

41.67 

35.50 

30.00 

30.00 

32.00 

30.00 

26.00  . 

31.00 

33.50 

34.00 

32.67 

Average 

composition 

•^U9D  J9d 
‘u{9;ojd  9pnjo 

I— 1 0303  rjl  COlC-O  00  IC  03rHOOOlOi— ICO  lO  t-  ID  CO  COCOi-H  O 

5h  5S  !5  S 52  ?h  S ^SSSS^^S^h  S ^ S S^S  S 

•CJU99  J9d 
‘:^B^  9pnjo 

rH  ril  LO  rH  03  rjl  lO  JtH  03  rH  Ml  03  r^l  rtl  O CO  00  lO  (M  03  00  Cd  rH  O (N  rH 

CD  (N  (M  CO  CO  <M  CO  CO  ^ CO  CO  CO  ^ CO  CO  CO  rii  Tt< 

•:iU99  J9d 

‘j9:iBAi 

9.3 

8.7 

10.4 

9.8 

12.8 

9.8 

8.9 

10.6 

10.7 

11.0 

10.3 
11.6 

10.8 

10.7 
8.6 

10.5 
10.1 

10.8 

12.9 

14.3 

9.9 

9.8 

11.5 

10.6 
10.7 

10.6 

P9ZA{BUB 

s9idniBS  J9quin_tj  | 

rH  CO  rH  lO  rH  XH  in  CO  00  Og  CO  00  tr  !M  CO  CO  IN  rH  rH  rH  rH  Cd  Cd  Cd  N O 

tuo  be 

M .y  I a a 

be^ 
n 73 
:73 


bo 


9 ^ 


.9^ 
9 a 


73  73 
a . ^ ',73  73 

ssa,99 

« =3  (S  I 03  9 1 Iv 

SraS^HOoi  ‘oj^  ' OS  aj  !o 

:s  5 ^ is-^  ;S  03  ti  “ !h  | x2 

- m ••  ••  ” ••  °.9  a ” I .. 

tint's 'OS 

SS'O'S  CO'S 
'O^'ag'O'aaj^asSi'a  ^73 

9 .*5  8 .a  .^3 .9  .9  ^ ^ .^3 

S 3 S3  3 Ph  w3  3 

CO  CO  05  o 1-HfMCQ 


-r? 

q;  P 


I 

1 s 

I cc 

1^3 


^"0  73 


CD  3 S "O 

'O  TS  'O 

r1  a O ® C3  t»> 
S ^ 03X2^  3 


M 03  t®  tn  [^r  CO  CO 
l9o3c3c3cdo3«!o3 

^“gooooooo 
^ S a fl  fl  a a a 3 3 
■Q  oooopooo 
g-OOUOOUOO 

^incc>t^oo®Oi-i(y 

p;inioioiomci>coo 


1-0 
I o3 


8 tm 
'*^.9 

a 3 
o £ 


03 

^2 
oT  2 
1/?^ 


C3  OQ  C3  ^ 
1?  tuO  cu  fl 


I a 
I o 


I 

I 

d 'S 


I C3  o) 

I rt 

> O H 

o 


QJ  £ 03  T3  TS  iH 

>1  o G c!  o 
^ CO  'I  ^ c3  03  " 

C0T3  CO  ^ CO  OD  tK 
*->  £3  ■!->  O +->  +j  -tj 
CS  s 03  O CS  03  03 

o o „ o o o 

q G G a 


G S G _ 

sasa 

o o 

5 s 


O O 0;Q 

000 


25 


TABLE  II — Summary  of  Results  of  Inspection  (continued) 


26 


paiaqBi  ijou 
sijuanidtqs  aaquin^j 

- 

Ui 

- 

- 

in 

I 

(M 

<N 

- 

in 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

paiaq^iaj 
s:^u^UIdIqs  aaquin^ 

1 

1 

1 

C<I 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

s^uaipaiSui 

paajaBJBnSun 
SniuiBijuoD  jaqtnn^ 

1 

- 

<N 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

s^nBJaiqnpB 
SuiuiB^jnoo  iaquin_ti 

1 

1 

05 

rnrn 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

nia^ojd  apruo 
ui  ajoui  JO  %i 
quaiapap  jaquin^ 

inca 

(M 

CO 

CO  rH  rH 

(M  « 

CO 

« i-< 

- 

05 

05 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

(jBj  apaio 
ni  aioin  jo  %s'0 
:^u^t^gap  jaquin^ 

rH 

0 

rH 

0 

rH 

05 

CO 

CO  CO 

(M 

rH  CO 

- 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

uia:)0Jd  apnJD  puB  ijbj 

‘ apnjD  ^:^oq  ui  aa;uB 
-iBnS  M0[aq  laquin^ 

;Ei 

- 

CO 

iq  CM 

05 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Aiuo  uiaiiojd  apnjo 
til  aaijuBJBnS 
Avoiaq  jaqtnriN: 

CO 

1>  <M 

rH  r^  CO  <M  CO  CCl 

CO 

J> 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

^[uo  itBj  apnja 
ut  aa^uBJBnS 
Moiaq  jaqinn^ 

i-(  rH  i-H  iq  rH 

0 

rH  rH  CO 

05  rH 

(^5 

rH  <N 

- 

05 

1 

1 

! 

t 

1 

1 

ea^uBJBttS 
o:j  IBnba  jaquinjs[ 

2 

1 

36 

112 

C<l 

i-H(MCO'^50C<l(MrHt~»q<Ol£5 

CO  CO  COrH  if3  05  i-lrH 

r-iT-Hf^4>Ln  CO  00  CO  CO  ^5  rH  rHCO  rH  e5 

i-H  CO 

paiaijsiSaj 
;jou  jaquini^ 

- 

1 

1 rH 

J 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

I 1 

uoiijBjijsiSai 

aiojaq  uaj[B4 
saiduiBS  jaqinn^ 

N 1'. 

- 

<N 

1 

1 

» 

$ ‘noi  jad 
aaijd  jiBijaj 
ill  aSnBa 

8 

in  CO  CO  ^ 

CO  jt^  CO  0 

iiiX 

^ <6  rH 

<^5 

1 

1 

) 

CO  0 C^1  ^ ^ 

Csi  'J  CO  'J  CO 

10  d)  0 '*rL  Ji  li 

rH  C<J  m CO  c< 

J 

J c- 

5 

:] 

30.95—55 

20--38.90 

20.50^-36 

23-42 

9'7u_Sl 

3 

(M  = e 
iq  iq  -Hi 

diJ 

TlH  CO  <> 

gq 

5 (=5  e 

i CO  ^ 

> ^ ] 

5 <M  C< 

) 0 

I 1 

3 

:> 

! 

05 

$ ‘noi  jad 
eoud 
eSBjaAV 


lOeO®OC3e5lOOOC3Ttl<Z)l>050C<)«0«=>;pt^OOl 

iOcot^oiftOTtt05e)e<5«o«ocviooeo05iftcooo( 


8 


> O CO  Ci  O 00  C<l  O o (N  CO O Oi 


<N 

CO  CO 


Q 


•:^a8D  J8d 

‘ma^oid  apruo 


I fc- l£S  10  ■<*<  i-H  (N  l-H  f-H  (M  ( 


>t»C<lO05t-0>C0l01S(M 
i|t^  05  CO  O CO 
I (M  r-l  CO  CO  i-H 


CO  CO  O 
I-H  M N 


•;a90  J8d 
‘IBj  apruo 


05C01>;'®05000lC5'i<CD-^T-lrH00001>.(Mt-.(55C0005rHi 

i-HO0=OrH8c0t-Ic0l>^05<NrHC0TiHjC^0dt^8cOrHi^C0£^l 


I 00  00  05 
> O O (M 


00  in 

<N  c4  CO 


•^aao  J9(I 


’^^0C0r-«mr-^050qC01>*i-<<NC0C0rH05t^l>*m’^C000C0'^O 

co^cooo-t^ooioo^i>^t-^oio6o6o6cdt>^co^Oi>^t^o6ooco 


in  o o CO 


paZi?iBnB 

saidniBS  laqinn^ 


CO  in  CO  I 


iCO(MOiCO.t>-C<JC<IOCD'^CO 
1 ,-1  CO  ^ rH  i-»  CO 


t Tji  CO 


o CO  CO  c<i  oa 


a,  P, 

as. 


I ^ 

' 

1 
^ I 


tuo  >-1 
.9  o) 


0 3 


S ! 

CO  ^ 
CO  q 

“.a , 
ii' 

^ fl . 

^ O 


c3  tuO-H  2 


a^p'^fla'S 

M'MoJOiw'a+j^Otuoa 

(dJCUni  r/^*r;£_, 


al'Sa^'S8sassa2i§§2'^s®^^"“ 

oSs=3-2'CoooooooOooo2o  >> « .a  .a 

pq  S^p^OQOOOOOuWOOOMO«^f>i-q 

C3 

co^^:roo^c>i^(Mco' 


g:=3  C ■ 

P,  O C3  ( 

QJ  W ^ 

M “ ?.,a  «j  1 

x bfl  ^ C3  O I 

^•9:5  ft-g  ' 

as:.  ' 

-u  • 


O 

w . 0 I □ 

2cj  S ^ 

^ ^3  Srrt 

“ioSi 

S s 2 O 
O o3  ■“  t3  “ 

a cl  » 

m c3  03  M 

T-j  W)  o tiJO 

fl.9  °^.a 

cs  G ^ Ki  q 
05  X W O) 
4J  05  gl  05 

S ^ _g.  ^ M 

w CO'S  tm  M 

a 


a s 

05 

-o  s 


G « w 

02  CO  M OT  a 


^ q q ra 

s-SS  a 
§ ® 8 


! q q q tH  " 
ISii S V 
■‘O 


m q <u 

« S q 

"^00 


a s 

”0 


10  Cereals,  alfalfa,  clipped  oat  by- 


27 


*^C<JC0O5 

oq  CO  (N  (N  (NCO'^COCOIO'^CO  CO<N  CO  CN  CO  (M  CO  CO  (N  (N  (N  CO  CO  CO  CO 


00  o 10  00  CO 
O O O 05  Ci 


I cq  CO  (N 
’ 05  O 00* 


I ?-t  rH  in  i-< 


o 3 
^ o 

X}  ^ 
fl 

S3  ^ 

4jXl 


« o 

^ =« 

O oj 

tH  t-, 

d,  1) 
O 


S p 


CB  O 

"'O 


O 2 

s ^ < 

”0 


w - o ® o 

I C3  -3  ft  t/3  ri  ft^  Q, 

cca;^ 

! ^os'cj'^ 

K.S  0s  ^ a •.CJ  •* 

i S'S'os^w^  ra'a'3'w 


(-1  I M 
ft  j ft 


O o s 

!=*  ft 
35  ft  '3 


(B  -4^ 

-M  o 

^X} 

^ <=> 
O U( 

|s 


‘5  5^ 

• a;  tU} 

rs^s.SftcB's.9 

I gS|  ""33  3 “i 

'«  « a g go  g " 


CD  cs  tc 'O 


3Sft“2ft-33 

33  s333-(-srQ33+jrrt33 

O W O-^  § O C3^  o 

^ t , O » , t_i  l,\J 

ft0Dft“Q,ft  DiftSi 


OlOJ^OJ^www 

OPCl^CCCUcC^ft^ 

r^r'^ 


00  o 


_CD  M ^ 

S o 2 

S ft  a> 

o ”0 


“ ^ 8 ^ S 

^ 03  (1  03_' 
O O)  03  <u'ft 


!>J  tB  >1  tk  t>j 

X3  ftj2  bO^X3  g,‘=^  * 

33  3”“  «i' 

02  P (B 'S 


X2-ft 


S'g| 


^ tB  CO  ^ O 

5.13  2:5 *3 13 '3 "3 "3^ 

' Q;cLa>a)a)a;<i?q 
^ fn  Sh  fH 


I fl  O? 

I cy  M 4J  rrt 

1 2 ^ S 

! o S 

I c«  O 

S3  <4-1  (J3 

KS-P-S  OB 


- O -CJ  ,/■  O 

“ a^  f^-2ft 

O o'ft  QJ 

ft3!  3 O ft  OJ 

'gg'S^P 

>»  Cl  ^ >>  c 

X3  ft^tf-O  ft 

-a  S - 

r/T  O r/-  O 


8 03  t>) 

ft^o  ^ 

tfl 


p C3 


I cd  p 

fT-.  ^ 

1 ^ ft 


! O QJ  QJ  U ID  C3 

ooooo  o 


o 

w aj  uvj  ft,, 

C >4 

6'“o--6'° 


®3  p.  c3  03 
C • cn 


^ — (,\3  w 

O M O CD  0,Q 

aft*  g . ft  ft 

Sa 

DO  <Q  ft  X2  CD 

^ 4J  rrt  4^ 

5J  ^ C • X C 

03  ^ P W g ^ P 

i3  ^ S P."^ 

O O)  O <0  • C O 
q tH  fH  M >i  S-.  f-| 
H a>  Cl  <1^  jO  ^ P 
w ^ Q ^ 


-a  S 


>»  CD  C3 

"..al 

03  fl  S 

P? 

S”“ 


tB  t>J0 

S ft 

a '3 

Xi  04 


000 
ft  ft  3 
3J35  3) 

000 

^ 4h  ^ 

O4  ft  ft 

>.  (^  >4 

PQWpq 


TABLE  II — Summary  of  Results  of  Inspection  (continued) 


28 


paiaqei  qou 
squaiiidiqs  aaqiun^ 

<N 

- 

paiaqBpj 
squauidtqs  jaquin^ 

- 

squaipajSui 
paa^ut^ienSuri 
SniuiB:;uoo  jaquin^ 

i 

squBjaqinpB 
Sajni'Bquoo  iaquin_tj 

- 

uiaqojd  aprua 
ui'aioui  JO  %i 
qnaiayap  jaqranj^ 

- 

- 

- 

03 

- 

aprua 
ui  ajoiu  JO  %s'0 
!}uaiagap  jaqiunjs[ 

1-H  t-H 

CO  rH 

- 

- 

tH 

CO 

niaqojd  apnia  puB  qBj 
apnja  q;oq  ui  aa:^UB 
-jBnS  Avoiaq  jaqinn^ 

i 

- 

- 

- 

<M 

./Jiuo  aiaqojd  aprua 
lii  aaquBJBnS 
Moiaq  Jaqtan^ 

(M 

- 

- 

<M  CO 

- 

- 

Aiuo  :jBj  aprua 
ut  aaquBjBnS 
Avopq  jaqran^^ 

- 

CO 

- 

rH 

- 

- 

eai^uBJBnS 
oq  iBnba  jaqttin^ 

1-  00 

- 

- 

Ml-  CO  t- 

3 

1 

34 

5 

4 

1 

3 

pajaqsiSaj 
qou  laqinn^^ 

1 

uoiqBi:tsiSaj 
ajojaq  ua'qB;; 
saidtuBS  jaqtun^ 

$ ‘uo;  jad 
aaud  [iBqaj 
til  aSuBa 

sin  (?■ 
'S'  CC 

c< 

1 m 

1 

; CO 

i 

I 

32—36 

.C';|V_.Q9 

I 

28—33 

a 

2 

C- 

> n 

; 3 

1 

) 

> 

s s 
i J 

(M  e- 

5 ^ 

a 

. j 

5 0 

' J 

q 0 

! 3 

4 C 

3 

5 

s 

4 

37—42 

$ ‘uo:j  jad 
aaud  iiBqaj 
aSBjaAV 

m <=> 
(M  0 

g 

gg 

g 

0 

g 

rD 

05 

g 

0 

0 

g 

g 

0 

0 

i>  0 

c4  e> 

0 

e> 

05  m CO  (M 
CO  CO  (M  CO  CO 

C?  CO 

CO 

04 

0 LO 
C<l  CO 

CO 

g 

0 

CO 

g 

cr> 

CO 

05 

C<I 

05 

(N 

o3 

rH  0 
CO 

g 

5 = 

o 


*;naD  jad 
‘uiajojd  apnjo 


!>•  10  GO  C<J 
in  GO  CO  10 


CO  ^ 
(N  CO 


C<1  O 

o 06 


s § 


’4uaD  jad  j °9 

‘;bj  apnjo  ^ 


00  IM  O 00  CO  a>05  (Minoo  COt^-^i-l  co  oj 


•;uaa  jad 

‘aa:tBAi 


pazAiBOB 
saiduiBS  jaqinn^N: 


co(mooooo  -^c^i  o mo  eo  rn  co  o 

OOCjJmOOCO  rHTp  OrH  CO  O rH  rH 


m 05  f-i 


^ S a ^ 


^<2  o * 


s 

M cT 


CZ  ,—k  M C/J  CM 

W ca  ca^ 
ca  ^ ca 

S S 3^  S'S 

ro  ^ ca 


O O 'CJ  O ^ 
s P 3 :=!  E3  3 
'O  'O 

p o o o p o 
Saaaaa;i 
^ >>  >>  ^ >> 
pqpq2q»pq?3 


o a 

3- 


03 

la's. 


'O'O  aT3 
o O 03  O 

t-l  tH  • 

5 a ai^  a 
3 g 
'^pqpq  “pq 


^ g 
^ a 

o ^ 

M X2 

a 


'0.2' 

2'3±;  o 


O O rrt  tJ 
^ ^ 2 ^ 


-W  O 

23 

2'^ 

>“3 

jZi  ^ 


a a- 


II 


. , . ! i 

o;  I w I c ca  I 

£»i3  j bi]  cc  I 

.2  !.SSgi^  I 

^ I ca  I 

I a?  ^ fcH  w I 

ej  I 0^  ^ CJ 

I S o cfl  - 

g I s 3 j I 

£ 5 a S p ! 


M o ■ 

.3  3 

g^' 

a>  a 


'O  ^ 

I OJ  M 

! a cc 


ao 

•-ga 


I m 2 Oi^ 

^ “ tU0T3  ^ 

a a C3\s 

> g'3  § 

, 3 =3-5 


P ^ ra  ^ ! 
'"Wpq  M ' 


1 1 “1^ 

“ 3 “ o 

2'g  2 2l°g 

-b  Q T3  t>>T3  'O  M 
aiO®3  0X^03^22 

o)  f-i  (H  a ® 

M p,i2  a^  2.2  o 
03  ^ 2 K*1  Q 5 

-^pq  “pq  ‘^pq 


1 tuo  b 

I ^ 

'.2 

0-^0 
S42.  X! 
T3  CS'O' 

000 
aTp  a 

CQ  PQ 


C ” ” _a 

CO  .2  g +2  _o 
(d  3 rg  3 +J  ^ 

■5  Td  o S3 

5 O O O w O 

H2£2^i2 

pq  W W 


O m 
2 M 
ca  .9 


oa  -Q 

CQ  CO  3 

CO  Td  Td  b 
2 0 0 
.2  ^ .LJ 

O 2 2^ 
3 (»  >>M 


29 


30 


CO 

•^naa  jad 
‘qsB^od; 

1.54 

1.59 

1.18 

1.36 

0.78 

0.80 

0.50 

0.65 

0.95 

1.02 

1.03 

0.47 

0.51 

0.45 

1.00 

1.29 

1.09 

1.16 

0.84 

1.48 

1.72 

0.95 

1.07 

0.95 

1.03 

0.59 

1.55 

0.59 

0.85 

0.73 

0.83 

0.97 

1.06 

0.91 

0.94 

0.45 

1.10 

1.30 

1.21 

1.27 

0.86 

1.21 

G R 
.G  o) 
^ G 

(h  CO 

•^uaa  jad 

‘ptOB 

aijoqdso’qa: 

'i 

2.62 

2.91 

2.60 

2.74 

1.61 

1.72 

0.66 

1.19 

1.78 

2.06 

1.28  1 

1.26  i 

0.68 

0.86 

2.21 

2.49 

1.89 

2.23 

2.29 

2.78 

2.38 

1.91 

1.97 

2.28  i 

2.53  ! 

1.28 

2.76 

1.33 

0.90 

1.25 

1.73 

1.61 

1.98 

1.34 

1.60 

0.74 

1.48 

2.03 

1.97 

1.94  1 

1.28 

0.97  1 

G 

pH  0 

C.) 

•^uaa  jad 

<TT  -i  3rk  T-l  T I^T 

COOOi-<CpOOtC5(M'^C<JC<Jl>OCOCC^OOCOOiC<lCO(MCOa5i-lO> 

ioioin)^mi>'COcoococOii>-i-Hoicnr3ir5AncD*^*^ioc<jmiG 

$ ‘uot^  jad 
eoiid 
'agBjaAv 


•:;nao  jad 
‘;aBJ!}xa  aaij 
— uaSoj:)!^^ 


• :^^aD  lad 
‘qsB  apruo 


•inaa  lad 
‘laqg  apnio 


•:;naD  jad 
‘□la^jojd  apnjo 


•:;uaa  lad 
‘:}Bj  apnjo 


';uao  Jad 
‘ajn;;s;oi\[ 


C^C<J<M(NC^<NC<lC<lC0(MC<lC<J(NO3C<lC<JC<l(M(N<M<NC<I(M<NCq  (N05C<JrHr-iC<JC^C^<N<MC<J<NCQ(NG<JC<l©^ 


OOSlSGOCOCOCOOOt^'^OCO'^COi— *<MOi-HlOOOO§oS  SSoSooKSSSJ^SSSSSS^ 

l>t^I:^X^C^i-HrHrHC5Oli5C0C^IM^CfiQ0OQdc0i^Jt>Cx5Q006cD  rHCOJ>lCO’-^’cO'*^^C>COO<35;D1^0fr^'^ 
C<1(M<NC"1COCOCOCOC^(NCOCOCO(N(MC<1COC^-IC^C<1C<1(NC<1C^C'J  CO(MC^lr-iC4COCOCO<M(?OCOC^C^COC^^C^ 

J:^0]lOCOlOCOC<li-HlOOr-iOilOOi<M'^C5COOiCii-HOOCDir-C<J  10C00il0Car-HC0mC0l:^C0M<C0l00iO0i 
CO  lo  LO  lO  1 


C5C0rHC0lCC0'^l0C000C0C>Tt<C<lO05OTtiI>*l^-C0Lf3C0ir:»C0  '^COCC<NOOCOC<JCOlCOirHlCt^i-«lCO 
ioiococdcO'^(>5co'^TiHcocor-IionHio*^’ir5ioLoiri'^'^'?i<co  coiocooJco'^'^a^'^cocoi-ncDirS'^'uicoco 


COOO<MrHCOOOOQCOlOOJC^i-Hi^OrHTt<OiCOOCi(NlOC<JOC<J  05'^r-iOOOirHC<lCOOOCOt^OQ05COt^'^< 
t^o6ciCX)'^lOC<J'^lOCO<N<NrHCD01>»'^COCOi^X-^mOOCOCO  '^t>TjS'^CO*^iniOiCOCOr-HlOOOlOo6cO< 


O(Mm00i000t^00C0i-H0irt4OC0C<l00in 
lO)COlO^^X*'*^<OCOCC>CO^CO<NlOCOlOCOCOlCuiLO'^if5CO  '^dHT^C01>rH'^COcd'^^COCO‘^<^'’^COlO 


ilCt-HCOCOOOrHJt>mrHOCC)i-ir-irHlCCD<MOiCO(MrHCOrHCO  cqeJTj^l'^OOCMCOlOJXMlOrHCOlA'^X^*?^ 

cO'^’coi-HCox>*iO'^cvico<M^cocococ^co 


X^CC>'«^l>C000C005  00  00C<Jir5C0rHf-»t^C0Q0f-'OC0C0OO00  O(MG0O0>C01>-'^001>^00*^l>t-*CDt^ 
OOiOiCJiOOiOOiOiO^'OOiOOOCiOiOiOOOiOCDOCO  C'lcioir^CjOOOiCiOCOOOsOiQiGOOQ 


pa^isoduioa 


saiduiBS  jaqranj^ 


lo  i-H  CO  00 


^ o o 

+->  tuo  c .9 

“ o'2  a 

.2  2 a 0'S 


CO  ^ ^ s-« 

OJ  tuo  O o 

a 

o 
TJ 


oa|-s 
o 
'O 


_ ^ ^ au 

cj  cu  o 

" - O JM  o q g;:^ 


m 'O 

tuo  Cl 

■4-)  „ 03  O C3 

il“l| 

o ^ ^ 

'o.a  o s g 

to  (c'Ci  '2  M 
G C ^ ^ 

S SiS 

S s .9 .9 .9 

a a s ^ 13 

TJ-aSSS 

ggaaa 


- r* 

w w g 
a cj 
3 C § fl 

a C3  « 03 

a^s^ 


.aS^ 

a o ^ 

s-i  a 

»s-§ 


a dr 

o o’ 

O O 


m . oj 
tuO  d tuo 

.a  O.H 

P'0  cQ-'O 

fa  ^a 

I -u  C3  -iJ 
, 03 'O  03 

I <u  rQ  cu 

I IS  a ^ 


o'S'rt  SSSSS  bxj’q  ' 

§ «;a.a.a.a.a;a  ” 

ddd  g§§§§^lg-2 


t-j^fia>a>CPa)a:)<ua)a)Q;a34J 

o SoocSdSdi  jdc:c:o^-e- 


! C3  c: 
^EsEs'^tsptSfs^ 


Xid2  C2 

ct3c3Gc3GGc3GGc3_ 
a>Q;a-)Q^cyQ;a>c.>Q.5oG^ 

i-(N«T}(in<Oi^00O3C>«ir-iC3i 


® P'O'O'O'O'O'O'a'a'O'a'O'a 

— — — 2^5^^ 


TO  ‘G  X '+H 

^aaaaaa'fbBrtw^^^^^.s.s.a.a^^^ 

2 ojotP'O'O'a'O'O'O'O’O'O'O'O'O 


d 

O' 

V 

0 S 

c3  ^ 

tuO  S O 
d^  « 

I S g 

O (H 
OCX} 
ui 

^ m 

5 

03  d 
f-i  03 
^'O 

®S 

&a 


a 


tao 

t«  d 
taO’2 

.a  « 

g 2 

® tc 


. ll 


03  03 

tuo  &0 
d d 


'O  , - „ , ^ 

^ t-i  »H  O 03  u. 

'*-'  d d tao  g> 

o „,.a'a 

'-‘SoIh 

O , ^'drq 
® tao  tao  ® O ® 

jp-'Q'gbflg^  Qjcu 

>2'dT3^®  SSSS 

^■“ci;!:;^cr®“0303 

TGri 

^Oo^^^^tuobJOtuD 
^ o o G G G G C G 

r G 

3 G 

js^aaaaaaa 


Gh  ^ 

sa 


taotx-g 

G P 

■G  .44 

g O § 


'G 

Oj  o;  OJ 
q;  0)  a> 


GGGGGGGGGc^GG 
gg:x:g:g:oG-gg3g:-gg3g:  ^.  . 

p£  ^ ^ ^ IS  PS  ^ ^ is  pS  ^ ^ » e^d 

d d .. 

'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'rddJ'O'ti 

’O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O'O  a a'd  ^ 

QJQJdJ®®®®®®  ®P^ 

^ssiiiS§§§iii§w«iipq 


^'O'O'O 
.2  o)  0?  a; 
XXX 


31 


rHOOOOOOCSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOcioOOOCSOOOOOOOOOOOO 

2.4-2 

oooooooo 

F2SS85SS?2gSgSsSSSSf^S^F2SoS^J^53g8Sgi^53§SJ2gE23§53£oggSg8$^ 

CqOOOCSOOOl— (OOCPOOOOOi-HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOr-IOOOOOOOrH 

o 

^ 

ssssggsss 

t,^^^^^^^M,-l.-H^rHrHrHrH.-ir-(rH,HrH^,-l,Hr-.rHrHr-(r-.,-l,HrHrHrH,M(N^,-(rHrH,-l,-((M 

gg5iS8S?S§gSg§SgSg§g§g§gSgSggg§g3gSgggggggggSg 

8 

ggggs^gg 

g 

<Min(Mr-ieOJ:~05i-ICO<MrH(MC>tO'HCOOS-«»<C<l'^<Mt'COi-ICO(N(»COOCv5lOin^COOrHO(MTj100eO(MO 

1 

37.1 

CD  1 <N  Oi.t^  j 

rH  CO  tM  1 io  CO  rH  j 

•«*((M(NOrH050rHOCO(M'iH(MrHrHCOCOO(?CIt-rHmM('l'!M'^>#'«i(-«Hi-ll:~(M<NeO(Ml>>-IC10Jt-COib~t~Mt 

CO 

<Ma>(MlOrHi-IOOO 

ltj(MeO<MC<i<MCO<Me»5(N<MC<IC^(MCOC^(MeO(M(M<MIM<M(MC<l(NCO(N(N<Ni-H(MC;irH(M(NlO(MrHi-ICO'^C<3 

-*<e0C0O«0Tt<-.H00OOC005O<N'>J<C0C0O<X>q0  00  00TXO0i00C000C01:^rH00rHJ:-0H0lft(Mt-00C0rHC0 

o 

OOCDOl^t^cOOO'^ 

d 

O O CD  O rH  (N  (>5  O 

C0aiJt^'O<Na5'^'^rH00'^'^l>*'^C0'^'^'rJi(MC005C0rHOC0l0C0C0C0G0l0C0CC>0iT-(»00>(Ni>-C0rHl0Ci 

la 

<MOJr~(MlOeO(MCO 

jo®QOgoo.oog^^;Hoo.g;^oo^3oo.go3oo^go.o.3c.gc«;^gg^o.ooj^oo3^ 

t-OC>rHrH-<Klr-<£>i-te<5e0i-l(M00C5O'^<C0-^00(Mt^t^<M-^CX3t^rH'i<i-l<>J0100--IC*St~C0C30>C/)50(M0> 

1>- 

o'i<-^t^QO-<ne*sco 

^<MOOOa.OO«> 

itsrH«o(MA-'t'COOifl-^jr-c>oso>mr-i-5j<e<5'<^(inooorHcocoeou5ooix>ooQoo>t~iO'^o<io?0'<J<eoeoo 

(MO'^l:^l>-O<MC0 

00 

cdcdoic^^i>i>^r^ 

i-lg^r-c,-ICO(M(>3'!j<(Mi-lrH(MrHrHi-(r-l(M!-(QOi-ig(MX>-!Oi-(i-lr-((Mi-IOgC<IOOmiH(Mi-((Mi-(i-li-lc<ltOi-l 

00 

THC<IrHi-IOOt»l-li-l 

x; 

5 

I 

.2 


I 

S 


'i 


o 


B 


TABLE  III — Analyses  of  Feeding  Stuffs  on  the  Basis  of  Inspection  (continued) 


32 


tUO-M 

Q O 


■:juaD  jad 
‘^SB:^od[ 


ooooocpoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooocioocgooo 


•:^uao  jad 

‘piOB 

Dijoqdsoq,! 


4>  10  1 

(M  (M  1-H  I 

CO  06  00  Oi  1 


iOOtOOOCiCOCO»0'^- 




iio-^Oooioo5co'»<Pir'^a>oooiaoeoc4i^«o<3jift?oi^O'«ii'ij<i 


•:juaa  jad 

‘naSoj;;iii 


cC’Mop'4icot--r-iin^ooa>cooiorH^;^coi05t'(MCOC>!»Oi5i'i'r)C5^ooooy;eoM<5m,-icc>e<3wcoo 
cooS<Mt^Oiio05C»oo(Mifl'£>incpd>oOJt’i-im->i'ioc<i(M(MOMc<i-^-5Hi£ie<3i-<tic5-aliftco<£)Ol>i-iOioO 
03  00  O 00  00t^(Mt~0300000J05ClOOlOt^0i00mt^inir--^05-^J:^'#':0cj00in-<titC>00ci->si03  0jjt^0ic0in0i 


$ ‘no:;  jad 
aaiid  nB:;ai 
aSBjaAy 


S8g8SS8g8^S§S$gg§Sgg8S8§gSS8g8gSSSSggSi®8S88S 


O cp  o 


•;naa  jad 
‘;DBj;xa  aaJj 
— uaSoj:;!^^ 


CO»ACOC<lOOi-l  lLOC<IrHJt^t:^C<J*^l>C<JCOCOOO>COr-«(NCOOCOCO<NlOJC^r^i-H 

C3LOOo6oi>^  llOCOCOr-H'<jHC^COVCCOi-HCO'^  lir:.i4'^'<^T-('^4<(MCOlO(MCOlOCOrHl>^cPrH'^’^i>^COcPrH'^CO 


•:jn90  Jad 

*qsB  apajQ 


M<OlOCOCOCOt^mC<li-HlOrH'^COi:^OOlOOOirHOOCOCDl>-OrHi-HCOrHOiir:)lOCOOirHC<100COt-tCOOi(MkOi>l>- 


•^uaa  jad 
‘jaqy  apnjQ 


■C0C0C<l'^»--«(M05C<JC0t0^-C^^OrH00r-iI>-00* 

iCOOc4c<J(MOi-HCqr-Ii-Hi-J<MCOC<JrHTHOi-ti 


iOO*^COi-HCO‘^'«!j<C<J'^COtOi^QOrHCOC^' 


•:;uaa  jod 

‘uta^jojd  apnjo 


LO(MCOlOCOOiC<JQOlO'^COCOCO'^COCOCOlOC<I^Oii-HLOlOOOCOOM<LOTl<TtiCDOilOOiJ:^COCOCOf-(lOrHCiCiO 


•:;naa  jad 

‘:;bj  apnjo 


C0C^C<li/tl0OC0C0l>-C0’^l>C0rHlCL0'^0505'^CiC0C000C0rH'^lCC5rHi-Hl>«-^it>-C<lt>C<lC0C^C0Ci'^0iOC0 

OlOCOOC^O'^*rHCOOrHOOiailOT^rHOlO(Tii>(MC01:^rH'^CO(MLr5CiCOOO'^^OOC>i:^COQCOG<Il^Q 
r-t  t-h  r-J  r-i  r-H  i-«  rM  r-l  i-i  rH  rH  (N  (N  (M  r-(  rH  tW  i-H  rH  ,-1  r-l  r-H  i-t  i-t  r-t  C<1  1-1  (M  i-t  r-t  r-t 


•;uaa  jad 
‘ajn:;sioi\[ 


lOCOCOCOi-'COlOC<lO’^r-tJ:^OOOrHOiCOOOOi^lOlOCii>*C<JCOCOt>-lOCOi-Ht>l:^C<ICOOTt<CiCDGOX>^^C<JlC<N 

COOOC>COlOCOlOCOC^t>»^OCOOOOCOlOrJ<t^C^COlO'^Tti©'^OOt^OOrHOiCOlOTjilOOOO'^OOOiCOOiCOtOO 


pa^isodmoD 
sa^doiBS  jaquin^ 


! (M  CO  i-H  CO  rH  rH  (N  1 


lC<5e0rrllMC<l>Or-l(MrH(Mi-(00 


ra  >> 

a g 

o p^ 

oa 

fi  Si 

i — ^ 

E 

'a 

iosga 


?o8  s'S'^3 


pa2 


TO  T 

I 


o ^ 5 S P , , 

>..0?  A 
G+;.  o taosS  oSS 


c3  ^ 
ft  >. 
P fl 


9 ^ 

^ 03  P 

. ft  03 

O P ft 

oSg 


iS  s 2 

' o.S  d 

q o o 


O' 


. ga 

lo"o 

I Q ^ ^ ^ 

a ini's  N q 

•SdSo^SSI  S 

cco^o  fl t;  g- 0,  _ 

in  — I C wQ  GpHc^C'T3c3f-j2;::^ho^^  S /-s^  S .9  ^ ^ 

5^®"NHffi«-rWoC03^03tU 


fcflO 

a 


® " Si  lcB-&ri4®C:-  qS 
iV.  - nieg  l^^^cs 

w a p 

ft  ^ P Jal  P 


oK  S ftSO  bfl 

N ^ O P 

® f-i  M Q P '3 

oP 

I I 

tao  ® P P i 

^ P3  ^ ,1^  p) 

g c3<^ 


84rillK;BiliiiiiliSBii!rJis5asiii!i!|iS 

I q^^osg  . p ^ 2 aS-2^ ® g q p a-s-a o 2 S p.s?  1 

+8.  P V5I  r:  S!  ^ a ft  2.aa'So3c3C3  03  03  O3«03c303O3qo3c3o303o3^^®ftft®gg2 

®^'SPPt«+^4a»^„+:>-3(gg^^Si,®0&fiPPPPPPPPPpPPPPPPP+iSoP'Pf§^iriW 
5J^^2o3Pft03o3i®c3®'^^^c3  .2rfP  OVPo3o3o3o3o3«cSo3c3qo3o3o3o3o3o3  03qe.joP®P-l 
m Eci  OS  es  ® ® H ® p.ui'P  §cOQW^Oft|ft|ftftft£H^ftftft|Hft:ftc-c_iftft 
m Vi^  is  t-i  S S fLScZJ’P  PiJr/i  " " ''"' 

'S'bflTS  m m 02  ^ SP^  S hfltujbjobjobobflbcbctniiijobljbx: 

■S  .a  a 0 .2  qj  qj  g 

'S'J:  qO  Pi  03  p P n: 
o3^M®®®o3^P 

Oi(MC<I<NlN(M?553 


Cl  (M  ^ 


:•  QD  OQ  o 
3 CO  (N  CO  ' 
3 ca  ca  cq 


I O O O O O O O O o o o o o 


33 

SJ;S^SSgS8?i  S§fei5l^S^:?SS§^SSSSi°S8g^SiSi2g: 


ootd-ciHt^iotowifiirioicoto^oj^oioojt^g  o’ 


ggiS§!SgS8S^g§§?Sg 


OCOlO'^COOllrti-HOTOO'dHlOC^OOirHi'-OOO 
Ifj  iri  CO  CO  r-i  (N  ci  fN  <N  'i!  C3  00  ITS  l-l  (M  -"li  t-H 


§5g^g2§S^ISg^S5Sg?^S?2^Sq; 


C<li-Hin(NO:)lOrHCOl>-lOCiOCJOi-HOimC<JrHijO 
rH  c^  rH  rH  rH  rH  IM  rH  r-I  i-H  O (>q  CO  I-I  O CO  rH  O 


SS§gSf;3S?SSS?oggSl^S8SS  S 

Igg  S 8 

I'^l  § ^ 


SggSSgS^D  ^:feg88S§^8]2^Sggg[8-a8S8g5g 


g ^ 


<M  (M  CO  CO  1 


COOiOiOOOCMM^lO 


C<ICO(MG<lt-000(N  J^-rHCO'*t^COCOLO(^^COrH«^qf-»OOCD^H•C^<Ol^:>T#^(M’^00 

8^2^SSSg5:  g88feggx°^g'igS3S8g3S3i3g 


CO  CO  lO  m I 
(MC^CO<NCOCOt-H<NC<IC<Ii 


(Mi^<MCOCOOaiCi'^CO'^(MOOC<JOt^(M?-imO(M 


ir:>0'^ir3icc<icoo<Noococo<NO(N(Ncoc<jio 

^'ss^^'sggsgsg^'s^g^sss^ 

incoa>t^coociaDooo(Moooc<io(MCO'’oa5 

s S S S ^ 8 S si  S 


Tt«00t^COL0^i-H'^ 


I 

S « « w 

^«W;§(§ow 

iiiiiigliggSiiiiiiS  l l aSisisgg  § ssss|gsgs5|g|s||s|S3s 


TABLE  III— Analyses  of  Feeding  Stuffs  on  the  Basis  of  Inspection  (continued) 


34 


■^uao  jad  j 

‘qsB^od;  ooodo 


•:iueD  jad 
‘piaB 
aijoqdsoqti 


•^uaa  jad 

‘uaSoj^jM 


$ ‘U04.  jad 
eaijd  i!B!}ai 
aSBjaAY 


ggsss 


■:;uaa  aad 

‘^aBuxa  aa.ij 

— uagoj:^rx 


<M  CO  00 


• :juaD  lad  , x-  lo  co  oo  co 
‘qsB  apnio  i =<i  im  (m 


•:}.uaD  jad  , x-rnoocoo 
‘jaqq  apnjo  j co  eo  co  -n‘ 


?|S 


^4 


gg 

?i?§ 


Cl  T-l 


GO  CO 


(N  C<1  C-l  fN  (>!  C^l  C^J  C^l  c<i  (m’  (>1  rA  (>5  (N  Ol  oi  rn  (M*  C^l  r4  rH  O'!  01  C-5  (M*  t>\  <N 


cDx>coX'mx^occ)0':Dccio^c<oocco50ocoooo 

gggiagg5gggl2ggg:3g^^S28ggggg  'oSS^S'gggfe^^ 

^rHCO^rHC^ICOCOlOrHCO-^C^l-^t^tMOOCi-^OCOOqi^  OCOlOl^LOCMlOi-H'^OlO 

oir*oi-iT-Hi:^ooo^i>*o(M(Mcococ>coi>>mincocoioco  i->T-toi-HOi-trHcooCio 
Locococ£)tocdcotocoi>^cocoototocdocdioioco’ioco'  co'ocdcococdcoco^'ifico 


CiOiCOCOC^^lOCOO^ 

dt^ooo’cot^ooddo 


COCOCiCOCOCOlOCOOLClO(MO 

COCiOirHCpOOOCirHOOT^r-t 
r-*  I-X  ^ T-t  1^ 


l-^t^^COrHOiJC^O’^r-O 


35 


S?3^S3 

O O O r^  O 


S‘4??i?:gi8 


r:ss?iS^  -2  =;; 


C^*  ^ C^  (^q’  C^  c^  (^5  c<l  t-H  C^  (N  C<i  <>5  rH  c4  C^  C^  C<i  C<J  C^  (N  rH  (N  CN  rH  rH  ,-I  t-I 


12  Sg^gSSi^:? 


OOlOOOOCOlO^OCOOlOCOCOlO 

S8‘^SSgg^S§SSggSS 


gfrS^gSSSSg^.§8gSS8 

if5iotoco»/5ioifiioiriicifiTj5Tj5co'«^’ 


^ (M  ^ CO 


IQ  lO  lO  LO  Ift  iri 


^ iS 

IQ  IQ  IQ  IQ  IQ  IQ  LQ  -« 


gggg^S8§8SSgl2i2g 


8^888 

?^g^88§i 


S8S8St^  g88?^88  fe  g 


COC5<M(NCO(MO(MOiX>'#0>t-IOOIQ 

gi8S8888S8S8?5S88 


Cl(MOO.-l>-llQOCOOr-l-:HOt~COr^ 


<M  i-H  '#  !Q>  IQ 


i'^  00  00  O 00  c> 


CD  t-  -O  IQ  c;  X CO 


OOC<|l:^OJ>-COOiOO*^^T-HT-^COrHOiO 

icoiocoiO':DiOLC<oir:)iois>Oir:i'0 


40i-HOOrHT^(Ml^OO^I>lOOOC^l-^ 

OOlOOOOOlOOO'^OiOlO*^**^ 


O to  CS  ^ 
CO  (>3  c^  o oi 


Oi  (M  to  »M  1-H 
•TtH  ^t)  LO  to  to  O 


I CO  — C:  CO  O CO 
: LO  lO  to  to  O 


^MCiOtMOi'^COOqCOOLOCOOii-HCO 

« S 8 d 8 3 g S g g g 8 g 


01(MrHC0O00rHl--C:»C0(Mt0C0l0l0 

S g g d g g g S g g i 2 


CO  -f  o 00  to 


CiC<lC000rHCO00rHCC>(MlOl>-i>l:^r-t 


Oi-lOiCO'4llQlQ(MOXX<M<Q>XOi 

^888^888888^8^8 


<=>  OOX^  CO  CO 


01  t-H  Ol  Ci  CO 


OCOOOICOO  1—  CO 

888888  8 8 


OqCNlOOCOt^CitOCSOOlOCOrHOOOO 

i'^i><:oi>cdocoo<:5i>-tooOiOO 


X^i-I'^CO(NIC50COOi-hCOCOOOt-HCO 

cDOt^l>^':00£'^<:oi^i-^Oo6o6cio 


I <0  (M  CO  o 

• O ci  r-n’  1>I 


. ^ to  1-H  oq  o 
• <;£)  O 00  O 


I to  n*  o CO 
• O O l>^ 


OOC0  001>‘00rH(NCDC0O0qrHl>.C0  i>-COCDi 

OOt^OCOOOQX^tOtor-OtOCOi:^  COOir^J 


to  CO  CO  I 
CO  O 1>*  C^1  J 


o 00  :o  o o 0-1  oi  ^ 

CO  CO  00  CO  GO  X.'* 


) CO  I'-  X>  i:^  J 


CO  Oi  00  X'^  00  00  c 


COT-HCO(MC<JOCO(MrH(MCOtOrHCMi 


S8' 


I CO  CO  X>  ' 


• OT  CO  CO 


TABLE  III — Analyses  of  Feeding  Stuffs  on  the  Basis  of  Inspection  (continued) 


36 


5?  rt 

Ynaa  jad 
‘qsBi^od; 

1.13 

1.13 

1.16 

^.Y 

0.93 

2.5.5 

1 1.62 

: 3.30 

; 1.0s 

1 1.41 

i 0.01 

1.06 

1 0.05 

1.47 

0.97 

0.50 

1.50 

1Y4 

0.84 

0.74 

2.08 

1.44 

1.52 

1.02 

1.42 

1.27 

1.44 

0.45 

1.16 

0.85 

1.27 

1.14 

1.14 

1.03 

2.50 

0.55 

1.07 

0.71 

2.10 

0.97 

.sS 

*-4P 

?H  W 

Yuao  J3d 

‘piOB  I 

oijoqdso'qd;, 

g:3 

i-HC0OOT-HC:>OOOC>OOOciorHOOC=)rHOCp<=>OOi-HC<lrHOOOOOOOO 

0 c3 
0 

CJ> 

•jnaa  jad 

‘naSn.TiTKT 

0 ^ 

10  10 

(M  CO  '1'  C-l  1 


I i-i  i-H  C-l  ^ 1 


^ ‘no:;  lad 

GDIJCl 

gSbjgay 


•^^UGD  jad 
‘;dbi:)X9  aaij 


l--  00  cp 
^ ^ ^ 


> m 10  CO  10  JLO 


lOCOCiOlOOi»-‘0'^OOlC'^C5000COO^OiCOlO'^ir5<NOCOOt^l:^COT-H 


• :}ti90  J9d 

‘qsB  apajo 


•q^naD  jad 
‘jaqg  apnjo 


00  CO 
10 1>  to 


J:^OrH^COOOOOOi^0001:^iOCOC<J(NOTtHT-H(MCOOOOT-‘Tt<»-HC<JC<JC^COT-HCOr-(l>-cO 
O.IO  Jr^'^lOCOOCOX-^X^CO'^lOlOCOtOCOi^'^'^OCOC^lOCOGOTtiiOOOCOJt^COlOO 


COC<JCiX^COOCOCOCO':0005f-Hl>.OOCOJt>-0'«!hCiCOa)OilO*^'*0»-HOOt^GOCOO(MCOO 

(M(Mai»OCOCOOOi-<OiC^rHOCOrHrHOodoCOlO^'!i<COJ>QlOJ^i>-t01r^^OOOrHT-H 


• :;uaa  jad 
‘uia^oid  apruQ 


CO  (M  CO 
CO  ^ ^ 


<M  <=> 

<s  d 


t^■<^|(^^col^'0o<3co(^^'^c>cpm■»l^oo■^• 


• in  CO  in  o 10  CO  ' 
' d C3  <3  1 


•:^naa  Jad 
‘JT3J  apnio 


•juaa  Jad 
‘ajajstoj\[ 


00  C3 
to  00  CO 


1-^  00  0-5 

cot^oo’ 


C<lCP(3lt0(M00C0C0cni-IC0C0C0J>-C0C0'#01int-IOC0'fC0r-lt^00C01>-inOOC0C0C0' 

TtlC<l<PaOC01^-^-^CO-^i-ICO'll(N-^'^<NCCIC<Ic6in'S'(MCOCOCO-^COCOCO<MCOnjCO<Ni 


pajisodnioD 
saiduiBS  jaqtnn_tj 


X'-00O(M00t^t-i-l(Mt0t-O-^ini-IOinC00il^<MC0  10C0t0C0<MC0C0rHin00CMOt0' 
cd  CO  IQ  00  03  to  eo  Q rH  cH  to  o co’  05  £3  nj  06  d ci  in  c>  d 06  o g M ^ g d ^ ■ 

(M(MCOCO(MCOCPCO(Ml>TH,-l-^in(M(MT-li-lrH 


(M  I-H-H  , 


) 1-1  I-I  (M  (M  1 


. 

Q G « 1 

M"  tt  t>i 
S oj  o a 

a 

oY^  O 
rt-r 

3 


. K -7 


^ ^ ^ <0 
_ 03  xi 

Q ><  2rH 

W Y Y Y 

gsl^ 

M a s 

P § 

^9p 

^ A 
S X m 

tH  O 


03  >> 

ll« 

i“i| 

wY . a 


ft 

’ a 

Y O 

030  >1  >3 


□ Q 
ftp  >>“  >■ 

Sp  Ci  O,  iH 

O 5 p o 
°o  ft 


>>  >1  !>>y  u p,  o o I 3 5 

c303c3u,2?P  fej  lr?P 
s “ « c3  V'  O'  -a  Y “ ^ o 

'a  ftftc  a a aYa^Ya^Yo 

p s s a 3 o o o ‘s  a ^ o p 

ftpac3®Q^|^^^S.P:5|  |p| 

^H^a-OiSaft’  . H = rp 


«:ao_g  a3wY' 

^ ^ rr«<  ^ Cl  W'T' 


bflhcY.s.a.B2 

pftbfi§°Q,i  sa-g^sg^.p 

P O ^ !-l  Q 
gcp^  o 

iac;pc3<!j 

(V -ft  3 >33  Si p P |ii  p . . . .r:iP  i3 


^ is. 
c/2  ^ 

ilTl® 


ft 

a 

P o 

CSQ 

ft 

a=3 


o«fta 
Opi 


1 1>>  >> 
p p 
1 03  C3 
' ft  ft 

a a 

o o 

lOQ 

I fcfl  “ 


' S o 
I ^ 
iPJp 


1 Cl 


0 


ft  P 

a s 


32 

a 

o 

WP 

p . 

03  |_3 

ftY 

a I 

o M 

r't  ‘1' 
w cc 


sis§«gl|ss2”S>Ti  Y'^lY’Ssigl 


« 

PO 


<=>  a^- 

_ c3  O 
^ ^ p a P 

o-S- 

r2  >> 


'0 


-pa"3-B'^  : w s.2Y^^ a'Y^^ 

^ J «5S0.2£;Sg 

=•§■2^  2|l3»  I »^'2iga  iSsg®  &“  SioS^d-Si-ti 


hH  W3  A 

W P-( 

rrt  cy 

^ 

02o 

g^O 

asg 

YOco 

25 


ft  ^ 
P 

^3  oj 
p 

03  ft 


a a 


rao'i'  I PPPif<®'~''^PEgO'~'sH-—  i^Eu  cB  ^ P 'P 

s4?iTll"!iS5t2SS^lg|iTlII«lgS4ss2T|Sr® 


PW  So  03 

2oi  Y-is  giss-ssll®  s:is  Yi  s § Ya  »o- 

= S B i S S gg'S'S?  g gawSIII  S SSS  i55s  «S'g|  2 

YYYYYYYYYYYWWMWWWWWWaWWWWWPPPPPPP'^^'^ 


S^gS! 


dr^(acot}'coint-dsoe^eod::^^< 

1— ir-Hi— It3-ii— 11— li— 'I— '1— '1— l03(NflC|C3<N< 

eococococococococococococococot 


37 


rH  O <^3  C<J  J> 


SSS S 5)^  J8 3g§  3 S § SSJH  ^ ;5  S 3 § S S § I 


OrHOOOrH  Qi3<NrHC<|OT 


I C<1  O O O < 


J2^g^iSg‘^_^^333SS3St:§5^_iS§S$3{31gS8Sg!5!83^g3SS33;l!S;^§'SS8  8^S;2:ggg§S3SgS§gg: 

T-iOt-HOOOCDOOOrHOOOOrHOi— to  OOOOi^OOOi-ti—tOCSOOOOOrHOrHOOr- lOO  Oi— ti— <i— li-H»-Hr-ti-trHOOOOOt 


t (M  (M  rH  Cq 


t rH  (N  rH  (Nt 


ICO  (NCO<M(MC<It-iCOCOC<IrHCOrHC<Ji^' 


gSg8ggggSSSgSSgSg8S{SSg8S§SSSSSS8oS§g8SgSgSg§^Sgg§§SggSg§§S; 


i'^O5tOt-00eO(MC<Il^C»5'>4<00i 

i■^•>#rH(^^a>QCO5P^~00(^^O>l 

iKllOOlOCOltSlOOlftlOlOlOl 

• t^(Mi-Hr^(Miooo<»OJjt'Oooo' 


C<IC0C51^C0C<It-CiJOt-0005-<i(l0C0a>05(M<M(M00  10(MC<lt^ 

^^Sg3S?gSg!SgSgtg^g^^g[g[8g^8^' 


I CO  <M  Ci  o CO  lO  (M  O : 


gS! 


t J>0  00  (M  1 


lCOrHl^lO'*^<lOOCO'^CO 


COOi(M'^rHT-tI>.l>.OOlO'«i<COrH^' 


50C0C0'^ir3'^’^OI>*C0<Ml01r^c 


(NCOa5':OC^CO<0'^00*-‘'^'»^<OLf5'X>'^lOQ>Oi<MOi^’^lOC<l(MCOU001>l>»^^CCOt^OO.t^lOJt^lOOC 


i<NOiCOJ>»lOOi-HCO*^OiO»--tTi^CO' 


CO  Oi  00 


OiCOrHCOir:iCOOOt-T-t(MCO'^OllOO(Ml>-COO'^OCOUOOOiCOOi-iOOCOOOCOf-f^lO'«^OiJ 


I CO  O CO  CO  00 


>i^corP  ri^  ^ 


I O ^ rr<  J 


Xio  t-h 

§s^ 


CqOLQCOlOOOOOCOOiX'^OOlOOl 

5<)r:|OrHC00iOrH0iC0"^OL^Oc0X 


0irHX(MXi-HrHOC'1i>»05Xt>-X05(MTj<CiOC<liH< 

cpt-OTrtrHcHOiOl-rv^OjOiOiQiTrHCOoOr-HOc^i 
rH  ^ rH  rH  i^  rH  rH  r—t  pH  t~I  i 


I CO  CO  ' 


coC^CJs^^trl^^cHWO 


■ t-Hi-llO'HiXCOOiCOOCOOJb-t^t^OCO 
icO(N(>5(MOrHC<lCOc4rH(MC<JCOCOTHrH 


OC<JCOCOrHOr^OiXCO':tt(Mlc:)l001:^l>-  rttiOXCOXr-tO»-H 
C<irHCO(NlO'»^iCOCO<:OCO<M(>J<M(NOOCO  '^(Ncooico^'^io 


iCOXCDCO^GiJ>-OOqx»-it^X 
1 CO  ^ lo  (N  tci  lo  »o  «i  (N  o 


XlOX'^OiOC<JC<ll>OC003C<lOiX« 


CM  05  LO  CO  X 1 
05  05  g ^ ^ 1 


<X(MC01>*'^lOC<li-Hi-HC005W  i-HfML005l:^CMl0C005'^rMXC0XOi 


05  lO  05  IC  CO  X 


— ii-ifMrHCM'^T^ICOrHlOrH^T-trHpHT-H  -?i<rHi-tt^TMCOC^rHi-HrH(MrHrHCO’^COT-lrHi-l(M  C0'^»-H(MC<lrH01rH  LO(MrHiQOqT-iCO'^'*4^<MrHO^C<l<M 


Pi 

is 

og„ 

tuoa>> 

l^a 

^ .go 

ggEH 


>>  >. 
a a 

d es 

aa 

aa 

o o 

^ a a a 
g S3  o o 

ft  CG 


a 


§ a 

I S3  S 

a a 


a>> 

°s 

2a 

o 

§50 


^ o tf  •£  o o W) 

.Sslioogga 

^•S'^^-gSass 

O D 
X3 


a is  S 


<Eh-S.2„< 


>> 
a 

03 

a 

a 

.a  ac' 

-~i  g >> 

■ja  a S 1 M 03 
^ ® a ^ 2 0. 
^O  at>.^a  g 

' <as=al 


fa" 

«u  ° 

mo 

"52 


a ■ cv 


^•3  a o 
>>2  >>2  SO 
a a ^ a t 
03«  ac-i  a ^ 

g* o ST 
9 'I  9 j.^o.3 

o 2 o S 
ooo|^ 
.§a|^0 
SoV 


03  g 


:2:o' 


, T32 

. ® qj  O)  I T 


si  ® o 

a.^  « 

o3  O "" 

o 


2?2§’S'H2o«^  I gw 

iU?^^3S|'^lSi|a 


.'oO  ® S 


,^a 


a,  a o 


i_g  a 


a 

a 

o _ 

o^ 


2 a 
■goSal 

fi°|S 

on  a 

.a 'S  9 ^_i  oqj 
in  ^O  B2 


W 


a r'“ 

a^a 


a t>> 

as 


^ • (H  - W ^ 9 

a g tuoo  o 

g‘aOp'-’^®Q 

ft922g  a'7'2 
JoSal^l^,^ 


a 

'O  a 

^|9 

ago 

a ao 
^o  ^ 


a a a'S 

lli|llT|ii|j|l| 

-2?3aoa  -gQ^  hi 


a2 

o ® 

O 


wa’W' 


$ I boa;  2 jS  0-:z 


^®  iSs!  I T'-2®R®.2ir'0gh4.JS'O2g'e3 

S g Sen’S k;®.®  g’lgSsHlTTsal  $^-Sl 

ISelgS^sgSl^SiYSiig^SngsS 


'^.5^g»2a'=loaS  i*5a'’d2®.2a®  .a2 


ss-sHa-gi.  •a'j 
a^Y  o.aM2.2 
2 3 a "3 

o 2 

:aoWo 


'c«s9.oS;52^  „ 

^5.2  I a^g 


a I 5 

Ph  I 

2 I 


b^2^YS^5S3  02T3Y®  I A^^yI®'^^  a-'^SiS'AS  I S'g 

«i^^Sa:ig53S®^ls^  I 


^ X M X X 


0§i^^§5£3§o^S«-®®g  I I 

S.tibj  CQ 

<50«S 

aagai 

*3  ^ ® 

<33  O)  0?  ^ 

Ph  Ph  Ph  c3  oj  .!2J  .S  O c-)  ^3 

OOOClQQQQQQQti^MWW 


MX  X^I^yB'SI-S 

Y^Q.2aaaa  a I i ®”  a 

s3-3'3|f^SY'g^S 

o "" 


^ « ga22;aa; 

aQ  gooooo 

joH  w 2^_^_^, 

^ ^ <H  /H  (H  /H 


Qaao3s3s3ao3^aj  i>>i-h  ^ 


®0  uflaaaaaai-iiK<w 
”-<M.2.2.2.2.2.2.2.2a  a 


§5S\c^  S o’aa  ® Y®S 

•aS>.^35gS«  ^ I ®'S  S'S  a 

® <«|.22gQSS£  ^ 

® M ® o YPI  g2 
£=oS5^®ti!'2W-M2’^ 

OWS 

g g >.g  a a ''^.g  o a^  gj^2  g 5 - : : : : g S « a a 2 boa  S ® ® 

S2g5’SiS''5-g-sa§2lsSs”g.gi  I § £ fs  9 ^ o a 2 S 

2SS2g.S.®®.^.^o®aa>MM‘^5  3®®2 oooSSSSaosssMooo 

OOOftQQQQQQQtbIMWW  WWWPil^^^OOOOOOOCDOOOOOaWMi  MWy 

igiiiiiiSiSiilSSilgISiiiilgiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliisiigiSiliillii 


I a 03  53  cs  03  03  S3 


o 

H a c3  03  a 
Q ^ 

gaaaaaaa  a a 2 w.2.2  S 
2.2  ggggggggabogjgia 
’a24J+J4J+j+J4->+j+j  g p p d.g 

sasasaaa2a.?saaa 


TABLE  III — Analyses  of  Feeding  Stuffs  on  the  Basis  of  Inspection  (continued) 


39 


,-J,-Io'oMrHOOCOC^rHOC=OOi-IorHrHt-lrHOc4i-10C5C3rHOOC3Cq 


f-Hi-HOi— iOOOr-JO 


81?^ 


q?®,-H'OrHcjoOO 


CpOi-Ht-HOOOrHO 


1 <N  rH  0!?  Og  1 


ci^^^oio^oicooi 


l§S 


g§ggggg§S8S8gSSg8S8Sgg§g§SSg88SS 


888888888 

i^88iagg8S8 


S88 


1-il-^-^T-H'?t^r^r^(^0<^I 

S88888888 


00  00  1>“  CO  00  CO  < 


I CO  § <0  ' 


.i-HCOrHO:»LOCOOr-ilOTj< 


O0i00i0^0500rHr-H 


C5<;Ot^OOO(MrHCOCi 


gg^8SFig88 


t 00  o <M  CO  lO 


O CO  w O CO  • 


TJH  CO  00  (N  ' 


OqOrHl^COW-HOt-^ 

lOlOCOlOCOCTiCOJOCO 


COCOCOOiCOlOO5(M00 


Ci  00  cq  05  (M  1 


ICOrHI^OOUOLOO^rHOiOCMT-tOOOCOl-QTtHOOCOOiCO' 


tj^^OO^OOCi^gOOCDi^^cooOQi^gCOIr'Jt-^T^OOgOiT^^COCO':© 


COC<IC<ICOJ>*<MC<JfMCq 

ocdco8c<h5:>cocc>(m* 


i:OQD<=>Oi-hkC'COI>»OOC>t 


(M00510(^50,-IC'1C> 


o lO  O 


C0«0i-HC0(MC>00OC0 


i>coOL005rHoir:>coLr5^co{Mcocoi-ioOTHoo5Loi>*coi-HcooTtHi'^coioi^o  Oioqi-Hoooicoicoir^ 

ggoo-®dd8oo-;^88o6ddga^gtd8g^d3oo‘o6d^'gdg  ddddi^f~:ddod 


C500I-H  CO  00  lO  <M  m o c<j  CO 

ddtJddgdcdd 


S2|?pl| 

ggaSS&S|S 

mmfij 

2222«5^ 

<iJoa5000pqOS 


lit  i^iiisiia 


40 


SHIPMENTS  REMOVED  FROM  SALE 

The  following  tabulation  is  a summary  of  feeding  stuffs  withdrawn 
from  sale  in  1916  showing  the  number  of  shipments  withdrawn,  number 
of  manufacturers  and  towns  represented  together  with  amount  withdrawn 
and  the  specific  reason  for  withdrawing  each. 


No.  of 
ship- 
ments 
with- 
drawn 
from 
sale 

No.  of 
manufac- 
turers 
repre- 
sented 

No.  of 
towns 
repre- 
sented 

I 

Reason  for  withdrawal  from  sale 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

pounds 

m 

166 

182 

Not  tagged 

1 1,418,440 

8 

1 7 

8 

Deficiency  in  crude  fat 

20,920 

38 

1 26 

82 

Deficiency  in  crude  protein j 

300,140 

9 

8 

9 

Deficiency  in  both  crude  fat  and  crude  protein 

16,540 

2 

2 

2 

Excess  fiber  > 

30,500 

1 

1 S 

1 

Deficiency  in  fat,  excess  fiber 

9,600 

8 

6 i 

8 

Deficiency  in  protein,  excess  fiber 

121 ,000 

6 

5'  j 

6 

Deficiency  in  fat  and  protein,  excess  fiber 

71,600 

• 1 

1 . : 

1) 

, Deficiency  in  fat  and  adulterated 

2,400 

1 

1 i 

1 

Deficiency  in  protein  and  adulterated ! 

5,400 

2 

2 1 

2 

Deficiency  in  fat,  protein  and  adulterated 

9,600 

88 

21  : 

24 

Misbranding  

271,280 

Id 

9 1 

10 

Incorrect  guarantee 

41 ,680 

25 

22'  i 

2d 

Wrong  label 

83,680 

4 1 

3 

8 

Altered  label  

12,060 

14  : 

8 

13 

Conflict  

108,710*0 

1 

288 

828 

Totals  

1 

2,612,680 

The  above  tabulation  shows  that  over  one-half  of  the  feeding  stuffs 
removed  from  sale  was  for  non-tagging,  about  one-eighth  for  protein  de- 
ficiencies, about  one-tenth  for  misbranding  and  the  rest  for  protein  de- 
ficiencies and  excess  fiber,  conflicting  guarantees,  etc.  Labels  were  fur- 
nished by  the  manufacturers  for  the  bulk  of  the  untagged  goods,  while 
in  cases  where  shipments  were  removed  for  deficiencies  of  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein  or  excess  crude  fiber  or  misbranding,  settlement  in  the 
majority  of  cases  was  reached  either  by  relabeling  with  State  Chemist’s 
labels  showing  correct  guarantees  or  by  returning  shipments  to  manufac- 
turers and  replacing  same  by  shipments  up  to  guarantee  in  every  par- 
ticular. 

Table  VI,  page  207,  gives  details  of  the  444  shipments  of  feeds  removed 
from  sale  in  1916. 

In  this  table  will  be  found  name  of  manufacturers,  brands,  official  and 
inspection  numbers,  place  where  sample  was  secured,  amount  withdrawn 
from  sale  and  cause  for  removel  from  sale. 

REBATES  , 

The  Indiana  law  makes  no  provision  for  the  payment  of  rebates,  but 
where  deficiencies  are  of  such  a nature  as  to  permit  of  reasonable  explana- 
tion the  payment  of  refund  on  the  basis  of  guarantee  and  inspection  re- 
sults should  be  accepted  as  an  evidence  of  good  faith  on  the  part  of  the 
manufacturer.  If  the  deficiencies  continue  over  a period  of  time  and  in  a 
number  of  samples,  the  payment  of  rebates  can  hardly  be  considered  as  an 
excuse  for  failure  to  exercise  proper  chemical  and  factory  control.  Rebates 
never  fully  compensate  the  purchaser  for  inferior  feed  and  consumers  may 
be  certain  that  deficiencies  or  the  presence  of  inferior  materials  will  be 
the  exception  and  not  the  rule  with  manufacturers  who  are  exercising 
proper  care  in  their  shipments. 

Cases  involving  the  payment  of  rebates  will  receive  individual  con- 
sideration and  the  payment  of  a refund  will  not  be  considered  as  affecting 


41 


the  right  of  this  department  to  take  such  action  in  all  cases  as  may  be 
deemed  advisable.  Interstate  shipments  in  violation  of  the  law  will  be 
sampled  under  the  Federal  Food  and  Drugs  Act. 

Retailers,  agents  or  dealers  receiving  rebates  will  be  required  to  pro- 
rate them  among  the  final  purchasers  on  the  basis  of  inspection  results, 
price  and  amount  purchased  and  to  file  receipts  from  the  purchasers  v;ith 
the  Department  showing  such  distribution.  If  any  of  the  shipment  remains 
unsold  and  permission  is  given  to  relabel  and  continue  the  sale,  reduction 
in  retail  price  on  the  basis  of  inspection  results  will  be  required. 

Receipt  and  distribution  of  the  following  rebates  have  been  certified 
in  1915.  For  details  of  inspection  of  samples  see  Table  IV. 


Manufacturer,  name  of  feed 


Acme-Evans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 

American  Milling  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Amco  Cottonseed  Meal 

Amco  Cottonseed  Meal 

F.  W.  Erode  & Company, 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

Brown  Molasses  Food  Co., 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Bro-Mo-Co  Molasses  Dairy  Feed 

C.  L.  Campbell  & Co., 

Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Single  Hump  Camel  Brand  Cotton- 
seed Meal 

Chicago  Feed  & Fertilizer  Co., 
Chicago,  111. 

Magic  Brand  Tankage 

Magic  Brand  Tankage 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Co., 
Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Choctaw  Sales  Co.,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Choctaw  Standard  Cottonseed  Meal 
and  Cake  — 

Cincinnati  Animal  Food  Co., 
Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digester  Tank- 
age   


S.  P.  Davis,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal- 

Veribest  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Dixie  Mills  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

Anchor  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

East  St.  Louis  Cotton  Oil  Co., 
National  Stock  Yards,  111. 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed 

Meal  

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed 

Meal  

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed 
Meal  


In- 

spec- 

tion 

No. 

D. 

Name  and  address  of  dealer, 
agent  or  consumer 

i 

' No. 
tons 
pur- 
1 chased 

1 

Amt. 

re- 

bate 

$ 

2882 

Geo.  W.  Blair,  Mishawaka 

i 

i 

5 

10.00 

2024 

W.  E.  Hayes,  Kokomo 

1 

3 

i 

1 8.22 

1469 

Geo.  Steckley,  Kendallville 

! 3 

5.16 

1524 

S.  F.  Trembley  Co., 

1 . 

Columbia  City- 

20 

1 42.80 

2241 

C.  E.  Bash  & Co.,  Inc., 

Huntington  

20 

' 7.80 

5083 

Heldt  Co.,  Evansville  

15 

17.55 

3261 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis— 

1 

i 20 

1 

14.66 

j 

4954 

1 G.  Wolff  & Sons  Co.,  Hamilton 

1 22 

34.22 

4426 

Hartine  & Co.,  Elwnnd 

171/2 

13.77 

4433 

! Windfall  Grain  Co.,  Windfall-.. 

171/2 

13.00 

1623 

A.  B.  Cohee  & Co., 

1 

i 

McCordsville  

1 

i 3.00 

2638 

Salem  Cooperative  Assoc.,  Salem 

i 71/2 

1 

19.12 

i 

1641 

Granville  Moody,  Rensselaer 

30 

! 128. 10 

2827 

John  Taylor,  Columbus,  R.  R... 

1/2 

2.03 

5058 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Benham  

20 

41.20 

5301 

Ed.  Helmick,  Greensburg  

231/2 

49.35 

3484 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon.— 

2 

2.36 

1807 

Purity  Bakery  Co.,  Linden 

20 

76.20 

5153 

Suckow  Co.,  Franklin 

25 

31.00 

5338 

T.  S.  Nuggen,  Lewisville 

20 

24.40 

42 


Manufacturer,  name  of  feed 

In- 

spec- 

tion 

No. 

D. 

Name  and  address  of  dealer, 
agent  or  consumer 

No. 
tons  1 
pur- 
chased 

Amt. 

re- 

bate 

$ 

Eldred  Mill  Company,  Jackson,  Mich. 

Gusto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5183 

Paul  V.  Brooks,  Greens  Fork 

20 

64.80 

Gusto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5324 

W.  F.  Parks,  Kitchel,  R.  R.  8... 

20  ! 

103.00 

Feeders  Supply  Company, 

i 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  MeaL. 

1619 

The  Farmers  Mill,  Huntingburg 

20  ' 

44.00 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  MeaL_ 

1676 

Wm.  Roff,  Conrad 

30 

92.67 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal__ 

1678 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Kansas  City,  Mo.. 

30 

117.05 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  MeaL_ 

1700 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Kansas  City,  Mo.. 

25 

59.91 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal.. 

1710 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Kansas  City,  Mo.. 

25 

28.15 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  MeaL. 

1862 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Kansas  City,  Mo._ 

i 25  1 

92.11 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  MeaL. 

1868 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Kansas  City,  Mo.. 

25 

,108.46 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  MeaL. 

2207 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Kansas  City,  Mo.. 

25 

59.00 

Humphreys-Godwin  Company, 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

! 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

2751 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

! 20 

10.08 

4934 

G.  I.  Neptune,  Thorntown. 

1 15 

6.15 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5135 

Butcher  & Duncan,  Oakland  City 

18 

57.25 

5142 

E.  W.  Masters,  Frankfort 

25 

30.25 

5302 

II.  L.  Beall,  Clarksburg 

10 

27.40 

Imperial  Cotto  Milling  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

i 

Meal 

2824 

H.  C.  Glick,  Elizabethtown 

20 

! 9.15 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

Meal 

3511 

Chas.  W.  Jessup,  Madison 

3 

9.15 

Johnson  & Company,  W.  B., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Supreme  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

2458 

Burge  Thomas  Milling  Co., 

Marion  

15 

18.30 

Supreme  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

2459 

Burge  Thomas  Milling  Co., 

Marion  

15 

18.30 

Supreme  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

2460 

Burge  Thomas  Milling  Co., 

Marion  

15 

18.30 

Kiewit,  Arnold,  West  Harrison,  Ind. 

Kiewit’s  Wheat  Middlings 

2873 

Fred  McKee,  Cedar  Grove, 

R.  R.  1 

IVi 

32.60 

Krause  Milling  Co.,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

1 

Rarlgpr  lhairy  Eepd 

3429 

W.  E.  Hayes,  Kokomo 

3 

6.00 

Lovitt  & Company,  L.  B., 

1 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

T.ovitt,  Brand  Cnttnnscpd  Meal 

2306 

Hawley  Hall,  Lewisville 

9 

18.80 

T.nvitt  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

2987 

D.  V.  Richardson,  Clayton 

20 

21.60 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

2232 

Luebcke  Bros.,  Crown  Point 

20 

20.00 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4628 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

20 

31.80 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5298 

Haynes  Milling  Co.,  Portland... 

20 

45.20 

Macdonald,  J.  M.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

3661 

M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

20 

38.92 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

5174 

M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

15 

30.00 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

5330 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

20 

53.60 

Macado  Cott.onsppd  Meal 

1768 

Haynes  Milling  Co.,  Portland 

20 

91.60 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal 

1873 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

20 

27.40 

Newsome  Feed  & Grain  Co.,  The, 

Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Palmo  Midds 

1501 

Emery  E.  Harper,  Connersville.. 

25 

20.80 

Xothern,  W.  C.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake 

1486 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester  ...  

20 

28.20 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake 

2799 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Whiteland  . 

20 

18.20 

liutterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake 

4980 

Sweitzer  & Wolfe,  Howe  

5 

20.80 

Manufacturer,  name  of  feed 

In- 

spec- 

tion 

No. 

D. 

Name  and  address  of  dealer, 
agent  or  consumer 

No. 

tons 

pur- 

chased 

Amt. 

re- 

bate 

$ 

Planters  Cotton  Oil  Co.,  Dallas,  Texas 
Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal  and  Cake.. 

2169 

Sedalia  Elevator  Co.,  Scdalia... 

20 

22.40 

Ralston  Purina  Co.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

2942 

National  Soldiers  Home,  Marion 

1% 

517/20 

3 

5.68 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

4044 

National  Soldiers  Home,  Marion 
Studebaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 
Bluffton  

8.54 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

4184 

2.49 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal .. 

4782 

Zionsville  Milling  Co.,  Zionsville 

Chas.  Kelley  & Son,  Pairmount 

10 

26.10 

Rapier  Sugar  Peed  Company, 
Owensboro,  Ky. 

Rapier’s  Molasses-Alfalfa  Hog  Peed. 

2422 

2 

40.60 

Sulzberger  & Sons  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein”  Tank- 
age   

3956 

Remington  Feed  & Flour  Store, 
Remington  

1 

.57 

Texas  Cake  & Linter  Company, 
Dallas,  Texas. 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 
Cracked  Cake 

1589 

Josiah  Meeks,  Parker  _ 

23 

26.91 

COOPERATION  WITH  THE  U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE 

All  interstate  shipments  showing  deficiencies  or  adulterations  suffi- 
cient to  justify,  are  sampled  not  only  under  the  state  law  but  also  under 
the  Federal  Food  and  Drugs  Act.  The  state  samples  are  entirely  inde- 
pendent of  those  secured  under  the  Federal  Act  which  are  forwarded  to 
the  U.  S.  laboratory  for  the  central  district  at  Chicago.  This  department 
has  absolutely  no  control  over  such  samples  or  subsequent  proceedings 
which  may  be  taken  under  the  Federal  law,  nor  do  said  samples  or  pro- 
ceedings in  any  way  affect  proceedings  against  local  dealers  under  the 
state  law. 

This  department  continuing  its  cooperation  with  the  Federal  Govern- 
ment under  the  Federal  Food  and  Drugs  Act,  sent  to  the  Central  District, 
United  States  Bureau  of  Chemistry,  88  samples  of  interstate  shipments 
representing  25  manufacturers  and  17  types  of  feed.  Since  November, 
1911,  when  the  State  Chemist  was  first  appointed  as  Federal  Inspector 
and  Collaborating  Chemist,  this  department  has  collected  and  sent  U.  S. 
laboratories,  201  samples  of  interstate  shipments  representing  117  manu- 
facturers and  108  types  of  feed. 

CASES  REPORTED  TO  PROSECUTORS 

A study  of  the  results  of  feed  inspections  for  the  past  several  years 
shows  that  deliberate  efforts  to  defraud  or  adulterate  are  few.  That  the 
large  proportion  of  violations  of  the  Feeding  Stuff  law  consists  of  failure 
to  furnish  or  attach  official  labels,  mistakes  in  attaching  proper  labels 
and  failure  to  make  registration  and  observe  similar  technicalities.  Care- 
ful investigation  of  all  these  cases  has  shown  that  the  majority  of  viola- 
tions are  due  to  ignorance  of  the  law  and  carelessness  on  the  part  of  the 
employees  and  similar  factors. 

In  connection  with  prosecutions,  it  is  to  be  noted  that  it  is  the  duty 
of  this  department  to  file  affidavits  in  cases  which  it  considers  advisable 
and  for  the  prosecutor  of  the  district  in  which  the  violation  occurs  to  con- 
duct subsequent  proceedings. 

Cases  may  be  reported  at  any  time  within  two  years  of  the  date  of 
violation  and  it  is  not  always  possible  to  file  affidavits  during  the  year  in 
which  the  violation  occurs. 

The  following  cases  were  certified  in  1916  and  the  filing  of  affidavits 
in  a number  of  others  was,  on  the  advice  of  prosecutors,  held  in  abeyance 
on  promise  of  future  compilance  with  the  law.. 


44 


Name  of  violator 

Address 

Violation 

No.  of  af- 
fidavits 
filed 

! Result 

i 

Chas.  Webster  of  Uhl  & 
Snyder  Milling  Co 

Jno.  F.  Hughes,  Elwood.__ 

Connersville 

Connersville 

1 

non-tagging 

misbranding 

1 

! ' 

held  pending  future 
compliance  with  law 
conviction 

Marion  S.  Hufford  

! Frankfort 

non-tagging 

1 

held  pending  future 

Wm.  Heppe  

Logansport 

not  registered 

1 

compliance  with  law 
held  pending  future 

F.  L.  Armtsrong, 

New  Albany  Milling  Co... 

New  Albany 

inaccurate 

1 

compliance  with  law 

held  pending  future 

Tra  Kidwell i 

Lakeville 

guarantee 

non-tagging 

1 ; 

compliance  with  law 
held  pending  future 

Helmet  & Ernest  Luebski. 

Crown  Point 

non-tagging 

1 

compliance  with  law 
no  report 

Akin-Erskine  Mlg.  Co.  | 

Evansville 

misbranding  and 

2 

no  report 

Herbert  Tull 

Monon 

adulteration 

misbranding 

1 

conviction 

ESTIMATED  SALES  1916  COMPARED  WITH  THOSE  OF  1914  AND  1915 

An  annual  report  of  sales  is  required  of  each  person  or  firm  register- 
ing brands  of  feeding  stuff,  but  owing  to  frequent  changes  of  ownership 
and  inaccurate  records  kept  by  many  dealers  it  is  impossible  to  secure 
data  showing  the  exact  amount  of  feed  sold  annually. 

However,  estimated  sales,  exclusive  of  condimental  feeds,  based  on 
labels  sold  and  other  available  information,  are  317,664  tons  in  1916  as 
against  270,339  tons  in  1915  and  271,751  tons  in  1914.  The  estimated  retail 
value  of  feeds  sold  in  1916  is  $10,316,516,  which  when  compared  with  the 
expenditures  for  1915  show  an  increase  of  $1,494,831. 

The  following  table  shows  the  estimated  sales  for  different  classes  of 
feed  for  1914,  1915  and  1916  together  with  estimated  expenditures  for 
1915  and  1916. 


Kind  of  feed 

j Estimated  tons 

Estimated  retail 
value  $ 

! 1014 

1016 

11916 

1016 

; 1016 

1 Mill  by-products— wheat  bran,  middlings, 
rye  feeds,  red  dog,  etc.,  with  and  with- 
out screenings 

121,808 

110,408 

146,086 

:3,481,304 

4,2172,072 

2 Poultry  feed— without  grit  

17,082 

18,281 

201,510 

785,297 

1 893,504 

with  grit 

16,318 

16,718 

14,688 

663,771 

1 616,141 

poultry  mash 

3 Proprietary  feeds— containing  molasses  

27,600 

1,344 

84,066 

1,688 

30,220 

50,741 

1,080,707 

78,047 

083,111 

without  molasses  

7,281 

7,780 

0,086 

255,007 

.302,730 

4 Hominy  feed  

31,844 

28,431 

38,625 

860',  186 

1,069,051 

5 Corn  bran  

2119 

375 

266 

7,620 

5,241 

44,978 

6 Corn  feed  meal 

812 

1,187 

1,406 

33, '667 

7 Corn  germ  meal 

6,500 

7,210 

11,375 

227,088 

366,402 

8 Corn  gluten  feed 

3, '375 

8,504 

3,088 

111,845 

116,004 

d Corn  gluten  meal 

110  Corn  and  oats  chop 

i 8,156 

1,876 

125 

1,666 

68,319 

160,340 

4,9'50 

65,067 

11  Miscellaneous  chops 

5,661 

6,111 

4,761 

166,594 

121  Wheat  middlings  and  palm  oil 

1,460 

1,125 

2,188 

88,041 

66,019 

13  Alfalfa  meal  

563 

318 

488 

10,086 

10,337 

14  Animal  by-products  

5,281 

6,406 

0,281 

809,968 

378,759 

440,068 

15  Cottonseed  meal  

14,281 

11,004 

18,388 

520,420 

16  Cottonseed  feed 

04 

260 

210 

6,668 

7,2120 

17  Cold  pressed  cottonseed 1 

376 

436 

460 

10,986 

14,278 

18  Linseed  meals 

6,219 

21,968 

1,625 

127,748 

71,101 

10  Unscreened  flaxseed  oil  feed 

876 

681 

500 

20,788 

24,829 

m Distillers’  dried  grains  ! 

219 

188 

2,189 

6,302 

71,258 

21  Brewers’  dried  grains 

1,000 

1,'348 

1,760 

33,300 

50,569 

22  Dried  yeast  grains 

28  Malt  sprouts , 

62 

82 

125 

31 

620 

2,750 

939 

24  Dried  beet  pulp  ! 

188 

166 

63 

4,368 

1,844 

26  Calf  meals  i 

069 

088 

1,000 

81,137 

86,000 

26  Miscellaneous  ! 

676 

260 

5,023 

Totals  - 

271,761  ; 

2701,380  817,664 

8,821,684 

10,016,516 

45 


Comparing  the  estimated  expenditures  for  feeds  sold  in  1916  with 
those  sold  in  1915  we  find  in  nearly  every  case  a considerable  increase; 
the  most  marked  increase  in  expenditures  being  $791,668  for  mill  by- 
products; $108,297  for  poultry  feeds  without  grit;  $200,815  for  hominy 
feeds;  $129,454  for  corn  germ  meal;  $109,087  for  animal  by-products; 
$32,978  for  wheat  middlings  and  palm  oil;  $17,239  for  brewers’  dried  grains 
and  $146,670  for  cottonseed  meal.  Those  which  show  a considerable  de- 
crease for  expenditures  are  as  follows:  $47,630  for  poultry  feeds  with 
grit;  $66,596  for  proprietary  feeds  containing  molasses  and  $56,552  for 
linseed  meals. 


The  annual  increase  of  tonnage  and  expenditures  for  feeding  stuffs 
for  the  past  six  years  is  summarized  in  the  following  table: 


Year 

10(11 

1012 

1018 

1 

1014 

1015 

1016 

Estimated  sales  tons 

170,000 

5,066,006 

106,752 

6,371,571 

217,680 

6,466,616 

1 

271,761 

1 

’ 8,461,761 

270,380 

8,821,664 

317,664 

Estimated  retail  value  $ 

110,316,516 

SUMMARY  OF  THE  ENFORCEMENT  OF  FEEDING  STUFF  LAW 

Between  July  1,  1907,  when  the  Indiana  Feed  Law  went  actively  into 
effect  and  January  1,  1917,  the  inspectors  of  this  department  secured 
25,337  official  inspection  samples.  With  the  exception  of  approximately 
230,  these  have  all  been  examined  either  macroscopically  or  microscop- 
ically, many  of  them  being  subjected  to  both  methods  of  examination, 
while  23,755  samples  were  chemically  analyzed  for  moisture,  crude  fat, 
crude  protein,  etc. 

The  following  summary  gives  in  brief  form  the  results  for  each  year: 


TEAR 

10’o7i 

10082 

101.0 

1 

1011 

1(012 

1013 

1914 

1015 

1016 

Number  of  samples  secured  

2303 

2433 

2903 

310.5 

3775 

3877 

Number  of  samples  analyzed  

1452 

2702 

2633 

2086 

2840 

2606 

2048 

3469 

3536 

Per  cent,  up  to  guarantee 

517.2 

67.1 

70.0 

75.3 

74 

70.7 

62 

79.4 

76.7 

Per  cent,  below  guarantee  in 

fat  only  

24.7 

22.4 

210.5 

16.1 

17.5 

9.4 

9.6 

9.9 

8.1 

Per  cent,  below  guarantee  in 

crude  protein  only  

18.9 

16.2 

6.3 

7.5 

4.8 

6.0 

6.1 

8.3 

12.7 

Per  cent,  below  guarantee  in  both 

crude  fat  and  crude  protein 

5.9 

7.6 

3.8 

2.9  I 

2.4 

3.4 

2.8 

2.4 

3.3 

Per  cent,  misbranded  as  to  presence 

1 

1 

of  inferior  ingredients  ^ 

9.9 

is.o 

7.1 

3.2 

2.7 

4.0 

3.8 

3.8 

2.3 

1 July  1,  1907- July  1,  1908 

2 July  1,  190&-Jan.  1,  1910 

2 Includes  samples  examined  microscopically 


It  is  practically  impossible  to  place  the  results  secured  from  the  en- 
forcement of  the  law  on  a dollar  and  cents  basis  but  special  attention  is 
requested  to  the  great  reduction  in  percentage  of  samples  found  deficient 
which  has  decreased  since  the  first  inspection  from.  24.7,  13.9,  5.9  for  crude 
fat,  crude  protein  and  both  crude  fat  and  crude  protein  to  8.1,  12.7  and 
3.3  respectively. 

The  percentage  misbranded  as  to  the  presence  of  inferior  materials 
is  shown  in  the  preceding  summary  to  decrease  from  9.9  per  cent,  in  1907 
to  only  2.5  per  cent,  in  1916.  This  marked  improvement  is  especially  im- 
portant from  the  purchaser’s  standpoint,  and  without  doubt  this  one  item 
saves  many  times  the  cost  of  enforcing  the  law. 

The  standard  of  feeds  examined  in  1916  does  not  show  an  improve- 
ment over  that  of  the  several  previous  years.  This  may  be  attributed  to 


46 


several  causes.  (1)  an  inspection  of  a larger  number  of  samples;  (2)  a 
more  thorough  examination  of  samples  collected;  and  (3)  owing  to  the 
demand  for  commercial  feeding  stuffs  and  the  high  prices  paid  for  the 
same,  together  with  the  nearly  complete  utilization  of  the  by-products 
from  manufacture  of  human  foods  for  the  purpose  of  feeding  animals, 
there  is  an  inducement  to  substitute  the  inferior  for  the  high  grade. 

This  department  is  convinced  that  at  this  time  of  demand  and  high 
prices  a most  rigid  examination  of  all  classes  of  feeding  stuff  is  necessary. 
This  is  especially  true  of  compounded  feed  and  those  bought  because  of 
their  high  protein  content. 

EXPLANATION  OF  TABLES 

In  considering  the  results  and  summaries  of  inspection  it  should  be 
noted  that  in  the  case  of  deficient,  adulterated  or  misbranded  samples 
manufacturers  were  given  10  days’  advance  notice  and  opportunity  to  re- 
quest a portion  of  sample  and  time  for  review  of  the  results  by  their  chem- 
ists. The  results  as  reported  in  Table  IV  are  official  and  final. 

Table  I,  page  12,  contains  the  Digestion  Coefficients  of  a number  of 
common  feeding  stuffs  as  determined  by  the  digestion  experiments  and 
compiled  by  various  authorities. 

Table  II,  page  22,  summarizes  the  results  of  the  inspection  from  Janu- 
ary 1,  1916,  to  January  1,  1917,  based  on  guarantees.  In  this  table  a feed 
sold  under  a guarantee  of  pure  wheat  bran  and  found  to  contain  screenings 
would  be  listed  under  wheat  bran  as  adulterated. 

Table  III,  page  30,  contains  the  average  complete  feeding  analysis  of 
the  1916  inspection  samples  arranged  in  classes  and  in  the  case  of  many 
concentrates  and  proprietary  feeds  under  brand  names  according  to  the 
results  of  inspection.  For  example  if  a feed  sold  under  a guarantee  of 
pure  wheat  bran  was  found  to  contain  screenings  it  would  appear  in  this 
table  under  the  heading  “Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings.” 

The  percentages  of  nitrogen,  phosphoric  acid  (P2O5)  and  potash  (K2O) 
for  the  different  classes  and  brands  of  feed  are  given  in  this  table.  This 
information  may  be  profitably  used  by  the  consumer  who  wishes  to  take 
into  consideration  fertilizing  values  of  feeding  stuffs  when  making  pur- 
chases. 

Table  IV,  page  48,  contains  the  detailed  results  of  samples  analyzed 
chemically  and  examined  microscopically  or  macroscopically  for  the  year 
ending  December  31,  1916,  including  manufacturers’  guarantees,  found 
composition,  names  and  addresses  of  persons  from  whom  samples  were 
obtained. 

In  Table  IV  the  results  in  the  found  column  of  samples  showing  a 
deficiency  of  0.3  per  cent,  in  crude  fat  or  1 per  cent,  in  crude  protein  or 
deficient  in  both  crude  fat  and  crude  protein  are  printed  in  bold  face  type. 

Ingredients  present  and  not  guaranteed  under  the  heading  “Principal 
Ingredients  Identified”  are  printed  in  bold  face  type.  In  poultry  feeds  the 
percentage  of  grit  was  determined;  and  where  found  present  in  quantities 
probably  in  excess  of  the  fowl’s  need  the  percentage  is  printed  in  bold 
face  type. 

Under  the  heading  “Principal  Ingredients  Identified”  in  Table  IV,  it 
is  not  intended  to  assert  that  the  materials  noted  are  all  that  the  samples 
contain  but  that  they  are  the  ones  constituting  the  bulk  of  the  feed  and 
are  present  in  such  quantities  as  to  be  capable  of  identification. 

Table  V,  page  199,  contains  a list  of  samples  collected  and  subjected 
to  microscopical  or  macroscopical  but  not  to  chemical  examination. 

Table  VI,  page  207,  contains  a list  of  the  shipments  withdrawn  from 
sale,  amount,  place  of  sale  and  reasons  for  withdrawal. 

Table  VII,  page  226,  which  is  published  in  accordance  with  the  wishes 
of  a majority  of  manufacturers,  dealers  and  consumers  as  ascertained 


47 


from  replies  to  circular  letter,  contains  a list  of  the  brands  which  we  are 
advised  will  be  on  sale  in  the  State  in  1917-1918.  Failure  to  appear  in  this 
table  does  not  prevent  a registered  brand  being  placed  on  sale  but  merely 
indicates  that  no  reply  to  circular  letter  has  been  received  from  the  manu- 
facturer by  this  department.  For  the  convenience  of  consumers  the  feed- 
ing stuffs  have  been  divided  into  classes,  covering  all  the  more  important 
feeds  offered  for  sale  in  Indiana. 

ATTENTION,  CONSUMERS,  AGENTS  AND  DEALERS 

In  deciding  on  companies  from  whom  to  purchase  and  represent,  study 
closely  the  details  of  inspection  in  Table  IV,  page  48;  purchase  from  and 
represent  companies  who  ship  feed  properly  labeled  and  up  to  guarantee; 
when  for  any  reason  rebate  is  received,  notify  this  department  promptly. 
Dealers  who  have  sold  any  deficient  feed  and  received  rebate  must  file 
receipts  showing  payment  of  proper  amount  to  such  customers.  When 
car  lots  or  appreciable  amounts  of  feed  are  received,  keep  all  bills,  way- 
bills and  correspondence,  notify  the  State  Chemist  of  arrival  and  probable 
time  of  distribution.  No  excuse  will  be  accepted  from  agents  or  dealers 
who  persist  in  representing  companies  who  ship  deficient,  adulterated  or 
unlabeled  feed. 

The  facts  are  presented  in  this  bulletin,  and  the  best  interests  of  pur- 
chasers of  feed  as  well  as  other  citizens  of  the  State  will  be  secured  by 
cooperating  with  this  department  and  patronizing  firms  who  meet  the  re- 
quirements of  the  law  in  every  particular. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

WHEAT  BRAN 

Akin-Erskine  Milling  Company, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6031 

1573 

Ray  &,  Hartz,  Chrisney 

10.1 

3.9 

4.1 

14.0 

16.9 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6031 

2781 

Coal  City  Milling  Co.,  Coal  City 

9.5 

3.9 

4.2 

14.0 

16.5 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  

6031 

3089 

Theo.  A.  Stunkel,  Haubstadt... 

9.3 

3.9 

3.7 

14.0 

16.1 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  

6031 

3101 

Edw.  E.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville.. 

8.8 

3.9 

3.8 

14.0 

16.6 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  ^ 

6031 

3156 

West  Side  Hay  &.  Grain  Co., 

Evansville 

10.3 

3.9 

3.8 

14.0 

16.1 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  2 

6031 

31.57 

-John  M.  Klenck  Co.,  Evansville. 

10.8 

3.9 

3.9 

14.0 

16.9 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6031 

40.55 

,1.  A.  Zink  Son,  Pekin 

10.0 

3.9 

3.6 

14.0 

16.5 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6031 

4056 

O.  T,.  tlanble,  Pekin 

10.0 

3.9 

3.8 

14.0 

16.6 

Akron  Milling  Company, 

Akron,  Ind. 

W^heat  Bran 

3597 

3571 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

3.5  1 

4.3 

14.0 

14.1 

Anderson  & Benzine,  Kouts,  Ind. 

1 

Anderson  Benzine’s  Wheat  Bran 

436 

4574 

Kouts  Roller  Mills,  Kouts  ..  ... 

8.4 

3.7  ! 

3.7 

14.0 

14.3 

Angola  Elouring  Mills,  Angola,  Ind. 

Angola  Elouring  Mills  Wlieat  Bran 

109S 

4316 

Manufacturers  

8.4 

3.8 

4.0 

14.0 

15.1 

Angola  Elouring  Mills  Wheat  Bran 

1098 

4950 

1 

Manufacturers  

8.2 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

14.1 

Ashley-Hudson  Milling  & Grain  Com- 

1 

i 

pany,  Ashley,  Ind. 

1 

1 

Ashlev-Hndsnn  W’heat  Bran 

3144 

4345 

Mnnufaeturers 

9.3 

3.8 

4.5 

14.0 

16.1 

Ballard  & Ballard  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

. 

i 

ttBallard’s  Bran 

3168 

2875 

Mathys  & Elynn,  Mauckport... 

10.0 

4.1 

4.0 

14.5 

14.4 

Ballard’s  Bran  

3168 

3670 

Ballard  & Ballard  Co., 

Charlestown  

9.7 

4.1 

4.3 

14.5 

15.0 

Batchelor,  Barlow  & Batchelor, 

Sharpsville,  Ind. 

i 

W'heat  Bran 

4675 

3435 

Batchelor  & Batchelor, 

! 

Sharpsville  

9.5 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

15.3 

Bay  State  Milling  Company, 

Winona,  Minn. 

“Winona”  Coarse  Wheat  Bran  

7140 

1784 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point... 

9.4 

4.0 

5.2 

13.0 

14.7 

“Wdnona”  Coarse  Wheat  Bran  

7140 

3219 

J.  S.  Crawford;  Crown  Point. __ 

10.1 

4.0 

5.4 

13.0 

14.0 

“Winona”  Coarse  Wheat  Bran  » 

7140 

4751 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

10.5 

4.0 

4.9 

13.0 

15.5 

Berlien  Mills,  Angola,  R.  E.  B.,  Ind. 

W’heat  Bran 

7738 

4319 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.0 

4.3 

14.0 

15.6 

W’heat  Bran 

7738 

4946 

Manufaeturers  

10.4 

3.0 

3.6 

14.0 

15.4 

Bluffton  Milling  Company, 

Bluffton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

661  ' 

1654 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.8 

4.3 

14.0 

15.9 

Wheat  Bran 

661 

4187 

Manufacturers  

8.0 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

17.1 

Bock,  Leonard,  Argos,  Ind. 

1 

W'heat  Bran 

550 

3521 

J.  A.  Bock,  Argos 

10.3 

3.7  ! 

4.C 

14.0 

15.1 

Boehmer  & Ritzer,  Scott,  Ind. 

VV'heat  Bran  4 

1628 

2563 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.8  1 

4.5 

14.0 

14.0 

W’heat  Bran  4 

1628  1 

4349 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.8 

4.5 

14.0 

13.6 

Bolte  & Sons,  Ben,  Eerdinand,  Ind. 

i 

i 

wheat  Bran 

7275 

3744 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.5 

4.0 

14.5 

17.2 

Wheat  Bran 

4612 

Manufacturers  

7.0 

3.5  ! 

4.2 

14^ 

16.8 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
1 8.7%  foreign  material  consisting  of  chaff, 
shrivelled  and  cracked  wheat,  ground  weed 
seeds  and  hulls.  Removed  from  sale.  Re- 
labeled No.  7729 

) 


2 11.8%  foreign  material  consisting  of  chaflF, 

shrivelled  and  cracked  wheat,  ground  weed 
seeds  and  hulls.  Salt  .61%.  Removed 
from  sale.  Returned  to  mfrs. 

3 ChaflF,  oat  hulls  and  cockle  hulls  present 
^ Wheat  middlings  present 


49 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


' LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

TS 

C 

1 

Bowling  Green  Mills,  The, 

j 

Bowling  Green,  Ind. 

3370 

2082 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.9 

4.6 

14.0 

18.0 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

1 

! 

253 

1578 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

14.6 

253 

3861 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.8 

4.6 

14.0 

14.0 

Butler  Milling  Company,  Butler,  Ind. 

■Riltlpr  Millinfr  rin’.s.  Wheat  Bran 

1029 

4288 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

14.7 

1029 

4925 

Manufacturers 

7.9 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

14.6 

Carpenter,  B.  0.,  Perrysville,  Ind. 

3582 

4490 

Manufacturer  

10.3 

3.0 

3.6 

14.0 

16.0 

3582 

5148 

Manufacturer  ... 

9.6 

3.0 

3.4 

14.0 

15.0 

Cauble,  0.  L.,  P.ekin,  Ind. 

1018 

40.52 

Manufacturer 

10.1 

3.8 

4.5 

14.0 

15.9 

Wheat  Bran  5 _ 

1018 

4970 

Manufacturer  _ 

lO'.l 

3.8 

3;6 

14.0 

15.3 

Cauble  & Dunlevy,  Henry ville,  Ind. 

4295 

2447 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.5 

4.9 

14.0 

16.9 

Cayuga  Milling  Company,  Cayuga,  Ind. 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s.  Wheat  Bran  « __ 

421 

4519 

Arthur  Maegerlein  Roller  Mills, 

Clay  City 

9.8 

3.8 

3.6 

14.0 

17.1 

Champion  Roller  Milling  Company, 

! 

Richmond,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

2496 

3308 

Richmond  Roller  Milling  Co., 

Richmond  

10.8 

3.5 

4.0 

14.8 

15.7 

Churubusco  Flouring  Mills, 

Churubusco,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

6282 

4988 

Duglay  «&  Jones,  Churubusco— 

9.0 

3.0 

4.3 

13.0 

15.1 

City  Milling  Company,  Kendallville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  _ _ _ _ 

6273 

4258 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.8 

4.8 

14.0 

16.6 

Wheat  Bran 

6273 

4985 

Manufacturers 

8.8 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

16.1 

City  Mills,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

6105 

3942 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

13.9 

Wheat  Bran 

6105 

4994 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.5 

3.9 

14.0 

14.9 

Clark  Bros.,  Hagerstown,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  __  _ 

2562 

4338 

Manufacturers 

9.0 

3.2 

4.4 

12.0 

14.7 

Cook  Milling  Company, 

Richmond,  R.  R.  No.  4,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

4796 

3349 

Manufacturers 

9.2 

3.4 

4.1 

12.0 

15.0 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook,  Nappanee,  Ind. 

Bran  

5628 

2073 

B.  I.  Holser  & Co.,  Walkerton_. 

8.9 

3.6 

3.9 

13.5 

14.9 

Bran  

5628 

3523 

Beni.  Noftsger.  Rochester 

9.8 

3.6 

4.4 

13.5 

13.4 

Bran  

5628 

4321 

G.  Wolff  &.Sons  Co.,  Hamilton 

8.8 

3.6 

4.0 

13.5 

13.7 

Daniels  & Pickering  Company, 

Middletown,  Ind. 

Daniels’  Wheat  Bran 

104 

4362 

J.  M.  Walker  & Son,  Middletown 

9.2 

3.2 

3.9 

12.0 

14.5 

Deck,  James  M.,  Roann,  Ind. 

Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran 

195 

5033 

Manufacturer 

8.9 

3.7 

3.8 

14.0 

15.8 

Delp  Grain  Company,  E.  E., 

1 

i 

Bourbon,  Ind. 

1 

Bourbon  Bran  

2989 

2808 

MannfflPtTirers  ' 

9.8 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

15.1 

Edwards  & Loomis  Company, 

! 

Chicago,  111. 

Wheat  Bran  s 

3950 

2063 

C.  B.  Way,  LaPorte i 

8.8 

__3.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.1 

® Crushed  cheat  present  ® 5%  foreign  material  consisting  of  chaff,  ground 

® Removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  6030  weed  seeds,  etc.  Relabeled  No.  6835 

Small  amount  of  middlings  and  chaff  present 


5^ 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

' D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found] 

Edwardsport  Mills,  Edwardsport,  Ind. 

7210 

1690 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

3.0 

3.7 

13.0 

17.1 

Wheat  Bran 

7210 

5023 

Mannfaetnrers 

10.4 

3.0 

3.0 

13.0 

15A 

Eesley  & Company,  Wm., 

West  College  Corner,  Ind. 

3220 

2894 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

3.5 

3.8 

14.0 

15.2 

Bran  

3220 

4404 

Manufacturers 

10.8 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

13.3 

Excelsior  Mill  Company, 

Yankton,  S.  Dak. 

**Bran  ® 

2119 

Hubert  French,  T.inn  Grove 

9.7 

4.8 

16.1 

Farmers  Milling  & Elevator  Company, 

Veedersburg,  Ind. 

5000 

2253 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.0 

4.0 

12.0 

18.5 

5000 

4468 

Manufacturers 

9.4 

3.0 

4.5 

12.0 

15.9 

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Company, 

Geneva,  Ind. 

3109 

1790 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

3.3 

3.7 

14.0 

16.3 

Miller’s  Wheat  Bran 

3109 

1792 

Manufacturers 

9.0 

3.3 

3.4 

14.0 

17.1 

Miller’s  Wheat  Bran 

3109 

3285 

Manufacturers  __ 

10.5 

3.3 

4.0 

14.0 

16.7 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

3484 

1842 

Manufacturer  

9.2 

3.8 

3.8 

14.0 

17.3 

Green  Bros.  & Oldfather,  Warsaw,  Ind. 

fWheat  Bran 

7919 

4475 

Manufacturers  - 

9.2 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

14.5 

Greenfield  Milling  Company, 

Greenfield,  Ind. 

Bran  

4469 

2740 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.0 

4.0 

15.0 

18.8 

Hampton,  W.  D.,  Worthington,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

1124 

2925 

Manufacturer  _ 

10.4 

3.8 

3.8 

14.0 

19.9 

W’heat  Bran  _ 

1124 

3935 

Manufaeturer  

10.0 

3.8 

3.8 

14.0 

14.9 

Hardinsburg  Milling  Company, 

Hardinsburg,  Ind. 

Hardinsburg  Milling  Co’s.  Wheat  Bran 

422 

1488 

Hardinsburg  Roller  Mills, 

Hardinsburg  

10.8 

3.7 

4.3 

14.0 

16.5 

Hardinsburg  Milling  Co’s.  W’heat  Bran 

422 

1490 

Hardinsburg  Roller  Mills, 

Hardinsburg  

10.3 

3.7 

4.3 

14.0 

16.3 

Haun  & Son,  A.  H.,  Bainbridge,  Ind. 

Haim’s  Bran  __  _ _ _ 

4422 

2449 

I.  A.  Leavel,  Bainbridge 

9.3 

3.8 

4.3 

14.0 

18.7 

Huber  & Schultz,  Poland,  Ind. 

Bran  

865 

2084 

Cagle  & Schopnjeyer,  Poland.. _ 

10.2 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

16.9 

Huntington  Mill  Company, 

Huntington,  Ind. 

Bran  _ _ _ 

491 

4002 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.6 

3.8 

14.2 

16.5 

Hutchinson  Flour  Mills  Company,  The, 

Hutchinson,  Kans. 

Mill  B,nn  Bran  lo 

4995 

3916 

Tull  Department  Store,  Monon.. 

10.9 

3.5 

4.0 

15.5 

16.9 

Mill  Run  Bran  

4995 

3917 

Tull  Department  Store,  Monon.. 

10.1 

3.5 

2.0 

15.5 

14.2 

Mill  Run  Bran  12 

4995 

3918 

Tull  Department  Store,  Monon.. 

10.8 

3.5 

4.3 

15.5 

17.3 

Mill  Rnn  Bran 

4995 

3919 

Tull  Department  Store,  Monon.. 

11.7 

3.5 

3.1 

15.5 

8.9 

Igleheart  Bros.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

5771 

3088 

Ballard  & Magenheimer, 

Haubstadt  — 

9.1 

4.0 

4.4 

14.5 

14.8 

**  Not  registered  n Low  grade  flour.  Removed  from  sale 

t Before  registration  Wheat  middlings.  Removed  from  sale. 

” 3700  lbs.  removed  from  sale  Relabeled  No.  4996  ^ _ 

4.2%  foreign  material  consisting  of  cracked  Groimd  corn  containing  screenings  consisting 

and  shrivelled  wheat,  chaff  and  weed  seeds.  of  cracked  and  shrivelled  wheat,  ground 

Removed  from  sale  weed  seeds  and  chaff.  Removed  from  sale 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

c 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

q; 

1 

1 Official 

u . 

OiQ 

§ 

MoistU] 

per  cen 

1 Guar- 
1 anteed 

1 Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 

6139 

2861 

Manufacturers  __  

9.3 

3.0 

4.1 

13.0 

13.5 

6139 

3718 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.0 

4.1 

13.0 

14.0 

Johnston  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Pinola, 
LaPorte,  R.  R.  No.  7,  Ind. 

7391 

2065 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.0 

4.5 

13.0 

16.1 

7391 

3778 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.0 

4.9 

13.0 

15.4 

J Street  Milling  Company,  LaPorte,  Ind. 

762 

2108 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.8 

3.8 

14.0 

14.7 

762 

3774 

Manufacturers  

8.8 

3.8 

4.7 

14.0 

15.4 

Kanimon,  Prank  W.,  Cross  Plains,  Ind. 

2360 

2912 

Manufacturer  

10.1 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

15.2 

Kehlor  Plour  Mills  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Palace  Bran  

5808 

1743 

J.  H.  Leonard,  Sullivan 

11.4 

4.0 

4.3 

14.5 

17.6 

5808 

3651 

Eberts  Grain  Co.,  Nabb  

{1.6 

4.0 

4.3 

14.5 

16.7 

Klondike  Milling  Company,  The, 
Danville,  Ind. 

274 

3401 

Manufacturers  

12.4 

3.7 

4.3 

14.4 

16.9 

274 

4884 

Manufacturers  __  

9.4 

3.7 

4.4 

14.4 

17.5 

Lawrenceburg  Roller  Mills  Company, 
Lawreneeburg,  Ind. 

Snowflake  Bran  

3936 

3616 

Milan  Mill  & Elevator,  Milan... 

9.8 

3.8 

4.1 

14.2 

14.9 

Snowflake  Bran 

3936 

5275 

Chas.  Kelly  & Son,  Pairmount.. 

8.4 

3.8 

4.0 

14.2 

14.7 

Leesburg  Grain  & Milling  Company, 

The,  Leesburg,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

305 

2818 

Manufacturers  . 

8.6 

3.8 

4.3 

14.0 

14.5 

Wheat  Bran 

305 

3893 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

3.8 

4.6 

14.0 

14.9 

Lewis  Milling  Company,  Lewis,  Ind. 
Wbieat  Bran 

6005 

4530 

Mannfaetnrers 

8.8 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

17.4 

Lindauer,  Perd.,  Pulda,  Ind. 

W'heat  Bran 

1036 

3770 

Manufacturer 

8.9 

3.8 

4.3 

14.0 

16.1 

Lindsborg  Milling  & Elevator  Company, 
The,  Lindsborg,  Kans. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

6073 

2254 

P.  A.  Pinch  & Co.,  Hillsboro... 

8.4 

3.5 

4.1 

1 

14.5 

17.6 

Lingeman,  Adams  & Company, 
Brownsborg,  Ind. 

Bran 

3320 

4143 

Manufacturers 

9.4 

3.8 

4.0 

14.0 

15.7 

Bran 

3320 

4528 

Manufacturer.s 

10.0 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

14.7 

Little  Crow  Milling  Company, 

Warsaw,  Ind. 

Jjittle  Crow  Wheat  Bran 

360 

1543 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

3.8 

3.8 

14.0 

14.8 

Little  Crow  Wheat  Bran 

360 

3597 

Manufacturers 

10.9 

3.8 

4.0 

14.0 

14.0 

Lynn  Milling  Company,  The,  Lynn,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran 

6233 

1899 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.5 

4.5 

13.5 

16.8 

Wheat  Bran 

6233 

4601 

Lynn  City  Mills,  Lynn 

8.1 

3.5 

4.3 

13.5 

14.6 

Maegerlein  Roller  Mills,  Arthur, 

Clay  City,  Ind. 

Bran  

3807 

2780 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

3.0 

4.6 

13.0 

17.0 

Bran  . 

3807 

4517 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.0 

4.3 

13.0 

15.9 

Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle,  Ind. 
Martin  & Martin’.s  Wheat  Bran 

3150 

2593 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

3.2 

4.0 

12.0 

16.7 

Martin  & Martin’s  Wheat  Bran 

3150 

4304 

Manufacturers 

9.6 

3.2 

4.3 

12.0 

16.5 

Martin  & Martin’s  Wheat  Bran 

31.50 

5306 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.2 

4.1 

12.0 

16.3 

t Before  registration 


52 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

^ Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Matthews  Roller  Mills,  The, 

Matthews,  Ind. 

] 

Wheat  Bran 

3131 

3575 

Manufaeturer.s 

11.0 

3.5 

4.1 

14.0 

15.3 

Maumee  Valley  Mills,  New  Haven,  Ind. 

Bran  

6896 

3591 

Kraus  & Apfelbaum,  Pierceton.. 

9.2 

3.5 

4.7 

14.0 

15.1 

6896 

3982 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

3.5 

4.5 

1 14.0 

j 16.4 

Mexico  Roller  Mills,  Mexico,  Ind. 

1 

Pure.  Wheat  Bran 

4009 

3525 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.5 

4.4 

1 14.0 

15.5 

Milan  Milling  Company,  Milan,  Ind. 

3315 

3612 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.7 

4.4 

14.0 

: 15.1 

3315 

4703 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

1 3.7 

3.9 

14.0 

' 14.1 

Myers  & Son,  Joseph  H.,  Chili,  Ind. 

1 

1 

j 

3326 

2193 

Manufaeturer.s 

10.6 

3.0 

3.9 

16.0 

15.2 

Bran  

3326 

3533 

Manufacturers  __ 

10.9 

3.0 

1 4.2 

16.0 

15.4 

McCoy  Bros.;  Liberty,  Ind. 

^ 1 

1 

1 

Wheat  Bran  _ 

1428 

4409 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

3.5 

4.5 

14.2 

14.6 

Naber  & Company,  Chas.  P., 

Alexandria,  Ind. 

Naber.s  Bran 

7197 

4420 

Manufacturers 

10.2 

3.3 

i 4.0 

14.0 

16.3 

Neill  & Van  Valer,  Jonesboro,  Ind. 

j 

1 

Wheat  Bran  1 

763 

2324 

Jonesboro  Milling  Co., 

Jonesboro  

11.3 

3.8 

! 4.4 

14.0 

16.0 

New  Carlisle  Milling  Company, 

1 

New  Carlisle,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

1316 

2104 

Manufacturers 

10.8 

3.8 

4.0 

14.0 

14.6 

Wheat  Bran  

1316 

3793 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

14.0 

Norris  & Kidwell,  Washington,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

6279 

3896 

ATanufacturers 

9.1 

3.0 

3.7 

13.5 

17.6 

Wheat  Bran  

6279 

5232 

Manufacturers  _ __  _ __ 

8.8  t 

3.0 

3.2 

13.5 

! 16.3 

Northwestern  Consolidated  Milling  Com- 

pany, The,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

2825 

3064 

1 Bicker  Bros.  Co.,  Hammond 

10.2 

4.0 

4.9 

14.5 

: 13.8 

Page  Milling  Company,  The  Thomas, 

i 

1 

Topeka,-  Kans. 

' 

ftPure  Winter  Wheat  Bran  __  . 

6109 

3980 

Neal’s  Feed  Store,  Jasonville 

9.8 

4.0 

4.6 

15.0 

17.3 

Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran  

6109 

5287 

Carter  & Edwards,  Martinsville. 

9.9  I 

4.0 

4.2 

15.0 

16.1 

Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran  

6109 

5288 

Carter  & Edwards,  Martinsville. 

9.9 

4.0 

4.4 

15.0 

16.6 

Phoenix  Flour  Mill,  Evansville,  Ind. 

i 

*Wheat  Bran 

3226 

W.  H.  Small  & Co.,  Evansville.. 

9.6  1 

4.2 

16.8 

Piqua  Milling  Company,  The, 

Piqiia,  Ohio.  ' 

ttWheat  Bran  

2296 

1836 

The  Mead  Grain  Co.,  Union  City 

9.8 

3.0  ' 

4.2  ! 

14.0 

15.6 

Plainville  Milling  Company, 

Plainville,  Ind. 

i 

Wheat  Bran  

4372 

3901 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

3.8 

4.4 

14.2  ! 

15.9 

Ray  & Rice,  Camden,  Ind. 

! 

! 

Wheat  Bran 

5342 

1478 

Manufacturers 

10.5 

3.3 

3.9  j 

14.0 

15.2 

Wheat  Bran  . 

5342 

2988 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

3.3  i 

4.4 

14.0  I 

14.5 

Richland  Milling  Company, 

1 

I 

1 

1 

Bloomfield,  Ind. 

1 

1 

Wheat  Bran  1 

1149 

2028 

Manufacturers  .. 

12.3 

3.5 

3.8 

14.0 

16.2 

Wheat  Bran  I 

1149 

3926  1 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.5 

4.5 

14.0 

15.8 

♦ Not  tagged  314  tons  removed  from  sale  because  of  muti- 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  lated  tags.  Replaced  on  sale 

1 3/20  tons  removed  from  sale  because  of 
mutilated  tags.  Label  No.  8195  furnished 


53 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  cf  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


- - ' - 

_ _ . ^ _ 

Crude 

Crude 

Fat 

Protein 

C 

_o 

per  cent. 

per  cent. 

LABEL 

Official 

a>rj 

a 

Sample  secured  from 

j Moistui 
I percen 

Guar- 
! anteed 

j Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

; Found 

Richmond  Roller  Mills,  Richmond,  Ind. 

1 

The  Richmond  Roller  Mills  Wheat 

482 

3312 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.2 

4.9 

12.0 

16.2 

Rittenhouse,  E.^.,  Liberty  Mills,  Ind. 

3043 

5029 

Manufacturer  

9.0 

2.5 

3.2 

12.5 

13.9 

Riverside  Mill,  The,  Wolcottville,  Ind. 

1620 

4278 

Riverside  Milling  Co., 

8.5 

3.8 

4.3 

14.0 

15.7 

Wolcottville  1 

1620 

4979 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.8 

4.5 

14.0 

15.6 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

4178 

1812 

1 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.5 

3.5 

3.2 

3.5 

14.0 

16.5 

4178 

4771 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

14.0 

15.4 

Russell-Miller  Milling  Company, 

1 

1 

i 

Fargo,  N.  Dak. 

3584 

4305 

New  Castle  Flour  and  Feed  1 

Exchange,  New  Castle j 

9.0 

4.0 

5.2 

13.0 

14.7 

Schilt,  W.  F.,  Bremen,  Ind. 

7971 

4873 

J.  A.  Zehner,  Plymouth 

8.8 

3.7 

4.3 

14.0 

16.5 

Schulte,  W.  0.,  Freelandville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

6435 

5019 

Manufacturer  

9.6 

3.6 

3.5 

12.0 

16.7 

Schultz,  Baujan  & Company, 

I 

Beardstown,  111. 

fSinnUAnm  DrflU  

6013 

1679 

Walker  & Chambers,  Wheatland 

9.4 

3.5 

4.6 

14.0 

15.8 

Seidel,  W.  T.,  Orland,  Ind. 

6372 

2963 

Orland  Milling  Co.,  Orland 

10.4 

3.0 

3.9 

13.0 

1 

15.4 

"WUpfit  Bran  

6372 

4340 

Orland  Milling  Co.,  Orland 

9.2 

3.0 

3.9 

13.0 

14.0 

Shane  Bros.  & Wilson  Company,  . 

Hastings,  Minn. 

f T^rnn  

4925 

i 2946 

Jacob  Portman,  Columbia  City 

10.3 

3.7 

4.0 

14.0 

16.8 

Shawnee  Milling  Company, 

1 

1 

i 

1 

Topeka,  Kans. 

*Rrpn  ..  . _ ........ 

4573 

4013 

Bishop  Elevator  Co., 

1 

i 9.6 

4.0 

i .3 

14.0 

! 16.7 

Logansport  

■Whpat  Rran  - 

4573 

4479 

Galbreath  & Schriner,  Cayuga.. 

8.9 

4.0 

1 4.2 

14.0 

1 15.8 

Sheridan  Milling  Company, 

1 

1 

Sheridan,  Ind. 

5595 

4268 

1 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

2.8 

3.5 

13.0 

18.0 

Silver  Star  Milling  Company, 

■ 

i 

Patricksburg,  Ind. 

3622 

2462 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.0 

i 4.6 

13.0 

17.9 

3622 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.0 

j 4.5 

j 13.0 

17.6 

Sims  Milling  Company,  Frankfort,  Ind. 

6303 

j 2773 

3437 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.7 

1 

i 4.2 

14.0 

15.4 

"RT*or» 

6300 

i 4700 

Manufacturers  

, 8.8 

3.7 

j 4.1 

1 14.0 

15.4 

151  ail 

Sleepy  Eye  Flour  Mills  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Sleepy  Eye  Bran 

4108 

1558 

P.  Backer  & Son,  Troy 

1 9.8 

4.4 

j 5.1 

15.3 

14.8 

Sloan,  J.  F.,  Palestine,  Burket  P.  0., 

i 

j 

1 

i 

Ind. 

0 1 /-V  ^ rt  TX71**  o 4"  I-?  t» 

. 228 

. 1660 

3621 

Manufacturer  

10.1 

3.8 

1 4.3 

14.0 

14.9 

Smith,  A.  S.,  Flint,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  — 

4324 

Manufacturer  

. 8.8 

3.8 

1 

4_^0 

! 

14.0 

1 

1 15.0 

54 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 
per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

§ 

•+3 

y . 

m 

C 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Smith  Grain  & Milling  Company, 

1 

Warsaw,  Ind. 

i 

Wheat  Bran  

804 

3588 

Green  Bros.  & Oldfather, 

Warsaw  

10.3 

3.5 

4.2 

12.5 

14.8 

ffWheat  Bran  

804 

4474 

Farmers  Co-Operative  Elevator 

Co.,  Ligonier  

9.1 

3.5 

4.5 

12.5 

14.9 

Southwestern  Milling  Company,  Inc., 

The,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

7285 

4476 

Jordan  & Baird,  Kewanna 

9.2 

3.5 

4.2 

17.0 

17.0 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

7285 

4573 

Jordan  & Baird,  Kewanna 

9.7 

3^5 

4!3 

17!o 

16!2 

Spencerville  Milling  Company, 

Spencerville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

5804 

4233 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.2 

3.9 

13.5 

16.2 

Star  Milling  Company,  The, 

Aurora,  Ind. 

1038 

3643 

Manufacturers 

10.5 

3.8 

4.0 

14.2 

16.5 

Star  Milling  Company,  Shoals,  Ind. 

Star  Wheat  Bran  

502 

4166 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

16.7 

St.  Joe  Milling  Company,  St.  Joe,  Ind. 

St.  Joe’s  Wheat  Bran 

5553 

4931 

Manufacturers 

8.8 

3.4 

3.7 

14.0 

14.8 

Stott,  David,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

5279 

2508 

Home  Grain  Co.,  LaGrange 

8.4 

4.5 

4.7 

16.0 

16.0 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  

5279 

4309 

Home  Grain  Co.,  Angola 

9.1 

4.5 

4.3 

16.0 

14.7 

Stoudt,  Thomas,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

’I''hnmas  Stnndt’s  Wheat  Bran 

2234 

1915 

Manufacturer 

11.1 

3.3 

4.1 

14.5 

14.3 

Suckow  Company,  Franklin,  Ind. 

“Perfection”  Wheat  Bran 

5047 

2340 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

17.8 

“Perfection”  Wheat  Bran 

5947 

4741 

David  R.  Webb  Co.,  Edinburg.. 

9^7 

3!8 

4!5 

14.0 

16A 

Thornburg  Milling  & Elevator  Com- 

pany, Martinsville,  Ind. 

Bran 

656 

2181 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

3.2 

3.8 

14.0 

15.4 

Timbrook  & Hursh,  Auburn,  Ind. 

Anbnrn  Roller  Mills  Wheat  Bran 

7031 

4226 

Manufacturers 

8.6 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

14.6 

Anbnrn  Roller  Mills  Wheat  Bran 

7031 

4911 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

3^8 

4.0 

14!o 

14!7 

Tresselt  & Sons,  C.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

409 

3964 

Manufacturers  ___  

9.9 

3.8 

4.7 

14.0 

15.9 

Tuttle  & Company,  R., 

Columbia  City,  Ind. 

Perfection  Bran 

817 

1.526 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

3.8 

4.0 

14.0 

16.1 

Perfection  Bran 

817 

3527 

0.  Gandy  & Co.,  Denver 

10.5 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

16.4 

Perfection  Bran 

817 

4990 

Manufacturers 

8.7 

3.8 

3.6 

14.0 

15.5 

Uhl  & Snider,  Connersville,  Ind. 

Uhl  & Snider’s  Wheat  Bran 

522 

2586 

Uhl-Snider  Milling  Co., 

Connersville 

10.0 

3.2 

4.5 

12.0 

16.1 

Ulrich  & Son,  Levi,  Greensboro,  Ind. 

Bran 

5397 

4299 

Manufacturers  ... 

10.6 

3.5 

3.2 

12.5 

14.7 

Valentine  & A"alentine,  Franklin,  Ind. 

Wheat  liran 

933 

2334 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.8 

4.0 

14.0 

16.8 

Wheat  Bran  

933 

4825 

Manufacturers 

7.7 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

16.2 

Wakarusa  Milling  Company, 

Wakarusa,  Ind. 

Wakarusa  Wheat  Bran  _ 

1249 

2614 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

14.3 

+ + Not  tagged.  T.,abels  furnished 

2.y  foreign  material  consisting  of  cracked  i"  Wheat  middlings  and  approx.  3.7%  foreign 
wheat  and  crushed  weed  seeds.  Removed  materials  chiefly  crushed  cheat 

from  sale 


\ 

55 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Wellington  Milling  Company, 
Anderson,  Ind. 

Wellington’s  A.  X.  A.  Bran- 

Wildcat  Roller  Mills, 

Cutler,  R.  R.  No.  2,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran  


Wilmot  Flouring  Mills,  Wilmot, 
R.  R.  No.  1,  Pierceton,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran  


Witmer  Grain  Company,  Grabill,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

Wheat  Bran  


Woodburn  Elevator  & Milling  Company, 
The,  Woodburn,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  


Yerxa,  Andrews  & Thurston,  Inc., 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Bran  


Yohn,  W.  B.,  North  Webster,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran  


Zehner  Milling  Company,  Plymouth,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

Wheat  Bran  


Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 
Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran  


WHEAT  BRAN,  SCREENINGS 

AcmCHEvans  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  Bran  and  Screenings 


ttAcme  Bran  and  Screenings  __ 

Bartlett  Company,  The  J.  E., 
Jackson,  Mich. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screeninga 
Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 


Bernet,  Craft  & Kauffman  Milling 
Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mt.  Carmel  Bran  and  Screenings. 
Mt.  Carmel  Bran  and  Screenings. 
Mt.  Carmel  Bran  and  Screenings. 


Billman  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Shelbyville,  Ind. 
Shelby  Wheat  Bran  and  Unground 

Wheat  Screenings 

Shelby  Wheat  Bran  and  Unground 
Wheat  Screenings 


Boonville  Milling  Company, 
Boonville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings. 


Brose,  George,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

; 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

4986 

4357 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

i 

3.0 

4.0 

15.7  i 

14.4 

3208 

3923 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

3.3 

4.6 

14.0 

15.8 

6432 

3589 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.0 

4.0 

13.0 

15.7 

2940 

4231 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.5 

3.7 

14.0 

17.1 

2940 

4927 

Manufacturers  

8.4 

3.5 

3.8 

14.0 

15.5 

4600 

4229 

Manufacturers  

8.6 

3.0 

3.4 

14.0 

16.1 

6516 

3477 

W.  G.  Sweet,  Royal  Center 

10.0 

5.5 

5.7 

12.0 

12.3 

6836 

3590 

Manufacturer  

10.0 

3.5 

4.1 

13.5 

14.3 

1431 

2795 

J.  A.  Zehner,  Plymouth 

9.3 

3.8 

4.3 

14.0 

14.3 

1431 

4871 

J.  A.  Zehner,  Plymouth 

9.1 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

15.8 

7670 

5051 

Manufacturers  

1 9.0 

4.0 

4.0 

1 

4.0 

14.5 

7159 

1960 

Thorntown  Grain  Co., 

Thorntown  

9.4 

3.5 

4.1 

15.5 

15.9 

7159 

3818 

Galt  Sc-  tin  J Smith  Pend 

10.0 

3.5 

4.3 

15.5 

15.5 

6813 

1887 

Chas.  A.  Neff,  New  Paris 

9.6 

3.0 

4.6 

14.0 

15.1 

6813 

3283 

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Co., 

Geneva  — 

. 10.1 

3.0 

5.1 

14.0 

13.6 

6813 

3991 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

Co.,  North  Judson  

9.4 

3.0 

4.5 

14.0 

15.2 

. 5518 

1904 

Zionsville  Milling  Co.,  Zionsville 

8.9 

3.5 

4.4 

14.3 

16.0 

5618 

2669 

E F -Tnbnsnn^  Pnnli 

9.3 

3.5 

4.1 

14.3 

16.3 

. 5518 

4629 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis. 

9.9 

3.5 

4.3 

14.3 

15.4 

6546 

3014 

Manufacturers  - 

10.0 

3.0 

3.6 

14.0 

16.5 

6546 

4788 

Manufacturers  

7.5 

3.0 

3.8 

14.0 

16.1 

2842 

3834 

Maniifflctnrer.s  

9.7 

3.7 

4.0 

14.0 

16.9 

2942 

3179 

Manufacturer  

. 9.8 

3.2 

4.0 

13.5 

16.4 

. 2942 

5127 

Manufacturer  

92 

3.2 

4.2 

13.5 

15.3 

ft  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


18  Small  amount  of  wheat  screenings 


TABLE  !V — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  ‘ 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Brose  & Arnold,  Evansville,  Ind. 

1 

i 

2257 

3173 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.7 

4.1 

14.0 

18.2 

2257 

5129 

Manufacturers 

9.1 

3.7 

3.9 

14.0 

1 

16.0 

Castetter  & Company,  Clyde  J., 

1 

Goshen,  Ind. 

tWheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings 

7291 

1587 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.5 

5.6 

14.0 

14.0 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  M’f’g.  Company, 

i 

1 

Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings... 

7005 

1731 

Russell  & -Co.,  Portland 

10.9 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

15.7 

“Prize”  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings... 

7005 

1866 

C.  E.  Roadrick,  Morocco 

! 9.0 

3.5 

4.7 

14.0 

15.8 

“Prize”  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings... 

7005 

3501 

H.  W.  Schmidt,  Madison 

1 10.0 

3.5 

4.9 

14.0 

i 15.6 

“Prize”  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings... 

7005 

4878 

R.  R.  McDaniel,  Danville 

8.9 

3.5 

4.6 

1 

14.0 

15.6 

Claro  Milling  Company,  Waseca,  Minn. 

1 

i 

1 

Claro  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

Screenings  

6615 

2014 

Przybysz  Flour  & Feed  Co., 

Claro  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

South  Bend  

9.5 

3.0 

6.0 

14.0 

14.9 

6615 

3822 

J.  0.  Barrett,  South  Bend 

10.5 

3.0 

5.7 

14.0 

14.3 

Commander  Mill  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Commander  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

7139 

3042 

Valparaiso  Grain  & Elevator 

Commander  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

Co.,  Valparaiso 

10.7 

4.0 

5.3 

14.0 

13.8 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

7139 

4757 

Valparaiso  Grain  & Elevator 

Co.,  Valparaiso 

9.9 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

14.5 

Coombs  Milling  Company,  Wm.  A., 

Coldwater,  Mich. 

j 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

I 

jiot  cxCPftiing  Mill  Run 

7345 

4941 

L.  W.  Crandall,  Fremont 

8.8 

3.0 

4.3 

14.0 

14.7 

Decatur  Roller  Mills,  Decatur,  Ind. 

, i 

Wh^'at  ftT’an  Mr.  Sf>rppning-R 

5427 

2096 

Manufacturers  [ 

10.8 

3.0 

3.9 

13.0 

15.5 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

5427 

4199 

Fornax  Milling  Co.,  Decatur | 

1 

9.8 

3.0 

4.2 

13.0 

14.8 

Deutseh  & Sickert  Company, 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

7259 

4617 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

7.7 

4.0 

4.1 

13.0 

15.4 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 

1 

Chicago,  111. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

not  f^XOPPrlirig  Mill  Run  

5841 

4759 

Wm.  Harbeek,  Valparaiso 

8.9 

4.0 

4.9 

14.5 

16.8 

Donmeyer,  Gardner  Company, 

Peoria,  111. 

Wheat  Bran  vdth  Screenings  not  to 

i 

exceed  Mill  Run 

6208 

3490 

North  Madison  Coal  Co.,  I 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings  not  to 

North  Madison 

10.0 

4.0 

5.3 

14.0 

16.1 

exceed  Mill  Run 

6208 

4038 

Burns  & Davis  Drug  Co., 

Otterbein  

9.4 

4.0 

5.1 

14.0 

16.1 

Eckhart  Milling  Company,  B.  A., 

Chicago,  111. 

Bran  anii  Spreenings 

6194 

3106 

Flack  Bros.,  Fast  Ghicagn 

10.1 

4.0 

4.5 

14.0 

14.9 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Wheat  Bran  & Wheat  Screenings 

7205 

4956 

Salem  Co-Operative  Association, 

Salem  

8.6 

4.0 

4.5 

14.5 

16.8 

Emison,  J.  & S.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

4237 

1637 

The  Crescent  Feed  Store, 

Oakland  City  

8.9 

3.0 

4.1 

14.0 

16.1 

Enterprise  Milling  Company,  Milroy,  Ind. 

l^ran  Mr.  SrrppniTig.R 

2077 

3050 

Manufacturers 

11.2 

2.9 

3.8 

14.1 

15.4 

Bran  & Screenings  

2077 

5039 

Manufacturers  .. 

9.5 

2.9 

4.2 

14.1 

15.9 

t Before  registration 


1*^  Wheat  middlings  present 


57 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


^ 

Number 

LABEL 

• 

j Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Etna  Lumber  & Milling  Company, 

Etna  Green,  Ind. 

6659 

2804  1 

Everett,  Aughenbaugh  & Company, 
Waseca,  Minn. 

E-A-CO  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

6024 

3214  : 

Fyke  Milling  Company,  LaGrange,  Ind. 

6423 

2504  ] 

6423 

4355  ; 

Garland  Milling  Company, 

Greensburg,  Ind. 

7279 

2489  : 

7279 

3182  : 

7279 

4747  : 

7279 

5036 

Goshen  Milling  Company,  Goshen,  Ind. 

2335 

1583 

2335 

3839 

2335 

3840 

Hales  & Edwards  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 
not  exceeding  Mill  Run I 

7509 

3044 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 
not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

7509 

5203 

Hall  Milling  Company,  W.  C., 

Brazil,  Ind. 

Hall’s  Bran  & Screenings  

3806 

4030 

Home  Mill  & Grain  Company, 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

IMixGd  Feed  ----- ------ 

3237 

3244 

TVTtypH  "PpPfl  — 

1 3237 

3245 

JVIixGd  FGCd  

3237 

5072 

MixGd  

3237 

5073 

Hornung,  J.  M.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  S<’'”pening.s  _ 

2577 

3193 

Wheat  Bran  ^ Screenings  

2577 

4743 

Huntcr-Robinson-Wenz  Milling 
Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Bran  and  Screenings  

. 5219 

3482 

Bran  and  Screenings  

. 5219 

4620 

Bran  and  Screenings  

. 5219 

5207 

Hum,  W.  D.,  R.  R.  No.  1,  Ramsey,  Ind. 
Mix^d  --------- 

1 65901 

3697 

Indiana  Milling  Company, 

Terre  Taute,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Mill  Run  Screenings.... 

. 5908 

3276 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce  Company, 
North  Judson,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

. 8123 

5187 

Kansas  Flour  Mills  Company,  The, 
Wichita,  Kans. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Se^ecnings 

5076 

1937 

Brtin  - 

5076 

; 3346 

Brsn  £ind 

5076 

; 3512 

Sample  secured  from 


Manufacturers 


Paul  E.  Raasch,  Crown  Point. 


M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville. 

Manufacturers  

D.  M.  Blackmore,  Greensburg. 
Eberts  Grain  Co.,  Nabb. 


Manufacturers  

C.  E.  Paxson,  Elkhart. 
C.  E.  Paxson,  Elkhart. 


Wm.  Harbeck,  Valparaiso 

T.  H.  Owens  & Co.,  Bedford. 


Manufacturers 


Manufacturers 

Manufacturers 


Geo.  W.  Graston  Milling  Co., 
Dupont  


W.  D.  Hum  Milling  Co., 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


H.  H.  Cliver,  Terre  Haute 9.8 


Manufacturers  


J,  C.  Barrett,  South  Bend... 

J.  H.  Menke,  Richmond 

Fulton  Grain  & Lumber  Co 

Fi^ton  — . 

Vo  Wheat  middlings.  Relabeled  No.  7471 


Crude 

Fat 

per  cent.  ] 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Moistui 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

73 

3 . 

O 

pH 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

9.5 

4.0 

4.0 

1 

1 

14.5 

15.9 

... 

9.7 

3.0 

5.7 

14.0 

14.9 

8.7 

3.5 

4.3 

13.5 

15.0 

8.7 

3.5 

4.0 

13.5 

15.0 

9.5 

3.7 

3.7 

15.0 

15.5 

9.9 

3.7 

3.8 

15.0 

14.8 

8.6 

3.7 

3.8 

15.0 

15.4 

8.7 

3.7 

3.8 

15.0 

14.8 

10.6 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

15.4 

10.3 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

15.0 

10.4 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

15.4 

10.6 

3.0 

4.8 

14.0 

13.9 

.... 

9.4 

3.0 

5.2 

14.0 

13.7 

9.4 

3.0 

3.8 

13.0 

16.7 

9.0 

3.2 

4.0 

14.4 

15.9 

8.6 

3.2 

4.0' 

14.4 

17.9 

8.8 

3.2 

3.8 

14.4 

14.7 

8.6 

3.2 

3.3 

14.4 

17.0 

J 10.0 

3.7 

3.8 

14.1 

13.9 

! 8.6 

3.7 

4.1 

14.1 

14.5 

. 9.9 

4.0 

4.7 

14.5 

17.0 

“0.. 

. 9.1 

4.0 

4.3 

14.5 

16.2 

. 9.1 

4.0 

4.1 

14.5 

16.1 

1 

. 10.8 

3.5 

4.5 

13.5 

15.8 

3.8 

4.6 

14.0 

13.6 

j 9.8 

- 8.7 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

16.1 

. 10.0 

4.4 

4.5 

14.7 

16.8 

9.2 

4.4 

4.2 

14.7 

, 16.9 

9.6 

4.4 

4^ 

1 14.7 

* 17.4 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Humber 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Kansas  Flour  Mills  Company,  The, 

1 

Wichita,  Kans. 

Mill  Run  Bran  and  Wheat  Screenings.. 

5077 

1804 

D.  G.  McFadden  Grain  Co., 

Ridge vi  lie  

8.9 

4.4 

4.8 

14.7 

14.7 

Kaw  Milling  Company,  The, 

Topeka,  Kans. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings  

6702 

2416 

Cayuga  Milling  Co.,  Cayuga 

8.2 

4.0 

4.5 

17.0 

18.4 

6702 

3324 

Omer  G.  Whelan,  Richmond.  

10.3 

4.0 

4.2 

17.0 

15.8 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings  

7935 

4795 

0.  W.  Gotto,  Michigan  City 

9.5 

4.0 

4.0 

16.0 

17.1 

Kemper  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

j 

Anchor  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings.. 

6030 

2146 

Bridgeton  Milling  Co., 

1 

• 

Bridgeton  

9.0 

4.0 

4.7 

14.5 

16.0 

ttAnehor  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings.. 

6030 

3978 

Ola  Chambers,  Jasonville 

9.0  j 

4.0 

3.7 

14.5 

17.4 

Anchor  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings.. 

6030 

4287 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

i 

Co.,  Westfield  

! 9.9 

4.0 

4.3 

14.5 

16.6 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings... 

6362 

1658 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton. 

1 10.1 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

15.3 

Badger  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings... 

6362 

3291 

Steifel  & Levy,  Bryant...  

10.0 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

15.2 

Ligonier  Milling  Company, 

Ligonier,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

28.53 

2605 

Mflnnfactnrers 

9.7 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

15.4 

Mixed  Feed  ...  

2853 

3845 

North  Side  Feed  Store, 

Mishawaka 

10.1 

3.8 

4.0 

14.0 

15.3 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain 

Company,  Monticello,  Ind. 

T.ong-hry’.s  Mixed  Feed 

1946 

2772 

City  Feed  Store,  Plymouth..  . 

8.7 

3.7 

5.3 

14.0 

15.3 

Louisville  Milling  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

1 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run...  

6175 

2482 

John  Gienger  & Co., 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

Jeffersonville  __  

9.1 

4.0 

4.0 

14.5 

14.6 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

6175 

2519 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

New  Albany 

8.5 

4.0 

4.1 

14.5 

14.8 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

6175 

3701 

Corydon  Milling  Co.,  Corydon.. 

10.4 

4.0 

4.3 

14.5 

14.9 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

6175 

4662 

John  H.  Shine  & Co., 

New  Albany 

8.7 

4.0 

4.2 

14.5 

13.4 

Mallinson,  Charles  L.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

7363 

3231 

Manufacturer  . _ 

9.3 

3.5 

4.1 

13.5 

16.5 

Maney  Milling  Company,  Omaha,  Neb. 

I 

Mixpd  Fppd 

.5.589 

2358 

Paul  Kuhn  & Co.,  Riley 

10.4 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

15.4 

Mayflower  Mills,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Mayflower  Bran  and  Screenings  22 

6715 

2549 

H.  E.  St.  John,  Albany 

10.6 

3.8 

5.2 

14.0 

15.6 

Mayflower  Bran  and  Screenings 

6715 

3985 

DeBolt  & Niswonger, 

Monroeville  

9.2 

3.8 

5.0 

14.0 

15.0 

ttMayflower  Bran  and  Screenings 

6715 

4688 

Garrett  & Funk,  Liberty  Center 

8.5 

3.8 

4.8 

14.0 

15.2 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

4659 

1735 

Fred  B.  Lash  Flour  Mills, 

Farmersburg ... 

11.2 

3.0 

4.1 

14.0 

16.4 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

4659 

2520 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany  

10.0 

3.0 

3.8 

14.0 

16.8 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

4659 

2676 

C.  H.  Galloway  & Co.,  Paoli 

9.5 

3.0 

4.2 

14.0 

17.2 

National  Mills,  Angola,  Ind. 

Wheat  liran  with  Screenings 

7622 

4312 

Manufacturers  ._  

8.8 

3.0 

4.1 

13.5 

14.1 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings  

7622 

4952 

Manufacturers  

8.3 

3.0 

3.8 

13.5 

14.6 

New  Era  Milling  Company,  The, 

Arkansas  City,  Kans. 

Wheat  Bran  & Wheat  Screenings 

6859 

2135 

John  H.  Kuhn  & Son, 

Michigan  City  ...  

9.2 

3.5 

3.9 

16.0 

17.6 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  Wheat  middlings  and  screenings 

“1  Wheat  middlings  present.  Relabeled  No.  8083 


59 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


■ 

Number 

Crude 
Fat  - 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

§ 

•u 

Sample  secured  from 

LABEL 

/ 

I Official 

“ft 

OQ 

a 

R o 

*S  ^ 

O <u 

s ft 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

I Found 

New  Era  Milling  Company,  The, 

Arkansas  City,  Fans. 

Wheat  Bran  Wheat  Sereeninga 

6859 

4800 

John  H.  Fuhn  & Son,  i 

Michigan  City 

9.3 

3.5 

3.7 

16.0 

16.8 

Wheat  Bran  & Wheat  Screenings 

6859 

4902 

W.  W.  Pearson,  Upland 

9.7 

3.5 

3.8 

16.0 

16.1 

New  Prague  Flouring  Mills  Company, 

New  Prague,  Minn. 

Seal  of  Minnesota  Wheat  Bran  (With 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  R.nn) 

7608 

3'0O3 

i 

Crabbs,  Reynolds,  Taylor  Co., 

LaFayette  

9.8 

4.5 

4.6 

13.1 

14.8 

Nichols  & Company,  C.  E.,  Lowell,  Ind., 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

7096 

1775 

Mamifaetnrers 

8.8 

4.0 

5.3 

14.5 

14.3 

Nieman,  C.,  Sunman,  Ind. 

501 

3188 

Manufacturer 

9.6 

3.7 

4.0 

14.0 

15.5 

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 

1 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

N.  M.  Co’s  Wheat  Bran  & Screenings. 

5252 

1612 

Pendleton  Feed  & Fuel  Co., 

Pendletnn 

9.6 

3.7 

4.3 

14.5 

16.2 

N.  M.  Co’s  Wheat  Bran  «fe  Screenings. 

5252 

1627 

A.  B.  Cohee  & Co.,  McCordsville 

9.0 

3.7 

4.4 

14.5 

16.1 

Norton  & Company,  Willis, 

Topeka,  Fans. 

Wheat  Bran  Screen  in  P'S 

6478 

6478 

2403 

4000 

TTershman  A-,.  Snn,  Tipton 

11.4 

3.5 

4.3 

14.5 

17.8 

Wheat  Bran  Screenings 

C.  E.  Bash  & Co.,  Inc., 

TTuntinetfin 

9.4 

3.5 

4.7 

14.5 

16.4 

Oldenburg  Flour  Mills,  Oldenburg,  Ind. 

17.0 

Mixed  Feed 

489 

3191 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.2 

4.0 

12.8 

Mixed  Feed 

489 

4588 

Manufacturers 

8.7 

3.2 

3.8 

12.8 

15.2 

Pancost  Milling  Company,*  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Bran  Jir,  Screenings 

6886 

1609 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.5 

3.0 

4.3 

U.O 

14.3 

Bran  Screenings 

6886 

3862 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.0 

4.7 

14.0 

1 14.3 

Paoli  Milling  Company,  The,  Paoli,  Ind. 

I 

1 16.8 

Clear  Mill  Feed 

3019 

2672 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.0 

4.8 

12.0 

Clear  Mill  Feed  23 

3019 

4092 

Manufacturers  . 

9.6 

3.0 

4.6 

12.0 

* 14.8 

Pennville  Milling  Company, 

Pennville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Wheat  Screen- 

j 

ings 

5503 

1762 

Manufacturers  

11.6 

2.9 

3.6 

12.0 

16.0 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Wheat  Screen- 

14.8 

irt^.d 

5503 

4157 

Manufacturers  

8.9 

2.9 

3.9 

12.0 

Peru  Milling  Company,  The,  Peru,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Sereenine's 

17 

2731 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.1 

4.2 

14.5 

15.9 

+tWhea,t  Bran  Sereenine-s 

17 

4381 

South  Side  Feed  Store,  Peru 

9.3 

3.1 

4.2 

14.5 

14.2 

Phoenix  Flour  Mill,  Evansville,  Ind. 

i 

Bran  Se.reeninvs 

2252 

3237 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

4.0 

4.0 

15.0 

15.1 

ttBran  Sereenines 

2252 

5137 

W.  A.  Browning  Milling  Co., 

Evansville 

8.6 

4.0 

3.8 

15.0 

15.3 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 
Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

7133 

i 

1811 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

9.8 

4.0 

5.5 

13.0 

14.3 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 
Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

7133 

2300 

J.  R.  Guild  & Co.,  Medaryville.. 

9.3 

4.0 

5.0 

13.0 

13.6 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

7133 

5263 

Thos.  C.  Fisher,  Anderson 

8.4 

4.0 

4.7 

13.0 

15.9 

Plant  Milling  Company,  Geo.  P., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Bran  Screenings 

4753 

2031 

G.  0.  Jean,  Bloomfield 

11.1 

3.0 

4.7 

15.0 

; 16.3 

(^P  ' Bran  Screenings 

4753 

3633 

The  Early  & Daniel  Co.,  Aurora 

9.2 

3.0 

4.3 

i 

15.0 

16.1 

1 

' 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

23  Wheat  middlings  present 

6o 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

§ 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

tn 

d 

R <a 

m o 

■q 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Plotnicki  & Company,  Louis  P., 

South  Bend,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Mixed  Feed  

6892 

6892 

2016 

3819 

Manufacturers  

Louis  P.  Plotnicki,  South  Bend. 

8.8 

12.4 

3.0 

3.0 

5.3 

4.8 

13.5 

13.5 

14.7 

13.8 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Garland  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

6845 

4367 

Pickering  & Son,  Anderson 

i 

9.9 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

15.4 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart, Tnd. 
ttWheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

7685 

3037 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.5 

! 5.1 

1 

14.0 

13.5 

Schultz  Bros.,  Elberfeld,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings  

3924 

1617 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

3.5 

1 

3.5 

13.5 

15.0 

Sheffield-King  Milling  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Fancy  Brodflake  Wheat  Bran  and 
Ground  Wheat  Screenings 

6D52 

2157 

0.  W.  Gotto,  Michigan  City 

9.1 

4.0 

1 4.9 

14.5 

13.7 

Snoddy,  M.  W.,  Covington,  R.  F.  D. 

No.  1,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

1071 

4486 

Manufacturer  _ . 

10.4 

3.5 

1 

1 

3.4 

13.0 

15.2 

Southwestern  Milling  Company,  The, 
Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings  

5285 

2039 

J.  F.  Biehl,  Brazil 

9.2 

4.0 

4.4 

15.2 

17.0 

Sparks  Milling  Company,  Alton,  111. 

ffhVy  Mfi  Bran  and  Scrpeninp-s 

6778 

1752 

Dugger  Feed  Store,  Dugger 

9.9 

3.5 

4.7 

15.0 

16.6 

! 

Sparks  Milling  Company,  ' 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Wabash  Bran  and  Screenings 

2775 

2775 

2775 

2779 

3341 

S.  A.  Travis,  Clay  City 

1 

9.5 

3.5 

1 4.1 

14.0 

17.8 

Wabash  Bran  and  Screenings 

Bavip  Bhillips,  Oaktnwn 

9.4 

3.5 

! 4.3 

14.0 

17.1 

Wabash  Bran  and  Screenings 

5251 

S.  A.  Travis,  Clay  City 

9.2 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

14.9 

Waha.sh  Bran  and  Screenings 

2775 

5257 

5377 

5268 

3699 

W.  D.  Hampton,  Worthington.. 

Thomas  & Hickman,  Corydon.. 

Knecht  Milling  Co., 

Hartford  City  

8.9 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

14.3 

Stanard-Tilton  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Wheat  Bran  Screenings 

10.7 

3.0 

3.8 

14.0 

17.0 

Star  & Crescent  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Star  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  ! 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

1706 

; 

Star  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 
not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

10.2 

4,0 

4.9 

15.0 

15.0 

5377 

3763 

A.  C.  Heitschmidt, 

Michigan  Oity 

11.0 

4.0 

4.7 

15.0 

15.5 

Trow  Company,  W.,  Madison,  Ind. 
M’rnw’s  Bran  and  Screenings  i 

1973 

3540 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

16.1 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Valier’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 
Wheat  Screenings 

6156 

1951 

M.  T.  Harris,  Thorntown 

8.9 

3.5 

5.9 

14.5 

17.0 

Valier's  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 
Wheat  Screenings  

6156 

3307 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Co., 

'|>rre  Haute 

10.2 

3.5 

4.9 

14.5 

16.1 

Valparaiso  Grain  & Elevator  Company, 
Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  Jir,  Screenings 

6008 

1853 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.8 

1 

4.7 

liO 

15.2 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co.’s  Wheat  Bran 
with  Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run 

5464 

1536 

Thomas  S.  Nugen,  Lewisville 

9.1 

4.0 

1 

5.9  ■ 

14.5 

14.7 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  20  sacks  not  tagged.  Removed  from  sale 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


• 

Number 

Crude 

Crude 

Fat 

irroLein 

LABEL 

o 

■+3 

Sample  secured  from 

a; 

S-i  tt 

per  cent. 

per  cent 

6 S 

I 

TJ 

1 

•73 

"o 

o 

m 

C 

OT  O 

'S  ^ 

O rt 

cl 

Cl 

S- 

O a 

1 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

i 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co.’s  Wheat  Bran 

! 

i 

with  Ground  iScreenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run 

5464 

1973 

Connell,  Anderson  Grain  Co., 

ttWa^hburn-Crosby  Co.’s  Wheat  Bran 

Beeson  

9.2 

4.0 

5.8 

14.5 

13.9 

with  Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run  .....  _ .. 

5464 

3132 

Hay  & Grain  Supply  Co.,  Gary. 

10.3 

4.0 

5.5 

14.5 

13.3 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

7229 

2583 

Frank  Wright,  Brookville 

10.0 

4.0 

5.5 

13.0 

i 13.2 

Wheat  Brail  with  Ground  Screenings 

7229 

2866 

T.  S.  Nugen,  T.ewisville 

9.8 

4.0 

5.4 

13.0 

13.3 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

nnt  exceeding  Mill  Run 

7229 

3118 

Indiana  School  for  Feeble  Mind- 

1 

Wheat  Bi:an  with  Ground  Screenings 

ed  Youth,  Fort  Wayne 

9.4 

4.0 

5.0 

13.0 

! 13.6 

7229 

4397 

Frank  A.  Wright,  Laurel 

10.0 

4.0 

5.0 

13.0 

1 13.9 

Western  Blour  Mill  Company, 

Davenport,  Iowa. 

“Black  Hawk  Bran”  with  Ground 

Screenings  not  to  exceed  Mill  Run... 

7086 

2005 

Wortjiington  Grain  Co., 

1 

1 

Black  Hawk  Bran  with  Ground 

Worthington  ..  . 

9.0 

4.5 

4.1 

13.1 

1 16.6 

Screenings  not  to  exceed  Mill  Run... 

7895 

4859 

Przybysz  Flour  & Feed  Co., 

1 

South  Bend 

8.8 

3.0 

4.2, 

13.3 

16.3 

Zenith  Milling  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings  not  exceed- 

ing Mill  Run 

7373 

2956 

Fred  Holtz.  Williamsnort 

10.6 

3.2 

4.0 

15.0 

15.1 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings  not  exceed- 

vvuiiaiiispuit  

1 

ing  Mill  Run 

7373 

3011 

j 

Richards  & Lawson,  Shelby ville_ 

10.1 

3.2 

4.2 

15.0 

15.7 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 

Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Ziliak’s  Wheat  Bran.&  Screenings 

5849 

3086 

Manufacturers  _ 

9.1 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

16.5 

STANDARD  WHEAT  MIDDLINGS 

OR  SHORTS 

\ 

Acme  Milling  Company,  The, 

i 

Aurora,  Ind. 

Middlings 

968 

1 

3606 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.9 

5.1 

14.2 

17.3 

Akron  Milling  Company,  The, 

Akron,  Ind. 

W^heat  Middlings 

2795 

2622 

Manufacturers  

11.4 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

14.4 

Wheat  Middlings 

2795 

3572 

Manufacturers 

12.1 

4.0 

3.4  i 

14.0 

13.6 

Amo  Mill  Elevator  Company,  Amo,  Ind. 

Amo  Middlings 

4442 

2992 

Manufacturers  

ip.2 

2.8 

3.8 

13.0 

16.1 

Amo  Middlings  25 

4442 

4734 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Anchor  Milling  Company, 

Rochester,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middling.s 

Bargersville  

9.7 

2.8 

4.3 

1 

i 

13.0 

16.0 

3747 

2189 

Manufacturers 

12.4 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

15.2 

W’heat  Middling.s  . 

3747 

I 

3515 

Manufacturers 

11.9 

4.0 

4.6 

14.0 

13.8 

Angola  Flouring  Mills,  Angola,  Ind. 

1 

Aneola  Flouring  Mills  Middlings 

1097 

4315 

Manufacturers 

8.7 

4.0 

4.3  1 

14.0 

14.8 

Ansrola  Flouring  Mills  Middlings 

1097 

4949 

Manufacturers 

10.3 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.7 

Ashley-Hudson  Milling  & Grain 

Company,  Ashley,  Ind. 
Ashlev-Hudsnn  Wheat  Middlings 

3145 

4344 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

4.0 

4.5 

14.0 

15.4 

Bainton  Bros.,  Buchanan,  Mich. 

Middlings  

7128 

2161 

A.  C.  Heitschmidt,  Michigan  Citji 

11.3 

2.5 

2.7 

12.0 

12.5 

Middlings  _ _ 

7128 

3762 

A.  C.  Heitschmidt,  Michigan  City 

11.9 

2.5 

2.5 

12.0 

11.8 

tt  Not  tag-g-ed.  Labels  furnished  Ground  screenings  present 


62 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Bay  State  Milling  Company, 

Winona,  Minn. 

“Winona”  Fancy  White  Flour  Mid- 
dlings   

“Winona”  Fancy  White  Flour  Mid- 
dlings   

“Winona”  Fancy  White  Flour  Mid- 
dlings   

“Wdnona”  Fancy  White  Flour  Mid- 
dlings 26  

Bergenroth  Bros.,  Troy,  Ind. 

Middlings  

Middlings  

Berlien  Mills,  Angola,  R.  F.  D.,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  

Berne  Milling  Company,  Berne,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

Wheat  Middlings 

Bicknell  Mill  Company,  Bicknell,  Ind. 
White  Middlings  

Billman  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Shelbyvillc,  Ind. 

Shelby  Shorts 

Shelby  Shorts 

Bluffton  Milling  Company, 

Bluffton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

Wheat  Shorts  27  

Wheat  Shorts  

Bock,  Leonard,  Argos,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

Boehmer  & Ritzer,  Scott,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  27  

Boldt  & Son,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 
Boldt’s  Shorts  

Bolte  & Sons,  Ben,  Ferdinand,  Ind. 
Wheat  Shorts  

Boonville  Milling  Company, 

Boonville,  Ind. 

Shorts  

Bowling  Green  Milling  Company, 
Bowling  Green,  Ind. 

Middlings  

Bridgeton  Roller  Mills,  Bridgeton,  Ind. 
Middlings  

Bristol  Milling  Company,  Bristol,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings 

Brizius  Company,  The  Chas.  W., 
Newburgh,  Ind. 

Eagle  Wheat  Shorts  or  Middlings 

Brose  & Arnold,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

Wheat  Middlings  


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

V 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

1 Inspection 

1 D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found  j 

7144 

2203 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point.— 

10.3 

4.5 

4.2 

14.0 

15.5 

7144 

2417 

Cayuga  Milling  Co.,  Cayuga 

8.7 

4.5  i 

4.2 

14.0 

15.2 

7144 

4763 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point—. 

9.7 

4.5 

4.8 

14.0 

17.0 

7144 

4765 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point... 

9.7 

4.5 

4.8 

14.0 

16.8 

2025 

1561 

Manufacturers  

11.4 

4.0 

4.4 

15.0 

17.1 

2025 

3787 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

4.0 

3.8 

15.0 

16.9 

7515 

4318 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.0 

4.2 

12.0 

15.8 

2107 

4159 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.3 

2.5 

14.0 

13.3 

2107 

4654 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.3 

2.3 

14.0 

! 13.0 

7825 

5015 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.0 

3.4 

12.0 

17.8 

494.3 

3013 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

2.0 

3.3 

12.0 

15.4 

4943 

4787 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

2.0 

4.1 

12.0 

17.0 

660 

16.55 

Manufacturers  

11.6 

4.5 

4.4 

14.9 

15.1 

660 

4186 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

4.5 

2.3 

14.9 

14.2 

660 

4658 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

4.5 

3.9 

14.9 

15.8 

548 

3522 

J.  A.  Bock,  Argos  _ 

10.4 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

15..3 

1627 

4348 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

4.0 

2.5 

14.0 

J 10.1 

51 

3019 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

15.7 

1 

7276 

3743 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

4.0 

3.6 

1 

14.5 

1 

1 17.1 

930 

3836 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

4.0 

4.5 

14.0 

18.2 

6206 

2080 

Bowling  Green  Mills, 

1 

Bowling  Green 

’10.9 

3.0 

2.5 

13.0 

14.5 

2850 

2145 

Bridgeton  Milling  Co.,  Bridgeton 

11.1 

2.0 

2.8 

14.0 

14.5 

2019 

1593 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

4.0 

3.8 

14.0 

13.4 

7194 

3831 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

17.3 

7491 

.3174 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

4.0 

3.9 

14.0 

16.1 

7491 

5130 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0  ' 

15.7 

1^/10  tons  removed  from  sale 


-7  Low  grade  flour  present 


^3 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

1 Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

[3 

’o 

O 

.2 

o . 

1 'O 

i 0) 

O Si 

<73 

n 

1 

O ri 

'O 

S 

g 

Brudi  & Company,  Jos., 

New  Haven,  Ind. 

2246 

4218 

Maumee  Valley  Mills,  New  Haven 

9.4 

2.8 

2.8 

13.1 

14.0 

Bundy  Mill  Company,  L.  L., 

Vallonia,  Ind. 

Shorts  . .... 

3917 

2836 

Mannfaettirers 

9.2 

3.0 

3.8 

13.0 

16.3 

3917 

4163 

Bundy  Bros.,  Vallonia _. 

11.0 

3.0 

2.6 

13.0 

13.9 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

254 

1577 

Mannfaetnrers 

11.0 

4.0 

4.6 

14.0 

14.9" 

Middlings  

254 

3850 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Mishawaka__ 

9.9 

4.0 

5.0 

14.0 

15.3 

Butler  Milling  Company,  Butler,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  28 

7082 

4289 

Manufacturers 

9.6 

3.6 

3.3 

14.0 

13  3 

Carpenter,  B.  0.,  Perrysville,  Ind. 

“Wheat  Middlings” 

4712 

4489 

Manufacturer 

10.8 

2.8 

3.8 

14.0 

15.5 

“Wheat  Middlings” 

4712 

5147 

Manufacturer 

10.9 

2.8 

4.7 

14.0 

15.9 

Cauble,  0.  L.,  Pekin,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

1016 

2577 

Manufacturer  _.  . ... 

10.2 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

16.2 

Wheat  Shorts  28 

1016 

4054 

Manufacturer  _ _ __ 

10.2 

4.0 

2.8 

14.0 

13.8 

Wheat  Shorts 

1016 

4961 

O.  L.  Cauhle,  Salem 

9.3 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.5 

Wheat  Shorts  29 

1016 

4971 

Manufacturer 

9.2 

4.0 

3.2 

14.0 

13.8 

Central  Kansas  Milling  Company, 

I.yons,  Kans. 

**Wheat  Shorts  

2152 

0.  W.  Gotto,  Michigan  City__  _ 

10.4 

4.6 

19.3 

Champion  Roller  Milling  Company, 

Richmond,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  or  Shorts 

4700 

3309 

Manufacturers 

11.3 

4.0 

4.9 

16.0 

17.8 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  White  Middlings  

7004 

1661 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton_ 

9.0 

3.5 

5.0 

15.0 

16.5 

“Prize”  White  Middlings  _ 

7004 

1711 

The  L.  Keilman  Co.,  Dyer__  ___ 

10.4 

3.5 

4.1 

15.0 

16.2 

“Prize”  White  Middlings  

7004 

1865 

C.  E.  Roadrich,  Morocco 

10.1 

3.5 

3.6 

15.0 

15.8 

City  Milling  Company,  Kendallville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

6370 

4257 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.0 

3.8 

13.0 

14.3 

City  Mills,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

6106 

3941 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

15.2 

Wheat  Middlings  _ 

6106 

4995 

Manufacturers  _ 

11.0 

3.5 

4.5 

14.0 

16.1 

Clark  Bros.,  Hagerstown,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

2007 

4337 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.7 

3.7 

14.0 

14.1 

Clark  & Sons,  C.  G.,  Rushville,  Ind. 

Clarks  Middlings 

6866 

3055 

Manufacturers 

11.2 

5.0 

4.9 

18.0 

18.0 

Clarks  Middlings 

6866 

3738 

E.  J.  Chambers,  Mays 

9.3 

5.0 

4.6 

18.0 

18.5 

Clarks  Middlings 

7918 

5042 

Manufacturers 

8.6 

4.5 

4.7 

18.0 

17.9 

Clayton  Milling  Company,  Clayton,  Ind. 

Clavton  Wheat  Middlings  28 

2114 

2986 

Manufacturers  ._  

10.2 

3.9 

1.9 

14.2 

13.4 

White  Middlings _ __  

7722 

4813 

Manufacturers  __  

10.1 

1.8 

2.8 

13.0 

13.9 

Coal  City  Milling  Company, 

Coal  City,  Ind. 

Coal  City  Wheat  Shorts 

6913 

2783 

Manufacturers 

10.3 

3.5 

3.8 

14.0 

15.4 

Collamer  Milling  Company, 

Collamer,  Ind. 

White  Middlings 

7052 

4993 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

2.0 

3.8 

13.0 

14.5 

**  Not  registered 

Low  grade  flour  present 


Low  grade  flour  present.  Relabeled  No.  5590 
^^/2o  ton  removed  from  sale.  Used  by  dealer 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sapiple  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Corbin  Milling  Company, 

New  Harmony,  Ind. 

1 

314 

3851 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

4.0 

4.4  ' 

14.0 

16.9 

Corbin’s  Wheat  Middlings  

314 

5061 

Fuhrer-Ford  Milling  Co., 

New  Harmony 

j 9.2 

4.0 

2.6 

14.0 

13.3 

Croxton,  James  W.,  Cloverdale,  Ind. 

246 

1481 

Manufacturer  

12.3 

3.8 

3.1 

14.0 

14.9 

Davis  & Johnson,  Coatesville,  Ind. 

1 

i 

Wbef>t.  Middlings  31 

438 

2994 

Manufacturers 

10.7 

3.8 

2.3  1 

14.4 

15.7 

Deck,  James  M.,  Roann,  Ind. 

196 

5032 

James  PI.  Deck,  Roann_.i 

10.2 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

16.7 

Delp  Grain  Company,  E.  E., 

Bourbon,  Ind. 

3118 

2802 

Manufacturers  — 

9.5 

4.0 

1 4.2 

; 14.0 

16.0 

Dilger  Bros.,  Mariah  Hill,  Ind. 

3632 

1509 

Manufacturers  

11.7 

2.5 

2.6 

12.0 

14.3 

Duglay  & Jones,  Churubusco,  Ind. 

j 

7468 

4987 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

/3.0 

4.2 

13.0 

! 15.9 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

i 

i 

Wheat  Shnrt.s  3i 

5413 

4731 

Manufacturers  

i 10.7 

i 4.0 

35 

15.0 

14.5 

Edwardsport  Mills,  Edwardsport,  Ind. 

1 

i 

1 

wheat  Shorts  31 

6830 

5022 

Manufacturers  

11.4 

3.0 

2.3 

13.0 

12.8 

Eesley  & Company,  Wm., 

College  Corner,  Ohio. 

Wheat  Middlings  

2921 

2895 

Wm.  Eesley  & Co., 

W.  College  Corner 

11.3 

1 4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

15.8 

Wheat  Middlings  

2921 

4403 

Wm.  Eedey  & Co., 

i , 

W.  College  Corner 

11.0 

1 4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

1 14.3 

Egloff  Milling  Company,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

! 

I 

Wheat  Shorts 

6054 

5012 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

1 17.6 

Egloff  Sons,  A.,  St.  Meinrad,  Ind. 

i 

1 

Shorts 

2749 

1518 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.8 

3.9 

15.0 

I 18.0 

Shorts 

2749 

3740 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.8 

3 4 

15.0 

1 16.4 

Shorts 

2749 

4606 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.8 

3.8 

j 15.0 

i 15.2 

Emison,  J.  & S.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

1 

1 

1 

Middlings 

1536 

1684 

Ray  Newsome,  Bickne’ll 

8.9 

4.0 

5.1 

14.0 

17.0 

Middlings 

1536 

3933 

W.  D.  Hampton,  Worthington.. 

9.5 

4.0 

4.9 

14.0 

17.4 

Enterprise  Milling  Company, 

j 

Milroy,  Ind. 

i 

Middlings 

2317 

3049 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

3.8 

5.3 

14.2 

17.1 

Ewing  Mill  Company,  Brownstown,  Ind. 

i 

•j-fWheat  Shorts 

298 

3555 

James  W.  Miles,  Butlerville 

8.3 

4.0 

3.7 

14.0 

17.4 

Wheat  Shorts 

298 

4149 

1 P’he  Ewing  Mill  Co.,  Ewing 

9.4 

4.0 

2.7 

14.0 

14.0 

Excelsior  Mill  Company, 

i 

Yankton,  So.  Dak. 

**Shorts  33 

2120 

Hubert  French,  Linn  Grove. 

11.1 

4.8 

17.0 

Farmers  Milling  & Elevator  Company, 

Veedersburg,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

7577 

4471 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

2.0 

3.0 

12.0 

14.3 

Fuhrer-Ford  Milling  Company, 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

4682 

3250 

Manufacturers  

8.5 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

14.9 

Wheat  Middlings  

4682 

5068 

Manufacturers  .. 

8.6 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

15.9 

**  Not  registered  l^ow  grade  flour  present 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  ^3  3350  ibs.  removed  from  sale 


65 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Crude 

Fat 

Protein 

LABEL 

1 

Sample  secured  from 

a;  4J 

per  cent. 

percent. 

Official 

on 

C! 

R 0) 

m w 

■J  S3 

ft 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Gaston  Roller  Mill,  Gaston,  Ind. 

5.')09 

2114 

Manufacturers  

11.4 

2.0 

3.6 

12.0 

15.6 

Wheat  Middlings  _ 

.5509 

4905 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

2.0 

4.8 

12.0 

17.1 

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Company, 

Geneva,  Ind. 

Shorts  Middling.s,  3-1 

42S7 

1791 

11.3 

3.4 

2.5 

14.0 

13.7 

Shorts  & Middlings  3-4  •_ 

4287 

3286 

10.2 

3.4 

2.7 

14.0 

13.8 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

5097 

1843 

Manufacturer  

10.9 

3.0 

3.8 

14.0 

16.0 

Greenfield  Milling  Company, 

Greenfield,  Ind.  • 

4470 

2739 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.0 

4.4 

15.0 

17.5 

Gross,  L.  J.,  Sandborn,  Ind. 

4267 

1693 

11.7 

3.5 

2.9 

14.0 

13.7 

4267 

5017 

Manufacturer  _ _ 

10.3 

3.5 

3.5 

14.0 

15.2 

Hall  Milling  Company,  The  W.  C., 

Brazil,  Ind. 

5923 

2041. 

11.7 

2.0 

2.5 

13.0 

13.8 

Hampton,  W.  D.,  Worthington,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

2220 

2926 

Manufacturer  

10.8 

2.3 

3.3 

12.8 

16.5 

Wheat  Shorts 

2220 

3934 

Manufacturer  _ __ 

9.5 

2.3 

2.8 

12.8 

14.3 

Hardinsburg  Milling  Company, 

Hardinsburg,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

2263 

1489 

Hardinsburg  Roller  Mills, 
Hardinsburg  _ 

11.4 

3.5 

4.3 

13.0 

15.6 

Harris  Milling  Company, 

Greencastle,  Ind. 

Harris’  Middlings  __  _ _ 

211 

2999 

Manufacturers  _ 

11.3 

3.6 

3.6 

14.5 

15.9 

Haynes  Milling  Company,  The, 

Portland,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

43a9 

1770 

Manufacturers  - 

11.2 

3.0 

4.0 

14.0 

16.5 

Wheat  Middlings  

4389 

4138 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.0 

4.6 

14.0 

16.8 

Hazleton  Flour  Mills,  The, 

Hazleton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  __  

6634 

1717 

Davis  & Phillips,  Oaktown  

11.1 

4.5 

4 0 

14.0 

16.8 

Wheat  Shorts  3^;  _ 

7475 

5000 

L.  Combs  & Sons,  Vincennes 

8.3 

3.0 

4.2 

14.0 

15.0 

Hibbits  Mill  Company,  Muncie,  Ind. 

Finished  Middlings 

7298 

4397 

M aniif  nctiiTprs 

9.5 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

16.1 

Holland  Mills,  The,  Holland,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  3^  

5386 

1.522 

Manufacturers 

12.0 

3.0 

2.5 

13.0 

14.8 

Wheat  Middlings  3^  j 

5386 

3734 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.0 

2.2 

13.0 

15.1 

Hollingsworth,  S.  P.,  Russiaville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  31  

1517 

1474 

Manufacturer 

12.6 

4.0 

2.0 

14.0 

13.1 

Home  Mill  & Grain  Company, 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  37 

7449 

3240 

Manufacturers 

8.7 

4.2 

3.9 

16.9 

16.4 

Hornung,  J.  M.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

Middlings  

415 

3194 

Manufacturer 

10.4 

3.8 

3.8 

14.2 

15.1 

Middlings  

415 

4748 

Manufacturer 

10.2 

3.8 

4.0 

14.2 

15.1 

Hubbard,  J.  W.,^  Monrovia,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  3i 

7551 

4858 

Manufacturer  

19.2 

3.5 

2.7 

14.0. 

14.1 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  Removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7174 

3^  Low  grade  flour  present  37  Removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7686 


66 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

<U 

Official 

m 

5 (1) 
m o 
0^5 
a 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Hubbard  & Company,  W.  H., 

Monrovia,  Ind. 

Shorts  

993 

2210 

J.  W.  Hubbard,  Monrovia 

11.2 

1 

5.0 

4.7 

14.0 

16.6 

Huntington  Mill  Company, 

Huntington,  Ind. 

Shorts  

495 

4003 

Manufacturers  _ .. 

10.2 

3.9 

3.9 

14.3 

14.3 

Hum,  W.  D.,  Ramsey,  R.  R.  No.  1,  Ind. 

6591 

4559 

W.  D.  Hum  Milling  Co., 

New  Salisbury 

9.8 

3.5 

4.3 

13.0 

14.8 

Imperial  Mills,  The,  D.  Z.  Creitz,  Prop., 
Cambridge  City,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  39 

260 

2881 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.7 

4.2 

14.0 

17.5 

Wheat  Middlings  . _ 

260 

2884 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.7 

4.6 

14.0 

15.9 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings 

6140 

2862 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

2.5 

4.1 

12.0 

12.0 

15.4 

15.7 

W’heat  Middlings 

6140 

3717 

Manufacturers 

11.9 

2.5 

4.5 

.lohnston  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Pinola, 

R.  R.  No.  7,  LaPorte,  Ind. 
fWheat  Middlings  

7392 

2066 

Manufacturers 

11.2 

3.0 

.3.8 

13.0 

15.4 

Wheat  Middlings 

7392 

3777 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.0 

2.3 

13.0 

13.0 

Jones  & Son,  C.  N.,  Wabash,  Ind. 

Wheat  Mirldlings  40 

5190 

4387 

Manufacturers 

11.3 

3.5 

2.3 

14.0 

12.3 

J Street  Milling  Company,  LaPorte,  Ind. 
White  Middlings 

5054 

2106 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

2.0 

3.7 

12.0 

13.6' 

White  Middlings 

5054 

3773 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

2.0 

2.5 

12.0 

11.4 

Kamman,  Prank  W.,  Cross  Plains,  Ind. 
Shipstnff  nr  Shnrts 

2359 

2911 

Manufacturer 

10.3 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

15.8 

Kaw  Milling  Company,  The, 

Topeka,  Kans. 

Wheat  Shorts  4i  . . 

3826 

4798 

Majot  & Morgan, 

Michigan  City 

9.1 

4.0 

4.1 

13.6 

14.7 

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Neptune  White  Middlings 

4191 

1742 

•T.  H.  T.eonard,  Sullivan 

12.2 

4.0 

3.4 

17.0 

17.3 

Neptune  White  Middline-s 

4191 

2777 

Paul  Kuhn  & Co.,  Clay  City 

Manufacturers 

10.7 

4.0 

3.3 

17.0 

17.0 

Kennedy  Milling  Company,  The  Geo.  W., 
Shelbyville,  Ind. 

Middlings 

2110 

3009 

10.3 

3.5 

3.7 

13.5 

15.5 

Middlings 

2110 

4789 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.5 

5.4 

13.5 

18.0 

Keplinger,  Chas.,  Zanesville,  Ind.. 
Middlings  . . 

842 

2239 

Keplinger  & Sons,  Zanesville 

10.7 

4.0 

3.9 

14.0 

16.3 

Kiewit,  Arnold,  West  Harrison,  Ind. 
Kiewit’s  Wheat  Middlings  42 

4013 

2873 

Fred  McKee,  Cedar  Grove 

10.2 

3.9 

2.5 

14.0 

13.7 

Klemm,  Geo.  J.,  Milton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  43 

4736 

2871 

Lewisville  Elevator  Co., 

T.ewisville 

10.0 

2.0 

4.0 

10.0 

14.9 

Wheat  Middlings 

4736 

3331 

Manufacturer  

10.4 

2.0 

4.3 

10.0 

15.1 

Klondike  Milling  Company, 

Danville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  4o 

2653 

4883 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.5 

3.0 

13.5 

14.8 

t Before  registration  Low  grade  flour  and  approx.  1%%  foreign 

Relabeled  No.  7592  material  consisting  of  ground  weed  seeds, 

40  Low  grade  flour  present  wheat  grits  and  chaff.  Rebate.  See  page 

41  Wheat  bran.  Relabeled  No.  8083  42 

4 3 Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran.  Removed  from 
sale.  Relabeled  No.  3465 


6; 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

[3 

‘o 

O 

e 

.2 

+3 

01 

C 

CS  S 

O ri 

'O 

§ 

a q; 
rt  45 

O rt 

n3 

i:3 

1 

Lawrenceburg  Roller  Mills  Company, 

The,  Lawrenceburg,  Ind. 

“Snowflake”  Middlings 

11 

3051 

Hill  Grain  & Coal  Co.,  Carthage 

10.4 

5.1 

5.4 

16.0 

17.7 

11 

3562 

Osgood  Grain  Co.,  Osgood 

8.0 

5.1 

5.3 

16.0 

17.9 

“Snowflake”  Middlings 

11 

4721 

Milan  Mill  & Elevator,  Milan... 

8.9 

5.1 

5.3 

16.0 

17.9 

Leavel,  I.  A.,  Bainbridge,  Ind. 

f Wheat  Middlings  46 

7501 

2450 

Manufacturer  

9.4 

4.0 

2.8 

14.5 

17.6 

Leesburg  Grain  & Milling  Company, 

The,  Leesburg,  Ind. 

Middlings  

306 

3892 

Leesburg  Milling  Co.,  Leesburg. 

11.1 

4.0 

3.6 

14.0 

14.2 

Lefforge,  Otto,  Eossville,  Ind. 

7055 

5139 

Manufacturer 

10.8 

1.5 

2.9 

12.0 

13.4 

Lemon  Milling  Company,  The, 

Bedford,  Ind. 

7431 

2691 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

2.0 

3.3 

12.0 

16.9 

7431 

4170 

Manufacturers  

8.9 

2.0 

2.6 

12.0 

14.6 

Lindauer,  Ferd.,  Fulda,  Ind. 

1035 

3769 

Manufacturer 

9.9 

4.0 

3.2 

14.0 

15.3 

Lingeman,  Adams  & Company, 

Brownsburg,  Ind. 

Shipstnff  45 

3321 

2223 

Manufacturer.s  

12.2 

4.0 

3.1 

14.0 

15.4 

Wheat  Middlings 

7603 

4526 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

2.5 

2.6 

14.0 

15.0 

Linton  Mill  Company,  The,  Linton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

507 

1756 

Board  of  Trade  Feed  .Store, 

Linton  

11.3 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

16.7 

Wheat  Shorts 

507 

3948 

Board  of  Trade  Feed  Store, 

Linton  

10.4 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

19.0 

Listman  Mill  Company,  The, 

LaCrosse,  Wis. 

Elmco  Standard  Middlings  

3367 

5182 

Omer  G.  Whelan,  Richmond 

9.4 

5.6 

5.8 

18.1 

17.6 

Little  Crow  Milling  Company, 

Warsaw,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

5082 

1544 

Manufacturers  

11.7 

3.0 

4.1 

14.0 

14.9 

Logan,  Geo.,  Shirley,  Ind. 

Shorts  . 

7032 

3355 

Manufacturer  .. 

10.4 

3.0 

3.1 

13.0 

15.0 

Lynn  Milling  Company,  The,  Lynn,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

6234 

1898 

Manufacturers 

11.9 

3.5 

4.2 

13.0 

16.6 

Wheat  Shorts  . _ 

6234 

4602 

T>vun  City  Mills,  T.ynn 

9.2 

3.5 

4.5 

13.0 

15.7 

Maney  Milling  Company,  Omaha,  Neb. 

Wheat  Shorts 

2996 

4533 

Paul  Fnhn  Xr,  Cn.,  Riley 

9.2 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

17.2 

Mangelsdorf  Bros.  Co.,  Atchison,  Kans. 

**-Feed  47 

4282 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Westfield 

9.2 

4.2 

8.3 

Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle,  Ind. 

Martin  & Martin’s  Wheat  Middlings.. _ 

3794 

2594 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

3.7 

3.8 

14.0 

16.7 

Mayflower  Mills,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

1 

Mayflower  Mills  Wheat  Middlings  ^®... 

451 

2768 

C.  H.  Grube,  Argos 

9.6 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

15.7 

Mayflower  Mills  Wheat  Middlings 

451 

2960 

Sheldon  & Wilier,  Orland 

9.8 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

15.7 

Mayflower  Mills  Wheat  Middlings 

451 

2973 

Arnold  & Nelson,  Montpelier 

9.8 

4.0 

5.6 

14.0 

16.5 

Mayflower  Mills  Wheat  Middlings 

451 

4313 

Sheldon  & Co.,  Angola 

9.2 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

15.4 

Milan  Milling  Company,  Milan,  Ind. 

Shorts  

3314 

3613 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

16.3 

Shorts  -- 

3314 

4702 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

4.0 

5.0 

14.0 

15.0 

**  Not  registered  Ground  kafir  and  milo  and  traces  of  wheat 

t Before  registration  and  millet.  33  1/20  tons  removed  from  sale 

*5  Low  grade  flour  present  and  shipped  out  of  state.  Omitted  from 


average  in  Table  II 

Small  amount  of  finely  ground  sereenings 


68 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

c 

.2 

I Official 

u . 

oiri 

a 

bample  secured  from 

R 0) 
00  W 

II 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Modoc  Roller  Mills  & Elevator, 

Modoc,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

4963 

1484 

Manufacturers 

11.8 

1.5 

1.6 

1 

1 

10.0 

12.9 

Muller  Bros.  Milling  Company, 
Ferdinand,  Ind. 

6708 

1520 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

4.0 

4.7  1 

14.0 

18.2 

6708 

4610 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

16.0 

Myers  & Son,  .Joseph  H.,  Chili,  Ind. 
White  Middlings  __ 

3324 

2195 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

3.0 

2.9 

16.0 

13.9 

Germ  Middlings  _ _ 

3325 

2194 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

3.0 

5.3 

15.0 

16.3 

3325 

3532 

Manufacturers  _ _ 

10.8 

3.0 

4.6 

15.0 

15.7 

White  Middlings  

7581 

3531 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

2.9 

2.6 

13.9 

14.0 

McCoy  Bros.,  Liberty,  Ind. 

162 

4408 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

3.8 

3.9 

15.1 

14.4 

Napoleon  Flour  Mills,  Napoleon,  Ind. 
Napoleon  Middlings  _ _ _ 

4043 

4.586 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.8 

4.1 

14.2 

15.4 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
“Middlings”  __  

3022 

1665 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton. 

9.3 

4.0 

4.2 

16.0 

18.6 

“Middlings”  _ __ 

3022 

2439 

Crabbs,  Reynolds, 

Taylor  Co., 

LaFavette  

8.6 

4.0 

4.6 

16.0 

18.1 

Neill  & Van  Valer,  Jonesboro,  Ind. 
Wheat  Shorts  

765 

2323 

Jonesboro  Milling 

Co., 

.Toneshoro 

11.6 

4.0 

3.9 

14.0 

14.0 

New  Carlisle  Milling  Company, 

New  Carlisle,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

1317 

2103 

Manufacturers  . __ 

10.9 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

15.4 

Wheat  Middlings  49 

1317 

3794 

Manufacturers  ___  

10.3 

4.0 

3.3 

14.0 

12.5 

New  Era  Milling  Company,  The, 
Arkansas  City,  Ark. 

Standard  Wheat  Shorts . 

6860 

2136 

John  H.  Kuhn  & 

Son, 

Michi£ran  Citv 

9.8 

4.0 

5.2 

17.5 

20.0 

New  Milling  Company,  The, 

Greenfield,  Ind. 

Middlings  49 

1863 

2743 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.8 

4.0 

2.7 

i 14.0 

15.5 

Middlings  49  __ 

1863 

2969 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

4.0 

3.2 

14.0 

17.2 

New  Prague  Flouring  Mill  Company, 

New  Prague,  Minn. 

Seal  of  Minnesota  Standard  Middlings 

7609 

3789 

South  Bend  Grain  Co., 

South  Bend  _ 

10.1 

6.0 

5.8 

13.5 

17.4 

Nieman,  C.,  Sunman,  Ind. 

Nieman’s  Middlings 

500 

3189 

Manufacturer  

10.1 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

17.1 

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

Noblesville  Milling  Co.’s  Middlings 

3767 

1613 

Pendleton  Feed  & 
Pendleton  

Fuel  Co., 

10.7 

4.0 

4.5 

15.0 

16.9 

Noblesville  Milling  Co.’s  Middlings  ^4_- 

3767 

2407 

Hollett-Winders  Grain  Co., 
Arcadia  _ _ _ 

9.3 

4.0 

5.0 

15.0 

17.0 

Nodine,  W.  J.,  Waterloo,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

3151 

4942 

W.  J.  Nodine,  Fremont 

10.1 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

14.6 

Nordmeyer,  John  A.,  Morris,  Ind. 

Wbent  Afiddlings 

4080 

3186 

Manufacturer  ... 

11.6 

3.6 

3 3 

14.6 

15.0 

Norris  & Kidwell,  Washington,  Ind. 
wheat.  Middlings  4,9 

6280 

3897 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

5.0 

2.7 

15.4 

14  3 

Wheat  Middlings  

6280 

.5233 

Manufacturers 

— 

9.5 

5.0 

3.6 

15.4 

15.4 

North  Manchester  Milling  Company, 
North  Mant'hester,  Ind. 

“North  Manchester  Milling  Companys 
Middlings’’  49 

8.55 

2476 

Manufacturers 

_10.4 

10.3 

4.0 

3.5 

14.0 

13.7 

“North  Manchester  Milling  Companys 
Middlings”  

8.55 

.3915 

Manufacturers 

— 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

15.3 

Low  ifrade  Hour  present  si  Removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7306 


69 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

’3 

o 

PI 

.2 

m 

1 'O 

O ri 

73 

1 

^ rj 

O rt 

T3 

p) 

g 

Oaktown  Milling  Company, 

Oaktown,  Ind. 

5432 

1719 

Mannfaeturer.s 

11.9 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

16.3 

AVheat  Shorts  

5432 

3338 

Manufacturers  __  _ _ __ 

10.4 

4.0 

3.9 

14.0 

15.6 

Oldenburg  Flour  Mills,  Oldenburg,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  __ 

2663 

3192 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.0 

4.5 

13.1 

17.2 

Wheat  Shorts 

2663 

4589 

Manufacturers  __  _ __ 

9.7 

3.0 

4.4 

13.1 

15.4 

Orleans  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Orleans,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

7019 

4088 

Manufacturers  __  

9.3 

4.0 

3.5 

14.0 

16.5 

Osakis  Milling  Company,  Osakis,  Minn. 

Fancy  Middlings  

3195 

2138 

H.  F.  Keppen,  Michigan  City 

9.0 

4.0 

6.9 

15.0 

17.5 

Ossian  Roller  Mills,  Ossian,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  _ 

6399 

1671 

Manufacturers  _ _ __ 

. 9.9 

3.1 

3.6 

13.5 

14.3 

Pancost  Milling  Company,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Middlings  

800 

1610 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

14.2 

Middlings  __  

800 

3860 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

4.0 

4.6 

14.0 

14.3 

Paoli  Milling  Company,  The,  Paoli,  Ind. 

Shorts 

627 

4090 

Manufacturers  

9 3 

3.0 

3.8 

12.0 

14.7 

Pennville  Milling  Company, 

Pennville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

3545 

1761 

Manufacturers 

13.1 

3.0 

3.5 

13.0 

15.4 

Peru  Milling  Company,  The,  Peru,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

18 

2732 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.1 

5.0 

14.2 

16.2 

AVheat  Middlings  __  _ 

18 

4393 

Manufacturers  _ _ __  

10.6 

3.1 

4.0 

14.2 

15.5 

Phoenix  Flour  Mills,  Evansville,  Ind. 

*Shorts 

3227 

AA’.  H.  Small  & Co.,  Evansville 

10.4 

3.7 

17.2 

Piqua  Milling  Company,  The,  Piqua,  ,0. 

AVheat  Middlings 

2295 

1803 

D.  G.  McFadden  Grain  Co., 

Ridgeville  _ ___  _ ___  __  __ 

10.3 

4.0 

4.7 

16.0 

17.2 

AA’heat  Middlings 

2295 

4069 

I).  G.  McFadden  Grain  Co., 

Ridgeville  ___  

9.8 

4.0 

4.6 

16.0 

16.8 

Plainfield  Milling  Company, 

Plainfield,  Ind. 

AA'heat  Middlings  __ 

4408 

4816 

Mnnnfactnrers 

10.2 

3.5 

4.9 

13.0 

14.7 

Plainville  Milling  Company, 

Plainville,  Ind. 

Middlings  _ 

3895 

3900 

Manufacturers  _ _ _ 

10.4 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

17.8 

Ray  & Rice,  Camden,  Ind. 

AVheat  Shorts  __  _______ 

3002 

1476 

Manufacturers 

11.4 

3.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.0 

Wheat  Shorts  _ _ 

3002 

2989 

Manufacturers 

io!2 

3.0 

3.9 

14’o 

14.9 

Redden  & Sons,  Wm.,  New  Paris,  Ind. 

AA’heat  Middlings  _ 

2625 

1888 

Manufacturers 

11.8 

2.0 

3.3 

10.0 

13.1 

Red  AA’ing  Milling  Company, 

Red  AA’ing,  Minn. 

Bixota  Standard  Middlings  ^5 

5493 

2546 

H.  E.  St.  John,  Albany 

9.9 

5.7 

5.7 

18.3 

16  8 

Richland  Milling  Company, 

Bloomfield,  Ind. 

Shipstuff  

1147 

2027 

Manufacturers 

12.3 

4.0 

3 8 

14.0 

16.7 

Shipstuff  ___ 

1147 

3928 

Manufacturers 

ll’.5 

4^0 

3.7 

u'.o 

14^9 

Richmond  Roller  Mills,  Richmond,  Ind. 

The  Richmond  Roller  Mills  AA’heat 

Middlings  ___  _ __  

483 

3310 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.7 

4.7 

14.0 

16.9 

* Not  tagged  Soreenings  present 

Small  amount  of  whole  and  crushed  weed  Relabeled  No.  7641 


seeds 


70 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

LABEL 

!:! 

O 

•43 

Sample  secured  from 

(U 

Official 

OiQ 

m 

d 

5 0) 

® o 

’3 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Ridgeville  Roller  Mills  & Elevator, 
Ridgeville,  Ind. 

Wheat,  Middlings  56 

1833 

1805 

Ideal  Milling  & Grain  Co., 
Ridgeville  

1 

1 

11.6 

4.0 

2.6 

14.0 

17.4 

Rittenhouse,  E.  S.,  Liberty  Mills,  Ind. 
T.iberty  Bird  Middlings  . 

3044 

2478 

Acme  Grain  Co.,  N.  Manchester. 
Manufaeturer 

10.4 

2.5 

3.5 

12.5 

13.3 

Liberty  Bird  Middlings 

3344 

5028 

9.9 

2.5 

3.4 

12.5 

13.3 

Riverside  Mill,  The,  Wolcottville,  Ind. 
Riverside  Mill’s  Wheat  Middlings 

1621 

4277 

Riverside  Milling  Co., 
Wolcottville 

9.5 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

15.0 

Roach  & Rothenberger,  Delphi,  Ind. 
Shorts  and  Middlings  se 

286 

3889 

Manufacturers 

10.8 

4.0 

3.4 

14.0 

14.5 

Rockport  Mining  Company, 

Rockport,  Ind. 

Kopp’s  Wheat  Middlings  56 

2748 

1569 

Manufacturers 

10.8 

3.5 

2.3 

i 

14.0 

13.5 

Kopp’s  Wheat  Middlings 

2748 

3809 

Manufacturers 

10.3 

3.5 

4.5 

14.0 

16.8 

Rohm  Bros.,  Rockville,  Ind. 

Shorts  _ _ _ 

293 

2148 

Manufacturers  . 

11.4 

4.0 

4.5 

14.0 

17.6 

Shorts  

293 

3674 

Bloomingdale  Mill  Co., 
Bloomingdale  

10.1 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

16.6 

Shorts  . _ . 

293 

3677 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

17.6 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

Hobart  Wheat  Middlings 

5960 

1813 

Manufacturers 

12.2 

3.5 

3.4 

14.0 

15.4 

Hobart  Wheat  Middlings 

5960 

4772 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

3.5 

4.6 

14.0 

16.5 

Russell-Miller  Milling  Company, 

Fargo,  N.  Dak. 

Standard  Middlings 

5182 

2850 

Guy  M.  Wells,  Knox  _ _ 

9.1 

4.0 

6.0 

15.0 

15.8 

Standard  Middlings 

5182 

4306 

New  Castle  Flour  & Feed  Ex- 

change, New  Castle 

9.1 

4.0 

6.0 

15.0 

16.5 

Russell-Miller  Milling  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Flour  Middlings  

5505 

3221 

Luebcke  Bros.,  Crown  Point 

10.4 

5.’0 

3.7 

16.0 

14.5 

Flour  Middlings 

7810 

4663 

John  H.  Shine  & Co., 

New  Albany  _ 

8.9 

5.0 

5.1 

15.0 

17.3 

Flour  Middlings 

7810 

5229 

Prater-Mottier  Co.,  Terre  Haute 

10.6 

5.0 

4.5 

15.0 

16.6 

Salem  Farmers  Milling  Company, 

Salem,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

6922 

2629 

T.  F.  Batt,  Salem 

9.7 

2.0 

4.1 

12.0 

15.6 

Salem  Milling  Company,  Salem,  Ind. 
Wheat  Shorts 

3161 

4047 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

2.0 

2.9 

13.0 

12.4 

Scharnberg,  N.  M.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlinsrs 

4142 

2140 

H.  F.  Keppen,  Michigan  City 

9.8 

3.5 

5.0 

14.0 

16.5 

Schulte,  W.  C.,  Preelandville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

6436 

5020 

Manufacturer  

10.8 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

17.2 

Schultz  Bros.,  Elberfeld,  Ind. 

Middlings 

3925 

1618 

Manufacturers  

11.9 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.5 

Seidel,  W.  T.,  Orland,  Ind. 

W^heat  Middlings 

6373 

2962 

Orland  Milling  Co.,  Orland 

10.4 

3.0 

3.9 

13.0 

15.6 

Wheat  Middlings 

6373 

4341 

Orland  Milling  Co.,  Orland 

9.9 

3.0 

4.1 

13.0 

15.0 

Shawnee  Milling  Company, 

Topeka,  Kans. 

Wheat  Middlings 

4574 

4478 

Galbreath  & Schriner,  Cayuga__ 

9.3 

4.0 

4.8 

16.0 

16.9 

Shine  & Company,  .J.  H., 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Star  Middlings  

5457 

3720 

Hammond  & Toncin,  Milltown.. 

10.6 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

16.6 

71 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


yilver  Star  Milling  Company, 
Patricksburg,  Ind. 

Shorts  

Shorts  

Shorts  59  

Sims  Milling  Company,  Prankfort,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

Wheat  Shorts 

Sloan,  J.  P.,  Palestine,  Burket  P.  O., 
Ind. 

Sloan’s  Wheat  Middlings  

Smith,  A.  S.,  Plint,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

Smith  Grain  & Milling  Company, 
Warsaw,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  — 

Snoddy,  M.  W.,  Covington,  R.  R.  No.  1 
Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

Southwestern  Milling  Company,  Inc., 
The,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Pancy  White  Middlings 

Pure  Gray  Shorts 

Pure  Brown  Shorts 

Pure  Brown  Shorts 

Pancy  White  Middlings  59 

Pancy  White  Middlings  59 

Pancy  White  Middlings  

Pancy  White  Middlings  59 

Sparks  Milling  Company, 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Wabash  Middlings 

Wabash  Middlings 


Spencer  & Company,  J.  W. 
Veedersburg,  Ind. 
Wheat  Shorts 


Spencerville  Milling  Company, 
Spencerville,  Ind. 

Middlings  & Shorts  Mixed  __ 


Spink  Milling  Company,  The, 
Washington,  Ind. 

.Wheat  Middlings  

Wheat  Middlings  


Star  & Crescent  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Ctescent  Middlings 

Crescent  Middlings 

Crescent  Middlings 


Crescent  Middlings 

*Star  Wheat  Middlings 


Starlight  Milling  Company, 
Borden,  R.  R.  No.  1,  Ind. 
tWheat  Middlings  


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

§ 

3838 

2461 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.5 

3.2 

13.0 

15.9 

3838 

2775 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.5 

2.8 

13.0 

14.6 

3838 

4536 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.5 

2.5 

13.0 

14.4 

6304 

3438 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

4.0 

4.6 

14.0 

16.9 

6304 

4699 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

16.4 

227 

3620 

Manufacturer  

10.8 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

15.0 

1661 

4323 

Manufacturer  

9.7 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

14.6 

803 

3586 

Green  Bros.  & Oldfather, 

Warsaw  

11.3 

3.8 

4.2 

13.5 

14.7 

4718 

4488 

Manufacturer  

10.6 

2.5 

4.5 

13.0 

17.2 

6158 

2156 

n W Bntt.rij  Michigan  City . 

10.5 

2.6 

3.3 

16.8 

17.0 

7286 

4004 

Zook  Bros.,  Logansport 

10.2 

4.0 

3.9 

18.0 

17.9 

7342 

4005 

Zook  Bros.,  Logansport 

9.7 

4.5 

4.5 

18.0 

18.1 

7342 

4583 

Jordan  & Baird,  Kewanna...  _ 

10.0 

4.5 

4.6 

18.0 

17.6 

7343 

3473 

Jnrdqn  Jir.  Bnirflj  Kewanna. 

11.4 

3.0 

2.7 

17.0 

15.9 

7343 

3705 

John  H.  Shine  & Co., 

New  Albany 

10.6 

3.0 

3.0 

17.0 

16.0 

7343 

4006 

Zook  Bros.,  Logansport 

9.5 

3.0 

3.3 

17.0 

16.4 

7343 

4582 

"Rf^ird^  Kewanna 

9.7 

3.0 

2.7 

17.0 

15.7 

2774 

4024 

Charles  Johnson,  Sullivan 

9.5 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

15.7 

■ 2774 

5264 

W.  D.  Hampton,  Worthington.. 

9.2 

4.0 

5.1 

14.0 

16.1 

334 

2251 

Parmers  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Veedersburg  

10.9 

3.0 

2.8 

12.0 

15.8 

• 5474 

4234 

Mannfactnrer.s 

10.1 

3.2 

3.6 

13.5 

14.6 

6960 

3877 

Mannfactnrer.s  . . 

9.9 

3.7 

4.0 

14.0 

15.7 

6960 

5221 

Mannfact.nrer.s  .. 

9.7 

3.7 

3.9 

14.0 

15.1 

3110 

1817 

Rnper  Brown,  Hobart 

10.8 

4.5 

4.3 

16.0 

16.5 

3110 

3164 

-Toe  SemanciV,  Whiting 

12.0 

4.5 

4.4 

16.0 

16.4 

- 3110 

4512 

Crabbs,  Reynolds,  Taylor  Co., 

LaPayette  

9.0 

4.5 

4.9 

16.0 

17.0 

- 3110 

4762 

Roper  Sr.  Brown,  Hobart 

10.3 

4.5 

4.7 

16.0 

17.6 

4550 

Arno  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Whiteland  

7.8 

— 

5.0 

— 

16.9 

- 7795 

4051 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

1 2.0 

2.0 

11.0 

13.1 

* Not  tagged 
t Before  registration 


59  Low  grade  flour  present 


72 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Star  Milling  Company,  Shoals,  Ind. 

Star  Shorts 

503 

4165 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

17.1 

St.  Joe  Milling  Company,  St.  Joe,  Ind. 

St.  Joe’s  Wheat  Middlings  _ 

5127 

4930 

St.  Joe  Mills,  St.  Joe... 

9.5 

4.0 

3.7 

14.0 

15.3 

Stott,  David,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Climax  Middlings  

5278 

4311 

Home  Grain  Co.,  Angola 

9.5 

5.0 

4.3 

17.0 

15  6 

Climax  Middlings  

5278 

4352 

Home  Grain  Co.,  LaGrange 

9.3 

5.0 

4.5 

17.0  , 

15  8 

Stoudt,  Thomas,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Thos.  Stoudt’s  Wheat  Middlings 

277 

1916 

Manufacturer  

V’  8 

5.0 

3,4 

15.4  ' 

1 

13.3 

Suckow  Company,  Franklin,  Ind. 

Middlings  

3914 

2141 

C.  B.  Cook  Co.,  Greenwood 

9.9 

4.0 

3.8 

14.0  i 

17.5 

Swayzee  Milling  Company,  Svvayzee,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  — 

4664 

4692 

Manufacturers  

7.5 

2.0 

2.9 

13.0 

14.3 

Thomas  & Son,  A.  R.,  Markle,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

3189 

2273 

Manufacturers 

10.2 

3.2 

3.7 

14.1 

1 

15.8 

Thompson,  Lester,  Prairie  Creek,  Ind. 

Thompson’s  Wheat  Shorts  

6529 

1737 

J.  P.  Allan,  Farmersburg 

12.4 

3.8 

3.7 

14.9 

15.9 

Thompson  & Son,  Somerville,  Ind. 

**Shorts  

1633 

Manufacturers  

11.9 

3.6 

15.4 

Thurgood,  Geo.  R.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Shorts  __  

1539 

3027 

Chas.  R.  Thurgood,  Vincennes.. 

10.7 

4.0 

3.9 

14.0 

14.7 

Timhrook  & Hursh,  Auburn,  Ind. 

Auburn  Roller  Mills  Middlings _ 

6985 

4225 

Manufacturers 

9.1 

3.4 

4.3 

14.0 

15.7 

Auburn  Roller  Mills  Middlings 

6985 

4910 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.4 

4.8 

14.0 

15.6 

Tresselt  & Sons,  C.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

410 

3963 

Manufacturers  ..  

10.6 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

16.9 

Wheat  Middlings 

411 

2905 

Indiana  School  for  Feeble  Mind- 

ed Youth,  Fort  Wayne 

10.6 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

16.0 

Wheat  Middlings  

411 

3962 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

4.0 

5.2 

14.0 

16.5 

Trimble  Milling  Company,  The, 

Milton,  Ky. 

I+Shipstuff 

1989 

3503 

C.  W.  Jessup,  Madison 

10.2 

4.0 

4.6 

14.0 

15.5 

Tuttle  & Company,  R., 

Columbia  City,  Ind. 

Perfection  Middlings 

818 

1527 

Manufacturers  . 

10.2 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

16.2 

Perfection  Middlings  

818 

3936 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

4.0 

3.8 

14.0 

14.2 

Perfection  Middlings 

818 

4991 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

15.9 

Uhl-Snider  Milling  Company, 

Connersville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

5136 

2585 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.7 

4.1 

14.0 

15.9 

Ulrich  & Son,  Levi,  Greensboro,  Ind. 

Shorts 

5396 

4309 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

2.0 

1.7 

12.0 

12.1 

Union  Roller  Mills,  West  Harrison,  Ind. 

Kiewit’s  Wheat  Middlings  

7078 

2874 

Manufacturers  . 

10.3 

3.9 

4.2 

14.0 

15.0 

Valentine  Valentine,  Franklin,  Ind. 

Middlings  ‘’i  __  __ 

932 

2335 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

4.0 

3.7 

14.0 

17.1 

Victoria  Milling  Company,  The, 

Jasper,  Ind. 

Victoria  Wheat  Shorts 

7170 

3798 

Manufacturers  

8.3 

3.3 

3.5 

15.0 

16.8 

Wabash  Milling  Company,  The, 

Wabash,  Ind. 

Middlings  

2 

4390 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

16.1 

♦*  Not  registered  15  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7455 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


4 


73 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

§ 

Sample  secured  from 

! 

Official 

m 

C 

Moistui 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Wakarusa  Milling  Company, 

Wakarnsa,  Ind. 

Wakarusa  Wheat,  Middling.s  C2 

1248 

2615 

Manufacturers 

10.6 

4.5 

3.9 

15.0 

13.5 

Wallace  Milling  Company,  The, 

Dale,  Ind. 

tW’allace’s  Pure  Wheat  Middlings 

7747 

3771 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

4.0 

3.5 

15.0 

16.6 

Wellington  Milling  Company, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Wellington’s  A.  X.  A.  Middlings 

4987 

4358 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

4.0 

4.7 

15.0 

16.3 

W^estern  Flour  Mill  Company, 

Davenport,  Iowa. 

“Black  Hawk’’  Wheat  Standard  Mid- 
dlings 63 

673.5 

1785 

A,  B Nicholson,  Merrillville. 

9.7 

5.7 

4.8 

16.3 

16.6 

Black  Hawk  Standard  Middlings 

7896 

4841 

South  Bend  Grain  Co., 

South  Bend  __  

,8.7 

5.2 

5.4 

15.0 

18.6 

Wildcat  Roller  Mills,  Cutler,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

1091 

3922 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

14.5 

W’ilkinson  & Company,  T.  B., 
Knightstown,  Ind. 

Middlings 

119 

4411 

Manufacturers  _ 

11.9 

3.5 

3.5 

14.0 

15.5 

Witmer  Grain  Company,  Grabill,  Ind. 
W’heat  Middlings  

1679 

4232 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

15.1 

W’heat  Middlings  __  

1679 

4928 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

4.0 

4.9 

14.0 

16.7 

Woodburn  Elevator  & Milling 

Company,  W^oodburn,  Ind. 

Wheat  IVfiddlings  62 

5480 

4228 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.0 

2.7 

14.0 

13.6 

W’oolard,  C.,  Hagerstown,  R.  R.  No.  20, 
Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

6746 

4.331 

Manufacturer  

8.7 

2.5 

4.3 

14.0 

15.7 

Wright,  John  H.,  Clinton,  Ind. 

W’heat  Middlings  __  _ 

7077 

5224 

Manufacturer  

10.4 

3.5 

4.6 

15.5 

16.5 

Yerxa,  Andrews  & Thurston*  Inc., 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Nokomus  Durum  W^heat  Middlings 

6955 

3476 

W^  G.  Sweet,  Royal  Center 

10.3 

5.5 

6.6 

14.5 

14.8 

Yohn,  W\  B.,  North  W^ebster,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

6837 

3593 

Manufacturer  _ 

10.8 

3.5 

3.9 

13.5 

15.0 

Zehner,  J.  A.,  Plymouth,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

6449 

2793 

Manufacturer  _ _ 

9.6 

3.0 

3.8 

13.0 

14.0 

Wheat  Middlings  _ _ _ 

6449 

4872 

Manufacturer  

9.4 

3.0 

4.7 

13.0 

16.1 

Zenith  Milling  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

W’heat  Shorts  _ 

7372 

2957 

Fred  Holz,  WJlliamsport  

10.4 

3.5 

5.5 

16.0 

19.6 

W’heat  Shorts  

7372 

3474 

Jordan  & Baird,  Ketvanna- 

9.3 

3.5 

4.1 

16.0 

16.6 

ttWheat  Shorts 

7372 

4501 

F.  W^  Gilbert  & Sons,  Dana 

8.4 

3.5 

5.7 

16.0 

18.1 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 
Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Middlings  _ __ 

4059 

3085 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.5 

3.7 

14.5 

16.4 

Middlings  

4059 

5049 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.5 

3.5 

14.5 

15.4 

Zionsville  Milling  Company, 

Zionsville,  Ind. 

W’heat  Shorts 

4298 

1938 

Manufacturers 

10.5 

3.0 

4.3 

14.0 

17.7 

W’heat  Shorts __  

4298 

4784 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.0 

4.1 

14.0 

16.3 

t Before  registration  *^3  1700  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  6655 

02  Low  grade  flour  present 


74 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

c 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

O . 

(UCi 

in 

P 

R o 

to  y 

*S  ^ 

kS  OJ 

s ft 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  RED  DOG 
FLOUR 

i 

i 

1 

Cadick  Milling  Company, 

Grandview,  Ind. 

136 

1566 

L.  Schoenfeld,  Rockport 

9.3 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

18.3 

136 

3799 

Manufacturers  

8.4 

4.0 

4.4  1 

14.0  1 

16.1 

WHITE  MIDDLINGS 

j 

1 

Schaefer  & Schwartzkopf,  , 

Columbus,  Ind. 

2102 

3459 

Manufacturers  

12.0 

2.0 

3.0 

11.0 

13.7 

2102 

4711 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

2.0 

3.2 

11.0 

14.1 

Stott  Flour  Mills,  David,  Detroit,  Mich. 

2021 

Kramer  & Wolff,  Lakeville 

10.7 

4.6 

15.8 

RED  DOG  FLOUR 

Baldwin,  Jr.,  Dwight  M., 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

3205 

3213 

Paul  E.  Raasch,  Crown  Point.. 

10.0 

5.5 

4.3 

17.5 

15.2 

Bay  State  Milling  Company, 

Winona,  Minn. 

7145 

1819 

McMahan  Bros.,  Wheeler 

10.0 

4.5 

4.1 

15.0 

15.4 

Rpddnp"  Flnnr  _ 

7145 

3220 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point 

10.3 

4.5 

4.8 

i 15.0 

16.6 

Reddog  Rlniir  65 

7145 

4764 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point 

9.9 

4.5 

4.4' 

15.0 

16.2 

Blish  Milling  Company,  Seymour,  Ind. 

"PlieVi’a  *r>r\or 

6403 

2828 

W.  H.  Newsome,  Grammer 

8.6 

3.5 

2.5 

16.0 

13.7 

‘Rlich’c  "nncr  'Plnnr 

6403 

3712 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.5 

2.7 

16.0 

16.6 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

t“Prize”  Red  Dog  Flour  

+t“Frize”  Red  Dog  'F'lnnr 

7402 

7402 

1877 

2275 

Hamilton  & Kellner,  Rensselaer- 
North  Judson  Flour  & Feed 

i 

8.6 

4.0 

5.4 

17.0 

17.6 

On.,  North  .Tndson 

9.4 

4.0 

5.1 

17.0 

17.6 

Claro  Milling  Company,  Waseca,  Minn. 

T^ncr 

7046 

3824 

J.  C.  Barrett,  South  Bend 

10.8 

3.0 

4.9 

15.0 

16.1 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook,  Nappanee,  Ind. 

6936 

2598 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

2.7 

3.5 

15.5 

14.5 

XvcUClU^  JjiUUI  (^X>i  cliiUCU.  V 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain 
Company,  Monticello,  Ind. 

T?P(4 

7731 

2854 

Thomas  Jensen,  W^heatfield 

10.2 

3.5 

4.9 

16.0 

17.3 

+T ./MTcrVirir’a  T?Pf4  T)no*  TPlmiP 

7731 

3599 

Manufacturers  

8.6 

3.5 

3.7 

16.0 

15.9 

+T  rMTcrhrir’c  T?Pr4  "nno*  T^lmir 

7731 

3600 

Manufacturers  

7.7 

3.5 

5.2 

16.0 

18.1 

1 j o xvvd  — ~ 

Mayflower  Mills,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

+ 1^0/1  T^nor 

7444 

2247 

Girt  L.  Gnagy,  Hamilton 

10.6 

2.0 

3.0 

10.0 

14.3 

Medora  Mill  Company,  Medora,  Ind. 

**Rprl  Dne*  l^lmir 

2832 

Manufacturers  : 

9.2 

2.4 

14.6 

XVCUX  ilCIUlA  — — 

New  Albany  Milling  Company, 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Superb  Red  Dog  Rlonr 

6104 

2521 

Manufaptnrprs 

9.4 

5.0 

6.3 

18.0 

19.1 

Snpprb  Rpd  Drig  Flour 

6104 

3625 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

5.0 

5.5 

18.0 

19.0 

Snp^rl^  l^pr]  "Plmir 

6104 

7097 

3626 

Mnnufapturers 

10.2 

5.0 

3.0 

18.0 

15.5 

Nichols  & Company,  C.  E.,  Lowell,  Ind. 
Rpd  T^of^  Flnnr 

1776 

Mannfnpturprs  . . 

9.0 

4.0 

5.7 

16.5 

18.1 

Valparaiso  Grain  & Elevator  Company, 
Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Red  Dog  Flour 

1406 

1852 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

2.0 

4.2 

16.0 

16.3 

* Not  tagged 
t Before  registration 
'♦  Not  registered 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

700  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7144 


75 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

'3 

5e 

O 

.2 

"IS 

01  rj 

CD 

c 

1 'O 
u 

O rt 

TJ 

1 

0 d 

O § 

1 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  “Adrian” 

735 

1787 

A.  G.  Nicholson,  Merrillville 

9.7 

5.0 

5.3 

18.0 

17.9 

7017 

4780 

Wm.  Steeb,  Crown  Point.  

8.8 

5.0 

6.2 

17.0 

19.5 

7233 

2246 

Girt  L.  Gnagy,  Hamilton. 

9.3 

4.0 

6.0 

16.0 

18.9 

Red  Dog  Elour  (Adrian) 

7233 

4351 

Hawk  Bros.  Milling  Co.,  Mongo. 

9.1 

4.0 

4.8 

16.0 

16.9 

LOW  GRADE  FLOUR 

Oakland  City  Roller  Mills, 

Oakland  City,  Ind. 

3859 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

1.5 

11.1 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills.  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pillsbnry’.s  XN  Daisy 

5489 

1821 

MeMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

9.8 

4.5 

5.0 

17.0 

16.8 

Pillsbury’s  XX  Daisy  

5489 

2301 

J.  R.  Guild  & Co.,  Medaryville. 

9.8 

4.5 

4.5 

17.0 

16.9 

f fPillshnry’.s  XX  Daisy 

7137 

4554 

De  T.oss  Smith,  TiaFayette 

9.3 

4.0 

4.0 

16.0 

17.5 

Sullivan  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Sullivan,  Ind. 

5212 

Isaac  Bunch,  T-intnn 

11.2 

1.6 

12.9 

WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  SCREENINGS 

Acme-Evans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 

5590 

1961 

Thorntown  Grain  Co.,  Thorn- 

town  

9.6 

4.5 

4.5 

16.5 

17.2 

Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 

5590 

2882 

Geo.  W.  Blair,  Mishawaka 

7.8 

4.5 

3 5 

16.5 

15.9 

Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 

5590 

4427 

Urmston  Grain  Co.,  Elwood  

9.4 

4.5 

4.2 

16.5 

17.2 

Baldwin,  Jr.,  Dwight  M., 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Baldwin  Flour  Mills  Wheat  Flour 

Midds  and  Screenings  

5694 

3212 

Paul  E.  Raasch,  Crown  Point... 

10.2 

5.0 

5.6' 

16.5 

16.7 

Ballard  & Ballard  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Kentucky  Farm  Feed 

5093 

2464 

George  H.  Denser,  Charlestown. 

7.9 

4.2 

4.2 

15.6 

13.6 

Kentucky  Farm  Feed 

5093 

3669 

Ballard  & Ballard  Co.,  Charles- 

town   

9.8 

4.2 

3.8 

15.6 

14.6 

Bartlett  Company,  The  J.  E., 

Jackson,  Mich. 

Standard  Wheat  Middlings  and  . 

Screenings  

6814 

1886 

Chas.  A.  Neff.  New  Paris 

10.3 

4.5 

5.5 

13.5 

17.1 

Standard  Wheat  Middlings  and 

Screenings  

6814 

3289 

Jacob  Rupel.  Brvant 

10.0 

4.5 

6.2 

13.5 

15.8 

Standard  Wheat  Middlings  and 

Screenings  

6814 

3989 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

Farmer  Brand  Flour  Middlings  with 

Co.,  North  Judson  

9.9 

4.5 

5.3 

13.5 

17.2 

Screenings  

7668 

3281 

Hubert  French,  Linn  Grove 

9.8 

4.0 

4.9 

15.0 

15.4 

Farmer  Brand  Flour  Middlings  with 

Screenings 

7668 

3313 

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Co., 

Farmer  Brand  Flour  Middlings  with 

Geneva  

10.2 

4.0 

5.1 

15.0 

15.2 

Screenings 

7668 

4320 

T.  I.  Ferris.  Pleasant  Lake 

9.3 

4.0 

4.7 

15.0 

17.1 

Farmer  Brand  Flour  Middlings  with 

Screenings 

7668 

4652 

Berne  Grain  & Hay  Co.,  Berne. 

9.7 

4.0 

4.4 

15.0 

16.1 

Bay  State  Milling  Company, 

Winona,  Minn. 

“Winona”  Wheat  Middlings  & Wheat 

Screenings  

5604 

1556 

P.  Backer  & Son,  Troy 

10.6 

5.0 

5.9 

17.0 

16.6 

“Winona”  Wheat  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  from  Wheat  _ . 

7141 

1818 

McMahan  Bros.,  Wheeler 

10.3 

5.0 

4.9 

15.0 

15.9 

“Winona”  Wheat  Middlings  with 

Grovmd  Screenings  from  Wheat 

7141 

3218 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point 

10.0 

5.0 

5.3 

15.0 

15.9 

“Winona”  Wheat  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  from  Wheat 

7141 

4781 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point 

8.8 

5.0 

5.0 

15.0 

17.4 

**  Not  registered 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


Rebate.  See  page  41 


76 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  -• 
per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

is 

'5 

o 

.2 

'43 

o . 

(D 

1 

O a 

'O 

a 

§ 

O a 

T3 

C 

1 

Bernet,  Craft  & Kauffman  Milling 

Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

5791 

1905 

Zionsville  Milling  Co.,  Zionsville 

9.4 

4.9 

4.4 

17.2 

17.6 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

5791 

3583 

.Tnhn  Grnrrij  Milan 

9.9 

4.9 

3.4 

17.2 

17.1 

“A”  Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings. 

5806 

4457 

N.  W.  Mattix  & Co.,  Lebanon.. 

9.8 

3.0 

3.7 

15.0 

17^4 

Brose,  George,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

6854 

3180 

Mannfactnrcr 

9.7 

3.8 

4.2 

15.5 

18.1 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

6854 

5128 

Manufacturer 

9.8 

3.8 

4.3 

15.5 

15.8 

Cannelton  Elour  Mills,  Cannelton,  Ind. 

Ship  & Wheat  Screenings 

2.589 

Manufacturers 

11.1 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

17.7 

Ship  & Wheat  Screenings  

2589 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

4.0 

4.4 

ll’.O 

16i8 

Castetter  & Company,  Clyde  J., 

Goshen,  Ind. 

fWheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

7292 

1586 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

4.0 

6.4 

14.0 

17.6 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

7292 

3881 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

4.0 

6.1 

14.0 

16.6 

Chicago  Height  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  

6444 

1730 

Russell  & Company,  Portland.. 

11.6 

4.0 

3.9 

15.0 

17.1 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  — 

6444 

1874 

Hamilton  & Kellner,  Rensselaer. 

10.2 

4.0 

4.4 

15.0 

17.2 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and 

Screenings  _ 

7006 

1663 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton. 

9.1 

4.0 

5.6 

15.0 

17.3 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and 

Screenings 

7006 

2541 

Beach  Suminers,  Alhanv 

10.7 

4.0 

4.8 

15.0 

18.4 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and 

Screenings 

7006 

2813 

Batchelor  & Batchelor,  Sharps- 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and 

ville  . ..  

8.8 

4.0 

4.8 

15.0 

18.5 

Screenings 

7006 

4437 

Windfall  Grain  Co.,  Windfall... 

8.9 

4.0 

5.4 

15.0 

16.4 

Claro  Milling  Company,  Waseca,  Minn. 

, 

Claro  Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings 

6616 

2400 

Rnlicrt  Pnrtcr  Piccrn 

10.3 

3.0 

6.4 

14.0 

16.5 

Claro  Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  _ 

6616 

3823 

.1.  Barrett,  South  Bend 

11.0 

3.0 

6.7 

14.0 

17.8 

Columbia  City  Mill  & Elevator 

Company,  Columbia  City,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

6990 

1.530 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

2.8 

4.1 

13.0 

15.0 

Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

6990 

3938 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

2.8 

3.4 

13.0 

14.3 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook,  Nappanee,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat 

Screenings  __  . 

5627 

1895 

Berry  Bros.,  Lynn  ..  .. 

9.4 

4.2 

4.7 

17.0 

16.0 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat 

Screenings  

5627 

2600 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

4.2 

4.6 

17.0 

15.8 

Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat  Screen- 

ings _ __  _ 

7561 

3921 

Miller  & Walker,  Plora 

9.8 

4.0 

5.0 

15.8 

15.9 

Middlings  and  Ground  W’heat  Screen- 

ings   __  __  __  __  

7561 

4235 

Manufacturers  . 

9.5 

4.0 

4.1 

15.8 

15.8 

Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat  Screen- 

ings   

7561 

4909 

Garrett  Elevator  Co.,  Garrett... 

9.9 

4.0 

4.4 

15.8 

15.8 

Crocker,  Win.  G.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run 

5469 

2380 

Jay  Grain  Co.,  Elwood 

10.5 

5.0 

5.7 

15.0 

16.1 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run 

5469 

3457 

.1.  R.  Starr,  Winamac 

10.3 

5.0 

5.4 

15.0 

15.9 

Decatur  Roller  Mills,  Decatur,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

5426 

2097 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

3.0 

3.2 

13.0 

13.2 

t Before  registration  \ 


77 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 

Chicago,  111. 

Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Wheat 
Screenings  not  to  exceed  Mill  Run... 
Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Wheat 
Screenings  not  to  exceed  Mill  Run___ 
Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Wheat 
Screenings  not  to  exceed  Mill  Run 

Eagle  Roller  Mill  Company, 

New  Ulm,  Minn. 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Eckhart  Milling  Company,  B.  A., 
Chicago,  111. 

Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 
not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Wheat  Middlings  and  Wheat  Screen- 
ings — 
Wheat  Middlings  and  Wheat  Screen- 
ings — 

Empire  Milling  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Empire  Milling  Company  Wheat 
Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Etna  Lumber  & Milling  Company, 

Etna  Green,  Ind. 

Etna  Middlings  & Screenings 

Everett,  Aughenbaugh  & Company, 
Waseca,  Minn. 

E-A-CO  Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground 

Screenings  

E-A-CO  Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground 
Screenings  

Fyke  Milling  Company,  LaGrange,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

Garland  Milling  Company, 

Greensburg,  Ind. 

Garland  Middlings  & Screenings 

Garland  Middlings  & Sereenings 

Goshen  Milling  Company,  Goshen,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Wheat 
Screenings  

Home  Mill  & Grain  Company, 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Sereenings 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

Hunter  & Company,  O.  L.,  Chicago,  111. 
Calumet  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 
Calumet  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

Indiana  Milling  Company, 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

§ 

6944 

2853 

John  Dolezal  & Co.,  San  Pierre. 

10.9 

4.5 

5.0 

15.5 

16.1 

6944 

3043 

Wm.  Harbeck,  Valparaiso 

10.0 

4.5 

5.3 

15.5 

16.1 

6944 

47.58 

Wm.  Harbeck,  Valparaiso 

10.5 

4.5 

4.9 

15.5 

16.0 

6687 

2621 

Urschel  Bros.,  Tippecanoe 

10.1 

4.5 

4.4 

15.4 

16.1 

5400 

2200 

0.  Gandy  & Co.,  Denver 

8.8 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

16.0 

5400 

3107 

Flack  Bros.,  E.  Chicago 

10.2 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.0 

7206 

3703 

James  M.  Lee  & Co., 

i 

New  Albany . ..  . 

10.1 

4.5 

4.2 

15.5 

16.9 

7206 

4553 

Salem  Cooperative  Association, 

Salem  

8.5 

4.5 

5.5 

15.5 

16.5 

7394 

3994 

North  Judson  Flour  & Feed 

Co.,  North  Judson 

10.1 

4.0 

5.6 

15.0 

16.3 

6660 

2803 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

4.0 

4.6 

1 16.0 

15.7 

5440 

2619 

0.  Gandy  & Co.,  Mentone 

10.3 

3.0 

6.0 

15.0 

17.4 

5440 

3328 

Omer  G.  Whelan,  Richmond.  ... 

10.0 

3.0 

6.4 

15.0 

17.2 

6422 

2505 

Manufacturers  ...  

9.8 

3.5 

3.8 

13.5 

14.4 

6422 

4354 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.5 

3.5 

13.5 

14.1 

7281 

3183 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

4.3 

4.3 

16.5 

16.5 

7281 

4720 

John  t'rum,  Milan  ._  ..  

9.2 

4.3 

4.6 

16.5 

17.0 

6610 

1581 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

4.1 

3.6 

14.5 

14.3 

7686 

5066 

Manufacturers  ... 

9.0 

4.0 

5.1 

16.0 

17.6 

7686 

5075 

Manufacturers  . ..  

8.8 

4.0 

4.2 

16.0 

16.5 

6131 

3719 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer 

11.0 

4.0 

5.1 

14.5 

14.3 

6131 

4061 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester  

9.9 

4.0 

4.5 

14.5 

14.0 

6787 

3297 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

4.0 

5.5 

14.5 

15.1 

78 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

• Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Kansas  Flour  Mills  Company,  The, 

! 

! 

Wichita,  Kans. 

Standard  Shorts  and  Wheat  Screen- 

ings  67 

5079 

3184 

Krnme  Son,  Batp.sville  . 

10.3 

5.8 

4.1 

17.0 

17.6 

standard  Shorts  and  Wheat  Screen- 

5079 

3345 

.1  H.  MpnlrPj  RiphTnnnd 

9.4 

5.8 

4.8 

17.0 

17.8 

White  Shorts  & Wheat  Screenings  ®®_- 

5080 

2133 

John  H.  Kuhn  & Son,  Michigan 

City  

9.7 

5.8 

4.4 

17.0 

19.1 

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Company, 

1 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

1 

Rex  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings. 

6682 

1674 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

! 

South  Raub 

9.4 

4.0 

4.0 

16.0 

17.6 

Rex  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings. 

6682 

1741 

J.  H.  Leonard,  Sullivan 

12.1 

4.0 

4.0 

16.0 

17.7 

Rex  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings. 

6682 

3650 

Eberts  Grain  Co.,  Nabb 

9.6 

4.0 

4.1 

1 16.0 

17.0 

Rex  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings. 

6682 

3683 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Crawfordsville  

10.9 

4.0 

4.1 

16.0 

' 17.3 

Rex  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings. 

6682 

4513 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

LaFayette  

9.4 

4.0 

4.3 

16.0 

16.4 

Kemper  Mill  & Elevator  Coyipany, 

i 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

! 

Crescent  Middlings  with  Ground 

6028 

2954 

Jones  Bros.,  Attica 

10.6 

4.2 

5.1 

16.0 

19.1 

i 

ttCarnation  Gray  Middlings  and 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

7325 

3977 

Ola  Chambers,  Jasonville 

9.6 

4.3 

4.6 

16.0 

1 17.9 

ttCarnation  Gray  Middlings  and 

1 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

7325 

4870 

Tull’s  Department  Store,  Monon 

7.6 

4.3 

4.9 

16.0 

17.5 

Ligonier  Milling  Company, 

Ligonier,  Ind. 

1 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

6421 

2242 

G.  Wolf  & Sons  Co.,  Hamilton. 

11.8 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

14.7 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

6421 

3846 

North  Side  Feed  Store, 

Lindsborg  Milling  & Elevator  Co.,  The, 

Mishawaka  

10.7 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

14.8 

Lindsborg,  Kans. 

Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 

6074 

2255 

F.  A,  Finch  & Co.,  Hillsboro 

9.3 

3.5 

5.1 

16.0 

19.0 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain 

Company,  Monticello,  Ind. 

Loughry’s  Wheat  Middlings  and 

Screenings  

6170 

2420 

Union  Elevator  Co., 

Louisville  Milling  Company, 

New  Richmond 

8.4 

4.0 

5.2 

14.0 

16.8 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings 

Tint  pvpppding  Mill  Run  69 

6176 

2463 

m A PnRSj  Spllprshnrg 

9.4 

4.0 

4.4 

15.0 

16.7 

Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

6176 

2490 

M.  A,  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

9.2 

4.0 

4.2 

15.0 

15.2 

ttWheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings 

Tint  pypppdinp-  Mill  Run 

6176 

2880 

rirnig^  Rrns  , T.pnvpnwnrth 

11.0 

4.0 

5.5 

15.0 

15.6 

Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings 

Tint  p-vpppding  Mill  Rnn 

6176 

4679 

M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

9.1 

4.0 

4.1 

15.0 

15.3 

Lyon  & Greenleaf  Company, 

Ligonier,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

8003 

4938 

T.  I.  Ferris,  Pleasant  Lake 

9.0 

4.0 

4.5 

14.0 

15.9 

Mallinson,  Charles  L.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  & Ground  Screenings 

Tint  PYpppiiing  Mill  Rnn 

7364 

3232 

Manufacturer  

9.8 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

17.8 

Marshall  Milling  Company, 

Marshall,  Minn. 

ItShorts  and  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run  

6396 

4736 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Uargpr.Rville 

9.7 

5.0 

5.0 

17.0 

16.8 

Miller  Flour  & Feed  Company,  The 

Wesley,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

6483 

1920 

W.  E.  Rouch,  Mishawaka 

12.2 

4.0 

4.6 

14.0 

17.4 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings. 

6483 

3812 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

18.0 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  % ton  removed  from  sale.  Labels  No.  6176 

Removed  from  sale  furnished 

tons  removed  from  sale  because  of  mutil- 
ated labels.  Relabeled  No.  7476 


79 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

u • 

on 

cn 

Pi 

rj  PJ 

R 0) 

ffl  y 

’S  !-i 

VH  y 
g ft 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
ttMcOoys  Choice  Wheat  Middlings  with 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run___ 

5514 

2025 

Albert  Rose,  Sharpsville 

10.6 

3.0 

4.2 

16.0 

17.4 

McCoys  Choice  Wheat  Middlings  with 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run___ 

5514 

2710 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.0 

4.2 

16.0 

18.0 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

7349 

3505 

C.  G.  Hunger,  Madison 

10.4 

4.0 

5.0 

16.0 

17.8 

Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

7349 

3660 

M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

10.1 

4.0 

4.7 

16.0 

17.7 

National  Mills,  Angola,  Ind. 

Wheat.  Middlings  with  Sereenings 

7623 

4953 

Ma.nnfflPtnrers 

9.1 

3.0 

4.1 

13.0 

15.0 

16.5 

Nichols  & Company,  C.  E.,  Lowell,  Ind. 
Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run___ 

7095 

1774 

Manufacturers  

8.8 

4.5 

6.0 

15.0 

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

Noblesville  Milling  Co.’s  Middlings  & 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run 

7306 

3529 

J.  F.  Crowder,  Macy 

10.3 

4.0 

5.5 

15.0 

16.4 

North  Madison  Coal  Company, 

North  Madison,  Ind. 

+tMiddlings  Sereenings 

7617 

5498 

2901 

Mannfapf.nrprs 

10.2 

4.0 

5.4 

15.0 

15.4 

Northwestern  Consolidated  Milling 
Company,  The,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run_._ 

2280 

J.  C.  Phillips,  Star  City 

9.9 

4.5 

5.8 

15.5 

16.1 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run___ 

5498 

5323 

J.  C.  Phillips,  Star  City 

9.5 

4.5 

5.1 

15.5 

16.7 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Sereenings  not  exceeding 

6394 

3062 

Bieker  Bros.  Co.,  Hammond 

9.5 

4.5 

5.4 

15.0 

15.2 

Mill  Run  

Phoenix  Flour  Mill,  Evansville,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground  Screen- 
ings 

6856 

3238 

Mannfar.tnrer.s 

9.3 

4.0 

4.2 

15.5 

16.3 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Standard  “B”  Mid- 
dlings with  Ground  Screenings  not 
exeepding  Mill  Run 

7134 

2278 

Miller  & Dilts,  Winamac 

9.2 

4.0 

5.9 

14.0 

15.8 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Standard  “B”  Mid- 
dlings with  Ground  Screenings  not 
pxpppdine-  Mill  Rnn 

7134 

7134 

2371 

4566 

A R.  Rmplpr,  Rlwnnd 

10.0 

4.0 

5.8 

14.0 

15.8 

15.6 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Standard  “B”  Mid- 
dlings with  Ground  Screenings  not 
exceeding  Mill  Run 

Peoples  Store,  New  Amsterdam. 

8.8 

4.0 

5.3 

14.0 

Plant  Milling  Company,  Geo.  P., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings 

V not  pxpeeding  Mill  Rnn  _ 

5558 

2032 

G.  0.  Jean,  Bloomfield 

11.7 

4.0 

5.1 

17.0 

18.6 

^ Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings 
not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

5558 

3315 

Creitz  & Deardorff,  Centerville. 

10.1 

4.0 

4.8 

17.0 

18.0 

Plotnieki  & Company,  Louis  P., 

South  Bend,  Ind. 

Middlings  Snrppnings 

6893 

2015 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

3.0 

5.6 

13.0 

16.0 

Poseyville  Milling  Company,  The, 
Poseyville,  Ind. 

Whpat,  .miorts  Xr.  Sprppnings 

7676 

3855 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

4.0 

4.8 

14.0 

17.3 

Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 

7676 

5063 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

4.0 

4.9 

14.0 

16.3 

t'!'  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


8o 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 

Number 


LABEL 


Prairie  State  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run  TO 


Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 
ttWheat  Middlings  with  Screenings. 


Riioff,  Geo.  D.,  Osgood,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  and  Crushed  Wheat 
Screenings  


Schilt,  W.  P.,  Bremen,  Ind. 
Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 
Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 
Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 


Schultz,  Baujan  & Company, 
Beardstown,  111. 

Sunbeam  Middlings  and  Screenings.. 

Sheffield-King  Milling  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

“Pairybow”  ti  


“Pairybow”  

“Pairybow”  


Sleepy  Eye  Plour  Mills  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Sleepy  Eye  Wheat  Middlings  with  not 
to  exceed  Mill  Run  of  Ground 
Screenings  


Star  & Crescent  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Star  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Star  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings not  exceeding  Mill  Run 


Suckow  Company,  Pranklin,  Ind. 

Middlings  & Screenings 

Middlings  & Screenings 


Trow  (’ornpany,  W.,  Madison,  Ind. 
Trow’s  Middlings  & Screenings 


Valentine  <fc  Valentine,  Pranklin,  Ind. 
Middlings  and  Screenings 


Southwestern  Milling  Company,  The, 
Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings. 

Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings. 

Stanard-Tilton  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings  not 
exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings  not 
exceeding  Mill  Run  t2 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings  not 
exceeding  Mill  Run 


7684 


6.588 

6.588 

6588 


5967 


6084 


7598 

7598 


6973 


.59-24 

5924 


7013 

7013 

7013 

5376 

5376 


7375 

7375 


1972 


4368 


3036 


3563 


2611 

4246 

4834 


1680 


25.54 


3756 

5320 


1.557 


1786 

1968 


2074 

3696 

3696 

1504 

4769 


2341 

4826 


3.538 


Sample  secured  from 


Pickering  & Son,  Anderson. 
Manufacturers  


Manufacturer 


Manufacturer  

Manufacturer  

Wesley  Miller  Plour  & Peed  Co., 
South  Bend  


Walker  & Chambers,  Wheatland 


Middlebury  Grain  Co., 

Middlebury  

O.  W.  Gotto,  Michigan  City 

.1.  R.  Starr,  Winamac 


P.  Backer  & Son,  Troy. 


I.uebcke  Bros.,  Crown  Point 

Jacob  Simmerman,  Eaton 


B.  I.  Holser  & Co.,  Walkerton.. 
Thomas  & Hickman,  Corydon.. 
Thomas  & Hickman,  Corydon.. 

Alfred  Collyer,  Palmouth  

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart 


Manufacturers 

Manufacturers 


Manufacturers 

Manufacturers 


3 


10.1 

10.2 

10.0 


11.4 

10.1 


8.9 


8.6 

11.0 

8.9 


10.1 

11.0 


10.0 

10.6 

10.8 

8.9 

10.6 


10.1 

8.1 


Crude 
Fat  A 
per  cent. 


Crude 
Protein 
per cent 


Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

3.5 

5.8 

14.0 

3.0 

3.4 

13.0 

3.8 

4.5 

14.0 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

4.0 

4.8 

15.0 

5.0 

5.8 

17.1 

5.0 

5.7 

15.0 

5.0 

5.7 

15.0 

4.5 

5.6 

16.5 

3.5 

4.6 

17.0 

3.5 

4.6 

17.0 

4.0 

4.9 

15.0 

4.0 

4.4 

15.0 

4.0 

4.0 

15.0 

4.0 

5.3 

15.0 

4.0 

4.3 

15.0 

3.5 

3.7 

14.0 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

4.5 

4.5 

16.0 

3.5 

4.7 

14,0 

16.5 

16.3 

15.2 


15.6 

15.6 


15.6 

17.0 


15.9 

15.5 

16.9 


16.1 


17.9 

18.0 


17.7 

17.4 

16.5 

17.1 

16.8 


17.6 

17.3 


16.8 

16.9 


tt  Xot  tagged.  Isabels  furnished 

206  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Isabels  No.  74  P 
i'liriiished 


1 Relabeled  No.  7598 

Wheat  bran.  Relabeled  No.  5257 


Found 


8i 


TADLC  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


, . 

Number 

Crude 

Crude 

X'  • 

Ah 

jrrui 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

per  cent. 

per  cent. 

! Official 

m 

r! 

Moistu] 

per  cen 

j Guar- 
anteed 

1 Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Company, 

. 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Valier’s  Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground 

0157 

1952 

M,  O’.  Harri.*?,  O’horntnwn 

8.9 

5.0 

5.1 

16.0 

19.0 

Valier’s  Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground 

Wheat  Se.reenings 

6157 

3306 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Co., 

Terre  Haute  

9.4 

5.0 

5.9 

16.0 

17.9 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat  Stand- 

ard  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 

5465 

1959 

R.  S.  Stall  & Co.,  Thorntown... 

9.4 

5.0 

5.5 

15.0 

15.5 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat  Stand- 

ard  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings not  exeeeding  Mill  Run 

5465 

1972 

Connell,  Anderson  Grain  Co., 
Beeson  . ..  

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat  Stand- 
ard Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 

9.7 

5.0 

6.3 

15.0 

16.2 

ings  not  exeeeding  Mill  Run 

5465 

1974 

Dr.  J.  E.  King  & Porter  Alley, 
Milton  

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

10.2 

5.0 

6.5 

15.0 

16.2 

Mill  Run  

7230 

2158 

A.  C.  Heitschmidt, 

Michigan  City  _ ..  

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

9.6 

4.0 

6.2 

14.0 

16.8 

Mill  Run  ...  ...  

7230 

2584 

Frank  H.  Wright,  Brookville 

9.6 

4.0 

5.5 

14.0 

15.8 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run  

7230 

2S41 

Robert  Crawfotd,  Crothersville. 

8.6 

4.0 

5.6 

14.0 

15.6 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run  . ... . 

7230 

2980 

Knecht  Milling  Co., 

Hartford  City  ..  

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

8.8 

4.0 

5.8 

14.0 

15.7 

Mill  Run  . . 

7230 

3357 

Collingwood  Bros., 

Willow  Branch  

ttWheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

9.5 

4.0 

5.5 

14.0 

15.4 

Mill  Run  

7230 

4555 

Sanitary  Milk  Depot,  Lafayette 

7.8 

4.0 

5.5 

14.0 

16.5 

tfWheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run 

7230 

4556 

J.  C.  F.  Martin  & Son, 
LaFontaine  ....  

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

8.3 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

18.5 

Mill  Run . ._ 

7230 

460C 

Indiana  School  for  Feeble  Mind- 

Wheat Standard  Middlings  with 

ed  Youth,  Fort  W’ayne 

8.7 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

15.8 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run  _ ... 

7230 

4864 

9.7 

4.0 

5.4 

14.0 

16.8 

Farmers  Elevator,  Monticello... 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run ..  

7230 

4865 

J.  E.  Buchanan  & Son, 

Lake  Cicott  

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

9.3 

4.0 

6.4 

14.0 

16.2 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run 

7230 

4836 

J.  E.  Buchanan  & Son, 

Lake  Cicott  

10.0 

4.0 

5.2 

14.0 

16.5 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 

Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  and  Ground  Screenings. 
Wheat  Shorts  and  Ground  Screenings. 
Wheat  Shorts  and  Ground  Screenings. 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 

7215 

7215 

7215 

2907 

3087 

5050 

Manufacturers  

Manufacturers 

10.7 

9.9 

4.5 

4.5 

4.0 

4.9 

16.5 

16.5 

17.2 

18.1 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

4.5 

5.2 

16.5 

16.8 

WHEAT  3IIDDLINGS 

Acme  Milling  Company,  The, 

Aurora,  Ind. 

Bran  Middling.*? 

970 

3605 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.9 

4.8 

14.2 

16.1 

Bachman,  Valentine,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Bachman’s  Cleaned  Wheat  Product... 

6950 

3402 

Karl  H.  Schaefer,  Indianapolis.. 

11.4 

3.7 

4.4 

16.0 

15.8 

Bachman's  Cleaned  Wheat  Product 

6950 

4812 

J.  F.  Jones,  Plainfield 

8.7 

3.7 

4.4 

16.0 

16.0 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


82 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

Crude 

c 

Protein 

LABEL 

o 

•43 

Sample  secured  from 

per  cent. 

per  cent. 

Official 

CD 

a 

-2  ^ 
^ y 

■3 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found  1 

Bainton  Bros.,  Buchanan,  Mich. 

Ba, intons  Bran  and  Shorts 

7026 

3761 

A.  C.  Heitschmidt, 

Michigan  City 

10.7 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

14.5 

Bristow  Flouring  Mills,  Bristow,  Ind. 

Meunier  & Weavers  Mixed  Feed 

4695 

1517 

Manufacturers 

10.3 

3.0 

4.3 

13.0 

17.1 

Brizius  Company,  The  Chas.  W., 

Newburgh,  Ind. 

Eagle  Mixed  Feed 

5927 

3830 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

4.0 

4.9 

15.1 

18.0 

Eagle  Mixed  Feed  . . _ 

5927 

5120 

The  Chas.  W.  Brizius  Co., 
Evansville 

9.7 

4.0 

4.7 

15.1 

16.6 

Cayuga  Milling  Company,  Cayuga,  Ind. 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Mixed  Wheat 

Bran  Wheat  Shorts 

419 

2418 

Manufacturers 

8.8 

3.9 

4.2 

14.0 

j 16.5 

1 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Mixed  Wheat 

Bran  & Wheat  Shorts 

419 

4480 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.9 

4.4 

14.0 

15.9 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Mixed  Wheat 

Bran  & Wheat  Shorts 

419 

5149 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

3.9 

4.1 

14.0 

15.2 

Clayton  Milling  Company,  Clayton,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7665 

4814 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.0 

4.3 

13.0 

15.7 

Columbus  Milling  Company, 

Columbus,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

652 

3466 

Manufacturers 

11.3 

3.5 

4.1 

14.0 

16.1 

Mixed  Feed 

652 

4714 

Manufacturers 

9.1 

3.5 

4.3 

14.0 

15.6 

Dalrymple,  J.  W.,  Rising  Sun,  Ind. 

Bran  & Shorts 

810 

2924 

Manufacturers 

11.0 

3.8 

4.7 

14.0 

16.5 

Eckert,  Andrew  W.,  Jasper,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Shorts  Mixed  73 

3300 

3795 

Manufacturer  

8.6 

4.0 

5.2 

14.0 

15.3 

Ewing  Mill  Company,  Ewing,  Ind. 

Ewine-  Mill  Co’s  Mixed  Feed 

2497 

4150 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

15.4 

Ewing  Mill  Co’s  Mixed  Feed 

2497 

4727 

R.  W.  Wrape,  North  Vernon 

9.5 

3.8 

3.7 

14.0 

15.2 

Farmers  Milling  & Elevator  Company, 

1 

Veedersburg,  Ind. 

No.  1 Mixed  Feed 

5598 

4470 

Manufacturers  

8.6 

4.0 

3.9 

14.0 

16.0 

Ftilks,  Willard,  R.  R.  No.  32, 

Columbus,  Ind. 

FUlks’  Mixed  Feed 

7113 

2398 

Manufacturer  

10.4 

3.5 

4.1 

14.0 

16.1 

Garrett  & Funk,  Liberty  Center,  Ind. 

12.1 

3.8 

3.9 

15.1 

Bran  & Shorts 

3796 

1653 

Manufacturers  

14.0 

Wheat  Bran  & Middlings 

5123 

4687 

Manufacturers  ..  . 

9.6 

2.5 

3.7 

12.5 

15.5 

Gaston  Roller  Mill,  Gaston,  Ind. 

10.1 

3.0 

3.8 

13.0 

16.8 

Wheat  Bran  & Middlings 

5508 

2115 

Manufacturers  

Wheat  Bran  & Middlings  74  _ 

5508 

4900 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

8.8 

3.0 

3.7 

13.0 

16.1 

On.,  Oastnn  ... 

Wheat  Bran  & Middlings 

5508 

4904 

Manufacturers  ..  .. 

9.3 

3.0 

4.4 

13.0 

17.2 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

10.7 

4.0 

3.5 

14.0 

16.0 

Bran  & Middlings 

3904 

1841 

Manufacturer  

Greenfield  Milling  Company, 

Greenfield,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

4468 

2741 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.0 

4.0 

15.0 

18.3 

Greenfield  Mills,  Greenfield  Mills,  Ind. 

9.9 

4.0 

3.9 

14.0 

14.1 

Mixed  Feed 

2412 

4342 

Heaton,  E.  H.,  R.  R.  No.  12, 

Manufacturers  | 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed _ 

5931 

4915 

Manufacturer  1 1 

9.8 

3.0 

4.2 

13.5 

16.5 

■^3  % ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7750  Wheat  bran.  2 tons  withdrawn.  Relabeled 

No.  8056 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent.  i 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Holland,  Thos.  A.,  Fort  Eitner,  Ind. 

5305 

4152 

Mannfaetnrer 

9.7 

3.5 

3.5 

13.5 

15.3 

Huntington  Mill  Company, 

Huntington,  Ind. 

493 

3995 

Manufacturers 

10.8 

3.9 

4.1 

14.2 

15.1 

Jay  Grain  Company,  The, 

Mulberry  Branch,  Mulberry,  Ind. 

.Tny’p  Wbpat,  Bran  and  Rhorts 

38 

2964 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

4.0 

3.4 

14.0 

15.7 

7716 

4421 

The  Jay  Grain  Co.,  Elwood 

10.9 

3.0 

3.5 

14.0 

14.8 

Jones  & Son,  C.  N.,  Wabash,  Ind. 

7733 

4385 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

3.0 

4.4 

14.0 

15.5 

Karnes,  Lubert,  Martinsburg,  Ind. 

527 

4053 

Manufacturer 

10.0 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

15.5 

Rpd  Winp-  Dairy  Bppd 

527 

4972 

Manufacturer  _ _ 

10.0 

3.8 

3.7 

14.0 

14^0 

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Kehlor’s  Mill  Feed  

935 

3681 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Crawfordsville  

10.8 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

17.1 

King,  0.  M.,  Marion,  R.  R.  No.  4,  Ind. 

5482 

2296 

Manufacturer 

10.3 

3.0 

3.5 

10.0 

14.8 

Lefforge,  Otto,  Rossville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7054 

4495 

Manufacturer 

10.1 

3.0 

3.7 

14.0 

15.0 

Mixed  Bppd 

7054 

5140 

Manufacturer 

9.8 

3.0 

3.1 

14.0 

14!3 

Mexico  Roller  Mills,  Mexico,  Ind. 

% 

ATill  Rnn  Rppd 

4011 

2219 

Mannfaptnrfirs 

11.8 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

14.8 

Mill  Rnn  Feed 

4011 

3524 

Manufacturers 

10.9 

3.8 

3.7 

14.0 

15!o 

Modoc  Roller  Mills  & Elevator 

Company,  Modoc,  Ind. 

Wheat,  Bran  Rhnrts 

5350 

1483 

Manufacturers 

11.5 

3.9 

3.9 

14.0 

15.6 

Nipp,  John,  Rushville,  R.  R.  No.  10,  Ind. 

Bran  A;  Middling.*? 

2686 

1503 

Manufacturer 

10.3 

3.5 

3.7 

13.0 

17.1 

Norris  & Kidwell,  Washington,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Middling*? 

6281 

3898 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

4.0 

3 5 

14.7 

17.0 

Wheat  Bran  and  Middlings 

6281 

5234 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

4.0 

3.4 

147 

15!9 

Plainville  Milling  Company, 

Plainville,  Ind. 

Millfeed  __  

5057 

2008 

Manufacturers 

10.3 

3.5 

4.5 

14.0 

17.6 

Millfppd 

5057 

3902 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.5 

4.4 

14.0 

17.0 

Millfppd 

5057 

5258 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

3.5 

3.9 

14.’o 

16.4 

Rapier  Grain  & Seed  Company, 

Owensboro,  Ky. 

Rhipstnff 

7692 

3806 

James  B.  Young,  Rockport 

9.5 

3.5 

4.5 

15.5 

17.9 

Sagers’  Mill,  Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

6189 

1854 

Manufacturers 

11.2 

3.0 

3.5 

13.0 

15.0 

Mixed  Feed  _ _ 

6189 

3048 

Manufaeturers  . . 

10.9 

3.0 

3.4 

13.0 

15.4 

Mixed  Feed  

6189 

4761 

Manufacturers 

11.0 

3,0 

3.9 

13!o 

16!9 

Schnell,  Joseph,  Schnellville,  Ind. 

Shipstnff 

7088 

3736 

Manufacturer 

9.2 

2.5 

4.6 

12.0 

17  3 

Shipstuff  

7088 

5055 

M.  Schuppert  & Sons,  Depauw__ 

9.5 

2.5 

4.6 

12^0 

15!i 

Smith,  D.  R.,  Tipton,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  .. 

4081 

2368 

Manufacturer 

11.3 

3.0 

4.1 

14.0 

15.4 

Mixed  Feed  . . ___  __ 

4081 

4445 

Manufacturer 

10.3 

3.0 

4^6 

14!o 

16.'5 

Smock  & Caca,  Noblesville,  Ind. 

Bran  and  Shorts 

1424 

4448 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.8 

4.4 

14.5 

15.6 

84 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  • 
per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

P 

.2 

‘43 
o . 

ai 

P 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Snoddy,  M.  W.,  Covington,  R.  R.  No.  1, 

Ind. 

Bran  and  Middlings  

4717 

4487 

Manufacturer  _ 

10.3 

3.0 

3.8 

14.0 

16.1 

Star  Roller  Mills,  The,  Burlington,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

3627 

3911 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

3.0 

4.3 

i 14.0 

16. 1 

Sullivan  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Sullivan,  Ind. 

6977 

1749 

W.  P.  Hopkins  Co.,  Dugger 

12.3 

3.4 

3.3 

V’  0 

15.4 

Mixed  Feed  

6977 

4020 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

3.4 

3.5 

12.0 

15.5 

Swayzee  Milling  Company,  Swayzee,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Shorts  

4475 

4691 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

3.8 

4.5 

13.5 

16.7 

Wheat  Bran  & Shorts 

4475 

5276 

Chas.  Kelly  &,  Son,  Fairmount.. 

9.5 

3.8 

5.0 

13!5 

17M 

Taylor,  .John  H.,  Ogilvilie,  Ind. 

Taylors  Mixed  Feed  _ 

801 

2397 

Manufacturer  _ 

10.5 

3.8 

3.7 

14.0 

16.1 

Victoria  Milling  Company,  The, 

Jasper,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2608 

3797 

Manufacturers 

8.3 

3.5 

4.5 

14.0 

17.3 

Walton  & Whisler,  Atlanta,  Ind. 

i 

1 

Mixefl  Feed  7.'. 

110 

2378 

Abbott  Milling  Co  , Elvvnnd 

11.7 

3.8 

' 3 4 

14.0 

15.0 

Mixed  Feed  

110 

2406 

Manufacturers  _ 

9.3 

3.8 

3.3 

i 14.0 

i 14.7 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 

1 

Ziliak’s  Shipstuff  __  _ 

5850 

3078 

Fort  Branch  Milling  Co., 

Fort  Branch  

10.2 

4.5 

'4.2 

16.5 

17.1 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 

1 

WHEAT  MIDDEINGS,  SCREEN- 

INGS 

! 

.A.cme-Evans  Company, 

j 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme-Feed  __  ..  _ 

5588 

1962 

Thorntown  Grain  Co.,  Thorn- 

town  _ - _ ...  ... 

9.6 

4.0 

4.4 

16.0 

16.7 

ttAeme-Feed  

5588 

3033 

U.  G.  McCoy  & Co.,  V^incennes.. 

10.1 

4.0 

4.2 

16.0 

j 15.5 

ttAcrne-Feed  __  

5588 

3034 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  Vincennes 

10.1 

4.0 

4.2 

16.0 

15.5 

Acme-Feed  __  

5588 

4661 

H.  Borgerding,  New  Albany..  .. 

8.3 

4.0 

4.4 

16.0 

15.8 

Ballard  & Ballard  Company, 

1 

Eouisville,  Ky. 

Ballard’s  Mixed  Feed 

5273 

2465 

George  H.  Denser,  Charlestown. 

8.0 

4.1 

4.2 

15.0 

14.5 

Ballard’s  Mixed  Feed  

5273 

3668 

Ballard  & Ballard  Co., 

Charlestown  ...  . 

9.9 

4.1 

4.0 

15.0 

14.7 

Ballard’s  Mixed  Feed 

5273 

4.565 

Mathys  & Flynn,  Mauckport 

9.1 

4.1 

4.2! 

15.0 

15.1 

Bernet,  Craft  & Kauffman  Milling 

1 

Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

1 

Mixed  Feed 

.5519 

44.58 

N.  AV.  Mattix  & Co.,  Lebanon.. 

9.3 

4.0 

3.9 

14.5 

16.9 

Blanton  Milling  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

The  Blanton  Mixed  Feed 

3805 

1984 

W.  P.  Oldendorf,  Lebanon 

9.9 

3.7 

4.5 

15.7 

16.5 

The  iflanton  Mixed  Feed 

3805 

4919 

E.  H.  Heaton,  Indianapolis 

8.8 

3.7 

4.1 

15.7 

15.3 

Blish  Milling  Company,  Seymour,  Ind. 

Bidls’  Kye  Mixed  Feed 

2179 

2469 

T.  A.  Pass,  Sellersburg 

9.3 

4.5 

4.5 

16.0 

15.9 

Bulls’  Eye  Mixed  Feed 

2179 

3544 

F.  T.  Semon,  Vernon... 

9.9 

4.5 

4.3 

16.0 

17.2 

Ihills’  Kve  Mixpd  Feed 

7939 

5038 

C.  C.  James,  Lexington 

9.1 

3.2 

4.4 

14.2 

15.8 

Boonville  Milling  Company, 

B()onville,  Ind. 

“A”  Mixed  Feed 

2244 

3835 

Manufacturers  ..  .. 

9.9 

3.8 

4.0 

17.0 

Boston  Milling  Company,  Eckerty,  Ind. 

14.0  j 

Bobbitt’s  Mixed  Feed 

3453 

3725 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.7 

3.6 

14.0  i 

15.8 

tt  Vot  tagged.  I..abels  furnishei’  '''*  Mj  ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7215 

gra«le  flour  jn'esent 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent.  j 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

is 

O 

.2 

‘fj 

o . 

(D 

1 'O 

rt 

O rt 

'O 

1 

I 'O 
u 

rt  « 

^ c 

O rt 

1 

Burge-Thomas  Milling  Company, 

Marion,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2388 

Manufacturers  

11.8 

3.8 

4.2 

14.0 

15.2 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook,  Nappanee,  Ind. 

6919 

4237 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

4.5 

4.5 

14.0 

14.3 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

26.52 

3486 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

4.0 

4.3 

15.5 

16.5 

2652 

3557 

Barney  Eder,  North  Vernon 

10.3 

4.0 

4.5 

15.5 

18.2 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  & Wheat  Screen- 

7207 

2363 

Martin  Cutsinger,  Edinburg 

10.4 

4.0 

4.2 

15.0 

17.7 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  & Wheat  Screen- 

7207 

3510 

C.  G.  Hunger,  Madison 

9.8 

4.0 

4.1 

15.0 

17.7 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  & Wheat  Screen- 

ings  

7207 

3692 

Seottsburg  Milling  Co., 

Seottsburg  

10.3 

4.0 

4.3 

15.0 

17.8 

Emison,  J.  & S.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Emi.snn’.s  Mixed  Feed  Middlings 

5768 

1685 

Ray  Newsome,  Bicknell 

9.3 

3.5 

4.5 

14.0 

16.7 

Fuhrer-Ford  Milling  Company, 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed— Wheat  Bran,  Middlings 

and  Screenings  _ __  _ __  

2386 

3249 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

3.9 

5.0 

14.0 

15.6 

Mixed  Feed — Wheat  Bran,  Middlings 

and  Screenings  

2386 

4205 

Tapp  & Bridwell,  Bloomington. 

10.3 

3.9 

4.6 

14.0 

16.2 

Mixed  Feed— Wheat  Bran,  Middlings 

and  Screenings 

2386 

5067 

Manufacturers  _ 

8.5 

3.9 

3.9 

14.0 

14.8 

Harris  Milling  Company, 

Greencastle,  Ind. 

Harris’  Mixed  Feed 

212 

2998 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

3.5 

4.0 

14.1 

17.0 

Hartford  City  Grain  & Milling 

Company,  Hartford  City,  Ind. 

Cooley’s  Mixed  Feed 

2.371 

1707 

P.  W.  Havens,  Hartford  City.. 

11.4 

3.0 

4.4 

12.0 

15.7 

Cooley’s  Mixed  Feed  

2371 

2977 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.0 

4.3 

12.0 

15.5 

Haysville  Milling  Company,  Haysville, 

(Jasper  R.  R.  No.  3),  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed . _ 

6020' 

4549 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.0 

4.5 

13.0 

15.9 

Hunter-Robinson-Wenz  Milling 

Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mixed  Feed 

5218 

2718 

J.  Henderson  & Sons,  Bedford.. 

9.4 

4.0 

4.2 

15.0 

17.7 

Mixed  Feed  

5218 

3723 

Milltown  Milling  Co.,  Milltown.. 

10.2 

4.0 

3.8 

15.0 

17.7 

ItMixed  Feed 

5218 

3950 

Purity  Bakery  Co.,  Linton 

10.4 

4.0 

4.6 

15.0 

17.2 

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Kehlor’s  Millfeed  

7508 

3747 

G.  Eberhardt  & Son,  Dale 

9.9 

4.0 

4.1 

15.0 

17.1 

Kemper  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Anchor  Mixed  Feed  with  Screenings 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

7248 

2227 

Stafford  Grain  Co.,  Jamestown 

10.4 

4.0 

4.4 

16.0 

17.6 

Lawrenceburg  Roller  Mills  Company, 

Lawrenceburg,  Ind. 

Snowflake  Mixed  Feed 

2275 

3617 

Milan  Mill  & Elevator,  Milan 

10.0 

4.3 

4.5 

15.2 

16.1 

Snowflake  Mixed  Feed 

2275 

4724 

Milan  Mill  & Elevator,  Milan... 

9.2 

4.3 

4.5 

15.2 

16.1 

Golden  Bull  Mixed  Feed 

7112 

3464 

Newcomb  & Whitehorn, 

Columbus  ...  _ 

11.2 

2.5 

4.5 

16.0 

17.5 

Golden  Bull  Mixed  Feed 

7112 

3687 

Hodapp  Hominy  Co.,  Seymour.. 

9.1 

2.5 

4.3 

16.0 

17.6 

Logan,  George,  Shirley,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed . 

6894 

.3356 

Manufacturer  

10.1 

3.0 

3.9 

13.0 

16.5 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  Wheat  bran 

Corn  bran  and  grit  present 


86 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent.  j 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Louisville  JMilling  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Wheat  Mixed  Eeed  with  Ground 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run___ 

6333 

2484 

John  Gienger  & Co., 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with  Ground 

Jeffersonville  

9.2 

4.0 

4.2 

14.5 

14.5 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run— 

6333 

3663 

John  Gienger  & Co., 

Jeffersonville  

10.2 

4.0 

4.3 

14.5 

16.5 

Markland  Roller  Mills,  Markland,  Ind. 

Mixed  Reed 

1260 

2916 

Manufaet,nrer.s  . . 

10.5 

3.8 

4.5 

14.0 

16.3 

Medora  Mill  Company,  Medora,  Ind. 

Medora,  Mixed  Feed 

526 

2834 

Manufaeturer.s  _ __  _ 

8.8 

3.6 

4.1 

14.0 

17.5 

Medora  Mixed  Feed 

526 

4162 

Manufacturers 

9.2 

3.6 

4,3 

14.0 

16.8 

Moore  Milling  Company,  R.  P., 

Princeton,  Ind. 

The  King  Mixed  Feed 

2370 

1645 

Geo.  W.  Woods,  Princeton 

10.3 

3.7 

3.4 

14.0 

15.4 

Nashville  Roller  Mills,  Nashville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7123 

2936 

Manufacturers 

11.6 

2.5 

2.8 

12.0 

14.5 

Mixed  Feed 

7123 

4705 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

2.5 

3.1 

12.0 

14.0 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mixed  Feed  or  Mill  Run  with  Screen- 

ings  

5216 

2170 

Martinsville  Milling  Co., 

Mixed  Feed  or  Mill  Run  with  Screen- 

Martinsville   

10.4 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

16.8 

ings  

5216 

2698 

J.  F.  Collier,  MitehelL. 

9.5 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

17.2 

Mixed  Feed  or  Mill  Run  with  Screen- 

ings — 

5216 

4048 

Farmers  Feed  Store,  Borden 

10.5 

4.0 

4.6 

14.0 

17.2 

Mixed  Feed  or  Mill  Run  with  Screen- 

ings   

5216 

4723 

John  Hallowell,  North  Vernon__ 

8.4 

4.0 

4.7 

14.0 

15.4 

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

N.  M.  Co’s  Mixed  Feed 

5243 

1727 

Conk  Xr,  Aukerman,  Redkey 

10.0 

4.0 

5.3 

16.0 

15.8 

N.  M.  Co’s  Mixed  Feed 

5243 

4443 

The  Hollett-Winders  Grain  Co., 

Arcadia  

9.6 

4.0 

4.6 

16.0 

16.1 

N.  M.  Co’s  Mixed  Feed  _ __ 

5243 

4945 

Kelly  & Son,  Fairmount 

8.6 

4.0 

4.4 

16.0 

17.0 

Orangeville  Flouring  Mills,  'The, 

Orleans,  R.  R.  No.  2,  Ind. 

N.  C.  Felknor’s  Mixed  Feed 

4649 

4113 

Manufacturers 

9.1 

2.7 

4.2 

12.5 

17.4 

Phoenix  Flour  Mill,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Phoenix  “A”  Mixed  Feed 

2253 

5133 

W.  A.  Browning  Milling  Co., 

Evansville  

10.3 

4.0 

4.0 

15.0 

14.7 

Plant  Milling  Company,  Geo.  P., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mixed  Feed  & Screenings 

4754 

2030 

G.  O.  Jean,  Bloomfield 

10.9 

3.5 

4.6 

15.0 

16.4 

Mixed  Feed  & Screenings  

4754 

3639 

Chas.  W.  Curtis,  Aurora 

10.0 

3.5 

4.5 

15.0 

16.8 

Princeton  Milling  Company, 

Princeton,  Ind. 

Star  Brand  Mixed  Feed 

1978 

1642 

Weise-Welborne  Grain  Co., 

Princeton  _ 

9.4 

3.5 

4.1 

13.0 

16.9 

Star  Brand  Mixed  Feed  _ _ . . 

1978 

3073 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

3.5 

3.9 

13.0 

17.4 

Star  Brand  Mixed  Feed 

1978 

3074 

Manufacturers 

9.2 

3.5 

4.0 

13.0 

17.4 

Star  Brand  Mixed  Feed  __  . _ 

1978 

5046 

Manufacturers 

9.0 

3.5 

4.1 

13.0 

16.1 

Star  Brand  Mixed  Feed  

1978 

5047 

Manufacturers 

8.1 

3.5 

4.1 

13.0 

16.2 

Rockport  Milling  Company, 

Rockport,  Ind. 

**Mixed  Feed  No  Corn  Bran  1 

1570 

Manufacturers 

10.6 

4.1 

15.5 

Schaefer  & Schwartzkopf, 

Columbus,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

4522 

3461 

Manufacturers 

12.0 

3.5 

3.9 

14.0 

16.4 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

4.522 

4709 

McCoy  & Garten,  Columbus 

9.6 

3.5 

3.9 

14.0 

15.1 

**  Not  registered  78  wheat  bran  and  screenings 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

1 

Sample  secured  from 

2^’ 

Official 

CO 

C 

5 ^ 

m « 

o ^ 

S ft 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Sparks  Milling  Company,  Alton,  111. 

Try  Me  Winter  Mixed  Feed.  _ 

6537 

2581 

Fieber  & Holmes,  Brookville 

9.7 

3.5 

4.7 

16.0 

16.8 

Try  Me  Winter  Mixed  Feed 

6537 

2723 

Habig  Bros.,  Indianapolis 

J.  W.  Linkhart  & Son, 

9.0 

3.5 

4.0 

16.0 

17.8 

Try  Me  Winter  Mixed  Feed  . 

6537 

3546 

North  Vernon 

9.3 

3.5 

4.2 

16.0 

17.9 

Try  Me  Mixed  Feed 

7687 

3558 

W.  P.  Neel,  Holton 

9.6 

3.5 

4.4 

16.0 

18.0 

7687 

4557 

.1,  N.  Shoemaker,  Borden 

9.6 

3.5 

5.0 

16.0 

16.6 

Sparks  Milling  Company, 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Wabash  Mixed  Feed 

3011 

1747 

li.  A.  Nesbit,  Sullivan 

10.2 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

16.1 

Wabash  Mixed  Feed  

3011 

2693 

T.  H.  Owens  & Co.,  Bedford 

9.7 

3.5 

3.9 

14.0 

17.8 

Trow  Company,  W.,  Madison,  Ind. 
n’rnw’s  Mixed  Feed 

1965 

3539 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

4.0 

4.5 

14.0 

16.5 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Valier’s  Mixed  Feed 

6127 

1953 

M.  T.  Harris,  Thorntown 

9.1 

4.0 

5.0 

15.0 

17.9 

Valier’s  Mixed  Feed  _ 

6127 

3293 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Co., 

Terre  Haute 

9.7 

4.0 

4.9 

15.0 

16.3 

Wallace  Milling  Company,  The, 

Dale,  Ind. 

Wallaee’.s  Mixed  Feed 

172 

1510 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.9 

4.2 

14.2 

17.6 

Wallace’s  Mixed  Feed 

172 

3749 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

3.9 

3.9 

14.2 

17.4 

Walton  & Whisler,  Atlanta,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed  . _ 

7638 

4436 

Manufacturer.s 

10.4 

3.0 

3.6 

14.0 

15.6 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with  Ground 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with  Ground 

7231 

4286 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 
Co..  Westfield 

9.2 

4.0 

5.4 

14.0 

16.1 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run___ 

7231 

4525 

Farmers  Elevator  Co., 

.Tamest  own 

8.8 

4.0 

5.0 

14.0 

15.8 

Wright  Milling  Company, 

Paris  Crossing,  Ind. 

“A”  Mixed  Feed  _ 

2508 

3553 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

16.4 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company,  The, 
Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Ziliak’s  Mixed  Feed  _ _ . _ . _ 

276 

2906 

Manufacturers 

10.6 

3.7 

4.6 

14.0 

16.9 

Ziliak’s  Mixed  Feed 

276 

1 

3084 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.7 

4.4 

14.0 

17.2 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  SCREEN- 
INGS, SALT 

Akin-Erskine  Milling  Company, 
Evansville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

1 

6047 

1565 

.Teff  Rav  & Son.  Rockport 

11.1 

4.0 

3.9 

15.0 

16.5 

Mixed  Feed 

6047 

2535 

Pete  Weidner,  Jeffersonville 

10.2 

4.0 

4.3 

15.0 

16.6 

ttMixed  Feed 

6047 

3080 

R.  P.  Moore  Milling  Co., 
Princeton 

10.2 

4.0 

3.3 

15.0 

15.7 

Mixed  Feed 

6047 

3102 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville 

8.8 

4.0 

4.0 

15.0 

16.8 

MIXED  FEED;  AVHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  SCREEN- 
INGS, CLEANINGS 

Garland  Milling  Company, 

Greensburg,  Ind. 

Garland  Mixed  Feed 

7280 

3181 

Manufacturers 

10.3 

4.0 

4.2 

15.5 

15.8 

Garland  Mixed  Feed 

7280 

4701 

.John  Crum,  Milan 

8.7 

4.0 

4.2 

15.5 

15.7 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CHAFF 

Friedrich  & Son,  C.  W.,  Dyer,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2716 

1713 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

3.5 

4.0 

14.0 

17.6 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


88 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 
Fat  • 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

c 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

2^' 

Official 

O . 

3) 

c 

5 I' 

S ft 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Vevay  Flour  Mills,  Vevay,  Ind. 

1261 

2920 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.7 

3.7 

14.0 

14.9 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN 

Acme  Milling  Company,  The, 

Aurora,  Ind. 

3607 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.7 

4.9 

13.6 

15.7 

Berne  Milling  Company,  Berne,  Ind. 
Berne  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  & Corn 

1117 

1799 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.8 

3.8 

14.0 

15.6 

Berne  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  & Corn 

1117 

4160 

Manufacturers  

8.5 

3.8 

3.8 

14.0 

16.1 

Boldt  & Son,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

5456 

3020 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.5 

4.4 

13.0 

14.6 

Clark  & Sons,  C.  G.,  Rushville,  Ind. 
Clark’s  Corn  & Wheat  Bran  (Mixed).. 

185 

2588 

J.  R.  McKee,  Connersville 

10.0 

3.7 

3.8 

14.0 

17.2 

Clark’s  Corn  & Wheat  Bran  (Mixed).. 

185 

3054 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

3.7 

4.2 

14.0 

14.4 

Clark’s  Corn  & Wheat  Bran  (Mixed).. 

185 

5041 

Manufacturers  

8.3 

3.7 

4.2 

14.0 

15.8 

Clayton  Milling  Company,  Clayton,  Ind. 

2525 

2985 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.7 

3.9 

14.0 

15.3 

Coal  City  Milling  Company, 

Coal  City,  Ind. 

Coal  C’tv  Mixed  Bran 

6601 

2782 

Manufacturers  .. 

9.6 

3.5 

4.0 

13.5 

16.8 

Coal  City  Mixed  Bran 

6601 

4518 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.5 

4.2 

13.5 

15.6 

Columbia  City  Mill  & Elevator 

Company,  The,  Columbia  City,  Ind. 

■Miypd  'Rran 

2701 

1.529 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.5 

3.9 

14.0 

15.9 

Mivpd  Bran 

2701 

3939 

Manufacturers  . 

9.6 

3.5 

3.9 

14.0 

16.0 

Mixed  Bran 

2701 

4989 

Manufacturers  

8.4 

3.5 

3.8 

14.0 

15.6 

Dilger  Bros.,  Mariah,  Hill,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  . ..  

3181 

1508 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

3.0 

4.0 

13.0 

16.1 

Mixed  Bran  

3181 

3745 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.0 

3.6 

13.0 

17.9 

Haynes  Milling  Company,  The, 

Portland,  Ind. 

T^ran  

4094 

1771 

Manufacturers  ..  

10.3 

3.5 

3.9 

15.2 

15.5 

Bran  ..  

4094 

4139 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

3.5 

4.3 

15.2 

16.3 

HollingsAvorth,  S.  P.,  Russiaville,  Ind. 
Hollingsworth’s  Bran  Feed  

1519 

1473 

Manufacturer  

10.2 

3.8 

4.0 

13.0 

16.5 

Hubbard  & Company,  W.  H., 

Monrovia,  Ind. 

Bra  n 

994 

2209 

J.  Wb  Hubbard,  Monrovia 

10.3 

10.5 

4.0 

4.2 

13.0 

15.4 

Imperial  Mills,  The, 

Cambridge  City,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  

1752 

•2887 

Manufacturers  

3.2 

4.3 

12.0 

15.8 

Jamestown  Milling  Company, 
Jamestown,  Ind. 

Noxemall  J5ran  

.5656 

2229 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.0 

4.4 

13.5 

15.5 

Noxemall  Bran  

5656 

4522 

Manufacturers  

8.5 

3.0 

4.6 

13.5 

15.5 

Keplinger,  Chas.,  Zanesville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran 

3486 

2240 

Keplinger  & Sons,'  Zanesville 

11.0 

3.5 

3.8 

14.0 

13.6 

I.aFayette  Milling  Company,  The, 

La  Fayette,  Ind. 

Mixed  Jhan  . ..  

117 

1695 

T.  C.  Martin,  Lafayette..  

11.5 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

14.0 

Naber  & Company,  Chas.  F., 

Alexandria,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  

6574 

23.54 

Ma'nufacturers  

11.1 

3.0 

3.6 

13.0 

16.3 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Ridgeville  Roller  Mills  & Elevator, 
Ridgeville,  Ind. 

Bran  

Salem  Milling  Company,  Salem,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed  

Mixed  Feed  

Taylor-Hitz  Company,  Madison,  Ind. 
Bran  

Titus  & Delph,  Shirley,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  

Wellington  Milling  Company, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Wellington  A.  X.  A.  Mixed  Bran 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN  RYE  BRAN, 
SCREENINGS 

Starr  Mills,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN,  SCREENINGS 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Amo,  Ind. 

Amo  Feed 

Anchor  Milling  Company, 

Rochester,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Mixed  Feed  

Bergenroth  Bros.,  Troy,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  & Screenings 

Mixed  Bran  & Screenings 

Bock,  Leonard,  Argos,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Mixed  Feed  

Cadick  Milling  Company, 

Grandview,  Ind. 

Bran  and  Screenings 

Bran  and  Screenings 

Cannelton  Flour  Mills,  Cannelton,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  & Screenings 

Mixed  Bran  & Screenings 

Clark  & Sons,  C.  G.,  Rushville,  Ind. 
Clarks  Mixed  Feed 

Davis  & Johnson,  Coatesville,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed  

Eesley  & Company,  Wm., 

College  Corner,  Ohio. 

Mixed  Feed  

Egloff  Milling  Company,  Vincennes,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran,  Ground  Screenings  and 

Corn  Bran  

Wheat  Bran,  Ground  Screenings  and 
Corn  Bran  

Egloff  Sons,  A.,  St.  Meinrad,  Ind. 

Bran  & Screenings 

Bran  & Screenings 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

§ 

•43 

Sq 

w 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

1832 

1806 

Ideal  Milling  & Grain  Co., 

i 

Ridgeville 

11.2 

3.8 

3.2 

13.0 

16.8 

6662 

2574 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.0 

4.4 

14.0 

17.9 

6662 

4046 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.0 

4.7 

14.0 

17.2 

414 

3500 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.7 

4.9 

14.0 

14.9 

6486 

3354 

George  Logan,  Shirley  

9.5 

3.0 

5.7 

13.0 

15.8 

6225 

4356 

Manufacturers  

8.6 

3.0 

4.8 

14.0 

14.4 

6001 

1979 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.0 

3.9 

14.0 

14.9 

4443 

2991 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

.3.0 

3.2 

13.0 

15.4 

4214 

2188 

Manufacturers  

11.7 

3.9 

4.7 

12.0 

13.9 

4214 

3427 

John  Fee  & Son,  Kokomo 

10.4 

3.0 

4.5 

12.0 

13.7 

3442 

1.5.59 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

16.1 

3442 

3786 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

17.1 

2843 

2767 

Manufacturer  

9.4 

3.7 

4.5 

14.0 

14.0 

2843 

4580 

Manufacturer  ..  __ 

8.5 

3.7 

4.1 

14.0 

14.5 

2099 

1562 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.8 

3.7 

14.0 

16.9 

2099 

3800 

Manufacturers  __  __  

9.2 

3.8 

4.4 

14.0 

15.6 

3427 

1.549 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

3.4 

4.4 

13.5 

15.7 

3427 

3783 

Manufacturers 

8.7 

3.4 

4.5 

13.5 

15.4 

5813 

5340 

Manufacturers  ■ 

9.1 

2.9 

4.4 

14.0 

16.0 

6827 

2993 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.4 

4.0 

13.4 

18.1 

4254 

2893 

Wm.  Eesley  & Co., 

West  College  Corner  

10.6 

3.0 

5.3 

13.5 

13.1 

6053 

3025 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.5 

3.8 

14.0 

16.1 

6053 

5011 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

3.5 

3.3  1 

14.0 

15.4 

2591 

1519 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.0 

4.5 

14.0 

16.3 

2591 

3741 

Manufacturers  _ 

9.6 

3.0 

5.0  1 

14.0 

16.2 

90 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

§ 

43 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

CO 

a 

Moistui 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Eohl,  Casper,  Cedar  Grove,  Ind. 

Mivpd  Eppd 

2580 

2878 

Manufacturer 

10.9 

3.8 

3.3 

14.0 

16.9 

Mivpf]  "Pppd  _ 

2580 

4295 

Manufacturer  . 

9.3 

3.8 

4.1 

14.0 

16.5 

Fornax  Milling  Company,  Decatur,  Ind. 

7200 

2094 

Manufacturers 

11.0 

3.2 

4.3 

13.0 

15.6 

Fornax  Mixed  Feed  

7200 

4197 

Manufacturers  

1 9.4 

3.2 

4.1 

13.0 

15.0 

Gross,  L.  J.,  Sandborn,  Ind. 

i 

Mixprt  Fppfl 

2911 

1692 

Manufacturer 

! 11.1 

3.2 

3.7 

13.0 

16.0 

2911 

5016 

Manufacturer 

10.8 

3.2 

3.4 

13.0 

16.3 

Harris  & Bell,  Montgomery,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran,  Screenings  and  Corn 
Bran  

3938 

5266 

Manufacturers  

1 

1 

1 9.4 

3.6 

3.2 

12.0 

15.2 

Hibbits  Mill  Company,  Muncie,  Ind. 

Mixpd  Fpcd 

2835 

4099 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.6 

4.2 

14.0 

13.9 

2835 

4100 

Manufacturers 

9.1 

3.6 

4.2 

14.0 

16.3 

Hubbard,  J.  W.,  Monrovia,  Ind.  . 

Mixpf]  Fppd 

7550 

4857 

Manufacturer  

9.1 

3.0 

4.3 

13.0 

16.1 

Ideal  Milling  & Grain  Company, 
Kidgeville,  Ind. 

Mivpd  Bran  and  Snrppning^s 

7353 

4071 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

2.5 

3.7 

12.5 

16.1 

Katterjohn,  Q.  F.,  Boonville,  Ind. 
Katterjohn’s  Mixed  Feed 

2243 

3827 

Manufacturer 

9.9 

4.0 

4.3 

13.5 

16.7 

Kennedy  Milling  Company,  The  Geo.  W., 
Shelbyville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2477 

3008 

Manufacturers  ... 

10.8 

3.5 

4.4 

13.5 

17.2 

ATixpd  Feed 

2477 

4790 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

3.5 

4.0 

13.5 

17.5 

Klemm,  Geo.  J.,  Milton,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

3465 

3332 

Manufacturer 

9.9 

3.5 

3.9 

13.0 

14.5 

Mattix  & Company,  N.  W., 

Lebanon,  Ind. 

“Our”  Cow  Chop 

3409 

1985 

Manufacturers 

9.6 

2.0 

3.2 

7.0 

14.0 

Miller  Flour  & Feed  Company,  The 
Wesley,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

2847 

1934 

Manufacturers 

10.5 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

15.9 

Muller  Bros.  Milling  Company, 
Ferdinand,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran,  Corn  Bran  & Screenings 

6710 

1.521 

Manufacturers  

1 

9.1 

3.5 

4.5 

14.0 

17.6 

Wheat  Bran,  Corn  Bran  & Screenings 

6710 

3742 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

17.0 

Wheat  Bran,  Corn  Bran  & Screenings 

6710 

4611 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

15.8 

Napoleon  Flour  Mills,  Napoleon,  Ind. 
Napoleon  Wheat  Bran,  Corn  Bran  and 
Screenings 

4042 

4587 

Manufacturers 

8.5 

3.7 

4.1 

14.1 

14.3 

North  Manchester  Milling  Company, 
North  Manchester,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ . . 

4252 

2477 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

3.0 

4.3 

11.5 

15.1 

Mixed  Feed 

4252 

3913 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

3.0 

4.7 

11.5 

15.4 

iSIixed  Feed 

4252 

5030 

Manufacturers 

8.7 

3.0 

3.7 

11.5 

14.8 

Orleans  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 
Orleans,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7020 

7020 

2650 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.4 

3.9 

12.5 

16.5 

Mixed  Feed  __ 

4087 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

3.4 

4.7 

12.5 

17.9 

Plainfield  Milling  Company, 

Plainfield,  Ind. 

Bran  & Screenings  

2.339 

4815 

Manufacturers  

8.8 

3.5 

4.1 

14.0 

15.7 

91 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

— 

Crude 

Crude 

Fat 

Protein 

LABEL 

o 

+3 

Sample  secured  from 

per  cent. 

per  cent. 

Official 

o . 

m 

C 

Moistm 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Plainville  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Plainville,  Kans. 

5128 

2033 

C.  F.  Engle,  Bloomfield. 

10.3 

4.0 

4.0 

16.0 

17.8 

Mixed  Feed  

5128 

4110 

Geo.  A.  Charles,  West  Baden 

9.0 

4.0 

4.0 

16.0 

17.2 

Poseyville  Milling  Company,  The, 

Poseyville,  Ind. 

7677 

3856 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

3.7 

4.5 

14.0 

16.4 

Mixed  Pran  and  Sereenings 

7677 

5064 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.7 

4.2 

14.0 

14.5 

Rockport  Milling  Company,  The, 

Rockport,  Ind. 

Bran  & Sereening.s 

2248 

3808 

Manufacturers  __ 

10.2 

3.8 

4.5 

13.3 

13.8 

Schilt,  W.  F.,  Bremen,  Ind. 

Bran  & Sereening.s 

6427 

2610 

Manufacturer  

10.5 

4.1 

14.0 

15.3 

Bran  Sereenings 

6427 

4245 

Manufacturer 

9.3 

^7 

4.4 

14.0 

15.6 

Silver  Star  Milling  Company, 

Patricksburg,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

3621 

2009 

W.  M.  Holland,  Worthington... 
Manufacturers 

! 10.1 

3.0 

4.5 

13.0 

13.8 

Mixed  Feed 

3621 

2774 

10.1 

3.0 

3.8 

13.0 

13.6 

Spink  Milling  Company,  The, 

Washington,  Ind. 

Bran  and  Ground  Screenings  not 

exeeeding  Mill  Run 

6597 

3878 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

3.5 

4.9 

12.0 

15.8 

Bran  and  Ground  Screenings  not 

exceeding  Mill  Run 

6597 

5222 

Manufacturers  

8.5 

3.5 

3.7 

12.0 

16.1 

Tell  City  Flouring  Mills,  Tell  City,  Ind. 

Bran  & Screenings 

5640 

1552 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

4.0 

4.5 

14.0 

16.2 

Bran  & Screenings 

5640 

3782 

Manufacturers  

8.8 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.0 

ttBran  & Sereenings 

5640 

4563 

John  W.  Timberlake,  Mauckport 

8.1 

4.0 

4.1 

14.0 

14.1 

Thomas  & Son,  A.  R.,  Markle,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran,  with  Corn  Bran  and 

• Ground  Screenings  . 

6337 

2272 

Manufacturers 

10.4 

3.5 

4.2 

14.0 

15.8 

Thompson,  Lester,  Prairie  Creek,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  No.  2 _ _ 

6531 

4033 

Bailey  & Thompson, 

Prairie  Creelr 

9.6 

3.0 

3.9 

12.0 

14.7 

Thompson  «&:  Son,  Somerville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

5042 

1634 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.0 

4.2 

12.0 

14.0 

Mixed  Feed  

5042 

3867 

Edgar  Thompson,  Somerville... 

10.0 

3.0 

4.0 

12.0 

15.7 

Thurgood,  Geo.  R.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Thurgoods  Mixed  Feed 

1806 

3026 

Chas.  R.  Thurgood,  Vincennes.. 
Chas.  R.  Thurgood,  Vincennes.. 

11.8 

3.5 

3.3 

12.0 

15.1 

Thurgoods  Mixed  Feed  79 

1806 

5001 

8.5 

3.5 

3.2 

12.0 

16.5 

Union  Roller  Mills,  West  Harrison,  Ind. 

Kiewit’s  Bran  and  Screenings 

7544 

2877 

Manufacturers 

10.6 

3.7 

34 

14.0 

15.4 

Kiewit’s  Bran  and  Screenings  . _ . 

7544 

4296 

Manufacturers  . . 

9.3 

3.7 

4.2 

14.0 

14.3 

Wabash  Milling  Company,  Wabash,  Ind. 

Summerton’s  Mixed  Feed  _ __ 

5968 

4389 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.0 

4.2 

13.0 

15.1 

Waltz  & Company,  J.  W., 

New  Palestine,  Ind.  • 

Mixed  Feed 

2923 

4543 

Manufacturers 

7.6 

3.7 

4.0 

13.0 

20.3 

Woolard,  C.,  Hagerstown,  R.  R.  No.  20, 

* 

Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

6747 

4330 

Manufacturer 

9.0 

2.5 

4.2 

13.5 

14.9 

Wright,  John  H.,  Clinton,  Ind. 

Venus  Bran  & Sereenings 

7250 

3365 

Manufacturer  

10.6 

3.5 

5.0 

14.0 

15.4 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  200  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  8076 


92 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

s:: 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

CD 

c 

S <u 

‘3 

Is 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

3IIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN,  ASPIRATOR 

BUST 

Lingeman,  Adams  & Company, 
Brownsburg,  Ind. 

6822 

•1994 

Manufacturers  

14.1 

2.4 

3.0 

7.0 

8.0 

Mixed  Feed  so 

6822 

4527 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

2.4 

3.4 

7.0 

8.6 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  3IIDDUINGS,  CORN 

BRAN 

Banner  Roller  Mills,  The, 

Mooresville,  Ind. 

437 

2213 

Manufacturers  

11.9 

3.9 

4.5 

14.0 

16.2 

437 

4853 

Manufacturers  _ _ 

9.4 

3.9 

4.2 

14.0 

15.8 

Boldt  & Son,  Waynetown,  Ind. 

Mix  Mill  Feed  _ __  _ _ 

4170 

2256 

Manufacturers  

8.9 

3.0 

4.2 

11.0 

16.8 

Mix  Mill  Feed  

4170 

2945 

Manufacturers  

11.4 

3.0 

4.3 

11.0 

16.4 

Daniels  & Pickering  Company, 
Middletown,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

3573 

4363 

J.  M.  Walker  ik  Son,  Middletown 

9.7 

3.5 

4.1 

13.0 

15.8 

Follett  & Company,  R.  J.,  Carmel,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed 

3163 

4284 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.7 

3.8 

13.0 

16.2 

Freed  & Lewis,  Campbellsburg,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed  _ 

6362 

2641 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.0 

4.7 

13.0 

16.5 

Mixed  Feed  __  

6062 

4082 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.0 

4.8 

13.0 

17.3 

Henline,  M.  S.,  Ossian,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

6836 

1673 

Manufacturer  

10.5 

2.5 

4.2 

12.5 

14.7 

Marengo  Milling  Company, 

Marengo,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2680 

3728 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.7 

4.7 

13.5 

16.8 

Metamora  Roller  Mills,  Metamora,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed 

7337 

2888 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

4.0 

4.2 

14.5 

15.3 

Mixed  Feed 

7337 

4396 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.2 

4.0 

4.1 

14.5 

14.6 

McCoy  Bros.,  Liberty,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

2436 

4410 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

3.5 

4.0 

15.0 

15.2 

Paragon  Roller  Mills,  Paragon,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed 

1526 

2217 

Manufacturers  

11.6 

3.8 

4.8 

12.0 

15.8 

Sanitary  Milling  Company, 

(ias  City,  Ind. 

I Mixed  Feed  _ . 

7445 

2318 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

3.0 

3.8 

13.0 

14.1 

Semon,  F.  T.,  Vernon,  Ind. 

Semon’s  Mixed  Feed 

5631 

3545 

Manufacturer  

9.8 

3.0 

3.7 

12.0 

15.9 

St.  Anthony  Mill  Company, 

St.  Anthony,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran,  Shorts  & Corn  Bran 

5262 

3735 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.0 

3.4 

13.0 

15.8 

Starliglit  Milling  Con»ijanv, 

Borden,  R.  R.  No.  1,  Ind. 
tMixed  Feed  

7704 

4050 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

2.0 

4.2 

12.0 

15.1 

Star  Milling  Company,  The, 

.Aurora,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  si  

2675 

3645 

Manufacturers  

12.6 

4.0 

2.6 

13.5 

13.9 

Stendal  Mill  Company,  Stendal,  Ind. 
.Mixed  Feed 

61.52 

3732 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.0 

3.6 

13.0 

16.5 

t Before  registration  I.ow  grade  flour  present 

Aspirator  dust  etiiefly  from  eorn  and  oats 


93 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

LABEL 

a 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

aiQ 

m 

C 

Moistui 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Truitt  & Son,  Wm.  P., 

East  Enterprise,  Ind. 

7456 

2915 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

3.8 

3.9 

14.0 

14.9 

Tunnelton  Milling  Company, 

Tunnelton,  Ind. 

2852 

4153 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.0 

3.2 

13.0 

14.3 

Wilkinson  & Company,  T.  B., 
Knightstown,  Ind. 

Mixed  ATill  Peed 

4518 

2304 

Manufacturers  _ __  _ 

9.8 

2.5 

3.7 

12.0 

16.9 

Mixed  Mill  Peed 

4.518 

4412 

Manufacturers  __  __ 

11.3 

2.5 

3.5 

12.0 

15.8 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  LOW 

GRADE  FLOUR,  CORN  BRAN 

Hardin  & Son,  Ladoga,  Ind. 

Hardin  Son’s  Mill  Peed 

3482 

2284 

Manufacturers 

10.6 

2.5 

4.3 

14.0 

15.3 

Hardin  A:  Snn’.s  Mill  Peed 

3482 

4505 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

2.5 

3.5 

14.0 

16.2 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
BHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  LOW 

GRADE  FLOUR,  CORN  BRAN, 
SCREENINGS 

Schulte,  W.  C.,  Freelandville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  __  _ 

6434 

5018 

Manufacturer 

10.9 

4.0 

4.2 

14.1 

15.2 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CORN 

BRAN,  DUST  COLLECTOR  BRAN 

Thornburg  Milling  & Elevator 

Company,  Martinsville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

2950 

2180 

Manufacturers  _ 

12.0 

3.5 

4.0 

14.0 

14.7 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN. 
WHEAT  PUDDLINGS  CORN 

BRAN,  DUST  COLLECTOR  DUST 

Miller,  A.  .1.,  Montpelier,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed 

6257 

1703 

Manufacturer  _ 

11.4 

3.0 

3.9 

13.0 

15.8 

Reiners,  Wm.  F.,  Birdseye,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  __  __ 

5406 

3731 

Manufacturer  __  

9.7 

3.2 

4.5 

13.5 

16.3 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN,  WHEAT  DUST 

Dillsboro  Milling  Company, 

Hillsboro,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed 

4053 

3611 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

2.9 

4.0 

14.0 

16.1 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN,  BUCKWHEAT 

MIDDLINGS,  WHEAT  SCREEN- 
INGS 

Runge  & Company,  John, 

Richmond,  Ind. 
tRunges’  Mixed  Feed 

7900 

4414 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

4.0 

5.6 

11.0 

14.3 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  IMIDDLINGS,  CORN 

BRAN,  SCREENINGS 

Bailey  & Thompson, 

Prairie  Creek,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  No.  1 

6952 

4034 

Manufacturers  __ 

9.4 

3.0 

3.4 

12.5 

15.1 

t Before  registration  5%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  Xo. 

7743 


94 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Bergenroth  Bros.,  Troy,  Ind. 

1 

3441 

1560 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

4.0 

3.8 

! 14.0 

' 16.3 

Besser,  W.  T.,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

! 

1 

! 

Res.^e^^^  Extra  Mixed  Feed 

5170 

2452 

.1.  W.  Crnxton,  Cloverdale 

9.7 

3.5 

3.2 

15.4 

i 16.3 

5170 

2790 

Manufacturer 

9.2 

3.5 

4.2 

i l.'i.4  1 15.8 

Bicknell  Mill  Company,  Bicknell,  Ind. 

i 

1 

Mixed  Feed 

7824 

5014 

Manufacturers  _ _ 

9.6 

3.0 

4.3 

13.0 

16.9 

Billman  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Shelbyville,  Ind. 

I 

Shelby  Mixed  Feed 

4303 

3015 

Manufacturers  . 

10.2 

2.0 

3.7 

10.0 

16.0 

Shelby  Mixed  Feed  

4303 

4785 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

2.0 

3.9 

I 10.0 

16.3 

Bloomfield  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Bloomfield,  Ind. 

Mixed  Mill  Feed  . . . _ ..  _ 

4924 

2035 

Manufacturers 

11.5 

3.0 

3.9 

' 12.8 

17.2 

Mixed  Mill  Feed 

4924 

3931 

Manufacturers 

9.9 

3.0 

4.0 

12.8 

15.4 

Bloomington  Milling  Company,  The, 

1 

Bloomington,  Ind. 

1 

Mixed  Feed 

3602 

4211 

Manufacturers 

9.1 

3.0 

4.2 

13.0 

13.6 

Mixed  Feed  

3602 

4683 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

3.0 

4.5 

13.0 

14.7 

Bowling  Green  Milling  Company, 

Bowling  Green,  Ind. 

• 

Mill  Feed 

6912 

2079 

M a nuf  ncturers 

10.5 

3.5 

3.3 

10.4 

12.9 

Mill  Feed 

6912 

4535 

Haltom  Bros.,  Patricksburg 

9.0 

3.5 

2 8 

10.4 

12.4 

Bowling  Green  Mills,  The, 

Bowling  Green,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

3371 

2081 

Manufacturers 

11.1 

3.5 

3.5 

13.5 

16.1 

Brewer,  0.  F.,  Freetown,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

5120 

3713 

Manufacturer 

10.9 

3.5 

4.8 

13.0 

15.4 

Brewer  Milling  Company,  Gosport,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

3930 

2000 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

2.6 

4.1 

9.5 

16.0 

Bundy  Mill  Company,  L.  L., 

Vallonia,  Ind. 

Mill  Feed 

2821 

2835 

Manufacturers 

9.2 

3.4 

3.0 

13.0 

16.0 

Mill  Feed 

2821 

3565 

.T  W IVTiIp.Qj  T^nt.lArvillp 

11.4 

3.4 

3.4 

1 13.0 

16.2 

Butt  & Bro.,  L.  T.,  Center  Point,  Ind. 

1 

Mixed  Feed  83 

4431 

2077 

Manufacturers 

10.9 

3.5 

4.2 

13.5 

16.5 

Cadick  Milling  Company, 

Grandview,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2100 

1567 

T,  Scbnenfeld  Rnckpnrt 

8.9 

4.1 

3.8 

14.0 

17.1 

Mixed  Feed  

2100 

2467 

Charlestowm  Milling  Co., 

Charlestown  

8.8 

4.1 

4.2 

14.0 

17.2 

Cagle  & Schopmeyer,  Poland,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed  

6884 

2083 

Manufacturers 

10.8 

3.8 

3.4 

13.0 

14.7 

Cannelton  Flour  Mills,  Cannelton,  Ind. 

“A”  Mixed  Feed  

3426 

L550 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

3.5 

4.1 

13.5 

16.9 

“A”  Mixed  Peed  

3426 

3784 

Manufacturers 

8.5 

3.5 

5.1 

13.5 

16.1 

Cauble,  0.  L.,  Pekin,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed  

4243 

4057 

Manufacturer 

10.4 

2.0 

4.0 

10.0 

17.1 

City  Roller  Mills,  Vevay,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  or  Wheat  & Corn  Product 

1158 

2919 

Manufacturers  __  

10.9 

3.0 

4.3 

14.0 

16.5 

Corbin  Milling  Company, 

New  Harmony,  Ind. 

Harmonie  Mixed  Feed  J 

5404 

3852 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.9 

4.9 

13.3 

15.2 

Harmonic  Mixed  Feed 

5404 

5062 

Fuhrer  Ford  Milling  Co., 

New  Harmony  

9.4 

3.9 

4.3 

13.3 

15.8 

Wheat  bran 


95 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

0 . 

01 
d 

Moistui 

percen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found] 

Crescent  Milling  Company, 

Crothersville,  Ind. 

Crescent  Mixed  Feed __ 

6027 

2444 

Mixed  Feed  .. 

7574 

3690 

Croxton  & Company,  J.  W., 

Cloverdale,  Ind. 

Croxton’s  Extra  Mixed  Feed  

2632 

1480 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

4151 

4730 

Edwardsport  Milling  Company, 
Edwardsport,  Ind. 

The  Edwardsport  Milling  Co’s  “Mixed 
Feed” 

724 

1691 

The  Edwardsport  Milling  Co’s  “Mixed 
Feed”  

724 

5021 

English  Milling  Company,  English,  Ind. 
English  Milling  Co.  Mixed  Feed 

966 

3726 

Forest  Park  Mills, 

North  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Mill  Feed 

5817 

3367 

Mill  Feed  ... 

5817 

4500 

Freeport  Roller  Mills,  Freeport,  Ind. 

H.  Baiting’s  Composition  Feed 

406 

4542 

Grimes  Milling  Company, 

Leavenworth,  Ind. 

Grimes  Mixed  Feed 

2511 

2879 

Holland  Mills,  The,  Holland,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _.  . 

7131 

1523 

Mixed  Feed  _ __. 

7131 

3733 

Holton  Milling  Company,  Holton,  Ind. 
A.  Mixed  Feed 

7404 

3560 

Hosmer  Milling  Company,  0.  I., 
Leavenworth,  Ind. 

0.  I.  Hosmer  Mixed  Peed 

7822 

4568 

Jamestown  Milling  Company, 

Jamestown,  Ind. 

Noxemall  Mixed  Peed  _ 

5655 

2228 

Noxemall  Mixed  Feed  _ 

5655 

4521 

Katterjohn,  Q.  F.,  Boonville,  Ind. 
Elkhorn  Mixed  Feed 

3310 

3828 

Klondike  Milling  Company, 

Danville,  Ind. 

The  Mill  Run  Mixed  Feed 

2654 

3398 

The  Mill  Run  Mixed  Feed 

2654 

4882 

Linton  Mill  Company,  Linton,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

4047 

1757 

Marengo  Milling  Company, 

Marengo,  Ind. 

“A”  Mixed  Feed 

7746 

4619 

Martinsville  Milling  Company, 
Martinsville,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Mill  Feed  

6743 

2185 

A.  Mixed  Mill  Feed 

6743 

4539 

Milltown  Milling  Company, 

Milltown,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

5581 

3722 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.0 

4.1 

10.0 

15.4 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.8 

4.1 

14.5 

16.0 

J.  W.  Croxton,  Cloverdale 

10.9 

3.5 

3.5 

12.0 

16.8 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

4.0 

4.3 

15.5 

15.4 

Edwardsport  Mills,  Edwardsport 

11.2 

3.9 

3.5 

12.4 

13.9 

Edwardsport  Mills,  Edwardsport 

1 9.9 

3.9 

2.5 

12.4 

13.1 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

4.0 

4.8 

14.1 

16.3 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

3.8 

3.4 

9.8 

14.0 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

3.8 

3.7 

9.8 

14.3 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.8 

4.3 

14.0 

16.8 

0.  I.  Hosmer  Milling  Co., 

Leavenworth  

11.5 

3.4 

3.5 

14.5 

15.2 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.0 

4.3 

13.0 

16.5 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.0 

3.2 

13.0 

14.9 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.5 

3.9 

14.0 

15.7 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.4 

4.0 

14.0 

14.7 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.2 

3.6 

14.0 

16.1 

Manufacturers  

. 9.5 

3.2 

3.9 

14.0 

16.0 

Manufacturer  

10.6 

3.5 

3.5 

13.5 

14.6 

Manufacturers  , 

10.4 

3.5 

3.5 

13.0 

16.6 

Manufaeturers  

9.7 

3.5 

4.0 

13.0 

16.1 

Board  of  Trade  Feed  Store, 

Linton  

11.0 

3.5 

4.1 

13.0 

15.1 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.5 

4.3 

13.5 

15.2 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

4.0 

4.6 

15.0 

16.9 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

4.0 

4.4 

15.0 

15.3 

Manufaeturers  

10.7 

3.5 

4.0 

13.5 

16.6 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

73 

S 

g 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Oaktown  Milling  Company, 

Oaktown,  Iiul. 

1 

Mill  Feed 

4648 

3339 

M anuf  acturers 

9.7 

3.5 

3.8  1 

! 

13.0 

15.1 

Odon  Milling  Company,  Odon,  Ind. 

Omco  Mixed  Feed  __  

6712 

3906 

Manufacturers 

9.4 

3.8 

4 0 1 

14.0 

15.4 

Omco  Mixed  Feed  _ . 

6712 

5259 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.8 

4.6  ' 

14.0 

15.6 

Paoli  Milling  Company,  The,  Paoli,  Ind. 

Paoli  Mixed  Feed 

2820 

2673 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.0 

4.8  1 

10.0 

15.9 

Petersburg  Milling  & Grain  Company, 

The,  Petersburg,  Ind. 

i 

Peter.sburg  Mixed  Feed 

6874 

16.32 

Manufacturers  _ __  

10.8 

3.5 

3.8 

13.0 

17.2 

6874 

3871 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.5 

3.5 

13.0 

16.1 

Petersburg  Mixed  Feed 

3872 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.5 

3.3 

13.0 

15.0 

Richland  Milling  Company, 

Bloomfield,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed  _ 

1148 

3927 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.0 

4.6 

12.5 

15.3 

Roach  & Rothenberger,  Delphi,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

2671 

3886 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.8 

3.9 

11.0 

15.4 

Rockport  Milling  Company,  The, 

Rockport,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

2247 

1.568 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.9 

4.5 

13.3 

16.0 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

2247 

2579 

J.  N.  Shoemaker,  Borden 

10.1 

3.9 

3.9 

13.3 

16.2 

Rohm  Bros.,  Rockville,  Ind. 

1 

Mill  Feed 

,5671 

2149 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.5 

4.3 

15.0 

16.5 

Mill  Peed 

,5671 

3676 

Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.5 

4.0 

15.0 

16.1 

Mill  Feed _ _ _ 

5671 

4823 

Manufacturers  - 

7.8 

3.5 

4.3 

15.0 

15.4 

Rouse  & Son,  Wm.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

• 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

3191 

3417 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.7 

3.7 

5.1 

13.5 

15.9 

Mixed  Feed 

3191 

4916 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.7 

4.6 

13.5 

17.4 

Scottsburg  Milling  Company, 

Scottsburg,  Ind. 

Home  Mixed  Feed  

6236 

2446 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

3.5 

4.3 

13.5 

16  2 

Home  Mixed  Feetl  

6236 

4674 

Manufacturers  

8.9 

3.5 

5.1 

13.5 

13.5 

Spink  Milling  Company,  The, 

Washington,  Ind, 

Mixt  Feed  __  __ 

6332 

3879 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.5 

4.0 

12.5 

16.5 

Star  Mill  Company,  Huntingburg,  Ind. 

Star  Mixed  Feed 

3509 

1496 

Mannfaetnrers 

10.9 

3.5 

4.4 

13.5 

17.1 

Star  Mixed  Feed  _ 

3509 

3768 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.5 

4.6 

13.5 

17.2 

Star  Roller  Mills,  Carlisle,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

5249 

1716 

Manufacturers  __  __  _ 

11.3 

2.8 

3.8 

12.5 

16.4 

Mixed  Feed  __  

5249 

3336 

Manufacturers  ' 

10.5 

2.8 

3.4 

12.5 

14.9 

Suckow  Company,  Franklin,  Ind. 

“Perfection”  Mixed  Feed 

6231 

2345 

Manufacturers  

4.0 

4.4 

12.4 

17.1 

“Perfection”  Mixed  Feed _ _ 

6231 

4827 

Manufacturers  __  __  __  

7.8 

4.0 

4.3 

12.4 

16.7 

Tapp  & Bridwell,  Bloomington,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

54 

4204 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

4.0 

4.0 

14.0 

14.9 

Mixed  Feed 

54 

4682 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

4.0 

4.4 

14.0 

16.3 

Tee-l  Milling  Company,  Owensville,  Ind. 

Daisy  Feed  __  

6137 

3858 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.0 

4.0 

14.0 

17.6 

Daisy  Feed  

6137 

5071 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

3.0 

4.2 

14.0 

16.1 

Three  Bros.  Milling  Company, 

Ificknell,  Ind. 

'J'hree  Brothers’  Mixed  Feed 

5166 

1682 

Manufacturers  __  

10.0 

3.0 

4.2 

13.0 

17.3 

97 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


- 

Number 

Crude 

Crude 

Fat  ' 

X'rotein 

LABEL 

o 

■43 

Sample  secured  from 

per  cent. 

per  cent. 

Official 

u • 

ft” 

§ 

5 § 
11 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Ulrey  & Company,  A.  A., 

Fa-rmount,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

6901 

1651 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.0 

4.1 

13.5 

14.7 

6901 

4417 

Manufacturers  _l __ 

11.0 

3.0 

■ 4.2 

13.5 

15.7 

Valentine  & Valentine,  Franklin,  Ind. 

Mived  Feed 

934 

2351 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

4.0 

4.5 

12.4 

14.5 

934 

4832 

Manufacturers 

7.8 

4.0 

4.5 

12.4 

15.6 

Zionsville  Milling  Company, 

Zionsville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

4783 

1907 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.0 

4.0 

13.0 

16.9 

MIXED  FEED:  AVHEAT  BRAN, 

WHEAT  IMIDDLINGS,  CORN 
BRAN  SCREENINGS,  DUST 
COLLECTOR  DUST 

Reiners,  \Vm.  F.,  Birdseye,  Ind. 

Reiners’  Mixed  Feed 

7743 

4607 

Manufacturer 

9.2 

3.2 

4.2 

13.5 

14.7 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 

WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CORN 

BRAN,  SCREENINGS,  SALT 

Tell  City  Flouring  Mills,  Tell  City,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

60.51 

15.53 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

4.0 

4.2 

14.0 

16.1 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

6051 

3781 

Manufacturers 

8.5 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

16.3 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 

WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CORN 
BRAN,  SCREENINGS,  MILL 
SWEEPINGS 

Fowler,  D.  W.,  Harrodsburg,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7126 

4203 

Manufacturer 

9.2 

2.7 

4.0 

13.0 

17.5 

Kingman  Grain  & Milling  Company, 

Kingman,  Ind. 

Millfeed  __  

31.56 

2258 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.1 

3.0 

3.9 

14.0 

16.7 

Millfeed  

3156 

2958 

Jones  Bros.,  Attica __  

11.6 

3.0 

3.3 

14.0 

16.2 

Lemon  Milling  Company,  The, 

Bedford,  Ind. 

Mixed  Mill  Feed 

3915 

2689 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.5 

4.8 

14.0 

16.5 

Mixed  Mill  Feed 

3915 

4171 

Manufacturers 

8.6 

1 

3.5 

5.1 

14.0 

14.7 

MIXED  FEED:  .WHEAT  BRAN, 

AVHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CORN 

BRAN,  SCREENINGS,  OAT 

HULLS  ^ 

Lash  Flour  Mills,  The  Fred  B., 

Farmersburg,  Ind. 

Lashs  Mixed  Feed  

6416 

4022 

Manufacturers 

9.4 

3.0 

3.6 

11.0 

16.0 

mXED  FEED:  AVHEAT  BRAN, 
AVHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CORN 

BRAN,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 

AVHEAT  SCREENINGS 

Milltown  Milling  Company, 

Milltown,  Ind. 

“Mixed  Feed” _ 

7742 

5053 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

3.5 

4.3 

13.5 

15.4 

McCord,  G.  W.,  Oakland  City,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

6843 

1640 

Manufacturer 

9.9 

2.5 

4.5 

12.0 

17.0 

Mixed  Feed  _ 

6843 

3868 

Oakland  City  Roller  Mills, 
Oakland  City  

Petersburg  Milling  & Grain  Company, 

10.4 

2.5 

3.8 

12.0 

15.6 

The,  Petersburg,  Ind. 

Petersburg-  “A”  Mixed  Feed 

7765 

5237 

Petersburg  Milling  Co., 
Petersburg  

9.7 

3.0 

3.6 

13.0 

15.4 

98 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 
Fat  • 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

2^' 

j Official 

o . 

a 

R 0) 

® o 

it 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Kichland  Milling  Company, 

Bloomfield,  Ind. 

6576 

2029 

Manufacturers  

12.0 

3.0 

3.2 

12.5 

14.0 

Springs  Valley  Milling  Company,  The, 
French  Lick,  Ind. 

Valley  Mixed  Feed  _ 

6976 

4104 

Manufacturers  

3.0 

4.0 

11.0 

15.5 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
SHORTS,  CORN  BRAN,  WHEAT 
SCREENINGS  AND  SCOCRINGS, 
MILL  SWEEPINGS 

i 

Farmers  Mill,  The,  Huntingburg,  Ind. 

6520 

1497 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3‘.0 

3.7 

13.0 

16.8 

6520 

3765 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.0 

4.0 

13.0 

16.2 

Roach  & Rothenberger,  Delphi,  Ind. 

7730 

4684 

Manufacturers  

8.9 

3.8 

4.0 

11.0 

15.3 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN,  SCREENINGS, 

DCST  COLLECTOR  DUST, 

WHEAT  CHAFF 

Hazleton  Flour  Mills,  The, 

Hazleton,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Mixed  Feed 

I 7174 
7174 

1718 

5003 

Davis  & Phillips,  Oaktown 

L.  Combs  & Sons,  Vincennes 

10.0 

8.8 

3.0 

3.0 

4.6 

4.0 

12.0 

12.0 

15.8 

15.0 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
MIDDLINGS.  CORN  BRAN, 

SCREENINGS.  DUST  COLLECT- 
OR DUST,  WHEAT  CHAFF 

Harmon  & Wallace  Milling  Company, 
Owensville,  Ind. 

3857 

Harmon  & Wallace,  Owensville. 
Manufacturers  . ..  

10.6 

3.5 

3.5 

13.0 

15.6 

Roval  Mixed  Feed 

7559 

1 

1 

5070 

9.3 

3.5 

3.5 

13.0 

15.5 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
SHORTS,  SCREENINGS,  WHEAT 
DUST,  MILL  SWEEPINGS 

Cauble,  0.  L.,  Pekin,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Mixed  Feed  

i 

I 6130 
6130 

2578 

4969 

Manufacturer  

Manufacturer  

10.1 

8.8 

2.0 

2.0 

3.9 

3.6 

10.0 

10.0 

16.7 

14.9 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
RYE  BR.\N,  CORN  BR.VN, 

WHEAT  SCREENINGS 

Starr  Mills,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

6001 

3813 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.0 

4.3 

14.0 

14.0 

Mixed  Feed 

6901 

4836 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

3.0 

4.1 

14.0 

14.3 

MIXED  PEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN,  GROUND  CORN 
SCREENINGS,  COB  3IEAL 

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Schaefer’s  Special  Filler  for  Malt 

7376 

2748 

Manufaeturer  ..  . 

11.0 

1.0 

1.7 

3.0 

7.8 

MIXED  PEED:  WIIPIAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN,  (’ORN  PPIPID 

MPIAL,  SCREENINtiS 

Elnora  Milling  Company,  The, 

Elnora,  Ind. 

Elnora  Mixed  Feed 

3671 

3907 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.0 

3.8 

9.5 

11.5 

99 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
HOMINY  FEED,  OATS 

Allan,  J.  P.,  Farmersburg,  Ind. 

J.  P.  Allan’s  Mixed  Feed 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  RED  DOG  FLOUR 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Fancy  Mixed  Feed 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 
DLING, RED  DOG  FLOUR, 

SCREENINGS 

Crocker,  Wm.  G.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat  Flour 
Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run-__ 
W’heat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run- 
Wheat  Flour  Middlings  Avith  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run- 
Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 

DLINGS, LOW^  GRADE  FLOUR 

Blanton  Milling  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

tBlanton’s  Pig  Feed 

Blanton’s  Pig  Feed 

Butt  & Bro.,  L.  T.,  Center  Point,  Ind. 
Wiieat  Middlings  and  Low  Grade 
Flour  

Rohm  Bros.,  Rockville,  Ind. 

**Wheat  Shorts  & Wheat  Screenings 
Product  

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 

DLINGS, LOW’  GRADE  FLOUR, 
SCREENINGS 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  “A”  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run  

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  “A”  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run  

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  “A”  Middlings  Avith 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 
Mill  Run  

Woodw'orth  & Company,  E.  S., 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Flour  Midds  with  Ground  Screenings.. 

t Before  registration 
**  Not  registered 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

2892 

1738 

Manufacturer  

10.0 

4.0 

6.9 

9.5 

12.9 

4341 

1662 

Hartman  & Dottercr,  Bluffton. 

8.3 

3.0 

7.2 

11.0 

14.3 

5470 

3458 

Miller  & Dilts,  Winamae 

10.8 

5.0 

5.3 

17.0 

16.4 

5466 

1512 

LcAvisville  Elevator  Co., 

LeAvisville  

8.7 

5.0 

5.5 

17.0 

17.7 

7232 

2870 

LeAvisville  Elevator  Co., 

LeAvisville  

8.4 

4.0 

5.6 

15.0 

17.0 

7232 

3168 

Geiiach  Bros.,  St.  John 

10.2 

4.0 

5.8 

15.0 

17.0 

7232 

4603 

Berry  Bros.,  Lynn  

9.1 

4.0 

5.5 

15.0 

18.0 

7232 

5152 

T.  S.  Nugen,  LeAvisville 

9.8 

4.0 

5.0 

15.0 

15.7 

7378 

2003 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

3.0 

4.9 

13.5 

17.8 

7378 

4918 

Habig  Bros.,  Indianapolis 

9.1 

3.0 

4.4 

13.5 

15.9 

5132 

2078 

Manufacturers  ___  

12.1 

2.1 

2.7 

11.5 

13.9 

4824 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.7 

15.5 

1 

7135 

2279 

Miller  Dilts,  Winamae 

9.7 

4.0 

4.9 

15.0 

15.8 

7135 

2302 

J.  R.  Guild  & Co.,  Medaryville.. 

9.6 

4.0 

5.0 

15.0 

16.0 

7135 

4307 

New'  Castle  Flour  & Feed  Ex- 

change, Ncav  Castle 

9.3 

4.0 

4.5 

15.0 

16.3 

8321 

4697 

Reed  & Co.,  Argos 

9.4 

4.5 

4.5 

15.5 

17.2 

lOO 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

§ 

•^3 

Sample  secured  from 

I Official 

o • 

00 

R Q) 

03  W 

II 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  ]MID- 

DLINGS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Fornax  Milling  Company,  Decatur,  Ind. 

7199 

2093 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

2.8 

2.9 

12.0 

14.0 

7199 

4196 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

2.8 

3.0 

12.0 

13.2 

7199 

4196 

(1)  Manufacturers  

11.0 

2.8 

3.0 

12.0 

13.2 

Three  Bros.  Milling  Company, 

Bicknell,  Ind. 

5165 

1683 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

2.0 

2.4 

9.5 

14.9 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 

DLINGS, CORN  BRAN 

Lewisport  Mill  Company,  Lewisport,  Ky. 
“Farmers  Choice” 

2377 

2876 

E.  Carver  & Co.,  Mauckport 

10.7 

4.2 

4.6 

14.0 

16.0 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 

DLINGS, RYE  MIDDLINGS 

Starr  Mills,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

6000 

1981 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.0 

3.4 

14.0 

14.0 

6000 

3815 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.0 

4.0 

14.0 

14.8 

6900 

4835 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.0 

3.8 

14.0 

14.9 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS. RYE  MIDDLINGS, 

SCREENINGS 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce  Company, 
North  Judson,  Ind. 

Fppd 

8124 

5186 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

3.5 

4.1 

14.0 

17.1 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS, CORN  RED  DOG 

FLOLR 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Wheat  Middlings  and  Maizo 
(Corn)  Red  Dog  Flour  

4362 

1660 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton. 

8.8 

3.0 

6.9 

11.0 

13.7 

Badger  Wheat  Middlings  and  Maizo 
('Cnrn'^  Red  T)np‘  Flnnr 

4362 

2428 

Ergest  Woods,  Brook  _ 

8.5 

3.0 

5.6 

11.0 

12.4 

Badger  Wheat  Middlings  and  Maizo 
(Corn)  Red  Dog  Flour 

4362 

4194 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton. 

8.8 

3.0 

6.8 

11.0 

12.7 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS, SALT 

Thompson,  Edgar,  Somerville,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed  84 

7448 

3866 

Manufacturer  

10.4 

3.5 

2.5 

14.0 

13.9 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 

DLINGS, SCREENINGS,  SALT 

Akin-Er.skine  Milling  Company, 
Evansville,  Ind. 

Standard  Middlings  or  Shorts,  Ground 
Wheat  Screenings  and  Salt 

6032 

1564 

Jeff  Ray  & Son,  Rockport 

11.1 

4.0 

3.8 

14.0 

17.6 

Standard  Middlings  or  Shorts,  Ground 
Wheat  Screenings  and  Salt 

6032 

3154 

John  M.  Klenck  Co.,  Evansville. 

11.3 

4.0 

3.8 

14.0 

16.8 

Standard  Middlings  or  Shorts,  Ground 

W'hPHt  Sprppning’s  and  Snlf, 

6032 

6050 

6050 

5078 

1554 

Manuf acturers  

8.6 

4.0 

4.3 

14.0 

15.7 

Tell  City  Flouring  Mills,  Tell  City,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  and  Wheat  Screen- 
ings Seasoned  with  S^dt 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

4.0 

3.7 

14.0 

15.7 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Wheat  Screen- 
ings Seasoned  with  Salt 

3780 

Manufacturers  

8.2 

4.0 

4.9 

14.0 

16.0 

I-ow  Oracle  flour  i)res<*nt 


lOI 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS, SCREENINGS,  OAT 

HULLS 

Lash  Flour  Mills,  The  Fred  B., 
Farmersburg,  Ind. 

Lashs  Extra  Mixed  Feed 


RYE  MIDDLINGS 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Rye  Middlings  

“Prize”  Rye  Middlings  


‘Prize”  Rye  Middlings 


Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Middlings. 
Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Middlings. 
It  Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Middlings. 
*Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Pure  Rye  Mid- 
dlings^sfi 


RYE  MIDDLINGS,  SCREENINGS 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Amo,  Ind. 

Rye  Middlings  and  Screenings  


Rye  Middlings  and  Screenings  s® 


Eagle  Roller  Mill  Company, 

NeAV  Ulm,  Minn. 

Rye  Feed  with  Ground  Screenings 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Rye  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 
not  exceeding  Mill  Run 


Kern  & Sons,  John  B.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Eagle  Rye  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run. 


MIXED  FEED: 
MIDDLINGS 


RYE  BRAN,  RYE 


Co-Operative  Bakers’  Milling  Company, 
North  Judson  Branch,  North  Jud- 
son,  Ind. 

ttRye  Mixed  Feed 


Rye  Mixed  Feed 

Friedrich  & Son,  C.  W.,  Dyer,  Ind. 

Rye  Mixed  Feed 

Rye  Mixed  Feed 


Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

Hobart  “Rye  Feed” 

Hobart  “Rye  Feed” 


MIXED  FEED:  BUCKWHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS AND  HULLS 

Bristol  Milling  Company,  Bristol,  Ind. 
Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 


* Not  tagged 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

8 tons  removed  from  sale 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

6417 

1736 

• 

Manufacturers  

12.8 

4.0 

2.9 

14.0 

15.3 

6986 

2587 

J.  R.  McKee,  Connersville 

10.1 

3.5 

3.3 

16.5 

17.3 

7118 

2171 

Branch  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Martinsville  

10.3 

3.0 

3.1 

16.5 

16.1 

7118 

2372 

Harting  & Co.,  Elwood 

11.5 

3.0 

3.3 

16.5 

15.2 

7018 

2178 

Carter  & Edwards,  Martinsville 

10.0 

3.0 

3.5 

14.0 

16.2 

7018 

3478 

Simon  J.  Carroll,  Royal  Center. 

8.8 

3.0 

3.8 

14.0 

16.1 

7018 

4592 

J.  F.  Hughes,  Elwood 

8.5 

3.0 

3.6 

14.0 

18.0 

4596 

J.  F.  Hughes,  Elwood 

9.1 

3.3 

17.9 

7947 

4732 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Bargersville  

9.1 

2.7 

3.5 

13.5 

15.6 

7947 

4829 

Valentine  & Valentine, 

Whiteland  _ 

8.5 

2.7 

3.5 

13.5 

15.9 

7162 

4283 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

8.5 

3.5 

3.3 

16.0 

16.1 

7604 

4630 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

8.6 

3.5 

3.6 

16.0 

16.7 

6553 

2791 

W.  T.  Besser,  Greencastle 

9.6 

3.0 

3.4 

16.0 

15.8 

6526 

3987 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

Co.,  North  Judson 

10.1 

2.0 

2.5 

12.0 

12.9 

6526 

3993 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

2.0 

2.5 

12.0 

12.3 

2715 

1714 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

2.0 

3.0 

12.0 

15.4 

2715 

3172 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

2.0 

3.2 

12.0 

15.0 

5993 

1815 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

2.0 

2.4 

13.0 

13.5 

5993 

5162 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

2.0 

2.5 

13.0 

13.8 

3353 

1594 

Manufacturers  

11.9 

4.0 

3.9 

12.0 

14.5 

Approx.  4%  foreign  material  consisting  of 
cracked  rye,  weed  seeds  and  chaff 
15  tons  removed  from  sale 


102 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Coombs  Milling  Company,  Wm.  A., 
Coldwater,  Mich. 

**Buckwheat  Feed  

Daily,  C.  C.,  Bristol,  R.  R.  No.  5,  Ind. 
Mixed  Buckwheat  Bran  & Middlings.. 

Huffman,  L.  R.,  Valparaiso,  R.  R.  No.  5, 
Ind. 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 
Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain 
Company,  Montieello,  Ind. 

Loughry’s  Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

CHOP  FEEDS:  CORN,  OATS 

American  Hominy  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Cracked  Corn  and  Rolled  Oats 

Bishop  Elevator  Company, 

Logansport,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Chop  Feed  

Branch  Grain  & Seed  Company, 
Martinsville,  Ind. 

Horse  Feed 

Horse  Feed 

Burge-Thomas  Milling  Company, 
Marion,  Ind. 

Chop  

Catron  Bros.,  Flora,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

Clyne,  I.  B.,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Cotton,  A.  F.,  Marion,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Crahbs,  Reynolds,  Taylor  Company, 
Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Crahbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Company, 
LaFayette,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Ground 

Cullom  & Son,  W.  H.,  Frankfort,  Ind. 
Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

Dague  & Company,  M.  L.,  Muncie,  Ind. 
Dague  & Company’s  Chop  Feed 

Dilley  Company,  C.  L.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

Dilley’s  No.  1 Chop 

Dilley’s  No.  1 Chop 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  - 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent 

I Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

.... 

4252 

Geo.  Steckley,  Kendallville 

1 

1 

1 8.8 

... 

4.1 

17.1 

1610 

1596 

Manufacturer  

j 10.6 

4.0 

3.9 

18.0 

14.7 

4823 

2201 

Manufacturer  _ _ 

11.9 

2.5 

3.7 

12.0 

15.8 

6299 

1875 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

2.0 

2.7 

10.0 

11.9 

4614 

2356 

Alexandria  Flour  & Grain  Co., 

Alexandria  

10.9 

2.5 

2.8 

10.0 

10.8 

6218 

1816 

Manufacturers  

11.8 

3.0 

4.4 

12.6 

17.4 

6218 

5163 

Manufacturers  __  __ 

9.9 

3.0 

5.4 

12.6 

21.8 

6578 

1746 

Chas.  Johnson,  Sullivan  _ 

11.5 

4.0 

4.0 

9.0 

9.8 

554 

2656 

Manufacturers  

14.2 

3.9 

3.3 

9.5 

98 

554 

4014 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.9 

3.9 

9.5 

10.1 

272 

2175 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

3.5 

4.6 

9.0 

9.2 

272 

4544 

Manufacturers  

8.9 

3.5 

4.2 

9.0 

9.1 

4624 

2393 

Manufacturers  

11.8 

3.9 

4.4 

9.0 

10.6 

2836 

1479 

Ashpaugh  & Flora,  Flora  ___ 

12.6 

3.0 

4.1 

9.0 

10.7 

6207 

3678 

Manufacturer  

10.6 

3.0 

4.1 

8.0 

9.9 

5096 

2386 

Homer  Pritchett,  Marion 

14.0 

3.5 

3.9 

9.0 

9.9 

1929 

3680 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.7 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

786 

4508 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.9 

4.3 

9.5 

9.5 

1514 

3436 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.9 

4.0 

9.0 

9.8 

1032 

4102 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.9 

4.0 

9.5 

9.9 

4211 

2658 

Manufacturers  

12.0 

3.5 

4.0 

9.0 

9.7 

4211 

4009 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.5 

4.7 

9.0 

11.5 

**  Not  registered 


103 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Dixie  Mills  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 
Dixie  Corn  & Oats  Chop  

Egloff  Milling  Company,  Vincennes,  Ind. 
Horse  & Mule  Chops 

Erie  Elevator,  The,  Rochester,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oat  Chop 

Finch  Bros.,  North  Liberty,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Tinkle  Bros.,  Warren,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop  

Corn  and  Oats  Chop  

Fowler,  A.,  Pittsboro,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Goshen  Milling  Company,  Goshen,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

Hanna,  G.  L.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

Hanna’s  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Haycock,  A.  W.,  Sims,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Haynes  Milling  Company,  The, 
Portland,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  Feed 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  Feed 

Holmes  & Son,  L.  G.,  Portland,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

Hubbard  & Company,  W.  H., 

Monrovia,  Ind. 

Chop  

Chop  

Hufnagle  & Miller,  Redkey,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Indiana  Elevator  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Gold  Medal  Chop 

Gold  Medal  Chop 

Johnston,  C.  H.,  Laporte,  R.  R.  No.  7, 
Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Johnston  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Pinola,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

J Street  Milling  Company,  Laporte,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  Feed 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  Feed 

Keilman  Company,  The  L.,  Dyer,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Killian  Elevator,  The,  Newberry,  Ind. 
Corn  & Oat  Chop 

Koenemann,  Ed.  F.,  Hoagland,  Ind. 
Corn  & Oats  Chop 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

1 Official 

1 Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

7093 

3865 

Crescent  Feed  Store, 

Oakland  City  

10.7 

3.0 

4.3 

8.0 

9.9 

7558 

3024 

Manufacturers  . 

10.6 

3.5 

4.4 

9.0 

9.4 

3416 

2191 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

3.5 

4.4 

8.5 

9.6 

1352 

2020 

Manufacturers  

12.4 

3.9 

4.3 

9.0 

10.0 

1198 

1650 

Jacob  Tinkle,,  Warren  

13.0 

3.9 

4.3 

9.5 

9.6 

1198 

2981 

Jacob  Tinkle,  Warren  

10.3 

3.9 

4.3 

9.5 

10.0 

2648 

2226 

Manufacturers  

12.9 

3.5 

4.6 

9.0 

10.4 

3238 

3880 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.7 

4.3 

9.8 

9.5 

3535 

4015 

Manufacturer  _ 

10.0 

3.5 

4.1 

9.0 

9.9 

4450 

4694 

Manufacturer  

8.2 

3.2 

4.2 

8.8 

9.9 

93 

1769 

Manufacturers  

12.4 

3.9 

4.1 

9.5 

9.7 

93 

4140 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

3.9 

4.2 

9.5 

9.6 

3963 

1772 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.0 

4.0 

9.0 

10.7 

3963 

4132 

The  Portland  Equity  Exchange, 

Portland  

9.1 

3.0 

4.0 

9.0 

9.4 

992 

2208 

J.  W.  Hubbard,  Monrovia  

11.9 

4.0 

4.0 

10.0 

10.4 

992 

4856 

J.  W.  Hubbard,  Monrovia 

9.5 

4.0 

4.1 

10.0 

9.7 

1694 

1728 

Cook  & Aukerman,  Redkey 

14.2 

3.9 

3.9 

9.5 

10.2 

5301 

2726 

Manufacturers  

12.0 

3.0 

3.5 

8.0 

9.2 

5301 

3414 

Manufacturers  

11.7 

3.0 

3.4 

8.0 

9.0 

1267 

2067 

C.  H.  Johnston  & Sons, 

Laporte  

13.4 

3.9 

4.1 

9.0 

9.2 

7666 

3779 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.9 

4.4 

9.0 

9.8 

760 

2109 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

3.9 

4.3 

9.5 

11.2 

760 

3776 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.9 

4.0 

9.5 

9.5 

2493 

1712 

Manufacturers  

15.0 

3.9 

3.8 

9.5 

9.5 

2493 

3170 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

3.9 

3.9 

9.5 

10.5 

1197 

5256 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.5 

4.4 

9.0 

10.2 

1682 

4221 

Manufacturer  

9.2 

3.9 

3.9 

9.5 

9.1 

^ 400  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Labels  No.  7693  1100  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

furnished  7661 


104 


•'  wif'i 


^ « K (J  f 


/it:‘ »■’  !!. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

u • 

GQ 

5 OP 
! ® O 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Kuhn  & Son,  John  H., 

Michigan  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Peed 

5331 

2134 

Manufacturers 

12.2 

3.5 

4.3 

8.8 

9.7 

Leesburg  Grain  & Milling  Company, 

The,  Leesburg,  Ind. 

Chop  

304 

3891 

Leesburg  Milling  Co.,  Leesburg. 

Manufacturers  __ 

10.7 

3.9 

3.4 

9.5 

9.8 

Lemon  Milling  Company,  The, 

Bedford,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oat.s  Chop 

3246 

4174 

8.6 

4.0 

4.3 

8.5 

9.3 

Ligonier  Milling  Company, 

Ligonier,  Ind. 

Ligonier  Milling  Co’s  Corn  & Oats 
Chop  

378 

2606 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.9 

4.5 

9.5 

10.2 

Ligonier  Milling  Co’s  Corn  & Oats 
Chop 

378 

4378 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.9 

3.9 

9.5 

10.4 

LinLhart,  J.  W.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 
Corn  & Oats  Chop  . 

4548 

3549 

J.  W.  Linkhart  & Son, 

North  Vernon ^ 

11.5 

3.0 

3.4 

9.0 

8.9 

Macy  Milling  Company,  Macy,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed“»‘' 

712; 

2197 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.7 

3.6 

11.0 

11.1 

Martin,  T.  C.,  LaFayette,  Ind. 

**Corn  & Oats  ChoD®®^ 

5313 

Artificial  Ice  Co.,  LaFayette 

Manufacturers  _ 

9.4 

3.7 

12.3 

Mead  Grain  Company,  Union  City,  Ind. 
Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

787 

1831 

12.6 

3.0 

3.6 

9.0 

9.9 

Morgan,  Frank,  Ilene,  (P.  0.  Lyons), 
Ind. 

Crax  Corn  Jir,  Oats 

7084 

2052 

Ola  Chambers,  Jasonville 

13.7 

3.5 

'3.7 

9.0 

8.8 

Crax  Corn  & Oats _ _ 

7084 

3949 

Purity  Bakery  Co.,  Linton.. . .. 

11.6 

3.5 

3.9 

9.0 

9.3 

McCorkle  & Riley,  ThorntoAvn,  Ind. 
Ground  Corn  and  Oats 

5888 

1958 

Manufacturers  

12.6 

3.5 

4.0 

9.0 

10.1 

McDougle,  T.,  Avilla,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1622 

4253 

Thos.  Grobis,  Avilla 

8.7 

3.9 

3.8 

9.5 

11.2 

Nading  Grain  Company,  Wm., 

Nading’s  Chop  Feed 

7278 

3196 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

3.9 

4.2 

9.5 

9.4 

New  Carlisle  Milling  Company, 

New  Carlisle,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  __  _ 

13h5 

2105 

Manufacturers  

12.2 

3.9 

4.3' 

9.0 

10.9 

Noftsger,  Benjamin,  Rochester,  Ind. 
Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

2051 

2187 

Manvifacturer  

11.0 

3.5 

4.4 

9.0 

10.3 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

2051 

3513 

Manufacturer  

10.3 

3.5 

4.6 

9.0 

10.1 

North  Manchester  Milling  Company, 
North  Manchester,  Ind. 

“North  Manchester  Milling  Companys 
Chop” 

856 

3914 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.9 

3.6 

9.5 

10.4 

Peru  Milling  Company,  The,  Peru,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed 

19 

2733 

Manufacturers  

13.6 

3.2 

3.5 

8.8 

8.9 

Chop  Feed 

19 

4392 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.2 

3.5 

8.8 

8.9 

Pitman,  H.  E.,  Bedford,  Ind. 

Chnp  Feed 

387 

2690 

Manufacturer  

11.6 

3.2 

3.9 

8.8 

8.9 

Chop  Feed 

387 

4178 

Manufacturer  

8.7 

3.2 

4.0 

8.8 

9.0 

Pyrmont  Mills  Company,  Pyrmont,  Ind. 

Pyrmont  Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

Pyrmont  Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

58.39 

5839 

3.576 

5.335 

T.  C.  Martin,  LaFayette 

T.  C.  Martin,  LaFayette 

12.4 

11.1 

3.9 

3.9 

3.5 

4.3 

9.5 

9.5 

10.0 

9.5 

'**  Not  registered  250  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

Corn  bran  and  probably  corn  feed  meal  7710 

Oats,  com  feed  meal  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  found 


105 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  - 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

[3 

*3 

€ 

o 

C 

.2 

’•+3 

0) 

1 'O 

(H  ^ 

c3  " 

O rt 

'O 

1 

I “ 

O tS 

'O 

a 

1 

Roach  & Rothenberger,  Delphi,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

284 

3890 

Manufacturers 

10.6 

3.9 

4.2 

9.5 

9.8 

Schlientz  & Sons,  Fred,  Centerville,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

1451 

3316 

Creitz  & Deardorff,  Centerville. 

10.6 

3.7 

4.3 

9.0 

9.0 

Schnaible  Grain  Company,  The  Matt, 

LaFayette,  Ind. 

Mixed  Ground  Corn  and  Oats 

3 

4514 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.0 

3.9 

9.0 

9.4 

Schroeder,  E.  F.,  Crown  Point,  Ind. 

Corn  Oats  Chop 

1356 

1789 

Manufacturer  _ 

14.9 

3.5 

3.3 

9.0 

9.4 

Smith,  D.  R.,  Tipton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

3016 

2369 

Manufacturer  i 

13.0 

3.5 

4.4 

9.0 

9.7 

Chop  Feed  

3016 

4444 

Manufacturer  ; 

10.7 

3.5 

4.3 

9.0 

9.3 

Smith  Grain  & Milling  Company, 

Warsaw,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oat  Chop 

802 

3587 

Green  Bros.  & Oldfather, 

Warsaw  

10.2 

3.7 

4.2 

9.5 

9.7 

South  Side  Cereal  Mills, 

Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

5403 

3960 

Manufacturers 

11.3 

3.5 

3.5 

9.0 

9.5 

Stafford,  Frank,  Bluffton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

3795 

1667 

Manufacturer 

10.8 

3.2 

3.9 

9.0 

9.9 

Strauss  & Son,  J.  W., 

North  Manchester,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  oo 

7406 

5027 

Manufacturers  _ __  _ __ 

9.8 

3.5 

6.3 

8.5 

10.6 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Company, 

Bluffton,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

6739 

1649 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Van  Buren  

12.8 

3.9 

4.0 

9.5 

9.6 

Sullivan  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Sullivan,  Ind. 

Coi’n  & Oats  Chop  

2959 

4027 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

3.5 

3.8 

9.0 

8.6 

Valentine  & Vaflentine,  Franklin,  Ind. 

Oat  Chops  _ _ 

3295 

2352 

Manufacturers  __ 

12.1 

3.5 

4.2 

9.0 

9.6 

Viers  & Wicks,  Rochester,  Ind. 

Viers  & Wicks’  Chop  Feed 

321 

2190 

Anchor  Milling  Co.,  Rochester. . 

12.5 

4.0 

4.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Wakarusa  Milling  Company, 

Wakarusa,  Ind. 

Wakarusa  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1250 

2613 

Manufacturers  _ _ _ 

11.4 

3.9 

4.9 

9.5 

10.9 

Watson  & Son,  C.  W.,  Redkey,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  __  __  

3931 

4125 

G.  Watson,  Redkev 

8.6 

3.5 

4.0 

9.0 

9.7 

Wilkinson  & Company,  T.  B., 

Knightstown,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

34.56 

2308 

Manufacturers 

11.7 

3.3 

4.0 

8.5 

10.1 

Chop  Feed  __  ^ _ 

34.56 

4415 

Manufacturers  

12.0 

3.3 

3.7 

8.5 

9.7 

Chop  Feed  _i_. __ 

3456 

5293 

Manufacturers 

12.1 

3.3 

4.1 

8.5 

io!i 

Wilson  & Company,  W.  D., 

Lakeville,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

3911 

2019 

Kramer  & Wolff,  Lakeville 

10.9 

3.5 

4.4 

9.0 

10.4 

Wiltrout,  Francis  M.,  Corunna,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

.5847 

4259 

Manufacturer  . 

9.0 

3.5 

4.2 

9.0 

11.7 

Woodburn  Elevator  & Milling 

Company,  Woodburn,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

748 

4230 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.9 

4.0 

9.5 

9.7 

Corn  feed  meal  present 


io6 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

§ 

43 

Sample  secured  from 

1 Official 

1 

u • 

oin 

GQ 

c 

R 0) 

OD  W 

o S 

S ft 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

CORN,  OATS,  SALT 

Acme-Evans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  Horse  & Mule  Peed  

5636 

1929 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  South  Bend... 

10.4 

4.0 

4.2 

i 

10.0 

10.2 

Acme  Horse  & Mule  Feed  

5636 

2002 

Farmers  Supply  Co.,  Spencer 

11.6 

4.0 

4.6 

10.0 

9.9 

Acme  Horse  & Mule  Feed  

5636 

4839 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  South  Bend— 

9.0 

4.0 

4.4 

10.0 

10.1 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE 

City  Feed  Store,  The,  Plymouth,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

3119 

2771 

Manufacturers 

12.0 

3.0 

3.6 

9.0 

9.4 

Goshen  Milling  Company,  The, 

Goshen,  Ind. 

5923 

1582 

Manufacturers 

11.2 

3.0 

4.1 

8.5 

10.6 

CORN,  OATS,  BARLEY 

Ashbrook  Company,  The  .1.  S., 

Mattoon,  111. 

Royal  Grain  Feed  _ 

5912 

5124 

Chas.  W.  Brizius  Co.,  Evansville 

10.7 

3.0 

4.7 

10.0 

10.0 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Kurvnek  Horse  Feed  __  _ __  

7060 

3059 

Maginot  Bros.,  Hammond  __ 

11.4 

3.0 

4.5 

10.0 

10.5 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 
Chicago,  111. 

White  Cross  Horse  Feed 

6245 

3163 

Paul  J.  Scholz  »&  Co.,  Whiting.. 

10.8 

2.5 

3.7 

10.0 

9.8 

White  Cross  Horse  Feed  _ 

White  Cross  Horse  Feed  

6245 

6245 

3258 

4180 

Probst  & Kassebaum, 

Indianapolis  

H.  E.  Pitman,  Bedford 

10.2 

10.4 

2.5 

2.5 

3.9 

3.9 

10.0 

10.0 

9.2 

10.2 

Edwards  & Loomis  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Excelsior  Horse  Feed  

4376 

3058 

J.  L.  Rhode  & Sons,  Hammond. 

10.9 

3.0 

4.4 

10.0 

10.4 

Keelin  Bros.  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 
American  Horse  Feed  _ _ 

7254 

3117 

A.  Heiberg,  Indiana  Harbor 

11.1 

3.0 

3.6 

9.0 

10.3 

CORN,  OATS.  BARLEY,  CORN 
FEED  MEAL 

Berne  Milling  Company,  Berne,  Ind. 

Lhnp  Lppd 

6673 

1801 

Manufacturers  

2.8 

3.9 

8.7 

9.9 

Chop  FePfl 

6673 

4158 

Manufacturers  

, 8.9 

2.8 

4.8 

8.7 

10.0 

CORN,  OATS,  BARLEY,  OAT  HULLS 

Acme-Evans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  C.  0.  & B.  Chop 

6200 

1928 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  South  Bend— 

8.0 

4.0 

3.7 

8.0 

8.7 

ttAcme  C.  0.  & B.  Chop 

6200 

3085 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  Vincennes 

10.6 

4.0 

4.7 

8.0 

8.7 

Acme  C.  0.  & B.  Chop 

6200 

4840 

Wilson  & Wykoff,  South  Bend.. 

7.2 

4.0 

3.7 

• 8.0 

8.0 

CORN,  OATS,  WHEy\T 

Claypole,*Geo.  M.,  Sardinia,  Ind. 
(Maypole’s  Chop 

2943 

3543 

John  Hallowell,  North  Vernon.. 

10.3 

3.5 

3.8 

10.0 

9.1 

(^laypole’s  Chop  

2943 

4722 

John  Hallowell,  North  Vernon.. 

9.4 

3.5 

3.8 

10.0 

9.7 

Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle,  Ind. 

**r’rar‘kpd  Lnrn  WhPHt  Ji’,  OmIs 

5310 

Manufacturers  

11.7 

3.3 

11.6 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  BARLEY 

Garrett  Elevator  Company, 

Garrett,  Ind. 

Chop  Fppd 

5229 

4227 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.0 

3.3 

9.0 

11.8 

Chop  f’ced  

4908 

Manufacturers  . 

10.7 

3.0 

3.3 

9.0 

11.4 

♦*  Not  registered  Kye  not  identifled 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  ”3  Wheat  and  cheat  present.  Barley  not  identifled 

s*!  400  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Labels  No.  .5636 
furnished 


107 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

c 

o 

Sample  secured  from 

2 -a 

LABEL 

O 

b . 

(DQ 

OD 

C 

5 g 

'S 

S ft 

O § 

73 

O rt 

•TS 

1 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  BARLEY, 

CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Columbia  City  Mill  & Elevator 
Company,  Columbia  City,  Ind. 

A.  Cbnp  Feed 

6991 

1531 

1 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

3.0 

3.5 

8.0 

10.5 

CORN,  OATS  BYE,  WHEAT,  CORN 
FEED  3IEAL 

Pancost  Milling  Company,  Elkhart,  Ind. 
Pnnenst,  Chop  Feed 

6887 

1608 

Manufacturers 

12.9 

3.0 

4.2 

8.0 

9.7 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  AVHEAT,  CORN 
MEAL,  CORN  BRAN 

Abbott  Milling  Company,  Elwood,  Ind. 
Ahbott’.c!  Chop  Eppd 

3779 

2377 

Manufacturers 

14.3 

3.8 

3.9 

9.4 

10.5 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  AVHEAT,  CORN 
FEED  3IEAL,  CORN  BRAN 

Pancost  Milling  Company,  Elkhart,  Ind. 
“Pancost’s”  Chop  Feed __ 

7400 

3863 

Manufacturers  

9.9 

3.0 

3.8 

8.0 

10.4 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  AVHEAT,  CORN 
FEED  3IEAL,  SCREENINGS 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain  Company, 
Winchester,  Ind. 

“Climax  Chop” 

6010 

1900 

Manufacturers 

10.0 

3.5 

3.4 

9.5 

11.5 

“Climax  Chop” 

6010 

4060' 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.5 

3.0 

9.5 

11.6 

CORN,  OATS.  RYE,  AVHEAT,  CORN 
FEED  AIEAL,  CORN  BRAN, 
SCREENINGS 

Myers  & Son,  Joseph  H.,  Chili,  Ind. 
Myers’  Chop  Feed  

6600 

2192 

Manufacturers 

12.9 

3.0 

4.2 

9.0 

10.7 

10.4 

Myers’  Chop  Feed  

6600 

3530 

Manufacturers 

10.1 

3.0 

4.0 

9.0 

CORN,  OATS,  SCREENINGS 

Acme  Grain  Company, 

North  Manchester,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

3556 

2470 

Manufacturers  . 

12.3 

3.9 

4.3 

9.5 

9.8 

Lewis  Milling  Company,  Lewis,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

7023 

4531 

Manufacturers  

8.9 

3.5 

3.6 

11.0 

10.7 

10.3 

10.3 

10.1 

10.7 

11.4 

9.7 

9.8 
9.7 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  BRAN 

Ashley-Hudson  Milling  & Grain 
Company,  Ashley,  Ind. 
Ashley-Hudson  Chop  Feed  

3783 

-4343 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.5 

3.7 

4.1 

4.1 

3.3 

4.5 

4.0 

1 5.0 
' 4.7 

9.5 

10.3 

9.5 

9.5 

9.5 

8.5 

10.3 

10.3 

Besser,  W.  T.,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Besser’s  Chop  Feed 

322 

2788 

Manufacturer  _ 

10.7 

11.2 

4.1 

3.5 

3.5 

3.5 

2.7 

4.1 

4.1 

Fyke  Milling  Company,  LaGrange,  Ind. 
Fyke’s  Chop  Feed 

2134 

2506 

Manufacturers 

Fyke’s  Chop  Feed 

2134 

43.53 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

10.2 

9.9 

11.4 

11.5 

Fyke’s  Chop  Feed  

2134 

4976 

Manufacturers 

Garrett  & Ftmk,  Liberty  Center,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

5122 

4686 

Manufacturers 

Harris  Milling  Company, 

Greencastle,  Ind. 

Harris’  Chop  Feed 

210 

2997 

Manufacturers 

Harris’  Chon  Feed 

21P 

3374 

Marshall  & O’Hair,  Greencastle. 

io8 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

.§ 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

CQ 

c 

5 ^ 

a y 

Is 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Martin,  John  D.,  LaFayette,  Ind. 

3889 

4484 

Manufacturer 

9.7 

3.5 

4.7 

9.5 

9.6 

Mattix  & Company,  N.  W., 

Lebanon,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

3231 

1986 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

3.5 

5.0 

9.0 

10.3 

Morgan  & Bro.,  C.  D.,  Mexico,  Ind. 

Ohnp  Feed 

4824 

2220 

R.  J.  Morgan,  Mexico..  

14.2 

3.5 

3.6 

9.0 

9.0 

Pennville  Milling  Company, 

Pennville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

3546 

4156 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

3.0 

3.8 

9.0 

9.9 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
CORN  BRAN 

Bicknell  Mill  Company,  Bicknell,  Ind. 
Chon  Feed  

7823 

5013 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.5 

4.4 

9.0 

10.1 

Blackmore,  D.  M.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 
Blackmore’s  Chop  Feed  . 

3787 

3201 

Manufacturer  

10.3 

3.5 

4.9 

9.0 

9.5 

Blackmore’s  Chop  Feed  

3787 

4746 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

3.5 

4.1 

9.0 

10.2 

Bristol  Milling  Company,  Bristol,  Ind. 
“Chop  Feed” 

7417 

3842 

A.  C.  Keene,  Elkhart  

10.4 

3.0 

3.9 

9.0 

9.9 

Brooks  & Son,  L.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

New  Chop  Feed 

4407 

3032 

U.  G.  McCoy  & Co.,  Vincennes.. 

10.4 

4.0 

3.8 

9.0 

8.6 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Burrell  & Morgan’s  Chop  Feed  

5835 

1576 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

3.0 

5.3 

8.0 

10.3 

Burrell  & Morgan’s  Chop  Feed 

5835 

3849 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Mishawaka.. 

10.1 

3.0 

3.8 

8.0 

10.5 

Butler  Milling  Company,  Butler,  Ind. 
Choi)  Feed  _ _ 

6940 

4926 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.0 

4.4 

8.7 

10.5 

Converse  Flouring  Mill,  Converse,  Ind. 
Converse  Flouring  Mill’s  Chop  Feed... 

4166 

2295 

Geo.  O.  Antrim,  Converse 

10.8 

2.7 

4.0 

8.0 

9.7 

DeBaun  Mill,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Old  Eeliable  Chop  Feed  . _ 

3338 

3303 

Yaw  Bros.,  Terre  Haute .. 

10.4 

3.5 

3.7 

9.0 

8.2 

Delp  Grain  Company,  E.  E., 

Bourbon,  Ind. 

Cbop  Feed 

6550 

2805 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.0 

4.5 

9.0 

10.7 

Gas  City  Elevator  Company, 

Gas  (hty,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7998 

5274 

Gas  City  Elevator,  Gas  City 

10.7 

3.0 

3.8 

9.0 

11.1 

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Company, 
Geneva,  Ind. 

Egly’s  Chop  Feed 

6740 

3284 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

2.8 

4.3 

8.7 

9.1 

Heckman  & Company,  Decatur,  Ind. 
Heckman’s  Chop  Feed 

3420 

2098 

Decatur  Roller  Mills,  Decatur 

13.4 

3.0 

3.7 

9.0 

10.1 

Heckman’s  Chop  Feed 

3420- 

4200 

Fornax  Milling  Co.,  Decatur 

9.9 

3.0 

3.7 

9.0 

10.3 

Hollett-Winders  Grain  Company,  The, 
Arcadia,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ . .. 

5780 

2399 

Manufacturers  

14.0 

3.0 

4.8 

9.0 

10.5 

Chop  Feed ..  . 

5780 

4442 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.0 

4.8 

9.0 

10.2 

Jones  & Son,  C.  N.,  Wabash,  Ind. 

“A”  Chop  Feed  _ . . 

5191 

4386 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.0 

3.3 

9.0 

9.2 

Lefforge,  Otto,  Rossville,  Ind. 
tChop  Feed  

7932 

4496 

Manufacturer  

9.2 

3.0 

4.5 

8.0 

10.3 

t Before  registration 


109 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

LABEL 

§ 

•43 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

u • 

GQ 

Moistu] 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

I Found 

Little  Crow  Milling  Company, 

Warsaw,  Ind. 

Little  Crow'  Mixed  Chop  Feed 

Little  Crow  Mixed  Chop  Feed 

Lowe  & Son,  J.  S.,  Gas  City,  Ind. 

Lowe’s  Chop  Feed  ___ 

Majot  & Morgan,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 
tChop  Feed 

5454 

5454 

3514 

8039 

1545 

3596 

2321 

4799 

Maumee  Valley  Mills,  New  Haven,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed 

4382 

3958 

Chop  Feed  _ 

4382 

4217 

McCormick  & Son,  Chas.  W., 
Logansport,  Ind. 

A.  Chop  Feed  

4060 

2652 

A.  Chop  Feed 

4060 

4008 

Naber  & Company,  Chas.  F., 

Alexandria,  Ind. 

Nabers  Chop 

7196 

2355 

Nabers  Chop 

7196 

4419 

Nading  Grain  Company,  Wm., 
Greensburg,  Ind. 

Nading’s  Ground  Feed __  

7710 

4744 

Niezer  & Company,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
Niezer’s  Chop  Feed ___ 

6269 

39&3 

Niezer’s  Chop  Feed 

6269 

4220 

Oxford  Feed  Mill,  Oxford,  Ind. 

Deed’s  “Chop  Feed’’ 

4990 

3672 

Phillips,  J.  C.,  Star  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Peed  _ 

7597 

3454 

Pierceton  Grain  Company, 

Pierceton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ 

4429 

3984 

Chop  Feed  

4429 

4219 

Ray  & Rice,  Camden,  Ind. 

“A”  Chop  Feed  

4762 

1477 

“A”  Chop  Feed  _ 1 . 

4762 

2990 

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Schaefer’s  Special  Chop  Feed 

7190 

2749 

Sheridan  Milling  Company, 

Sheridan,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ 

5964 

4269 

Smith  & Company,  A.,  Sheridan,  Ind. 
New  Chop  Feed 

6264 

4265 

Smith  Company,  0.  E.,  Wabash,  Ind. 
Smith’s  Chop  Feed ___ 

5300 

4391 

South  Side  Feed  Store,  Peru,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed __  

7530 

4382 

St.  Joe  Milling  Company,  St.  Joe,  Ind. 
Kosht’s  Chop  Feed  ..  

5842 

4932 

Stone  Quarry  Mills,  Spiceland,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  •_  _ 

3996 

2627 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.0 

4.1 

9.0 

10.1 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.0 

4.1 

9.0 

10.5 

Gas  City  Elevator  Co.,  Gas  City 

12.4 

3.0 

3.4 

8.7 

9.9 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

2.8 

3.9 

8.5 

10.5 

Allegers  Feed  Store,  Fort  Wayne 

11.8 

3.5 

3.7 

9.0 

9.7 

Manufacturers  ___  

9.4 

3.5 

3.6 

9.0 

9.9 

Manufacturers  

12.5 

3.5 

3.6 

9.0 

10.3 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.5 

4.0 

9.0 

10.5 

Manufacturers  _ 

12.6 

2.5 

5.5 

8.0 

10.7 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

2.5 

4.5 

8.0 

9.3 

Manufacturers  

8.8 

3.3 

3.9 

9.5 

10.3 

Niezer  & Co.,  Monroeville.. _ 

10.3 

2.8 

3.9 

8.7 

10.2 

Niezer  «fe  Co.,  Monroeville 

9.4 

2.8 

3.9 

8.7 

10.4 

Oxford  Feed  Store,  Oxford...  . 

10.6 

3.0 

4.1 

9.0 

9.6 

Manufacturer  .... 

12.4 

2.8 

3.0 

8.7 

10.3 

Debolt  & Niswonger,  Monroeville 

10.1 

3.0 

4.6 

8.0 

19.2 

Debolt  & Niswonger,  Monroeville 

9.1 

3.0 

4.0 

8.0 

9.8 

Manufacturers  ..  ...  ... 

10.6 

3.5 

4.2 

9.0 

10,7 

Manufacturers  . ..  ... 

9.4 

3.5 

3.9 

9.0 

9.1 

Manufacturer  ... 

10.0 

3.0 

4.4 

8.0 

11.8 

Manufacturers  ..  

8.7 

2.7 

3.7 

9.0 

10.1 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

3.0 

4.5 

8.8 

10.7 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

3.0 

2.8 

9.0 

8.7 

Manufacturers  . 

9.9 

2.8 

3.9 

8.8 

10.7 

St.  Joe  Mills,  St.  Joe 

4 

9.7 

3.0 

4.0 

8.5 

19.7 

Manufacturers 

10.9 

2.7 

4.1 

8.0 

9.2 

t Before  registration 


no 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

c 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

CQ 

c 

5 g 

CD  W 

*s  ^ 

Is 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Strombeck,  John  C., 

North  Webster,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ . 

6542 

3592 

W.  B A^nhn,  North  Wel'Ster 

10.6 

2.8 

4.1 

8.7 

9.0 

9.8 

9.4 

Swayzee  Milling  Company,  Swayzee,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed _ _ __  

5208 

4693 

Manufacturers  

8.5 

3.0 

4.6 

Swayzee’s  Market,  Marion,  Ind. 
ywayzee’s  Chop  Feed 

5522 

2391 

Manufacturers 

12.8 

3.0 

4.0 

3.9 

9.0 

10.3 

9.6 

Tresselt  & Sons,  C.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
Tresselt’s  Chop  Feed 

7209 

3965 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.5 

9.0 

Tuttle  & Company,  R., 

Columbia  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed __  

6945 

1528 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.8 

3.0 

4.2 

9.0 

9.9 

Chop  Feed  __ 

6945 

3937 

Manufacturers 

10.3 

3.0 

' 4.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Chop  Feed 

6945 

4992 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

3.9 

4.2 

9.0 

10.1 

Ulrey  & Company,  A.  A., 

Fairmount,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

6241 

4416 

Manufacturers  __  

11.2 

2.5 

4.3 

8.0 

9.6 

Walton  & Whisler,  Atlanta,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ 

5781 

2405 

Manufacturers  

13.2 

3.0 

4.6 

8.7 

9.7 

Chop  Feed  _ 

5781 

4435 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.0 

2.9 

8.7 

9.7 

Wellington  Milling  Company, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Wellington’s  A.  X.  A.  Cboji  Feed 

5145 

4359 

Manufacturers  __  

9.7 

3.0 

4.6 

9.0 

9.8 

West  Middleton  Mill  & Elevator 
Company,  West  Middleton,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  _ _ . 

6992 

2939 

Manufacturers  

12.6 

3.0 

3.8 

9.0 

9.7 

Chop  Feed  _ 

6992 

3431 

W.  E.  Hays,  Kokomo 

10.8 

3.0 

4.0 

9.0 

10.2 

Zionsville  Milling  Company, 

Zionsville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

4621 

1903 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

3.0 

3.6 

9.0 

9.4 

Chop  Feed  _ __  

4621 

4783 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.0 

3.9 

9.0 

9.9 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
CORN  FLOUR,  CORN  BRAN 

Nichols  & Company,  C.  E.,  Lowell,  Ind. 
Ground  Feed  

5398 

1708 

Manufacturers  __  _ 

13.0 

3.5 

3.5 

9.0 

11.0 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  AIEAL, 
CORN  BRAN,  SCREENINGS 

Clover  Leaf  Flour  Mills,  Kokomo,  Ind. 
(?lover  beat  Chop  Feed 

4448 

3428 

ivlanufacturer  _ _ 

10.7 

3.0 

3.3 

7.9 

9.0 

Lynn  Milling  Company,  The,  Lynn,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed 

6939 

1897 

Manufacturers  

12.1 

2.7 

4.1 

8.7 

12.1 

Worthington  Grain  Company, 
Worthington,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  No.  1 

6758 

2006 

Manufacturers  __  

12.1 

2.8 

3.0 

8.7 

10.4 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
CORN  BRAN,  COB  MEAL 

Heavilin  & Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

(,'hop  Feed 

7411 

2383 

Manufacturers  

12.8 

2.5 

4.2 

7.0 

10.2 

Smock  & Caca,  Noblesville,  Ind. 

Caca’s  Choj)  Feed  

4483 

4447 

Manufacturers  

9.4 

3.5 

3.8 

9.0 

10.0 

Zook  Bros.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

No.  2 Chop  Feed  

4993 

2655 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

2.8 

5.3 

7.0 

10.5 

Ill 


TABLE  IV— Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


- — - ■ - 

Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

I 

P-M- 

per  cent. 

LABEL 

Official 

Q* 

(A 

c 

HH 

Sample  secured  from 

Moistui 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

j Found 

CORN,  OATS,  rye,  CORN  FEED 
MEAL 

Fiat  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 
Montpelier,  Ind. 

46Ga 

1 

1763 

John  Dean,  Fiat 

i 

11.7 

i 

! 

3.0 

3.8 

8.5 

9.9 

Hershman  & Son,  Tipton,  Ind. 

4898 

2402 

Manufacturers  

12.7 

3.2 

4.2 

8.7 

10.0 

4898 

4446 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.2 

4.0 

8.7 

10.0 

Jones,  G.  W.,  Upland,  Ind. 

G012 

4124 

Manufacturer  __  

9.1 

3.5 

3.3 

9.0 

9.2 

Milner  & Grube,  Plymouth,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

G079 

2796 

W.  C.  Curtis  & Co.,  Plymouth.. 

10.0 

2.8 

3.8 

8.7 

10.1 

Watson  & Son,  C.  W.,  Redkey,  Ind. 

5622 

1725 

G.  L.  Watson,  Redkey 

12.4 

3.5 

3.5 

8.0 

10.7 

CORN,  OATS,  rye,  CORN  FEED 
MEAL,  CORN  BRAN 

Angola  Flouring  Mills,  Angola,  Ind. 

7241 

4317 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.0 

3.6 

9.0 

10.1 

7241 

4948 

Manufacturers  — 

11.0 

3.0 

5.2 

9.0 

10.7 

Bluffton  Milling  Company, 

Bluffton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Chop  Feed  

3397 

1657 

Manufacturers  

13.1 

3.0 

4.3 

9.0 

10.1 

3397 

4656 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

3.0 

4.2 

9.0 

9.6 

Crawford,  J.  C.,  Gas  City,  Ind. 

npnp  pppd 

6826 

2320 

Manufacturer  ...  

13.2 

3.0 

4.1 

9.0 

9.6 

French,  Hubert,  Linn  Grove,  Ind. 

5723 

2123 

Manufacturer  . 

13.6 

2.9 

4.2 

8.4 

10.5 

XitJilLll  X CCCl  

French  Chop  Feed 

5723 

3282 

Manufacturer  . 

11.3 

2.9 

3.2 

8.4 

9.9 

('"’hnTA  'R’ppH 

5723 

4651 

Manufacturer  ..  ..  ._  ._  

11.4 

2.9 

3.3 

8.4 

10.3 

X’iCllLll  X 

Gaston  Roller  Mill,  Gaston,  Ind. 

"FppH 

5510' 

4936 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.0 

4.9 

8.7 

9.8 

Gnagy,  G.  L.,  Hamilton,  Ind. 

Ohop 

5434 

4322 

Manufacturer  ...  

9.2 

2.8 

2.8 

8.5 

10.4 

Harting'  & Company,  Elwood,  Ind. 

TTor1-ino'’c  Ti’ppH 

5253 

2373 

Manufacturers  . 

14.0 

3.5 

5.0 

9.0 

10.2 

Xiditlllg  O X ttCl  — — 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  CORN  FEED 
MEAL,  MHEAT  BRAN,  WHEAT 
MIDDLINGS,  CORN  BRAN 

Milan  Mill  & Elevator,  Milan,  Ind. 

TTr^-ron  T?  o f’f'Pn  PT 

6367 

6367 

6002 

3618 

Manufacturers  

11.6 

3.2 

3.8 

10.5 

9.£ 

TTr^Too  T?PnH  Xr.  T^tiffpriPl' 

4725 

Manufacturers  : 

9.9 

3.2 

3.9 

10.5 

10.5 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  CORN  FEED 
3IEAL,  WHEAT  :MIDDLINGS, 

CORN  BRAN 

Starr  Mills,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

^hop  "ppp^i 

1989 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

3.0 

4.5 

9.0 

lO.f 

C'hop 

6002 

3814 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

3.0 

3.8 

9.0 

lo.r 

(^hop  Ff*Pcl 

6002 

4837 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

3.0 

4.4 

9.0 

10.f 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE,  CORN  FEED 
MEAL,  CORN  FLOUR,  CORN 
GERMS,  CORN  BRAN 

Jonesboro  Milling  Company, 

Jonesboro,  Ind. 

Naber’s  Chop  

. 7336 

2322 

Manufacturers  

11.8 

3.0 

4.2 

9.0 

10.5 

Rye  not  identified  v^hrivelled  and  cracked  wheat  and  cheat 


■112 


TABLE  IV— Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

- - 

Crude 

Crude 

S 

Fat 

Protein 

LABEL 

per  cent. 

per  cent. 

Sample  secured  from 

.rt 

5 ^ 

1 13 

jV  Q) 

1 fO 

i 0) 

'O 

56 

O 

OQ 

d 

CQ  W 

*s  ^ 

Is 

1 

O rt 

1 

CORN,  OATS.  RYE,  CORN  BRAN, 
WHEAT  SCREENINGS,  MILL 
SWEEPINGS 

Akron  Milling  Company,  The, 

Akron,  Ind. 

tMixed  Chop  Feed 

7510 

2616 

Manufacturers 

19  9 

2.5 

2.3 

8.0 

10.4 

CORN,  OATS,  WHEAT,  CORN 

PEED  3IEAL 

Clayton  Milling  Company,  Clayton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ _ 

5344 

2984 

Manufacturers 

10.5 

3.0 

4.8 

9.0 

10.7 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 

CORN  BRAN,  CORN  SCREEN- 
INGS 

Milford  Grain  & Milling  Company, 

Milford,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

6628 

2819 

Manufacturers 

10.9 

2.8 

3.7 

8.7 

10.1 

CORN,  OATS.  WHEAT,  CORN 

FEED  MEAL,  CORN  BRAN, 
CORN  SCREENINGS 

1 

Wabash  Milling  Company,  Wabash,  Ind. 

Surnmerton’s  Chop 

5969 

4388 

Manufacturers 

11.6 

2.0 

3.4 

8.0 

9.3 

WTIEAT.  CORN,  OATS,  WHEAT 

SCREENINGS 

Phillips  & Ross  Grain  Company, 

Rosedale,  Ind. 

Mill  Feed 

3096 

2110 

Manufacturers 

10.2 

10.5 

2.0 

2.0 

2.2 

2^7 

5.0 

5.0 

11.6 

11.3 

Mill  Feed  

3096 

4498 

Manufacturers 

CORN,  OATS.  WHEAT  BRAN, 
SCREENINGS 

Stader,  Frank  E.,  Evansville,  Ind. 
Stader’s  Mixed  Horse  Feed 

5134 

3229 

Manufacturer 

9.5 

3.7 

5.4 

10.0 

11.3 

CORN,  OATS,  AVHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BR.VN,  SCREENINGS 

Spink  Milling  Company, 

Washington,  Ind. 

Snink’s  Standard  Horse  Feed 

7454 

3876 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.5 

3.8 

9.5 

9.5 

11.1 

10.9 

Snink’s  Standard  Horse  Feed 

7454 

5223 

Manufacturers 

9.5 

3.5 

4.8 

CORN,  OATS,  WHEAT  BRAN, 

CORN  FEED  MEAL,  CORN 

BRAN,  SCREENINGS 

Mexico  Roller  Mills,  Mexico,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  No.  1 

5952 

3534 

Manufacturers 

10.5 

3.2 

3.8 

8.5 

10.8 

CORN,  OATS,  WHEAT  BRAN, 

MIDDLIN(;S,  SCREENINGS 

Moutoux,  P.  & H.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

“X  L.”  Dry  Mixed  Feed 

5079 

Manufacturers 

9.3 

2.5 

4.3 

9.0 

11.4 

CORN,  0.\TS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Amboy  Grain  Company,  Amboy,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

6897 
5004  1 

2292 

M a nufactnrers 

11.6 

2.8 

4.0 

8.7 

10.2 

Auburn  Feed  Store,  Auburn,  Ind. 

Choi)  Feed  

4223 

Manufacturers  __ 

9.8 

3.2 

4.0  1 

8.5 

10.8 

t Before  registration  "6  1200  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 


7663 


113 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


V 

Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

1 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

§ 

^ A 
R o 
m y 

*s  ^ 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Bash  & Company,  S.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
A.  Chop  Feed  _ 

4456 

3973 

Manufacturers  

9.7 

2.5 

6.2 

1 

9.0 

11.0 

Belt  Elevator  & Feed  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ 

3777 

3394 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.5 

4.2 

9.0 

9.7 

Bristol  Milling  Company,  Bristol,  Ind. 

3901 

1595 

Manufacturers  

14.5 

3.5 

3.5 

9.0 

9.3 

City  Mills,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

6107 

3943 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

3.0 

3.6 

9.0 

9.4 

6107 

4996 

Manufacturers  

9.8 

3.0 

4.1 

9.0 

10.5 

Crawford  Feed  Store,  Jay  S., 

Crown  Point,  Ind. 

5246 

2202 

Manufacturers 

13.3 

3.0 

4.0 

8.0 

10.7 

10.2 

Crawford’s  Chop  Feed  

5246 

3216 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point__- 

10.8 

3.0 

3.7 

8.0 

Fornax  Milling  Company,  Decatur,  Ind. 

7201 

2092 

Manufacturers  

12.2 

3.5 

3.5 

9.0 

11.3 

7201 

4198 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.5 

4.1 

9.0 

9.6 

Candy  & Company,  0., 

South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

3927 

2196 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.0 

5.3 

8.5 

10.9 

Chop  Feed  

3927 

3041 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

10.2 

3.0 

4.1 

8.5 

9.7 

Cotto,  0.  W.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _____ 

6885 

21.54 

Manufacturer 

11.4 

3.2 

4.4 

9.0 

10.1 

Chop  Feed  _ __  __ 

6885 

3758 

Manufacturer  

12.0 

3.2 

3.3 

9.0 

9.6 

Craft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

3838 

1844 

Manufacturer  

11.0 

3.5 

3.5 

8.5 

9.8 

Chop  Feed  

3838 

4065 

Manufacturer 

9.5 

3.5 

3.3 

8.5 

9.6 

Havens,  P.  W.,  Hartford  City,  Ind. 
Havens’  Chop  Feed  _ __  __  

,5542 

2974 

Manufacturer 

10.5 

3.5 

3.7 

8.5 

9.1 

Heitschmidt,  A.  C.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

5672 

2159 

Manufacturer 

12.4 

3.0 

3.2 

9.0 

9.3 

Chop  Feed 

5672 

3760 

Manufacturer 

11.9 

3.0 

3.3 

9.0 

9.1 

Chop  Feed  

5672 

4797 

Manufacturer  

10.1 

3.0 

3.3 

9.0 

9.3 

Hibhits  Mill  Company,  Muncie,  Ind. 
Hibbits  Chop  Feed  _ 

3708 

4098 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

3.2 

3.7 

9.0 

9.7 

Jay  Grain  Company,  The,  Elwood,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed _ 

7021 

2379 

Manufacturers  

13.8 

3.8 

4.1 

9.0 

9.7 

Jordan,  Geo.  M.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

G.  M.  J.  Horse  & Mule  Chop 

7619 

5008 

Manufacturer  

12.2 

3.5 

3.7 

9.0 

9.1 

Kasch,  Chas.  C.,  Logansport,  Ind. 
Kasch’s  Chop  Feed 

5539 

26,57 

Manufacturer  

13.1 

3.5 

3.7 

9.0 

8.9 

Kasch’s  Chop  Feed  _ __  

5539 

4012 

Manufacturer  

10.8 

3.5 

3.5 

9.0 

9.5 

Kennedy  Milling  Company,  M.  W., 
LaFontaine,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ _ _ 

6067 

2298 

Manufacturers  

11.8 

3.0 

4.0 

8.0 

9.7 

Chop  Feed  _ _ _ 

6067 

2965 

Hare  Feed  Mill,  T.aFnntaine 

10.3 

3.0 

3.9 

8.0 

9.4 

Kiest  Milling  Company,  Knox,  Ind. 

Kiest  Milling  Co’s  Chop  Feed  

3957 

2845 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

3.0 

4.1 

9.0 

10.2 

Klondike  Milling  Company, 

Danville,  Ind. 

Klondike  Chop  Feed 

4430 

3399 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

3.0 

4.8 

9.0 

10.4 

1500  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
6456 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Knecht  Milling  Company, 

Hartford  City,  Ind. 

Knecht  Milling  Co.  Chop  Peed 

Lee  & Company,  James  M., 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Success  Chop  Feed 

Success  Chop  Feed 

Miller  Flour  & Feed  Company,  The 
Wesley,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Chop  Feed  

Paxson,  C.  E.,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Chop  Feed  

Rakestraw,  H.  E.,  Oakford,  Ind. 

“A”  Perfection  Chop  Feed 

Rouch,  W.  E.,  Mishawaka,  Ind. 

Rouch’s  Chop  Feed 

Runge  & Company,  John, 

Richmond,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Russell  & Company,  Portland,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

Scientific  Milling  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

Sellars,  James  H.,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

Simmerman,  Jacob,  Eaton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Sims  Milling  Company,  Frankfort,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  ^ 

Streeter  Coal  & Feed  Company, 

Muncie,  Ind. 

tChop  Feed  

Union  Elevator  Company, 

New  Richmond,  Ind. 
tUnion  Chop  Feed 

Union  Feed  & Poultry  Company, 
LaFayette,  Ind. 

Union  Chop  Feed 

Union  Chop  Feed 

Wells,  Guy  M.,  Knox,  Ind. 

Wells’  Chop  Feed 

Wiegman  & Zelt,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

CORN.  OATS.  CORN  FEEO  MEAL, 
SCREENINGS 

Hammel  Milling  Company, 

Fremont,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Cho p Feed ... 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture  '' 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

i 

.2 

o . 

mo 

OQ 

C 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

6433 

1704 

Manufacturers  

13.1 

2.5 

4.1 

i 

, 8.5 

9.0 

5421 

2530 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

2.7 

4.8 

8.5 

11.2 

5421 

3704 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

2.7 

4.7 

S.5 

( 

10.6 

4111 

1933 

Manufacturers  

13.1 

3.5 

3.3 

I 

9.0 

9.8 

4111 

3811 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.5 

4.2 

9.0 

9.3 

1 

6407 

1579 

Manufacturer  _ _ 

11.5 

3.0 

4.3 

1 0.0 

' H.2 

6407 

3841 

Manufacturer  

10.5 

3.0 

4.3 

9.0 

9.3 

6496 

3432 

Manufacturer  . 

10.5 

3.5 

3.8 

9.0 

9.5 

7247 

3847 

North  Side  Feed  Store, 

Mishawaka  _ __  

10.5 

3.5 

4.1 

; 9.0 

9.9 

3502 

3318 

Manufacturers  

10.5 

2.7 

5.5 

8.5 

10.0 

6798 

1732 

Manufacturers  . . 

14.5 

3.0 

3.8 

8.7 

9.4 

4437 

2385 

Manufacturers  __  

13.2 

3.0 

4.4 

8.5 

9.8 

5213 

3684 

Manufacturer  ___ 

11.3 

3.0 

3.3 

8.5 

10.4 

5722 

1969 

Manufacturer . 

12.5 

3.4 

4.2 

8.7 

10.3 

6723 

3440 

Manufacturers  _ 

i 

1 10.8 

3.0 

4.0 

9.0 

9.7 

7792 

4094 

Manufacturers  __ 

9.3 

3.0 

3.9 

8.5 

10.1 

7755 

3685 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.0 

4.4 

9.0 

9.7 

7182 

2684 

Manufacturers  

11.7 

3.5 

3.8 

9.5 

9.2 

7182 

5252 

Manufacturers  __  

10.3 

3.5 

4.4 

9.5 

9.4 

6065 

2849 

Manufacturer  

11.9 

3.2 

3.5 

8.3 

9.3 

5179 

3970 

Manufacturers  

11.1 

3.2 

3.6 

8.0 

9.5 

4048 

4290 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

2.5 

3.4 

9.0 

10.6 

4048 

4940 

Manufacturers  

9.3 

2.5 

4.0 

9.0 

n.o 

t Before  registration 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Timbrook  & Haifley,  Auburn, 
Auburn  Roller  Mills  Chop  __ 
Auburn  Roller  Mills  Chop  __ 


Ind. 


CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
OAT  MIDDLINGS,  OAT  SHORTS, 
OAT  HULLS,  SALT 

Fairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

Winner  Chop  

Winner  Chop  

Winner  Chop  

Winner  Chop  **8 

Winner  Chop  


CORN,  OATS,  COB  MEAL 

Daugherty,  S.  P.,  Edwardsburg,  Mich. 
S.  P.  Daugherty’s  Chop  Feed 


Friedrich  & Son,  C.  W.,  Dyer,  Ind. 

Friedrich’s  Chop  Feed  

Friedrich’s  Chop  Feed  


CORN,  OATS,  CORN  BRAN, 
SCREENINGS 

Akron  Milling  Company,  The, 
Akron,  Ind. 

Akron  Ohop  

Akron  Chop  


Farmers  Milling  & Elevator  Company, 
Veedersburg,  Ind. 

No.  1 Chop  Feed 

No.  1 Chop  Feed 


CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
CORN  BRAN,  SCREENINGS 

Lemon  Milling  Company,  The, 

Bedford,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  


CORN,  OATS,  CORN  SCREENINGS 

Canal  Elevator  Company,  Peru,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Chop  Feed  


CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
CORN  SCREENINGS,  WHEAT 
SCREENINGS 

Furr  & Cohee,  Bunker  Hill,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  


CORN,  CORN  FEED  MEAL,  CORN 
BRAN,  OAT  mODLINGS,  OAT 
SHORTS,  OAT  HULLS,  WHEAT 
SCREENINGS 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 
Mixed  Chop  Feed 


CORN  MEAL,  CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Dillsboro  Milling  Company, 

Dillsboro,  Ind. 

**Corn  & Corn  Feed  Meal  Mixed 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent.  j 

Crude 
Fat  - 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

6340 

4224 

Timbrook  & Hursh,  Auburn 

9.7 

3.9 

4.1 

9.5 

10.8 

6340 

4912 

Timbrook  & Hursh,  Auburn 

10.1 

3.9 

4.6 

9.5 

10.5 

7108 

1755 

Dugger  Feed  Store,  Dugger  

1L4 

3.0 

3.1 

8.0 

7.5 

7108 

2602 

H.  E.  Pitman,  Bedford 

1 10.8 

3.0 

3.0 

8.0 

7.7 

7108 

3874 

F.  S.  Gregory,  Washington 

1 8.5 

3.0 

3.0 

8.0 

8.2 

7106 

4109 

Geo.  A.  Charles,  West  Baden 

8.0 

3.0 

3.0 

8.0 

8.7 

7714 

4707 

Warford  Bros.,  Trevlac 

1 8.8 

3.0 

2.7 

7.0 

8.6 

6492 

3844 

C.  A.  Anderson,  Elkhart 

10.1 

3.3 

4.3 

8.7 

9.8 

2714 

1715 

Manufacturers  

14.7 

3.0 

3.8 

9.0 

9.4 

2714 

3171 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.0 

3.7 

9.0 

8.8 

2794 

2618 

Manufacturers  _ 

11.6 

3.5 

5.4 

9.0 

11.6 

2794 

3573 

Manufacturers  

10.7 

3.5 

3.5 

9.0 

11.1 

5.597 

2252 

Manufacturers  

10.4 

3.5 

3.9 

9.0 

10.5 

5597 

4469 

Manufacturers  _ 

9.9 

3.5 

3.8 

9.0 

9.5 

6804 

4169 

Manufacturers  _ 

8.8 

3.0 

5.1 

8.5 

9.9 

886 

2734 

Manufacturers  

12.7 

3.2 

3.0 

8.8 

10.3 

886 

4395 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

3.2 

3.4 

8.8 

9.9 

6408 

4400 

Manufacturers  

11.4 

3.0 

4.3 

8.5 

9.3 

6598 

1876 

Manufacturers  

1 

9.7 

2.0 

4.4 

7.5 

11.4 

3602 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

4.0 

8.6 

Not  registered 


Oat  middlings  not  identified 


ii6 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

a> 

5 0) 

OQ  O 

*s  ^ 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Orleans  Mill  & Elevator  Company,  The, 
Orleans,  Ind. 

7451 

2649 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

5.0 

1 

5.9  1 

9.0  ^ 

10.2 

Shields  & Company,  A.  D., 

Seymour,  Ind. 

5231 

3716 

Chas.  Vogel,  Seymour  

11.8 

2.5 

1 

4.4 

7.5 

8.5 

OAT  3IIDDLINGS 

Dixon  Cereal  & Feed  Company, 

Dixon,  111. 

3207 

C.  J.  Loyd  & Co.,  Greensburg__ 

7.7 

7.9 

16.5 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The, 

Chicago,  111. 

**Rock  River  Fine  Oatmeal 

4241 

Krause  & Applebaum,  Bremen.. 

9.2 

4.6 

H.7 

OATS,  BARLEY,  WHEAT 

Mortorff,  M.  J.,  Metz,  Ind. 

4310 

Manufacturer  

9.4 

2.7 

12.5 

OATS,  CORN  MEAL,  SCREENINGS 

Worthington  Grain  Company, 
Worthington,  Ind. 

<~lhnp  Ti'ppr) 

3967 

3932 

Manufacturers  

10.0 

3.5 

3.3 

10.0 

10.1 

OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL,  CORN 
BRAN,  MHEAT  AND  CORN 
SCREENINGS 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain 
Company,  Monticello,  Ind. 

I.miyhry’s  Mivpii  Chop  Feed 

5935 

3373 

J.  F.  Biehl  & Son,  Brazil 

10.6 

3.0 

3.5 

8.5 

11.0 

Loughry’s  Mixed  Chop  Feed 

5935 

3577 

T.  C.  Martin,  LaFayette 

11.4 

3.0 

3.2 

8.5 

10.8 

T nnghry’s  Mivpd  Chop  Feed 

5935 

5319 

T.  C.  Martin,  LaFayette 

9.2 

3.0 

3.5 

8.5 

11.9 

OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Kuhn  & Company,  J.  H., 

Michigan  City,  Ind. 

“A”  Chop  Feed 

3840 

3752 

J.  H.  Kuhn  & Son, 

Michigan  City 

11.6 

3.4 

3.9 

9.0 

9.7 

OATS,  CORN  BRAN 

Greenfield  Milling  Company, 

Greenfield,  Ind. 

Chop  Fppd 

5141 

2742 

Manufacturers  . 

10.6 

2.0 

6.0 

6.0 

11.2 

.VLFALFA  MEAL 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 
Chicago,  111. 

Alfalfa  Meal 

2816 

2162 

A.  C.  Heitschmidt, 

Michigan  City  

8.6 

1.0 

1.5 

12.0 

13.3 

Alfalfa  Meal  — 

2816 

4796 

A.  C.  Heitschmidt, 

Michigan  City  

7.9 

1.0 

1.6 

12.0 

15.0 

Kornfalfa  Feed  Milling  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Pioneer  Alfalfa  Meal  

3727 

4818 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

8.2 

1.5 

1.5 

12.0 

15.1 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Alfalfa  Meal 

7330 

4254 

Stiefel  & Lew,  Avilla 

8.0 

1.0 

1 

14.0 

15.0 

Ralston  Purina  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Purina  Alfalfa  Meal  °°  

955 

2212 

A.  L.  Wheeler,  Mooresville 

9.4 

2.0 

2.5 

16.0 

14.3 

Not  registered 


y**  1700  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
7352 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Wash-Co.  Alfalfa  Mixed  Feed  & Milling 
Company,  Port  Calhoun,  Neb. 

Wash-Co.  Alfalfa  Meal 

ttWash-Co.  Alfalfa  Meal 

BONE 

Joslin-Schmidt  Company,  The, 
Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Poultry  Bone 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

ttSwift’s  Poultry  Bone 

Swift’s  Poultry  Bone 

BLOOD  MEAL 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works,  The, 

Chicago,  111. 

Blood  Meal 

Major  Bros.  Packing  Company, 
Mishawaka,  Ind. 

Blood  Meal  

MEAT  SCRAPS  AND  MEAT  MEAL 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Com- 
pany, The,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

ttGround  Meat  Scraps 

ttGround  Meat  Scraps 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works,  Chicago,  111. 

Armour’s  Meat  Meal  

Armour’s  Meat  Meal  

Armour’s  Meat  Meal  

Armour’s  Meat  Meal  

Armour’s  Meat  Meal  

Armour’s  Meat  Meal  

Armour’s  Meat  Meal  

Chicago  Feed  & Fertilizer  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Magic  Brand  Meat  Scraps 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps  

ttDarling’s  Meat  Scraps 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps  

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps  

Darling’s  Standard  Meat  Scrap 

Darling’s  Standard  Meat  Scrap 

Darling’s  Meat  Crisps  

Joslin-Schmidt  Company, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Meat  Scraps 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Meat  Scraps 

*“Abattoir  Brand”  Meat  Scraps 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Meat  Scraps 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

1 percent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

5477 

2498 

J.  P.  Struck,  Wolcottville 

9.0 

0.5 

1.6 

12.0 

15.4 

5477 

2662 

C.  C.  Kasch,  Logansport 

8.3 

0.5 

1.5 

12.0 

13.7 

6792 

2514 

H.  L.  Graf,  New  Albany 

6.2 

2.0 

1.0 

25.0 

28.2 

62 

1.542 

Little  Crow  Milling  Co.,  Warsaw 

7.3 

0.0 

2.4 

25.0 

26.0 

62 

4613 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

5.8 

0.0 

2.4 

25.0 

26.1 

906' 

4043 

National  Military  Home,  Marion 

9.4 

0.0 

0.4 

80.0 

84.7 

1971 

1917 

Manufacturers  

39.7 

1.0 

0.7 

55.0 

55.2 

8106 

5253 

Elnora  Elevator  Co.,  Elnora 

6.3 

10.0 

9.9 

45.0 

49.6 

8106 

5265 

Odon  Milling  Co.,  Odon 

6.4 

10.0 

10.2 

45.0 

50.2 

6263 

2243 

G,  Wolf  & Sons  Co.,  Hamilton.. 

7.3 

6.0 

10.7 

60.0 

66.3 

6263 

2307 

T.  S.  Mttgen,  Louisville  . ..  . 

6.1 

6.0 

9.8 

60.0 

69.5 

6263 

2867 

Louisville  Elevator  Co., 

Louisville  . ... 

7.5 

6.0 

9.7 

60.0 

68.4 

6263 

2934 

C.  H.  Billman  & Sons, 

Shelbyville 

7.5 

6.0 

8.1 

60.0 

59.0 

6263 

3564 

Geo.  D.  Rouff,  Osgood 

8.6 

6.0 

9.5 

60.0 

68.5 

6263 

4571 

J.  Gienger  & Co.,  Jeffersonville. 

3.8 

6.0 

10.9 

60.0 

66.5 

6263 

4967 

0.  L.  Cauble,  Pekin 

7.9 

6.0 

9.1 

60.0 

65.5 

6284 

19401 

J.  C.  Barrett,  South  Bend 

5.1 

6.0 

12.5 

55.0 

54.6 

4503 

1810 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

6.2 

5.0 

7.9 

55.0 

56.6 

4503 

2064 

C.  B.  Way,  Laporte  _ . 

6.6 

5.0' 

8.1 

55.0' 

54.0 

4503 

2512 

L.  Thorne  & Sons,  New  Albany. 

7.5 

5.0 

7.8 

55.0 

56.4 

4503 

3092 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville.. 

7.0 

5.0 

10.0 

55.0 

56.4 

4503 

3208 

C.  J.  Loyd  & Co.,  Greensburg.. 

6.8 

5.0 

8.2 

55.0 

59.1 

4503 

4649 

L.  Thorn  & Sons,  New  Albany.. 

6.8 

5.0 

9.4 

55.0 

64.2 

4503 

4753 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

5.7 

5.0 

11.3 

55.0 

61.0 

4503 

4947 

Sheldon  & Wilier,  Orland  

5.7 

5.0 

12.2 

55.0 

60.0 

4503 

5117 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Co.,  Evansville 

6.2 

5.0 

8.7 

55.0 

59.0 

5072 

2485 

John  Gienger  & Co., 

Jeffersonville  

8.8 

0.5 

5.6 

45.0 

52.7 

5072 

3094 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville.. 

8.5 

0.5 

4.8 

45.0 

47.7 

5436 

5104 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Co.,  Evansville 

7.3 

0.5 

6.6 

75.0 

80.3 

6791 

2513 

H.  L.  Graf,  New  Albany.. 

6.1 

10.0 

18.8 

55.0 

57.4 

6791 

2547 

H.  E.  St.  John,  Albany  

5.8 

10.0 

22.7 

55.0 

57.2 



4155 

Pennville  Milling  Co.,  Pennville. 

7.9 

14.0 

61.9 

6791 

4893 

W.  W.  Pearson,  Upland 

6.3 

lo'.o 

11.8 

5~5".0 

61.8 

* Not  tagged 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


100  1.6  tons  returned  to  mfrs. 


ii8 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

V 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Morris  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Big  Brand  Meat  Scraps 

6905 

2072 

B.  I.  Holser  & Co.,  Walkerton_. 

7.2 

7.0 

8.3 

55.0 

57.2 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

McCoys  Fancy  Beef  Scraps  __  

5312 

2327 

Manufacturers 

6.4 

6.0 

11.5 

50.0 

51.0 

McCoys  Fancy  Beef  Scraps  ___  . _ 

5312 

2839 

Manufacturers 

6.4 

6.0 

10.1 

50.0 

60.0 

McCoys  Fancy  Beef  Scraps _ 

5312 

4968 

O.  Ti.  Caiible,  Pekin 

6.3 

6.0 

10.0 

5o!o 

53.5 

Ranh  & Sons,  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Ranh’s  Meat  Meal  loi 

6076 

1893 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co,.  Winchester 

5.5 

14.3 

80.0 

78.2 

Ranh’s  Meat  Scraps  for  Poultry 

6077 

1603 

Abe  Bossert,  Brookville  

6.4 

12.4 

50.0 

57.3 

Ranh’s  Meat  Scraps  for  Poultry 

6077 

1891 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester 

5.9 

12.8 

50.0 

49.4 

Ranh  & Sons  Animal  Feed  Company,  E., 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Ranh’s  Meat  Scraps  for  Poultry 

7246 

2729 

The  Indiana  Elevator  Co., 

* 

Indianapolis  

6.4 

0.0 

13.7 

50.0 

50.1 

Ranh’s  Meat  Scraps  for  Poultry 

7246 

3325 

Oiner  G.  Whelan,  Richmond 

6.4 

0.0 

12.1 

50.0 

48.5 

Ranh’s  Meat  Scraps  for  Poultry  i0“__. 

7246 

4614 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

5.7 

0.0 

6.8 

53.0 

43.4 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

2128 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

5.3 

8.0 

10.0 

50.0 

50.8 

*Swift’s  Meat  Scraps  . 



3083 

McCarty  Hardware  Co., 

Fort  Branch  ..  

7.6 

10.4 

48.8 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

3203 

C.  J.  Loyd  & Co.,  Greensburg.. 

6.4 

s’.o 

10.6 

50.0 

53.9 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

3953 

,lohn  Dunn,  Wolcott 

7.3 

8.0 

12.0 

50.0 

53.2 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

4133 

The  Haynes  Milling  Co., 

Portland  

5.5 

8.0 

10.4 

50.0 

55.9 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

4240 

Nappanee  Produce  Co., 

Nappanee  

6.0 

8.0 

10.9 

53.0 

50.0 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

4590 

Purdue  Poultry  Farm, 

W.  Lafayette  

4.6 

8.0 

13.7 

50.0 

50.0 

Swift’s  Meat  Meal 

5687 

4261 

E.  P.  Welborn,  Cynthiana 

7.4 

6.0 

10.3 

46.0 

52.4 

Wnichet  Fertilizer  Company,  The, 

Dayton,  Ohio. 

Gronnd  Beef  Scraps 

3958 

3566 

J.  W.  Miles,  Butlerville 

9.8 

10.0 

13.2 

50.0 

68.6 

TANKAGE 

Adams  & Clevenger  Fertilizer  Company, 

Lynn,  Ind. 

Onr  Choice  Feeding  Tankage 

7093 

1894 

Berry  Bros.,  Lynn 

14.9 

15.0 

17.6 

45.0 

48.0 

Onr  Choice  Feeding  Tankage 

7093 

4598 

Berry  Hros.,  Lynn  

17.4 

15.0 

8.1 

45.0 

59.8 

Albany  Tanking  Company,  The, 

Albany,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

7382^ 

2059 

Manufacturers  

17.8 

5.0 

26.9 

40.0 

53.3 

Feeding  Tankage 

7382 

2542 

Beach  & Summers,  Albany 

7.4 

5.0 

17.9 

40.0 

53.6 

Angola  Reduction  Company, 

Angola,  Ind. 

Tankage  

5358 

2555 

Wolfe  & Bevington, 

Shipshewana  

6.3 

8.0 

10.9 

40.0 

49.6 

Tankage 

5358 

2961 

E.  E.  Swiger,  Orland 

5.8 

8.0 

9.8 

40.0 

52.8 

Tankage  __ 

5358 

4314 

L.  A.  Hendry  & Co.,  Angola 

6.3 

8.0 

12.1 

40.0 

52.1 

Tankage  _ __  

5358 

4951 

Clare  Hanselman,  Angola 

6.1 

8.0 

11.4 

40.0 

52.9 

Ballard  Packing  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  _ __ 

5682 

2381 

Manufacturers  

6.5 

8.0 

7.9 

36.0 

33.9 

Blue  River  Reduction  Company, 

Edinburg,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

7488 

4584 

Manufacturers  

5.5 

16.0 

22.8 

40.0 

47.1 

* Not  tagged 

101  IGOO  lbs.  removed  from  sale 


102  4 tons  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to 
mfrs. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Cavanaugh  Packing  Company, 
Muncie,  Ind. 

tPeeding  Tankage  

Feeding  Tankage 


Chicago  Feed  & Fertilizer  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Magic  Brand  Tankage  

Magic  Brand  Tankage  


Magic  Brand  Tankage 


Magic  Brand  Tankage 
Magic  Brand  Tankage 
Magic  Brand  Tankage 


Magic  Brand  Tankage 
Magic  Brand  Tankage  1°^ 
Magic  Brand  Tankage  104 
ttMagic  Brand  Tankage 


Magic  Brand  Tankage  

Cincinnati  Animal  Food  Company, 
Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digester  Tankaj 
“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digester  Tank- 
age   

“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digester  Tanka; 


“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digeste 
tt“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digeste 
“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digeste 

Connelly,  Clare,  Judson,  Ind. 
Tankage  


Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 


Darling’s  60%  Digester  Tankage- 
Darling’s  60%  Digester  Tankage- 
Darling’s  60%  Digester  Tankage- 
Darling’s  60%  Digester  Tankage- 
Darling’s  60%  Digester  Tankage. 


Decatur  Fertilizer  Company,  Decatur, 
R.  R.  No.  1,  Ind. 

tTankage  


Delphi  Fertilizer  Company,  The, 
Delphi,  Ind. 

tFeeding  Tankage  


Dewey  Bros.  Company,  The, 
Blanchester,  Ohio. 
ttDewey’s  Digester  Tankage 


LaFayette,  Ind. 
Feeding  Tankage 


Eckart  Packing  Company,  Fred, 
Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Eckart’s  Feeding  Tankage 

Eckart’s  Feeding  Tankage 

Eckart’s  Feeding  Tankage 


Number 

is 

'C 

1 

to 

0 

7734 

3598  ; 

7734 

4120  ; 

6368 

1513  : 

6368 

2342  ' 

6368 

2531 

6368 

2865 

6368 

3693 

6368 

3986  ^ 

6368 

4103 

6368 

4426 

, 6368 

4433 

6368 

4740 

. 6368 

5178 

> 6728 

1697 

. 6728 

2827 

) 6728 

2927 

6728 

3340 

?!  6728 

3954 

} 6728 

4472 

i 6728 

4577 

? 6728 

5180 

- 6364 

3675 

. 4734 

1547 

- 4734 

3093 

- 4734 

3455 

. 4734 

4545 

- 4734 

4695 

- 4734 

5077 

. 7438 

2095 

. 8052 

4896 

- 7152 

2221 

. 7322 

2933 

. 6055 

2236 

- 6055 

2237 

- 6055 

3957 

Sample  secured  from 


Manufacturers 


Harting  «fe  Co.,  Elwood 

The  J.  M.  Dunlap  Grain  Co., 

Franklin  

Louis  Hartman  & Sons, 

New  Albany 

Hamilton  & Kellner,  Rensselaer. 
Scottsburg  Elevator,  Scottsburg 
Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

Co.,  North  Judson  

E.  F.  Johnson,  Paoli 

Harting  & Co.,  Elwood 

Windfall  Grain  Co.,  Windfall — 
J.  M.  Dunlap  Grain  Co., 

Franklin  

Windfall  Grain  Co.,  WindfalL- 


Jas.  H.  Harper,  Sharpsville- 


John  Taylor,  Columbus 

M.  M.  Walker,  Alexandria  

Davis  & Phillips,  Oaktown 

John  Dunn,  Wolcott 


E.  T.  Harper,  Sharpsville 


Manufacturer 


Little  Crow  Milling  Co.,  Warsa' 
Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville- 

J.  C.  Phillips,  Star  City 

H.  E.  Pitman,  Bedford 

Reed  & Co.,  Argos 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville. 


Manufacturers 


Manufacturers 


Rees  J.  Morgan,  Mexico. 


Manufacturers 


Geo.  F.  Nickelson,  Fort  Wayne- 
Geo.  F.  Fogwell,  Fort  Wayne.. 


Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

5,8 

6.0 

15.8 

30.0 

34.2 

4.0 

6.0 

17.4 

30.0 

30.7 

6.9 

5.0 

5.2 

60.0 

60.5 

7.9 

5.0 

9.3 

60.0 

59.4 

7.3 

5.0 

8.0 

60.0 

59.6 

6.9 

5.0 

7.4 

60.0 

59.3 

7.9 

5.0 

9.0 

60.0 

59.3 

11.9 

5.0 

4.6 

60.0 

64.2 

10.6 

5.0 

6.3 

60.0 

61.3 

13.3 

5.0 

5.8 

60.0 

57.6 

12.8 

5.0 

5.9 

60.0 

57.4 

9.7 

5.0 

4.8 

60.0 

62.6 

12.7 

5.0 

3.1 

60.0 

59.7 

6.4 

8.0 

12.8 

60.0 

60.0 

, 4.2 

8.0 

8.2 

60.0 

55.3 

5.1 

8.0 

13.6 

60.0 

60.4 

5.4 

8.0 

13.0 

60.0 

59.3 

, 6.4 

8.0 

11.1 

60.0 

59.1 

1 6.8 

8.0 

9.4 

60.0 

62.9 

. 7.7 

8.0 

8.7 

60.0 

61.2 

7.6 

8.0 

8.2 

60.0 

62.1 

13.4 

6.0 

22.2 

38.0 

52.3 

r 11.6 

o..^ 

5.5 

60.0 

63.0 

- 10.3 

0.5 

4.9 

60.0 

62.8 

. 13.3 

0.5 

6.6 

60.0 

61.4 

6.7 

0.5 

7.2 

60.0 

60.4 

9.2 

0.5 

5.7 

60.0 

64.8 

. 9.2 

0.5 

3.1 

60.0 

60.6 

20.0 

7.0 

15.0 

35.0 

43.3 

4.7 

12.0 

17.8 

35.0 

45.5 

3.9 

8.0 

14.5 

60.0 

62.3 

_ 19.2 

10.0 

11.6 

30.0 

26  8 

- 18.8 

9.0 

10.9 

28.0 

36.9 

- 22.9 

9.0 

9.2 

28.0 

38.6 

5.9 

9.0 

14.1 

28.0 

33.5 

t Before  registration 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

7^  tong  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
7974.  Rebate.  See  page  41 


1''^  6 tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
7974.  Rebate.  See  page  41 
Rebate.  See  page  41 


120 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

.*2 

‘0 

0 

1 

.M 

0 . 

s 

-1 
0 rt 

TJ 

a 

1 

0 rt 

n3 

c 

1 

Elkhart  Fertilizer  Company, 

Elkhart,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage 

6504 

1606 

Manufacturers  

4.6 

8.0 

14.1 

44.0 

60.3 

Einge  & Sons,  Peter,  Fort  Branch,  Ind. 

fFpeding  Tankage 

7749 

2909 

Manufacturers 

8.3 

10.0 

16.4 

25.0 

27.0 

Evansville  Packing  Company,  The, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

Stock  Feeding  Tankage 

6855 

3100 

Edvv.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville.. 

4.0 

10.0 

19.9. 

40.0 

39.6 

tt60%  Stock  Feeding  Tankage 

7403 

2908 

McCarty  Hardware  Co., 

Fort  Branch  

7.5 

15.0 

10.4 

60.0 

59.2 

60%  Stock  Feeding  Tankage  

7403 

3247 

Clint  Stroud,  Mt.  Vernon 

7 2 

15.0 

10  5 

60.0 

57.3 

60%  Stock  Feeding  Tankage  loe 

7403 

5080 

The  Heldt  Co.,  Evansville 

5^3 

15.’o 

12^0 

6o!o 

58J 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Company,  The, 

Columbus,  Ohio. 

Farmers  Digester  Tankage  

635S 

2923 

J.  W.  Dalrymple,  Rising  Sun 

7.9 

6.0 

5.9 

60.0 

57.2 

Farmers  Tanking  & Fertilizer  Company, 

Muncie,  Ind. 

fWhitn  River  Feeding  Tankage 

7860 

4119 

Manufacturers  

5.7 

10.0 

17.6 

45.0 

51.8 

White.  River  Feeding  h'ankage 

7860' 

5339 

Manufacturers  . 

9^8 

io!o 

15!6 

45.0 

5o!5 

Hancock  Fertilizer  Company,  The, 

Greenfield,  Ind. 

fFeeding  Tankage 

7659 

2970 

Manufacturers 

1 2.7 

6.0 

13.7 

40.0 

■10.8 

Feeding  d'ankage 

7659 

5296 

Manufacturers  ..  

8.7 

6.0 

13^8 

40.0 

43.6 

Feeding  d’ankage 

7659 

5326 

Ti.  R.  Fro.st,  Greenfield 

1L8 

6.0 

10.1 

40.0 

51.9 

Heppe  & Sons  Company,  Wm., 

Logansport,  Ind. 

ffFeeding  d’ankage 

7590 

2362 

Isaac  Breeding,  Edinburg 

6.7 

7.0 

10.7 

45.0 

50.0 

Holzapfel,  Henry,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  __ 

3551 

2889 

Maher  & Davenport,  Richmond. 

9.9 

15.8 

28.0 

26.9 

Feeding  Tankage  __  

3551 

3353 

Maher  & Davenport,  Richmond. 

7.1 

16.0 

28.0 

28.1 

Hoosier  Packing  Company,  The, 

Decatur,  Ind. 

■j-Ta  nka  ge 

7396 

2091 

Manufacturers  

8.7 

8.0 

16.1 

35.0 

31.6 

Ta  nka  gpioTa 

7396 

4201 

Manufacturers  

4.5 

8^0 

19.6 

35!o 

30.9 

Hughes-Curry  Packing  Company, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

fFeeding  d'ankage 

7374 

1997 

Manufacturers  

11.6 

8.0 

19.1 

40.0 

40.4 

Independent  Feed  & Fertilizer  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Clover  Leaf  Digester  Tankage 

7553 

3266 

Prater-Mottier  Co.,  Terre  Haute 

8.4 

6.0 

8.7 

60.0 

59.3 

Clover  Leaf  Digester  Tankage 

7563 

3480 

Geo.  W.  Graston  Milling  Co., 

Dupont  _.  

7.6 

6.0 

9.6 

60.0 

59.6 

Joslin-Schmidt  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

6376 

2486 

John  Gienger  & Co., 

Jeffersonville  

6.8 

8.0 

10.3 

60.0 

60.4 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

6376 

2982 

Jacob  Finkle,  Warren  ... 

4.8 

8.0 

12.7 

60.0 

61.9 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

6376 

3584 

John  Crum,  Milan  

5.5 

8.0 

11.4 

60.0 

59.6 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tank- 

})gp  108 

6376 

4122 

W.  W.  Pearson,  Upland .. 

4.8 

8.0 

14.5 

60.0 

56.9 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

6376 

4332 

Wisehart  Bros.,  Millville 

7.0 

8.0 

10.8 

60.0 

59.4 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

6376 

4599 

Berry  Bros.,  Lynn 

5.8 

8.0 

11.0 

60.0 

60.8 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

6376 

46a5 

Jacob  Finkle,  Warren  

8.5 

8.0 

8.2 

60.0 

59.5 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

6376 

5306 

M.  A.  Donall,  Greensburg 

10.5 

8.0 

7.2 

60.0 

58.5 

Kendallville  Fertilizer  Company, 

Kendallville,  Ind. 

“Feeding  Tankage”  . 

6488 

4986 

Manufacturers  

9.1 

10.0 

8.1 

44.0 

.59.4 

t Before  registration  3 tons  shiijped  out  of  state 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  5 1/20  tons  removed  from  sale.  3%  tons 

10c  1 (,)„  returned  to  mfrs.  returned  to  mfrs. 

10’  880  lbs.  returned  to  mfrs. 


I2I 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Kenney  Brothers  Reduction  Company, 

Lowell,  Ind. 

7192 

1777 

C.  E.  Nichols  & Co.,  Lowell 

7.3 

11.0 

13.0 

44.0 

51.3 

Tankage  

7192, 

3215 

J.  S.  Crawford  & Co., 

Crown  Point 

5.6 

11.0 

13.4 

44.0 

48.6 

Tankage  

7192 

5170 

J.  S.  Crawford  Feed  Store, 

Crown  Point  

5.5 

11.0 

13.1 

44.0 

50.1 

Kuhner  Packing  Company,  Muncie,  Ind. 

6406 

2118 

Manufacturers 

4.5 

9.0 

10.2 

30.0 

27.2 

6406 

4116 

Manufacturers 

5.2 

9.0 

8.9 

30.0 

34.1 

Manns’  Fertilizer  Works, 

North  Manchester,  Ind. 

Manns’  Feeding  Tankage 

6617 

3912 

J.  W.  Strauss  & Son, 

North  Mancnester 

6.8 

21.0 

22.4 

50.0 

49.1 

Manns’  Feeding  Tankage 

7062 

5931 

J.  W.  Strauss,  North  Manchester 

6.5 

15.0 

17.4 

45.0 

47.8 

Meier  Packing  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

8075 

4924 

Manufacturers  

5.7 

5.0 

20.4 

28.0 

36.9 

Montpelier  Fertilizer  Company, 

Huntington,  Ind. 

Farmers  Commercial  Feeding  Tankage 

y 

5766 

2972 

Manufacturers  

4.8 

24.0 

20.9 

49.0 

48.5 

Morris  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

1563 

Jeff  Ray  & Sons,  Rockport 

6.6 

8.0 

9.5 

60.0 

60.8 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

1867 

Fowler  Grain  Co.,  Fowler 

5.8 

8.0 

9.6 

60.0 

63.2 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

2071 

B.  I.  Holser  & Co.,  Walkerton.. 

7.1 

8.0 

9.2 

60.0 

61.8 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

2636 

V.  nv  Reid,  Salem 

6.1 

8.0 

10.0 

60.0 

61.3 

Big  Brand  60%  .Digester  Tankage 

4224 

2797 

Herbert  Gibson,  Plymouth 

6.2 

8.0 

10.3 

60.0 

60.8 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage  __ 

4224 

2955 

Nixon  & Van  Deventer,  Attica.. 

6.2 

8.0 

9.4 

60.0 

60.5 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage  

4224 

3012 

Richards  & Lawson,  Shelbyville. 

6.6 

8.0 

9.4 

60.0 

60.4 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

3648 

F.  M.  Campbell,  Lexington 

7.8 

8.0 

9.5 

60.0 

59.6 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage  io^__ 

4224 

4074 

V.  T.  Reid,  Salem . 

8.8 

8.0 

8.3 

60.0 

58  8 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

4401 

Wm.  Eesley  & Co., 

0 

West  College  Corner 

7.1 

8.0 

7.9 

60.0 

59.8 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

4511 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

LaFayette  

6.8 

8.0 

9.3 

60.0 

59.5 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

McCoys  Choice  Hog  Digester  Tankage 

5223 

2294 

Geo.  0.  Antrim,  Converse 

6.9 



8.6 

60.0 

62.7 

McCoys  Choice  Hog  Digester  Tankage 

5223 

2325 

Manufacturers  

7.6 

8.7 

60.0 

.59.9 

McCoys  Choice  Hog  Digester  Tankage 

5223 

2840 

Manufacturers  _. 

8.3 



6.9 

60.0 

58.0 

McCoys  Choice  Hog  Digester  Tankage 

5223 

3385 

Manufacturers  

11.7 



5.2 

60.0 

59.8 

ttMcCoys  Choice  Hog  Digester  Tankage 

5223 

3908 

Elnora  Elevator  Co.,  Elnora 

8.7 

— 

6.8 

60.0 

60.9 

Pearl  Packing  House,  The, 

Madison,  Ind. 

The  Pearl  Brand 

5015 

3537 

Manufacturers 

5.5 

5.0 

15.0 

37.0' 

34.9 

Portland  Fertilizer  Plant,  Portland,  Ind. 

Tankage 

5629 

1773 

Manufacturers 

12.4 

7.0 

21.2 

40.0 

46.1 

Tankage  n®  

5629 

4154 

Manufacturers 

11.0 

7.0 

18!8 

40.0 

50.4 

Rauh  & Sons,  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

1489 

Harper  & Sons,  Modoc  

7.8 



6.9 

60.0 

61.4 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

1505 

Ed  Dolan,  Glenwood  

6.3 



7.4 

60.0 

60.8 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

1539 

Hawley  Hall,  Lewisville 

7.0 

8.0 

60.0 

61.6 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

1602 

Abe  Bossert,  Brookville 

7.3 



7.9 

60.0 

61.9 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

1760 

Pennville  Milling  Co.,  Pennville. 

9.7 



6.7 

60.0 

60.3 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

1835 

Pierce  Elevator  Co.,  The, 

Union  City 

6.5 



7.5 

60.0 

60.7 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

1892 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester 

7.1 

8.4 

60.0 

61.4 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

2097 

2928 

A.  M.  Armstrong,  Letts 

8.1 



7.8 

60.0 

60.5 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage 

3942' 

2326 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

7.2 

10.5 

50.0 

56.3 

t Before  registration  no  75  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  7887 

100  % ton  returned  to  mfrs. 


122 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Cample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  -■ 
per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

! 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Rauh  & Sons  Animal  Feed  Company,  E., 

1 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

2553 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester 

6.4 

8.4 

60.0 

60.2 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

2822 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Bargersville  

8.5 

8.0 

60.0 

59.5 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

2896 

Willey  Grain  Co., 

W.  College  Corner 

7.7 

7.9 

60.0 

58  6 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

30.56 

O’Neal  Bros.,  Rushville 

9.0 

7.0 

60.0 

60.2 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

3326 

Omer  G.  Whelan,  Richmond 

6.7 

9.2 

60.0 

60.2 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

4267 

A.  Smith  & Co.,  Sheridan 

8.5 

7.9 

60.0 

60.0 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

4591 

Purdue  Poultry  Farm, 

W.  LaFayette 

7.3 

7.6 

60.0 

60.8 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

4595 

McCarty  Hardware  Co., 

Fort  Branch  

7.9 

7.9 

60.0 

60.0 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

4735 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Bargersville  

6.5 



8.6 

60.0 

60.9 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

4894 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Gaston  

6.1 

8.2 

60.0 

61.4 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

5325 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester  

8.7 



7.5 

60.0 

60.9 

Ranh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

.5337 

Hawiey  Hall,  Lewisville 

i 12.0 

6.6 

60.0 

61.8 

7518 

3327 

Omer  G.  Whelan,  Richmond 

11.3 

50.0 

51.0 

Roberts,  Frank  A.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

j 7.8 

Tankage  _ 

7029 

2852 

Manufacturer  _ __ 

i 4.8 

12.0 

18.2 

40.0 

61.2 

Roberts,,  Robert  A.,  Greensbnrg,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  __  . __  

.5602 

3223 

Manufacturer  

43.6 

5.0 

16.0 

20.0 

17.6 

Feeding  Tankage  _ _ _ _ __ 

5602 

3224 

Manufacturer  

5.8 

5.0 

13.2 

20.0 

29.1 

Feeding  Tankage  _ _ 

.5602 

4794 

Manufacturer  

12.6 

5.0 

14.8 

20.0 

35.8 

Robey  Bros.,  Winchester,  R.  R.  No.  4, 

Ind. 

Robey  Bros.  Feeding  Tankace 

7552 

40701 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

17.0 

19.7 

40.0 

48.5 

Rochester  Fertilizer  & Tankage 

\ 

Company,  Rochester,  Ind. 

Pure  'tankage 

7070 

2186 

Manufacturers 

8.4 

10.0 

11.5 

50.0 

47.7 

Pn7-e  'Pankage 

7070 

3528 

Manufanturers 

8.6 

10.0 

13.4 

50.0 

49.4 

Ronth  & Company,  W.  C., 

Logansport,  Ind. 

Ronth’s  Best  Feeding  Tankage  m 

3575 

2290' 

W G.  Sweet,  Royal  Center 

4.1 

6.4 

60.0 

56.8 

Ronth’s  Best  Feeding  'tankage 

3575 

4016 

Manufacturer 

6.9 

4.0 

69.0 

66.9 

Ronth’s  Best  Feeding  Tankage 

3575 

4546 

W.  G.  Sweet,  Royal  Center 

5.9 

___ 

4.0 

60.0 

67.2 

St.  Lonis  Independent  Packing 

Company,  St.  Lonis,  Mo. 

ttindependent  Brand  Digester  Tankage. 

7204 

5065 

Clint  Stroud,  Mt.  Vernon...  ... 

8.5 

8.0 

9.1 

60.0 

60.0 

independent  Brand  Digester  'Tankage. 

— 

3225 

W.  H.  Small  & Co.,  Evansville.. 

8.2 

9.3 

59.2 

Stolle  & Sons,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Feeding  'Tankage  

4312 

2883 

Manufacturers 

5.1 

11.7 

28.0 

36.6 

Feeding  'Tankage  

4312 

3329 

Connell-Anderson  Grain  Co., 

Richmond  .. 

5.5 



11.7 

28.0. 

39.0 

Stolle’s  Feeding  'Tankage  

7586 

3343 

Manufacturers  . 

5.4 

6.0 

13.1 

34.0 

38.0 

Snlzberger  & Sons  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Sulzberger’s  High  Protein  'Tankage  112 

.5625 

1622 

Kelley  & Son,  Fairmount 

14.9 

8.0 

4.3 

60.0 

67.3 

Snlzberger’s  High  Protein  'Tankage 

5625 

1794 

Geneva  Elevator  Co.,  Geneva... 

10.5 

8.0 

8.0 

60.0 

60.9 

ttSnlzberger’s  “High  Protein”  'Tankage. 

7435 

2404 

Hershman  & Son,  'Tipton.. 

10.3 

4.0 

7.3 

60.0 

64.1 

ttSnlzl>erger’s  “High  Protein”  'Tankage. 

7435 

2499 

0.  Gandy  & Co.,  Churubusco... 

10.4 

4.0 

7.2 

60.0 

62.8 

Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein”  'Tankage. 

7435 

3470 

0.  Gandy  & Co.,  Grass  Creek 

12.0 

4.0 

6.7 

60.0 

61.5 

Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein”  'Tank- 

age 112  

7435 

3956 

Remington  Feed  & Flour  Store, 

Remington  ..  

8.3 

4.0 

12.0 

69.0 

55.0 

Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein”  'Tankage. 

7435 

4650 

Chas.  Kelly  & Sons,  Fairmount. 

9.4 

4.0 

7.0 

69.0 

67.0 

* Not  tagged  n-  2400  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

tt  Xot  tagged.  I.,abels  furnished  7435 

111  600  lbs.  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to  1700  lbs.  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to 

mfrs.  mfrs.  Rebate.  See  page  43 


123 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Swift’s' Digester  Tankage 

6d 

2507 

Home  Grain  Co.,  LaGrange 

7.7 

8.0 

6.4 

60.0 

58.0 

60 

2620 

Urschel  Bros.,  Tippecanoe 

10.8 

8.0 

6.9 

60.0 

59.9 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  __  

7030 

1702 

Farmers  Elevator  Co.,  Poneto.. 

7.0 

6.0 

8.3 

60.0 

60.5 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage 

7030 

1825 

Morrison  & Tegarden,  Saratoga 

4.6 

6.0 

6.4 

60.0 

59.7 

7030 

1847 

C V Grnft,  Winrhester 

5.9 

6.0 

7.0 

60.0 

62.0 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  _ 

7030 

2129 

Studakaber  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton 

7.6 

6.0 

7.9 

69.0 

62.0 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7030' 

2257 

Kingman  Grain  & Milling  Co., 

Kingman  _ _ __  

5.7 

6.0 

6.4 

60.0 

60.9 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

2285 

L.  E.  Greenwood,  Galveston 

5.0 

6.0 

6.5 

60.0 

61.4 

7030 

3248 

Henry  Schniu’,  Mt.  Vernon 

5.0 

6.0 

11.0 

69.0 

60.3 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

3287 

Geneva  Elevator  Co.,  Geneva.— 

7.6 

6.0 

7.4 

60.0 

60.6 

Swift’.s  Digester  Tankage 

7030 

3887 

D T..  Trout,  T-pp 

9.4 

6.0 

7.1 

60.0 

57.9 

Swift's  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

4188 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

6.8 

6.0 

7.4 

60.0 

.59,3 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

4285 

Moore  Bros.,  Rosston 

7.7 

6.0 

7.3 

60.0 

60.6 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  m 

7030' 

4333 

New  Castle  Elevator  Co.,  New 

Castle  _ 

8.5 

6.0 

7.5 

60.0 

,59.9 

7030 

4485 

.John  D.  Martin,  T.afayptte 

6.5 

6.0 

7.1 

60.0 

60.3 

7030 

4494 

Martin  S.  Hufford,  Sedalia 

6.2 

6.0 

6.8 

60.0 

60.6 

7080 

4532 

Paul  Kuhn  Ar,  Cn  , Rilpy 

8.6 

6.0 

7.4 

60.0 

57.6 

7030 

4551 

Colfax  Grain  Co.,  Colfax 

4.5 

6.0 

8.0 

69.0 

60.5 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage 

7030 

4594 

Vincennes  Feed  & Produce  Co., 

Vincennes  _ _ 

6.9 

6.0 

8.1 

60.0 

62.6 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

4625 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

6.0 

6.0 

9.7 

60.0 

.59.1 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  i 

7030 

4689 

Swayzee  Milling  Co.,  Swayzee 

5.8 

6.0 

8.2 

60.0 

57.2 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

4750 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

6.4 

6.0 

7.0 

60.0 

63.2 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7080i 

4895 

Flovd  Kirklin,  Gaston 

5.8 

6.0 

7.2 

60.0 

63.3 

Swift's  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

4939 

R.  C.  McNaughton,  Rav 

5.9 

6.0 

7.1 

60.0 

63.1 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  

7030 

5069 

Henry  Schnur,  Mt.  Vernon 

5.8 

6.0 

9.1 

60.0 

62.1 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  n® 

7089 

5184 

J.  Runge  & Co.,  Richmond 

6.6 

6,0 

9.0 

60.0 

58.0 

Tanking  & Fertilizing  Company,  The, 

Muncie,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  _ _ 

5626 

4118 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

9.0 

20.7 

43.0 

52.7 

"Valentine  & Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

**Tankage  __  

4032 

Manufacturers 

7.7 

23.8 

29.3 

Wabash  Fertilizer  Company, 

W’abash,  Ind. 

' 

Meat  & Bone  Tankage 

7605 

4384 

Manufacturers 

9.7 

8.0 

23.4 

40.0 

57.1 

FISH  SCRAPS 

International  Glue  Company, 

Boston,  Mass. 

ttRed  Star  Brand  Fish  Scrap 

7166 

5309 

Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle... 

7.5 

2.0 

1.9 

45.0 

47.5 

DRIED  SUGAR  BEET  PULP 

Larrowe  Milling  Company,  The, 

Detroit,  Mich. 

Dried  Beet  Pulp  

2709 

5115 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Co.,  Evansville 

6.9 

0.5 

0.7 

8.0 

9.8 

ttDried  Beet  Pulp 

2709 

5159 

Francis  Bushore,  Valparaiso 

9.2 

0.5 

0.9 

8.0 

10.5 

COCOANUT  OIL  MEAL 

Shepard  Clark  & Company, 

Cleveland,  Ohio. 

tCocoanut  Oil  Cake  Meal 

740k 

1910 

C.  V.  Graft.  Winchestpr 

5.9 

7.0 

16.0 

21.0 

22.9 

CORN  BRAN 

Akron  Milling  Company,  Akron,  Ind. 

*Corn  Bran  m 

2617 

Manufacturers  

11.4 

7.3 

11.5 

* Not  tagged 
t Before  registration 
**  Not  registered 
tt  Not  tagged.  Babels  furnished 


4.5  tons  returned  to  mfrs.  on  account  of  poor 
mechanical  condition, 

115  800  lbs.  returned  to  mfrs. 

115  2%  tons  returned  from  sale 
111  Corn  grits  and  germ  present 


124 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 
Fat  -• 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

§ 

+3 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

o . 

ai 

PI 

S a 
R 0) 

'S  ^ 

Is. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Billman  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Shelbyville,  Ind. 
Corn  Bran  

4743 

4792 

Manufacturers  

9.2 

3.0 

5.8 

5.0 

9.0 

8.0 

8.0 

8.0 

9.3 

9.9 

Boonville  Milling  Conapany, 

Boonville,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  117 

3030 

3833 

Manufacturers 

9.8 

4.0 

5.9 

Cauble,  0.  L.,  Pekin,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  m 

6129 

2576 

Manufacturer 

10.5 

11.1 

2.0 

4.0 

9.1 

11.1 

10.5 

10.3 

Columbus  Milling  Company, 

Columbus,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  m 

6903 

3468 

Manufacturers 

7.4 

Corn  Bran  ii7 

6903 

4715 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

4.0 

8.6 

Glen  Echo  Mills,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  n” 

4515 

2756 

Manufacturers  

10.9 

2.4 

6.0 

9.0 

10.6 

Corn  Bran  m 

4515 

3396 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

2.4 

5.9 

9.0 

10.3 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  m 

3833 

1845 

Manufacturer  

10.0 

3.5 

7.9 

8.5 

10.9 

Harris  Milling  Company, 

Greencastle,  Ind. 
tCorn  Bran  m 

7667 

3000 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

3.5 

7.5 

7.0 

10.5 

Heaton,  E.  H.,  Indianapolis, 

R.  R.  No.  12,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  m 

5932 

2730 

Manufacturer  

10.8 

3.0 

8.1 

6.0 

10.7 

Corn  Bran  117 

5932 

3446 

Manufacturer  

6.3 

3.0 

5.9 

6.0 

10.0 

Corn  Bran 

5932 

4913 

Manufacturer  

11.5 

3.0 

5.0 

6.0 

9.5 

Home  Mill  & Grain  Company, 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  m 

2598 

3243 

Manufacturers  

7.4 

5.0 

7.6 

8.0 

9.9 

Corn  Bran  m 

2598 

5074 

Manufacturers  

9.5 

5.0 

8.3 

8.0 

12.4 

Kennedy  Milling  Company,  The  G.  W., 
Shelbyville,  Ind. 

tCorn  Bran  m _ 

7791 

4058 

Manufaeturers  _ __  

9.1 

5.0 

7.5 

8.0 

11.2 

Corn  Bran  m 

7791 

4786 

Manufacturers  

7.0 

5.0 

6:9 

8.0 

11.6 

Martin,  Martin  & Company, 

New  Castle,  Ind. 

Martin,  Martin  & Co’s  Corn  Bran  n^. 

217 

4303 

Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle___ 

9.0 

4.5 

7.4 

7.5 

11.2 

Moore  Milling  Company,  R.  P., 

Corn  Bran  __  ^ 

999 

1630 

Manufacturers  __ 

10.8 

6.0 

5.4 

8.0 

9.2 

Nashville  Roller  Mills,  Nashville,  Ind. 
Corn  Bran  ii7 

2568 

2937 

Manufaeturers  _ 

9.8 

5.0 

10.4 

9.0 

11.6 

Norris  & Kidtvell,  Washington,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  117 

7911 

5235 

"Manufacturers  

10.3 

3.0 

7.4 

6.0 

10.4 

Plainville  Milling  Company, 

Plainville,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  ^^7  __  __  

3819 

2007 

Manufacturers  

11.9 

4.0 

8.5 

7.5 

11.2 

Corn  Bran  117 

3819 

3899 

Manufaeturers  

9.6 

4.0 

7.8 

7.5 

10.7 

Corn  Bran  117 

3819 

5257 

Manufacturers  - 

11.3 

4.0 

7.1 

7.5 

10.7 

Schaefer  & Schwartzkopf, 

Columbus,  Ind. 

No.  ()  Corn  Bran  ii7 

476 

3462 

Manufacturers  

11.5 

5.0 

9.3 

8.0 

11.1 

No.  G Corn  Bran  _ 

476 

4710 

Manufacturers  

9.6 

5.0 

11.3 

8.0 

11.4 

Sims  Milling  Company,  Frankfort,  Ind. 
Corn  Bran  ii7 

6926 

3439 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

3.5 

8.3 

8.0 

117 

* Not  tagged  Corn  grits  and  germ  present 

t Before  registration 


125 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

LABEL 

1 

Sample  secured  from 

I Official 

OQ 

c 

Moistu] 

per  cen 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

Smith,  D.  R.,  Tipton,  Ind. 

(^orn  Bran 

1543 

2370 

Alanufacturer  _ 

13.9 

5.0 

8.2 

8.0 

11.9 

Stader,  Prank  E.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

6343 

5095 

Manufacturer  

9.5 

5.0 

7.6 

8.0 

9.8 

Wright  Milling  Company, 

Paris  Crossing,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  ht 

2849 

3552 

Alanufacturers  

10.6 

4.0 

7.0 

7.0 

10.9 

Zehner  Milling  Company, 

Plymouth,  Ind. 

4205 

2794 

J.  A.  Zehner,  Plymouth 

11.6 

2.5 

6.8 

6.0 

10.7 

CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Acme-Plvans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

ttHomlik  

6876 

1999 

Parmers  Supply  Co.,  Spencer... 
Bloomington  Alilling  Co., 

10.4 

3.0 

4.8 

8.5 

9.3 

Homlik  _ 

6876 

4212 

Bloomington  

9.6 

3.0 

3.6 

8.5 

8.9 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 
ftAmcn  Corn  Peed  Meal 

8095 

5352 

Hammond  & Troncin,  Milltowm 

9.8 

2.5 

6.0 

8.0 

10.7 

Anderson,  G.  H.,  Seymour,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  ATeal 

5230 

2429 

Alanufacturer  

11.4 

2.0 

3.2 

7.0 

8.2 

Corn  Peed  ATeal 

5230 

3715 

Alanufacturer  

11.5 

2.0 

3.8 

7.0 

8.6 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
ttCorn  Peed  Meal 

6989 

2018 

Przybysz  Plour  & Peed  Co., 
South  Bend  ___  __  __ 

10.6 

1.2 

3.1 

7.0 

8.1 

■ftCorn  Peed  ATeal 

6989 

3134 

George  Naumoff,  Garv 

12.4 

1.2 

2.0 

7.0 

6.9 

Bailey  & Thompson,  Prairie  Creek,  Ind. 
fCorn  Peed  ATeal 

7785 

4031 

Alanufacturers  

10.7 

2.5 

3.1 

7.5 

7.0 

Belt  Elevator  & Peed  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Peed  Aleal  _ 

3322 

3393 

Manufacturers  

12.4 

3.7 

3.5 

8.5 

8.7 

Billman  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Shelbyville,  Ind. 
Corn  Peed  ATeal 

3344 

3016 

ATanufaetnrers 

12.9 

2.5 

2.1 

7.0 

6 8 

Corn  Peed  ATeal 

3344 

4791 

Manufacturers  

11.3 

2.5 

3.7 

7.0 

9.0 

Boonville  Alilling  Company, 

Boonville,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  Meal  __  

6851 

3832 

Manufacturers  

10.6 

2.5 

3.1 

7.5 

8.6 

Browning  Milling  Company,  W.  A., 
Evansville,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  ATeal 

.3.537 

3128 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

2.4 

5.0 

6.7 

7.7 

Columbus  Milling  Company, 

Columbus,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  Aleal 

6934 

2517 

New  Albany  Alilling  Co., 

New  Albany 

13.1 

2.5 

4.0 

7.5 

7.9 

Crum,  John,  Milan,  Ind. 

**Corn  Peed  Meal  n®  

3582 

Afannfacturer 

11.2 

3.6 

8.2 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 

Chicago,  111. 

ffCorn  Peed  ATeal 

3616 

1848 

Will.  Harbeck.  Valparaiso 

12.5 

2.5 

3.4 

7.0 

8.3 

Emison  & Company,  J.  «fc  S., 

Vincennes,  Ind. 

Peed  Meal 

4464 

2645 

Pickens  & Brengle,  Orleans 

11.2 

3.0 

3.7 

8.0 

8.5 

t Before  registration  Corn  grits  and  germ  present 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  % ton  removed  from  sale.  Used  in  com- 

**  Not  registered  pounding  feed 


126 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

LABEL 

c 

0 

■43 

Sample  secured  from 

Official 

w • 

tn 

C 

R 

a « 

’S  ^ 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Fairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

6503 

1753 

Dugger  Feed  Store,  Dugger 

13.5 

2.5 

3.4 

7.0 

8.2 

6503 

3944 

Dugger  Feed  Store,  Dugger 

11.1 

2.5 

2.4 

7.0 

8.2 

Feed  Meal  

6503 

4706 

Warford  Bros.,  Trevlac 

10.3 

2.5 

2.7 

7.0 

10.3 

Farmer  & Sons,  Oscar,  Louisville,  Ky. 
**“We  Kno”  Feed  Meal  _ 

4672 

Scottsburg  Elevator,  Scottsburg 

Manufacturers  _ _ 

10.5 

2.5 

8.2 

Forest  Park  Mills, 

North  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
fOorn  Feed  Meal 

7927 

4502 

10.1 

2.5 

4.4 

7.5 

9.2 

Habig  Bros.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Habig’s  Feed  Meal  

3339 

3425 

Manufacturers  _ _ 

12.9 

3.0 

1.8 

i 8.0 

8.1 

Habig’s  Feed  Meal  

3339 

4202 

Manufacturers  ; 

11.7 

3.0 

1.9 

8.0 

8.0 

Hall  Milling  Company,  W.  C,, 

Brazil,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal  » 

5131 

5247 

Manufacturers  __  

11.6 

3.0 

8.0 

7.0 

10.3 

Hanks  Company,  Howard  H., 

Chicago,  111. 

Corn  Feed  Meal _ __ 

6101 

4860 

Przybysz  Flour  & Feed  Co., 

South  Bend 

10.6 

2.7 

1.7 

8.5 

7.2 

Corn  Feed  Meal  ___  

6101 

5228 

Standard  Hay  & Grain  Co., 
Terre  Haute  

19.8 

2.7 

3.9 

8.5 

9.3 

Harris  Milling  Company, 

Greeneastle,  Ind. 

Harris’  Cracked  Corn  Siftings 

Harris’  Cracked  Corn  Siftings 

5139 

3001 

Manufacturers  

12.2 

3.2 

2.6 

8.0 

7 0 

.5139 

3379 

Manufacturers  

19  9 

3.2 

3.0 

8.0 

7.5 

Heaton,  E.  H.,  Indianapolis, 

R.  R.  No.  12,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal  

5933 

3445 

Manufacturer  _ 

12.3 

2.5 

2.6 

7.0 

7.2 

Lash  Flour  Mills,  Fred  B., 

Farmersburg,  Ind. 

tCorn  Feed  Meal 

7783 

4019 

Manufacturers 

10.9 

2.5 

2.9 

7.5 

6.3 

Lingeman,  Adams  & Company, 
Brownsburg,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal  

4426 

4144 

M anuf  aeturers 

10.1 

3.0 

3.2 

8.5 

9.0 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain 
Company,  Monticello,  Ind. 
ttLoughry’s  Feed  Meal  

7713 

3368 

Marshall  & O’Hair,  Greeneastle. 

13.4 

2.5 

2.4 

7.0 

7.2 

ttLoughry’s  Feed  Meal  

7713 

3589 

T.  C.  Martin,  Lafayette 

11.6 

2.5 

2.3 

7.0 

7.5 

*Meal  Siftings  

4280' 

Moore  Bros.,  Rosston  _ 

10.6 

11.1 

1.6 

7.2 

Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle,  Ind. 
tCorn  Feed  Meal  _ __  

7863 

4302 

/ 

Manufacturers 

2.7 

3.4 

7.5 

8.4 

Martinsville  Milling  Company, 
Martinsville,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal  _ 

5977 

4541 

Manufacturers 

10.6 

2.5 

3.6 

7.5 

7.5 

Nading  Grain  Company,  Wm., 
Green^burg,  Ind. 

**Corn  Feed  Meal  _ 

3195 

Manufacturers  

12.2 

3.3 

7.9 

Nappanee  Produce  Company, 

Nappanee,  Ind. 

•^♦Corn  Feed  Meal  122 

4238 

Manufacturers  

10.2 

2.0 

11.0 

* Not  tagged  ii9  Small  amounts  of  oat  hulls,  ground  weed 

t Before  registration  seeds  and  fragments  of  corn  cobs 

**  Not  registered  120  x/^  removed  from  sale 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  121  % ton  removed  from  sale  to  be  used  in 

compounding  feed 

122  175  permanently  removed  from  sale 


127 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


Number 

Crude 

Crude 

Fat 

Protein 

LABEL 

.9 

Sample  secured  from 

<0  4J 

per  cent. 

per  cent. 

IS 

P ^ 

1 'O 

*^3 

1 ^ 

'O 

'3 

IS 

0 

GQ 

c 

m « 

II 

0 rt 

1 

it  ^ 

0 rt 

1 

North  Star  Peed  & Cereal  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

7715 

3199 

D.  M.  Blackmore,  Greensburg__- 
Berry  Bros.,  Lynn  __ 

10.5 

5.7 

7.7 

9.5 

10.1 

Corn  Peed  Meal 

7715 

4604 

9.6 

5.7 

6.0 

9.5 

9.8 

Odon  Milling  Company,  Odon,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  Meal  _ 

5160 

3905 

Manufacturers  

10.1 

2.8 

4.5 

7.0 

7.7 

Plainville  Milling  Company, 

Plainville,  Ind. 

5162 

3903 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.2 

2.5 

3.3 

6.8 

7.5 

Prater-Mottier  Company, 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

tCorn  Peed  Meal  

7704 

3265 

Manufacturers  _ 

12.5 

2.0 

3.0 

7.0 

7.7 

Corn  Peed  Meal _ _ 

7704 

5230 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

2.0 

3.9 

7.0 

9.4 

Rohm  Bros.,  Rockville,  Ind. 

Peed  Meal 

5336 

4499 

Montezuma  Mill  & Elev.  Co., 

Montezuma  __  

10.9 

2.5 

3.9 

6.0 

7.8 

Range  & Company,  John, 

Richmond,  Ind. 
fCorn  Peed  ATpmI 

7901 

4413 

Manufacturers  __  __  _ 

3.0 

7.5 

7.8 

12.0 

2.7 

Shine  & Company,  John  H., 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Star  Peed  Meal 

5907 

3707 

Manufacturers  

13.0 

2.5 

3.3 

7.0 

8.2 

Star  Peed  Meal _ - 

5907 

4045 

Parmers  Peed  Store,  Borden 

11.7 

2.5 

2.9 

7.0 

8.4 

Smith  & Company,  A.,  Sheridan,  Ind. 

Peed  Meal  

4001 

4264 

Manufacturers  

11.2 

2.5 

2.0 

6.5 

7.7 

Sullivan  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Sullivan,  Ind. 

tCorn  Peed  Meal __ 

7777 

4018 

Manufacturers  

10.8 

2.5 

2.8 

7.5 

7.0 

Wright  Milling  Company, 

Paris  Crossing,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  Meal _ 

6235 

3551 

Manufacturers  _ 

10.3 

2.0 

3.3 

7.0 

7.5 

CORN  RED  DOG  FLOUR 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Maizo  Corn  Red  Dog  Plour _ 

7440 

2427 

Prgest  Woods,  Brook 

8.0 

5.0 

7.1 

8.5 

11.0 

Maizn  Corn  Red  Dog  Plour 

7440 

2948 

Jacob  Portman,  Columbia  City. 
Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

9.3 

5.0 

7.4 

8.5 

10.1 

Badger  Maizo  Corn  Red  Dog  Plour 

7671 

3988 

Co.,  North  Judson 

5.9 

7.5 

8.4 

11.0 

11.0 

CORN  GERM  3IEAL 

American  Hominy  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Homenline  Peed 

3929 

2445 

Scottsburg  Elevator,  Scottsburg 
Indiana  School  for  Feeble  Mind- 

1.3 

5.0 

7.6 

17.0 

18.3 

Hnmcoliup  Peed 

3929 

2904 

ed  Youth,  Port  Wayne 

4.3 

5.0 

7.7 

17.0 

18.2 

Homcoline  Peed  _ 

3929 

3434 

.1.  H.  Harper,  Sharpsville 

3.3 

5.0 

7.4 

17.0 

18.5 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

“Heights”  rnrn  Oileake  Meal 

6819 

2001 

Farmers  Supply  Co.,  Spencer.. _ 
Branch  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

8.1 

8.0 

10.0 

21.0 

22.2 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

6819 

2173 

Martinsville  

9.2 

8.0 

10.8 

21.0 

18  3 

“Heights”  Porn  OileaVe  Meal 

6819 

2343 

J.  M.  Dunlap  Grain  Co., 

Franklin 

5.7 

8.0 

11.1 

21.0 

23.5 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal  ^24 

6819 

2632 

0.  L.  Cauble,  Salem 

9.9 

8.0 

8.7 

21.0 

18.1 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

“Heights”  Porn  OileaVe  Meal 

7457 

7457 

2666 

2812 

P.  H.  Turner  & Sons,  Paoli 

Batchelor  & Batchelor, 

9.0 

8.0 

12.6 

18.0 

20.8 

Sharnsville  

7.6 

8.0 

8.3 

18.0 

18.2 

t Before  registration 

10%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled 
No.  7457 


124  5 tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7457 


128 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 
per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

! 

Chicago,  111. 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

7457 

2842 

Robert  Crawford,  Crothersville. 

9.5 

8.0 

8.0 

18.0 

18.6 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

7457 

3159 

T.  S.  Nugen,  Lewisville  _ _ 

8.9 

8.0 

8.1 

18.0 

19.6 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

7457 

3496 

P.  Wade,  Madison 

8.7 

8.0 

10.2 

18.0 

19.2 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal  __  ___ 

7457 

3561 

Osgood  Grain  Co.,  Osgood 

8.9 

8.0 

10.0 

18.0 

19.1 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

7457 

3649 

R.  L.  Clapp  & Son,  Marysville.. 

8.7 

8.0 

8.3 

18.0 

19.9 

“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

7457 

4078 

Salem  Co-Operative  Associa- 

tion,  Salem 

8.3 

8.0 

9.8 

18.0 

20.7 

^“Heights”  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

4739 

Geo.  Powell,  Pranklin 

10.1 

8.0 

21.1 

Clinton  Sugar  Refining  Company, 

Clinton,  Iowa. 

Clinton  Corn  Oerm  Meal 

6788 

3471 

O.  Gandv  Co.,  T.neernp 

7.3 

7.0 

10.7 

20.0 

22.8 

Clinton  Corn  Oerm  Meal 

6788 

4085 

Albert  McIntosh,  Orleans 

6.8 

7.0 

7.6 

20.0 

22.3 

Clinton  Corn  Oerm  Meal 

6788 

5164 

0.  P.  Johnson  & Sons,  Paoli 

8.5 

7.0 

8.6 

20.0 

24.0 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Diamond  Hog  Meal 

6749 

1672 

Ossian  Roller  Mills,  Ossian  

8.9 

9.0 

8.3 

20.0 

19.0 

Diamond  Hoe-  Meal 

6749 

2199 

0.  Gandy  & Co.,  Denver 

8.4 

9.0 

9.0 

20.0 

22.6 

6749 

2.543' 

H.  E.  St.  John,  Albany 

8.3 

9.0 

9.5 

20.0 

22.8 

Diamond  Hog  Meal 

6749 

4339 

E.  E.  Swiger,  Orland 

8.2 

9.0 

8.4 

20.0 

22.6 

Diamond  Hog  Meal  

7478 

3017 

C.  H.  Billman  & Sons, 

Shelbyville  ... 

7.7 

7.0 

8.3 

18.0 

21.6 

Argo  Corn  Oil  Cake  Meal 

7720 

3969 

Wiegeman  & Zelt,  Port  Wayne.. 

8.0 

7.0 

9.6 

18.0 

19.9 

Argo  Corn  Oil  Cake  Meal 

7720 

4023 

Chas.  Johnson,  Sullivan 

7.8 

7.0 

8.1 

18.0 

21.3 

Argo  Corn  Oil  Cake  Meal 

7720' 

4874 

City  Peed  Store,  Plymouth 

7.5 

7.0 

6.8 

18.0 

22.4 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Yellow  Corn  Germ  Meal 

6429 

2709 

Manufacturers  ... 

8.0 

8.0 

10.1 

18.0 

21.0 

Yellow  Corn  Germ  Meal  _ 

6429 

3384 

Manufacturers  __  

9.1 

8.0 

8.5 

18.0 

21.9 

Yellow  Corn  Germ  Meal 

6429 

3854 

J.  A.  Cartwright,  New  Harmony 

7.2 

8.0 

9.7 

18.0 

22.7 

Yellow  Oorn  Oerm  Meal 

6429 

4493 

E.  T.  Harper,  Sharpsville 

9.0 

8.0 

9.3 

18.0 

22.2 

Yellow  Corn  Oerm  Meal 

6429 

4576 

S.  Y.  Hardwick,  Montclair 

6.5 

8.0 

10.2 

18.0 

20.4 

White  Corn  Germ  Meal 

7220 

2708 

Manufacturers  

2.1 

6.0 

7.0 

19.0 

18.2 

White  Corn  Germ  Meal  __  

7220 

3387 

Manufacturers  ..  

2.5 

6.0 

8.4 

19.0 

19.3 

•ItWhite  Corn  Germ  Meal 

7220 

4272 

Wolfe  Bros.,  Wolcottville 

4.3 

6.0 

7.0 

19.0 

18.6 

Pearson,  W.  W.,  Upland,  Ind. 

Pearson’s  Meal 

7702 

4123 

Manufacturer  

7.9 

7.0 

9.0 

18.0 

20.5 

Pincoffs  Company,  Maurice, 

Chicago,  111. 

Pinco  Brand  Yellow  Corn  Germ  MeaL_ 

6729 

3574 

Akron  Milling  Co.,  Akron 

6.5 

8.0 

15.6 

20.0 

19.7 

Pinco  Brand  Yellow  Corn  Germ  Meal.. 

6729 

3630 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany  

5.3 

8.0 

13.9 

20.0 

19.3 

Pinco  Brand  Yellow  Corn  Germ  MeaL_ 

6729 

4645 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany  

5.7 

8.0 

10.0 

20.0 

24.4 

Simpson,  H.  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Simpson’s  Corn  Oilcake  Meal  __  

8005 

5165 

C.  P.  Johnson  & Sons,  Paoli 

6.3 

9.0 

10.7 

21.0 

22.4 

Simpson’s  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

8005 

5205 

Salem  Co-Operative  Associa- 

tion, Salem  

4.6 

9.0 

10.7 

21.0 

22.8 

Union  Starch  & Refining  Company, 

Edinburg,  Ind. 

Union  Corn  Germ  Meal  

2237 

4713 

Newcomb  & Whitehorn, 

Columbus  

4.8 

8.0 

13.0 

18.0 

19.5 

CORN  GLUTEN  FEED 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Corn  Glutenfeed 

7266 

4176 

L.  A.  Walker,  Bedford 

9.5 

1.0 

2.3 

23.0 

20.9 

Clinton  Sugar  Refining  Company, 

Clinton,  Iowa. 

Clinton  Corn  Gluten  Peed 

5452 

4773 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart 

9.6 

3.0 

2.1 

23.0 

24.4 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

1 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Peed.  

5.530 

1780 

Paul  E.  Raasch,  Crown  Point... 

1 11.4 

1.0 

l.S 

23.0 

28.3 

Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Peed 

1914 

Thomas  Stoudt,  South  Bend 

i 9.0 

1.0 

1.8 

23.0 

26.2 

* Not  tagged  tt  Not  tagged.  Isabels  furnished 


129 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

1 per  cent. 

Crude  - 
Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

is 

‘0 

0 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

§ 

0 

h 

Guar- 

anteed 

'a 

a 

3 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

5530' 

2637 

V.  T.  Reid,  Salem 

1 10.2 

1.0 

1.4 

23.0 

26.6 

5530 

3040 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

1 9.7 

1.0 

2.0 

23.0 

24.8 

5530 

3426 

C.  M.  Barlow,  Kokomo 

8.5 

1.0 

2.1 

23.0 

25.7 

Rnffnln  Corn  Glnten  Peed 

5530 

4775 

R.  W.  Miller,  Valparaiso 

9.4 

1.0 

1.1 

23.0 

24.6 

Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

5530 

4776 

C.  & W.  Reiners,  Valparaiso 

9.1 

1.0 

2.3 

23.0 

24.3 

Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

5530 

4777 

C.  & W.  Reiners,  Valparaiso 

10.5 

1.0 

2.4 

23.0 

24.5 

Douglas  Company,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa. 

6932 

3045 

B.  A.  Gott,  Wheeler 

10.3 

1.0 

2.0 

23.0 

24.5 

ttDouglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

6932 

3267 

Prater-Mottier  Co.,  Terre  Haute 

8.1 

1.0 

2.1 

23.0 

24.6 

ttDouglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

6932 

3554 

Wright  Milling  Co., 

Paris  Crossing  

10.0 

1.0 

2.4 

23.0 

25.4 

Douglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

6932 

4183 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

7.7 

1.0 

2.1 

23.0 

25.6 

6932 

4430 

Arthur  S.  Cecil,  Selma 

8.0 

1.0 

1.8 

23.0 

24.6 

Douglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed  .. 

6932 

4529 

Lingeman,  Adams  & Co., 

Brownsburg  __ 

9.9 

1.0 

1.7 

23.0 

23.7 

Douglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

6932 

4855 

Comer-Scearce  Co.,  Mooresvllle. 

8.2 

1.0 

1.8 

23.0 

24.7 

Union  Starch  & Refining  Company, 

Edinburg,  Ind. 

Union  Gluten  Feed 

559 

2715 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.- 

7.2 

3.0 

4.1 

24.0 

24.5 

TTninn  rjlntcn  Ppcd 

559 

4733 

Manufacturers  

8.8 

3.0 

3.1 

24.0 

23.2 

CORN  GLUTEN  MEAL 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Diamnud  Corn  Glntpn  Mpal 

6979 

1944 

J.  C.  Barrett,  South  Bend 

9.2 

1.0 

1.3 

40.0 

44.8 

Diamnrid  Corn  Glntpn  Mpal 

6979 

3217 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point 

8.0 

1.0 

0.7 

40.0 

48.6 

ffDinmnnd  Gnrn  Glntpn  Mpal 

6979 

3838 

C.  D.  Paxson,  Elkhart 

9.1 

1.0 

1.4 

40.0 

44.8 

HOMINY  FEED  MEAL  OR  CHOP 

American  Hominy  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

ttHomco  125  

4265 

1750 

-W.  P.  Hopkins  Co  , Dugger 

10.1 

7.0 

6.3 

9.5 

11.0 

Homco  Feed  

6716 

2234 

Crabbs  I^ynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Crawfordsville  

9.0 

7.0 

7.5 

10.0 

11.0 

Homco  Feed — 

6716 

2628 

Salem  Co-Operative  Associa- 

tion, Salem  

7.8 

7.0 

6.2 

10.0 

10.7 

Homco  Feed 

6716 

2792 

W.  T.  Besspr.  Greeneastle 

8.1 

7.0 

6.8 

10.0 

10.4 

Homco  Feed 

6716 

3099 

Edw.  F.  Gopke,  Evansville 

7.1 

7.0 

9.2 

10.0 

9.7 

Homco  Hominy  Feed 

7614 

3433 

•T.  H.  Harper,  Sharpsville 

8.9 

6.0 

6.5 

10.0 

10.4 

Homco  Hominy  Feed  • 

7614 

3924 

Jesse  .Johnson,  Cutler 

5.8 

6.0 

7.2 

10.0 

10.2 

Homco  Hominy  Feed 

7614 

4142 

Clarence  Masten.  Amo 

7.5 

6.0 

7.7 

10.0 

10.4 

Homco  Hominy  Feed 

7614 

4190 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

7.3 

6.0 

7.2 

10.0 

10.4 

Billman  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Shelbyville,  Ind. 

t+Hominy  Feed 

4336 

4793 

Manufactnrprs 

8.0 

7.8 

8.0 

10.7 

12.1 

Blair  Milling  Company,  The, 

•Atchison,  Kans. 

Blair’s  Hominy  Feed 

6154 

3654 

V.  J.  Hardv,  Lexington  _ 

7.6 

6.5 

7.3 

9.0 

11.1 

Blair’s  Hominy  Feed 

6154 

3656 

W.  R.  McClanahan,  Otisco 

7.9 

6.5 

7.1 

9.0 

10.2 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  White  Hominy  Peed 

6732 

4081 

Freed  & Lewis,  Campbellsburg. 

8.1 

7.0 

7.5 

9.0 

10.0 

“Prize”  White  Hominy  Feed 

6732 

4083 

Campbellsburg  Exchange, 

Campbellsburg  

8.7 

7.0 

7.0 

9.0 

9.8 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

ttEberts  Hominy  Feed 

6366 

3479 

North  Madison  Mill  & Elevator, 

North  Madison  __  _ _ 1 

9.2 

7.0 

7.3 

10.0 

10.1 

Eberts  Hominy  Feed 

6366 

3483 

Manufacturers  _l 

8.5 

7.0 

6.9 

10.0  ' 

10.0 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  125  This  feed  was  shipped  through  Miesenhelder 

Bros.,  Palestine,  111.,  to  the  W.  B.  Hop- 
kins Co. 


130 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Eberts  Grain  Company,  Nabb,  Ind. 
Homing  Meal  

Hominy  Meal 

Hominy  Meal  

Edwards  & Loomis  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Hominy  Eeed  

Elevator  Milling  Company, 

Springfield,  111. 

Hominy  Feed  

Hominy  Feed  

Emieon  & Company,  J.  & S., 

(Baltic  Mills),  Vincennes,  Ind. 
Hominy  Feed  

Hominy  Feedi-^'’  

Homing  Feed  

Evans  Milling  Company,  The, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Hominy  Feed  

Hominy  Feed  

Hominy  Feed  

Hominy  Feed  

Hominy  Feed  

Ewing  Mill  Company,  Brownstown,  Ind. 

Hominy  Meal  

Hominy  Meal 

Hominy  Meal  

Gienger  & Company,  John, 
Jeffersonville,  Ind. 

Hominy  Feed  

Hominy  Feed  

Hall  Milling  Company,  W,  C., 

Brazil,  Ind. 

Hall’s  Hominy  Feed  

Hodapp  Hominy  Company, 

Seymour,  Ind. 

Hodapp  Hominy  Feed 

Hodapp  Hominy  Feed 

Hodapp  Hominy  Feed 

Hodapp  Hominy  Feed 

Hodapp  Hominy  Feed 

Hunter  & Company,  O.  L.,  Chicago,  111. 
Calumet  Hominy  Feed  

Kern  & Sons,  John  B.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Eagle  Hominy  Feed 

Kidder  & Company,  F.  L.,  Paris,  111. 

Peerless  Hominy  Feed 

Peerless  Hominy  Feed 

Peerless  Hominy  Feed 

J’eerless  Hominy  Feed 


Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

OflScial 

1 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

4460 

2468 

Charlestown  Milling  Co., 

Charlestown  

8.4 

7.5 

7.8 

10.0 

10.3 

4460 

3550 

Wright  Grain  Co., 

Paris  Crossing 

8.1 

7.5 

7.9 

10.0 

10.2 

4460 

3652 

Manufacturers  

8.2 

7.5 

7.6 

10.0 

10.6 

5415 

2786 

Marshall  & O’Hair,  Greencastle. 

8.8 

6.5 

9.5 

8.5 

12.1 

2514 

3559 

W.  P.  Neel,  Holton 

i 

8.0 

7.5 

7.8 

10.0 

10.5 

2514 

3667 

Charlestown  Milling  Co., 

Charlestown  

8.0 

7.5 

7.7 

10.0 

10.4 

4482 

1721 

Home  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Carlisle  Jet.  _ 

! 7.2 

8.0 

9.5 

9.1 

10.8 

4482 

3746 

G.  Eberhardt  & Son,  Dale 

8.0 

8.0 

7.6 

9.1 

9.9 

8046 

5267 

W.  D.  Hampton,  Worthington.. 

9.9 

7.0 

9.3 

8.0 

11.6 

20 

2798 

Herbert  Gibson,  Plymouth 

8.0 

7.5 

7.7 

10.0 

10.5 

20 

3481 

Geo.  W.  Graston  Milling  Co., 

Dupont  

7.2 

7.5 

7.0 

10.0 

11.1 

20 

3520 

J.  A.  Bock,  Argos 

8.3 

7.5 

7.1 

lO.Q 

10.6 

20 

3737 

E.  J.  Chambers,  Mays... 

8.5 

7.5 

6.9 

10.0 

10.7 

20 

4042 

National  Military  Home,  Marion 

7.9 

7.5 

7.5 

10.0' 

10.9 

296 

2833 

Manufacturers  

7.2 

7.5 

7.6 

9.0 

10.1 

296 

4148 

Manufacturers  

7.2 

7.5 

6.7 

9.0 

9.6 

296 

4726 

R.  W.  Wrope,  North  Vernon 

8.2 

7.5 

8.8 

9.0 

11.0 

1887 

2-^3 

Manufacturers  

8.1 

7.0 

7.9 

9:0 

10.5 

1887 

4678 

Manufacturers  

7.4 

7.0 

10.2 

9.0 

10.9 

3064 

2040 

Manufacturers  

11.0 

6.5 

5.3 

9.5 

9.6 

2642 

1538 

Hawley  Hall,  Lewisville 

8.4 

7.5 

7.6 

10.0 

10.3 

2642 

2437 

Manufacturers  

7.4 

7.5 

7.7 

10.0 

10.0 

2642 

2722 

Habig  Bros.,  Indianapolis 

7.2 

7.5 

8.2 

10.0 

10.4 

2642 

2869 

Hawley  Hall,  Lewisville 

8.3 

7.5 

8.2 

10.0 

10.8 

2642 

3688 

Manufacturers  

9.0 

7.5 

7.3 

10.0 

10.2 

4417 

4867 

Farmers  Elevator,  Monticello... 

8.1 

7.0 

6.7 

8.5 

10.1 

6552 

2789 

W.  T.  Besser,  Greencastle 

7.9 

8.4 

8.6 

10.4 

10.7 

2449 

1889 

Chas.  A.  Neff,  New  Paris 

9.1 

7.5 

7.8 

8.5 

10.9 

2449 

2050 

Ola  Chambers,  Jasonville 

9.2 

7.5 

7.5 

8.5 

10.4 

2449 

2642 

Campbellsburg  Exchange, 

Campbellsburg  

9.5 

7.5 

7.7 

8.5 

10.2 

2449 

2778 

Paul  Kuhn  & Co.,  Clay  City 

9.9 

7.5 

7.5 

8.5 

10.3 

i2Ga  (500  lbs.  withdrawn  and  used  by  agent  Corn  bran,  germ  and  meal  from  yellow  corn 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  -■ 
per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

'3 

0 

1 

0 . 

m 

a 

I 'O 

0 rt 

73 

1 

1 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

5101 

1492 

Paoli  Milling  Co.,  Paoli  _ 

9.3 

6.0 

7.3 

10.0 

11.9 

Badger  Hominy  Peed 

5101 

2947 

Jacob  Portman,  Columbia  City. 

9.2 

6.0 

7.1 

10.0 

11.0 

Badger  Hominy  Peed 

5101 

3489 

North  Madison  Coal  Co., 

North  Madison  

8.4 

6.0 

6.3 

10.0 

10.2 

Louisville  Cereal  Mill  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Hominy  Meal  

2020 

4670 

Scottsburg  Elevator,  Scottsburg 

8.4 

7.0 

8.5 

9.0 

10.5 

Mead  Johnson  & -Company, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

fMead’s  Hnminv  Peed 

7760 

3682 

M nnnf  nptnrprs 

8.8 

6.0 

7.7 

10.0 

10.3 

Medora  Mill  Company,  Medora,  Ind. 

tHominy  Peed 

7572 

*>831 

Manufacturers 

8.2 

5.0 

7.7 

8.0 

10.4 

National  Peed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

“Hominy  Peed”  

3020 

1532 

A.  B.  Mosher  & Co., 

Columbia  City 

9.6 

7.0 

9.8 

10.0 

11.7 

“Hominy  Peed”  

3020 

4080 

Campbellsburg  Exchange, 

Campbellsburg  

8.9 

7.0 

7.9 

10.0 

10.7 

“Hominy  Peed”  

3020 

4089 

.Orleans  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Orleans  

7.9 

7.0 

8.1 

10.0 

11.0 

tt“Hominy  Peed”  

3020 

4293 

Hammel  Milling  Co.,  Fremont.. 

8.1 

7.0 

8.5 

10.0 

10.8 

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

Hominv  Chop 

3309 

2198 

Macy  Milling  Co.,  Macy 

8.0 

3.5 

10.0 

9.5 

11.2 

Pfeffer  Milling  Company,  Lebanon,  111. 

ttPfeffer  Milling  Co.  Hominy  Peed 

2617 

3657 

Clem  C.  James,  Lexington..  ... 

8.1 

8.0 

8.5 

10.0 

10.5 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The, 

Chicago,  111. 

Yellow  Hominy  Peed  127  

3053 

2042 

City  Peed  & Fuel  Co.,  Brazil 

9.6 

4.0 

7.2 

9.0 

11.8 

*Yellow  Hominv  Peed  127 

3076 

Chas  A.  Steele,  Princeton 

9.1 

7.8 

11.1 

Suffern-Hunt  Mills,  Branch  American 

Hominy  Company,  Decatur,  111. 

Hominy  Peed 

5153 

1625 

A.  B.  Cohee  & Co.,  McCordsville 

9.1 

7.1 

6.9 

9.3 

10.4 

Hominy  Peed  

5153 

2522 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany  • 

8.0 

7.1 

7.8 

9.3 

11.1 

Hominy  Peed  

5153 

3375 

Marshall  & O’Hair,  Greencastle. 

8.7 

7.1 

7.6 

9.3 

10.6 

Hominy  Peed  

7479 

4145 

Lingeman-Adams  & Co., 

Browmsburg  

8.0 

7.0 

8.3 

10.0 

10.7 

Hominy  Peed 

7479 

4189 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

7.8 

7.0 

7.4 

10.0 

10.3 

Hominy  Feed  

7479 

4360 

Wellington  Milling  Co., 

Anderson  

7.6 

7.0 

7.8 

10.0 

10.8 

COTTONSEED  FEED 

American  Cotton  Hull  & Fiber 

Company,  The,  Memphis,  Tenn. 

“Cyclone”  Cottonseed  Peed 

4971 

1739 

Turner  & Robbins,  Shelburn 

8.2 

3.0 

3.7 

20.0 

21.5 

Tennessee  Fiber  Company, 

Memphis  Tenn. 

Creamo  Brand  Cottonseed  Peed 

4952 

4907 

Perry  Harky,  Huntertown 

8.0 

4.0 

4.2 

20.0 

19.7 

* Not  tagged 
t Before  registration 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


127  Corn  bran,  germ,  grits  and  meal  from  yellow 
com  and  corn  germ  meal.  Returned  to 
mfrs. 


132 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

a 

1 

COTTONSEED  MEAL 

1 

i 

j 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Amen  Cottonseed  Meal  128 

5617 

1469 

(Jpo.  Stppklpy,  trpndahville  > 

7.5 

8.0 

6.8  1 

41.0  1 

39.0 

Ameo  Cottonseed  Meal  120 

5617 

2024 

W.  P.  HaySj  TCnknmn 

5.2 

8.0 

6.5 

41.0 

38.7 

^Cottonseed  Meal 

2013 

University  of  Notre  Dame, 

Bartlett  Company,  The  J.  E., 

Notre  Dame 

8.2 

— 

6.9 

... 

42.9 

Jackson,  Mich. 

Michigan  “Parmer”  Brand  Cotton 

Seed  Meal  

5484 

1826 

R.  P.  Linn  & Son,  Union  City.. 

6.7 

7.0 

7.4 

41.0 

43.5 

♦Michigan  “Parmer”  Brand  Cotton 

Seed  Meal  

1837 

Edward  Warren,  Union  City 

7.1 

7.1 

42.2 

Michigan  “Parmer”  Brand  Cotton 

Seed  Meal  

5484 

1838 

C.  S.  Pierce  & Lester  Arthur, 

Michigan  “Parmer”  Brand  Cotton 

Winchester  ..  

7.1 

7.0 

7.1 

41.0 

42.2 

Seed  Meal 

5484 

1839 

Edward  Curtner,  Union  City 

7.5 

7.0 

6.9 

41.0 

40.8 

Michigan  “Parmer”  Brand  Cotton 

Seed  Meal  

5484 

1840 

C.  S.  Pierce  & Lester  Arthur, 

Michigan  “Parmer”  Brand  Cotton 

Winchester  

7.5 

7.0 

6.9 

41.0 

40.8 

Seed  Meal  

5484 

2503 

Home  Grain  Co.,  LaGrange 

7.6 

7.0 

6.4 

41.0 

40.8 

Michigan  “Parmer”  Brand  Cotton 

Seed  Meal  

5484 

2564 

Switzer  & Wolf,  Howe 

6.7 

7.0 

6.8 

41.0 

41.7 

++Bartlett’s  Jersey  Parmer  Brand  Prime 

Cottonseed  Meal  

7249 

2560 

P.  A.  Waker  & W'm.  Bowman, 

ttBartlett’s  Jersey  Parmer  Brand  Prime 

Middlebury  

6.8 

6.0 

6.9 

38.5 

38.6 

CottonsPAd  Meal 

7249 

4937 

T.  T.  Perris,  Pleasant  T.ake 

7.7 

6.0 

6.4 

38.5 

38.5 

Bartlett’s  Jersey  Parmer  Brand  Prime 

Cottonseed  Meal __  _ 

1 7249 

5202 

Sheldon  & Company,  Angola... 

7.1 

6.0 

6.9 

38.5 

41.7 

Bartlett’s  Jersey  Parmer  Brand  Prime 

Cottonsppd  Meal 

7249 

5283 

Suckow  Co.,  Pranklin  

7.5 

6.0 

6.2 

38.5 

38.0 

Brode  & Company,  P.  W., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  _ _ _ _ 

4840 

1506 

Wallaee  Milling  Go.,  Dale 

6.4 

6.0 

7.1 

41.0 

40.4 

ttOwl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i^o 

4840 

1524 

S.  P.  Trembly  Co., 

Columbia  City 

7.0 

6.0 

8.8 

41.0 

38  5 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4840 

1540 

Harry  E.  Heck,  Lewisville 

6.3 

6.0 

7.3 

41.0 

40.5 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4840 

1857 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Lafayette  

1 6.6 

6.0 

6.2 

41.0 

41.0 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

; 4840 

1871 

Valentine  Valentine,  Pranklin 

1 7.1 

6.0 

6.7 

41.0 

42.0 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

4840 

2241 

C.  E.  Bash  & Co.,  Inc., 

Huntington  

7.7 

6.0 

7.0 

41.0 

39.2 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

4840 

2281 

Bryant-Dowd  & Co.,  Hebron... 

1 7.3 

6.0 

6.6 

41.0 

42.1 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4840 

2282 

Tapp  & Bridwell,  Bloomington. 

! 8.2 

6.0 

6.0 

41.0 

41.0 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4840 

2333 

W.  E.  Lowman,  Mulberry 

7.4 

6.0 

6.3 

41.0 

41.1 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  _ 

4840 

2396 

Wm.  Marr,  Cnlnmbns 

* 6.7 

6.0 

10.2 

41.0 

42.4 

tfOwl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

; 4840 

2474 

Wm.  Metzger,  North  Manchester 

6.1 

6.0 

7.3 

41.0 

41.0 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

4840 

2639 

Salem  Milling  Co.,  Salem 

6.7 

6.0 

6.6 

41.0 

42.8 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  _ 

4840 

2753 

W.  A.  Jones,  New  Lebanon 

7.1 

6.0 

6.2 

41.0 

40.2 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

. 4840 

2902 

Edw.  P.  Goeke  & Co.,  Evansville 

, 6.3 

6.0 

6.8 

41.0 

40.3 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

1 4840 

2953 

Jones  Bros.,  Attica . 

7.2 

6.0 

6.2 

41.0 

40.6 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

i 4840 

5204 

A.  E.  Hollowell,  Orleans  

i 7.0 

6.0 

6.5 

41.0 

40.1 

ttOwl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

! 4840 

5271 

Chas.  Coulter,  Prankfort 

6.7 

6.0 

9.2 

41.0 

43.9 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal.  

1 4885 

1502 

James  K.  Mason,  Bentonville 

5.3 

6.0 

6.4 

38.6 

41.3 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

' 4885 

1783 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point... 

I 6.6 

6.0 

6.2 

38.6 

39.5 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4885 

2233 

J.  S.  Crawford,  Crown  Point. ._ 

j 6.4 

6.0 

6.3 

38.6 

38.8 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

1 4885 

2283 

Bloomington  Milling  Co., 

Bloomington  _.  

7.1 

6.0 

6.0 

38.6 

39.4 

Dove  Brand  Cnttnns;eed  Meal 

1 4885 

2571 

0.  T;.  Canble,  Pekin 

7.6 

6.0 

6.7 

38.6 

40.5 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal..* 

4885 

2843 

Kiest  Milling  Co.,  Knox 

■7.4 

6.0 

7.8 

38.6 

39.0 

+fDnve  Ttrand  rinttonsped  Meal 

i 4885 

4121 

W.  W.  Pearson,  Upland 

[ 7.3 

6.0 

6.8 

38.6 

37.2 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

1 4885 

4572 

Bryant-Dowd  & Co.,  Hebron 

8.0 

6.0 

6.9 

38.6 

39.8 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

! 4885 

4618 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

I 6.6 

6.0 

8.6 

38.6 

38.1 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4885 

4637 

Probst  & Kassebaum, 

Indianapolis  

6.5 

6.0 

6.9 

38.6 

40.7 

♦ Not  tagged 

tt  Not  tagged.  Liabels  furnished 
128  2%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
718{>.  Rebate.  See  page  41 


120  21/4  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
4885.  Rebate.  See  page  41 

180  17  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

4085.  Rebate.  See  page  41 

181  Rebate.  See  page  41 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture  i 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Erode  & Company,  F.  W., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4885 

5037 

Fisher  Fisher,  Nabb 

6.2 

6.0 

6.1 

38.6 

38.4 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4885 

5084 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville.. 

6.8 

6.0 

7.3 

38.6 

39.0 

Jay  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7902 

4560 

W.  D.  Hum  Milling  Co., 

New  Salisbury  

6.0 

5.0 

6.3 

36.0 

35.8 

Jay  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  i32 

7902 

4567 

Marengo  Milling  Co.,  Marengo.. 

7.4 

5.0 

6.3 

36.0 

34.6 

ttDove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

4737 

W.  E.  Jackson,  Greensburg 

5.9 

6.0 

7.0 

38.6 

38.6 

ffDnve  Brnnd  Dnttnn  Seed  Menl 

8009 

4738 

Harry  Pavy,  Burney 

5.9 

6.0 

7.9 

38.6 

38.6 

Dove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  

8009 

5043 

Porter  Copeland,  Markleville 

5.6 

6.0 

6.6 

38.6 

40.1 

Dove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  i33 

8009 

5083 

Heldt  Co.,  Evansville  

6.7 

6.0 

6.9 

38.6 

37.1 

Dove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

5097 

R.  J.  Follett  & Co.,  Carmel 

5.8 

6.0 

7.2 

38.6 

39.3 

ttDove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

5150 

Svfers  & Heck,  T.ewisville 

5.4 

6.0 

6.4 

38.6 

37.5 

Dove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

5171 

Charlestown  Milling  Co., 

Charlestown  

6.6 

6.0 

7.1 

38.6 

40.9 

Drive  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

5176 

McCoy  Bros.,  Liberty  

7.2 

6.0 

6.6 

38.6 

38.6 

8009 

5220 

Karl  Seherscel,  Bedford 

6.4 

6.0 

7.0 

38.6 

40.5 

ttDove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

5240 

Theodore  McCabe,  Pendleton 

6.0 

6.0 

6.8 

38.6 

39.6 

Dove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

5321 

J.  C.  Phillips,  Star  City 

5.9 

6.0 

6.6 

38.6 

39.3 

Dove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8009 

5327 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

7.9 

6.0 

6.7 

38.6 

39.7 

Buckeyet  Cotton  Oil  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Buckeye”  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

5534 

1616 

Guy  E.  Davis,  Lebanon 

6.6 

6.0 

7.7 

38.6 

41.5 

“Buckeye”  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

5634 

2168 

Phillip  Dorner  Sons  Co., 

Frankfort 

6.4 

6.0 

6.8 

38.6 

39.5 

“Buckeye”  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

5534 

2951 

E.  F.  Haynes,  Avilla 

6.3 

6.0 

6.5 

38.6 

38.2 

“Buckeye”  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

5534 

2952 

Ellen  Eldridge,  Kendallville 

6.3 

6.0 

6.5 

38.6 

38.2 

“Buckeye”  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

5534 

5177 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

' 

Lafayette  

6.2 

6.0 

6.5 

38.6 

39.5 

Burnett  Company,  The  Wm.  A., 

Louisville,  Ky. 

ttBurnett’s  Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7160 

5269 

J.  K.  Wagler,  Montgomery 

6.2 

6.0 

7.0 

38.6 

41.2 

Campbell,  C.  L.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Double  Hump  Camel  Brand  Cotton- 

seed Meal  . _ . 

7937 

4547 

•Tav  Grain  Co..  Mulberry 

7.1 

6.0 

7.3 

41.0 

42.8 

Campbell  & Company,  C.  L., 

Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Cottonseed  Meal  ^34  

8031 

4954 

G.  Wolff  & Sons  Co.,  Hamilton 

5.9 

6.0 

6.5 

38.5 

36.1 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  III. 

“Prize  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6347 

1584 

C.  E.  Paxsnn,  Elkhart 

7.4 

6.0 

7.6 

41.0 

43.3 

“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ^35 

6347 

1623 

A.  B.  Cohee  & Co.,  McCordsville 

8.4 

6.0 

7.2 

41.0 

38.0 

“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ^36 

6347 

2638 

Salem  Co-Operative  Associa- 

tion, Salem  

8.3 

6.0 

6.8 

41.0 

38.2 

“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6347 

2820 

Milford  Grain  & Milling  Co., 

Milford  _ 

8.9 

6.0 

8.0 

41.0 

41.5 

“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8000 

5138 

Jerome  Bartholomew,  Kouts 

5.3 

6.0 

7.8 

38.5 

40.2 

Choctaw  Sales  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

“Choctaw  Quality”  Cottonseed  Meal 

and  Cake  __  

6802 

2311 

Granville  Moodv,  Moodv 

6.8 

7.0 

7.2 

43.0 

43.7 

“Choctaw  Quality”  Cottonseed  Meal 

and  Cake  

7176 

2863 

W.  C.  Rose,  MeCovsburg 

6.6 

6.0 

6.1 

43.0 

44.2 

“Choctaw  Quality”  Cottonseed  Meal 

and  Cake  

7176 

2864 

Granville  Moody,  Rensselaer 

6.0 

6.0 

6.1 

43.0 

44.8 

“Choctaw  Quality”  Cottonseed  Meal 

and  Cake 

7176 

3888 

D.  L.  Trout.  Lee 

7.8 

6.0 

6.6 

43.0 

45.8 

Choctaw  Standard  Cottonseed  Meal 

and  Cake  137 

7177 

1641 

Granville  Moody,  Rensselaer 

7.3 

6.0 

6.9 

41.0 

36.4 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

132  19  tons  removed  from  sale.  Returned  to  mfgr.  7.307.  Rebate.  See  page  41 

133  6%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Rebate.  See  i®”  Rebate.  See  page  41 

page  41  Rebate.  See  page  41 

134  sy-  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

8144.  Rebate.  See  page  41 


134 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  - 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Cottonseed  Products  Company,  The, 

i 

j 

Louisville,  Ky. 

1 

Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

7103 

1748 

Board  of  Trade  Peed  Store, 

Linton  

9.0 

6.0 

6.8 

38.0 

37.8 

Prime  Cottonseed  Meal _ 

7103 

2523 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany  ___  

7.3 

6.0 

6.8 

38.0 

38.0 

Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  __  

7103 

3567 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

9.1 

6.0 

7.2 

38.0 

37.8 

Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

7103 

4648 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany 

8.8 

6.0 

7.4 

; 38.0 

37.9 

Good  Cottonseed  Meal 

7981 

5155 

R.  E.  Hayes,  Campbellsburg 

7.1 

6.0 

7.6 

36.0 

40.1 

Good  Cottonseed  Meal 

7981 

5167 

Heise  Bros.,  Orleans 

7.2 

6.0 

7.7 

36.0 

38.5 

Davis,  S.  P.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

i 

Good  Lucie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6671 

1601 

G.  & H.  Walters,  Co.,  Brookville 

6.7 

6.0 

9.6 

41.0 

41.1 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

1675 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

1 

South  Raub  

7.4 

6.0 

7.2 

41.0 

40.8 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2004 

Trafalgar  Grain  Co.,  Trafalgar. 

8.3 

6.0 

9.4 

41.0 

42.4 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2235 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Lafayette  

6.5 

6.0 

6.9 

i 41.0 

42.3 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2303 

Nichols  Bros.,  Denham 

6.5 

6.0 

7.3 

41.0 

41.6 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2315 

W.  A.  Cooper,  Markleville 

6.1 

6.0 

7.8 

41.0 

43.4 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2331 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

1 

Lafayette  

1 6.2 

6.0 

6.5 

41.0 

40.9 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2346 

Valentine  & Valentine,  Franklin 

6.3 

6.0 

7.2 

41.0 

41.1 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2394 

Phillip  Dorner  Son’s  Co., 

1 

Frankfort  

6.4 

6.0 

7.4 

41.0 

41.7 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2409 

E.  V.  Temple,  Frankfort 

1 6.2 

6.0 

6.7 

i 41.0 

41.6 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

! 6671 

2413 

H.  C.  Vestal,  Montezuma 

6.9 

6.0 

7.5 

41.0 

40.8 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

I 6671 

2419 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

i 

1 

Wingate  

6.6 

6.0 

7.6 

41.0 

42.2 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

1 6671 

2640 

0.  L.  Cauble,  Salem 

6.9 

6.0 

8.2 

41.0 

42.6 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

2719 

Oscar  Hart,  Sanburn 

8.0 

6.0 

7.1 

41.0 

42.3 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

1 6671 

4863 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

1 

Lafayette  ___  

1 9.3 

6.0 

7.7 

41.0 

41.9 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

i 6671 

4944 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

1 

Lafayette  

i 7.0 

6.0 

7.6 

41.0 

42.1 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

5056 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

1 

1 

South  Raub 

6.3 

6.0 

7.2 

i 41.0 

40.7 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ^38 

6671 

5058 

Robert  Jaques,  Lafayette 

7.8 

6.0 

7.3 

1 41.0 

38.9 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

5189 

Robert  Jaques,  Lafayette 

6.5 

6.0 

7.7 

41.0 

44.6 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___ 

6671 

5270 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Lafayette  __  

6.6 

6.0 

6.4 

41.0 

41.9 

Veribest  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7432 

2360 

W.  C.  Hall  Milling  Co.,  Brazil... 

6.1 

6.0 

7.2 

1 38.5 

39.8 

Veribest  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7432 

4028 

W.  C.  Hall  Milling  Co.,  Brazil... 

7.1 

6.0 

7.5 

38.5 

38.5 

Veribest  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7432 

4466 

Hamilton  Like,  Monroe  City 

6.6 

6.0 

6.0 

38,5 

38.4 

Veribest  Brand  Cnttnnseed  Meal 

7432 

4548 

Jay  Grain  Co.,  Mulberry 

7.2 

6.0 

7.6 

38.5 

39.7 

Veribest  Brand  rinttnnseed  Meal 

7432 

5161 

Gus  Jacobs,  Wanatah 

6.0 

6.0 

7.8 

38  5 

40.3 

Veribest  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7432 

5197 

Wilbur  Doddridge,  Centerville... 

6.7 

6.0 

5.2 

38.5 

37.7 

Veribest  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i39___ 

7432 

5301 

Henry  Helmich,  Greensburg 

7.0 

6.0 

6.2 

38.5 

36.6 

Dixie  Mills  Company, 

1 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

1 

Anchor  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  i*3___ 

7537 

3484 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon... 

8.2 

6.0 

7.7 

38.5 

37.1 

Anehor  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7537 

3829 

J.  W.  Wilkinson,  Boonville 

8.4 

6.0 

8.2 

38.5 

37.7 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

ttPrime  Cotton  Seed  Meal  

5476 

2897 

Fred  Miller,  West  College  Corner 

7.5 

6.5 

6.7 

38.6 

38.0 

Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal  

5476 

3647 

The  Early  & Daniel  Co.,  Aurora 

7.0 

6.5 

6.4 

38.6 

36.2 

East  St.  Louis  Oil  Company, 

National  Stoek  Yards,  111. 

Illinois  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  i*2___ 

3429 

2837 

Vincennes  Feed  & Produce  Co., 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed 

1 

Vincennes  ..  ... 

5.4 

7.0 

7.0 

41.0 

41.0 

Meal  

1 6258 

1468 

George  Steckley,  Kendallville 

6.1 

6.0 

9.0 

38.5 

42.1 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
138  Rebate.  See  page  41 
130  Rebate.  See  page  41 

1*3  1%  tons  removed  from  sale  and  used  in  com- 
pounding feed 


1*1  % ton  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to 
mfrs. 

1*2  Relabeled  No.  7091 


135 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL  . 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Fat  • 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

1 Found 

East  St.  Louis  Cotton  Oil  Company, 

National  Stock  Yards,  111. 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6258 

1580 

Goshen  Milling  Co.,  Goshen 

6.7 

6.0 

7.9 

38.5 

39.7 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed 

IVIenl  1*3 

6258 

1807 

Purity  Bakery  Co.,  Linton 

7.6 

6.0 

6.4 

38.5 

34.2 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6258 

2838 

Vincennes  Feed  & Produce  Co., 

Vincennes  __  

5.3 

6.0 

6.8 

38.5 

40.4 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6258 

5024 

J.  W.  Emison,  Cerecelius 

5.3 

6.0 

7.1 

38.5 

41.0 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed 

ATpnl  1** 

6258 

5153 

Suckow  Co.,  Franklin 

7.1 

6.0 

6.0 

38.5 

37.2 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6258 

5213 

The  Purity  Bakery  Co.,  Linton. 

5.6 

6.0 

6.9 

38.5 

38.9 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed 

Mpnl  1*5 

6258 

5338 

T.  S.  Nngen,  T,ewi.«!ville .. 

7.4 

6.0 

5.5 

38.5 

37.7 

Illinois  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7091 

1494 

George  I.  Neptune,  Thorntown.. 

6.1 

6.0 

7.2 

41.0 

40'.5 

7091 

1495 

Caleb  0.  Brown,  T.ebanon 

7.2 

6.0 

7.6 

41.0 

41.1 

Illinois  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7091 

3383 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

6.4 

6.0 

6.7 

41.0 

42.0 

Eberts,  H.  F.  H.,  Little  Eock,  Ark. 

Milko  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7428 

2550 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester 

7.5 

5.5 

6.6 

38.6 

37.7 

Milko  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7428 

4059' 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester  

6.4 

5.5 

7.3 

38.6 

38.3 

Milko  Brand  Cnttnnsppd  Mpal 

7428 

4569 

Goshen  Milling  Co.,  Goshen 

7.0 

5.5 

6.2 

38.6 

40.1 

Milko  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7428 

5193 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

LaFayette  

6.8 

5.5 

6.9 

38.6 

40.6 

Milko  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7428 

5285 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

6.2 

5.5 

6.3 

38.6 

40.1 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7921 

4955 

Salem  Co-Operative  Associa- 

tion, Salem  

6.2 

6.0 

6.9 

41.0 

41.1 

Edwards  & Loomis  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Cottonseed  Meal 

7138 

2601 

Nappanee  Produce  Co., 

Nappanee  

7.2 

6.0 

7.6 

38.5 

39.9 

Eldred  Mill  Company,  Jackson,  Mich. 

ttCusto  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  **0 

8125 

5183 

Paul  V.  Brooks,  Greens  Fork... 

8.1 

5.0 

6.7 

36.0 

33.8 

Gusto  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  **'^ 

8125 

5324 

W.  F.  Parks,  Kitchel 

8.3 

5.0 

5.8 

36.0 

31.1 

Feeders  Supply  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal  i*®. 

6167 

1619 

The  Farmers  Mill,  Huntingburg. 

7.0 

6.0 

8.6 

41.0 

38.2 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal  i*®- 

6167 

1676 

Wm.  Raff,  Conrad 

8.1 

6.0 

6.9 

41.0 

39.0 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

1677 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Pogue 

7.6 

6.0 

7.5 

41.0 

40.4 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

1678 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Pogue 

7.2 

6.0 

7.1 

41.0 

40.1 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal  *0*. 

6167 

1709 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Dyer  ...  

8.0 

6.0 

7.5 

41.0 

39.7 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal  102. 

6167 

1710 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Dyer 

7.9 

6.0 

8.0 

41.0 

40.0 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal  10®- 

6167 

1862 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Morocco 

6.7 

6.b 

7.4 

41.0 

40.4 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal  ^0*- 

6167 

1863 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Morocco 

6.6 

6.0 

7.6 

41.0 

40.4 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2204 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Rensselaer 

7.4 

6.0 

8.0 

41.0 

40.6 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2205 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Pleasant  Ridge 

7.8 

6.0 

6.7 

41.0 

45.6 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2206 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Pleasant  Ridge 

6.3 

6.0 

6.4 

41.0 

48.4 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal  *00. 

6167 

2207 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Dyer 

6.9 

6.0 

7.1 

41.0 

39.4 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2222 

Wm.  Raff.  Conrad  . 

7.6 

6.0 

8.3 

41.0 

40.6 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2527 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Pleasant  Ridge 

6.0 

6.0 

6.6 

41.0 

47.1 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2678 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Fair  Oaks 

7.4 

6.0 

6.0 

41.0 

45.1 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2679 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Fair  Oaks 

6.7 

6.0 

6.0 

41.0 

44.2 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2680 

Wm.  Raff.  Conrad  _ . 

6.1 

6.0 

6.3 

41.0 

45.1 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2681 

W.  Raff,  Conrad  

6.5 

6.0 

6.2 

41.0 

45.0 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2682 

J.  J.  Lawler,  Fair  Oaks 

6.4 

6.0 

6.1 

41.0 

45.0 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2763 

W.  A.  Meloy,  Argos 

5.7 

6.0 

7.9 

41.0 

43.1 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2764 

J.  M.  Romig,  Argos 

5.7 

6.0 

7.9 

41.0 

43.1 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2765 

Geo.  R.  Mvers.  Argos  : _ 

5.7 

6.0 

7.9 

41.0 

43.1 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

2959 

D.  L.  Trout,  Monon 

7.1 

6.0 

6.0 

41.0 

43.6 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

1^3  1 ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
7459.  Rebate.  See  page  41 
Rebate.  See  page  41 
Rebate.  'See  page  41 
Rebate.  See  page  42 
Rebate.  See  page  42 

19  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
7413.  Rebate.  See  page  42 


1*0  Rebate. 
150  Rebate. 
i®i  Rebate. 
i®2  Rebate. 
1®3  Rebate. 
10*  Rebate. 
100  Rebate. 


See  page  42 
See  page  42 
See  page  42 
See  page  42 
See  page  42 
See  page  42 
See  page  42 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from  • 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain  Company, 

Winchester,  Ind. 

Magic  Cottonseed  Meal  

7317 

2060 

Manufacturers 

6.7 

6.0 

7.0 

36.0 

36.0 

Gronauer  & Company,  Gus, 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Globe  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6872 

1493 

Panli  Milling  Cn  , Panli 

6.5 

6.0 

7.0 

41.0 

40.4 

Globe  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6872 

2245 

Gustav  Wolf  & Sons  Co., 

Hamilton  

6.7 

6.0 

6.9 

41.0 

41.0 

Globe  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6872 

5312 

C.  F.  Cattrnn,  Wcstvillp 

5.6 

6.0 

7.6 

41.0 

40.8 

Hewitt,  C.  G.,  Montgomery,  Ala. 

Puritan  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7441 

2457 

Farmers  Elevator  Co.,  Laketon. 

5.9 

6.5 

7.3 

41.0 

41.7 

*Cottonseed  Meal 

2473 

Dow  Bush,  Urban  a 

6.1 

7.2 

40.9 

Humphreys,  Godwin  Company, 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5064 

1535 

Thomas  Nugen,  Lewisville  __  _ 

5.9 

6.0 

7.4 

41.0 

42.6 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

5064 

1592 

Geo.  E.  Bordner,  Bristol 

7.3 

6.0 

7.0 

41.0 

42.3 

Dixie  Brand  Gottonseed  Meal 

5064 

2250 

Walter  Cook,  Veedersburg  

6.9 

6.0 

7.4 

41.0 

43.4 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5064 

2687 

The  Lemon  Milling  Co.,  Bedford 

7.7 

6^0 

6^4 

4L0 

42  .’6 

5064 

2717 

Frank  Owen,  Bedford  _ _ 

6.7 

6.0 

6.1 

41.0 

40.8 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

5064 

2814 

C.  W.  T^ee,  Sharpsville 

6.4 

6.0 

6.6 

41.0 

43.0 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5064 

2815 

C.  W.  T.ee,  Sharpsville 

7.2 

6.0 

6.6 

41.0 

41.9 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5064 

2868 

T.  S.  Nugen,  Lewisville 

6.0 

6.0 

8.9 

41.0 

44.0 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5064 

2910 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

Co.,  North  Judson  

6.2 

6.0 

8.4 

41.0 

43.0 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5064 

2932 

J.  W.  Corya,  Hope  

7.9 

6.0 

7.5 

41.0 

42.1 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5064 

4958 

Salem  Milling  Co..  Salem 

6.0 

6.0 

6.9 

41.0 

41.8 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7116 

1638 

Butcher  & Duncan, 

Oakland  City  

7.7 

6.0 

7.4 

38.5 

38.1 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i®® 

7116 

2751 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

6.8 

6.0 

6.6 

38.5 

37.7 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7116 

4465 

Vincennes  Feed  & Produce  Co., 

Vincennes  

6.7 

6.0 

7.9 

38.5 

38.7 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

7116 

4803 

R.  L.  Ader,  Clayton  

6.1 

6.0 

6.8 

38.5 

38.5 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7116 

4933 

G.  I.  Neptune,  Thorntown 

7.0 

6.0 

6.1 

38.5 

38.8 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

7116 

4934 

G.  I.  Neptune,  Thorntown 

6.9 

6.0 

6.7 

38.5 

37.9 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i®® 

7116 

5135 

Butcher  & Duncan, 

Oakland  City 

6.0 

6.0 

6.2 

38.5 

36.4 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ^®® 

7116 

5142 

E.  W.  Masters,  Sedalia 

6.1 

6.0 

6.3 

38.5 

37.3 

■porfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7116 

5208 

H.  E.  Pitman,  Bedford 

5.8 

6.0 

6.2 

38.5 

38.9 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7116 

5209 

H.  E.  Pitman.  Bedford 

6.0 

6.0 

6.7 

38.5 

38  0 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i®® 

7116 

5302 

H.  L.  Beall,  Clarksburg 

6^2 

6!o 

7!o 

38.5 

36.9 

Danish  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7178 

1860 

Frank  Vanatta,  Fowler 

6.4 

5.0 

8.3 

36.0 

36.4 

Danish  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

7178 

1861 

W.  J.  Smith,  Fowler.  ..  

6.8 

5.0 

7.8 

36.0 

37.7 

Danish  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7178 

4562 

Geo.  E.  Bordner,  Bristol 

7.0 

5.0 

7 4 

36.0 

36.7 

Danish  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7178 

5246 

W.  C.  Hall  Milling  Co.,  Brazil... 

7.2 

5.0 

6.3 

36.0 

37.9 

Danish  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7178 

5303 

J.  G.  Miller,  Greensburg. 

7.3 

5.0 

7.1 

36.0 

36.2 

Danish  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7178 

5304 

Hugh  Taylor,  Greensburg 

7^3 

5.0 

7.5 

36.0 

36.5 

Imperial  Cotto  Milling  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Imi>erial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

1591 

L.  B.  Puckett,  Muncie 

8.5 

6.0 

7.0 

41.0 

43.0 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2259 

Gideon  Gerber,  Craigville 

7.1 

6.0 

6.6 

41.0 

41.6 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2264 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart 

7.3 

6.0 

6.7 

41.0 

42.0 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2270 

J.  P.  Lockwood,  Keystone 

7.6 

6.0 

6.5 

41.0 

41.2 

ttlmperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2313 

L.  B.  Puckett,  Muncie 

6.8 

6.0 

6.4 

41.0 

39.2 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2314 

L.  B.  Puckett,  Muncie ... 

6.7 

6.0 

7.5 

41.0 

41.8 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2330 

Arthur  Cecil,  Selma ..  ... 

6.6 

6.0 

6.8 

41.0 

40.9 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2456 

Haynes  Milling  Co.,  Portland... 

6.5 

6.0 

7.4 

41.0 

43.9 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

Meal  ..  

7099 

2824 

H.  C.  Click,  Elizabethtown 

7.2 

6.0 

6.8 

41.0 

37.3 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

Meal  i®2  

7099 

2826 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon... 

7.2 

6.0 

6.8 

41.0 

37J^ 

* Not  tagged  iso  Rebate.  See  page  42 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  Rebate.  See  page  42 

Rebate.  See  page  42  1%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

157  Kel)ate.  See  page  42  7307.  Rebate.  See  page  42 

158  i2y>  tons  removed  from  sale.  Rebate.  See  i®^  2'%,  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

page  42  7307. 


137 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent.  , 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

'S 

O 

1 

QO 

a 

1 'O 
efl  ^ 

O a 

1 

1 

u 

rt  « 

O c3 

ns 

§ 

Imperial  Cotto  Milling  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

ttlmperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2930 

Earl  Garten,  Burney  

7.5 

6.0 

6.3 

41.0 

40.2 

ttlmperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7099 

2935 

Hillis  & Toten,  Pair  Oaks 

6.4 

6.0 

7.8 

41.0 

44.2 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

Meal  163 

7099 

3511 

Chas.  W.  .les.sup,  Madison 

8.1 

6.0 

7.0 

41.0 

37.2 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed  Meal  

7150 

1668 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

Bluffton  

8.2 

5.0 

7.2 

38.5 

39.C 

.seed  Meal 

7150 

1878 

Chfts.  D.  I. a kin,  Parr 

7.8 

5.0 

6.0 

38.5 

34.4 

ttlniperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

7150 

1879 

Obas  T).  I, akin,  Parr 

8.0 

5.0 

5.8 

38.5 

33.7 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

7150 

2309 

,1.  S.  Mineh,  Ohalmers 

6.9 

5.0 

7.4 

38.5 

37.4 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed  Meal  i®^ 

7150 

2646 

Orleans  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Orleans 

8.2 

5.0 

6.2 

38.5 

36.8 

Imperial  Brand  Cnttnn.seed  Meal 

7307 

2130 

Geo.  W.  Taber,  Bluffton 

7.0 

5.5 

7.0 

36.0 

36.7 

ttlniperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7307 

2165 

Marguard  Slipher,  Moran 

7.0 

5.5 

6.5 

36.0 

35.3 

7307 

2310 

,1.  S.  Mineh,  Reynolds 

6.3 

5.5 

6.7 

36.0 

32.5 

Imperial  Brand  rinttnnseed  Meal 

7307 

2332 

,1.  S.  Mineh,  Chalmers 

7.0 

5.5 

8.7 

38.0 

33.5 

ttlniperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7307 

2410 

R.  V.  Thompson,  Dana 

6.4 

5.5 

6.1 

36.0 

35.5 

ttimperial  Brand  Ontt.nnseed  Meal 

7307 

2411 

M.  P.  Collier,  Dana 

6.4 

5.5 

6.1 

36.0 

35.5 

ttimperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7307 

2800 

Wm.  Erwin  & Son,  Bourbon 

7.6 

5.5 

7.1 

36.0 

35!6 

7307 

2811 

TiOuis  S.  Sift.as,  Tipton 

8.2 

5.5 

6.5 

36.0 

37.3 

I+Imperial  Brand  D'nttnn.seed  Meal 

7307 

2817 

,1.  C.  Erwin^  Inwood 

7.6 

5.5 

7.5 

37.7 

Imperial  Cotto  Milling  Company, 

Peoria,  111. 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed Meal 

4881 

2317 

A.  S.  Thomas,  LaPontaine 

7.7 

6.5 

6.7 

38.6 

38.4 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4929 

2122 

Wm.  Gerber,  Bluffton 

6.3 

6!o 

7!o 

41.0 

40.3 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Mealf 

4929 

2569 

Ray  Taylor,  Lebanon 

6.8 

6.0 

6.4 

41.0 

41.5 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal' 

4929 

2570 

Orville  Taylor,  Lebanon 

6.8 

6.0 

6.4 

41.0 

41.5 

Imperial  Cotto  Sales  Company, 

i 

Chicago,  111. 

ttimperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8091 

5179 

Geo.  C.  Wood.  Windfall 

8.0 

5.0 

7.6 

36.0 

35.9 

tjlmperial  Brand  riottonseed  Meal 

8091 

5249 

Ralph  Moss,  Clay  City 

8.3 

5.0 

6.6 

36.0 

37.6 

ttimperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8091 

5250 

W.  J.  Hall,  Clay  City 

8^0 

5^0 

6.8 

36^0 

36!o 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed Meal 

8093 

5157 

St.  Marys  Academy,  Notre  Dame 

6.4 

5.0 

7.2 

38.5 

38.5 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed Meal 

8093 

5158 

University  of  Notre  Dame, 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

Notre Dame 

6.2 

5.0 

6.5 

38.5 

40.3 

seed  Meal 

8093 

5188 

Roth  Bros..  Rensselaer 

7.1 

5.0 

9.0 

38.5 

41.9 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed Meal  

8093 

5194 

R.  A.  Parkison.  Moodv 

8.5 

5.0 

6.7 

38.5 

40.5 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton-  [ 

seed  Meal  l 

8393 

5195 

R.  A.  Parkison,  Moodv  _ 

6.2 

5.0 

5.4 

38.5 

39.8 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton-  - 

seed  Meal 

8093 

5238 

G.  C.  Arbogast,  Selma. 

6.4 

5.0 

7.5 

38.5 

40.4 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed Meal  [ 

8093 

5239 

G.  C.  Arbovast.  Selma 

6.3 

5.0 

7.6 

38.5 

38.3 

ttimperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

seed Meal 

8093 

5291 

W.  0.  Talbert.  Wabash 

6.1 

5.0 

7.9 

38.5 

39.6 

Johnson,  H.  N.,  Athens,  Ga. 

Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7740 

5034 

W.  R.  McClanahan,  Otiseo 

5.6 

6.0 

6.9 

38.6 

39.6 

Cdtton  Seed  Meal  

8061 

5210 

Bloomington  Milling  Co.,  ' 

Johnson  & Company,  W.  B., 

Bloomington  * 

6.3 

5.5 

6.1 

36.0 

36.1 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Supreme  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i®®___ 

6930 

2458 

John  Doty,  Marion 

6.6 

7.0 

6.7 

41.0 

33.7 

Supreme  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i®® 

6930 

2459 

Harvey  Bragg,  Marion 

6.6 

7.0 

6.7 

41.0 

33.7 

Supreme  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i®'^... 

6930 

2460 

John  Dotv.  Marion  _ 

6.6 

7.0 

6.7 

41.0 

39.7 

Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6931 

2265 

Prater  & Mottier,  Terre  Haute. 

7.0 

6.0 

7.0 

38.0  1 

40.1 

Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6931 

2359 

Paul  Kuhn  & Co.,  Riley 

6.2 

6.0 

7.3 

38.0  ! 

42.2 

Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal. 

6931 

5290 

A.  L.  Wheeler,  Mooresville 1 

6.9 

6.0 

7.1 

38.0 

39.3 

Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6931 

5332  1 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

6.4  1 

6.0 

7^5 

38!  0 1 

39!4 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  Rebate.  See  page  42 

163  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  i®®  Rebate.  See  page  42 

7307.  Rebate.  See  page  42  ^®’^  Rebate.  See  page  42 

164  4 3/^^  tons  removed  from  sale 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

percent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Keeton  & Company,  J.  P.,  Atlanta,  Ga. 

t“Southern  King  Brand”  Cottonseed 

Meal 

8398 

5154 

0.  L.  Caiihle,  Salem 

5.1 

6.0 

9.1 

38.6, 

38.7 

Lanier  Bros.,  Nashville,  Tenn. 

Jersey  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5537 

2829 

Wesley  Miller  Plour  & Peed 

Co.,  South  Bend 

6.9 

6.0 

6.1 

38.6 

38.0 

Jersey  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  1®® 

5537 

3320 

John  Runge  & Co.,  Richmond.. 

6.9 

6.0 

7.0 

38.6 

35.7 

Lovitt  & Company,  L.  B., 

. 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

T.nyit  Brand  Cnttnn.seed  Meal 

6238 

1500 

Gpn  P.  Wngmpr,  -Tasppr 

6.6 

7.5 

6.9 

41.0 

41.5 

Lovit  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6238 

1575 

The  PTpldt  Cn.,  Bvansyillp 

7.4 

7.5 

6.5 

41.0 

42.4 

Lovit  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6238 

1872 

Suckow  Company,  Pranklin 

7.1 

7.5 

7.8 

41.0 

44.3 

1909 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

6.8 

6.7 

39.5 

Lovit  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ^®® 

6238 

2306 

Hawley  Hall,  T.pwisvillp 

6.7 

7.5 

6 8 

41.0 

40  4 

T.nvit  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  i70 

6238 

2987 

Calvin  Stout,  Clayton 

7.7 

7.5 

6 5 

41.0 

40.5 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

1781 

Paul  E.  Raasch,  Crown  Point... 

7.7 

6.0 

6.0 

38.6 

38.2 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

1782 

Paul  E.  Raasch,  Crown  Point... 

7.9 

6.0 

7.0 

38.6 

40.1 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

2232 

Luebcke  Bros.,  Crown  Point 

6.3 

6.0 

6.4 

38.6 

37.4 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

4628 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis. 

6.9 

6.0 

6.0 

.38.6 

36.7 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

4806 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis. 

6.3 

6.0 

6.8 

38.6 

39.7 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

6849 

4851 

A.  L.  Wheeler,  Mooresville 

6.4 

6.0 

6.9 

38.6 

40.1 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

6849 

5057 

Pred  Slinkard  & C.  M.  East, 

Worthington 

5.5 

6.0 

5.7 

1 38.6 

39.1 

Mpmphis  Brand  Cottonsppd  Meal 

6849 

5168 

Wm.  Steeb,  Crown  Point 

6.5 

6.0 

5 6 

38.6 

38.8 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

5211 

Harry  Matlock,  Bloomington.^.. 

5.9 

6.0 

6.2 

38.6 

38.6 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

5217 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

6.6 

6.0 

7.0 

38.6 

41.9 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

5241 

J.  S.  Minch,  Chalmers 

6.6 

6.0 

5 3 

38.6 

39.0 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

5244 

Jos.  S.  Minch,  Chalmers 

6.3 

6.0 

5.3 

38.6 

38.8 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

5286 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  - 

6.8 

6.0 

7.3 

38.6 

40.8 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6849 

5298 

Haynes  Milling  Co.,  Portland 

7.1 

6.0 

7.0 

38.6 

36.6 

T nvit  Brand  Cnttnnsppd  Mpal 

7460 

4492 

E.  T.  Harper,  Sharpsville 

6.2 

6.5 

8.2 

41.0 

43.0 

T.nvit  Brand  Cottnnsppd  Meal 

7460 

5284 

Siipknw  Cn.,  Pranklin 

6.7 

6.5 

7.1 

41.0 

40.8 

Macdonald,  J.  M.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

TCinpda  Primp  Cnttnnsppd  Mpal 

6761 

1574 

E.  P.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville 

6.9 

6.0 

7.1 

38.6 

39.4 

T\ inpda  Primp  Cnttnnsppd  Mpal 

6761 

1744 

.T  H T.ponard,  Snllivan 

7.5 

6.0 

7.2 

38.6 

39.5 

ttKineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

2421 

W.  J.  Loy,  Columbus 

6.5 

6.0 

6.7 

38.6 

39.9 

ttKineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

2440 

Crothersville  Peed  & Grain 

Exchange,  Crothersville 

7.6 

6.0 

6.7 

38.6 

39.4 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

2528 

Louis  Hartman  & Sons, 

New  Albany 

6.1 

6.0 

7.3 

38.6 

40.8 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

2534 

M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

6.5 

6.0 

7.3 

38.6 

38.7 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

2551 

John  Gienger  & Co., 

Jeffersonville  

5.7 

6.0 

7.5 

38.6 

39.6 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  

6761 

3661 

M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

7.4 

6.0 

5 8 

.38  6 

35.2 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  

6761 

3695 

Hodapp  Hominy  Co.,  Seymour. 

7.1 

6.0 

7.3 

38.6 

38.9 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

4262 

Ed.  P.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville 

6.4 

6.0 

8.0 

38.6 

39.5 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  

6761 

4668 

Louisville  Cement  Co., 

Jeffersonville  

7.8 

6.0 

6.6 

38.6 

39.1 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

5054 

Milltown  Milling  Co.,  Milltown.. 

5.6 

6.0 

7.9 

38.6 

38.0 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

5076 

Edw.  P.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville.. 

6.2 

6.0 

6.4 

38.6 

38.4 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

5173 

J.  Gienger  & Co.,  Jeffersonville. 

7.5 

6.0 

6.7 

38.6 

38.5 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  

6761 

5174 

M.  A.  Conroy,  Jeffersonville 

7.3 

6.0 

6.9 

38.6 

36.9 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

5328 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

6.2 

6.0 

8.1 

38.6 

39.8 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

5329 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

6.0 

6.0 

5.8 

38.6 

40.0 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  i"^® 

6761 

5330 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

7.4 

6.0 

6.1 

38.6 

36.2 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  - 

6891 

1626 

Oaklandon  Grain  Co., 

Oaklandon  

6.1 

6.0 

6.7 

41.0 

41.2 

* Not  tagged 
t Before  registration 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
1®®  IVfj  tons  removed  from  sale 
1®®  Rebate.  See  page  42 
1^®  Rebate.  See  page  42 

10  tons  removed  from  sale.  Rebate.  See 
I)age  42 

Rebate.  See  page  42 


11  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
7580.  Rebate.  See  page  42 
174  g 1/2^  tons  removed  from  sale.  Returned  to 
mfr.  Rebate.  See  page  42 
176  7 ®/io  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled 
No.  7973.  Rebate.  See  page  42 
1"®  10  tons  removed  from  sale.  Rebate.  See 
page  42 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

ttMacdonald,  J.  M.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

1768 

Haynes  Milling  Co.,  Portland— 

7.4 

6.0 

6.3 

41.0 

35  7 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  n® 

6891 

1873 

J.  B.  Harrell  & Son,  Shelbyville 

7.2 

6.0 

6.7 

41.0 

39.5 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

1996 

Union  Crain  & Feed  Co., 

Anderson 

7.6 

6.0 

6.4 

41.0 

42.2 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

2305 

Paul  V.  Brooks,  Greens  Fork... 

7.6 

6.0 

7.6 

41.0 

41.3 

6891 

2336 

Sueknw  Co.,  Franklin 

8.0 

6.0 

7.9 

41.0 

40.5 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

2711 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

5.5 

6.0 

7.3 

41.0 

42.6 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

2712 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

5.4 

6.0 

7.3 

41.0 

43.2 

ttMacado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

2929 

Wm.  E.  Jackson,  Greensburg 

7.7 

6.0 

7.5 

41.0 

41.3 

6891 

2931 

Harry  F-  Pa,vy,  Burney 

7.5 

6.0 

6.3 

41.0 

42.3 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

3090 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Co., 

Haubstadt  _ 

7.5 

6.0 

7.7 

41.0 

40.5 

Macado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

3146 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Co.,  Evansville 

6.5 

6.0 

8.2 

41.0 

41.0 

6891 

3151 

Heldt  Co.,  Evansville 

6.5 

6.0 

8.2 

41.0 

41.0 

ttMacado  Cottonseed  Meal  

6891 

3166 

Rosenberger,  Klein  & Co., 

Evansville 

6.3 

6.0 

7.8 

41.0 

41.0 

Avon  Cottonseed  Meal 

7973 

5172 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany 

6.7 

5.0 

6.5 

36.0 

37.4 

Avon  Cottonseed  Meal 

7973 

5196 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester 

6.3 

5.0 

6.4 

36.0 

36.9 

Avon  Cottonseed  Meal 

7973 

5206 

Salem  Co-Operative  Associa- 

tion,  Salem 

6.5 

5.0 

6.9 

36.0 

39.2 

Avon  Cottonseed  Meal 

7973 

5214 

Board  of  Trade  Feed  Store, 

Linton  

6.6 

5.0 

6.2 

36.0 

36.1 

Avon  Cottonseed  Meal 

7973 

5215 

Board  of  Trade  Feed  Store, 

Linton  

6.7 

5.0 

6.5 

36.0 

36.5 

Avon  Cottonseed  Meal  

7973 

5331 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

J 7.3 

5.0 

8.1 

36.0 

35.9 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Cotton  Seed  Meal  

3324 

1548 

Elmer  Shook,  Columbia  City 

6.8 

7.5 

7.8 

41.0 

44.1 

Nothern,  W.  C.,  Little  Eock,  Ark. 

Bee  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

3563 

2968 

A.  0.  Haynes  & Son,  Modoc 

6.1 

7.0 

6.8 

41.0 

44.4 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

Cake  11®  

6525 

1486 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Winchester 

7.3 

6.0 

5.9 

39.0 

37.5 

ttButterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake- 

6525 

1827 

Ned  Odle,  Ridgeville 

6.1 

6.0 

6.7 

39.0 

39.7 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake__ 

6525 

1828 

Ernest  Spiders,  Ridgeville 

6.1 

6.0 

6.7 

39.0 

39.7 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  > Meal  and 

Cake  180 

6525 

2799 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Whiteland  

6.9 

6.0 

7.1 

39.0 

38  0 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake__ 

6525 

2967 

A.  0.  Haynes  & Son,  Modoc 

6.4 

6.0 

6.7 

39.0 

43.7 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

r:ake  181 

6525 

4980 

Sweitzer  & Wolfe.  Howe 

6.6 

6.0 

7.0 

39.0 

37.8 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake__ 

6525 

5281 

Kraus  & Apfelbaum, 

Osage  Cotton  Oil  Company, 

Fort  Wayne  

5.7 

6.0 

7.6 

39.0 

40.2 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Silo  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake 

8032 

4891 

C.  D.  Laken,  Parr 

7.0 

5.0 

5.5 

38.5 

40.5 

Planters  Cotton  Oil  Company, 

Dallas,  Texas. 

tPrime  Cotton  Seed  Meal  and  Cake  i®® 

7463 

2169 

Sedalia  Elevator  Co.,  Sedalia... 

7.4 

6.0 

6.0 

43.0 

41.7 

Ralston  Purina  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6909 

1470 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Reynolds  

7.5 

6.0 

6.4 

38.6 

39.7 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6909 

2144 

Polks  Sunlight  Farm, 

Greenwood  . 

7.3 

6.0 

6.9 

38.6 

38.4 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  1®® 

6909 

2942 

Marion  Soldiers’  Home,  Marion. 

7.2 

6.0 

8.2 

38.6 

35.1 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  i®i 

6909 

4044 

National  Military  Home,  Marion 

7.3 

6.0 

6.6 

38.6 

37.2 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  1®® 

6909 

4184 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

Bluffton  

6.8 

6.0 

6.0 

38.6 

37.6 

t Before  registration 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
I 1%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
744.3.  Rebate.  See  page  42 
Rebate.  See  page  42 

10  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
7317.  Rebate.  See  page  42 


Rebate.  See  page  42 
Rebate.  See  page  42 

1®- 31/10  tons  removed  from  sale.  Rebate.  See 
page  43 

1®®  Rebate.  See  page  43 
i®i  Rebate.  See  page  43 
1®®  Rebate.  See  page  43 


140 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent.  ‘ 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

ra 

c 

1 

Ralston  Purina  Company, 

1 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  is® 

6909 

4782 

Zionsville  Milling  Co.,  Zionsville. 

7.8 

6.0 

6.7 

38.6  1 

35.4 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6909 

4935 

Thorntown  Grain  Co., 

Thorntown 

7.4 

6.0 

6.8 

38.6  1 

37.2 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  

6909 

5245 

Harrison  Smith,  Terre  Haute 

7.7 

6.0 

7.2 

38.6  [ 

36.4 

Texas  Cake  & Linter  Company, 

Dallas,  Texas. 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

riraePed  Cake 

7035 

1499 

Gen  P WagnPT,  .Tasppr’ 

6.1 

6.0 

7.7 

41.0 

41.0 

Texas  Cake  & Linter  Company, 

! 

1 

Dallas,  Texas. 

1 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

i 

Cracked  Cake  

7035 

1588 

A.  0.  Haynes  & Son,  Modoc 1 

7.6 

6.0 

6.9 

41.0 

38.9 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

7035 

1589 

.Tnsiab  Meeks,  Parker 

7.0 

6.0 

6.9 

41.0 

39.7 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

j 

7035 

1590 

R.  S.  Arbogast,  Selma__ 

8.1 

6.0 

6.3 

41.0 

44.5 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

7035 

1963 

R.  S.  Arbogast,  Selma 

8.8 

6.0 

5.9 

41.0 

42.1 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

i 

7035 

1964 

G.  C.  Arbogast,  Selma 

8.9 

1 

6.0 

5.9 

41.0 

42.1 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

Cracked  Cake  

7035 

2312 

Uhl  & Snider  Milling  Co., 

Connersville 

6.6 

6.0 

6.4 

41.0 

38.2 

Union  Seed  & Pertilizer  Company, 

Argenta,  Ark. 

^American  Red  Tag  Cottonseed  MeaL__ 



2995 

R.  J.  Spencer,  Marion 

8.0 



6.4 



38.5 

^American  Red  Tag  Cottonseed  Meal.— 

— 

2996 

Jesse  A.  Ballard,  Marion___  __  _ 

8.0 

6.4 

38.5 

Union  Seed  & Fertilizer  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

“American  Red  Tag”  Cottonseed  Meal 

6210 

1977 

Omer  G.  Whelan,  Richmond  _ _ 

7.4 

7.0 

6.9 

38.5 

39.9 

“American  Red  Tag”  Cottonseed  Meal 

6210 

5118 

W.  H.  Small  & Co.,  Evansvuie.. 

7.3 

7.0 

6.4 

38.5 

39.4 

Number  7 Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7711 

4643 

L.  Hartman  & Sons, 

New  Albany 

6.9 

5.5 

7.0 

36.0 

37.8 

Number  7 Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7711 

4667 

John  Elrod  & 0.  L.  Cauble, 

Pekin 

7.1 

5.5 

7.1 

36.0 

35.8 

Security  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

7993 

5132 

John  R.  Goyer,  Kokomo  

7.7 

5.5 

6.1 

36.0 

36.9 

Security  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7993 

5185 

J.  Runge  & Co.,  Richmond 

7.7 

5.5 

6.3 

36.0 

37.0 

Security  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7993 

5218 

J.  H.  Williamson  Co.,  Muncie_._ 

7.1 

5.5 

6.7 

36.0 

37.1 

ttSecurity  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7993 

5272 

Gas  City  Elevator  Co.,  Gas  City 

7.9 

5.5 

6.3 

36.0 

36.0 

Security  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7993 

5333 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

7.4 

5.5 

6.9 

36.0 

36.6 

Security  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7993 

5334 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

7.5 

5.5 

6.9 

36.0 

37.1 

COLD  PRESSED  COTTONSEED 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed 

7002 

1475 

Farmers  Grain  & Supply  Co., 

Camden  

7.5 

6.0 

9.4 

25.0 

22.9 

“Prize”  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed 

7002 

1498 

Reutepohler  Hardware  Co., 

Davis,  S.  P.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Huntingburg  ..  . 

7.7 

6.0 

10.7 

25.0 

21.6 

ttStandard  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cotton 

Seed 

6272 

4463 

John  Cofer  & Frank  Utt, 

Bruceville 

7.8 

6.0 

6.3 

26.0 

29.3 

Feeders  Supply  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Equity  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cotton 

Sppfl 

7080 

1572 

T.ee  Shrader,  Greentown 

8.7 

6.0 

9.2 

20.0 

26.5 

Imperial  Cotto  Milling  Company, 

Peoria,  111. 

**Cold  Pre:  sed  Cottonseed  

1982 

University  of  Notre  Dame, 

Notre  Dame  

7.2 

___ 

8.8 

—■ 

26.0 

♦ Not  tagged 
*♦  Not  registered 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
18C  2%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

81i)8.  Rebate.  See  page  43 
187  ly,  tons  removed  from  sale 


188  14%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Used  by  owner 
180  Rebate.  See  page  43 

190  2%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

7034.  Rebate.  See  page  43 
101  1 7/20  tons  removed  from  sale.  Returned 
to  mfrs. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Mississippi  Delta  Planting  Company, 

Scott,  Miss. 

Acme  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed. 

6125 

2526 

De  Lars  Thompson,  Eensselaer. 

6.1 

7.0 

8.0 

23.0 

24.7 

Acme  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed. 

6125 

3075 

J.  W.  Emison,  Vincennes 

8.6 

7.0 

7.7 

23.0 

23.3 

Acme  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed. 

6125 

4892 

C.  P.  Moody,  Moody 

8.8 

7.0 

9.6 

23.0 

25.1 

Acme  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed- 

6125 

5156 

University  of  Notre  Dame, 

Notre  Dame  

8.2 

7.0 

10.9 

23.0 

25.0 

ttAcme  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed- 

6125 

5201 

Oliver  Smith,  Parmland 

6.7 

7.0 

6.7 

23.0 

28.0 

BREWERS’  DRIED  GRAINS 

Berghoff  Brewing  Company, 

Port  Wayne,  Ind. 

ttBerghoff’s  Dried  Brewers  Grains 

1516 

4597 

Indiana  School  for  Peeble  Mind- 

ed  Youth,  Port  Wayne 

5.3 

6.0 

8.2 

25.0 

24.1 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

8036 

4973 

G.  L.  McCutcheon,  Borden 

6.0 

5.0 

6.3 

25.0 

28.0 

Evansville  Dried  Malt  & Peed  Company, 

The,  Evansville,  Ind. 

6384 

1599 

Pred  Niederhaus,  Stacer 

6.4 

5.0 

7.9 

24.0 

33.3 

6384 

3149 

Manufaeturer.s  

5.9 

5.0 

8.0 

24.0 

30.6 

6384 

5096 

Manufacturers  '. 

4.4 

5.0 

7.5 

24.0 

30.1 

Goeke  Company,  Edward  P., 

Evansville,  Ind. 

“Uncle  Sam”  Brewers’  Dried  Grains 

6949 

3095 

Manufacturers  

8.2 

5.0 

7.1 

24.0 

30.0 

Interstate  Peed  Association, 

Detroit,  Mich. 

Interstate  Brewers’  Dried  Grains 

8040 

4820 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

6.9 

6.0 

6.2 

24.0 

27.1 

ttinterstate  Brewers’  Dried  Grains 

8040 

4831 

C.  B.  Cook  Co.,  Greenwood 

6.6 

6.0 

5.9 

24.0 

31.4 

Interstate  Brewers’  Dried  Grains 

8040 

4852 

A.  L.  Wheeler,  Mooresville 

6.6 

6.0 

7.0 

24.0 

25.1 

Jones  Company,  J.  H.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Big  J.  Brewers  Dried  Grains 

7724 

4647 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany 

8.3 

5.0 

5.8 

25.0 

25.1 

Big  J.  Brewers  Dried  Grains 

7724 

4828 

Valentine  & Valentine, 

Whiteland  

6.6 

5.0 

7.0 

25.0 

24.7 

Muessel  Brewing  Company,  The, 

South  Bend,  Ind. 

Muessel’s  Dried  Brewers  Grains 

5292 

1948 

J.  C.  Barrett,  South  Bend 

7.2 

6.1 

7.0 

24.0 

27.9 

Mnps<?pl’s  Driprl  Brpwprs  ftrnins 

5292 

4845 

J.  C.  Barrett,  South  Bend 

5.4 

6.1 

7.9 

24.0 

26!2 

Neumond,  Inc.,  K.  & E., 

St.'  Louis,  Mo. 

“Goldnes  Kalb”  Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

7132 

2328 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.. 

8.2 

6.0 

7.9 

24.0 

29.3 

“Goldnes  Kalb”  Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

7132 

2713 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis. . 

7.2 

6.0 

7.8 

24.0 

29.0 

“Goldnes  Kalb”  Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

7132 

3627 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany 

7.4 

6.0 

7.9 

24.0 

27.9 

“Goldnes  Kalb”  Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

7132 

3628 

New  Albany  Milling  Co., 

New  Albany 

5.9 

6.0 

6.7 

24.0 

25.8 

“Goldnes  Kalb”  Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

7132 

4634 

Probst  & Kassebaum, 

Indianapolis  

8.1 

6.0 

7.1 

24.0 

27.6 

CORN  DISTILLERS’  DRIED 

GRAINS 

Ajax  Milling  & Peed  Company, 

Hammond,  Ind. 

Ajax  Plakes  122 

3731 

1605 

J.  H.  Masters  & Son,  Brookville 

7.6 

11.0 

10.2 

30.0 

31.3 

Ajax  Plakes 

3731 

1696 

Dairy  Dept.,  Purdue, 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

W.  LaPayette  

7.1 

11.0 

9.9 

30.0 

32.7 

Empire  State  Dairy  Peed  

7625 

3491 

North  Madison  Coal  Co., 

North  Madison  

8.5 

12.0 

11.5 

30.0 

32.2 

Empire  State  Dairy  Peed  123 

7625 

4101 

J.  H.  Williamson  & Co.,  Muncie 

5.9 

12.0 

11.0 

30.0 

29.8 

Empire  State  Dairy  Peed 

7625 

4431 

Arthur  S.  Cecil,  Selma 

6.6 

12.0 

8.0 

30.0 

32  2 

Empire  State  Dairy  Peed  124 

7825 

4552 

V.  T.  Reid,  Salem 

4.4 

12.0 

10.9 

3o!o 

29  J 

ttEmpire  State  Dairy  Peed  125 

7625 

4633 

Probst  & Kassebaum, 

Indianapolis  

5.5 

12.0 

10.5 

30.0 

28.0 

Empire  State  Dairy  Peed  

7625 

4835 

Probst  & Kassebaum, 

Indiananolis 

4.7 

12.0 

11.4 

30.0 

30.2 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnisjied  1M»  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 

192  5800  lbs.  relabeled  No.  7225  8014 

193  tons  removed  from  sale  i99  15  tons  removed  from  sale 


142 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent.  j 

Crude 
Fat  ■■ 
per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

[ Found 

American  Milling  Company, 

1 

Peoria,  111. 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed  

7625 

4854 

Comer-Scearce  Co.,  Mooresville. 

6.5 

12.0 

12.0 

30.0 

31.2 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed  

7625 

5086 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Eyansyille__ 

6.2 

12.0 

10.1 

3D.0 

32.9 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed 

7625 

5144 

Hawley  Hall,  Lewisville 

6.2 

12.0 

9.0 

30.0 

31.7 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed  

8014 

5200 

J.  H.  Williamson  Co.,  Muncie.__ 

4.0 

8.0 

11.7 

30.0 

30.7 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed 

8014 

5295 

Richard  Hagans,  Greenfield  _ ___ 

5.0 

8.0 

12.2 

30.0 

31.9 

Chapin  & Company,  Hammond,  Ind, 

Ajax  Flakes 

7225 

1850 

McMahan  Bros.,  Valparaiso 

7.2 

10.0 

10.4  ■ 

30.0 

32.2 

Ajax  Flakes 

7225 

4642 

L.  Hartman  & Sons, 

Continental  Cereal  Company, 

New  Albany 

7.3 

10.0 

9.0 

30.0 

34.0 

Peoria,  111.. 

Continental  Gluten  Feed 

6066 

1800 

Berne  Milling  Co.,  Berne 

8.8 

6.0 

7.3 

26.5 

26.5 

Continental  Gluten  Feed 

6066 

4398 

Fieber  & Holmes,  Brookville 

6.7 

6.0 

10.2 

26.5 

30.5 

Continental  Gluten  Feed 

6066 

4399 

Fieber  & Holmes,  Brookville 

8.2 

6.0 

10.5 

26.5 

32.8 

Continental  Gluten  Feed 

6066 

4593 

Fieber  & Holmes,  Brookville 

6.6 

6.0 

9.7 

26.5  1 

29.7 

Dewey  Bros.  Company,  The, 

Blanchester,  Ohio. 

Eagle  Three  D Grains 

3593 

2218 

R.  J.  Morgan,  Mexico 

10.3 

10.0 

12.8 

30.0 

29.7 

Eagle  Three  D.  Grains . 

3593 

5082 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville— 

4.5 

10.0 

9.8 

30.0 

29.3 

Glenmore  Distilleries  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Distillers’  Dried  Grains 

7916 

5116 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Co.,  Evansville 

6.6 

8.0 

8.6 

28.0 

32.0 

Herman  & McCoy  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

McCoys  Choice  Distillers  Corn 

Grains  i®®  

4945 

4632 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis.- 

5.6 

8.0 

10.6 

32.0 

30.1 

McCoys  Choice  Distillers  Corn 

Grains  i®® 

4945 

4833 

C.  B.  Cook  Co.,  Greenwood 

4.6 

8.0 

11.1 

32.0 

29.6 

Jordan,  Geo.  M.,  Vipcennes,  Ind. 

G.  M.  .1.  Distillers  Dried  Grains 

7511 

5006 

Manufacturer  

8.2 

10.0 

12.1 

30.0 

29.5 

Murphy  Distilling  Company, 

Vincennes,  Ind. 

1 

Distillers  Dried  Grains 

8082 

5025 

,1.  W.  Fmisnn,  Bruceville 

7.1 

9.0 

13.1 

26.0 

28.1 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Distillers  Corn  Grains  _ _ _ _ _ 

8025 

4804 

Manufacturers  

5.2 

8.0 

10.9 

30.0 

30.1 

Old  Vincennes  Distillery  Company, 

Vincennes,  Ind. 

1 

0.  V.  D.  Dried  Grains 

8030 

5026 

Manufacturers  

6.5 

10.0 

12.1 

30.0 

29.8 

Squibb  & Company,  W.  P., 

Lawrenceburg,  Ind. 

Squibbs  Distillery  Dried  Grains  

7505 

3615 

Milan  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Milan  

9.8 

10.0 

9.4 

28.5 

31.2 

Squibbs  Distillery  Dried  Grains  __  _ 

7505 

3644 

Manufacturers  

6.7 

10.0 

9.6 

28.5 

30.5 

Ubiko  Milling  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Fourex  (XXXX)  Distillers  Dried  Corn 

Grains  

7311 

1869 

Polk  Sanitary  Milk  Co., 

Fourex  (XXXX)  Distillers  Dried  Corn 

Indianapolis  

4.7 

12.0 

11.9 

31.0 

32.6 

Grains  

7311 

2142 

Polks  Sunlight  Farm, 

Fourex  (XXXX)  Distillers  Dried  Corn 

Greenwood  

6.3 

12.0 

11.9 

31.0 

32.3 

Grains  

7311 

2943 

Marion  Soldiers’  Home,  Marion- 

4.2 

12.0 

12.7 

31.0 

30.3 

Fourex  (XXXX)  Distillers  Dried  Corn 

Grains  

7311 

4041 

National  Military  Home,  Marion 

6.4 

12.0 

10.0 

31.0 

36.0 

RYK  DISTILLERS’  DRIED 

GRAINS 

Interstate  Feed  Association, 

Detroit,  Mich. 

ttlnterstate  Dairv  Hog  Feed 

7719 

3517 

F.  S.  Turner,  Argn.s 

7.4 

7.0 

6.1 

15.0 

14.0 

Interstate  Dairy  & Hog  Feed 

7719 

3910 

Kensey  Bros.,  North  Manchester 

7.5 

7.0 

6.4 

15.0 

15.7 

Interstate  Dairy  & Hog  Feed 

7719 

4473 

Jordan  & Baird,  Kewanna 

7.2 

7.0 

6.2 

15.0 

14.5 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
106  5%  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
8014 

1®'^  1 ton  removed  from  sale 


198  g:^  tons  removed  from  sale 
109  12/^  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No. 
8025 


143 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture  1 

per  cent.  j 

Crude 
Fat  ‘ 
per  cent. 

Crude 

Protein 

percent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

MALT  SPROUTS 

! 

Hales  & Edwards  Company, 

1 

Chicago,  111. 

ttMalt,  Sprouts  _ . 

7644 

3961 

Reed  Bros.,  Fort  Wayne 

12.3 

1.0 

1.3 

22.0 

27.9 

VINEGAR  GRAINS 

Mueller,  Edward  P.,  Chicago,  111. 

1 

tFleischmans  Dried  Grains 

7762 

3729 

Luebcke  Bros.,  Crown  Point 

7.8 

7.0 

7.0 

19.0 

19.3 

LINSEED  MEAL 

American  Linseed  Company, 

New  York,  N.  T. 

Old  Process  Linseed  Oil  Meal 

48.59 

1906 

Zionsville  Milling  Co.,  Zionsville 

7.8 

6.0 

6.8 

34.0 

36.9 

Old  Process  Linseed  Oil  Meal 

4859 

3882 

Fieber  & Holmes,  Brookville 

; 8.8 

6.0 

7.7 

34.0 

33.1 

Old  Process  Linseed  Oil  Meal 

4859 

4809 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis— 

7.4 

6.0 

7.2 

34.0 

35.7 

Old  Process  Linseed'  Oil  Meal 

4859 

4997 

0.  Gandy  & Co.,  South  Whitley 

! 7.3 

6.0 

8.9 

34.0 

35.4 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

ttAmco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal 

5618 

1571 

Cadick  Milling  Co.,  Chrisney 

9.0 

5.0 

7.1 

30.0 

31.2 

Amro  Old  Process  T.inseed  Meal  

5618 

1621 

Kelley  & Son,  Fairmnnnt 

9.0 

5.0 

6.7 

30.0 

31.1 

Amco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal 

5618 

2433 

Hodapp  Hominy  Co.,  Seymour. 

8.0 

5.0 

7.3 

30.0 

3i!2 

Amco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal  200 

5618 

5087 

Edw.  F.  Goeke  Co.,  Evansville.. 

8.6 

5.0 

6.4 

30.0 

30.8 

*Amco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal 



5136 

Butcher  & Duncan, 

Oakland  City 

9.6 

6.0 

31.3 

Archer-Daniels  Linseed  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Old  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake 

1834 

1976 

Omer  G.  Whelan,  Richmond 

8.6 

6.0 

6.3 

32.0 

35.8 

Old  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake 

1834 

3222 

Luebcke  Bros.,  Crown  Point 

8.9 

6.0 

6.2 

32.0 

33.3 

Old  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake 

1834 

3837 

J.  W.  Wilkinson,  Boonville  . . 

8.4 

6.0 

7.0 

32.0 

33.0 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

6351 

1859 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Lafayette  ...  

8.3 

6.0 

6.8 

32.0 

35.8 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

6351 

2423 

The  Brook  Flour  & Feed  Mill, 

Brook  ...  

8.6 

6.0 

5.7 

32.0 

36.3 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  

6351 

2776 

Paul  Kuhn  & Co.,  Clay  City 

8.1 

6.0 

6.0 

32.0 

33.9 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  . _ 

6351 

2809 

Walter  A.  Schaffer,  Bourbon 

7.8 

6.0 

5.7 

32.0 

34.3 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  __  

6351 

3990 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

Co..  North  Judson 

8.2 

6.0 

6.1 

32.0 

35.3 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  

6351 

4719 

John  Crum.  Milan 

7.3 

6.0 

7.1 

32.0 

35.6 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  j 

6351 

5190 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce 

Co..  North  Judson  _ _ 

7.7 

6.0 

7.5 

32.0 

35.3 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 

Chicago,  111. 

Dickinson’s  Linseed  Meal 

6404 

1935 

Wesley  Miller  Flour  & Feed  Co., 

South  Bend  .. 

8.4 

5.0 

7.9 

32.0 

35.5 

Dickinson’s  Linseed  Meal  

6404 

4182 

H.  E.  Pitman.  Bedford 

7.4 

5.0 

7.9 

32.0 

32.8 

Dickinson’s  T.inseed  Meal  . _ 

6404 

4504 

Ashbv  & Ashbv.  Tiadoga, 

8.6 

5.0 

'6.8 

32.0 

32.6 

Dickinson’s  Linseed  Meal 

6404 

4779 

Wm.  Steeb,  Crown  Point 

7.9 

5!o 

7.0 

32.’o 

35^5 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

! 

Tuxedo  Old  Process  Oil  Meal  201 j 

6230 

3631 

The  Early  & Daniel  Co.,  Aurora 

7.4 

6.0 

6.8 

32.0 

23.9 

Hirst  & Begley  Linseed  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

*Linseed  Cake  Meal  

1858 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co. 

Hirst  & Begley  Linseed  Co.  Brand 

Lafayette  

8.4 

9.9 

33.9 

Linseed  Meal 

7165 

2573 

0.  L.  Cauble.  Pekin 

8.0 

'o'.o 

9.3 

3'4".0 

34.9 

Hirst  & Begley  Linseed  Co.  Brand 

Linseed  Meal 

7165 

3005 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co., 

Hirst  & Begley  Linseed  Co.  Brand 

Lafayette  1 

8.4 

6.0 

6.4 

34.0 

33.4 

Linseed  Meal 

7165  1 

4959 

y.  T.  Reid,  Salem 

7.8 

6.0 

7.4 

34.0 

36.7 

♦ Not  tag-ged 
t Before  registration 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


200  1 ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7473 

201  Weed  seeds  present.  900  lbs.  removed  from 

sale  and  returned  to  mfrs. 


144 


/ 

TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 

Number 

Sample  secured  from 

Moisture 

per  cent. 

Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Kellogg  & Sons,  Inc.,  Spencer, 

! 

Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

• 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  

5877 

2070 

B.  I.  Holser  & Co.,  Walkerton.. 

7.6 

5.0 

5.8 

33.0 

34.7 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  __  

5877 

3167 

Gerlaeh  Bros.,  St.  John 

8.7 

5.0 

6.2 

33.0 

33.4 

ttOld  Process  Oil  Meal  __  

5877 

4250 

C.  P.  Franks,  .Albion 

8.2 

5.0 

6.0 

33.0 

34.0 

Major  Company,  The  Guy  G., 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  202  

2858 

1525 

Crowell  Grain  Co., 

Columbia  City 

8.6 

5.0 

6.1 

30.0 

30.6 

Metzger  Seed  & Oil  Company,  The, 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

6672 

1767 

The  Haynes  Milling  Co., 

f 

Portland  

8.1 

5.0 

6.4 

30.0 

33.5 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  203 

6672 

3311 

Richmond  Roller  Mills, 

Richmond  

! 8.0 

5.0 

6.5 

30.0 

31.2 

Midland  Linseed  Products  Company, 

1 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Midland  Brand  Pure  Old  Process 

Ground  Linseed  Cake 

5367 

3817 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  South  Bend... 

8.3 

5.5 

7.4 

32.0 

33.2 

ttMidland  Brand  Pure  Old  Process 

5367 

3955 

J.  S.  Minch,  Reynolds 

9.6 

5.5 

6.8 

32.0 

36.0 

Crescent  Brand  Pure  Old  Process 

Ground  Linseed  Cake 

7125 

3447 

Indiana  Elevator  Co., 

Indianapolis  

9.1 

5.0 

7.7 

29.0 

34.2 

Minnesota  Linseed  Oil  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Ground  Oil  Cake  or  Oil  Meal 

5405 

1885 

Goshen  Milling  Co.,  Goshen 

8.3 

5.0 

6.0 

34.0 

34.2 

Ground  Oil  Cake  or  Oil  Meal  203 

5405 

2979 

Knecht  Milling  Co., 

Hartford  Citv 

7.9 

5.0 

6.2 

34.0 

33.3 

Ground  Oil  Cake  or  Oil  Meal 

5405 

4350 

Hawk  Bros.  Milling  Co.,  Mongo 

! 8.5 

5.0 

6.1 

34.0 

34.4 

Sherwin-Williams  Company,  The, 

Cleveland,  Ohio. 

(S.  W.  C.)  Linseed  Meal  

1723 

1604 

C.  Samonial,  Brookville 

7.7 

6.0 

8.5 

33.0 

34.7 

(S.  W.  C.)  Linseed  Meal  

1723 

2466 

Charlestown  Milling  Co., 

Charlestown  

7.3 

6.0 

7.2 

33.0 

33.0 

rs  W n.'i  T.insppd  Meal 

1723 

4096 

Hibbits  Mill  Co.,  Muncie__  

6.7 

6.0 

7.7 

33.0 

34.5 

Sugarine  Company,  The,  Peoria,  111. 

Snen  Old  Prnce.s.s  T.in.seed  Meal  204 

6193 

4072 

V.  T.  Reid,  Salem 

8.1 

5.0 

7.0 

30.0 

30.3 

.Siipo  rdd  Prnpp.«s  T.insppd  Mpal  205  i 

6193 

4073 

V.  T.  Reid,  Salem 

8.3 

5.0 

6.4 

30.0 

29.5 

Toledo  Seed  & Oil  Company,  The, 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 

1659 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton. 

8.8 

5.0 

7.1 

30.0 

33.6 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 

1669 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co., 

[ 

Bluff  ton  

9.0 

5.0 

6.8 

30.0 

30.9 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal [ 

5546 

2347 

Valentine  & Valentine,  Franklin 

8.6 

5.0 

6.7 

30.0 

31.9 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 1 

5546 

2823 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Bargersville  

10.3 

5.0 

6.4 

30.0 

31.0 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 

4193 

Hartman  & Dotterer,  Bluffton. 

8.7 

5.0 

6.5 

30.0 

34.4 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  MeaL__ 

5546 

4742 

Wm.  Nading  Grain  Co., 

( 

Greensburg  

8.1 

5.0 

6.6 

30.0 

33.4 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn.  ' 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Ground  Lin-  | 

seed  Cake  Oil  Meal 

5323 

3198 

D.  M.  Blackmore,  Greensburg... 

8.2 

5.0 

6.7 

32.0 

31.7 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Ground  Lin- 

seed Cake  Oil  Meal 

.5323 

3996 

Weber  & Purviance,  Huntington 

8.7 

5.0 

5.8 

32.0 

34.5 

Ground  Linseed  Cake  Oil  Meal 

7234 

4497 

Otto  Lef forge,  Rossville 

6,8 

5.0 

7.0 

32.0 

33.4 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  2200  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Weed  seeds 

202  13/20  tons  removed  from  sale  because  of  mu-  present.  Relabeled  No.  7905 

tilated  tags.  Relabeled  No.  5.540  5300  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Weed  seeds 

203  Small  amount  of  weed  seeds  present  present.  Relabeled  No.  7905 


145 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


LABEL 


Number 


Sample  secured  from 


Crude 

Fat 

per  cent. 

Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

y 

S a 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found 

Guar- 

anteed 

Found  1 

UNSCREENED  FLAXSEED  OIL 
FEED 


American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Ameo  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Peed 7473 

Amco  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Feed 7473 


■ftAmco  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Feed 1 7473 

ttAmco  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Feed 1 7473 

Amco  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Feed 7473 


2683 

4372 

4491 

5088 

5199 


Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis.. 

Thomas  C.  Fisher,  Anderson 

Paul  Kuhn  & Co.,  Perrysville... 

The  Heldt  Co.,  Evansville 

J.  H.  Williamson  Co.,  Muncie— 


8.5 

8.8 

8.1 

8.7 

8.5 


5.0 

5.0 

5.0 

5.0 

5.0 


7.2  30.0 

6.8  30.0 

7.8  30.0 
6.5  30.0 
6.7  30.0 


31.9 

31.2 

30.6 
31.0 

31.6 


Laxo  Cake  Meal  Company,  The, 
Chicago,  111. 

Old  Process  Laxo  Cake  Meal 

Sugarine  Company,  The,  Peoria,  111. 
Suco  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Feed  

WHEAT  IMIDDLINGS,  PALM  OIL 


4618 


1514 


Harting  & Co.,  Elwood 


7905 


Theo.  Wooden,  Veedersburg. 


8.0  25.0  27.2 

6.7  30.0  31.1 


Newsome  Feed  & Grain  Company,  The, 
Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Palmo  Midds  207  

Palmo  Midds  ^os 

Palmo  Midds  


6911 

6911 

6911 


Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
*Palmo  Midds 
ttPalmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 


6911 

6911 

6911 


6911 

6911 


Palmo  Midds 


6911 


Palmo  Midds 


6911 


Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 


6911 

6911 

6911 

6911 

6911 


Palmo  Midds 


6911 


*Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 
ttPalmo  Midds 
Palmo  Midds 


6911 

6911 

6911 

6911 

6911 


Palmo  Midds  

WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  PEANUT 
HULLS  AND  MEATS,  PALM  OIL 


6911 


1482 

1.501 

1615 

1620 

1652 

1722 

1880 

1881 

1995 


2297 


2374 

2375 
2938 
2941 
2966 
3330' 

4281 

4297 

4328 

4329 
4429 
4439 
5307 

5318 


J.  F.  Hughes,  Elwood 

Emery  E.  Harper,  Connersville. 
Falls  City  Supply  Co., 

Pendleton  

C.  C.  Inglis,  Summitville 

A.  A.  Ulrey  & Co.,  Fairmount.. 

John  F.  Hughes,  Elwood 

John  F.  Hughes,  Elwood 

Jerry  Bannon,  Ridgeville 

Daleville  Grain  & Coal  Co., 

Daleville  

J.  C.  F.  Martin  & Son, 

LaFontaine  

Newsome  Feed  & Grain  Co., 

Elwood  

Harting  «fe  Co.,  Elwood 

Pierce  Elevator  Co.,  Union  City 

Kirklin  Grain  Co.,  Kirklin 

Banister  Grain  Co.,  Treaty 

Connell-Anderson  Grain  Co., 

Milton  

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain 

Co.,  Westfield 

John  F.  Hughes,  Elwood 

Clark  Bros.,  Hagerstown 

Clark  Bros.,  Hagerstown 

Harting  & Co.,  Elwood 

John  Bock,  Sheridan 

New  Castle  Elevator  Co., 

New  Castle 

The  Pierce  Elevator  Co., 

Union  City 


4.1 

6.0 

5.7 

6.0 

6.7 

6.0 

7.1 

6.0 

6.6 

6.0 

5.2 

6.0 

3.6 

4.3 

6'.0 

4.9 

6.0 

5.3 

6.0 

5.8 

6.0 

6.5 

6.0 

4.3 

6.0 

7.2 

6.0 

5.1 

6.0 

7.5 

6.0 

7.4 

6.0 

7.8 

_ 

6.3 

6’.0 

5.9 

6.0 

6.6 

6.0 

7.5 

6.0 

6.3 

6.0 

6.7 

6.0 

8.0  16.0  16.1 
6.9  16.0  15.3 


8.0 

8.1 


8.1 

7.5 


16.0 

16.0 

16.0 

16.0 

ie.o 


16.0 

16.1 

15.7 
17.0 
17.3 

16.7 


8.9  16.0 


14.9 


7.7  16.0 


16.8 


9.0  16.0 
8.6  16.0 

8.1  16.0 

9.2  16.0 

8.3  16.0 


17.5 

16.5 
15.9 

15.6 
17.1 


16.0 


16.8 


16.0 


6.5  16.0 

7.1  16.0 
8.9  16.0 

7.2  16.0 


16.0 

16.1 

16.0 

15.9 

16.1 

16.1 


8.5  16.0  16.5 
8.1  16.0  16.9 


Newsome  Feed  & Grain  Company,  The, 
Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Palmo  Mixed  Feed  6910 

Palmo  Mixed  Feed  6910 


Palmo  Mixed  Feed 


6910 


1998 

2357 

4365 


Woodward  Bros.,  Lapel 

Chas.  F.  Naber  & Co., 

Alexandria  

C.  A.  Warne,  Sulphur  Springs... 


5.9  6.0 


7.8  14.0 


16.3 


7.2 

8.9 


7.7  14.0  16.5 
7.7  14.0  14.2 


* Not  tagged  208  15  tong  removed  from  state.  Peanut  shells 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  present.  Rebate.  See  page  42 

207  Peanut  shells  present.  Removed  from  state 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917 


146 


<i>  .fl 

c fl 

Cd 

ed 

erials 

axe 

0 to 

0 'fl  V.O 

0 OJ 

0!2 

0) 

U1 

Id 

cn 

tn 

OP 

bfl 

tn 

OP 

Is 

s fl'®  * 
fl  a|i 

'®  bM  i g 
tn  .S  ij-a 
.M  h fl  S 

U)  „ « 

C ^ 

S “ 

rO  ^ 

- S W 

w 

rt 

0 

a 

cn 

0 

a 

“cn  - 

OP  OP 

sd  ^ 

c £ sa) 

.9  ‘H  »*fl 
'o  .5 

Q>  4J 

a--9 

.-a 

d 

OP 

a 

meal 

.2  c 

'd  CP 

ipal  ingr 

column 
but  no 
sed  as 

t bran, 
iny  fee 
al,  oat 

c^lf  3. 

3119 

3119 

alfalfa 

meal, 
al,  glut 

4664 

Princ: 

n this  < 
present 
clas 

^ S 2 

2 0 S 

tn 

Q 

Q 

tn 

OP 

-o  a Q 

^ 0) 

- TO  j/j 

0 

CQ 

cd 

<D 

tn 

cd 

OP 

-M  <D 

Cd  OP  w 

0 cn  2 cd 

V..O  ^ ^ 

0 cd  OP 

Ss.s 

C 

L. 

S 

a 

fl  0 

" p-  a 

oi  Ki 
tfl 


O .-I 


m m o 


g g £ 

O c3  o 

ouiO 


0)  <B 

a s 

O ® CS 

U cn  K) 


QQ  P 


<D  <u 

a a 

ci  nJ 
Ui  W 


Oi  o o 
'0 

c . ^ 

- 

bx)>-i  g « 


tin: 

® - .'0  B 

<u  S S ^ 

S ^ Sis 

-E 

PgSiS 

g c «H  a 

rt  gi’E  fl  ® 
bo  01  4j  a 

(JJ  0)  ■«  fl 

rt  o to  bo  b« 
M O 


Crude 
Protein 
per  cent. 

puno^ 

135 

9.5 

CO 

ci 

10.5 

10.4 

29.0 

26.5 

in  CO  CO 

0 ci  ni 

10.7 

10  5 

9.1 

0 

0 <3 

n.o 

16.5 

paat^uu 

-anno 

16.0 

9.0 

9.0 

9.0 

9.0 

25.0 

25.0 

000 

06  06  i>^ 

10.0  I 

1 1 

10.0 

i 10.0 

l 

i 10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

16.0 

<3 

CO 

0 

<D 

J>; 

Cd  CO 

0 

0 

Ci  Ci 

00 

<3  CO 

0 "2 

fl  flg 

puno^ 

(N 

CN 

(N 

(N 

0 

id 

csi  (N  rH 

CN 

01  (N 

c-i  c^i 

(N 

CO  0 

paa:;u'3 

10 

0 

10 

to 

0 

10 

in 

in  in  0 

in 

in  in 

in  in 

in 

in  0 

^ OP 

a 

-anno 

CO 

00 

(N 

c4  (N  rH 

<N 

(N  oi 

C<i  CN 

C^l 

CN  id 

•:juaD  aad 

01 

CO 

r-t 

in 

Tt1 

CO 

ri  in 

^ CO 

CO  0 

ni 

CO 

Ci 

CO 

10 

10 

id 

06 

CO* 

CO*  in 

TlH  CO 

id 

rH 

a^n^stoj/^ 

1— » 

r-< 

1—  I-H  T-" 

f— « 

T— 1 rH 

rH  rH 

•a 

uoiaoadsuj 


bo  I 

.9  I. 

9 

oa 

mlf 

. a 

03 

>• 


cc 


<!  C3 
> 


W « QJ  ^ 

g S)>S  S bi> 

. S Qj  o £ oj  o 
cj^oSiJci^gS 

^C3  W35  <u.a^X3  QJ 
0*-5  OiZi  01-3 
l-S  1-3  '■3  l-S 


5U  N 

>.  S 2 

.ti  P PP 
<u  C , 


ol'2n 

^ ±<!  C3  . 


o 

OJ  03 


^03 


•-H  0^ 

eS  0<  M 

c3  c3 

90 

S ® fl  fl 

£gsg 

“ .9  . 

2 

M 
w 

k2”  >> 

M-3^ 
■B&g 
■g  «c« 
■9'a  X 

O c O 
Sh  lSj  CU 

Ph  O 


o:>  0 u 

rH  CO  Ci 

0 CO 

•rtH 

CO 

CO  C^  00 

CO  rH  CO 

ooLomcoooooo^ 

co»-HCOini>orHcO 

CO  CO  ^ 

5 cd 

i ^ 

CO  00 
rH  CO  (N 

CO  <M  (M  CN  rH  00 

rH  CN  CN  CO  CO  I-H 

FPUJO 


S'Oo 
® a M 

s'l'S 

0.52 


99s 

>.2  Q . 
W'O*^ 
2 ® N 

g w 

C 


95^ 

O -fl 

0.2  s 

=11 

:o  .C 


!3  4J  OT 

^ M “ 
O 03  «5 

gM  o 


o 

OJ 

cu  a 

Et|  fcH 

o 

OJ  OJ 

fl.2 


o O 


9 

0'S? 


9 S CO 

Mp 

fl  03  O 
03  « cj 
ot:  c 
P C3  fl 

9 M 

c 


'O'O 

D a> 

ai  <ij 


O o 

Ww 


9 

w a 
W X 


c>C 

CJ  ^ 
fcaT 

cf^ 

2 iJ 

t>0 


o 

SW- 


03  i x:  1 jfl 

x: 

-C 

1^  1^ 

^ 1 ^ 1 

'O  1 'O  1 'fl! 

xd 

oi  1 a>  1 <u 

O) 

0 

OP 

Ph  [Ph  [Ph 

s 

0 1 CP  j CP 

rS 

rS 

3 '3  |3 

3 

3 

^ is  [S 

§ 

=3  jbg  1=3 

CP  1 CP  1 CP 

CP 

CP 

CP 

£ 1 “ 1 Sh 

Lh 

fcH 

000 


fcn  a 
o>  3 

9» 


<3  gc  g<3  g.<i3  g<3 
X X X X 


g<3  3^ 

02  C» 


mteed 


147 


'O 

c 

3 

o 


g d 
w 

to” 


S o 

a 


C 02 
C <D  tH 
<u  OJ 
3 y Q 

'S)  “ “ 


O bO  rt 
O CO 


■ CO 


<U 

P. 

ft 

o (32 

a"; 

y m 

r-  “ 

o o 


d V 
O 3 

.■P 
c o 

o ft 
O i 


t-  ^00  «D 

o IH  O O 


mcnmcn 
o o d <d 


a ^ 

I,  y -M 

a;  « fl  '2 
3"^  S ^ 
S C o “ 
•S  830 
-2  b w 
fifl  -2- 


, <1^ 
. oi5 

,3^0 

- s 

y C M 


OO  LO  ' 

odd 


2PPCQ 

5 fi  w w w w 

ts 

P a a;  (1)  0)  p 

rt  6*  3 3 3 3 

cn  wcococn 


o o o o 

t'-  c^  t^ 

CO  00  OO  CO 

p ppp 


oos: 


y <D  y 

a a a 

ci  d oj 
COCOCO 


S a 

o ^ *j'!3 

o 'C  4-7 

^ 0)03^0 

-gw  o 3 

CO  3 z!  S '5 


> .JS  lv^  0^  ‘ 
- --  ” — >2 
00(20  OB  ^ C 42 

P p a ^ a a 

» w a S 
a -a 

y y y y a rv 

aa'sSfi» 

a a a c ;a 

coco  w u 


a bDy 
y a 

ic? 

£“S 


5* 

'^'2.9 

+j  —g 
a 2 a 

M ^ 

-M  5 

y oO 

“a 
CO  » 


a 


(u  a 

a a 


LO  CO  Tt< 

d i-i  P 


COCOCO 


<1>  (3  CD  «0  CD 

^ y ft  M M 

'«'a:a5^QQQ 

a . ^ w to  CO 


O y “ -u  y y y 
— — M a a a 
■w  .-a  c a a a a 

o ■—  -rH  CO  a a a 

U cococo 


^ “ 12S> 

O y S'  erf 

a y y 
d C 

a ® -2  ^ _ 

to"  2 ii  a 5 a 
a:  3 a y a sh 
a 3 w ts  bx) 
P be  ""  >3 

• 'W  d)  . 

•*->  ® CO  o m 
oj  feUeo  fl  <M  C 

°:9S^  ^ 
5:gQ| 
00^2 
e*-*S  2 ^ 

£2  a s 

o O 3 be 

O CO 


-a  t, 

P y isP 
y co^tN 

tw  <5^  CD  ^ 

a a — 


to  fc,  5" 

aiJ  « c 

aa3 

2 to 

be  * « 

td  " 3 o 
be  fi 


w o ^ 
d c JX 


CO  CO 


y O O 
3 tH  T-C 

to  O O 


2 ^Ipp 


^ VI  in 

bjD  ^-.  rj  ^ 

_ a O y y 

a y o a a 

>-  a di  K 

o a .ft -3  3 
U CO  w 


wl  0 

-1“ 
-;  ta  fci  CD'S.- 

p -M  .2  os  <^^  - a 

— ca  3 CO  y 

.2  tci  2 So 

-d  ” a 

y -2 

to"  -3  y 

" to  2 

» £ 

o w * 

-3 -9  S 

® 2 
c M y 
o a be  be 
O 


'•S 

«l| 

M ^ y 
a 6e 

ns  a 
y y r 

a ^ ® 

CO 


in 


00  02 


<M 


0000 


CO  o (M 


« r 

sS 
g.s 

CO  a 

Sh 

- O ^ -- 
■S  O 
^ Q ift 
g a£!'<  a 

9 a .S 

,-;'0 'd  X0t3 

^2§2g 
•-j  S Pi 


t>  > 

— to  to 

2 a a 
SI  a a 

CL  > t> 

a 


005 

OO-S 


d! 

a .. 

'i' 

W ° 


^ E 

5g 

^ C-> 

•mC/2 


sa ^ • 

w o^a 

. ^'  o ri  - ww  - * 

0^25 


i 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

1 1 1 

J oO 

i 1 

1 1 

1 G 

1 

2 

1 1 1 

1 1 i 

d E 

1 0 

1 VJ 

% 

cc 

■ , 0 G 

C2  .a  — 

as 
£ s ^ 


S r:2<  ^ 

2 s ^ o oM 


^ a”  2^ 

ci^dsa 
2^  £:-3: 


^ I 


y ~ 

CL  > 


<5  O 


PEh 


t2:.2 


ftd^  tl  w 

oQ<is  a o 

p .Iz;  . .302^5 
i-j  t-s  i-sco  c-i 


dj  a 

O 


O >-( 

42  1' 

a<i 


aO 

iPO 


i .a  t>2 


50 
Ss 

rt  0^  ^ 

S oO—i  2 
^ a 02  a 
.S  X3 

Wch^W^ 

a P CJ  43  y 

olz; 


> 

a” 

O O g 
.Sip;  a 
o o o 


wm^  « 

y y to  a 

2S  S dS 
o o g o 


IS 


(M  CO  CO  CO 


i-l  <M  lO  CO 

(M  Ip  (N  i:^ 

00  05  O CO 

CO  CO 


IC  (N  (M 


00  f:-  M 00 
CO  C5  00  CO 
i>  o c?5 10 
(N  CO  CO  (N 


§3  3 SI 


) 00  00  00  00  00  00  ( 


in  in  10  in 


333S  S SSS  S S 


a 
a 
ft 

s 

O S3  C3 
y y 

a 

la  bo  bo 
xa  o o 
SWP 

>=12  2 
a a a 

y y y 
•S3  IH 
tH  y y 
y 3 3 

Bcoco 


;-(  (h 

y y 
MM 
a a 


IPPh 

o o 

O O 

a a 

*<<1 


^ (4  t4  (h  t-i 

Qp  d;  d>  ^ 

^ ^ ^ ^ 


0000 

o y y y 

a a a a 

<^<;<3c 


a a a 


000 

y y y 

a a a 

<<5< 


to 

y 

I y 

-aP 


ft  a 


y y 
d!  M 
y y 
y 3 
f^CO 


a 

•^3  'C  S 

CU  CU  OJ  ^ 


a a a o o 

PPPP  W 


y y y y y 

3333  3 

COCOCOCO  CO 


a a 
y y 3 

1 . 03 

bo  bon 
o od 

ww^ 

Qi 

S S o 
S SEh 

Jh 

t)  a 0. 

a a-.- 
ccccE-i 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  Relabeled  No.  7833 

208  2700  lbs.  removed  from  sale  212  g tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No,  7833 

210  3 12/2Q  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7834 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


148 


■S-a  * 
2 3^  c 

fl  ^ 

.2 

s 

sr 
- ® * 
^ fi  3 


M tO^ 


fi 

” W — < 

-3  S « 

a)  fl  w 

t>D  cj  ^ 

J-  H 05  M 'B  ^ 

u O K!  W W pS  CO 

. bfl  ^ .S 

' ft 

S ^ 2 o 2 


B-§QQfl|Q 

01  B W to  M d M 

i»_,a)333d3 
C 'B  p,  lJ 

0<Up(U<D<Uej<D 

2 = S S S 3 S 

o^  o § § d 6*  ri 

O xnuim  m 


m 


t£)^  • ••J  - 

. ^ ^ .2 

•S  3 3 oj  ^ 

rt  ^ CO  W CO  ^ 

^ - . . . 2 

^ CO  O ^ 

X CO  CO  CO 

c;  p ^ CO  CO 

•r  Tji  Tji 

|qpq 

” 2 2 2 

O ^ TO  C3  G3 

x:  ^ o o 0) 

M B g g S 

•3  ® 3 3 3 

P CO  to  CO 


a “ 

, ~ i5  -w 

S'® 

.£  ^ =0  2 
3 « c a 

Si)  rt  B 

“ w 3J 

r-l  ^ 

OJ  M rrt  ■« 

^ w .2  O 

B M tH 

^ w o ^ ^ 

S S a 

^ C)  ft 


— ^ ■ d w 

c^  d ^ 'd 

w o ^ . 

2s|?'2f'S 

oSSo^goS 
-iS  . -«c 

C o C tf  B — « 
2 t,  3 S-,  d T3 
O C o O o M .S 
■U  U O 


2S 

c a 


.2  a>vO 
d 

u C '-^ 
bC-3  ^ 


(D  W Bl  CO  00  .-H  M 

^ jH  M O O P B 

bJD  d to  CO  to 


1 

SgB^S 

^ nd  ^ 
bD  ^ 

^ ^ Q Q Q M 

<D  “ J w to  to  d 

cd  C3  O 

® 2 4_)  ® ® ® 3" 

2 a B g g g t, 
O to  O d rt  O 
U CO  CO  CO  U 


i-“s 

= = “ar 
■4-5  3 to  B 
■;5  ^ S 

to  3 .,5 
^ to 

d tao  oj  -M 
O)  to  O 
g -B  d 
C 7?  +s 
C 3 ° « 
0)  o g S 

-4-'  i-  F® 

B bfl  5 

“.»■=. 

illi- 

odd 

s ^s-g 

B y ® 

S 2 “-s 

to  0)  J 

11^1 
o .B  wC.> 
O 


to' 

*5^0 

333 

O 'B  FQ 

hi 

- ^ 

3 3! 

d tao  ® 

<D 

c 0) 

® ® p 

® ® .2* 

B boo^ 

tm 

CO  to  o 
-f'  3 be 
3 -d  3 *1 
<D  3 — . --I 

St-  C 3 

bo  5 w 

® ^ to 

<u  to  O <D 
<1>  t-  to  (0 
to  y to 

§ ^-Bi^ 

^ <U  y O 
2 ® 3 
O -B  M 3 

u 


B .S  3 

TD  3 y 

S O y 


T3  4J 

3 3 


punoj 


.-H  (M  I 


p3a:;uB 

-JT?no 


puno^ 


p^^:^UB 

-a^no 


10  C5  00  J 


•:iuaD  aatJ 
aan:^stO]^ 


CO 


2 

3 

-a  bo 

< ^ 
3X3 
3 M 

3 g 


y 'r  t' 

B3  O ^ O 

CK 

„X'  “<=3 

Si  0 g 


J-i  O - 0 >1  p 

|i§| ^ 

43  iS  3 .S 

i 1^"  3 s 

H Oh  Ph  >■3 


1 

1 

B! 

J 

1 

1 

cl 

.. 

3 

Q 

d 

0 

2 

n 

£2 

a 

B 

£ c 

1 0 B 

3 

0 

3 

32 

OJ 

r/) 

3 0X3  3 

0 ’3  c-i  -S 
ceP 

) o t-  Q 


^ 3 

t:  a 

ra  3 ^3 

0 

^ a 

to  'B 

Ph 

■2 

? a 

. 4 3$  — 

OPW-Q^ 
i-id  S p 

P! 

3 ' a 

2 1 o 


llald 

o “ t>.S2^ 

73  rF-  2 XB 
3 2 f2  " ^ 
oiwgo 
. P5  ap^  ^ 
^25  . a . S 

• PIfSp  3 


ip 


•a 

uopDadsuj 


IBioyjO 


00  05  04-1  00  13 
t£  05  ^ S t3  ' 


CO  c©  CO  to 


CO  O CO  I 
00  00  00  < 


§§  S8 


S I3  s s ^ 


2 ' 

0 B! 

1 1 1 1 

FQ  73  TO  473 

1 

TU 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 1 ;-« 

i i i£ 

1 

1 

1 

i 

a B3 

' ' 'J® 

p 

P 

p 55 

® 05  ® ® 

05  05  05  05 

o; 

QJ> 

rp  473  ^3 

U 

SH 

.a  ® 

B3  ® 

^ ^ Q,^  ^ 

0,1  0;  a,'  <1^ 

477 

TJ 

bef^ 

PPPP 

Ph 

OJ 

a> 

0?  q;  OJ  c3 
a>  0 QJ  t+X 

,§ 

P .P 

pppp  3 

3 

3 

a ^ 

^ >5  >5  >5 

>i 

ppp-^ 

>>  >i  >>i:; 

1 

S 

5 >5 
2^--S 

^ 

■< 

'3  ’3  ’3  3 

.a  .a  .a  <1 

'3  33  0 3 

i^P 

PPPQ 

ft 

3 3 3 _ 

c3 

C3 

a 2® 

PPPBp 

' p' 

a ® 

® ® 05  ® 

0 

ft 

ppp  ^ 

Ph 

;i^ 

>5 

>5  >5  >5  >4  . 

3 a 

0 OJ 

a a a a 
® ® ® ® 
t-  tH  tH  Sh 

a 

a* 

Sh 

0 

0 

000^ 

0 0 05 

0 

a 

0 

c) 

^ a ^3 

X?  0 3 

4C  473  XJ  TO  td 

3 3 3 3*^ 

M 

M 

y 2 

® ® ® ® 
a 3 a a 

0 

3 

s 

2 2 2.2 

g 

g 

3«  £5 

c;>  0 0 c->  ^f! 

^ ^ 

<A 

2 1» 

<rt 

CCtCtCCC 

«2 

<5 

<! 

£ 

<Tj 

16.9  I Same  as  D 4749.  Salt  1% 


149 


C C3  63 

O O « 


- ® C! 
bp  w ® 
C ic 

gil 

V. 

■g^-s 

Q)  S 


d ^ 


-d  “ 

<B  .5 

O)  —, 

<w  -d 
-d 
® d 

S 


-d 

<u 


d o a> 

^ M-d 
biD  bJD  <u 
d (U 

—I  w 


Q Q 


^ <W  (M 

Q^.P 

W 

d g d 

(U  . OJ 

d e d 


(D  -d 
^ g 

>.-M 


d OJ  r| 

-'di'« 

O «] 

u 


PB  ‘ 


>>dJ 
d w 


C d 

srp 

5 ^ “ « 

<D  cj 


uo 

C<l  cq 


® S d 
33  d 2 ® 
m K 


C d S H 

^ s 

O d!  ^ 

O w 


d 

m P P 


. <p  (D 

£ s a 

Odd 
U 75  M 


■j:  S'® 


do© 

® o fi 

o 

" '^’3 
d d‘l 

do 

. S'® 


d3dJ  J 


Hi 


ss 


I Cd  • 


CO  CO  o 


fl  _ 
d 6 

690 
-G  B 

ixi  03 


-§>> 


1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 O)  1 

1 

h i 

I 

1 

1 

® 

1 

1 0 
|0 
Id 

1 S3 

6 

0 

d 

1 

1 

1 

1 0 

|o 

i.a 

1 c3  ^ 1 

i|s  i 

1 S'  03  1 

1 03  •.  1 

l^P  6 1 

1 0 1 

0 

p 

d 

w 

0 > 

6 1 
^ 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

> 

G 

03 

> 

'> 

w 

d 

d 

> 

P 

® 

6 

0 

I ^ 
;0 

d 

1 P 

' 2 

1 d 0 d 1 

d 

d 

^>> 

1 

w 

6 

■3 

!» 

d 

0 

1 'd 

jo 

! 

d 

1 

1 

- 

0 

t* 

p 

'n 

1=3 

1 >> 

1 <^ 

>> 

d 

io 
® =3 

1=3 

1 

1 >> 

' d 

lIgS  i 
i 

ttrta  t-i 

d 

d 

03 

dO 

02  .. 

.a  ^ 

1 

£ 

03 

1 

! CO  a 

1 ;h  ^ 

1 03  q; 

! CC 

1 03 

03 

a 

1 G 

• It! 

d 

<v 

® 

CO 

CJ 

0 

w 

'Sh 

p 

>'B'> 


‘l?  t4  c ^ « O) 


. «/2  t> 


«2  Ph  72 


^ ^ . tH  fl 

<0  d;  d --<  > 

^ c3  x3 .22  ft] 


2 a 

O d 

d 

Wo 


d d d 

■+J  4^  4— > 
WOO 

d d d 
G d d 

SSS 


0 >■ 


<M 


CO  CO 
CO  CO 


(M  (M  1^ 
01  fM  1'- 

O 00 


00  00  CO 
00  GO  00 


>>  C3  c3 

9 

C3 

Q.^’  <13  O) 

G ;-3  cc  CO 
S t-.  fcH 
0-00 
OgWM 

w 4j  0^  Qj 
£ 

•S  wp 
<J 


w p^ 


p p p p 


■d  -d^ 

<13  <D  ^ 
03  03  OJ 

PP3; 

'g'g  & 

X X O 

B.d.1 

safe 

i-j  d P 


O 1 

d I 

P 'd 

.fe 

>-P 

d 


oW 


Q)  O 

P 


d d 

t^O 


So 

^dl 


o d 
OP 


— H O) 

O o- 
p 

p <1; 

d ■ M 
d d ^ 

o|" 

O a> 

S-t  Cd  44> 

sa.22 

*03 

a 

03 


cz 

p 


^ I 

s § 

^ d 

p 


"o  -Q  -a  -c  d 

d <D  O)  O 

P *4^  ^ [iH 

°8 .2^  d d d 
aj  a>  <u 
O ><  >< 

d c! 

fe  .a  ^ ^ .2 

p 'c  ^ ^ 

O <l<<5<i 
p 


§d 


p d d 
Poo 

o d'* 
p g bfl 

.S'  s 

P 


d c _M 
O d 1^ 
^ bfi  tl 
d d o 

P<M 
® dp 
d C3 

•23  3^^ 


ta>  o 

C ''^  G 

.^3  03  .G 

S s 

oP  o 

.2  ft 

p 


p p 

ft  . OJ 
..d  CO 

g .W 
a'S.a 

® d "S 

d^  tio 

o 

•j:  ft 
p 


tt  Not  taggred.  Labels  furnished 


Principal  ingredients  identified 


150 


.a  ^ 

re3  y y 

puno^ 

2 0 a 

0£  y 
^ ft 

paa:ju'B 

-anno 

® ft 

ft  re  a 

puno^ 

y 

ft 

paa:juB 

-aeno 

•:juao  aad 
ean^sioi^ 

A ^ 

a|§ 

.2-1 
U 3 s 
aj  fl'S 
•g  ieeS 

■-  -w 

r.  ® 2 

C S eS 

^ OD 

cn 

c ft 


' d '8  'S  o 

§ ® ® ^ c 

c 


o ai 
!C  +;>  to 

fi'-S  c c 
5 fl 


S^5 

00 


nd  o 

ss 


oTM 


I ft  2 c 

D C S -tJ 

iS 


3 -w 
C 

d in 

® ba. 
ft  c 


H . X 

OJ 

03 


. ^'8  a 


0 d 
+j  y 

reredreisj^screft 

y.MftS'a4jyyp 

+j  y 

0 W 

0 

J3™redftc.ftrftp 
;rre+-Prec.Sdiio 
P H ^ 

■^QQ  P 

w 

aj 

0) 
a 

cj 
U1 


aa^ 

g d aj- 


3d 
£ » 

► 05  ' 

i 

<u  ( 

'd  a ' 


Ctu  IJ 
(1) 

O y ft 

t;  “ 

3 _ t3 
0-^5^ 
<u  u 

- 4)  tH 

a S2 

re  r*.  « 


i'8'§PQQQQ 

^ Tl 

T r CO  to  to  to  to 
- a*  4)  tp  (u  y <u 

gs^aaaaa 

o w)^  d c^  d c^ 
O W CO  CO  W CO 


pp 


(D  o 

a a 


(M  C^ 
J>  IC 


10  10  m 10  10  10  m 


•a 

uoi^oadsui 


I^PUJO 


y" 

1 

ft”  1 

0 

1 

•2  1 

05 

re  • 

' ^ 

■ft 

M 1 

^ 0 
•^0 

l-i 

>Po 

I™*®- 

i red 

y 

P 

y 

0 

^ y 

oT  1 

0 

-jj 

CZ2 

1 

QJ  1 

y g 

s 

a j 

y y 

a " 

! 

. re 

go 

W O )-HWI  "ft  ^ -I-’  -'t:  ■■— 

tn'^M  Q C+i 

(^•«re  ft™  coSScdoS 

^ 2t>  >>P3  «q  reo 
Mc3  .ftOj^O. 

p p 
02^^^4jfey 

O <^Oa 

K>^Md  ;2;  ;2; 


o o 


QP 

p 


a .Si  5 ® 
re  re  « -S  " 5 
WW|re|2| 

t«“  oi  g,  re  ^ cc  ^ 
o o S'x;  M 

aB^^nS'^ 

a a”  SI®? 

"|»=2«a 

jfflp  Wcc^  >, 
_■  'ft  4^  ™ 


ft: 

&fl  „ 
ft  ft 


•-J  'o  P S . 

00  . d . ft  ^ 

;2;:2;0PP3PW 


§ 


rH  rH  CO 


gr:ig^§S?3?2!d 

O Ci  CO  O r-i  I— I rH 

rH  rH  (5<J  C<3  (N  <^3  m 


CO  O CO  CO  O O CD 


re 

CO  3 "q 
y l-t  ^ 
to 

2 ft 

do® 

ore" 

^-ft  a 

ft  ft  ' 

fc:<J  g 

S W 

M 


P bfl 
ft)  O 

w a 

i I 

IS  I 


ft3  c3 


P P 

p p 

^ !» 

bD  bo 
0 0 

KW 

bo  bo 
0 0 
MW 

bo'd 
0 s 
WP 

a a 

ft  ft 

aa 

ft  ft 

a^ft 
ft  y 

a a 

<U  oj 

a a 

03  03 

a re 

"d 

pp 

PP 

u f-, 
■ft  41 

doi 

ft  W 
M 


ft  ft 

ww 


ft  ft 
M« 


ft  ft^ 


d 

i'g 

o 41 
reS 

d « 

to  to 

tH  f-i 

y <v 
ftSft! 

aa 

re  re 

ft^jft 

00 


T! 

ft 

ci  § 

a 

3 9^ 
00^ 
00  s 

bfl.2^ 
ftc»  to 
a? 

p-<  CQ  02 

li  § re 

'Sdl 

S'^ft 

^ o 

a o-ft 
a.a  a 
§s.§ 


ft3  T3  T3  ftJ  "ft  73  .ft 
ft  ft  ft  ft  ft  ft  ft 
ft  ft  ft  ft  ft  ft  ft 

0000000 

O,  ft,  fti  ft,  fti  (ft  fti 

aaaaaaa 

0000000 
QOOOOOO 
•73  no  ^ ^ ^ 

q;  a>  a>  cu  O)  a> 
a>  _<o  oj  1?  1?  OP  QJ 

Ph  P4  P4 


QJ  ^ QP  QP 

03  02  02  02  CG  02  CO 
03  CO  03  CO  CO  03  CO 

d d d d d d d 
0000003 

ft  ft  ft  ft  ft  ft  ft 

0000000 
■ft,a'ft,a'a.'a  a 

aaaaaaa 

d d d d d d d 

0000000 


ft  u y 
™ y y 

Iti 

™‘  . c 

re  W yC,  *.3 

aft!:® 

nj  a •" 

(p  CQ  4j 

o W o 

ft^«  = 

■S  ft  -’® 

ii  ft  ft  ® 
O .re® 

'^'ft  a 

® ■“  >, 


g® 


ftSj 

'7;  ^ 


""a 

"to  U) 


p rs 
a 


CD  P 0^ 

d ft  ^ S 
P 


|b 

a.& 

o re 

op 

t^ft 

ft  o 

.ft  o 

II 

O 


I5I 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  213  17^  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  G215.  Rebate.  See  page  41 


o 

lx 

0) 

CC 


(«  03  M 

:r  'w  bx) 
" c 


152 


- ^ c 

, a 


I stci 


•S  s 


o * 

C g C3 


J s-^ 
©a  1) 


£ £ 


0-  5^ 
* 

Oi 

h 


■M  ,0  00 

o . 

g S -Q 

^ © ai  M 

»©  <2  M “ 


is 

c 03 


s © 
0) 
r© 

<1^  © 
© g 
W ^ 


-W  g"  >1 

g 03  00 

00  C5  C5 

^50  o3  oq  (M 

•g  SQ^PP 

5 02  C^  W W 

^ cti  O c3  03 

..  c3  c)  (1)  OD 

^Ss£ss 

i«  a c<3  O 03  c3 

O mo  mm 


o3  S 
© 

S <5 

'a  "5 
© >*-( 
<i> 

to  « 

a - 

ij  © 
o g 
0 a 
^3 


„-2ppp  Pg 


CO  P 

d w 


©—.©©- 

S2  S S £ 

o3  " o3  c3  O 

m mmo 


^sc: 


puno^ 


paa:}UB 

-anno 


- . © © o 

£ £ s s a 

o S d oS  d , 

Oijmmm  m< 

GO  ir:)  ic  1-1  CO  o 


o3  ^ 


O T-H  1-H  i-H 


>000  00 


O Oi  O Ci 


^3 
p cd 


puno^ 


(M  Cl  00  00  01 


I (M  (M  <>J  CO  ' 


p33:;uB 

-JBno 


LO  iO  10  10  no 


•;uaD  aad 
aan:>stoj;\[ 


1 a 

d 

la 


N « 


, !-i  --■  I'a  , - 

m - o .2 
_ I o ic:  cs 

_^SSo&j  ! ^ ^ ^ ^ 
g r'^  axj'^^ 

issigi°:si:: 

jSSsIfeOS 

„ . >. 
dtn 


tH 

a 53 

5 ^ 


ccg 

a 

•-5 


©^a3l  bfloJ’PQ 

S S a ^ 
^ .o^2^o-g 

• n ^ a I-,  . d 

. S 71 

) s 7r  r^)  uj;  5? 


•e'“  . 
Sd&z 


a 

d 

o 

!>. 

d 

a © 

© p 

"a  > 

4J  d 
CO  > 


> M 2 

^'S  s ^ 

r - .-g 
o a 6 o a 
O 

bfl'®©  rg 

a <13  ,i<  o _ 


i«5«s 


E o 

So 


W ®3 
u, 
rO 

0=8 

rH'3  >> 
a^  d 
O^M 


a « -o  rn 

|g|5S 

i'-p.li!«-'s^ 

OPh  r/i'a  a CO 


a • 

a Oh 

;0  ^ g § W >;g  © “ d 

w ^ 


fl  P . 

o da-^  «.2  £:g' 


•Q 

uopaadsuj 


PPUJO 


3002 

4510 

3581 

CO 

4275 

3294 

3608 

4029 

4308 

00 

CO 

1511 

3052 

3098 

3488 

4210 

5126 

3177 

3296 

4621 

5236 

7048 

7048 

(M 

10 

CO 

0 

s 

4233 

6753 

6753 

6753 

6753 

10  10  LO  0 
00  00  CO  ^ 
X^  X^  J>  (M 
CO  0 0 X^ 

g 

10 

0 0 Ci  Oi  Ci 

Tff 

LO  LO  LO  10  10 

0 (31 

10  10 

6871 

w 

7977 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

lilt 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 

till 

1 

CO  I 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 i 

1 i I i i 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 ( t 1 1 

1 -O 
© 

© 

1 ^ 

1 

1 

1 

I 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

^ I 
§ ! 

! 

1 

1 

1 

I 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 ^ "O  'XJ 

1 1 1 1 

1 1 i 1 
till 

‘p  I 

0 1 

1 1 1 < 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

! a 

1 

1 

f 

1 

1 

'q 

^ -S  o 

Qj  >>  d 
^ d © 

CO  ^ 

Xi  dO 

•aP  . 


» ■i’ 
d ^ 

|P 
S a 
^ 3 

as  « 

no 

sa 

o 


-o 

© © 

p;  'g 

a o 

d -t^ 

a.-;  ^ 

a a CO 

o O 2 

r-t  ^O 

rt  d 
o © © 
SS.ti 


cy  a>  <0;  a> 
\ <V  CJ  <v 

I p p p p 


{»  CO  {/2  W 

©0000 

paaaa 

>1  >1  >J  >> 

°X3X2iOjO 

00  o O O O 

^aaaa 

^ m M m m 
tH  3 o o c 
O o o o o 

CO  CO  CO  CO 

© _c3  a G Id 

•g  3 3 5 5 

jd  © © © © 

fi  Q 5 5 ft 


QJ  O 

<y  <y  <y 

^ Ph 

.03  ^ O 

3S3 

000 
p X p 

CO  CO  CO 

03  Q3  O) 

a a a ^ 

aaa^ 

<D 

CO  JO  JO  CO 

333  o 

O O Oi-r) 

to  CO  CO  hH 

.3  .a  .a  — ' 
© © © >• 
ftftfift 


-o 

•M 

mpc, 
W o 

« a 


5 a 
§.==* 
a % 

-I 

CO 


ft 


T©  t;  Td  'O  "O 

© © © © © 

ft  ft  ft  ft  ft 

© © © ^ © 

33333 

"P 

c a p c p 

cj  cj  P P 


00000 

aaaaa 

00000 

X 'y.  ‘R  'S 

S55S5 


o 

CO  CO 

o «-• 
CO  o 

JM 

O CO 

CO 

c3  P 

11 

o ^ 

;2  s 

Q< 


153 


>=i  .!2 

° S 

o 

U Bi 
_r  2 w 
-d  g c 

0)  d 
<M  'O 
0)  bfl 
C (P 


.-PQQ 


£ S 

O d 

u w 


? o 

-'5 
^ £ 
u 3 
O to 
U 


3 C 


00  o <u 


S^to 

Sft.S 


!-,  <0 
^ g. 


'O 

01  g 

O g 

<W  ^ 

b'd 

C 0> 
■?  a> 

S “ 

o s5 

A - 

to  * 

C (1) 

” S g 

(D 'd  ^ 
w fd 

g .S 


g^  . 

5 ito  to 

. w 
- 
2 

s - ^ 

n3  0)  « d 

•g  gS:ti 

frt  ^ !d 


I 'd  0)  o d ^ d 


3- 

V s 

,2  i 2 

<1-1  B o 
1>  U 


5 g 

be 

(£ 


0) 


0 2*=^ 
CO  cc 

IH 

i toQ 


•“  g d to 

d d 

d -0) 
<P  (P  C - 
^ <p  !-.  C 

o cti 

t>  O CO 


f-  la 

be  • 


g to 


«D(mct>«d7:;  oo  co 


d d d d - d 
CO  CO  CO  CO  d tg  72 


UO  lO 


QQQQiSSfl  P 


o k,' 


<P  (P  0)  (P  --  (il  <p 

g^lgggsS^S 

O'-iBSajctjctidHri 
U CO  CO  CO  CO  U 72 


to"  O Q Q 


- d 0)  01 

£Sse 

o ^ d d 

O a? 


Ift  00  rH  00  I 


LO  1C  iO  Lf5  lO 


IC  LQ  IC 


CO  Ci  00 


CO  CO  CO 


(M  (M  Cq  Oq  (M  <M  <M 


2 p d 

o o<J  r r 

S m - ° o 

.a 

qJ'Q  ^ [3  [3 

^ - bifl'S  ’5 

52  ?i:  add 

|°aQp 

■•  a S'S'S 

<3  O d d d 
^ g<^|ilP£l 
^ ^ a>  d O) 
O 

*-5'-5  n a r-i 


'2^ 
I S 
sa 

k o 

dQ 


§ 

be 

fee  Sh 
tH  d 

d d! 
Xi  to 
to  ^ 
O 
O 'tJ 
dCO 
CC 


^5 

c3  ^ 
03  C3 

PW 

dp 

§d 
. d3 

o s 

C3 

Eh  ^ 


ft  a 


T3  >i 

gg 


a r| 


CO 

fcs^  W ^ 

o £;.2i 
be  a t® 
d P ^ 

t-i  o 

O d 


I ® 


ts  a 

f-i 

o 


:3ri 


lO 

’Wa 

d • ^ 


cot 


" o 

ao 

ti.5 

Hd 

'O 

oa  § 

m^bi 
_ be  a 

'H.aa 

o-a 

!-i  Sh  O 

d of> 


si 


^ rA  I 


CO  CO  CO  CO  c 


10  10  03  00  05  00  CD 

lO  x>*  oq  ^ CO  o 00 

OOOiOi-HO  1>(M 

rH  COCO’^'^'^  ^lO 


00  CO 
lO  CO  CO  ! 

CO  CO  CO  I 


I I 

LO  LO 


3 o < 


i>.  : 

LO  LO  i 
CO  CO  ' 
LO  LO  ; 


ft 

0.2 

aaftao. 

•~  .d-  o o o o o 

O 4J  dj  d3  d;  d!  dJ 

^ gooooo 

^.a  o o o o o 

®«  "'O'a'a'OTd 

a d d d d d 
>>D  X XX 
'w'  p d d d d 
d a Eh  E-i  E-i  H 


o 

fp  d 

a§ 

d 

g 03 

O CO 

-«w 

w 


a 

O ru  t3 

a d g 

n3.b5  d 

So  o 


pH 


O O 

wa 


d d 

aa 


d 

d 

a -a 


a ^ 
.ap 


m d 

aw 

w 


CO  m" 

=«  d 

a 

u_'  d 
t-j  d 

. fl 
>>'C 

a=p 

6§2 


offl  2 

.“-a 
a <1 

M 


fcH 

fp  o 

d y 

^ >. 
>>a 

d ft 

ft-g 


03  03  03  03  03 

CO  CC  C«  C«  03 

o o o o o 

aaaaa 

>>>.>>>>>> 
^ C3  ^ CS  C3 
ft  ft  ft  ft  ft 


d d 


O O 

aa 


d d 


^ O - 

aaa 

621 

'ii^ 

c3  G 
^ G ^ 

0-3  d 

d d 

'i.S  be 

d rd  P 
be'-'  d 

Ph 

a 


O O 1 

aa 


d d 


aa 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  215  1900  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  4606.  1800  lbs.  returned 

211  % ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7784  to  mfrs. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


154 


^ -S 
& c 
.S  S 


Is 

0^ 

^ c 

.12:^ 
U 2 s 


S'®  I 


(D  -m  W O 
<D  4)  W-d 

'tH  a)  w 

^ ° ^ e 

od  S » " 


M -3  <W  jH  -g 

c " c 


C O 

rt  a 


>5 

C.S 

s s 

o o 


o 5 


3 a 


o 

^ eo 

5 o’® 


be  Cl 

c . 


5 S 


1 1 1 1 ■“  g • 

:^: 

2 s 

tn  ^ U +->  2 CU 


^ o !h  a 
ft  y o Cl 
U 


y '13  o a 

-is  - c 

W'*^a>WL. 
^ FS  ^->  O 

c5  !5  .S  g3  u 

O O 


S rt  ■::;  rt  ' 


QqQQ 


- y 0)  y 

£ SpSS 

P d ;;?  cj  ni 
O M 02  M 


>-'  C2  y 

fd  c ^ 

(P  {m 

(1)  o ^ 
w O <D 
* W ^ 
^ G ^ 

.i  cy 

<D G 

5^  - 

^ ^ c 

.Q  y !-.  b 
y X5 

s ^ 

|o|- 


'*-'  d 

>.a 

c 

id 

o y 

2::  ?: 


-d  £ “ s 

y ft  _ 

y ' w 
<M  ^ y >. 

45  tn  y 

r.  Ul  .Z 

i 3 ° 2 

bi'C!  - 


y 


1 d (M 


“c6j 

■ iH'“" 

— I— T o)  ^ 

.£  -d  “ P 

o y C " ram 


I d oc 

O 


id- 

rt  C;  — 

r t-  o G 

i bC  » *=  c 

! 

. tH  *-.  y 5-  ci  (-  C 
i y o w bfi—  o cj 
O <!0«J 


o n . 

£ ^ -2 
m d 
d''° 

!b  y - y 

^ S £ S 

■-  d o d 
W U W 


05.1=  C 
na  y y 

P'S  « 

I 


puno^ 


i-H  (M 


o 


p^^:^u•B 

-a^no 


d 
d c3 


punoj 


paatjUB 

-JBno 


•ijuao  aad 
8an:jsioj^ 


c a 


dO 

oa^ 

igl 

^=1 

. d M ' 
052;  I 


I y y 

i ^ ^ 

iaa 


w O O 

WqO 

4 ^ ^ 

y y 

y d d 

oSa 

CD  o o 


§« 

II 

O CO 
CO 


^'d 
^ Q 
c ^ 

Sm 

«4= 

5 d 
d o 
oco 


o 05 

bfl-d 

« d 

4:  w 


tuo  r^d 
|og 
|mS 

oO 

yd. 


•a 

uopoadsuj 


I 00  iA  CO  00 


S ^ 

(M  CO  CO 


I^PHJO 


CO  CO  CO  OO  00 

CO  CO  CO  ^ 05 

10  irti  m 00  rH 

LO  10  1^5  IG 


g g 


?2  i2  !2 

10  o o 


5^  O CO 

as^ 

OQ  ” 
o .3 

•sSI 


CD--  a 

y d 

m .2 

Son 

y CO 


c=  2 

So 

05 


'O 'd 
y y 
y y 

a a 


d d 

2 y y 

m to 
Ja  O O 

dwa 

d a 


£5oo 

^ CD  y y 
d 03'd'd 

r^J  W 'o  "o 


OCD 


! Fh 


iTd  o 

sw 

Ph 

aw 


- o 

ga 

W'S 

tuoS 


'd  o d 

M wg 

=3.SiW 

MO'O 

y '-5  2 

d W 


a 


fed  d 
d be 

'§32 
>.2  -W  . 
o d:  -S 

W ft^  d to 

d oa  ■" 
d do^ 
d d • 

•S^d^^O 

-d  d^  . 


'M 


CO  1>* 
(M  01 

10  uo  10 


'd'd 
y y 
y y 


; o o 

■aa 


is 

o 

a y 

y pR 

" § 

is.2 

O g d 


r d d 

oaa 


'3'^.s 

d a 

a 


'd 
y 'd 'd 


y O O 

§aa 


MMM 


as  D 2037 


155 


C>  Oi  CS 


PQ  PQ 


0)  <y  o 0) 

s a a a 


mm  mm 


•-I 

d C 


'O  „- 
C d 
3 o 
o u 


cJ 

bX) 


'O  u 
o V 
o w 


;i!  « 

c c 

d 

fi 

ra 


C O 
(U  fl 


hi 

-d  ^ 
a>  .fi 


-d 
e 

3 

o 

d bo 
0) 


bo^ 


o 


C d 
0)  h,  0) 

O 


: ^a: 

3.Q  d 

m I 


bi)  ^ 

.s 

S s 

0)  w 
w 

y 


T}^  Oi  C5  05  Ci 
CD  rH  T-t  rH  r-(  ^ 
M ID  ID  to  LD 

PQQOQP 


d d 

-O  csi  W W 


s-  X 
-a  d 


— . ID  LD 

d o o 
to  C'J  cq 


m P P 


(U  tJ.  CO 

to  CD  d 

C ftfcS) 
o ftS^  01 

o 0.-1 
U O! 


0)  0)  <D  (15  O 

a a a a a 

d d d d d 

mmmmm 


1 

2 d S 

Uj  to  to 
-d  ^ i/j  d d 

0)  5 d 

01  ^ 0)  <u 

S ^ § £ 2 

.a  bx)  a s d 


M -d 

^ c 

d a 

!* 

-d  -g 

c o c~ 

d lo  ITS 
_ -M  O O 

C a 

af:pp 

to  to 
>3  d d 
a a;  d 01 

o ^ a a 


TS 

s3 

<M  ff 

^ d 

P'S 


01  J; 

a^ 


ccTO  TO'~r; 

mm  O mm  m O 


X ><  o 

d d c 

c c 

-d  'd  (j- 

.a  .2^ 

d d 

^ bX) 

^ d "a  d 

bxi  a o 

^ 5 ^ 

■“  2 
- 5 o 

M ^ ^ ^ 

«.a-“-2 

C . 1= 

d 01  to  d 

> t-  oJ 

l>  CJ  o 

W W 
- CO 

2 'd  d 'd  5; 
d d d d o 

o d ^ d a 

h to  ^ to  rd 


9.9 

11.1 

10.0 

11.3 

10.4 

8.8 

10.2 

25.0 

22.3 

13.3 

17.4 

’^i>-ocqcqr-- 
gq  o’  ^ CO  ^ ^ 

23.9 

22.3 

23.6 

16.0 

16.2 

15.8 

16.5 

16.0 

16.2 

0 

C>  C5 

0 0 

0 

C5 

CD 

0 to 

0 

000000 

to 

to  iq 

<q 

cq  <q 

0 

cq 

0 

05 

05  05 

05  05 

CO 

w 

to 

(M 

to  cq 

01  rH 

cd 

06  cd  td  id  td  id 

22, 

Di  oi 
cq  cq 

cd 

cd  cd 

cd 

cd 

cd 

IM 

00  0 

0 J>. 

CO 

\ to 

rH  00 

to 

cq  (o  cq  ^ 05  ^ 

cq 

iq  to 

cq 

00  tq 

00 

cq 

cq 

Cq  rH 

CO 

CO 

CO 

cd  Tt1 

td 

cd  cd  td  id  ^ 

cd 

id  id 

cd  J>^ 

id 

id 

id 

to 

to  to 

to  to 

0 

0 

C5 

0 0 

to 

iq  iq  to  to  to  to 

iq 

iq  iq 

0 

cq  0 

cq 

0 

0 

T-i’r-; 

nH  nH 

CO 

CO 

id 

id  ^ 

'di 

^ tJH  tJH  Hji 

TJ1  Til 

id 

id  id 

id 

id 

id 

to 

CD  rH 

cq  rH 

cq 

to 

0 

05  rH 

00  iq  cq  iq  cq  tq 

t- 

cq  cq 

00 

cq  Ttj 

00 

(J5 

to  CO 

CD*  J>^ 

05 

05 

cq 

<d  cq' 

cq 

rn'  r-^  cq  rH  C-5  id 

w 

rH  cd 

cd 

05  05 

cd 

05 

J o 

hH  3O 

P 


a®: 

>•£1 


cc  S S s 

_r^  a og 
o ^ o 
bD  • bjO  n 

o o ^.a.c 

>■  .S  a d 

•«ai« 

d fe  ° o a 
jd  <s,2  S S 
OfHfq^CD 


O o 

<V  ^ 

O 

f-t  r 

S 

1^ 


o h, 
O d 
rxCM 


0 d 

B> 

'^d 


to  P 
a d 

d-d 


di 

o Ph 

d 

Ph  d 
o'  o fl  -a 

o«2  g o 
W2  '■j'S  P 

cJS  d te 
Xh  O d 

§ Sd.2 

M d d d 
dddd 


'r^  ' buO 

d §5 

-ll® 

o-^W 
0‘=3  „ 
a ® 

OP  C5 

OP  W tH  r3 

m “0  o 

d d ^ 

a . o 

6 

^ OO 


o d 

a- 

§0 

p ^ 


d d o 

"S 


>>  ^ 


O Sh  fl 

00  o 


5'SSo 


P S b£.ti 

•ld‘^11 

SS'g'S  a 
d d sd  i=i 

TJ  .d  O CD  -u 

<(Ui4  P 


m 

'O 

d 

d 

2r§- 


«o; 


I Oi 

I o o 
I CO  D1 


05  00 


05  00 

^ lA  CM 


' O to  05  00 
I rH  T—i  CO  to 
> 00  O 00  O 


to  CO  00 


(N  (M  (M 


5^ 


S I 

to-J 

3? 


pie's 

rp  ^ 


o ^ 


Cb  ID 
D1  to 


(M  C^J  (M  (M  (M  <N  C5 
■ ■ ■ ■ ■)  CO  CO  CO  O 

• to  to  to  o 


ss?s 


§n 


00  00  00 


rj  OP  a>  OP 

. 02  C«  W S 
g 4^  W CO 

jh  ^ o o o .-S 

d 

3;  S'.tJ.'P.'p  d 

roO'a'O'o  ^ 

d O)  QJ  CU  3 

^ cu  OP  a>  ^ 

^ gPPpH  S 

.2|MdM  I 
:§  000  P 


Pt  . T3 

a'ss 

® i2  Ph 

oj'O 

tJJ^  d 

a p X 

^ o bx) 

a 2 d 

p d 0 
.2^1^ 


p^ 

^•Sd 

CO  cf.  ^ 

dO  <^ 

ia§ 

li'^ 

dps 

P M d 


00  Q 


d d 

p P 


^ 

OP  OP  OP  OP 

<1^  OP  OP  OP  ^ 


'P  ^3  d d d d _ 

^ SJPPPfi'S 

pH  ^ ^ ^ ^ d 

^ d d d d HH 

.a.al  sl’i  ^ 

d d p,  a p,  a o 

Q Q c»  cc  CB  OQ  pq 

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 
fl  ca  a G a G p 
.2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 
G (KS  ^ ^ ca  G 

G Cl  G G G G G 

qp  qp  qp  qp  OP  qj 

G G G G G G G 


G ' 

^ra 

■TJ  Ph 


S X 

d 


M Wo 

"d  'd'd 
P P P 
o 00 


p p 

Sh  (-1 
d d 

P P 


IQ  T3  '3 
d d d 
d d d 

PhPhPh 

bX)  bX)  bX) 

000 

WWW 

XXX 

III 

000 

"d  "d  W 
P P P 
o o o 

p p p 

Sh  Ph  fn 
qp  qp  q> 

p p p 


WW 

as 

60 

d "d 
P P. 
O O I 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  216  Relabeled  No.  7650 


TABLE  rv — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


156 


* 


s WJ  03 

■s 

& c s « 
.S  S 

1 'sll 

5 ® 

e ->*03 

.5  « c — 

V.  2 ^ 

h 

c a 


^ ^ 05 

CC  4i  . 

bfl  cs  <=> 

_fl  « ->-' 


0) 

0)  to 


o 

S 


■J  o ^ c _| 

d ^ 4,  -d 

'>=:  S 33  . C _ 

— « oj  oj  'C 


“ ^ d 

-«  d s 

0)4-.^ 

0)  W 

g>.S 

d c: 

rO  G3 


ft  <p  ^ 


W w 

w o 


w V 

s s 

O f- 

-a  S 

SSSo 

P.  o _ 


c o 

TO  M 


® ~ 

y d 
k,  o 
. ® 

y Ih  c 
be  d 
d .fi  o 
U 


c3  ^ 

c .5 
S c 

j-  d ^ 

bJD  o 

y 
. w 
T)  ^ 

S p s 

® XI  O 

P > P 

o 


§ S 


lls 

n3 

2 

O m 


X 

k 

o 42  "3 

C C S 

p p 'd 

o o.S 

uu 


CO  J 

c d a 
!_■--& 
o o ^ 

® S « 

m-  . to"  j 

d y ctJ  ^ 
O d O --I 
.-d  _ 

C o C •- 

« ^ d 

o a o CO 

u u c 


S ^ • 

'd  ^ 

ftdJ 

_a  d +j 
y p 5 

-d  “ '1 


y y 

y ;3 

C ^ 
« 

u •. 

« d 

3 S::! 

M d 


' CB  k 
I y 

’ d ^ 

'0^5 

. X 
1 ” - 


^ 5 

3 -Si 


to  rd 
d fd 


^ d » -j-i 

- " I 3 

3 bJ3  o 2 y 


S Sc 


Odd 
o 3 

y C S 

SS-S 

u 


i y 

o c 3 

^ y 

C o O => 

3 e 3 

ioii 
d -j  d 

«w  d CD 

S il  « 

•d  d 
d,g  3 C 

3 S 
3 9 d ^-' 
o "d  <2  y 

P H — ■ to 

O <\ 


d ^ 
2I  M 


to  Q 


. y 

s s 

o d 

O'® 


d-d  d 

dS  y y 
3 o d 
3 sh 


puno^ 


CO 


Irt  -41 


paaijuB 

-aBn0 


" o 
'H'S  d 
2:2  " 
0^3 


puno^ 


p38:>U'B 

-JBno 


10  (M 


10  CO  o 


c>j  o m 


•;u9D  jad 
aanijsio]^ 


•a 

uoiijoadsuj 


PPUJO 


§ 


-d  -d 
dl  ci 
o o 

s s 

X X 
y y 

SS 


G G 

y y 

WK 

35  i-i 


00 
CO  T-l 
CO  in 


k ^ 


02  _m  ^ 3 

a 3 2, 

2 GO  C3 

■SgS^ 
9 ■'5  P 


2 bx) 

o o 

WM 


aa 


<3  d d) 

9 9 d 


O a> 

^ -cS 

X ^ Sh 

3 9 ® 

S p W 


3'd 
2 3 'd'd 

fthH  q;  <d 

S ^ a>  a> 

o 

O 3 y y 

d a “ “ 

•G  2 o o 

MW 


S S 5;5 


^ a y 
y 1-^  G 
35  o 


C3  C3 
y y 

d d5 


G d 

.,4^ 

X « 

(k  (in 

6m 

g'M 


22  30*0 


G 

a 

o . 

Q-d 


O M 

bflM  3 


I 'S'S 

Sh  QP  OJ 

0 

<V  CP 

^ 33 

1 

|^__=8c3 

>J  O)  <t) 

^ -t-a  M CQ 

^'6  o o 

^ mMM 

>a  s ><  X 

G3  3 d cs 

•S«|| 
S M« 


157 


t Before  registration  21s  160O  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7326  and  returned  to 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  mfrs. 

217  9 17/2^  tong  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7782  210  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7775.  Rebate.  See 

page  42 


iS8 


-d  m’-O 

D <D  4) 

0)  M 5d 


0) 

(U 

CO  CO 


li 

■S'S  * 

III 

% 

•c§’3 

a d-d 

i*ej 

® tn 

gB« 

3^- 

,2  s'® 

o S 4» 

5*^  ® 


h 

C ft 


3+^' 
iJ-5  Cl 
'CO)® 

P'S  « 

Sh  c< 

Ah  S, 


Oc 


>73  +J 

3 cj 
Sh  [b 


puno^ 


paaijuB 

-JBno 


puno^ 


paai^uB 

-aBno 


•;u30  aad 
aanijsioi^ 


•a 

uoi^toadsuj 


I^paJO 


« Q 


S2 


d 3 -g 

•A  9 


^ d.9 

323 

« typ'd 

-a 


s 

o ,3  O 

o 


«2  S 

•.  o; 

§ s 

ft  ” 

oK 


=3  ^ 

qM 
*— « ^ 


■“3  s 

d d I 

<D  2 

,3  CD*  O 

^.sa 


C3  tn  ^ ^ 
•^|3« 

3 TH  e<i 

co-Q 

»*PQ 

d 3 w 

3 3 CO 

0 . 0 d 

0 c5  c^ 

- 3 . P 

- (0)  0) 

C oj  3 3 
^ d c,  C 

0 Cl  0 3 

£ a a 

033 

0 xjxn 

U CO  CO 

^ rH 

1-1  “ ^ ir:>  ^ 
oq  ^ cq  c^q  Csi 


Q g 

w 

si 


QgQQQ  Q QQ 


W d M c^  c^ 

^ (M 

^ o ^ o 0 (V 

3 s^  s s a 

3 •-:  3 3 3 

w <1 M w w 


33  o 

Ph 


o 

■3^ 

^ is  fcjo 

33  0.0 

Wm<2 

3 

'O 

n S f 

3-73  CCS 

M o<«l 

.CO^  C 
CO  W N 


> ° 
ss 


o 3 

S-go 

2-^3 


h h o 

U jH  a, 

3 d o 
SX3  3 
^ <V  'tC 

S2  3 


> 

3 ^ 
° 6 
30 


3 3^ 

'3  "3  M 

• • O 
<3<JO 


cAh 

4^ 

CO  =8 

loS 

”30  g 
^ s S 
3 

<u  £ 


iO  CO  ic 


(M  O ^ 

irt  CO  Ci 

CO  ^ irt 


^ O) 


.22  -M 
|5o 

3 OcM 


p, 
o 

O O) 

2?s 


ggo 

<U  ‘ft  r- 


Ah  2 


so 

&>a 

11:3 

t>  > « 
oW  X 
s w 
o 


pH  Ph 

a>  0? 

"33 

d8=8 


o o 

wa 

s s 

3 d 
o o 
coco 

(>>  >J 

3 3 
3 3 
d d 
COCO 


I a 
i o 

' • s 

« oj 

13"^ 

< (-!  W 


>:  w w 

O O?  O) 

wapH 

o ® ® 

a “ ^ 

s o o 

-saa 

^00 

“33 


' ^ ^ 


O 

'z^  d 

'dr^ 

«Ph 

O) 

Eu  a> 

b S 
•sW 
a 3 

O aj 

S 3) 


0)  aj 

a a 


- o 


s o 

a^ 

sa 

o . 

5I 

oa 


3 o 

C3  ^ C? 

a a 

o 


O c3 

aa 


o 

“"a  2 


ft  . 

s-g 

O^ 


o o 

aa 


o o 

a a 

"3  ”3 


<H<H<lHOO, 


12.2 

8.9 

8.3 

15.4 

11.2 

10.5 

CO  C5  CO 

0 0 r-H 

11.3 

20.8 

00  c*q  e>j  10 
ca  OD  05  oi  oq 

05 

11.5 

11.4 

13.6 

0 

0 

10 

0 

0 0 

0 0 Q 

CD  1 

0 0 0 0 0 

0 

CD  0 

0 

0 

Oi 

06 

0 0 

0 0 CD 

CD  j 

0 rH  rH  rH  CD 

Q 

05  05 

rH  rH 

1-H  rH  rH 

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 

rd 

rH 

00 

CO 

10  rH 

0 rH  00 

c-q  CO 

m in  X CO 

CO 

10  HiH 

CO 

CO 

Cq 

CM 

CO 

oi  CO 

rH  <N  r4 

<N  CO 

(N  0 0 CDr-; 

® 

(>q  oq 

0 

LO 

0 

0 

10  10 

0 CD  CD 

0 , 

0 0 CD  CD  0 

0 

0 0 

0 

CN 

CO 

c4  cq 

<>q  CN  cq 

1 

Oi  rH*  r-^ 

c4  c4 

Ci 

00 

0 

00  rH 

rH  Ol  CO 

CO  00 

00  C<l  (M  T)<  CO 

CO 

<N  <=> 

(N 

C5 

0 

f-H 

CO 

j>  10  10 

C^l  rH 

oi  CJO  CO  06 

CO  CO 

0 

rH 

rH 

i-H  rH  ,-. 

1-^  r-i 

I— 1 I-l  I-^  T-l  I— 1 

(N 

<N 

gS  S 

'^hH  O 

ra 


33  3 <1  <1 

(-Si  3 CD  M 

■2 

^ g 3 

3 J-l  (H 

CD  3 QJ  dJ 

.®'.a  3 

J-t  4D  -4-J 

<V^  <V  ^ 

Ph  Ph 

2 a 

Ph 

a 

159 


o H 

0) 


CO 
d 

c 

o . « S 

o^'S  - 
8® 


iS^  'O 


, d) 


c S i 2 

•;^  r ® 


:sg 


S^tSS 

w C^  o 
do-^  g 

o +j  +j  d 

S _ 

-T  ™ 
d r2 

^ . . fa  . 

tH  C<l,  CO 


^ 0) 


j3  (rq  M ' 

«QQ 


--01  01  — 
£ s s<S 

O d d 

Omrn< 


d ^ 

“ “ ” 

C .O  c 

d CO  15  ^ o 

^r-i  bJO’^  W l2  ii 

+J  ^ ^ 

"to  d ^ 2 >» 

S"S“S5” 

CO  (_  w d d 

o OT  O M t-  ^3  -r 

cs  ^ ° 

. o - O ^ S 

d H "S  2 2 ”5  - 

•;5  >^o  S 0)  5i  O d 

ZS^toCC^SC^jiC, 

- d . <w  f*  ™ 

r-|  ^ <2  oT -d  d 

S 2 cS  <1^  2 r«“ 

®^S»  .o»g 

ccw2o2'Sc2S 

>^owo<wp<Moo5yo 

O U o uu 


d OJ 


' 'O  M 

. a 


3'S  « 

3 '«  C 
« 

= s S' 

. o 
; ^ • 


£ g ^ g? 

. o ^ 

d ^ g ojJ 

Z >>  d 01  c 

3 

S 5 4-. 

•9  d ^ 
g 01  -d  d 

01  OJ 


c ® 


bi’g 


^-d  ^ 

>>  ^ (P  c 

o •£  ^ S -4 

o^  -p  o 

{S  ^ CO  ~ g ^ 

d S 2?  dCt- 

^ h d g 

'd  5 d _ 2 o , 

2?8 

^ fl  ,r4-  ® ^ 

o§c.5c5^^ 

awo'doo-iiSo 

o u 


§3 

dW 

a 

6*  . 


“®  2 ^ S 2 W 

«H  ^ <y  fi  52 


°-S 

d 

<1>  -M 

£§ 

-4  ® 

^ be 
0)  17 
(B  .5 

C T3 
o 'd 

o S 

y 

« 

®'® 

tg  W CO 

^0)  'f 

d to  o 
d 

Q 


O a; 

W'd 


y o 
Sgfl 
i5  ® 

o be 

£.3 


d a 
o y 
-O 


".3 


o .S 

tiS 


t®  (D 
8£ 


“ O 

°!  s 

CO 

-r: PH  <1^ 
£ ® ® £ 
o43C  d 
u M 


(N  <M 

Q Q 

CO  to 

d d 

y y 

£ £ 

d d 

02  02 


c ^ 
c c ^ 

tH  ©S 
O -H 

O 


0) 

CO  <D 
«M 

o 

Csl  >> 

® £^ 
w o 

CB 

y _-+j 
S£d 

d o to 
M O 


<£  >» 
^il  y 
d “ 


CO  o 
d £ 


CO 

CO  'S 

--S  y ® 

£ gS  £ 

o J3  -M  d 
U 02 


y CO 

Sy 
to 
to 

-dis 

y o 
y c 
to  C 


° d 


W to 
d *>® 

o.£ 


o g 

o ^ 


rH  <>]  10  cq 

0 0 CD 

12.2 

23.0 

21.5 

9.8 

25.4 

10.1 

05 

/ 05 

11.3 

cq 

10.4 

CO 

CD 

05 

10.0 

9.3 

09  rH 

00  06 

11.1 

roi 

9.8 

CO  CO  CO  0 

0 

CD 

CD 

10  p 

0 

p 

0 

0 

p 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 y> 

0 

0 

p 

Ci  0 0 05 

CD 

cq 

CD 

cq 

0 

t-H  01 

06 

06 

s 

CD 

0 

rH 

0 

0 

0 

0 

geo 

CD 

0 

rH 

0 

CO  CO  CO  0 

CD 

cq 

CO  1— 

p 

p 

p 

P 

CM 

p 

P 

eq  cq 

cq 

p 

cq  cq  rH 

cq 

CO 

CO 

CO  ^ 

CO 

cq 

csi 

(03 

cq 

cq 

cl  CO 

d 

cq 

cq 

1>- J>;  J>-  0 

CD 

00 

00 

p iq 

p 

p 

p 

p 

p 

p 

p 

p 

p 

P 0 

p 

p 

p 

rH* 

cq' 

CO 

co’ 

co’ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

cq 

cq 

cq 

cq 

<M* 

d CO 

cq 

cq 

cq’ 

■H;  00  0 0 

0 

CO 

rH 

cq  p 

p 

p 

p 

p 

01 

p 

cq 

p 

CO 

« eq 

p 

,-( 

in  P in  oi 

cq 

cq 

'^’  06 

d> 

05 

06 

tZ) 

cq 

tg  d 

'Th 

cq 

eo 

,-4  .-t  rH  rH 

rH 

r-H 

rH 

t-h 

rH 

'.  M g> 

R ! o3 

d 1 £^ 

> I >i4J 

a>  I y o 
p:  lOQ  y 

M I 02 
3 ► C3 

««  0^4^= 

•sa  >*1  § 

§ ^ -g  - ^ 
^.SgW  r 

M ^ o 

l4il 


a d 

£ ^ 


rv 

pH-g 

CO  0 

32  a 

<V 

r2 

> 

go 

^ (V 

4-» 

32  >. 

ss 

A.  L. 

.0 

2 

0 

Ray 

Geo. 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

i 

-d 

i 

I 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 

CQ  1 

0 

’n 

‘n 

>. 

1 

pH 

1 

Q?  1 
£ 1 

£ 

d 

d 

0 

1 

S I 

n 

pp 

W 

0 

.S2 

1 

d ' 

6 

6 

0 

03 

Q-i 

6 

'P 

d 

•r  d 

6 

0 

0 

Q 

hM 

Q 

s 

-C 

“ d 

bo 

"y 

d 

Ph 

% 

G 

P4 

6 

Q 

£u) 

P 

O) 

t/2 

fl 

d 

Jessup, 

<D 

Cl? 

oB 

bfl—- 
d d 
22  0 

d 

1 

d 

s bfl 


be  a 
M<3 


C3 

ooS 

d . eS 

K-|o 

a-oS 

Oh^  - 

a S 
g-M-s 
^02^ 

kJ” 

q;> 


CO  CO 

f2  r5 
GO 

d3  y 

.•S+i  Ph 
ti  ^ . 


-'O  'd'd  S 


3 dpH 
S&d 

a4  ® d 

do-® 
O ‘-I 
•dU  3 


3 d d 

Ph  Ah  Ph 


Ph  Pi 


'd 
y y 
to  y 

tH  ^ 


d-= 

go 

O fe 

S o 
oo 

d d 


ti  Ch 

d 3 

PhPh 


a ^ 

S dJ 

o„-  d 
Opo 
to  4,  P 

^ S)Q 

y 33  .33 
4^03: 
d > 


M S 

y t4 
O O 

So  W ; 


CO  y 
to  y 

o Ph 


dO-d 

I d « 

d y ro 
-gSS 
odCD 


o o 
W-M 

CO  y CO 
to  y to 

oPh  o 


d X d 

y '-  ■ 

SS  ' 

O O 


y 

t2  ' 

o ' o 

•d^33  -d 
y to  y to  y 
y y 00  y 
Ph  o Ph  o Ph 

►4  ^4  ^4  >1 

O'aO'ciOto^'d 

- y y y 

X d X d X 

iiTs  £§ 

o o 


“ 

to  ^ 

® aj 

s§§ 

O fq 


o 

«(-( 

33 

y 

PP 

QS 

3 

bfid 

.2-^ 

5 “ 

§ d .2 

oMa 


y Mt 

d ^ d 

g^  d 
PI  m.2 
SOd 

33  tH  P 

PPh 


2182 

2435 

3689 

2339 

1471 

2211 

5106 

1686 

1 4984 

i 

1939 

2176 

1820 

2044 

2043 

2671  ; 

bs7 

3502 

41.51 

4^9 

3358 

2688 

4172 

3254 

5830 

5830 

5830 

6265 

6902 

7033 

7033 

7043 

7868 

4831 

4831 

4997 

4997 

5610 

5610 

5610. 

5610 

.5610 

5610 

5747 

5787 

5787 

6019 

O C3 

§w 


O g 


* Not  tagged  221  1500  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  To  be  used  by  agent 

ft  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  222  500  lbs.  removed  from  sale 

““3®/io  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7251  2235  tons  removed  from  sale  because  of  conflicting  guarantees 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


i6o 


1’S- 


i « fl 
c ^ 

'E  ^9 

a>  3^3 


1 = 


o w 


I If?. 


o (C 


S>-i 

be 


<U 

0)  ^ 
|g 

TO 

9 ^ 

O -W 
I-,  U 
P.  3 
TO  ris 

rt  a ! 

3 i,  i 


■Si 

c:  ^ 5 
= ^9 


“ .-d 
;3  w 
O bX)^ 

99 1 

TO  C 


3 . 


o g 

TO  ;g 


4) 


OJ  d 
TO  (D 

C ft 

2 ft 


1- 
s s 


c 
11 


- C « N 

(1)  TO  <XI 

3 rt  W 
3 fi  3 

Sid  2 ^Q-d  *^90 

•ScJ^wwS'd^'® 

C TO  [0  3 TO  -H 

0)  C — * 3 C 

P O 3 — P o 

J-  ■!->  0)  O 3 +J 

O 4-.  - 3 C 

TO  o S S 3 O 

u wo 


°9  p 

^3  H 

bD^ 

W 


0)  .+i  TO 

TO  “ O 3 

(4  be  2 '“ ' 
^ S .s  ® ° 

<M  lO  tj  3 ?.  S 

^ o 3 if 

'H  M O 3 3 — 


^ “ M -5  3 

TO  TO  3 "3  ^ 

° 3 S 3 

3 3 '2  +s  « 

!=!  g 2 2 « ^ 

3 3 O teO  - 

W W O -< 


rt  S i£ 

Q V-  ^ 

f =1 

fS  ft'^ 


3 (U 
'I'  3 
<1-1  3 M 


•ps 


■3  « g 
’ fe  S H ^ 

' “ ^ -tJ  1 

99  o S 


d^rai 

2 C 


3 'S  4J 
S S ;2  « d 


io 

d d 


w ic  o 

d d d 


5^0 


3 

W 


3 3 

^-.-d  fe 
3 -o 

I'i 


IC  li5  LO 


•d  3 _ fl 

^ OS 

"d  i t-  _- 

29  30  S3 

S|^  &9 

3 4 C 9 "o  >1^  3 3 3 
3 9-3  9 C C 'J'  W W W 
•d  35  c *5  _ '3  ® 

^ 5^9  99  3 • • • 

■ftaS  3 3 p-^cucici 

S^-3CT.a>C5 

'^p. 


N M W 

cc  eo  CO 

^^QQQ^S  TO-f|gp-CQQ 

d'^TOTOTO3'd’;; 


2S 


333 

4->  3 3 3 

9 £ S S 

“5333 

WWW! 


3!  bit  ^ d 3 3 
+j9Sgg'*j333 

S’^i3®3SS££ 

OTO'd3  0 0^33 

o xTiinm 


3 ■*^ 

®.5  3 

■73  3 3 

29® 

r ^ >-i  ^ 

2. 


punoj; 


pa9:^UTj 

-jBno 


'V  +J 

d d 


puno^ 


paatjuB 

-aunr) 


*:ju9o  aad 

9Jn:^SIOI^ 


•Q 

uot^oadsui 


o9 

coO 

^pT 

35  o 

•■p  o 

o« 

^<i 

aJo 


l§;d 

I - o 
I ^ 3 


35  > . 

3 OJ  O 

^ Ai  ^ O 

fl  ^ ^ ,*'"' 

35  ft  31  3J 


I 

-r;  » 

I a 

23  '3 

035  )P5 

3 I 3 

- m m 

§ 3 “5  ^ 

2=3 


. 03  ™ CO 

fe'ft'C'ft 

l>  O c p 

i-j  Ah  '~' Ah  ’ 


ft  3P^ 


O M 

ft  CO  S 

3 d 3 
G 3 p 

.2  a 3 

9^  ft 

3 c o 
O 


LO  O 
!>• 
(M  (M 


Ci  t>  < 

10  i:^  ( 

CO  <M  ' 

CO  I 


I^PUJO 


c ; a 

C3  p ^ 
O)  T3 

29^3 

c» 


1=  r^* 

r-\  ffj  ^ Sh 

G r ft 

0 0 0 

0^0  « 

§ 

W^OQ 

•s2.Sd 

<58  bc=8 

0 ft  « Ai 

A-i 

a 

3 .G  3 

G CO  03  ^ 

0 d3 

-d  03  HJ  3 

0 

u 

CO  Zd  M 

d-ft  d 
og  0 

. a . 

a2  a 

G 3 03  K 

<i5WAO 

ggg 

CO  CO  CO 


0 3.ti 

w 3 

“ .Q 

3 O— I 

O ^3 
.!« 
-^O  ft 

§ S 

O' 


3 3 

9 9 

33 


S S 'S 

3 

3 3 pR 


P P P P 


cd 'd 
3 3 
3 3 


3 3 

OQ 


■3  3 3 
3 3 « 
<15  3 Q 


tH  tir'd 
3 3 X 


2 o 

ooS 


d 

9 1^ 

s 

-Sw 

2 d 

a-s 

30 

coO 


3 'd  d 'd 
3333 
3333 
pR  pR  fe  fR 


0 0 3 3 
oj  cd  cd  ci 

£ £ a a 

3 d 3 P 
3 3 3 3 

0 0 0 3 

W W W W 


d d d d 
3 333 

3 333 

;sH  Ah  Ph  Ah 

d d d d 
d fl  G d 
o 000 

a aaa 

c3  Cl  a c3 

5 pfiS 


10.0 


i6i 


c ^ 

as  « 

1| 

'S 

5 -fci 
«H  © o 

fl  ® 

o "S 

+;» 

O^  4)  05 
Ci 

CO  .S  ^ 

CQ  ^ eg 

P © Q 

CO  S CQ 

cci  cci 

<1)  fi  <D 

s ^ s 


Sl« 

^.5-S 
°S  fi 

iMf- 


- t; 

rt  4)  g 

0)  V S 

S 

i|g 

bo  © ^ 

C S3  fg 

fi 


. rri  H 


d 

S”^  s 

g-9S 

s « 

bo  o iie 

cS3« 


-o 

in  «o  « . © 

oo  rt®.2 

a 


© “ o 

'M  <=>  '^  © -O 

a . '*^  " 

£ il  i-  Cfi  rj  t, 

“ . 

^ ”-g  Q P co'-ji  g 

a '"  - 

© 


bo 


uri-gCt^rtO® 
OO.Sajooaa 
u mu 


m m © rt 

2 «r'^ 

5 -M  ^ 

a^c;  ^ .'O.S 

05  05  'd  ° rg  © " 
CO  to  © ja  g © d 
MM©  C "g 

Q Q C m'^  « “ 
SS°'3-0PO 

0^:2  S) 

s s £ ® ® £ 

os  oj  o o a a o 
m m u O 


“ bi 

9.9 

.^9 

•d 


a ®| 
5 g fi 


0"  W ^ 
. !->  0 
CO  o ;2 
c Jl  9 

£ 

bo  co”  S 
ii  O 


-0^ 

^ lO 


S fH  “ _:  bi)  - 

^ ^ QJ  ^ rH  O 

nd  © M d .g 

■d  © CO  -d  © 3 

S ” d © S g*5 

o oS 
■d 

5 . o o C © CO  © 
rH“M[ScO^Co|2 

Sii  c o.^|d  1 S 

.,-.CflOCOao5>0-..rt 

u o 


bo 


© di; 

2 9 


"1  » 
O 1-1  CO  iH  C^ 

^ +j  ^_)  O 

o3  d oS  c3  S 

" a? 

' . . . . ^ 

. CO  CO  CO  CO 

eg  eg  cq  cq  c^ 


'ti  ft  5Q-  p p Q Q co' 


Pdl 
o o a 
u 


© © © © 
BBBB 


-g  ^ 


a ®< 

.5  a, 

d <5 

bo 

CO 

"^  © 00  ® ' 


lO  lO 
t>» 
05  05 


groi 

molai 

s D ] 

rom  1 

ats,  1 

ses,  s 

U2 

d 

PP 

t/1  w 

c3  ° ^ 

0 

cd  cd 

£1  w a;  >>  - .a 

0)  V 

C 

u 

Q 

BB 

-<  CO  U 

0 

Tfl  CO 

) m lo  CO  o 


CO  CO  CO 


eg  eg 

LO  lA 


T3 

^ s 

ai 

CO  © 


3=8  §-=8  g- 

W*^  S 

w .2  M .S 

a o'§o^ 


i 1 

1 V 

•SS  .52 
00 
ft  0. 

.2 

> 

a 

Tj 

1 *3 

03  SS 

a a 

0 

w 

c 

O' 

5 cd 
iia 

03  2 

*2 

M 

is 

o © 

gcH 


Wo 
W W 

do 


oo-g 

o8«8  d 

t>> 

o o o 
OO  d 
© o ca 


a ® 

a o 

CO  is 

a 

GO  © 

w © 

0(5 

w 


i o'i-S 

idji  H 


^ d -2 

o 


: o s 
ra' 

® 9^=!g  » 

gss  ^1 
Ss'-^lg 

cs 

P^^g.2  5 

. . o JIh  ^ 
Q^J2;0M 


O? 


o 

a ^ 

gs 

o°^ 

O CO 

CO  g 

>.<5  ^ 

'S  G'-g 

^al 

a:  .a  cq 
OP) 


^ OJ  fH 

a>  O 

p 

a © 

.2  d _a 

! 


a o'^ 

>o  ■ 
W P 


CO 
r-*  0 
Cs  i> 
Tti  eg 

3253 

3929 

5225 

2714 

4631 

5216 

3664 

4844 

4876 

2143 

3362 

3495 

3894 

5106 

3277 

00 

GO 

2422 

2225 

3975 

§ 

3200  1 

0 rH 

0 0 
CO  CO 

CO 

0 

CO  CO 

^ CO  ^ 

^ 

i 

10 

1 

0 

CO  eg  0 0 I— 1 

t-  0 

Oi 

10 

0>  Oi 

C5  0 

00 

01 

10 

1 

i>*i> 

i>  i> 

1>  1>» 

J>- 

uo 

ift  in  m in  t- 

CO 

CO  cp 

CO 

GO 

I 1 

1 i 

1 

1 

1 1 

I 1 

i 1 1 
t 1 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 1 1 1 

1 1 1 1 1 

! 

N ! 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Oi  &j 

"^Sgl 

i2  ^ a w 

=3  2, -a 

O d 
tH.2  ©CO 

woS'g 

§ 

a 


g g 
© © 
© © 
WW 


coco 

g g 
© © 
PP 


'g'g' 


^ Ul  ^ 
.2 .2 .2 
222 
'S  'S  ^3 

O O t) 

X XI 


Oi 

I .' 

«S- 
a - 


P g d 
_P  a 
a © 


g g gg 
© © © © 

© © © © 
p P P P 

& b b 

QQPQ  © 

c3  cj  o 
’©  '©  '©  ’©  £ 


a.  - 

a .1 

O ' 

O * 

. • I 

g >5  < 
© P ' 


oS 

. xs 
■ a 


eS 


P **  d 

ft  ft  ft  a®  tH  g o 

CCa2C/2COffl  cS  OS 

( 


CJ<V<V<V<V 

o o o o o 
p p p p p- 


1^5 


So 


.2 .2 
'S'S 


.2'g.©'g©'2 

ft©  ft©  ft© 

03  P 03  P 03  P 
P P P 


J1  tagged.  Labels  furnished  225  igoo  lbs.  removed  from  sale 

2~>4  » ^ conflicting  guai'antees.  Relabeled  No.  8160  2263300  lbs.  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to  mfrs. 

221  Relabeled  No.  7754 


Principal  ingredients  identified 


162 


■g'd  * 

O t-  Z- 

’C  39 

4J  S-d 
•g  Ml  d 

■^+a 

-OS 

g B c8 

Ib^ 

*b-2 
•S  O « 


TJ  (U  (U 

B-B  « 


puno^ 


pa3:juB  j 

-anno  j 


puno^j 


p9^:^u•B 

-anno 


s 

1= 


0,  c 

m 0) 
C <U 


C O 

S 


ill  M 


cj  « 
• 4)  4) 


.<2  5^ 


000 

000 

CO  CD  CD 


X o 
rt  B 
'B 
O 

— Pt 


rt  S 


a B 

W ctf  -w 

cS 
be  O 


Q QObeBQ  QQQ 


w rd  05 

ci  C “ 

05  ii  g 05  4> 

a 2 'd  s 

^ bX)  ^ 

CO  ^ CO 


(D  O 0) 

a a a 

cS  cj  rt 

mmxa 


-d  t'3  0 

o e “ 

(D  g CQ 
W M 


^ Ti 

§1  - 
05 


Pi 

<1>  «i^ 

P W 
^ rt  . 
r5  "3  ^ 


c5  S: 


c y 
ci  B cJ 
--dCO 


w 
y to 

S B 


d o 

, 05  . 

i a £ 

I d o 

W D 


£ d a 

O «5  rt 

u w 


• • —T » ^ ^ 

<=*  ® ijj  M ^ d 

-M  ® 05 a 
d d P M ^ 
U2U}  45 

-a  . £^»-r£ 

cd  I • • o ^ o 

O t>,  CO  C'l  <M  w fs 

^^U^F^COCO^_-W 

^ 5C 
- B Q •« 

“ ° B 

'O  “ ± rt  ,„- 

oyB'Brtd  <2“ 
p,  -*d  ill  C 

-GO^yyOd- 

£=  a c g s^ii £ a 

oodCddS'^*'''’^ 
u m mw> 


iQQ  £ 
, 42 


ao  c 

^ e £ 

X5 


^ rt 

<D  n 
t-  o 


s ft 

s? 

^ Si 

.4i  'li 


d be  d he’s 


00 


m CO  CO 


CO 


•:;u90  aad 
0an:jsioi^ 


O 10 


•a 

uoi:;oaclsui 


o 

ft  - 

y ® 

OO 

Ph  rg 
^ y 

taO  45 

§'^  id 

bfljj  o 

. B 

cqa2  0.2^ 
S 3-^ 

45  . 2c  05  — 

S ft  o ^ 
i-c  W Ph 


n g 
o o 
+^02 
d 

P4lc3 

ra 

o Id 

•P§d 
£«  £ 

^dS 

a rb< 

o d ^ 
+J  ^ o 

d OpH 
P5l  l-s 


>?o 
B o 

a5  d ^ 

be 

d^-9 

05  22 

d iBa 

K*  O 05 

O s 
.21  +J  o o 

^ W ^ -S 


d y 


® b' 

d£S 

5 od 
o!>c  . 

1-0  5-0 


S a 
o> 

€ 

9g 

B ft 

^9 

d O 


05 

qS 


05 

d 

0 

CO 

d 

d 

43 

0 

CO 

0 

CO 

d 

d 

<=8 

43 

« B g 

tl,  d B 
d 02 

B y 1^ 

- 

h-1 


_y  73 
^ B 

B^S 

O y 
45  ^ 

Is 

>>  l>.^^ 

9§Bg 
B2  S 02  O k 


o o 

rH  Ci 
(X)  00 


inpgjO 


CO  ^ 

o o 


<d>  00 


10  10  in  (M 

-Tf  -Ti  (M 

e-  1^  'St 


o m 
Q 

be 

'o  >i.S 

SW> 

P4| 

, O-d 


«2  S Ch  re  'iH 


d « M 


be  be 

ss 


d 

S S 9 

S§  g 

fcU)  bJ]  ^ 

SSd 

05  M 05 


ft  ft  ft 

d d d 

C^«W 


IS 


a 

sa 

w 

w OJ 
C3  c4 

o^ 

so 

03  tzi 
a>  ^ 

’S'S 

ca  CS 
WPh 


.52 

<v 

O 


;ga 

-13 

al 

,-,  B, 
5-1  CO 


1-1,2 
„ B 

>“S 

d'^ 
d 73 
ft  d 

a 

O y 

O “ 

^a 

O) 

c/}  >» 
dS 


fit 

d73 


M ® 

a “ 

O d 

aa 
a B 

o C 

p-'S 


meal,  molasses,  salt  0.5% 


1 63 


^ -S) 


•M  CsJ 

POP  P 


(P  (D  <p  (P 

BBB  a 

cj  c^ 

CO  7i  W CO 


o 

oT  S 

be  s-i 
oj  ni 

C 

ci 

oT 
be 
fl 

a <i> 

(p 

-d  ^ 

S” 

C X 
S d 

c ' 

CP 'd 
<0  d ' 
d : 

Ilf: 

o bC(N 


” i S 
» 

.a  3 “ 

c ^ i5 

<l>  o 

bg^ 

w 

d d 
C23  2:! 

g<a<a 

d 


O 

W o;  ^ 


o cj  aj 
gCOM 


'3 

a d” 


o ^ o O o 
O o o 


<M 

|pp 
«r  S 

g ^ d d 

3*-  a a 

'-'  d s a 

t»£i  o d 

CO  C/2 


c 

-d  !>>^ 
d 

d a 73 

<p  o tc 

a-^  - 

. w 

'd  a 3 


O .3  d cS 

"^;d  aw 

-dS  . 

» —■  !/i  . 

3 S _d  5 

d 4j  d to 

-3  , P 

S ^ 


ag  : 

d . 

'd  o /-I 
3 3 "d 
bfird  3 


d 

a^ 


C£>  CO  C£> 

P PP 

CO  CO  CO 


'in  ft  W 


o;  ^ 0^ 

5 g d 

CO 

p 


(P 

3 a 

d 

CO 


<p 

a 

d d d 

72  CO  72 


a a 


d * .-1  rH 


eg  oq  eg 

PP  P 


w -M  o 
P S 
■d  o 

d‘^  ^ 

CP  ft. 3 

a.&3 

S 0) 

CP  aj 
di  o 
<D  » to 
<p  ^ 

add 


(P  CP 

a a 


tt_i  3 c^/ 

dS-^ 

tH  rH 

d Q Q 

■JJ  <u  w M 

oS 

c 0)  S c 

^ 0)  S £ 

O CO  c?3  03 
O CO  CO 


rH 

(M  CM  (M 


(M  (M  (M 


CO  CO  CO  CO 


6 

» Ig.^ 

§ ig  r . 

w ; do  I 

g ‘-J«8 

S Q CO  S d 
t^  d d 03 

dd}^  tH  g d! 
q; 

a Jh 

ft  03 


a a a 


W ^ 

_M  ts.  di 


o;^  Sir  . 


a a 

a>  (p 


S2 

'<P  'oj 


O M 


ft 

« 

p 

CD 

*3 

a 

p 

H 

Pri 

ft 

> 

k> 

>> 

W CD  ^ 

ft’d  P ^ 
dp  3 


d.a^dS 
3 a-3 
g .3  rS,  d 


O 

O 

d 

o ^ 

3.S 

3d: 

S P 


CJ  33 

^ (P 

. bx) 
O 'd 


o 

O 

^ d 
C -3 
d <3 
o Sh 

P <l> 

a 3) 

d-d 


d Elh  d d S _ 
jJ  d s 33  a ^ 
CO  s ^,a  03  d 

r.- 

a.  O 

P X ^=5  J g’  Ph 
HP  <iJP 


C. 

» 2 
2o 

«xr 

ft  a> 

2-S 

^ a 


2533 

3407 

3702 

4641 

4981 

LO 

CO 

4075 

2634 

4076 

4960 

00 

•0 

2940 

3257 

4112 

Ift 

0 

'tH 

1 

(O 

CO 
10  CD 

o\ 

4114 

4134 

1779 

3047 

3046 

4778 

5423 

CO  CO  CO 

01  (M  (M 

'rtl 

0 

i 

0 

f2 

0 Lft 

CO  0 

00 

I 

CD 

CD 

00 

CD 

I 

1 

r-t  i-q 
iO  l5) 
y—^ 

r-H  i-H 

Ift  10 

0 

Ift 

CP  )0  LO 

Ift  LO  10 

10 

x:^ 

1> 

J:^ 

10 

1> 

10 

■ftd 
ft  o; 

a ^ 
p^ 


ftP 
O 3 

Og 

d§ 

IS 

si 

-cft: 


'O 

<V  <V  QJ 
a>  oj  CD 

p p p 


ppp 
>.>/>» 
a a a 

o o o 

Odd 

o o o 

<p  (p  <p 

P W P 

d d d 
d d d 
d d d 


IP  33 
d3  0^ 
T ^ 

d ijo 
'd  o 

SH 


<p  3 
bo  <p 
3 ft 

g !» 


3X  d 
o +J 
_2  to 
CO 


pp^ 

- (P  d 

<u  35  -d 
P 3^ 

3 gj  (P 
d aj  M 

goo 

§HH 

Q CP  (P  d 
cd  d "/-I 
® .31  .i:i  „ 
a tH  tH  d 

•3  d d «/-i 

d^^:< 

t>X)gr7^ 


P 


P P 
>/  !>> 


PP 


d d 

be  be 
3 3 
COCO 


d o 

d ..X 

0.2  p 
3^P 

o “ o 

td  _ m .d 
be’P  .a  "S 

.agaw 

|.a^>, 

S ri  *-* 

o-ag« 
pO  dfi 

s H 

p 


^df^d^d^d 
c/r.2  »r.2  c«'.2  c«^2 

s^.S7^.a-s.a-s 
w 

0 


0 


!>. 

.2  d 
d o 
fid 
p 


(2  SP 
0 ...0 


d O d O d 

fi  3 fi  d fi 
p p 


a> 

ft  [Xi 

0 

^ dS 

1 1 

2 S 
^ efifi 

1 1 

CU  O) 

o)  a> 

o'"*  " 
'§3?^ 

a 3 
.a  |fi 

0 

d 

p P 
>>>/ 

d"  d 

=3*^  <p  0 

- W CQ 

<v  0 

Kfl  X/l 

s 

d d 

PP 

- d^ 
.S  0 0 

/-»  ft  ^ ^ 
.5  0 0 0 

!h  ^ 

0 0 

d C3  73 

5M§ 

< 

'O  -c 

s 

« “PP 

HP 

0 

d d 
0 0 

0 g d 

P'S  d d 

d d 

dM  a 

be 

a a 

0^-2 
0^  d 

3.g.2.2 

0^  d d 

0 .0 

'd 'd 

s > a 

+^t>  d 

.2 

2 

a a 

d d 

d P 

d fifi 

PP 

1 H 

0 

PM 

P H 

P H 

X- 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  22745^4  tong  removed  from  sale 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


164 


'S 

"C 

PM 


2^ 


T!  ^ 

P 

§■3 


5'S’^ 

0,0  o 


*S  ' 

h 

c a 


. M 
r3  tH 


2i 

p cj  S 

-K  “ 

J W 


(V  d o 
<D  <u  O 


— o 
oj  O •;:: 
a) P 

O <U 
ttl  _ ^ 


^"O 
d o 

<D  O 

B 3 
■c 

o) 

(u .-. 

to  C 

•S  ^ 

^ -d 

. 1* 

h 

0 'O 

B r 


'O  c 

<U  <U 

c 

2 c 
3g 

Oc 


» 


« ^-0 
3 

.2  ^ ^ ^ 

B bJD  ® o .0 

« o 5^  — 

rrt  O 4-)  ^d 

mS  g dS 
3 s “ P 

o 

^ d d 3 

<1)  (P  <y  a; 

S 0 0 M r 


d 

to 

C ^ 
i m 

s 

- <p 

ll“ 


c3 

0)  (l> 

0)  ^ 
d d 
CO  4) 

X P 

d C 

«C 


” J3 

3 “ . 

B ^ 

_,  ce 
"0  0 0 
O O 
<v  o ^ 
W o Zh 


z:  d 

n c d 
ui 


QQQ 


4)  0)  OJ 

0 0 0 


3 2 

<D  c — 00  oi 

d o t-  t- 

%) 

^4  o Q Q 

a-d  r 


SSESSiiSi 

O)  M CO 


-d'O 
d o 

d 4J 
d “ 
0 X 
d 

TJ  C 
4) 


o 


X 


d d d *0 
o <D  o "C 

0 0c  S 

-3  C bfl'5 
d d O ^ 
p 4)  -d  a 


CO 

0 0 

00 

0 

meal 

grail 

^ V — 

^•2  fnS 

<M  iO 

- - .0  >, 

-M  4_» 

-M 

5 

C H ,_  — . 

<D  i -d  a 

.02  02 

d 

U2 

S g 

•“  0 

Li 

a g3| 
be  - 0 2 

fci 

Vi,  C 

<u  bfl'd 

fe-d  J 

d-d  £: 
C 4)  O 
4)  (-,  w 

P14 


- ~ a 
.-00 

^ d^-'^ 

2 rrt  ^ 

2oif 

o 3 ' 
u 


41  . 


puno^ 


(M 


00 


^Ph 


p99:iUB 

-JBno 


puno^j 


P99:^UB 

-jBno 


•q^u99  a9ci 
9an:isto]/^ 


•a 

uoi:j09dsui 


I«PWO 


=3 


T3 

a< 


cc 


a o; 


a a .SS  -a 

•d  p to  p:  „ to 

§ a'g  “ §5 

d Es  5 d CO 

d:  <u  s-(  o di  a 

o;2i  o;?;  oX3 

>-i  ^ dsH 


CJ  Ol 

5t> 

> rH 


4 

.Spq 


fit: 

cu 


S! 

^ §§! 


^ C<I  (M 
Jt>-  !>• 
o CO  o 


n 3 

0"'| 
o a 
o •=  d 
=:a2.2 


93o 


._.'X2 

3 B 

A o 
O 


d d 

<U  CD 


Cj  d 


■'O  c 


^ E,2 

G ra  a 

d <^.Si 
"C’O 

S E£ 
<5 


S a 

0 CO 


O)  q; 


d d 

00 


ZJ  o 

a a 

COM 


'^aid 

^-IQ 
53  d CO 

O d^ 

aJ  p o 

a aS 
a:52 

3 w 
w 


a a> 

a § 

O o-< 

^ 3 
-o  O 

fi  al 

«is 

0^0 


•2  03 


B ^6 

O)  dJ  ^ 

«ia 

afi.a 


d d 

S3 


1 65 


* Not  tagged  ft  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

t Before  registration  228  goo  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7845 

♦ Not  registered  229  loo  lbs.  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to  mfrs. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


i66 


Is 

V 

Its 

c ^ 

I §9 

I I p C3 

1 1^1 

3 2 

.2  ®5  fl  p-H 

*2  S 


tH 

fi  ft 


<u.S  c 

T3  m (U 

^2“ 

“»<S. 


puno^ 


4) 

s 

-a  oj 

O) 

0)  d) 

£w 

o 

o ^ 

► ^ 
w a; 

c S 
'C  S 

C 9)' 

u OJ 
XI  g 1 

a -a  , 

OJ  (1)  , 

43  <D  1 


fi 

m aj 


0)  0) 

S§ 


« ri  S a 

^S'^S-5 

;«!  g o c 

y 

'C  a ra 

g m*  (U 

2 - ^ . 
C bo  a £3 
a c o <1^ 
4)  . y a 

■“9  a g ^ 

as  y w 
to  •-'  a 

ga^i| 

° s ? “ 

- ^ y ^ 2 

M tp  ■“  ■a  o 
c*. 


y s c 9 *. 

M 4h  a 43  a 41  ■— 

y S S ft  C 

fc 


■ g a » ^ 


■ a 
g 42 


y -rt 


C (-■ 

fn  2 '-'  y 
. . — * a 


! -^  y ® 
) ^ c fl 
; y o o 

P y 

-„--2S 

; a to  « 
ta 

CO  a 

4^  ft  a 

a a 

ogg 

. CD  p 


33 

ss 

22 


” 2 “ 
S ° S 

o 42 

" .'a 
.r42  9. 


Z a 

St  02 


y§ 

.2  c 

e,2 


^ 2. 
g 2 


<M 

'd 
c 9 


^ o 

W2 

■d 

O'  ^ 

^ d 
o 

ci  ^ 


a 2 
^2 
a 


y 


?:  y ft 

aS«  a 

t -so 

•22  » a 

■a  a a r .g  t;  M « 

C ^ rri  dt)  2 

^ O ^ 

3si  y a ^ , 
y T y a 
g g 

j-  y 'C  be  t;  Q , 

g a a a 

o o Jp  a o ® - 

y 42  y C ft  y 

fc 


; 'O  ® 4; 
j -c  4j;c  Q 

■j2  2-gb.s 

. ■ - ^-  ® a 
> :*  5 a 4J  y o 
* ra  a y *,4  ^ y 
g t-  g o 
42  g St  y 


43  O '- 

gyft 


T C d ^ 
I?  oJ  ^ o 

a-S 

•2 

33  - 
2 ^ a 

^ I ” g 

a ^ a a 

2 y 2 2 

a y +4 

||iJ 

<1 


y y 

g ” 


of  a 
be  y 
a £ 


■a  33  ■ 

g-E- 


M Q 

O M 


t-s-yt- 
^ O y ^ O 

^ y to  - 


s g 

W a 
02 


CO 


pa3:juT3 

-jBno 


puno^ 


p^^:^UB 

-aeno 


•:;U9D  jad 
^ant^SIOI^ 


a CO 

Mo 

r!S  ft 


O 1 

1 

33 

a 

^ 1 
ft  I 

S'  1 

O 

;h 

O 

d 

Q 

3 

02  1 

pin 

C3 

OJ 

a 

o8 

rr- 

g a 

y 

tD 

44  O 

C3 

a 

g 

pq  S 

Q 

C« 

Q2  ^ 

[H 

C.'B 

g 

•a 

uoiioadsui 


I^PUJO 


a ro 
ft  a >> 

li“ 

cj  lS  w 
O 9.  2 


03 

a W 

« 


>, 

o 

g 

a CD 

Ph  a 

— S 


a p tn 

O a^ 

,44  ^ 

33  y o 

p 44  <w 

£,  343 

■' 


03  y 

: a 

S 


m 


|n  ' 

1-4  • 

gft  ^ 

§ 

w • a; 

opS 

<V 

ag 

O 33 

o 6s 

3^Ah 

tuo 

bo 

W 

S g 

mao 

42 

g 

0 

tD  y ^ 

O y ,-( 

r/j  K 

y 

-o-^O 

0 

•CO  2 

g s 

^ r-!  QJ 

!§  G? 

42 

5 

5533 

9 p 

33 

y 

M 

o 

Q 

p 

167 


* Not  tagged  ^ ton  returned  to  mfrs. 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


Principal  ingredients  identified 


i68 


(D  O fi 

a 'O 

OJ  o ^ 


"S’®  5 

2 4''S 

s^i 

•2 

a Prs 


5>£i  2 


c -a  iz: 

fi  (D  <V 

O (U  r| 

^ t-i 
rt  0^ 

s ^ 

^ o 

4-»  ci 

- 


^ ® 2 


A 

- CO 
-1.(1)^ 
00^ 


8-®^ 
cc'q^ 
2 S V 
5 cfi 
V 

u 

a ^ 


>,Cd- 

<D  4_) 

'C  “ 

^.S  “ 
m ^ 3 

gg®. 

-M  fe  O 
sJ'  . (B  ^ ^ 

C C S'?  . rt  2 

CS  Ci!  X3  ^ M (B  -C! 

-S  s 

>“  <u  +s  C 

_ C C 

^ cj  ^ ^ ® 

^ a ® 


— . to 

-d  s-  ft 

« OJ 
■«  d 
H ^ M 


<B  rt 
<B  (B 

^ a 

c ^ 

§ s 
a 


C d 

^ (B 

s ^ 

•d 

a 


c •::: 


m 


><13  C 
' ^^  - 


M 


'd 

3 .a  s o 

o — ■ d o 

t.  -d  a a bt  2 ;o 

O O 


3 « .a 


^ r1 

?:  S 


■sa 


C 3 
d — 

;h 

£! 


>>73 
3 C 

ao 


-d  ^- 

^ <B 


3 +j  <p 

d 3 u 
!h  ,— . y 

.3  b£  OH 


:?  3 ^ 


- 

* c 
C 


® rri 

'd  • CO 
- <B  ’-'  (N 
3 IB 

IIS« 

— w w 

. - ^ 


i:;  bD  1 
d ^ ' 


a ft  s: 


O ft  <B 

y da 


rrt 

^ Si 

3 a 


'ss  = 


o a 

u d 


0 P 


a a 

d d 
73  CQ 


d 

3 a ^ 

^ ^'5 

^ <d , 


■iS 


1 to  d -d 

I biD  O <D 

i.a-.^ 


gBZ 

a. 


118 

m 


puno^ 


eo 


p39:;UB 

-anno 


puno^ 


p^^:^un 

-anno 


■ is 

I'd  g 

^a2 

b073  . 

2 

•ft|2 

d 15  w 

-d  c 0 

5=2 

B 


B d g 

^*73 
d d o 
<B  <B  O 

I'" 


•:>uaD  jad 
aan:»sioi^ 


2 “ ^ 
^ O 73 

‘>*.2 


•a 

uoi:;aad8ui 


IBPSJO 


g:^  g 


o 

>■ 

a « 

C3 

ft 

a o 

O O 
^ m73 
^ 03  C3 


61^ 


IB  d 

33  ^ 

0 2 

«ft 

G K« 

' 

^ CO  ^ . «2 

0 'p  ^ 

"2  o'-^s 

2 tU)^ 
GC  g.O 

.25  •- 

G ^ 

buo 

ftP 

.^0  2 

C/i  [tJ 

CO 

d ft 

2 ^ 

0 

ft 

ft 

P5  m'|rH 

•.  ^3  O ^ 

|3gi 


- >>—  — 
,2  3^  d 
33  C3  O O 

a ^ 

^ d ^ 

2 o-g,c 

.So  go 

3 
(k 


ft  '3 

a o 

Oft  ft 

o5 

Ui 

M - IB 

O’® 

d bo  IB 
Odd 

^.2  a 

feft  3 
ft  OJ=l 

d d 
33  C» 

a 


ft 

a 

o 

06 
dg 
3 , 

'5  •” 

ft  o 
3^ 


3: 

33 

is 

'd 

73“ 

73“ 

IB 

IB 

IB 

ft 

ft 

ft 

fH 

>1 

fH 

-d 

d 

-d 

ts 

i= 

is 

0 

0 

0 

33 

33 

33 

0 

0 

Q 

3 

3 

3 

ft 

ft 

ft 

O o 

d 2 
q c3 
» ’r  -G 

(go 

ft 


q cc  n G q G 

*r^  »G  *1^  pG  pG 

sO  3O  sO 

ft  ft  ft 


1- 
ft  >> 


IS 

Ml 

^ ft 

f-,  U1 
G 

M-T 


a>  a> 

2" 

•Sco 


a 

IB 

M 

d - 
bflft 

™ 2 
O d 
y ft 

^ >> 

>>^ 
IB  33 

ft  5 
d 9 

dft 

c» 


o a 
08  oTiJ 


g^ft 
^.2  3 
3^.2 
Opl  3 
3 O 

o 


169 


**  Not  registered  , 230  900  lbs.  removed  from  sale 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


li 

0) 

"S-O  * 

a«i 

I si 

4)  P'S 

^ Mei 


¥ 


« 

u 

a ft 


"S 

^ M 

o 

p <u 
. >> 


^ u 

s " 


« 

^ a< 
. t>a 


IS 


o o 
o 


--d 

O (U 

a” 


. p 
g 3 
*1  w 


CO)" 

-m"  o ® 
rt  tC  -t; 

a a ^ 

gs« 


a 5 

5 ^ M 


c .7: 

w C 


C fl 

L. 
O O 
a cj 


£ = 


r V ^ 


c 

p 'CJ 
X ® 


o 


fl 


: c X 
rt 

^ fcn  rH 
: « o 

*.  E: 

-o  c o ^ 

lo^Q 


e 


5c^ 


l«°’S 

Isll 

P c 

^ p;  ® 

O <1"73 

4J-  ® .rt 

^ 02  m 
p:  ~ O 
fi  d C 
(1) 

W ^ O) 

iS" *3^ 

d s s 


g di  ^ ® 

x* 

® -C 

c “ c 

o ^ ° • 

S <u  y "d 


TO  W 

O C <D 


I S) 

O c 

“c 

*J  02 

d y 

(I)  y 

£ 

"T  M 


i® 


'5 


d d 
o <v 


- o C 

« c'^  d 
M 35  ^ 

W CO 

3-0  c 


d "g  P P W (12 

<y  a 5 ti  p 

^ 3 P J2  P P 

r e o rt 

t>  t>  OJ 


p-^ 
iJ.S  p 
■d  y y 


puno^ 


1—  <M 


TJi  O 


paac^uB 

-jBno 


punoj 


paa:>uB 

-jBno 


CO  CO  CO  CO 


•:;uaD  aad 
^Jn:^slox^ 


a a 

a p 


1?  a> 


1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 
i 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

6 

o 

a 

1 1 
>-.  >> 
G a 
cd  c3 

.5 

a> 

t-i 

‘n 

C3 

<< 

'0 

w 

' ^ ^ 

cc 

1 cc 

1 

( a 

i CC 

1 ;- 

, <D  O? 

i !zi!2; 

a 

(D  a 

;h 

1 q; 

1 ;i 

1 0^ 

1 «i-r«4-r 

cc 

1 n 

> 

1 p p 

C3  > 

-C 

; 5 

o c 

c3  c: 

1 c 

i cc 

) c. 

[ ct 

I o5 

oa 

(D  > 

i X! 

; o 

p 

! p 

i £ 

! E 

i oo 

gw  ea 

B-i  i-s 

p 

1 p 

! F 

; c: 

! S 

! c: 

1 ^ 

I WM 

^ § 


•a 

uopaadsui 


in  CO 

rH  i-H 

ir^  m 


CO  CO 


a ! 

o 1 

'2'g  : 

(12  P 
P^l-ld 

1 

1 

1 

1 

■rJ 

S’  ' ' 

3 1 1 

P 1 1 

S'  ' ! 

S '2  ' 

O g^ 

ft  d 

02-  ^ 

£ 33 

H . y 

“'a  ta 

n 5 
o « 

O d 

bfl  y 

.9  ^ 

ft  ft 

c3  1 

a » 

^ -- 
P'S 

^ a> 

. G 

1 

1 

ra 

<V 

<V 

G 

J-i  ■ 
pd 

o g 

aw 

-ft 
Ah  y 

» y 

^ S n 

<V 

zz  ar^2  ^ 

P H y 

P «cc 
ftft  ^ 

w G M 

G h- ( O 

•* 

C 

0^ 

y 2 

S y 
Occ 

3 g-g 

G 

<u 

S 33  O 5 

g tuo.s 

a 

mO 

O 

cc^ 

g qM 

!>  P 

w 

„>wo 

y p 

o 3-2 

Oftf?^ 

'^ft 

«3 

d p 

y a 

w 

d 

a> 

« 

ft  (3  y y 

'P§§ 

u O 

•ilg 

^ o 
zz  ^ 

O tH 

t ^ 

"o 

(H 

G 

y S 

w a 

i 

§ «W 

•g  o 

p Cl 

pO 

o 

ftp 

n 

W 

w 

W 

o 

Q 

g g ^ s 


<M  <M  O O 

T—i  1-1  -rti 

r^  1-1 

LO  LO  O o 


_•  "S  d 
, ^ 


ft 

a < 
oS 
O . 

rr.  “ -Si  3 

13 

o o 

O +3  ^ 

PCC  p p 

o ^ ^ 

o 


^02  >> 
Qi  P'l.ti 
PQ 

So 


y 


cc  O 

>>  >. 

—>  -i2> 

o o 

^ iH 

p p 


cc  cc  02  cc 


I7I 


t Before  registration  % ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  5600 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


172 


S a 

S 

c ^ 

III 

sees 

- ® * 

C c CS 


a oi® 
•s  « ^ 


.2  fir 

5*' 

4-  aj 

h 

e ft 


<0.5  c 

TJ  OJ  0) 

3-^0 


puno^ 


s'® 

“S 

“i 


^2 


O*^ 

5 

cd 

X 


^ £ ri 

5 o 

4i  •** 

S-o  ^ 


cj  y 
O 


*J- 

. y 


u ft 
fe-S  S 

P 'D  y 


'3  ^ w 


y 

iS 

'O  cj 

y 

y 

* . 
'd  tc 


cs  y cs 


C y . 
U y y 
O W ® 

".S 


y fi 
. s 

y ® 

^fr-CS  ^ M 


*-  tb 

"5  M 

Clj  rrt  TO  M 


o ^s 


15^  ^ 5 


d)  c.)  (D  ■♦-’ 

4:1  3 ^ ^ 


^ .3  y 

.s » 

3 's 

X c^ 
3 ^ c ^ 

s-sisQ 

w 3 y TO 
3 d y 

® .t:  ® 5 3 

3:  > .3  5 fi 

^ ^ s 


o 

s'® 

si 

§ 
3 I 


^*0 

c 


O .3 


3 '6 


yS 

to  ^ 

a 

t->  y 
|2 
O .M 

c o 

3 S 

S^ 

" y 

® s 

3-0 

.3  B 


3"^ 
5 ® 
o s 
«.o 


3 CC 
y cS 
M 


32 


.A. 

3 w 

3! 


3 ? 

iT  3 3 CO  eo 

TO<  ” IQ  to  CM  CO 

y 3 «o  to 
C 3<C  ^ ^'coco 
3 3 ’TO  o ci  ^ ^ 

oo|yyQQ 
® 'f  to  to 

aJ-a-tS  a-T  P 3 3 

S S 5 C 3 

r*  r*  O P E S 

> w w 


00 


03  !3 


II 


toW 


X 


pa9:^u’B 

-jBnf) 


punoj 


p^^::^u•B 

® -a^no 


CO  CO  CO  CO 


CO  CM  CM  CO  CM 


•;uao  aad 

^an:^SIOI^ 


33  33 

TO  00 

W =3=3 

r N N 

K 33  "3 

o 2 9 

u 33  33 

fO  y ^ 

^ CCM 


3 3 
TO  TO 


r 6 

5^ 


.^30 
o 'O 
33  33  3 

o [TO  y 

02  yW 

TO 

^335 

g 3 O 
® 002 
PM  02 


O 3 


3.S 


3 y y 

"9 

go  o 

g 3 3 

33  y y 

o d d 

00  O' 


TO  TO 

00 


2S 

o§ 


O O 

00 


=3  =8=3 

IQ  IQ  IQ 

3 3 3 

o 00 

d do 


•a 

uoi^oadsuj 


lePHJO 


S JO  JO 

S CO  CO 


sss 


Ci 
CO 
LO 
CO  CO 


CO  CO  CO  CO 


§ g 


o 

o 

WiQ 
« y 
s Pn 

.3:  y 

o2 

1-1  y 

d: 

li  A-> 

pq  CO 

=3^ 

y ^ 
20- 
W 


a 3 

»«aa 

^.25 

SoS 


33  X 

0.9 

yg 

CO  ^ 

0.9 

OpH 

3535 

a 9 

o o 

00 

IQ  X3 

CD  CL> 

P«Pci 


.9  02 


.90 

^ iJX) 

“o  .9 
3 g 
■o  9 

« o 

OS 


I £ 
1 "■ 


3 3 

O*  O' 

05,  02 

'O  -o 
3 3 

3 3 

o 
PM 


o 

3 

« o 

M Ph 


p^02 


Ph  '5 


TO02 


§ .0 

ft  03- 

as  " 

00  TO 

^.3-^ 

ft  - 


.3  32 

^03 

^.9  3 

tJ]0  o 
y ^ 

Ph 


pqm 

<< 

Od'g'g 

aS  TO  TO 

>>  XSTi 

TO  ^Tto  § 

a|®“ 

0^-0 -o 

OS  y y 

OJ  OJ 


>1  O o y 

'§!»52 

TO  00 

o 


pH  Ph 

>»■>>>> 


3 3 
o o 
PM  PM 

-O  TJ 
3 3 
TO  TO 


-a  IQ 


3 TO  TO  £ 

02  ^02  -TO  W 

O 


. >> 
y ca 

9^  3 
O 

“PM 


«3! 

® a 

s p 

o 


Winchester,  Ind, 


173 


I® 

-d  fl 

4)  «r  cs 

aj  -u  o 
w d 
0)  ° fci 

C * S'® 

a 

^ & 2 

1||E 
“ +? 
^ (h  ® 

Cc  u fi 
ra  <u 

_ O 4> 

C C'5  ® 

O O 3 53 
U O to  g 


XJ 

o <u 

g d 

,5“  t7 

^ C 

^ ^0) 
d) 

£«  = " 

u « 8 j 

s|s| 

<D  J 0)  C 


Peg  *7 

O fl  4) 

•^-a  ^ 
to'il'g 

■;;;<  ® 3 

(B  OJ  <U 


^ 5 ^ 

-fe  - 

3 c « • 
^ a^ 
.32  . 
3 C 

' ;h 

o 


33  C 

0)  Sh 

_ 43  O „ 

O 3 o m 4) 

0^0 


'•V 

r (^  TO 

o ^ ^ 


c3  ^ c3  > 


(1)  O) 

1“ 


c & 

S ej  hj) 

3 3 3 
“'“3 


"S  " 

ta  2 G -3 

3 2 3 ^ Tt. 
^ ^ ^ ^ 
C a a 

O o O i Q 

43  O y “3 

CO 

- . . y 3 

+-!  -M  +j  0) 

> o 


■ I V <n 

S «s  “ 

3.2  y 43 

^ J fQ 

y 

® 43 

1 £ 

° “ ®-d 

- 3 ® "“  -a 

2 43  y 

•«  G 3?  43 

3 y ® -M 

G "3  a — 


;3j 

y 

3 

to  'O 
43  ® 
y G 
P.2 


y to 


w u ® 

.Sift 
£.S2y 
^ f 

^ t.  43  a 
« SJ  bcG  y 

2-07:  - - 


CR  H 


<V  o <D 
.Cl  G G 


o a 


3 5 


2 y S ^ 

i*  3 

y " ® ^ O 

£"5^  .til  = £ 

0 C -g  *.  o 

® 5 C3 

® a - 

3 ® ^-> 

3 y a ta  t;3  43 

y G o 51  ® 


3 

3 Q 


SS 

y 3 

m 


>H  y (m 
O y o 
y to  y 


‘2  y 

3 y 
ao 

t-*  ft 

« c 

s 

-^.3 

PG 

3 


G-  a*7  3 
3 3 3 y 
y y 2 G 


" ” S’  y 

g y 3 a 

o ^ «.9 

- o H 

«3®  . 
a ^ ^ • 

riiJ  „ 

c ■^■'  2 ■ ’ ■ ' 

to  to 
. P 3 3 


— in  CO 
2 03  ca 


” y y 

a"S  S 

— 3 3 

W rn 


10  10  10 


00  G C30 


a 

3 

pq 

tiZ 

tH 

3 

G 

3 

y tH 
2 ® 
PG 
y Eh 
3 

1^ 


« o 
®o 

to  'G 


■<0 
“'O  O 

'ESm 


G O 
O 3^ 


3 3 3 
3 3 3 
3 3 3 


f « i I 
1^=^  1 1 
la  1 f 
rs  I 1 

I 

1 

3-0  w ) 

O g 2 ' 

^ pH  +J  CO 

^ y 2 S 

g'So  a 

.2  « y— 

y 

DO 


'si 


a p 
3 


4062 

4068 

4366 

3792 

3145 

3144 

4838 

2975 

1766 

4137 

1764 

4136 

2075 

0 

05 

Cl 

CO 

1949 

2443 

3264 

4616 

<ib 

05 

3263 

4579 

2163 

4405 

4406 

0 CO 

<M  CO 

CO  CO  00 

CO 

1 

LO  10 

rH  I-H 

^ 0 

i>.I^ 

CO 

o^ 

g S 

10  J>* 

10 

10 

0000^ 

CD  CD  05 

10  10  0 

i 

i 

Cl  d 
CQ  Cl 

0 

CO 

0 

CO 

CO 

<M  (M 

M M 

0 

ia  W .id 


7^0 
■p  o 
Oi^; 

5g 


t>0;» 

*£33 

2oo 


'O  . h2 
P 

o ® -S 

D fcujD  a 


to  G y -o 
yO  c3  2 
3 0« 


^ G 
^ o 

^ 3 

I . O 

o'~'  ^ 

'Sg  aS 

.S  <V 

2^^  o 

-go  o^ 

3 O 

W 


r &fl 


3 
G 

ft  ' ' O 

I i,  D 

O'!  ft  ft£5 

3 o o ™ 
.3  G t>  >■  • 

-rr.  ^ l>pq 


'S  S. 


3 CC 

w 


lOQ^ 
I W M ' 


'DDEh 


W 3 

QJ 

l-'S 
a o £ 

O o y 
Ot^Oi 
y s-i 
08  Gy 
y 'Sw 

l^§ 

o W 

w 


3 D 
ft  • ^ 

§^9 
o .0 

^ y Q. 

tao+j 

55” 

1^0 

y .Q 
3 r;  P> 

3 y *-i 
-d 


O'O 

o o 
o o 
DD 


>>  G G 

SgP>^ 

3 G 

ft  3 -d  -d 
2'“'  a P 
o M 2 £ 

“ ^ a a 

go  p 3 
.2^§§ 


O G 
O O 
o o 
DD 


O ^3 
3 3 
3 3 

Wffl 


3 3 
y y 

a a 

3 3 
3 3 
o o 


3 3 
Qi-H  3 
O -O 
y y 

.Q-g-Sf 

s Sd 

“ y.2 

« £ O 

3 y o 
.SEhm 
-o  ^ 

3 t~ 


t Before  registration  232  ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7807 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


174 


T3 

O 

S 

'•M 

§ 

CO 

% 

c 

3 

'C 

.S 


X 3 


s|i 

1 fl  « 

c ^ <y 

« % 

2 S'? 

!e  4*  ^ 

* Hi 

c a 


in  i 


-a  « 

a M C 2 

d « 4s; 

Q c» 

0^  i o 
cc  > 

S&jK 

- 5 i*  C 0) 

c 3 r z: 

- “ 0)  S •- 

S^.jSs 

-M  cc  -J*  : 
d 0)  i rt  w 


•S  o 


, - OJ 

SI 

^ - 

c 

o <1^ 

o w 


a a 43 

JS 

CZ  o 
P 3 
. fcc^ 


::;-  c w 
‘5  ^ d 


a r 


= C 
3 OS-O 

O 4)  S 1'  ' 

a !!  5C  ” 

^ S22 

2- 5 «' 

“ o 

4s;  pg  p 4,  S 
I*  C!  43  2 


rt  -3 
0)  O' 
^ OJ 


d d 
a>  0) 
43  43 


U tH 
tC  <V 

^ I 


£ 3 
o w 


ci  o 


o g g ^ 

o ^ ^ ^ 

a 


3^3 

OI  4)  QJ 

43  -s  a 


• . c -s 

s-  a 4, 

'5  Js« 

3 3 •»< 

^ "'“I 
:i!:i 


•k 

y 

3 • 


o '2 

. w 3 
■3  '3  y . 
3 (U  -» 

3 y ^ 3 o 

> 5 o - 


o 4,  . ^ 

S3"i-ja^'33';: 


:=g«e 


^ SM  4)  45  , 

3 o*-e 
Oi  P- 


®.a  c 

'tJ  a>  o 
-g  « 
r*3  Jh  S-l 

'^(a  g, 


pnno^ 


O l-H 


poa^uB 

-JBno 


n3  +3 
3 3 
s-i 


puno^ 


paa5,uB 

-JBno 


*:iuaD  aacJ 
Dan:^stox^ 


•a 

uot^oadguj 


a>  a; 

Jh  Sh 


^ n 

P P 

I?  o ^ o 

O Q ^ 
CO  CO 
03  <1^  CO  ^ ' 

c3  ;h  C53 


O i>  LO 

o o t^ 

10  (M  CO 


00  O 

s § 


8 § 


l^PUJO 


o 00 
o 

LO  CO 
O I- 


S 3 


d - 

t-,a^ 

3 -_ 
cc  w a 

«l§ 

o 2*13 
O S 3 
a d 3 
3 d 

ea- 

5'^  c 


i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

d 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

y 

tU 

1 

1 

1 

•M 

d 

ines,  Ind. 
itch  Feed 

0 

a 

1-1 

3^ 

P 0 

t-H  q; 

-Ph 

g>s 

d ^ 

CO 

C3 

3 

bC 

n:; 

<v 

0 

0 

5, 

J,  No  Gri 

3,  No  Gri 

i t: 

• Oi 

1 A- 

J 

2 

0 

S' 

0 

y 

01 

o 

bjO  d 'o 

^ 3 

IPS 

o2 


34=  p-  3 


jw 


C5 

3 

d ^ a 
S 


gM 

-a  . 
SO 


o 

TJ 

.S  a?  OP 

4=  4= 

4^  o o 

qj  4J  4-i 

OJ  03  C« 
_r^  Sh  Sh 

^ (y  cy 


P 

d'fS 

I'o 

o bji 
bfl.S 
d = 

53 

^ -u 
4J  O? 

^ r2 
.2^  M 
M 


&j 

p ^ 

'S 

a 

O-^O 

0, 

c SS=i 

S'^a” 

agg.f 

flj  <—•  Sh 

“PP  SO 

2 W 
M 


a 2,  =3 

eii  03 

^.s  S 

dlsi  a 
d p^  y 

”§  W 

M 


”§  i-s 

2 o' 

y a 

02  CC 

d '=52 


W a 

1-^ 


TZ 

d 4s; 


SO  O 


o d 


Waseo  Chick  Feed I 5051 


John  D.,  LaFayette,  Ind, 


175 


«•<  W 

t-T 

tc  tn 

<D 


^ 03 

« Ci)  ^ 

isj'S 

:^l| 

■M  !2 

'"|o 

01  o 

^ 01 
^ ^:S 

. 

c'5 


'S  “ 

0.)  -4-) 


^ o 


- - ^ 

-43 

fl 

2 S 

"^iS 

<B  O 

T a 


■«  S 


C ^ 

sjs'gg^ 

.+s  - Sh 

ti  (D  ti  « p 


.0 

d 

3 'U 


« § c 


^ o 
o . 


Si  00 


^ Sh  Q 

o S 
« ^ » 
- o ^ 

ri  '2  (u 

^ xn 


^ a 

U CS 

a b 
^ 08 

m S 


a a 

a© 


;s)  o 

u 
a S 


cj  a)  'O 
(1)  ^ © 


^ 3 
O be 


© s 3 
"S 

cQ  4^  a 

.M  © 

feoS 

^ -M 

o • © 

c 33  a 
a u 
3 be  « 

“ ©■© 
tC  4J 

a S oi 

a 5 


o 

O (N 


ad 

TO 

© c8  ■ 


r © 

© c8  -tj 

,305 
■- . © a 


tc  a 
d ^ 
3^!  « 


1 = 


a © 


©*.'2 

1 

2 -a  '3 
-^d  JS 

M 34  © -M 
^ y © a 

a a m a 

t^si 

Sl|3. 

SEE? 

->:S® 

C C ® 

ssi^ 

a a . 

o o 5'3 
« U © « 

. “ s 

a a ^ a 

O ^ >-<  ^ 

^ a; 


> ■“ 

^ 2 

1 

. . a 

>>  2 g 

I-  O 

2 .-a 
— >>  y 
.a  © 

° g ■nd 

.«  j d © 
g d a:  p 
. ^ “ 
iJ-  w t. 


c . 

d 'd 


c © 

■u  a ^ 

© -^  o 
© c 

rrt  •'^ 


CO  CO  CO 


CO  W 
^ tH 
q;  qj) 

US 


^ a 
a fl 

c3  c3 
§§ 


CO  OJ 

$H  ^ 

^ <u 
:::3  ^3 


03 


G 
!^  © 
OJG  M 
ca  '>r2 


£3  S 

CO  CO 


■rs 

-a  S 

© tVj 
y 

^ Si 


O 

— ® 


■S-  d 

G ft 


© 

. O ® 

■r)  oPh 


t>.  ® d 

!h  G y 

G.Si 
r © 3a 
gMo 

«l§ 

Q .2 .2 
©«« 


S --a 
o S-£^ 

O G rt 

eg  £ ® 
y 03 

^.S  K 
O 03 


r-  © 
G © 

S 

Oy 


>>  © 


0 

-M 

G 

« O 

© g: 
G 33 

C3  .9 
ft  « 

9 o 
6^X3 

£ 


ft 

9 

o 

O . 


•a 

S a .© 


ft  ft 

i >> 

o . 

0-0  33 

i"i 

cc  ® 

^ G3  GJ 


ft 

9 

O 

o 

he'd 


2 «3  © 

G c ® 

ftftO 

g*^g: 

??  > a 

.S2  m G 
^ rl  tH 

-o  ti  0 0 
dftft 

G d 3 
03  >-0 

;9  ^ 2 

<3  © G 

m S 

0 3;  © y 

9^2 

U ^ y 

oM=£ 

« PM 

1 c» 

2 W 

d 00 

0 

ft 

O 

•i  -o 
„ o 
>.  o 
G ft 
G . 
ft  O rl^l  . 

9S-~ 

o_^o 

-or'* 

“ S'* 

'C  22-2 
^ o ft 
« ft 
ftW-r^ 


ft 

>, 

>i 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

0 

G 

d 

-0 

ft 

ft 

-d 

'O 

G 

d 

9 

0 

0 

Ph 

,a 

0 

© 

© 

ft 

ft 

bo 

a 

03 

© 

* Not  tagged  232a  ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  8090 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  232b  is/g^  ton  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  6534 

t Before  registration 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


176 


Is'S  * 

^ ^ M 

s^i 

e ^ 

-2 

C ^ s 

4i  Srs 
^ iteS 

® 2 

c c « 

® S-S 
®—  2 
CJ  ® 

■**  « 
« c-2 


c a 


Uj  m 


CD  ^ 
<P  0) 
^ 0) 


« a 

-i4 

c s 

o P o 

y o 

CO 

•M  ^ -M 

C3  'd  CD 
CD  (D  cl  ^ 


ppo  Q 

CO  to  M 

rt  aj 

(D  0)  'd  <D 

c y y f 

6 c ^ y G 

cj  cci  M aj 


CO  eo  M 

05  O Oi 

c^  ca  cq 

PQQ 


y y y 

ass 


y S 

2 o ' 

coQ 

P 

'C  CO 
ccj  bD 

'^.s 

. s 

y 

CO  CD 
<D  L. 
^ O . 
> 


2 a® 

S i; 

°-s^ 

. y 

2 2 O 


” ^ c 

prf  ,- 
CC  ® ,S 

V > ™ d 
.•^1- 
c d c “ ” 

^ ® tH  n 

® I'  o ?3 

” ® I » 

cS  > oj  'C  ^ 

OJ  (U  C ^ 

> a;  CO 
1>  I>  M 


puno^ 


paai^uB 

-aBtio 


puno^ 


G rt 


paat^uB 

-jBno 


m 10  10  m 


*:^ua^  aad 
ajn:^sioi^ 


I ^ 

o 

: a. 

1“  O og 


1 O 
|0 


§"1=^  \g^B  ' 
g 6 g)y^'S  S;2 
So -S S rt 9 
^.•aS  > 


rS  fl 


0 

io|"i 


Sq 

^ bfi 

r 


!»2 


_ a-d  . 

q.O>m  5 
& -Pi 

o^g> 
WSH  ►P 


o.a 

Q.  C3  CO  . .„ 

§ 

1S-|^.2dO-S 

g’o:aa'9>‘bDG 

§05  >*5^.2  g 
.2  .So 

.-au 


0,0  a‘5 

c3  C3 
G y G y 
G3  t>x)-G  bO 
OTj  O'V 

c:S.-a 


CO  y 

• 2 

'O 

W 

=8 

m 

CO  ' 

=3  2 

C-l  S 
y 

.a 

^'2 
y G 

Henry 
W.  T. 
W.  T 

y 

y 

S 

0 

G 

's 

> 

Chas. 

y G 

■So 

03 

•a 

uoi:jDacIsuj 


CO  LO 


^ ^ CO  Oi 

S5: 


10 


(M  (M  C<1  CO 


(M  C<1  CO 

S ti 

CO  CO  C<J 


l^PUJO 


ITS  to  10  lO  lO 
CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

1^  J:^  J:^ 


1 

s 

_G 

'g 

P 

G • 

0 0 

, m 

•J 

>»  qj 

1 Cl 

' a “ 

' k“ 

; CD  ^ 

1 ^ rrt 

2 

omp 

Ind. 

teh 

, GG  0 y 
1 y i_j  y 

: g^ph 

U -.  P g: 

^y 

S=«2  .>:« 

" s . CO  Sh 

^ a>  2 

i 

; s 3.a 

QJ  ^ 5; 

; .aog 

p 

1 5 Ah 

Ah 

P 

Q^'C'V 
rv,  CJ 

^ GJ  CJ 


c3  c3  c3 

c c a 


(PiShPi 


'O  TJ 

c?  <u 

rr^  ^ <v 


JG  JG  Ph 
y y 


00 


a -rt 
g o^ 

^ I— I O) 
® [Xl 

’-'  ,i4 

CO  O y 

G a S 

o So 


1 a 


.a  !.a 


O G G G G 3 

p(  PhPhPh  P|jl| 


>>  c3 

.-go 

G ► 

Oh  : 


0 0 


O • +->  y 
GG  IS  +-> 
'-'l-l  tH  S 

42  o las  y 
^ S)in“ 
O S 5r  Sh 

^o  2 
§ W0 


CC  IM  ICC 


IS  _ s _ s _ 

asa.?as„s 

gSgCgHSu, 

^o^o-go-po 

OQ  cc  c»  Ah 


177 


w 'd 

. D 


r-  S 


a ^ 
X w 


o « Q 
P oi 

?lg 

> rj 

t>  01 


QP  QQ  Q PQ*p  Q pQ 


S « 
S s 

rC  bn 

^ O 
3 ” 
X>  <ti 


-Q  '5 


f-  c 
o c 
o 3 


3 ^ 


3 

. a> 

3 (U 

(3  S-. 
3 u 
^ “ 


C oJ 

O ,3  P P 


o ^ 


^^pp  P PS  P 


<X)  0) 

a a 

a 3 
01  ui 


(U  <r  -*j  (B 

s a’2  a 

a d ^ ci 

oim  w 


(B  0) 

a a 

3 3 
m yi 


3 'd  a)  3 

3 

^ 0)  3 3 
^“33 
1>  W Ul 


S ^ 

3 3 3 3 

"3  c c 

•>  O'  3 3 

> mm 


3 3 

(B  3 'd  (B 
3333 

a x;  3 a 

3 “ 3 

m>  m 


n3  :d 

^ « a 

« +S 

CO  S M 

CO 

CO 

"o£ 

peg 

“ "a 

M5  3 
333 

S S ^ 


•3'  HO  CO 


CO  CO  CO 


^ I 

d >> 

S5 

40  O 
CQ  3 

oW 

40  r 


> o 

s 

C3  <v 

Q.-t^ 

.33 

s ^ 

5 „ 

3 =« 


6 

rO 

^.S 

^ s 


w g 

6 3' 

o .S 


fi  _ 3 O w 3 

S d S -g  S 

. g 3 3 d 3 

« ^ o 

. 3 O tH  O O 


3 o 


si. 

•r  d 


P_. 


go 


S .^03 


>>  d 3 

~ " 3 C3  M 

OM  oSi O 

• ^ jJ  . 

f^cn  ^ ^ 3 d 
*-5  O S5  !> 


<D 

«8W 


<0.  a 

3 o 

40  CO 


H-Sogls 

gg-d 

t^o  g-gn 

t>.S  d ” “ 3 

3 3 M =14  0 

«M  PO 


> ! 

ra 

O 

3 3 

td  O 
^ 3 

JM 


- -'o  ^ 3 >> 

' g ^ g 

d 4j  g 2 5 

!>0  3 « g g§ 

S« 

d3  . ^40  ^ W • 

000  W P 


p 


!pl  s 


1 

2976 

3406 

2365 

3268  ! 
3467 

4173 

2348 

00  rH 

LO 

CD 

CO  CO 

2697 

3541 

3629 

2704 

4861 

1687 

1705 

3610 

3870 

2917 

3124 

3279 

3869 

x>- 

3363 

3 

S3 

4208 

2918 

<M 

(M  0 
T-H  CO 

0 c:p 
CO  CO 

0 

CO 

§ 

GO 
LO  CO 

§ 

0 

(M  (M 

00  CO 

oi  0 

00  0^ 

1 (M  (M  C<J 

1 CO  CO  CO 

7532 

S3 

CO 

CO 

7533 

3 

§ 

3 3 

0 CO 

0 

0 

3 3 

3 3 

3 

i 

00 

CO  CO 

1-H 

CO  CO 

i 

12 

g‘  I 

d 

3 d 

a S 
S p 

5s^ 

'-'1-4  o 


^o  00 

O 3 3 3 

4j  O 00 

o£  £5 

O .'3  .d  d 

5^ 


_^33  id 

o| 

3 d 
£p 

^■3 


^.S 

OJ  u 

d 3 
3 4-1 

'•S  s 

Q 3 

m 

>1 

d 02 
3 3 
3 3 

O-p 


.S  .3 

"3  ’3 

t4  !h 

00 


3 3 
3 3 


d d Q 
'^3 
02 
3 " 
3 ^ 


^ 00  O 

^ 40  40  40 
4-1  3 3 3 

3 


d d 
3 3 

PP 


Bd._ 
>>9  4^ 

d a g 

3-3  o 

P M 


Sd^ 

ad  ^ 

s2-^ 

m M 


o o 

dd 

II 

d d 
3 3 
3 3 

P P 

d d 
3 3 

dd 

QO 

dd 

;-l  t4 

WP 

a?  a? 

IZ  'H 
3 3 
PP 


00 


^ P 


d d 
o o 
dd 


a 

a 

d ,.^  ^ 

'P  .52  2;  3 

d ’5  P P 

^Sdd 

^ M o o 


M 


o-p 

° d 

£ o 


000  oo 

40  40  40  40  40 

d d d d d 
000  00 

ddd  dd 


ddd 


dd 


O?  'O 

CQ 

a>  oj  CO 

CO  0?  CO 

<u  u 1 <u  1 O)  1 
o (B  a>  <u  ' 

'G 

a? 

PP  Ip  Ip  .# 

dP 

-G  x:  x: 

d d ' d ' d N 

<0 

Q 

-2  -2  ^2 

££  « « ® ® 

M 

cs  0 

a 

2 2 2 

03  C3  ^ C3  ^ c3  5? 

X4  i4  d ^4  d ^4  d 

JU 

coO 

f 

V V a 

mmxn 

^ C3 

CCCC  XJl  XJl 

4m 

0 

♦ Not  tagged  233  Relabeled  No.  7961 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  234  j 11/20  tons  removed  from  sale.  Relabeled  No.  7828. 

232c  3100  lbs.  returned  to  mfrs. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


178 


m ® 

•cS 


q;  V 
er>  w 


E|| 

III 

1) 

.s^ 

- o ® 

1 B « 

2'S'^ 

© S 0) 

<n  c ^ 

2 © w 

.0  ® 


X S 
o cS 
3 u 
X2  B 
P 


r 


•7^  os  © 


|S 


So 

. OD 
tn 

tC  P 

30 


CS  © — O 

o ,£3  n o 

w 3 (-. 

*7  fi  3 

% - 

3 . S'  S c 

° cn  ^ 

_ 3 ©s  7?  © "3  ^ 

-P  M O ® “ © © 

3 H q ^ M 


r- 

^^(j- 


G to 
•.  L< 


3 fe 
^ o 


© X3  © 


t:  f-'® 
3 © © 

S to  © 


© P 


_6  '"' 

•“  © 

. B £-  P 

t,  S tc  © 
tc  3 
3 '3^  ^ 

8|S|« 

ili©| 


■ 

TO  <D 

<D  ^ 


to  3 


£7*  tC 

C 3 

»« 

£ n '®  ^ 

SSg83 

3 3 3 3 
(D  <D  0)  ^ 


3 ©7 

S p 

i-  ^ 


c 

3 © o 


o [go 

O 3 

l"s 

^ ' 


3 


^j'd  * 

c;  a>  X 

^ (D  a 

- 3 

d»a 

© c 

■r  ® "S  tt! 
3 a 


si|  ° 

O « -g 

^ 0*  c 

w y-l 

'««®'3 


C “ 

':  3 


® c 


S ®? 

© 

^-'®  • - 
3 -2  r©  3 

© ^ (i,  © 

^3  2 © ^ 


C -M 

<d.5  d 

T3  a;  a> 

s 0“ 


puno^ 


pa9:;uT3 

-jBno 


© 

5(2 

ft 


puno^ 


paar^uB 

-a^no 


•:)uaa  jad 
ajn:^sioi^ 


T-H  Ifb  • (>1 

1-H  C>  O 


ft  ft! 

75  CO 

“ ij 

o 

O © 
© 02 
CO 


3 t:  3 73 
'ft  fcxi'ft  bjo 
33  c tuo  ft 

I s-p  a 

ft  o ft  o 
0000 
o ft!  O ft! 


© © 
3 3 

ft  ft 


as*. 


=3 

__  ft  ft  ft 
^ C3  2 3 3 3 
3X2  gft!  gft> 


•a 

uoi;^Dadsui 


I«PlUO 


-ft  a 

© ►>  o 
ft 

[*<  _-  o 
O o 
^ ^ r T 
3 O W 

baft!  to 

•III 

3 « 

(ft 


O 1 

t=^  I 

ftX! 

a^ 

o « 

^co 

o 

^ W 

O P 
c o 

l§ 


1 1 

1 1 

>1 

1 1 

1 1 

I 

1 1 

1 1 

(ft 

1 1 

1 1 

i 

1 

'd  t 1 

©*" 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

Id 

a ! i 

-ftr,^ 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

to  S © 

! 1 

^ 1 

0 

rO 

0? 

(ft  fit,  © 

a 

'ft 

0 

® 0 - g 

>» 

' ^ ” 

d 

H 

D 

&u 

C ►-H  n>H 

o' 

^ 0 A 

gas 

ft] 

' t^'ft 

1 ^ 

! 1 ^ 8 

s © ^ 

>5^ 

w M cs 

^ 'M 
ft  © " 

■aa  g 

ft  > * 


©^ 

O 3 

(ft  '-I 

rc» 


a ftP^ 


CO  t-i  ft 

fQ  'ft 

^ a 
Ip 


aa 

3 £ 

ft 

a -ft. 

O ft  £ 

00© 

®.ft  © 

ft  O 
(ft 


- 3 c3 
h-i  © 

^ a X 
a 02  (ft 

CS 


a a 


ft  s 

a 


CO  >> 

Ei 

© ft 


(ft  (ft 


0=3 

'ft  © 

.«2 
W-S 
(ft  a 


CO 


©ft'-' 
Sft 'ft 


.3^ 

ft'ft  O 
3)^2 


=3  2 'ft 


wheat,  sunflower  seed,  charcoal 


179 

g 


(U  *i 

y ri 

r 

s 

y y 3 

^ y- 


3 4-r'P! 

o y 'O 

5-^  « 

P c"  ® 
S - o y 

^ C o > 

- ° - I 

2 ft  S s 

gS|l 


d • 
^ OJ 
0) 

- w 


o > 

0)  fl 

rC  3 
> “ 


y 'S  o ' 

t <^> 


© 

«H  if 

^ ® fi 

■“1  §|j! 
....  .o| 


i 

1 1 = 2 
S >.  S 
iJ  ” 

C tT 

cS  C S tc 

^ gM  ri 


C'S 
eS  £5 


£ C'^  c 

o i: 

ri  ^ 3 y O 

oS  u “ o 
o . 

+j  y ^ *jr 
ri  S 3 > oS 

y 2 y S y 

£!  -3  £ 


- iD'l 


2 * '3 
* ® y 


s^' 

M ttl 


d 'd  5 

^ <Xf 
(D 

E"l 

8 s^  o oj 
S o , 

.^'  O y ' 

— y C y 2 

S ^ 3 ^ 3: 
" r to  IT  y 


tc 

cj  X 
^ ri 


£ 

o c 


>> 
. o 
>, 

y r-T 
(m  <]) 

rt  y 

^ Ui 


..  y 


y y 
33  3 
b>  .3 


33  w 


^5i 

y ri  O 

' y i 

ao  53 
00  3 

M 

^3<!  a 
y 

L C3  * 

& « 

rt  o 

3 ■§ 

”fi 

..  ® 

4->  ^ 

y y 

§ i " 

!^+i 

2 a 

y 

— as 

^ i 

rt  32 

^-d 
; . y 
‘ o y 

2 * 
y Frt  . 

> y “ 

35  ^ 

•2S 

1 33  > 

’C  ^ y 

2 a p. 

■'3 

3 fc,"  * 
3 tC  -d 
aj  (jj  y 

I d c -s 


5^ 

y Hi 


. rn- 


rt  > 

y £ 

33  3 


^ '-'*  C 3^ 

t-  - « y ^ y 
y t C y P O ;3 

ys  ■g  3 S3  rt  _^-  J 


'O 

• y 

« y 


4->  +J  * ' 

O o2' 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


i8o 


'E 

4<  s-s 
*H  Ucj 


0^4; 


ij.s  c 

T3  O (U 

Bo" 


puno^ 


- 

•S-o  S 

^ flj 


* ^ 
® X 
VO 


o ? 


«.2 
“ s 
v g 


^§2 
a ^d 


2»  111 


T 


® -w 

by  es 

.5  ® 

C -w  tT 
O j;  C 


aSc^ 


. fi ' 


I ^ 5b 


O 9^  r 

a-c  O 

&0 


a cs  -a 

^ o 
0) 

sg: 

§s| 

<D  (D  fl 


'0  g g "o 

s||  = 

W * g 
« g oe 

^ S S=3 

o .5  ii 

c tN  fi 

g*®  « " 

• ^ X 

X j:  >. 
” 2 & ® 
a-i*! 

o a "-o 

S 


“ ^ c 

o 2 

C M 

_ ^_l  © 4) 

® S 

o be  © « 

H!  g'- 

g o ...  iP 
o g >«  f5^ 

d2« 

C ^ © L. 

P, 


: o o 


2 '^2- 
dj  S "0 
83  § 

c|^  i 

8l|g^8Sp« 

- >^  s 

OI  Sh  S u D 


oa  05 

O 00  00 

C tn  ^ . 

tH  P 


CO  X 


©■3  ^ ® : 

43  c a 

> “ oi  d 

(5  CO  CC 


ffs; 

iH  C ii 

tr^. 

ago 

ft  ® 

<mB 

<o  '37  ® 

03  * d ^ 

■2  c *« 

CO 

J <D  w C3  ^ 

: a 'E  ^ S 

CO  >> 


<U  (L> 

^ a 

O •'- 


01  ^ 


a 


•«  c 
© 


c8^ 


tC 

a ^ 

CO 

£-E^ 

o 


*4  o ” 
d c 0) 

(B  0,  - 
d 

1^  CO 


ag 

pS 
tc  - 


s®'E° 

o be  w 

4-3  . 4)  ^ 

-©  C 0, 
d 4)  o d 
43  43  « S 
> W to  d 
E>  CO 


paa:juB 

-a^no 


puno^ 


paa:^UB 

-jBno 


■:jU9D  aad 
aarnsioj^ 


<M  (M  e*s 


00  (M  03  in  to 


ft  ft 
ft  ft 
d d 


Was 

> 

43  ft 


O Z, 

tc  CO 
ft 

d "ft 


<3 !?;  CO 


o 

nO 

t-i  'C3 
pq  43 


^ ftft; 

..:g^ 


Ph 

t-i 

> 

C3 

w.a  .2 

4J  'O  B 

”3^0 
M 12; 


Number  I 

■a 

uopoadsuj 

2529 

3686 

2654 

2653 

4847 

1890 

1927 

2049 

3472 

3700 

CO 

CO 

2785 

3372 

3360 

I 

CO 

00 

CO 

I^PUJO 

(M 

B 

7652 

5909 

5910 

5721 

6292 

6292 

6292 

6292 

6493 

5990 

6568 

6568 

7218 

7218 

1 7218 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 I 

1 I to 

1 

i 

i 

! i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

.t^ 

i 

1 

1 

1 t 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

I ; Q 

1 

I 

• * 

1 

1 

1 I 

1 1 

1 

I 

I 

1 

1 H 

1 

1 1 

1 

1 

o 

1 

1 1 

1 

I 

e' 

1 

1 

1 

! 1 

1 1 

1 

i i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

4^ 

."S 

Ph  5 


>3 

ft 

d 

a . 
SS 


5 

; 

1 M - 2 

s 

73 

ft 

d 

n 

777  ^ 

2Ph  o 

j43  « 
HQtrl 

to 

ah-.^ 

i«-s 

“Is 

Q) 

pH 

O 

KJ 

<V  0) 

<v  <v 

ft3  4: 

CJ  o 

c3  c3 

S 

Ph 

o 

C3 

1 

1 

1 

1 

X 

.43 

illing  Co 
. Louis,  ] 
“D”  Her 

2 > O 

CO 'd  g 

43 

q 

03  M tn 

” d S 

tfa 

q d 

d ft  2 
> d 3 

<L> 

CO 

(h  S-( 

O O 
CCC/2 

u 

c« 

2 

o 

C+3.  g 

ft  ft 

o i-i  - 

fc: 

d 

.£3 

wSS 

a ft 
d d 

H ^ 
l-iM 

P 

<V 

§ 

C>  0? 

a a 

o o 

OP 

a 

o 

43 

a 

43 

f-i  w ft 

o d a 

43  M q 
O ^ -q 

O 

gpHpH 

N 

C" 

Pi 

3 H 
< 

■< 

<J<5 

< 

< 

s ft 

<51 

a 

a 

0 -rr-l 

1 O.H 
W &0 
a d o 
111 
a M 

<3 


n3  Q3 
43  ptj 

^43 

.Si  a 
Oco 
o o 

43  43 

a a 

o o 

ww 


O O O 

43  43  43 

'5  'g 

'O  73  TJ 


'ashington__l  9.5  I 2.5  I 3.1  I 10.0  I 10.2  I Same  as  D 3360.  Approx.  3.7%  limestone  grit 


i8i 


.o«5 
0 to 

2h 

c. 


• ^ 
g 


o S'-" : 

S I «■  * 

.1  |£- 


d O ^ 00 

gS^Q 

S J. 


0 0,0 
^ ft  C 
^ bfi  X5 
~ C . <u 

So  eo  aj  . M 

® O 0’S 
O ^ O ^ S 

w J ft  cS  o 
O O X »,o  <^-0 

■g.^  l-a  o 

^-^<1  --  - “ - 
<c  F©  . ; 

j -c  ■ 


•S^ 


.3  o 

. rH  g d -C 
X UO)  P lyj  O 
* o CO  0) 
C tn  -T  ~ W 

g go-s  £ 

- -5 

c 
c 


-«  g 
o £ 
3 .5 

,Q  « 


S-d 

<D 

0) 

fcT 


c cn 
o ^ 


11 
cq  ^ 

. S 

£^ 

ft” 

ft<M 

*<rO 

fl 

. « 


t>  ai 


4a  3 “ m +j  C3  d 

•c  g £ s ’c  g 3 

W)^  t>0  5 tiog  to 

1>  O!  t> 


g O ‘'-i 

2 -3  .--T 

s C g-S 

r:  03  r ^ 


5’«3 

M ® 

-Q  S 

b£  CQ  Q 
o3  a 

<D  o 

C o -M  * 

2 S'C  2 

to  nS  bo  ft 

xn 


o3  3 

rC-S 
& * 


Xi  on 

>;® 

0) 

if 


tts  • T3 
ce  -C-rt 
M O 

(U  4a 

. to  O 

c fl 
o o is 

:.ii 

cti'S-M 

S 3 
.3  fl  S 

to  S 


o o 
.fl  o a 

^ S S 

^uh 


:x  != 


<0  . 


'4x3  o o *r;  ” 


03  o " 

O o 

o'l  « S. 

llo  S 

tu  . 

c 


VO  o “ o 

ll  l“i 

Ss  Si= 

“ - § IS 

■V  — to  h 

o^-S  .»w 
^Sd^oX 

o3  r •-  © 


42  S* 


o 

h O 


(l  ll 

bo  ft 
ft 
o ■< 


: dj 

: o " 


o o bo 

"Is' 

-m'C  " 
o3  C fl 
033 
^3  to  O' 

k 


flo  o?S 

rr'fl’’^ 
.0 


..  ’2’^^  ft 

.©  ® cs 

-'3  S 2 ^J-  - 
2 S S - rt  2 
•g  toflj  S 0| 

- ^ M 

1^  ooe  £ ,;s3 

fl|*,^fl2 
C H ■“  “ 
fl-§2fl.oO 

^ to  ft  ^ - . 

o S'  o ^ 3 


X -.-fl 

2 Sfe 

I ”2 

2 fl 

CQ  ^ 

ri  S'® 

° cts 

1 

2 j 


^ c .t:  n ^ ft 

S ^ ^ o ft 

f-  ° ^ 0 es 


o ^ o S 

.fl2  fl 

53  ft  pj 


4J  3 O 5 3 '3  b 
. « o ,3  o o O fl 
42  fe  43  3;  O 45 
bOk.  P to  k^  to  o 


fi  3'  S o fl  - 

£ s^^ 


3 

O V 


3 ^ 


fl  53 


kS 


8 “'3 

o o ^ 

fl  o S fl  X 
O rj  ® O C 


(M  (M  (M 


C<J  O 00  LC> 


<M  00 


O 

«6 

6^ 

O08 


bo 

fl 

bo 

G 

O) 

Ph 

Q 

ca 

-G 

3 

0 

.2 

0 

0 

0 . 

43  fl  ^ 

0 X3  0 

M 

< 

fl  2 

43  fl 

G 

§ 

Ph 

d 

d 

• 3 

<'-i 

< 

opq 

i-s 

a 

§ 

d 

i> 

lO 

CO 

0 

^D 

1-*  0 

10  !"-• 

CD 

Ci 

s? 

CD 

01 

Ol 

(M 

CO 

CO  CO 

<M 

(cq 

(M 

ID 

ID 

0 

Oi 

in  10 

0 

l—H 

irti 

s 

is 

0 

0 

r- 

0 

01 

ID 

in 

10 

10  10 

10 

10 

m 

>-^ 
2 "o 
W ft 


W S' 


Kn  w 
^ (h 

dJ  Q^ 


G G 
G C3 


CO  o 
CO  01 
CO  CM 


ft's 

o^ 


(M  Cl  Cl 


1 1 

-i_5 

4-P 

1 

1 

> 1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

*c 

0 

*5 

0 

0 

-Witl 

~ 

S i 

> 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

^ M I 

1 1 

0 

o'  1 

.1^ 

c/2  * * • 

ID 

LD 

ID 

•»  • 

43 

txJ.d 

0 

GI 

1 1 I 

00 

5 

£ 

G a> 

k2  fi 

G 

.20 

0 

43  ! 11 

^111 

ft  3 
O O 

PM  2 


bo2 

£3  03 

43  ;-i 

33  fl 

fl 

3 

CJ 

4x3  4x3 

2 ® 
22 

0 

OQ 

« 

CO 

0 

CO 

4x3 

fl  - •'53 

^CO 

CO 

00 

0 

ID 

0 

ft 

u 

ft 

a flS'l 

rH  fl< 

a p 

ft 

0 

ft  ft 

0 0 

6 

6 

Q 

>.  1 

g&H 

&4Eh 

4X 

4x3 

4x3 

k fl  Fft  +lx 

0 G *n 

8.& 

ft 

ft  ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

3p^  £io 

a^ 

0 

0 

d 

2 

d 'ft 
o 2 
g ^ 

. s 

fl  fl 


o 

o s 

o-a 
-x  O fl 
o 2 o 

223 
43  S. 2 
"S  O 

<J 


Op 

o 

t;F^ 

ii 

S 3 
® p 
QfM 

43  >> 
0-7 


io  O 


O ft  fl 


-CO 


ft 

s 

o w 
O-g  ^ 

o 2 m 
o 

o £ fl 

Sft  ® 

2 tr  fl 

3 pq 
n 


'3  ' 
1)  'G 

1^  2 

.fl^ 
"4x3 
fl.2 
^ ^G 
coO 


.52 .2 
’53  'S 

s a 

tl  tH 
CL>  O) 

3 3 
3 3 

pqpq 


fl  kCO 
ft43  _ 

s c“).a 

® fl  "rt 

^-go 


•2 

pq 


bo 


P^-rt 

'ft 

- a, 

flCP 
'3  M 

O)  +J 

tu  I— < 

fl 

O 

08  PM 

a ® 

fl  3 

OO} 
Ph  5sjo 

4x3  .a 

O w 
2« 
pq 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  241  g tons  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to  mfrs. 


1 82 


•S  § 


S s'®  ® 

I 

I -Si’S 
I ^^1 

'S 

^ e s s 

I 1=^ 

•I  S'®! 

u ’S  i>v 
P-i  5 * 

^ +-4) 

fi  ft 


- < 


>-  H 
d S 
^ S 
o bci^S 

^ 2§ 
2 ^ c 
•r'  ® 4» 
Pft  '8 

^ 4,  -H 

o ^ ^ 
8*0 
t-  fi 


oo  ^ 

^ OT  fi 

ii  - ® 
b 2 * 

c3  O 

^ W g 

C ^ 2 
O M 
O >i  . 

o 


j_r  ' 'O 

’i-’ls 


° 

•w  ° ^ 
8ft® 

® ag 


s c 


~ 2 « : 
S 


s-  to 
tc  -d 
8 0)  . 


S ■=! 


.8  ie 

g ® 

0)  C 

to  cc 
® 

8.§ 

<u  ~ 


® 2 = 

-^3  ft-! 

^ 8 


® O 

(11  y 


C M 


— '8 
X ® 


Oi3 

a-- 

8 C 


® — 


w 2 


,2  *- 
8 

X <v 


m 


® ; 


8 

■=rlts 

So-g*® 

Is-" 

o 


•2*  ct! 
•8  2® 


^ g ® 

3 to  g 


® T C 

5 i*8 

> m 


® S 5 ® 


* V ^ r; 

2S  £ “ 

J S -M  O ® 

®2  S o £ 
8 ® fcPS 
^ • o 2^ 


S£"8 

tc^Sc  o' 
8 O 8: 

g 


o ii  O 8 

«ft^  £ 

r 3*  ► 


Sio 


'O 

gl 

®l 

b *8 
ft  — 


s: 

C ^ 

'^1 


0 ^ • 

-c  z 

;r  cQ  th  f5 


8^^  <D  4J 

•c  2®  gt 
4*>«  8 ^ 
t>  M 


8 C 

.S3 


8 ■^-' 

®.S  8 

'O  ® <D 

SaS 

2 


puno^ 


paa:juB 


puno^ 


p3a:^u'e 

-JBno 


•:}uaD  aad 
aan:^stoj^ 


•Q 

uopaadsui 


I^PSJO 


(M  I-H 


"“>■ 

S^5 

HH  p 03 

■ .ft  M .Sf 

|w| 


' s 

s a 

g ^ 

;f3  W 


g"  ft' 
.8  8 
a > 


o-n 

!i 


S CO 
as  ft 

8 H 
« 


ft 

S 

oa  w 
Q^'a 


^ iJ 
a»  '3 

^ . S 

^ o 
o 


Sft!  ^ 

,Q  h-i  <y 
8 

las 
8 ® 
tS-- ft 
®ft3  8 

rl 

o 


ftT3  ^ 

S t2  2 

o'^  s 

Q H CO 

•ill 

®li 

(ft—  o 

•3  n 
Q 


o ^ 

•■i  !=«' 

Jd  ft  t— I 'ft 


Q d 


Q 


_ _ _M 
8 8 8 '£ 
O o Oi  — 

“ '8  ® v-i 

p 83  to  iifl 

.8  o ® 8 

^ ^ tH  .8 

[3  OM 
« 


.■8  CD 

^ 83 

-8  .8 

3 is 

^ TD 

8 


i83 


qT  A ^ 
r ft  0) 

t:  ^ ^ 

w"  <ir:§ 

2 cS  prt 
O o'g 

'd  — I ^ 

iJ  o « 

3 >» 

a> 

•p  •;:: 't,  « 
c i»D-g 

tT  "S  N S 
'c  :=;  tn  ® 

5i3S 


5 aJ  ^ K 
r ^ ^ 

^ y g " 
3 3 2:3 
" ^ a © 


i s £ 

-a  § ft 

te  2 ft 

S 

=“  2,  “ ■ -M- 

.Q  tx)-"  % 

- oj  ^ S 


O M 


® rrt  p5 


5 ^ 

S ^ 


- 'x* 

CO  C 

^1::^ 
O M ^ 

<1^  . 

2 1 o 

g ft 
ft 


c3 

d 

1 s 

cS  2 - 

'S”  . 1 « 

^ J O © Gj 

n °°  .:£! 

.£”  -o 
g ft  £ ® c 
g ftn  o © 
g ©go 

. w ^ 

cd  - 

= y S5  cj 

y « s-  r 2 fti 


y 

L§ 

. &o 

-d  o 
y 0)  5; 
y £2  ft 
to  o ft 

t-  “ ^ 

01  y 
ts  £ oj 
O :3  cn 
cn  o 


y ti 
„ ft 
c3  ft 

^ CO 


2 £ 
fe  2S 
t>  cO  cO 


O cS 

y o 

xJ-^- 

S S © 

^ pC  ^ 

fgx. 


2 XX  S 

^.> 
ra  g W5 


- y M 
^£2 


C ft  _ 

£ ftQ 
O cO 


C3  (D  0 ^ 

(S  cO  ^ cO 
1>  K!  CC 


^ 2 
s.§ 

^-H 


^y 


£'§ 
O 33 


beg  ^ 


cO 

o ^ 

xT  ^ 


>.  - 
O XS 

T y 


y 
C ^ 
tC  o 
cO  t3 
-«  C 
3 -w 
to  .rt 

g be 

g y 

y y 5 
.|2 

c " 


y ft  o 
^ cO  a 

o 

C P fci 
CO© 

==  s s 
“si 

oj 

be 

2 to- 

•"  be  y 

^■11 
tj  O CQ 
^ (V  <D 

5ll 


sg 

_ y 

^c£ 

" aj  ^ 


= si^ 

CO  o 2 00 


g O o 


tC  c-  tC  - 

S J S 

^ X c 

Q 


^ 2 


a cog^c©  c ^ a o 
*-'y2<©^o^y 
y'r,p4iyc0yo 

- §*•■-“ 
'©  ^’  *2  a 2 TS 

00Og0W00, 

2 2 £.  2-£^2-ft  2 


c^y^co 


™ y O ^3^ 
^ C C£> 
>0  00 

£^ 

° £ pQ 

,c  -a  m 


a O 

© y?.  o 
^ y • a 


5 bJJ 
to  N 


2 a 
.-a  af 


o 

S g 

ft 
u ft 
tc  a 
cO 


cO  to* 

^ a 


lo  in  lo 


(M  CO  00  CO 


S'y 

d 

^ o 

sa 

«a 

CD  a 


a a 

N „ o 2 ’o 
2 M -K.  £ a 
a ^ g'2  2 

MW-S  y a 

• ftW  a 
'apq  d a;  a 
2 . trl^ tri 


-a 

o 

'S  a 

CQ  O 
^02 


a a ^ 
42  di  a 
•«  d a 

^ M .a’ 

3 .5 
^td2 


a. 


a 

a . 

M S 
M a 


'xW 

OOJ 

w 

C^  w 

»«-3 

III 

y g a 
S2i'^ 


£ 
c 42> 


6 1 
o ^ 


1^  = ' 


.2  > 

N 


3068 

4380 

4459 

3999 

8 

S 

4181 

3755 

3066 

3260 

3323 

3065 

2724 

5092 

5119 

3127 

3767 

1864 

OA 

CO 

3211 

s 

CO 

I>  lO 
C<1 
CO  a 

in 

in  CO 

00  Oi 

CO  CO 

S§ 

. 6538 

I 

07) 

o 

(M 

O O 
(M  CO 
i-H  CO 

O 

in 

CO 

lO 

in  in 

I 1 

CO 

CO  CO 

1 1 

CO  CO 

t 1 

o 

CO 

1 

1 

1 1 

1> 

1 

<M 

1 

1 

. 

G be 
a .a 
2-:  ft 

£s2 

O y 

^ O ^ 
a^Q 
“•ag 

c a!  > 

y O 

O 


O) 
0 <3^ 

be  © 
.ft -ft 

ftO 

2 

^ M 

> O 
PQ 
(D  y 
b^.iP 
oa: 

5^ 


.20 

o5 

5'^ 

'gs 

S-a 


ai  o 
2'o 
OO 


0O 

S-ft 

'% 

-0  73 
y a> 

CD  y 

PhPh 


«Ph 


a.“^ 

a gt) 

§3| 

00  03  y 

g +j  M 

.2^0 
« Ah 
Q 


y d3 

Mo 


a G 

0_;  O 
Op(l| 

■=8  a a 

m a o 
^0.2  0 
^ G! 
aQ^ci 

-5  Ah 

W 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


184 


■S’®  ^ 

I si 

i'  5-^ 

_ c ® 

i== 

C-C  ^ 


a; 

to  M g-g  " 

S I 


paa:^UB 

-anno 


13  CS 

s-<  ta 


puno^ 


punojj 


-jBno 


^ ^ 
bfl  ? to 


II 

cc 
- V 

■ s 


•“  s 


1:2  - d?i 


ri  --I  . 

3 . >. 
o'  X 4)  ' 
O r 


M tS 


” G-^  2 
>-'  <j  ^ w 
. ^ >* 
X c <2 

^”c§ 

-Q  O 03 

o ^ ^S 

0 - (1)  (1) 
■G  C o 
u oj  > “ 


C l> 


. X 
W o 
-d  t* 


^ 0) 

^ s 

SC- 
'S i . 


G bo 

g c 

c‘° 

cj 

M 'O  •-« 
C ‘1 

. <V  s* 


o t-  C 
o o o 
fe  -» 


bco 

§ g 


X ^ 

o S' 

t.  G 
G<; 
G 
<! 


C G 
3 a 


a “ 
-Q  5 


r ft 

cj  . 

.gs 

ss 

■ 


bX) 


o . 


c c 

•Sg' 


‘S  B 

t;  M 03 
c tn 


*j  a3  w X (u  c 

■--gs|sg 


oj  aS  ^ :3 
W CC  CO 


X C X 

„ ° o O o 

■p  rt  Go:  M a 

g o ft  c o Q, 

.i^ 

^ be  t,  - 
^ ^ . CG 

o o3  00  o3  "O  00 

« -t-  ^ C -X 

-•p  ^ CS  ^ 

. -O  g M . CM 

oSgOSla 

w ^ P to 

« ^ . '^  ^s 

p > ^ (U  c3  ^ oj 
o p P ^ a>§^  p 
^ O t-  H ^ ~ c 
G^r  .H  S 
CO  i>  CO 


10  ira  10 


(M  (M  CM  CO 


X o 

o -p 

3 S. 
•“  o 

•gs 


ra  ;C  .-. 
° « >- 
b£ 

c 'd  S 

■r  oj  .P 
4^  fl 
3 «,  g 

c 

g O X 


C 3 G 
p to  G 


o|  2 

C 

« to  e 2 

Sd  S S 

.G  4, 

. . « "O 
>>  X &►,-> 
c o 

S ft  ^2 

. "S'® 

= I 
is  * 

fe 

tc  ^ « !S 

l«l| 

gd* 

o^pq 


-M*  S ”'  -*-'-  'S 


c 2S 


TO  w 

2 3:  G c 

to  bfl  S 


•:tua3  aacJ 
ajn:}sioj^ 


'a 

uoi^oadsui 


I^PWO 


3 

W eg 


i-i 

0 

03 

« .G 
Ot- 

02 

P 

CC  3^ 

<=8 

03 

M 

^oT 

0 

CO 

03  d 

“P 

0 

« 

cc 

Sag 

P 

G 

d 

tH 

22 

— c 
S o 


O)  0? 
•r;  HU 

d 

P 

fcH  c3 

0 

ll 

=8 

CO  « 

G > 

P'S 

6 

G Pl) 

« 

GJ 

P 

2 P 

0 

CO  G 
C G 
03  4J 


^ CXI 

g’“ 

|a 

OJ  -K 

c3  g 

^ o 

o ^ 

tu]  a> 

t.  ^ 
O e 


-X  CO  -X  '*( 
CO  CO  CO  CO 


CO  Ift 

ii 


00  00 
-X 

o o 


LO  CM 
1>- 
o o 


woo 


o 5 £ w 
£ > •>  o 


3 .ti 

G G 

a ^ 

O "o 

5 

CO  Q 

a g 

o„-.9 

9p^ 

-M  o' -2 

^ CX)  G 

“15 


o <v 
“Ph 

Sb 

2 o 
c P 

® ® n, 

P ^3 

G g -d  -d  -o  « 

> W gj  (y  OJ  G 

^ K K KO 


6 

M 

« 

o 

o 

G5 

e 


.'O 

'1-34;  a; 

'O  _(y  (y 

P P 

CO  ,x 

- ” " .9 

J3 

o 


►3  4J 

^ G^ 

. 00 


P 43  ^ 

^ G — 

G > 

« 
ft 

a 

o 


i e 

4)  ^ o 

Q^a 

c G® 

a w 

p 


,p  p 
-o 

G 


-d  -d 

03  03 
03  03 

P P 


G G 
O O 

PP 

d d 
G G 
O O 

a a 


48  i 

c8 

i 148 

p ' 

.ta 

1 1 -W 

0 1 

0 

1 1 0 

•d  I 

d 

iPd 

OP 

1 i 

1 > 

Id  " 

1 P d 

d I 

d 

1 Ss  S 

03  1 

' 03  1 

03 

03 

IdP 

P 1 

P 

I Sd 

a £ 

Q 


P 

p 

PP 

p 

a> 

03 

03  03 

03 

G 

G G 

G 

p 

S 

S5 

5 

d CO 


03  03  CO 

d 43  >1 

ft  03  0 

W x-!  '>J 


£ d ^ G d 
^d-g  «d 

oOjdCCco 

CO  £ m_G  £ 

“ CO  g)  a CO 
03  >:  03  W >1 

90  aso 


S P rSi 


G 

O 
G "O 
G S 

.gjp 

d 


G O P 

d CX)  03 
O GCO 

Pdd 

d^'S 
g P 
P 


O w 

43 

■2  g 

oP 

O 


i85 


•4^  P,  © 0) 

o g ® 2 

. S 

15  ccS  S 


w 

« fe  • H 

= ® ^:; 
c o fc<  ft 

C 3 ft  ft 

^ ft 
C . ^ 

!C  ^ 

rt  C . o 


* ^ ^ 'C  ^ ^ 

ri  'C :;:  'k, 

wo.’Sbcfe-o^bfi 

3oC  Po.tl 

^^bCN 


s^'O 


gfe5 


I 55g<° 

cd  'O  ^ I 

o 4)  '^6^  (D 
(1)  ^ — 
w »>S> 


W jjPlM 


01  O ♦- 

C o fi 


Q Q 


O 0»  X5 

^ ^ " <u  ^ 
ogft'c^x'g' 

o p S' 

c « ft^  -C 

.«§! . 
^ Oj  to  ™ to 

- ^ .CO 

. to  w tH  to  tH 

C +j  ^CQ  - . n:  CO 

(h  o3  ^ e ^ " 

P °-PP 


tS  rS 


^ P 


. o 


O £ 


01  cti  'O  4j 

s^l^g-c 


to  it  rt 
m 


S ^ 

m 


tJ  ti 

l-cIsS 

5 s oS? 


■«  to 

^ fH  I3j 
^ 2 
y to  2 
3 >.  B 
O rt 

m 


|g 


5 'S  ft  c3 

® X y g y 

- P S S c 

— ' p4  4> 

d '^.'2 
^ <1> 

. “■g  ^ X- 

u ^ S . o ^ 

tg  0)  fi  s-  t,  y , 

tc  ftcg 

2 to-g  d P.-2 

O 3 s 

. tl  « « 

ctj  'O  +J  ttl  >2 

0)  (D  <D  C5 

^ 0)  ^ ^ © 

^ W bD^  ^ O 


J CC 

• 5 ‘-^  "S  • 

X S3  C C M 
o ^ y 3 o 
t,  a fC  to 
ft  ? — ft 
■ ft  it^  ^ ft 

a -g  g?a 
-■mci:- 

y ® ^ ri  “ 
b " g y 
’“y-o'g 


3 y 
c C 


2M  y 


-«  6-C 

y 


C c ® 

*?  a 1 


“do 

rt  h ® 

o St 

te 

-c2| 

C»  S-»  ® 
2-  d 
3 :3  ^ 
^ 0*2 

g =^  ^ 

ex's 
-£§ 
c ft  S 
2 =^'0 


O O 
a , 


o 


^ <3^  o w 

2 S y 

2 y y 

. to  y +:•  . 

to  y "g  3 -d 

o„0^to 


^£g  = 

as  o 43 

i«“« 

2 t.  ® 

■g  .r  B y 


^ a bo'j_ 
7“  d , 

d ^2-®' 
42  t. 

--3  2 P' 
B y Hi'*^ 
tC  y O'  d 
d w X 

- t-  o' 
o y : ft. 

II  ;i' 

..  c o 

■®  *=  3 g P 
y o " ft  o 
^ y y 


2 y 
B B 


. X 
X o 

y g 

^ P< 
a Pi 


y d 

C y 

.5  43 


I 5 y y 


d y p W 

43  C 

y y to  “ 

d cs 

2 d y y 
Sis  S' 


kO 

JV 

i>; 

o 

Oi 

00 

o o 

CO 

o 

o 

CO 

1> 

rH 

to 

J>; 

Ml 

0 Ir- 

Oi 

CP 

o 

o 

Ol 

Oi 

o oi 

CP 

o> 

CP 

O 

CP 

0 

CP 

d 

d d 

rH 

rH 

o 

o 

kO 

to 

kO 

o 

CP  O 

O 

CP 

CP 

o 

CP 

LO 

kO 

cq 

ko 

kO  kO 

o 

00 

CP 

CP 

o 

o 

CP  o 

o 

CP 

CP 

o 

CP 

<d 

o> 

d 

cx5 

06  06 

I“t 

I-H 

rH 

i-H  i-H 

rH 

rH 

iq 

oo 

CP 

CD 

CP 

J>; 

kO 

CO 

04 

o 

to 

Oi 

cq 

TJH  rH 

CO 

CO 

co' 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO  CO 

CO 

04 

CO 

CO* 

CO 

CO 

04 

04 

co’ 

c4  eo 

kO 

CP 

O 

o 

CP 

lO 

kO  kO 

kO 

kO 

kO 

lO 

iq 

LO 

kO 

kO 

kO 

kO  LO 

<N 

id 

CO 

CO 

CO 

c<i 

c4  04 

c<i 

04 

04 

04 

04 

04 

04 

04‘ 

04 

04’  04 

kO 

rH 

kC 

ko 

Oi 

CO 

CD 

rH 

lO 

I>- 

Cq 

00 

04 

Oi  cq 

rA 

d 

CP 

C5 

<d 

i-h’  O 

O 

CP 

<d 

oi 

O 

CP 

d 

d 

d 

d d 

’"' 

1-H 

rH  ,-H 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

i 1 

1 

1 

1 

.y 

j 

1 

1 

0 

1 

1 > 

I 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t 

t 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

6 1 i 
i i 

.S  1 1 

g 

ft 

d 

o 

a 

d 

B 

d 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

> 

to 

B 

d 

> 

s 

73' 

B 

73 

B 

d 

_y 

5 

Q 

>i 

Q 

1 1 

1 1 

1 i 

1 1 

1 1 
!'§ 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

J 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

. Chicagc 

S i i 

o : 1 
^ 1 1 
^ la 

3 |C5 

B 

d 

B 

to 

3 

B 

B 

O 

02 

O 1 

O 1 

1 

.S  1 

I 

M 

6 

Q 

73 

y 

'> 

a 

o 

to 

d 

y 

M 

43 

0 

02 

y 

W 

43 

3 

0 

02 

M 

CO 

B 

0 

02 

B 

d 

.^? 

2 

y 

S 

Clinton 
South  Be 

(h 

<1? 

tH 

W 

tH 

<V 

tH 

to 

o 

tH 

£ 

tH 

w 

o 1 
ixj  y 
^ eS44 

1 

«8 

y 

tH  ’ 

-rs 

y 

02 

>1 

to 

y 

y 

«8 

2? 

B 

y 

ft 

CJ  h4> 

G a> 

P 

o 

Hi 

o 

c3 

Hi 

4^ 

o 

a 

^3 

H-d 

o 

C3 

p 

a 

C5 

o 

tH 

w 

d 'r  3 
'C'S 
'3  Bm 

3 d" 

O 

43 

y 

M 

M 

O 

W 

gpq 

_y 

’d 

B 

d 

43 

B 

d 

ft) 

Sh 

d 

W 

Sh  , 
d 

w 

ft 

M 

*3 

P 

*3 

*s 

44 

d X . 

5 "S 

o 

_ ' 

OJ  . 

fl 

a 

C3 

o3 

a 

c3 

c 

• C3 

G 

cs 

s 

y 

_d 

5 

Alex 

Ale 

Edw 

B 

y 

3 

S 

3 O 
002 
m 

_o 

s 

o 

d 

O 

J.  c 

J.  c 

Jos. 

PH 

w 

So 

^ . 

3757 

4922 

2720 

3413 

4920 

3111 

4418 

3136 

3395 

3421 

4843 

5111 

3979 

1945 

3820 

CO 

co 

2139 

3366 

4846 

CD 

01 

04 

04 

04 

kO 

to 

1 

J>- 

CD 

§ 

<5 

CO 

1 

M^ 

rH 

M 

M 

kO 

CD 

CO 

J>  Jr- 

CO  CO 

Ml 

3 

M< 

M 

to 

00 

1 

0 

CD 

0 

J> 

CP  0 

X-  X- 

. o 
“1^ 


«l 

tuo^ 


e;” 


C5 
4:: 

I , 

^ ' r“  ®S 

-o  |1^  o 

y 1 d P 

cs  ^ ct3  ^ O 

(H  3 t-.  3 y 

4^  p O ^ ^ 


^ O'^ 

jd  P'« 

y g S 

dg;^ 

ccdj.y 


r O 

W ^ 

-o  •'d 


'Sp 

y d 

^ o 


to  w 

B g 
43 

t»‘2 

2p 

73 

y 

y 

Ph 

73 

y 

y 

pH 

1 

1 

73 

y 

y 

pH 

'O  3 s-i  B ft  . fl 
ft  . 0 a 0 a p 03 
a 33  Q,  43  n,  43  g 

teKHtn^PH^  0^ 

-a  '43^43^0^ 

o;c^>.p 

ft  s 

•2  !ft  <U  030 
2 0 

bo02pH  da^s 

kT  .3? 
ft33-S 
ft^  it 

ft  S,PJ 

0 it^ 

B 

Ph 

it 

it 

W 

43 

y 

d 

ft 

y 

02 

M 

d 

0 

0 

<->  1 
a 

02  1 
it  1 

fit  I 

M it 
btS 

S2 

B 

0 

y 

it 

B 

0 

y 

to 

B 

0 

y 

it 

yS'S^ySoO 

•S  6 .s  ft! 

a-^X 

0 g B 

.G  a; 

TO  X3  TG 

'^03 

B 

y 

2 

2 

0 

0 

rX 

0 

0 

44 

3 

olden 

Shell 

d W 

S 

S 

S 

d « « S 

S 0 0 

d 0 

0 

M 

0 

a 

a 

a 

y tu 
43  43 
CCCO 


OO 

431  43 

'6'a 

y y 
y y 


O O 
O O 
44  43 
3 3 

MW 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  -^-  600  lbs.  removed  from  sale.  Labels  6248  furnished 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


s 

.2  tii-i 

sil 


.£  S 


ft 


^ VI 

•g  5 

h 

a ft 


to  4P  " !>  Orf 

a rrt  ^ ^ ^ 

c;  c 

cti«Cs8a.ctj-J? 

0*0  4(  'J'  O ® 

i ® X 


Ft^  o ^ 

' S^Q  5 S 


' C 

1 o;  0) 

-g  u 
X in 
'q.  a> 
^ ft 


puno^ 


paa:;uB 

-JBno 


o -5  puno^ 
3 rt  2 

Cj^  J-. 


a> 


paa:ju’B 

-a^no 


•:^uao  aad 
aan:jsioi^ 


r-H  O 


OO' 
fl  a 

o3  c3 

a a 


MM 

cl  d 
a a 

o3  03 


•a 

uoi^oadsuj 


l^PWO 


o .s 
M d 

o' I 


i d "d 


S M 


•sa  s 


d 

>^3 


do. 

Wm  k 


< a 


OJ  I 
dJMd 
d!  , 

Q risi  4J  a> 
V O OP 
t^rd.SiM 

.22  OM 
M 


Ot3 

. o 

td  o 


fl  o 

OpL| 

"S 

cy 
03  MH 

d^ 

M^: 


xi  d) 
o o 
o o 
M M 


d d 
o o 
MM 


t S 
Sg 
i?.a= 

C3 

03  C3 
03 

§.§ 

d> 

s 


a 

a bo 

M o 


approx  3.6%  gn 


^ § 2* 

«-2  2 . 

^ « 

“u  S :=: 

M ® . 

o' I"  IS  >2 
g^-E 

0)  73  -j^ 

- o ® t*  L 

• w «tC  bfl 


tc  . ;> 

M O 

S'® 

^ fl 


8“ 

S 


, O 

^ s 


s s 


^ <1>  ^ 2 'o 

2 ^ £|  S) 

*5  o Q,"!;  cd 
^ tn  ft  S > 

S 2 15 

- S “ 'C 

2 “ S ^ 

^ boM^- 

O C . ^ c^  0) 

<U  g 

0^5 

‘^0)0 

- C “ 

« a> 

i;  "S  o 
'‘=i  - rr^ 

'3  ^ a> 

Js!  S Pi  ^ 

§ 

C +J  0 w 

CD 

^ ce 
-.O  - S 


Id-- 

' ^-  o nj  w 
^ C 5 •“ 


CCS 

cS  ^ 

CD  C 


rt  w 
45 


c ® 


■g  d)  !3 
“sS 

^ CQ 

-M  c5  g 

g«l, 

it.  Ry< 
milo, 
6%  lime 

, milo, 
enings. 

rit  not 

^Cft  ” 

- d . 

<ftg“ 

g 8 

:c,i 


■gc 
c ^ 

H 4, 

at) 


187 


45 

4> 

C § 
(D  Z 
82 
o S 
B'^ 

o 

43 


0 ftc 


fl 

C o 


>5  ft 

CD  ft 


o s rt 

O 2 p- 

-o 

CD  ® CD  ^ C DO 

43  S CD  • > 

►j,  C W CC  o P 

^ U 


I « 

- c 

^ C i:3 

^ fe  5 ° 


CD  ® CD 
CD  C d:; 

M ® 77 


p’  'fl  C 
w B g 
* 

!-.  C 

»§1 
ciS 
§ B « 

“ * « 

■^7  "i  c 
«| 
I^S§ 


-S 

CD  -M 

7:  C 

.,H  D 
22 
o-g 


2 

M c 

>.  c 


O ^ 


<c|  d 

- c ® ” 

F C S r) 


CO 


rt  ^ 

ig  ^ o 


P 


iS  ^ 

c ^ 
c ^ 

-^cS 

..  O c^a 

glo 

ft  g 

c B) 

+7-^ 

-w  c pg  CD 

•-I  CD  S cs 

5.43  S 2 

et^  a 


.«  CD 

c o 
. - m 

C 2 
oj  B 
X ■“ 


c^ 


CD  . 

X m 
^ O 0 

F ft 

►>  ™ cci 
t>  M 


O CC!  B ft 

cn  M C 
45 

*7  “ • ^ . . 

0 CD  'E  ® 2 

DO  43  bc^  C ' 

t»  »J  r«  ft 

L c » -• 

ISiS!?. 

•°si|5s 

2 fi  2' 


c O C * 'c  CD  CD 
45  o B '2  C W C 
^ » O 

«"2®^ 

° C -ii! 

. d c*  ft  - 

F ft  vspS  F 
ft  CDfeSj  ft 

8 g 8 

.^"-8  . 

+j  CD  • -B 

Ci  g ><!  O 

ft  g ft  ft 

r|  ft  >1  O d3 


F ,F^r 


7:  bo 
22- 
c5 

2 ft  2, 

9 X 

rl 

ft  X 

plii  O . 
f-  o 

ftCD 

4 ft'^ 

£ c 

■ -o 


C ft 


ft  2 
^-T  o 

ft  ^ 2 
i 43  43  S 
" t>-  ft  cc^ 
> 


m 


in 

C<J 

CO 

C<| 

00 

cq 

cq  in  cq 

in 

CO 

cq 

CO 

Oi 

<p 

Oi 

0 

0 

0 

a> 

0 

rH  C5 

05 

05 

0 

05 

cr> 

rH 

rH  rH 

<0 

0 

0 

, 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

cq  0 cq 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

» 

Oi 

05 

05 

0 

0 

0 

0 C5  0 

0 

0 

<0 

0 

CD 

T-l 

' 

l-H  ,-H  r-H 

,-M 

,-H 

00 

Cq 

05 

J>; 

05 

cq 

cq  0 m 

rH 

cq 

j^. 

in 

r- 

CO 

c4 

CO 

CO 

c<5 

c-i 

CO 

CO 

CO  CO  CNJ 

CO 

C^l 

01 

oq 

e>i 

10 

in 

0 

, 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 CD  0 

in 

in 

in 

in 

in 

c<i 

CO 

1 

c4 

o5 

CO 

CO 

CO 

Co'  CO  CO 

(>i 

<N 

<N 

0 

cq 

'O 

cq 

05 

in 

CO 

05 

rH  CD 

05 

0 

cq 

0 

rH 

oi 

06 

0 

0 

00 

05 

0 

05 

cO 

0 CD  CD 

05 

0 

0 

rH 

CD 

l-H 

rH  rH  rH 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t 

_5D 

CD 

1 

d?  1 . 1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t 

1 

ft 

1 

1 

^ 1 >J  1 

0 

r 1 

0 

tUD 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

> 

> 

1 

'> 

1 O)  1 

0 1 

di 

1 

1 

i 

ft 

1 

1 

0 

CO 

ft 

CO 

ft 

1 

CO 

CD 

d ' 2 i 

03 

0 1 

m 

d 

d 

rQ 

1 

1 

s-T  1 

1 

'> 

1 

1 

03 

frH 

ft 

> 

ft 

> 

.22 

3 

0 

>s<s  1 

w 

be  1 

PI 

C3 

in 

G 

-d 

1 

' 

Odor 

ft 

0 

0 

w 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

Q 

PM 

d 

w 

d 

'o 

Oi 

C3 

d 

CO 

qj 

PM  0 « j 

- ft  3 I 

d ft  2 ^ 

C3 

d 

03 

tft  I 

0 1 

0 

PB  ' 

0 

O) 

a» 

0 

in 

o3 

G 

S i 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

.2 

0 

0.2  0 g 

cy 

r 

^ i 

6 

Sh 

3 

ft 

0 

'ft 

'ft 

d 

CC 

PC 'o  43  -2 

ir  d hn 

d 

bg  1 

0 

r:) 

^ c 
^-2 
.2  2 
CD  S 

c o 

oQ 

CO 


O ^ 

bJO 

a pfS 

a 5 


S I— t ^ a 

“ -flS 

S3  ft  be  ft 

“25  Cpq 

^.^2  - 
•2-ft  g d 

J-:  c3  ft 


■OMpq 


ao 


'ft 

cu 

a> 

^ TO 

r-H  Cl 

ft  ft 

ftW 

M 


.2 

a 

a c 

hH  <U 

CD 

D ^ 


6 = 

oW 


O I 

■ft  C® 

a ^ 

O G 


.2§ 

O 03 

TTO 
m CD 
03  CD 
^CO 
O rg 
. ft 
l-D  CS 

43.2 
bo  03 
3 n 

00 


ftc  • 
2.2 
O 43 

00, 


S 60rg 

^•sl 

-a 

cftCO  ^ 
<v  d 

S SM 

ID 

ft 

> 


>. 
ft  'V 

a S 

2 Ph 

o 

ft  l-H  IS 


3 CO 


•2§: 

ft 

;z; 


CO. 

^ W CO 
.— . O) 

« ft'^ 


' ?Q  o3  CO 


W9 

|i| 


O 
ftj 
►7  'ft 
c ft 
2 ft 
a c5Pr 
2 ^ ft 

o ^ ^ 

” ft  ft 

-la 

G r 


Pm  pm 


'ft -ft '3 

000 
000 
pH  pH  Pn 


000 

P^PMPh 

1 i CD 
G G G 
G G G 


E -ft 

.2  S“ 

CO  ft  CD 


a F^  aarH 


CO0CO0CO0 


g ^ 2 ES  g ‘5 
PM  PM  PM 


**  Not  registered  243  135  u,g^  removed  from  sale 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  244  400  lbs.  removed  from  sale  and  returned  to  mfrs. 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


1 88 


1 1 

V 

aji 

c ^ 

.2 

E os  s 

4)  P'S 

C q CS 

-2  S'?! 


"S  ® 

4, 

h 

B e. 


S ::: 


c 50  5 0, ' 

^ S ^ 

C . O 

c M OS 

d S«  c 

^ tn  3 
P,^  » 

- P 

^ oS  q"  ^_r 

g O 1 

3 y 

rf  H /T< 


„•■  bXiQ 

O N “ 

^ ^ 3 

s,  a 

y 07  q 

m 


S 2 

al 


■5S 

tu  h 

® Oi 
Si  a 
rl  ’-:* 


<D 

ts  > 
d O 
^ o 


c'2-r 


O 3 6® 
U 


0)  ® 
t.  B 
cj  o 

"Sd 

V 

oS 

'i't 


c z 
^ a 


<D  Q) 


tu  <u  3;  ® 

II  '^1 

G "■ 


a H 


tc  33 
ctj  ra 
X 


-n  . 4) 

c3  -3  C 
<U  <U  o 


33  a 


^ p 
o ri 
3 

•a  ,3 


5”"fe 


o y 'E  Q 

y ^ 

3 -g  C a; 

aass 

•a  M 03 

m 


c -a 

g y ■ 

c3  g to 

^ a y ' 

^ B : 

iW: 

y w oo  ; 

cj  ^ ^ I 

<D  o ' 


y ID 

S « 

-O 

^ . 

t--0 

M y 

a 

. -w 
><  B 
o y 


3 o 


u -B 

iSH* 
rl  I 

> c .ti  S 

! fc.  ? 

. 03  bx)  ^ 


3 O 

o “ 

^ !-> 
y 2 *-' 

"n  “ 'E 

^ a ^ 

0*73  g 
:b  y 5 

a ” CO 

. y 

c3  P — 

X O 

c a^^'B 

E 3 eo  y 
O “ ^ 


a a 

y o 
33 

P y 

^.i 

3-" 

32  TS 

t»»a 


3 y g 
^ ^ P M 


y “ 

1 s| 

sl| 


y .S  B 

73  y y 

3 Hf  o 

puno^ 

Ci 

oi 

9.3 

cs 

oi 

11.8 

zq 

00 

10.0 

10.1 

10.1 

oi 

CO 

6 8 

eo 

0[V  y 

paa:;uB 

O 

O 

O 

O 

CD 

p 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

^ P 

-anno 

O 

s 

o 

1>^ 

CO 

ci 

o 

o 

o 

ci 

a 

i ^ 

puno^ 

00 

(M 

00 

o 

CO 

p 

oa 

Crude 
Fat 
:r  cen1 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

oi 

CO 

co’ 

CO 

CO 

p^^:^uB 

lO 

lO 

lO 

o 

iq 

p 

p 

in 

p 

p 

p 

p 

a 

-auno 

c4 

c4 

oi 

oi 

oi 

oi 

oi 

oi 

oi 

oi 

oi 

•:^U30  aad 

(M 

CO 

o 

rH 

p 

CO 

00 

aan:jsioj^ 

ci 

o 

rH 

ci 

oi 

ci 

CD 

00 

oi 

CD 

CD 

o 

i 

X 

.y  • 

o 

bo 

.y 

2 

<v 

<v 

>> 

C3 

Ph 

p 

o 

a 

s 

1 ! 

1 

1 

' ! 

p 

2 

'y 

C 

g 

1 

>1 

P 

c3 

P 

«d 
rO 
o . 

o 

bo 

a 

_y 

P 

53 

> 

w 

d 

o 

O 

O HJ 

^ o 

• o 

> t« 

! ^ P 

o 

tn 

^ 2 

M 

C3 

1-1 

.s' 

C5 

ip 

.s 

M 

y 

P 

o 

ra 

o 

o 

S 

bo 

P 

St.  John,  A 

Owens  & C 
Bend  Grain 
h Bend 

O 

i i 

1 

O 

■=8 

a 

cc 

1 . ».^ 

M bo 

3 0 2 

d 

p 

P 

P 

Ah 

a 5 3 

3 C 

i O 

> crt 

w 

s 

Eh 

2 

i-s 

S 

d 

M 

^•002  p-< 

Ehoq  Ah 

Number  I 

•Q 

uoi:joad8uj 

CO 

Ol 

3108 

3578 

3364 

3272 

2034 

1 

2545 

4177 

1926 

1 

3105 

3175 

3412 

i^ptyo 

6770 

7257 

1 

7257 

o; 

i 

7582 

5741 

6411 

6411 

6431 

CO 

s 

6431 

6431 

1 

: 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

\ 

.■12 

4.^ 

1 

t 

1 1 

1 

1 

1 

O 

p 

O 

P 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

1 4-d 

I'e: 

1 

» 

4^ 

1 

\ 

*Sh 

1 

1 

'E 

CO 

.3 

1 

4.^ 

O 

o 

O 

P 

O 

5 

'Ep 

p 

.c 

O 

o.te 

.H 

.ti 

P 

a 

S 

'C 

y 

73  r 

y 1-5 

H 

o 

p 

pps 

I 

Ha^ 

oil 

•go  a 

s ^ 

Ah 


W .% 


P y .i; 
P ■^33 
O 


o 

t-l 

o 

(H 

0^  y y 

O 

U 

. 2 c3 

y 

73 

y 

Sh 

K 

A5 

C3 

-a 

. y 

Ts  y 

a Ah 
'^33 

y " 
a 2 

3o» 

y tn 


033  S 

« .M 

5“S 

.CJ 

<i>  cy  *n 
SO 

3 C 

a 


^33 
3t1  O 


N S 


^ (U  !h  -I 


s s 

C “ 01  ft 
tC  C ft 

■^>02 

c«.5- 

t,  g --  CO 

0 ^ IS  ^ 

y tO^Q 

tn 

■M  d • 

01  0)  X (u 
<u  r;  O 2 

^ ^ S 

> m 


— « 
‘^1 


ft  i 

s 


o a 
ft 

- 

<o 

ft 

ft  s ^ 

O <D  (H  Q 
H3 


189 

4J  • 

'M 

j_r  y 

1 1 

4J  4d  -M 

- +J 

oc 

0 

ft 

me  gri 
a,pprox 

i 

© 

ft 

’u 

he 

0) 

ft  F 

y 2 

X M 

^ a 

2 

a 

3 .s 

X — 

.Q 

whea 

grit 

me  gri 

ine  gri 

grass 

Mille 

' seed 

whea 

a a 


t>3  y «5 

U5  W ;o 

X X 

ftfe  .ti  ft 
ft>^  sh  a 
<j  : 


M OJ  <N1 

p«|a 


<D  0)  (U 

li:i 

W CO  M 


a a 

?=s 


O — ' 

ft 

X2 

d)  . 

^ oq 

;h 

d 

X 


'C'ft 
,1s!  S 

U2 

d 

g ^ 

^ o 

d;  Sh 


wT  O) 


II 


c 

ft  tl 

^ o 

. o 
ft  c 
u a 

O 3 


o W'g 

. i« 

ft  ® 

1 D ® 


y ft  --H  O)  ft 
> 


01  ® 2 
^ § 2 S 

5 M S g 

SO)  •M  — . 

a-- 

d «® 

s X X 
.”2  2 
sg§§ 

ft--5  r-; 
^ d a^  cn 
ft  O O 
g „-^co 

y ^Q  Q 

/5  a s 

■W  y ft  ft 

^ 2 a 2 
ft!  u a a 

> M ft  ri 
P*  CO  M 


ft  .ti 

O u 
0)  be 


‘is 


^ g fl 

o ft  ft 


.ftH  i 

r*  O 

gftfl 


>,4S>  Frt  (U  (-,  JjO 

y r 5 01  ft  01  ^ I 


a 

® 

3 « a 

ft  ® «3 

-ft  a 

O ■"  OB 

ft  3 , 


^ ft'E  V g 

a 3 4*2  ^ 
o'  'O  o « ^ 

” - “‘^5 


.^a 

>>  ft  :5 

<D  <D 

'O  "H  2 

01  ft  ^ ft 

ft 


§^- 

« o . 


05  . 

^S2 


o ^ 


0)  - tl 

^ w M 

M M 


1 d'S'S  g 

^ d>  S ^ rT 

. 3 ^ g S t-*'  c^ 

•W  ri  ^ Q 
2-^0  o 

® -'a  ® c 2 

_ c ft  . eft  F 1h 

) * " 3 CQ  ;a 

Sf  o M a>ft 

.3  ® 3 3 


^ IF  — 
■>-'  y M 

to  ft 

>>  5 j* 

o to  i# 


. 01 

p -ti  ft's 

01  +J  ft  01  •«< 


C . ft 

ggS 

” a © 
to- a a 


a 

■ft  ® " 

®;S'3 


d ^ 

a 


01 


2 ® 
r “ 
0.O 
o 


c^ 


01  +J  ft  01 

y ft  y y 

y XI  1h  "t?  y y 
« X fe  o 2 -F  ft 

QtJ  rr  {>  W3  C V-  CO 


C^  . 

<v  <u  • 


I ^ CQ  Ofl^  W 


- o ^ 'S 
a y tx)  S 

§^g  p 

ft  2 ft 

+J  . to  ft 

I ft  03  ft  -O  y 

ft  y ft  y ■ 

x!  y .a  © 


CM  CM  CM 


>>  1 1 

t ( 1 

> 

j 

^ ' 

1 

1 

y 1 1 

1 1 cj 

1 

1 

1 

7^  1 

1 

ft  1 

0 1 1 

0 i^x  i 

i ° i 

3 rX  1 

«5  1 N 1 

a>  't-s  1 

F g ft  i 

J il 

0 ! 1ft 

Cj  1 1 ;> 

ft!  i 

© ' 6 ' r 
Ph  0 ! 0 

go 

pq^ 

X!  © 
ft^ 

1 

1 

6 1 

1 

ft!  1 

g 1 

pH  1 

ft3 

ft 

© 

PP 

x: 

ft 

X 

ft 

0 

ft 

0 

^ ! 
ij 

>a 

H F 
ft 

6^ 

02 

© 

ft 

ft 

1 

1 

1 

1 

! 1 

1 >* 

! -e 

s 

XI  2 1 

! 

a 0 1 

ft -ft  “2  ' 

5 !<«  g 

ft-2^.§ 

a 

a . © ft 

1 lO 

^ '^©^ 
ft! 

0 Ift  © T ft! 
4ft  0 fcuo  C 03 

^g-gga 

-a^  ft5£«^ 
PI.2  .2w 

4p'.a 

■+ft  ft 

2 Sh 

ft  ft 

ppg2 

=3  ' 

o-~ 

> ^ 
il  a 

W ft 

0 

cc 

4^ 

^4 

ft 

PP 

§ 

d 

Ma 

ft 

tnfe 

d 

PP2 

. 

fc>  C3 
t^o 

1 1 

•d  CJ 

t>  w 

c3 

>r  ^ 

Ph 

ti  Side  Cerea 
Wayne 

4^-0 

^ rl  pC  CJ> 

6g-^ 

d 

ft'd 

Ph 

0 

ft+4 

^o-go 

fp  cc 

ft  (_|  0 

PP  1-3  1> 

.ift  0 ft 
»-30  w 

x:  . 

00 

M 

oPh 

02 

CO 

CO 

6465 

g 

l>- 

Gi 

I> 

Gi 

£3 

> CO  cc 

) CO  c^ 

) 00 

5 1'- 

t ^ 

s 

i 'TtH 

) CO  00 

3 

3 

3 

0 

CO 

10  LO 
CO  CO 

CO 

00 

00  CO  00  LO 

LO  LO  LO  LO 

! ^ 

e 

? <z: 

H ^ 

> cr 

1 rti 

1 

1 

I 

1 

1 

1 

J 

1 

1 

1 

1 1 

I I 

1 1 

; 

1 

j 

I 

1 

1 

t 

l 

'pH 

‘S 

1 

1 

1 1 

1 1 

44> 

S 

'ft' 

1 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 1 

cq 

dj 

1 

4^ 

.t^ 

2 

5 

4-3 

0 

1 

0 

0 

I 

s 

"C 

CD 

xi 

CD 

X 

1 1 

1 1 

5 

0 

-C 

, 

r!^ 

.-C 

& 

1 

1 

1 

1 

© 4.4 

-tC 

Eh  ^ 
d g 

ft  -ft 
ft  ft 

I 

.a 

ft 

ftj 

g 

Ph 

rX 

.© 

■ft 

g 

Ph 

,x 

.© 

ft! 

© 

© 

Ph 

© 

CDO 

-C  -ft 

'ft 

© 

© 

Ph 

ft 

CQ 

a 

ft 

ft 

ft. 

a 

a 0 
1 

S 03 

0 CQ 

.ft 

1 'S 
a ^ 

c«  <0 

S| 

tJ 

ft 

X! 

0 

'^'ft‘'a 

: 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

T3 

a S 

^F^-g 

^ 1— 1 +p» 

0 

X 

© 

0 

bSi 

ft 

d 

fciX) 

_g 

XI 

.© 

s 

0 

xo 

.© 

Ift 

CD 

© © 

© © 
PhPh 

XIX! 

w 

bfl 

ft 

0 

CJ 

na  Co 
, Mo. 

>73  (>v  © 

^p§ 

0 • 

^ . 

dT  c3 

>>t— 1 © 

F'  .Ph 

a >> 

ft,  c > 

© 

Ph 

. >. 

QJ 

. >» 

II- 

©si 

a 


Ph  Ph 


o « 

S5 

ou 

t>s  ^ 
03  W 

G n. 


P F 

P^  Of 
riP 


u oo 


ft  002 
tix),o^ 
3 tn  CO 
02  g M 
CS'S 

© X a 
’aP'  ft 

ft  w 
P5 


OP  CQ 

wa  01 

^ o.ift 
Pi  ::!= 


3 & 
S o 

© 03 


oa 

o<c 

© 

a 

2 ' 
02 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  245  Relabeled  No.  7963 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


190 


Li 

1 4^ 
jh  © 

•0  X 

.t^ 

Li 

<D 

tn*  ® 

tn 

(V  — • 

;::: 

p c t: 

..Si  -ft 

rf 

« fi 

y 0 

0 0 

ra 

c3  .- 

5 P 

c3  « 00 

H S 

d 

(0 

S.ft^ 

y 0 
rt  ® 

cc 

0 

0 

.5I 

to  ft 
ft 
Oca 

CD 

C 

0 

>> 

0 

0 

^ <D  CO 

^ Q-  ► 

S 0 h? 

d CD* 

L 

C5 

2 c 3 
. 0 

Cfj  b£  CQ 

S c 

•2§ 

'ft  S'® 

it 

ft  F 
ft  h 

^ TO 

cj  . 
y 0 

P 

Ui 

<D 

CD 

CD  +j 

0 . 

- S) 

P 0 ft  ® 
“fS 

0 0 ®.4J 

CD 

"tn  tn*^ 

p 

, 

Sli 

Sp 

•Sg9 

4>  s-s 


a A 


o ^ 


0^  TO 

4:^ 


s 

u ® 
C tc 

Cj  01 

XB 


- .S 
ifc 
0*0 


C - ^ 

go  e*5 


O M ^ ft- 

__  .S  •'^  a 

-O  o o 
.ii!  o C Oi 

O O'  LO 

- to  ■!->  cq 

g g Q 


- O 


“r 

i-.  ^ 

o o 

c Cl 

c g 
o X 
" ^ 


t:  ft 
o ft 

O 


y 'O 
tn 


c«>2 


o O « 
O 


. ft 
*-  i! 

bJj  goo 


o 

r-;  ® 


i c 

O y * 

o 

o-o  S 

-So® 
^ ^-5  c 

o — ® 
P S &H 


o d 


12' 
X2  O 


o£  d 

C!  S-, 

C Cij 
O O 


c . 

o d 


S£  = « 

ft  o -g  S 

O «2  ft  Clj 
U CC 


S 

be  * 


TO  O w fc.  ^ 

^ n:  ^ be  5 
^ y (C  ™ C 

oft  .-i  g ® 

S ® s-g 

^ o '*  o 

cS 

siigi 

.-  c 

I bo’i  ^ 

^-|.SW£S 

o ^ 

S >>  C(f  ^ 

C rt  tn  C 
'g  C !-  S O 

sli#|l«- 

i d s”^  § E 

fc  a 


r*  4-2 

O.S  fi 

puno^ 

11.4 

10.0 

9.7 

10.5 

8.G 

I'll 

26.5 

19.3 

14.9 

5.9 

14.6 

p^^:^uB 

-auno 

0 

10 

C=, 

0 

cq 

10 

0 

(Z> 

iq 

<q 

C7> 

06 

cd 

0 

0 

06 

00 

0 

CM 

i2 

cd 

10 

0 

0 

C<I 

00 

r- 

00 

10 

Cl 

cJj 

0 

O] 

* a 
art  ® 

puno^ 

CO 

cd 

cd 

cd 

cd 

10 

<>1 

0”  ftl 

paai^uB 

0 

00 

iq 

iq 

cq 

iq 

0 

CO 

iq 

cq 

CD 

w 0 
A 

-auno 

CN 

cd 

cd 

cd 

C^l 

10 

cd 

CM 

•^uaa  aad 
eam^sio]/^ 

0 

0 

9.5 

0 

cd 

9.6 

00 

7.0 

G.5 

9.7 

11.4 

1 

5.3 

<M_ 

o C3 

S-^ 


,Q  g 

B~ 

ca 

O 


•Q 

uoii^oadsui 


(M 


I^PUJO 


>> 

a 

e,  Ind. 
ry  Feed, 

-a 

0 

0 

P 

>1 

nsville,  Ind. 

FOODS, 

te, 

^ 0 ! 

. £-0 

03  0 is  - 1 

1 

ft  03  ® ^ ] 

.S  'ft  -ft  03  F 1 

®a.ft  ft  5 ' 

03 

ft 

. 5 

: ft 

! 0 

4-d  ^ 

CC  ^ 

C3  Q 

^ fl-i 

ft 

0 

P 

« 

> 

P 

r'ft 

CO  2" 

COCK 

Syndical 
, N.  Y. 
tfiur  __ 

'ft  F ft  .®  0 

-c  beP  >, 

■ ftF  ft  ^ 'ft 

: ft2^^  'ft  .1 

0-^3 


b 0 

rt  VO 


r- 

a>  a> 

^ CSJ 

r.  C3  C3 

.5  o sh 
(7-  o 
^ »H  a? 

O-S  ft 
c ®.2 
o*^  o 

•S 


<ii  “ .-t^ 

a fcH 
CH  ftO 

5 “ 

ft  C3  ja 
cn .-  -ft 
C -i<  .ti 

;5S  ts 


cc 

p 

c3 

P 

K 

"c  'iH 
o o 

to  ^ 

.5x3 


I- 

<=3  0 


5 ft  £ 
CS  ^ Ft^ 


CZ! 

mQ 

W 

&PS 
;«  w 
HH 
F* 

°w 

§« 

o 


CO 


s=JO 

beTO  F 
be  a 
ft  oa  M 
M — o 

Q “ fcH 

ft  be^' 
03  o c-l 

.5  o i 
P '*"' 


I -ft  K> 

b 


'C 


CO 


oft 
...  o 

no“^ 

ft  “-5 
5 o ij 

o C3 

o So 

p 


r^o:  c 
ft 

5 o-“ 

to  W b 

o •'B 

-ft  2 C 

5ft  2 
03  ^ 5 
p '- 

o 


III 

Sii 

llB 

5"!E 


pp 

'C's 


K'ft 

^ ft 
- c3 


I" 

•s  W 
W 


3.1%  sulphur,  9.9%  salt 


Clark,  Dr.,  Ashland,  Ohi( 


I9I 


ft  ^ a 

c3  j-  ad 
to  .iil 
I*  -< 

tJ0,2 

O 13  Prt 

F Co 
o ^ 


<D  (£ 
Qi 

o r» 


■sfl 

-f  ft 


kS"1 
^ -'S 

-d.s  S 

cd  S i^-d 
•7;  O 
m “ 

'd  * 

3 W S a 
a 


bo  o « 

- -W'g 

>,  W rH  O 

c S - e! 

iSS» 

d 'd  ►Frt 

- <i>  a V 

ij  <B  <U  5S  a; 

.a  — . Bj  .S  S 

o a X t;  -S 

ft  cd  fl  a 

3 d cc  « 1) 

O 'o 

M cd  cd  , +s 

a a a 

^*r-d  ft-g 
2 o 0173  b 
a o 0)  " a 


t cs-o 
S *«>’-j  - 

»^.s 

- OJ®  S 

'S-^cjS 

g ■£  S 


£ ^ « a 

Pll 

V ® g 

■s  . 

a .5  d 

^ 60  o » 

-a. 2 

3 ft 
"S'  3 Or^ 
o ^ vO 

cu 


rs  ^ 

V 

Id 

CD  C< 

O C 

a a “ 

'g-^f 

O O ^ 


o ^ ^ 

05  W 

’S  bJD 

C t**  fl 

>H  >-'. 


a ft  a 

ft  ^ 

I 3 a 


. 4) 


^ ft  a 

TO  O O 
^00 


S 2 


.a  s^.JL 

. Bj"  ft  2 -Q  CQ- 

a cd-a  <=  bJD 
. S .£ 
a w .3  S 

4)  "d  "d 

be  5 5 o -a 

.*  *r  " ^ 

oT  a *-"* 


fcj}  CD  W ®3 

Ti)  3 'ci^  . 
a 5^2 
a 

bT‘  a 

- 4)  fl 

4)  . a 

as  ^ cd-d  a 

CQ  d <U  « 

p rQ  4)  K 

. C S’!! 


.-a, 


ft  o m 4)  , 

rv  .«  (jn  ^_>  cd  ao  o 

8.065.3  ft.a^^ 
•2'^  Q 


cd  a 01  a o 4)  , 
o a ft  a;  u ft.; 
O 


4)  cd  a _ 

Sep.'S 
O *r  >.  . S I 

§S  a ® a 

- 

a 2 a § ^ 

•S§«^2| 

<u  7*  O B 

2 d « fl 
4>  -z:  o 

tn  a a;  4)  « 

a 3 2 4> 

ci i » a a 

od  i 'C  ^ 

1-  bD  o 4-» 


w 

c3  ^ 

93 

'::3  ^ 

8.3 

^-'d 

a a _ 
be  ^ S 
a sS 

01  ^ !D 

a 

cd  a!  00 
z:  ^ M 
a 
01 

bjo  j*  aT 

a a 
X ' 

01 
01 


8”-^ 

> ® 

bX) 

al  o 
41  o ft 


1 a fc, 
?a:  41 
; ^ -d 

3 ^ 


aT'S 

.“  2 


a ^ 

1°”^ 
, OT 


93 


bfi  r/T 


bJD  w 


111 

[a 


.bs  £ a 

'd  41  3 M 

41  41  2 
01  t,  ^ . 

-M  bn  . 01 
fi  a 52  bn 

1 c 2.S 

3 O (D  ^ 

2^  ftS 
SD^-g-S 

41  cd 

® 3 ^ 3^ 
-3  g c'S'^ 

2 ai  d rn 


o Z ^ 
d Cl  a 41 

41  41 

g-d'*^  a 

41  d o 

c B 41  +J 

o o 

-o  2 ^ ® 

“i  sl  g-^' 

8 S g=  8 B S §? 

6>-d;gteo>-!ag 


>>5 

n 
03  ^ 


s 1 

d I 
41  I 

o i 

41  I 
> I 


fH  d 
41 

tl 

Id 
go 
5 >> 

5- 


„ d 
-c  o 
oPh 

^08 


^ r-. 


03  Q 


^ 5 

2“ 
*C  Cl 

92  .y 

.3  a 


^ g 

ri«!  -g 

1^ 

CC.m 

O 

a & 


o 

"d 

_d 

'o 

'B 

41 

"d 

d 

o 

’■S  * 

d 41 

2'S 

S o 


o 

,2  o 


g 

o® 


o.tS 

41  T3 

O 


Vr-I  '-'  O 

3 -m 

d ai 
ft  4) 

gpq 
O'o 

03 
CJ  ^ 


Q 

03  6 ^ 


0 


93  C3 
03-^  03 

sgo 

hP  41 
d . 1-1 
01  4J 

u 


1 

! c3 

1 

41 

>> 

d 

0 

ai 

fi  i 

1 0 

t 

1 

1 

i 

'g 

0 

r-i 

a 

d 

ft 

g 

0 

X 

41 

d 

a: 

1-4  i 

o' 

I .a 

1 B 

1 ft 

” s 

"3 

03 

'O 

a 

^3 

d 

c 

d 

go 

P-i 

03  'TJ  ‘ 

! 

- ft 

>>  S 

§ 0 

ft 

g 

0 

a 

ft 

0 

^ ? 

P ^ 

P ^ 
ft« 

Sd 

0 C3  (i, 

0 0^ 

g Crc3 

0 0 0 

>. 

d 

0 

0 

Ph 

0 2 

Q g 
d’S 

ft)  § 

B d ® 

ro  %M-| 

1^0 

■4-1 

'd 

0 

o<; 

“ 8-Si 

« S >> 

>» 

ii  a 

dSS 
lO  0 d 

SO  S' 
& K 

s.d 

i*  d Z 
•r  fi  s 
d^  S 

8 «2 

0 

4) 

m 

Pbii 

M 

m 

-b  .3  V « I 

S a 2 B S 

© «•  B *H  a a 

.S  -S  t?  i « 

®-3££||5 

a-dg®  *1©*^ 

islss^^a 

©•^idd'^gd 
>d  © ©d  « 2 
gid’^'oc^-o 

©a+>aa®*"a 

B’3s£4;i_4i 

3^®i3j3*''05a 

1^2  ftl^  S|l 

g ft  91  p d ft'"  s 

'";«bnao®-g^x 
iH  S5  Oi  C5  >s$3  5 fH 


j? 


5©'! 

01  S-g 
oa| 

•o « a 

a B.g 

®'2 

.Sid 

Id’S  © d 

4)  ft  ft-< 

bed  a 3 

d.a 


91 

d 

1 

g '5 

QJ  Sm 

^ a « ft 

a 

o 
u 


a 

t3 


i^a^ 

sss 

91  *H  41 

©.a'g.a 

t*  2 
2 'S  o 'S 
fi  91  2 © 
£ d g d 
2 s 91  3 

, , 91  91 

1 3 .3  *-  .a 

* ,3  s 


— © 
d i fti 
* aS  ft 

i 65d  ^od 


“6S.S'i 

12  «: 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


192 


■S'®  * 
^ ® e 

s 

fi 

III 

4)  S-a 

.sr 

CsS 

11^ 
S’®  » 


■fl  ® ® 

fS  a) 

h 

c a 


®.S  c 

tj  <u  a> 


S 

a 


puno^ 


c;  X! 

“ "o  r- 
5>0  O S 

•S  2 ® 

c 

O)  . 

■9a° 


o w 

b “ x: 

w 


S 

.5 

O ^ 

“a 


rt  S 


^ <D  CC 


3 
2 

^ m 

So- 


!S 
r « 
! ® 


o ® eo 

s 


S “ ^ 

” ® . 

.2  <y  4i 

S S ® '?S 

^ cd  ^ cc  ^ 

^'w 

^^§■32 


S g 

cd  C 
0)  2 
X! 

“ 52 

2 a 

0)  o 

a tH 

2 a'« 

O o 

^ 5 ^ 
S 
b? 

3 


CO  CO 


(D 

0,(M 

a 06 


2^ 


ci:  2 3 

O;  CS  ” — ^ 

bj3  « a 

w i; 

3 m 2 S “ 

SIS 

H 


XI  aT 

o " 

- rt 


to  . - 
XI  ii 

,*  M 55 


x-c  2 
o a 


. <v 

— 0)  +-' 

S—  a 
X 9 

* +-*  W 

^ g-  a° 

2aS^£ 


S-S 

o g a 

« 


•“  i S 

- S g-* 


■'X  ®x-^i 

.01  X cd  rt 

— a)  to  H 

td  ^ . td  Q 

(U  bJ3  g 2- 
g 3 g - ft  3 
C a 2 “ 

<1)^0  ^ 

"3  'M  -g  o rt  c 

2 J -S3 

X 

3 -3  ^ « O O 
^ -M  1— I ^ <W  CO 

fe  eg 


.5  bX)  fl 
t-  c 

o bti2 


C cd 
cd  ® ® 
X tlD43 


- a to 
Wax® 
w cd  r 


c a G 

<v  Cd 

® W ,T-( 

'3 

cj  - <u 
to  ^ a 

c 2 X 

.a  2 cd 

cd  box 

t 3 

bo  c - 


gi 

^a 

r^  5 

2w 

, X 

1^2. 


■g  - 3 3 

3^95“ 

•r-JJft  O --  K§ 

_^oagto 

X 


O ® ® 

t,  x g: 

o 


o|  2 
a 3 .a  bxj  a 
J 


a c 
H 


paaijuB 

-jBno 


^ puno^ 


Sr*®  S 

Aw  pasijuB 
S.  --t^no 


(M  10 


•:;uaD  aad 
eanijsioi^ 


a 

0 

pq 

& 

cS 

-S 

tH 

> 

fl 

1 

1 

1 

C3 

(y 

0 

1 

tn 

2 

X 

cd 

«« 

Ta 

<u 

^^ 

3 

y 

y 

m 

® 

6 

0 

bo 

a 

1 

m 

tT 

OP 

p* 

C3 

w 

0 

w 

A 

"a 

0 

0 

« 

"S 

•-d 

0 

, Manila 

Q 

iS 

1 

1 

1 

J 

1 

t 

1 

Q.^ 

'0 

X 

>» 

« 

6 

0 

>. 

X 

S 

Sh 

X 

>. 

X 

X 

X 

X 

_co 

S 

X* 

"a 

a 

'3 

Eh* 

pg 

>. 

a 

0 

'g 

o; 

0 

5 

=8 

s 

0 

3 

0 

cd 

w 

W 

4-i 

0 

$-H 

0 

*2 

Si 

0 

pg 

w.  c. 

a 

a 

eg' 

« 

<i 

J.  E. 

a 

0 

Q 

a 

C3 

a 

>. 

0 

eg 

•a 

00 

0 

CD 

e 

CO 

0 

§ 

ID 

CO 

i 1 

uoi^oadsuj 

(M 

10 

s 

(M 

10 

<N 

9; 

Ci 

(M 

(M 

0 

CM 

(M 

10 

Ci 

CO 

CO 

, 

1 

, 

, 

1 

, 

iz; 

IBioyjo 

Oi 

10 

Ci 

S 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

i 

; 

1 

1 

1 

i 

^-S 

•SS 

r o 

*9  w 


A ^ 


S Q 52 

S 'Ox  S 
X c 
3'^  o 

W 5 o ® 

C3  Qj  ^ c3 

SQ'go 

W 

o 


OD 


O.S 

C)  ^O 
O 

Ox’cJ 
'0^0 
'o'  o 
O 


X a 

bo  o 

.a(ii 


cd  od 

ao 

Oo 

§Wt 


’0-3  " 

® a S 
■^x  o 
X.^fPd 

W 


193 


O ® 


ft- 


0)  o, 

SW 

bn 

2 

C OJ 
m u 


C 

o 


^ s 

3 

O 


2>o 
2 ° 

0) 

<J^  2 

-y  2 
- ° "S 

« 0-3 

3 3 

OT  ^ W 

.»sf 

O . 

3 o OJ 


3 

° S 

t.  ^ 


ssf 

a 

ft” 


.2  5 
^ ”4^2:  ” a 

^ « 3 

S -2  * “ w “ 

l-gf  ceS^ 

w ft  o ^'IM 


_ oT  3 
bT  j 
(3  ^ ft 


2^3  3 

a;  ft  3 03 

aq  w 3 S 
a 2.c>-  “ .- 


^ ^ .z  ^ 

o-in^q  S) 
^ ^ - 2 

3 O rj  3h  .2  I 

^ M ft  p^  O 4->  I 

O ^ 


fi 


3^ 
3 00 
3 t2 


» 2 
s-  ft 
ft  3 

a“ 


gc 
o , 
w q 
ft  3 


^ >s 

w ^ 
aJ 

if- 

Sal 


g3  5 


3 g 

-2  5>0 


.2 

-3  2 
O 3 


tJ  — 
3 y, 
(U  o 


'O  (U 

r-  2 C 300 

3 3 3 3 

.3  q a>  J- 

52  ^ q 

-3 

3'>>'^^P 

oSSbtI^ 


^ w o ^ 


2 

“ a 


.2  ^ 
^3 

2 &q 
S S 


VI 

"^2^1 
.3  2""  a 
q ftca  o 
> O 


- § - 

2 3 » |gs 

3 q — ft  tifl  o 
“ ,3  3 M 3 w 
a “ a 

q 3 g 3 2 

J M § 3 .2 

■^Sa'^^i 

3 H 3 § > 

O O 


^ 3- 
w 3 

35  T, 


0<1 


q 3 *1 

3 3 3 

-d  3 c 
3 2 


g “> 

53 


ft  >> 

a 2 H+s 

8 g-g’a 


^ C3  0^  Qj 

^ SJ  bX)N 

d 3!  C5 

3)  3 3 ^ 
= •2  3^- 
g 3 

<S  £q 
ft  a 

3‘i,-l 

si>s5 

3 3 g 
q o'2i>: 

u 


CO  00 


00  10 


35 

m 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

-iii 

3 

1 ! 

3 

ft 

P 

33 

1 

1 

1 

1 

3 

0 

3 

q 

03 

P 1 

'o'  2 

44 

f-i 

3 

ftl 

.2 

2 

p(5 

r2 

a> 

x: 

p4 

3 

ft 

P 

"O 

>> 

3 

ft 

1 

W 

a> 

S 

a 

C3 

03 

0 

w 

1 

s' 

2 

0 

P2 

hi  hi 

30 
^ P 
S qT 

w gi 

m . 

t-S 

0) 

CC 

*3 

a 

5 

s 

W 

bo  j 
_^'-5 

hp 

0 

§ 

3 

Sh 

o 10 
m i- 
(M  (M 


I OJ 


35  CC 

; P O 
jAh 


40  qT  ^ 

3 a P 
O 


O gcB 

MS3 

320 

a 0.2 

3Q;)'a 


35' 

Os  1 

o'  ^ 

d 3 

S 25^ 

3.2aj  — 
O'goa 

^ 03 

►4  ft  o ^ 

3 2 9.2 

3 o aq 
.SO  30 

35  Q 


S.3 


3 
ft 

S 5 

o >* 

O ro 

§|i 


g^§ 

lls 


o 

oq 

. 3 


2 ° 
§05 

0 bO 

s 9 ° 

© H c/5 

0 . 

44  q © 

3 

P “ © 

- 235 

"S  s ^ 

2 “ ° 

a q 

^50 

08  P 
0 

50.2 

> 

0° 

.2W 

p 

ot^ 

0 S 

M 

p 

S 

bfl  p 

s 

a 

c3  bjo 

3s^ 

!Z1 

3 

3 3 3 

2 3 o 

8^1 


PM 

t>> 


o ^ 

oO 

^i2 


2 . 


305 
O O 

•2>  2 
> Sh 


ti 

f-i 

OJ 

c-l 

|| 

o ^ 
O 0^ 

o« 

r^Tl 
TD  o 
o)  O 

g no 


3^.2.2 


CC  03 
03  03 

3 3 


^Ph 


jj  40  44  4> 

CJ  O « O O 

■*^3q-23333 

VrOOhbh;* 

-^--.30  003 


V 03 
»H  h 


h hi  h ;ri 


w - _ „ u 13  03  d 
Ol>a  43  4)'®’^'^’^ 

S+^S  344443+-+- 
igd^—OOOOi 

gissioii 

© £ O O ,«1  .«cl  .s^  h 

h.'”  h fc,«H4H«HeM 
«H  «H  «t-l 

'O^'O'Soood 

SSs^ooo© 

g|esS222 

*H  h h rd 

«'SSHS-^i;s-22 

af ftftaaaap 

C5i-((NO0r^l'«iHI^P? 


3 3 45 
‘I  h.  3 


h h ^ t,  . 
2 S ‘H  O 

'a::5^5' 

O'  © 03  5 q 

■si  I si. 

'^35  3! '^13 

03  © © — 4) 

goSiS- 

3 S S © g ' 

. © (H  >-  hi  , 

35  a s s 
43x3:  gs 
bo  a a 2 a" 
^’3’3  ap 
g « « "2  ® ^ 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


194 


V 

2 

s®i 


® 2 
gflcs 


<U  »}  .cl 


5 

03  .0  O 

c H 


^ 5 

03  O 

P..55  b 


. 03 

•3>g 

gp.S 

5'^ 

oj  :3  o 

^ O CO 

O 


<D  S-. 

h 

O) 

p.  3 


S 03 


03 

p3 

fi  13 

<D  CO 


s a 

P o 

W +a 
o3  ft— < 

® a 5 

03  ® 


SS| 

^--d  9 

cO  03  W 
O 03 


- 


03*  ^ ' 


o bo  3 

<v 

X 

3 .5 

3 bOTt: 


C 3 d 

a'i  S 

,Q  i-,  ft 
ft 
. O 
. 03 


3 3 
jS  0) 
.0  M 


.3  ^ 


P. 

2 3 

3 03 


bo  2 oj  o 

•S'S^’g'S 


.0^ 

3 03  OD 

03  H W 


3 a 


' r»r 


<i>  ti  <f  ii  ^ 


.0  -*  03 

3^"J2 

3 3^t^9 
3 3 — 3 '3 
^ 3 3 33  O 


c .b  ^ 
S|^.3S 
2 32  ft 
”•“23* 
3 ^ a“  = 
-^2 
^ c 2“^ 


O 3 

3 a 


-c  -d 

."d  5 3 o 

- P 2 3 3 *0 

.P  3 ® § -ti  f-  -r 

O bo^c  ® S 3 

3 S ft 

3 ® § 3 03* 

A 


to  - 

oo3''c2'ss2.^ 

£x!  3 ““x  ft  2 

ft^  “ “ - ft§  O 

w 3 G-d  C'2-2  5 
CJOOO^S^JS 

.3+J303MR3.P 


puno^ 


00 


'^Ph 


paai^uB 

-JBno 


2(2 

u*** 


puno^ 


paaijuB 

-aeno 


1 ’ituao  aad 
aanijsiopi 


•a 

uoiijaadsui 


IBPUJO 


2 

c3  "3 


i s 

o3  '3 


Eh  Eh 


d) 

a >> 

oQ 

03^ 

|§ 

.A 

O.H 


3 

3 

■i4 

CJ 

2 

.0 


^«.S 

^bo'g 

9'2g 

««  3 

bo  . o 

an-G 


ll  a&H 


oSg 

3 >2 

« pW 

“ ft." 

“SB 

xb  p 5 
sog- 
g-  w 


fH 

1 

1 

1 

! 

1 

0 

1 

m 

« 

bo  2 

;h 

3 3 

’n  ^ 

a 3 

B w 

3 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

' d 

5 

d 

po 

0 

p 

35+^ 

0 

3 

C3  3 

Pi 

3 

3^  3 

3 .0 

g 3 
'^XSeg 

3 1 ,3 

0 3 w 

rS 

So 

a? 

W 

cts  Com 
W.  Va. 
and  Cat 

CS 

0 

d 

3 

a 

■3  0 t-< 

a^  0 

60 

0 

d^-S 

3 

w 

2 g 0 

0 

'O 

Ph  ga 

a 

d ftS 

Irt  «d 

;h 

a 

T3 

1|§ 

0 

3 

0 

Bo  3 

3 +j 

P 

KS 

e-i 

P. 

3 CO 

yj 

J9 

3 P 

P 

P 

o 3 
db  bo 
3 

ego 


3 3'^  2 

Qi-i+i” 

<y  ^ g 

g^O.2 

|n.3B 

3 H 


hQ 

P« 

ow 

02 

do 


So 


lps 

O 3 o 

ro  3Ph 

25  t>. 


bo 
3 3 
033 
+J  O 
CCq 


c3  OQ 

•25  g 

s^a 

a 

<5 


ft  2 

a ^ 

o 2 

>3  .‘^ 

a 3W 

3 ft 


c;  ^4^ 

a O ^ 


X3  S 
;0^ 
! O 


sulphur 


195 


" OJ  0) 

ft  a 

cj 

H o 


2 to  . 
td  H 

^ to  3 

.S  1-0 

- o ^ « 
C w cd 

3 a ^2 

0 fl 

a oT  -0 

a3  d •" 

.3  § 

to'd  - 

g 2 

5 P &C-0 
“ S 


cs  o 


to  D 


<1^ 

^ o. 


-d  ” c 
S 2!  “ O 5 

Or.  --2 

S 2 

.5  ft  c £ w 

_ o'  o .in 


o ni  ®< 

to  S a 

rH-:§W 


<D  ^ 


C 

d ® rH 

+J  to 

2 >“  .r 
c o ^ 
(D  P 

> .'g 

0)  P< 


S'® 

+J  s 'W 

^ a 

(U  .2 

fl 

sa 


-d  ■“ 

^ -d . 


■d-O  ( 

-|  ' 


S ^ i 

go  2 - 
•2.0^  rt  oj  ^ 

OT  S-.  ^ 4)  (n  C 
ft  r{  O 


<“S 

. o 
o C 

d 

o ^^ 

o 01 

a 

,.-0. 


S3 

o a 

d V 


a 

-d  o 
d d 


-So 

o ,o 
Ph 


S o> 

> 

-d  S S 


. a i;- 

o 

o . 


d 

.o  ns!  o 

O Xi 

d d 

d 3 o 
O .S 
o d 
to  .in  jH 

to  d 

to-  2 d 

> 1 
g S “ 

^ d . 
.,^  O -1 


d P* 


d ^ 1-1 
o 

? to- ft 
^ d 3 

d 2 P 
in  ft  a 
.2  ftS 

*♦-»  O <-« 
O)  y 

S g 

>d§ 

2.2  ,- 
'Ti  ^ H. 


' -d-d-o 
Pood 

S P ^ 3 

^ -P  ><  — 
d es 
-d  -tc  o 

p d a 

d o -- 
P y dirt 
h p ^ ■ 


rgp 

IB^O 

y to  -3  ® 
ft  S 3 

dS^i 


s “a  ® 
g 2 i 

ft  «« 

d t,  o 5 
y o >“ 

■ J d ^ § 3 
o o P o -- 

SO  CH  ft 
► O 

tS  ^ 2 

xj  5 


to  m s 

•rt  nn  to  .S 

O 3 d — 

S3  ^ “ 5 


. ad's  Pg2 

to  * *2  d 5 ® 2 

12  M 


t-  to  ^ 

bjo:d  £“ 

d O bfl  to  gj 

d j3  y 3 ft  2 
O)  to  rO  to  3 d 
b u 


S^O 

.TjH  to 
X<N  d 

B cB 

Odd 
■o*.  ci 
m 


y 


- be  ' 


'3'^ 

03 

y — — : 
3 d d d 
. w o <l> 

s s 

m 


«S 

u . 
P-d  u 


wo'O 

p t>o  p-a  d 
-|2§ii§ 

^ ^ be  o ao  S 

§ 


Oi 


lO  ^ 


^ fl 

gw 

>>5 

^ d 

g O 

^co 


tuo 

S-l 

d 

ns 

CO  OJ 

2-^ 

O 3 

w^n 


a ^ 

. bo 

o 

p -s 

d ^ 

ft  ^ 

Sid^ 


nsi'-'  ft 
yfH  o 
o a, 

Ss  CO 

^ia 

.d  O 
Q 


d 

O) 

^.2  a 

Cl  O 

S .3 

a?" 

O 3 tn 
>. 

0? 

ri 

o 


rd  d . [. 

a 


o ^ 

.2  p 

nn-g 

.2^ 
£ t» 
id  Sh 


ns! 
nsT  y 


p ^ 
pH 


t>0 

bo 

w 

dra 


-d  >> 
d-d 

|a 

o y 

MM 


2 d a 

*^n°  2 

d -d 

•sM 

W 


ft  y 
O y 

-d 


Oo 

o =: 


M a 
X3  d 
^Ph 
- t>> 


O g 
.gM 

yfi 

a 


d '“' 

2 >> 
a sh 

2 ^ 

O ft 

^ (S 

-d  — 

O 3 

P -.9 

pH  d o 
nsi-SS 

F.a 

ft  ft 
2 ao 
o 

■■P  d 2 ~ 
ft  ft  S 9 

ds  y P 


2011 

4460 

2825 

3305 

1924 

1533 

0 

CO 

CO 

03 

C3 

2244 

1987 

(M 

CO 

0 

CO 

CO 

0 

0 

§8 

(M 

8 

<M 

iCt 

CD 

0 

0 

0 

g 

10 

lO 

05 

CO 

CO 

1:^ 

iO 

10 

LO 

03  O 

Sft 


M a-a  « d B c d 
ft  d ® .5  y 3 y -ft 
3® 

ttsfllssll 

fSsSgSz* 


^ y 

« g 
||2 
y ® H y 

lii  = 

ft 

H SH 

'2-3'ft.S 

y 2 " 
3 > rtM 
y o rt  ft 

p 9 £a 


OJ  s 

^ g 

2 ft  £3 
^ ^ S-d 
ft  ft. 5 ft 

'w 


0 0^0 
^ ^ ^ ^ 
ti  h H h 


^11^ 
2£|2 
«H  "rt  tH  !H 

-S'S'd'd 
y y y y 

®li® 

sasa 

y y y y 
»H  h ft  h 


ft  ft  ft  ft 

S3  d g d 

-ft-fta-ft 

a a a a 

a s ft  d 

pQ  jz;  ®!*®® 

■g  ® ‘5 
o^so  yoosoi^t- 
-^iHW  WM'^jn’Oir^ 


. 5 d . -y 

a-®  -ft  ft  ft 

S,a-®'-2  y 

bo  ft  a 2.g 

rt  ® ® ft* 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


i 


1 sli 

oj  .S 
4->  h d s 
d £ 5-^3 

S ^ d 

■s  -S* 

^ sIS 


i S’« 
^ « 
.2  d« 

iV 

U 

a ft 


196 


S 

biC’C 

.SP 


a>  O cS 

” - "a 
^ S o 

o ” 

SH 

£ d 'd 
O « 

is 

"d 


d a 
■ .h  d 


d c 
S d 


' a. 

d S ^ 

: w ® eS 

' cj  +s 

0 Ot-  O e 
'^rH  d ® 

- - 
id  . i«  .2 

1 a;  w '®  * 
' y d 3 X 

' d a 

I y OD  a 

i a.  Cl 

! “ a 

' d 8'S'g 
.-d  c S 


y M ,11!  • 

d : 

S.  ==  S ' 

^ cr^ 

M-  S d ' 

d ft' 

£.Ho 

ga*^ 


^ o O 
^8ft 


. y — 

5 

,2  dJ  ^ 


d 2 


i1^ 

1 o_2 


W X 

' ^ ^ 

y ® fci 

^ d ' 


y "d  d 

o w d 
. d '-' 

" -CO' 
d to  d 
■r-  d . 

® £ .£ 

'S  O'  2 d .ti 

lifers 

y a ^ m' d 

S St.s  ly  d 

y 

2 d c ft  “ 

a 'S  y 2>  2 3 

S d , ^ - 

d d M 
d Cii 


g^d 

>ei 


^ s _- 

d y 

dye 

y y C 


O'  -2 

M 

a 

d 


d .3  3 

I'd'- 

a o d 


,ro  o 

X .Si 

y 'C  y 
y fO  y 

3 " 

3 

y y 


i 2 5 5?-: 


d r-  ii 

Q 'C 

C 


rt  r' 
^ - o 

- w o 2 


2 w-d—  d.S  coal'd  a 


i-d  .3 
cd  to  M 
W 


y d d __ 
- o o 
c to  -a  d 
d o 
■42  H o ® 
c .a! '3 
y "3  •- 


C c d-P 
2d  2 a 


z;  i»o 

0 © 

a; 

1 ^ 

TO  o 


yd 

d -5 
■c  -a 
y •'- 
-£ 
S 

3 ^ 


y 'a  i: 
ft  y rt 
as-  S 


> C y _- 
' d C 5 
y y 2 

r b>  c 
pS  .£ 

; ■ y be 
;■£  d . 

, ^ c ^ 

^ O ^ (V 

. d 8 'Sj 


® ':3  -tJ  tc  ^ -3  1 


X y a to  y 


a to  „ 

y y 2 ® 

2S-af 

ft  y 

lii  d y I’ 
a a X iH 

W 


be 

.5  M 00 

o 


d,^‘ 


-d  3 

,3 

a 


^ y d ■-  be 

8s>gd 

o 


-a 

y aJ  y a: 

d si's  ° 

. d +j'  y 
X y y a X 
;3  a:  3:  ® c 
d ? a '5  s 
“ £ - 
— * -3  x' 

C d +j''  ® be 
d C £ -S  ® 
a^-d  d 
H d S|2  g 

,•*0  . ^ ^ 

2 

O oj  ci 

& c ^ >> 

a £ 5 

3 y C d 

_ jii  a y as 
c y be  o 


I a:  y 


c ,3 


c-^' 
d.d  d 
33  y y 
3 U 

r2  2 


punoj 


to  eo 


paatjUB 

-JBno 


puno^ 


paai^uB 

-JBno 


•;uao  aad 
0an:^SIOJ^ 


•a 

uopoadsuj 


I^PUJO 


o 

fti 

a 


ft.  t. 

S A 

I 

'd!  ^ 

O a 

r°  • 
dl  c 


'3  5 2 

§1'^ 

•43  a d .2 
3 c g o 

S322 


d y 
ft  'c 

Si  3 
y O 


■^-a 

£ o 

t-H  o 
— ^ 


2 d 

.5  o 
.2  H 

^3  a 

i>° 

di  d . 

3 

N (4  .a) 

3 W 

w 


y 


O .0 
^ o Ph 
.S^x 
.2 

T3  .S2  ^ 

g §0 
£_,  ® 

C3  . 

OJ  4^ 

fH* 

(i;  ft 

hP 


-5^ 

2 ft 

P-i  3 


dIP 

ft^ 

S & 
03 


o 

M 

c4 
35 
£ >• 
g y 
o d 
y 

. >. 


of  soda,  6%  sulphur 


197 


2 ':;3 


-c  .S 

g' « c 'd 

C cu  4) 

3 hT  <1^  4) 

O " t-  -w 
« o £S 
w a>  ai  2 

g “ 3 C8 

<U  o 

tm  o 'o 


bjo.i: 


a 


a o 

(U  X! 

o 


: oc 


411/2  d 

■S  « o 

“ =3^ 
'2^1 
aO 


fi 

►id  W 

£a 

jH 

Pm 

OO 

PP 

9? 

Pr  , 


SO 


2 S 

/2  M 

U 


s 

3 (- 

|i 

c 3 
E to 
3 ^ 


E 3 

3-3 


3 '3 
cj  0) 
•3  /s) 


a)  o 

be -3 
3 


o >1 


I"!  ft 


W D 

? s 


U 3 

0)  fO 

ft  £ 

Sft 


►d  3 

<D  to 
*-•  3 

w ^ 
3 t,  ft 
.2  ^ d 

^ 3 ” 


3 <D 

S| 

-d-d 
3 01 
d !- 
O 3 
ft 
be  0) 


d . 
o to 
be 
^ 3 
o ^ 
«i33 
W 


^ tn  7j  M ' 

<u  S :2  , 

“ (p . 

2^3^-^ 


to  y 
o — 


- M 3" 

t W cj  S 

D O d 
p tT  « o 
d ° 'm 

J ft 

-ft  3 
g 3 co' 

“ be 

vP  ^ ^ 
.^2^  01 
0 e-  rd  be^ 
3 £ 

= •2  1^3 


to  o to 
<p  X5  >. 

o 


43  rt  //  iT 

„g»(> 


C 

be  (h 


0)  3 

beZl 

3 <P 
'be  £ 
> 
43 

^3 
3 “ 
3 ^ 

O)  g 


oT  ft 

tp  i- 
ft  pT  3 
<P  33 
3 ft  ft 

m 


►^1 

<X) 

CU  ^ 

W w 


a <y 


m ^ 


*w  ft 


a3  g' 
ft  5 

&l 

0)  W 

ft 


to  - E 

O X5  3 

■3  3 * 
ft/2  ft 
£ 3 
'3ft” 
3 
3 

0) 


-d 
<p 
3 3 

2 ^ 


o 3 

ft  y 


y "d  y arrt  to  ^ 

.3  01  2 0)  +3  3 

3 - -H  0) 

— '►-'  iK  kr 


/2 

ft 
<P  E* 
3 2 

•M.  ft 


3 

P-  3 


<P  3 
3 /3 
o>  o 
> 


3-2  3^  S) .2 

Pi  O ^ C 

o ft  o CO  .2  (p 

O O 


fi  6 


O ^ 

fa  3 d 

sor 

3^  be 

-i-d)  . j3 

3 O o 

3 l2 

^ j Ph 

fi<ii 


E 


pq 


>)+f 
^3 
O 
3 ft. 


^ 3 

dpq 

pq 


ft'd  >1 

■3.-1 

Pq  ” 


S 

'd  o g 
G ^ 
3 


>1  . 
S'? 

06^ 
bel5  t>> 

o . 

WK9 

3fti  ft 
_3  ^ pq 

6'S  s 

ftsl 

3 /3  pq 


a j'^'2 

G 

a&|« 

/3  cH 


.0  a 

^X2  qj 

go^ 

ft  ^ ^ 

al^ 

o|'^ 

^ 

-gog 

o O 


3 
ft 

a g 

O 3 

O .2< 


^-1  ^ 


o o 

Oh 


.2 
tp 'b 


=3=8  2h 


/3  O 


^'d  u t- 
o 3 01  o) 

y H didJ 

ftj  d o o 

3g^f^ 
a ,2  be  be 
a W be  be 
g WW 
O 


3 h 


tftO 

3 


- 7Z  O 

ft  ft  >1 

S (V  bft  g 


o 

be.d  ■>,« 
CM  3^ 


>>r 


.=3 


o 
^ o 
c h 
■2  >. 
y ^ 

d^l 


C3  f3  a; 

0,5  3 

X2  1^  d! 
3 O 

lJ  4"  t-i 

Efq 

/3  ft 
o o be 
M /2  be 
3 d?  td 
O > 


pq 

b^S 
3 o 

3 -3 

g'ft 

O >1 


lg 

pad! 

-d  a, 


pa 


'ft  . 

sa 

^ c- 
'd  ft 
ft^c 

O y 

'^02 
. ft 

3 kT  O 
5ft2H 

“Sc 

;gS^ 

XJ  O y 

ft02 
& ^ 
pa 


a § 

O'  Cl 
^ . 
0.2  g 

MH/ai-i 

P20  y 


3 .a  =3 

U2  O 
§ « 
pa 


2|  ^1 

V ><  H ^ 

«fty 

diu 

M tdh 

-ftM 


2 © ^2 
S fi  td  a S 

y s « a y 

'stJg'ag*- 

2 ^ Id 

a s a 2 ^ = 
ixj  E a gx: 
2 aft  ^ a 
•2  ft  3 £ B ft 
a * 3-g  ft  * 

.2  wG  ® » f^ 

CD  ft  ^ 

^ >sS>  -H 

V • ^ • 

M M M X eo 


O ^ 


y « 

25  2 a a 

it:: 

.2  y 41  y 

2/3/= 

£y  y y 

Igsa 


-'d'ft'a 

fi  ^ 4J  V 


> ^ ? 2 
= iil  i 
iHN:; 

£ a a a.S  3 

p’s  a * 

^ M O IftM  10 


TABLE  IV — Report  of  Inspection  of  Feeds  Collected  1916  (continued) 


198 


I 1^* 

1 all 

to  *2  ra 
■+a  h w s 
C 4J  5-0 
^ Mei 

5>  C g A 

•s  s” 

5?  o _fi  ^ 

.&  S'®  ® 
3 ^ ® 

.S  C£  C ^ 

p 3 5 « 


K 

c; 

I 


“£ 

n ft 


ft  0 

CD  be  g 

0 

cd 

<D 

ft 

ftft 

ft 

0 ^ 

. ,--ft 
" ft  ^ 

ft 

0 

bT  m 

c3  0 pj 

0 ft.  y 

0 

ft  via 

Sh 

0 a-ft 

ch  y ft- 

0 ^ 
ft  • 

ft  ft  _ 

0) 

■ft  a 

“3. a 

d 

0 ^ 

0 ^ 

■s 

<c 

- c^ 

'O  u 0 

d 

i2  ^ 

0 ^ w 

0 

ct» 

C ji 

CO 

o 

"5 


- M w 

-I-'  4sJ  4_, 

cj  ba  ZI  00  ;r 
(li  ^ 


^.2  s 

> w-C  3 

£ rH- 

C .^S 

w ^ :3 

'd  ^ 

-O  2 5 » 

Co  p, 
^ cij 


M 0)  CS 
>.  O 

o o 


>» 

§ 

Cl 

ffl  o 


SJ.5  fl 
'O  3;  (U 

So" 


S[£  « 

ft 


puno^ 


p^^:^uB 

-jBno 


puno^j 


paa:iUB 

-jBno 


•;uao  aad 
aan:^sioj\[ 


1-1  <M 


"3  o 
30 
o.  ^ 
c»^ 

^ ft 
^ ft 

-M  a 

S” 

02  g 

03^ 

'p  « =3 


5 

. o 

w 


o 

s 

sh 'd 

a 

:;3  ^ 

gm 

>>5 
-2  a 
S o 

t>co 


•a 

uoi^oadsui 


m CO 
CM  CO 


g^'a 

§ -o 

^ a >i 

•2I- 

a^g 

^^■Ph 

m S-a 
,2  o a 

5 «j 


a .0'S 
p 's  1=1  a 

O f>  O a3 
.EHftl 


d >>>, 


-a  ^-a:  ft. 
o a ft  ft 
ft"  3 o o 


2^SS  * 
“ 'S  o o W 

>^ao,  y, 
a O 

D H 


a 

i.s 

Oft: 

ft-jf 

ft 

c»  a ’a 
.a  >1 

tH  3 <D 

2 a> 

ft^-p 
O «J 
O J 


oc  ft  s 

t)  'ft  g 

5J  o -ft 

O t-l  . Ch 

W ftft:r^ 
< 

m 
o 

a s ft 


M o ft 
tuo  o 
ft  03  -52 
cs  OJ  CQ 

.S2 
S^O  b 


d > 

ft 


<1 

-'s, 
Sk 
S n 

-^‘2 

oO 

eqj 


ft  t-i 

as 

o w 

o^ 

-ft  o 


4-> 

tJ  5S 

S| 


QJ  O) 

ft  g 
Orn 


ft  ^ 


'39 


g-a 

►2  ft 
^2 
0 


ftO*^ 

-S  b ft 
ft 

^^2 
ft  0 


a^ft 

• <D 

'd  o 
o? 
wl 


flH^ 

do 

03ft 


ot  registered  11.4%  sulphur  removed  from  ether  extract 

esin  included 


199 


TABLE  V — Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 

Examination 


LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

WHEAT  BRAN 

Castetter  & Company,  Clyde  J., 

Goshen,  Ind. 

ttWheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings. 

Bristol 

Akin-Erskine  Milling  Company, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  ^ 

Evansville 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  ^ _ 

Charlestown 

“Prize”  Wheat  Bran  and  Screen- 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  3 

Rockport 

Salem 

Craigville 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  

“Prize”  Wheat  Bran  and  Screen- 

ings — 

Lexington 

Ballard  & Ballard  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Ballard’s  Bran 

Mauckport 

Christian  & Company,  Geo.  C., 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Bluffton  Milling  Company, 

Bluffton,  Ind. 

ttJersey  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill 
Run  

LaPorte 

Wheat  Bran 

Bolte  & Sons,  Ben,  Ferdinand,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran  

Bluffton 

Ferdinand 

Fyke  Milling  Company, 

Lagrange,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

Lagrange 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook, 

Hunter-Robinson-Wenz  Milling 

Nappanee,  Ind. 

Nappanee 

Nappanee 

Walton 

Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Bran  and  Screenings  . . _ _ 

Marengo 

Fountain  City 

Bran  

Daniels  & Pickering  Company, 
Middletown,  Ind. 

Daniels’  Wheat  Bran 

Kemper  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 
Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Anchor  Bran  with  ground  screen- 
ings   

1 

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Company, 
Geneva,  Ind. 

Millers  Wheat  Bran 

Geneva 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Wheat  Bran  and  Screen- 

ings — 

Argos 

Igleheart  Bros.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran  i 

Evansville 

Ligonier  Milling  Company, 

1 

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Company. 

Ligonier,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Ligonier 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Palace  Bran  

Union  City 

National  Feed  Company, 

Palace  Bran 

Francesville 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Maumee  Valley  Mills, 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings _ 

Berne 

Depauw 

New  Haven,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

Orleans 

Bran  _ 

New  Haven 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

Orleans 

Nodine,  W.  J.,  Waterloo,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

Fremont  R.  R.  2 

NoblesviUe  Milling  Company, 
Noblesville,  Ind. 

Ray  & Rice,  Camden,  Ind. 

N.  M.  Co’s  Wheat  Bran  & Screen- 
ings   

Fortville 

Wheat  Bran  _ _I 

Camden 

N.  M.  Co’s  Wheat  Bran  & Screen- 

ings   

Thorntown 

Silver  Star  Milling  Company, 

Patricksburg,  Ind. 

Bran  

Patricksburg 

Paoli  Milling  Company,  The, 

Paoli,  Ind. 

Clear  Mill  Feed  

Paoli 

Street  Milling  Company,  J, 

LaPorte,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

LaPorte 

Peru  Milling  Company,  The, 

Peru,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

Peru 

WHEAT  BRAN  AND  SCREEN- 

INGS 

Bernet,  Craft  & Kauffman  Milling 
Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mt.  Carmel  Bran  and  Screenings.. 

Paoli  R.  R.  1 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Bran  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run 

North  Madison 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

1 Adulterated  with  9.1%  foreign  material  con- 

sisting chiefly  of  cracked  and  shrivelled 
wheat,  cheat  and  misc.  weed  seeds 

2 Adulterated  with  10.5%  foreign  material  con- 

sisting of  shrivelled  and  cracked  wheat, 
straw  and  chaff 


3 Adulterated  with  6.8%  foreign  material  con- 
sisting of  shrivelled  and  cracked  wheat, 
straw,  chaff  and  weed  seeds 
* Oat  hulls  and  chaff  present 


200 


TABLE  V— Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 

Examination  (continued) 


LABEL. 


Raschka,  Wm.,  Ainsworth,  Ind. 

ttWheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings. 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Valier’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 
Wheat  Screenings  

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat 
Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 
not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

ttWheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

WHEAT  BRAN,  SCREENINGS 
AND  SCOL RINGS 

Gaston  Roller  Mills,  Gaston,  Ind. 

ttWheat  Bran  with  Screenings  and 
Scourings  

STANDARD  WHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS OR  SHORTS 

Bluffton  Milling  Company, 

Bluffton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

Wheat  Shorts 

Bolte  & Sons,  Ben,  Ferdinand,  Ind. 

tWheat  Shorts 

Wheat  Shorts  

Browning  & Company, 

Alexandria,  Ind. 

Browning’s  Shorts  ® 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company 
Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  White  Middlings  

“Prize”  White  Middlings  

“Prize”  White  Middlings  

“Prize”  White  Middlings  

Coombs  Milling  Company,  Wm.  A., 
Coldwater,  Mich. 

Wheat  Middlings  ® 

Delp  Grain  Company,  E.  E., 
Bourbon,  Ind. 

Bourbon  Middlings 


Sample  taken  at 


Ainsworth 


Thorntown 


Thorntown 

Bryant 


Gaston 


Bluffton 

Bluffton 


Ferdinand 

Ferdinand 


Alexandria 


Portland 
Union  City 
Martinsville 
Walton 


Shipshewanna 


Bourbon 


LABEL 


Imperial  Mills,  The,  D.  Z.  Creitz, 
Proprietor,  Cambridge  City,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Neptune  White  Middlings  

Keplinger,  Chas.,  Zanesville,  Ind. 
Middlings  

Linton  Mill  Company,  The, 

Linton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

ttW’heat  Shorts 

Mayflower  Mills,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
Mayflower  Mills  Wheat  Middlings. 
Mayflower  Mills  Wheat  Middlings. 

National  Feed*  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

“Middlings”  

“Middlings”  

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 
Noblesville,  Ind. 

Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings’-^ 
Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings’^^ 
Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings^^ 
Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings’^ 
Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings.. 
Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings’^ 
Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings.. 
Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings.. 

Piqua  Milling  Company,  The, 

Piqua,  Ohio. 

ttWheat  Middlings  

Wheat  Middlings  

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 
Hobart  Wheat  Middlings  

Salem  Farmers  Milling  Company, 
Salem,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

Truitt  & Son,  Wm.  P., 

East  Enterprise,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  


Sample  taken  at 


E.  Germantown 


Union  City 


Fort  Wayne 


Dugger 

Linton 


Albany 

Rochester 


Berne 

Paoli 


Fortville 
McCordsville 
Red  Key 
Red  Key 
Winchester 
South  Bend 
Thorntown 
Daleville 


Union  City 
Saratoga 


Hobart 


Salem 


East  Enterprise 


Edwardsport  Mills, 
Edwardsport,  Ind. 
Wheat  Shorts 


Edwardsport 


Wilkinson  & Company,  T.  B., 
Knightstown,  Ind. 
Middlings  


Knightstown 


Goshen  Milling  Company,  The, 
Goshen,  Ind. 

Middlings  ’ 

Harris  Milling  Company, 
Greencastle,  Ind. 

Harris’  Middlings 

Home  Mill  & Grain  Company, 
Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  ® 

Wheat  Middlings  » 

Wheat  Middlings  


New  Paris 


Greencastle 


Mt.  Vernon 
Mt.  Vernon 
Mt.  Vernon 


RED  DOG  FLOUR 

Blish  Milling  Company, 
Seymour,  Ind. 

Blish’s  Red  Dog  Flour 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook, 
Nappanee,  Ind. 

Reddog  Flour  (Branded  “F”). 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Red  Dog  Flour  (Adrian) 


Bedford 


Nappanee 


New  Castle 


tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
t Before  registration 
Relabeled  No.  7452 
® Relabeled  No.  7344 
’ Relabeled  No.  6010 
® Relabeled  No.  7686 
® 1 ton  returned  to  ^I’f’g’s 


’0  Relabeled  No.  7348 

” Adulterated  with  approx.  4.1%  foreimn  ma- 
terial consisting  of  shrivelled  wheat, 
wheat  grits,  chaff  and  ground  weed  seeds. 
Relabeled  No.  7349 
’2  Relabeled  No.  7306 


201 


TABLE  V — Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 

Examination  (continued) 


LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

WHEAT  MIDDLINGS  AND 
SCREENINGS 

Acme-Evans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Standard  “B” 
Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Lowell 

Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 

Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 

Eaton 

Eaton 

Plant  Milling  Company,  Geo.  P., 

Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 

Salem 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Akin-Erskine  Milling  Company, 

(P)  Wheat  Middlings  with  Screen- 
ings not  exceeding  Mill  Run. 

Aurora 

Evansville,  Ind. 

Standard  Middlings  or  Shorts, 
Ground  Wheat  Screenings  & Salt 

Galveston 

Raschka,  Wm.,  Ainsworth,  Ind. 
ttWheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screen- 

Bartlett Company,  The,  J.  E., 
Jackson,  Mich. 

Standard  Wheat  Middlings  and 
Screenings  

Paoli 

ings  — 

Star  & Crescent  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Star  Middlings  with  Ground 

Ainsworth 

Castetter  & Company,  Clyde  J., 
Goshen,  Ind. 

Screenings  not  exceeding  MiU  Run 
*Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Jasonville 

E.  Germantown 

ttWheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and 

Bristol 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Valier’s  Wheat  Middlings  with 
Ground  Wheat  Screenings 

Bloomfield 

Screenings  

Henryville 

Valier’s  Wheat  Middlings  with 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and 

Ground  Wheat  Screenings 

Thorntown 

Screenings  

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and 
Screenings  

Elwood 

Danville 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Decatur  Roller  Mills,  Decatur,  Ind. 
ttWheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

Linn  Grove 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
. ing  Mill  Run 

MontmorencI 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Wheat  Middlings  and  Wheat 

ttWheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run  

Portland 

Screenings  

Everett,  Aughenbaugh  & Company, 
Waseca,  Minn. 

E-A-CO.  Wheat  Midlings  and 
Ground  Screenings 

Corydon 

Junction 

Lucerne 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN 
AND  WHEAT  MIDDLINGS 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 
Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Fyke  Milling  Company, 

Lagrange,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

Lagrange 

Ziliak’s  Shipstuff 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS  AND 

Fort  Branch 

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Rex  Middlings  and  Ground  Screen- 
ings 

1 

j 

' Francesville 

SCREENINGS 

Blish  Milling  Company, 

Seymour,  Ind. 

Bulls’  Eye  Mixed  Feed  _ . _ 

New  Albany 

Kemper  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

1 

Fuhrer-Ford  Milling  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Crescent  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screeninp-s 

1 

! Fountain  City 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed, 'Wheat  Bran,  Mid- 
dlings and  Screenings 

Salem 

Ligonier  Milling  Company, 

Ligonier,  Ind. 

Harris  Milling  Company, 

Greencastle,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings— 

Wolcottville 

Harris’  Mixed  Feed 

Greencastle 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings— 
Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings— 

Ligonier 

Wolcottville 

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings— 

Topeka 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

Miller  Flour  & Feed  Company, 

The  Wesley,  South  Bend,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

South  Bend 

N.  M.  Co’s  Mixed  Feed 

Princeton  Milling  Company, 
Princeton,  Ind. 

Thorntown 

NoblesviUe  Milling  Company, 

Star  Brand  Mixed  Feed 

Princeton 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

NoblesviUe  Milling  Co’s  Middlings 
& Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 

Sparks Milling  Company, 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Wabash  Mixed  Feed 

Amboy 

ing  Mill  Run 

Thorn  town 

Wabash  Mixed  Feed 

Bedford- 

* Not  tagged 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 


20%  wheat  bran  present 
1*  Relabeled  No.  7215 


202 


TABLE  V— Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 

Examination  (continued) 


LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Valier’s  Mixed  Teed 

Thorntown 

Rockport  Milling  Company,  The, 
Rockport,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

Lake 

Fairmount 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with  Ground 

Patricksburg 

Ulrey  & Company,  A.  A., 

Fairmount,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Screenings  not  Exceeding  Mill 
T?nn 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 
The,  Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Ziliak’s  Mixed  Feed 

Haubstadt 

mXED  FEED;  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  mDDLINGS,  CORN 
BRAN,  SCREENINGS  AND 
mLL  SWEEPINGS 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS, 
SCREENINGS  AND  CLEAN- 

Kingman  Grain  & Milling  Company, 
Kingman,  Ind. 

Millfeed 

Kingman 

INGS 

Garland  Milling  Company, 
Greensburg,  Ind. 

Garland  Mixed  Feed 

Otisco 

mXED  FEED;  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CORN 
BRAN,  CORN  FEED  MEAL 

AND  WHEAT  SCREENINGS 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  BRAN, 
AND  CORN  BRAN 

Berne  Milling  Company,  Berne,  Ind. 

Peterburg  Milling  & Grain  Com- 
pany, The,  Peterburg,  Ind, 
ttPeterburg  “A”  Mixed  Feed 

Petersburg 

Berne  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  & Corn 

Berne 

MIXED  FEED;  WHEAT  IVIID- 

3I1XED  FEED;  WHEAT  BRAN, 
CORN  BRAN  AND  SCREEN- 
INGS 

Egloff  Sons,  A.,  St.  Meinrad,  Ind. 

Rran  Xr,  Sereenings 

St.  Meinrad 

DLINGS.  RED  DOG  FLOUR 
AND  SCREENINGS 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat 
Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill 
Run  

Hubbard,  J.  W.,  Monrovia,  Ind. 

Lewisville 

Mixed  Feed  is 

Monrovia 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat 
Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill 
Run 

Silver  Star  Milling  Company, 
Patricksburg,  Ind. 

Martinsville 

Pleasant  Lake 

Lewisville 

Greensburg 

Bremen 

Mixed  Feed  

MIXED  FEED;  WHEAT  BRAN,  | 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS  AND 

Patricksburg 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat 
Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill 
Run  . 

CORN  BRAN 

Boldt  & Son,  Waynetown,  Ind. 

Mix  Mill  Feed — 

i 

MIXED  FEED;  WHEAT  BRAN, 
WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  CORN 
BRAN  AND  SCREENINGS 

Besser,  W.  T.,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Besser’s  Extra  Mixed  Feed 

Waynetown 

tfWheat  Flour  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run 

Greencastle 

Bloomfield  Mill  & Elevator  Com- 
pany, Bloomfield,  Ind. 

Mixed  Mill  Feed ! 

j 

Bloomfield 

MIXED  FEED;  WHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS, LOW  GRADE 

FLOUR  AND  SCREENINGS 

1 

Bundy  Mill  Company,  L.  L., 

Vallonia,  Ind. 

Mill  Feed 

Vallonia 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  “A”  Middlings 
with  Ground  Screenings  not  ex- 

needing  Mill  Run 

Cadick  Milling  Company, 

Grandview,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Noblesville 

Grandview 

MIXED  FEED;  WHEAT  MID- 

Corbin Milling  Company, 

New  Harmony,  Ind. 

Harmonic  Mixed  Feed 

New  Harmony 

Petersburg 

DLINGS,  CORN,  RED  DOG 
FLOUR 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Wheat  Middlings  and 

Maizo  (Corn)  Red  Dog  Flour 

Petersburg  Milling  & Grain  Com- 
pany, The,  Petersburg,  Ind. 
Petersburg  Mixed  Feed 

Bryant 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished  Relabeled  No.  6743 


203 


TABLE  V — Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 

Examination  (continued) 


LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

MIXED  FEED:  WHEAT  MID- 
DLINGS, SCREENINGS  AND 
OAT  HULLS 

OATS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
CORN  BRAN,  WHEAT  AND 
CORN  SCREENINGS 

Lash  Flour  Mills,  The  Fred  B., 
Farmersburg,  Ind. 

Lash’s  Extra  Mixed  Feed  

Hymera 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain  Com- 
pany, Monticello,  Ind. 

T.mighry’s  Mixed  Chop  Feed 

Anderson 

T. ash’s  Extra  Mixed  Feed 

Farmersburg 

RYE  mDDLINGS 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Mid- 
dlings — 

ALFALFA  MEAL 

[Denver  Alfalfa  Milling  & Products 
! Company,  The,  Hartman,  Colo. 

ttAlfalfa  Meal 

Dana 

Royal  Center 

Jamestown 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 
Chicago,  111. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Mid- 
dlings 

Goshen 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Mid- 

l+tAlfalfa,  Meal 

Royal  Center 

ittAlfalfa  Meal  

North  Judson 

Alfalfa,  Meal 

Arcadia 

mXED  FEED:  BUCKWHEAT 
mDDLINGS  AND  HULLS 

De  Baun  Mill,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

i 

Dixie  Mills  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

■IfAlfalfa  Meal 

Cicero 

Terre  Haute 

CORN  AND  OATS 

Edwards  & Loomis  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

f+Red  Comb  Alfalfa  Meal 

Middlebury 

Fort  Branch 

Wolcottville 

Sehnaible  Grain  Company,  The  Matt, 
LaFayette,  Ind. 

ttMixed  Ground  Corn  and  Oats 

LaFayette 

Kingfalfa  Mills,  Nebraska  City,  Neb. 
ftAlfalfa  Meal 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED 
MEAL  AND  CORN  BRAN 

Broad  Ripple  Flour  & Feed  Mills, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 
tChop  Feed  

BONE 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 
ttSwift’s  Poultry  Bone 

Indianapolis 

MEAT  SCRAPS  AND  MEAT 
MEAL 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 
ttDarlings  Meat  Se.raps 

Lefforge,  Otto,  Rossville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

Rossville 

West  Middleton  Mill  & Elevator 
Company,  West  Middleton,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed 

Wakarusa 

West  Middleton 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Seraps 

North  Manchester 

Wakarusa 

Ligonier 

North  Manchester 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED 
MEAL,  CORN  BRAN  AND 
SCREENINGS 

Worthington  Grain  Company, 
Worthington,  Ind. 

Chon  Feed  No.  1 _ 

t+Swift’s  Snecial  Meat  Scraps. . ..  . 

ttSwift’s  Meat  Meal  _ 

Worthington 

TANKAGE 

Mann’s  Fertilizer  Works, 

North  Manchester,  Ind. 

Mann’s  Feeding  Tankage 

CORN,  OATS,  CORN  FEED 
MEAL,  CORN  BRAN  AND 
COB  MEAL 

Heavilin  & Company,  Marion,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  _ . 

Meier  Packing  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

^Tankage  

Indianapolis 

Marion 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 
ttSwift’s  Digester  Tankage 

CORN,  OATS,  RYE  AND 

CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Jones,  G.  W.,  Upland,  Ind. 

Jones  Chop  Peed  _ 

Johnson 

Upland 

*Swift’s  Pure  Disrester  Tankage 

CORN  BRAN 

Glen  Echo  Mills,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Corn  Bran  

Millgrove 

CORN,  CORN  FEED  MEAL, 
CORN  BRAN,  OAT  MID- 
DLINGS. OAT  SHORTS,  OAT 
HULLS  AND  WHEAT 

SCREENINGS 

Indianapolis 

Greencastle 

Harris  Milling  Company, 

Greencastle,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

Iroquois  Roller  Mills, 

Rensselaer,  Ind. 

Mixed  Chop  Feed 

Rensselaer 

CORN  FEED  MEAL 

Montgomery,  Ira,  Madison,  Ind. 
*Corn  Feed  Meal 

Madison 

♦ Not  tagged  tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 

t Before  registration  i»  Relabeled  No.  4659 


204 


TABLE  V — Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 

Examination  (continued) 


LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

Whelan,  Omer  G.,  Richmond,  Ind. 
tCorn  Feed  Meal 

CORN  GERM  MEAL 

American  Hominy  Company, 

Richmond 

LINSEED  MEAL 

American  Linseed  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Old  Process  Linseed  Oil  Meal  _ . 

Old  Process  Linseed  Oil  MeaP® 

Indianapolis 

Plainfield 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Homcoline  Feed - 

Fort  Wayne 

American  Milling  Company, 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Peoria,  111. 

ttAmco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal  2o_ 

New  Ross 

White  Corn  Germ  Meal 

Mays 

ttAmco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal  2o_ 

Evansville 

ttWhite  Corn  Germ  Meal 

CORN  GLUTEN  FEED 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

Wolcottville 

Archer-Daniels  Linseed  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Old  Process  Groupd  Linseed  Cake. 
ttOld  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake- 

Geneva 

Monroe 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Old  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake. 

West  College 

Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Feed  _ 

Valparaiso 

Corner 

Douglas  Company, 

Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  

Chalmers 

Douglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

Goldsmith 

Old  Prncps.s!  Oil  Meal 

Lewisville 

HOMINY  FEED  MEAL  OR 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  21 

Madison 

Chalmers  • 

CHOP 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  . 

Chalmers 

American  Hominy  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Homco  Feed 

Argos  R.  R.  12 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 
Chicago,  111. 

Diekinson’.'?  T inseed  Meal 

Roachdale 

Homco  Hominy  Feed 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

North  Vernon 

Metzger  Seed  & Oil  Company,  The, 
Toledo,  Ohio. 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  22 

Richmond 

Badger  Hnminy  Feed 

Denver 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  22 

Brookville 

Louisville  Cereal  Mill  Company, 
Louisville,  Ky. 

Hominy  Meal  

Jeffersonville 

'Minnesota  Linseed  Oil  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Ground  Oil  Cake  or  Oil  Meal  

Medaryville 

Suffern-Hunt  Mills,  Decatur,  111. 

Hominy  Feed 

Jamestown 

Sherwin-Williams  Company,  The, 

: Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Linseed  Meal  

Berne 

COTTONSEED  MEAL 

Toledo  Seed  & Oil  Company,  The, 
Toledo,  Ohio. 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Erode  & Company,  F.  W., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Warren 

ttOwl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Middlebury 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Poneto 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 
Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Redkey 

Winchester 

Chicago,  111. 

tfMajor  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Mishawaka 

Old  Proce:s  Oil  Meal 

Craigville 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Winchester 

Davis,  S.  F.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

ttMajor  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 
tfMajor  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

South  Bend 

South  Bend 

Good  Luck  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Nappanee 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Daleville 

Deutsch  & Sickert  Company, 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 
Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Gaston 

Markle 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Markle 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings  

Plainfield 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Portland 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Centerville 

Kberts,  H.  F.  H.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

ttMilko  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Elkhart 

DISTILLERS’  DRIED  GRAINS 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 
ttGround  Linseed  Cake  Oil  Meal 

Logansport 

ttGround  Linseed  Cake  Oil  Meal 

Logansport 

American  Milling  Company, 

Peoria,  111. 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed  is 

Muncie 

* Not  tagged 
t Before  registration 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
Cottonseed  meal 
18  Relabeled  No.  7816 


1“  Linseed  meal  made  from  cake  containing 
weed  seeds.  Relabeled  No.  5618 

20  Unscreened  flaxseed  oil  feed 

21  Barley  hulls  present.  Returned  to  Manufac- 

turer 

22  Small  amount  weed  seeds  present 


205 


TABLE  V— Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 

P rvi ! na  + i n ^ nt i n IJ pH  ^ 


LABEL, 


UNSCREENED  FLAXSEED 
OIL  FEED 

American  Milling  Company, 
Peoria,  111. 

Amco  Old  Process  Unscreened 
Flaxseed  Oil  Feed  


Laxo  Cake  Meal  Company,  The, 
Chicago,  111. 

Old  Process  Laxo  Cake  Meal.— 
Old  Process  Laxo  Cake  Meal.— 
Old  Process  Laxo  Cake  Meal.— 
Old  Process  Laxo  Cake  Meal.— 
ttOld  Process  Laxo  Cake  MeaL— 


WHEAT  MIDDLINGS  AND 
PALM  OIL 


Newsome  Feed  & Grain  Company, 
The,  Pittsburg,  Pa. 

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  ^3  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  - 

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  — - 

Palmo  Midds  

Palmo  Midds  


WHEAT  MIDDLINGS,  PEA- 
NUT HULLS  AND  MEATS 
AND  PALM  OIL 

Newsome  Feed  & Grain  Company, 
The,  Pittsburg,  Pa. 

Palmo  Mixed  Feed 


PROPRIETARY  FEEDS 

American  Milling  Company, 
Peoria,  111. 

ttSucrene  Dairy  Feed 


Butler  & Company,  Edw.  J., 
Chicago,  111. 

ttButler’s  Golden  Leaf  

ttButler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed  23. 
ttButler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed  23. 
ttButler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed  23. 

Butler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed 
ttButler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed 


Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Company, 
LaFayette,  Ind. 

A.  Creamo  Dairy  Feed 

Creamo  Horse  Feed 


Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 
Chicago,  111. 

White  Cross  Stock  Feed 


* Not  tagged 
tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
23  Adulterated  with  peanut  hulls 
2^  Adulterated  with  wheat  screenings  and  .7% 
limestone  grit.  Buckwheat  guaranteed,  not 
identified 

23  Adulterated  with  5.5%  limestone  grit 


Sample  taken  at 

LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

Dixie  Mills  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

Dixie  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

Evansville 

North  Judson 

Glen  Echo  Mills,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Three  In  One 

Indianapolis 

Jamestown  Milling  Company, 
Jamestown,  Ind. 

Noxemall  Horse  Feed 

Jamestown 

Craigville 

Ralston  Purina  Company, 

Markleville 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Brook 

ttProtena  Special  Dairy  Feed 

Johnson 

Crothersville 

i 

Ubiko  Milling  Company,  The, 
Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Union  Grains  Ubiko,  Biles  Ready 
Dairy  Ration  

Indianapolis 

Gaston 

CALF  MEALS 

Galveston 

Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Factory, 

Walton 

Waukegan,  111.  * 

Spiceland 

ttBlatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

Dillsboro 

Union  City 

Parker 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The, 

Sheridan 

Chicag*o,  111. 

Spiceland 

ttSchumacher  Calf  Meal 

Hoagland 

Hagerstown 

Kirklin  R.  R.  2 

POULTRY  aiASH 

Noblesville 

Sheridan  R.  R.  23 

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

, Lebanon  R.  R.  10 

Schaefer’s  Special  Poultry  Mash___ 

Indianapolis 

, Gaston 

Lebanon 

POULTRY  AND  SCRATCH 

. Union  City 

1 FEEDS  WITHOUT  GRIT 

American  Hominy  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

ttHomco  Chick  Feed .. 

Princeton 

. Hagerstown 

American  Milling  Company, 

Peoria,  111. 

Tip  Top  Scratch  Feed  

Wolcottville 

ttTip  Top  Chick  Feed  25 

Scott  White 

. Wolcottville 

Cyphers  Incubator  Company, 
Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

ftChick  Food  

Pigeon  R.  R.  2 

Brookville 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 
Graft’s  Scratch  Feed  20 

Winchester 

Logansport 

Hunger,  C.  G.,  Madison,  Ind. 

. Albion 

*Chicken  Feed  

Madison 

. Kendallville 

. Ligonier 

Indiana  Seed  Company, 

Plymouth 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

. Lewisville 

. LaFayette 

Monument  Brand  Chick  Food 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Blue  Top  Fine  Chick  Feed  No 

Indianapolis 

LaFayette 

Grit  27  

Charlestown 

. Lagrange 

Purina  Mills,  Branch  Ralston 

Purina  Co.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
Purina  Scratch  Feed  28 

Marion 

28  Amber  cane  and  sunflower  seed 

present,  not 

guaranteed.  Relabeled  No.  7807 
2'^’  Adulterated  with  approx.  11.4%  limestone  grit. 
Relabeled  No.  6534 

23  Kafir,  barley,  milo  and  sunflow'er  seed  not 
identified.  Relabeled  No.  6480 


206 


TABLE  V— Report  of  Samples  of  Feed  Collected  and  Subjected  only  to  Microscopical 
Examination  (continued) 


LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

LABEL 

Sample  taken  at 

Ralston  Purina  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Purina  Mill  Peed— Scratch  Size 

Marion 

Moorman  Mfg.  Company, 

Quincy,  111. 

Mormans  Hog  Remedy  34 

Winchester  R.  R. 

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Schaefer’.s  Extra  Scratch  Peed  , 

Indianapolis 

Pratt  Pood  Company, 

Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Pratts  Cow  Remedy  ss 

POULTRY  AND  SCRATCH 
FEEDS  WITH  GRIT 

Acme-Evans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  Scratch  Peed  _ . _ 

Scottsburg 

Butler 

Websters  Wonder  Hog  Powder 
Company,  Butler,  Ind. 

The  Great  Hog  & Live  Stock 
Conditioner  3e  

American  Milling  Company, 

Peoria,  111. 

Cluck  Cluck  Scratch  Peed  with 

5%  Grit  

South  Bend 

CONDIMENTAL  POULTRY 
FOODS,  REGISTERED 

Pleek,  J.  J.,  Tiffin,  Ohio. 

[ Plecks  Poultry  Powder 

Cluck  Cluck  Scratch  Peed  with 

Worthington 
Center  Point 

5%  Grit  

North  Madison 

I Plecks  Poultry  Powder 

ttTip  Top  Scratch  Peed  with  5% 

Grit  29  

Wolcottville 

Indianapolis 

International  Stock  Pood  Company, 

1 Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Medicinal  Poultry 
Pood  Tonic  37 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J., 

Chicago,  111. 

C-er-lay  Poultry  Peed  with  Grit___ 

Brook  Plour  & Peed  Mill, 

Hobart 

{ International  Medicinal  Poultry 
Pood  Tonic  38 

Bloomfield 

Seymour 

New  Albany 

Oakland  City 

Bloomfield 

Brook,  Ind. 

Rising  Sun  Poultry  Peed 

Brook 

International  Medicinal  Poultry 
Pood  Tonic  39  _ . 

Chamberlain  Company,  P.  B., 

, International  Medicinal  Poultry 

1 Pood  Tonic  4o 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

ttChamberlain’s  Perfect  Chick  Peed- 

Indianapolis 

International  Medicinal  Poultry 
Pood  Tonic 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 
Chicago,  111. 

ttCrescent  Chick  Peed,  with  Grit 

Globe  Chick  Peed  with  Grit  30 

ttSpecial  International  Medicinal 
Poultry  Pood  Tonic  _ 

Winamac 

Milford 

Pratt  Pood  Company, 

ttPine  Tree  Scratch  Peed  with  Grit— 

Corunna 

Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Pratts  Poultry  Regulator  . _ __ 

LaPorte 

Edwards  & Loomis  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Red  Comb  Coarse  Chick  with  Grit 

Nappanee 

CONDIMENTAL  POULTRY 
FOODS,  NOT  REGISTERED 

Knoke  & Company,  H.  C., 

Chicago,  111. 

Perfecto  Poultry  Pood  3i  

Prancesville 

Universal  Products  Co., 

Pairmount,  W.  Va. 

*TTnroco  Poultry  Tonic  4i 

Prankton 

tfPerfecto  Poultry  Pood  32  

Prancesvillo 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Red  Crown  Scratch  Peed,  With 

Grit  . 

LaPayette 

MISCELLANEOUS 

American  By-Products  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

*Dried  Biscuit  Trimmings 

Michigan  City 

Shine  & Company,  John  H., 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

*Scratch  Peed 

Borden 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The, 

Chicago,  111. 

++Maz-All  Peed  ...  . _ 

South  Bend 

CONDIMENTAL  STOCK  FOODS, 
NOT  REGISTERED 

German  American  Live  Stock  Rem- 
edy Co.,  The,  Shenandoah,  Iowa. 
Tonic  for  Hogs  Only  33 

Kokomo  R.  R.  1 

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Schaefer’s  Special  Piller  for  Malt— 

Indianapolis 

* Not  tagged 

tt  Not  tagged.  Labels  furnished 
Misc.  weed  seeds  present 
Wheat  bran.  Registered  No.  5841 
Sunflower  seed  not  identified.  Peas  present, 
not  gruaranteed 

32  Sunflower  seed  not  identified.  Peas  and  misc. 

weed  seeds  present,  not  gruaranteed 

33  Charcoal,  sulphur,  sodium  thiosulphate,  sodi- 

um sulphate,  sodium  bicarbonate  and  small 
amount  of  Epsom  salts 

31  Glaubers’  salt,  worm  seed,  sulphur,  charcoal, 
traces  of  salt  and  Epsom  salts 
35  Gentian,  Epsom  salts,  Venetian  red,  charcoal, 
sodium  bicarbonate,  ginger,  capsicum, 
salt,  fenugreek,  nux  vomica 


33  Charcoal,  sulphur,  sodium  sulphate,  sodium 
thiosulphate 

3'^  Considerable  fine  sand  present.  Poplar  bark 
gruaranteed,  not  identified.  Relabeled  No. 
6378 

33  Fine  sand  present.  Quassia  and  poplar  bark 
guaranteed,  not  identified 

33  Quassia  and  poplar  bark  gruaranteed,  not 
identified 

13  Quassia  gruaranteed,  not  identified 

11  Wheat  middlings,  wheat  bran,  oyster  shells, 
Venetian  red,  capsicum,  calcium  carbonate 
and  salt 


207 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist 


Number 

LABEL 

[3 

*3 

O 

_o 

<UQ 

to 

a 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Acme-Evans  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

5588 

3033 

1.75 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

5588 

3034 

11 

Apmft  C.  O.  R.  Chop 

6200 

3035 

5 

Arme  Snratrh  Efipd 

6292 

1890 

.45 

*Anme  Sp.rfltrh  Efied  . _ _ 

6292 

Dillshoro 

.15 

*Acme  Chick  

6493 

Dillshorn 

.23 

*Acme  Chick ^ 

6493 

Montmorenci  

.06 

F.-Z  Dairy  Eecd 

6683 

2644 

1.35 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

6876 

1999 

Spencer 

.75 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Acme  Bran  & Screenings 

7159 

3818 

South  Bend. 

2.35 

Akin-Erskine  Milling  Company, 
Evansville,  Ind. 

Wintpr  Whpat  Bran 

6031 

3101 

.45 

Adulterated  with  screenings 
Adulterated  with  screenings 
Adulterated  with  screenings 
Adulterated  with  screenings 
Adulterated  with  screenings 

Wintpr  Whpat  Bran 

6031 

3156 

Evansville  

1.2 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6031 

3157 

Evansville  

.85 

6031 

3228 

.23 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6031 

3671 

Charlestown  

3.25 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6031 

3805 

Roekport  

2.25 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Mivpd  Feed 

6047 

3080 

5 

Not  tagged 

Akron  Milling  Company,  Akron,  Ind. 

Mixed  Chop  E'eed 

7510 

2616 

Akron  

.1 

Not  registered 

Alfocorn  Milling  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

Molasses  Alfocorn  Horse  & Hule  Feed 

5338 

3119 

Evansville  

2.4 

Not  tagged 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co., 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Crnnnd  Meat  Scraps 

8106 

5253 

Flnora 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Qrnnnd  Meat  .Scraps 

8106 

5265 

Odon 

.2 

American  Hominy  Company, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

♦Hnmcnlinp  Feed 

3929 

Monon 

3 

Homcn 

4265 

1750 

Dugger  

.4 

♦Horn  CO 

4265 

Dugger  

.45 

Homco  Dry  Mash 

6565 

3408 

Indianapolis  

.4 

Homcn  Chick  Feed 

6568 

2785 

Greencastle 

.75 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Homcn  Chick  Feed 

6568 

3081 

Princeton 

.05 

*Homco  Chcik  Feed  

6568 

Fort  Branch 

.05 

Homco  Scratch  Feed 

3239 

Mt.  Vernon 

.45 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

♦Homco  Feed 

6716 

Tocsin 

.6 

♦Homco  Hominy  Feed 

7614 

— 

Remington  

.3 

American  Linseed  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Old  Process  Idnseed  Oil  Meal 

4859 

4810 

Plainfield 

.1 

Wrong  label  attached 

American  Merchants  Syndicate, 

Chicago,  111. 

Svndicate  Calf  Meal  _ . _ . _ 

7333 

1809 

Wheeler 

.05 

Not  registered 

Not  registered 

Syndicate  Milk  Mash 

1808 

Wheeler 

.05 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Tip  Top  Scratch  Feed  with  5%  Grit 

5549 

4274 

Wolcottville  

.15 

Not  tagged 

*Tip  Top  Scratch  Feed  with  5%  Grit 

5549 

Vallonia, 

.15 

Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein  and  excess 
crude  fiber 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein  and  excess 
crude  fiber 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Amco  Cottonseed  Meal 

5617 

1469 

Fendallville 

2.75 

Amco  Cottonseed  Meal 

5617 

2024 

Kokomo  

2.25 

Amco  Old  Process  T.inseed  Meal 

5618 

1571 

Chrisney  ....  _ 

.95 

Amco  Old  Process  l inseed  Meal 

5618 

2480 

New  Ross 

.85 

Amco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal 

5618 

5087 

Evansville  

1 

*No  sample  taken 


208 


TABLE  VI— Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

— _ 

■■■■■■ 

LABEL 

j Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Amco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal 

Amco  Old  Process  Linseed  Meal 

Tip  Top  Chick  Peed 

Tip  Top  Scratch  Peed 

Amco  Fat  Maker 

Amco  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Feed ..... 

Amco  Old  Process  Unscreened  Flax- 
seed Oil  Feed 

Tip  Top  Alfalfa  Horse  Feed 


Empire  State  Dairy  Feed 
Empire  State  Dairy  Feed 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed 
Empire  State  Dairy  Feed 


Empire  State  Dairy  Feed  ,... 

Empire  State  Dairy  Feed 

Sucrene  Dairy  Feed 

Sucrene  Dairy  Feed 

Amco  Corn  Peed  Meal 

Tip  Top  Alfalfa  Horse  Feed 


Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 
Amo,  Ind. 

Rye  Middlings  and  Screenings. . 


Arcady  Farms  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Farm  Brand  Poultry  Feed 


Archer-Daniels  Linseed  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Old  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake. 


Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 


Badenoch  C.  & O.  Chop 

*Chop  Feed  

Corn  Feed  Meal 


^Alfalfa  Meal 


Bailey  & Thompson,  Prairie  Creek,  Ind. 


Ballard  & Ballard  Company, 
Louisville,  Ky. 

Ballard’s  Bran 


Bartlett  Company,  The  J.  E., 

Jackson,  Mich. 

Bartlett’s  Jersey  Farmer  Brand  Prime 
Cottonseed  Meal 


Bay  State  Milling  Company, 

Winona,  Minn. 

“Winona”  Fancy  White  Flour  Mid- 
dlings   


Reddog  Flour 

*No  sample  taken 


5618 

5103 

Evansville  

.15 

Not  tagged 

5136 

Oakland  City  ___ 

.3 

Not  tagged 

5064 

4346 

Scott  

.2 

Not  tagged 

5807 

4271 

Wolcottville  

.2 

Not  tagged 

6348 

5292 

Greenfield  

3!6 

Wrong  label  attached 

7473 

4491 

Perrysville  _ ... 

.5 

Not  tagged 

7473 

5088 

Evansville  

4.7 

Not  tagged 

7568 

4704 

Pierceville 

2.4 

Incorrect  guarantee  of 
ingredients 

7625 

4101 

Muncie  

1.5 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein 

7625 

4432 

Muncie  

.25 

Conflict  of  statements  on 
sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

7625 

4552 

Salem  

1.5 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein 

7625 

4633 

Indianapolis  

20 

Unlabeled  and  deficient  in 
crude  fat  and  crude 
protein 

7625 

5086 

Evansville  

5.6 

Deficient  in  crude  fat 

7625 

5144 

Lewisville  

1 

Deficient  in  crude  fat 

7674 

4270 

Wolcottville  

.15 

Not  tagged 

7674 

4270 

(1)  Wolcottville. 

.2 

Not  tagged 

8095 

5052 

Milltown  _. 

3’.5 

Not  tagged 

7833 

4635 

Indianapolis 

6 

Wrong  label  attached 

7947 

4829 

Whiteland  

15 

Not  tagged 

7680 

5169 

Crown  Point 

.95 

Not  tagged 

1834 

2056 

Monroe  

■ .8 

Not  tagged 

6221 

3131 

Gary  _ 

1 

Not  tagged 

6641 

3133 

Gary  

2 

Not  tagged 

6779 

3135 

Gary 

Gary  

.65 

1.5 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

6989 

2018 

South  Bend  

3 

Not  tagged 

1 0989 

1 

3134 

Gary  

Gary  

.4 

.2 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

7785 

4031 

Prairie  Creek  _.. 

.15 

Not  registered 

3168 

2875 

Mauckport  

.3 

Not  tagged 

7249 

2560 

Middlebury  

3.95 

Not  tagged 

7144 

4765 

Crown  Point 

1.3 

Conflict  of  statements  on 
sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

7145 

4764 

Crown  Point  ... 

.35 

Wrong  label  attached 

209 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Berghoff  Brewing  Company, 

Ft.  Wayne,  Ind. 

Berghnff’s  Dried  Brewers  Crains 

1516 

4597 

Ft.  Wayne 

9.5 

Not  tagged 

Billman  & Sons,  C.  H., 

Shelbyville,  Ind. 

Hominy  Feed  ___ 

4336 

4793 

Shelbyville  

3.5 

Not  tagged 

Blanton  Milling  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Blanton’s  Pig  Feed 

7378 

2003 

Indianapolis 

.15 

Not  registered 

Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Factory, 
Waukegan,  111. 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal  _ . .. 

4536 

Saratoga  

.09 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

4536 

Redkey  

.13 

*Rla.tf‘hfnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

6718 

South  Bend  

.29 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

3601 

Dillsboro  

.25 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal  

7267 

Converse __ 

.08 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Millersburg  _ 

.1 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Georgetown 

.04 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

— - 

Georgetown  

Henryville  __  _ 

.03 

.11 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 



W.  College  Corn’r 

.09 

♦Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal  _ _ 

7267 

Shelbyville  _ 

.01 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

*Blatehfnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Aurora 

.48 

*Rlatehfnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Holton  

.13 

*Rlatehfnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Hoagland  

.15 

*Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Redkey  

.06 

*Rlatehfnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Scott, 

.11 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Net  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

*rilat,ehfnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Nappanee 

.05 

■*  Rlatehfnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Frankton  _ 

.2 

*Rlatehfr)rd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Kewanna  

.08 

*Rlatehford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Mooresville  

.25 

*Rlaf,elifnrd’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

Odon 

.15 

Rlatehford’s  Hne-  Ratinn 

7695 

3147 

Evansville  __ 

.1 

Broad  Ripple  Flour  & Feed  Mills, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8065 

4936 

Indianapolis 

.05 

Not  registered 

Erode  & Company,  F.  W., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4840 

1524 

Columbia  City  __ 

17 

Unlabeled  and  deficient  in 
crude  protein  and  excess 
crude  fiber 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

4840 

2474 

North  Manchester 

.55 

Not  tagged 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4840 

2562 

Middlebury 

,1 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4885 

4121 

Upland 

.9 

Jay  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7902 

4567 

Marengo 

19 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8009 

4737 

Burney  _ .. 

11 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8009 

4738 

Burney 

30 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

8009 

5083 

Evansville 

6.4 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

8009 

5150 

Lewisville  . 

19.5 

Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8009 

5240 

Pendleton . 

11.7 

■*Dove  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Brown  Molasses  Food  Company, 

8009 

Greensburg  

7 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Bro-Mo-Co  Molasses  Dairy  Feed 

Burge-Thomas  Milling  Company, 

6997 

3261 

Indianapolis 

17.25 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
and  excess  crude  fiber 

Marion,  Ind. 

Tip  Tod  Scrateh  Feed  . 

7340 

2983 

Warren  

.75 

Wrong  label  attached 

Burnett  Company,  The  Wm.  A., 
Louisville,  Ky. 

Burnett’s  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

7160 

5269 

Montgomery 

24 

Not  tagged 

*No  sample  taken 


210 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Butler  & Company,  Edw.  J., 

Chicago,  111. 

Butler’s  Golden  Leaf 

7262 

2661 

Logansport  

.05 

Not  tagged 

Butler’s  Premium  Hog  Peed 

7774 

4249 

Albion  

.4 

Adulterated  with  peanut 
hulls 

Butler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed 

7774 

4251 

Kendallville  

.55 

Unlabeled  and  adulterated 
with  peanut  hulls 

Butler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed 

7774 

4375 

Ligonier  

.35 

Unlabeled  and  adulterated 
with  peanut  hulls 

7774 

4578 

.25 

.65 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Butler’s  Pr^Tninm  TTng  Fped  , 

7774 

4752 

Bnt'pT’’s  Prenninm  Hog  Fped  ... 

7774 

5146 

Lewisville  

2.8 

*Butler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed 

Campbell  & Company,  C.  L., 

7774 

Lewisville  

4 

Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Single  Hump  Camel  Brand  Cotton- 

seed  Meal  

8031 

4954 

Hamilton 

3.2 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
and  excess  crude  fiber 

Castetter  & Company,  Clyde  J., 

Goshen,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings 

7291 

1587 

Goshen 

10 

Not  registered 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings 

7291 

1598 

Bristol  

9.5 

Not  tagged 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

7292 

1586 

Goshen  

10 

Not  registered 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

7292 

1597 

Goshen  

8.75 

Not  tagged 

Cauble,  0.  L.,  Pekin,  Ind. 

Whpat,  Shorts 

1016 

4961 

Salem  ..  

.4 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Cayuga  Milling  Company,  Cayuga,  Ind. 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  Bran 

Central  Kansas  Milling  Company, 

421 

4519 

Clay  City 

10 

Conflict  of  statements  on 
sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Lyons,  Kans. 

Wheat  Shorts 

2152 

Michigan  City  .. 

.55 

Not  registered 

Chamberlain  Company,  F.  B., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

’Chamberlain’s  Perfect  Chick  Feed 

Chapin  & Company,  Hammond,  Ind. 

7323 

3441 

Indianapolis 

.2 

Not  tagged 

Tlniporn  Hairy  Ration 

7224 

1849 

Valparaiso  

.35 

Not  tagged 

Chicago  Feed  & Fertilizer  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Mngip  BranH  TanVagp 

6368 

4426 

Elwood  

7.5 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 

Magip  Branrl  Tankagp 

6368 

4433 

Windfall  

6.9 

Magic  Brand  Tankage .. 

6368 

4740 

Franklin  . 

.8 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6347 

1623 

McCordsville 

.9 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
and  excess  crude  fiber 

Old  Proppss  Oil  Meal 

6351 

5242 

Chalmers  

.15 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Deficient  in  crude  protein 
and  excess  crude  fiber 

“Hpights”  Corn  Oilpakp  Mpal 

6819 

2173 

Martinsville  

10.4 

“Heights”  Corn  Oileake  Meal 

6819 

2632 

Pekin  

5 

“Prize”  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed 

7002 

1475 

Camden  

1.35 

“Prize”  Rye  Middlings 

7118 

2372 

Elwood  

8 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

“Prize”  Red  Dog  Flour 

7402 

1877 

Rensselaer  

.35 

“Prize”  Red  Dog  Flour 

7402 

2275 

North  Judson  ... 

.2 

Christian  & Company,  Geo.  C., 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Jersey  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run... 

Cincinnati  Animal  Food  Company, 

7429 

2100 

Laporte  

.1 

Not  tagged 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Porkopolis”  Brand  Digester  Tankage 

6728 

4577 

Sharpsville  

3 

Not  tagged 

*No  sample  taken 


211 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  V, 

c 

3 

Inspection  S' 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 
with- 
drawn ■ 
approx, 
tons 

Cause 

Clayton  Milling  Company,  Clayton,  Ind. 

rVinp  T^Pfirt 

5344 

2984 

Clayton 

.6 

Corn  bran  present 

•Coombs  Milling  Company,  Wm.  A., 

Coldwater,  Mich. 

Wheat  Middlings  — 

1692 

2561 

Shipshewanna  .. 

.15 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

sacks  and  official  labels 

Co-operative  Bakers’  Milling  Company, 

attached 

North  Judson  Branch,  North  Jud- 

son,  Ind. 

Rye  Mixed  Feed 

6526 

3987 

North  Judson  __ 

.49 

Not  tagged 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

New  York,  N.  T. 

Buffalo  rinrn  ninten  Feed 

5530 

3426 

Kokomo  

.9 

Not  tagged 

*Bnfff(ln  rinrn  f^lntpn  Fppd 

5530 

South  Bend 

.55 

Not  tagged 

^Buffalo  rinrn  Olnten  Feed 

5530 

1 

Not  tagged 

^Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

5530 

Fort  Wayne 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Diamond  Corn  Gluten  Meal  

6979 

3838 

F.lkhart 

1.85 

Not  tagged 

7478 

1 

Not  tagged 

Crum,  John,  Milan,  Ind. 

Hnrsp  and  Mnle  Feed  _ . _ 

6652 

3581 

Milan  

.75 

Incorrect  guarantee  of 

ingredients 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

3582 

Milan  

.2 

Not  tagged 

Cyphers  Incubator  Company, 

Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

rhiek  Food 

4195 

2580 

Brookville  

.05 

Not  tagged 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

4503 

2064 

T.apnrte 

.15 

Not  tagged 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

4503 

2607 

Wakarusa  

.15 

Not  tagged 

♦Darling’s  Standard  Meat  Scraps 

5072 

Pleasant  Lake 

.14 

Not  tagged 

♦Darling’s  Meat  Crisps 

5436 

Goshen 

6 lbs. 

Not  tagged 

♦Darling’s  Meat  (Crisps 

5436 

Fvansville 

13  lbs. 

Not  tagged 

♦Darling’s  Meat  (Crisps 

New  Castle 

.02 

Not  tagged 

♦Darling’s  Meat  Crisps 

5436 

Bloomfield 

.02 

Not  tagged 

Davis,  S.  P.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Standard  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cot- 

ton Seed 

6272 

4463 

Brnceville 

5 

Not  tagged 

♦Standard  Brand  Cold.  Pressed  Cot- 

/■ 

ton  Seed  ' . . . 

6272 

Bmceville 

.5 

Not  tagged 

*Veribest  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7432 

Brazil  

2.57 

Not  tagged 

Decatur  Fertilizer  Company, 

Decatur,  Ind. 

n’ankagp. 

7438 

2095 

Decatur  

.2 

Not  tagged 

Decatur  Roller  Mills,  Decatur,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlinp-s  Screenings 

5426 

2121 

T,inn  Grove 

.85 

Not  tagged 

Denver  Alfalfa  Milling  & Products 

Company,  The,  Hartman,  Colo. 

Alfalfa  Meal 

7576 

4503 

Dana  

.05 

Not  tagged 

Deutsch  & Sickert  Company, 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

7259 

4811 

Plainfield 

.1 

Wrong  label  attached 

Dewey  Bros.  Company,  The, 

Blanchester,  Ohio. 

Dewev’s  Digester  Tankage 

7152 

2221 

Mexico 

.2 

Not  tagged 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert, 

Chicago,  111. 

Crescent  Chick  Feed  with  Grit 

2807 

2277 

Winamac 

.15 

Not  tagged 

Alfalfa  Meal 

1 2816 

1585 

Goshen  

.05 

Not  tagged 

*No  sample  taken 


212 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  ^ 

c 

nber 

PI 

o 

Id 

CD 

c 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Dickinson  Company,  The  Albert,  . 

1 

Chicago,  111. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

2816 

2276 

North  Judson  ___ 

.1 

Not  tagged 

2816 

2408 

.05 

Not  tagged 

3616 

1848 

Valparaiso  

.2 

Not  tagged 

\VhitP.  r.rnRS  Stnrk  "Ppprl 

4233 

4347 

T.agrangp 

.15 

Not  tagged 

Globe  Chick  Feed  with  Grit 

5615 

2821 

Milford  

.25 

Wrong  label  attached 

5647 

4380 

Pern 

.2 

Not  tagged. 

Pinp  '^I'rpp  Spratph  Fppd  with  Grit 

6969 

4248 

Corunna 

.05 

Not  tagged 

7240 

1822 

.55 

Not  tagged 

Dillsboro  Milling  Company, 

Dillsboro,  Ind. 

3602 

.4 

Not  registered 

Dixie  Mills  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

5392 

2401 

Cieero 

. 05 

Not  tagged 

5419 

5102 

Evansville 

.1 

Not  tagged 

Anchor  Cottonseed  Meal 

7537 

3484 

North  Vernon  ___ 

1.25 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Dixie  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

7693 

3865 

Oakland  City  ___ 

.2 

Not  tagged 

Douglas  Company,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa. 

Douglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

6932 

3267 

Terre  Haute 

.75 

Not  tagged 

Douglas  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

6932 

3554 

Paris  Crossing  __ 

3 

Not  tagged 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Tuxedo  Chop  _ 

5297 

3603 

Dillsboro 

.7 

Not  tagged 

M'livpdn  Ghop 

5297 

3604 

Aurora  

.8 

Not  tagged 

Tuxedo  Chop 

5297 

3646 

Aurora 

.9 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 

Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

5476 

2897 

West  College 

crude  protein 

Corner  

*.25 

Unlabeled  and  excess 

crude  fiber 

Primp  Gnttnn  Sppd  Mpal  ' 

5476 

3647 

Aurora 

.75 

Unlabeled  and  deficient  in 

crude  protein  and  excess 

East  St.  Louis  Cotton  Oil  Company, 

crude  fiber 

National  Stock  Yards,  111. 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cottonseed  Mealj 

6258 

1807 

Linton  

1 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

i 

and  excess  crude  fiber 

Eberts,  H.  F.  H.,  Little  Rock,  Ark.  | 

Milko  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7428 

4570 

Elkhart  

1 

Not  tagged 

*Milkn  Brand  Onttnn.RPPd  Meal 

7428 

Gas  City 

.25 

Not  tas'P'ed 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

Eberts’  Mix-Feed  

2652 

3557 

North  Vernon 

1.95 

Not  tagged 

Eberts  Hominy  Feed  

6366 

3479 

North  Madison  _ 

.3 

Not  tagged 

Eckert,  Andrew  W.,  Jasper,  Ind. 

Whpat  Ttran  and  Short.s  Mi-xpd 

3300 

3795 

Jasper  __  _ . 

.75 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Edwards  & Loomis  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Red  Comb  Fine  Chick  with  Grit 

2908 

3423 

Indianapolis 

1.4 

Not  tagged 

Red  Gnmh  Alfalfa  Mpal 

3001 

2559 

Middlebury  

.15 

Not  tagged 

Eldred  Mill  Company,  Jackson,  Mich. 

GiiRfn  l^rand  Gnffnnsppd  Meal 

8125 

5183 

Greensfork  

20 

Not  tagged 

Emge  & Sons,  Peter,  Fort  Branch,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

7749 

2909 

Fort  Branch 

.25 

Not  registered 

Emison  & Company,  J.  & S., 

(Baltic  Mills),  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Hominy  Feed 

4482 

3746 

Dale  . _ . 

.3 

Deficient  in  crude  fat 

*Blue  Diamond  Little  Chick  Feed 

5071 

Roachdale  

.08 

Not  tagged 

*Bob  White  I.ittle  Chick  Feed  __  

Brookville  

.15 

Not  tagged 

Blue  Diamond  Poultry  Feed  

6248 

3082 

Princeton  _ - 

.3 

Not  tagged 

*No  sample  taken 


213 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Cause 

Evansville  Packing  Company, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

7403 

2908 

Fort  Branch 

.4 

Not  tagged 

* 

Ewing  Mill  Company,  Brownstown,  Ind. 

298 

3555 

Butlerville  

.6 

Not  tagged 

Excelsior  Mill  Company,  Yankton,  S.  D. 

2119 

Linn  Grove 

1.85 

Not  registered 

2120 

Linn  Grove  

1.13 

Not  registered 

Fairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

6453 

5280 

Worthington  ___ 

.4 

Not  tagged 

Farmers  Fertilizer  Company, 

Columbus,  0., 

6358 

2923 

Rising  Sun 

.4 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 

Feeders  Supply  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

“Equity  Brand”  Cottonseed  Meal 

Ferger  Grain  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  0. 

T^r\T»V\vr 

6167 

7691 

1619 

3190 

Huntingburg  ___ 

Sunman  

19 

.35 

crude  protein 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
and  excess  crude  fiber 

Not  tagged 

JJcI  Uy  XlUlotJ  J;  ecu. — — 

Finkle  Bros.,  Warren,  Ind. 

1198 

2981 

Warren  . 

.55 

Not  tagged  * 

V_/Ulix  cliiu  vy<iLo 

Forest  Park  Mills, 

North  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Corn  Fppd  Meal  __  - 

7927 

4502 

No.  Terre  Haute 

.75 

Not  registered 

Gaston  Roller  Mills,  Gaston,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Middlings  

5508 

4900 

Gaston  

2 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings  & Scour- 

ing;R  

8056 

4899 

Gaston  

2 

sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Not  tagged 

Golden  Grain  Milling  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

IVTnlp 

Laconia  

.15 

Not  tagged 

V^UiilCttC  J-XUloC  tX/  XTXLAIC  X CV-VJ. 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

^hop 

3832 

4065 

Winchester  

.75 

Corn  bran  present 

GrEift’s  Sorntph  T^ppfi 

4406 

4064 

Winchester  

1.9 

Wrong  label  attached,  am- 

Graft’s pprateh  Peed 

4406 

4068 

Farmland  

.15 

ber  cane  and  sunflower 
seed  present 

Wrong  label  attached,  am- 

Green Bros.  & Oldfather,  Warsaw,  Ind. 
Wheat  Prau  

804 

4474 

Ligonier  

.53 

ber  cane  and  sunflower 
seed  present 

Not  tagged 

Whpfit  T^TcITI 

7919 

4475 

Warsaw 

10 

Not  registered 

H^ales  & Edwards  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Oreertn  Peed 

. 7578 

2851 

Knox  

1 

Not  tagged 

Harvest  Horse  Feed  

7615 

3112 

East  Chicago 

2 

Not  tagged 

Malt  Snrouts  _ 

7644 

3961 

Fort  Wayne 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Cackle  Fine  Chick  Feed  (With  Grit 

Charcoal)  __  

. 7697 

3421 

Indianapolis  

1.6 

Not  tagged 

Hancock  Fertilizer  Company,  The, 
Greenfield,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  _ _ ___  _ 

. 7659 

2970 

Greenfield  

.1 

N )t  tagged 

‘No  sample  taken 


214 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

PI 

Amount 

_o 

Sample 

with- 

is 

taken  at 

drawn 

"o 

approx. 

O 

m 

a 

tons 

LABEL 


Cause 


Hanks  Company,  The  Howard  H., 
Chicago,  111. 

Eingfalfa.  Mea.rlnw  Eced 

5267 

5219 

Mitchell 

.3 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

*TCiTigfalffl.  Horfift  "Reed 

5276 

.2 

Golden  Egg  Eine  Chick  Eeed  with  Grit 

6684 

3979 

Jasonville 

1.65 

Kukoo  Scratch  Eeed  with  Grit  & Shell 

7037 

3366 

Clinton  

2.75 

Not  tagged 

Hazleton  Elour  Mills,  Hazleton,  Ind. 
Wheat  Shorts 

7475 

5000 

Vincennes 

1 

Wrong  label  attached 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Heppe  & Sons  Company,  Win., 
Logansport,  Ind. 

Eeeding  'Tankage 

7590 

2362 

Edinhiirg 

.25 

Hewitt,  C.  G.,  Montgomery,  Ala. 

2473 

1.1 

Home  Mill  & Grain  Company, 

Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

7449 

3240 

Mt.  Vernon 

j 

5 ' 

Wheat  Middlings 

7449 

3241 

Mt.  Vernon 

.5 

Adulterated  with  screenings 
Adulterated  with  screenings 
Adulterated  with  screenings 

W'heat  Middlings 

7449 

3242 

Mt.  Vernon > 

1 

*Wheat  Middlings 

7449 

Mt.  Vernon 

.1  i 

Hoosier  Packing  Company,  The, 

Decatur,  Ind. 

Tankage  _ 

7396 

2091 

Decatur  

1 

Not  registered 

Tankage  

7396 

4201 

Decatur  ’ 

3 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Hubbard,  J.  W.,  Monrovia,  Ind. 

Mixed  Eeed 

7550 

4850 

Monrovia  

Wrong  label  attached 

Hughes-Curry  Packing  Company, 
Anderson,  Ind. 

Eeeding  Tanka ve 

7374 

1997 

Anderson  

.35 

Not  registered 

Humphreys-Godwin  Company, 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Eorfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7116 

5135 

Oakland  City 

12.5 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Hunger,  C.  G.,  Madison,  Ind. 

Chicken  Eeed 

3506 

Madison  

.05 

Not  tagged 

Hunter-Robinson-Wenz  Milling  Com- 
pany, St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mixed  Eeed 

5218 

3950 

Linton  

5 

Not  tagged 

Hutchinson  Elour  Mills  Company,  The, 
Hutchinson,  Kans. 

Mill  Run  Bran 

4995 

3916 

Monon  

1.5 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Mill  Run  Bran 

4995 

3917 

Monon  

2 

Incorrect  guarantee  of 

Mill  Run  Bran 

1 

1 4995 

3918 

Monon  

3 

ingredients 

Wrong  label  attached 

Mill  Run  Bran 

1 4995 

1 

3919 

Monon  

.65 

Wrong  label  attached 

Igleheart  Bros.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

*Whent  Bran 

1 

’ 5771 

Mauckport 

.45 

Not  tagged 

Imperial  Cotto  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 
seed Meal 

4881 

2317 

LaEontaine 

3.5 

Not  tagged 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

Meal 

7099 

2313 

Muncie  

30 

Not  tagged 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 
Meal 

7099 

2824 

Columbus  

1.75 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 
Meal  

7099 

2826 

North  Vernon  ___ 

2.25 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

*Xo  sample  taken 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Imperial  Ootto  Milling  Company, 
Chicago,  111. 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

7099 

2930 

Burney  

7 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

7099 

3511 

Madison  

1.75 

^Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

Meal  

7099 

Elizabethtown  __ 

3 

imperial  Cotto  Brand  Cottonseed 

Meal  

7099 

North  Vernon  ___ 

.2 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

7150 

2646 

Orleans  

4.3 

7307 

2165 

Frankfort  _ . 

2 

Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Imperial  Cotto  Sales  Company, 

Chicago,  lU. 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Gotton- 

7307 

7307 

8093 

2800 

2817 

5188 

Bourbon  

Inwood  

Rensselaer  ._ 

4.5 

.2 

15 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 
seed Meal  

8093 

5157 

Notre  Dame 

13 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 

8093 

^94 

Moody  

10 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cotton- 
pppd  Mpal  _ 

8093 

5291 

Wabash  

10 

Indiana  Seed  Company,  The, 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

*Pony  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

7426 

Columbus  

.25 

International  Glue  Company, 

Boston,  Mass. 

T?pd  Star  Brand  Pi.sh  Scrap 

7166 

5309 

New  Castle 

.1 

International  Sugar  Peed  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Special  Dairy  Peed 

5327 

2816 

Inwood  

.3 

TntPrnafic^nal  Poultry  Peed 

5669 

4963 

S alem  

.8 

♦International  Hog  Peed  and  Charcoal. 

6097 

Grabill  

3 

International  Climax  Hog  Peed  & 

nharpoal 

7650 

4247 

Nappanee  

9.85 

Interstate  Peed  Association, 

Detroit,  Mich. 

Interstate  Dairy  & Hog  Peed  

7719 

3517 

Argos  __  

3 

Int.prstatp  Dairy  A-,  Hog  Peed 

7719 

8040 

4473 

Pewflnna 

6.5 

Interstate  Brewers  Dried  Grains  

4831 

Greenwood  

2 

Johnston  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Pinola, 

R.  R.  No.  7,  Laporte,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

7391 

2065 

Pinola  (Laporte 

Wheat  Middlings - 

. 7392 

2066 

R.  R.  No.  7)  — 
Pinola  (Laporte 

.2 

Joslin-Schmidt  Company,  The, 
Cincinnati,  0. 

“Abattoir  Brand”  Digester  Tankage.. 

“/\battr*ir  Branrl”  Meat  Rpraps 

. 6376 

4122 

4155 

R.  R.  No.  7)— 

Upland  

Pennville  

.15 

5.05 

.2 

Kansas  Plour  Mills  Company,  The, 

• Wichita,  Kans. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

5076 

3346 

Richmond  

5 

Standard  Shorts  and  Wheat  Screen- 

ings  

. 5079 

3184 

Batesville  

1 

White  Shorts  & Wheat  Screenings 

5080 

2133 

Michigan  City 

.1  1.25 

Cause 


Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 
Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 
Not  tagged 
Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 
Not  tagged 
Not  tagged 
N't  tagged  • 

Not  tagged 


Not  tagged 


Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein  and  adul- 
terated with  grit 
Not  tagged 

Wrong  label  attached 


Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein  and  excess 
crude  fiber 
Not  tagged 


Not  registered 
Not  registered 


Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 


Not  tagged 

Deficient  in  crude  fat 

Mutilated  labels  attached 


*No  sample  taken 


2i6 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

----- 

Amount 

LABEL 

.2 

Sample 
taken  at 

with- 

drawn 

Cause 

’o 

approx. 

o 

QO 

a 

tons 

Kaw  Milling  Company,  Topeka,  Kans. 

7935 

4796 

Michigan  City  _. 
Michigan  City  _. 

3.3 

Wrong  label  attached 

Not  tagged 

*\Vhpnt  Bran 

1.35 

Kellogg  & Sons,  Inc.,  Spencer, 

Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5877 

4250 

Albion 

.3 

Not  tagged 

Kemper  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Anchor  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings.. 
Carnation  Gray  Middlings  and  Screen- 

6030 

3978 

1.85 

Not  tagged 

7325 

3977 

Jasonville  

2.05 

Not  tagged 

Carnation  Gray  Middlings  and  Screen- 

7325 

4870 

4 

Not  tagged 

Kennedy  Milling  Company,  The  G.  W., 

Shelbyville,  Ind. 

7791 

4058 

Shelbyville  ..  ... 

.5 

Not  registered 

Kingfalfa  Mills,  Nebraska  City,  Neb. 

3971 

3079 

Port  Branch  

.15 

Not  tagged 

Klemm,  Geo.  J.,  Milton,  Ind. 

4736 

2871 

Lewisville  

1.95 

Wrong  label  attached 

Knoke  & Company,  H.  C.,  Chicago,  111. 

Perfecto  Poultry  Pood  . 

3940 

2859 

Prancesville  

,25 

Not  tagged 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Incorrect  guarantee  of 
ingredients 

Perfecto  Poultry  Pood 

3940 

4035 

Otterbein  

.06 

Perfecto  Poultry  Pood 

3940 

4036 

Otterbein  

.06 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Dairy  Peed 

6426 

2102 

Laporte  

Incorrect  guarantee  of  in- 
gredients and  excess 

crude  fiber 

Blue  Top  Pine  Chick  Peed  No  Grit 

6500 

3658 

Charlestown  

.65 

Incorrect  guarantee  of 

ingredients 

Blue  Top  Pine  Chick  Peed  No  Grit 

6500 

3659 

Charlestown  

.65 

Incorrect  guarantee  of 

ingredients 

Badger  Dairy  Peed  

7326 

3429 

Kokomo  

1.5 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Kuhn  & Son,  John  H., 

Michigan  City,  Ind. 

TTeneatta  Scratch  Peed  No  Grit 

7798 

3992 

Michigan  City  .. 

.08 

Not  registered 

Lanier  Bros.,  Nashville,  Tenn. 

1 

.Tersey  Brand  Pottonseed  Meal 

5537 

3320 

Richmond  

1.2 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
and  excess  crude  fiber 

Larrowe  Milling  Company,  The, 

Detroit,  Mich. 

Dried  Beet  Pulp 

2709 

5159 

Valparaiso  

i 

2.5 

Not  tagged 

I. ash  Plour  Mills,  The  Pred  B., 

Parmersburg,  Ind. 

Iva'^h’s  Extra  Mixed  Peed  

6417 

3976 

TTyinera 

.14 

Wrong  label  attached 

Not  registered 

Porn  Peed  Meal 

7783 

4019 

Parmersburg 

.25 

Laxo  Pake  Meal  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Did  in-nee.«!S  T.axo  ("ake  Meal 

4618 

2441 

Crothersville  

.18 

Not  agged 

Not  tagged 

*Dlfl  Process  T.avo  Pake  ATeal 

4618 

Clinton  

.25 

Leavel,  I.  A.,  Bainbridge,  Ind. 

Wheat  Aliddlings 

7501 

2450 

Bainbridge  

.5 

Deficient  in  crude  fat 

Lefforge,  Otto,  Eossville,  Ind. 

Chop  Peed  

7932 

4496 

Rossville  

.05 

Not  registered 

Linton  Mill  Company,  The,  Linton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

507 

1751 

Dugger  

1 

Not  tagged 

^No  sample  taken 


217 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain  Com- 
pany, Monticello,  Ind. 

7713 

3368 

Greencastle  

.25 

Not  tagged 

7713 

3580 

LaPayette  

,1 

Not  tagged 

7731 

3599 

Monticello  

.25 

Not  registered 

7731 

3600 

Monticello  

.2 

Not  registered 

Louisville  Cereal  Mill  Company, 
Louisville,  Ky. 

Memphis  

.1 

Not  tagged 

Louisville  Milling  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

*Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

6175 

Laconia  

.1 

Not  tagged 

Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings 

6176 

2463 

Sellersburg  

.25 

Not  tagged 

Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings 

6176 

2880 

Leavenworth  — 

.15 

Not  tagged 

Lovitt  & Company,  L.  B., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

6849 

2232 

Crown  Point 

10 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

]Vl6inphiS  PTfind  r^ntt.nnspprl  TVfpal 

6849 

5298 

Portland 

11 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Oottons^^'Cl 

1909 

Indianapolis 

10 

Not  tagged 

Macdonald,  J.  M.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Kineda  Prim<^  rintt<^Tisppfl  Meal 

6761 

2421 

Columbus  

1 

Not  tagged 

Kin^clfl  ppiTTip  r^ntt.nnsppfl  IVfpal 

6761 

2440 

Crothersville 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Kineda  Prim*'  rinttnnsppfi  Mpal 

6761 

3661 

Jeffersonville  ___ 

6.05- 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  

6761 

5174 

•Jeffersonville 

7.6 

crude  protein  and  excess 
crude  fiber 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6761 

5330 

Indianapolis 

10 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Maeado  riott<^n®p*'d  Mpal 

6891 

1768 

Portland  

1.25 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

MRCftdo  ivfpal 

6891 

3090 

Haubstadt  

1.75 

and  excess  crude  fiber 

Not  tagged 

Maead*^  rinttnnsppd  Meal 

6891 

3166 

Evansville  

.5 

Not  tagged 

Maegerlein  Roller  Mills,  Arthur, 

Clay  City,  Ind. 

Sprppning'S 

4516 

Clay  City  

3 

Not  registered 

Major  Company,  The  Guy  G., 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Old  Process  Oil  Meal  

2858 

1525 

Columbia  City  __ 

.65 

Mutilated  labels  attached 

*01d  Process  Oil  Meal 

2858 

Lawrenceburg  __ 

.13 

Not  tagged 

Majot  & Morgan,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 
nhnp  Pppd 

8039 

4799 

Michigan  City  __ 

.6 

Not  registered 

Mangelsdorf  Bros.,  Atchison,  Kans. 

Pppd 

4282 

Westfield  

33.05 

Not  tagged 

Marshall  Milling  Company, 

Marshall,  Minn. 

Shorts  & Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run  

6396 

4736 

Bargersville 

15 

Not  tagged 

Martin  & Company,  John  C., 

Mineral  Point,  Wis. 

*MartiTi’s  rialf  Mpal 

5047 

Goshen  

.25 

Not  tagged 

Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle,  Ind. 

Corn  Ppp.d  Mpal 

. 7863 

4302 

New  Castle  

.35 

Not  registered 

Cracked  Corn,  Wheat  & Oats 

5310 

1 New  Castle  

.05 

Not  tagged 

*N6  sample  taken 


2i8 


TABLE  VI— Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


LABEL 


Number 


Sample 
taken  at 


Mayflower  Mills,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

^Mayflower  Mills  Wheat  Middlings 

451 

Albany 

5 

Not  t3,g'^6(l 

Mayflower  Bran  & Screenings 

6715 

4688 

Liberty  Center  _ 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Bed  Dog  _ . 

7444 

2247 

Not  tagged 

Mead,  Johnson  & Company, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

Mead’s  Hominv  Feed 

7760' 

3682 

7.5 

Not  registered 

! 

Meier  Packing  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

1 

Tankage  _ 

4897 

Indianapolis 

.03 

Not  tagged 

Metzger  Seed  & Oil  Company, 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

*01d  Process  Oil  Meal 

6672 

Pleasant  Lake 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Montgomery,  Ira,  Madison,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

3536 

,2 

1 

Not  registered 

Morris  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Big  Brand  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4224 

4074 

Salem 

.5  ! 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Mortorff,  M.  J.,  Metz,  Ind. 

i 

Chop  Feed  

4310 

Metz 

.25 

Not  registered 

Mueller,  Edward  P.,  Chicago,  111. 

Fleischmans  Dried  Grains 

7762 

3729 

Crown  Point 

17.5  1 

1 

Not  tagged 

Muun  Brokerage  Company, 

Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Tierer  Brand  Molasses  Fattener 

7399 

1829 

Rldgevillft 

■1.75 

Not  tagged 

Tieer  Brand  Molasses  Fattener 

7399 

1830 

Ridgeville 

2.05 

Not  tagged 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

McCoys  Choice  Distillers  Corn  Grains. 

4945 

4632 

Indianapolis 

8.5 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

McCoys  Choice  Distillers  Corn  Grains- 

4945 

4830 

Greenwood  

1.4 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

McCoys  Choice  Hog  Digester  Tankage 

5223 

3908 

Elnora  

.2 

Not  tagged 

*Green  Pasture 

5513 

Plainfield 

.85 

Not  tagged 

Eureka  Poultrv  Mash  _ _ _ 

6572 

5255 

Odon 

.25 

Not  tagged 

White  Corn  Germ  Meal 

7220 

4272 

Woleottville  

.25 

Not  tagged 

White  Corn  Germ  Meal  _ _ 

7220 

4273 

Wolcottville  

.35 

Not  tagged 

Nading  Grain  Company,  Wm., 

Greensburg,  Ind. 

Nading’s  Chop  Feed 

7278 

3196 

Greensburg 

.13 

Incorrect  guarantee  of 

ingredients 

Nappanee  Produce  Company, 

Nappanee,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  Meal  

4238 

Nappanee 

.09 

Not  registered 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

“Hominv  Feed”  _ 

3020 

4293 

Fremont 

.8 

Not  tagged 

“Middlings”  

3022 

1797 

Feme 

10 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

sacks  and  official  labels 

attached 

“Middlings” 

3022 

2675 

Pa  nil 

4.4 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

*Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

7349 

Montmorenci  

1.75 

Not  tagged 

National  Feed  Mill  Company,  The, 

Mineral  Springs,  Ohio. 

Silver  Hen  Feed 

3885  1 

Brookville  

.2 

Not  registered 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 


Cause 


sample  taken 


219 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Newsome  Feed  & Grain  Company,  The, 
Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Palmo  Midds 

6911 

1501 

Connersville  

15 

Excess  crude  fiber  and 

Palmn  Midds 

6911 

1881 

Ridgeville  _ _ 

20 

adulterated  with  peanut 
hulls 

Not  tagged 

Adulterated  with  peanut 
hulls 

Not  tagged 

6911 

2626 

Spiceland 

2 

Pfllmo  Midds 

6911 

4439 

Sheridan 

1.4 

Noblesville  Milling  Company, 

Noblesville,  Ind. 

Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middline^s 

3767 

1613 

Pendleton  

11.5 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

3767 

1614 

Fortville  

5 

sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings 

3767 

1628 

McCordsville 

4 

sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

3767 

1723 

Red key 

2.9 

sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Conflict  of  statements  on 
sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Conflict  of  statements  on 
sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings 

Noblesville  •Milling  Co’s  Middlings 

3767 

3767 

1726 

1936 

Redkey  

South  Bend 

2.5 

.25 

Noblesville  Milling  Co’s  Middlings • 

3767 

2407 

Arcadia  

2.5 

sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Conflict  of  statements  on 

North  Madison  Coal  Company, 

North  Madison,  Ind. 

Middlings  & Screenings 

7617 

2901 

North  Madison  . 

3.75 

sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

Not  tagged 

Nothern,  W.  C.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 
Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake.. 

6525 

1486 

Farmland  

10 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake.. 

6525 

1827 

Ridgeville  

2.9 

Not  tagged 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Company, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

Fnllnest  Serateb  Feed 

6594 

3796 

Grandview  ...... 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Omaha  Alfalfa  Milling  Company, 

Omaha,  Neb. 

Creamo  Dairy  Feed  No.  1 

1884 

Mishawaka 

.25 

Not  tagged 

Page  Milling  Company,  The  Thomas, 

Topeka,  Kans. 

Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6109 

3980 

Jasonville  

.4 

Not  tagged 

Mutilated  tags  attached 
Mutilated  tags  attached 

Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6109 

5287 

Martinsville 

1.15 

Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran 

6109 

5288 

Martinsville 

3.5 

Peppard  Seed  Company,  J.  G., 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

“Brite  Mawnin”  Brand  Poultry  Feed.. 

7385 

2921 

Noblesville  

.15 

Not  tagged 

“Tripple-P”  Thiek  Fund 

7387 

2922 

Noblesville  

.15 

Not  tagged 

Petersburg  Milling  & Grain  Company, 
Petersburg,  Ind. 

Petersburg  “A”  Mixed  Feed 

7765 

5231 

Petersburg  

.15 

Not  tagged 

Pfeffer  Milling  Company,  Lebanon,  111. 

Pfeffer  Milling  Co.  Hominy  Feed 

Phoenix  Flour  Mill,  Evansville,  Ind. 

2617 

3657 

Lexington  

! Evansville  

8 

Not  tagged 

Bran  & Screenings 

2252 

5137 

.4 

Not  tagged 

220 


TABLE  VI — Feedihg  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


LABEL 

Nun 

is 

*3 

o 

Inspection  ^ 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Piqua  Milling  Company,  Piqua,  Ohio, 

Wheat  Middlings  

2295 

1823 

Union  City 

1.55 

Not  tagged 

Wheat  Bran 

2296 

1836 

Union  City  .. 

.65 

Not  tagged 

Planters  Cotton  Oil  Company, 

Dallas,  Texas. 

Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  -fe  Cake 

7463 

2169 

Sedalia  

3.1 

Not  tagged 

Portland  Fertilizer  Plant,  Portland,  Ind. 

Tankage  

5629 

4154 

Portland  

75 

Adulterated  with  stomach 

offal 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

- 

Garland  Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

6845 

4367 

Anderson  

1 

Not  tagged 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run 

7412 

4368 

Anderson  

.1 

Not  tagged 

Prussian  Remedy  Company, 

St.  Paul,  Minn. 

^Prussian  Calf  Meal 

7801 

Dunkirk  

.03 

Not  tagged 

*Prussian  Calf  Meal 

7801 

T.inton 

.03 

Not  tagged 

^Prussian  Calf  Meal 

7801 

Elwood  _ 

.04 

Not  tagged 

Purina  Mills,  Branch,  Ralston  Purina 

Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

*Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  W^ith 

Charcoal  not  over  1% 

6409 

Roanoke 

.12 

Not  tagged 

*Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  With 

Charcoal  not  over  1% 

6409 

Roanoke  

.05 

Not  tagged 

Purina  Scratch  Feed 

6410 

2393 

Marion  

.05 

Wrong  label  attached 

*Purina,  Chiek  Feed 

6480 

Roanoke  _ 

• .26 

Not  tagged 

*Purina  Chick  Feed  _ _ 

6480 

Ru.sihville 

.01 

Not  tagged 

' *Purina  Chick  Feed  

6480 

T.eeshurg 

.08 

Not  tagged 

Purina  Pig  Feed 

6902 

1471 

Reynolds 

3.8 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Purina  Omolene  Horse  Feed  _ 

7043 

1686 

Bicknell 

.25 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 

crude  protein 

Purina  Calf  Meal 

7297 

1913 

Mishawaka  

.1 

Not  tagged 

*Purina  Calf  Meal 

7297 

Oakland  City 

.03 

Not  tagged 

*Purina  Scratch  Feed  _ 

7350 

Tell  City 

.05 

Not  tagged 

*Purina  Scratch  Feed  

7359 

Connersville  

.09 

Not  tagged 

Purina  Chick  Feed 

7351 

2746 

Indianapolis 

.25 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

*Purina  Serateh  Feed 

7350 

Roanoke 

.10 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Scratch  Feed 

7350 

Weisburg  

.10 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Scratch  Feed 

7350 

Waterloo  

.03 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed 

7351 

Urban a 

.04 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chiek  Feed  1 

7351 

Connersville  

.09 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed  

i 7351 

No.  Manchester 

.03 

Not  tasrged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed 

1 7351 

No,  Manchester  . 

.04 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed  

7351 

Rrookville 

.07 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed 

7351 

Nohlesville 

.04 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed 

7351 

Weisburg  

.11 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed  _ _ 

7351 

Waterloo  

.10 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed 

7351 

Nohlesville 

.10 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina.  Chick  Feed 

7351 

Stendal  

.05 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Phick  Feed 

! 7351 

Owensville  

.02 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed  

* 7351 

Odon  . 

.08 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed  

! 7351 

Sullivan  

.12 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Chick  Feed 

1 7351 

Spencer  

.03 

Not  tagged 

♦Purina  Calf  Meal i 

7872 

Sheridan  

.05 

Not  tagged 

Purity  Oats  Company,  Davenport,  Iowa 

- 

Iowa  Chick  Feed 

6760 

2892 

Cambridge  City. 

.18 

Not  tagged 

Iowa  Scratch  Feed 

7015 

2891 

Cambridge  City. 

.05 

Not  tagge'd 

♦Iowa  Scratch  Feed 

i 7015 

— 

Boswell  

.12 

Not  tagged 

*No  sample  taken 


221 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


LABEL 


Number 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

1 5610 

4999 

Vincennes  

5 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

6468 

3451 

Indianapolis  

1.55 

Incorrect  guarantee  of  in- 
gredients 

6431 

3764 

Porter  

.9 

Not  tagged 

! 6577 



Bremen  

.4 

Not  tagged 

i 6889 

2017 

South  Bend  

.05 

Not  tagged 

7027 

3251 

Indianapolis 

2 

Conflict  of  statements  on 
sacks  and  official  labels 
attached 

7027 

3465 

Columbus 

1.7 

Not  tagged 

7299 

5289 

Martinsville 

1.5 

Wrong  label  attached 

7300 

1 

4917 

Indianapolis 

10 

Incorrect  guarantee  o‘f 
ingredients 

1 7439 

5216 

Linton  

.55 

Not  tagged  and  incorrect 
guarantee  of  ingredients 

1 7584 

4215 

Hoagland  

.8 

Not  tagged 

7986 

4876 

Danville  

1.8 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein 

955 

2212 

Mooresville  

.9 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

5767 

3495 

Madison  

.9 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

5836 

3091 

Evansville  

.4 

Not  tagged 

1 6909 

4782 

Zionsville  

2.8 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

6909 

5245 

Terre  Haute 

1.5 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

7221 

— 

South  Bend  

.04 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Roachdale  

.04 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Roachdale  

.03 

Not  tagged 

7221 

t 

— 

Brookville  

' .17 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Owensville  

.03 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Oakland  City 

.07 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Tell  City 

.03 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Odon  

.21 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Cayuga  

.03 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Angola 

.05 

Not  tagged 

7221 

— 

Spencer  _ . 

.09 

Not  tagged 

7221 

Frankton  

.16 

Not  tagged 

7221 

Princeton  

i 

.1 

Not  tagged 

7533 

4208 

Bloomington  ___ 

1.6 

Wrong  label  attached 

7534 

2918 

Vevay _ 

1.4 

Not  tagged 

2917 

Vevay 

.13 

Not  tagged 

Adulterated  with  silica 

6094 

2422 

Fairmount  

1.8 

7181 

4745 

Greensburg 

4.8  j 

1 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
excess  of  crude  fiber 

7436 

2261 

Ainsworth  

_9 

Not  tagged 

7437 

2262 

Ainsworth  

!i 

Not  tagged 

6076 

1893 

Winchester 

.8 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

7354 

2663 

Logansport  1 

.4 

Not  tagged 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The, 
Chicago,  111. 

Green  Cross  Horse  Feed  (Molasses 


*Pansey  Chick  Feed  with  Grit. 

Maz-All  Feed  

Golden  Sweet  Mule  Feed 


Golden  Sweet  Mule  Feed 

Schumacher  Feed  

White  Diamond  Feed 


Excelsior  Feed  I 7439 


Quaker  Dairy  Feed  with  Molasses. 

Ralston  Purina  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 


Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

*Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

’‘Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 


“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 


'‘Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 


'‘Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 


“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal  

“Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Feed  with 

not  over  1%  Charcoal 

Scratch  Feed  with  Grit  or  Screenings.. 

Chick  Feed  Without  Grit 

Winner  Scratch  Feed  


Rapier  Sugar  Feed  Company, 
Owensboro,  Ky. 

Rapier’s  Molasses  Alfalfa  Hog  Feed- 
Rapier’s  Molasses  Fat  Maker 

Raschka,  William,  Ainsworth,  Ind. 


Rauh  & Sons,  E.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Rauh’s  Meat  Meal 


Reid-Murdock  & Company,  Chicago,  111, 
Farm  House  Scratch  Grains 


“No  sample  taken 


222 


TABLE  VI— Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

C 

Amount 

LABEL 

"eS 

_o 

OJQ 

Sample 
taken  at 

with- 

drawn 

Cause 

Ij 

approx. 

5E 

O 

00 

C 

tons 

Reiners,  Wm.  F.,  Birdseye,  Ind. 

1 

Mixprl  FflPd 

5406 

3731 

Birdseye 

5.5 

Adulterated  with  wheat 
screenings 

Ritter,  Hennings  Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Shnr-PlfiPT:  Baby  Chipk  Fppd 

5914 

4673 

.25 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein 

Whitp  T?npV  TTpn  Fppd 

6863 

3724 

Fckerty 

.9 

Not  tagged 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings 

7684 

3086 

Hnbart 

8 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged  and  deficient 
in  crude  protein 

7685 

3037 

8 

Routh  & Company,  W.  C., 

Logansport,  Ind. 

Rnnth’s  Bpst  Fppding  Tankage 

3575 

2290 

Logansport 

.3 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Runge  & Company,  John, 

Richmond,  Ind. 

Rnngp’s  Mitred  FPed 

7900 

4414 

Riehmnnd 

,1 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

Dnrn  Feed  Meal 

7901 

4413 

Richmond  

.1 

Ryde  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

*^R,ydp’s  riream  Half  Meal 

5496 

Areadia 

.18 

Not  tagged 

Not  tagged 

*Rydp’s  riream  Half  Meal 

5496 

Wolcottville  

.25 

Sanitary  Milling  Company, 

Gas  City,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7445 

2318 

Gas  City 

.3 

Not  tagged 

Schaefer  & Schwartzkopf, 

Columbus,  Ind. 

*r;nrn  Bran 

476 

Columbus  

.08 

Not  tagged 

Schnaible  Grain  Company,  The  Matt, 

LaFayette,  Ind. 

Mixed  Ground  Corn  and  Oats 

3 

4516 

T,a  Fayette 

.05 

Not  tagged 

Security  Remedy  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

*Seeurity  Oalf  Meal  

5973 

Fremont 

.38 

Not  tagged 

Shepard  Clark  & Co.,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Ooeonnnt;  Oil  OaVe  Meal 

1910 

Winchester  

1 

Not  tagged 

Shine  & Co.,  John  H.,  New  Albany,  Ind. 

Serateb  Feed 

4049 

Borden  

.08 

Not  tagged 

Star  Middlings 

5457 

3720 

Milltown  

.6 

1 Adulterated  w ith  screenings 

Sparks  Milling  Company,  Alton,  111. 

Not  tagged 

Try  Me  Bran  and  Sereenings 

6778 

1752 

Dugger 

1 

^^'^I’ry  Me  Mixed  Feed 

6537 

Borden  

1.5 

Not  tagged 

*Try  Me  Mixed  Feed 

7687 

Borden 

4.6 

Not  tagged 

Stanard-Tilton  Milling  Company, 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings  not 

Incorrectly  labeled 

pxeeeding  Mill  Run 

7013 

3696 

Corydon  

1.9 

Starlight  Miiling  Company,  Borden, 

R.  R.  No.  1,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7794 

4050 

Borden  R.  R.  1 

.15 

Not  tagged 

Wheat  Middlings 

7795 

4051 

Borden  R.  R.  1— 

.05 

Not  tagged 

St.  Louis  Independent  Packing  Com- 

pany, St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Independent  Brand  Digester  Tankage. 

7204 

5065 

Mt.  Vernon 

.2 

Not  tagged 

*No  sample  taken 


223 


TABLE  VI— Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued)  • 


LABEL 

Official 

c 

nber 

a 

Iq 

m 

fl 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Stott,  David,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  _ 

5279 

4309 

Berlein 

4 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 

crude  protein  and  adult- 

Streeter Coal  & Feed  Company, 

erated  with  screenings 

Chop  Feed  _ 

7792 

4094 

Muncie  

.3 

Not  tagged 

Suckow  Company,  Franklin,  Ind, 

• 

*Wheat  Middlings  _ . 

5946 

Trafalgar 

15 

Not  tagged 

* Wheat  Bran 

5947 

12 

Not  tagged 

♦Middlings  & Screenings 

7375 

Franklin 

.75 

Not  tagg'^a 

Sugarine  Company,  The,  Peoria,  111. 

6193 

4072 

1.1 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Sneo  Old  Process  Tdnseed  Meal 

6193 

4073 

Salem  . 

2.7 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

and  adulterated  with 

Sullivan  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

screenings 

Sullivan,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

7777 

4018 

Sullivan 

.15 

Not  tagged 

Sulzberger  & Sons  Company, 

Chicago,  111. 

Sulzberger’s  High  Protein  Tankage 

5625 

1622 

Fairmount 

1.2 

Deficient  in  crude  fat 

Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein’’  Tankage. 

7435 

2404 

Tipton  

.25 

Not  tagged 

Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein”  Tankage. 

7435 

2499 

Churubusco  

1.35 

Not  tagged 

Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein”  Tankage. 

7435 

3956 

Remington 

.85 

Not  tagged  and  deficient 

in  crude  protein 

Swift  & Company,  -Chicago,  111. 

Swift’s  Poultry  Bone 

62 

1542 

Warsaw  

.1 

Not  tagged 

Swift’s  Poultry  Bone 

62 

2500 

Wolcottville  

.1 

Not  tagged 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

2608 

Wakarusa  

.15 

Not  tagged 

Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

3953 

Wolcott  

.7 

Wrong  labels  attached 

♦Swift’s  Special  Meat  Scraps 

4697 

Rushville-  . 

.05 

Not  tagged 

♦Swift’s  Meat  Scraps 

T.aconia 

.06 

Swift’s  Meat  Meal 

5687 

2597 

Ligcnier  

.05 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankae-e 

7030< 

4689 

Swayzee 

.4 

IN  U L LdggCLl 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage 

7030 

5060 

Johnson  

.06 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage 

7030 

5184 

Richmond  

2.25 

Not  tagged 

Swift’s  Meat  Scraps 

3083 

Ft.  Branch 

.1 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Not  tagged 

Tell  City  Flouring  Mills,  Tell  City,  Ind. 

Bran  &,  Screenings 

5640 

4563 

Mauckport  

.5 

Not  tagged 

Texas  Cake  & Linter  Company, 

Dallas,  Texas. 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

Cracked  Cake 

7035 

1588 

Modoc  

14.8 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

and  excess  of  crude  fiber 

Cracked  Cake 

7035 

2312 

Connersville 

2.8 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 

♦Sunset  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

and  excess  of  crude  fiber 

Cracked  Cake 

7035 

.... 

Selma  R.  R.  2.. 

2 

Not  tagged 

Thurgood,  Geo.  R.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Thurgoods  Mixed  Feed 

1806 

5001 

Vincennes  

.1 

Wrong  label  attached  and 

deficient  in  crude  fat 

Toledo  Seed  & Oil  Company,  The, 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 

1883 

Mishawaka 

.5 

Not  tagged 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 

1921 

South  Bend  

13 

Not  tagged 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal i 

5546 

1925 

South  Bend 

1.9 

Not  tagged 

♦Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 

, 

South  Bend  

.4 

Not  tagged 

♦Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 



South  Bend  

.2 

Not  tagged 

Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

5546 

4742 

Greensburg  

1 

Not  tagged 

Trimble  Milling  Company,  The, 

Milton,  Ky. 

Shipstuff  ...  

1989 

3503 

Madison  

1 

Not  tagged 

*No  sample  taken 


224 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Ubiko  Milling  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Union  Grains  Ubiko  Biles  Ready  Dairy 
Ration  

Union  Grain  & Coal  Company, 
Anderson,  Ind. 

*Union  Chick  Feed 

*Union  Chick  Feed 

Union  Chick  Feed 

Union  Molasses  Feed  

Union  Horse  Feed  

Union  Horse  Feed  

Union  Chick  Feed 

Union  Elevator  Company, 

New  Richmond,  Ind. 

Union  Chop  Feed 

Union  Grain  & Hay  Company,  The, 
Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Union  Challenge^  Chick  Feed 

Union  Seed  & Fertilizer  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Security  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

American  Red  Tag  Cottonseed  MeaL__ 
American  Red  Tag  Cottonseed  Meal- 

Valentine  & Valentine,  Franklin,  Ind. 
Middlings  

Washburn-Crosby  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Wheat  Bran 

with  Ground  Screenings 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Middlings 
Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 
Ground  Screenings  not  exceeding 

Mill  Run 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run- 

Ground  Linseed  Cake  Oil  Meal 

Ground  Linseed  Cake  Oil  Meal 

Wash-Co.  Alfalfa  Mixed  Feed  and  Mill- 
ing Company,  Fort  Calhoun,  Neb. 
Wash-Co.  Alfalfa  Meal 

Western  Flour  Mill  Company, 

Davenport,  Iowa. 

“Black  Hawk’’  Wheat  Standard  Mid- 
dlings   

Whelan,  Omer  G.,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Wilbur  Stock  Food  Company, 
Milwaukee,  Wis. 

•Wilbur’s  Calf  Meal  

Wilkinson  & Company,  T.  B., 
Knightstown,  Ind. 

Combination  Dairy  Feed 


7068 

2940 

Terhune  

3.45 

Not  tagged 

3003 

Marion 

2.25 

Not  tagged 

3003 



No.  Manchester. 

.03 

Not  tagged 

3003 

2392 

Marion 

.15 

Not  tagged 

5593 

4067 

Ridgeville 

1.8 

Not  tagged 

7151 

4066 

Ridgeville  

.1 

Not  tagged 

7151 

4114 

Muncie  

.35 

Not  tagged 

7596 

4095 

Muncie  

.25 

Not  tagged 

7755 

3685 

New  Richmond  __ 

.05 

Not  tagged 

.3 

Not  tagged 

7993 

5272 

Gas  City 

1.0 

Not  tagged 



2995 

Marion 

15 

Not  tagged 

— 

2996 

Marion  

3 

Not  tagged 

932 

2335 

Franklin  

15 

Adulterated  with  cracked 

wffieat  and  ground  weed 

seeds 

5464 

3132 

Gary  

1 

Not  tagged 

7018 

4592 

Radley  

20 

Not  tagged 

7229 

3288 

Bryant  

.2 

Not  tagged 

7230 

4555 

LaFayette  

3.5 

Not  tagged 

7230 

4556 

LaFontaine 

.2 

Not  tagged 

7232 

2872 

Lewisville  

8 

Not  tagged 

7234 

2664 

Logansport  

.15 

Not  tagged 

7234 

2665 

Logansport 

1.5 

Not  tagged 

5477 

2662 

Logansport 

1 

Not  tagged 

6735 

1785 

Merrillville  

.85 

Deficient  in  crude  fat 

7709 

3317 

Richmond  

.03 

Not  tagged 

Lawrenceburg  __ 

.06 

Not  tagged 

7654 

2971 

Knightstown 

20 

Not  tagged 

^No  sample  taken 


225 


TABLE  VI — Feeding  Stuffs  Withdrawn  From  Sale,  Jan.  1,  1916,  to  Jan.  1,  1917,  on  Advice 

of  State  Chemist  (continued) 


Number 

LABEL 

Official 

Inspection 

D. 

Sample 
taken  at 

Amount 

with- 

drawn 

approx. 

tons 

Cause 

Wood  Stubbs  & Company, 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Shawnee  Brand  Chick  Feed 

6927 

2511 

New  Albany 

1.2 

Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 

adulterated  with  screen- 
ings 

Shawnee  Brand  Chick  Feed 

6927 

2716 

New  Albany 

New  Albany  ! 

New  Albany  

7 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Deficient  in  crude  protein 
Deficient  in  crude  fat  and 
crude  protein 

Shawnee  Brand  Scratch  Feed 

6928 

2510 

3.8 

6928 

3622 

.45 

Shawnee  Brand  Chick  Feed 

7332 

2529 

New  Albany 

Seymour 

2 

Adulterated  with  screenings 

Not  tagged 

Shawnee  Brand  Pigeon  "Feed 

7652 

3686 

.2 

Zenith  Milling  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Wheat  Shorts  

7372 

4501 

Dana 

.9 

Not  tagged 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Company, 

Haubstadt,  Ind. 

• 

7iliak’s  Shipstnff 

5850' 

3077 

rt.  Branch  

.25 

Improperly  tagged 
Improperly  tagged 

Ziliak’s  Shipstnff 

5850 

3078 

Ft.  Branch  

.5 

CONDI3IENTAL  FEEDS 

American  Druggists  Syndicate, 

Long  Island.  City,  N.  Y. 

Safe-T-Kros  Regnlatenr 

6208 

4898 

Matthews 

18  lbs. 

Not  tagged 

Barker,  Moore  & Mein  Medicine  Com- 

pany, The,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Barker’s  Chemical  & Vegetable  Horse, 

Cattle  & Poultry  Medicinal  Powder. 

Blackman  Stock  Remedy  Company, 

4610 

2762 

Coal  City  

3.6  lbs. 

Not  tagged 

Chattanooga,  Tenn. 

Owen’s  Health  Jir,  Fgg  Producer 

6242 

2566 

Indianapolis 

2.4  lbs. 

Not  tagged 

International  Stock  Food  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Special  International  Medicinal  Poul- 

try Food  Tonic 

7421 

5277 

Bloomfield 

17  lbs. 

Not  tagged 

Pratt  Food  Company,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Pratts  Animal  Regulator 

4491 

4561 

Elkhart 

57  lbs. 

Not  tagged 

Wilbur  Stock  Food  Company, 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Wilbur’s  Stock  Tonic 

5691 

2567 

Borden  

25  lbs. 

Not  tagged 

Total  

.... 



1,381.11 

Condimental  Feeds.  In  addition  to  the  shipments  listed  in  the  preceding  table  126  consign- 
ments of  condimental  feeds  representing  56  brands  and  27  manufacturers,  from  which  no  samples 
were  taken  were  removed  from  sale  in  93  towns  on  accoimt  of  failure  to  meet  the  requirements  of 
the  law.  This  makes  a total  of  701  consignments  removed  from  sale  in  1916 


226 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18 

Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


BRAN,  MEDDLINGS,  SHORTS,  CHOP 
FEEDS,  CORN  FEED  MEAL  AND 
OTHER  MILL  BY-PRODUCTS 

Acme-Evans  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  Feed  


Acme  Middlings  and  Screenings 


Homlik  

Acme  Bran  and  Screenings 


Capitol  Red  Dog  Flour 

Acme  Flour  Middlings  & Screenings. 


Acme  Farm  Feed 


Acme  Milling  Co.,  The,  Aurora,  Ind. 

Middlings  

Bran  & Middlings  

Mxd  Bran 


Akin-Erskine  Milling  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 
Standard  Wheat  Middlings  or  Shorts,  Ground 
Wheat  Screenings  and  Salt 


Mixed  Feed 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  & Mill  Run  Wheat 
Screenings  


Corn  Feed  Meal 


Akron  Milling  Co.,  The,  Akron,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

Wheat  Bran 


Albion  Roller  Mills,  Albion,  Ind. 

Winter  Wheat  Bran  

Winter  Wheat  Middlings  


American  Hominy  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind, 
Cracked  Corn  and  Rolled  Oats 


American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 
Amco  Corn  Feed  Meal 


Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Company,  Amo,  Ind. 

Amo  Middlings 

Amo  Feed 


Rye  Middlings  and  Screenings 
Middlings  and  Screenings 


Anchor  Milling  Company,  Rochester,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

Mixed  Feed 


Feed  Meal 

Anchor  Chop  Feed 


Anderson,  G.  H.,  Seymour,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

Com  Feed  Meal 


Official  Number 

1 Not  less  than 
per  cent. 

1 Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 
per  cent. 

' Crude  Protein 

1 Not  more  than 

1 per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

5588 

4.0 

16.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings  and 
not  exceeding  mill’s  run  of  ground 
cleaned  wheat  screenings 

55&0 

4.5 

16.5 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  not  exceeding 
mill’s  run  of  ground  cleaned  wheat 
screenings 

6876 

3.0 

8.5 

4.0 

Reground  corn  feed  meal 

7159 

3.5 

15.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  not  exceeding  mill’s 
run  of  ground  cleaned  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Low  grade  wheat  flour,  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

7573 

4.0 

15.0 

5.0 

7618 

4.5 

16.5 

8.0 

Wheat  flour,  wheat  middlings  and 
not  exceeding  mill’s  run  of  ground 
cleaned  wheat  screenings 

8439 

5.0 

12.0 

7.0 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings 
and  hominy  feed 

968 

3.9 

14.2 

6.6 

Wheat  middlings 

970 

3.9 

14.2 

8.2 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings  • 

.j  2556 

1 

3.7 

13.6 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

1 

. 6032 

4.0 

14.0 

6.0 

Wheat  shorts,  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings and  salt 

. 6047 

4.0 

15.0 

9.5 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  salt 

. 7729 

3.9 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings not  exceeding  mill  run 

. 8572 

2.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

. 2795 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

. 3597 

3.5 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran 

8610 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

. 8611 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

’ 6578 

4.0 

9.0 

5.0 

Corn  and  rolled  oats 

_ 8095 

2.5 

8.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

4442 

■ 2.8 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

4443 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

- 7947 

2.7 

13.5 

12.0 

Rye  middlings  and  ground  rye  screen- 

8118 

2.8 

13.0 

7.0 

in^s 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

3747 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

_ 4214 

3.0 

12.0 

11.5 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

4927 

3.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

_ 8587 

3.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

4837 

3.0 

7.0 

15.0 

Com  bran 

. 52.30 

2.0 

7.0 

1 3.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

227 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Angola  Flouring  Mills,  Angola,  Ind. 

Angola  Flouring  Mills  Middlings 

1007 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Angola  Flouring  Mills  Wheat  Bran 

1008 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Angola  Flouring  Mills  Chop  Feed 

1099 

3.9 

9.5 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  rye 

Arkansas  City  Milling  Company,  The, 

Arkansas  City,  Kans. 

Standard  Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings.— 

8469 

3.5 

16.0 

5.5 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

8470 

3.5 

14!o 

10.0 

screenings  not  to  exceed  8% 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Ashbrook  Co.,  The  J.  S.,  Mattoon,  III. 

Royal  Grain  Feed 

5912 

3.0 

10.0 

7.0 

screenings  not  to  exceed  8% 

Corn,  rolled  oats  and  rolled  barley 

Peerless  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

7983 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Diamond  A.  Feed  Meal 

8209 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Feed  meal  from  corn,  kafir,  milo  and 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

8530 

4.0 

13.0 

13.0 

wheat 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

8531 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Ashley-Hudson  Milling  & Grain  Co., 

Ashley,  Ind. 

Ashley-Hudson  Wheat  Bran 

3144 

3.8 

14.0 

12.0 

screenings 

Wheat  bran 

Ashley-Hudson  Wheat  Middlings 

3145 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Atkinson  Milling  Company,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

8199 

4.0 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Aviston  Milling  Company,  Aviston,  lU. 

Hobby  Horse  White  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

7383 

5.0 

14.5 

7.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Amilko  Pure  Bran 

7384 

5.0 

15.0 

11.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran 

Courtesy  White  Shipstuff,  (Red  Dog) 

7483 

3.0 

14.5 

13.5 

Wheat  middlings  and  reddog  flour 

Hobby  Horse  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

7503 

3.5 

,14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Bachman,  Valentine,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Bachman’s  Cleaned  Wheat  Product 

0950 

3.7 

16.0 

10.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Bachman  Flour  Mill,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

White  Middlings  

5902 

3.7 

15.0 

9.0 

W^heat  middlings 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  HI. 

J.  J.  Badenoch  Co’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 
Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

6219 

4.0 

14.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

J.  J.  Badenoch  Co’s  Wheat  Standard  Mid- 
dlings with  Ground  Screenings  Not  Exceed- 
ing Mill  Run  — — 

6220 

5.0 

15.0 

9.5 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

6989 

1.2 

7.0 

3.5 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  

8638 

4.0 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Bailey  & Thompson,  Prairie  Creek,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  No.  1 

6952 

3.0 

12.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 

Thompsons  Wheat  Shorts 

7769 

3.8 

14.9 

7.4 

screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  shorts 

Mixed  Feed  No.  2 

7770 

3.0 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

7785 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

and  com  bran 

Corn  feed  meal 

Baldwin,  J.  Jay,  Crown  Point,  Ind. 

“Baldwin  Chop  Feed’’ 

8700 

3.0 

S.O 

6.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Baldwin,  Jr.,  Dwight  M.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Dwight  Flour  Mills  Red  Dog 

3205 

5.5 

17.5 

6.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 

Baldwin  Flour  Mills  Wheat  Shorts  and 
Screenings 

5693 

5.0 

15.0 

11.0 

the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

228 


TABLE  Vll — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Baldwin,  Jr.,  Dwight  M.,  Mineapolis,  Minn. 
Baldwin  Flour  Mills  Wheat  Flour  Midds  and 

Screenings  

Baldwin  Flour  Mills  Wheat  Bran  and 
Screenings  


Ballard  & Ballard  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Ballard’s  Mixed  Wheat  Feed  & Mill  Run 
Screenings  


Ballard’s  Bran  

Ballard’s  Kentucky  Farm  Feed 


Banner  Roller  Mills,  The,  Mooresville,  Ind. 
Wheeler’s  Banner  Mixed  Feed 


Barlow,  C.  M.,  Kokomo,  Ind. 

• Wheat  Middlings  

Barlow’s  Chop  Feed 


Barnes  & Company,  R.  J.,  Dunkirk,  Ind. 

“Bran”  

Middlings  

Bran  and  Middlings  


Barry,  Russell,  Crandall,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed  


Wheat  Middlings 

Bartlett  Company,  The  J.  E.,  Jackson,  Mich. 
Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 


Standard  Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

“Farmer  Brand”  Red  Dog  Flour 


Bash  & Co.,  C.  E.,  Huntington,  Ind. 
C.  E.  Bash  & Co’s  Chop 


Batchelor,  Barlow  & Davis,  Sharpsville,  Ind.i 
Corn  Bran  


Batchelor,  Barlow  & Batchelor, 
Sharpsville,  Ind. 2 

Wheat  Bran 

Wheat  Shorts  


Batchelor  & Barlow,  Sharpsville,  Ind. 
B.  & B.  Chop 


Bay  State  Milling  Company,  Winona,  Minn. 

Rye  Middlings  

“Winona”  Fancy  White  Flour  Middlings. . 
“Winona”  Fancy  Mixed  Wheat  Feed  & 
Wheat  Screenings  


“Winona”  Wheat  Middlings  & Wheat  Screen- 
ings   

“Winona”  Coarse  Wheat  Bran 

Reddog  Flour  


Beck,  Delbert  F.,  Burlington,  Ind. 

Beck’s  Chop  Fe^  r 

1 Succeeded  by  Batchelor,  Barlow  & Batchelor 

2 Succeeded  by  Batchelor  & Batchelor 


] 

Official  Number 

Guaranteed  t 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

5694 

5.0 

16.5 

7.0 

5695 

4.0 

14.5 

12.0 

8758 

4.4 

14.6 

6.9 

8759 

4.1 

14.5 

9.6 

8760 

4.4 

15.0 

6.4 

437 

3.9 

14.0 

8.5 

5368 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

5938 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

287 

4.0 

15.1 

10.0 

288 

2.9 

13.9 

3.5 

289 

3.6 

15.6 

10.2 

8421 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

8422 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

6813 

3.0 

14.0 

11.0 

6814 

4.5 

13.5 

10.0 

7211 

4.0 

15.0 

3.7 

1749 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

4037 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

4675 

3.8 

14.0 

12.0 

4676 

3.7 

14.0 

7.0 

8389 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

8189 

3.4 

16.0 

6.0 

8190 

4.5 

16  0 

2.5 

8191 

4.5 

16.0 

8.0 

. 8192 

5.0 

16.0 

S.O 

. 8193 

4.5 

15.0 

12.0 

. 8194 

4.5 

16.0 

2.0 

. 1209 

3.9 

.9.5 

6.0 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 


Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings  and 
cleaned  and  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings  and  cleaned  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  bran 


Wheat  middlings 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 


Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
sereenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  partieles  of  wheat  bran 

Corn  and  oats 
Corn  bian 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 


Corn  and  oats 


Rye  middlings 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  reddog  flour 
and  less  than  6%  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  less  than  8% 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Wheat  bran 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  af  wheat  bran 

Corn  and  oats  


229 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


0) 

fl  (U 

GO 


Belt  Elevator  & Eeed  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

1 

Eeed  Meal 

3322 

3.7 

8.5 

7.0 

Chop  Feed  

3777 

3.5 

9.0 

7.0 

Mixed  Feed 

3778 

2.0 

10.0 

15.0 

Bergenroth  Bros.,  Troy,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  and  Screenings  

2023 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Bergenroths  Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

2024 

3.8 

14.0 

10,0 

Middlings  

2025 

4.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Mixed  Feed  

3441 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Mixed  Bran  & Screenings 

3442 

3.8 

14.0 

12.0 

Corn  Bran  

8443 

4.5 

8.0 

14.0 

Berlien  Mills,  Angola,  R.  F.  D.,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  ___  

7515 

3.0 

12.0 

10.0 

W'heat  Bran 

7738 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Berne  Milling  Co.,  Berne,  Ind. 

Berne  Milling  Co’s  W^heat  & Corn  Bran 

1117 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Chop  Feed  

6673 

2.8 

8.7 

8.0 

Wheat  Shorts 

8018 

2.3 

13.0 

7.0 

Bernet,  Craft  & Kauffman  Milling  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mt.  Carmel  Bran  & Screenings 

5518 

3.5 

14.3 

9.5 

Mixed  Feed  

5519 

4.0 

14.5 

9.5 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

5791 

4.9 

17.2 

6.0 

“A”  Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings 

5806 

3.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Berry  Bros.,  Lynn,  Ind. 

Daisy  Chop  

7044 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Eesser,  W.  T.,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Besser’s  Extra  Mixed  Feed  

5170 

3.5 

15.4 

12.0 

Besser’s  Wheat  Middlings 

8594 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Bicknell  Mill  Company,  Bicknell,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7824 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Bicker  Bros.  Company,  The,  Hammond,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

3869 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Big  Diamond  Mills  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

“Big  Diamond  Standard  Middlings”  and 

Screenings  __  

7059 

4.2 

14.6 

9.3 

“Big  Diamond  Bran”  and  Screenings 

7069 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Billman  & Sons,  C.  H..  Shelbyville,  Ind.sa 

Shelby  Mixed  Feed 

4303 

2.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Shelby  Shorts  

4943 

2.0 

12.0 

10.0 

Shelby  Wheat  Bran  and  unground  wheat 

screenings  

6546 

3.0 

14.0 

12.0 

Bishop  Elevator  Co.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  . 

554 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

^‘‘Succeeded,  by  Cutsinger  & Thompson 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Corn  feed  meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 
Wheat  and  crushed  wheat  screenings 


Wheat  and  ground  wheat  screenings 
Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 
Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 
Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 
Corn  bran 


Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran 


Wheat  and  corn  bran 
Corn,  oats,  barley  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Wheat  shorts 


Wheat  bran  and  crushed  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  crushed 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Wheat  middlings  and  crushed  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Corn  and  oats 


Wheat  bran,  middlings,  com  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings  not 
exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Corn  and  oats 


230 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

1 

Blair  Milling  Company,  The,  Atchison,  Kansas. 

Bran  and  Screenings 

7735 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  1%  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Soft  Wheat  Shorts — 

7736 

3.5 

16.0 

5.5 

Wheat  shorts 

Blanton  Milling  Co.,  The,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Blanton’s  Middlings  

47 

3.6 

16.1 

• 5.3 

Wheat  middlings 

The  Blanton  Mixed  Feed 

3805 

3.7 

15.7 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  whole 
wheat  screenings 

Blish  Milling  Company,  Seymour,  Ind. 

Blish’s  Red  Dog  Flour 

6403 

3.5 

16.0 

1 

3.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Bulls’  Eye  Mixed  Feed 

8176 

4.5 

16.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Bloomfield  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 

Bloomfield,  Ind. 

Mixed  Mill  Feed  

4924 

3.0 

12.8 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Corn  Bran  

8654 

3.0 

6.0 

9.0 

Corn  bran 

Bloomington  Milling  Company,  The, 
Bloomington,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

3602 

3.0 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Middlings  & Screenings 

8447 

4.0 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Bluffton  Milling  Co.,  Bluffton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

661 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings  

8017 

2.5 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Bock,  Leonard,  Argos,  Ind.^ 

Wheat  Middlings 

548 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Chop  Feed 

549 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Bran 

550 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Mixed  Feed 

2843 

3.7 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn. bran 

Boldt  & Son,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

Boldt’s  Shorts  . .. 

51 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Boldt’s  Corn  and  Oat  Chop  _ . . . 

53 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Boldts  Mixed  Feed 

5456 

3.5 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  com  bran 

Boldt  & Son,  Waynetown,  Ind. 

Mix  Mill  Feed  

Bolte  & Sons,  Ben,  Ferdinand,  Ind. 

4170 

3.0 

11.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn 
bran 

Wheat  Shorts 

7276 

4.0 

14.5 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  & Corn  Bran  and  Ground  Screenings 

8178 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Bonner  & Company,  F.  J.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

8141 

3.5 

9.5 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn  bran 
and  corn  feed  meal 

Boonville  Milling  Co.,  Boonville,  Ind. 

“A”  Mixed  Feed _ 

2244 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

2842 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Corn  Bran  

3080 

4.0 

9.0 

13.0 

Corn  bran 

Corn  Feed  Meal  

6851 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Shorts  & Feed  Meal 

7847 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  com  feed  meal 

Boston  Milling  Co.,  Eckerty,  Ind. 

Bobbitt’s  Mixed  Feed 

3453 

3.7 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
w'heat  screenings 

Bowling  Green  Mills,  The,  Bowling  Green,  Ind.^ 

Wheat  Bran 

3370 

3.9 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Ship  Stuff 

3372 

3.7 

13.5 

6.0 

Wheat  product 

3 Succeeded  by  J.  A,  Bock 
* Bowling  Green  Milling  Co. 


231 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

(U 

c 

fl  .S 

fl 

as 

LABEL 

aJ 

5 .15 

^ .2 

5 1 
(1) 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

s 

O 

Not  less 

per  cent 

Crude  F 

Not  less 

per  cent 

Crude  P 

Not  mor 

per  cent 

Crude  F 

following  ingredients 

Bowling  Green  Milling  Co.,  Bowling  Green,  Ind. 

Middlings  

62C6 

3.0 

13.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mill  Feed 

Branch  Grain  & Seed  Co.,  Martinsville,  Ind. 

0912 

3.5 

10.4 

13.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Horse  Feed  

272 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

3888 

2.5 

6.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Brewer  Milling  Company,  Gosport,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Bridgeton  Milling  Co.,  Bridgeton,  Ind. 

3930 

2.6 

9.5 

7.5 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  com  bran 

Mixed  Feed  

6621 

4.0 

9.3 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  com  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Mill  Feed  

7226 

3.7 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Shorts 

7717 

2.0 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Bran  & Ground  Screenings 

Bristol  Milling  Co.,  Bristol,  Ind. 

8177 

3.8 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  

2019 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Bran 

2150 

3.8 

13.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed  

3353 

4.0 

12.0 

25.0 

Buckwheat  hulls  and  middlings 

Brizius  Company,  The  Chas.  W., 

Newburgh,  Ind. 

Eagle  Mixed  Feed 

5927 

4.0 

15.1 

5.9 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Eagle  Corn  Feed  Meal 

6075 

2.7 

6.8 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Eagle  Wheat  Shorts  or  Middlings 

7194 

3.8 

14.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Eagle  Corn  Bran  

7388 

4.0 

8.3 

13.5 

Corn  bran 

Brook  Flour  & Feed  Mill,  Brook,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

2430 

4.5 

7.0 

10.0 

Corn  bran 

Chop  Feed  

2431 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Brose,  George,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

2942 

3.2 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

6854 

3.8 

15.5 

7.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Brose  & Arnold,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Shipstuff  

192 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Bran  and  Screenings 

2257 

3.7 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings 

7491 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Brown  & Cole,  Vevay,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed  

7771 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Browning  Milling  Co.,  W.  A.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

2163 

4.0 

7.0 

14.0 

Com  bran 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

3537 

2.4 

6.7 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Brudi  & Co.,  Jos.,  New  Haven,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oat  Chop  Feed 

586 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Middlings  

2246 

2.8 

13.1 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Bundy  Bros.,  Vallonia,  Ind. 

Mill  Feed 

7861 

3.4 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Shorts  

7862 

3.0 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Bran  

253 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Middlings  

254 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Butler  & Company,  Edw.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

8346 

4.0 

14.0 

14.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  and  Screenings 

8347 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

232 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Butler  & Company,  Edw.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Standard  Middlings  & Screenings  

8348 

4.0 

14.0 

14.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Butler  Milling  Co.,  Butler,  Ind. 

Butler  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  Bran 

1029 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Butler  Milling  Co’s  Chop  Feed 

1031 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Middlings • 

7082 

3.6 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Butt  & Bro.,  L.  T.,  Center  Point,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed 

4431 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Low  Grade  Plour 

5132 

2.1 

11.5 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  low  gjade  flour 

Corn  Peed  Meal  

5133 

3.0 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Byrnes  & Co.,  W.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

Wheat  Bran 

Cadick  Milling  Company,  Grandview,  Ind. 

5435 

3.5 

15.7 

12.9 

Wheat  bran 

Mixed  Peed  

7857 

4.0 

16.0 

7.0 

W’heat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Bran  and  Screenings  

7858 

3.8 

15.0 

10.0 

W’heat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Shipstuff  

7859 

4.0 

16.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts,  middlings  and  red  dog 
flour 

Cagle  & Schopmeyer,  Poland,  Ind.® 

Mixed  Peed  

Cannelton  Plour  Mills,  Cannelton,  Ind. 

6884 

3.8 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  middlings,, 
ground  wheat  screenings  and  corn 
bran 

Ship  & Wheat  Screenings 

2589 

4.0 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

“A”  Mixed  Peed  

3426 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Mixed  Bran  & Screenings 

3427 

3.4 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings, 
and  corn  bran 

Carmer  Company,  J.  M.,  Auburn,  Ind. 

Carmer  & Walker  Chop  Peed  

7925 

3.9 

9.5 

6.5 

Corn  and  oats 

Carpenter,  B.  O.,  Perrysville,  Ind. 

Wffieat  bran 

Wheat  Bran 

3582 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

“Wheat  Middlings’’  

4712 

2.8 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Carter,  C.  P.,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran  and  hominy  meal 

Bran  & Homco  Mixed — 

4003 

5.0 

10.0 

9.0 

Carter  Peed  Store,  The,  Martinsville,  Ind. 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Chop  Peed  - 

4862 

3.0 

9.0 

.7.0 

Castetter  & Company,  Clyde  J.,  Goshen,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings 

7291 

3.5 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

7292 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Cauble,  0.  L.,  Pekin,  Ind. 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Shorts 

1016 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  Bran  

1018 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Pnrn  Ttran  

6129 

2.0 

8.0 

13.0 

.Corn  bran 

Mixed  Peed  

6130 

2.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings,  wheat  dust  and  mill 
sweepings 

Cauble  & Dunlevy,  Henryville,  Ind. 

Corn  bran 

Corn  Bran  

1728 

4.0 

7.0 

13.0 

Bran  

4295 

3.5 

14.0 

8.5 

Wheat  bran 

Corn  Peed  Meal 

4296 

2.7 

6.8 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Star  Mixed  Peed 

5825 

4.0 

14.0 

8.5 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  shorts 

Star  Wheat  Shorts  

.5826 

3.5 

13.5 

7.4 

Wheat  shorts 

^ Succeeded  by  Lewis  Schopmeyer 


233 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Niimber 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Cayuga  Milling  Company,  Cayuga,  Ind. 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Mixed  Wheat  and  Corn 

Bran  and  Wheat  Shorts 

418 

4.2 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  bran 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Mixed  Wheat  Bran  and 

Wheat  Shorts  

419 

3.9 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran  and  shorts 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  Shorts 

420 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Cayuga  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  Bran 

421 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  & Corn  Bran 

3892 

3.5 

12.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Corn  Meal,  Shorts,  Wheat  Bran  & Corn  Bran 

4373 

3.0 

11.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  meal  and 
corn  bran 

Corn  Meal  and  Shorts  Mixed 

4374 

3.0 

12,0 

9.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  corn  meal 

“B”  Mixed  Peed 

5175 

3.5 

13.0 

6.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  corn  feed  meal 

“A”  Mixed  Peed 

5176 

3.6 

11.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Champion  Roller  Milling  Co.,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

2496 

3.5 

14.8 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings  or  Shorts 

4700 

4.0 

16.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Chapman-Doake  Company,  The,  Decatur,  111. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

8590 

4.0 

10.0 

7.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 

Screenings  

6444 

4.0 

15. 0‘ 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

“Prize”  White  Middlings 

7004 

3.5 

15.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

“Prize”  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

7005 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

“Prize”  Standard  Middlings  and  Screenings.— 

7006 

4.0 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  mn 

“Prize”  ped  Dog  Plour 

7402 

4.0 

17.0 

5.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

“Prize”  Rye  Middlings  

7595 

3.0 

14.5 

5.0 

Rye  middlings 

Christian  & Co.,  Geo.  C.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Geo.  C.  Christian’s  Red  Dog 

3769 

3.5 

15.5 

4.0' 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

White  Middlings  & Screenings 

Jersey  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

5515 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7429 

4.0 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Poland  Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run.. 

7430 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Cincinnati  Grain  & Hay  Company,  The, 
Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Wheat  Bran 

8665 

4.0 

14.5 

9.0 

W’heat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

City  Milling  Co.,  Kendallville,  Ind. 

8666 

4.2 

15.7 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Bran  

6273 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings  

6370 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

City  Mills,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

6105 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

6106 

3.5 

14.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Chop  Peed  

6107 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Clark  & Sons,  C.  G.,  Rushville,  Ind. 

Clark’s  Com  & Wheat  Bran  (Mixed) 

185 

3.7 

14.0 

10.7 

Corn  bran  and  wheat  bran 

Clark’s  Corn  and  Oat  Chop 

187 

3.0 

8.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Clark’s  Wheat  Bran 

188 

3.7 

14.0 

10.3 

W^heat  bran 

Clarks  Mixed  Peed 

5813 

2.9 

14.0 

10.7 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Clarks  Middlings 

7918 

4.5 

18.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Claro  Milling  Company,  Waseca,  Minn, 

Claro  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings... 

6615 

3.0 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

234 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

Vi 

D 

c 

fl  B 

I C 

Cj 

_ci  S.4 

LABEL 

3 .S 

^ J 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

m 

v<  +Jrr. 
o 

following  ingredients 

QJ  0)  Q) 

o S 
iz;  ao 

Q)  <x> 

O TQ 

c (u  a> 

S t)T3 
^ V,  S 
|2  QJ  Vl 

:z:  fto 

1 

o 

O S S 
:z:  fto 

Claro  Milling  Company,  Waseca,  Minn. 

Claro  Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings 

6616 

3.0 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Claro  Wheat  Flour  Middlings 

7045 

3.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Claro  Ked  Dog 

7046 

3.0 

15.0 

5.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Claypole,  Geo.  M.,  Sardinia,  Ind. 

Geo.  M.  Claypole’s  Mixed  Feed 

1889 

3.5 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Geo.  M.  Claypole’s  Wheat  Bran 

2144 

3.2 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Geo.  M.  Claypole’s  Wheat  Middlings 

2500 

4.0 

14.0 

8. O' 

Wheat  middlings 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

4056 

2.7 

7.0 

7.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Chop  Feed  

Clayton  Milling  Company,  Clayton,  Ind. 

8165 

3.5 

9.5 

10.0 

Corn,  oats  and  wheat 

Mixed  Feed 

7665 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

White  Middlings  

Clifty  Mills,  R.  R.  No.  3,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

7722 

1.8 

13.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

• 

Mill  Feed 

4381 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Clyne,  I.  B.,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

1 1 

Chop  Feed  

1 6207 

3.0 

8.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Coal  City  Milling  Co.,  Coal  City,  Ind. 

Pure  Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

2952 

3.5 

9.5 

7.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Coal  City  Mixed  Bran  __  

6601 

3.5 

13.5 

11.5 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Coal  City  Wheat  Shorts  

1 6913 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Columbia  City  Mill  & Elevator  Co.,  The, 
Columbia  City,  Ind.® 

Mixed  Bran  

2701 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Chop  Feed  

1 2703 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye  and  barley 

Mixed  Feed 

I 5525 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

6990 

2.8 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  barley  and  corn  feed 
meal 

A.  Chop  Feed 

i 6991 

3.0 

8.0 

10.0 

Columbus  Milling  Co.,  Columbus,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

652 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Corn  Feed  Meal  

6904 

2.5 

7.5 

7.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

1 8676 

3.0 

i 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Combs  & Sons,  L.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

t 

Corn  & Oats  Feed 

1 8070 

3.0 

8.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Comer  & Scearce  Co.,  The,  Mooresville,  Ind. 

Feed  Meal  

5379 

2.4 

6.0 

4.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Commander  Mill  Company,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Commander  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Commander  Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

7139 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Ground  Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run__ 
Commander  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground 

7957 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

8374 

4.5 

16.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Cook,  E.  N.,  Plymouth,  Ind. 

Corn,  oats,  ground  corn  screenings 
and  corn  feed  meal 

Cook’s  Chop  Feed 

4770 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Cook  Co.,  C.  B.,  Greenwood,  Ind. 

Corn  feed  meal 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

4798 

2.0 

7.0 

6.0 

® Succeeded  by  The  Farmers  Mill  & Elevator 


235 


TABLE  VSI — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Coombs  Milling  Co.,  Wm.  A.,  Coldwater,  Mich. 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

7344 

3.0 

15.0. 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7345 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook,  Nappanee,  Ind. 

Bran  

5628 

3.6 

13.5 

11.0 

■ Wheat  bran 

Mixed  Eeed 

6919 

4.5 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat  Screenings 

7561 

4.0 

15.8 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Reddog  Flour  (Branded  “F”) 

7610 

2.7 

14.0 

2.3 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Corydon  Milling  Company,  Corydon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

3305 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

“A.”  Mixed  Feed 

7100 

3.5 

1*.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Crabbs,  Reynolds  Taylor  Company, 
Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

1029 

3.7 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Ground  Corn  and  Oats  Screenings  

8208 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Ground  screenings  from  corn  and 
oats 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2468 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

5310 

2.0 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Ground  Corn  and  Oats  Screenings.  

8208 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Ground  screenings  from  corn  and 
oats 

Thrift  Chop  Feed 

8688 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Company, 

Reynolds,  Ind. 

C.  R.  T.  Chop  Feed  

5831 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Crandah,  L.  W.,  Fremont,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop  __  

1650 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Middlings  

1651 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Bran 

1652 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Crescent  Milling  Company,  Crothersville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7574 

3.8 

14.5 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 
and  whole  wheat  screenings 

Crescent  Milling  Company,  Fairfax,  Minn. 
Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  not 

exceeding  Mill  Run 

Standard  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

6772 

5.1 

14.2 

13.2 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

not  exceeding  mill  run 

6773 

5.8 

16.2 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Crocker,  William  G.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  not 

exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 

7235 

4.0 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with  Ground  Screenings 

7236 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 

7237 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

ings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7238 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings,  reddog  flour  and 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run 

Red  Dog  Flour 

7239 

4.0 

16.0 

4.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Crown  Mill  & Feed  Co.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

7773 

4.0 

7.0 

14.0 

Corn  bran 

Croxton,  James  W^,  Cloverdale,  Ind. 

Middlings  

246 

3.8 

14.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

236 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Croxton  & Co.,  J.  W.,  Cloverdale,  Ind. 

> 

Croxton’s  Extra  Mixed  Feed 

•263-2 

3.5 

12.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Daily,  0.  C.,  Bristol,  R.  R.  No.  5,  Ind. 

Bonneyville  No.  1.  Chop  Feed 

.5501 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Dalrymple,  J.  W.,  Rising  Sun,  Ind. 

Bran  & Shorts 

810 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  shorts 

Daniels  & Pickering  Co.,  Middletown,  Ind.’^ 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

4331 

2.5 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

DeBaun  Mill,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

1 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed  

3337 

3.5 

12.0 

25.0 

Buckwheat  hulls  and  middlings 

Deck,  James  M.,  Roann,  Ind.s 

Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran A 

195 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Pure  Wheat  Middling 

196 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Dclp  Grain  Company,  E.  E.,  Bourbon,  Ind.  . 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

7555 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings  

7556 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Speeial  Corn  Feed  Meal  _ _ 

8372 

6.0 

11.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Deutsch  & Sickert  Company,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Coarse  Wheat  Bran  ___  

5389 

4.0 

15.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran 

Pure  Wheat  Middlings 

5472 

5.0 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mystic  Bran  

7187 

4.5 

14.0 

15.0 

Wheat  bran 

Eagle  Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Ground  Screenings 

7188 

5.0 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

7259 

4.0 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  rvheat 
screenings 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

8553 

6.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  feed  meal  from  yellow  and 
white  corn 

•Flour  Middlings  including  Mill  Run  Screenings 

8555 

4.3 

16.0 

7.7 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Reddog  Flour 

a582 

5.0 

15.0 

4.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Mixed  Feed 

Dilger  Bros.,  Mariah  Hill,  Ind. 

8705 

4.8 

15.3 

10.4 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Mixed  Bran  . 

3181 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  and  corn  bran 

Dilger  Bros.  Wheat  Shorts 

3632 

2.5 

12.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Dilley  Company,  C.  L.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

Corn,  cats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Dilley’s  No.  1 Chop  Feed 

7951 

3.5 

9.0 

7.0 

Dillsboro  Milling  Company,  Dillsboro,  Ind. 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Shorts 

1008 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Mixed  Feed 

4053 

2.9 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  wheat 
dust 

Dixie  Mills  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 

Dixie  Corn  & Oats  Chop-  

7693 

3.0, 

8.0 

10.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Donmeyer,  Gardner  & Co.,  Peoria,  111. 

Wheat  middlings 

Pure  Wheat  Middlings 

2612 

4.5 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings  Not  to  exceed 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  to  exceed  mill  run 

Mill  Run  -• 

6208 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Doolittle  Mills,  Doolittle  Mills,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Bran  and  Middlings  

a345 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

7 Succeeded  by  J.  M.  Walker  & Son. 

8 Succeeded  by  James  H.  Deck 


237 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

. per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than  ^ 

per  cent.  p 

Crude  Protein  p 

Not  more  than  g- 

per  cent.  ^ 

Crude  Fiber  _ 

Dreyer  Commission  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

8606 

8.0 

8.0 

11.5 

White  Corn  Feed  Meal 

8632 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

W.  Corn  Peed  Meal 

8655 

3.5 

8.0 

5.0 

Dubois  Milling  Company,  Dubois,  Ind. 

Bran  So  Shorts  

1192 

3.6 

13.0 

10.0 

Duglay  & Jones,  Churubusco,  Ind.° 

Wheat  Middlings 

7468 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

W'heat  Bran 

7469 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Dunlap  Grain  Company,  The  J.  M., 

Franklin,  Ind. 

Middlings  & Screenings  

8668 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

“Dairy”  Wheat  Bran 

8669 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Eagle  Roller  Mill  Company,  New  Ulm,  Minn. 

Superb  Red  Dog 

3555 

5.7 

20.7 

3.8 

Rye  Red  Dog 

5782 

2.6 

15.2 

3.1 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

6687 

4.5 

15.4 

9.5 

, Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

exceeding  Mill  Run 

7105 

3.4 

14.0 

11.0 

Rye  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7604 

3.5 

16.0 

7.0 

Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7701 

4.2 

14.5 

8.0 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  The, 

' 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Bran  & Screenings  

7273 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

Middlings  & Screenings 

7274 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Mixed  Feed  and  Screenings 

8385 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Eberts  So  Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran 

1242 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

Eberts’  Mix-Feed 

2652 

4.0 

15.5 

8.0 

Eberts  C.  & 0.  Feed 

3742 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Mixed  Feed 

4151 

4.0 

15.5 

11.0 

W'heat  Shorts 

5413 

4.0 

15.0 

7.0  ' 

“C”  Mixed  Feed 

5612 

3.5 

11.0 

12.0  ' 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

7669 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0  ' 

Eberts  Grain  Co.,  Nabb,  Ind. 

* 

Eberts  Grain  Co.,  Mixed  Peed  •_ 

4970 

4.0 

15.5 

8.0  ■ 

Eckert,  Andrew  W.,  Jasper,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

7756 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0  ■ 

Eckhart  Milling  Co.,  B.  A.,  Chicago,  111. 

! 

Bran  and  Screenings  

6194 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0  ' 

Wheat  and  Rye  Middlings  with  Ground 

Wheat  Screenings  not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

8673 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0  ^ 

Mixed  Feed  

8674 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Flour  Middlings  

8675 

4.0 

15.0 

7.0  1 ^ 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Corn  feed  meal 
Corn  feed  meal 
Corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  bran  and  shorts 


Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran 


Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 
Wheat  bran 


Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 
Low  grade  rye  flour  containing  the 
finer  particles  of  rye  bran  ' 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run  ' 
Rye  middlings  and  ground  rye  screen- 
ings not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 


Wheat  bran  and  whole  w’heat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Corn  bran 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 
Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  groimd 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 


ground  w^heat  screenings 


wheat  screenings 


wheat  screenings 


screenings 

tVheat  middlings,  rye  middlings  and 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run 

iVheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  rye 
middlings  and  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings not  exceeding  mill  run 


y Succeeded  by  Churubusco  Flouring  Mills 


238 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Grade  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Eclipse  Mill,  The,  Ramsey,  Ind. 

• 

Mill  Eeed  

2485 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

E*Mipse  Mixed  Eeed  

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

3455 

3.5 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  screen- 
ings 

Wheat  Bran  & Wheat  Screenings 

7205 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Wheat  Screenings 

7206 

4.5 

15.5 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  & Wheat  Screenings 

7207 

4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

i?trrow  Feed  Meal  

7811 

3.9 

8.7 

2.5 

Corn  feed  meal 

Edwardsport  Mills,  Edwardsport,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

6830 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Bran 

7210 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Eesley  & Co.,  Wm.,  College  Corner,  Ohio. 

Wheat  Middlings  

2921 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Bran  

3220 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Mixed  Feed 

4254 

3.0 

13.5 

13.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Egloff  Milling  Company,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran,  Ground  Screenings,  and  Corn 

Bran  

6053 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Wheat  Shorts 

6054 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Mixed  Feed 

6873 

3.5 

14.0 

8.6 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Egloff  Sons,  A.,  St.  Meinrad,  Ind. 

Bran  & Screenings 

2591 

3.0 

14.0 

8.5 

Wheat  bran,  whole  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Shorts  

2749 

3.8 

15.0 

4.2 

Wheat  shorts 

Elizabeth  Milling  Company,  Elizabeth,  Ind. 

E.  M.  Co’s  Wheat  Bran  and  Middlings 

8410 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Emison,  J.  & S.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Middlings  

1536 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mixed  Feed 

4237 

3.0 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 

Emisons  Mixed  Feed  & Middlings 

5768 

3.5 

14.0 

8.5 

IDff  S 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  whole 
wheat  screenings 

Emison  & Co.,  J.  & S.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Feed  Meal 

4464 

3.0 

8.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Emmert,  C.  B.,  Clarksburg,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

6929 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Empire  Milling  Company,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Empire  Milling  Co.  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground 

Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run  

Empire  Milling  Company  Wheat  Standard 

7393 

4.0 

14.0 

ILO 

Wheat  bran  and  ground,  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Empire  Milling  Company  Wheat  Flour  Mid- 

7394 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

dlings  with  Ground  Screenings  Not  Exceed- 

ing Mill  Run 

7395 

4.5 

17.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

English  Milling  Co.,  English,  Ind. 

English  Milling  Co.  Mixed  Feed 

966 

4.0 

14.1 

9.2 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Enterprise  Mill  Co.,  The,  Bicknell,  Ind.^® 

Enterprise  Wheat  Bran  _ 

497 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Erie  Elevator,  The,  Rochester,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oat  Chop 

3416 

3.5 

8.5 

10.0 

Corn  and  oats 

239 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified. by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

0) 

XI 

§ 

.1^ 

c .S 

rt  03 

^ .g 

^ 1 
03  .:S 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

03  4J|i. 
03 

fci  +J|V, 
O p|t^ 

following  ingredients 

'S 

iB 

o 

(33  Q)  03 

T- 

O ^ S 

^ AO 

03  03  03 

^ 03-0 

:zi  fto 

C 03  03 
Ot3 

|§3S 
iz;  AO 

Etna  Lumber  & Milling  Company, 

Etna  Green,  Ind. 

Mixed  Ee.ed 

5860 

4.0 

Etna  Bran  & Screenings  

6659 

4.0 

Etna  Middlings  & Screenings  i 

6660 

4.0 

Everett,  Aughenbaugh  & Co.,  Waseca,  Minn. 
Eaco  Winged  Horse  Mixed  Feed 

4397 

3.0 

E-A-CO  Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground  Screen- 
ings ..... 

5440 

3.0 

E-A-CO  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings. 

6024 

3.0 

Ewing  Mill  Co.,  Brownstown,  Ind. 

Ewing  MiU  Co’s  Mixed  Feed 

2497 

3.8 

Fairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

Feed  Meal  . 

6503 

2.5 

Farmers  Elevator  Co.  of  So.  Whitley, 

South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Farmer’s  Chop  Feed 

6117 

3.0 

Farmers  Grain  & Milling  Company,  The, 

Union-  City,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

8259 

2.5 

Farmers  Mill,  The,  Huntingburg,  Ind. 

Farmers  Mi^ied  Feed  

6520 

3.0 

Farmland  City  Flour  Mills,  The, 

Farmland,  Ind. 

M:heat  Shorts  

1658 

4.0 

Wheat  Bran  . 

1659 

3.8 

Feed  Products  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  HI. 
Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings  not  exceed- 
ing Mill  Run  

8624 

3.5 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

■Rxepeding  Mill  Run 

8625 

3.0 

Ferger  Grain  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Nutritia  Winter  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings.. 

8392 

4.0 

Nutritia  Rye  Middlings  and  Screenings 

8393 

3.0 

Nutritia  Winter  Wheat  Middlings  and  Screen- 

ing.ci  ..  .. 

8394 

3.5 

Fette,  Nicholas  H.,  New  Alsace,  Ind. 

Fette’s  Cleaned  Wheat  Middlings 

2603 

3.2 

Fette’s  Cleaned  Wheat  Bran  

2604 

3.^ 

Fisher  Bros.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wh^at  MidfBings  and  Snreenings 

8715 

4.0 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

8718 

3.5 

Flater,  Joda,  Alfordsville,  Ind. 

. Joda  Flater  Wheat  Bran  

576 

3.7 

Joda  Flater  Wheat  Middlings 

577 

4.0 

Fohl  & Son,  Casper,  Cedar  Grove,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

8418 

4.0 

Mixpd  Fped 

8419 

3.8 

Follett  & Co.,  R.  J.,  Carmel,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

3163 

3.7 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye  and  corn  bran 

14.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  not  exceeding  mill’s 
run  of  ground  cleaned  wheat  screen- 
ings 

16.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  not  exceeding 
mill’s  run  of  ground  cleaned  wheat 
screenings 

15.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

15.0 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  shorts 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

12.5 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

13.0 

14.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran, 
crushed  wheat  screenings,  mill  sweep- 
ings and  wheat  screenings 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  3%  ground  wheat 
screenings 

15.0 

7.0 

Rye  middlings  and  3%  ground  rye 
screenings 

15.0 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  3%  ground 
wheat  screenings 

13.8 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  bran 

240 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Forest  Park  Mills,  North  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
Mill  Peed  


5817  3.8  9.8 


Corn  Peed  Meal 


7927  2.5  7.5 


6.0  Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 

and  ground  wheat  screenings 

5.0  Corn  feed  meal 


Pornax  Milling  Company,  Decatur,  Ind. 

Pornax  Hog  Peed  

Pornax  Mixed  Peed 

Powler,  A.,  Pittsboro,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  


7199 

'7200 

2618 


2.8  12.0 

3.2  13.0 


7.0 

12.0 


Wheat  middlings  and  corn  feed  meal 
Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 


3.5  9.0 


9.0  Corn  and  oats 


Pox  & Hess  Company,  The,  Coldwater,  Ohio. 
Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 


6865 


3.0  14.0 


Wheat  Middlings 


6998 


14.0 


Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Wheat  middlings 


Predericksburg  Milling  Co.,  The, 
Predericksburg,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

Blue  Eiver  Mixed  Peed 

Peed  & LcAvis,  Campbellsburg,  Ind. 
Mixed  Peed 


2280 

3668 


3.0  13.0 

3.0  12.0 


7.0 

11.0 


Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 


6062 


3.0  13.0 


10.0 


Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn  bran 


Preeport  Roller  Mills,  Preeport,  Ind. 
H.  Baiting’s  Composition  Peed 


Friendship  Milling  Company,  Friendship,  Ind. 

Shorts  

Wheat  Bran 


960 

4379 


3.8 


14.0 


10.0 


Wheat  bran,  shorts,  middlings,  whole 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 


4.0  14.0  8.0 
3.5  14.0  9.5 


Wheat  shorts 
Wheat  bran 


Fuhrer-Ford  Milling  Co.,  Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings  

Mixed  Feed — Wheat  Bran,  Middlings  and 
Screenings  

Wheat  Middlings 


2385 

2386 
4682 


3.7  14.0 
3.9  14.0 
3.5  14.0 


11.8 

9.5 

6.3 


Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 
Wheat  middlings 


Fulks,  Willard,  Stonehead,  Ind.,  R.  R.  No.  32, 
Columbus,  Ind. 

Pulks  Mixed  Peed 


7113 


14.0 


8.0  Wheat  bran  and  middlings 


Pyke  Milling  Co.,  LaGrange,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings  . 


6422 


AVheat  Bran  & Screenings 6423 

Gandy  & Company,  O.,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Chop  Peed  3927 


3.5  13.5 

3.5  13.5 


10.0  Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

10.0  Wheat  bran  and  ground  w'heat 
screenings 


3.0 


8.0  Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


Gard,  Geo.  N.,  Schererville,  Ind. 

Chopped  Feed 

Garland  Milling  Company,  Greensburg,  Ind. 
Garland  Bran  & Screenings 

Garland  Mixed  Peed > 


Garland  Middlings  & Screenings 

Garrett  Elevator  Company,  Garrett,  Ind. 
Chop  Peed  

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Co.,  Geneva,  Ind. 

Miller’s  Wheat  Bran 

Shorts  & Middlings  


6946-  3.0  9.0 


6.0  Corn  and  oats 


7279 

7280 

7281 


3.7  15.0 

‘BO  15.5 

4.3  16.5 


10.9 


7.9 


Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran,  middlings,  cleanings  and 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 


8445  3.0 


9.0  6.0  Corn,  oats  and  rye 


3109 

7527 


3.3 

2.5 


14.0 

13.0 


10.0 

8.0 


Wheat  bran 

Wheat  shorts  and  middlings 


241 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


<u 


.2 

'3 


o 


c 

-p 


SR  ^ 

<D  oj 

^ ftO 


m 

(u  0)  aj 
^ O73 

o S)  S 

no 


20  (B 
OTJ 

tz;  no 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Gilman,  S.  B.,  Summitville,  Ind. 

Gilman’s  Mixed  Feed 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain  Co., 

Winchester,  Ind. 

Climax  Rye  Middlings  with  Screenings 

Goshen  Milling  Company,  The,  Goshen,  Ind. 

Bran  

Mixed  Bran 

Mixed  Feed 

“A”  Mixed  Feed 

Chop  Feed  

Island  Park  Chop  

Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat  Screen- 
ings — 

Goshorn,  Jesse,  Washington,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Chop  Feed  

Gotto,  O.  W.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

Corn  Bran  

Bran  & Middlings  

Graft  Wheat  Middlings 

Green  Bros.  & Oldfather,  Warsaw,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

Greenfield  Milling  Co.,  Greenfield,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Bran  

Shorts  

Corn  Bran  

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Habig  Bros.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Habigs  Corn  Feed  Meal 

Hall  Milling  Co.,  W.  C.,  Brazil,  Ind. 

Hall’s  Wheat  Bran 

Hall’s  Bran  & Screenings 

Hall’s  Wheat  Shorts 

Hamilton  & Kellar,  Rensselaer,  Ind.n 
“A”  Chop  Feed 

Hammel  Milling  Co.,  Fremont,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran  

Wheat  Middlings 

Hampton,  W.  D.,  Worthington,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

Wheat  Shorts  

Corn  Bran  

Hanna,  L.  G.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

Hanna’s  Corn  & Oats  Chop 


3216 

3.7 

12.5 

12.0 

7841 

3.0 

14.0 

11.0 

66 

3.7 

15.4 

9.5 

1564 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

2335 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

3155 

3.8 

13.5 

11.5 

3238 

3.7 

9.8 

4.5 

5923 

3.0 

8.5 

7.0 

7471 

3.2 

13.5 

7.0 

6840 

3.0 

10.0 

9.0 

7168 

2.8 

8.7 

7.0 

6885 

3.2 

9.0 

8.0 

8403 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

3484 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

3833 

3.5 

8.5 

10.0 

3904 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

5097 

3.0 

14.0 

7.0 

7919 

3.5 

14.0 

12.0 

8369 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

4468 

3.0 

15.0 

10.0 

4469 

3.0 

15.0 

10.0 

4470 

3.0 

15.0 

8.0 

5140 

2.0 

6.0 

13.0 

7540 

2.5 

7.0 

6.0 

7844 

1.8 

8.0 

6.0 

412 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

3806 

3.0 

13.0 

9.0 

5023 

2.0 

13.0 

8.0 

5087 

3.0 

8.0 

9.0 

3154 

3.8 

14.0 

12.0 

3578 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

1124 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

2220 

2.3 

12.8 

8.0 

3673 

4.0 

7.8 

13.0 

3535 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn 
bran 


Rye  middlings  and  ground  rye 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

W’heat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Corn  and  oats 

Corn,  oats  and  rye 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Corn,  wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Corn,  oats,  rye  and  .corn  feed  meal 


Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 
Wheat  bran  and  whole  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  bran 
Corn  bran 

W’heat  bran  and  middlings 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran  and  shorts 
Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 
Corn  bran 
Corn  feed  meal 


Corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  bran 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 
Wheat  shorts 


Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 
Corn  bran 


Corn  and  oats 


Succeeded  by  Kellner  & Callahan 


242 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Hanover  Star  Milling  Co.,  Germantown,  111. 

Hanover  Star  Milling  Co.  Winter  Wheat  Bran 

743 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Hanover  Star  Milling  Co.  Wheat  Middlings.— 

744 

5.0 

15.4 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Hardin  & Son,  Ladoga,  Ind. 

Hardin  & Son’s  Mill  Feed  _ . 

3482 

2.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  middlings,  low- 
grade  flour  and  corn  bran 

Hardinsburg  Milling  Co.,  Hardinsburg,  Ind. 12 

Hardinsburg  Milling  Co’s  Wheat  Bran 

422 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Shorts 

2263 

3.5 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Hardinsburg  Boiler  Mills,  Hardinsburg,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Wheat  Bran 

7864 

3.5 

13.0 

12.0 

Corn  bran  and  wheat  bran 

Hargrave  Bros.,  Russellville,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oat  Chop  

3990 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Harmon  & Wallace  Milling  Co.,  Owensville,  Ind. 

Royal  Mixed  Feed 

Harris  Milling  Co.,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Harris’  Middlings 

7559 

3.5 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  and 
ground  wheat  screenings,  eorn  bran, 
dust  collector  dust  and  chaff 

211 

3.6 

14.5 

7.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Harris’  Mixed  Feed 

212 

3.5 

14.1 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Harris’  Cracked  Corn  Siftings 

5139 

3.2 

8.0 

5.6 

Corn  feed  meal 

Corn  Bran  

7667 

3.5 

7.0 

14.0 

Corn  bran 

Hartford  City  Grain  & Milling  Company, 
Hartford  City,  Ind. 

“Cooleva  Corn  & Oat  Chop” 

340 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Cooleys  Mixed  Feed 

2371 

3.0 

12.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  whole 
wheat  screenings 

Hartz  & Carey  Milling  Company, 

Chrisney,  Ind. 

Shipstuff  

8685 

4.0 

16.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts,  middlings  and  reddog 
flour 

Mixed  Feed 

8686 

4.0 

16.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
sereenings  and  corn  bran 

Bran  and  Screenings  . . . . 

8687 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  eorn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Havens,  P.  W.,  Hartford  City,  Ind. 

Havens’  Chop  Feed ^ 

Haynes  Milling  Co.,  I’he,  Portland,  Ind. 

7688 

3.5 

8.5 

8.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  Bran  

92 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  Feed 

93 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Bran  __  

4094 

3.5 

15.2 

9.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  Middlings  __ _ 

4389 

3.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

‘‘Havnes  Mixed  Feed”  _ 

7893 

3.5 

15.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Havnes  Special  Mixed  Feed 

7894 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Mary  Putney  Chop  Feed 

Ilaysville  Milling  Company,  Haysville,  Ind. 

8542 

3.2 

9.0 

6.5 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Mixed  Feed  _ . _ _ 

6020 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Shorts  ___  _ . 

6439 

2.0 

12.0 

6.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Hazleton  Flour  Mills,  The,  Hazleton,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7174 

3.0 

12.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran,  ground 
wheat  screenings,  dust  collector  dust 
and  wheat  chaff 

Wheat  Shorts  

7475 

3.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts 

12  Succeeded  by  G.  W.  Hoffman 


243 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Heaton,  E.  H.,  Indianapolis,  R.  R.  No.  12,  Ind. 

Wheat  & Cracked  Corn 

.'5930 

2.7 

9.0 

3.0 

Wheat  and  corn 

Corn  Bran  

5932 

3.0 

6.0 

13.0 

Corn  bran 

Corn  Eeed  Meal 

5933 

2.5 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Heitschmidt,  A.  C.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Eeed  

5672 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Henline,  M.  S.,  Ossian,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  

3263 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Mixed  Eeed  

6806 

2.5 

12.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn 
bran 

Herbert  & Sons,  Joseph,  Millhousen,  Ind. 

Herbert’s  Mixed  Eeed 

7101 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  shorts  and 
corn  bran 

Hoag,  N.  S.,  Huntington,  Ind. 

Chop  Eeed  

8588 

2.8 

8.5 

9.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Holland,  Thos.  A.,  Fort  Ritner,  Ind. 

Holland  Mixed  Eeed 

8678 

3.5 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Holland  Mills,  The,  Holland,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7131 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  crushed 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

8200 

2.0 

12.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Hollingsworth,  S.  P.,  Russiaville,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1518 

3.9 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Hollingsworth  Wheat  Shorts 

2941 

2.5 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Hollingsworth  Mixed  Feed  

7829 

1 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  bran 

Holton  Milling  Company,  The,  Holton,  Ind. 

I 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  ___  

3290 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

A.  Mixed  Feed  

7404 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Home  Mill  & Grain  Co.,  Mt.  Vernon,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran 

2598 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

Corn  bran 

Mixed  Feed 

3287 

3.2 

14.4 

10.5 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings 

7449 

4.2 

16.9 

5.6 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings  

7686 

! 4.0 

16.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Hornung,  J,  M.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

Middlings  

415 

3.8 

14.2 

9.7 

Wheat  middlings 

Mixed  Eeed 

j 416 

3.7 

14.0 

9.7 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Wheat  Bran  

417 

3.7 

14.1 

9.7 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

2577 

3.7 

14.1 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Hosmer  Milling  Co.,  0.  I.,  Leavenworth,  Ind. 

0.  I.  Hosmer  Mixed  Feed 

7822 

3.4 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  shorts,  whole 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Hubbard,  J.  W.,  Monrovia,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed — 

7550 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Middlings 

7551 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Hubbard  Milling  Company,  Mankato,  Minn. 

Standard  Fine  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

8538 

5.0 

16.0 

11.5 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Pure  Flakey  Bran  

8603 

3.0 

15.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran 

White  Flour  Middlings 

8607 

5.5 

18.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Sterling  Red  Dog 

8608 

4.0 

17.0 

4.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Huffman,  L.  R.,  Valparaiso,  R.  R.  No.  5,  Ind. 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

4823 

2.5 

12.0 

25.0 

Buckwheat  middlings  and  hulls 

Hughes,  John  F.,  Elwood,  Ind. 

Rye  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings 

8012 

3.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Rye  middlings  and  ground  rye 
screenings 

244 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


§ 

05  +f  rv, 
05  0)  C) 
Wt3 

o §3  S 


;z;  fto 


05 

0)  .£ 
o 

es-S 

12;  P.O 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Hunter-Robinson-Wenz  Milling  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Middlings  

3346 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Winter  Bran 

4732 

4.0 

14.5 

9.5 

Mixed  Eeed 

5218 

4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

Bran  and  Screenings 

5219 

4.0 

14.5 

9.5 

5220 

4.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Huntington  Mill  Co.,  Huntington,  Ind. 

491 

3.6 

14.2 

10.0 

Mixed  Eeed 

492 

3.8 

13.5 

6.4 

Bran  and  Shorts 

493 

3.9 

14.2 

9.5 

495 

3.9 

14.3 

5.4 

Hum  Milling  Company,  W.  D., 

NeAV  Salisbury,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7959 

3.5 

• 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  Middlings 

8089 

3.5 

13.0 

7.0 

Hutchinson  Flour  Mills  Co.,  The, 

Hutchinson,  Kas. 

Fancy  White  Shorts 

7835 

3.0 

14.0 

3.5 

Wheat  Shorts  and  Wheat  Screenings  Not 
Exceeding  Mill  Run  

7636 

3.5 

16.0 

5.5 

Wheat  Bran  and  Wheat  Screenings  Not 
Exceeding  Mill  Run  

7838 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  and  Wheat  Screenings 

7865 

3.5 

15.5 

8.5 

Ideal  Milling  & Grain  Company,  RidgeviUe,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  and  Screenings 

7353 

2.5 

12.5 

10.0 

Mixed  Feed 

7797 

2.5 

11.0 

6.0 

Igleheart  Bros.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran  

5771 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

Pure  Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings  Not 
exceeding  Mill  Run 

5772 

5.0 

16.0 

7.0 

Pure  Mixed  Feed  

5773 

4.5 

15.5 

9.0 

Imbs  Milling  Company,  J.  F.,  Belleville,  111. 
“Charm”  Bran  With  Ground  Wheat  Screen- 
ingp 

7074 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat  Screenings 

Not  in  excess  to  Mill  Run  

7195 

4.0 

15.0 

5.0 

“Charm”  Mixed  Feed  (Wheat  Bran,  Wheat 
Middlings  and  Ground  Wheat  Screenings 
Not  to  exceed  Mill  Run) ' 

8529 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Imperial  Mills,  The,  Cambridge  City,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran 

1752 

3.2 

12.0 

11.0 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings 

7592 

3.7 

14.0 

7.0 

Indiana  Elevator  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind.i^ 

Corn  Bran  ___  

4940 

3.5 

8.0 

13.0 

Gold  Medal  Chop 

5801 

3.0 

8.0 

9.0 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

7073 

2.7 

7.5 

5.0 

Indiana  Flour  Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran ^ 

4962 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Pure  Bran  and  Shorts — 

6190 

3.5 

14.0 

6.5 

Pure  Wheat  Shorts 

6191  1 

4.0  1 

15.0 

6.5  ■ 

Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings  and 
whole  wheat  screenings 
Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 
Wheat  bran  and  shorts 
Wheat  shorts 


Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  shorts  and  whole 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  shorts,  middlings  and  corn 
feed  meal 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  to  exceed  mill 
run 

W^heat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 


Corn  bran 
Corn  and  oats 
Corn  feed  meal 


Succeeded  by  Indiana  Elevator 


245 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Indiana  Milling  Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Bran  & Mill  Run  Screenings 

5908 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Standard  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 
Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

6787 

4.0 

14.5 

11.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Sterling  Mixed  Reed  — - — 

6824 

3.0 

10.0 

16.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran  with  ground  wheat 

Interstate  Feed  Association,  Detroit,  Mich* 
Interstate  Standard  Middlings  and  Screenings 

8183 

5.0 

14.0 

6.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run, 
cob  meal  and  ground  corn 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Interstate  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

8342 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Bran 

6139 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  Middlings  

6140 

2.5 

12.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

6299 

2.0 

10.0 

25.0 

Buckwheat  middlings  and  buckwheat 
hulls 

Buckwheat  hulls 

Buckwheat  hulls  __ 

7115 

1.5 

6.8 

33.0 

Jacobson,  Soren,  Young  America,  Ind. 

Wheat  middlings 

Jacobsons  Wheat  Middling  

385 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Jacobsons  Wheat  and  Corn  Bran 

2718 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  and  corn  bran 

Jacobsons  Mixed  Feed 

6359 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 

Jay  Grain  Company,  The,  Elwood,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7021 

• 3.8 

9.0 

7.0 

and  ground  wheat  screenings  not 
exceeding  mill  run 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Jay  Grain  Co.,  The,  Mulberry  Branch, 

Mulberry,  Ind. 

Corn  bran 

Jay’s  Corn  Bran - 

37 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

“Jay’s”  Wheat  Bran  & Shorts  

7716 

3.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran  and  shorts 

Jennison  & Company,  W.  J.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 

Wheat middlings  and  ground  wheat 

ings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

6038 

4.5 

17.0 

5.5 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 
exceeding  Mill  Run  __  __  

6039 

• 4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Johnson  & Sons,  C.  H.,  Pinola,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

7391 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings  _ 

7392 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Chop  Feed 

7666 

3.9 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Mixed  Feed 

7757 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Jones,  G.  W.,  Upland,  Ind. 

Corn  and  oats 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

3212 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Jones  & Son,  C.  N.,  Wabash,  Ind. 

Bran  and  Shorts 

7733 

3.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran  and  shorts 

Wheat  Middlings 

8383 

2.0 

12.5 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Jordan,  Geo.  M.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Corn  feed  meal 

Feed  Meal  — — 

7290 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

G.  M.  J.  Bran  & Screenings 

8310 

3.8 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

G.  M.  J.  Middlings  & Screenings 

8311 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

G.  M.  J.  Mixed  Feed 

8703 

3.5 

15.0 

10.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  ground 

' Judson  Creamery  & Produce  Company, 

wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run  and  salt 

North  Judson,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

8123 

3.5 

14.0 

11.0 

Mix^d  FP'Pd  

. 8124 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings,  rye  middlings  and 

Judson  Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

. 8496 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

ground  screenings  from  wheat  and 
rye 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

1 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

246 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

rirndp'  En-h 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

rivnrlQ  Pmtpin 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

ririidp.  Eibpv 

! 

1 and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

> 

1 

1 . 

) 

Kamman,  Frank  W.,  Cross  Plains,  Ind. 

Shipstuff  or  Shorts  _ 

2359 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Bran  

2360 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Kasch,  Chas.  0.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

Kasch’s  Chop  Feed 

5539 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Katterjohn,  A.  F.,  Lynnville,  Ind. 

A.  F.  Katterjohn’s  Wheat  Bran 

487 

3.7 

14.0 

•10. 0 

Wheat  bran 

Katterjohn’s  Shorts 

6937 

3.4 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Mixed  Feed 

6938 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Kaw  Milling  Company,  The,  Topeka,  Kansas, 

Mill  Run  and  Screenings 

Kaw  Kaw  Shorts  & Ground  Screenings  Not 

6128 

4.0 

17.0 

9.6 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  middlings,  low 
grade  flour  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

to  exceed  5% 

8304 

4.0 

17.0 

5.5 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  to  exceed  5% 

Kaw  Kaw  Bran  & Scourings 

8305 

3.5 

15.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
scourings  not  to  exceed  5% 

Kaw  Kaw  Pure  Middlings 

8306 

3.0 

15.0 

3.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Keene,  A.  C.,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Keene’s  Chop  Feed 

3281 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings 

7361 

3.5 

13.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

W’heat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

7362 

3.5 

13.5 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Kehlor  Flour  Mills  Co.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Neptune  White  Middlings  

4191 

4.0 

17.0 

4.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Palace  Bran  _ 

5808 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Rex  Middlings  and  Ground  Screenings 

6682 

4.0 

16.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Kehlor’s  Millfeed 

Kemper  Mill  & Elevator  Co.,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

7508 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Crown  Shorts 

2055 

4.7 

16.0 

5.7 

Wheat  shorts 

Diamond  Bran 

2076 

4.0 

14.5 

9.5 

Wheat  bran 

Crescent  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings— 

6028 

4.2 

16.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Anchor  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

Anchor  Mixed  Feed  with  Screenings  Not 

6030 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
sereenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Crescent  Mixed  Feed  and  Screenings  Not 

7248 

4.0 

16.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Carnation  Gray  Middlings  and  Screenings 

7324 

4.0 

16.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7325 

4.3 

16.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  . 

Kennedy  Bros.,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

5211 

3.0 

8.5 

9.0 

Com,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Kennedy  Milling  Company,  M.  W., 

LaFontaine,  Ind.i* 

Chop  Feed  

6067 

3.0 

8.0 

6.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Kennedy  Milling  Company,  Geo.  W., 

Shelbyville,  Ind. 

Middlings  

2110 

3.5 

13.5 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mixed  Feed — _ 

2477 

3.5 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  whole  wheat  screenings 
and  com  bran 

Corn  Bran  

7791 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

Cora  bran 

Kennedy’s  Winter  Wheat  Bran  . 

8201 

3.5 

16.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Kent  Milling  Co.,  Kent,  Ind. 

Kent  Mixed  Feed 

3364 

3.2 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

6914 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Corn  Bran  _ 

6915 

4.0 

7.0 

10.0 

Com  bran 

Wheat  Middlings — __ 

7649  I 

3.8 

14.0 

7.0  1 

Wheat  middlings 

Succeeded  by  Hare’s  Feed  Mill 


247 


TABLE  VII Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


Kern  & Son,  A.  J.,  Trinity  Springs,  Ind. 
Trinity  Brand 


Killian  Elevator,  The,  Newberry,  Ind. 
Mixed  Feed 


Corn  Feed  Meal 

Klein,  M.  J.,  Cedar  Lake,  R.  R.  No.  1,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  


Klondike  Milling  Company,  The,  Danville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

The  Mill  Run  Mixed  Feed 


Klondike  Chop  Feed 

Cracked  Corn  & Screenings 


Knecht  Milling  Company,  Hartford  City,  Ind. 
Knecht  Milling  Co.  Chop  Feed 


Koenemann,  Ed.  F.,  Hoagland,  Ind. 
Corn  & Oats  Chop 


Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Fancy  Mixed  Feed -- 

Badger  Wheat  Middlings  and  Maizo  (Corn) 
Red  Dog  Flour  


Badger  Cream  Flakes  

Badger  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings. 


Badger  Maizo  Corn  Reddog  Flour 


Kuhn  & Co.,  Paul,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

Wheat  Bran 


Kuhn  & Son,  John  H.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  


Lafayette  Milling  Co.,  The,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran 

Middlings  

Corn  Feed  Meal  


LaGrange  Mills,  Red  Wing,  Minn. 

Fine  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 
Exceeding  Mill  Run  


LaGro  Milling  Company,  LaGro,  Ind. 
Prop’s  Special  Mixed  Feed 


Lake  Milling  Company,  Lake,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Mixed  Feed 


Wheat  Middlings 


Larabee  Flour  Mills  Corporation,  The, 
Hutchinson,  Kansas. 


exceed  8%  

Standard  Wheat  Shorts 


Official  Number 

jNot  less  man 

per  cent. 

■Crude  Fat 

JN  or  less  man 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

JNot  more  man 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

813 

3.8 

14.0  1 

8.1 

1196 

3.5 

8.5 

8.0  ^ 

8139 

2.5 

7.5 

6.0  C 

4799 

3.5 

9.0 

10.0  c 

. 274 

3.7 

14.4 

10.0  y 

. 2654 

3.5 

13.0 

13.0  M 

. 4430 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0,  C 

. 4099 

2.5 

7.5 

7.0  C 

. 6433 

2.5 

8.5 

10.0  C 

1682 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0  ( 

4341 

3.0 

11.0 

9.0  1 

4362 

3.0 

11.0 

9.0  '' 

4683 

3.0 

8.5 

*9.0  ( 

6362 

3.5 

14.0 

10.5  ^ 

- 7671 

7.5 

11.0 

2.0  ] 

_ 3250 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0  ' 

3273 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0  ■ 

..  5331 

3.5 

8.8 

10.0 

117 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

3831 

2.8 

14.0 

7.0 

. 6116 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

8604 

5.0 

15.5 

9.5 

3606 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

8657 

4.0 

9.0 

15.0 

8658 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

__  8659 

3.9 

14.0 

6.0 

0 

• 

8467 

3.2 

15.0 

10.0 

...  8468 

! 4.2 

17.0 

6.2 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Wheat  bran  and  shorts 


ings  and  corn  bran 
)orn  feed  meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


wheat  oran,  miaanngs,  gruuuu 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 


Wheat  bran  and  corn  reddog  flour 

^heat  middlings  and  corn  reddog 
flour 


YVlieat;  UliXll  UiiU  vvxiv.c*u 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Low  grade  corn  flour  containing 
finer  particles  of  corn  bran 


Corn  and  oats 


Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 
Wheat  middlings 
Corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 


Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  com  bran 


Corn  bran,  corn  grits  and  corn  germ 
Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran  and  mill  run  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  to  exceed  8% 
Wheat  shorts 


248 


TABLE  VII  Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


5 -p 

m c3 
<D  aj 

GO 


a .E 

Q) 

^ .g 

S-gAn 
<u  <u  a; 

►2  S 

:2i  ftO) 


O C" 
g (U  0) 

^ CJT) 

^ ao 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Lash  Elour  Mills,  Ered  B.,  Earmersburg,  Ind. 

Lash’s  Shorts  

Lashs  Mixe^  Eeed IIIII” 


Corn  Eeed  Meal  . 
Eine  Mixed  Eeed 


Coarse  Mixed  Eeed 


Lawrenceburg  Roller  Mills  Co.,  The, 
Lawrenceburg,  Ind. 

“Snowflake”  Middlings 

Snowflake  Bran  

Golden  Bull  Bran 

Golden  Bull  Middlings 

“Golden  Bull”  Mixed  Eeed 

“Snowflake”  Mixed  Eeed 


Lee  «&:  Co.,  Janies  M.,  New  Albany,  Ind. 
Success  Chop  Eeed * 


Co.,  The,  Salina,  Kansas. 


Lee- Warren  Millin 
Wheat  Shorts 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

Leesburg  Grain  & Milling  Co.,  The, 

Leesburg,  Ind. 

Chop  

Wheat  Bran 

Middlings  306 


Lemon  Milling  Co.,  The,  Bedford,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop • 

Mixed  Mill  Eeed 


Elour  Middlings 

Lewis  Milling  Company,  Lewis,  Ind. 

W’heat  Bran 

Wheat  Shorts  & Low  Grade  Elour 

Lewisport  Mill  Co.,  Lewisport,  Ky. 

“Earmers  Choice”  

“Mixed  Eeed” 


Ligonier  Milling  Co.,  Ligonier,  Ind.i^ 
Ligonier  Milling  Co’s  Corn  & Oats  Chop... 

Lingeman,  Adams  & Co.,  Brownsburg,  Ind. 

Bran  

Corn  Eeed  Meal '."..1.1"' 

Mixed  Eeed 


Wheat  Middlings  _. 
Chop  Eeed  


Jnkhart,  J.  W.,  North  Vernon,  Ind.ic 
Corn  and  Oats  Chop 


-inkhart  & Son,  J.  W.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 
Linkhart’s  Mixed  Eeed  


anton  Mill  Co.,  The,  Linton,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oat  Chop 

Succeeded  by  Lyon  & Greenleaf  Co. 

Succeeded  by  J.  W.  Linkhart  & Son 


4.0 

14.0 

8.( 

3.0 

11.0 

15. [ 

2.5 

7.5 

5.C 

3.0 

12.0 

15.0 

3.0 

11.0 

15.0 

5.1 

16.0 

7.0 

. 3936 

3.8 

14.2 

9.5 

. 7110' 

2.0 

15.5 

11.5 

- 7111 

3.0 

17.5 

8.0 

. 8517 

2.5 

16.0 

10.2 

. 8518 

4.3 

15.2 

8.0 

. 5421 

2.7 

8.5 

8.0 

. 7480' 

3.5 

16.0 

5.5 

. 7481 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

304 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

305 

■ 3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

306 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

3246 

4.0 

8.5 

6.0 

3915 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

7431 

2.0 

12.0 

5.0 

6005 

3.5 

14.0 

12.0' 

6006 

2.5 

13.0 

8.0 

2377 

4.2 

14.0 

7.0 

2378 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

378 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

3320 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

4426 

3.0 

8.5 

5.0 

6822 

2.4 

7.0 

10.0 

7608 

2.5 

14.0 

6.0 

7038 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

4548 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

« 

7410 

3.5 

9.5 

12.0 

506  1 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran, 
ground  wheat  screenings  and  oat 
hulls 

Corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  oat  hulls 
Wheat  bran,  corn  bran,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  oat  hulls  ^ 

Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran 
Wheat  bran 
Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran  and  middlings 
Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Corn,  oats  and  com  feed  meal 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings not  to  exceed  mill  run 


Corn  and  oats 
Wheat  bran 
Wheat  middlings 


Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  shorts,  corn 
bran,  ground  wheat  screenings  and 
mill  sweepings 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran 

Wheat  shorts  and  low  grade  flour 


Wheat  middlings  and  corn  bran 
Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Corn  and  oats 


Wheat  bran 
Corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  aspirator 
dust  from  ground  corn,  oats  and 
rye 

Wheat  middlings 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


Corn  and  oats 


Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran,  com 
feed  meal  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Corn  and  oats 


249 


TABLE  VM — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


Linton  Mill  Co.,  The,  Linton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts 

Wheat  Bran 

Mixed  reed 

A.  Mixed  Feed  

Listman  Mill  Company,  LaCrosse,  Wis. 

Elmco  Reddog  

Elmco  White  Middlings 

Elmeo  Standard  Middlings 

Elmco  Bran 

Elmeo  Mixed  Feed 

Little  Crow  Milling  Company,  Warsaw,  Ind. 

Little  Crow  Wheat  Bran 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

Logan,  George,  Shirley,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Shorts  ; 

Lone  Star  Feed  Mill,  Washington,  Ind.^'^ 

Lone  Star  Chop  Feed 

Longfellow  Bros.,  Kokomo,  R.  R.  No.  8,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

Loogootee  Milling  Co.,  Loogootee,  Ind. 

Bran  

Shorts  

A.  Dairy  Mixed  Feed 

Mixed  Feed 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain  Co.,  The, 
Monticello,  Ind. 

Loughry’s  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Loughry’s  Mixed  Feed 

Loughry’s  Corn  Bran  

Loughry’s  Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

Loughry’s  Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings.. , 

Loughry’s  Feed 


Loughry’s  Feed  Meal 

Loughry’s  Reddog  Flour 

Louisiana  State  Rice  Milling  Co., 

New  Orleans,  La. 

Rice  Polish 

Rice  Bran  

Pearling  Cone  Meal 

Louisville  Cereal  Mill  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Nonesuch  Mixed  Feed 

Louisville  Milling  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 
exceeding  Mill  Run 


Ouicial  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

507 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

508 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

1792 

4.0' 

13.0 

11.0 

4047 

3.5 

13.0 

12.0 

3365 

3.9 

17.2 

2.5 

3366 

4.5 

17.6 

5.6 

3367 

5.6 

18.1 

6.4 

3368 

4.1 

16.6 

11.3 

3369 

5.3 

17.9 

9.7 

360 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

7284 

3.0 

13.0 

9.0 

6894 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

6895 

3.0 

7.0 

6.0 

7032 

3.0 

13.0 

8.0 

5929 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

7293 

3.0 

8.5 

9.0 

1837 

3.2 

14.0 

10.0 

1888 

3.8 

14.0 

8.0 

41.02 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

4103 

3.0 

14.0 

11.0 

6438 

2.5 

8.0 

5.0 

41 

3.7 

9.5 

6.0 

1946 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

2549 

4.0 

7.0 

11.0 

4614 

2.5 

10.0 

33.0 

6170 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

6171 

4.0 

16.5 

9.0 

7713 

2.5 

7.0 

5.0 

7731 

3.5 

16.0 

3.0 

5275 

6.. 5 

• 9.0 

5.0 

5298 

8.5 

11.5 

12.0 

8525 

13.2 

13.2 

9.0 

2561 

7.8 

11.6 

6.5 

6175 

4.0 

14.5 

9.0 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Wheat  shorts 
Wheat  bran 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  bran 
Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 
Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  red  dog 
flour 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 
Corn  feed  meal 
Wheat  shorts 


Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 
W’heat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Corn  feed  meal  ' 


Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  “not  exceeding  mill  run” 

Corn  bran 

Buckwheat  middlings  and  hulls 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Corn  feed  meal 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 


Rice  polish 
Rice  bran 

A manufactured  mixture  of  rice  bran 
and  rice  polish 

Wheat  bran  and  hominy  meal 


Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat ' 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 


Succeeded  by  G.  E.  Reeve  & Son 


250 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


0)  (D  OJ 


1 1 

<D  <D  0) 
ten 

% ftU 


5 I 

d)  .£ 

ss-g 

:2:  fto 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Louisville  Milling  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Wheat  Shorts  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 


Wheat  Mixed  Feed,  with  Ground  Screenings 
Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 


Dandy,  Red  Dog  Middlings 

Lynn  Milling  Co.,  The,  Lynn,  Ind.i* 

Wheat  Bran 

Wheat  Shorts 


Lyon  & Greenleaf  Co.,  Ligonier,  Ind. 
Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 


Mixed  Feed 


Maegerlein,  E.  S.,  Patricksburg,  Ind. 

Shorts  

Bran  

Mixed  Feed 


Maegerlein  Roller  Mills,  Arthur,  Clay  City,  Ind. 

Bran  

Shorts  ”” 

Mixed  Feed 


Mahalasville  Milling  Company, 
Mahalasville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

Mixed  Bran  


Majot  & Morgan,  Michigan  City,  R.  R.  1,  Ind. 
Mill  Feed 

Mallinson,  Charles  L.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Wheat  Shorts  & Ground  Screenings  Not 
Exceeding  Mill  Run 


Maney  Milling  Company,  Omaha,  Neb. 

Wheat  Shorts  

Mixed  Feed 


Marengo  Milling  Company,  Marengo,  Ind. 
“A”  Mixed  Feed  


Marshall  Milling  Company,  Marshall,  Minn. 
Wheat  Shorts  with  Screenings  Not  Exceeding 

Mill  Run 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings  Not  Exceeding 
Mill  Run 


Red  Dog  

White  Middlings 


Martin  & Martin,  New  Castle,  Ind. 

Martin  & Martin’s  Wheat  Bran 

Martin  & Martin’s  Wheat  Middlings 

Martin  & Martin’s  Mixed  Feed 

Dairy  Mixed  Feed 


Corn  Feed  Meal 


. 6176 

4.0' 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

6333 

4.0 

14.5 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

6703 

4.0 

16.0 

5.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
•the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

6233 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

6234 

3.5 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

8008 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

8217 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

! 8100 

3.0 

13.0 

9.0 

Wheat  shorts 

I 8103 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

8698 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings and  corn  bran 

. 3807 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran 

. 3808 

3.5 

13.0 

8.5 

Wheat  shorts 

, 6589 

2.8 

12.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

8211 

2.0 

10.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

; 8212 

1 

3.0 

13.0 

*11.5 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

I 

I 8037 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat,  rye,  rye  bran,  rye  middlings 
and  com  feed  meal 

7363 

3.5 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

7364 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

2996 

4.0 

l4.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

5580 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

7746 

3.5 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  com  bran 

8626 

5.0 

15.5 

10.5 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

8627 

4.0 

14.5 

12.5 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

8628 

5.0 

17.0 

5.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

8(^9 

5.5 

17.5 

6.5 

Wheat  middlings 

3150 

3.2 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

3794 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings 

4351 

3.5 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

6958 

3.2 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  com 
bran  and  corn  feed  meal 

7863 

2.7 

7.5  1 

8.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

IS  Succeeded  by  Lynn  City  Mills 


251 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18 .(continued) 


I 

Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

U 

d) 

rQ 

c 

a 

cS  ^ 

LABEL 

3 

^ .Is  ' 

5 .t 

® .a 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

cn  C ” 

o c**’ 

following  ingredients 

O)  O 0) 

0)  <U  UJ 

fly® 

— 1 OtJ  ' 

^ y-r) 

5H 

o 

:z:  fto 

tz;  ftO 

_ 

Martinsville  Milling  Company,  Martinsville,  Ind. 

5977 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 

6743 

4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

and  ground  wheat  screenings  not 

Maumee  Valley  Mills,  New  Haven,  Ind. 

6896 

3.5 

14.0 

7.0 

exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran 

Mendenhall-Weaver  Cornpany,  Sheridan,  Ind. 

8639 

2.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

screenings 

8649 

3.5 

14.0 

6.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Merchants  Hay  & Grain  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

3.0 

Rye  middlings 

4385 

2.9 

15.0 

4386 

4.0 

15.5 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

4387 

4.0 

15.4 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

8535 

2.4 

8.0 

3.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Metamora  Roller  Mills,  Metamora,  Ind. 

8523 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 

and  ground  wheat  screenings  not 

Mexico  Roller  Mills,  Mexico,  Ind. 

14.0 

11.0 

exceeding  mill  run 

4009 

3.5 

Wheat  bran 



4011 

3.8 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  middlings 

Miesenhelder  Bros.,  Sullivan,  Ind. 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

AVheat  Middlings  --  - 

858 

5.0 

15.4 

Wheat  Bi’aTi  

859 

4.9 

15.4 

9.0 

Wheat  bran 

Mi^S6nlif^lcl^r’s  lVTix^(i  T^ppd  

4152 

2.5 

10.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 

wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Miesenhelder’s  Perfecto  Mixed  Peed 

4586 

2.5 

8.0  1 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

dlings, corn  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Milan  Milling  Co.,  Milan,  Ind. 

Shorts  

3314 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

screenings 

Wheat  shorts 

Wh^'at  ‘Rmn  

3315 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Milford  Grain  & Milling  Company,  Milford,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran 

8479 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  to  exceed  mill  run 

Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

8489 

3.5 

14.0 

9.0 

Miller,  A.  J.,  Montpelier,  Ind. 

]VIix6d  !F6€ci — - 

6257 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 

and  dust  collector  dust 

Miller  Flour  & Feed  Co.,  The  Wesley, 

South  Bend,  Ind. 

Mix€d  Feed - 

2847 

3.8 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  w^heat  screen- 

ings and  corn  bran 

Chop  — - 

4111 

3.5 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  Middlings  & Scr^^’nings 

6483 

4.9 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

screenings 

Milltown  Milling  Company,  Milltown,  Ind. 
**Mix6d  !P(i€d’*  - 

7742 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  .ground 

wheat  screenings,  corn  bran  and 

Mishawaka  Feed  Store,  Mishawaka,  Ind. 

6.0 

corn  feed  meal 

MishclWfllfH  ^^hnp  

, 8695 

3.0 

9.5 

Corn,  oats  and  rye 

Model  Mill,  The,  Friendswood,  Ind. 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Shorts  

. 3850 

2.0 

12.0 

7.0 

Mi'^ed  Bran  

. 3851 

3.5 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  and  corn  bran 

Modoc  Roller  Mills  & Elevator,  Modoc,  Ind. 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Middlings  

. 4963 

1.5 

10.0 

5.0 

^Vh^£it  !Brcin  &■  Sh*^^^s 

5359 

3.9 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  shorts 

M''S'PtI  Eppd  

. 7253 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  ground 

wheat  screenings 

Monarch  Milling  Company,  The, 

Hutchinson,  Kansas 

Wh^at  Midtilings  __  

. 8741 

5.0 

18.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Winter  Wheat  Bran 

.i  8742 

3.0 

16.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran 

252 


TABLE  VII— Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Pat. 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

1 and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

1 

> 

Montmorenci  Elevator  Company, 

Montmorenci,  Ind 

Corn  Feed  Meal  .. 

8532 

2.0 

8.5 

7.0 

13.0 

Com  feed  meal 

Corn  bran 

Moore  Milling  Co.,  E.  P.,  Princeton,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

999 

5.0 

8.0 

Morning  Star  Mills,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Stader’s  Peed  Meal 

400S 

3.0 

7.0 

6.0 

Corn  meal  and  siftings  from  cracked 
corn 

Corn  and  oats 

Morocco  Peed  & Grist  Mill,  Morocco,  Ind. 

Chop  

5928 

3.2 

9.2 

6.0 

Morristown  Milling  Co.,  Morristown,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran 

2614 

5.0 

9.0 

13.0 

Corn  bran 

Moutoux,  P.  & H.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

“XL”  Dry  Mixed  Peed 

7997 

2.5 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  middlings 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Eye  middlings  and  ground  rye 
screenings 

Corn  feed  meal 

Mueller,  E.  P.,  Chicago,  111. 

Eye  Middlings  and  Screenings 

8731 

3.5 

16.1 

9.0 

Mulberry  Coal  & Peed  Company,  Mulberry,  Ind.‘ 
Mulberry  Corn  Peed  Meai 

5986 

2.7 

7.5 

5.0 

Muller  Bros.  Milling  Co.,  Ferdinand,  Ind. 

Mixed  Peed 

6709 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Bran,  Corn  Bran  & Screenings 

67101 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  Shorts  and  Screenings 

8448 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Mystic  Milling  Company,  Sioux  City,  Iowa. 
“Mvstic  Bran”  

6044 

4.5 

14.0 

15.0 

McCorkle  & Eiley,  Thorntown,  Ind. 
lAl  Wonder 

5887 

3.5 

9.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Corn  and  oats 

Ground  Corn  and  Oats 

5888 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

McCormick  & Son,  Chas.  W.,  Logansport,  Ind. 
Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

7538 

3.5 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings  & Sereenine-s 

7539 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

McCoy  Bros.,  Liberty,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  .. 

162 

3.8 

15.1 

5.0 

Wheat  Bran 

1428 

3.5 

14.2 

11.5 

Mixed  Peed  

2436 

3.5 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn 

McCoy  & Company,  U.  G.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop  . 

8168 

3.9 

9.0 

6.0 

bran 

Corn  and  oats 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Mheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

5504 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  ekceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Eye  middlings 

McCoy’s  Choice  Wheat  Middlings  with  Screen- 
ings Not  Exceeding  ATill  Enn 

5514 

3.0 

16.0 

8.0 

Eye  Middlings 

5879 

3.0 

15.0 

6.0 

McHenry  Milling  Company,  L.  E., 

Lexington,  Ind. 

McHenry’s  Mixed  Peed 

8499 

3.4 

14.3 

4.9 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  middlings  and 

McKenzie  Cereal  Pood  & Milling  Co., 

Quincy,  Mich. 

McKenzies  Pure  Wheat  Middlings 

2822 

3.8 

13.0 

9.0 

ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run 

Wheat  middlings 

McKenzies  Pure  Wheat  Bran 

2823 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

253 


TABLE  VII Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

rQ 

1 

'cS 

‘S 

§ 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein  _ 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

McMahon  Brothers,  Valparaiso,  Ind. 

4901 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0  1 

Corn  and  oats 

McMillen  & Son,  J.  W.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind.i9 

8459 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Naber  & Co.,  Chas.  F.,  Alexandria,  Ind. 

6574 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

7197 

3.3 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran 

Nading  Grain  Company,  Wm.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

7278 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

7710 

3.3 

9.5 

11.0 

meal 

Napoleon  Flour  Mills,  Napoleon,  Ind. 

■ Napoleon  Wheat  Bran,  Corn  Bran  and 

4042 

3.7 

14.1 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  whole 
wheat  sereenings 

Wheat  middlings 

4043 

3.8 

14.2 

8.0 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

5216 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  whole  wheat 

wH/'nt  Mi'HHlinp-rj  Ground  Scrpf'uinp's 

7349 

4.0 

16.0 

8.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and _ ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
bran  and  ground  wheat  sereenings 
Corn  bran,  corn  germ,  corn  grits  and 
a part  of  the  starchy  portion  of  the 
corn  kernel 

Corn  and  oats 

Vvllcclb  IVJLlLlLlllXl&O  tX/  VA  J.  - 

, 8547 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

8637 

7.0 

10.0 

10.0 

New  Carlisle  Milling  Co.,  New  Carlisle,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  <^hop  - 

1315 

3.9 

9.0 

9.0 

T^ran  — 

1316 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings 

ATi (i  1 in ffs  _ - 

1317 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

New  Era  Milling  Co.,  The, 

Arkansas  City,  Kansas. 

TUiii  Pnn  T^ran  Whf*at  Screeninsfs  

6850 

3.7 

17.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Bran  & Wheat  Screenings 

6859 

3.5 

16.0 

10.5 

screenings 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Cf-onricivn  whpftt.  Shorts  

6860 

4.0 

17.5 

6.0 

screenings 

Wheat  shorts 

XVhifp  - - - 

7476 

3.7 

17.6 

3.5 

Wheat  shorts 

New  Milling  Co.,  The,  Greenfield,  Ind. 

Corn  & Ofits  

1861 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  middlings 

AfivpH  Tn^PPfl  1 - - 

2616 

3.8 

14.0 

12.0 

Corn  

.3830 

2.7 

7.5 

5.0 

TK/hpat  TVTiHrllino'.ci  

7721 

2.4 

14.0 

7.0 

New  Prague  Flouring  Mill  Company, 

New  Prague,  Minn. 

Seal  of  Minnesota  Wheat  Flour  Middlings 

Seal  of  Minnesota  Wheat  Bran,  with  Ground 
CJ/^T»/-»nnir»nrc'  XT /vi*  TTvPPPH  ITl  D*  ATlll  T?)nn 

7906 

7907 

3.5 

3.0 

15.5 

13.3 

4.5 

11.2 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  brafi  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  middlings 

Seal  of  Minnesota  Wheat  Standard  Middlings. 

. 7908 

5.2 

15.0 

7.0 

Newton  Stewart  Milling  Co.,  New  Stewart,  Ind. 
]VIix6d  !PG6d  

, 4725 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Nichols  & Co.,  C.  E.,  Lowell,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

. 1528 
5398 

3.5 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn  feed  meal 
and  corn  flour 

Corn  bran 

Buckwheat  middlings  and  buckwheat 

/ 

Corn  Bran  

5399 

5.0 

9.0 

13.5 

Buckwh^Eit  'ppf’d  ..  

. 6377 

3.0 

12.0 

33.0 

hulls 

19  Succeeded  by  The  McMillen  Company 


254 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent.  i 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Nichols  & Co.,  0,  E.,  Lowell,  Ind. 

Standard  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  not 

7005 

4.5 

15.0 

11.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

exceeding  Mill  Run 

7006 

4.0 

14.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Red  Dog  Elour 

7007 

4.0 

16.5 

3.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Nieman,  C.,  Sunman,  Ind. 

Nieman’s  Middlings 

500 

4.0 

14.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Nieman’s  Mixed  Eeed 

501 

3.7 

14.0 

9.7 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Niezer  & Co.,  Monroeville,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1501 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Bran 

1502 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

1508 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Niezer  & Company,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings 

6268 

3.0 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Mixed  Bran  and  Screenings 

Noblesville  Milling  Co.,  Noblesville,  Ind. 

6270 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

N.  M.  Co’s  Mixed  Eeed 

5243 

4.0 

16.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

N.  M.  Co’s  Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

5252 

3.7 

14. 5 

8.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

N.  M.  Co’s  Goodcatch  Feed 

Noblesville  Milling  Co.’s  Middlings  & Ground 

5351 

4.0 

15.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7306 

4.0 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Nodine,  W.  J.,  Waterloo,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  

2773 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

3151 

3.5 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Noftsger,  Benjamin,  Rochester,  Ind.  ) 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

2051 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Nordmeyer,  John  A.,  Morris,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

4080 

3.6 

14.6 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Norris  & Kidwell,  Washington,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

6279 

3.0 

13.5 

9.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Bran  and  Middlings 

6281 

4.0 

14.7 

8.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Corn  Bran  

7011 

3.0 

6.0 

19.0 

Corn  bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

8235 

3.5 

15.4 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

North  Judson  Milling  Company, 

North  Judson,  Ind. 

Rye  Mixed  Eeed 

8127 

2.0 

12.0 

10.0 

Rye  bran  and  rye  middlings 

^’orth  Manchester  Milling  Co., 

North  Manchester,  Ind. 

“North  Manchester  Milliiig  Companys  Mid- 

dlings”   

855 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

“North  Manchester  Milling  Companys  Chop”_ 

856 

3.0 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Mixed  Feed  

4252 

3.0 

11.5 

12.5 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

North  Star  Eeed  & Cereal  Co., 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

No.  1 Corn  & Oats  Feed 

2606 

3.1 

9.8 

5.9 

Corn  and  oats 

Rye  Middlings  

4353 

1.5 

14.5 

5.2 

Rye  middlings 

No.  2 Corn  & Oats  Eeed  

4884 

3.2 

9.5 

7.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Corn  Eeed  Meal 

7715 

5.7 

9.5 

6.5 

Corn  feed  meal 

Northwestern  Consolidated  Milling  Co.,  The, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

2825 

4.0 

14.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran 

255 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


ja  4j 

■u 


02 

a>  0) 
^2;  fto 


SI  -mE 

§ § ® 
fl  o-o 

;zi  fto 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Northwestern  Consolidated  Milling  Co.,  The, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

XXX  Comet 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

“Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run”— — 

Northwestern  Elevator  & Mill  Co.,  The, 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Taylor’s  Bran *- 

Taylor’s  Middlings 

Norton  & Company,  Willis,  Topeka,  Kansas. 
Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 

Oakland  City  Roller  Mills,  Oakland  City,  Ind. 
Dairy  Mixed  Feed 

O’Conner  Milling  Company,  Corydon,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  

Bran  and  Screenings 

Odon  Milling  Co.,  The,  Odon,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Mill  Feed 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

Pure  Wheat  Middlings 

Omco  Mixed  Feed 

Ogle-Cook  Grain  Company,  Hamlet,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Oldenburg  Flour  Mills,  Oldenburg,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Wheat  Shorts - 

Orangeville  Flouring  Mills,  The, 

Orleans,  R.  R.  No.  2,  Ind. 

N.  0.  Felknor’s  Mixed  Feed 

Osakis  Milling  Co.,  Osakis,  Minn. 

Fancy  Bran  

Fancy  Middlings 

Osgood  Flour  Mills,  Osgood,  Ind. 

Mixed  Mill  Feed 

Ossian  Roller  Mills,  Ossian,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings . 

Wheat  Bran  and  Ground  Wheat  Screenings.. 

Otwell  Milling  Company,  Otwell,  Ind. 

Otwell’s  No.  1 Mixed  Feed 

Page  Milling  Company,  Thomas, 

Topeka,  Kansas. 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with  Ground  Screenings 
(not  exceeding  5%  Screenings) 

Bran  and  Screenings 

Pure  Wheat  Shorts 


2828 

4.0 

16.5 

3.0 

Reddog  flour  and  low  grade  wheat 
flour  containing  the  finer  particles 
of  wheat  bran 

5498 

4.5 

15.5 

6.0 

Wheat  flour  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 

6394 

4.5 

15.0 

11.0 

run 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

5313 

4.0 

13.0 

6.0 

Wheat  bran 

5814 

4.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

6478 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

6479 

3.5 

16.0 

5.5 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

1941 

3.0 

12.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

7024 

2.5 

13.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

7025 

3.0 

13.5 

9.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

55 

3.9 

1 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

5037 

4.1 

16.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

5160 

2.8 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

5393 

3.8 

15.4 

9.0 

Wheat  bran 

5394 

4.0 

16.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings 

6712 

3.8 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

8556 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

489 

3.2 

12.8 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

2663 

3.0 

13.1 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

4649 

2.7 

12.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

1 3194 

4.0 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran 

3195 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

3239 

3.0 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

6399 

3.1 

13.5 

9.9 

Wheat  middlings 

6400 

3.5 

13.5 

9.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

3828 

3.2 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  com  bran 

. 8195 

1 

3.0 

16.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  not  exceed- 
ing 5%  ground  wheat  screenings 

I 8399 

1 

3.5 

15.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  not  to  exceed  5% 
ground  wheat  screenings 

.'  8093 

3.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Wheat  shorts 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufatturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Paoli  Milling  Co.,  The,  Paoli,  Ind. 

627 

3.0 

12.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

2820 

3.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 

ripnr Mill  Ppprl 

3019  ' 

3.0 

12.0 

11.0 

Paragon  Roller  Mills,  Paragon,  Ind. 

1526 

3.8 

12.0 

10.0 

ings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn  bran 

Corn  and  oats 

Paxson,  Charles  E.,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Paxsnn'ls  Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

868 

3.9 

9.0 

6.0 

Chop  Eppd 

6407 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Pearson,  Warren  W.,  Upland,  Ind. 

Eureka.  Peed  . 

1764 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

8559 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

AVheat  bran,  wheat  middlings  and 

8560 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

ground  wheat  screenings 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Middline-s  Sereenings  . . . 

8561 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Pendleton  Peed  & Fuel  Co.,  Pendleton,  Ind. 
Phnp  Fpprl  • 

1477 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

screenings 

Corn,  oats  and  wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Bran 

3279 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Onrn  Eppii  Meal 

5146 

3.0 

7.0 

6.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Pennville  Milling  Company,  Pennville,  Ind. 
Wheat  Midfllinp-s 

3545 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Bran  X’:  OrnnnrI  Wheat  Sereenings 

5503 

2.9 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

W'heat  Bran  K-'.  Corn  Bran 

8099 

2.9 

12.0 

11.0 

screenings 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Peru  Milling  Company,  The,  Peru,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  Sereenine-s  . . 

17 

3.1 

14.5 

10.0 

W’heat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Wheat  Middlings 

18 

3.1 

14.2 

7.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings 

Ohnp  Epp<i 

19 

3.2 

8.8 

4.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Petersburg  Milling  & Grain  Co.,  The, 
Petersburg,  Ind. 

Petersburg  “A”  Mixed  F'eed 

7765 

3.0 

13.0 

11.5 

W’heat  bran,  middlings,  ground 

Pfeifer  Milling  Company,  Lebanon,  111. 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Mill  Run  Wheat 
Screenings  

7528 

5.0 

13.0 

6.0 

wheat  screenings,,  corn  bran  and 
corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Phillips,  J.  C.,  Star  City,  Ind. 

“A”  Chop  Feed*  

7737 

3.0 

10.0 

10.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  rvm 

Corn,  oats,  rye  and  wheat 

Phillips  & Ross  Grain  Co.,  Rosedale,  Ind. 

Mill  Feed  

3096 

2.0 

5.0 

4.0 

W’heat,  corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat 

Phoenix  Flour  Mill,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Hran  /ir.  f>;ereenings 

2252 

4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

screenings 

W’heat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Phneniv  “A”  MiYed  Feed 

2253 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

screenings 

W’heat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 

W’hefit  Middlings  and  Oronnd  Sereenings 

6856 

4.0 

15.5 

8.0 

wheat  screenings 

W’heat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Pierce  Elevator  Co.,  Union  City,  Ind. 

Pierce’s  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

399 

3.8 

9.4 

7.0 

screenings 

Corn  and  oats 

AVheat  Middlings  

2623 

4.0 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mixed  Feed  . 

2624 

3.8 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Durum  W’heat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 
not  exceeding  mill  run  _ 

6869 

4.0 

11.0 

14.0 

screenings 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

sereenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

257 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  th  a 
following  ingredients 

Pillsbury  Flour  Mills  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Durum  Wheat  “B”  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

6870 

4.0 

12.5 

11.0 

1 

1 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screen- 
ings not  exceeding  mill  run 

7133 

4.0 

13.0 

•13.0 

screenings  not  exeeeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  Standard  “B”  Middlings 
with  Ground  Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill 
Run  

7134 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Pillsbury’s  Wheat  “A”  Middlings  with 

Ground  Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run.. 

7135 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

sereenings  , 

Wheat  middlings,  low  grade  wheat 

Pillsbury’s  Fancy  Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with 
Ground  Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run.. 

7136 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

flour  and  ground  wheat  screenings 
Wheat  bran,  low  grade  wheat  flour 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Low  grade  wheat  flour 

Pillsbury’s  XX  Daisy 

7137 

4.0 

16.0 

4.0 

Pillsbury’s  Rye  Middlings  with  Ground 
Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

8519 

3.5 

15.0 

9.0 

Rye  middlings  and  ground  rye 

Pincoffs  Co.,  Maurice,  Chicago,  111. 

Pinco  Brand  Standard  Middlings  and  Screen- 
ings — 

8785 

4.0 

15.0 

7.0 

sereenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Pinco  Brand  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

8736 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

screenings 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Piqua  Milling  Co.,  The,  Piqua,  Ohio. 

Wheat  Middlings 

2295 

4.0 

16.0 

7.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Bran 

2296 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Bran  and  Middlings  Mixed  

5295 

3.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Pitman,  H.  E.,  Bedford,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

387 

3.2 

8.8 

4.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Plainfield  Milling  Co.,  Plainfield,  Ind. 

Bran  & Screenings 

2839 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  sereenings 

Wheat  Middlings  

4406 

3.5 

13.0 

7.0 

and  corn  bran 

Wheat  middlings 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

7923 

2.0 

5.0 

4.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Corn  Bran  

8656 

1.0 

5.0 

26.5 

Corn  bran 

Plainville  Milling  Company,  Plainville,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

3819 

4.0 

7.5 

14.0 

Corn  bran 

Middlings  - 

3805 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Milled  Feed 

4140 

1.5 

4.5 

14.0 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat  screen- 

Wheat Bran  

4372 

3.8 

14.2 

10.0 

ings 

Wheat  bran 

Millfeed  

5057 

3.5 

14.0 

7.5 

Wheat  bran  and  wheat  middlings 

Plainville  Mill  & Elevator  Co.,  The, 

Plainville,  Kans. 

Bran  & Screenings 

7830 

4.0 

16.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 

Shorts   

7831 

4.0 

17.0 

3.5 

ings 

Wheat  shorts 

Plant  Milling  Company,  Geo.  P.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
(P)  Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings  not 
, Exceeding  Mill  Run 

5558 

4.0 

17.0 

6.5 

Wheat  middlings  and  whole  wheat 

Plotnicki  & Co.,  Louis  P.,  South  Bend,  Ind. 
Polonia  Chop  Feed 

6083 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Mixed  Feed 

6892 

3.0 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 

Middlings  & Screenings 

6893 

3.0  , 

J3.0 

8.0 

screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 

Portland  Equity  Exchange,  The,  Portland,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

8034 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

screenings 

Corn,  oats  and  rye 

Poseyville  Milling  Company,  The, 

Poseyville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 

7676 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 

I 

screenings 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Poseyville  Milling  Company,  The, 

Posey ville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  and  Screenings 

7677 

3.7 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  III. 

Garland  Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 

6845 

3.5 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Screenings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

7412 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Prater-Mottier  Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Corn  Peed  Meal 

7704 

2.0 

7.0 

5.5 

Corn  feed  meal 

Praters  Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

8145 

3.0 

10.0 

14.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Praters  Mixed  Feed 

8174 

4.0 

14.5 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Princeton  Milling  Co.,  Princeton,  Ind. 

Star  Brand  Mixed  Feed 

1978 

3.5 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Star  Feed  

8818 

3.5 

13.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  

8619 

3.5 

13.5 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Puritan  Mills,  The,  Medora,  Ind. 

Puritan  Mixed  Feed 

8644 

3.6 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Puritan  Feed  Meal 

8645 

2.5 

8.0 

7.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Purity  Oats  Cornpany  of  Davenport, 
Davenport,  Iowa. 

Oat  Middlings 

8440 

5.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Oat  middlings 

Pyrmont  Milling  Co.,  The,  Pyrmont,  Ind. 20 

Pyrmont  Ship 

Pyrmont  Mills  Company,  Pyrmont,  Ind. 

265 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Pyrmont  Corn  and  Oats  Chop  ___  

5839 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Pyrmont  Bran 

7157 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Rakestraw,  H.  E.,  Oakford,  Ind. 

Perfection  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

6495 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

“A”  Perfection  Chop  Feed 

6496 

3.5 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Rankin  & Company,  M.  G.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Jersey  Rye  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings 

8679 

3.0 

14.0 

3.0 

Rye  middlings  and  ground  rye  screen- 
ings not  exceeding  mill  run 

Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

8680 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Exceeding  Mill  Run  

Rapier  Grain  & Seed  Company,  Owensboro,~Ky. 

8681 

4.0 

14.0 

9.5 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Shipstuff  

7692 

3.5 

15.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Raschka,  William,  Ainsworth,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Screenings 

7436 

3.5 

13.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Screenings 

7437 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Ray  & Rice,  Camden,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

5342 

3.3 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Shorts  & Low  Grade  Flour 

a534 

3.0 

12.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  low  grade  wheat 
flour 

Red  Mill,  The,  R.  F.  D.,  Fairland,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2601 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middling.s 

3256 

2.5 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

“A”  Mixed  Feed  

4538 

3.5 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  whole  wheat  screenings 
and  com  bran 

20  Succeeded  by  Pyrmont  Mills  Co. 


259 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


fl 

oS 

ja  jj 

S fife 
0 0)0) 

O U S 


C 

a B 

cS 

52  B 
^ .2 

® .t£ 

a>  m d; 

^ o-p 

S V V 
R 073 

"A  ftU 

Iz;  aO 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Ked  Wing  Milling  Co.,  Red  Wing,  Minn. 

Bixota  Standard  Middlings 

5493 

5.7 

18.3 

7.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Bixota  Flour  Middlings  

5494 

5.1 

16.1 

3.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Bixota  Red  Dog 

6108 

4.0 

12.7 

1.1 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Bixota  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Sereenings.. 

7158 

4.8 

14.0 

13.2 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Bixota  Wheat  Middlings 

7641 

5.1 

15.4 

9.8 

Wheat  middlings 

Reiners,  Wm.  F.,  Birdseye,  Ind. 

Reiners  Mixed  Feed 

Richmond  Corn  Mills,  Richmond,  Ind. 

7743 

3.2 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings,  corn  bran  and  dust  col- 
lector dust 

Corn  Bran  

Richmond  Roller  Mills,  Richmond,  Ind. 

1727 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

Corn  bran 

The  Richmond  Roller  Mills  Wheat  Bran 

482 

3.2 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

The  Richmond  Roller  Mills  Wheat  Middlings.. 

483 

3.7 

14.0 

4.3 

Wheat  middlings 

Rittenhouse,  E.  S.,  Liberty  Mills,  Ind. 

Liberty  Bird  Bran 

3043 

2.5 

12.5 

20.0 

Wheat  bran 

Liberty  Bird  Middlings 

3044 

2.5 

12.5 

20.0 

•Wheat  middlings 

River  Side  Barn  & Feed  Store,  Marion,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

7180 

2.8 

8.5 

8.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Roach  & Rothenberger,  Delphi,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

284 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Shorts  and  Middlings 

286 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  middlings 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

7730 

3.8 

11.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  scourings,  whole 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Roekport  Milling  Co.,  The,  Rockport,  Ind. 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

2247 

3.9 

13.3 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Bran  & Screenings 

2248 

3.8 

13.3 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Kopp’s  Wheat  Middlings 

2748 

3.5 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Kopp’s  Mixed  Feed 

3679 

3.0 

10.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings,  corn  bran  and 
corn  feed  meal 

Kopp’s  White  Middlings 

7477 

2.3 

13.5 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Rohm  Bros.,  Rockville,  Ind. 

Feed  Meal 

5386 

2.5 

6.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Mill  Feed 

5671 

3.5 

15.0 

10.0 

W’^heat  bran,  middlings,  shorts,  corn 
bran  and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Shorts  and  Screenings  Product 

8110 

4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  and  bolted 
wheat  screenings 

Rohm  Bros.  & Co.,  Mansfield,  Ind. 

Shorts  

295 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Mill  Feed  

3991 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  shorts,  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

Hobart  Wheat  Bran  

4178 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Hobart  Chop  Feed  

4409 

3.8 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Hobart  Wheat  Middlings 

5960 

3.5 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Hobart  “Rye  Feed’’  

5993 

2.0 

13.0 

8.0 

Rye  bran  and  rye  middlings 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

6218 

3.0 

12.6 

35.0 

Buckwheat  middlings  and  buckwheat 
hulls 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings 

7684 

3.5 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  Bran  with  Screenings 

7685 

3.5 

14.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Rothrock,  Julius,  White  Cloud,  Ind. 

Julius  Rothrock’s  Mixed  Feed 

4553 

3.5 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  crushed 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Rouse  & Son,  Wm.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran 

2124 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

Corn  bran 

C & 0 

2776 

4.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

26o 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Rouse  & Son,  Wm.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

i 

Mixed  Feed 

3191 

3.7 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

7114  1 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Ruoff,  Geo.  D.,  Osgood,  Ind. 

1 

1 

Rye  Shorts 

2860  1 

2.5 

14.0 

7.0 

Rye  shorts 

Wheat  Shorts 

3054 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Bran 

3065  1 

3.0 

12.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Shorts  & Crushed  Wheat  Screenings.— 

Russell  & Company,  Portland,  Ind. 

7712  1 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  crushed  wheat 
screenings 

Chop  Feed  

6798 

3.0 

8.7 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Russell-Miller  Milling  Co.,  Fargo,  N.  D. 

Bran  

3584 

4.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran 

Red  Dog ■ 

3585 

4.5 

17.0 

6.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Standard  Middlings 

5182 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Russell-Miller  Milling  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

1 

Flour  Middlings  

7810 

5.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Sager’s  Mill,  Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed — . 

6189 

3.0 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Sahm,  Adam,  Lawrenceville,  Ind. 

Sahms  Middlings  _ 

560 

4.0 

15.6 

5.4 

Wheat  middlings 

Sahms  Wheat  Bran 

561 

3.7 

.14.0 

10.7 

Wheat  bran 

Salem  Milling  Company,  Salem,  Ind. 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Shorts  

6134 

3.5 

14.0 

Mixed  Feed 

Schaefer,  Carl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

6662 

1 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Corn  bran  and  wheat  bran 

Schaefer’s  Special  Corn  Feed  Meal 

8119 

3.0 

S.O 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Schaefer  & Schwartzkopf,  Columbus,  Ind. 

No.  6 Corn  Bran 

476 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

Corn  bran 

Anchor  Wheat  Bran 

477 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Acorn  Wheat  Middlings 

2102 

2.0 

11.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mixed  Feed 

4522 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Sehilt,  W.  F.,  Bremen,  Ind. 

Chop 

824 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn,  oats  and  rye 

Wheat  Shorts  & Screenings 

6588 

3.8 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Bran 

7971 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Schnaible  Grain  Company,  The  Matt, 

Lafayette,  Ind. 

Mixed  Ground  Corn  and  Oats 

3 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Sehnell,  Joseph,  Schnellville,  Ind. 

Shipstuff  

7088 

2.5 

12.0 

6.0 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Seholl  & Tieteman,  Weisburg,  Ind. 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  & Screenings  

7679 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Big  Four  Mixed  Feed 

8641 

3.6 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Schroeder,  E.  F.,  Crown  Point,  Ind. 21 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1356 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Schulenborg  & Donselman, 

Dillsboro,  R.  F.  D.  No.  3,  Ind. 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Shorts  

2578 

3.3 

13.3 

8.0 

Mixed  Feed 

4368 

3.0 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  mill  sweepings 

21  Succeeded  by  Ernest  H.  Hixon 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Schulte,  W.  C.,  Freelandville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

6434 

4.0 

14.1 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings,  corn  bran  and  low  grade 
flour 

Wheat  Bran 

6435 

3.6 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Shorts  

6436 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Schultz-Baujau  & Company,  Beardstown,  111, 

Sunbeam  Middlings  and  Screenings 

5967 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Sunbeam  Bran  

Schultz  Bros.,  Elberfeld,  Ind. 

6613 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

3924 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  cmshed  wheat 
screenings 

Middlings  

Scientific  Milling  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

3925 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Com  and  Oats  Chop  Feed 

1245 

3.0 

8.8 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Mixed  Bran  

1.567 

4.0 

9.0 

13.0 

Wheat  and  corn  bran 

Corn  Bran  __ 

7148 

3.5 

7.0 

10.0 

Corn  bran 

Scottsburg  Milling  Co.,  Scottsburg,  Ind. 

Home  Mixed  Feed 

6236 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Sellars,  James  S.,  Crawfordsville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

5213 

3.0 

8.5 

8.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Semon,  F.  T.,  Vernon,  Ind. 

Semon’s  Mixed  Feed 

5631 

3.0 

12.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  bran 

Shane  Bros.  & Wilson  Co.,  Hastings,  Minn. 

Cloverleaf  Bran 

4925 

3.7 

14.0 

12.6 

Wheat  bran 

Snow  Ball  White  Middlings 

4926 

4.0 

15.0 

7.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 

Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

8485 

5.0 

15.0 

9.5 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Sheaks,  Irvin,  Indiana  Harbor,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

6511 

3.5 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Sheffield-King  Milling  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

“Fairybow”  

7596 

5.0 

15.0 

9.5 

Wheat  middlings  and  pulverized 
wheat  screenings 

“Gold  Mine”  Feed  

7599 

4.5 

15.0 

9.9 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  low  grade  wheat 
flour  and  pulverized  wheat  screen- 
ings 

“Whitehope”  

7600 

4.5 

16.0 

7.6 

Wheat  middlings  and  pulverized 
wheat  screenings 

Low  Grade  

7661 

4.6 

16.9 

1.7 

Low  grade  wheat  flour 

Fancy  “Brodflake”  

Sheldon  & Company,  Angola,  Ind. 

7602 

3.5 

13.5 

12.7 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Bran  & Ground  Wheat  Screenings 

6484 

1 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  & Ground  Wheat  Screenings 

6485 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Shellabarger  Elevator  Company,  Decatur,  111. 

Feed  Meal  

8593 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Shellabarger  Mill  & Elevator  Co.,  The, 

Salina,  Kansas. 

Bran  & Screenings 

5820 

3.0 

•16.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Brown  Shorts  & Screenings 

8678 

1 

1 

3.0 

16.0 

6.5 

Wheat  brown  shorts  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  cleanings  not 
to  exceed  8% 

262 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


V (U  0) 

-H 

■g  S 
® 0) 
iz;  fto 


1 1 

.S 

a;  o 

O §3  S 
:z;  fto 


© .tS 

2 

S8^ 

Ogg 

% fto 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Sheridan  Milling  Co.,  Sheridan,  Ind.22 

Corn  Bran  

Wheat  Bran 

3232 

5595 

3.5 

2.8 

8.0 

13.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  Shorts 

5506 

1.7 

11.0 

6.0 

Shetterly  Bros.,  Lapel,  Ind. 

2644 

Bran  and  Middlings  

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Shine  & Co.,  John  H.,  New  Albany,  Ind. 

Star  Peed  

863 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  Bran __  

2086 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Star  Middlings  

5457 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Star  "Peed  Meal  ... 

5007 

2.5 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  Bran  

6677 

5.0 

8.0 

18.0 

Simmerman,  Jacob,  Eaton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

5722 

3.4 

8.7 

9.0 

Sims  Co-Operative  Grain  Company,  Sims,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8407 

3.2 

8.8 

11.0 

Sims  Milling  Company,  Frankfort,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  _ 

6308 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  Shorts 

6304 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Chop  Feed  

6723 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  Bran  

6926 

3.5 

8.0 

13.0 

Slick  & Company,  L.  E.,  Bloomington,  111. 

Safety  First  Corn  By-Product 

8382 

6.0 

10.0 

8.0 

Small  & Company,  Inc.,  W.  H.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Com  Bran  

4447 

3.0 

6.0 

15.0 

Feed  Meal  _ 

4537 

1.0 

7.0 

17.0 

smith,  A.  S.,  Flint,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  _..  _ _ . 

1660 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  Middling'S 

1661 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Smith,  D.  R.,  Tipton,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

1543 

5.0 

8.0 

13.0 

Chop  Feed  1 

3016 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Mixed  Feed 

4081 

3.0 

14.0 

6.5 

Snell  Mill  & Grain  Company,  The, 

Clay  Center  Kans. 

Wheat  Bran 

4567 

3.5 

14.0 

13.0 

Wheat  Shorts . 

4568 

4.0 

17.0 

6.0 

Snoddy,  M.  W.,  R.  F.  D.  No.  1,  Covington,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings 

1071' 

3.5 

13.0 

10.0 

Bran  and  Middlings  _ . 

4717 

3.0 

14.0 

9.5 

Wheat  Jdiddlings 

4718 

2.5 

13.0 

8.0 

Southwestern  Milling  Co.,  Inc., 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Pure  Wheat  Bran 

7952 

4.0 

14.5 

10.2 

lure  Wheat  Brown  Shorts 

7953 

4.2 

15.0 

8.0 

Pure  Gray  Shorts 

7954 

3.8 

15.0 

6.7 

Pure  Fancy  White  Middlings 

7955 

2.5 

14.0 

4.2 

Pure  Wheat  Mixed  Feed 

7056 

4.0 

14.5 

9.0 

Sparks  Milling  Company,  Alton,  El. 

8.0 

Try  Me  Bran  and  Screenings 

6778 

3.5 

15.0 

Try  Me  Mixed  Feed 

7687 

3.5 

16.0 

9.0 

Corn  bran 
Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 


Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 
Wheat  bran 
Wheat  middlings 
Corn  feed  meal 
Corn  bran 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 
Corn  and  oats 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 
Corn  bran 


Corn  feed  meal  (by-product  from 
manufacture  of  table  meal  and  grits 
by  the  degerminating  process) 

Corn  bran 
Corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  middlings 


Corn  bran 
Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  middlings 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 


Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran 
Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  shorts  and  white  middlings 
Wheat  white  middlings 
Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  white  mid- 
dlings 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 


22  Succeeded  by  Mendenhall  & Weaver 


263 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Sparks  Milling  Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

2Y74 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wnear 
screenings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings  not  to 
exceed  mill  run 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  to  exceed  mill 
run 

Wheat  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  com  feed  meal 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
ground  wheat  sereenings,  corn  bran 
and  corn  feed  meal 

Com  bran 

2776 

3.5 

14.0 

11.0 

■Wattash  Mixfid  "Pfied 

3011 

3.5 

14.0 

11.0 

Spink  Milling  Company,  The,  Washington,  Ind. 
IVfixt  T'f'fid 

6332 

3.5 

12.5 

10.0 

Bran  and  Ground  Screenings  Not  to  Exceed 
Mill  Run  . _ 

6507 

3.5 

12.0 

10.0 

.Einp  Mivpd  Mill  Eppd  

8137 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Springs  Valley  Milling  Co.,  The, 

French  Lick,  Ind. 

Vallpy  Mi^pd  Feed 

6076 

3.0 

11.0 

11.0 

Stader,  Frank  E.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

6343 

5.0 

8.0 

15.0 

StadRr’.<?  “Mixed”  Horse  Feed 

8088 

3.5 

10.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran  and  corn  feed 

Stafford,  Frank,  Bluffton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

3796 

3.2 

9.0 

8.5 

meal 

Corn  and  oats 

Stafford  Grain  Company,  Hope,  Ind. 

Corn  Feed  Meal  . . _ 

8533 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Stampers  Creek  Mill,  Paoli,  R.  R.  No.  2,  Ind. 
Caublp’s  Mixed  Feed  . _ _ . 

3667 

2.7 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 

Stanard-Tilton Milling  Co.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
Wheat  Bran  Sereenings 

5267 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  Middlings  with  Screenings  Not  Exceed- 
ing Mill  Run  . 

7013 

4.0 

15.0 

6.0 

ings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  middlings 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  eontaining 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  to  exceed  mill  run 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  to  exceed  mill  run 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  to  exceed  mill  run 

Wheat  bran  middlings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  bran 

St.  Anthony  Mill  Co.,  St.  Anthony,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran,  Shorts  &,  Corn  Bran 

5262 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Star  & Orescent  Milling  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
Crescent  Middlings  ...  _ . 

3110 

4.5 

16.0 

6.0 

Star  Red  Dog 

4391 

4.0 

16.5 

3.0 

Star  Middlings  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

F.xeeeding  Mill  Rnn 

5376 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Star  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

Fxeeeding  Mill  Rnn 

5377 

4.0 

15.0 

10:0 

Crescent  Bran  with  Groimd  Screenings  Not 

Fxeeeding  Mill  Rnn 

5378 

4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Starlight  Milling  Company, 

Borden,  R.  R.  No.  1,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7794 

2.0 

12.0 

Wheat  Middlings 

7705 

2.0 

11.0  i 

7.0  1 

Star  Mill  Co.,  Huntingburg,  Ind. 

Star  Mixed  Feed 

3509 

3.5 

13.5 

I 

12.0 

Star  Milling  Co.,  The,  Aurora,  Ind. 

Bran  . 

1038 

3.8 

14.2 

1 

1 

9.5  ' 

Middlings  

Mixed  Feed 

2672 

2675 

4.0 

4.0 

14.6 

13.5 

6.0 

12.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn 

Star  Milling  Co.,  Shoals,  Ind. 

Star  Wheat  Bran  _ _ 

502 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0  ' 

bran 

Wheat  bran 

Star  Shorts  ..  _ 

503 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0  ! 

Wheat  shorts 

Star  Mixed  Feed 

5783 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0  j 

Oats,  wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn 
bran  and  ground  wheat  screenings 

264 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Starr  Mills,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Wheat  & Rye  Middlings 

6000 

3.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  rye  middlings 

Mixed  Feed 

6001 

3.0 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran,  rye  bran  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Star  Roller  Mills,  Carlisle,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

5249 

2.8 

12.5 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Steckley,  George,  Kendallville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

406 

4.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Bran  & Screenings 

5633 

3.5 

13.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Mixed  Feed 

5834 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings,  reddog  flour  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Steeb,  William,  Crown  Point,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8112 

3.0 

8.0 

6.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Stephensport  Roller  Mills,  Stephensport,  Ky. 

Mixed  Feed 

4828 

3.9 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Shipstuff  & Screenings  

6374 

4.1 

16.0 

8.5 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  reddog  flour 
and  4%  ground  wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings  

6620 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  and  2%  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Stern  & Sons,  Inc.,  Bernhard,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Atlas  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  not 

exceeding  Mill  Run 

Atlas  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 

5756 

3.5 

15.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

ings  Not  exceeding  Mill  Run 

5757 

4.5 

16.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exeeeding  mill  run 

Stevenson  & Linebrink,22a 

Rochester,  R.  R.  No.  9,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

6017 

2.5 

12.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  Bran  

6018 

2.5 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Stiefel  & Levy,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Wheat  Screenings— 

8494 

4.0 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

St.  Mary’s  Mill  Company,  St.  Mary’s  Mo. 

“Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings’’ 

Stokes  Milling  Company,  Watertown,  S.  D. 

8188 

4.5 

15.5 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Country  Wheat  Middlings  and  Screenings 

not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  not 

8492 

5.5 

15.9 

8.5 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Exceeding  Mill  Run 

8501 

3.5 

13.9 

8.5 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Stone  Quarry  Mills,  Spiceland,  Ind. 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

4746 

2.5 

14.0 

9.0 

Stott,  David,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Pennant  Middlings 

4461 

5.0 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Climax  Middlings  

5278 

5.0 

17.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Stott  Flour  Mills,  Inc.,  David,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Stott’s  Pure  Winter  Wheat  Bran  

8336 

3.5 

13.0 

9.5 

Wheat  bran 

Studabaker  Grain  & Seed  Co.,  Bluffton,  Ind. 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

6739 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Suckow  Company,  Franklin,  Ind. 

“Perfection”  Wheat  Middlings 

5946 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

“Perfection”  Wheat  Bran 

5947 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

“Perfection”  Mixed  Feed 

6231 

4.0 

12.4 

9.5 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Middlings  and  Screenings 

7875 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Suckow’s  Corn  By-Product 

8521 

6.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn  feed  meal  and  corn  germ  meal 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

8589 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

22nSucceeded  by  Millark  Roller  Mills 


265 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


0,6 


o 

5 .1 

“ cu 
02 

<12  0)  (D 

:zi  Gu 


Sullivan  Mill  & Elevator  Co.,  Sullivan,  Ind. 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

Mixed  Feed 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Corn  Bran  

White  Middlings  

Swayzee  Milling  Co.,  The,  Swayzee,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  & Shorts 

Wheat  Middlings - 

Swert,  W.  G.,  Royal  Center,  Ind. 

Swert’s  Corn  & Oat  Chop 

Syracuse  Flour  Mills,  Syracuse,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

Bran  

Tapp  & Bridwell,  Bloomington,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Wheat  Shorts  

Corn  Feed  Meal 

Taylor,  John  H.,  Ogilville,  Ind. 

Taylors  Mixed  Feed  

Taylor-Hitz  Co.,  Madison,  Ind. 

Middlings  

Bran  

Mixed  Feed 

Taylor-Hitz  Co.’s  Middlings  and  Screenings.. 

Tell  City  Flouring  Mills,  Tell  City,  Ind. 

Bran  & Screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  and  Wheat  Screenings 
Seasoned  with  Salt  

A.  Mixed  Feed 

Thomas  & Son,  A.  R.,  Markle,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts  

Corn,  Oats  & Rye  Chop 

Wheat  Bran,  With  Corn  Bran  and  Ground 
Screenings  

“Mixed  Feed”  

Thompson,  Edgar,  Somerville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

Thornburg  Milling  Company,  Martinsville,  Ind 
Corn  Feed  Meal 

Thornburg  Milling  & Elevator  Co., 
Martinsville,  Ind. 

Bran  

Mixed  Feed 

Thorntown  Grain  Co.,  Thorntown,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Three  Bros.  Milling  Co.,  Bicknell,  Ind. 23 
“C”  Mixed  Feed 


6977 

7777 

7778 


4475 

4664 


704 


6135 

6136 


4604 

8584 


801 


413 

414 
6249 

6313 


5640 

6060 

6051 

3189 

4077 

6337 

7614 

7448 

8591 


656 

2950 


5586 

5165 


3.5 

3.4 

2.5 
3.0 
1.2 


3.8 

2.0 


3.9 


4.0 

4.0 


4.0 


3.5 

2.0 


3.8 


4.0 

3.7 

3.7 

3.7 


4.0 

4.0 

4.0 

3.2 

3.2 

3.5 

3.5 

3.5 

2.5 


3.2 

3.5 


3.0 

2.0 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


9.0 

12.0 

7.5 

7.0 

12.0 


13.5 

13.0 


9.5 


14.0 

14.0 


14.0 


13.5 

9.0 


14.0 


14.0 

14.0 

14.0 

14.0 


14.0 

14.0 

14.0 

14.1 

9.5 

14.0 

14.5 

14.0 

7.5 


14.0 

14.0 


9.0 

9.5 


6.0 

10.0 

5.0 

13.0 

5.0 


10.0 

7.0 


6.0 


6.5 

11.0 


10.0 


7.0 

7.0 


10.0 


7.0 

10.0 

11.0 

11.0 


10.0 

8.0 

9.7 

8.0 

10.0 

9.5 

9.5 

7.0 

5.0 


10.1 

8.0 


7.0 

5.0 


Corn  and  oats 
Wheat  bran  and  shorts 
Corn  feed  meal 
Corn  bran 
Wheat  middlings 


Wheat  bran  and  shorts 
Wheat  middlings 


Corn  and  oats 


Wheat  middlings 
Wheat  bran 


Wheat  bran,  middlings,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 
Wheat  shorts 
Corn  feed  meal 


Wheat  bran  and  middlings 


Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Wheat  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  salt 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran, 
ground  wheat  screenings  and  salt 

Wheat  shorts 

Corn,  oats  and  rye 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  shorts  and  salt 


Corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran  and 
dust  collector  bran 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 
W^heat  middlings  and  corn  feed  meal 


23  Succeeded  by  Bicknell  Mill  Co. 


266 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

Thurgood,  Chas.  R.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Mixed  Bran  and  Screenings 

1 

8076 

3.0 

12.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Middlings 

8077 

3.0 

13.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Titus  & Delp,  Shirley,  Ind.^^ 

Mixed  Bran 

6486 

3.0 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Topeka  Flour  Mills  Co.,  Topeka,  Kans. 

i 

Wheat  Shorts  & Ground  Screenings 

8019 

1 3.0 

14.5 

3.5 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Bran  & Scourings 

8020 

3.5 

15.0 

i 10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
scourings 

Tresselt  & Sons,  C.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran 

400 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Shorts 

410 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Middlings  

411 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Trimble  Milling  Co.,  The,  Milton,  Ky. 

1 

Wheat  Bran 

1988 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Shipstuff  

1989 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Trow  Company,  W.,  Madison,  Ind. 

1 

Trow’s  Mixed  Feed 

1965 

1 4.0 

14.0 

1 

8.5 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

Trow’s  Middlings  & Screenings 

1972 

4.5 

16.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Trow’s  Bran  and  Screenings 

1978 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Truitt  & Son,  Wm.  P.,  East  Enterprise,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

7066 

2.5 

11.0 

5.0 

W’heat  middlings 

Mixed  Feed 

7456 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn  bran 

Tunnelton  Milling  Co.,  Tunnelton,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

5852 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn  bran 

Tuttle  & Co.,  R.,  Columbia  City,  Ind. 

Perfection  Bian  _ 

817 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Perfection  Middlings 

818 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Uhl-Snider  Milling  Co.,  Connersville,  Ind. 

Bran  

5135 

3.5 

14.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  Middlings 

Ulrey  & Co.,  A.  A.,  Fairmount,  Ind. 

5136 

3.7 

14.0 

7.0 

1 

Wheat  middlings 

Ulrey’s  Wheat  Bran  

455 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Ulrey’s  Wheat  Middlings  

457 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Corn  Feed  Meal  

3691 

3.0 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Mixed  Feed I 

6901 

3.0 

13.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Union  Elevator  Company,  New  Richmond,  Ind. 

i 

Union  Chop  Feed 

7755 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Union  Feed  & Poultry  Company, 

Lafayette,  Ind. 

Union  Chop  Feed  

7182 

3.5 

9.5 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Union  Roller  Mills,  West  Harrison,  Ind. 

Kiewit’s  Wheat  Middlings  

7078 

3.9 

14.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Kiewit’s  Bran  and  Screenings 

7544  1 

3.7 

14.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings and  corn  bran 

Valentine  & Valentine,  Franklin,  Ind. 

Middlings  

932 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mixed  Feed 

934 

4.0 

12.4 

7.0 

i 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

2^  Succeeded  by  Shirley  Roller  Mills 


TABLE  VM — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Valentine  & Valentine,  Franklin,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

1999 

3.9 

6.9 

11.0 

Corn  bran 

Oat  Chop  

3295 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Middlings  and  Screenings 

7455 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  Bran  and  Screenings  

8580 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Valier  & Spies  Milling  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Valier’s  Mixed  Feed  

Valier’s  Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Wheat 

6127 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  5% 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Screenings  

Valier’s  Wheat  Middlings  with  Ground  Wheat 

6156 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  5%  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Screenings  

6157 

5.0 

16.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  5%  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Valparaiso  Grain  & Elevator  Co., 

Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Wheat  Bran  ___  

1402 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1408 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Shorts 

1405 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Eed  Dog  Flour 

1406 

2.0 

16.0 

1.7 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings 

6008 

3.8 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Victoria  Milling  Co.,  The,  Jasper,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed __ 

2608 

3.5 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran  and  shorts 

Victoria’s  Wheat  Shorts 

7170 

3.3 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wabash  Milling  Co.,  The,  Wabash,  Ind. 

Middlings  

2 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Summerton’s  Mixed  Feed 

5968 

3.0 

13.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  sereenings 
and  corn  bran 

Wakarusa  Milling  Co.,  Wakarusa,  Ind. 

Wakarusa  Wheat  Bran 

1249 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wakarusa  Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1250 

3.9 

9.5 

10.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Middlings 

7642 

3.7 

13.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Walker  & Co.,  Peter  M.,  Loogootee,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

538 

4.0 

14.2 

5.7 

Wheat  middlings 

Bran  & Screenings 

589 

3.6 

14.0 

10.5 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Walker  & Son,  J.  M.,  Middletown,  Ind. 

Gilt  Edge  Bran  

8161 

3.2 

12.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Gilt  Edge  Middlings  

8162 

3.7 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Walker’s  Mixed  Feed  

8163 

3.5 

13.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn  bran 

Wallace  Milling  Co.,  The,  Dale,  Ind. 

Wallace’s  Mixed  Feed 

172 

3.9 

14.2 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  5% 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Wallace’s  Pure  Wheat  Middlings 

7747 

4.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Walnut  Creek  Milling  Company, 

Great  Bend,  Kans. 

Wheat  Bran  

8121 

3.5 

14.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

"Wheat  Shorts 

8122 

3.5 

16.0 

5.5 

Wheat  shorts 

Walton,  A.  G.,  Atlanta,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

8677 

3.4 

14.9 

11.1 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Walton  & Whisler,  Atlanta,  Ind.^s 

A.  Mixed  Feed 

7638 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Waltz  & Co.,  J.  W.,  New  Palestine,  Ind. 

New  Palestine  Wheat  Miadlings 

685 

2.0 

12.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Mixed  Feed  

2923 

3.7 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

3341 

3.0 

8.5 

6.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

25  Succeeded  by  A.  G.  Walton 


268 


TABLE  Vil — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  leas  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

1 

1 

Washburn-Crosby  Company,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 

1 

Washburn-Crosby  Co’s  Rye  Middlings 

7018 

3.0 

14.0 

6.0 

Rye  middlings 

Wheat  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings  Not 

exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Standard  Middlings  with  Ground 

7229 

4.0 

13.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Screenings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Mixed  Feed  with  Ground  Screenings 

7230 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

Wheat  Flour  Middlings  with  Ground  Screen- 

7231 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run 

ings  Not  Exceeding  Mill  Run 

7232 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings,  reddog  flour  and 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run 

Red  Dog  Flour  (Adrian) 

7233 

4.0 

16.0 

4.0 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Waterloo  Mills,  Waterloo,  Ind. 

Buckwheat  Mixed  Feed 

1955 

4.0 

15.0 

20.0 

Buckwheat  hulls  and  middlings 

Watson,  Gilf.  L.,  Redkey,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8187 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wellington  Milling  Co.,  Anderson,  Ind. 

Wellington’s  A.  X.  A.  Bran 

4986 

3.0 

15.7 

11.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wellington’s  A.  X.  A.  Middlings 

4987 

4.0 

15.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wellington  A.  X.  A.  Mixed  Bran 

6225 

3.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran  and  corn  bran 

Wellington  Milling  & Elevator  Co.,  The, 
Wellington,  Kansas. 

Bran  

3257 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran 

Shorts  

3258 

4.0 

15.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

W’ells,  Guy  M.,  Knox,  Ind. 

Wells’  Chop  Feed 

6065 

3.2 

8.3 

9.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Wells-Abbott-Nieman  Company,  Schuyler,  Neb. 

Wheat  Bran 

6941 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  Shorts  

6942 

4.0 

15.0 

6.5 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Middlings 

6943 

3.5 

15.0 

5.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Wells  Flour  Milling  Co.,  Wells,  Minn. 

Feedwell  Germ  Middlings  

3244 

8.0 

20.2 

3.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Feedwell  Flour  Middlings 

4731 

5.5 

17.0 

5.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Feedwell  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

8322 

3.0 

13.3 

11.2 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 

Feedwell  Standard  Middlings  

8323 

5.2 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Western  Flour  Mill  Company,  Davenport,  Iowa. 
Black  Hawk  Bran  with  Ground  Screenings 

Not  to  exceed  Mill  Run 

7895 

3.0 

13.3 

11.2 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Black  Hawk  Standard  Middlings  

7896 

5.2 

15.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Black  Hawk  Germ  Middlings 

7897 

10.0 

25.0 

3.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Black  Hawk  Flour  Middlings 

7898 

3.5 

15.5 

4.5 

Wheat  middlings. 

Black  Hawk  Red-Dog 

7899 

2.3 

14.5 

2.5 

Low  grade  wheat  flour  containing 
the  finer  particles  of  wheat  bran 

Wheatland  Milling  Company,  Wheatland,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed  

Wheeler,  A.  L.,  Mooresville,  Ind. 

85.64 

i 

3.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran, 
ground  wheat  screenings  and  mill 
sweepings 

Banner  Corn  & Oat  Chop 

i 4708 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Whelan,  Omer  G.,  Richmond,  Ind. 

I 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

1 7709 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Widener  & Speck,  Pendleton,  Ind. 20 

1 

Chop  Feed 

i 6398 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

26  Succeeded  by  Baker  & Hodges 


269 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Wiegman  & Zelt,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  . 

5179 

3.2 

8.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

Wildcat  Roller  Mills,  Cutler,  Ind.,  R.  R.  No.  2. 
Whpflt  Shorts 

1001 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Rran 

32:08 

3.3 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Wilkinson  & Co.,  T.  B.,  Knightstown,  Ind. 
Middlings 

119 

3.5 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran 

Bran 

120 

3.2 

12.0 

10.0 

Chop  Feed 

3456 

3.3 

8.5 

10.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Mixed  Mill  Feed 

4518 

2.5 

12.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  corn 
bran 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Wheat  shorts 

Williams  Milling  Co.,  Williams,  Ind. 

Williams  Milling  Co’s  Mixed  Feed 

135 

3.9 

13.0 

9.0 

W’illiamson  Milling  Co.,  The, 

Clay  Center,  Kansas. 

Wheat  Shorts  

4487 

4.0 

17.0 

5.0 

Wheat  Bran  _ 

4656 

3.5 

16.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  • - 

White  Middlings 

4656 

4.5 

15.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Corn  and  oats 

Wilson  & Co.,  W.  D.,  Lakeville,  Ind.27 

Corn  and  Oats  Chop  _ 

3911 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Wiltrout,  Francis  M.,  Corunna,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

5847 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Winslow  Milling  Co.,  Winslow,  Ind. 

Pikes  Mixed  Feed 

4846 

3.5 

13.0 

12.1 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings  and 
wheat  scourings 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran, 
corn  feed  meal,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  ground  wheat  seour- 
ings 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran 

Pikes  “A”  Mixed  Feed 

7058 

4.0 

14.0 

9.0 

Witmer  Grain  Co.,  Grabill,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings  . 

1679 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  Bran 

2940 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

Woolard,  C.,  Hagerstown,  R.  R.  20,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

6746 

2.5 

14.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  unground 
wheat  screenings  not  to  exceed  mill 
run 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Corn  bran 

Mixed  Feed 

6747 

2.5 

13.5 

11.0 

Wright,  John  H.,  Clinton,  Ind. 

Wheat  Middlings 

7077 

3.5 

15.5 

7.0 

Venus  Bran  & Screenings 

7260 

3.5 

14.0 

10.0 

W’right  Milling  Co.,  Paris  Crossing,  Ind. 

“A”  Mixed  Feed 

2508 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Corn  Bran  

2849 

4.0 

7.0 

11.0 

Corn  Feed  Meal 

6235 

2.0 

7.0 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Wright’s  Corn  Bv  Product  _ . 

6699 

6.5 

10.8 

3.3 

Corn  bran,  corn  germ  and  corn  grits 

Corn  bran 

Yaw  Bros.,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Torn  Bran 

6450 

4.8 

8.0 

13.0 

Yerxa,  Andrews  & Thurston,  Inc., 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Flour  Middlings 

6515 

5.5 

15.5 

6.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  bran 

Bran 

6516 

5.5 

12.0 

13.0 

Nokomos  Durum  Wheat  Middlings  

6955 

5.5 

14.5 

10.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Wheat  reddog  flour 

Pure  durum  wheat  bran  and  pure 

Hector  Durum  Wheat  Red  Dog  

6956 

5.0 

18.0 

3.0 

Golden  Durum  Wheat  Mixed  Feed 

6957 

5.5 

15.5 

8.5 

Yohn,  W.  B.,  North  Webster,  Ind. 

W’heat  Bran  

6836 

3.5 

13.5 

10.0 

durum  wheat  reddog  flour 

Wheat  bran 

Wheat  middlings 

W heat  Middlings 

6837 

3.5 

13.5 

7.0 

27  Succeeded  by  Kramer  & Wolff 


270 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

! 

i and  to  be  composed  of  the 

< following  ingredients 

) 
i 

1 

) 

Yorktown  Lumber  Co.,  Yorktown,  Ind. 

Corn  Bran  

6630 

3.0 

9.0 

11.0 

Corn  bran 

Toungs  Creek  Milling  Company, 

Youngs  Creek,  Ind. 

Youngscreek  Mixed  Feed 

7127 

2.5 

12.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Yountsville  Mill,  The,  Yountsville,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

3081 

3.5 

13.5 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screenings 
and  corn  bran 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

3082 

3.5 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Shorts  

3083 

3.5 

13.5 

8.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Zabel  & Son,  Lanesville,  Ind. 

Zabel  & Son’s  Mixed  Feed 

6627 

3.0 

13.5 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat  Middlings  

7089 

2.5 

14.0 

6.5 

Wheat  middlings 

Zehner  Milling  Co.,  Plymouth,  Ind. 28 

Wheat  Middlings 

1429 

4.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Corn  & Oats  Chop 

1430 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Wheat  Bran 

1431 

3.8 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

Corn  Bran  

4205 

2.5 

6.0 

15.0 

Corn  bran 

Zenith  Milling  Company,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Wheat  Shorts 

7372 

3.5 

16.0 

9.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings  Not  Exceeding 

Mill  Run 

7373 

3.2 

15.0 

13.5 

Wheat  bran  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings not  exceeding  mill  run 

Ziliak  & Schafer  Milling  Co.,  The, 

Haubstadt,  Ind. 

Ziliak’s  Mixed  Feed 

276 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  middlings  and 
crushed  wheat  screenings 

Middlings  

4069 

3.5 

14.5 

9.0 

Wheat  middlings 

Com  Feed  Meal 

6857 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Corn  feed  meal 

Wheat  Shorts  and  Ground  Screenings 

7215 

4.5 

16.5 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

I’ure  Wheat  Bran 

7670 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran 

W’heat  Shorts,  Screenings,  Corn  Bran  and 

Feed  Meal  _ 

8291 

4.5 

16.5 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts,  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings, corn  bran  and  corn  feed  meal 

Z.  & S.  M.  Mixed  Feed 

8292 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran,  corn 
feed  meal  and  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Wheat  Bran  & Screenings  

8597 

4.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Zionsville  Milling  Co.,  Zionsville,  Ind. 

Wheat  Shorts — 

4298 

3.0 

14.0 

7.0 

Wheat  shorts 

Mixed  Feed 

4783 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Zook  Bros.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

4358 

3.5 

9.0 

9.5 

Corn  and  oats 

mSCELLANEOUS  CHOP  FEED,  CON-  I 
TAINING  CORN  AND  COB  MEAL 
(CRUSHED  EAR  CORN) 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Company, 

Bargersville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  ' 

Daily,  C.  C.,  Bristol,  R.  R.  No.  5,  Ind. 
Bonneyville  No.  2 Chop  Feed 1 

j 

8381 

3.0 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  whole  and  shrivelled 
wheat,  weed  seeds,  cob  meal,  chaff 
and  whole  wheat  screenings 

5602 

2.5 

7.3 

14.0 

Corn  and  cob  meal  (crushed  ear 
corn)  oats  and  corn  bran 

Heavilin  & Company,  Marion,  Ind. 29 

Chop  Feed  j 

7411  1 

1 

2.5 

7.0 

11.0 

Oats,  corn  and  cob  meal  (crushed  ear 
corn),  com  bran  and  corn  feed  meal 

28  Succeeded  by  Plymouth  Roller  Flour  Mills 

29  Succeeded  by  Heavilin  Milling  & Coal  Co. 


2Jl 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

1 and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

1 

1 

1 

Loogootee  Milling  Co.,  The,  Loogootee,  Ind. 
Standard  Mixed  Feed 

3146 

3.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran,  groimd 

Ogle-Cook  Grain  Company,  Hamlet,  Ind. 
Economy  Feed 

8557 

3.5 

8.0 

18.0 

wheat  screenings,  oats,  corn  and  cob 
meal  (crushed  ear  corn) 

Corn  and  cob  meal  (crushed  ear 

Reeve  & Son,  G.  E.,  Washington,  Ind. 

Mill  Chop  Feed  

8493 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

corn)  and  oats 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  cob  meal 

Ruoff,  Geo.  D.,  Osgood,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

2870 

3.5 

9.5 

10.0 

(crushed  ear  corn) 

Corn  and  cob  meal  (ground  ear  corn) 

Walker  & Co.,  Peter  M.,  Loogootee,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

3136 

3.5 

10.0 

10.0 

and  wheat  bran 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran. 

Zook  Bros.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

No.  2 Chop  Feed 

4993 

2.8 

7.0 

13.0 

corn  and  cob  meal  and  oats 

Corn  and  cob  meal  (crushed  ear 

MISCELLANEOUS  CHOP  FEED  CON- 
TAINING COB  MEAL,  OAT  HULLS, 
WHEAT  SCREENINGS  OK  OTHER 
FILLER 

Acme-Evans  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

E-Z  Chop  Feed  

5635 

3.3 

8.4 

11.0 

corn),  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  oat  hulls  and  salt 

Acme  C.  0.  & B.  Chop 

6200 

4.0 

8.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley  and  oat  hulls 

Acme  Grain  Company,  North  Manchester,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed 

3556 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Corn,  ofets,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts 

Ashbrook  Company,  The  J.  S.,  Mattoon,  111. 
Egyptian  Mixed  Feed 

8067 

2.0 

8.0 

12.0 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Badenochs  B.  & 0.  Chop 

8762 

3.0 

8.0 

12.0 

and  oat  hulls 

Hominy  feed,  corn  feed  meal,  oat 
• middlings,  oat  shorts  and  oat  hulls 
and  salt 

Corn,  oat  bran,  oat  middlings,  oat 

Belt  Elevator  & Feed  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

“A”  Chop  Feed 

3978 

3.0 

7.5 

16.0 

Barnes  & Co.,  R.  J.,  Dunkirk,  Ind. 

New  Chop  Feed 

1761 

3.5 

9.5 

8.0 

hulls  and  corn  feed  meal 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Corn,  oats  and  cob  meal  , 

Brown,  W.  W.,  Goshen,  Ind. 

Favorite  Feed 

2596 

3.5 

8.0 

18.0 

Canal  Elevator  Co.,  Peru,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

886 

3.2 

8.8 

9.0 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  corn  screen- 

City Mills,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Scrap  Feed 

8027 

2.5 

i 

8.0 

9.5 

ings 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn  feed 

Daugherty,  S.  P.,  Edwardsburg,  Mich. 

S.  P.  Daugherty’s  Chop  Feed 

6402 

3.3 

8.7 

10.0 

meal,  ground  wheat  screenings  and 
mill  sweepings 

Corn,  oats  and  cob  meal 

Colfax  Grain  Co.,  Colfax,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

3408 

2.0 

7.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  ground  screenings  from 

Fairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

Winner  Chop 

7714 

3.0 

7.0 

12.0 

wheat,  corn  and  oats 

Corn,  oats,  corn  feed  meal,  oat 

Farmland  City  Flour  Mills,  Farmland,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

3703 

2.0 

7.0 

11.0 

shorts,  oat  groats,  oat  hulls  and 
salt 

Wheat  bran,  corn,  oats,  oat  bran, 
oat  middlings,  oat  hulls  and  corn 
feed  meal  ^ 

Corn,  oats,  corn  feed  meal,  ground 

Furr  & Cohee,  Bunker  Hill,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

6408 

3.0 

8.5 

9.0 

corn  screenings  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

2J2 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

percent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain  Co., 

Winchester,  Ind. 

•"Climax  Chop”  

6010 

3.5 

9.5 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  feed 

Hamlet  Grain  Co.,  The,  Hamlet,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

7914 

3.5 

9.0 

9.5 

meal  and  ground  wheat  screenings 
from  wheat,  corn,  oats  and  rye 
Corn,  oats  and  ground  screenings 

Hammel  Milling  Company,  Fremont,  111. 

Chop  Feed 

4048 

2.5 

9.0 

9.0 

from  wheat  and  corn 

Corn,  oats,  whole  wheat  screenings 

Hutchinson  Flour  Mills  Co.,  The, 

Hutchinson,  Kans. 

Hutchinson  Chop  Feed  

7837 

3.5 

9.0 

4.0 

and  corn  feed  meal 

Corn  and  whole  wheat  screenings 

International  Sugar  Feed  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Chop  Feed 

7185 

4.0 

10.5 

16.0 

Corn,  barley,  ground  screenings  from 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 

Mixed  Chop  Feed 

6598 

2.0 

7.5 

15.0 

wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax,  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts  and  oat  hulls 
Com,  corn  bran,  corn  feed  meal,  oat 

Lash  Flour  Mills,  Fred  B.,  Farmersburg,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

1780 

3.5 

11.0 

5.0 

middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat  screen- 

Lemon Milling  Company,  The,  Bedford,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

6804 

3.0 

8.5 

9.0 

ings 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn  feed 

Lewis  Milling  Company,  Lewis,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7023 

3.5 

11.0 

5.0 

meal  and  ground  corn  screenings 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat  screen- 

Maegerlein Roller  Mills,  Arthur,  Clay  City,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  ! 

3809 

3.2 

9.0 

9.0 

ings 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat  screen- 

Maegerlein, E.  S.,  Patricksburg,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8102 

3.2 

9.0 

7.0 

ings 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat 

Mattix  & Co.,  N.  W.,  Lebanon,  Ind. 

“Our”  Cow  Chop 

3409 

2.0 

7.0 

20.0 

screenings 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran  and  ground 

Milford  Grain  & Milling  Co.,  Milford,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

6628 

2.8 

8.7 

8.0 

screenings  from  wheat,  corn  and 
oats 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn  feed 

McMillen  & Son,  J.  W.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind.^o 
Eagle  Brand  Chop  Feed  

1 

8138 

2.5 

7.5 

8.0 

meal  and  ground  corn  screenings 

Oats,  corn  feed  meal  and  corn  screen- 

Noragon & Son,  Butler,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ 

6275 

2.8 

8.5 

7.0 

ings 

Corn,  oats,  ground  wheat  screenings 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  III. 
Prairie  State  Chop  Feed 

7727 

2.5 

8.0 

11.0 

and  corn  feed  meal 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  corn  feed  meal, 
ground  barley  screenings  and 
ground  oat  hulls 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn  feed 

Prater-Mottier  Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
Praters  Chop  Feed  

7.585 

3.0 

10.0 

15.0 

Probst  & Kassebaum,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Special  C.  0.  & B.  Chop 

8444 

4.0 

S.O 

7.0 

meal,  alfalfa  meal  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Corn,  oats,  barley  and  oat  hulls 

Walker,  H.  L.,  Montpelier,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8130 

3.5 

8.0 

9.0 

Corn,  oats  and  ground  wheat  screen- 

CHOP FEEDS  CONTAINING  CORN  BRAN 

Akron  Milling  Co.,  The,  Akron,  Ind. 

Akron  Chop 

1 

2704 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

ings 

1 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  whole 

Mixed  Chop  Feed  

7510 

2.5 

8.0 

8.0 

wheat  screenings 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran,  ground 

wheat  screenings  and  mill  sweepings 

30  Succeeded  by  The  McMillen  Company 


2/3 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Albion  Roller  Mills,  Albion,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8600 

3.5 

9;0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  wheat  bran 

Alter  & Son,  Amos  H.,  R.  R.  No.  1,  Parr,  Ind.- 
Chop  Feed  

4245 

3.0 

9.0 

14.0 

and  ground  wheat  screenings  not 
exceeding  mill  run 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn 
feed  meal  and  buckwheat  hulls 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 

Angola  Flouring  Mills,  Angola,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7241 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Ashley-Hudson  Milling  & Grain  Co., 

Ashley,  Ind. 

Ashley-Hudson  Chop  Feed 

3783 

3.5 

9.5 

8.0 

feed  meal 

Corn,  oats  and  com  bran 

Besser,  W.  T.,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Besser’s  Chop  Feed  

322 

4.1 

10.3 

7.7 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

Bieknell  Mill  Company,  Bicknell,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

- 7823 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 

Bluffton  Milling  Co.,  Bluffton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

3397 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Boldt  & Son,  Waynetown,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7926 

2.8 

8.7 

8.0 

feed  meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Bristol  Milling  Co.,  Bristol,  Ind. 

“Chop  Feed” 

7417 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Broad  Ripple  Flour  & Feed  Mills, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8065 

2.8 

8.7 

8.0 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Burrell  & Morgan’s  Chop  Feed 

5835 

3.0 

8.0 

10.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Butler  Milling  Company,  Butler,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

6940 

3.0 

8.7 

7.0 

City  Feed  Store,  Plymouth,  Ind. 

Plymouth  Chop  Feed 

7542 

3.0 

8.7 

8.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 

City  Milling  Company,  Kendallville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ 

7339 

3.0 

8.7 

7.0 

feed  meal 

Com,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Clayton  Milling  Company,  Clayton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7663 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Coppes  Bros.  & Zook,  Nappanee,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

6009 

3.0 

8.0 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Creitz  & Deardoff,  Centerville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7703 

3.3 

9.0 

12.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

DeBaun  Mill,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Old  Reliable  Chop  Feed 

3338 

3.5 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Delp  Grain  Co.,  E.  E.,  Bourbon,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

6550 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  com  bran  and  corn  feed 

Dotson  & Sons,  Chas.,  Parker,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

5963 

2.8 

8.7 

7.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 

Farmers  Elevator  Company,  Kempton,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

7639 

2.8 

8.0 

12.0 

feed  meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Farmers  Grain  & Milling  Company,  The, 

Union  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8261 

2.8 

8.7 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  feed  meal,  corn 

bran  and  ground  screenings  from 
wheat  and  corn 

274 


TABLE  Vll — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

1 

) 

1 and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

1 

1 

; 

1 

Finkle,  Jacob,  Warren,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7661 

3.9 

9.5 

6.0 

i 

1 

Corn,  oats,  corn  feed  meal  and  corn 

Fornax  Milling  Company,  Decatur,  Ind. 

Fornax  Chop  Feed  _■ 

8402 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

1 bran 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Fyke  Milling  Co.,  LaGrange,  Ind. 

Fyke’s  Chop  Feed  

2134 

3.5 

9.5 

10.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

Gas  City  Elevator  Co.,  Gas  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  — 

7998 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Geneva  Milling  & Grain  Co.,  Geneva,  Ind. 

Egly’s  Chop  Feed 

6740 

2.8 

8.7 

8.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Gilman,  S.  B.,  Summitville,  Ind. 

Gilman’s  Corn  and  Oats  Chop 

2444 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

1 

Gnagy,  G.  L.,  Hamilton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  _ 

5434 

2.8 

8.5 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind.  ’ 

Graft’s  Chop  Feed 

8166 

3.5 

8.5 

8.0 

feed  meal 

' Corn,  oats,  eorn  feed  meal  and  corn 

Greenfield  Milling  Company,  Greenfield,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

5141 

2.0 

6.0 

15.0 

bran 

j Oats  and  corn  bran 

Harris  Milling  Co.,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Harris’  Chop  Feed 

210 

4.1  ' 

10.3 

1 7.7 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

Harting  & Co.,  Elwood,  Ind. 

Harting’s  Chop  Feed 

5253 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 

Hillscher,  J.  W.,  Kniman,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

4765 

3.0 

9.0 

I 

9.0 

feed  meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Hollett-Winders  Grain  Co.,  The,  Arcadia,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed 

5780 

3.0 

9.0 

1 

8.0  1 

Hollingsworth,  S.  P.,  Russiaville,  Ind. 
Hollingsworth’s  Chop  Feed 

8661 

3.9 

9.0 

9.0 

Holser  & Co.,  B.  I.,  Walkerton,  Ind. 

Chop  

4122 

3.5 

9.0 

1 

9.5 

meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

Hornung,  J.  M.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

2576 

4.8 

10.0 

11.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

Huntington  Mill  Company,  Huntington,  Ind. 
“Chop  Feed’’  

8586 

2.7 

8.5 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

5088 

3.5  i 

9.0 

i 

IC.O  1 

Jenkins  & Cohee,  Whitestown,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

6880 

3.0 

8.7 

10.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Jones  & Son,  C.  N.,  Wabash,  Ind. 

“A”  Chop  Feed 

5191 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Jonesboro  Milling  Co.,  Jonesboro,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

7999 

2.8 

8.7 

7.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Kirst  Milling  Co.,  Knox,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  •_ 

7970 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  eorn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Killian  Elevator,  The,  Newberry,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

8140 

2.8 

8.7 

8.0 

meal 

Com,  oats,  eorn  bran,  corn  feed  meal 

and  ground  wheat  screenings 

275 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Kuhn  & Son,  J.  H.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 

A.  Chop  Keed  _ __  _ 

8488 

3.5 

8.5 

10.0 

Oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed  meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Lefforge,  Otto,  Rossville,  Ind. 

rhnp  Kppfl 

7032 

3.0 

8.0 

10.0 

Little  Crow  Milling  Company,  Warsaw,  Ind. 
T.ittlp  Crnw  Mixpd  Chop  Kped  

5454 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn  feed  meal 

Lynn  Milling  Co.,  Lynn,  Ind. 

Chop  "Pppri 

6989 

2.7 

8.7 

10.0 

Majot  & Morgan,  Michigan  City,  R.  R.  1,  Ind. 

8089 

2.8 

8.5 

9.0 

and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Matthews  Roller  Mills,  Matthews,  Ind. 

Mnnrp’s  Chop  Repd  . 

6650 

2.8 

8.7 

7.0 

Mattix  & Co.,  N.  W.,  Lebanon,  Ind. 

Chop  Rpcd 

6883 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Maumee  Valley  Mills,  New  Haven,  Ind. 

No.  2 Chop 

3140 

3.5 

9.5 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feeo 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Chop'  Kppd 

4382 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Mexico  Roller  Mills,  Mexico,  Ind. 
r:hop  Kped 

4012 

3.2 

8.5 

10.0 

Chop  Rped  No.  1 

5052 

3.2 

8.5 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn  bran, 
corn  feed  meal  and  ground  wheat 
screenings 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Middlebury  Milling  Company,  Middlebury,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  

5437 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Monroe  Grain,  Hay  & Milling  Co.,  Monroe,  Ind. 
Chop  "Fppd 

3406 

3.0 

8.0 

9.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

Morgan,  Rees  J.,  Mexico,  Ind. 

Chop  Fppd 

8213 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Mulberry  Coal  & Feed  Company,  Mulberry,  Ind. 
Mulberry  Chop  Feed  _ 

5985 

3.5 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

McCormick  & Son,  Chas.  W.,  Logansport,  Ind. 
A r.hop  Fppd 

4060 

3.5 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feeed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  com  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 

Naber  & Co.,  Chas.  F.,  Alexandria,  Ind. 

Nflbpr.«!  Chop 

7106 

2.5 

8.0 

7.0 

Niezer  & Company,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Nipzpr’.s  Chop  Feed 

6269 

2.8 

S.7 

7.0 

Nodine,  W.  J.,  Waterloo,  Ind. 

Nodine’s  Chop  Feed 

5222 

3.0 

8.5 

9.0 

Nodine’s  Chop  

7723 

2.4 

8.3 

12.0 

meal 

Corn,  oats,  com  bran,  corn  feed  meal 
and  mill  sweepings 

Corn,  oats,  com  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Com,  oats,  corn  bran  and  com  feed 
.meal 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 
feed  meal 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

Norwood  & Smithson,  Lebanon,  Ind.^i 

Chop  Fppd 

6923 

3.0 

8.5 

7.0 

Oxford  Feed  Mill,  Oxford,  Ind. 

Dped’s  “nhop  Fppd” 

4990 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Pearson,  W.  W.,  Upland,  Ind. 

Chop  Fppd 

5952 

2.5 

8.0 

9.0 

Pennville  Milling  Company,  Pennville,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed 

3646 

. 3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

31  Succeeded  by  G.  W.  Norwood 


276 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Phillips,  J.  C.,  Star  City,  Ind. 

Chop  Peed  

Radcliffe  Flour  & Feed  Exchange,  E.  M., 
Pierceton,  Ind. 

A.  Chop  Feed  

Ray  & Rice,  Camden,  Ind. 

“A”  Chop  Feed 

Rittenhouse,  E.  S.,  Liberty  Mills,  Ind. 
Liberty  Bird  Chop  Feed 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

Hobart  No.  1 Chop  Feed 

Rouse  & Son,  Wm.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Rouse’s  Chop  Feed  

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Schaefer’s  Special  Chop  Feed  

Scientific  Milling  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 
Scientific  Chop  Feed 

Sheridan  Milling  Company,  Sheridan,  Ind. 32 
Chop  Peed  , 1 

Shirley  & Jones,  Lebanon,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  J 

Smith  Co.,  C.  E.,  Wabash,  Ind.ss 
Smith’s  Chop  Feed  

Smith  & Co.,  A.,  Sheridan,  Ind. 

New  Chop  Feed 

South  Side  Feed  Store,  Peru,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Starr  Mills,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

St.  John,  H.  E.,  Albany,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Stone  Quarry  Mills,  Spiceland,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Strombeck,  John  C.,  North  Webster,  Ind.^^ 
Chop  Feed  

Swayzee  Milling  Company,  Swayzee,  Ind. 
Chop  Peed  

Sweetser  Grain  Co.,  Sweetser,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  

Syracuse  Flour  Mills,  Syracuse,  Ind. 

Syracuse  Chop  Feed  

Thomas  Milling  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

.Q 

s 

§ 

fl  .£ 

a 

cS 

3 

5 .1^ 

^ .2 

<0 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

0 

Not  less 

per  cent 

Crude  F 

Not  less 

per  cent 

Crude  P 

Not  mor 

per  cent 

Crude  F 

, following  ingredients 

7507 

2.8 

8.7 

8.0 

1 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and. corn  feed 
meal 

7732 

3.0 

0.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 
feed  meal 

4762 

3.5 

0.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

5645 

2.5 

7.5 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

5004 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

3327 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

7100 

3.0 

8.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

8571 

3.0 

8.5 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

5064 

2.7 

0.0 

8.0 

j 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

8126 

3.0 

8.5 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

5300 

3.0 

0.0 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

6264 

3.0 

8.8 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

7630 

2.8 

8.8 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

6002 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  wheat  middlings, 
corn  bran  and  corn  feed  meal 

6365 

3.0 

8.7 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

3006 

2.7 

8.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

6542 

2.8 

8.7 

7.0  i 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

5208 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Com,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

6800 

2.8 

8.7 

7.0 

j 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

7204 

2.8 

8.5 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  bran  and  corn 
feed  meal 

8452 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  feed  meal  and  corn 
bran 

32  Succeeded  by  Mendenhall  & Weaver 

33  Succeeded  by  C.  E.  Smith 
31  Succeeded  by  W.  B.  Yohn 


277 


YABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 

Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


Tresselt  & Sons,  C.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
Tresselt’s  Chop  Feed  


Tuttle  & Company,  R.,  Columbia  City,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  


Ulrey  & Co.,  A.  A.,  Fairmount,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  


Union  Grain  & Feed  Company,  The, 
Anderson,  Ind. 

Star  Chop  Feed 


Wabash  Milling  Company,  Wabash,  Ind. 
Summerton’s  Chop  


Walker  & Son,  J.  M.,  Middletown,  Ind. 
Walker’s  Chop  Feed  


Walton  & Whisler,  Atlanta,  Ind.^s 
Chop  Feed  


Wellington  Milling  Co.,  Anderson,  Ind. 
Wellington’s  A.  X.  A.  Chop  Feed  . 


West  Middleton  Mill  & Elevator  Co., 
West  Middleton,  Ind. 

Chop  Feed  i 


Witmer  Grain  Co.,  Grabill,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  


Worthington  Grain  Company,  The, 
Worthington,  Ind. 

Enterprise  Chop  Feed  


Zionsville  Milling  Co.,  Zionsville,  Ind. 
Chop  Feed  


COCOANUT  BY-PRODUCTS 

Proctor  & Gamble  Distributing  Company,  The 
Port  Ivory,  Staten  Island,  N.  Y. 

P & G Copra  Oil  Meal 


COTTONSEED  MEAL 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 
Amco  Cottonseed  Meal 


Badenoch  Co.,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Cotton  Seed  Meal 


Bartlett  Co.,  The  J.  E.,  Jackson,  Mich. 
Michigan  “Farmer”  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal. 
Farmer  Brand  Straight  Cotton  Seed  Meal — 

Brode  & Co.,  F.  W.,  Memphis,  Tenn. 

Owl  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

Jay  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

Dove  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 


Buckeye  Cotton  Oil  Company,  The, 
Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“Buckeye”  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 
“Buckeye”  Cottonseed  Meal  


Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

I 

7209 

3.5 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

6915 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

6241 

2.5 

8.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

7228 

2.5 

5.5 

20.0 

Oats,  eorn  feed  meal,  corn  bran,  oat 
middlings  and  oat  hulls 

5969 

2,0 

8.0 

9.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn 
feed  meal  and  ground  corn  screen- 

8164 

3.0 

8.0 

8.0 

in^s 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

5781 

3.0 

8.7 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

5145 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

6092 

3.0 

9.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

4270 

3.5 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  bran 

8153 

2.8 

8.7 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  corn  feed  meal 
and  ground  screenings  from  corn, 
wheat  and  oats 

4621 

3.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn,  oats,  eorn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

8652 

6.0 

.20.0 

12.0 

Dried  cocoanut  meats 

5617 

8.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  produet 

8764 

6.0 

36.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

. 54S4 

7.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

. 8064 

5.0 

36.0 

22.0 

Cottonseed  product 

4840 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

7902 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

8000 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

5534 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

1 6179 

6.5 

41.0 

lO.C 

Cottonseed  product 

35  Succeeded  by  A.  G.  Walton 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Pat. 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

Burnett  Company,  The  William  A., 

Louisville,  Ky. 

Burnett’s  Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7160 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Bourbon  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7906 

6.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Campbell  & Company,  C.  L.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Double  Hump  Camel  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7037 

6.0 

41.0 

9.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Single  Hump  Camel  Brand  Cottonseed  MeaL_ 

8031 

6.0 

38.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Baby  Camel  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8144 

6.0 

36.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  M’f’g,  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
“Prize”  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  ___  _ 

Choctaw  Sales  Company,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 
“Choctaw  Quality”  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

SOOO 

6.0 

38.5 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Cake  

7176 

6.0 

43.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Choctaw  Standard  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake 

7177 

6.0 

41.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Choctaw  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake 

8159 

5.0 

38.5 

15.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Cottonseed  Products  Co.,  The,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Eagle  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4671 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

7108 

6.0 

38.0 

14.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Good  Cottonseed  Meal 

7981 

6.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

I 

Crescent  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

2765 

7.5 

41.0 

13.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Cottonseed  Meal 

4776 

6.0 

37.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Davis,  S.  P.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

ireribest  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7432 

6.0 

38.5 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Beauty  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cracked 

Screened  Cake 

8162 

6.0 

36.0 

12.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Goodluek  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

Cracked  Screened  Cake 

8438 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Dewey  Bros.  Co.,  The,  Blanchester,  Ohio. 

Queen  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

3506 

6.0 

41.0 

8.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Dixie  Mills  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 

Anchor  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7537 

6.0 

38.5 

12.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Tuxedo  Choice  Cottonseed  Meal 

6259 

7.0 

41.0 

10.5 

Cottonseed  product 

Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

East  St.  Louis  Cotton  Oil  Co., 

8339 

6.0 

38.6 

13.0 

Cottonseed  product 

National  Stock  Yards,  111. 

East  St.  Louis  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6258 

6.0 

38.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Illinois  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7091 

6.0 

41.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Eberts,  H.  F.  H.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Milko  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  

7428 

5.5 

38.6 

12.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Bossy  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8133 

5.0 

36.0 

15.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Milko  Blue  Tag  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8462 

5.5 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Edingcr  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Arrow  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7920 

6.0 

38.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7921 

6.0 

41.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

E-Co  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8053 

6.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Feeders  Supply  Company,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

“Equity  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6167 

6.0 

41.0 

10.5 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

“Equity  Brand”  Red  Tag  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

and  Cake 

Ferger  Grain  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

7690 

5.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Nutritia  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8395 

6.0 

38.6  1 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


• 

Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than  | 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent.  . 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

French  Seed  Products  Co.,  Piqua,  Ohio. 

Piqua  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6725 

5.5 

38.6 

11.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain  Co., 

Winchester,  Ind. 

Climax  Cotton  Seed  Meal _ 

6805 

7.0 

41.0 

10.5 

Cottonseed  product 

Magic  Cottonseed  Meal 

7317 

6.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Hartford  City  Grain  & Milling  Co., 

Hartford  City,  Ind. 

Choice  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6356 

7.0 

43.0 

8.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Hewitt,  C.  G.,  Montgomery,  Ala. 

Puritan  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7441 

6.5 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Company,  New  Albany,  Ind. 
Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8456 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Humphreys,  Godwin  Company,  Memphis,  Tenn. 
“Southern”  Cottonseed  Meal 

4036 

6.0 

37.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Dixie  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal _ 

5064 

6.0 

41.0 

12.0 

Pressed  cottonseed 

Forfat  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7116 

6.0 

38.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Danish  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7178 

5.0 

36.0 

15.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Imperial  Cotto  Sales  Company,  Chicago,  111. 
Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8001 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Choice  Cottonseed 

Meal 

8092 

6.0 

41.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Imperial  Cotto  Brand  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

8093 

5.0 

38.5 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Im.perial  Cotto  Brand  Extra  Choice  Cotton- 
seed Meal 

8401 

8.5 

43.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Indiana  Seed  Company,  The,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Monument  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

4079 

6.5 

41.0 

13.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Pony  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7426 

6.0 

36.0 

14. C 

Cottonseed  product 

Interstate  Peed  Association,  Detroit,  Mich. 
Superior  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8343 

6.0 

39.0  . 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Johnson,  H.  N.,  Athens,  Ga. 

Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8061 

5.5 

36.0 

15.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Johnson  & Co.,  W.  B.,  Memphis,  Tenn. 

SnprPTTiP  Prand  nnttnn  Sepd  Mpal 

6930 

7.0 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Imperial  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

6931 

38.0 

Keeton  & Company,  J.  P.,  Atlanta,  Ga. 
“Southern  King  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8008 

6.0 

38.6 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Lanier  Bros.,  Nashville,  Tenn. 

Jersey  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5537 

6.0 

38.6 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Canary  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

5538 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Holstein  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8096 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Lovitt  & Co.,  L.  B.,  Memphis,  Tenn. 

Memphis  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

6840 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Lovit  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

7460 

6.5 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7580 

5.0 

36.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Macdonald,  J.  M.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Kineda  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal  

6761 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Avon  Cottonseed  Meal  

7973 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Merchants  Hay  & Grain  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Choice  Cottonseed  Meal • 

4726 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Montgomery  & Company,  C.  L., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

Eagle  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8239 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Star  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8315 

6.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

28o 


TABLE  VII— Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

i 

I Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

flrndo  TTa-f- 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

i; 

2 and  to  be  composed  of  the 

H fdllowing  ingredients 

3 

3 

5 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Choice  Cottonseed  Meal 

5162 

1 

7.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal _ 

8753 

6.0 

38.5 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

National  Feed  Co.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Cotton  Seed  Meal 

3024 

7.5 

41.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

N.  F.  Co’s  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

5859 

7.3 

39.9 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Prime  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

! 7934 

6.5 

38.5 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Nothern,  W.  C.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Butterfly  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cakp 

6525 

6.0 

39.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Standard  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8198 

6.0 

36.0 

12.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Bee  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal  or  Cake 

8320 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 
Crown  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  . 

4091 

7.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Osage  Cotton  Oil  Company, 

Chattanooga,  Tenn. 

Silo  Brand  (Standard  Quality)  Cottonseed 

Meal  and  Cake 

Silo  Brand  (Special  Quality)  Cottonseed 

6395 

6.0 

41.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Meal  and  Cake  

6964 

7.0 

43.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Osage  Cotton  Oil  Company,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Silo  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and  Cake 

8032 

5.0 

38.5 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Paxson,  C.  E.,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Cottonseed  Meal  

6589 

6.0 

37.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Pierce  Elevator  Co.,  The,  Union  City,  Ind. 

Choice  Cottonseed  Meal 

6267 

7.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Pincoffs  Co.,  Maurice,  Chicago,  111. 

Victoria  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8733 

6.0 

38.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Pinco  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal 

8734 

6.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Poe  Cottonseed  Products  Company, 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

“Butter  Cup’’  Brand  of  Prime  Cottonseed 

Meal  

8298 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

“Golden  Rod’’  Brand,  a Good  Cottonseed 

Meal  

8294 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Dandelion  Brand,  Choice  Cottonseed  Meal 

8710 

6.0 

41.1 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Ralston  Purina  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Winner  Prime  Cottonseed  Meal 

6900 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Protena  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8158 

5.0 

36.0 

15.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Rapier  Sugar  Feed  Co.,  Owensboro,  Ky. 

Rapier’s  Brand  Choice  Grade  Cottonseed  Meal 

6278 

7.5 

41.0 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Ranier’s  Cottonseed  Meal  . 

6693 

7.0 

38.5 

14.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Roberts  Cotton  Oil  Co.,  Memphis,  Tenn. 

“Diamond  R’’  Cottonseed  Meal 

6975 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Cotton  Seed  Meal 

7975 

5.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Good  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8708 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Southern  Seed  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Atlas  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

3385 

6.0 

41.0 

9.0 

Cottonseed  product 

Texas  Cake  & Linter  Co.,  Dallas,  Texas. 

“Texoma’’  Brand  High  Grade  Cottonseed 

Meal  

6180 

6.0 

41.0 

10.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Interstate  Brand  Cottonseed  Meal  and 

Cracked  Cake  

7034 

6.0 

38.6 

12.0 

Decorticated  cottonseed 

Sunset  Brand  Prime  Cracked  Cottonseed 

Lake  and  Meal  

8.598 

5.0 

41.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

28i 


TABLE  VII— Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


! 

Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Union  Seed  & Fertilizer  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

“American  Red  Tag”  Cottonseed  Meal 

6210 

7.0 

38.5 

11.5 

Cottonseed  product 

Surety  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8264 

5.5 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  product 

COLD  PRESSED  COTTONSEED 

Bartlett 'Company,  J.  E.,  Jackson,  Mich. 

Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed 

6494 

5.0 

26.0 

25.0 

Pressed  whole  cottonseed  including 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  M’f’g.  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
“Prize”  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed 

7002 

6.0 

25.0 

20.0 

hulls' 

Pressed  whole  cottonseed  including 

Davis,  S.  P.,  Little  Rock,  Ark. 

Standard  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cotton  Seed 

6272 

6.0 

26.0 

25.0 

hulls 

Cottonseed  meal  and  delinted  cotton- 

Feeders Suppliy  Company,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 
Equity  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cotton  Seed 

7080 

6.0 

20.0 

23.0 

seed  hulls 

Pressed  whole  cottonseed  including 

Mississippi  Delta  Planting  Co.,  Scott,  Miss. 

Acme  Brand  Cold  Pressed  Cottonseed 

6125 

7.0 

23.0 

27.0 

hulls 

Whole  pressed  delinted  cottonseed  in- 

COTTONSEED MEAL  AND  COTTON- 
SEED HULLS  (COTTONSEED  FEED) 

American  Cotton  Hull  & Fibre  Co., 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

“Cyclone”  Cottonseed  Feed 

4971 

3.0 

20.0 

23.0 

cluding  hulls 

Cottonseed  meal  and  ground  delinted 

Buckeye  Cotton  Oil  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Buco  Cottonseed  Feed 

7965 

3.5 

20.0 

27.0 

cottonseed  hulls 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

“Buckeye”  Good  Cottonseed  Feed 

8184 

5.0 

36.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

East  St.  Louis  Cotton  Oil  Company, 

National  Stock  Yards,  111. 

Cottonseed  Feed 

7459 

6.0 

34.0 

16.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

Humphreys-Godwin  Co.,  Memphis,  Tenn. 

77  Cottonseed  Feed 

6115 

4.0 

20.0 

28.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  delinted  cotton- 

Imperial Cotto  Sales  Company,  Chicago,  111. 
Imperial  Brand  Cottonseed  Feed 

8446 

4.5 

35.0 

16.0 

seed  hulls 

Cottonseed  meal  and  delinted  cotton- 

Johnson & Company,  W.  B.,  Memphis,  Tenn. 
“Winner  Brand”  Cotton  Seed  Meal 

8651 

5.5 

36.0 

,14.0 

seed  hulls 

Cottonseed  meal  and  25%  cottonseed 

Memphis  Cotton  Hull  & Fibre  Co.,  The, 
Memphis,  Tenn. 

“Cyclone”  Cotton  Seed  Feed 

8704 

3.0 

20.0 

26.0 

hulls 

Cottonseed  meal  and  ground  delinted 

Poe  Cottonseed  Products  Company, 

Memphis,  Tenn. 

“Raven  Brand”  Cottonseed  Feed 

8295 

3.0 

20.0 

25.0 

cottonseed  hulls 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

“Poco  Brand”  Cottonseed  Feed 

8711 

5.0 

33.4 

17.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

Gold  Dust  Brand  Cottonseed  Feed 

8740 

4.0 

30.0 

23.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

Tennessee  Fibre  Company,  Memphis,  Tenn. 
Creamo  Brand  Cotton  Seed  Feed 

8495 

3.5 

20.0 

25.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

Union  Seed  & Fertilizer  Company,  The, 

West  New  York,  N.  J. 

Columbia  Cotton  Seed  Feed 

8653 

3.0 

20.5 

25.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  cottonseed  hulls 

COTTONSEED  HULLS 

Tennessee  Fibre  Company,  Memphis,  Tenn. 
Cotton  Seed  Hulls 

4182 

1.0 

3.0' 

50.0 

Cottonseed  hulls 

282 


TABLE  VII— Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as ^eing  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


LINSEED  3IEAL 


American  Linseed  Company,  New  York,  N,  T. 

Old  Process  Linseed  Oil  Meal 

Cleveland  Linseed  Oil  Meal 


Archer-Daniels  Linseed  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Old  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake 

Badenoch  Co.,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Old  Process  Oil  Meal 


Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
Old  Process  Oil  Meal 


Crabbs,  Eeynolds,  Taylor  Co.,  Lafayette,  Ind 
Linseed  Meal  


Evans  Linseed  Oil  Co. 
Linseed  Oil  Meal 


Indianapolis,  Ind. 


Hirst  & Begley  Linseed  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
Hirst  & Begley  Linseed  Co.  Brand  Linseed 
Meal  


Kellogg  & Sons,  Inc.,  Spencer,  Buffalo,  N.  Y 
Old  Process  Oil  Meal 


Macdonald,  J.  M.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Kineda  Old  Process  Linseed  MeaL 


Merchants  Hay  & Grain  Co 
Linseed  Meal 


Metzger  Seed  & Oil  Co. 
Old  Process  Oil  Meal  . 


Indianapolis,  Ind 
The,  Toledo,  Ohio. 


Midland  Linseed  Products  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Crescent  Brand  Pure  Old  Process  Ground 

Linseed  Cake 

Midland  Brand  Pure  Old  Process  Ground' 
Linseed  Cake 


Minnesota  Linseed  Oil  Co.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
Ground  Oil  Cake  or  Oil  Meal 


National  Peed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
Linseed  Oil  Meal 


Northern  Linseed  Oil  Co.,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 
“Pure  Old  Process  Ground  Linseed  Cake” 

Pincoffs  Co.,  Maurice,  Chicago,  111. 

Pinco  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 


Sherwin-Williams  Co.,  The,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 


Linseed  Meal 


Toledo  Seed  & Oil  Company,  The,  Toledo,  Ohio. 
Major  Brand  Old  Process  Oil  Meal 


Valparaiso  Grain  & Elevator  Co., 
Valparaiso,  Ind. 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


0)  0)  0) 


;z:  fto 


§ I 

^ .8 

S-gOn 

(u  aj 

o 8 

^ P.U 


2 

I oi  2 

^ ftO 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


. 4859 

6.0 

34.0 

9.0 

Flaxseed  product 

. 4860 

2.0 

36.0 

9.0 

Flaxseed  product 

. 1834 

6.0 

32.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

. 8763 

6.0 

30.0 

9.0 

Flaxseed  product 

. 6351 

6.0 

32.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

, 2380 

6.0 

32.0 

11.0 

Flaxseed  product 

773 

6.0 

32.0 

15.0 

Flaxseed  product 

7165 

6.0 

34.0 

9.0 

Flaxseed  product 

5877 

5.0 

33.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

8111 

5.0 

30.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

4957 

8.0 

36.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

6672 

5.0 

30.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

7125 

5.0 

29.0 

9.5 

Flaxseed  product 

8670 

5.0 

32.0 

9.5 

Flaxseed  product 

.5406 

5.0 

34.0 

11.0 

Flaxseed  product 

4592 

7.0 

32.0 

7.0 

Flaxseed  product 

5770 

6.0 

33.0 

9.0 

Flaxseed  product 

8732 

6.0 

32.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

1723 

6.0 

33.0 

8.0 

Flaxseed  product 

8713 

6.0 

33.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

1404 

5.0 

30.0 

12.0 

Flaxseed  product 

283 


TABLE  VII Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Washburn-Crosby  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Ground  Linseed  Cake  Oil  Meal 

UNSCREENED  FLAXSEED  OIL  FEED 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  Tbe,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 
Old  Process  Oil  Meal 

Laxo  Cake  Meal  Co.,  Tbe,  Chicago,  111. 

Old  Process  Laxo  Cake  Meal 

LINSEED  MEAL  AND  SCREENINGS 
OIL  FEED 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Amco  Old  Process  Linseed  Oil  Meal  and 
Screenings  Oil  Peed 

VELVET  BEAN  MEAL 

Aeme-Jones  Company,  Inc.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Big  J.  Bean  Meal 

McGowin-Bennett  Milling  Company, 

Georgiana,  Ala. 

Velvet  Bean  Meal 

VELVET  BEAN  FEED 

Alabama  Black  Belt  Company, 

Montgomery,  Ala. 

Velvet  Bean  and  Pod  Peed  Meal 

Joseph  & Company,  Dan,  Columbus,  Ga. 

Velvet  Bean  Peed 

Smith,  Roy  & Mark,  Tennille,  Ga. 

Velvet  Bean  Peed 

BARLEY  CLEANINGS 

Klipfel  & Company,  P.  L.,  Chicago,  111. 

Malted  Barley  Cleanings  - 

DISTILLERS’  DRIED  GRAINS 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Empire  State  Dairy  Peed 

Atlas  Peed  & Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 
Atlas  Distillers’  Grains  — 

Chapin  & Company,  Hammond,  Ind. 

Ajax  Plakes 

Chapin  & Company,  Inc.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Ajax  Plakes 

Conroy,  M.  A.,  Jeffersonville,  Ind. 

Sunny  Brook  Distillers’  Dried  Grains 

Continental  Cereal  Company,  Peoria,  111. 
Continental  Gluten  Peed  

Dewey  Bros.  Co.,  The,  Blanchester,  Ohio. 

Corn  Three  D.  Grains - - — 

E agle  Three  D.  Grains 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


Official  Niimber 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

JNot  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

71234 

5.0 

32.0 

10.0 

Plaxseed  product 

8210 

5.0 

30.0 

10.0 

Flaxseed  product 

4618 

6.0 

25.0 

12.0 

Ground  cake  from  flaxseed  and  field 
seeds  (wheat,  wild  buckwheat,  pig- 
eon grass,  wild  mustard) 

8378 

5.0 

30.0 

10.0 

Linseed  meal  and  ground  screenings 
oil  feed 

8443 

4.0 

19.0 

14.0 

Ground  velvet  beans  and  pods 

8612 

4.2 

17.2 

14.0 

Ground  velvet  beans  and  pods 

8568 

4.0 

18.5 

15.0 

Ground  velvet  beans  and  pods 

8415 

4.5 

19.0 

12.0 

Ground  velvet  beans  and  pods 

8429 

4.0 

17.0 

15.0 

Ground  velvet  beans  and  hulls 

6556 

1.2 

20.8 

15.9 

Malted  barley  cleanings 

8014 

8.0 

30.0 

14.0 

Corn  distillers’  dried  grains 

8303 

6.0 

30.0 

14.0 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  corn, 
oats,  barley  and  rye 

7225 

10.0 

30.0 

14.0 

Corn  distillers’  grains 

2337 

12.0 

30.0 

16.0 

Dried  distillers  grains 

8308 

7.0 

29.0 

14.2 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  corn, 
rye  and  malt 

6066 

6.0 

26.5 

10.0 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  corn, 
oats,  rye  and  barley 

3124 

1 3593 

9.0 

10.0 

26.0 

30.0 

13.0 

13.0 

Distillers  dried  grains 

Distillers’  dried  corn  grains 

284 


TABLE  VM — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than  ■ 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Arrow  Distillers  Dried  Grains 

80S5 

10.0 

30.0 

11.0 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  corn. 

Glenmore  Distilleries  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Distillers’  Dried  Grains  

7916 

8.0 

28.0 

12.0 

barley,  malt  and  rye 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  com. 

Jordan,  Geo.  M.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

G.  M.  J.  Distillers  Dried  Grains 

7611 

10.0 

30.0 

13.0 

barley,  malt  and  rye 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  com. 

Mueller,  E.  P.,  Chicago,  111. 

M V C 0 Dried  Grains 

8031 

5.0 

21.0 

19.0 

rye  and  barley  malt 

Barley  malt,  malt  sprouts  and  corn 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Distillers  Corn  Grains 

8025 

8.0 

30.0 

14.0 

distillers  dried  grains 

Corn  distillers’  dried  grains 

Old  Vincennes  Distillery  Company, 

Vincennes,  Ind. 

0.  V.  D.  Dried  Grains 

8030 

10.0 

30.0 

13.0 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  corn. 

Probst  & Kassebaum,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

A.  Dairy  Feed 

8181 

8.0 

28.0 

14.0 

rye  and  malt 

Corn  distillers’  dried  grains 

Semans  Edible  Oils  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Corn  Distillers’  Dried  Grains  (Jersey  Brand)__ 

8420 

10.0 

30.0 

12.0 

Distillers’  dried  grains  from  corn. 

Squibb  & Company,  W.  P.,  Lawrenceburg,  Ind. 
Squibbs  Distillery  Dried  Grains  

7950 

9.0 

30.0 

15.0 

rye  and  barley 

Corn,  rye  and  barley  malt  ' 

Ubiko  Milling  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Fourex  (XXXX)  Distillers  Dried  Corn  Grains.. 

7811 

12.0 

31.0 

13.0 

Distillers’  dried  corn  grains 

Walsh  & Company,  James,  Lawrenceburg,  Ind. 
Walden  Dried  Grains 

8069 

11.5 

28.5 

14.5 

Corn  distillers’  dried  grains 

BREWERS’  DRIED  GRAINS 

Bartlett  Company,  J.  E.,  Jackson,  Mich. 

Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

8015 

5.0 

25.0 

13.0 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  barley 

Berghoff  Brewing  Co.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
Berghoff’s  Dried  Brewers  Grains  

1516 

6.0 

25.0 

16.8 

Malted  barley  and  rice 

Brewers  Dried  Grains  

8701 

7.0 

19.0 

17.0 

Barley  malt  and  corn  grits 

Centlivre  Brewing  Co.,  C.  L.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
“Centlivre’s  Brewers  Dried  Grains” 

5652 

6.0 

19.0 

18.0 

Barley  malt  and  refined  corn  grits 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Arrow  Brewers  Grains 

8036 

5.0 

25.0 

17.0 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  barley 

Evansville  Dried  Malt  & Feed  Co.,  The, 
Evansville,  Ind. 

Dried  Brewers  Grains 

6384 

5.0 

24.0 

16.0 

malt,  rice  and  corn  grits 

Malted  barley,  cereal  corn  flakes  and 

Fruechtemicht,  Henry,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Blue  Grass  Dried  Brewers  Grains 

8577 

6.0 

26.0 

15.0 

corn  grits 

Brewers  dried  grains  from  barley 

Interstate  Feed  Association,  Detroit,  Mich. 
Interstate  Brewers’  Dried  Grains 

8040 

6.0 

24.0 

13.0 

malt,  com  grits  and  rice 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  malted 

Milwaukee  Grains  & Feed  Company, 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

“Crown”  Dried  Brewers  Grains 

5.587 

5.0 

26.0 

15.0 

barley,  rice  and  corn  grits 

Brewers  dried  grains  from  barley 

Mueller,  Edward  P.,  Chicago,  111. 

Fleisehmans  Dried  Grains  

7762 

7.0 

19.0 

19.0 

malt  and  corn  grits 

Dried  yeast  grains  from  com,  barley 

Brewers’  Dried  Grains  

8630 

5.0 

25.0 

17.0 

malt  and  malt  sprouts 

Brewers  dried  grains  from  barley 

malt  and  corn  grits 

28s 


TABLE  V!l — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Muessel  Brewing  Co.,  The,  South  Bend,  Ind. 
Muessel’s  Dried  Brewers  Grains 

5292 

6.1 

24.0 

16.1 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  barley 

Neumond,  Inc.,  K.  & E.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

“Goldnes  Kalb”  Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

71(32 

6.0 

24.0 

13.0 

and  com 

Malted  barley,  rice  and  corn  grits 

Peoples  Brewing  Co.,  The,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
Brewers  Dried  Grains 

5585 

5.5 

23.0 

15.2 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  barley 

Ralston  Purina  Co.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Eagle  A.  Dried  Brewers’  Grains 

5027 

6.0 

21.0 

18.0 

malt,  granulated  rice  and  refined 
corn  flakes 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  barley 

Brewers’  Dried  Grains  

7924 

6.0 

26.0 

16.0 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  barley 

Rankin  & Company,  M.  G.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Durham  Dried  Brewers  Grains 

8682 

6.0 

26.0 

16.0 

Brewers  dried  grains  from  malted 

Scottsburg  Elevator,  Scottsburg,  Ind. 

Brewers’  Dried  Grains  

8440 

6.0 

24.0 

18.0 

barley 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  corn  grits. 

Western  Grains  & Peed  Company,  Chicago,  111. 
Milkmaid  Dried  Brewers’  Grains  

6777 

5.0 

25.0 

16.0 

barley  malt  and  rice 

Brewers’  dried  grains  from  malted 

Pure  Dried  Brewers’  Grains ... 

6839 

5.0 

21.0 

17.0 

barley  and  rice 

Malted  barley  and  rice 

MALT  SPROUTS 

Klipfel  & Co.,  P.  L.,  Chicago,  111. 

Malt  Sprouts 

3898 

1.5 

23.5 

16.4 

Malt  sprouts 

Mueller,  E.  P.,  Chicago,  111. 

Malt  Sprouts 

8700 

2.0 

20.0 

15.0 

Malt  sprouts 

Raschka,  Wm.,  Ainsworth,  Ind. 

Malt  Sprouts 

4023 

1.5 

25.0 

12.0 

Malt  sprouts 

Zorn  Brewing  Company,  Ph., 

Michigan  City,  Ind. 

Malt  Sprouts I 

5097 

1.0 

18.0 

18.0 

Malt  sprouts 

CORN  GLUTEN  FEED 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
“Prize”  Corn  Glutenfeed 

7206 

1.0 

23.0 

8.5 

Corn  gluten  feed 

Clinton  Sugar  Refining  Co.,  Clinton,  Iowa. 
Clinton  Corn  Gluten  Feed 

5452 

3.0 

23.0 

8.0 

Corn  gluten  feed 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Buffalo  Corn  Gluten  Peed 

5630 

1.0 

23.0 

8.5 

Corn  gluten  feed 

Diamond  Corn  Gluten  Meal 

6979 

1.0 

40.0 

4.0 

Corn  gluten  meal 

Douglas  Company,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa. 

Douglas  Com  Gluten  Peed 

6932 

1.0 

23.0 

8.0 

Corn  gluten  feed 

Hubinger  Bros.  Co.,  J.  C.,  Keokuk,  Iowa. 

K K K Corn  Gluten  Peed 

6638 

2.4 

23.0 

7.5 

Corn  gluten  feed 

Macdonald,  J.  M.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Kineda  Gluten  Peed 

8527 

2.0 

23.0 

8.0 

Corn  gluten  feed 

Piel  Bros.  Starch  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Hoosier  Gluten  Peed  

2856 

2.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Cora  gluten  feed  artificially  colored 

Union  Statch  & Refining  Co.,  Edinburg,  Ind. 
Union  Gluten  Peed 

559 

3.0 

24.0 

6.3 

with  orange 

Com  gluten  feed 

286 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

CORN  GERM  MEAL 

American  Hominy  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Homcoline  Feed 

3029 

5.0 

17.0 

7.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Amco  Corn  Germ  Meal 

8520 

7.0 

18.0 

9.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

Atlas  Feed  & Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Atlas  Corn  Oil  Meal 

8460 

7.0 

18.0 

9.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  M’f’g.  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
“Heights”  Com  Oil  Cake  Meal 

7467 

8.0 

18.0 

10.0 

Com  germ  meal 

Clinton  Sugar  Refining  Company,  Clinton,  Iowa 
Clinton  Com  Germ  Meal 

6788 

7.0 

20.0 

12.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

Continental  Cereal  Company,  Peoria,  111. 
Continental  Corn  Germ  Meal  

8667 

7.0 

18.0 

9.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

Corn  Products  Refining  Company, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Diamond  Hog  Meal  _ 

7478 

7.0 

18.0 

13.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

Argo  Corn  Oil  Cake  Meal 

7720 

7.0 

18.0' 

13.0 

Cora  germ  meal 

Dewey  Bros.  Company,  The,  Blanchester,  Ohio. 
Com  Germ  Oil  Meal 

8662 

6.0 

20.0 

10.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Yellow  Corn  Germ  Meal 

6420 

8.0 

18.0 

9.0 

Corn  hearts  with  part  of  the  oil 

White  Corn  Germ  Meal 

7220 

6.0 

10.0 

4.5 

extracted 

Cora  hearts  with  part  of  the  oil 

Pearson,  W.  W.,  Upland,  Ind. 

Pearson’s  Meal 

7702 

7.0 

18.0 

10.0 

extracted 

Corn  germ  meal 

Piel  Bros.  Starch  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

P Bro  Corn  Oil  Cake 

7910 

10.0 

15.0 

10.0 

Cora  germ  meal 

Semans  Edible  Oils  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
“Germena”  Germ  Oil  Meal 

8530 

6.0 

18.0 

5.0 

Corn  germ  meal 

Simpson,  Orval,  Chicago,  111. 

Simpson’s  Corn  Oilcake  Meal 

8664 

9.0 

21.0 

8.0 

Com  germ  meal 

CORN  GERM  MEAL  AND  CORN  DIS- 
TILLERS’ DRIED  GRAINS 

Semans  Edible  Oils  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Maizmeal  

8240 

8.0 

25.0 

8.0 

Cora  germ  meal  and  corn  distillers 

HOMINY  MEALS,  FEEDS  AND  CHOPS 

American  Hominy  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Homco  Hominy  Feed 

7614 

6.0 

10.0 

7.0 

dried  grains 

Corn  product 

Amo  Mill  «fe  Elevator  Co.,  Amo,  Ind. 

Amo  Hominy  Feed 

5778 

7.0 

10.0 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Amo  Mill  & Elevator  Co.,  Bargersville,  Ind. 
Amo  Hominy  Feed  

8724 

7.0 

10.0 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Aunt  Jemima  Mills  Company,  St.  Joseph,  Mo. 
Hominy  Feed  

6254 

6.0 

11.0 

9.0 

Corn  product 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

That  Snowflake  Fine  White  Hominy  Feed 

8620 

7.0 

10.0 

4.0 

Corn  product 

Blair  Milling  Company,  The,  Atchison,  Kansas. 
Blair’s  Hominy  Feed  

6154 

6.5 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn  product  

287 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  M’f’g.  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
“Prize”  White  Hominy  Feed 

6732 

7.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn  product 

Cincinnati  Grain  & Hay  Co.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Hominy  Meal  

7839 

8.4 

11.0 

7.5 

Corn  product 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Co.,  LaPayette,  Ind. 
Hominy  Feed  

4*516 

7.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Corn  product  ^ 

Deutsch  & Sickert  Company,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Success  Hominy  Feed 

6071 

6.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  product 

Eagle  Roller  Mill  Company,  New  Ulm,  Minn. 
Hominy  Feed  

6966 

7.0 

10.6 

6.0 

Hominy  feed 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 
Hominy  Meal  

8338 

6.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  product 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

Eberts  Hominy  Feed  

6306 

7.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Corn  product 

Eberts  Grain  Co.,  Nabb,  Ind. 

Hominy  Meal  

4460 

7.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Corn  product 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

• Arrow  Hominy  Feed 

7766 

6.7 

10.2 

5.5 

Corn  product 

Elevator  Milling  Co.,  Springfield,  111. 

Hominy  Feed  

2514 

7.5 

10.0 

3.8 

Com  product 

Emison  & Company,  J.  & S.  (Baltic  Mills), 
Vincennes,  Ind. 

Hominy  Feed  

8046 

7.0 

8.0 

6.0 

Corn  product 

Evans  Milling  Co.,  The,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Hominy  Feed  

20 

7.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Cora  product 

Ewing  Mill  Co.,  Brownstown,  Ind. 

Hominy  Meal  

296 

7.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Corn  product 

Farmers  Hominy  Mill,  Seymour,  Ind. 

Farmers  Hominy  Feed 

8296 

7.5 

10.0 

3.0 

Corn  product 

Ferger  Grain  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Nutritia  Hominy  Meal  _ 

8606 

7.8 

10.7 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Fisher  Bros.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Diamond  Hominy  Feed 

8737 

6.0 

10.0 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Gienger  & Co.,  John,  Jeffersonville,  Ind. 
Hominy  Feed 

1887 

7.0 

9.0 

5.0 

Corn  product 

Hall  Milling  Company,  W.  C.,  Brazil,  Ind. 

Hall’s  Hominy  Feed 

7482 

5.0 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  product 

Hunter  & Co.,  0.  L.,  Chicago,  111. 

Calumet  Hominy  Feed 

4417 

7.0 

8.5 

10.0 

Corn  product 

Tellow  Calumet  Hominy  Feed 

4959 

7.0 

8.5 

10.0 

Corn  product 

Hunter-Robinson-Wenz  Milling  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Capital  White  Hominy  Feed 

3921 

7.7 

11.0 

8.5 

Cora  product 

Kidder  & Co.,  F.  L.,  Paris,  111. 

Peerless  Hominy  Feed 

2449 

7.5 

8.5 

4.5 

Corn  product 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Hominy  Feed 

5101 

6.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Com  product 

288 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


1 

Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Kuhn  & Co.,  Paul,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Hominy  Peed  

2735 

7.7 

1 

10.0 

5.0 

Corn  product 

Louisville  Cereal  Mill  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 
Hominy  Meal  _ 

2020 

7.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Corn  product 

Mead  Johnson  & Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 
Mead’s  Hominy  Peed 

7760 

6.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Corn  product 

Merchants  Hay  & Grain  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Hominy  Peed  

4304 

6.0 

9.0" 

5.0 

Com  product 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Hominy  Peed  

7761 

6.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Corn  product 

National  Peed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
“Hominy  Peed” _ 

3020 

7.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Com  product 

Noblesville  Milling-  Co.,  Noblesville,  Ind. 

Hominy  Chop  

3309 

3.5 

9.5 

8.0 

Corn  product 

Perin  Bros.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Hominv  Peed  _ . 

8721 

7.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Corn  product 

Pfeffer  Milling  Co.,  Lebanon,  111. 

Pfeffer  Milling  Co.  Hominy  Peed 

2617 

8.0 

10.0 

3.7 

Corn  product 

Prater-Mottier  Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
Praters  Hominy  Peed 

7647 

7.0 

9.5 

6.0 

Corn  product 

Raidt  Milling  X)o.,  P.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Hominy  Meal 

1020 

6.0 

8.0 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Ruoff,  Geo.  D.,  Osgood,  Ind. 

Hominy  Peed  

4400 

7.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Stiefel  & Levy,  Port  Wayne,  Ind. 

Hominy  Peed  

7866 

6.5 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Suckow  Company,  Pranklin,  Ind. 

“Perfection”  Hominy  Peed 

5945 

7.5 

10.0 

7.0 

Corn  product 

Suffern-Hunt  Mills,  Decatur,  111. 

ACME  Hominy  Peed 

7479 

7.0 

10.0 

7.0 

Com  product 

DRIED  BEET  PULP 

Larrowe  Milling  Co.,  The,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Dried  Beet  Pulp 

2700 

0.5 

1 

I 

j 

8.0 

20.0 

Dried  beet  pulp 

Small  & Company,  W.  H.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Dried  Beet  Pulp 

3968 

0.5 

! 

8.0 

20.0 

Dried  beet  pulp 

ALFALFA  MEALS 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Amco  Alfalfa  Meal  

5390 

2.0 

13.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

6535 

1.0 

13.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Cyphers  Incubator  Company,  Chicago,  111. 
Alfalfa  Meal  

7636 

1.0 

12.0 

32.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Denver  Alfalfa  Milling  & Products  Company, 
Hartman,  Colo. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

7676 

1.5 

12.0 

35.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

289 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

(Irndf*  Protein 

; i 

1 5 § 

! a) 

' 

; 

) iz;  P.C 

3 

i and  to  be  composed  of  the 

< following  ingredients 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Dixie  Mills  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 
Alfalfa  Meal  

5392 

1 

1.0 

13.0 

1 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Arrow  Alfalfa  Meal 

8300 

1.0 

12.0 

35.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Emison  & Co.,  J.  & S.,  (Baltic  Mills), 
Vincennes,  Ind. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

5491 

1.5 

12.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Eairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

Fairplay  Green  Feed  

65C2 

1.0 

12.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Golden  Grain  Milling  Co.,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 
Golden  Grain  Alfalfa  Meal 

6291 

1.5 

14.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Haywood  Alfalfa  Warehouse  Co.,  The, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

5676 

1.0 

12.0 

35.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Kornfalfa  Feed  Milling  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Pioneer  Alfalfa  Meal  

3727 

1.5 

12.0 

35.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

7330 

1.0 

14.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

8079 

0.5 

12.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Pure  Alfalfa  Meal 

4720 

1.2 

13.5 

33.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Omaha  Alfalfa  Milling  Co.,  Omaha,  Neb. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

5714 

1.0 

12.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Peters  Mill  Co.,  M.  C.,  Omaha,  Neb. 

“Lueern” 

3470 

0.5 

12.0 

33.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Purina  Mills,  Branch  Ealston  Purina  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Purina  Alfalfa  Meal i 

7352 

1.5 

14.0 

29.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

7689 

1.5 

14.0 

25.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Rapier  Grain  & Seed  Company,  Owensboro,  Ky. 
Alfalfa  Meal  

8297 

1.5 

12.0 

28.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Small  & Co.,  W.  H.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Alfalfa  Meal  

4177 

1.5 

13.5 

32.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Southern  Seed  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Atlas  Alfalfa  Meal 

3569 

1.7 

15.0 

28.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Union  Grain  & Feed  Company,  The, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Union  Alfalfa  Meal 

8435 

1.0 

12.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

United  States  Stock  Food  Co., 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Alfalfa  Meal 

6354 

1.2 

10.0 

30.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

Wash-Co.  Alfalfa  Mixed  Feed  & Milling  Co., 
Fort  Calhoun,  Neb. 

Wash-Co.  Alfalfa  Meal ___ 

5477 

0.5 

12.0 

35.0 

Ground  alfalfa  hay 

290 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent.  : 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Wichita  Alfalfa  Stock  Food  Co.,  The, 

Wichita,  Kansas. 

Wichita  Pure  Alfalfa  Meal 

3032 

2.0 

12.5 

30.0 

Alfalfa  product 

ANIMAL  by-products 

American  Agricultural  Chemical  Co.,  The, 

New  York,  N.  Y. 

Pure  Ground  Meat  Scraps 

8106 

10.0 

55.0 

Meat  product 

Anderson  Fertilizer  Company,  Anderson,  Ind. 
Phillip’s  Feeding  Tankage 

8387 

8.0 

36.0 

5.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 

Angola  Reduction  Co.,  Angola,  Ind. 

Tankage  

5358 

8.0 

40.0 

2.2 

offal 

Meat  product 

Armour  Fertilizer  Works,  Chicago,  111. 

Armour’s  Blood  Meal 

4792 

80.0 

2.0 

Dried  blood 

Armour’s  Granulated  Bone 

4795 

'2~0 

23.0 

2.0  i 

Bone  product 

Armour’s  Meat  Meal 

6263 

6.0 

60.0 

2.0  I 

Meat  residues 

Ballard  Packing  Co.,  Marion,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

5682 

8.0 

36.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Blue  River  Reduction  Co.,  Edinburg,  Ind. 
Feeding  Tankage  

7488 

16.0 

40.0 

6.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Becker,  Gustave,  Peru,  Ind. 

Beckers  Tankage  

8563 

5.0 

58.0 

3.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Brown  Brothers,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

“Circle  B’’  

8502 

9.0 

40.0 

.... 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Buhner  Fertilizer  Company,  Seymour,  Ind. 
Buhner’s  Feeding  Tankage 

8671 

8.0 

45.0 



Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Butler  & Company,  Edw.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Butlers  Premium  Digester  Tankage 

7990 

6.0 

60.0 

5.0 

Meat  residue  blood  and  bone 

Chicago  Feed  & Fertilizer  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 
Magic  Brand  Tankage 

6368 

5.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

Magic  Special  57%  Protein  Tankage 

7974 

5.0 

57.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

Magic  Brand  Meat  Scrap  

8621 

5.0 

50.0 

3.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Clendenin  & Company,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

Cleveland  Provision  Company,  The, 

Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Premium  Digester  Tankage 

2132 

5712 

13.0 

7.0 

45.0 

60.0 

2.5 

Meat  product 

Meat  product 

Clinton  Manufacturing  Co.,  Frankfort,  Ind. 

C.  M.  C.  Meat  and  Bone  Meal 

5547 

12.0 

45.0 

Meat  and  bone  product 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Columbus  Sanitary  Reduction  Company, 
Columbus,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage 

8182 

15.0 

45.0 

Cyphers  Incubator  Company,  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 
Beef  Scrap — 

4271 

10.0 

45.0 



Meat  product 

Darling  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Raw  Bone  Meal 

754 

2.0 

20.0 

Bone  product 

Darling’s  Meat  Scraps 

4503 

5.0 

55.0 

'3^0 

Meat  product 

Darling’s  Hog  Cents  Digester  Tankage.— 

4733 

0.5 

40.0 

5.0 

Meat  product 

Darling’s  60%  Digester  Tankage 

4734 

0.5 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

Darling’s  Standard  Meat  Scrap 

.5072 

0.5 

45.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

Darling’s  Meat  Crisps 

5436 

0.5 

75.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

Darling’s  Granulated  Bone 

5858 

0.5 

20.0 

3.0 

Bone  product 

Darling’s  Blood  Meal 

6309 

— — 

80.0 

— 

Dried  blood 

291 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Daudistel,  Henry,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

8599 

8.0 

40.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Decatur  Fertilizer  Company, 

Decatur,  R.  R.  1,  Ind. 

Tankage  

7438 

7.0 

35.0 

9.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 
offal 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

DeKalb  Tanking  Company, 

Auburn  Junction,  Ind. 

T.  & S.  Tankage 

7012  . 

8.0 

45.0 

Delphi  Fertilizer  Company,  The,  Delphi,  Ind. 
Feeding  Tankage  

8052 

12.0 

35.0 

1.8 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 
offal 

Meat  residues  containing  6%  phos- 

Dewey Bros.  Company,  The,  Blanchester,  Ohio. 
Dewey’s  Digester  Tankage 

7152 

8.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Dold  Packing  Company,  Jacob,  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 
Dold  Quality  Poultry  Bone 

4017 

5.0 

24.0 

phates 

Bones  containing  55%  phosphates 

Dold  Quality  Digester  Tankage 

4018 

10.0 

32.0 

'sTo 

Meat  product 

Dold  Quality  Meat  Meal 

4019 

10.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

Early  & Daniel  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 
Digester  Tankage  

8498 

.... 

50.0 

.... 

Meat  residues 

Eckart  Packing  Co.,  Fred,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 
Eckart’s  Feeding  Tankage 

6065 

9.0 

28.0 

5.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Evansville  Packing  Company,  The, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

''  60%  “Feeding  Tankage” 

8298 

8.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Goldreich  Fertilizer  Co.,  Marion,  Ind. 

« Feeding  Tankage 

4352 

11.0 

45.0 

.... 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Hancock  Fertilizer  Company,  The, 

Greenfield,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

7659 

6.0 

40.0 

4.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Heppe  & Sons  Co.,  Wm.,  Logansport,  Ind. 
Feeding  Tankage  

7590 

7.0 

45.0 

.... 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Home  Packing  & Ice  Company, 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Digester  Meat  & Bone  Tankage 

7450 

10.0 

32.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Hoosier  Packing  Co.,  The,  Decatur,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage 

7092 

8.0 

28.0 

5.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 

Hopkins  Fertilizer  Co.,  The,  New  Albany,  Ind. 
Poultry  Bone 

3643 

20.0 

offal 

Bone  product 

Hughes-Curry  Packing  Company, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

7374 

8.0 

40.0 

3.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Independent  Feed  & Fertilizer  Co., 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Clover  Leaf  Digester  Tankage 

7563 

6.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Digester  Tankage,  Clover  Leaf 

8503 

6.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

International  Glue  Company,  Boston,  Mass. 

Red  Star  Brand  Fish  Scrap  

7166 

2.0 

45.0 

1.0 

Ground  fish  scrap 

Joslin-Schmidt  Co.,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
“Abattoir  Brand”  Poultry  Bone 

6792 

2.0 

25.0 

3.0 

Bones  containing  55%  phosphates 

Abattoir  Brand— Digester  Tankage 

8616 

1.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

Abattoir  Brand— Meat  Scraps 

8616 

1.0 

55.0 

3.0 

Meat  product 

292 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

U 

0) 

Xi 

s 

s 

5 

c 

03 

rC 

03  tiCLj 

fl  .£ 

2 

cS 

Si 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

0 

u-S 

0 2 s 

% P.O 

1 2 S 

% ftO 

^ P.O 

Kalberer,  William,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

The  '^rippeeaTine  Hog  Grower  . _ . _ . 

8060 

10.0 

50.0 

5.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 
offal 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Kendallville  Fertilizer  Company, 

Kendallville,  Ind. 

“Feeding  Tankage” 

6488 

10.0 

44.0 

11.0 

Kenney  Brothers  Reduction  Company, 

Lowell,  Ind. 

Tankage  

7192 

11.0 

44.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone  products 

Kingan  & Company,  Ltd.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

8574 

6.0 

60.0 

6.0 

Meat  residue  and  evaporated  tank 
water 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  stomach  offal 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Kuhner  Packing  Company,  Muncie,  Ind. 

8464 

5.0 

30.0 

4.0 

Maher  Cold  Storage,  J.  F.,  Richmond,  Ind. 
Feeding  Tankage  _ . 

8552 

5.0 

28.0 

3.0 

Major  Bros.  Packing  Company, 

Mishawaka,  Ind. 

Blood  Meal 

1971 

1.0 

55.0 

5.0 

Dried  blood 

Mann’s  Fertilizer  Works, 

North  Manchester,  Ind. 

Mann’s  Feeding  Tankage  

7062 

16.0 

45.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Meier  Packing  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 
Feeding  Tankage 

8075 

5.0 

28.0 

6.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 

Morris  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Big  Brand  40%  Digester  Tankage 

4223 

8.0 

40.0 

5.0 

offal 

Meat  product 

Big  Brand  Poultry  Bone 

6816 

23.0 

Bone  product  containing  55%  phos- 

Big Brand  Meat  Scraps 

6905 

7.0 

55.0 

5.0 

phates 

Meat  residue 

Big  Brand  Meat  Meal 

6906 

7.0 

50.0 

5.0 

Meat  residue 

Big  Sixty  Meat  Meal  Digester  Tankage 

8165 

6.0 

60.0 

5.0 

Meat  product 

Muncie  Tanking  Company,  Muncie,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage 

8428 

10.0 

50.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

McCoys  Choice  Hog  Digester  Tankage 

5223 

60.0 

Meat  product 

McCovs  Fancy  Beef  Scraps  _ 

5312 

"e.o 

50.0 

Meat  product 

Fancy  Meat  & Bone 

8463 

8.0 

42.0 

Meat  and  bone  product 

McKenzie  & Company,  J.  H., 

Brazil,  R.  R.  No.  8,  Ind. 

Tankage 

8238 

8.0 

55.0 

2.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Newton  County  Reduction  Plant,  Kentland,  Ind. 

Pendergrass  Hog  d’ankaae 

8554 

8.0 

38.0 

10.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 

offal 

Odon  Reduction  Company,  Odon,  Ind. 

Tankage  _ 

8575 

12.0 

40.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 

Pearl  Packing  House,  The,  Madison,  Ind. 

The  Pearl  Brand 

5015 

5.0 

37.0 

3.0 

offal 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Portland  Fertilizer  Plant,  Portland,  Ind. 

Black’s  Tankage  

7887 

7.0 

40.0 

9.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 

Piice,  L.,  Converse,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage - 

4906 

10.0 

45.0 

5.0 

offal 

Meat,  bone  and  blood  products 

Rauh  & Sons  Animal  Feed  Company,  E., 
Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Ranh’s  Meat,  Scrap.s  for  Poultry 

7246 

50.0 

Meat  product 

Rauh’s  Digester  Tankage  for  Hogs 

7308 

— 

60.0 

:::: 

Meat  product 

293 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL  ‘ 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Rauh  & Sons  Animal  Feed  Company,  E., 
Indianapolis,  Ind, 

Meatall  

8086 



65.0 



Meat  product 

Meatone  

8087 



50.0 



Meat  product 

Meat  Flakes 

8280 



75.0 



Meat  product 

Meato  

8290 

— - 

75.0 

— 

Meat  product 

Roberts,  Frank  A.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

Tankage  

7029 

12.0 

40.0 

— 

Meat  and  bone 

Roberts,  Robert  A.,  Greensburg,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

5602 

5.0 

20.0 

3.0 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Robey  Bros.,  Winchester  R.  R.  No.  4,  Ind. 

Robey  Brothers  Feeding  Tankage 

7552 

17.0 

40.0 

2.6 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Rochester  Fertilizer  & Tankage  Company, 
Rochester,  Ind. 

Pure  Tankage  

Routh  & Company,  W.  C.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

81i96 

10.0 

50.0 

— 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Routh’s  Best  Feeding  Tankage 

Southern  Seed  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

3575 

— 

60.0 

— 

Meat  and  blood  product 

Beef  Meal  

2466 

7.0 

37.0 

Meat  and  bone 

Atlas  Granulated  Bone 

3567 

3.0 

20.0 

Bone  product 

Atlas  Beef  Scrap 

35'6S 

5.0 

55.0 

Meat  product 

Spratt’s  Patent,  Ltd.,  Newark,  N.  J. 

Crissel  

6087 

11.0 

43.0 

2.0 

Meat  product 

Stadler  Rendering  & Fertilizer  Company, 

The,  J.  L.  & H.,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Feeding  Tankage : 

8173 

10.0 

40.0 

2.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  stomach  and 
intestinal  offal 

St.  Louis  Independent  Packing  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Independent  Brand  Digester  Tankage 

7204 

8.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  residues  and  scraps 

Stolle  & Sons,  Anton,  Richmond,  Ind. 

Fresh  Ground  Bone 

6277 

12.0 

i 15.0 

3.0 

Ground  bones 

Stolle’s  Feeding  Tankage 

Sullivan  Reduction  Company, 

7588 

6.0 

34.0 

— 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

• 

Farmersburg,  Ind. 

Feeding  Tankage  

8282 

2.0 

35.0 

10.0 

Meat,  blood,  bone  and  intestinal 
offal 

Sulzberger  & Sons  Company,  Chicago,  Ill.^e 

Sulzberger’s  Pure  Sterilized  Blood  Meal 

4672 

87.0 

1.0 

Dried  blood 

“Sulzberger’s  Poultry  Bone’’  ___ 

4674 

"s'o 

25.0 

1.0 

Bone  product 

Sulzberger’s  High  Protein  Meat  Scraps 

5624  j 

10.0 

50.0 

3.0 

Meat  residue 

Sulzberger’s  “High  Protein’’  Tankage 

7435 

4.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  residue 

Swift  & Company,  Chicago,  lU. 

Swift’s  Poultry  Bone 

62 



25.0 



Bones  containing  55%  phosphates 

Special  Beef  Scrap 

3493 

8.0 

50.0 



Meat  and  bone  residue 

Swift’s  Meat  Meal 

5687 

6.0 

46.0  1 

3.0 

Meat  residue 

Swift’s  Soluble  Blood  Flour 

5761 



80.0 

3.0 

Dried  blood 

Swift’s  Blood  Meal 

5762 



80.0 

3.0 

Dried  blood 

Swift’s  Meat  Scraps 

6953 

8.0 

50.0 

3.0 

Meat  residues 

Swift’s  Digester  Tankage  __ 

7030 

6.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  residues 

Wabash  Fertilizer  Company,  Wabash,  Ind. 

Meat  & Bone  Tankage 

7606 

8.0 

40.0 

— - 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Warsaw  Fertilizer  & Tanking  Co.,  Warsaw,  Ind. 

Tankage  

8066 

.3.0 

40.0 

— 

Meat  product 

3G  Succeeded  by  Wilson  & Co.,  Inc. 


294 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

I 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

rirnrlp  Fnf-. 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

PtrifpiTi 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

) ^ 

1 and  to  be  composed  of  the 

i following  ingredients 

) 

) 

Western  Packing  & Provision  Company, 

! 

Union  Stock  Yards,  Chicago,  III. 

Western  Digester  Tankage  _ _ _ 

8549 

6.0 

60.0 

3.0 

Meat  products 

WMIson  Provision  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Wdlson’s  Digester  Tankage 

6755 

6.0 

45.0 

1.0 

Meat  product 

W'orm  «&!  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Eureka  Concentrated  Hog  Peed 

8202 

11.0 

1 36.4 

6.5 

Meat,  blood  and  bone 

Wuichet  Fertilizer  Company,  Dayton,  Ohio. 

Ground  Beef  Scrap  

8958 

10.0 

50.0 

2.0 

Meat  product 

Stock  Tankage  

4169 

10.0 

40.0 

5.0 

Meat  meal  and  bone 

60%  Tankage 

8175 

5.0 

60.0 

5.0 

Meat  product 

PROPRIETARY  AND  3IOLASSES  FEED 

Acme-Evans  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Acme  Horse  & Mule  Feed  

5636 

4.0 

10.0 

9.0 

Corn,  oats  and  V2%  salt 

E-Z  Dairy  Feed 

6683 

3.5 

16.0 

12.0 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  w’heat  middlings, 
cottonseed  meal,  hominy  feed,  brew- 
ers’ dried  grains,  linseed  oil  meal, 
oat  hulls  and  %%  salt 

Acme  Molasses  Grain  Feed 

6807 

2.0 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Acme  Dairy  Feed  

Alfocorn  Milling  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 

7318 

6.0 

20.0 

7.5 

Brewers’  dried  grains,  cottonseed 
meal,  wheat  middlings,  corn  feed 
meal,  winter  wheat  bran,  linseed 
meal,  hominy  feed  and  %%  salt 

Alfocorn  Horse  & Mule  Feed  __  ___  

5337 

2.5 

10.5 

15.0 

Corn,  oats  and  alfalfa  meal 

Molas:es  Alfocorn  Horse  & Mule  Feed ^ 

5338 

2.0 

9.0 

13.5 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Alfocorn  Corn  & Oat  Chops 

5917 

3.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Corn  and  oats 

Sweet  Meal 

6185 

1.0 

10.0 

20.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Leader  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

I 

6994 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

X-tra  Oats  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

7818 

2.0 

9.0 

13.5 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  i/^%  salt 
and  molasses 

Special  Molasses  Alfocorn  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

7819 

2.0 

9.0 

13.5 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt 

and  molasses 

Alfocorn  Dairy  Feed 

7976 

4.5 

25.0 

15.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  distillers  dried 
grains,  alfalfa  meal,  corn  gluten 
feed  and  molasses 

King  Cotton  Horse  &*  Mule  Feed 

8042 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  alfalfa  meal,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, clipped  barley  by-product 
and  molasses 

Alfa-Oats  Horse  & Mule  Peed ' 

8648 

2.0 

9.0 

13.5 

Oats,  alfalfa  meal,  %%  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

American  Hominy  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

1 

Special  Horse  Feed  

6727 

1.0 

7.0 

18.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Hexite  Horse  Feed  

8490 

1.5 

10.0 

14.0 

Corn,  rolled  oats,  alfalfa  and  mo- 
lasses 

Homco  Jr.  Horse  Feed 

8510 

2.5 

10.0' 

12.0 

Corn,  rolled  oats,  alfalfa  and  mo- 
lasses 

Homco  Horse  Feed  — 

8537 

2.5 

10.0 

10.0 

Corn,  rolled  oats,  alfalfa  and  mo- 
lasses 

Homco  Hog  Feed 

8646 

4.0 

16.0 

12.0 

Wheat  middlings,  hominy  feed,  vel- 
vet bean  feed  meal,  tankage,  alfalfa 
and  molasses 

Hexite  Dairy  Feed 

8647 

3.5 

16.0 

14.0 

Wheat  bran,  hominy  feed,  cottonseed 
meal,  velvet  bean  feed  meal,  alfalfa 
and  molasses 

Special  Hog  Feed  _ 

8691 

4.0 

14.0 

12.5 

Wheat  middlings,  hominy  feed,  vel- 
vet bean  feed  meal,  alfalfa  and  mo- 
lasses 

Homco  Dairy  Feed  

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

8725 

4.0 

20.0 

14.0 

Wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal,  velvet 
bean  feed,  linseed  meal,  alfalfa  and 
molasses 

Amco  Alfalfa  Molasses  Feed 

.5663 

0.5 

10.0 

26.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

295 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Sucrene  Horse  Peed,  with  Alfalfa  

8246 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa,  corn  dis- 

Sucrene Horse  & Mule  Peed 

8247 

2.5 

9.0 

12.0 

tillers  solubles,  salt  and  molasses 
Corn,  oats,  corn  distillers  dried 

Tip  Top  Horse  Peed,  with  Alfalfa 

8248 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

grains  and  solubles,  oat  middlings, 
oat  shorts,  oat  hulls,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  corn  dis- 

Amco Pat  Maker 

8249 

3.5 

10.0 

12.0 

tillers  dried  grains  and  solubles, 
salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  corn  distillers  dried 

Peoria  Horse  Peed  

8318 

2.5 

10.0 

14.0 

grains  and  solubles,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  corn  distillers’  dried 

Sucrene  Dairy  Peed 

8726 

3.5 

16.5 

14.0 

grains  and  solubles,  alfalfa  meal, 
oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls, 
salt  and  molasses 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  gluten  feed. 

Tip  Top  Sugared  Peed 

8727 

2.5 

12.0 

14.0 

ground  and  bolted  wheat  screenings, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  corn  dis- 
tillers’ dried  grains  and  solubles, 
palm  kernel  meal,  calcium  carbon- 
ate, salt  and  molasses 

Cottonseed  meal,  com  distillers’  dried 

Amco  Dairy  Peed 

8728 

8.0 

25.0 

16  ."o 

grains  and  solubles,  palm  kernel 
meal,  ground  and  bolted  wheat 
screenings,  clipped  oat  by-product, 
calcium  carbonate,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  distillers’ 

Sucrene  Hog  Meal 

8729 

4.0 

18.0 

14.0 

dried  grains  and  solubles,  palm  ker- 
nel meal,  clipped  oat  by-product, 
corn  gluten  feed,  calcium  carbonate 
and  salt 

Alfalfa  meal,  corn  feed  meal,  corn 

Arcady  Parms  Milling  Co.,  Rondout,  111. 

Arcady  Horse  Peed 

6204 

2.0 

9.0 

12.0 

germ  meal,  corn  distillers’  dried 
grains  and  solubles,  linseed  meal, 
blood  flour,  palm  kernel  meal,  cal- 
cium carbonate,  salt  and  molasses 
Corn,  oats,  alfalfa,  salt  and  molasses 

“R.  K.  D.”  Arcady  Dairy  Peed 

7295 

3.5 

16.0 

15.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  gluten  meal. 

(R.  K.  D.)  Arcady  Special  Horse  Peed 

7575 

1.5 

9.0 

12.0 

malt  sprouts,  brewers’  dried  grains, 
ground  and  bolted  clipped  oat  by- 
product, ground  and  bolted  screen- 
ings from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and 
flax,  salt  and  .molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa,  salt  and  mo- 

(R. K.  D.)  Arcady  Hog  Meal 

7968 

5.0 

18.0 

10.0 

lasses 

Wheat  middlings,  linseed  oil  meal. 

Ashbrook  Company,  The  J.  S.,  Mattoon,  111. 
Peerless  Horse  Ration 

5209 

2.0 

9.5 

7.5 

corn  germ  meal,  corn  feed  meal, 
digester  tankage,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax, 
charred  peat,  %%  salt  and  molasses 
Com,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 

Diamond A.  Horse  Peed 

6415 

2.0 

9.0 

16.0 

lasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 

Jumbo Mixed  Peed 

1 6947 

2.0 

8.0 

16.0 

lasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  corn  bran. 

Peerless  Cow  Peed 

8002 

3.0 

15.0 

12.0 

kafir  com  bran  and  molasses 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 

Badenoeh  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Gloskoat  Horse  Peed 

6221 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and 
molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 

Kumboss Dairy  Peed 

6222 

0.5 

10.0 

25.0 

lasses 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Kurvnek  Horse  Peed 

7060 

3.0 

10.0 

8.0 

Corn,  oats  and  barley 

TABLE  VM — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

' and  to  be  composed  of  the 

1 following  ingredients 

1 

I 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

Graingold  Dairy  Deed  

Bartlett  Company,  The  J.  E.,  Jackson,  Mich. 

8157 

6.0 

25.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  linseed  oil  meal, 
corn  gluten  meal,  com  meal,  soy 
bean  meal,  corn  distillers  grains, 
brewers’  dried  grains,  malt  sprouts, 
horhiny  feed,  rock  phosphate  and 
salt 

Bartlett’s  Malt  Dairy  Feed 

Belt  Elevator  & Feed  Company, 

8404 

5.0 

21.0 

20.0 

Corn,  malt  and  malt  sprouts 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

1 

Alfalfa  Mixed  Feed 

3818 

2.7 

9.0 

15.5 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Big  Four  Elevator  & Milling  Co.,  Mattoon,  111. 

Big  4 Horse  Feed 

6963 

2.7 

9.7 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Big  3 Horse  Feed  

8692 

2.1 

10.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Blanton  Milling  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Blanton’s  Pig  Feed  

7378 

3.0 

13.5 

8.0 

Wheat  middlings  and  low  grade  flour 

Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Factory,  Waukegan,  111.37 

Blatchford’s  Pig  Meal 

7268 

5.0 

18.0 

7.0 

Anise,  linseed  oil  meal,  bean  meal, 
locust  bean  meal,  oat  meal,  blood 
flour,  wheat  flour,  barley  meal,  cot- 
ton seed  meal,  rice  polish,  corn 
meal,  cocoa  shell  meal,  flaxseed 
meal  and  salt 

Blatchford’s  Milk  Mash 

7269 

4.0 

20.0 

7.5 

Fenugreek,  anise,  locust  beal  meal, 
flaxseed,  wheat  flour,  barley  meal, 
blood  flour,  bean  meal,  pea  meal, 
rice  polish,  old  process  linseed  oil 
meal,  cocoa  shell  meal,  cocoanut 
meal,  cottonseed  meal,  dried  milk, 
corn  meal,  oat  meal,  wheat  mid- 
dlings, meat  scraps,  fish,  bone  meal, 
salt  and  limestone  grit 

Blatchford’s  Hog  Ration 

Brizius  Company,  The  Chas.  W.,  NeAvburg,  Ind. 

7695 

7.5 

15.2 

6.7 

Barley  meal,  linseed  oil  meal,  wheat 
flour,  rice  meal,  locust  bean  meal, 
cocoa  shell  meal  and  bean  meal 

Log  Cabin  Horse  Feed  

7980 

2.0 

9.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Brook  Flour  & Feed  Mill,  Brook,  Ind. 

Rising  Sun  Pig  and  Poultry  Feed 

Brown  Molasses  Food  Company,  Anderson,  Ind. 

8388 

3.0 

12.0 

11.0 

Corn,  corn  feed  meal,  corn  bran, 
W'heat  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed  oil 
meal,  tankage  (meat,  blood,  bone 
and  intestinal  offal),  blood  meal 
and  salt 

Bro-Mo-Co  Molasses  Dairy  Feed 

Brudi  & Company,  Jos.,  New  Haven,  Ind. 

8047 

3.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  sorghum  cane  meal, 
sorghum  seed  meal,  salt  and  mo- 
lass 

Bell  Cow  Dairy  Feed  

Butler  & Co.,  Edw.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

8016 

3.5 

16.5 

11.0 

Corn,  oats,  brewers  dried  grains, 
wheat  bran,  corn  gluten  feed,  al- 
falfa meal,  cottonseed  meal,  linseed 
oil  meal,  ground  wheat  screenings, 
salt  and  molasses 

Edw.  J.  Butler  & Co.’s  Special  Horse  Feed... 

7261 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Wheat  middlings,  barley  flour,  flour 
middlings,  reddog  flour,  linseed  oil 
meal,  alfalfa  meal  and  tankage 

Butler’s  Premium  Hog  Feed 

7774 

4.0 

23.0 

12.0 

Butlers  Premium  Pig  Meal 

7991 

4.0 

20.0 

12.0 

• i 

Alfalfa  meal,  linseed  oil  meal,  digest- 
er tankage,  blood  flour,  barley 
flour  and  reJdog  flour 

3"  Succeeded  by  Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Co. 


297 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Butler  & Co.,  Edw.  J.,  Chicago,  III. 

Butler’s  Balanced  Beady  Ration  Hog  Feed 

8337 

6.0 

16.5 

22.0 

Wheat  middlings,  flour  middlings, 
corn  oil  cake  meal,  digester  tankage, 
peanut  meats,  peanut  shells_  and 
palm  oil  from  manufacture  tin  plate 

Butler  Special  Hog  Tankage  Feed 

Byrnes  & Company,  W.  J.,  Chieago,  111. 

8617 

6.0 

40.0 

10.0 

Digester  tankage,  ground  peanut 
meats,  ground  peanut  shells  and 
palm  oil 

Banner  Horse  Feed 

3115 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Corn,  rolled  oats  and  rolled  barley 

Cairo  Milling  Company,  Cairo,  111. 

Velvet  Molasses  Feed 

Champion  Feed  Milling  Co.,  Lyons,  Iowa. 

8516 

2.0 

1 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  alfalfa  meal,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  molasses 

Champion  Digester  Hog  Feed 

Champion  Feed  Milling  Company, 

Clinton  (Lyons  Station),  Iowa. 

4278 

2.9 

22.0 

9.0 

Wheat  germs,  tankage,  charred  peat, 
flax  plant  by-product  (shives,  pods, 
seeds),  and  molasses 

Champion  Molasses  Feed  Compound 

Champion  Special  Molasses  Feed  Compound 

6774 

1.5 

10.0 

8.2 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal, 
ground  screenings  from  wheat,  bar- 
ley and  flax,  flax  plant  by-product, 
charred  peat  and  cane  molasses 

(Heavy  Cottonseed  Mixture) 

Chapin  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

7470 

3.5 

16.5 

9.0 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal, 
flax  plant  by-product,  ground 
screenings  from  wheat,  barley  and 
flax,  charred  peat  and  cane  mo- 
lasses 

Unicorn  Dairy  Ration 

Chapin  & Company,  Hammond,  Ind. 

7060 

5.5 

26.0 

11.0 

Corn  distillers’  grains,  cottonseed 
meal,  linseed  meal,  hominy  meal, 
corn  gluten  feed,  barley  feed,  malt 
sprouts,  brewers  dried  grains,  wheat 
bran  and  salt 

Centaur  Stock  Feed  

6414 

6.0 

16.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  hominy  meal,  corn 
gluten  feed,  brewers’  dried  grains 
and  linseed  meal 

Lactola  Dairy  Feed 

7397 

3.0 

t 

j 

16.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  distillers’ 
grains,  corn  gluten  feed,  corn  germ 
meal,  brewers  grains.  Ivory  nut 
meal,  clipped  oat  by-product,  salt 
and  molasses 

Vigor  Horse  and  Mule  Feed  

5828 

2.0  1 

8.0 

17.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Chapman  Doake  Company,  The,  Decatur,  111. 

Diamond  “F”  Cow’  Feed 

8432 

3.0 

12.0 

16.0 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
hominy  feed  (cottonseed  meal  and 
hulls),  alfalfa  meal,  %%  salt  and 
molasses 

Diamond  “F”  Horse  Feed  _ 

8433 

3.0 

10.0 

17.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt 

and  molasses 

Yankee  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

8642 

3.0 

11.5 

20.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn  feed 
meal,  alfalfa  meal,  corn  gluten  feed, 
%%  salt  and  molasses 

Diamond  “F”  Hog  Feed 

Chicago  Heights  Oil  Mfg.  Co.,  Chieago,  111. 

8643 

4.0 

22.0 

15.0 

Corn,  wheat  shorts,  corn  feed  meal, 
corn  gluten  feed,  linseed  oil  meal, 
digester  tankage,  cottonseed  feed 
meal  (cottonseed  meal  and  hulls), 
and  %%  salt 

“Prize”  Brand  Malt  Grains 

6549 

6.5 

19.0 

10.0 

Corn,  barley  malt  and  malt  sprouts 

“Prize”  Alfalfa  Molasses  Feed  _ 

6733 

0.5 

12.0 

20.0 

Alfalfa  meal  1%  salt  and  molasses 

Cincinnati  Grain  & Hay  Co.,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

No  Better  Sweet  Dairy  Feed 

7309 

4.0 

1 

1 

19.0 

9.5 

Wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal,  dis- 
tillers’ dried  grains,  brewers’  dried 
grains,  hominy  meal,  malt  sprouts, 
y2%  salt  and  molasses 

No  Better  Horse  & Mule  Feed  

7310 

4.0 

1 

12.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  brewers’ 
dried  grains,  alfalfa  meal,  salt 

and  molasses 

Dry  Dairy  Ration 

8672 

5.6 

20.2 

12.3 

Corn  distillers  dried  grains,  brewers 
dried  grains,  malt  sprouts,  cotton- 
seed meal,  hominy  feed,  wheat  bran, 
wheat  middlings  and  salt 

2gS 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Clark  & Sons,  C.  G.,  Eushville,  Ind. 

Clark’s  Stock  Feed 

6344 

2.7 

7.8 

12.0 

Com,  com  feed  meal,  oat  middlings, 
oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and  1%  salt 

Coal  City  Milling  Company,  Coal  City,  Ind. 

Top  Round  Horse  & Cow  Feed 

3760 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Cora,  oats  and  wheat  bran 

Combs  & Sons,  L.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Combs’  Ideal  Horse  Feed 

Combs’  Oats,  Corn  Meal,  Alfalfa  Meal  and 

6651 

2.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  meal,  alfalfa  meal 
and  molasses 

Molasses  

7316 

2.0 

8.0 

14.0 

Oats,  com  meal,  alfalfa  meal  and 
molasses 

Combs  Dairy  Feed 

Corno  Mills  Company,  The,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

8524 

3.0 

16.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  meal,  alfalfa  meal, 
cottonseed  meal,  cottonseed  hulls, 
salt  and  molasses 

Alasco  Sweet  Meal 

6226 

1.0 

10.0 

20.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Corno  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Company, 

6818 

3.5 

10.0 

15.0 

Corn,  hominy  feed,  cottonseed  meal, 
alfalfa  meal,  oat  middlings,  oat 
shorts  and  oat  hulls 

Lafayette,  Ind. 

Thrift  Horse  Feed  

8313 

2.5 

10.0 

10.0 

Cora,  oats,  corn  feed  meal,  wheat 
bran  with  ground  wheat  screenings 
not  exceeding  mill  run,  alfalfa  meal, 
salt  and  molasses 

Thrift  Dairy  Feed 

Crum,  John,  Milan,  Ind. 

8437 

3.0 

14.0 

20.0 

Wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal,  linseed 
oil  meal,  brewers’  dried  grains,  al- 
falfa meal,  corn  feed  meal,  ground 
corn  screenings,  sialt  and  molasses 

Horse  and  Mule  Feed  

6652 

3.6 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye  and  wheat  bran 

Crum’s  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

Dixie  Mills  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 

7784 

3.0 

8.5 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  corn  feed  meal, 
wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings  and 
ground  wheat  screenings 

Anchor  Horse  and  Mule  Feed ' 

4550 

3.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  cotton- 
seed meal 

Dixie  Alfalfa  Molasses  Feed  

5420 

0.5 

8.0 

26.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Anchor  Molasses  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

5939 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mol- 
lasses 

Diamond  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

6935 

1.5 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  cane 
molasses 

Clipco  Molasses  Feed 

7977 

1.0 

7.0 

1 12.0 

Corn,  oats,  clipped  oat  by-product 
and  molasses 

Dixie  Horse  & Mule  Feed  

8314 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  sugar 
cane  molasses 

Polo  Horse  Feed 

8546 

1.5 

9.0 

12.0 

Cora,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  cane 
molasses 

Anchor  Dairy  Feed i 

8634 

4.0 

24.0 

12.0 

Corn  feed  meal,  cottonseed  meal, 
corn  gluten  feed,  old  process  linseed 
meal,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
alfalfa  meal,  dried  brewers’  grains 
and  1%  salt 

Dixie  Dairy  Feed 

8635 

3.5 

16.5 

12.0 

Alfalfa  meal,  cottonseed  meal,  corn 
feed  meal,  ground  flaxseed  screen- 
ings, clipped  oat  by-product  and 
molasses 

Polo  Dairy  Feed  _ 

Early  & Daniel  Co.,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

8636 

3.5 

17.5 

16.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  brewers’  dried 
grains,  alfalfa  meal,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, wheat  bran,  corn  feed  meal 
and  ground  flaxseed  screenings 

Tuxedo  Chop 

5297 

3.0 

10.5 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  brewers 
dried  grains  and  molasses 

Ce-re-a-lia  Sweets  for  Dairy _ 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

7272 

4.5 

19.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  com 
gluten  feed,  cottonseed  meal,  com 
meal,  distillers  dried  corn  grains, 
brewers’  dried  grains,  malt  sprouts 
and  molasses 

Quality  Feed — 

2919 

5.0 

16.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  hom- 
iny meal,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed  meal, 
cottonseed  meal  and  salt 

Molasses  Horse  Feed 

5169 

2.0 

8.0 

17.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Quality  Horse  Feed 

8670 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

299 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Official  Number 

Guaranteed  1 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

6877 

2.0 

10.0 

18.0 

7358 

4.5 

10.6 

7.0 

7562 

1.0 

9.0 

25.0 

8064 

4.5 

19.0 

11.0 

8417 

3.5 

11.0 

15.0 

8522 

3.0 

19.0 

12.0 

7558 

3.5 

9.0 

6.5 

666 

16.0 

6.0 

24.7 

2453 

2.0 

10.0 

15.0 

5108 

2.0 

7.0 

12.0 

8258 

3.7 

12.7 

14.0 

6451 

3.0 

12.0 

12.0 

6453 

2.0 

9.0 

15.0 

6601 

1.0 

8.0 

20.0 

7169 

2.0 

5.0 

13.0 

8353 

I 3.0 

10.0 

8.0 

8354 

0.5 

10.0 

26.0 

8355 

2.0 

I 10.0 

16.0 

8357 

4.0 

25.0 

[ 

16.0 

8330 

4.5 

17.0 

13.0 

8331 

5.5 

17.0 

13.0 

8332 

4.0 

18.0 

12.0 

8333 

4.0 

12.0 

10.0 

8334 

7.0 

24.0 

13.0 

LABEL 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Edinger  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Arrow  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

Eureka  Ground  Feed  

Arrow  Alfalfa  and  Molasses 

Arrow  Dairy  Feed  

E-Co  Falfa  Feed 

Arrow  Hog  Meal  

Egloff  Milling  Company,  Vincennes,  Ind. 
Horse  and  Mule  Chops 

Ehrmann  & Co.,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Ehrmann’s  ^Poultry  Food 

Ellis,  Edwin,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Eureka  Dairy  Feed  

Emison  & Co.,  J.  & S.,  (Baltic  Mills), 
Vincennes,  Ind. 

Amo  Syrup  Feed 

Emison’s  Dairy  Feed  

Fairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

Fairplay  Dairy  Feed 

Fairplay  Horse  Feed  

Heavy  Molasses  Feed 

Fairplay  Fattener  

Feed  Products  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  111. 
Eatall  Horse  Feed 

Kingfalfa  Meadow  Feed , 

Kingfalfa  Horse  Feed  

Eatall  Dairy  Feed 

Ferger  Grain  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
York  Dairy  Feed  

Blue  Boar  Hog  Feed 

Sunshine  Dairy  Feed 

Nutritia  Horse  Feed 

Nutritia  Dairy  Feed  


Corn,  oats,  alfalfa,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Corn,  oats,  barley  and  wheat  bran 
Alfalfa  and  molasses 
Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
meal,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa,  dis- 
tillers’ dried  grains  (corn,  barley, 
malt,  rye),  brewers’  dried  grains 
(corn  grits,  barley,  malt,  rice),  and 
molasses 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  alfalfa  and 
1/2%  salt 

Wheat  middlings,  digester  tankage, 
corn  meal,  corn  germ  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  cottonseed  meal  and  1%  salt 
Corn  and  oats 


Pork  and  beef  cracklings,  bone,  meat, 
cayenne  pepper  and  carbolic  acid 

Whole  corn  screenings,  malt  and 
chaff 


Corn,  alfalfa  meal,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats  and  barley,  1% 
salt  and  molasses 

Hominy  feed,  corn  feed  meal,  cotton- 
seed meal,  alfalfa  meal,  ground  corn 
silks,  husks  and  screenings  and  1% 
salt 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  cottonseed  meal, 
alfalfa,  clipped  oat  by-product,  salt 
and  molasses 

Com,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa,  salt  and 
molasses 

Alfalfa  meal,  clipped  oat  by-product, 
salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  clipped  oat 
by-product,  salt  and  molasses 

Sifted  cracked  corn,  rolled  oats  and 
rolled  barley 

Alfalfa  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa  and  mo- 
lasses 

Wheat  bran,  corn  feed  meal,  cotton- 
seed meal,  corn  gluten  feed,  brewers’ 
dried  grains,  malt  sprouts,  and  lin- 
seed oil  meal 

Oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
malt  sprouts,  corn  meal,  corn  dis- 
tillers grains,  cottonseed  meal  and 
salt 

Wheat  middlings,  corn  meal,  corn 
gluten  meal,  hominy  meal,  digester 
tankage  and  salt 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  hom- 
iny meal,  corn  meal,  corn  distillers 
grains,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  alfalfa 
meal,  cottonseed  meal,  brewers 
grains,  salt  and  molasses 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  hom- 
iny meal,  cottonseed  meal,  corn  dis- 
tillers grains,  malt  sprouts,  linseed 
meal  and  salt 


300 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Eerger  Grain  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Queen  City  Horse  Feed 

8391 

3.0 

Fisher  Bros.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Diamond  Cow  Feed 

8716 

3.0 

1 

Red  Crown  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

8717 

1.5 

Diamond  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

8719 

2.0 

Diamond  Hog  Feed  _ 

8720 

4.0 

1 

Fruechtenicht,  Henry,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Blue  Grass  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

8576 

2.5 

] 

Blue  Grass  Dairy  Feed 

8578 

3.5 

' 

Gandv  & Company,  0.,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Standard  Hog  Feed  

8283 

3.0 

Golden  Grain  Milling  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

Golden  Grain  Cornette  Brand 

5632 

1.5 

“Ben  Hur  Horse  & Mule  Feed” 

8203 

2.0 

“Golden  Grain  Horse  & Mule  Feed” 

8204 

2.0 

“Puritan  Horse  «&;  Mule  Feed” 

8206 

1.5 

“Golden  Grain  Alfalfa  Molasses  Feed” 

8206 

1.0 

’“Golden  Grain  Dairy  Feed” 

8207 

3.0 

“Mascot  Horse  & Mule  Feed” 

8324 

1.5 

“Val-U  Horse  & Mule  Feed”  — _ 

8371 

1.5 

Grain  Belt  Mills  Company, 

South  St.  Joseph,  Mo. 

“Hunter”  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

8147 

2.0 

“Bronco”  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

8148 

1.5 

“Pennant”  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

8149 

1.0 

“Stag”  Alfalfa  and  Molasses  Feed 

8750 

2.0 

“Greenleaf”  Alfalfa  and  Molasses  Feed 

8151 

0.7 

Oatfalfa  (Brand)  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

8760 

2.0 

ExXtra  Brand  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

8776 

2.0 

Habig  Bros.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Habig’s  Horse  Feed  

3271 

4.0 

Hamlin,  DAvight  E.,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Hamlin’s  Purekane  Molasses  Feed 

6543 

1.5 

Hamlin  & Co.,  Dwight  E.,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

H.  and  S.  Alfalfa  Feed 

5144 

3.5 

Hazleton  Flour  Mills,  Hazleton,  Ind. 

Horse  Feed  

8506 

2.0 

Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


I OJ  S 
2i  ftO 


10.0 


12.0 


9.0 

20.0 


9.0 

17.0 

I 

12.0  i 

9.0 
9.0  I 


10.0 

12.0 

9.0 

9.0 


10.0  j 
10.0 

12.0 
10.0 
12.0 


10.0 

5.0 


14.0 

8.0 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


12.0  1 Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  cottonseed 

meal,  alfalfa  meal,  brewers’  dried 
I grains,  salt  and  molasses 

15.0  j Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  alfalfa 

meal,  cottonseed  feed  (meal  and 
i hulls),  hominy  feed,  salt  and 

molasses 

16.0  Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
■ j molasses 

17.0  Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt 

and  molasses 

15.0  ! Wheat  middlings,  linseed  oil  meal, 

! cottonseed  meal,  hominy  feed,  corn 
j feed  meal,  digester  tankage  and 

I 1/2%  salt 

12.0  ; Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt 

and  molasses 

16.0  : Cottonseed  meal,  corn  meal,  alfalfa 

i meal,  corn  distillers’  dried  grains, 

j brewers’  dried  grains,  salt  and 

molasses 

8.0  1 Corn,  oats,  corn  feed  meal,  corn 
I bran  and  corn  germ  meal 


12.0 

12.0 

14.0 

16.0 

25.0 

18.0 

18.0 

18.0 

14.0 

15.0 

18.0 

17.0 

26.0 

17.0 

14.0 


Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  V2  to  1% 
salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  Ms  to  1% 
1 salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  y2  to  1% 
salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  V2  to  1% 
salt  and  molasses 

Alfalfa  meal,  to  1%  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Alfalfa  meal,  brewers’  dried  grains, 
cottonseed  meal,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, y2  to  1%  salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  to  1% 
salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  peanut 
meats,  peanut  hulls  and  palm  oil 
(palmo  meal),  y2  to  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  to  1% 
j salt  and  molasses 
I Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  to  1% 
salt  and  molasses 

j Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  to  1% 

I salt  and  molasses 
[ Oats,  alfalfa  meal,  y2%  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

I Alfalfa  meal,  to  1%  salt  and  mo- 

Oats,  alfalfa  meal,  to  1<%  salt 
I and  molasses 

j Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  y2  to  1% 
salt  and  molasses 


8.0  Oats,  wheat  bran,  linseed  meal,  hom- 
iny feed,  corn  feed  meal  and  corn 
bran 

8.0  j Brewers’  dried  grains,  distillers’ 
dried  grains  and  cane  molasses 


16.0 


Alfalfa,  brewers’  and  distillers’  dried 
grains  and  molasses 


20.0 


Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  molasses 
and  salt 


301 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than  ' 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat  1 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Henderson  Grain  Company,  Henderson,  Ky. 

Kentucky  Star  Horse  & Mule  Eeed 

0239 

2.0 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  clipped  oat 
by-product,  salt  and  molasses 

0.  K.  Uncle  Sam  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

6240 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Com,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  clipped  oat 
by-product,  1%  salt  and  molasses 

Hillscher,  J.  W.,  Kniman,  Ind. 

Hog  Feed 

4766 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Corn  and  rye 

H.  0.  Company,  The,  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

The  H.-O.  Co’s  Algrane  Horse  Feed 

Hord  Alfalfa  Meal  Co.,  T.  B., 

Central  City,  Neb. 

7000 

4.0 

11.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  middlings,  hominy 
feed,  corn  gluten  feed,  ground  wheat 
screenings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls, 
y2%  salt  and  molasses 

“A.  M.”  

2956 

0.8 

10.0 

20.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Illinois  Feed  Mills,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

0.  K.  Feed  with  Molasses 

7881 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Pecks  Mule  Feed  with  Molasses 

7882 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Star  Feed  with  Molasses 

7883 

1.7 

9.3 

13.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt  and 
molasses 

Indiana  Elevator  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind.^s 

King  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

6890 

1.5 

8.0 

18.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Indiana  Milling  Co.,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

W-hiskerene  

2127 

2.0 

11.4 

14.0 

Corn  silks,  husks  and  whole  and 
ground  corn  screenings 

Blue  Ribbon  Feed 

3330 

3.5 

8.0 

8.5 

Shelled  corn  and  cob  meal 

Universal  Feed 

5212 

3.2 

10.2 

7.2 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran  and  mo- 
lasses 

Cracker- Jack  

5366 

1.5 

8.0 

14.0 

Wheat  bran,  cob  meal  and  molasses 

Imco  Combination  Feed 

5686 

2.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Ground  corn  screenings,  ground 
wheat  screenings,  ground  clipped 
oat  by-product  and  molasses 

“Holstein  Feed”  : 

International  Sugar  Feed  Co., 

6825 

3.0 

11.0 

16.0 

Wheat  bran  with  ground  wheat 
screenings  not  exceeding  mill  run 
and  cob  meal 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Dairy  Feed 

5326 

4.5 

18.0 

12.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  salt  and 
molasses 

Dan  Patch  Special  Horse  Feed 

5548 

3.0 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa  meal,  salt 
and  molasses 

International  Hog  Feed  and  Charcoal 

6097 

4.5 

22.5 

12.0 

Old  process  linseed  oil  meal,  tankage, 
ground  and  bolted  screenings  from 
wheat,  oats,  barlev  and  flax,  char- 
coal, salt  and  molasses 

I.  S.  F.  Horse  Feed 

6721 

2.0 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa  meal,  salt 
and  molasses 

International  Climax  Horse  Feed  

7781 

2.0 

9.0 

17.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt  and 
molasses 

International  Alfalfa  Meal  and  Molasses 

7848 

1.0 

10.0 

25.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

International  Cattle  Feed 

8085 

5.0 

25.0 

10.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

International  Special  Dairy  Feed 

8412 

4.5 

15.0 

14.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

International  Climax  Dairy  Feed _ 

8413 

4.0 

12.5 

14.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

38  Succeeded  by  Indiana  Elevator 


302 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

International  Sugar  Feed  Co., 

Minneapolis,  Minn, 

International  Climax  Hog  Feed 

8696 

3.5 

15.0 

18.5 

Ground  and  bolted  screenings  from 
wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax,  tank- 
age, old  process  linseed  oil  meal, 
ground  delinted  cottonseed  hulls 
and  molasses 

International  Planters  Dairy  Feed 

8697 

3.5 

22.0 

18.5 

Cottonseed  meal,  ground  delinted 
cottonseed  hulls,  salt  and  molasses 

I.  S.  F.  Dairy  Feed 

Interstate  Feed  Association,  Detroit,  Mich. 

8702 

3.5 

12.7 

13.8 

i 

Cottonseed  meal,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Interstate  Dairy  & Hog  Feed 

7719 

7.0 

15.0 

15.0 

Distillers  dried  rye  grains 

Mormilk  Ready  Ration  Dairy  Feed 

Jordan,  Geo.  M.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

G.  M.  J.  Horse  & Mule  Chop 

8131 

5.0 

23.0 

15.0 

Brewers  dried  grains,  com  distillers 
dried  grains,  cottonseed  meal,  malt 
sprouts,  hominy  feed,  wheat  bran 
with  mill  run  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings, rock  phosphate  and  salt 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

7619 

3.5 

9.0 

6.0 

G.  M.  J.  Pig  Meal 

7969 

5.5 

16.5 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts,  corn  feed  meal,  dis- 
tillers dried  grains  and  digester 
tankage 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

“Producer”  

8108 

3.0 

9.0 

10.0 

G.  M.  J.  Dairy  Feed 

Judson  Creamery  & Produce  Company, 

North  Judson,  Ind. 

8309 

4.0 

18.0 

10.0 

Com,  oats,  cottonseed  meal,  linseed 
meal,  wheat  bran  with  not  exceeding 
mill  run  ground  wheat  screenings, 
corn  distillers’  dried  grains,  alfalfa 
meal  and  molasses 

Palmo  Hog  Feed  

8497 

6.0 

16.0 

8.0 

Cleaning  wheat  middlings  and  palm 
oil  from  manufacture  tin  plate 

King  Manufacturing  Company, 

North  Vernon,  Ind. 

King  High  Protein  Dairy  Feed 

8026 

4.5 

20.0 

20.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa  meal, 
ground  and  bolted  screenings  from 
clover  and  alfalfa  seed  and  1%  salt 

King’s  High  Protein  Seed  Meal 

8185 

6.0 

23.0 

18.0 

Ground  and  bolted  screenings  from 
clover  seed  and  alfalfa  seed  and  lin- 
seed oil  meal 

King’s  High  Protein  Hog  Feed  Meal 

Kornfalfa  Feed  Milling  Co.,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

8489 

6.5 

17.0 

12.0 

Hominy  meal,  ground  and  bolted 
screenings  from  clover  and  alfalfa 
seed,  linseed  oil  meal,  tankage  and 
ViP/o  salt 

Kornfalfa  Feed  ... 

3728 

3.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Alfalfa  meal,  corn  meal,  corn  chop, 
rolled  oats  and  %%  salt 

Straight  Alfalfa  Molasses  Feed 

4679 

1.0 

9.0 

25.0 

Alfalfa  and  molasses 

Kornfalfa  Kandy  Feed  

50'94 

2.5 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Klimax  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

5244 

1.5 

8.0 

17,0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Keno  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

5245 

2.5 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Kay  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

5904 

2.0 

10.0 

17.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Krause  Milling  Co.,  Chas.  A.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Cream  City  Horse  Feed — 

6679 

1.5 

10.0 

14.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt  and 
molasses 

Badger  Evergreen  Feed 

6724 

0.5 

11.5 

30.0 

Alfalfa  meal,  salt  and  molasses 

Blue  Top  Horse  Feed 

7617 

1.0 

10.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt  and 
molasses 

Krause  Horse  Feed  

7967 

2.5 

10.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt  and 
molasses 

Badger  Horse  Feed 

8080 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Com,  oats,  alfalfa,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Pul-Mor  Horse  Feed  _ 

8081 

1.0 

9.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, salt  and  molasses 

Crescent  Horse  Feed  

8649 

1.5 

10.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, salt  and  molasses 

303 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Krause  Milling  Co.,  Ohas.  A.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Krause  Dairy  Feed 

870Y 

5.0 

24.0 

13.0 

Corn  distillers’  dried  grains,  brewers’ 
dried  grains,  cottonseed  meal,  corn 
gluten  feed,  linseed  oil  meal,  wheat 
middlings,  wheat  bran,  ground 
wheat  screenings  not  exceeding  mill 
run,  hominy  feed,  corn  germ  meal, 
malt  sprouts  and  salt 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 

Larrowe  Milling  Company,  The,  Detroit,  Mich. 
Larro-Fecd  

4981 

3.0 

10.0 

14.0 

Mingo  

6290 

4.0 

25.0 

12.0 

gluten  feed,  cottonseed  meal,  dis- 
tillers’ dried  corn  grains,  dried  beet 
pulp  and  %%  salt 

Dried  beet  pulp,  cottonseed  meal. 

Larrowe’s  Big  Six  Complete  Dairy  Feed 

8886 

4.0 

21.0 

12.0 

malt  sprouts,  corn  gluten  feed,  lin- 
seed oil  meal,  wheat  bran  containing 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run,  dried  distillers  grains 
(mainly  from  corn),  and  %%  salt 
Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings  (with 

Lash  Flour  Mills,  The  Fred  B., 

Farmersburg,  Ind. 

Lashs  Sweet  Feed 

8545 

2.0 

9.0 

20.0 

ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run),  hominy  feed,  corn 
gluten  feed,  cottonseed  meal,  corn 
distillers’  dried  grains,  linseed  oil 
meal  and  %%  salt 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 

Linton Mill  Company,  Linton,  Ind. 

B.  Mixed  Feed • 

5806 

3.0 

13.0 

12.0 

lasses 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  bran,  lin- 
seed meal,  corn  gluten  feed,  ground 
wheat  screenings,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn  bran. 

Loogootee  Milling  Company,  The, 

Loogootee,  Ind. 

Falfa  Syrup  Feed 

7283 

2.0 

10.5 

12.0 

L.  M.  C.  Pig  Meal 

8565 

7.0 

28.8 

12.0 

alfalfa  meal,  ground  w'heat  screen- 
ings, salt  and  molasses 

Corn  distillers  dried  grains,  wheat 

L.  M.  C.  Horse  Feed 

8566 

9.0 

30.0 

13.0 

middlings,  corn  feed  meal  and 
tankage 

Corn  distillers  dried  grains  and  cot- 

Loy, W.  J.,  Columbus,  Ind. 

Dairy  Feed 

5238 

3.2 

9.0 

10.0 

tonseed  meal 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

Maumee Valley  Mills,  New  Haven,  Ind. 

Quality  Dairy  Feed 

6803 

4.0 

22.0 

11.0 

dlings,  com  bran,  corn  feed  meal 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal,  corn 

Mexico  Roller  Mills,  Mexico,  Ind. 

Blacks  Balanced  Hog  Feed 

5053 

3.5 

1(0.0 

7.0 

gluten  feed,  brewers’  dried  grains 
and  linseed  oil  meal 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings 

Milan  Mill  & Elevator,  Milan,  Ind. 

Horse  Feed  and  Fattener 

6367 

3.2 

10.5 

10.0 

and  wheat  shorts 

Corn,  oats,  rye,  wheat  bran,  wheat 

Milan  Milling  Company,  Milan,  Ind. 

Horse  Feed  

7739 

3.0 

8.5 

11.0 

middlings,  corn  bran  and  corn  feed 
meal 

Corn,  oats,  rye  and  corn  feed  meal 

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Cracker  Jack  Horse  Feed 

5612 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

. Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt  and 

Green  Pasture 

5513 

0.5 

12.0 

20.0 

molasses 

Alfalfa  meal,  salt  and  molasses 

Naber  & Co.,  Chas.  F.,  Alexandria,  Ind. 

Mixed  Feed 

7452 

4.0 

13.5 

13.0 

Wheat  shorts  and  cleaning  wheat 

National  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Alfalfa  Molasses  Peed 

4260 

1.0 

10.0 

20.0 

middlings,  peanut  meats,  peanut 
shells  and  palm  oil  from  manufac- 
ture tin  plate 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

“Oat  Hull  Feed” 

5832 

2.7 

6.7 

32.6 

Ground  oat  hulls 

304 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

National  Oats  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

i 

Nutro  Sweet  Peed 

National  Produce  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 

7943 

2.5 

9.0 

16.0 

1 

Corn,  alfalfa  meal,  ground  wheat 
screenings,  oat  middlings,  oat 
shorts,  oat  hulls  and  molasses 

National  Horse  Peed 

Neals  Feed  Store,  Jasonville,  Ind. 

8059 

2.0 

9.0 

16.0  1 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Neal’s  Mixed  Peed  _ 

Neumann  Co.,  John  G.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

7772 

2.5 

10  0 

14.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  feed  meal,  wheat 
bran,  wheat  middlings,  alfalfa  meal, 
ground  wheat  screenings,  salt  and 
molasses 

Black  Beauty  Horse  Peed 

Newsome  Peed  & Grain  Company, 

7088 

2.0 

9.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Palmo  Mixed  Peed 

6910 

6.0 

14.0 

16.0 

Cleaning  wffieat  middlings,  peanut 
meats,  peanut  shells  and  palm  oil 
from  manufacture  tin  plate 

Palmo  Midds  

6911 

6.0 

16.0 

7.0 

Cleaning  wheat  middlings  and  palm 
oil  from  manufacture  tin  plate 

Special  Palmo  Midds 

7624 

6.0 

15.0 

7.0 

Cleaning  wheat  middlings,  cotton- 
seed oil  and  palm  oil 

Odon  Milling  Company,  Odon,  Ind. 

Omco  Dairy  Peed 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 

8384 

3.2 

13.7 

11.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  wheat  bran,  wheat 
middlings,  ground  wheat  screenings, 
corn  bran,  corn  meal  and  1%  salt 

Excello  Horse  Feed 

5111 

4.0 

14.0 

11.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  wheat  bran,  cot- 
tonseed meal,  brewers’  tdried  grains, 
alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Sunny  South  Horse  & Mule  Peed 

7648 

2.5 

10.0 

14.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Big  Deal  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

8341 

2.0 

8.0 

16.0 

Com,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  corn  bran, 
kafir  corn  bran  and  molasses 

Olney  Milling  Co.,  The,  Olney,  111. 

General  Purpose  Perfection  Feed 

5901 

2.8 

10.3 

10.5 

Corn  meal,  wheat  bran,  alfalfa  meal 
and  molasses 

Omaha  Alfalfa  Milling  Company,  Omaha,  Neb. 

Alfalfa  Syr | 

3186 

1.5 

11.0 

26.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Peerless  Alfalmo  Horse  Peed  

5715 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Al-Corn-0  Horse  Feed  

5922 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Perfection  Horse  Feed  

6445 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Cream  Alfalfa  Dairy  Peed  No.  1 

6691 

3.0 

20.0 

18.0 

Corn,  wffieat  bran,  cottonseed  meal, 
alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Cream  Alfalfa  Dairy  Feed  No.  2 

6692 

2.5 

16.0 

18.0 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal, 
alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Evergreen  Horse  Feed 

6868 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Grain-Palmo  Horse  Peed 

7011 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Alfalmo  

7156 

1.0 

11.0 

25.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Green  Meadow  Dairy  Peed 

7180 

1.0 

10.0 

26.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Omaha  Special  Horse  Feed  

7203 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Cream  Alfalfa  Dairy  Feed  Number  Three 

8335 

2.2 

11.0 

16.0 

Corn,  alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Peters  Mill  Co.,  M.  C.,  Omaha,  Neb. 

Alfalfa  meal  and  syrup 

June  Pasture  Dairy  Feed 

2760 

0.5 

10.0 

26.0 

Peters  Arab  Horse  Feed 

2761 

2.0 

9.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  syrup 

Alfal-fat  Sugar  Meal 

2762 

0.5 

10.0 

26.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  syrup 

Peters’  King  Corn  Sugar  Feed 

4560 

1.5 

9.0 

18.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Peters’  Alfalfa  Queen  Dairy  Feed 

4760 

3.0 

17.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  gluten  meal, 
corn  meal,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Peters’  Babbit  Mule  Feed 

6555 

1.5 

9.0 

18.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Peters’  High-Score  Alfalfa  Molasses  Feed 

6815 

0.5 

10.0 

26.0 

Alfalfa  and  molasses 

Peters’  Re-Peter  Horse  Feed 

7816 

1.5 

9.0 

18.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Peters’  Economy  Horse  Feed 

8663 

2.0 

10.0 

20.0 

305 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain  ' 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Greenfield  Brand  Alfalfa  & Molasses 

6S46 

0.5 

10.0 

26.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Emerald  Horse  Feed 

7094 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa  meal  and 
molasses 

American  Horse  Feed 

7922 

3.0 

9.0 

12  ;o 

Corn,  rolled  oats  and  rolled  barley 

Purina  Mills,  Branch,  Ralston  Purina  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Purina  Feed  with  Molasses 

7867 

1.7 

9.3 

13.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Purina  Dairy  Feed 1 

7869 

3.5 

20.0 

16.5 

Cottonseed  meal,  brewers  dried 
grains,  corn  gluten  feed,  alfalfa 
meal,  1%  salt  and  molasses 

Purina  Sweet  Feed  

7870 

1.0 

9.0 

20.0 

Alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and  molasses 

Purina  Fatena  Feed  

7871 

2.5 

12.0 

10.0 

Corn,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa  meal, 
dried  peat,  ground  wheat  screenings, 
1%  salt  and  molasses 

Purina  O’Molene  Feed  

7874 

3.2 

9.7 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Purina  Feed 

8477 

3.2 

11.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  brewers  dried  grains,  corn 
feed  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Purina  Pig  Chow 

8743 

3.2 

14.0 

9.0 

Corn  feed  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  digester 
tankage,  dried  peat,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Purina  Cow  Chow  Feed 

Purity  Oats  Company,  Davenport,  Iowa. 

8744 

3.7 

24.0 

16.0 

Cotton  seed  meal,  corn  gluten  feed, 
brewers  dried  grains,  alfalfa  meal, 
1%  salt  and  molasses 

Tom  Boy  Horse  Feed 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

70'83 

2.0 

9.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  molasses 

Green  Cross  Horse  Feed  (Molasses  Mixed 

Feed)  

5610 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  cottonseed 
meal,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  molasses 

Schumacher  Special  Horse  Feed  

57-35 

3.7 

9.7 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  oat  middlings,  oat 
shorts,  oat  hulls  and  %%  salt 

Vim  Horse  Feed  

5738 

3.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa  meal,  cot- 
tonseed meal,  ground  flax  screen- 
ings, oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  salt 

Molac  Molasses  Mixed  Feed  for  Horses 

5787 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  cottonseed 
meal,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  molasses 

Green  Harvest  Horse  Feed 

6019 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  molasses 

Blue  Bell  Dairy  Feed  

6307 

4.0 

16.0 

14.5 

Cottonseed  meal,  malt  sprouts,  lin- 
seed meal,  clipped  oat  by-product, 
ground  screenings  from  wheat,  rye, 
barley  and  oats  and  molasses 

Vim  Feed 

6547 

2.0 

5.0 

28.0 

Oat  middlings,  oat  shorts  and  oat 
hulls 

Horse  Power  Feed 

6676 

2.8 

10.0 

11.0 

Corn,  oats,  new  process  linseed  oil 
meal,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  molasses 

Mogul  Mixed  Molasses  Feed 

6714 

3.0 

10.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  ground  screenings  from  wheat, 
rye  and  barley,  oat  middlings,  oat 
shorts,  oat  hulls  and  molasses 

Molac  Molasses  Dairy  Feed  ! 

6864 

3.0 

12.0 

19.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  rye  and  barley,  clipped 
oat  by-product  and  molasses 

Maz-All  Feed 

6889 

1.4 

8.0 

2.0 

Toasted  corn  flakes  by-product 

Shamrock  Alfalfa  Molasses  Feed  , 

6907 

0.5 

10.0 

18.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Sweet  Green  Horse  Feed _ 

6978 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  cottonseed 
meal,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  molasses 

3o6 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Big  Mule  Molasses  Feed  Mixture 

1683 

2.5 

10.0 

15.0 

Corn,  oats,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa 

Golden  Sweet  Mule  Feed  

7754 

2.0 

9.0 

16.0 

meal,  ground  screenings  from  wheat, 
corn,  oats,  flax,  barley  and  rye,  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls, 
V2%  salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa  meal. 

Quaker  Dairy  Feed  with  Molasses 

7086 

5.5 

16.0 

16.0 

oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls, 
V2%  salt  and  molasses 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  distillers  dried 

Boss  Feed  

8228 

3.0 

8.0 

12.0 

grains,  ground  screenings  from 
wheat,  corn,  oats  and  barley,  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls, 
V2%  salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  hominy  feed,  corn  feed  meal 

Sterling  Feed  

8229 

3.2 

10.0 

10.0 

(by-product  from  manufacture  of 
corn  meal  by  degerminator  process 
with  partial  extraction  of  oil),  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and 
1/2%  salt 

Corn,  barley,  hominy  feed,  corn  feed 

Victor  Feed  

8230 

3.0 

8.0 

12.0 

meal  (by-product  from  manufacture 
of  corn  meal  by  degerminator  pro- 
cess with  partial  extraction  of  oil), 
wheat  flour,  wheat  middlings  (with 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run),  cottonseed  meal, 
ground  puffed  rice,  ground  puffed 
wheat,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts, 
oat  hulls  and  salt 

Corn,  hominy  feed,  corn  feed  meal 

White  Diamond  Feed 

8231 

3.2 

8.0 

9.0 

(by-product  from  manufacture  of 
com  meal  by  degerminator  process 
with  partial  extraction  of  oil),  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and 
y2%  salt 

Corn,  hominy  feed,  corn  feed  meal 

Red  Star  Feed 

8232 

3.2 

8.0 

9.0 

(by-product  from  manufacture  of 
corn  meal  by  degerminator  process 
with  partial  extraction  of  oil),  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and 
1/2%  salt 

Corn,  hominy  feed,  com  feed  meal 

Excelsior  Feed  - 

8233 

3.2 

8.0 

9.0 

(by-product  from  manufacture  of 
com  meal  by  degerminator  process 
with  partial  extraction  of  oil),  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and 
1/2%  salt 

Corn,  hominy  feed,  corn  feed  meal 

Schumacher  Feed  

8284 

3.2 

10.0 

10.0 

(by-product  from  manufacture  of 
corn  meal  by  degerminator  process 
with  partial  extraction  of  oil),  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and 
1/2%  salt 

Corn,  barley,  hominy  feed,  corn  feed 

meal  (by-product  from  manufacture 
of  corn  meal  by  degerminator  pro- 
cess with  partial  extraction  of  oil), 
wheat  flour,  wheat  middlings  (with 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run),  cottonseed  meal, 
ground  puffed  rice,  ground  puffed 
wheat,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts, 
oat  hulls  and  salt 

307 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

Blue  Ribbon  Dairy  Feed 

8281 

5.0 

25.0 

14.0 

Hominy  feed,  corn  feed  meal  (by- 

Market Top  Feed 

8380 

3.0 

9.0 

,9.0 

product  from  manufacture  corn 
meal  by  degerminator  process  with 
partial  extraction  of  oil),  wheat 
bran  (with  ground  wheat  screenings 
not  to  exceed  mill  run),  corn  dis- 
tillers dried  grains,  cottonseed  meal, 
new  process  linseed  oil  meal,  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls, 
y2%  salt  and  molasses 

Corn,  barley,  hominy  feed,  corn  feed 

Big  Q.  Dairy  Ration  

8458 

6.0 

21.0 

10.5 

meal  (by-product  from  manufacture 
of  corn  meal  by  degerminator  pro- 
cess with  partial  extraction  of  oil), 
wheat  flour,  wheat  middlings  (with 
ground  wheat  screenings  not  exceed- 
ing mill  run),  cottonseed  meal, 
ground  puffed  wheat,  ground  puffed 
rice,  oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat 
hulls  and  molasses 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  distillers’ 

Ralston  Purina  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
Protena  Special  Dairy  Feed  

5767 

3.5 

.16.5 

12.0 

grains  and  solubles,  corn  gluten 
feed,  linseed  oil  meal,  corn  feed  meal 
(by-product  from  the  manufacture 
of -corn  meal  by  degerminator  pro- 
cess with  partial  extraction  of  oil), 
white  wheat  middlings,  w^heat  bran 
(with  ground  wheat  screenings  not 
exceeding  mill  run),  oat  middlings, 
oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and  1%  salt 
Cottonseed  meal,  brewers’  dried 

Winner  Feed  with  Molasses  

7875 

1.7 

9.3 

13.0 

grains,  clipped  oat  by-product, 
ground  wheat  screenings,  1%  salt 
and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 

Protena  Horse  Feed 

7876 

1.5 

9.0 

16.0 

Brown  Mule  Feed  with  Molasses 

7877 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 

Big  Ben  Feed  with  Molasses 

7878 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 

XX  Good  Feed  with  Molasses 

7879 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 

Good  Luck  Feed  with  Molasses  _ 

788C 

1.5 

9.0 

15.0 

molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 

Purina  Cow  Chow  Feed 

8344 

4.5 

24.0 

13.5 

molasses 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  gluten  feed. 

Rapier  Sugar  Feed  Co.,  Owensboro,  Ky. 

Rapier’s  Mixing  Feed  

5259 

2.5 

12.0 

12.0 

brewers  dried  grains,  alfalfa  meal, 
1%  salt  and  molasses 

Linseed  meal,  corn  gluten  feed. 

Rapier’s  Mixed  Feed 

5623 

4.9 

16.6 

8.5 

ground  and  bolted  wheat  screenings, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  salt  and 
molasses 

Wheat  bran,  shorts  and  ground 

Rapier’s  Molasses-Alfalfa  Hog  Feed 

6094 

2.5 

10.0 

12.8 

screenings  from  wheat,  oats,  barley 
and  flax 

Alfalfa  meal,  ground  and  bolted 

Rapier’s  Big  Four  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

6528 

2.0 

9.0 

12.0 

screenings  from  wheat,  oats,  barley 
and  flaxseed  and  molasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa,  1%  salt  and  mo- 

Rapier’s Red  Wing  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

6738 

2.0 

9.0 

12.0 

lasses 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 

Rapier’s  Honey  Meal 

6878 

1.0 

9.0 

18.0 

cane  molasses 

Alfalfa  meal  and  cane  molasses 

Rapier’s  Pig  Meal 

7072 

2.5 

12.0 

12.0 

Alfalfa  meal,  eorn  feed  meal,  linseed 

meal,  ground  and  bolted  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax- 
seed, salt  and  cane  molasses 

3o8 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Rapier  Sugar  Feed  Co.,  Owensboro,  Ky. 

Rapier’s  Creamo  Dairy  Feed 

1 

7589 

3.5 

16.5 

1 

16.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  distillers  dried 
grains,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed  meal, 
ground  and  bolted  wheat  screenings, 
salt  and  molasses 

Rapier’s  Otene  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

7696 

2.0 

9.0 : 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and 
molasses 

Rapier’s  Molasses  Fat  Maker 

Rouse  & Son,  Wm.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

8117 

2.0 

9.0 

18.0 

Alfalfa  meal,  ground  and  bolted 
screenings  from  wheat,  oats,  barley 
and  flaxseed,  clipped  oat  by-prod- 
uct, 1%  salt  and  molasses 

Wm.  Rouse  & Son’s  Special  Horse  Feed., 

3317 

3.2 

9.2 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  oat  middlings, 
oat  shorts,  oat  hulls  and  salt 

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Schaefer’s  Special  Filler  for  Malt 

7376 

1.0 

3.0 

25.0 

Corn,  corn  bran,  wheat  bran,  ground 
wheat  screenings  and  cob  meal 

Schaefer’s  Special  Horse  Feed 

7700 

2.0 

8.0 

14.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  bran,  alfalfa  meal, 
salt  and  molasses 

Shellabarger  Elevator  Co.,  Decatur,  111. 

Big  S.  Horse  Feed 

7173 

2.5 

9.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Big  “S.”  Dairy  Feed 

Simmons  & Norris,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Simmons’  More-Milk  Dairy  Feed 

8592 

4.0 

18.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran,  alfalfa  meal,  corn 
gluten  feed,  corn  feed  meal  and  lin- 
seed meal 

6812 

3.5 

16.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  linseed  meal,  corn 
gluten  feed,  ground  and  bolted 
wheat  screenings,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, salt  and  molasses 

Simmons  Molasses  Chop 

8461 

3.0 

10.5 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  brewers’  dried  grains,  al- 
falfa meal  and  molasses 

Southern  Seed  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Atlas  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

4510 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa,  hominy  meal, 
cottonseed  meal,  wheat  bran,  wheat 
middlings,  %%  salt  and  molasses 

Atlas  Alfalfa  and  Molasses  

4722 

1.0 

10.0 

25.0 

Alfalfa  and  molasses 

Economy  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

4745 

2.5 

9.0 

1 

1 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  alfalfa, 
clover  hay,  clipped  oat  by-product, 
V2%  salt  and  molasses 

Economy  Stock  Feed 

5408 

3.5 

20.0 

15.0 

Cottonseed  meal  and  clipped  oat  by- 
product 

Wheat  bran,  corn  meal,  cottonseed 
meal,  alfalfa,  brewers’  dried  grains, 
distillers’  dried  grains,  V2%  salt  and 
molasses 

Indiana  Atlas  Dairy  Feed  

5422 

4.0 

18.0 

12.0 

Econo  Horse  and  Mule  Feed 

8375 

2.5 

9.0 

20.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  clover 
meal,  cottonseed  meal,  ground  cot- 
tonseed hulls,  flax  plant  by-product, 
y2%  salt  and  molasses 

Econo  Dairy  Feed  

8376 

3.0 

16.0 

20.0 

Brewers’  dried  grains,  corn  distillers’ 
dried  grains,  alfalfa  meal,  clover 
meal,  cottonseed  meal,  ground  cot- 
' tonseed  hulls,  flax  plant  by-product, 
V2%  salt  and  molasses 

Eagle  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

Spink  Milling  Company,  The,  Washington,  Ind. 

8548 

2.0 

9.0 

20.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  clover  meal, 
brewers  dried  grains,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, ground  cottonseed  hulls, 
flax  plant  by-product,  %%  salt  and 
molasses 

Spink’s  Standard  Horse  Feed  

7454 

3.5 

9.5 

8.0 

Corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn  bran 
and  ground  wheat  screenings 

Sugarine  Company,  The,  Peoria,  111. 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  gluten  feed, 
ground  and  bolted  wheat  screenings, 
clipped  oat  by-product,  corn  dis- 
tillers’ dried  grains  and  solubles, 
salt  and  molasses 

Sugarine  Dairy  Feed 

8284 

3.5 

16.5 

14.0 

Sugarine  Horse  Feed,  With  Alfalfa 

8285 

2.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  alfalfa,  distillers’ 
corn  solubles,  salt  and  molasses 

309 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Sugarine  Company,  The,  Peoria,  111. 

Sugarine  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

8286 

2.5 

9.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  distillers’  dried 
grains  and  solubles,  oat  middlings, 
oat  shorts,  oat  hulls,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Suco  Fat  Maker  

Teel  Milling  Company,  Owensville,  Ind. 

8287 

3.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  corn  distillers’  dried 
grains  and  solubles,  clipped  oat  by- 
product, salt  and  molasses 

Daisy  Feed  

6137 

3.0 

14.0 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  crushed 
wheat  screenings  and  corn  bran 

Ubiko  Milling  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Ubiko  Horse  and  Stock  Feed 

Union  Grains,  Ubiko,  Biles  Ready  Dairy 

6861 

6.0 

16.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  hom- 
iny meal,  brewers’  dried  grains  and 
old  process  linseed  meal 

Ration  

Union  Grain  & Feed  Company,  The, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

8197 

6.0 

24.0 

10.0 

Fourex  corn  distillers  dried  grains, 
choice  cottonseed  meal,  old  process 
linseed  meal,  white  wheat  middlings, 
winter  wheat  bran,  hominy  meal, 
brewers’  dried  grains,  barley  malt 
sprouts  and  V2%  salt 

Union  Horse  Feed 

7151 

2.5 

8.5 

11.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Union  Dairy  Feed 

United  States  Stock  Food  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

7227 

2.7 

16.5 

15.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  old 
process  linseed  oil  meal,  corn  feed 
meal,  ground  screenings  from  wheat, 
corn  and  oats,  salt  and  mo- 

lasses 

Eagle  Brand  Horse  & Mule  Feed 

4954 

3.5 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Eagle  Brand  Alfalfa-Molasses  Feed 

6063 

1.0 

9.0 

16.0 

Alfalfa  meal  and  molasses 

Van  Meter,  Flem,  Jasonville,  Ind. 

Van  Meter’s  Special  Horse  Feed 

8650 

2.0 

9.0 

16.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Walsh  & Co.,  James,  Lawrenceburg,  Ind. 

Kuhmelo  _ 

8024 

6.0 

21.8 

16.1 

Corn,  wheat  middlings,  cottonseed 
meal,  corn  distillers’  dried  grains, 
alfalfa  meal  and  salt 

Morlac  

Wash-Co.  Alfalfa  Mixed  Feed  & Milling  Co., 

8541 

6.0 

21.8  1 

16.1  . 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  cottonseed  meal, 
corn  distillers’  dried  grains,  alfalfa 
meal  and  salt 

Fort  Calhoun,  Neb. 

Wash-Co.  Horse  and  Mule  Feed  

3755 

2.0 

'10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  salt  and 
molasses 

Alfalgreen  

3839 

0.5 

12.0 

20.0 

Alfalfa  meal,  1%  salt  and  molasses 

Butlers  Strong  Horse  Feed 

6875 

2.0 

9.0 

25.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  and  molasses 

Special  Horse  Feed 

8278 

2.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Western  Grain  Products  Company, 

West  Hammond,  111. 

Hammond  Horse  Feed  

4864 

2.8 

12.0 

11.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley,  linseed  meal, 
ground  screenings  from  wheat,  corn, 
oats  and  barley,  ^10%  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Special  Hammond  Dairy  Feed 

7347 

3.5 

15.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  distillers  dried  corn 
grains,  malt  sprouts,  ground  clipped 
oat  by-product,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  corn,  oats  and  barley, 
salt  and  molasses 

Hammond  Dairy  Feed  

8254 

3.5 

16.5 

12.0 

Cottonseed  meal,  corn  distillers 
grains,  malt  sprouts,  ground  clipped 
oat  by-product,  ground  screenings 
from  wheat,  corn,  oats  and  barley, 
ground  cocoa  shells,  salt  and  mo- 
lasses 

Calumet  Alfalfa  Horse  Feed 

8327 

2.5 

10.0 

15.0 

Corn,  rolled  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  lin- 
seed meal,  salt  and  molasses 

Wiedlocheiy  & Sons,  Inc.,  Springfield,  111. 

Wiedlochers’  Faultless  Horse  Feed 

8450 

3.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Corn,  oats,  alfalfa  meal,  y2%  salt 
and  molasses 

Wiedlochers’  Congress  Horse  Feed 

84i51 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Corn,  oats,  barley  and  salt 

310 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Wilkinson  & Company,  T.  B., 

Knightstown,  Ind. 

Combination  Dairy  Feed 

7654 

1 

3.0 

11.0 

10.0 

Oats,  rye,  corn  and  cob  meal  (crushed 
ear  corn),  cottonseed  meal  and  salt 

Wheat  middlings,  corn  meal,  linseed 

CALF  MEALS 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Sucrene  Calf  Meal 

6722 

4.0 

20.0 

3.0 

Arcady  Farms  Milling  Company,  Rondout,  111. 
Arcady  Calf  Meal 

6625 

5.0 

25.0 

7.0 

meal,  malt  flour,  soluble  starch 
from  corn,  dried  skim  milk,  soluble 
blood  flour  and  bone  meal 
Cottonseed  meal,  wheat  flour,  malt 
flour,  linseed  oil  meal,  powdered 
milk  and  salt 

Fenugreek,  anise,  cottonseed  meal, 
locust  bean  meal,  flaxseed,  wheat 
flour,  blood  flour,  barley  meal,  bean 
meal,  pea  meal,  old  process  linseed 
oilmeal,  dried  milk,  cocoanut  meal, 
rice  polish,  cocoa  shell  meal  and  salt 
Anise,  bean  meal,  rice  polish,  cocoa- 

Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Factory,  Waukegan,  111. so 
Blatchford’s  Calf  Meal 

7267 

5.0 

24.0 

6.7 

Blatchford’s  Dairy  Brand  Calf  Meal 

7557 

5.0 

19.0 

6.5 

Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Company,  Waukegan,  111. 
Blatchfords’  Calf  Meal  

8722 

5.0 

24.0 

6.7 

nut  meal,  barley  meal,  blood  flour, 
wheat  middlings,  flaxseed  and  salt 
Fenugreek,  anise,  locust  bean  meal, 

Butler  & Company,  Edw.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

Butlers  Station  Calf  Meal 

7989 

4.0 

32.0 

3.5 

flaxseed,  wheat  flour,  blood  flour, 
barley  meal,  malt  sprout  meals, 
bean  meal,  pea  meal,  rice  polish,  old 
process  linseed  oilmeal,  cocoa  shell 
meal,  cocoanut  meal,  cottonseed 
meal,  dried  milk  and  salt 

Blood  flour,  barley  flour,  linseed  oil 

Clover  Leaf  Milling  Company,  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 
Clover  Leaf  Calf  Meal 

5827 

7.0 

25.0 

7.0 

meal  and  reddog  flour 

Cottonseed  meal,  linseed  meal,  barley 

Hales  & Edwards  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 

Red  Horn  Calf  Meal 

8739 

5.0 

18.0 

6.0 

malt  flour,  wheat  flour  and  salt 

Dried  buttermilk,  oat  flour,  barley 

International  Stock  Food  Co., 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Grofast  Calf  Meal 

6380 

5.0 

25.0 

10.0 

flour,  red  dog  flour,  corn  flour,  old 
process  linseed  oil  meal,  alfalfa  leaf 
flour,  dextrose,  not  over  1%  cal- 
cium carbonate  and  %%  salt 
Fenugreek  seed,  locust  bean  meal,  lin- 

International Sugar  Feed  Company, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Grofast  Calf  Meal 

8280 

5.0 

25.0 

10.0 

seed  oil  meal,  reddog  flour  and 
ground  screenings  from  wheat,  oats, 
barley  and  flax 

Fenugreek  seed,  locust  bean,  linseed 

Peters  Mill  Company,  M.  C.,  Omaha,  Neb. 
Peters’  Submilk  Calf  Meal 

8536 

3.0 

22.0 

8.0 

oil  meal,  ground  screenings  from 
wheat,  oats,  barley  and  flax  and 
reddog  flour 

Linseed  oil  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  corn 

Prussian  Remedy  Company,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 
Prussian  Calf  Meal 

7801 

5.5 

25.0 

5.5 

feed  meal,  blood  meal  and  red  dog 
flour 

Anise  seed,  fenugreek  seed,  lime,  sodi- 

Purina Mills,  Branch,  Ralston  Purina  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Purina  Calf  Chow 

7872 

4.0 

33.0 

3.5 

um  chloride,  locust  bean  meal,  oat 
meal,  blood  meal,  corn  meal,  cotton- 
seed meal,  linseed  meal,  corn  gluten 
meal,  wheat  flour  and  rye  middlings 
Hominy  feed,  wheat  flour,  blood 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 
Schumacher  Calf  Meal 

7584 

8.0 

18.0 

4.0 

flour  and  linseed  meal 

Cottonseed  meal,  oat  meal,  wheat 

Ryde  & Co.,  Chicago,  111. 

Rydes  Cream  Calf  Meal 

5496 

5.0 

26.0 

6.0 

meal,  flaxseed  meal,  milk  albumen 
and  Vz%  bi-carbonate  of  soda 
Fenugreek,  anise  seed,  cottonseed 

meal,  wheat  flour,  flaxseed  meal, 
carob  beans,  bean  meal,  lentils,  co- 
coa shells  and  salt 

30  Succeeded  by  Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Co. 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Simmons  & Norris,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Simmons’  Butter-Eat  Calf  Meal  

Sugarine  Company,  The,  Peoria,  111. 

6810 

5.0 

25.0 

6.0 

Fenugreek,  anise  seed,  wheat  flour, 
cottonseed  meal,  flaxseed  meal,  ca- 
rob  beans,  bean  meal,  lentils,  cocoa 
shells  and  salt 

Sugarine  Calf  Meal 

Wilbur  Stock  Food  Co.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 

6796 

4.0 

20.0 

3.0 

Wheat  middlings,  corn  meal,  linseed 
meal,  malt  flour,  soluble  starch 
from  corn,  dried  skim  milk,  soluble 
blood  flour  and  bone  meal 

Wilbur’s  Calf  Meal 

Williams  & Son,  P.  I.,  North  Adams,  Mich. 

6618 

2.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Gentian,  fenugreek,  anise  seed,  blood 
root,  elecampane,  ginger,  quassia, 
elm  bark,  bi-carbonate  of  soda, 
charcoal,  salt  and  ground  screenings 
from  flax,  wheat  and  rye 

Anise,  linseed  oil  meal,  blood  meal 
and  toasted  corn  flake  by-product 

“Williams  Calf  Meal’’  

POULTRY  AND  SCRATCH  FEEDS 

7338 

1.2 

13.5 

6.2 

Acme-Evans  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

E-Z  Chick  Feed 

5641 

2.5 

110. 0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  millet  seed,  steel  cut 
oats,  charcoal  and  mica  grit 

E-Z  Scratch  Feed  

5721 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  sunflower 
seed,  charcoal,  oyster  shells  and 
granite  and  mica  grit 

Acme  Scratch  Feed 

6292 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oyster 
shells  and  limestone  grit 

Acme  Chick  

Alfocom  Milling  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 

6493 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  car- 
bonate of  lime  (limestone) 

Alfocorn  Hen  Feed 

5339 

3.5 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize  and 
sunflower  seed 

Alfocorn  Chick  Feed 

6730 

3.5 

10.0 

4.0 

Corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and  whole 
wheat  screenings 

Sunshine  Scratch  Feed  with  Grit 

American  Hominy  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

8414 

2.5 

10.0 

6.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  oats,  sun- 
flower seed  and  carbonate  of  lime 
(crys-eo  grit) 

Homco  Chick  Feed  

6568 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  hen-e- 
ta grit  (sodium,  lime,  silica  and 
phosphorus  compounds) 

Homco  Dry  Mash 

7845 

4.0 

12.0 

7.0 

Homcoline  (corn  germ  meal),  homco 
hominy  feed,  wheat  bran,  wheat 
middlings,  linseed  oil  meal  and  hen- 
e-ta  grit  (sodium,  lime,  silica  and 
phosphorus  compounds) 

Homco  Poultry  Developer 

8491 

3.0 

11.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  homcoline  (corn 
germ  meal),  and  buckwheat 

Homco  Scratch  Feed 

8509 

2.5 

10.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed  and  homco- 
line (corn  germ  meal) 

Standard  Scratch  Feed  with  Grit 

8754 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
whole  wheat  screenings  and  carbo- 
nate of  lime  (limestone) 

Standard  Scratch  Feed  

8755 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 
whole  wheat  screenings 

Hexite  Scratch  Feed  with  Grit 

8756 

2.5 

10.0 

7.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  hom- 
coline (corn  germ  meal),  sunflower 
seed  and  carbonate  of  lime  (lime- 
stone) 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  hom- 
coline (corn  germ  meal),  and  sun-- 
flower  seed 

Hexite  Scratch  Feed 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

8767 

2.5 

10.0 

7.0 

Tip  Top  Chick  Feed 

5664 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  pigeon 
grass  seed 

Tip  Top  Chick  Feed  with  5%  Grit 

6665 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  pigeon 
grass  seed  and  marble  grit 

Sucrene  Chick  Feed  

6660 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  l^fir  and  millet 

Sucrene  Chick  Feed  with  5%  Grit 

6561 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  marble 
grit 

Cluck  Cluck  Scratch  Feed 

8241 

2.5 

10.0 

, 5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

312 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

American  Milling  Company,  Peoria,  111. 

Sucrene  Scratch  Feed  

8242 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Tip  Top  Scratch  Feed  

8243 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Tip  Tod  Scratch  Feed,  with  5%  Grit_  . 

8244 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  mar- 
ble grit 

Sucrene  Scratch  Feed,  with  Grit 

8245 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  mar- 
ble grit 

Sucrene  Poultry  Mash _ . 

8250 

3.5 

16.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  feed  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  corn  distillers’  dried  grains, 
meat  scraps,  linseed  meal  and  salt 

Cluck  Cluck  Scratch  Feed,  With  5%  Grit 

8263 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  mar- 
ble grit 

Sucrene  Poultry  Mash  .. 

Arcady  Farms  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  111. 
Farm  Brand  Poultry  Feed  With  Grit,  Shell 

8730 

3.5 

18.0 

12.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  feed  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  corn  distillers  dried  grains, 
meat  scraps,  linseed  meal,  palm  ker- 
nel meal,  calcium  carbonate  and  salt 

and  Charcoal 

8325 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  whole 
wheat  screenings,  5%  oyster  shell, 
1%  charcoal  and  5%  limestone  grit 

Farm  Brand  Poultry  Feed 

Arcady  Farms  Milling  Co.,  Rondout,  111. 

8326 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

j 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
whole  wheat  screenings 

Arcadv  tR.  K.  D.'i  Poultry  Feed 

Arcady  (R.  K.  D.)  Poultry  Feed— With  Grit- 

7619 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0  i 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Shell-Charcoal  

Arcady  (R.  K.  D.)  Chick  Feed,  with  Grit- 

7620 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  1%  char- 
coal, 3%  oyster  shell  and  3%  lime- 
stone grit 

Charcoal  

7521 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  hulled 
oats,  1%  charcoal  and  6%  limestone 
grit 

Arcady  (R.  K.  D.)  Chick  Feed 

7522 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0  ! 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  hulled 
oats 

Arcady  (R.  K.  D.)  Baby  Chick  Feed 

Arcady  (R.  K.  D.)  Baby  Chick  Feed  with 

7623 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  hulled 
oats 

Grit-Charcoal  ___ 

Ashbrook  Co.,  The  J.  S.,  Mattoon,  111. 

7624 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  hulled 
oats,  IP/o  charcoal  and  6%  limestone 
grit 

Peerless  Scratch  Feed 

4181 

3.6 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  kafir,  buckwheat, 
sunflower  seed  and  linseed  meal 

Peerless  Chick  Feed  

5895 

3.5 

10.5 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  steel  cut  oats  and 
millet  seed 

Diamond  A.  Scratch  Feed  . 

7904 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize,  oats,  buckwheat  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Diamond  A.  Scratch  Feed  tWith  Gritd 

7941 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize,  oats,  buckwheat,  sunflower 
seed  and  5%  quartz  grit 

Peerless  Scratch  Fped  With  Grit 

8043 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  oats,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed,  linseed  oil 
cake,  oyster  shell  and  quartz  grit 

Diamond  A.  Chick  Peed 

8277 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  milo 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  rye,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  charcoal 
and  limestone  grit 

C-er-lay  Special  Poultry  Feed 

6100 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Sunflower  Poultry  Feed  with  Grit _ 

S 

0644 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo 
maize,  buckwheat,  sunflower  seed, 
charcoal,  oyster  shell  and  limestone 
grit 

Sunflower  Poultry  Feed  No  Grit 

6645 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

i 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo 
maize,  buckwheat,  sunflower  seed 
and  charcoal 

313 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Badenoch  Company,  J.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

C-er-lay  Poultry  Peed  With  Grit  

8765 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo. 

C-er-lay  Poultry  Peed  No  Grit 

8766 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  oyster 
shells  and  limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 
Wheat,  kafir,  milo,  millet  seed,  peas. 

Sunflower  Special  Pigeon  Peed 

8767 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Daily  Egg  Poultry  Peed  No  Grit 

8768 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

buckwheat  and  hemp 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo. 

C-er-lay  Developing  Peed  No  Grit 

8760 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

whole  screenings  from  wheat  and 
barley  and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  milo,  mil- 

Daily Egg  Poultry  Peed  With  Grit 

8770 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

let  seed  and  hulled  oats 

Wheat,  com,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo. 

C-er-lay  Developing  Peed  With  Grit 

8771 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

whole  screenings  from  wheat  and 
barley,  sunflower  seed,  oyster  shells 
and  limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  milo,  millet 
seed,  hulled  oats  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  millet  seed. 

C-er-lay  Pine  Chick  Peed  With  Grit 

8772 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

C-er-lay  Pine  Chick  Peed  No  Grit 

8773 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

steel  cut  oats,  hulled  oats  and  lime- 
stone grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  millet  seed. 

Egspay  Poultry  Peed  No  Grit 

8774 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

steel  cut  oats  and  hulled  oats 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  milo, 
w'ild  buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
whole  screenings  from  wheat  and 
barley 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  milo, 
wild  buckw'heat,  sunflower  seed, 
whole  screenings  from  wheat  and 
barley,  oyster  shells  and  limestone 
grit 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 

Egspay  Poultry  Peed  With  Grit 

8775 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Barrett,  J.  C.,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Barrett’s  Henola  Dry  Mash 

6924 

2.0 

12.0 

3.0' 

Bash  & Co.,  Inc , C.  E.,  Huntington,  Ind. 

Busy  Biddy  Scratch  Peed 

5679 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

meal,  corn  gluten  meal,  linseed  oil 
meal  and  heneta  grit  (sodium,  lime, 
silica  and  phosphorus  compounds) 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  lin- 
seed oil  meal 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 

Busy  Biddy  Egg  Mash  & Chick  Grower. _ 

6102 

3.0 

17.5 

7.0 

Bash’s  Seed  Store,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Bash’s  Scratch  Peed  _ 

4479 

2.0 

9.0 

7.0 

feed  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed  oil 
meal,  meat  scraps,  charcoal  and 
salt 

Corn,  whole  wheat  screenings,  cane 

Bauermeister  Company,  Inc.,  Chas.  W., 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Bauermeisters  Scratch  Peed 

5215 

2.0 

9.0 

6.0 

seed,  sunflower  seeds,  non-germinat- 
ing garden  seeds,  charcoal,  lime- 
stone grit  and  oyster  shells 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats  and  hen-e- 

Bauermeister’s  Chick  Peed  

5221 

2.0 

8.0 

3.0 

ta  grit  (sodium,  lime,  silica  and 
phosphorus  compounds) 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  steel  cut  oats. 

Bauermeister  Dry  Mash 

5302 

2.0 

12.0 

5.0 

millet  seed  and  hen-e-ta  grit  (sodi- 
um, lime,  silica  and  phosphorus 
compounds) 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 

Belt  Elevator  & Peed  Company, 

Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Mixed  Hen  Peed  

5905 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

feed  meal,  linseed  oil  meal,  corn 
gluten  meal  and  hen-e-ta  grit  (sodi- 
um, lime,  silica  and  phosphorus 
compounds) 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats. 

Hen-O-La  Mash 

8045 

2.0 

10.0 

5.0 

buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  charcoal 
and  oyster  shell 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  com 

gluten  feed,  corn  feed  meal,  hominy 
feed,  linseed  oil  meal,  ground  wheat 
screenings  and  heneta  grit  (sodium, 
lime,  silica  and  phosphorus  com- 
pounds) 

314 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Ofiicial  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Big  Four  Elevator  & Milling  Company, 
Mattoon,  111. 

Big  4 Scratch  Feed 

8583 

3.6 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  buckwheat. 

Bonner  & Company,  F.  J.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 
Bonner’s  Scratch  Feed 

8142 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

sunflower  seed  and  linseed  meal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 

Boonville  Milling  Company,  Boonville,  Ind 

Boon  Poultry  Feed 

7193 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  sorghum  cane  seed  and 
sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  sorghum  cane  seed,  sun- 

Boone Chick  Feed  

7433 

3.0 

8.5 

4.0 

Brizius  Company,  The  Chas.  W., 

Newburgh,  Ind. 

Eagle  Scratching  Grains 

6673 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

flower  seed  and  millet 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats  and 

Eagle  Little  Chick  Feed 

6784 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  char- 

Log Cabin  Scratch  Feed 

7979 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

coal  and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 

Log  Cabin  Scratch  Grains,  With  Grit 

8033 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

maize,  oats,  buckwheat  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo,  oats. 

Log  Cabin  Chick  Feed 

8615 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
quartz  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  milo 

Brook  Flour  & Feed  Mill,  Brook,  Ind. 

Rising  Sun  Poultry  Feed 

6536 

2.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  millet  seed. 

Browming  Milling  Company,  W.  A., 

Evansville,  Ind. 

Brownings  Mxd  Chicken  Feed  

6477 

2.0 

9.0 

5.0 

meat  scraps  and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  oats  and  granite  grit 

Burrell  & Morgan,  Elkhart,  Ind. 

Morgans  Feed 

5876 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats. 

Butler  & Company,  Edw.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 
Butler’s  Special  Poultry  Feed,  “With  Grit” 

62-01 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

^ buckwheat  and  sunflower  seeds 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  sun- 

Butler’s Special  Poultry  Feed,  “No  Grit” 

6202 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

flower  seed,  shells,  charcoal  and 
mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  sun- 

Byrnes & Company,  W.  J.,  Chicago,  111. 

Royal  Meat  Mash 

47S6 

4.0 

14.0 

8.0 

flower  seed  and  charcoal 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  kafir. 

Royal  Brand  Poultry  Peed 

4787 

3.0‘ 

10.0 

5.0 

corn  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed  oil 
meal,  beef  scraps  and  oyster  shells 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  oyster 
shells  and  limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  millet,  peas 

Daisy  Chick  Feed,  With  Grit  ___  

5065 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Daisy  Chick  Feed 

5006 

2.5 

■ 10.0 

5.0 

and  limestone  grit 

Wheatj,,corn,  kafir,  oats,  millet  and 

Jewel  Poultry  Feed 

5260 

2.5 

9.5 

10.0 

pGSS 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley. 

Royal  Pigeon  Feed  

5-789 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

buckwheat,  sunflow'er  seed,  oyster 
shell  and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  hemp,  peas,  mil- 
let, buckwheat  and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  oats, 
barley,  buckwheat  and  sunflower 
seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  sunflower  seed 

Royal  Poultry  Feed  no  Grit 

6274 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Jewel  Poultry  Feed  without  Grit 

6034 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Cairo  Milling  Company,  Cairo,  111. 

Prize  Poultry  Feed  

8457 

3.5 

10.0 

6.0 

✓ 

Callahan  Company,  The  C.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 
Purdue  Line  First  Prize  Chick  Feed 

6608 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

and  whole  wheat  screenings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  hulled  oats  and 

millet  

315 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Pat. 

Not  less  than  ^ 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein  p 

Not  more  than  g- 

per  cent.  n 

Crude  Fiber 

Callahan  Company,  The  C.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

Purdue  Line  White  Hen  Scratch  Peed 

6609 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Carroll  & Son,  E.  L.,  Decatur,  Ind. 

Carrolls  Chicken  Peed 

6786 

3.0 

9.5 

5.0 

Carrolls  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

8t08 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Carrolls  Scratch  Peed  With  Grit 

8409 

2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Chamberlain  Company,  P.  B.,  St.  Louis,' Mo. 

Acorn  Hen  Peed  

4849 

3.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Acorn  Chick  Peed 

4850 

3.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Premium  Chick  Peed  

5965 

3.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Premium  Hen  Peed 

5966 

3.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Chamberlain’s  Perfect  Chick  Peed 

8255 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Chamberlain’s  Perfect  Hen  Peed 

8266 

3.5 

11.0 

4.0 

Chamberlain's  Perfect  Mash  Egg  Peed 

8267 

3.5 

11.0 

7.0 

Chapman-Doake  Company,  The,  Decatur,  111. 

Laymore  Scratch  Peed  

8370 

2.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Diamond  “P”  Scratch  Peed 

8431 

3.0 

10.0 

12.0 

Laymore  Pine  Chick 

8660' 

2.0 

10.0 

9.0 

Cincinnati  Hay  & Grain  Company,  The, 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

“No-Better”  Poultry  Peed 

8595 

2.5 

10.0 

4.0 

City  Peed  Store,  Plymouth,  Ind. 

Plymouth  Scratch  Peed 

7163 

2.5 

8.7 

7.0 

Plymouth  Chick  Peed 

7541 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0  ' 

Plymouth  Egg  Mash  

75-13 

4.0 

15.0 

11.0 

City  Milling  Company,  Kendallville,  Ind. 

“Hoosier”  Scratch  Peed  _ 

6317 

4.0 

9.5 

8.0  ' 

Conroy,  M.  A.,  Jefferronville,  Ind. 

Conroy’s  Scratch  Peed 

3875 

3.0 

11.0 

7.0 

Blue  Ribbon  Scratch 

8368 

2,5 

10.0 

7.0  ' 

Corno  Mills  Company,  The,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Corno  Hen  Peed _ 

7800 

3.0 

10.0 

3.5 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  lin- 
seed oil  cake 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo 
maize,  millet  and  sunflower  seed 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckw’heat  (with  not  to 
exceed  ^2%  miscellaneous  wild  seeds 
occurring  in  above  seeds  and  grains), 
charcoal  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  lime- 
stone grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  sun- 
flower seed  and  w'hole  screenings 
from  wheat,  oats  and  barley 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  whole  screen- 
ings from  wheat,  oats  and  barley 
Wheat,  corn  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Wheat,  corn,  barley,  oats,  sunflower 
seed  and  Avhole  screenings  from 
wheat,  oats  and  barley 
Wheat,  kafir,  oatmeal,  millet,  milo, 
field  seeds  from  wheat  screenings, 
meat,  bone,  charcoal  and  limestone 
grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  rolled  oats, 
buckwheat  seed,  sunflower  seed, 
meat,  bone  and  charcoal 
Corn,  rolled  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn 
meal,  alfalfa  meal,  cottonseed  meal, 
linseed  meal,  meat,  bone,  charcoal 
and  salt 

Wheat,  corn,'  kafit,  milo,  oats,  rye 
and  sunflower  seed 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  oats  and 
sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  millet  seed,  whole  field 
seeds  from  -w’heat  screenings  and 
oyster  shell 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  millet  seed, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  oyster 
shells  and  charcoal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  hulled 
oats,  charcoal  and  oyster  shell 
Vheat  bran,  wheat  miduimgs,  ground 
wheat  screenings,  hominy  feed,  al- 
falfa meal,  meat  scraps,  cottonseed 
meal,  charcoal,  salt  and  oyster  shell 
Corn,  kafir,  buckwheat,  sunflower 
seeds,  whole  wheat  screenings  and 
charcoal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  sunflower 
seed  and  bone 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  oats, 
cane  seed,  cow  peas,  soy  beans, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
whole  wheat  and  seed  screenings 


3i6 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


Crabbs  Reynolds  Taylor  Company, 
Lafayette,  Ind. 

Thrift  Chick  Feed 

Thrift  Scratch  Teed  

Be  Baun  Mill,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Old  Reliable  Scratch  Feed 

Help  Grain  Co.,  E.  E.,  Bourbon,  Ind. 
Bourbon  Scratch  Feed 


Bourbon  Chick  Feed 

Dixie  Mills  Company,  East  St.  Louis,  111. 
Dixie  Chick  Feed 


Polo  Chick  Feed 


Dixie  Poultry  Mash 


Polo  Hen  Feed 


Polo  Hen  Feed  (With  Grit)  

Dixie  Hen  Feed 

Early  & Daniel  Co.,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Eadan  Chick  Feed 

Tuxedo  Scratch  

Tuxedo  Scratch  (With  Grit) 

Ce-re-a-lia  Egg  Mash  

Eadan  Scratch  Feed  (No  Grit)  

Tuxedo  Chick 

Eberts  & Bro.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

Quality  Scratch  Feed  

D.  D.  Hen  Feed 


Edinger  & Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Arrow  Egg  and  Growing  Mash 

Arrow  Chick  Feed  (With  Grit) 

Arrow  Chick  Feed  (No  Grit) 

Arrow  Hen  Feed  (With  Grit) 


8G90 

4370 

4935 

5906 

7859 

7860 
7621 

aZ62 

8263 

8638 

4436 

4606 

4607 
4867 

5862 

5863 

3063 

8001 

6694 

6695 

6696 

6697 


03 

03  (13  <D 

O ^ S 

^ ftO 


^ I 

1)  d) 

^ Org 

I 03  2 


0 

C 03  03 
« 03-0 

1 §32 

iz;  P.O 


and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


2.5  10.0 

3.0  11.0 


Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  steel 
cut  oats 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 


3.0  11.0 

3.2  10.0 

3.2  10.0 

3.0  10.0 

2.0  9.0 

3.0  17.0 

3.0  10.0 

2.0  9.0 

3.0  10.0 

2.5  10.0 

2.5  10.0 

2.5  10.0 

5.0  20.0 

2.5  10.0 

2.5  10.0 


6.0  Wheat,  corn,  oats,  buckwheat,  sun- 
flower seed  and  oyster  shell 

6.0  Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  millet, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  bone, 
charcoal  and  limestone  grit 
6.0  Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  lime- 
stone grit 


5.0  Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize  and 
ground  screenings  from  wheat  and 
flax 

5.0  Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize, 

ground  screenings  from  wheat  and 
flax  and  limestone  grit 

9.0  Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  alfalfa 

meal,  corn  meal,  linseed  meal,  gran- 
ulated meat,  1%  charcoal  and  1% 
salt 

5.0  Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  em- 

mer,  sunflower  seed  and  whole 
wheat  screenings 

5.0  Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  em- 
mer,  sunflower  seed,  wLole  wheat 
screenings  and  limestone  grit 
5.0  Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  oats, 
emmer  and  sunflower  seed 


11.0 


5.0 


7.5 


5.0 

5.0 


Wheat,  corn,  oats,  barley,  timothy 
seed,  clover  seed  and  Mhole  screen- 
ings from  timothy  and  clover  seeds 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 
sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  sun- 
flower seed  and  marble  grit 
Ground  wheat,  wheat  bran,  wheat 
middlings,  corn  meal,  ground  oat 
groats,  alfalfa  leaf  meal,  linseed 
meal  and  beef  scraps 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  rye, 
buckwheat  and.  sunflower  seed 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  oat 
groats 


2.5 

2.5 

4.0 


2.7 

2.7 

3.0 


10.0 

10.0 


14.0 

5.0 


17.0  9.0 

10.5  4.0 

10.5  4.0 

10.0  5.0 


Wheat,  corn,  barley,  oats,  kafir, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  wild  buckwheat, 
millet  seed  (with  not  to  exceed  %% 
miscellaneous  wild  seeds  occurring  in 
above  seeds  and  grains),  charcoal 
and  marble  grit 

Oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
corn  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed 
meal,  meat  scraps,  bone  meal,  char- 
coal and  1%  salt 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  millet, 
whole  wheat  screenings  and  lime- 
stone grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  millet 
and  whole  wheat  screenings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  bar- 
ley, clipped  oats,  sunflower  seed  and 
limestone  grit  


317 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

0) 

ja 

c 

C3  .6 

(3 

rt 

LABEL 

A3 

^ .2 

c ^ ' 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

OT 

05+jQ. 

following  ingredients 

v-S 

S 0'S 

if  sj  d 

►3  S ^ 

O Si  2 

J Si  2 

o 

^ ftU 

% ftO 

Edinger  & Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Arrow  Hen  Eeed  (Nn  GrifA  _ . 

6698 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  bar- 
ley, clipped  oats  and  sunflower  seed 

Prodneer  Se.rateh  Peed 

7263 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize,  oats,  buckwheat,  sunflower 

seed  and  linseed  oil  cake 

Prodneer  ■Developing  Peed 

7264 

3.0 

liO.O 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  hulled  oats,  milo 
maize,  millet  and  buckwheat 

Prodneer  Chielr  Peed 

7265 

3.0 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  hulled  oats,  mil- 
let and  milo  maize 

Emison  & Co.,  J.  & S.  (Baltic  Mills), 

Vincennes,  Ind. 

Bine  Diamond  Tdttlft  Chick  Peed_._  . _ 

5-071 

2.5 

8.5 

6.0 

Wheat  containing  field  seeds,  corn, 
kafir,  barley,  millet  and  carbonate 

of  lime  (limestone) 

Bine  Diamond  Poultry  Peed  _ 

6248 

2.5 

8.5 

6.0 

Wheat  containing  field  seeds,  corn, 
kafir,  barley,  oats,  rye,  sunflower 

seed,  corn  germ  and  carbonate  of 

Everitts  0.  K.  Seed  Store,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

lime  (limestone) 

O.  P.  Scratch  Peed 

8706 

2.7 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  kafir,  whole 
wheat  screenings,  buckwheat  and 
non-germinating  garden  seeds  * 

Fairplay  Feed  Mills,  Linton,  Ind. 

Success  Scratch  Feed  (with  Grit  & Oyster 

Shell)  

6454 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  sun- 
flower seed,  charcoal,  oyster  shell 

and  mica  grit 

Success  Chick  Peed  with  Grit  . . . 

6720 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  char- 
coal and  mica  grit 

Fairplay  Scratch  Feed  with  Grit  & Oyster 

Shell  — 

7753 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  sun- 
flower seed,  charcoal,  oyster  shell 

Fairplay  Scratch  Peed  

7826 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  oats, 
sunflower  seed  and  charcoal 

Feed  Products  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  111, 

Kukoo  Scratch  Peed  No  Grit  _ 

8276 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats  and 
sunflower  seed 

T.ykit  Scratch  Peed  tWith  Grit  & ShelD 

8350 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  not 

over  4%  oyster  shell  and  4%  quartz 
grit 

Lykit  Scratch  Feed  (No  Grit)  

8351 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Golden  Egg  Pigeon  Feed  (With  Grit) 

8352 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  hemp,  peas,  mil- 
let, buckwheat  and  not  over  6% 

quartz  grit 

Golden  Egg  Scratch  Feed  (With  Grit  & Shell) 

8358 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  not 

over  3%  oyster  shell  and  3%  quartz 
grit 

Golden  Pgg  Scratch  Peed  tNo  Grit') 

8359 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Golden  Egg  Coarse  Chick  Feed  (With  Grit)... 

8360 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  hulled 

oats  and  not  over  6%  quartz  grit 

Golden  Egg  Coarse  Chick  Feed  (No  Grit) 

8361 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and 

hulled  oats 

Golden  Egg  Fine  Chick  Feed  (With  Grit) 

8362 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  steel 

cut  oats  and  not  over  6%  quartz 
grit 

Golden  Egg  Fine  Chick  Feed  (No  Grit) 

8363 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and 
steel  cut  oats 

Golden  Pgg  Mash  Peed  ("With  ShelD 

8364 

4.0 

15.0 

10.0 

Oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
corn  feed  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed 

oil  meal,  meat  scrap  and  not  over 
&%  oyster  shell 

Pnkoo  Scratch  Peed  CWith  Grit  & ShelD  _ 

8365 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  sun- 
flower seed  and  not  over  4%  oyster 

shell  and  4%  quartz  grit 

Piikoo  Pine  Chick  Peed  ("With  Grit') 

8366 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and 
not  over  8%  quartz  grit 

Kukoo  Fine  Chick  Feed  (No  Grit) 

8367 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

' Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  millet  seed 

3i8 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

u 

0) 

c 

cS 

i I 

a 

c3 

LABEL 

jj 

.rt 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

CQ+2Q-I 

§ S « 

following  ingredients 

*o 

t;  "'o 

— W-S 

O OJ  S 

O OJ  S 

o 

Z ftO 

iz;  fto 

!z:  ftu 

Ferger  Grain  Company,  The,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 
Gnliunhia  T.ittle  Ghick  Feed 

7G55 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Gandy  & Co.,  0.,  South  Whitley,  Ind. 

Ghiek  Feed  Standard  A.  Tlrand 

4747 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Standard  A.  Brand  Poultry  Feed 

4748 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Gas  City  Elevator  Company,  Gas  City,  Ind. 
Scratch  Feed •_ 

8569 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Gienger  & Co.,  J.,  Jeffersonville,  Ind. 

Blue  Bell  Scratch  Feed’.... 

6014 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Globe  Mills,  The,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

Anthony  Poultry  Feed 

5892 

2.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Baisy  Ghick  Feed 

6706 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

•Tiimho  Ghick  Feed 

7640 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Golden  Grain  Milling  Company, 

East  St.  Louis,  111. 

Golden  Grain  Scratch  Feed 

7366 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Economy  Scratch  Feed 

7367 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Golden  Grain  Chick  Feed 

7368 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Goodrich  Bros.  Hay  & Grain  Company, 
Winchester,  Ind. 

Climax  Chick  Starter 

5976 

1.5 

7.0 

8.0 

Gotto,  0.  W.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 

“Peerless”  Scratch  Feed 

i 

! 8699 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Graft,  C.  V.,  Winchester,  Ind. 

Imperial  Chick  Feed  

7806 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Imperial  Scratch  Feed 

1 7807 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Habig  Bros.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Habig  Brothers  Chick  Food  

1 

2521 

5.0 

8.0 

4.0 

Pigeon  Feed  _ __  _ 

4112 

3.0 

10.5 

5.0 

Yankee  Chick  Food  

5673 

3.0 

8.0 

6.0 

Hales  & Edwards  Co.,  Chicago,  111. 

Ked  Comb  Chick  Mash  with  Buttermilk 

8738 

4.0 

16.0 

9.0 

Havens,  P.  W.,  Hartford  City,  Ind. 

Havens’  Best  of  All  Chicken  Feed 

1 

5540 

2.2 

8.5 

6.0 

Start  Me  Eight 

5541 

2.5 

9.0 

4.5 

Haynes  Milling  Company,  The,  Portland,  Ind. 

U.  B.  Chick  Starter  Without  Grit 

i 

i 3788 

2.0 

9.0 

6.0 

“U.  B.  Developer”  

' 5083 

1 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Haynes’  Henola  Mash 

1 5330 

i 

2.0 

12.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn  grits,  kafir,  oat  groats 
and  millet  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley  and  millet 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
millet,  buckwheat  and  sunflower 
seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  milo,  sun- 
flower seed  and  charcoal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 
marble  grit 

Wheat,  corn  kafir  and  millet 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  millet 


Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize  and  sunfloM'er  seed 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley  and  milo 
maize 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize  and 
millet 


Corn,  millet,  beef  scraps,  pigeon 
grass  seed,  charcoal,  oyster  shell 
and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat,  charcoal,  oyster  shells 
and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  steel 
cut  oats 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  cane  seed, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  lime- 
stone grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  buckwheat,  peas, 
hemp  seed,  charcoal  and  limestone 
grit 

Corn,  kafir,  millet,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  limestone  grit 

Corn  feed  meal,  old  process  linseed  oil 
meal,  dried  buttermilk,  oat  flour, 
barley  flour,  wheat  middlings,  al- 
falfa leaf  flour,  dextrose,  not  over 
1%  calcium  carbonate  and  salt 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize,  buckwheat,  sunflower  seed, 
charcoal  and  limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  charcoal 
and  oyster  shell 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  char- 
coal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
meal,  corn  feed  meal,  corn  gluten 
meal,  linseed  meal  and  heneta  grit 
(sodium,  lime,  silica  and  phosphorus 
compounds) 


319 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Haynes  Milling  Company,  The,  Portland,  Ind. 

“The  U.  B.  Egg  Producer’’ 

6918 

2.5 

9.5 

8.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed  and  whole 
wheat  screenings 

U.  B.  Scratch  Feed 

Heitschmidt,  A.  0.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 

8218 

2.5 

9.5 

9.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  barley,  buckwheat 
and  whole  wheat  screenings 

Heitschmidt’s  Screenings  

Henderson  & Co.,  W.  D.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

2551 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  barley,  oats,  kafir, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  shells 
and  mica  grit 

Atlas  Poultry  Mash 

H.  0.  Company,  The,  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

The  H.  0.  Company’s  Steam  Cooked  Chick 

5333 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts,  corn  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  linseed  oil  meal,  beef  scraps, 
charcoal  and  salt 

Feed  

6653 

3.0 

12.0 

9.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  peas  and 
cut  oat  meal 

The  H.  0.  Co’s  Algrane  Scratching  Feed 

Holser  & Co.,  B.  I.,  Walkerton,  Ind. 

6838 

3.5 

11.0 

9.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  hulled  oats, 
barley,  milo  maize,  peas,  buckwheat, 
sunflower  seed  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

Hoosier  Scratch  Feed 

5814 

2.5 

9.5 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  rye,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed,  linseed  cake 
and  oyster  shells 

Hoosier  Chick  Feed 

5815 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and 
oyster  shells 

Hoosier  Egg  Mash __ 

Humphreys  & Company,  J.  F., 

Bloomington,  111. 

5816 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
alfalfa  meal,  wheat  feed  meal,  corn 
bran,  corn  feed  meal,  linseed  meal 
and  meat  scraps 

Wishbone  Poultry  Feed,  Hen  Size 

5543 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat and  sunflower  seed 

Wishbone  Chick  Feed  With  Grit  

6473 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  V2  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 

Wishbone  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit 

Illinois  Feed  Mills,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

6474 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exbeed  14  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 

Star  Chick  Feed  with  Grit 

5287 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  milo 
maize,  whole  wheat  screenings  and 
limestone  grit 

Star  Scratch  Feed  with  Grit 

Indiana  Elevator,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

5288 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize,  sunflower  seed,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  limestone  grit 

Hoosier  Scratch  Feed 

Indiana  Milling  Co.,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

8579 

2.0 

8.5 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  oats,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed,  whole  wheat 
screenings,  charcoal,  oyster  shell 
and  limestone  grit 

3—7  Chick  Feed 

3133 

3.0 

7.0 

20.0 

Whole  oat  screenings  and  whole  corn 
screenings  * 

Eggo  Chicken  Feed 

3965 

2.0 

10.0 

2.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats  and  barley 

Everybodys  Poultry  Feed 

4768 

4.0 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn  and  oats 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Monument  Brand  Chick  Food  

2245 

3.0 

10.5 

4.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  flaxseed, 
charcoal,  whole  and  ground  screen- 
ings from  wheat,  corn,  oats  and 
barley 

Monument  Brand  Pigeon  Feed 

3041 

2.5 

10.5 

4.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  buckwheat,  mil- 
let, peas  and  hemp  seed 

Monument  Brand  Scratch  Food  

3421 

3.0 

10.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  cane, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  linseed 
oil  cake  and  whole  screenings  from 
wheat,  corn,  oats  and  barley 

320 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

U 

M 

1 

*s 

o 

§ 

03  (-W 
V 03  0) 

« 

O s 

P 03 

% ftO 

fi  .s 

^ J 

03  03  03 

o 03  ^ 

'A  ftU 

a 

a 

(U 

C 03  33 
OT3 

' A aO 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Indiana  Seed  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Monument,  Brand  Poultry  Mash 

6113 

3.0 

10.5 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed  oil 
meal,  eorn  bran,  siftings  from 
crushed  wheat,  corn  and  kafir,  beef 
scraps  and  charcoal 

Millet  seed,  corn  bran,  siftings  from 
cracked  wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  cane 
seed  and  charcoal 

Corn,  kafir,  peas  and  peanut  kernels 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo 
maize,  buckwheat  and  sunflower 
seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo 
maize  and  millet  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
quartz  and  limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  buckwheat  and 
oyster  shells 

Wheat,  corn,  millet,  charcoal  and 
mica  grit 

Wheat  containing  field  seeds,  corn, 
kafir,  barley,  millet  and  carbonate 
of  lime  (limestone) 

Wheat  bran,  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings, corn  feed  meal,  cottonseed 
meal  and  distillers  dried  grains 
(corn,  rye  and  barley  malt) 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  milo,  sun- 
flower seed  and  oyster  shells 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  charcoal 

Monument  Brand  Mixed  Feed  __  . 

5643 

2.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Indiana  Squab  Company,  The, 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

“FToosier  Pigeon  Feed” 

7407 

2.5 

10.0 

7.0 

International  Sugar  Feed  Co., 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Poultry  Feed 

5669 

3.5 

10.0 

5.0 

International  Poultry  Feed  (Chick  Size) 

5823 

3.5 

10.0 

5.0 

International  Poultry  Feed  (With  Grit) 

8000 

3.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Iroquois  Roller  Mills,  Rensselaer,  Ind. 

Iroquois  Hen  Feed  

5089 

2.5 

8.0 

11.0 

Iroquois  Chick  Starter 

5797 

2.S 

8.7 

5.0 

Jordan,  Geo.  M.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

C.  M.  J.  Chink  Feed 

7513 

2.5 

8.0 

6.0 

(i.  M.  .T.  Prodiieer  Pairv  Feed 

8107 

6.0 

18.0 

13.0 

G.  M.  J.  “Red  Hen”  Scratch  Feed 

8109 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Kaseh,  C.  C.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

“Kay”  Chick  Feed  .. 

7694 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Kiest  Milling  Company,  Knox,  Ind. 

Kiest  Milling  Co’s  Poultry  Feed  ' 

6107 

2.5 

8.0 

7.0 

and  limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  milo 
maize,  buckwheat,  sunflower  seed 
and  eharcoal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  sun- 
flower seed,  charcoal  and  oyster 
shell 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
w'heat,  sunfloAver  seeds  and  beef 
scraps 

W’heat,  corn,  kafir,  steel  cut  oats, 
millet  and  beef  scrap 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  steel  cut  oats. 

Knecht  Milling  Company,  Hartford  City,  Ind. 
Sunflower  Scratch  Feed' 

6143 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Knollenberg  Milling  Company,  Quincy,  111. 
National  High  Protein  Fgg  Scratch 

4246 

3.5 

12.5 

3.5 

National  High  Protein  Growing  Scratch 

4247 

3.5 

13.0 

3.0 

National  High  Protein  Chick  Starter 

4248 

4.0 

13.0 

3.0 

National  High  Protein  Grow'ing  Mash 

4249 

3.5 

16.5 

6.0 

millet,  rice  and  beef  scrap 

Wheat  flour,  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

National High  Protein  Fgg  Mash 

4250 

3.5 

16.5 

6.5 

dlings,  corn  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  lin- 
seed meal,  blood  meal  and  salt 
Wheat  flour,  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 

Kornfalfa Feed  Milling  Company, 

Kansas  City,  Mo. 

Kl.ik  Scratch  Feed 

3725 

3.2 

10.0 

4.5 

dlings,  corn  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  lin- 
seed meal,  blood  meal  and  salt 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  buck- 
wheat and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize  and 

Kluk  Chick  Feed  _ . . .. 

3726 

3.5 

9.5 

4.0 

Krause  Milling  Co.,  Chas.  A.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Blue  Top  Fine  Chick  Feed  (No  Grit) 

6500 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

millet  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  millet  seed 

Blue  Top  Fine  Chick  Feed  fWith  Crit'i 

6534 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  char- 
coal and  mica  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 

Blue  Top  Scratch  Feed  (With  Grit) 

7327 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
limestone  grit 

321 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Krause  Milling  Co.,  Chas.  A.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 
Blue  Top  Scratch  Peed  (No  Grit) 

7328 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Blue  Top  Chick  Peed,  With  Grit 

7752 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and 
carbonate  of  lime  (cryseo  grit) 

Krause  Mash  

8068 

3.5 

18.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran,  w’heat  middlings,  maizo 
(corn)  reddog  flour,  corn  feed  meal, 
corn  germ  oil  meal,  hominy  feed,  al- 
falfa meal  and  meat  scraps 

Cream  City  Scratch  Peed,  With  Grit 

8328 

2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  car- 
bonate of  lime  (crysco  grit) 

Cream  City  Scratch  Peed,  No  Grit 

Kuhn  & Son,  John  H.,  Michigan  City,  Ind. 

8329 

2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Heneatta  Scratch  Peed 

5410 

2.0 

9.0 

13.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  charcoal, 
oyster  shells  and  mica  grit 

Heneatta  Scratch  Peed,  No  Grit 

Linkhart  & Son,  J.  W.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

7798 

2.2 

9.0 

8.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 
rye 

Linkhart’s  Chick  Peed  •_ 

Linton  Mill  Company,  Linton,  Ind. 

7616 

2.0 

9.5 

8.0 

Salvage  wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and 
charcoal 

Success  Scratch  Peed  

5848 

2.5 

10.0 

4.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  wild  buck- 
wheat 

Success  Scratch  Peed  with  Grit  

5844 

2.5 

10.0 

4.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  wild  buckwheat 
and  marble  grit 

Success  Little  Chick  Feed 

Loogootee  Milling  Company,  Loogootee,  Ind. 

5845 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  pigeon  grass,  mil- 
let and  marble  grit 

Mixed  Chicken  Feed  

3824 

2.5 

10.0 

8.0 

Wheat,  corn  and  oats 

L.  M.  C.  Chick  Peed 

Loughry  Bros.  Milling  & Grain  Company, 
Monticello,  Ind. 

8567 

4.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Wheat,  corn,  peas,  oyster  shell  and 
mica  grit 

Loughry’s  Star  Poultry  Peed 

2523 

2.5 

10.0 

4.5 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  buckwheat,  millet, 
kafir,  sunflower  seeds,  whole  wheat 
screenings,  shells,  charcoal  and 
quartz  grit 

Loughry’s  Star  Chick  Peed 

Louisville  Cereal  Mill  Co.,  Louisville,  Ky. 

2524 

2.5 

10.0 

4.5 

Wheat,  corn,  millet,  kafir,  oats,  whole 
wheat  screenings,  charcoal  and 
quartz  grit 

Nonesuch  Poultry  Peed  

Majot  & Morgan,  Michigan  City,  R.  R.  1,  Ind. 

6237 

2.5 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 
sunflower  seed 

Scratch  Feed  

Maumee  Valley  Mills,  New  Haven,  Ind. 

8038 

2.0 

9.0 

7.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  oyster  shells  and  mica 
and  quartz  grit 

Favorite  Chick  Peed  

3141 

2.5 

10.0 

5.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  hulled 
oats,  eharcoal,  bone  and  mica  grit 

Favorite  Scratch  Peed  

3142 

2.5 

10.0 

5.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  sun- 
flower seed,  charcoal,  shell  and  mica 
grit 

Atlas  Chicken  Feed 

5126 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats  and 
millet 

Corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  rye,  buck- 
wheat, whole  wheat  screenings,  oys- 
ter shell  and  limestone  grit 

Vim  and  Vigor  Chicken  Peed 

Merchants  Hay  & Grain  Co.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

5395 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Perfection  Poultry  Mash 

Michael  Company,  J.  P.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

4966 

3.0 

12.5 

14.0 

Mustard,  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings, alfalfa  meal,  corn  feed  meal, 
beef  scraps,  linseed  oil  meal  and 
charred  bone 

J.  P.  M.  Brand  Chick  Feed 

7496 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  heneta 
No.  2 grit  (sodium,  lime,  silica  and 
phosphorus  compounds) 

J.  P.  M.  Brand  Scratch  Peed 

7497 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  sunflower 
seed  and  homcoline  (corn  germ 
meal) 

322 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  In  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Midland  Poultry  Pood  Co.,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

No.  4 Midland  Egg  Pood . 

4409 

3.5 

15.0 

7.0 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  wheat  shorts, 
dried  blood,  sand  grit  and  charcoal 

No.  2 Growing  Chick  Pood  

4983 

3.0 

12.0 

8.5 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  wheat  shorts, 
dried  blood,  charcoal  and  quartz 
grit 

No.  1 Nursery  Chick  Pood  ' 

McCormick  & Son,  Chas.  W.,  Logansport,  Ind. 

4964 

4.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  shorts,  wheat 
flour,  corn  meal,  dried  blood,  char- 
coal and  quartz  grit 

Balanced  Poultry  Peed 

McCoy  Bros.,  Liberty,  Ind. 

0045 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  milo  maize, 
millet,  buckwheat,  sunflower  seed, 
linseed  oil  cake,  charcoal,  oyster 
shells  and  limestone  grit 

Reliance  Hen  Scratch  Pood 

3357 

3.0 

10.0 

8.0 

Wheat,  eorn,  oats,  barley  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Reliance  Egg  Mash  Pood 

3358 

5.0 

18.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
meal,  old  process  linseed  oil  meal, 
beef  scraps  and  charcoal 

Reliance  Chick  Mash  Peed 

3003 

5.0 

16.0 

8.0 

i 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  meal, 
alfalfa  meal,  beef  scraps,  linseed  oil 
cake  meal  (old  process) 

Reliance  Chick  Scratch  Peed 

3604 

3.0 

9.0 

5.0  1 

1 

Wheat,  eorn,  kafir,  millet,  pin  head 
oats  and  charcoal 

McCoy  & Co.,  U.  G.,  Vincennes,  Ind. 

Star  Scratch  Chicken  Peed — _ 

7044 

2.5 

7.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  sunflower 
seed,  charcoal  and  oyster  shell 

Star  Scratch  Chicken  Peed  Without  Grit 

8062 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  sunflower 
seed  and  charcoal 

Our  Choice  Scratch  Chicken  Peed  

McCoy  & Garten,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

8063 

3.0 

8.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  sunflower 
seed,  charcoal  and  oyster  shell 

Eureka  Hen  Peed 

5371 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  char- 
coal 

Eureka  Poultry  Mash 

6572 

3.0 

12.0 

11.0 

Wheat  bran,  corn  gluten  meal,  al- 
falfa meal,  wheat  feed  meal,  corn 
feed  meal,  linseed  meal,  meat  scraps 
and  1/2%  salt 

Eureka  Chick  Peed  

6611 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and 
carbonate  of  lime  (limestone) 

McCullough,  J.  Chas.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Bell  Grain  and  Seed  and  Screenings 

2862 

3.0 

10.0 

11.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  rye,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat,  millet,  cane  seed,  sun- 
flower seed  and  whole  screenings 
from  millets,  cane,  clover  and  sun- 
flower seeds  and  limestone  grit 

Acme  Chick  

McCullough  Seed  Co.,  The  J.  Chas., 

Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

2026 

3.0 

10;  0 

11.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  buckwheat,  millet 
seed,  cane  seed  and  whole  screenings 
principally  from  millet  seed,  cane 
seed  and  clover  seed  and  limestone 
grit 

J.  C.  M.  0.  Poultry  Peed 

National  Oats  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

5674 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  mil- 
let, cane,  buckwheat  and  sunflower 
seed 

Nutro  Hen  Peed  

7078 

3.0 

10.0 

3.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

National  Produce  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wheat,  eorn,  kafir,  barley,  milo, 
oats,  buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

National  Scratch  Peed 

8060 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Neumann  Co.,  John  G.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize,  oats,  buckwheat  and  sun- 
flower seed 

No  Waste  Scratch  Peed 

Odon  Milling  Company,  Odon,  Ind. 

7987 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Champion  Chick  Peed 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 

7461 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat 
meal,  wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 

Bell  Brand  Chick  Peed  

3589 

3.5 

10.5 

7.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  hulled 
oats,  flaxseed  and  charcoal 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Ohio  Valley  Seed  Company,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Golden  Egg  Dry  Mash 

53145 

3.5 

14.0' 

6.0 

Wheat  bran,  shorts,  corn  meal,  lin- 
seed meal,  alfalfa  meal,  corn  gluten 
feed,  meat  scraps,  charcoal  and  hen- 
eta  grit  (sodium,  lime,  silica  and 
phosphorus  compounds) 

Bell  Brand  Poultry  Eeed 

6306 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  sun- 
flower seeds  and  charcoal 

FuU-Nest  Scratch  Feed  

0.  K.  Seed  Store,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

6694 

2.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
whole  wheat  screenings,  oyster  shells 
and  mica  grit 

0.  K.  Scratch  Feed 

2362 

2.7 

10.0 

10.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  wheat  screenings 
and  non-germinating  garden  seeds 

0.  K.  Pigeon  Feed  

Ossian  Roller  Mills,  Ossian,  Ind. 

6316 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Corn,  kafir,  hemp,  Canadian  peas, 
buckwheat  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Dry  Mash  Chick  Feed 

7564 

3.0 

20.0 

7.0 

Wheat  bran  and  ground  wheat 
screenings,  wheat  middlings  and 
ground  wheat  screenings,  corn  meal, 
corn  gluten  meal,  beef  scraps  ahd 
charcoal 

Egg  Producer  

Oswego  Milling  Company,  Oswego,  N.  Y. 

8714 

3.0 

14.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
ground  wheat  screenings,  oats,  corn 
gluten  feed,  charcoal  and  salt 

Pontiac  Scratch  Feed  

8601 

1.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo,  oats 
and  buckwheat 

Park  & Pollard  Company,  The,  Boston,  Mass. 

The  Park  & Pollard  Co.  Growing  Feed...  .. 

7852 

1.5 

10  0 

8.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings, alfalfa,  meat,  bone,  beet 
pulp,  salt  and  calcium  carbonate 
(limestone) 

Pontiac  Scratch  Feed 

7864 

1.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  oats 
and  buckwheat 

Screened  Scratch  Feed 

7855 

1.5 

10.0 

5.0  1 

t 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Baby  Buster  Chick  Feed 

8423 

2.0 

11.0 

5.0  i 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  oats,  millet 
seed  and  shredded  fish 

Red  Ribon  Scratch  Feed 

8424 

1.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Red  Ribbon  Chick  Feed 

8425 

1 

2.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  and  millet 
seed 

Intermediate  Chick  Feed 

8426 

1.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  oats,  millet 
and  buckwheat 

Peru  Milling  Company,  Peru,  Ind. 

t 

Peru  Poultry  Feed 

' 7526 

2.5 

10.0' 

5.0  1 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  cane  seed, 
sunflower  seed  and  oyster  shells 

Peirce  Company,  0.  W.,  Lafayette,  Ind. 

! 

Flag  Brand  Chick  Feed 

6447 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  steel 
cut  oats 

Flag  Brand  Scratch  Feed 

6448 

3.0 

11.0 

5.0 

1 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Peters  Mill  Company,  M.  C.,  Omaha,  Neb. 

Peters’  Red  Feather  Chick  Feed 

7312 

1.5 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn  grits,  wheat  germs  and 
millet  seed 

Peters’  Red  Feather  Poultry  Mash 

7313 

2.5 

22.0 

10.0 

Wheat  shorts,  cottonseed  meal,  corn 
feed  meal,  alfalfa  meal,  meat  meal, 
linseed  oil  meal,  charcoal  and  mo- 
lasses 

Peters’  Red  Feather  Scratch  Feed 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

7314 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo 
maize,  buckwheat  and  sunflower 
seed 

Prairie  State  Scratch  Feed  No  Grit 

6762 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat,sunflower  seed  and  charcoal 

Prairie  State  Scratch  Feed  with  Grit...  

6763 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed,  charcoal, 
oyster  shell  and  limestone  grit..,-,,: 

Garland  Scratch  Feed,  No  Grit 

6764 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

1 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed  and  charcoal 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  1 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

Prairie  State  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Garland  Scratch  Peed,  with  Grit 

6765 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Prairie  State  Chick  Feed,  Coarse,  With  Grit-. 

6766 

2.5 

10.  Oi 

5.0 

Prairie  State  Chick  Feed  No  Grit 

6767 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Prairie  State  Chick  Feed  with  Grit 

6768 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Garland  Chick  Feed  No  Grit 

6769 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Garland  Chick  Feed  with  Grit 

6770 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Prairie  State  Poultry  Mash 

7255 

3.5 

17.0 

10.0 

Red  Crown  Scratch  Feed,  No  Grit.^ 

7256 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Red  Crown  Scratch  Feed,  With  Grit 

7257 

2.5 

10.0 

5*0 

Prairie  State  Pigeon  Feed 

7744 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Prater-Mottier  Company,  Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Praters  Scratch  Feed 

7582 

1.5 

6.0 

3.0 

Praters  A.  Scratch  Feed 

7612 

3.0 

8.0 

15.0 

Praters  Chick  Feed __  

8400 

2.0 

7.0 

15.0 

Purina  Millo,  Branch,  Ralston  Purina  Co., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Purina  Scratch  Feed 

7827 

2.5 

10.0 

4.0 

Purina  Chick  Feed  

8004 

'2.5 

10.0 

4.0 

Purina  Chicken  Fatena 

8585 

5.0 

9.0 

9.0 

Purity  Oats  Company  of  Davenport, 

Davenport,  Iowa. 

Iowa  Chick  Feed 

6760 

3.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Perfect  Scratch  Feed  

7121 

3.2 

10.0 

5.0 

Perfect  Chick  Feed 

7122 

3.5 

10.0 

5.0' 

Iowa  Chick  Feed,  Whth  Grit 

7464 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Tom  Boy  Chick  Feed,  With  Grit 

7545 

2.7 

10.0 

5.0 

'l  orn  Boy  Chick  Feed,  (No  Grit) 

7546 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

'lorn  Boy  Scratch  Feed  (With  Grit) 

7786 

2.7 

10.0 

5.0 

'I'om  Boy  Scratch  Feed  (No  Grit)  

7787 

2.7 

10.0 

5.0 

Iowa  Scratch  Feed  (With  Grit)  

7788 

2.7 

10.0 

5.0 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seed,  charcoal, 
oyster  shell  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  hulled 
oats,  charcoal  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  steel  cut 
oats  and  charcoal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  steel  cut 
oats,  charcoal  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  steel  cut 
oats  and  charcoal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  steel  cut 
oats,  charcoal  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  wheat, 
meal,  corn  feed  meal,  kafir  meal,  al- 
falfa meal,  linseed  oil  meal,  meat 
scraps,  charcoal  and  oyster  shell 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  char- 
coal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  oyster 
shells,  charcoal  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  buckwheat,  peas, 
hemp  seed,  millet  seed,  charcoal  and 
limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  sunflower 
seed  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Corn,  kafir,  whole  screenings  from 
wheat,  millet  and  clover  seed  and 
limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 
maize  and  sunflower  seed 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  milo 
maize 

Ground  corn,  ground  oats,  kafir 
meal,  barley  meal,  ground  sunflower 
seed,  wheat  middlings,  corn  germ 
meal  and  linseed  meal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  steel 
cut  oats,  millet  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  hulled  oats,  milo 
maize,  barley,  buckwheat,  sunflower 
seed  and  whole  wheat  screenings 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  steel 
cut  oats,  millet  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  steel 
cut  oats,  millet,  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  steel 
cut  oats,  millet,  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  steel 
cut  oats,  millet  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  bar- 
ley, hulled  oats,  buckwheat,  sun- 
flower seed  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  bar- 
ley, hulled  oats,  buckwheat  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  bar- 
ley, hulled  oats,  buckwheat,  sun- 
flower seed  and  limestone  grit 


325 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Numbt.  '* 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
followingf  ingredients 

Purity  Oats  Company  of  Davenport, 

Davenport,  Iowa. 

Iowa  Scrateh  Feed  

7789 

2.7 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,-  milo  maize,  bar- 
ley, hulled  oats,  buckwheat  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Tom  Boy  Poultry  Mash 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 

8146 

4.0 

16.0 

10.0 

i 

Wheat,  barley,  kafir,  milo,  millet, 
buckwheat,  meat,  wheat  bran, 
wheat  middlings,  oat  meal,  oat 
germ  meal,  oat  middlings,  corn 
meal,  corn  gluten  feed,  hominy  feed, 
alfalfa  meal,  rock  phosphate,  salt, 
calcium  carbonate  and  charcoal 

Eureka  Hen  Feed  (With  Grit) 

4876 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

1 

i 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  buckwheat,  sun- 
flower seed,  oyster  shells  and  marble 
grit 

Eureka  Hen  Feed  (Without  Grit) 

4876 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  buckwheat  and 
sunflower  seeds 

Schumacher  Poultry  Mash 

5455 

4.0 

17.5 

10.0  j 

Wheat  bran,  oatmeal,  alfalfa  meal, 
hominy  feed,  corn  gluten  feed,  meat 
scraps  and  ground  screenings  from 
wheat,  oats,  barley  and  rye 

Big  Egg  Scratch  Grains  With  Grit__ 

5709 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  sun- 
flower seeds,  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings, oyster  shells  and  marble  grit 

Big  Egg  Scratch  Grains  Without  Grit 

5710 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  sun- 
flower seeds  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat and  sunflower  seeds 

Purity  Hen  Feed  (Without  Grit)  

5728 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Quaker  Scratch  Grains  (Without  Grit) 

5729 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat and  sunflower  seeds 

Schumacher  Scratch  Grains  (Without  Grit)... 

5731 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat and  sunflower  seeds 

Blue  Ribbon  Scratch  Grains  (Without  Grit)... 

5783 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat and  sunflower  seeds 

American  Hen  Scratch  Grains  (With  Grit) 

5741 

2,5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  sunflower 
seeds,  oyster  shells  and  marble  grit 

Quaker  Scratch  Grains  (With  Grit) 

5748 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat, sunflower  seeds,  oyster  shells 
and  marble  grit 

Sterling  Scratch  Feed  (Without  Grit). 

5749 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat and  sunflower  seeds 

Mothers  Feed  (Hen  Size)  

5785 

3.5 

11.0 

2.5 

Wheat,  corn,  milo  maize,  buckwheat, 
sunflower  seeds,  oatmeal  and  linseed 
oil  cake 

Mothers  Feed  (Chick  Size) 

5786 

3.0 

10.5 

2.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  rolled 
oats,  oatmeal  and  charcoal 

Quaker  Poultry  Mash 

6361 

4.0 

17.5 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  alfalfa  meal,  hominy 
feed,  corn  gluten  feed,  oatmeal, 
meat  scraps  and  ground  screenings 
from  corn,  oats,  wheat  and  barley 

Quaker  Chick  Feed  with  Grit 

• 

6411 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  V2  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 

Quaker-  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit 

6412 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  V2  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 

Schumacher  Little  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit.. 

6457 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  miUet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 

seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 

Schumacher  Little  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

6458 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  V2  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 

326 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111. 
Purity  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

6469 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Purity  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit r 

6460 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Blue  Ribbon  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

6461 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Blue  Ribbon  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit 

6462 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

American  Little  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

6463 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

American  Little  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit 

6464 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Prize  Winning  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

6465 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Prize  Winning  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit..  _ _ 

6466 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Sterling  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit 

6468 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Early  Bird  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

6497 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Earlv  Bird  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit..  

6498 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Early  Bird  Scratch  Grains  With  Grit 

6548 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Pansy  Chick  Feed  With  Grit 

6577 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Pansy  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit 

6661 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  V2  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  y^  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  y^  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 
Wheat,'  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  abovl  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  sun- 
flower seeds,  whole  wheat  screenings, 
oyster  shells  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  charcoal  and  marble  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed,  oat- 
meal, wild  buckwheat  (with  not  to 
exceed  % of  1%  miscellaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 


327 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 


LABEL 


S § 4) 

o Si  S 
iz;  phO 


§ I 

tn  a< 

to  C" 

0)  dJ 

ISiS 

:zi  fto 


o c 
g 0)  <u 

Iz;  fto 


Quaker  Oats  Company,  The,  Chicago,  111, 

Early  Bird  Scratch  Grains  Without  Grit 

6844 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Big  Egg  Chick  Eeed  With  Grit 

7356 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Big  Egg  Chick  Eeed  Without  Grit  

7357 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Schumacher  Scratch  Grains,  With  Grit 

7706 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Pansy  Scratch  Grains  Without  Grit 

7961 

2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Pansy  Scratch  Grains  With  Grit 

7962 

2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Prize  Winnine-  Hen  Eeed  Without  Grit 

7063 

■ 2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Prize  Winning  Hen  Eeed  With  Grit 

7964 

2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Ralston  Purina  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Mill  Eeed  “Chick  and  Scratch  Size” 

1823 

3.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Purina  Chicken  Chowder  Eeed,  With  Charcoal 

7221 

4.0 

19.0 

9.0 

Chick  Eeed __ 

7535 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Scratch  Eeed _ 

7536 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Scratch  Eeed  Without  Grit  . 

7828 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Purina  Pigeon  Eeed  

8365 

2.5 

11.0 

4.0 

Chick  Eeed  with  Screenings  . .. 

8224 

2.5 

9.0' 

5.0 

Chick  Eeed  Without  Grit  _ 

8316 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Scratch  Eeed  Without  Grit  or  Screenings 

8317 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Rapier  Sugar  Eeed  Company,  Owensboro,  Ky. 

Rapier’s  Black  Hen  Scratch  Eeed 

5577 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Rapier’s  Blue  Hen  Baby  Chick  Eeed 

5678 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Rapier’s  Blue  Hen  Scratch  Eeed 

6092 

2.0 

10.0' 

5.0 

Rapier’s  Economy  Scratch  Eeed 

6266 

2.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Rapier’s  Economv  Scratch  Eeed,  Orit 

6580 

2.0 

10,0 

5.0 

Rapier’s  Blue  Hen  Baby  Chick  Eeed,  Without 

Grit  _ 

7588 

2.5 

I'O.O 

5.0  . 

Red  Mill,  The,  Eairland,  Ind.,  R.  R.  No.  3. 

Rasp  Chick  Eeed  

4549 

2.3 

8.5 

12.0 

Rittenhouse,  E.  S.,  Liberty  Mills,  Ind. 

“All-In”  Chick  Starter 

580i0 

2.0 

9.0 

5.0 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Wheat,  corn,  kaflr,  oats,  barley,  sun- 
flower seed  and  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  millet 
seed,  oatmeal,  wild  buckwheat  (with 
not  to  exceed  y2  of  1%  miscellaneous 
wild  seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds 
and  grains),  charcoal  and  6%  mar- 
ble grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  millet 
seed,  oatmeal,  wild  buckwheat  (with 
not  to  exceed  y2  of  1%  miscellaneous 
wild  seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds 
and  grains),  and  charcoal 
.Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 

M'heat,  sunflower  seeds,  oyster  shells 
and  marble  grit  0% 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  barley,  kafir, 

buckwheat  and  sunflower  seeds 
Wheat,  corn,  oats,  barley,  kafir, 

buckwheat,  sunflower  seeds  and 
limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  barley,  kafir, 

buckwheat  and  sunflower  seeds 
Wheat,  corn,  oats,  barley,  kafir, 

buckwheat,  sunflower  seeds  and 
limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  barley,  oats,  kafir,  milo 
maize,  seeds  and  grit 
Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
meal,  alfalfa  meal,*  linseed  meal, 

granulated  meat,  charcoal  and  salt 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  milo  maize 
and  limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 

maize,  sunflower  seed  and  limestone 
grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo 

maize,  sunflower  seed  and  whole 
wheat  screenings 

Wheat,  millet,  kafir,  milo  and  Can- 
ada peas 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  milo  and 
M'hole  screenings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  milo 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  milo  and 
sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  sunflower  seed, 
wild  buckwheat  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  pigeon  grass  and 
limestone  grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  sunflower 
seed  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  sunflower 
seed  and  limestone  grit 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  pigeon  grass 


Corn,  kafir,  millet  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  hemp, 
charcoal  and  bone 


328 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Kitter-Hennings  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

hhur-Pleez  Baby  Chick  Peed 

5914 

5.1 

12.8 

2.9 

Wheat,  corn,  pin  head  oats,  millet 
seed,  flaxseed  and  whole  wheat 
screenings 

Shur-PIeez  Egg  and  Growing  Mash 

8013 

4.5 

20.0 

9.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
gluten  meal,  corn  feed  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  meat  scraps  and  bone  meal 

Shur-Pleez  Scratch  Feed  

8220 

2.2 

9.0 

5.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  and  sun- 
flower seed 

Ancona  Hen  Feed 

8299 

2.2 

7.0 

7.2 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  sunflower  seed, 
whole  wheat  screenings,  charcoal 
and  limestone  grit 

Banton  Baby  Chick  Feed 

8310 

3.1 

7.2 

5.5 

Wheat,  corn,  pin  head  oats,  flaxseed 
and  whole  wheat  screenings 

Good  Baby  Chick  Feed  

Robey  Mills,  Inc.,  Chicago,  HI. 

8540 

2.9 

9.0 

4.9 

Wheat,  corn,  millet  seed,  steel  cut 
oats,  flaxseed,  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings and  5%  mica  and  quartz  grit 

Velvet  Chick  Feed  with  Grit 

Rohm  Bros.,  Rockville,  Ind. 

8427 

2.5 

9.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oatmeal,  oat  groats, 
millet,  whole  screenings  from  Avheat 
and  barley,  oyster  shell  and  mica 
grit 

Best  Chick  Feed 

Roper  & Brown,  Hobart,  Ind. 

7790 

3.0 

10.0' 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  steel  cut 
oats,  buckwheat,  whole  wheat  screen- 
ings, charcoal  and  oyster  shells 

Hobart  Hen  Feed •_ 

Schaefer,  Karl  H.,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

3476 

1.8 

9.0 

10.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buck- 
wheat, shell  and  grit  (mica,  feldspar 
and  quartz) 

Schaefer’s  Special  Scratch  Feed 

7191 

2.0 

9.0' 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats  and 
milo  maize 

Schaefer’s  Extra  Scratch  Feed 

7506 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
whole  wheat  screenings,  peanut 
meats  and  peanut  germs 

Schaefer’s  Special  Chick  Feed 

7507 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  steel  cut  oats, 
millet  and  charcoal 

Schaefer’s  Special  Poultry  Mash 

7660 

6.0 

12.0 

13.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
meal,  alfalfa  meal,  linseed  meal, 
beef  scraps,  peanut  germ  meal,  kafir 
meal,  milo  maize  meal,  ground 
wheat  screenings,  charcoal  and  salt 

Schaefer  Competitive  Scratch 

Shellabarger  Elevator  Company,  Decatur,  111. 

8373 

2.0 

8.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 
whole  wheat  screenings 

Big  S.  Scratch  Feed  - 

8214 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  milo, 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Big  S.  Chick  Feed 

Shine  & Company,  John  H.,  New  Albany,  Ind. 

8215 

3.0 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  eorn,  kafir,  milo,  millet  and 
oatmeal 

Star  Poultry  Feed  

Sii^mons  & Norris,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

4084 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  kafir,  sunflower 
seed,  charcoal  and  mica  grit 

Fattenum  Poultry  Mash  

8067 

5.0 

19.0 

6.0 

Wheat  middlings,  wheat  flour,  hom- 
iny meal,  eorn  meal,  oat  flour,  al- 
falfa meal,  granulated  meat  and 
salt 

Excello  Poultry  Mash 

8683 

4.0 

19.0 

10.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  oat 
flour,  hominy  meal,  corn  feed  meal, 
linseed  meal,  fine  ground  alfalfa, 
granulated  meat,  salt  and  charcoal 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley  and 
sunflower  seed 

Excello  Scratch  Feed  

Small  & Co.,  Inc.,  W.  H.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

8684 

3.0 

10.0 

5.0 

“Eclipse”  Poultry  Feed 

3229 

3.0 

9.4 

2.1 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  sunflower  seed 
and  oyster  shell 

“Eclipse”  Chick  Feed  

3230 

3.0 

9.5 

2.5 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  millet  seed 
Corn,  kafir,  sunflower  seed,  salvage 
wheat  and  oyster  shell 

“Poultry  Feed”  

Southern  Seed  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

4471 

2.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Atlas  Chiek  Feed  

3775 

3.0 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  milo  maize 
and  buekwheat 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Southern  Seed  Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

Indiana  Economy  Scratch  Feed 

7994 

2.5 

9.5 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  whole  wheat 
screenings  and  mussel  shells 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  millet. 

Indiana  Economy  Chick  Feed 

7995 

2.5 

9.5 

6.0 

Sowash,  E.  K.,  Middletown,  Ind. 

E.  K.  Chick  Starter  & Feed 

7492 

2.0 

9.0 

7.0 

w'hole  wheat  screenings  and  mussel 
shells 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  whole 

Sprague,  Warner  & Company,  Chicago,  111. 

Cero  Brand  Poultry  Feed 

8301 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

wheat  screenings,  charcoal  and  oys- 
ter shells 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley, 

Chico  Brand  Chick  Feed 

8302 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

buckwheat  and  sunflower  seeds 
Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  millet  seed, 

Spratt’s  Patent,  Ltd.,  Newark,  N.  J. 

Chicgrain  

G034 

3.0 

14.0 

5.0 

oatmeal,  wild  buckwheat  (not  to  ex- 
ceed Vz  of  1%  miscelaneous  wild 
seeds  occurring  in  above  seeds  and 
grains),  and  charcoal 

Wheat,  kafir,  millet,  buckwheat, 

Chick  Meal __  

G035 

2.5 

20.0 

2.0 

green  peas,  hemp,  Mexican  peas, 
popcorn,  canary,  rice,  meat,  char- 
coal and  bone 

Wheat  flour  and  meat 

Poultry  Food  __  

608G 

3.5 

20.0 

2.0 

Wheat  flour  and  meat 

Stader,  Frank  E.,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Staders  Star  Brand  Scratch  Food  

7377 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  buckwheat 
and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  oats,  buckwheat  and 

Starr,  J.  R.,  Winamac,  Ind. 

Mixed  Poultry  Feed 

8G02 

2.5 

9.5 

7.0 

Starr  Mills,  South  Bend,  Ind. 

Scratch  Feed  — 

G0I03 

2.0 

9.0 

5.0 

millet 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  rye, 
sunflower  seed  and  charcoal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  whole 

Scratch  Feed  with  Grit 

G933 

2.0 

8.0 

4.0 

Steckley,  George,  Kendallville,  Ind. 

Poultry  Mash 

3489 

4.5 

16.0 

9.0. 

wheat  screenings,  charcoal  and 
limestone  grit 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  gluten 

Steinmesch  Feed  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
Steinmesch  Mixed  Feed  for  Poultry 

4025 

3.5 

10.0 

6.0 

feed,  corn  feed  meal,  beef  scraps 
and  linseed  meal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  sun- 

Stone Quarry  Mills,  Spiceland,  Ind. 

Blue  River  Chick  & Hen  Feed 

7579 

2.0 

5.0 

7.0 

flower  seed,  flaxseed,  rape  and  mus- 
tard seed 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  millet,  char- 

Sugarine Company,  The,  Peoria,  111. 

Sugarine  Chick  Feed  

G562 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

coal  and  oyster  shell 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir  and  millet 

Sugarine  Chick  Feed  with  5%  Grit 

6563 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  marble 

Sugarine  Scratch  Feed  _ 

82S8 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

grit 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 

Thomas  Milling  Company,  Marion,  Ind. 

Tip  Top  Chick  Feed 

8453 

2.5 

9.0 

4.0 

buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Wheat,  corn,  millet,  charcoal  and 

Tip  Top  Scratch  Feed  

8454 

2.5 

9.0 

5.0 

oyster  shell 

Wheat,  corn,  barley,  oats,  buck- 

Union Feed  & Poultry  Company, 

Lafayette,  Ind. 

Union  Scratch  Peed  No  Grit 

7183 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

wheat,  charcoal  and  oyster  shell 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  bar- 

Union Poultry  Mash 

7184 

3.5 

12.0 

10.0 

ley,  buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
bone 

Oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings. 

Union  Grain  & Feed  Company,  The, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

Union  Mash 

7065 

2.5 

11.0 

11.0 

corn  gluten  feed,  corn  meal,  alfalfa 
meal,  linseed  meal,  beef  scraps, 
blood  meal,  ground  wheat  screen- 
ings and  charcoal 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  shorts,  corn 

! 

Union  Chick  Feed  with  Grit ' 

8511 

2.0 

9.0 

10.0 

meal,  alfalfa  meal,  meat  meal  and 
charcoal 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  seed  and 

limestone  grit 

330 


TABLE  Vil — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain  - 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Union  Grain  & Feed  Company,  The, 

Anderson,  Ind. 

1 

Union  Chick  Feed  Without  Grit  . . _ 

85il2 

2.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Whe'at,  corn,  kafir  and  millet  seed 

Diamond  Scratch  Feed  With  Grit 

8622 

2.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  milo, 
sunfloAver  seed,  linseed  oil  cake  and 
limestone  grit 

Diamond  Scratch  Feed  Without  Grit 

8623 

2.0 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  barley,  milo, 
sunflower  seed  and  linseed  oil  cake 

Walker  & Co.,  P.  M.,  Loogootee,  Ind. 

Mixed  Chicken  Feed 

Weber  & Purviance,  Huntington,  Ind. 

7809 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  whole 
wheat  screenings  and  oyster  shells 

Game  Cock  Scratch  Feed 

0266 

2.5 

10.0 

i 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  lin- 
seed oil  meal 

Game  Cock  Poultry  Mash  __  

6256 

4.5 

16.5 

8.0 

Wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings,  corn 
feed  meal,  hominy  feed,  linseed  oil 
meal,  meat  scraps  and  salt 

Game  Cock  Chick  Feed  

Wells,  Guy  M.,  Knox,  Ind. 

6318 

2.5 

10.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet  and  meat 
scraps 

Wells  Mixed  Chicken  Feed 

Western  Grain  Products  Company, 

6308 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  oys- 
ter shell 

West  Hammond,  111. 

Calumet  Scratch  Feed— No  Grit 

7422 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat  and  sunflower  seed 

Calumet  Scratch  Feed— With  Grit 

7423 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  wild 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  5% 
limestone  grit 

Hammond  Scratch  Feed — No  Grit 

7424 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  lin- 
seed oil  cake 

Hammond  Scratch  Feed— With  Grit 

Whelan,  Omer  G.,  Richmond,  Ind. 

7425 

2.5 

10.01 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed,  linseed 
oil  cake  and  5%  limestone  grit 

Scratching  Grains  with  Grit 

8128 

2.9 

9.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckAvheat,  sunflower  seed,  charcoal, 
oyster  shells  and  limestone  grit 

Scratching  Grains  Not  Grit _ 

8129 

3.0 

9.5 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats, 
buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and  char- 
coal 

Whelan’s  Chick  Feed  

Wilkinson,  A.  E.,  New  Castle,  Ind. 

Wilkinson  s Henola  Mash 

8551 

2.0: 

8.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  steel  cut 
oats,  whole  clover  seed,  screenings, 
charcoal  and  limestone  grit 

5677 

2.0 

12.0 

5.0 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  gluten 
meal,  corn  feed  meal,  linseed  oil 
meal  and  heneta  grit  (sodium,  lime, 
silica  and  phosphorus  compounds) 

Wilkinson’s  La-u-Se  Poultry  Feed  

5678 

. 2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  millet,  sun- 
flower seed  and  linseed  oil  cake  ' 

Rapid  Developer 

6809 

2.5 

9.0 

6.0 

i 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  millet,  buckwheat 
and  cane  seed 

Wilkinson’s  La-U-Se  Poultry  Feed,  with  Grit__ 

Wood,  Stubbs  & Company,  Louisville,  Ky. 

7063 

2.5 

10.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oat",  millet,  cane 
seed,  sunflow^er  seed,  linseed  oil  cake 
and  limestone  grit 

Shawnee  Brand  Scratch  Feed  

7331 

3.0 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  rrlilo  maize,  bar- 
ley, buckwheat  and  sunfloAver  seed 

Shawnee  Scratch  Feed  5%  Grit 

7500 

3.0 

10.5 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  bar- 
ley, buckwheat,  sunflower  seed  and 
5%  marble  grit 

Shawnee  Chick  Feed 

7549 

3.5 

10.0 

3.1 

Corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  millet  seed, 
flaxseed  and  whole  wheat  screenings 

Shawnee  Brand  Pigeon  Feed 

Ziliak  & Shafer  Milling  Company,  Evansville 

7652 

2.0 

10.0 

4.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo  maize,  Ca.n- 
ada  peas,  buckwheat  and  sunflower 
seed 

Branch,  Evansville,  Ind. 

Acme  Scratch  Feed 

8694 

2.0 

9.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  milo,  barley, 
emmer,  sunflower  seed,  wffiole  Avheat 
screenings  and  limestone  grit 

331 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Zionsville  Milling  Company,  Zionsville,  Ind. 

Scratch  Peed 

7061 

2.0 

9.0 

10.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats,  cane  seed 
and  buckwheat 

Zook  Bros.,  I-ogansport,  Ind. 

Faultless  Chick  Feed 

5909 

2.5 

8.0 

5.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  oats  and  millet 

Faultless  Hen  Food  

591-0 

3.0 

9.0 

7.0 

Wheat,  corn,  kafir,  barley,  oats,  milo 
maize  and  sunflower  seed 

CONDIMENTAL  STOCK  AND  POULTRY 
FOODS 

American  Druggists  Syndicate, 

Long  Island  City,  N.  Y. 

Safe-T-Kros  Regulateur  

Amos,  Carl,  Kokomo,  Ind. 

8416 

1.5 

8.5 

5.0 

Gentian,  nux  vomica,  capsicum,  white 
arsenic,  iron  sulphate,  sodium  sul- 
phate, wheat  middlings 

The  Amos  Horse,  Cattle  and  Sheep  Tonic 

7928 

10.0 

4.0 

53.0 

Red  percoon  root,  fenugreek,  sul- 
phur, horse  medley,  Indiana  worm 
seed,  copperas,  asafetida,  tobacco, 
salt,  flaxseed  meal 

The  Amos  Pig  Tonic 

7929 

3.0 

5.0 

50.0 

Red  percoon  root,  sulphur,  copperas, 
horse  medley,  santonin,  asafetida, 
fenugreek,  Indiana  worm  seed,  to- 
bacco, coal,  Epsom  salt,  salt,  red- 
dog  flour,  flaxseed  meal,  old  process 
linseed  oil  meal 

Amos  Worm  Powder 

Ashland  Stock  Food  Co.,  Ashland,  Ohio. 

8377 

2.0 

10.0 

5.0 

Copperas,  santonin,  Indian  worm 
seed,  calomel,  Epsom  salt.  May  ap- 
ple root,  aloes,  .slippery  elm,  soda, 
reddog  flour 

Ashland  Poultry  Food  Digester 

4771 

2.2 

10.2 

5.5 

Venetian  red,  red  pepper,  sulphate  of 
iron,  hyposulphite  of  soda,  salt, 
oyster  shells  and  wheat  middlings 

Ashland  Stock  Food  Digester  

Barker,  Moore,  Mein  Medicine  Co.,  The, 
Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Barker’s  Chemical  & Vegetable  Horse,  Cattle 

4772 

4.4 

14.3 

4.7 

Fenugreek,  nux  vomica,  sulphate  of 
iron,  hyposulphite  of  soda,  char- 
coal, saltpeter,  salt,  wheat  mid- 
dlings 

& Poultry  Medicinal  Powder 

Blackman  Stock  Remedy  Co., 

Chattanooga,  Tenn. 

8007 

5.0 

20.0 

41.0 

Charcoal,  gentian,  sodium  nitrate, 
sulphate  of  iron,  fenugreek,  flowers 
of  sulphur,  rosin,  salt,  African  gin- 
ger, pennyroyal  herb,  cascara  sa- 
grada,  linseed  cake  meal 

Owen’s  Health  and  Egg  Producer 

Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Factory,  Waukegan,  Ill.'^o 

6242 

0.0 

8.0 

5.0 

Rosin,  sulphur,  copperas,  red  pepper, 
charcoal,  oyster  shells,  bone  flour, 
blood  meal 

Blatchford ’s  “Fill  the  Basket”  Egg  Mash 

Blatchford’s  Genuine  Old  English  Tonic  and 

7270 

4.0 

19.0 

10.0 

Fenugreek,  anise,  capsicum,  locust 
bean  meal,  flaxseed,  wheat  flour, 
rice  polish,  blood  flour,  barley  meal, 
bean  meal,  pea  meal,  old  process  lin- 
seed oil  meal,  cocoa  shell  meal, 
cocoanut  meal,  cottonseed  meal, 
dried  milk,  alfalfa  meal,  corn  meal, 
oatmeal,  wheat  bran,  wheat  mid- 
dlings, meat  scraps,  fish,  bone  meal, 
salt,  limestone  grit 

Regulator  

7271 

8.0 

21.0 

9.5 

Peruvian  bark,  gentian,  fenugreek, 
anise,  ginger,  licorice,  sulphate  of 
iron,  sulphate  of  soda,  chloride  of 
sodium,  sarsaparilla,  sulphur,  char- 
coal, locust  bean  meal,  flaxseed, 
wheat  flour,  rice- polish,  blood  flour, 
barley  meal,  bean  meal,  pea  meal, 
old  process  linseed  oil  meal,  cocoa 
shell  meal,  cocoanut  meal,  cotton- 
seed meal,  dried  milk 

Succeeded  by  Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Co. 


332 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Blatchford  Calf  Meal  Factory,  Waukegan,  111. 

1 

Blatchford’s  Lamb  Meal  

Blatchford’s  Topping  Off  Meal  (Formerly, 

7767 

4.0 

1 

20.0 

j 

1 

6.0 

Anise  seed,  locust  bean  meal,  barley 
meal,  blood  flour,  linseed  oil  meal, 
rice  polish,  bean  meal,  cottonseed 
meal,  corn  meal,  wheat  flour,  salt 

Sugar  and  Flaxseed) 

• 

Blue  Moon  Stock  Corrector  Co.,  The, 
Crawfordsville,  Ind.^i 

7808 

10.0 

25.0  j 

1 

8.0 

Gentian,  anise,  sulphate  of  soda,  lo- 
cust bean  meal,  bean  meal,  pea 
meal,  cottonseed  meal,  old  process 
linseed  oil  meal,  cocoa  shell  meal, 
flaxseed,  rice  polish,  cocoanut  meal, 
y2%  salt 

Blue  Moon  Stock  Corrector 

3137 

2.2 

i 

12.0  i 

i 

i 

1 

5.0 

Gentian,  asafetida,  ginger,  mandrake, 
fenugreek,  resin,  sodium  bicarbo- 
nate, sodium  sulphate,  sodium  chlo- 
ride, Epsom  salt,  potassium  nitrate, 
sulphate  of  iron,  sulphur,  linseed 
meal 

The  Blue  Moon  Hog  Corrector 

Bradick,  V.  S.,  B.  F.,  Grayville,  111. 

6900 

2.0 

11.0  i 

10.0 

Gentian  root,  mandrake  root,  mad- 
der, African  ginger,  asafetida,  cal- 
cium carbonate,  . sodium  bi-carbo- 
nate, sodium  sulphate,  sodium  chlo- 
ride, Epsom  salt,  sulphur,  ferrous 
sulphas  cxicated  (dried  copperas), 
charcoal,  linseed  meal 

Dr.  Bradick’s  Medicated  Stock  Tonic 

Buckeye  Company,  The,  Lorain,  Ohio. 

7694 

4.0 

15.5 

6.5 

Black  antimony,  madder,  worm  seed, 
ginger,  fenugreek,  nux  vomica,  gen- 
tian, copperas,  charcoal,  potassium 
nitrate  (saltpeter),  sulphur,  Glaub- 
er’s salt,  Epsom  salt,  bicarbonate 
of  soda,  salt,  wood  and  corn  cob 
ashes,  linseed  oil  cake 

Gentian  root,  Venetian  red,  sulphate 
of  iron,  hyposulphite  of  soda, 

1 Glauber’s  salt,  nux  vomica,  salt- 
peter, charcoal,  sodium  chloride, 

, ground  wheat  screenings 

Buckeye  Poultry  Powder 

6081 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Buckeye  Stock  Conditioner 

Buffington  Famous  Condition  Powder  Co., 

The,  Petroleum,  Ind. 

6082 

0.0 

0.0 

1 

0.0 

Gentian  root,  ginger,  fenugreek  seed, 
anise  seed,  nux  vomica,  sulphate  of 
iron,  Glauber’s  salt,  saltpeter,  Ep- 
som salt,  charcoal,  sodium  chloride, 
ground  wheat  screenings 

The  Buffington  Famous  Condition  Powder... 

Busch  Remedy  Company,  Inc.,  The, 

Evansville,  Ind. 

3400 

4.0 

15.0 

9.0 

Copperas,  sulphur,  fenugreek,  salt- 
1 peter,  linseed  meal 

[ 

1 

Busch’s  Poultry  Laying  Tonic 

Capitol  Food  Co.,  The,  Tiffin,  Ohio. 

3999 

1.2 

15.0 

8.5 

Gentian,  ginger,  capsicum,  nux  vom- 
ica, cantharides,  iron  sulphate,  po- 
tassium nitrate,  Epsom  salt,  Vene- 
tian red,  bone  meal,  oyster  shell, 
malt  sprouts 

Capitol  Stock  Remedy 

4611 

0.0 

0.0 

10.0 

1- 

1 

! 

Gentian,  fenugreek,  anise  seed,  quas- 
sia, worm  seed,  nux  vomica,  mag- 
nesium sulphate,  ferrous  sulphate, 
sodium  chloride,  charcoal,  screen- 
ings from  flaxseed 

Capitol  Poultry  Remedy 

Carpenter  Company,  W.  D.,  Syracuse,  N.'Y. 

4612 

0.0 

0.0 

9.0 

Capsicum,  nux  vomica,  quassia, 
worm  seed,  magnesium  sulphate, 
ferrous  sulphate,  iron  oxide,  potas- 
sium permanganate,  sulphur,  screen- 
ings from  flaxseed 

Nutriotone  

7398 

0.0 

0.0 

n.O 

Caraway,  anise,  fenugreek,  coriander, 
quassia,  nux  vomica,  wild  cherry, 
xanthorrhiza,  cascara  sagrada,  gin- 
ger, sulphur,  charcoal,  sodium  bi- 
carbonate, sodium  chloride,  linseed 
meal,  flaxseed  meal,  cottonseed  feed, 
bean  meal,  ground  screenings  from 

1 wheat,  flax  and  seeds 

Succeeded  by  the  Blue  Moon  Corrector  Co, 


333 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


LABEL 


Chambers  Stock  Powder  Company,  The, 
Rossville,  111. 

Chambers  Poultry  Powder 


Chambers  Hog  Remedy 


Chambers  Horse  Conditioner 


Chambers  Cattle  Powder  

Chapman-Doake  Company,  The,  Decatur,  111. 
Yankee  Stock  Peed  


Conkey  Company,  The  G.  E.,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 
Conkey’s  Buttermilk  Starting  Pood 

Crosier  Stock  & Poultry  Powder  Co., 

New  Albany,  Ind. 

Crosiers  Poultry  Powder 


Crosiers  Horse  & Cattle  Powder. 


Dairy  Association  Co.,  The,  Lyndonville,  Vt. 
Kow  Kure  


Daisy,  W.  H.,  Kokomo,  Ind. 

Daisy  Horse,  Cattle,  Sheep  and  Hog  Tonic.— 


Daniels,  Inc.,  Dr.  A.  C.,  Boston,  Mass. 
Dr.  A.  C.  Daniels’  Cow  Invigorator.. 


Davis,  E.  D.,  North  Vernon,  Ind. 

Davis  Poultry  Powder  & Egg  Producer. 

Deam  & Spivey,  Bluffton,  Ind. 

Beam’s  Egg  Pood  & Poultry  Powder... 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

u 

<D 

§ 

c .S 

l.l 

5 .1^ 

<u  .e. 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 

o 

Not  less 

per  cent 

Crude  F 

Not  less 

per  cent 

Crude  P 

Not  mor 

per  cent 

Crude  F 

following  ingredients 

38S1 

3.0 

17.0 

4.5 

Capsicum,  Venetian  red,  sulphur,  cop- 
peras, resin,  bicarbonate  of  soda, 
salt,  oyster  shell,  flaxseed  meal 
Copperas,  resin,  sulphur,  bicarbonate 
of  soda,  Epsom  salt,  saltpeter,  salt, 
flaxseed  meal 

3882 

2.8 

15.0 

4.0 

3883 

2.5 

13.5 

3.5 

Copperas,  resin,  sulphur,  bicarbonate 
of  soda,  Epsom  salt,  salt,  charcoal, 
saltpeter,  cold  pressed  flaxseed  meal 

3884 

2.5 

15.0 

4.0 

Copperas,  resin,  sulphur,  bicarbonate 
of  soda,  salt,  cold  pressed  flaxseed 

8434 

3.0 

12.0 

17.0 

Corn,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
hominy  feed,  alfalfa  meal,  cotton- 
seed feed  (cottonseed  meal  and 
hulls),  ground  w'heat  screeningj>, 
V2%  salt,  molasses 

7212 

3.0 

12.0' 

4.0 

Gentian  root,  iron  sulphate  (cop- 
peras), mustard  seed,  wheat,  corn, 
hulled  oats,  wheat  middlings,  bone, 
evaporated  buttermilk 

4640 

2.0 

5.0 

6.0 

African  ginger,  fenugreek  seed,  blood 
root,  American  Venetian  red,  sul- 
phur, wood  ashes,  mustard  bran, 
ground  flaxseed 

4641 

4.0 

5.0 

11.0' 

African  ginger,  gentian  root,  blood 
root,  black  antimony,  sassafras 
bark,  rosin,  iron  sulphate,  sulphur, 
charcoal,  wood  ashes,  ground  flax- 
seed, saltpeter 

750] 

0.0 

0.0 

7.0 

Fenugreek,  ginger  root,  capsicum, 
spearmint,  asafetida,  elecampane, 
uva  ursi,  damiana  leaves,  witch 
hazel  leaves,  garget  root,  boneset, 
aletria,  cinchona,  black  haw  bark, 
potassium  nitrate,  Epsom  salt,  car- 
bonate of  iron,  wheat  middlings 
Fenugreek,  asafetida,  saltpeter,  cop- 
peras, horse  medley,  bicarbonate  of 
soda,  ginger,  blood  root,  black  pep- 
per, flowers  of  sulphur,  tobacco 
dust,  wood  ashes,  salt,  ground  flax- 
seed 

8723 

5.0 

5.0' 

15.  C 

6271 

5.0 

10.5 

12.7 

Poplar  bark,  Epsom  salt,  spearmint, 
salt,  carbonate  of  iron,  nitre  (salt- 
peter), elecampane,  ginger,  pepper, 
sulphur,  poke  root,  boneset,  asa- 
fetida, gentian,  fenugreek,  althaea, 
Peruvian  bark,  life  root,  queen  of 
the  meadows,  water  pepper,  bone 
meal 

4973 

10.0 

6.5 

10.0 

Ginger,  gentian,  capsicum,  Venetian 
red,  sulphur,  charcoal,  cantharides, 
flaxseed  meal 

4585 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Sodium  chloride,  sodium  sulphate,  so- 
dium bicarbonate,  sulphur,  iron  sul- 
phate, fenugreek,  black  antimony, 
gentian-,  ginger,  potassium  nitrate, 
potassium  bitartrate,  asafetida, 
capsicum,  Venetian  red,  bone  meal, 
wheat  shorts,  linseed  oil  cake 

334 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Empire  Drug  Store,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

Empire  Stock  and  Poultry  Powder 

Feed  Products  Milling  Company,  Chicago,  111. 

2904 

4.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Elecampane,  fenugreek,  juniper  ber- 
ries, coriander  seed,  gentian,  valer- 
ian, blood  root,  lobelia,  mandrake, 
poplar  bark,  black  mustard,  rosin, 
licorice  root,  ginger,  sodium  sulfate, 
sodium  chloride,  sodium  carbonate, 
sulphur,  iron  sulphate,  potassium 
nitrate,  black  antimony,  alum,  flax- 
seed meal,  linseed  meal 

Polo  Stock  Feed 

Fleck,  J.  J.,  Tiffin,  Ohio. 

8356 

2.5 

10.0 

9.0 

Oats,  wheat  bran,  wheat  middlings, 
corn  gluten  feed,  corn  feed  meal, 
oat  middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls 

Flecks  Poultry  Powder 

Furst-McNess  Company,  Freeport,  111. 

4520 

0.0 

0.0 

i 

9.0 

Fenugreek,  sassafras,  sage  leaves, 
bayberry  bark,  Venetian  red,  cay- 
enne pepper,  bicarbonate  of  soda, 
sulphate  of  magnesia,  mustard 
bran,  bone  meal,  oyster  shells 

F.  W.  McNess  Poultry  Tonic  _ 

6982 

9.6 

4.8 

12.9 

Gentian,  quassia,  ginger,  capsicum, 
copperas,  sulphur,  charcoal,  Vene- 
tian red,  oyster  shell  and  wheat  mid- 
dlings 

F.  W.  McNess  Stock  Food _ 

German  Reliable  Medicine  Co.,  Decatur,  Ind. 

8044 

8.2 

13.5 

12.4 

Capsicum,  coriander,  ginger,  quassia, 
fenugreek,  areca  nut,  sulphur,  sul- 
phate of  iron,  potassium  nitrate, 
sodium  sulphate,  salt,  charcoal, 
wheat  middlings 

German  Reliable  Stock  Food _ 

Gieger-Fishback  Co.,  The,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

6737 

0.6 

10.0 

5.0 

Fenugreek,  elecampane,  gentian, 

blood  root,  sulphur,  wood  ashes, 
salt,  sugar,  ground  flaxseed  meal, 
wheat  middlings 

Hog  Feed  _ 

Gifford,  Charlie,  Russiaville,  Ind. 

6369 

1.5 

7.0' 

2.0 

Bicarbonate  of  soda,  phosphate  of 
lime,  salt,  wheat  flour,  corn  flour, 
rice  flour 

Giffords  Stock  'I’onic  and  Worm  Expeller 

Golden  Drop  Medicine  Company,  Chrisney,  Ind. 

8712 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Sulphate  of  iron,  nux  vomica,  horse 
medley,  sulphur,  magnesium  sul- 
phate, Spanish  brown,  sodium  chlo- 
ride 

Peerless  Poultry  Powder __ 

Guarantee  Food  Company  of  Pennsylvania, 

6041 

0.5 

3.0 

3.0 

Copperas,  copper  sulphate,  capsicum, 
Venetian  red,  nitrate  of  potassium, 
w^heat  shorts 

Lewisburg,  Pa, 

Keystone  Stock  Conditioner 

Hale,  G.  S.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

8478 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Flowers  of  sulphur,  copperas,  Epsom 
salt,  fenugreek,  gentian,  African 
ginger,  Bombay  capsicum,  ground 
cocoa  shells,  buckwheat  hulls 

Hale’s  Spanish  Poultry  Powder 

Harlan  Products  Company,  Indianapolis,  Ind. 

750 

3.7 

14.0 

10.0 

Frumentum  powder  (corn  meal),  sul- 
phur, Venetian  red,  black  antimony, 
capsicum 

Harlan  Stock  Regulator 

8514 

4.5 

25.0' 

6.5 

Gentian,  fenugreek,  sulphur,  san- 
guinaria,  carbo  ligni,  asafetida,  po- 
tassium tartrate,  ginger,  mandrake, 
populus  alba,  sodium  chloride,  lin- 
seed oil  meal 

Harlan  Poultry  Regulator 

Heitman  Bros.,  Holland,  Ind. 

8558 

4.5 

25.0 

6.5 

Gentian,  fenugreek,  sulphur,  san- 
guinaria,  carbo  ligni,  asafetida,  po- 
tassium tartrate,  ginger,  mandrake, 
populus  alba,  sodium  chloride,  oys- 
ter shell,  linseed  oil  meal 

H.  B.  Poultry  Remedy  and  Egg  Producer 

5006 

5.0 

3.0 

5.0 

Borax,  cream  of  tartar,  salt,  bicar- 
bonate of  soda,  capsicum,  nitrate 
of  potash,  resin,  oxide  of  calcium, 
black  antimony,  ground  flaxseed 

H.  B.  Horse  and  Cattle  Powder 

Henderson  «fc  Co.,  W.  D.,  Fort  Wayne,  Ind. 

5007 

1.0 

7.0 

5.0 

Sulphur,  Glauber’s  salt,  bicarbonate 
of  soda,  Jamaica  ginger,  fenugreek, 
black  antimony,  salt,  linseed  meal 

Atlas  Medicated  Stock  Salt 

4839 

0.0 

0.0 

10.0 

Fenugreek,  copperas,  gentian  root, 
rosin,  chalk,  saltpeter,  salt,  char- 
coal, linseed  oil  meal 

335 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Herb  Medicine  Company,  The,  Springfield,  Ohio. 
Lightning  Horse  Cattle  & Poultry  Powders.. 

5251 

0.0 

0.0 

6.0 

Fenugreek,  sulphur,  saltpeter,  Epsom 

Hess  & Clark,  Dr.  Ashland,  Ohio. 

Dr.  Hess  Poultry  Pan-a-ce-a 

7758 

1.0 

2.0 

26.0 

salt,  rosin,  flaxseed  meal,  linseed  oil 
cake  meal 

Quassia,  nux  vomica,  potassium  ni- 

Dr. Hess  Stock  Tonic 

7759 

1.0 

2.0 

24.0 

trate,  calcium  carbonate,  sodium 
hyposulphite,  sodium  chloride,  iron 
sulphate,  iron  oxide,  fine  ground 
cottonseed  hulls 

Quassia,  nux  vomica,  charcoal,  potas- 

Hog Joy  System,  Springfield,  111. 

Gro-Past  ...  

7446 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

sium  nitrate,  sodium  sulphate,  mag- 
nesium sulphate,  sodium  chloride, 
iron  sulphate,  fenugreek,  fine 
ground  cottonseed  hulls 

Vegetable  ash  containing  silica,  iron. 

Illinois  Stock  Food  Co.,  The,  Paris,  111. 

Illinois  Stock  Food 

3086 

5.0 

15.0 

7.0 

alumina,  calcium,  magnesium,  sul- 
phur, sodium,  potassium,  phos- 
phorus compounds 

Sulphur,  ginger,  sulphate  of  iron 

Indispensable  Chemical  Company, 

Kokomo,  Ind. 

Indispensable  Condition  Powder 

7936 

0.0 

O.OI 

10.0 

(copperas),  sodium  hypo  phosphite, 
charcoal,  sugar,  wheat  middlings, 
linseed  meal 

Gentian,  sulphur,  sodium  chloride. 

International  Stock  Food  Company, 
Minneapolis,  Minn. 

International  Medicinal  Poultry  Food  Tonic.. 

6378 

0.0 

0.0 

34.2 

copperas,  lime,  anise,  charcoal,  ash, 
Epsom  salt 

Sassafras,  gentian,  copperas,  calcium 

International  Medicinal  Stock  Food  Tonic 

7940 

0.0 

0.0 

20.0 

carbonate,  mustard,  ginger,  char- 
coal, magnesium  carbonate,  poplar 
bark,  capsicum,  quassia,  mustard 
bran 

Saltpeter,  gentian,  mustard,  ginger. 

Iowa  City  Food  & Remedy  Co., 

Iowa  City,  Iowa. 

Iowa  City  Stock  Tonic  _.  — 

5550 

6.9 

28.3 

7.5 

capsicum,  charcoal,  quassia,  cin- 
chona bark,  rosin  weed,  Colombo, 
poplar  bark,  iron  sulphate  (cop- 
peras), nux  vomica,  sulphur,  salt, 
prepared  meal  from  wheat,  oats,  rye 
and  barley 

Gentian,  ginger,  fenugreek,  anise 
seed,  licorice,  charcoal,  salt,  linseed 
meal 

Gentian,,  ginger,  copperas,  Colombo, 

K.  & B.  Medicine  Company,  Kirklin,  Ind. 

K.  & B.  Hog  Tonic 

8349 

4.0 

14.0 

13.0 

Komo  Manufacturing  Company, 

Knightstown,  Ind. 

Komo  Hog  Tonic 

6178 

3.0 

3.0 

6.0 

madder,  sulphur,  wood  charcoal, 
sodium  bi-carbonate,  saltpeter,  Ep- 
som salt,  Glauber’s  salt,  salt,  lin- 
seed meal 

American  worm  seed,  Glaubers’  salt. 

Komo  Stock  Tonic 

6192 

3.0 

5.0 

16.0 

Jamaica  ginger,  bicarbonate  of 
soda,  sodium  chloride,  charcoal,  sul- 
phur, wood  ashes,  flaxseed  meal 
Gentian,  Jamaica  ginger,  fenugreek, 
elecampane,  caraway  seed,  anise 
seed,  fennel  seed,  worm  seed,  areca, 
St.  John’s  bread  (carob  beans), 
sodium  sulphate,  sulphur,  flaxseed 
meal,  corn  meal,  wheat  middlings 
Gentian,  fenugreek,  black  antimony. 

Kurtz-Bronson  Medicine  Company, 

Kirklin,  Ind.^s 

K & B Stock  Conditioner 

3886 

5.0 

14.0 

9.5 

K.  & B.  Poultry  Tonic  and  Egg  Producer 

4357 

5.0 

14.0 

6.5 

asafetida,  ginger,  copperas,  san- 
guinaria,  mandrake,  columbo,  pop- 
lar bark,  madder,  sulphur,  wood 
eharcoal,  potassium  bitartrate, 
Glauber’s  salt,  salt,  linseed  cake 
Gentian,  ginger,  capsicum,  fenugreek. 

cantharides,  Venetian  red,  sulphur, 
Epsom  salt,  linseed  oil  cake,  beef 
scraps,  blood  meal  and  bone  meal 

^2  Succeeded  by  K.  & B.  Medicine  Co. 


336 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  -to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

King-  Company,  The,  Rockford,  111. 

King  Poultry  Tonic 

7945 

3.6 

8.1 

11.5 

Spanish  flies,  African  capsicum,  gen- 
tian root,  African  ginger,  Venetian 
red,  American  sulphur,  ground  co- 
coa shells,  ground  mussel  shells,  al- 
falfa meal,  American  shipstuff 
(wheat  middlings  and  bran) 

King  Stock  Tonic  

Klein-Lambert  Company,  The, 

Chicago,  (Blue  Island),  111. 

7946 

2.0 

7.3 

15.7 

Sulphate  of  iron,  gentian  root,  ele- 
campane root,  salts  of  tartar,  gin- 
ger root,  mandrake  root,  cascara 
sagrada  bark,  fenugreek  seed,  Amer- 
ican w'orm  seed,  anise  seed,  pumpkin 
seed,  juniper  berries,  African  capsi- 
cum, coriander  seed,  sodium  bicar- 
bonate, American  sulphur,  areca 
nuts,  sodium  chloride,  cocoa  shells, 
charcoal,  linseed  meal,  American 
shipstuff  (wheat  middlings  and 
bran) 

0.  K.  Stock  Food 

5998 

5.0  i 

[ 

25.0 

12.0 

Gentian,  fenugreek,  sodium  chloride, 
linseed  meal,  charcoal 

0.  K.  Poultry  Food 

Krause  Milling  Company,  Chas.  A., 

5999 

5.0 ; 

25.0 

8.0 

Gentian,  fenugreek,  sodium  chloride, 
subcarbonate  of  iron,  wheat  mid- 
dlings, linseed  meal,  charcoal 

Milwaukee,  Wis. 

Badger  Stock  Feed 

Lancaster,  Dills,  Brattain  & Co., 

Greencastle,  Ind. 

8560 

4.5 

j 

10.0 

12.0 

Corn,  corn  germ  meal,  hominy  feed, 
maizo  (corn),  reddog  flour,  oat 
middlings,  oat  shorts,  oat  hulls,  salt 

0.  D.  Shover’s  Poultry  Pow’der 

7560 

0.0 

0.0 

2.0 

Fenugreek,  black  antimony,  Spanish 
brown,  blood  root,  sulphur,  salt,  old 
process  linseed  oil  meal 

Shover’s  Stock  Food 

Lee  Company,  Geo.  H.,  Omaha,  Neb. 

8307 

0.0  i 

0.0 

2.0 

Fenugreek,  black  antimony,  Spanish 
brown,  blood  root,  sulphur,  salt, 
linseed  oil  meal 

Lee’s  Best  Conditioner  

4526 

2.0 

25.0 

10.0 

Gentian,  ginger,  fenugreek,  sulphur, 
anise,  licorice,  rhubarb,  cayenne,  po- 
tassium nitrate  (saltpeter),  iron  sul- 
phate (copperas),  charcoal,  salt, 
corn  germ  meal,  linseed  meal 

Lee’s  Stock  Tonic 

4527 

5.0 

15.0 

10.0 

Gentian,  ginger,  anise,  licorice,  rhu- 
barb, copperas,  cayenne,  charcoal, 
soda  bicarbonate,  Glaubers’  salt, 
salt,  corn  germ  meal,  linseed  meal 

Lees  Egg  Maker  

LeGear  Medicine  Company,  Dr.  L.  D., 

St.  Louis,  Mo. 

5258 

2.0 

30.0 

5.0 

Potassium  nitrate,  sodium  sulphate, 
ginger,  gentian,  fenugreek,  iron  sul- 
phate, cayenne,  salt,  sulphur,  char- 
coal, granulated  blood,  linseed  meal 

Dr.  LeGear’s  Poultry  Powder 

8135 

3.0 

4.0 

50.0 

Ginger,  charcoal,  salt,  capsicum,  iron 
sulphate,  ground  oyster  shell,  palmo 
meal  (composed  of  ground  wheat 
middlings,  ground  peanut  hulls, 
palm  oil) 

Dr.  LeGear’s  Stock  Powders  

Lewis  Waukarusha  Stock  Food  Co.,  The, 

Lee,  Ind. 

8136 

3.0 

4.0 

50.0 

Charcoal,  salt,  sodium  nitrate,  fennel 
seed,  ginger,  sodium  bi-carbonate, 
iron  sulphate,  quassia,  nux  vomica, 
palmo  meal  (composed  of  ground 
wheat  middlings,  ground  peanut 
hulls,  palm  oil) 

Wakarusha  Stock  Food  

Ludwig  Remedy  Company,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

1090 

5.5 

32.0 

11.0 

Sulphur,  resin,  sulphate  of  iron,  salt- 
peter, oil  meal 

Appe  Tona  Medicated  Stock  Conditioner 

7606 

3.5 

10.4 

9.0 

Nux  vomica,  gentian,  anise,  fenu- 
greek, potassium  nitrate,  copperas, 
sulphur,  charcoal,  salt,  alfalfa  meal, 
cottonseed  meal 

Appe-Tona  Poultry  Conditioner  

7607 

6.0 

16.7 

14.0 

Nux  vomica,  capsicum,  potassium  ni- 
trate, copperas,  calcium  hydrate, 
sulphur,  charcoal,  salt,  alfalfa,  cot- 
tonseed meal 

337 


TABLE  \7ll — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  I 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

Maple  City  Stock  Food  Co.,  LaPorte,  Ind. 

Maple  city  Poultry  Food  & Conditioner 

3207 

3.3 

17.5 

9.2 

Maple  City  Stock  Food  & Conditioner 

4705 

1.0 

6.0 

4.0 

Moorman  Manufacturing  Company,  Quincy,  111. 

Moorman’s  Concentrated  Horse  Powder 

5958 

6.6 

12.6 

5.8 

Moorman’s  Special  Cattle  Powder 

5959 

8.2 

18.3 

7.5 

McCrillus  Medical  Company,  Muncie,  Ind. 

McCrillus’  Stock  Powders  

5088 

0.0 

0.0 

2.0 

McCrillus’  Poultry  Tonic 

5989 

0.0 

0.0 

2.0 

Peelle  Food  Co.,  The,  Frankfort,  Ind. 

Peelle’s  Poultry  Powder  and  Improved  Egg 

Producer  

474 

5.4 

31.2 

12.2 

Peelle’s  Stock  Conditioner 

475 

5.6 

31.5 

12.0 

Pratt  Food  Company,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Pratts  Poultry  Regulator  _ 

4492 

3.0 

8.0 

23.0 

Pratts  Baby  Chick  Food 

4494 

2.5 

12.0' 

2.0 

Pratts  Calf  Tonic 

6026 

1.0 

1.0 

10.0 

Pratts  Animal  Regulator 

8171 

1.0 

1.0 

25.0 

Pratts  Conditioner  for  Horses  and  Cattle 

8172 

1.0 

1.0 

25.0 

Prussian  Remedy  Co.,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Prussian  Stock  Tonic 

1713 

3.0 

10. 0i 

12.0 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 


Carbonate  of  iron,  anise  seed,  Afri- 
can ginger,  mustard,  salt,  sulphur, 
licorice  root,  willow  charcoal,  ashes, 
alfalfa  meal,  meat  meal 
Potassium  nitrate,  sulphur,  apocy- 
mum,  anise  seed,  licorice  root,  yel- 
low poplar  bark,  rosin,  charcoal, 
red  pepper,  hyposulphite  of  soda, 
Armenian  bole,  quaking  asp  bark, 
salt,  linseed  meal,  alfalfa  meal, 
wheat  middlings 

Ginger,  fenugreek,  copperas,  areca 
nut,  sulphur,  black  antimony,  sul- 
phate of  soda,  salt,  linseed  meal, 
siftings  from  corn  cereal  foods 
Ginger,  gentian,  fenugreek,  tamarae 
bark,  sulphur,  charcoal,  salt,  linseed 
meal,  siftings  from  corn  cereal 
foods 

Gentian,  fenugreek,  American  worm 
seed,  podophyllin,  sanguinaria,  bi- 
carbonate of  soda,  sulphate  of  iron, 
sulphur,  charcoal,  Glauber’s  salt, 
nux  vomica 

Gentian,  African  ginger,  African  cap- 
sicum, sanguinaria,  podophyllin,  bi- 
carbonate of  soda,  sulphate  of  iron, 
sulphur,  Glauber’s  salt,  nux  vomica, 
bone  meal,  charcoal 
Fenugreek,  gentian,  willow  charcoal, 
sulphur,  capsicum,  African  ginger, 
sodium  phosphate,  oyster  shells, 
prineess  metallic,  linseed  meal 
Gentian,  asafetida,  fenugreek,  willow 
charcoal,  sulphur,  African  ginger, 
poplar  bark,  cream  of  tartar, 
Glauber’s  salt,  sodium  chloride, 
blood  root,  linseed  meal 
Red  Peruvian  bark,  gentian,  ginger, 
sassafras  bark,  fenugreek,  cayenne, 
caraway,  sulphur,  sub  carbonate  of 
iron,  oxide  of  iron,  shell  meal, 
ground  grain  screenings 
Gentian,  ginger,  pepper,  caraway, 
Epsom  salt,  rape,  hulled  oats,  corn 
meal,  wheat  middlings,  cooked 
wheat,  millet,  bone  meal,  shell  meal 
Gentian,  ginger,  fenugreek,  asafetida, 
nux  vomica,  oxide  of  iron,  salt,  corn 
meal 

Gentian  root,  quassia,  ginger,  fenu- 
greek, fennel  seed,  nux  vomica,  Ep- 
som salt,  Glauber’s  salt,  sulphate  of 
iron,  salt,  charcoal,  palmo  meal 
(peanut  meats,  peanut  shells,  palm 
oil) 

Gentian,  quassia,  ginger,  fenugreek, 
fennel  seed,  nux  vomica,  Epsom 
salt,  Glauber’s  salt,  sulphate  of 
iron,  salt,  charcoal,  palmo  meal 
(peanut  meats,  peanut  shells,  palm 
oil) 

Gentian,  anise  seed,  fenugreek,  sul- 
phur, elecampane,  ginger,  asafetida, 
charcoal,  sodium  sulphate,  sassa- 
fras, licorice  root,  capsicum,  cheni- 
podium,  curcuma,  wheat  shorts,  rye 
shorts,  ground  flaxseed  screenings 


338 

TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Prussian  Remedy  Co.,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Prussian  Poultry  Tonic 

1077 

1.0 

5.0 

20.0 

Gentian,  anise  seed,  fenugreek,  sul- 
phur, elecampane,  ginger,  asafetida, 
charcoal,  sodium  sulphate,  sassa- 
fras, licorice  root,  capsicum,  cheni- 
podium,  curcuma,  bone  meal,  oyster 
shells  sodium  chloride,  copperas,  rye 
shorts,  wheat  shorts,  ground  flax- 
seed screenings 

Prussian  Horse  Tonic  

Pure  Drug  Co.,  Blooniingdale,  Ind. 

4706 

3.5 

11.0 

8.0 

i 

1 

Gentian,  ginger,  fenugreek,  elecam- 
pane, anise  seed,  sassafras,  licorice 
root,  chenipodium,  curcuma,  asa- 
fetida, capsicum,  sulphur,  charcoal, 
sodium  sulphate,  sodium  chloride, 
iron  sulphate,  rye  shorts,  wheat 
shorts,  ground  flaxseed  screenings 

Pure  Drug  Poultry  Remedy  & Egg  Producer._ 
“The”  Pure  Drug  Treatment  for  Horses, 

3252 

2.0 

12.0 

10.0 

Venetian  red,  capsicum,  oyster  shell, 
wheat  middlings,  linseed  meal 

Cattle,  Sheep  & Hogs 

3626 

1.5 

5.5 

5.0 

Iron  carbonate,  fenugreek,  salt, 
wheat  middlings 

Rawleigh  Company,  The  W.  T.,  Freeport,  111. 

Rawleighs  Poultry  Powder 

6905 

9.2 

16.1 

27.6 

Ginger,  fenugreek,  quassia,  capsicum, 
copperas,  sulphur,  charcoal,  oyster 
shells,  ground  bone,  tankage,  wheat 
middlings 

Rawleighs  Stock  Tonic ^ 

Roberts  Veterinary  Co.,  Dr.  David, 

Waukesha,  Wis. 

6996 

6.6 

10.8 

10.6  j 

Fenugreek,  gentian,  ginger,  capsicum, 
quassia,  anise  seed,  sulphur,  char- 
coal, sodium  chloride,  sodium  phos- 
phate, ferrous  sulphate,  worm  seed, 
wheat  middlings 

Dr.  David  Roberts  Calf  Meal 

6023 

7.0 

25.0 

6.5 

Sassafras,  salt,  chalk,  charcoal,  lo- 
cust bean  meal,  blood  meal,  flaxseed 
oil  cake  meal,  oat  meal 

Dr.  David  Roberts  Hog  Tonic 

6216 

2.5 

10.0 

10.0 

Anise,  fenugreek,  gentian,  licorice, 
nitrate  of  potash  (saltpeter),  sul- 
phate of  iron  (copperas),  charcoal, 
corn  starch,  corn  meal 

Dr.  David  Roberts  Poultry  Tonic  

Rust  & Sons,  William,  New  Brunswick,  N.  J. 

6217 

5.5 

31.0 

7.6 

Gentian,  ginger,  fenugreek,  sassafras, 
licorice,  anise,  capsicum,  sulphur, 
sulphate  of  iron  (copperas),  nitrate 
of  potash  (saltpeter),  salt,  blood 
meal,  bone  meal,  cottonseed  meal, 
linseed  meal,  corn  starch,  corn  meal 

Rust’s  Haven  Climax  Powder 

5013 

2.0 

5.9 

25.0 

Red  cinchona,  quassia,  capsicum,  fen- 
nel, gentian,  sodium  bicarbonate, 
sulphur,  linseed  meal 

Rust’s  Egg  Producer 

Shores-Muellcr  Company,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa. 

5014 

1.0 

10.0 

15.0 

Capsicum,  quassia,  sulphur,  iron  sul- 
phate, sodium  bicarbonate,  char- 
coal, bone  shells,  flaxseed 

Shores  Hog  Powder  

4886 

6.6 

14.3 

14.1 

Gentian  root,  anise  seed,  fenugreek 
seed,  sassafras  bark,  quassia,  mag- 
nesium sulphate,  charcoal,  potas- 
sium nitrate,  sulphur,  sodium  chlo- 
ride, dried  blood,  ground  flax  and 
wheat  screenings 

Shores  Stock  Regulator - 

4887 

7.2 

13.8 

I Gentian  root,  ginger  root,  licorice 
root,  fenugreek  seed,  anise  seed, 
worm  seed,  coriander  seed,  sassafras 
bark,  quassia,  capsicum,  magnesium 
sulphate,  charcoal,  potassium  ni- 
trate, sulphur,  sulphate  of  iron,  so- 
dium chloride,  ground  flax  and 
wheat  screenings 

Shores  Stock  Tonic 

4888 

7.0 

9.5 

11.5 

Gentian  root,  ginger  root,  licorice 
root,  fenugreek  seed,  anise  seed, 
quassia,  capsicum,  magnesium  sul- 
phate, charcoal,  sulphate  of  iron, 
sulphur,  sodium  chloride,  ground 
flax  and  wheat  screenings 

339 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  In  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

Shores  Mueller  Company,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa. 

• 

Shores  Poultry  Powder 

Shrader  Drug  Co.,  Iowa  City,  Iowa. 

4880 

3.6 

12.3 

12.5 

Gentian  root,  fenugreek  seed,  nux 
vomica,  capsicum,  sulphate  of  iron, 
iron  oxide,  sulphur,  sodium  carbo- 
nate, charcoal,  sodium  chloride, 
dried  blood,  shells,  ground  flax  and 
wheat  screenings 

Eureka  Stock  Food 

756 

6.7 

30.2 

9.5 

Anise,  blood  root,  charcoal,  fenu- 
greek, gentian,  ginger,  licorice,  lin- 
seed meal,  salt 

Eureka  Poultry  Food  

Snoddy  Remedy  Co.,  The  Dr.  J.  H.,  Alton,  111. 

1262 

5.0 

17.6 

6.1 

Bone  meal,  gentian,  fenugreek,  blood 
root,  capsicum,  wheat  middlings, 
buckwheat  middlings,  carbonate  of 
iron 

The  Snoddy  Remedy 

Soudan  Specialty  Mfg.  Co.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 

6296 

0.5 

11.6 

8.3 

Sulphur,  copper  sulphate,  arsenic  tri- 
oxide, charcoal,  phytolacca  (poke 
root),  sodium  sulphate,  ammonium 
chloride,  mandrake,  w’heat  middlings 

Soudan  Blood  Toner  

Standard  Chemical  Manufacturing  Company, 
Omaha,  Neb. 

6199 

5.0 

17.0 

6.0 

Gentian,  ginger,  fenugreek,  anise 
seed,  elecampane,  elm  bark,  sodium 
bicarbonate,  charcoal,  salt,  wheat 
middlings,  ground  flax  screenings 

Standard  Stock  Food  

5172 

0.0 

0.0 

15.0 

Caraway  seed,  anise  seed,  coriander 
seed,  fenugreek  seed,  capsicum,  gen- 
tian root,  yellow  dock  root,  ginger 
root,  licorice  root,  sulphur,  bicarbo- 
nate of  soda,  salt,  charcoal,  ground 
wheat  screenings 

Standard  Poultry  Tonic 

Stevens  Stock  Food  Co.,  Wabash,  Ind. 

7587 

0.0 

0.0 

18.0 

Ginger  root,  capsicum,  gentian  root, 
charcoal,  salt,  bone  meal,  dried 
blood,  alfalfa  meal,  peanut  meats, 
peanut  hulls 

Stevens  Stock  Food  _ 

Stock  Food  Company  of  America, 

Minneapolis,  Minn. 

1000 

3.0 

12.0 

0.0 

Gentian,  sassafras  bark,  buchu- 
leaves,  nitrate  of  potash,  sodium 
chloride,  willow  charcoal,  fenugreek, 
wheat  middlings 

Clover  Brand  Poultry  Tonic 

Union  Stock  Food  Company,  Greenville,  Tenn. 

4489 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

Gentian,  capsicum,  ginger,  charcoal, 
copperas,  anise,  bone  meal,  oyster 
shells,  alfalfa  meal 

Union  Stock  Tonic 

United  States  Food  Company,  The, 

Pleasant  City,  Ohio. 

5232 

0.0 

0.0 

18.0 

Epsom  salt,  fenugreek,  anise  seed, 
sulphur,  salt,  charcoal,  tobacco 
dust,  ground  cottonseed  hulls 

U.  S.  Poultry  Food  Tonic 

6441 

0.0 

0.0 

16.0 

Ginger,  sulphur,  Epsom  salt,  Vene- 
tian red,  gentian  root,  fenugreek, 
copperas,  salt,  ground  flax  screen- 
ings 

U.  S.  Animal  Regulator 

6443 

0.0 

0.0 

12.0 

Charcoal,  copperas,  fenugreek,  sul- 
phur, gentian  root,  ginger,  Epsom 
salt,  saltpeter,  American  wormseed, 
salt,  ground  flax  screenings 

U.  S.  Stock  Food  Tonic 

Universal  Products  Co., 

Fairmont,  West  Virginia. 

7493 

0.0 

0.0 

12.0 

Gentian  root,  blood  root,  Epsom 
salt,  ginger,  sulphur,  poplar  bark, 
licorice  root,  charcoal,  fenugreek, 
salt,  copperas,  quassia,  flax  screen- 
ings 

Uproco  Poultry  Tonic 

7698 

0.0 

3.5 

3.0 

Mustard,  (sinapis  alba)  capsicum, 
Venetian  red,  sulphate  of  iron,  cal- 
cium carbonate,  sodium  chloride, 
oyster  shells,  wheat  bran,  wheat 
middlings 

Uproco  Horse  & Cattle  Powders 

United  Breeders  Co.  of  America,  Syracuse,  N.  T. 

7699 

0.0 

3.5 

3.0 

Sodium  chloride,  nux  vomica,  rosin, 
sulphur,  ginger,  copperas,  fenugreek, 
digitalis,  senna,  charcoal,  wheat 
bran,  wheat  middlings 

Baum’s  Cattle  Tonic  _ _ 

2069 

1.0 

1.0 

10.0 

Serpentaria,  cascara  sagrada,  gen- 
tian, mustard  seed,  sulphur,  mag- 
nesium sulphate,  sodium  bicarbo- 
nate, nitre,  charcoal,  sodium  chlo- 
ride, licorice  root,  ginger,  capsicum, 
yellow  dock,  Colombo,  linseed  meal 

340 


TABLE  VII — Brands  Certified  by  Manufacturers  as  Being  on  Sale  in  1917-18  (continued) 


Guaranteed  by  the  manufacturer  to  contain 

LABEL 

Official  Number 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fat 

Not  less  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Protein 

Not  more  than 

per  cent. 

Crude  Fiber 

and  to  be  composed  of  the 
following  ingredients 

United  Breeders  Co.  of  America,  Syracuse,  N.  T. 

Baum’s  Sheep  Tonic" 

3448 

1.0 

1.0 

10.0 

Gentian,  zedoary,  galega,  sulphate  of 
magnesia,  wormseed,  sage,  bicarbo- 
nate of  soda,  sulphur,  chloride  of 
sodium,  ginger,  capsicum,  mustard 
seed,  charcoal,  linseed  meal 

Baum’s  Poultry  Tonic 

4216 

1.0 

1.0 

10.0 

Ginger,  cayenne  pepper,  anise,  gen- 
tian, mustard  seed,  sulphur,  sul- 
phate of  iron,  bicarbonate  of  soda, 
carbonate  of  iron,  Colombo,  n\ix 
vomica,  charcoal,  linseed  meal 
Gentian,  ginger,  capsicum,  anise, 
mustard  seed,  galega,  pipsissewa, 
stillingia,  licorice  root,  yellow  dock, 
nitre,  sulphate  of  magnesia,  bicar- 
bonate of  soda,  sulphate  of  iron, 
sulphur,  charcoal,  chloride  of  sodi- 
um, sugar,  linseed  meal 

Baum’s  Dairy  Tonic 

4216 

1.0 

1 

1.0 

10.0 

1 

Baum’s  Horse  Tonic 

4217 

1.0 

1.0 

10.0 

Ginger,  gentian,  capsicum,  anise, 
mustard  seed,  worm  seed,  spigelia, 
elecampane,  nux  vomica,  cascara 
sagrada,  licorice  root,  sulphate  of 
magnesia,  sulphate  of  iron,  carbo- 
nate of  iron,  bicarbonate  of  soda, 
chloride  of  sodium,  nitre,  charcoal, 
sugar,  linseed  meal 

Baum’s  Hog  Tonic 

Watkins  Medical  Co.,  The  J.  R.,  Winona,  Minn. 

4218 

1.0 

1.0 

10.0 

Gentian,  ginger,  mustard  seed,  anise, 
berberis  aquifolium,  spigelia,  worm- 
seed,  areca,  hyposulphite  of  soda, 
bicarbonate  of  soda,  chloride  of  so- 
dium, sulphate  of  magnesia,  sul- 
phur, nitre,  charcoal,  sugar,  linseed 
meal 

Watkins  Stock  Tonic  

5808 

3.0 

i 

10.0 

9.0 

1 

j 

Anise  seed,  areca  nuts,  cascara  sa- 
grada, charcoal,  capsicum,  corian- 
der seed,  elecampane  root,  fenugreek 

1 seed,  gentian  root,  ginger  root,  juni- 
per berries,  mandrake  root,  worm 
seed,  pumpkin  seed,  sulphate  of 
iron,  sodium  chloride,  sodium  bicar- 
bonate, American  sulphur,  salts  of 
tartar,  linseed  meal,  standard  wheat 
middlings 

Watkins  Poultry  Tonic 

Whelan,  Omer  G.,  Richmond,  Ind. 

5936 

2.5 

7.0 

6.0 

Venetian  red,  American  sulphur,  Afri- 
can ginger,  Spanish  flies,  gentian 
root,  capsicum,  ground  shells, 
standard  wheat  middlings 

Whelan’s  Chop  Peed 

Wilbur  Stock  Pood  Co.,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 

7933 

4.0 

12.0 

10.0 

Gentian,  ginger,  fenugreek,  cascarilla, 
elecampane,  blood  root,  golden  seal, 
bitter  sweet,  caraway,  dandelion, 
mandrake,  salt,  charcoal,  quassia, 
copperas,  Venetian  red,  ground 
grain  screenings,  corn,  oats,  corn 
feed  meal,  corn  bran,  wheat  bran, 
wheat  middlings,  ground  wheat 
screenings,  linseed  meal,  cottonseed 
meal,  corn  gluten  feed,  corn  germ 
meal 

Wilbur’s  Stock  Tonic 

5691 

3.0 

17.0 

6.0 

Fenugreek,  gentian,  ginger,  anise  seed, 
elecampane,  blood  root,  elm  bark, 
quassia,  soda,  charcoal,  salt,  wheat 
middlings 

Wilbur’s  Poultry  Tonic 

5692 

3.0 

17.0 

6.0 

Fenugreek,  gentian,  ginger,  anise 
seed,  elecampane,  blood  root,  elm 
bark,  quassia,  soda,  Venetian  red, 
charcoal,  salt,  wheat  middlings 

Wilbur’s  Hog  Tonic 

6619 

2.0 

10.0 

1 

10.0 

Fenugreek,  gentian,  ginger,  anise 
seed,  elecampane,  blood  root,  elm 
bark,  quassia,  bi-carbonate  of  soda, 
charcoal,  salt,  wheat  middlings, 
ground  flax  screenings 

341 


INDEX 


Page 


Attention,  consumers,  ag  nts,  dealers 47 

Cooperation  with  U.  S.  Department  of 

Agriculture  43 

Explanation  of  terms  10 

Definition  and  description  of  feeding  stuffs.  13 

Details  of  inspection  19 

Indiana  Deeding  Stuff  Law- 

Administration  8 

Analyses  9 

Analytical  methods 10 

Inspections,  requests  for  9 

Objects  3 

Official  methods 10 

Provisions  summarized  4 

Reports  9 

Samples  8 

Weights  10  and  6 

Shipments  removed  from  sale 40 

Digestible  nutrients  in  feeding  stuffs 11 


Page 


Cases  reported 43 

Rebates  40 

Remarks  to  agents,  dealers,  distributors 5 

Remarks  to  consumers  7 

Remarks  to  manufacturers 4 

Results  of  enforcement 45 

State  Chemist’s  label,  reproduction 8 

Sales  of  feeding  stuffs 44 

Tables— 

Explanation  of  — . 46 

Table  I Coefficients  of  digestibility 12 

II  Summary  of  results  of  inspec- 
tion   22 

III  Average  complete  analyses 30 

IV  Details  of  inspection  48 

V Samples  examined  microscopic- 
ally only  199 

VI  Shipments  removed  from  sale...  207 

VII  Brands  certified  on  sale  1917-18..  227 


CONTENTS  OF  TABLES 

Average 

complete 

analysis 

Summary 

results 

inspection 

Definition 

and 

description 

Details 

inspection 

Registra- 

tion 

Alfalfa  meal 

31 

25 

16 

116 

288-290 

Animal  by-products  

31-33 

26 

16 

117-123 

290-294 

Brewers’  dried  grains  ... ... 

35 

26 

15 

141 

284-285 

Calf  meals 

39 

29 

17 

164 

310-311 

Cocoanut  by-products 

33 

26 

19 

123 

277 

Condimental  feeds  . 





17 



331-339 

Condimental  poultry  feeds,  registered.. 



29 



194-196 



Condimental  poultry  feeds,  not  regis- 

tered   



29 



197-198 



Condimental  stock  feeds,  registered 



29 



190-192 



Condimental  stock  feeds,  not  registered 



29 

* 

192-194 



Corn  feed  meal 

33 

26 

14 

125-127 

226-270 

Corn  germ  meal 

33 

26 

14 

127-128 

286 

Corn  gluten  feed 

33 

26 

14 

128-129 

285 

Corn  gluten  meal 

33 

26 

14 

129 



Cottonseed,  cold  pressed 

35 

26 

15 

140-141 

281 

Cottonseed  feed  

34 

26 

15 

131 

281 

Cottonseed  hulls 









281 

Cottonseed  m,eal 

34-35 

26 

15 

132-140 

277-281 

Distillers’  dried  grains 

35 

26 

14 

141-142 

283-284 

Dried  beet  pulp  

33 

26 

16 

123 

288 

Hominy  meal,  feed  or  chop . 

33-34 

26 

14 

129-131 

286-288 

Linseed  meal 

35-36 

26 

14-15 

143-145 

282-283 

Malt  sprouts  ..  

35 

26 

16 

143 

285 

Miscellaneous  

39 

29 



206 



Oat  middlings 

31 

25 

16 

116 



Poultry  and  scratch  feeds 









311-331 

Mash  

39 

29 

17-18 

165-169 



Without  grit 

39 

29 

17-18 

169-180 



With  grit  

39 

29 

17-18 

180-190 

Proprietary  stock  and  molasses  feeds 

36-39 

26-29 

17 

146-165 

294-310 

Screenings  oil  feed .. 









283 

Tinplate  cleaning  by-products . 

36 

26 

17 

145 

303 

Unscreened  flaxseed  oil  feed 

36 

26 

15 

145 

283 

Velvet  bean  products . 

Yeast  and  vinegar  grains 

"35 

”26 

”18 

’143 

283 

Mill  by-products 









226-270 

Buckwheat  mixed  feed 

30 

24 

14 

101-102 

226-270 

Chop  feeds  containing  cob  meal  or 

1 

other  fillers 

31 

25 

17 

110 

271-272 

Chop  feeds  containing  crushed  ear  corn 

31 

24-25 



102-115 

270-271 

Chop  feeds  containing  corn  bran : 

31 

24-25 



107-112 

272-276 

Chop  feed  miscellaneous 

1 31 

24-25 



102-116 

270-272 

Corn  bran  

1 33 

26 

14 

123-125 

226-270 

Corn  red  dog  flour 

33 

26 



127 

226-270 

Corn  and  oats  feed  ._  — . 

1 31 

24 



102-106 

226-270 

Corn,  oats  and  corn  feed  meal 

1 31 

25 



112-114 

226-270 

Low  grade  Hour 

i 30 

22 



75 

226-270 

Mixtures  miscellaneous  mill  by-products 

I 30 

22-24 

17 

75-102 

226-270 

Red  dog  flour 

1 30 

22 

13 

74-75 

226-270 

342 


INDEX  (continued) 


CONTENTS  OP  TABLES 

Average 

complete 

analysis 

Summary 

results 

inspection 

Definition 

and 

description 

Details 

inspection 

Registra- 

tion 

Mill  by-products  ^continued) 

226-270 

Rye  bran  and  middlings 

30 

' 24 

”l4 

ioi 

226-270 

Rye  middlings  

30 

24 

14 

101 

226-270 

Rye  middlings  and  screenings 

30 

24 

14 

101 

226-270 

Wheat  bran 

30 

22 

13 

48-55 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran 

30 

22 



88-89 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  corn  bran,  wheat  screen- 
ings — 

30 

22 

89-92 

226-270 

Wheat  bran  and  middlings  _ 

30 

22 

81-84 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings  and  chaff 



22 



87-88 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  cleanings 



22 



87 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran..  .. 

30 

22 

92-93 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran, 
screenings  ^ 

30 

23 

93-97 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  corn  bran, 
screenings,  salt  

30 

23 

97 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  low  grade  flour 

30 

_ 



_ 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  screenings 

30 

22 



84-87 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  screenings, 
cleanings  

22 

87 

226-270 

Wheat  bran,  middlings,  screenings,  salt 
Wheat  bran  and  screenings 

”30 

22 



87 

226-270 

30 

22 

14 

55-61 

226-270 

Wheat  middlings  or  shorts  (standard). 

30 

22 

13 

61-74 

226-270 

Wheat  middlings,  corn  red  dog  flour... 

30 

24 



100 

226-270 

Wheat  middlings,  low  grade  flour 

23 



99 

226-270 

Wheat  middlings,  low  grade  flour, 
screenings  

30 

23 

99 

226-270 

Wheat  middlings,  red  dog  flour, 
screenings  

30 

23 

99 

226-270 

Wheat  and  rye  middlings 

23 



100 

226-270 

Wheat  middlings  and  screenings 

30 

22 



75-81 

226-270 

Wheat  middlings,  screenings,  salt 

30 

k 

. _ 

100 

226-270 

Wheat  white  middlings 

30 

22 

13 

74 

226-270 

PURDUE  UNIVERSITY 


Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


Bulletin  No.  210 
February,  1918 


Fig.  1.  Corn  on  Bedford  experiment  field,  1&17.  Each  shock  is  the  produce  of  one- 
twentieth  acre 


No  treatment 
32.1  bushels  corn 
per  acre 


Manure 

41.0  bushels  corn 
per  acre 


Lime  and  manure  Lime,  manure  and 
48.5  bushels  com  phosphorus 

per  acre  62.0  bushels  corn 

per  acre 


THE  VALUE  OF  PHOSPHATES  ON  INDIANA  SOILS 


Published  by  the  Station; 
LAFAYETTE,  INDIANA 
U.  S.  A. 


PURDUE  UNIVERSITY  AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT  STATION 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 
Joseph  D.  Oliver^  President,  South  Bend 


Fay  S.  Chandler Indianapolis 

Charles  Downing  Greenfield 

John  A.  Hillenbrand Batesville 

Cyrus  M.  Hobbs Bridgeport 

WiNTHROP  E.  Stone,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D, 


Warren  T.  McCray Kentland 

James  W.  Noel Indianapolis 

George  W.  Purcell Vincennes 

Andrew  E.  Reynolds Crawfordsville 


President  of  the  University 


ADVISORY  COMMITTEE 
(Under  Legislative  Act  of  1909) 

John  G.  Brown,  Monon D.  B.  Johnson,  Mooresville 

State  Live  Stock  Association  State  Dairy  Association 

U.  R.  Fishel,  Hope D.  F.  Maish,  Frankfort 

State  Poultry  Fanciers^  Association  State  Corn  Growers’  Association 

H.  H.  SwAiM,  South  Bend....lNDiANA  Horticultural  Society 


ADMINISTRATION 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  M.  S.,  Director 

Harry  J.  Reed Assistant  to  the  Director 

Nellie  Tracy Administrative  Assistant 

Mary  K.  Bloom BookkeepeT 

AGRICULTURAL  EXTENSION 
George  I.  Christie,  B.  S.  A.,  Superintendent 

Thomas  A.  Coleman Ass’t  State  Leader 

Field  Studies  and  Demonstrations 

George  M.  Frier,  B.  S.  A Associate  in 

Charge  of  Short  Courses  and  Exhibits 
Mabel  L.  Harlan. .Ass’t  in  Agricultural  Extension 

ANIMAL  HUSBANDRY 
John  H.  Skinner,  B.  S.,  Chief 

Chester  G.  Starr,  B.  S.  A 

Acting  Associate  in  Animal  Husbandry 

Herbert  E.  McCartney,  B.  S.  A 

Ass’t  in  Animal  Husbandry  Extension 

BOTANY 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  A.  B.,  Chief 

George  N.  Hoffer,  M.  S Associate  in  Botany 

George  A.  Osner,  Ph,  D Associate  in  Botany 

Luna  E.  Allison,  B.  S Assistant  in  Botany 

Edwin  B.  Mains,  Ph.  D Assistant  in  Botany 

Harry  R.  Rosen,  M.  S.,  Assistant  in  Rust  Work 

Grace  O.  Wineland,  A.  B.,  M.  S 

Assistant  in  Botany 

DAIRY  HUSBANDRY 
Ralph  E.  Caldwell,  B.  S.,  Acting  Chief 

Howard  W.  Gregory,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Manufactures 

George  Spitzer,  Ph.  G.,  B.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

Harry  M.  Wueter,  M.  S 

Associate  in  Dairy  Bacteriology 

Turner  H.  Broughton,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Creamery  Inspection 

William  F.  Epple,  Ph.  G 

Assistant  in  Dairy  Chemistry 

ENTOMOLOGY 
James  Troop,  M.  S.,  Chief 
Preston  W.  Mason,  B.  S.,  Ass’t  in  Entomology 

HORTICULTURE 
Laurenz  Greene,  M.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Harry  A.  Noyes,  M.  S Associate  in 

Horticultural  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology 
Joseph  Oskamp,  B.  S..  Associate  in  Pomology 

Walter  A.  Huelson,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Horticulture 


POULTRY  HUSBANDRY 
Allen  G.  Philips,  B,  S.  A.,  Chief 

Dwight  C.  Kennard,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Poultry  Husbandry 

SOILS  AND  CROPS 
Alfred  T.  Wiancko,  B.  S.  A.,  Chief 

Martin  L.  Fisher,  M.  S 

Assistant  Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Samuel  D.  Conner,  M.  S 

Associate  Chemist  in  Soils  and  Crops 

Clinton  O.  Cromer,  B.  S Associate  in  Crops^ 

Sadocie  C.  Jones,  M.  S Associate  in  Soils 

STATE  CHEMIST. 

Wm.  J.  Jones,  Jr.,  M.  S.,  A.  C.®  State  Chemist 
Edward  G.  Proulx,  M.  S.^.. Acting  State  Chemist 
Reuben  O.  Bitler,  B.  S...... Deputy  State  Chemist 

Paul  B.  Curtis,  B.  S.- Deputy  State  Chemist 

Omar  W.  Ford,  A.  B.^ Deputy  State  Chemist 

Mary  J.  Minton,  B.  S.^ Assistant 

Microscopist  State  Chemist’s  Department 
Herman  J.  Nimitz,  B.  S. 2. .Deputy  State  Chemist 
J.  Howard  Roop,  B.  S,-.... Deputy  State  Chemist 

Samuel  F.  Thornton,  B.  S.- 

Deputy  State  Chemist 

Otis  S.  Roberts,  B.  S.2 

Chief  Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Glenn  G.  Carter,  B.  S.^ 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

Benjamin  F.  Catherwood^ 

Inspector  State  Chemist’s  Department 

VETERINARY  SCIENCE 
Robert  A.  Craig,  D.  V.  M.,  Chief 
David  B.  Clark,  D.  M.  C... Associate  Veterinarian 

Lawrence  C.  Kigin,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  Veterinarian 

Rex  a.  Whiting,  D.  V.  M 

Associate  in  Animal  Pathology 

Carl  H.  Clink,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Serum  Production 

Leo  P.  Doyle,  B.  S Ass’t  in  Animal  Pathology 

Leslie  R.  George,  B.  S 

Assistant  in  Animal  Pathology 
Fred  L.  Walkey,  D.  V.  M Ass’t  Veterinarian 

DETAILED  BY  U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF 
AGRICULTURE 

Cereal  and  Forage  Crop  Insect  Investigations 
John  J.  Davis,  B.  S..  Entomological 
Assistant  in  Charge 

John  M.  Aldrich,  Ph.  D.,  Entomological  Assistant 
Walter  H.  Larrimer,  B.  S... Scientific  Assistant 

Dean  A.  Ricker,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Chester  F.  Turner,  B.  S Scientific  Assistant 

Seed  Testing 

Anna  M.  Lute,  M.  A Seed  Analyst 


1 In  charge  of  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

2 Connected  with  Fertilizer  and  Feeding  Stuff  Control 

3 Died  August  31,  1917 


THE  VALUE  OF  PHOSPHATES  ON  INDIANA  SOILS 


A.  T.  WlANCKO 


S.  C.  Jone:s 


SUMMARY 

Available  phosphates  are  the  most  profitable  fertilizers  for  ordinary 
Indiana  soils. 

In  the  experiments  reported  in  this  bulletin,  acid  phosphate  has 
given  the  best  results.  Basic  slag  and  steamed  bone  meal  have  also 
given  good  results,  standing  next  to  acid  phosphate  in  profitableness. 
Rock  phosphate  has  given  good  results  in  certain  cases,  although  it  has 
been  the  least  profitable  of  any  of  the  phosphates  used. 

On  the  Scottsburg  field,  acid  phosphate  used  alone  has  given  the 
largest  returns.  Where  acid  and  rock  phosphates  have  been  used  on 
limed  land,  the  returns  per  acre  have  been  about  equal,  but  considering 
the  cost  of  the  applications,  the  acid  phosphate  has  been  the  most  profit- 
able. Where  rock  phosphate  has  been  used  in  addition  to  manure,  it  has 
not  produced  profitable  returns. 

On  the  North  Vernon  and  Worthington  fields,  where  acid  and  rock 
phosphates  have  been  used  in  addition  to  lime  and  manure,  the  acid 
phosphate  has  produced  returns  averaging  over  three  times  as  large  as 
those  secured  from  the  rock  phosphate. 

On  the  South  Bend  field,  where  acid  phosphate,  steamed  bone  meal 
and  rock  phosphate  have  been  used  in  addition  to  lime  and  manure,  the 
acid  phosphate  and  bone  meal  have  produced  profitable  returns,  while 
the  rock  phosphate  has  been  used  at  a loss. 

On  the  Bedford  field,  where  acid  and  rock  phosphates  have  been 
used  on  otherwise  untreated  land,  the  two  phosphates  have  yielded 
about  equally  good  returns.  On  limed  land,  the  acid  phosphate  has 
produced  large  returns,  while  the  rock  phosphate  has  been  used  at  a 
loss.  On  manured  land,  both  of  these  phosphates  have  produced  good 
returns,  but  the  acid  phosphate  has  been  the  most  profitable.  On  limed 
and  manured  land,  acid  phosphate,  basic  slag,  steamed  bone  meal  and 
rock  phosphate  have  all  produced  good  crop  increases  and  have  been 
profitable  in  the  order  named. 

In  a quantitative  test  of  approximately  equal  money  values  of  acid 
and  rock  phosphate  on  limed  and  manured  land  -on  the  Bedford  field,^ 
the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  net  returns  per  acre  from  over  two  to 
over  47  times  as  large  as  those  secured  from  the  rock  phosphate. 

In  immediate  returns  on  the  first  and  second  crops  after  application, 
acid  phosphate  has  yielded  crop  increases  from  three  to  over  25  times 
as  large  as  those  secured  from  rock  phosphate. 

Neither  acid  phosphate  nor  any  other  phosphate  will  increase  soil 
acidity  or  the  need  for  liming,  although  Indiana  soils  needing  phosphorus 
generally  also  need  lime. 


4 


INTRODUCTION 

The  ordinary  soils  of  Indiana  need  available  phosphates  more  than 
any  other  fertilizer.  These  soils  have  been  deficient  in  phosphorus  from 
the  beginning  and  with  the  system  of  farming  commonly  followed  dur- 
ing the  last  half  century,  they  have  been  still  further  depleted  of  this 
element.  The  only  means  by  which  the  phosphorus  deficiency  can  be 
made  up,  is  by  the  purchase  and  application  of  phosphatic  fertilizers. 
Fortunately  phosphatic  fertilizer  materials  are  plentiful  in  this  country, 
and  relatively  cheap. 

With  the  prices  of  crops  doubled,  while  those  of  phosphates  have 
increased  less  than  one-half,  and  with  this  country  so  largely  depended 
upon  to  make  up  the  world  shortage  of  food,  there  has  never  been  a 
time  when  the  liberal  use  of  phosphatic  fertilizers  has  been  so  important 
or  so  profitable  as  at  present.  The  farmer  will  find  that  he  can  get 
from  loo  to  900  per  cent,  on  any  investment  in  available  phosphates 
judiciously  applied  to  the  land. 

This  bulletin  presents  the  results  that  have  been  secured  by  this  sta- 
tion from  the  use  of  different  phosphates  on  five  experiment  fields  on  dif- 
ferent soil  types  in  different  parts  of  the  State  during  the  last  12  3^ears. 

PHOSPHATE  EXPERIMENTS  AT  SCOTTSBURG,  SCOTT  COUNTY 

The  Scottsburg  experiment  field  is  located  on  Volusia  silt  loam, 
commonly  called  “yellow  clay,”  which  is  the  predominating  soil  type  on 
the  hill  lands  of  southern  Indiana.  The  field  was  laid  out  in  the  fall 
of  1905  with  three  series  of  similarly  treated  plots  for  a corn,  wheat  and 
clover  rotation  and  the  various  treatments  first  applied  to  wheat  on 
each  series.  The  field  was  underdrained  in  19  ii  with  three  parallel 

lines  of  four-inch  tile  laid  crosswise  of  the  plots,  spaced  about  59 

feet  apart  in  such  a way  as  to  give  uniform  drainage  to  all  plots.  The 
land  had  been  cropped  continuously  for  at  least  two  generations,  with 
no  manure  and  but  little  fertilizer  applied,  and  was  considerably  run 
down.  The  soil  is  naturally  poor  in  phosphorus,  showing  only  .07  per 
cent,  of  total  phosphoric  acid  in  the  surface  soil  and  .03  per  cent,  in  the 
subsoil.  Only  the  plots  concerned  in  the  phosphate  comparisons  are  to 
be  discussed  in  this  bulletin.  These  have  been  treated  as  follows: 

Plots  8 and  9 received  an  application  of  ground  limestone  at  the 

rate  of  1000  pounds  per  acre  on  the  first  wheat  crop  and  4000  pounds 
per  acre  in  1911.  At  this  time,  plots  12,  13,  14  and  15,  which  had  not 
been  previously  limed,  also  received  ground  limestone  at  the  rate  of 
4000  pounds  per  acre. 

Plots  9 and  ii  have  received  an  application  of  130  pounds  per  acre 
of  16  per  cent,  acid  phosphate  on  each  wheat  crop.  Since  1915,  the  ap- 
plication has  been  repeated  on  the  corn,  so  that  now  these  plots  are  re- 
ceiving 300  pounds  of  acid  phosphate  per  acre  per  rotation. 

Plots  12  and  14  received  a dressing  of  rock  phosphate  at  the  rate 
of  one  ton  per  acre  on  the  first  wheat  crop  and  a second  ton  per  acre  in 
1911-12. 

On  plots  14  and  15,  manure  has  been  applied  at  the  rate  of  10  tons 
per  acre  per  rotation.  The  first  application  was  made  on  wheat.  Since 
then  the  manure  has  been  plowed  under  for  corn. 

Plot  10  has  received  no  special  treatment. 


5 


In  Table  I are  shown  the  average  yields  of  corn,  wheat  and  clover 
on  the  phosphated  plots  and  on  the  otherwise  similarly  treated  but  un- 
phosphated  plots  alongside.  The  small  average  yields  of  clover  have 
been  due  to  repeated  clover  failures,  caused  by  unfavorable  weather  con- 
ditions and  the  impoverished  condition  of  the  soil  brought  about  by 
many  years  of  exhaustive  cropping. 

In  these  experiments,  all  the  produce  has  been  removed  from  the 
land  except  the  small  amount  of  second  growth  clover,  which  was 
plowed  under. 


Table  I. — Results  from  Phosphates  on  Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover  Rotation 
— Scottsburg  Experiment  Field,  1906-1917 


« Treatment 

.o 

P 

P-i  c 

Average  yields  per  acre 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Corn 

bushels 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value 
of  in- 
crease 

Cost 

of 

treat- 

ment 

Net  re- 
turns 

10  Nothing 

22.9 

2271 

8.0 

738 

333 

11  Acid  phosphate  alone  ^ 

32.4 

2576 

13.1 

1201 

618 

a - 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 

9.^ 

305 

5.1 

463 

285 

$24.60 

$2.39 

$22.21 

8 Lime 

29.9 

2551 

10.2 

915 

578 

9 Lime,  acid  phosphateN. 

33.3 

2861 

14.1 

1166 

731 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 

3.4 

310 

3.9 

251 

153 

$14.32 

$2.39 

$11.93 

13  Lime 

30.6 

2674 

9.2 

887 

574 

12  Lime,  rock  phosphate^— 

39.0 

3025 

12.6 

1181 

682 

Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

8.4 

351 

3.4 

294 

108 

$18.06 

$7.07 

$10.99 

15  Lime  and  manure 

50.2 

4064 

18.4 

1891 

1305 

14  Lime,  manure  and  rock 

phosphate  ^ _ 

50.9 

4167 

19.0 

1953 

1422 

Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

0.7 

103 

0.6 

62 

117 

$3.52 

$7.07 

$-3.55 

ERRATA 

In  Table  I under  “Cost  of  treatment,”  the  acid  phosphate  cost  should 
be  $2.55  instead  of  $2.39,  and  the  rock  phosphate  cost  should  be  $5.27  in- 
stead of  $7.07,  and  the  corresponding  corrections  should  be  made  in  the 
“Net  returns”  column  as  well  as  in  the  discussion  of  this  table  at  the  top 
of  page  6.  In  the  first  note  under  the  table,  the  amount  of  acid  phosphate 
should  be  204.5  pounds  instead  of  187.5  pounds.  These  errors  also  appear 
in  the  Scottsburg  data  in  Circular  No.  79  of  this  station. 


- — , -i-r ............ j.  «,i.  tiie  ynces  prevailing  at  this  time,  as 

follows:  acid  phosphate  (16  per  cent.),  $25.00  per  ton;  rock  phosphate  (30  per  cent.), 
$10.00  per  ton;  steamed  bone  meal  (25  per  cent.),  $35.00  per  ton;  basic  slag  (18  per  cent.), 
$25.00  per  ton;  corn,  $1.00  and  wheat,  $2.00  per  bushel;  stover,  $6.00,  straw,  $5.00  and 
hay,  $20.00  per  torT^ 


6 


ceived  a total  of  4000  pounds  of  rock  phosphate  per  acre,  while  plot  9 has 
received  a total  of  only  750  pounds  of  acid  phosphate.  After  deducting 
the  cost  of  the  fertilizer  per  rotation  to  date,  the  net  returns  per  acre  per 
rotation  have  been  $10.99  for  the  rock  phosphate  and  $11.93  for  the  acid 
phosphate.  Per  dollar  invested,  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net  profit 
of  $5.00  as  against  $1.55  for  the  rock  phosphate. 

On  the  limed  and  manured  land  (plots  14  and  15),  the  addition  of 
two  tons  of  rock  phosphate  has  produced  only  small  additional  crop  in- 
creases. Evidently  the  manure  (10  tons  per  acre  per  rotation),  has  sup- 
plied all  the  phosphorus  that  could  be  utilized  under  the  conditions,  and 
something  else  has  become  the  limiting  factor  on  this  soil.  At  any  rate. 


Fig:,  2.  Effect  of  phosphate  on  corn,  Scottsbiirg:  field,  1917.  Each  shock  is  the  produce 
of  one-twentieth  acre 

Acid  phosphate  No  treatment 

48.2  bushels  corn  per  acre  29.4  bushels  corn  per  acre 

the  manure  does  not  seem  to  have  increased  the  availability  of  the  rock. 
A number  of  dry  seasons  have  kept  down  the  average  corn  yields,  and  fly 
damage  has  several  times  seriously  reduced  the  wheat  yields.  Acid  phos- 
phate was  not  used  with  manure  on  this  held. 

PHOSPHATE  EXPERIMENTS  AT  NORTH  VERNON,  JENNINGS  COUNTY 

The  North  Vernon  experiment  held  is  located  on  the  naturally  poor, 
acid,  flat,  whitish-gray  silt  loam  soil  commonly  known  as  “crawfish,” 
“slash  land”  or  “white  clay,”  which  is  widely  represented  in  southeastern 
Indiana.  This  soil  is  naturally  very  poor  in  phosphorus,  showing  only  .03 
per  cent,  of  total  phosphoric  acid  in  the  surface  soil  and  .035  per  cent,  in 
the  subsoil.  This  means  only  600  pounds  of  phosphoric  acid  in  the  plowed 
surface  of  an  acre.  The  field  was  laid  out  and  tile  drained  in  the  fall  of 
1911.  In  the  spring  of  1912,  the  plots  to  be  limed  were  treated  with  four 


7 


tons  of  ground  limestone  to  the  acre  and  the  whole  field  was  planted  to 
soybeans.  In  1913,  the  various  fertilizer  treatments  were  begun.  The 
crop  rotation  is  corn,  wheat  and  clover.  All  the  produce  is  removed  from 
the  land  except  the  second  growth  clover.  Only  the  plots  concerned  in 
the  phosphate  comparisons  are  to  be  discussed  in  this  bulletin.  The  treat- 
ments received  by  these  plots  and  the  average  crop  yields  produced  are 
shown  in  Table  II. 

In  addition  to  the  application  of  four  tons  per  acre  of  ground  lime- 
stone mentioned  above,  all  of  these  plots  have  been  manured  at  the  rate 
of  six  tons  per  acre  plowed  under  for  corn  once  in  three  years.  On  plot 
II,  acid  phosphate  (14  per  cent,  up  to  1916  and  16  per  cent,  since  then) 
has  been  applied  at  the  rate  of  200  pounds  per  acre  for  corn,  broadcasted 
and  harrowed  in  shortly  before  planting.  On  plot  12,  rock  phosphate 
(30  per  cent.)  has  been  applied  at  the  rate  of  350  pounds  per  acre  for 
corn,  broadcasted  and  harrowed  in  up  to  1916  and  since  then  400  pounds 
per  acre  plowed  under  with  the  manure.  These  acid  and  rock  phosphate 
applications  were  considered  practically  equal  money  values  at  the  time 
the  experiment  was  begun. 


Taelf.  II. — Results  from  Phosphates  on  Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover  Rotation 
— North  Vernon  Experiment  Field,  1913-1917 


Average  yields  per  acre 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

1 Plot 
number 

Treatment 

Corn 

bushels 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value 
of  in- 
crease 

Cost 

of 

treat- 

ment 

Net  re- 
turns 

10 

Lime,  manure 

77.3 

5330 

16.3 

1600 

3260 

11 

Lime,  manure,  acid 
phosphate 

82.0 

5950 

17.8 

2045 

3933 

12 

Lime,  manure,  rock 
phosphate 

81.3' 

5845 

16.1 

1760 

3700 

' 

13 

T>ime,  manure 

78.4 

5123 

15.5 

1545 

3413 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 
Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

4.4 

3.3 

6i76 

646 

1.8 

0.3 

464 

197 

378 

216 

$14.98 

8.50 

$2.25 

1.79 

$12.73 

6.71 

In  Table  II  are  shown  the  average  annual  crop  yields,  the  increases 
from  the  acid  and  rock  phosphate  over  lime  and  manure  and  the  financial 
results.  The  table  is  so  simple  that  explanations  are  hardly  necessary. 
Both  phosphates  have  yielded  large  profits,  although  the  combination  of 
drainage,  lime  and  manure  had  already  lifted  the  yields  to  a high  plane, 
especially  the  corn  yield.  Two  of  the  five  wheat  crops  were  badly  dam- 
aged by  Hessian  fly. 

It  will  be  observed  that  the  acid  phosphate  has  been  considerably 
more  profitable  than  the  rock  phosphate,  yielding  a net  return  of  $12.73 
per  acre  per  rotation  and  $5.66  per  dollar  invested  as  against  $6.71  per 
acre  per  rotation  and  $3.80  per  dollar  invested  for  the  rock  phosphate. 


8 


PHOSPHATE  EXPERIMENTS  AT  WORTHINGTON,  GREENE  COUNTY 

The  Worthington  experiment  field  is  located  on  Knox  silt  loam,  com- 
monly called  “clay,”  which  is  the  predominating  soil  type  of  the  rolling 
uplands  of  that  section  of  the  State.  The  land  had  been  farmed  for  many 
years  and  was  considerably  run  down. 

This  field  was  started  at  the  same  time  and  is  in  every  respect  a dupli- 
cate of  the  North  Vernon  field  so  far  as  the  phosphate  experiments  under 
discussion  are  concerned,  except  that  the  soil  being  less  acid,  it  received 
only  two  tons  of  ground  limestone  to  the  acre. 

This  soil  is  considerably  better  supplied  with  phosphorus  than  the 
North  Vernon  soil,  showing  .12  per  cent,  of  phosphoric  acid  in  both  sur- 
face and  subsoil,  or  2400  pounds  in  the  plowed  surface  of  an  acre. 

In  Table  HI  are  shown  the  average  annual  crop  yields,  the  increases 
from  the  acid  and  rock  phosphate  over  lime  and  manure  and  the  financial 
results. 


Table  III. — Results  from  Phosphates  on  Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover  Rota- 
tion— Worthington  Experiment. Field,  1913-1917 


Treatment 

Oh  g 

Average  yields  per  acre 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Corn 

bushds 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

Straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value 
of  in- 
crease 

Cost 

of 

treat- 

ment 

Net  re- 
turns 

10  Lime,  manure 

43.7 

2616 

11.2 

975 

3325 

11  Lime,  manure,  acid 

phosphate 

51.7 

2836 

14.2 

1265 

4940 

12  Lime,  manure,  rock 

phosphate 

49.6 

2711 

13.2 

1181 

4383 

13  Lime,  manure 

50.8 

2733 

13.9 

1280 

4263 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 

3.2 

^183 

~2.r 

188 

1302 

.$21.44 

$2.25 

$19.19 

Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

17 

-0.2 

3 

432 

3.98 

1.79 

2.10 

On  this  field,  the  returns  from  the  rock  phosphate  have  been  very 
small,  while  the  returns  from  the  acid  phosphate  have  been  much  larger 
than  at  North  Vernon.  At  present  crop  and  fertilizer  prices,  the  acid 
phosphate  has  yielded  a net  return  of  $19.19  per  acre  per  rotation  and 
$8.53  per  dollar  invested  as  against  $2.19  per  acre  per  rotation  and  $1.22 
per  dollar  invested  for  the  rock  phosphate. 

PHOSPHATE  EXPERIMENTS  AT  SOUTH  BEND,  ST.  JOSEPH  COUNTY 

The  experiment  field  at  South  Bend  is  located  on  the  County  Farm 
on  a brown  sandy  loam  soil  of  somewhat  better  than  average  quality  but 
fairly  representative  of  large  areas  of  sandy  soil  in  St.  Joseph  and  neigh- 
boring counties. 

The  experiment  was  started  in  the  spring  of  1914  with  the  object  of 
comparing  the  relative  merits  of  acid  phosphate,  steamed  bone  meal  and 
rock  phosphate  used  as  additions  on  limed  and  manured  land  in  a corn, 


9 


wheat  and  clover  rotation.  The  land  was  uniformly  limed  with  limestone 
screenings  at  the  rate  of  four  tons  per  acre.  The  manuring  has  been  at 
the  rate  of  six  tons  per  acre  on  all  plots.  The  phosphates  have  been  ap- 
plied in  three  different  proportions. 

The  average  results  so  far  secured  from  the  different  phosphates  are 
reported  in  Table  IV.  The  three  different  rates  of  application  of  the 
phosphates  are  averaged  at  this  time  because  the  bone  and  acid  phosphate 
are  differently  proportioned  for  corn  and  wheat  and  will  not  be  even  until 
the  end  of  the  second  round  of  the  rotation.  The  acid  phosphate  and 
steamed  bone  applications  average  70  pounds  of  phosphoric  acid  per  acre 
per  rotation,  part  applied  for  corn  and  part  for  wheat.  The  rock  phos- 
phate applications  average  280  pounds  of  phosphoric  acid  per  acre,  all 
put  on  at  the  beginning  of  the  experiment. 

In  Table  IV  are  shown  the  average  annual  crop  yields,  the  increases 
from  acid  phosphate,  steamed  bone  meal  and  rock  phosphate  over  lime  and 
manure,  and  the  financial  results. 


Table  IV. — Results  from  Phosphates  on  Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover  Rota- 
tion— South  Bend  Experiment  Field,  1914-1917 


Average  yields  per  acre 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

I Plot 

number 

P 

3 

a 

Corn 
busln  Is  j 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 
bushels  j 

Straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value 
of  in- 
crease 

Cost 

of 

treat- 

ment 

Net  re- 
turns 

1,  0, 

10,  14  Tn'inp^  mannrp 

1 

38.2 

3413 

1 

25.4 

2202 

3039 

3,  9, 13  Lime,  manure,  acid 
phosphatp 

40.2 

3591 

29.8 

2291 

4036 

4,  7, 11  Lime,  manure,  rock 
phosphate 

40.2 

3370 

25.7 

2054 

3962 

2,  8, 12  Lime,  manure, 

steamed  bone 

41.9 

3262 

28.1 

2418 

4107 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 
Increase  for  rock  phosphate 
Increase  for  steamed  bone— 

2.0 

2.0 

3.7 

178 

-43 

-151 

4.4 

0.3 

2.7 

89~ 

-148 

216 

97 

23 

168 

$12.52 

2.34 

10.87 

$5.46 

4.76 

4.92 

-2.42 

5.95 

Table  IV  shows  that  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net  return  of  $7.06 
and  steamed  bone  $5.95  per  acre  per  rotation,  while  rock  phosphate  has 
been  used  at  a loss  of  $2.42.  On  the  basis  of  returns  per  dollar  invested, 
the  acid  phosphate  and  steamed  bone  stand  about  equal. 

PHOSPHATE  EXPERIMENTS  AT  BEDFORD,  LAWRENCE  COUNTY 

This  experiment  is  located  on  the  Moses  Fell  Annex  Farm  about  six 
miles  northwest  of  Bedford,  d'he  soil  is  a yellowish  brown  silt  loam,  rep- 
resentative of  most  of  the  uplands  of  Lawrence  and  neighboring  counties. 
Although  underlaid  by  limestone  and  probably  of  limestone  origin,  the 
soil  was  found  to  be  acid  and  the  subsoil  very  acid.  The  held  was  thor- 
oughly underdrained  in  the  spring  of  1915  and  planted  to  soybeans.  This 
crop  made  a fair  growth  and  was  plowed  under  in  the  fall,  at  which  time 


10 


Fig:.  3.  Effect  of  phosphates  on  corn,  Bedford  field,  1916.  Each  shock  is  the  produce 
of  one-twentieth  acre 


Lime,  manure  and  acid  phosphate  Lime,  manure  and  rock  phosphate 

64.0  bushels  corn  per  acre  42.0  bushels  corn  per  acre 

Lime  and  manure  without  phosphate  yielded  38.1  bushels  per  acre 


the  first  wheat  crop  was  sown  and  the  limestone  and  various  phosphate 
treatments  were  begun. 

The  experiment  was  designed  to  study  the  relative  merits  of  different 
phosphates  used  alone,  with  lime,  with  manure,  with  both  lime  and  ma- 
nure and  with  nitrogen  and  potash  in  fertilizer  instead  of  manure. 

The  limestone,  manure  and  phosphate  treatments  have  been  as  follows: 
limestone,  four  tons  per  acre ; manure,  six  tons  per  acre ; acid  phosphate 
at  four  different  rates,  supplying  24,  48,  72  and  160  pounds  of  phosphoric 
acid  per  acre,  respectively ; rock  phosphate  at  four  different  rates,  supply- 
ing 96,  192,  288  and  600  pounds  of  phosphoric  acid  per  acre,  respectively; 
steamed  bone  meal,  48  pounds  of  phosphoric  acid  per  acre ; basic  slag,  48 
pounds  of  phosphoric  acid  per  acre. 

In  Table  V are  shown  the  various  treatments,  the  average  annual 
crop  yields,  the  increases  produced  by  the  different  phosphates  and  the 
financial  results  to  date. 


II 


Table  V. — Results  from  Phosphates  on  Corn,  Wheat  and  Clover  Rota- 
tion— Bedford  Experiment  Field,  1916-1917 


Treatment  per  acre 
per  rotation 


33  Nothing 

14  Acid  phosphate, 

300  pounds  

15  Rock  phosphate, 

640  pounds  

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 
Increase  for  rock  phosphate 


31  Lime  

11  Lime,  acid  phosphate, 

300  pounds  

12  Lime,  rock  phosphate, 

640  pounds 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 
Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

32  Manure  ^ 

8 Manure,  acid  phosphate, 

300  pounds  

9 Manure,  rock  phosphate, 

640  pounds  

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 
Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

7 Lime,  manure  ^ 

5 Lime,  manure,  acid 

phosphate,  300  pounds 

6 Lime,  manure,  rock 

phosphate,  640  pounds 

2 Lime,  manure,  steamed 

bone,  192  pounds 

3 Lime,  manure,  basic 

slag,  261  pounds 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 
Increase  for  rock  phosphate 
Increase  for  steamed  bone.- 
Increase  for  basic  slag 


Average  yields  per  acre 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Corn 
bush.  Is 

Stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

Straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value 
of  in- 
crease 

Cost 

of 

treat- 

ment 

Net  re- 
turns 

30.8 

1730 

1.3 

265 

1040 

46.0 

2245 

5.8 

715 

1800 

43.3 

2077 

4.6 

725 

2960 

15.2 

515 

4.5 

450 

760 

$34.46 

$3.75 

$30.71 

12.5 

347 

3.3 

460 

1920 

40.48 

3.20 

37.28 

34.2 

2076 

2.0 

310 

1366 

46.8 

2120 

5.6 

752 

1720 

32.7 

1884 

2.7 

465 

1320 

12.6 

44 

3.6 

442 

354 

$24.58 

$3.75 

$20.83 

- 1.5 

-192 

0.7 

155 

-46 

-.75 

3.20 

-3.95 

41.2 

2012 

1.7 

385 

1000 

52.1 

2715 

5.1 

670 

1420 

46.5 

2367 

4.9 

640 

1500 

10.9 

703 

3.4 

285 

420 

$24.72 

$3.75 

$20.97 

5.3 

355 

3.2 

255 

500 

18.41 

3.20 

15.21 

37.1 

2287 

2.7 

381 

1047 

51.4 

2459 

6.1 

827 

1560 

47.9 

2510 

3.7 

595 

1222 

46.3 

2429 

4.2 

580 

1340 

44.4 

2275 

5.7 

730 

1580 

14.3 

172 

3.4 

446 

513 

$27.86 

$3.75 

$24.11 

10.8 

223 

1.0 

214 

175 

15.74 

3.20 

12.54 

9.2 

142 

1.5 

199 

293 

16.06 

3.36 

12.70 

7.3 

12 

3.0 

349 

533 

19.54 

3.33 

16.21 

1 The  clover  crop  has  not  yet  had  the  benefit  of  manure 


By  referring  to  the  first  part  of  Table  V,  it  will  be  seen  that  when 
used  alone,  both  acid  and  rock  phosphate  have  produced  large  crop  in- 
creases. In  this  case  the  rock  phosphate,  through  the  increase  of  192c 
pounds  in  the  clover  crop  on  plot  15,  has  been  more  profitable  than  the 
acid  phosphate,  although  plot  9,  which  has  had  identically  the  same  treat- 
ment for  clover,  shows  only  500  pounds  increase  in  the  clover  crop. 


12 


Taking  the  average  clover  yield  of  plots  9 and  15  for  the  rock  and  the 
average  of  plots  8 and  14  for  the  acid  phosphate,  the  net  returns  where 
the  phosphates  have  been  used  alone  are  $29.01  for  the  acid  phosphate, 
and  $30.18  for  the  rock  phosphate,  per  acre  per  rotation.  For  each  dollar 
invested,  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net  profit  of  $7.75  and  the  rock 
phosphate  $9.43. 

Where  the  phosphates  were  used  on  limed  land,  as  shown  in  the  sec- 
ond part  of  Table  V,  the  acid  phosphate  has  produced  a net  return  of 
$20.83  pel*  ^ere  per  rotation  and  $5.55  per  dollar  invested,  while  the  rock 
phosphate  has  been  used  at  a net  loss  of  $3.95  per  acre  per  rotation  and 
$1.23  per  dollar  invested. 


Fi>j.  4.  Kffect  of  phosphate  on  clover,  Bedford  field,  1917.  Each  shock  is  the  produce 
of  one-twentieth  acre 

Idme  alone  Eime  and  acid  phosphate 

1600  pounds  clover  ha.v  per  acre  4000  pounds  clover  hay  per  acre 

Where  the  phosphates  were  used  on  manured  land,  as  shown  in  the 
third  part  of  Table  V,  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net  return  of 
$20.97  the  rock  phosphate  $15.21  per  acre  per  rotation.  For  each 
dollar  invested  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net  profit  of  $5.59  and 
the  rock  phosphate  $4.75. 

Where  the  phosphates  were  used  on  limed  and  manured  land,  as 
shown  in  the  fourth  part  of  Table  V,  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a 
net  return  of  $24.11;  the  rock  phosphate,  $12.54;  the  steamed  bone, 
$12.70,  and  the  basic  slag,  $16.21,  per  acre  per  rotation.  For  each  dollar 
invested,  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net  profit  of  $6.43 ; the  rock 
phosphate,  $3.92;  the  steamed  bone,  $3.78,  and  the  basic  slag,  $4.87. 

QUANTITATIVE  TEST  OF  ACID  AND  ROCK  PHOSPHATE  ON  THE 

BEDFORD  FIELD 

In  Table  VI  are  shown  the  returns  from  different  quantities  of  acid 
and  rock  phosi)hate  used  on  limed  and  manured  land.  In  each  case,  the 
quantity  of  phosphoric  acid  applied  is  four  times  as  large  in  rock  phos- 
phate as  in  acid  phosphate. 


13 


Table  VI. — Results  from  Different  Quantities  of  Acid  and  Rock  Phos- 
phate— Bedford  Field,  1916-1917 


S Treatment  per  acre 

per  rotation 

Pu  a 

Average  yields  per  acre 

Average  totals  per  acre 
per  rotation 

Corn 

bushils 

stover 

pounds 

Wheat 

bushels 

straw 

pounds 

Hay 

pounds 

Value 
of  in- 
crease 

Cost 

of 

treat- 

ment 

Net  re- 
turns 

22  Lime,  manure 

47.1 

2470 

2.7 

445 

1340 

23  Lime,  manure,  acid  phos- 

phate  (16  per  cent.), 

150  pounds 

55.6 

3000 

4.9 

715 

1880 

24  Lime,  manure,  rock  phos- 

phate  (30  per  cent.). 

320  pounds 

47.6 

2595 

3.2 

520 

1500 

25  Lime,  manure 

47.4 

2567 

2.5 

510 

1600 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 

8.4 

407 

2.3 

251 

453* 

$19.64 

$1.87 

$17.77 

Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

0.3 

60 

0.7 

38 

-13 

1.86 

1.60 

0.26 

4 Lime,  manure 

3.7.8 

2170 

2.7 

435 

1060 

5 Lime,  manure,  acid  phos- 

phate  (16  per  cent.). 

300  pounds  _ 

51.4 

2459 

6.1 

827 

1560 

6 Lime,  manure,  rock  phos- 

phate  (30  per  cent.). 

640  pounds 

47.9 

2510 

3.7 

595 

1220 

7 Lime,  manure 

38.9 

2535 

2.7 

390 

1020 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 

13.2 

168 

3.4 

407 

447 

$25.98 

$3.75 

$22.23 

Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

9.3 

97 

1.0 

190 

153 

13.60 

3.20 

10.40 

25  Lime,  manure 

47.4 

2567 

2.5 

510 

1600 

26  Lime,  manure,  acid  phos- 

phate (16  per  cent.). 

450  pounds 

56.1 

3022 

6.8 

995 

2600 

27  Lime,  manure,  rock  phos- 

phate (30  per  cent.). 

960  pounds 

49.1 

2597 

2.7 

455 

1680 

28  Lime,  manure 

43.8 

2472 

2.7 

440 

1600 

Increase  lor  acid  phosphate 

9.9 

487 

4.3 

508 

lOOO' 

$31.22 

$5.62 

$25.60 

Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

4.1 

94 

0.1 

-8 

. 80 

5.36 

4.80 

0.56 

28  Lime,  manure  _ 

43.8 

2472 

2.7 

440 

1600 

29  Lime,  manure,  acid  phos- 

phate (16  per  cent.). 

1000  pounds 

63.5 

3052 

7.8 

1070 

4000 

30  Lime,  manure,  rock  phos- 

phate (30  per  cent.). 

2000  pounds 

52.0 

2725 

2.8 

550 

1660 

31  Lime,  manure 

44.1 

2407 

2.6 

485 

1440 

Increase  for  acid  phosphate 

19.6 

602 

5.1 

615 

2454 

$57.68 

$12.50 

$45.18 

Increase  for  rock  phosphate 

8.0 

297 

0.2 

80 

167 

11.16 

10.00 

1.16 

Average  increase 

acid  phosphate 

12.8 

438 

3.8 

445 

1088 

$33.63 

$5.93 

$27.70 

Average  increase 

rock  phosphate 

5.4 

137 

0.5 

75 

96 

7.90 

4.90 

3.09 

14 


Table  VI  shows  that  in  all  cases  the  acid  phosphate  has  produced 
very  much  larger  increases  than  has  the  rock  phosphate.  On  the  average, 
as  shown  at  the  foot  of  the  table,  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net  re- 
turn of  $27.70  per  acre  per  rotation,  as  against  $3.09  for  the  rock  phos- 
phate. For  each  dollar  invested,  the  acid  phosphate  has  yielded  a net 
profit  of  $4.67  as  against  $0.63  for  the  rock  phosphate. 

RELATIVE  IMMEDIATE  RETURNS  FROM  ACID  AND  ROCK  PHOSPHATE 

At  this  time  it  is  especially  important  to  secure  immediate  crop  in- 
creases. It  is  therefore  important,  in  determining  whether  to  use  acid  or 
rock  phosphate,  to  ask  which  of  the  two  will  be  more  effective  in  the  first 
year  or  two  after  application.  On  this  point,  very  conclusive  evidence  is 
presented  on  all  the  experiment  fields  where  the  two  phosphates  have 
been  directly  compared. 

The  increases  produced  on  the  first  and  second  crops  after  application 
have  been  from  three  to  over  25  times  as  large  from  the  acid  phosphate 
as  from  the  rock  phosphate,  averaging  nearly  six  times  as  large  in  a total 
of  3o  tests  on  the  different  fields. 

THE  EFFECT  OF  PHOSPHATES  ON  SOIL  ACIDITY 

Acid  phosphate  does  not  increase  soil  acidity  or  the  need  for  liming; 
this  is  also  true  of  the  other  phosphates  used  as  fertilizers.  It  is  some- 
times said  that  the  continued  use  of  acid  phosphate  will  make  the  soil 
acid.  This  is  an  assumption  contrary  tO'  the  facts  so  far  as  actual  field 
results  are  concerned.  The  experiments  of  this  and  several  other  stations 
show  that  the  use  of  acid  phosphate  rather  reduces  the  need  for  lime  on 
acid  soils. 

On  the  old  experiment  field  on  the  Purdue  farm,  the  plot  where 
heavy  applications  of  acid  phosphate  alone  have  been  used  for  the  last  28 
years,  is  less  acid  than  the  plot  alongside  which  has  never  received  acid 
phosphate.  In  Bulletin  No.  298  of  the  Ohio  Agricultural  Experiment 
Station,  Williams,  in  connection  with  data  showing  the  results  of  liming 
acid  soil  receiving  different  fertilizer  treatments,  calls  attention  to  the  fact 
that  lime  produced  larger  results  on  the  plot  receiving  its  phosphorus  in 
bone  meal  than  on  the  plot  which  gets  its  phosphorus  in  acid  phosphate, 
and  says ; “Apparently,  acid  phosphate  has  not  increased  the  need  of 
lime.”  In  the  summary  of  Bulletin  No.  162  of  the  Massachusetts  Agri- 
cultural Experiment  Station,  Brooks  states:  “Finally,  no  injurious  sec- 
ondary effects  are  known  to  be  associated  with  any  reasonable  use  of  dis- 
solved phosphates.  Our  experiments  indicate  that  they  do  not  increase 
the  necessity  for  the  use  of  lime.”  In  Bulletin  No.  160  of  the  West  Vir- 
ginia Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Bear  and  Salter,  in  discussing  the 
effect  of  manure  and  fertilizer  on  the  lime  requirement  of  the  soil,  state: 
“This  work  verifies  the  statements  published  by  certain  other  experiment 
stations  and  indicates  that  the  belief  that  the  soil  will  become  acid  from 
the  use  of  acid  phosphate  is  without  foundation.”  The  results  on  the 
Scottsburg  and  Bedford  experiment  fields  reported  in  this  bulletin  also 
show  that  liming  is  less  needed  on  land  where  acid  phosphate  is  used  than 
on  untreated  land. 


15 


GENERAL  RECOMMENDATIONS 

1.  Adopt  a systematic  rotation  of  crops,  including  clover  or  some 
other  legume  at  least  once  every  three  or  four  years. 

2.  Wherever  clover  fails  to  do  well,  apply  two  or  more  tons  of 
ground  limestone  to  the  acre. 

3.  See  that  the  land  is  properly,  drained,  and  practice  good  tillage 
methods. 

4.  Feed  as  much  of  the  produce  as  possible  and  carefully  conserve 
and  return  to  the  land  the  manure  produced,  as  well  as  any  unused  crop 
residues. 

5.  Apply  from  150  to  200  pounds  per  acre  of  acid  phosphate  or  some 
other  available  phosphate  to  each  grain  crop  in  the  rotation.  In  a perma- 
nent system,  where  manure  is  applied  for  corn,’  enough  phosphate  for  the 
whole  rotation  may  be  most  conveniently  applied  when  seeding  wheat  or 
oats.  Under  certain  systems  of  farming,  where  the  crops  are  not  all  fed 
on  the  farm,  it  will  pay,  under  normal  conditions,  to  add  some  nitrogen 
and  potash  in  the  fertilizer. 

6.  If  acid  phosphate  or  other  available  phosphate  cannot  be  secured, 
a mixed  fertilizer  as  high  as  possible  in  available  phosphoric  acid  should 
be  used. 


i6 


The  Value  of  Phosphates 


How  to  Grow  More  and 
How  to  Grow  More  and 


AVAILABLE  PURDUE  PUBLICATIONS  ALONG  SOIL  FERTILITY  LINES 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  155.  Results  of  Cooperative  Fer- 
tilizer Tests  on  Clay  and  Loam  Soils 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  157.  Unproductive  Black  Soils 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  'No.  170.  The  Reclamation  of  an  Un- 

productive Soil  of  the  Kankakee  Marsh  Region 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  172.  Soybeans  and  Cowpeas 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  187.  Acid  Phosphate  vs.  Raw 

Rock  Phosphate  as  Fertilizer 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  198.  Summaries  of  Soil  Fertility 
Investigations 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  210 
on  Indiana  Soils 

Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  213.  The  Value  of  Lime  on 

Indiana  Soils 

Experiment  Station  Circular  No.  23. 

Better  Wheat 

Experiment  Station  Circular  No.  25. 

Better  Corn 

Experiment  Station  Circular  No.  36.  How  to  Grow  Alfalfa 

Experiment  Station  Circular  No.  49.  Farm  Manures 

Experiment  Station  Circular  No.  66.  The  Lime  and  Fertilizer 

Needs  of  Indiana  Soils 

Experiment  Station  Circular  No.  76.  Increasing  Crop  Yields  for 

War  Needs 

Experiment  Station  Circular  No.  79. 
phates 

Department  of  Extension  Bulletin  No.  22. 
provement 

Department  of  Extension  Bulletin  No.  46.  Lime  for  Acid  Soils 

Department  of  Extension  Leaflet  No.  3o.  Unproductive  Black 

Soils 

Department  of  Extension  Leaflet  No.  31.  The  Value  and  Man- 

agement of  Clover 

Department  of  Extension  Leaflet  No.  53.  Alfalfa  for  Indiana 

Department  of  Extension  Leaflet  No.  55.  More  and  Better 

Wheat  in  Indiana 

Department  of  Extension  Leaflet  No.  62.  Sweet  Clover 


Indiana  Soils  Need  Phos- 
Hints  on  Soil  Im- 


t 


